Loading...
HRA Agenda Packet 07-13-19831. AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF THE HRA July 13, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. Membeis: Phil white, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Vic Vokaty and Jack Reeve. 1. Call to Order. 2. Minutes of the Meetings Held on June 1, 1983 and June 22, 1983. 3. Public Hearing - T. I. F. Proposal/Disposition of Public lands. 4. Consideration of a Policy Establishing a Fee or Service Charge for Tax Increment Financing. 5. Consideration of Entering a Developer's Agreement with Power's Strength and Health Club. 6. Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Plan and Budget for Monticello Tax Increment District 92 and Submitting to the City Council, School District 9882 and Wright County. 7. Other Business. S. Adjournment. MINUTES HOUSING 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING June 22, 1983 - 7:30 P.M. A special meeting for the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority, being properly called, was duly held at 7,00 P.M. on Wednesday, June 22, 1983, in the City Council Chambers. Members present were Vokaty, Reeve, white, Cochran and Schrupp. Members absent: none. Also present was City Administrator, Tom Eidem. 1. Chairperson White called the meeting to order and advised that being a special meeting, the sole item of business would be consideration of the development proposal to be presented by Mr. Jim Powers. 2. white requested Eidem to go aver the financing alternatives that had been submitted. Eidem explained that Springsted, Inc., the City's finance consultants, had prepared four possible finance alternatives. All proposals were using an estimated interest rate of 7�% and looked at receiving tax increment for a period of eight yeers under an economic development proposal. He did note that two proposals did not include capitalized interest and, as such, would require an upfront financial committment from the developer. The other two proposals did include capitalized interest in the amount of the bond issue and thus, if the development proposal generated the required amount of tax increment, the land subsidy could be such that the land could be sold to the developers for a minimal amount. Eidem explained that the land acquisition coat was projected for this purpose at 8150,000.00 and incidental and contingent expenses were estimated at $7,000. He noted that for the HRA to make the acquisition, they would have to sell tax increment finance bander but that since the value was under $300,000, the City could pursue a private placement or it negotiated sale with a single lending institution. This, Eidom said, would eliminate a substantial amount of expense in legal fees, paying agent fees and the expense of going to public bidding. Several members of the HRA expressed concern aver the possibility cf default of the development and what would occur to the City's comitmant to retire the bonded debt. Ono suggestion Eidem made was that in preparing the devolopor'o agrooment, the HRh could aequiro a letter of credit from the financo institution repro - senting the developer that would occurs the bonded debt in the event the taxes (and thus the tax increment) fell delinquent. The conconoun of the Authority wao that ouch a letter of credit would bo doomed essential for this project, and, in fact, ohould probably be made a necessary condition of all tax incre- ment projecto which may comc before them in the future. - 1 - HRA Minutes - 6/22/83 whits expressed his concern about running such a fine line on our tax increment finance projects. He stated that he was somewhat concerned that the formulas were always being developed to balance out at zero, and said that he did not think it unreasonable to expect some contribution from the developer that would help build a reserve fund for the HRA. Various alternatives of achieving this were discussed. The Authority directed Eidem to investigate as many alternatives as he could in order to make a presentation to the Authority at their next regularly scheduled meeting. Mr. Jim Powers, proposer of Power's Strength and Health Club, was present to go over his project for the Authority. He presented to the members a copy of the floor plan, a feasi- bility study, and a site plan. He discussed the nature of the business operation and type of activities that would be available. He expanded somewhat on the data provided in the marketing feasibility report which indicated that such a project was fiscally sound and would