HRA Agenda Packet 07-13-19831. AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE HRA
July 13, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
Membeis: Phil white, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Vic Vokaty and
Jack Reeve.
1. Call to Order.
2. Minutes of the Meetings Held on June 1, 1983 and June 22, 1983.
3. Public Hearing - T. I. F. Proposal/Disposition of Public lands.
4. Consideration of a Policy Establishing a Fee or Service Charge
for Tax Increment Financing.
5. Consideration of Entering a Developer's Agreement with Power's
Strength and Health Club.
6. Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Plan and Budget for
Monticello Tax Increment District 92 and Submitting to the City
Council, School District 9882 and Wright County.
7. Other Business.
S. Adjournment.
MINUTES
HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
June 22, 1983 - 7:30 P.M.
A special meeting for the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority,
being properly called, was duly held at 7,00 P.M. on Wednesday, June 22,
1983, in the City Council Chambers. Members present were Vokaty,
Reeve, white, Cochran and Schrupp. Members absent: none. Also present
was City Administrator, Tom Eidem.
1. Chairperson White called the meeting to order and advised that being
a special meeting, the sole item of business would be consideration
of the development proposal to be presented by Mr. Jim Powers.
2. white requested Eidem to go aver the financing alternatives that
had been submitted. Eidem explained that Springsted, Inc., the
City's finance consultants, had prepared four possible finance
alternatives. All proposals were using an estimated interest rate
of 7�% and looked at receiving tax increment for a period of
eight yeers under an economic development proposal. He did note
that two proposals did not include capitalized interest and, as
such, would require an upfront financial committment from the
developer. The other two proposals did include capitalized
interest in the amount of the bond issue and thus, if the
development proposal generated the required amount of tax
increment, the land subsidy could be such that the land could be
sold to the developers for a minimal amount. Eidem explained that
the land acquisition coat was projected for this purpose at
8150,000.00 and incidental and contingent expenses were estimated
at $7,000. He noted that for the HRA to make the acquisition,
they would have to sell tax increment finance bander but that
since the value was under $300,000, the City could pursue a
private placement or it negotiated sale with a single lending
institution. This, Eidom said, would eliminate a substantial
amount of expense in legal fees, paying agent fees and the
expense of going to public bidding.
Several members of the HRA expressed concern aver the possibility
cf default of the development and what would occur to the City's
comitmant to retire the bonded debt. Ono suggestion Eidem made
was that in preparing the devolopor'o agrooment, the HRh could
aequiro a letter of credit from the financo institution repro -
senting the developer that would occurs the bonded debt in the
event the taxes (and thus the tax increment) fell delinquent.
The conconoun of the Authority wao that ouch a letter of
credit would bo doomed essential for this project, and, in fact,
ohould probably be made a necessary condition of all tax incre-
ment projecto which may comc before them in the future.
- 1 -
HRA Minutes - 6/22/83
whits expressed his concern about running such a fine line on
our tax increment finance projects. He stated that he was
somewhat concerned that the formulas were always being
developed to balance out at zero, and said that he did not
think it unreasonable to expect some contribution from the
developer that would help build a reserve fund for the HRA.
Various alternatives of achieving this were discussed. The
Authority directed Eidem to investigate as many alternatives
as he could in order to make a presentation to the Authority
at their next regularly scheduled meeting.
Mr. Jim Powers, proposer of Power's Strength and Health Club,
was present to go over his project for the Authority. He
presented to the members a copy of the floor plan, a feasi-
bility study, and a site plan. He discussed the nature of
the business operation and type of activities that would
be available. He expanded somewhat on the data provided in
the marketing feasibility report which indicated that such a
project was fiscally sound and would generate substantial
revenue to maintain a successful operation. On a motion by
Echrupp, with a second by Reeve and carried unanimously, the
Power's proposal was given preliminary approval and authori-
zation is given to proceed with the tax increment financing
procedure. Motion by Vokaty, seconded by Reeve directing
Eidem to negotiate and execute a purchase agreement for the
parcels described as followam
Lot 1 -Block 1, lot 2 - Block 1, lot 3 - Block 1, all in
Commercial Plaza 25, and lot I - Block 1, Lot 2 - Block 1,
Lot 5 - Block 1, and Lot 6 - Block 1, all in Comercial
Court
at a price of 8149,000.00 and at setting a public hearing
before the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority
to accept public comment on the disposition of public landu,
said hearing to be hold at 700 P.M. on Wednesday, July 13,
1983 in the City Council Cham tw rs. Thia motion was carried
unanimously.
A motion by Vokaty, ascended by Reeve and carried unanimounly
rescheduling the regular July meeting of the HRA to coincide
with the public hearing ochuduled fur July 13, 1983. Without
a formal motion, the [IRA directed Eidem to comeonco negotiations
for the private placement of a tax increment bond issue. Thorn
being no further buoineou White adjourned the mooting.
'flame A. Ei
City Administrator
-
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
has the statutory power to establish tax increment financing
districts to assist developers, and;
WHEREAS, the Monticello HRA desires to avoid utilizing their power
to levy a special tax upon the central Monticello redevelopment
area, anal
WHEREAS, there are expenses involved in establishing tax increment
districts that are not recovered by the collection of tax increment,
and;
WHEREAS, there are other operating expenses related to HRA business
for which a revenue source is required.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Housing and Redevelopment
Authority for the City of Monticello than
1. A charge of 2% of all financial assistance granted to a
developer by the HRA or $2,500.00, whichever is lose,
be and the same hereby is established.
2. This amount shall be paid to the HRA upon approval, by
the City Council, of the tax increment financu plan.
3. The HRA may waive said foo if it io determined that ouch
a waiver of the foo io in the boot overall interests of
the HRA and/or the City of Monticello.
Adopted this day of , 1983.
Chair, Housing and Redevelopment Authority
City Administrator
Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Moaticello
Housing and Redevelopment Authority hap been properly called for
by two members and will be held at 7,00 P.M. on Wednesday,
June 22, 1983, in the City Council Chambers. The only item of
business before the NRR will be consideration of a development
proposal by Mr. James Powers and a request to assist said
proposal using Tax Increment Financing.
Notice given this 20th day of Juno, 1983.
City Administrator
y
*/we, L (3— a ( I SC -1 R () ? e C1,0 V, C VO ' `a ; /
of the Monticello Mousing and Redevelopment A'uth'ority do hereby
call a Special beating of said Authority on WQ-�,
the i- day of 1981, at 9 o'clock I.s. at
City Ball.
Signed this _J.�Ay of Ct'tti%.c
L.6WJ7-
�I�ch���J'
Hsme
, 1981.
T(L/
Naso / \ J Slgneture
On this day of , JA- A)P. , 1981, I have received a duly
executed request for a Special geeting of the Nnnticallo Housing
and Redevelopment Authority.
1
City Administrator
MINUTES
i HOUSING i REDEVEMPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
June 1, 19E3 - 7:30 P.M.
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Monticello Housing and Rede-
velopment Authority was duly held at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday,
June 1, 1983 in the City Hall. Members present were Chairperson Phil
White, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Vic Vokaty. Member absent was
Jack Reeve.
The meeting was called to order by the chair.
Eidem explained to the Authority that for reasons unknown the minutes
of the April 6, 1983 HRA Fleeting were missing. He noted that the
proposed business for the April 6th, 1983 meeting was, at the time
of the meeting, deleted from the agenda and that the meeting was
primarily a discussion session and a determination to invite the
Council to attend a meeting in the near future in order to discuss
priority of development. All members present recalled the meeting
and agreed by consensus that they would acknowledge the existence
of the meeting in the absence of the formal written minutes.
Eidem also explained the reason for the cancellation of the meeting
in May and hoped that the amount of business that had to wait could
be now picked up in the next couple of meetings. Discussion began
concerning Late 13 and ld and Lot 15, leas the southerly 15 feet in
C
Block 51, which the City has an option upon from the Monticello
Development Corporation. An option has further boon extended to
the HRA and the HM has extended to Mr. Joe Pochler an option con-
tingent upon successful financing from the Farmers Home Administra-
tion. Eidem noted that this issue could be seen as closely related
to a request by Mr. Poehler for an extension of his original option
which expired May gth, 1883. Eiden explained that the bank was
willing to extend the original mortgage amount of $35,000 so long
as the interest that was accruing would be paid at the and of each
six month term. He noted that it was the City's obligation to
PAY that interest, but when and if the HRA elected to outright
purchase the property, they would be faced with not only the
mortgage amount but also with the original option amount of
approximately $6,700 and each additional interest payment that
the City would have to make in the interim. Some discussion
followed relating to whut.her or not the HRA should purchase
outright the land and clear away all of the early options. Cidem
auggooted that there miqht be a possibility of simply transferring
t Mi title and the name on the mortgage to the 11RA, thereby elimi-
nating the Development Corporation and the City from the arrange-
ment as it now otandc. Several members expressed come concerr
about the payment of closing costa and would such an expense be
'
needed. Prior to any action being taken, the discussion shifted
to the letter from Poshlor explaining that the project and the
L
-1-
0
I
NRA Minutes - 6/1/83
proposed site had been tentatively approved by Farmer's Hose Admin-
istration, but that funding may not be forthcoming until July as a
result of the recent opening of the Big Lake Farmer's Home Admin-
istration. His letter had requested an option of an additional
six months so that he may continue to pursue the funding cycle. A
motion by Cochran, seconded by Vokaty and carried unanimously to
extend the option to Joe Poehler until August 9th, 1983, or if
required by Farmer's Home Administration to November 9th, 1983. A
motion by Schrupp, seconded by Cochran and carried unanimously to
exercise the HRA's right to extend for six months the option on
Lots 13, 14 and Lot 15, less the southerly 15 feet in Block 51.
Eidem raised the issue concerning Lot 5 and 6, Block 3 in Oakwood
Industrial Park which the LLRA agreed to acquire an option on, on
behalf of IXI Laboratories. He noted that IXI expansion was pro-
ceeding ahead of schedule and further that the development agree-
ment executed between the HRA and IXI stated that the HRA would
secure such am option. Eidem noted that the original negotiations
had broken down at about Christmas time and were now being rein-
troduced. He explained to the Hoard that the breakdown had to do
with the option fee and that the owners of the Oakwood property
hoped to secure a payment annually that would cover taxes, interest,
po nalty and penalty that was still accruing on earlier delinquencies.
ILo pointed out that hie original objection during the negotiation
was to paying the penalty on those assessments and taxes that ware
already delinquent at the time of the negotiation. No said that
at that time he did not think it was in the beat interest of the
HRA to pay fees for a predicament that the property owners had
gotten into quite independent of HRA negotiations. Cochran spoke
very strongly in favor of this position, however, noting that. the
HRA was bound by the developers agreement to arrive at something.
Without appropriate facts and figures at hand, tho figure of
$2,500 was thrown as the maximum amount it might cost the HRA
annually to retain such an option. Member Schrupp spoke
strongly in favor of paying the option fee it absolutely
necessary in order to honor the agreement and committment with
IXI. By consensus, Eides was directed to reopen negotiations
on the sale/option of I,ot 5 and 6. Block 3, Oakwood Industrial,
and report the results to the membership at the noxt meeting.
In other busineas, eidom reported to the Authority en a pro-
liminary design for a project to accoamodato the parking noodo
for the proposed building by Motcalf and laroon. He noted
that the Planning Commission had reviewed thin project and had
sent it back to staff for review and recommendation. In the
course of staff discussion, a major development proposal in-
volving the entire oouth half of Block 50 was developed. Eidem 1
said he talked with Metcalf and [arson about the poaaibility
and the working details aro buinq pursued. The Authority
07
MINUTES
IIOUSINC 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIM;
JULY 15,1983 - 7:00 A.M.
l� A special meeting for the Monticello Housing 6 Redevelopment Authority,
being properly called was duly held at 7:00 A.M. on Friday, July 15, IQ8i,
at Perkins. Member present were Chairperson White, Vokaty, Reeve, Schrupp,
and Cochran. Alva present were, Tom Eidem, City Administrator, and Allen
Pelvit, Director of Economic Development.
The special meeting was callod to o,d.•r by the chair, and asked Eidem to
give his findings for the Powers Lind acquisition costs. Springstead quoted
Eidem a 9.1 rate for 9; years. Using thin rate Lite Ave. Annual Debt would be
$70,600. Increment $'17,.165, n•;.ull int; in a Bond Issue of $167,000. This is
$IU,OUI) under tht• prvposal. Eiden sum;4t•e.ted that $10,000 should be paid up-
front and held in osetow. Also, to obtain a -,-ru balance a total of $15,060
would bt• needed. Lidera also sugro:eted that Powers be charged a $2,500 service
charge, and the remaining $2,500 l..• added to the $IU,000 to pay for land acqui
sition ousts and give a zero balance. 'lite $I'1,5U0 is to cover the costs of
interest etc,. The $2,500 is a service charge for city expenses. The Author-
ity calculated the 21 or $2,500 method as f,tlltw s: $149,000-$12,500=$I30,0tA)
multiplied by 2%, ($136,000x.U2-$2,73U) The Authority decided to us.•
the lesser amount of $2,500 in this cave. The Authority, as a whole, is
in agreement that the total of $15,000 is not unreasonable and that Ibwt•ts
knew he had to pay some out of pucker mutii.:s upfront.
Eidem suggested the Authority has other obligations in the community, uthvr
than obtaining land for this reason. Eidem also suggested that the Author-
ity not end with a aero balance .vorytime.
` Because of the Estimate of Indebtedness section the amount is now $167,000,
instead of $177,000. Thin remainder of the sections aro the same except
for filling in the blanks with the $12,500, and $2,500.
Eidem, again confirmed that the Wright Conty Bank will provide n Certi-
fication and will hold in their purtlolio. 77me bunds will sell anytime
after July 25, 1987. (if approved at the City Coucil Public meeting.)
Motion to accept the land coat sal, by Selu•upp, 2nd by It .... ve. Voted on 6
passed. Another mution to ace.•pl R.•nnl(itlnn A 'l. by Cochran, 2nd by Sehrup.
Voted on and pained. Isidem will gmv.• c„pien of the proposal to Lite eormncil
prior t.t the Jaly '!6,lyR'1 meetin•, tom their review. The IIRA will have a rqp
reicOlntive ..t ti en,u.iI mt•.mnn Iv4ddie 16.0ring) lam file at Monticello Cily
Mall).
There being it., ulh •m l.ngi.i, ,& t:hmirp, r mem Whmte adjourned the meeting.
a
Allen L. Polvit
Director of Economic Development
RESOLUTION ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCE PIAN 02
t_ HRA 1983 - 02
WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
has passed a resolution adopting a redevelopment plan known as
the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan, ends
WHEREAS, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan in part, states
objectives for economic development to wit, land acquisition as an
incentive to private enterprise, ands
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, the City of Monticello
is authorized to establish a tax increment econcmic development
district, ands
WHEREAS, a development agreement for economic development shall Ix:
entered into between the Monticello Huusiml and Redevelopment
Authority and Powor's Strength and Health Club, the developer.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by eho noucing aed nodevelop-
mcnt Authority for thr. City of Moeticellos
I. the tax incruniont !rrnamiu devrlo1,mnt finance plan relatnW
to t•uc increment district 42 he, and the same hereby is,
adopted.