generate substantial revenue to maintain a successful operation. On a motion by Echrupp, with a second by Reeve and carried unanimously, the Power's proposal was given preliminary approval and authori- zation is given to proceed with the tax increment financing procedure. Motion by Vokaty, seconded by Reeve directing Eidem to negotiate and execute a purchase agreement for the parcels described as followam Lot 1 -Block 1, lot 2 - Block 1, lot 3 - Block 1, all in Commercial Plaza 25, and lot I - Block 1, Lot 2 - Block 1, Lot 5 - Block 1, and Lot 6 - Block 1, all in Comercial Court at a price of 8149,000.00 and at setting a public hearing before the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority to accept public comment on the disposition of public landu, said hearing to be hold at 700 P.M. on Wednesday, July 13, 1983 in the City Council Cham tw rs. Thia motion was carried unanimously. A motion by Vokaty, ascended by Reeve and carried unanimounly rescheduling the regular July meeting of the HRA to coincide with the public hearing ochuduled fur July 13, 1983. Without a formal motion, the [IRA directed Eidem to comeonco negotiations for the private placement of a tax increment bond issue. Thorn being no further buoineou White adjourned the mooting. 'flame A. Ei City Administrator - RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has the statutory power to establish tax increment financing districts to assist developers, and; WHEREAS, the Monticello HRA desires to avoid utilizing their power to levy a special tax upon the central Monticello redevelopment area, anal WHEREAS, there are expenses involved in establishing tax increment districts that are not recovered by the collection of tax increment, and; WHEREAS, there are other operating expenses related to HRA business for which a revenue source is required. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Housing and Redevelopment Authority for the City of Monticello than 1. A charge of 2% of all financial assistance granted to a developer by the HRA or $2,500.00, whichever is lose, be and the same hereby is established. 2. This amount shall be paid to the HRA upon approval, by the City Council, of the tax increment financu plan. 3. The HRA may waive said foo if it io determined that ouch a waiver of the foo io in the boot overall interests of the HRA and/or the City of Monticello. Adopted this day of , 1983. Chair, Housing and Redevelopment Authority City Administrator Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Moaticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority hap been properly called for by two members and will be held at 7,00 P.M. on Wednesday, June 22, 1983, in the City Council Chambers. The only item of business before the NRR will be consideration of a development proposal by Mr. James Powers and a request to assist said proposal using Tax Increment Financing. Notice given this 20th day of Juno, 1983. City Administrator y */we, L (3— a ( I SC -1 R () ? e C1,0 V, C VO ' `a ; / of the Monticello Mousing and Redevelopment A'uth'ority do hereby call a Special beating of said Authority on WQ-�, the i- day of 1981, at 9 o'clock I.s. at City Ball. Signed this _J.�Ay of Ct'tti%.c L.6WJ7- �I�ch���J' Hsme , 1981. T(L/ Naso / \ J Slgneture On this day of , JA- A)P. , 1981, I have received a duly executed request for a Special geeting of the Nnnticallo Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 1 City Administrator MINUTES i HOUSING i REDEVEMPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING June 1, 19E3 - 7:30 P.M. The regularly scheduled meeting of the Monticello Housing and Rede- velopment Authority was duly held at 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, June 1, 1983 in the City Hall. Members present were Chairperson Phil White, Don Cochran, Bud Schrupp, Vic Vokaty. Member absent was Jack Reeve. The meeting was called to order by the chair. Eidem explained to the Authority that for reasons unknown the minutes of the April 6, 1983 HRA Fleeting were missing. He noted that the proposed business for the April 6th, 1983 meeting was, at the time of the meeting, deleted from the agenda and that the meeting was primarily a discussion session and a determination to invite the Council to attend a meeting in the near future in order to discuss priority of development. All members present recalled the meeting and agreed by consensus that they would acknowledge the existence of the meeting in the absence of the formal written minutes. Eidem also explained the reason for the cancellation of the meeting in May and hoped that the amount of business that had to wait could be now picked up in the next couple of meetings. Discussion began concerning Late 13 and ld and Lot 15, leas the southerly 15 feet in C Block 51, which the City has an option upon from the Monticello Development Corporation. An option has further boon extended to the HRA and the HM has extended to Mr. Joe Pochler an option con- tingent upon successful financing from the Farmers Home Administra- tion. Eidem noted that this issue could be seen as closely related to a request by Mr. Poehler for an extension of his original option which expired May gth, 1883. Eiden explained that the bank was willing to extend the original mortgage amount of $35,000 so long as the interest that was accruing would be paid at the and of each six month term. He noted that it was the City's obligation to PAY that interest, but when and if the HRA elected to outright purchase the property, they would be faced with not only the mortgage amount but also with the original option amount of approximately $6,700 and each additional interest payment that the City would have to make in the interim. Some discussion followed relating to whut.her or not the HRA should purchase outright the land and clear away all of the early options. Cidem auggooted that there miqht be a possibility of simply transferring t Mi title and the name on the mortgage to the 11RA, thereby elimi- nating the Development Corporation and the City from the arrange- ment as it now otandc. Several members expressed come concerr about the payment of closing costa and would such an expense be ' needed. Prior to any action being taken, the discussion shifted to the letter from Poshlor explaining that the project and the L -1- 0 I NRA Minutes - 6/1/83 proposed site had been tentatively approved by Farmer's Hose Admin- istration, but that funding may not be forthcoming until July as a result of the recent opening of the Big Lake Farmer's Home Admin- istration. His letter had requested an option of an additional six months so that he may continue to pursue the funding cycle. A motion by Cochran, seconded by Vokaty and carried unanimously to extend the option to Joe Poehler until August 9th, 1983, or if required by Farmer's Home Administration to November 9th, 1983. A motion by Schrupp, seconded by Cochran and carried unanimously to exercise the HRA's right to extend for six months the option on Lots 13, 14 and Lot 15, less the southerly 15 feet in Block 51. Eidem raised the issue concerning Lot 5 and 6, Block 3 in Oakwood Industrial Park which the LLRA agreed to acquire an option on, on behalf of IXI Laboratories. He noted that IXI expansion was pro- ceeding ahead of schedule and further that the development agree- ment executed between the HRA and IXI stated that the HRA would secure such am option. Eidem noted that the original negotiations had broken down at about Christmas time and were now being rein- troduced. He explained to the Hoard that the breakdown had to do with the option fee and that the owners of the Oakwood property hoped to secure a payment annually that would cover taxes, interest, po nalty and penalty that was still accruing on earlier delinquencies. ILo pointed out that hie original objection during the negotiation was to paying the penalty on those assessments and taxes that ware already delinquent at the time of the negotiation. No said that at that time he did not think it was in the beat interest of the HRA to pay fees for a predicament that the property owners had gotten into quite independent of HRA negotiations. Cochran spoke very strongly in favor of this position, however, noting that. the HRA was bound by the developers agreement to arrive at something. Without appropriate facts and figures at hand, tho figure of $2,500 was thrown as the maximum amount it might cost the HRA annually to retain such an option. Member Schrupp spoke strongly in favor of paying the option fee it absolutely necessary in order to honor the agreement and committment with IXI. By consensus, Eides was directed to reopen negotiations on the sale/option of I,ot 5 and 6. Block 3, Oakwood Industrial, and report the results to the membership at the noxt meeting. In other busineas, eidom reported to the Authority en a pro- liminary design for a project to accoamodato the parking noodo for the proposed building by Motcalf and laroon. He noted that the Planning Commission had reviewed thin project and had sent it back to staff