2. The City Administrator transmit copies of said plan to the
City Council with a request for a public hearing, to tho
Superintendent of Schools of School Dibtrict 1882 and to
the County Auditor of Wright County with a request fot
comment.
3. Upon the holding of a public hearing, foto 1. 2. 5 and 6
in Block 1 of CM=tCial Overt and lots 1. 2 and 3 in
Block 1 of Cosmorcial Plaza 25 be cortifiod to the County
Auditor of Wright County, State of Minnesota, as Manticollo
tax incremont district 12. 1,
Adopted this 13th day of July, 1983.
I4Whiw�haiatto. t91air
ATTWTi
�!- ' 1iociao A. F.ld�,n
City lvlminletrutor / -
NESCU1TiON ADOPTIN, %10.4TICELLO
TAX IIICRFII:'NT DISTRICT 02
WnREAS, the Monticello Housing s Redevelopment Authority pursuant
to a resolution passed the 15th day of July, 1983, has adopted the
Monticello Tax Increment District #2 and accompanying finance plan,
(A copy of which is attached hereto) and;
NIMRFAS, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan in part, states
objectives for economic development, to wit, land acquisition as
an incentive to private enterprise, and;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, the City of Monticello
is authorized to establish a tax increment economic development
finance plan, and$
WHEREAS, a development agreement for economic development has been
entered into between the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Auth-
ority and Power's Strength and Health and Club, the developer, and$
MHERFJIS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, a public hearing was
duly held an July 25th, 1983, at which hearing all persons interest-
ed in making comment were allowed to make said convent, ands 1
WtMREAS, the City Adminintrator has submitted to the Superintendent
School District 0882 and the Auditor of Wright County, a copy of
such plan as required by taw.
NOW T11f.REFORr.., HE 1T HELEBY RMSOLVI:D by the City Council of the
City Council of the City of Monticello thate
1. The tax increment economic finance plan known as Monticello
Tae Increment District 02 Finance Plan e, and the same
hereby is adopted.
2. The City Administrator is directed to transmit a copy of
said plan to the Auditor of Wrinht Ccuenty for certification.
3. The Monticello 11ouoing and Rmdoveloimcnt Authority im hereby
authorized to losuo bunds in lho amount of 0167,000 for the
purpose of carrying out tho tae incrouwnt finance plan.
Adopted this 25th day of July. 11181.
Arvo A. Grim&mo, Mayor
ATTEST&
71tomau A. 11likm
City AdminiA r
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
6. Final Consideration of Rehabilitation of Pedestrian Lightirq
on the Mississippi River Bridqe. (J.S.)
As you know I polled the Council on this item at Tom's request,
as Tom did not wish to see it on another agenda and would
rather see the project dropped. As you know we have been
trying to get in touch with Dave Hoskin to obtain a quote
from him since we first asked him for one on Jun 28th. He
would not return calls and we could not reach him.
He did, however, deliver a quote to City Hall late Thursday
which I received Friday morning. His quote is for $1,650 for
the 4 fixtures and $1,985 if 5 fixtures are needed. Dick
Oslund from Double "D" Electric stopped in Friday morning
and said he may be able to have his quote in by Monday.
As you may remember, Olson's quote wan for $1,864.80 for
4 fixtures or $2,180.80 for 5 fixtures. This is $195.80
to $214.80 over Haskin's quote.
I have about exhausted any further discussion on this matter.
My recommendation? Do it or don't, do it but don't, put it
on another agenda.
- 3 -
Comments from Tam Eidem on Bridqe Liahting Situation.
At the last meeting, the action you took was to delay a decision
until John Simola returned from his vacation. At that time we
had only one bidder who met the deadline that we had stipulated
for bidders. Even at that time, if you will recall, had we re-
ceived other bids, I would have heartedly recommended that we
discard all bids and begin again, since the one bid had been
published in advance in the paper. As I sea it, the only
decision that needed to be made after the last meeting was
shall we do the project or shall we not. We knew what the cost
would be if we elected to do it. When John returned, I asked
him to simply ask everyone whether or not they were in favor
of pursuing the project. If, based upon the sole bid, the
majority of people were opposed to the project, then the
proposal would die a quiet death and not appear on the agenda
again. If, however, the majority of people were in favor of
pursuing the project, we would put it on the agenda for
authorization of the expenditure. As it has turned out, after the
closing of bids, we have been presented with two more bids, both
of which I consider to be invalid since the first bid was
published. I think to award the job to a bidder loan than
that which was published would be highly unfair, and perhaps
even legally irresponsible. I think at this point it would be
unwise to pursue the project any longer unless we intend to
invite sealed bids for a future decision. For us to go out
and pursue bids after the bids closing date becauso the first
one did not appeal to un, I think is somewhat unethical in a
professional business sense. If we wore dissatisfied with the
solo bid, than that bid should have boon rejected and now bids
invited. We should not extend the bidding deadline in order to
secure added bids. The other contractors ware invited to submit
a bid, they chose not to, therefore, in my estimation, they should
not be considered for the job. I think it is boat for the City
at this time to simply abandon the project for this particular
y construction season and perhaps reinvestigate the entire matter
from a now perspective next winter or very early eF.ring.
V
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
7. Consideration of a Resolution to Continue the Cable Franchisinq
Process. (T.E.)
The Minnesota Cable Communication's Board requires that each
City participating in a joint powers agreement adopt a resolution
stating the advisability of continuing on with the franchising
process. It also relates to a needs assessment which was done
soma time ago by Cary. The needs assessment has evolved under
State guidelines to a system wherein community loaders made the
determination that cable can provide services that are determined
to be desirable and in some cases needed. No longer is a com-
munity forced to go to a household by household survey. This
resolution states simply that in the opinion of the community
leaders the franchising process should be continued so as to
ultimately provide cable to the community and the school.
The Joint Cable Cott®ission to this point has met on a regular
basis every two weeks and have discussed basic policy decision
and the formulation of the Request For Proposal (RIP)• Our
legal counsel is currently forming all that information into
the final document. This final document will be submitted to
each of you for review prior to going to the bidding process.
There are currently 10 communities involved in the joint powers
agreement. Other cities may be added before the cable service
territory is deemod complete by the State. our commission has
requested that all affected school districts form their own
advisory group and son.i a representative to our commission
meetings co an to provide comment and opinion from the school
district'n point of view. I think there is unanimous con-
sent that the putential of cable far out weighs its current
offering. Tnot is tc -.lay the educational and institutional
uses which are now developing are for greater than the notion
of recuiviny pito and 24 hour nin-rl.'a programming, for iuotanco.
Our projected timetable is that the RFP be submitted to bidders
in the early fall with bids and contract negotiations and
franchising occurring over the winter months. Actual con-
otruction of the system would than begin by next spring end
may take as long as a year, year and a half to complete.
R]TERENCESs A copy of tho resolution to be adopted.