for review and recommendation. In the course of staff discussion, a major development proposal in- volving the entire oouth half of Block 50 was developed. Eidem 1 said he talked with Metcalf and [arson about the poaaibility and the working details aro buinq pursued. The Authority 07 MINUTES IIOUSINC 6 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETIM; JULY 15,1983 - 7:00 A.M. l� A special meeting for the Monticello Housing 6 Redevelopment Authority, being properly called was duly held at 7:00 A.M. on Friday, July 15, IQ8i, at Perkins. Member present were Chairperson White, Vokaty, Reeve, Schrupp, and Cochran. Alva present were, Tom Eidem, City Administrator, and Allen Pelvit, Director of Economic Development. The special meeting was callod to o,d.•r by the chair, and asked Eidem to give his findings for the Powers Lind acquisition costs. Springstead quoted Eidem a 9.1 rate for 9; years. Using thin rate Lite Ave. Annual Debt would be $70,600. Increment $'17,.165, n•;.ull int; in a Bond Issue of $167,000. This is $IU,OUI) under tht• prvposal. Eiden sum;4t•e.ted that $10,000 should be paid up- front and held in osetow. Also, to obtain a -,-ru balance a total of $15,060 would bt• needed. Lidera also sugro:eted that Powers be charged a $2,500 service charge, and the remaining $2,500 l..• added to the $IU,000 to pay for land acqui sition ousts and give a zero balance. 'lite $I'1,5U0 is to cover the costs of interest etc,. The $2,500 is a service charge for city expenses. The Author- ity calculated the 21 or $2,500 method as f,tlltw s: $149,000-$12,500=$I30,0tA) multiplied by 2%, ($136,000x.U2-$2,73U) The Authority decided to us.• the lesser amount of $2,500 in this cave. The Authority, as a whole, is in agreement that the total of $15,000 is not unreasonable and that Ibwt•ts knew he had to pay some out of pucker mutii.:s upfront. Eidem suggested the Authority has other obligations in the community, uthvr than obtaining land for this reason. Eidem also suggested that the Author- ity not end with a aero balance .vorytime. ` Because of the Estimate of Indebtedness section the amount is now $167,000, instead of $177,000. Thin remainder of the sections aro the same except for filling in the blanks with the $12,500, and $2,500. Eidem, again confirmed that the Wright Conty Bank will provide n Certi- fication and will hold in their purtlolio. 77me bunds will sell anytime after July 25, 1987. (if approved at the City Coucil Public meeting.) Motion to accept the land coat sal, by Selu•upp, 2nd by It .... ve. Voted on 6 passed. Another mution to ace.•pl R.•nnl(itlnn A 'l. by Cochran, 2nd by Sehrup. Voted on and pained. Isidem will gmv.• c„pien of the proposal to Lite eormncil prior t.t the Jaly '!6,lyR'1 meetin•, tom their review. The IIRA will have a rqp reicOlntive ..t ti en,u.iI mt•.mnn Iv4ddie 16.0ring) lam file at Monticello Cily Mall). There being it., ulh •m l.ngi.i, ,& t:hmirp, r mem Whmte adjourned the meeting. a Allen L. Polvit Director of Economic Development RESOLUTION ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT FINANCE PIAN 02 t_ HRA 1983 - 02 WHEREAS, the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) has passed a resolution adopting a redevelopment plan known as the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan, ends WHEREAS, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan in part, states objectives for economic development to wit, land acquisition as an incentive to private enterprise, ands WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, the City of Monticello is authorized to establish a tax increment econcmic development district, ands WHEREAS, a development agreement for economic development shall Ix: entered into between the Monticello Huusiml and Redevelopment Authority and Powor's Strength and Health Club, the developer. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by eho noucing aed nodevelop- mcnt Authority for thr. City of Moeticellos I. the tax incruniont !rrnamiu devrlo1,mnt finance plan relatnW to t•uc increment district 42 he, and the same hereby is, adopted. 2. The City Administrator transmit copies of said plan to the City Council with a request for a public hearing, to tho Superintendent of Schools of School Dibtrict 1882 and to the County Auditor of Wright County with a request fot comment. 3. Upon the holding of a public hearing, foto 1. 2. 5 and 6 in Block 1 of CM=tCial Overt and lots 1. 2 and 3 in Block 1 of Cosmorcial Plaza 25 be cortifiod to the County Auditor of Wright County, State of Minnesota, as Manticollo tax incremont district 12. 