:C
./ RESOLUTION DETERMINING TUE ADVISABILITY
F`14
OF CONTINUING 11111 h'RANCII1::1141: PI(0C1;:::i
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello in included in an approved cable
service territory which includes 10 other cities in Sherburne and
Wright County, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello shall be the franchising authority
for the cable system to be installed within its corporate boundaries,
and;
WHEREAS, the City Council has been informed and will continue to be
informed about cable communications by its representatives to the
Sherburne Wright Counties Cable Communications Commission (SWC4),
and;
WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has assessed the communication
needs of the persons residing within the City of Monticello, and;
WHEREAS, the summary of the needs assessments of the City of
Monticello is publicly available from the City, and;
WHEREAS, the needs assessments indicates certain cable cowuni-
cation needs of the citizens of Monticello which would be satisfied
! by a cable communications system.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY T1117 MCN;TICf:1110 CITY COUNCIL that.
it is advisable at this time to co;ltirwc the franchisi:q prccoua
through participation in the SWC4.
Adopted this day of 1983.
ATTEST;
Thomas A. Eiden
City Administrator
Arve A. Grimsmo
Mayor
0
1
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
8. Consideration and Evaluation of the Conduct of the Monticello
Jaycee Circus and tho Subsequent Waiver of the Fee. (T.E.).
At the June 27th meeting, you stipulated that a representative
of the Jaycees should return after they had held the circus.
There was considerable discussion at that time and concern
expressed over proper parking. The Jaycees also requested
that the traveling show fee be waived for their non-profit
organisation. Ultimately, the decision that was reached was
one of "we will evaluate your performance after the fact and
at such time determine whether or not to waive the fee*. As
of this writing, of course, the circus has not yet been hold.
I encourage however many of you who wish, to observe the final
results of circus day. If you are satisfied that the Jaycees
put forth enough effort to accommodate the traffic and parking
needs as wall as monitoring the overall circus operation, then
we can simply return the check that they submitted to us for
the license fee.
- 5
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
9. Consideration of a Request to Pclinyuish an Easement for
Street Purposes - Dale l.ungwitz, (.bkwocd industrial Park. M E.
In September of 1977, the Oakwood Industrial Park partnership
granted to the City an easement which runs over the northerly
40 feet of the north half of Lot 4 in Oakwood Industrial Park,
the easement being permanent for roadway and utility purposes.
The north half of lot 4 now is up for sale to an industrial
developer from Willmar. The individual hopes to set up a
plant to manufacture acetylene gas and is apparently very
interested in this particular lot. He is however concerned
with meeting all of the setback requirements and having
expansion room for the future. The main concern is whether or
not to begin to measure the side yard setback limitations
from the south line of the 40 foot easement or from the north
property lino which is also the north line of the 40 foot
casement. At this point, it is staff's interpretation that
there Doing a roadway easement the setback would have to be
figured from the southerly line of that roadway casement.
If, however, the roadway portion of the casement were lifted
(or adjusted) the setback would actually go from the line
which is 40 feet north of that point. won though the developer
could not build any kind of a structure over or on top of that
easement, it would help him moot all the zoning requirements
as wall as the statutory requirements for his particular busi-
noes. Dale laingwitz has indicated to me thatnone of the Oakwood
Partnership can recall why a roadway casement would have been
provided for. They clearly recall that the easement wan
negotiated, and it is their recollection that it was for
utility purponcol they speculate that the roadway casement
was more of an error rather than a negotiated point. An such,
Dale will be prouent requeetinq that the easement only for
roadway purposco be lifted.
Staff has diacusned thio and Jobui Slmola fools that it would
not he beneficial to give up the easement now that we have it.
lis fools that no Int 5 develops into a well field, which it
probably will, having roar access to cur property would be a
benefit to the City. Ono simple benefit would be the lessor
coot of constructing the access along this oaacment to the
northerly and of the lot as cyn+oaod to constructing a
driveway all the way to the north end of the lot from Chelara.
It'ooieply a matter of being a ohortor diotanco and thuu a
cheaper project. John also pointed out the south half of the
40 foot easement is a drainage ditch that in quite deep. Thio
ditch drains moat of lhomao Park and for thio particular
ditch to over be filled or used, the person intending to use
- 6 -
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
r
it would have to put in an 18 or 24 inch storm scror which could be
very costly. Hance, the only roadway space that is developable
would be the northerly 20 feet of the 40 foot easement.
Sam0 other considerations: This is not a dedicated street, but
rather an easement for roadway purposeal we do not have a similar
40 foot easement over the property abutting on the north, and thus,
we do not the 80 foot required'street.areai even if we had the
full 80 foot dedicated street through these parcels, development
would be highly improbable since the physical extention of the
street would run directly into the freeways development also
would be highly unlikely due to the existence of the drainage
ditch and the considerable expense it would require to construct
a storm sower system in order to allow a developed street over
the top.
I have consulted with Gary Pringle on this matter, and because
Jt is an easement, it the Council elects to lift or altor said
easement, a simple motion will suffice. Not being a dedicated
atroet, the City would not be required to go through the formal
vacation process. One solution we have considered that we think
�.' will accommodate all partiea concerned would be to simply insert
the word "private" in front of roadway. If necessary, we could
change the word roadway to driveway. This adjustment would
eliminate any question of the property in question as being
a street and thus allow the land to be uaeablu with respect
to toning setback requirements, but would atilt provide the City
as the owner of Lot 5 accoas to ita property. A variation of
this alternative would be to retain the 40 foot underground
utility easement but amend the roadway casement to be effective
only for the northerly 20 feat of the 40 foot encement. I would
also like to point out that the notion of building a street
through hero really servos no function. There is no land that
would be served by that particular street. Tbo parcel abutting
to the north has access from Thomas park Drive and lot 6 of
Oakwood has access from both Industrial Drive and Cholsea
Our lot, Lot S. has access from Choloca so that the roar access
is eoloy for our convenience and not really for public benefit.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION&
1. Deny any alterations to the canement - Thi&& may effect
thu final duc inion& of thu duvelopor to lecatu his plant
in Monticello. Ila to lntorented in this local., because
a by produ.a of his pntu:u can be uued by N811. The
other aito Im may tx) conr,ldor&n�i In in Becker.
MAC
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
Our information indicates that his business may be a
rapid growth business, and we would hope to have him
select Monticello.
2. Alter the casement to provide private access to the rear
of Lot 5 - This would allow full utilization of Lot 4
by the developer, but would still provide us with a con-
venient access, in the event that we ever need it, to our
property. Because of the substantial ditch, we can be
pretty sure that he will never wish to build that far
to the north.
3. Suspend the roadway easement completely - This would still
provide us with underground utility easement, but would
eliminate Lila convenience of a rear access to our property.
F:f:COHMENOED ACTION:
I recommend that we negotiate an altered roadway casement
providing the City with private access to Lot 5. This
strikes me to be the most equitable position for all parties
concerned. My inclination is to stipulate that the under-
ground utility will remain at 40 foot and the private drive-
way casement will be rostricted to tho north half of the 40
foot easement or the northerly 20 foot whichever would be the
appropriate wording.
REFERENCES& A copy of the original easement, a map indicating the
cite and the parcel in question.
-a-
Foes No. Llai ,,... �. t•...r�,�..j ��`rrriar`,o w'�iy
Us 31*109t. red. th. M day I 5%taabor . 1Y71
hsaaaaa ONomd rri—nir'al Park. a gen al puttzerd4 under the love, 'if than State
of 10ftwoots
of As Congo of Itrlot rrwd swu o/ Klnneeote
Party. of As 10 pest, and The City of ibnticallo, a amlclpal
aamponatiora undo &U ince of elle Steep at Minnesota . Party of the and past.
!1laaaat4, ffat to aatd party of t4 prd rust in wasideeatiow of Ma auw of
.0as Dollar trod other good tad ralua0le canr'•erstion Donalims{
to it in hand paid by CAr said party of th. --.d ptrt, fhr renipl wph.,waf L
Araby adraarindfad, de as Aoney Orwnt, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Conies unto the add parte, of
Cho aatad part, its acwaaws and aalfar, ►aurae,, all the trod or par—r of rand lylnf and Wail
PAR ldiicA Ba000a1t iq nId it b.rr aJ .Minwrota. Sia nf+d as fallen, tow+b
No lat 4. Block 1, Oakrood 1n,Ltotrial Park, according to the plat
on file in the office of the 0ounty Recorder, bright Ootnty. Mzuwaaota.
A pwoverient easement for roadway and utility see over, under
and across the northerly 40.00 feet of the northerl of Lot 4.
Together with a 40 foot permanent eaeemmit over, under, aid
across the westerly 140.00 feet of said northerly } of Lot 4.
No state deed tax - tax exempt
Me thacf ane to Bo1A rbt Sault
in Qranmonr [6htrrol. ., I •y •I ...,,r r„ a r.•"..,•, r., r rte
I i /
•n .
B. Phillip Partner
for Oakwood Industrial Park
MO ADMQJWVMA M e� 0. 8. rhulftwkr II:IM• btAodmi___
®�ww�i�t GOt� � ��L% _ �_�•��R� IaMt
IMI SUM" WAS DSAIRD by "• .• ••••
Qw7 Vlobar _ - -- I
I ' I ty if wcticsuo
I YY. N
M'f'g• 1 cel 1u1 eM. ;Sidi: I
I �o se
C
IO L
I r PARK
I
OMA ~ - -- PARK
i
4e � Zr�J..•«� � u�...�� faftwru'
i I ! •Iuw MIG. C' pESEgvUllt
s
I
CINE SEBA RD.
i
�
u
Council ,agenda - 7/2;/83
10. Consideration of Revisinq the City's License/Fee Schedule. (T.E.)
Not long ago we renewed liquor and beer licenses throughout the
City and at that time we discussed the possibility of increasing
the rates. I think it would be best, if we are going to increase
the rates, to increase them now and send notice to all license
holders so that they have nearly one year to prepare for the new
fees. Also, rather than adjusting only the beer and liquor
licenses, we reviewed all of the license fees and made adjust-
ments whereever it seemed appropriate. The City's ordinance
code, in its text, refers to fees which will bo set from time
to time by the Council. Hence, a simple resolution adopting
the fees will suffice rather than the need to go through
ordinance amendments for every item. The resolution is then
attached as a part of the ordinance code.
The one license that stands in question is that relating to
transient merchants. Currently, we have a $2.00 application
charge plus a $50.00 per day fee, which the City can waive
for non-profit organization. 1 presume that we have this
rather substantial fee for the purpose of discouraging
transient merchants. Iiowever, in a technical sene:e anyone
who acts up a stand becomes a tranniont merchant oxcludinq
garage salus ar,d auctions. tel Wolter's inquiry into a flea
market raised the entiro queution of transient morchant.
The Planning Canmisnion is going to hold a public hearing
an a proposed zoning nrdinm,ce amendment which would allow
flea markets as a conditional ore in some particular zone.
If that amendment In passed, any person who participates
will still be subject to the transient merchant regulations.
Ono alternative hero would be to charge the flea market
operator a act fee per broth or vendor within his flea
market. That would be a feu that would be incorporated
into the zoning ordinance and only referred to in the
resolution and fee schodulo. Tito problem that arises is
that if the floa market ordinance is not adopted, what
then do we charge for people who wish to just act up to
loll their crafts or other goods. In a technical sense,
our curront transient merchant ordinance would require
that each vendor who participates in the various mall
shown should be paying the transient merchant foo. Because
thio is kind of a sticky problem, and I think it needs
further study, especially since it dopondn upon t:ho decision
of the Planning Csamiseion (and ultimately the City Council)
concerning the otatun of like proposed ordinance amendment,
I am suggesting that the fen stand an iu for the time being.
If there in a radical change in the ordinance or a genuine
demand to occamnodato a few 1N oplu who wish to act up on
vacant lattd, then we will proceed to adopt an appropriate
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
fee schedule.
REFEREHCESt A copy of the proposed new fee schedule with
comparison to the existing fee schedule.
- lU
CITY OF AiTICELLO
Effective September 1, �3
FEE SCHEDULE
CURRENT
PROPOSED
3.2 Beer, On-Sale
S 220/yr
S 245/yr
3.2 Beer, Off-Sale
33/yr
500/yr
P
F�
Liquur, On-Sale
3,000/yr
3,300/yr 0-
Liquor, Sunday Sales
100/yr
100/yr (Statutory Limit)
Liquor, Club
220/yr
300/yr (Statutory Limit)
L:juur• Set-ups
220/yr
250/yr
1i#*#in.•.ua:rov#d#Yh*f ftrdddlf�fiif*MHR#'1\**i'Ff*fff*ff**♦f**f/f 3d33#'i#O*#h#�N Of***#HtfHfi R�►f*ff�WfN*•Yi*Mf*fffff#lf *•i-l. a
Ncving Buildings
75 + expense.,
SAME
Cuudittonal Use Permit
75
SAME
Svtha,k Variance
25
SAME
All ether Variances
75
SAME
k"2,,ning Request
75
5 100 + necessary consulting enp. ,o.
w.ii!dinF inspection - - - - -
- - 20 - - - - - -
- -25 for let two hours, 515/hr
town-p,rmit related)
thereafter
Lingo•- - - - - - - -
- 50/yr for "-re than 5 events -
- - 75/yr for more than � events
No fee fet 1• than 5 events
20/yr for 5 or less events
.raveling Shows-- - - - •- -
- - 100/first. Any �,Uidav thereaftor -
- -SAME
P,( Li.ense - - - •- - -
- - -10. nne ti.,., ... ,: p.t .- - - -
- SAME
DcF Impoundment let occurence
10 3.SU/da_+
12.50 + 4.00/day
2nd occurence
20 • 3.5U/da:
25.00 + 4.00/day
3rd occurence
30 3.50/ i}
35.00 • 4.00/day
Sew.•r )look-up, Residential
100
SAME
Swer (look-up, Petit
10/inbpcction
SAME
Water shut-off, then turned on
15 + delinqu,•t, y
SAME
txcavation Permit - - - - - - -10/permit - - - -
- SAME
Street Vacation- - - - - -
- - - 50 deposit, fee .hall be tutal
SAME
cost incur•eJ by the City
Transient Merchant .- - - - - -
- - 2.00 application tee + 50/day -
- - SAME -
Scavenip.r _ - _ _ - - -
- 50.00(0n,- tine f,c)- - -
- _SAME
• Water Nook-up, Residential
40 • City Cuut
50 • Material Coot
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
11. Consideration of an Application for a 3.2 Beer On -Sale License
St. Henry's Catholic Church, Fall Festival. (R.W.)
As in the past years, St. Henry's Catholic Church is requesting
a one day 3.2 beer license for their annual church fall festival
scheduled for September 18, 1983.
PJULIBLE ACTION: G-nuideration of approving issuing the one
day license cantit.gent upon proper insurance coverage being
provided.
N
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
12. Consideration of an Appointment of a Wastewater Treatment Plant
Operator. (J.S.).
The applications for Wastewater operator closed on July 12, 1983.
We received 25 applications as of that date. Eight (8) applicants
are from Monticello, eight (8) are from the nearby surrounding
areas and the remaining nine (9) are from the Twin cities or out
state area.
We have selected five individuals for interviews that have some
previous wastewater experience and who now hold a Class "D'
or 'C" wastewater operator's license. Two of these individuals
are or have been temporary City of Monticello employees. The
other three are from the out state area.