1, Adopted this 13th day of July, 1983. I4Whiw�haiatto. t91air ATTWTi �!- ' 1iociao A. F.ld�,n City lvlminletrutor / - NESCU1TiON ADOPTIN, %10.4TICELLO TAX IIICRFII:'NT DISTRICT 02 WnREAS, the Monticello Housing s Redevelopment Authority pursuant to a resolution passed the 15th day of July, 1983, has adopted the Monticello Tax Increment District #2 and accompanying finance plan, (A copy of which is attached hereto) and; NIMRFAS, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan in part, states objectives for economic development, to wit, land acquisition as an incentive to private enterprise, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, the City of Monticello is authorized to establish a tax increment economic development finance plan, and$ WHEREAS, a development agreement for economic development has been entered into between the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Auth- ority and Power's Strength and Health and Club, the developer, and$ MHERFJIS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 273, a public hearing was duly held an July 25th, 1983, at which hearing all persons interest- ed in making comment were allowed to make said convent, ands 1 WtMREAS, the City Adminintrator has submitted to the Superintendent School District 0882 and the Auditor of Wright County, a copy of such plan as required by taw. NOW T11f.REFORr.., HE 1T HELEBY RMSOLVI:D by the City Council of the City Council of the City of Monticello thate 1. The tax increment economic finance plan known as Monticello Tae Increment District 02 Finance Plan e, and the same hereby is adopted. 2. The City Administrator is directed to transmit a copy of said plan to the Auditor of Wrinht Ccuenty for certification. 3. The Monticello 11ouoing and Rmdoveloimcnt Authority im hereby authorized to losuo bunds in lho amount of 0167,000 for the purpose of carrying out tho tae incrouwnt finance plan. Adopted this 25th day of July. 11181. Arvo A. Grim&mo, Mayor ATTEST& 71tomau A. 11likm City AdminiA r Council Agenda - 7/25/83 6. Final Consideration of Rehabilitation of Pedestrian Lightirq on the Mississippi River Bridqe. (J.S.) As you know I polled the Council on this item at Tom's request, as Tom did not wish to see it on another agenda and would rather see the project dropped. As you know we have been trying to get in touch with Dave Hoskin to obtain a quote from him since we first asked him for one on Jun 28th. He would not return calls and we could not reach him. He did, however, deliver a quote to City Hall late Thursday which I received Friday morning. His quote is for $1,650 for the 4 fixtures and $1,985 if 5 fixtures are needed. Dick Oslund from Double "D" Electric stopped in Friday morning and said he may be able to have his quote in by Monday. As you may remember, Olson's quote wan for $1,864.80 for 4 fixtures or $2,180.80 for 5 fixtures. This is $195.80 to $214.80 over Haskin's quote. I have about exhausted any further discussion on this matter. My recommendation? Do it or don't, do it but don't, put it on another agenda. - 3 - Comments from Tam Eidem on Bridqe Liahting Situation. At the last meeting, the action you took was to delay a decision until John Simola returned from his vacation. At that time we had only one bidder who met the deadline that we had stipulated for bidders. Even at that time, if you will recall, had we re- ceived other bids, I would have heartedly recommended that we discard all bids and begin again, since the one bid had been published in advance in the paper. As I sea it, the only decision that needed to be made after the last meeting was shall we do the project or shall we not. We knew what the cost would be if we elected to do it. When John returned, I asked him to simply ask everyone whether or not they were in favor of pursuing the project. If, based upon the sole bid, the majority of people were opposed to the project, then the proposal would die a quiet death and not appear on the agenda again. If, however, the majority of people were in favor of pursuing the project, we would put it on the agenda for authorization of the expenditure. As it has turned out, after the closing of bids, we have been presented with two more bids, both of which I consider to be invalid since the first bid was published. I think to award the job to a bidder loan than that which was published would be highly unfair, and perhaps even legally irresponsible. I think at this point it would be unwise to pursue