The interviews will be conducted on Friday and Monday. We
(Tom, Al and myself) will mike a recommendation to the Council
at Monday night's meeting.
- 12 -
k
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
13. Consideration of an Initiating a Permanent Clerical Position in
City Hall. (T.E.).
At the July 11th meeting, I requee:ted that this item be postponed
largely because we were unable to assemble the required material
for your review. I was only half joking when I stated that wu
simply didn't have the time and I rest my case. In the pre-
paration of the formal job description that we are proposing,
I requested that Rick address ammo of the specific provisions
that would be required of such a position since he could more
accurately address what precisely has to be done. It is in
fact true that lack pimply did not have the time to got to
working on a Jew e. mcrirtion. I could have made the time to
write the entire j.ib description, but it is my opinion that
it is absolutely critical that kick be involved in the design
of such a position that will work so closely with him.
In assembling supporting data to show the need for this position,
we sometimes arrive at rather chaotic type of a presentation.
Ono example of our being short handed has to do with the ro-
assessment of the 1978 project. This reassessment has not gone
one atop further than the action taken by the Council at the
meeting where all of the details wore agreed upon. This typo
of an unexpected, special project, will require submtantial f
time commitment, and neither Rick nor I aro able to simply
suspend our other duties in order to go to work on this
particular project. Granted, this project is only a temporary
work overload, but it is an example of how under staffed we
aro when we aro faced with a necessity of unexpected projects.
Another temporary work overload is the revision of our entire
filing system. As a result of our Wastewater Treatment Plant
grant, we will be required to sot up a totally independent
filing system that holds every document related to that
project. o8M will be transferring to us all of their related
eoeumante and that takes up, so I understand, throe full filing
cabinets. Those records have to be filed to suit the Federal
Agencies and bo made available for the next several years upon
their requoot. Our regular City filing is in drastic need of
revision and cleaning. In order for us to properly rofile and,
perhaps, destroy unnucoaoary records, we are required to take
a comylnto inventory of all documcnto and submit to the winneoota
Historical soctuty before receiving pormiasion to destroy un-
necessary dmnumnto. Wh.tln ouch a project is temporary, my boat
ustlmatu Wood on other cities wluo have gone through this pro-
, eoduro, the opuration cuuld take up to a year.
Mother matter of cuncorn in the poucibility that the Director
of Economic Devolopoont become a pormanontly financed position.
Getting aside, for Cho time being, the question of how hia
position might be financed, if it is financed, came clerical
help will be required. Currontly, Harlon takoo caro of all
-13 -
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
correspondence for Rick, Gary, John Simola and myself. She is
also responsible for agenda preparation for the Council, the
Planning Commission, the HRA and the Business and Industry
Committee. She also spends anywhere from 2 to 4 hours daily
assistiny with deputy registrar duties. She is responsible for
all budget preparation, as well, that is to say, the typing and
preparation of the work sheets, compiling all data for those
work sheets, typing and compilation of the preliminary budget
document, editing and revising, and preparation of the final
budget document.
With respect to the new position, I have requested that the
other office employees estimate the amount of hours in any
given work day the new position might devote to particular
tasks. Diane has estimated, and Marlene and Lynnoa have
confirmed., that the average daily work load for filing reports
for the deputy registrar department would be approximately 3
hours. I must emphauizo that this is an average. Soma days
may be slightly greater, some slower days would be less. On
sumo very slow customer days. Diane would be able to keep up
with the reports herself. In talking with Lynnea, she felt
that this person would put in approximately an hour a day
being involved with City payroll and utility collection and
billings. Again, I emphasize that this is determined to be
an average figure. The parson would not necessarily put in
an hour a day every day. Likewise, in speaking with Rick and
Marlene, we figure that it would be an average of about 1 hour
a day working on Rick's corraspondonco and financial report,
that in, just the typing and mailing of corroopondanco and
reports. Lastly, in dincusning with Rick the actual bookkeeping
duties, he thinks that it would be easy to average out to at
least 3 hours a day doing just that typo of work. As he in-
dicatcd hu han more than enough to keep him busy right now
and he upoendn moot of No time doing the actual bookkeeping,
again, coding vouchers for the budyot, preparing checks, and
the other duties have their peak periods and low periods so
we aro using an average figure.
To further illustrate the need, Rick's vacation record
indicates that he has accumulated nearly 8 wooku of vacation.
lie has not taken his vacation in many instances simply because
the work would continuo to pilo up on hie dock.. As he stated
he could take two or throe weeks off at a time, rather than
one week, but that would only mean the pilo would be higher
on his dock when he got back. I should also note that our
auditors have recommended that a separate party be able to
assume the bookkeeping rolou in Rick's absence. I do not
moan to play down the importance of thin recommendation. I
simply don't think It needs a lengthy discunsionp I do, how-
ever, think it is very important.
- 14 -
Council Agenda 7/25/83
Another point, perhaps of limited importance, is that Rick has
virtually no time to read professional journals, attend work
sessions, or participate in professional organizations. This
simply means that he is not really improving at his job. He
Is simply going an in continuing to do the tasks the way he
always done them. He has no opportunity to improve his skills
and thus, improve the City's financial record keeping.
With respect to Diane's service as deputy registrar, we have
discovered that in 1983 she is consistently two to four reports
behii.d. In some cases, when the reports gettoo far behind, she
will take work home. In 1982, Diane worked overtime at home
a total of 45 hours filing juut reports. So far in 1983, she
already hes acquired 43 hours of oveatima. I should note that
these are actual ovortime hours when she takeo reports hone and does
not reflect time she spondee here in the City Hall when she
will stay a half hour to 45 minutes lata (after the door is
locked) to complete the day's work.
I think one other labor aspect should he considered briefly,
that being the eminent appointment of Gary as our City Assessor.
This will certainly require some correspondence and additional
clerical assistance on his behalf. nasically, all of the duties
that are building up will have to be reassigned, and at this
point, we simply do not have an adequate amount of poruonnel to
assign all those duties.
I think the above data adequately substantiates over request. to
create a now clerical position for City Hall. I have fully taken
into consideration that sumo of the projacte listed are of a
somewhat temporary nature, but I conclude two things from thate
Ona, spacial, unexpected projocts may occur on a regular basis.
Two, if when the unexpected projects diminish or cease all
together and we can no longer supply 40 houru worth of labor
for this person, hours would have to be trimmed back to the
necessary level. Thu nuidUun of lrluwinq hours, in not
difficult and is considered on a regular basis when work load
seems to be down. Thia clarical position would not be union
and thus would not bu quarantoed a 40 hour work week by labor
contract. 71w ouccouuful applicant would simply have to be
made aware of that fact.
hinally, thcuo aro tho haoic salary/financial conniderations.
Thi I.reimot na3ory runqu for a utartinq clerical position is
'05.60 per hour -16.u6 por 1x+ur. If we uhould hire someone
relatively law in experience, such that the person would
txtgin at the bottcmi ,end of the salary nealue tho i1ritnu City
exponoo would be 614,796.00. Unto includes employer's Ohara
of VM, social security and employee innuraneo. If we hiro
a parson who is aubstantially skilled and wo place that peroon
at the tap of the pay scala, the gross outlay from tho City
would be 415,973.
-ls-
Council Agenda - 7/25/83
Because we already have adequate space, furniture and equipment,
I do not foresee any capital cost related to establishing this
position.
REFERENCE: Copy of tho proposed job description.
- 16 -
M
of DKKt:F.P6A/A6t:RF
,ccountab. tot Finance Dire, r/Aust. admin.
Primary Responsibilitip
This position is raspcmeiblo for the keeping of the
financial records for the city. Will include recorciling
liquor and general bank statements; payroll assistancrr
additional duties as may, frml time to time, be assigned
by the Finance Director, City lvlministrator or City Council.
Additional duties will include typing, filing, reception,
telephone for the Finance Director/Asuistant Administrator.
This person will also be responu;ble for acquiring a workinq
knowledge of the duties of the Ilepury Pewliutrar with the
exlross intent to asci:,t in thnsc dutiou during peak periods
and during the absonce of other ,haft Ila•mlKra. Sime
additicmal restmn^ibility will 1. lu Lu aro,, cd ul,llt;
billing and I'aymrnt c1,111•c111.11.
pal t,. At, I::
A :rumor illi Tcrlt, n•t 111
rim, ly Pr'•par.lri•al .a /.•I+al•. anll aa•.npmn•ut.:.
- t:nuwleap: of •tunut 11 ,wc•,writinq pnnclplet:
- Verification and clxlinq ,1f vwchoru for all chucks
- Calculate and allorate omploy-- payroll to dllpropriatu
departtmmts
- Prepare bank dei—sits
- Timely cagtlet.tun of total 1 ul.ulcial data packet f„r
submitral to CMI'lttvr Service nureau
Annual budget
- I;arly preparation of Ixtdlrt workuhcut:i
- Aecurato pr000nt.ation of current budget data
- Monitoring dopartmont heads on bud'let selladulo
- Timely completion of budget docutient
Annual Audit
- Preparation of year end financial relwrta and work
papers neceonary for audit
Financial Corresilindlh'ncu L'lurival
- Neat, accurate letters and M111,r rl,rr,•:.pondencu
- Timely cnml I, t lull 'd u11I tr••I,,n,11, m
FI_u n' I l l •:1 (, 111 t l l l u
L,nnit'n"duwr UI}
„','dl .Ir ••411'11 11 1"I
- ,�•rlu .,I, 1 • :lel ul 1 ,
, ,�•'l l . u I,1 111 1 •
'1P1 I 1 Ill .u•I 1, 1.
111•11uI'l-& ;�• I_ !i -'T
cl- urtolxt't i%itui, 1 O'Lt it t..1 11
A turate ca;.il t 11111
I'rltlli 1, 1, "UWL.. ,••m'1, 1, 1. 1, 11 '11 Irlllll;111 Iei41 t'tU
tibcervatlt ut need fill' Ln•,Llzn•t aaniotanuu
GENERAL - FUND
- -ILL-
AMOUNT
(.111:CK
MN. State Treasurer - Lievrist- 1'%,L- - vi-ri 11 i-I Car)
I $ J.O0
17471
MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees1
38. Ilk)1741:
Inti-irnal Revenue Service - Lvvy proc-A.,;
3151.H41/47'1
Gwors Bateman - Animal control - June
222.86
74,.
R"..'t i gis" i Ill,$ - Seumsol' ."llary
17*1.#,il
Amanda Chowvn - 11
1'14. b9
11411,
Charles Walters
173.60
17471
Craig Kondali -
5.1.611
11478
Chris Sarvela -
53.61)
1747u
Mr. Art,) ll'iss, Plaii r,vi-v lar :41W his i Wing
473.22
17481)
.terry fletme:; - Janitorial at Libtjry
125.00
174HI
Richard Knutson, III,'. - Payment ill - h2-2 ProjliL
119,712.97
1702
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dod.
144.04
17485
James Prous." - Cleaning City Hall
250.00
174H4
(:orruw Sanitation - Contract payment
3,761.50
17485
MN. state rreatiurvir - Dup. RvS. fet-ti
230.0(1
17486
Mr. Arve Griallinso - Mayor salary
175.00
17487
Mr. Dan Ittonigen - Council salary
125. 00
174MM
Mrs. Fran Fair - Comicil salary
125.00
17489
Mr. Ken Mauti - Council tialary1
25.0:)
7490
Mr. Jack Maxwell - Cuuncil salary
125.11
� 7491
YMCA of Millis. - Contract payin.-rit
284. 1h
174-1.1
Monticello School Diutrict - 19HI Otimm-ir recreation ps,�Iram
I 10.00().00
174^1
CormLasionscr of Revenue - SWT - June
I ' 338.00
t749 4
Mrs. Lucy Andrews Inf. Center salary
117.00
1749,
I-Irv. Ull Schafter Inf. Center j;a1al,y
I ID.ols
'14'Ji-
174'9-
Wright
Wright County State Bank - fVl'
1 '949. 10
174-)7
MN. State Treasurer - FICA - Jun,
4,804.80
17491+
(Ven, Hati-man - Partial payment for duly animal -ioinl
1,
1741"+
voin
Paul A. I..uretict, t*,-. paymi-lit ll.!ji - WW,l,l,
M11. State Treasurer Pep. Rej. t
I:ol3L-rt Dovdigliciater summes
134.Ho
1751,1
Amanda Cliowen
100.:4
Crai,,; Kendall
. 16
. 8O
17505
Oiric OarvQlj
26.11u
1750f,
Ch"irlet; Walters;
94.(m
17507
AW. 6tatc Treasurer D!I). r%L-ij. t t.cG
64.00
175011.
Gwen Bagman - Animal imp. ,sil IIL:,,
150.U0
17509
State Qlatol Credit 'Inlon - Payroll dod .
144.04
1781n
Jerry litirmors - JaniLarlat itt Imilaly
125.(jo
17511
". :1. pool-M39f.ex - llunlaqe
370.00
17512
P43. ,,toLc Treavur,sr - PITA W/11
1.619.04
17513
Mrrl- LUCY "IdrCW11 - list- t701`ItVt L;,Al,lt','
103.50
17514
Msru. W011.2 Schaflvr - Int. Center salary
1 123.75
17514
t1conah Foundry - Manhole cautingo for Wrijhtuo !,ower lino
138.58
i
17510
Bridgewatos, TeLephono - Pl,one liyqt.-n at. W. W. T. Plant
2"099.68
17517
Atlamii 14,t;t Control - (',,,ntrt,l at
341.75
17510
Local 049 - Unless dues
95.OU
17519
Star h Titibunti - WWTP ht' 114 wantcNl ail
40.40
i 17529
Dr. Joul Erickson - March - mane Vet. (cen
180.110
17521
worwiy lionland - PA,imb. for Piro Is, 1,t. rolkiII!,
6.11
175'.'
BilliIIII31il- A- 111-1116tVidl lh.'V. C(ITTISTIll t, r - '41, 0. ,
7,J11U.11(i
17').:1
lut. bank Mlslu. - Public activity 4,har,je
4.o(l
17524
Natitslial Lil'4, lnt,. ru. - T,.m I ph-m joli,i,ili 1.1.111 la-,p Ij
ll".011
171,."
Mrii. Marjorit, lkjotzke - OAA llv.ad ms-Litiq is
j j". wo
17W4,
Mr. Tom IJalkowuki - O&A Board metimi-,
125.11(1
175;.7
0RAI FlIk"'
AMOUN I'
CHECK
Mr. Lorzy zn9sti -i - Ojv,,j jjtj 112.,t in is 1138.00
17528
2r. Franklin Dern OAA Board ri--- ,rot
75.00
1752
Mr. Nrv, i;r,m-. m, 41.1 P. tid tn.-t in,v. j
7".00
1753t,
Banker'!: lal',- b: - r:L < ul .n.•
2,499.A1
17511
Pai:1 It. I.jurvnce il,�;. ul vor 1 1. il,,%!, ,.L till 'I
I2jXU
175!2
Mr. Arco UrImsmo Mit-.agc L,- I %n,
23.75
175 t ,
Tom Eidem - Misc. miloago
51.17
17'. 0
tern Boll - Fit.