the project any longer unless we intend to invite sealed bids for a future decision. For us to go out and pursue bids after the bids closing date becauso the first one did not appeal to un, I think is somewhat unethical in a professional business sense. If we wore dissatisfied with the solo bid, than that bid should have boon rejected and now bids invited. We should not extend the bidding deadline in order to secure added bids. The other contractors ware invited to submit a bid, they chose not to, therefore, in my estimation, they should not be considered for the job. I think it is boat for the City at this time to simply abandon the project for this particular y construction season and perhaps reinvestigate the entire matter from a now perspective next winter or very early eF.ring. V Council Agenda - 7/25/83 7. Consideration of a Resolution to Continue the Cable Franchisinq Process. (T.E.) The Minnesota Cable Communication's Board requires that each City participating in a joint powers agreement adopt a resolution stating the advisability of continuing on with the franchising process. It also relates to a needs assessment which was done soma time ago by Cary. The needs assessment has evolved under State guidelines to a system wherein community loaders made the determination that cable can provide services that are determined to be desirable and in some cases needed. No longer is a com- munity forced to go to a household by household survey. This resolution states simply that in the opinion of the community leaders the franchising process should be continued so as to ultimately provide cable to the community and the school. The Joint Cable Cott®ission to this point has met on a regular basis every two weeks and have discussed basic policy decision and the formulation of the Request For Proposal (RIP)• Our legal counsel is currently forming all that information into the final document. This final document will be submitted to each of you for review prior to going to the bidding process. There are currently 10 communities involved in the joint powers agreement. Other cities may be added before the cable service territory is deemod complete by the State. our commission has requested that all affected school districts form their own advisory group and son.i a representative to our commission meetings co an to provide comment and opinion from the school district'n point of view. I think there is unanimous con- sent that the putential of cable far out weighs its current offering. Tnot is tc -.lay the educational and institutional uses which are now developing are for greater than the notion of recuiviny pito and 24 hour nin-rl.'a programming, for iuotanco. Our projected timetable is that the RFP be submitted to bidders in the early fall with bids and contract negotiations and franchising occurring over the winter months. Actual con- otruction of the system would than begin by next spring end may take as long as a year, year and a half to complete. R]TERENCESs A copy of tho resolution to be adopted. :C ./ RESOLUTION DETERMINING TUE ADVISABILITY F`14 OF CONTINUING 11111 h'RANCII1::1141: PI(0C1;:::i WHEREAS, the City of Monticello in included in an approved cable service territory which includes 10 other cities in Sherburne and Wright County, and; WHEREAS, the City of Monticello shall be the franchising authority for the cable system to be installed within its corporate boundaries, and; WHEREAS, the City Council has been informed and will continue to be informed about cable communications by its representatives to the Sherburne Wright Counties Cable Communications Commission (SWC4), and; WHEREAS, the City of Monticello has assessed the communication needs of the persons residing within the City of Monticello, and; WHEREAS, the summary of the needs assessments of the City of Monticello is publicly available from the City, and; WHEREAS, the needs assessments indicates certain cable cowuni- cation needs of the citizens of Monticello which would be satisfied ! by a cable communications system. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY T1117 MCN;TICf:1110 CITY COUNCIL that. it is advisable at this time to co;ltirwc the franchisi:q prccoua through participation in the SWC4. Adopted this day of 1983. ATTEST; Thomas A. Eiden City Administrator Arve A. Grimsmo Mayor 0 1 Council Agenda - 7/25/83 8. Consideration and Evaluation of the Conduct of the Monticello Jaycee Circus and tho Subsequent Waiver of the Fee. (T.E.). At the June 27th meeting, you stipulated that a representative of the Jaycees should return after they had held the circus. There was considerable discussion at that time and concern expressed over proper parking. The Jaycees also requested that the traveling show fee be waived for their non-profit organisation. Ultimately, the decision that was reached was one of "we will evaluate your performance after the fact and at such time determine whether or not to waive the fee*. As of this writing, of course, the circus has not yet been hold. I encourage however many of you who wish, to observe the final results of circus day. If you are satisfied that the Jaycees put forth enough effort to accommodate the traffic and parking needs as wall as monitoring the overall circus operation, then we can simply return the check that they submitted to us for the license fee. - 5 Council Agenda - 7/25/83 9. Consideration of a Request to Pclinyuish an Easement for Street Purposes - Dale l.ungwitz, (.bkwocd industrial Park. M E. In September of 1977, the Oakwood Industrial Park partnership granted to the City an easement which runs over the northerly 40 feet of the north half of Lot 4 in Oakwood Industrial Park, the easement being permanent for roadway and utility purposes. The north half of lot 4 now is up for sale to an industrial developer from Willmar. The individual hopes to set up a plant to manufacture acetylene gas and is apparently very interested in this particular lot. He is however concerned with meeting all of the setback requirements and having expansion room for the future. The main concern is whether or not to begin to measure the side yard setback limitations from the south line of the 40 foot easement or from the north property lino which is also the north line of the 40 foot casement. At this point, it is staff's interpretation that there Doing a roadway easement the setback would have to be figured from the southerly line of that roadway casement. If, however, the roadway portion of the casement were lifted (or adjusted) the setback would actually go from the line which is 40 feet north of that point. won though the developer could not build any kind of a structure over or on top of that easement, it would help him moot all the zoning requirements as wall as the statutory requirements for his particular busi- noes. Dale laingwitz has indicated to me thatnone of the Oakwood Partnership can recall why a roadway casement would have been provided for. They clearly recall that the easement wan negotiated, and it is their recollection that it was for utility purponcol they speculate that the roadway casement was more of an error rather than a negotiated point. An such, Dale will be prouent requeetinq that the easement only for roadway purposco be lifted. Staff has diacusned thio and Jobui Slmola fools that it would not he beneficial to give up the easement now that we have it. lis fools that no Int 5 develops into a well field, which it probably will, having roar access to cur property would be a benefit to the City. Ono simple benefit would be the lessor coot of constructing the access along this oaacment to the northerly and of the lot as cyn+oaod to constructing a driveway all the way to the north end of the lot from Chelara. It'ooieply a matter of being a ohortor diotanco and thuu a cheaper project. John also pointed out the south half of the 40 foot easement is a drainage ditch that in quite deep. Thio ditch drains moat of lhomao Park and for thio particular ditch to over be filled or used, the person intending to use - 6 - Council Agenda - 7/25/83 r it would have to put in an 18 or 24 inch storm scror which could be very costly. Hance, the only roadway space that is developable would be the northerly 20 feet of the 40 foot easement. Sam0 other considerations: This is not a dedicated street, but rather an easement for roadway purposeal we do not have a similar 40 foot easement over the property abutting on the north, and thus, we do not the 80 foot required'street.areai even if we had the full 80 foot dedicated street through these parcels, development would be highly improbable since the physical extention of the street would run directly into the freeways development also would be highly unlikely due to the existence of the drainage ditch and the considerable expense it would require to construct a storm sower system in order to allow a developed street over the top. I have consulted with Gary Pringle on this matter, and because Jt is an easement, it the Council elects to lift or altor said easement, a simple motion