36.43
171135
Moon Motors Repair party Ent, Fit,- , 'rr,•,••
71.In
17',3,
Hanover Sand 1. Uravul - Sand for pall.
11,5,011
171,37
Phillipi* Petrolulan - Cot;, oil, repair - Svw.r/Watur IA-I-Lo.
87.12
171,34
ZLP Mf'). Co. - Supplies for S(:W,.I.
42.60
17530
Independent Uwlxr Misc. supplivo for all dqjtj.
138.33
17540
Harry's Auto Supply WWTP small tools- $85.135 - other depts.
190.49
17541
Monticello Office Products - 141ile. uupplicq for all depts.
91.86
1754
Wright Service oil - 55 gal. oil for Sever I)LpL.
201.70
17543
Water Products - 2 meters - Reittert Apt.u.
704.38
17544
Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts.
129.00
17545
Share Corporation Weed control for parka
368.65
17546
Our Own Hardware Supplies - mower, rain suitu, tape, etc.
965.56
17547
Coast to Coast - St., Shop, Sewer, Library
104.81
1754R
Lcef Bros. - Uniform rental j
124.00
17547
North Central Public Service - (:;P.wur plant - 1,168.36)
1,176.73
17550
Gordon Link - Diesel feel
490.50
17551
Monticello Ready Mix - Park supplies
513.38
17552
Monticello Times - Publishing, rtc. - June aiul duly
11011.51
17553
NaLiunal Buuhlnij - Rev. IlLvs lot plant ',715.28
728.82
17554
Biq Laku lumber - P.7(lwood lar parko
I9B.91
17555
Vikinq Pip,.- Service - &-wtr roadinq
1,297.33
17556
0. K. Hardware - niuc. nap! lieu
10.52
1750
fritrc,ii Alloy-1 C,)rP. - Wol•l.iiq rods
R11.23
1755H
:tarc,.) Hiii,ji-ru;
I
52..RB
175514
la 1-1, 1; 0. 11,1141
1751,1•
46M - �1-j
14P. to
1711e.)
:,au. Tire buvicv - 1,11-j and lvjq:ir'l
'4.00
17567
St. CIrKi.) P,re rqtitl7m; nt - fir,- l,xt .
13.',0
.7 :•G3
tk-lyo Pljrttcl; - S.-Wel D"I'L.
1756-1
N. S. Kmor - litilitivo
7,414.1.5
BrId,jowater TrIopliono - 111-ilit.let I
194.45
17',11
PlacWuen FAsuilluxant - SL.
in.13
17!,,,7
Wright County Auditor - It poli,:L. fliioti - iijiv,
878.20
17560
Fair's Garden Center - PoplacuLivait Lte.-:i
331.91
1751,9
Fidelity Bank & Trust - Interest on 71 Water h 71. 0. (V. tondo
2,444.22
17570
Int Batik St. Paul - Tntereot on 78 0.0. bond
23,933.95
17571
Wright Coonty Sheriff - Pollre runtract payuhnil -,Tulle
9,041.98
17572
NorWevt Batik Mplit. - 70, 77, 791, 8(1, 01 1%%nkl jujincilts i, Interest
162.569.20
17571
nroun I:mjineerinq - Testill(I at Mi,adow tkik prOji-cl.
684.81)
17574
Feed Rite Controls - Potablo namplu
7.50
17575
Central NW.owan Sewrr Dept. - 359.69, St. 1:!
363.00
17576
lut Bank Mpl- . 75 HLex. b 75 G. O. lit-iol %nLurCLIt payment i
18,344.80
171,77
Sherburne (Xjunty Vquipmant - St. t.upplavu
53.60
17578
Jerry Weill - Fire vchon), In St. Clnud relml). I
36.00
17579
rquttable Life Assurance Inu. W/H
40.00
17580
CM Elovotor - PrIntr. Public Wnt4, iwpt
7.50
171,61
IlJeUfj Je - IV&; jr.''al plaiii rajah
269.0
17592
W4. Vallci T,;Linq - N-roulvr rental t,, •.c%A,t dept.
60.00
17563
C)
I
f:E1:t:kA1. FUND
1 udio Communications - Repairs to pagers - 391 .95, truck radios
" and switching radios in truckr.
Davis Electronics - Pager repairs
Foster Franzen Agency - '83 Chev. van s antique policies
Mr. Al Nel::on - Sub.
Monticello Printing - Bldg. Inup. b Office supplies
Jim (latch Sales Co. - Gutter brava b wurk gloves
Mobil Oil Corp. - Street and Fire yas
The Plumbery - Park supplies
Buffalo Bituminous - Clasm 5 b Cedar St. crossing const.
Burlington Northern Railroad - Npense for flagging at crnsaing
in Meadoa Oak project
Central Eyewear - 13 pair safety ;lasses
Walters Cabinet Shop - Hinges for Mtce. Bldg.
6indberg Paint - Sewer supplies
Rick Wolfsteller - Mine. mileage
Payroll for June
AMOUNT CIIECK N
544.35 17584
51.50
17585
168.50
1758A
11.70
175H7
91.60
17588
320.33
1750')
110.59
17590
110.82
17591
6,191.80
17592
1,233.70
17593
157.00
17594
7.00
17595
35.97
17596
31.OU
17597
25,964.83
"Al. DISHIINSI{MISNTi IDR .1111.Y - 1"A i I .'498.111.46
0
l
ltdv- -ua�
LIQUOR DIB] :SEMEITPS FOR JULY - 1983
State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll drd.
20.00
cb miesioner of RCvunuc - SWT - June
320.00
MN. State Treasurer - F1C1, - June
643.76
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor
1,277.71
i,rigys, Cooper b Co. - 1'Lluor
2,929.26
Vright County State Bank - FWT - June
612.90
State Capitol Credit Union - Paytoll ded.
20.00
MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H
213.67
Let Bank Mple. - interest on 76 Liquor Store Fay. Bond
2,815.00
Onset to Coact - Misc. expense
2.77
Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins.
276.58
Granite City Cash Register - Paper
53.97
7 Up Bottling - Misc. mdse.
413.80
Viking Coca Cola - Rise. mdse.
849.50
Lsvegren ice 00. - Ice
319.95
Judo Candy i 1bba=o - Misc. mdoe.
339.47
Old Dutch Foods - Misc. ales.
203.27
Tharpe Diet. Co. - Beer
6,522.15
Midland Beverage - Mine
56.25
Gsossloin Beverage - Hees
I' 17,744.20
Day Dist. Co. - Boor
104.90
Dick Beverage - Beer
4,491.99
Dahlhoimer Dist. Co. - Boor
15.692.96
Ed Phillipe i Sone - Liquor
13,315.64
Griggs. Cooper b Co. - Liquor
2,902.20
Twin City Nino - Liquor
1,272.0E I
NonCicelle Tim, --G - Pdv. - J mo,
267.40
tiorthem Staten Power - Utilitirn
I1
(1211.67
YLnak Sanitatinn - Contract I,.ym•-nl
H2.',0
1n:1141a.1 TruChim) - I'rC1•1111
'.2d47
Lio(••rt Trucklmi - Fr..•Glht
4it'..17
hrid, ji water luta.
I'., )'7 411 f A :Ula•
.1, +, Jl. Ill
'i'(."PAL I�ICII;�3C:I;Fi1•CIT, i . 1.lii !•)'