will suffice. Not being a dedicated atroet, the City would not be required to go through the formal vacation process. One solution we have considered that we think �.' will accommodate all partiea concerned would be to simply insert the word "private" in front of roadway. If necessary, we could change the word roadway to driveway. This adjustment would eliminate any question of the property in question as being a street and thus allow the land to be uaeablu with respect to toning setback requirements, but would atilt provide the City as the owner of Lot 5 accoas to ita property. A variation of this alternative would be to retain the 40 foot underground utility easement but amend the roadway casement to be effective only for the northerly 20 feat of the 40 foot encement. I would also like to point out that the notion of building a street through hero really servos no function. There is no land that would be served by that particular street. Tbo parcel abutting to the north has access from Thomas park Drive and lot 6 of Oakwood has access from both Industrial Drive and Cholsea Our lot, Lot S. has access from Choloca so that the roar access is eoloy for our convenience and not really for public benefit. ALTERNATIVE ACTION& 1. Deny any alterations to the canement - Thi&& may effect thu final duc inion& of thu duvelopor to lecatu his plant in Monticello. Ila to lntorented in this local., because a by produ.a of his pntu:u can be uued by N811. The other aito Im may tx) conr,ldor&n�i In in Becker. MAC Council Agenda - 7/25/83 Our information indicates that his business may be a rapid growth business, and we would hope to have him select Monticello. 2. Alter the casement to provide private access to the rear of Lot 5 - This would allow full utilization of Lot 4 by the developer, but would still provide us with a con- venient access, in the event that we ever need it, to our property. Because of the substantial ditch, we can be pretty sure that he will never wish to build that far to the north. 3. Suspend the roadway easement completely - This would still provide us with underground utility easement, but would eliminate Lila convenience of a rear access to our property. F:f:COHMENOED ACTION: I recommend that we negotiate an altered roadway casement providing the City with private access to Lot 5. This strikes me to be the most equitable position for all parties concerned. My inclination is to stipulate that the under- ground utility will remain at 40 foot and the private drive- way casement will be rostricted to tho north half of the 40 foot easement or the northerly 20 foot whichever would be the appropriate wording. REFERENCES& A copy of the original easement, a map indicating the cite and the parcel in question. -a- Foes No. Llai ,,... �. t•...r�,�..j ��`rrriar`,o w'�iy Us 31*109t. red. th. M day I 5%taabor . 1Y71 hsaaaaa ONomd rri—nir'al Park. a gen al puttzerd4 under the love, 'if than State of 10ftwoots of As Congo of Itrlot rrwd swu o/ Klnneeote Party. of As 10 pest, and The City of ibnticallo, a amlclpal aamponatiora undo &U ince of elle Steep at Minnesota . Party of the and past. !1laaaat4, ffat to aatd party of t4 prd rust in wasideeatiow of Ma auw of .0as Dollar trod other good tad ralua0le canr'•erstion Donalims{ to it in hand paid by CAr said party of th. --.d ptrt, fhr renipl wph.,waf L Araby adraarindfad, de as Aoney Orwnt, Bargain, Quitclaim, and Conies unto the add parte, of Cho aatad part, its acwaaws and aalfar, ►aurae,, all the trod or par—r of rand lylnf and Wail PAR ldiicA Ba000a1t iq nId it b.rr aJ .Minwrota. Sia nf+d as fallen, tow+b No lat 4. Block 1, Oakrood 1n,Ltotrial Park, according to the plat on file in the office of the 0ounty Recorder, bright Ootnty. Mzuwaaota. A pwoverient easement for roadway and utility see over, under and across the northerly 40.00 feet of the northerl of Lot 4. Together with a 40 foot permanent eaeemmit over, under, aid across the westerly 140.00 feet of said northerly } of Lot 4. No state deed tax - tax exempt Me thacf ane to Bo1A rbt Sault in Qranmonr [6htrrol. ., I •y •I ...,,r r„ a r.•"..,•, r., r rte I i / •n . B. Phillip Partner for Oakwood Industrial Park MO ADMQJWVMA M e� 0. 8. rhulftwkr II:IM• btAodmi___ ®�ww�i�t GOt� � ��L% _ �_�•��R� IaMt IMI SUM" WAS DSAIRD by "• .• •••• Qw7 Vlobar _ - -- I I ' I ty if wcticsuo I YY. N M'f'g• 1 cel 1u1 eM. ;Sidi: I I �o se C IO L I r PARK I OMA ~ - -- PARK i 4e � Zr�J..•«� � u�...�� faftwru' i I ! •Iuw MIG. C' pESEgvUllt s I CINE SEBA RD. i � u Council ,agenda - 7/2;/83 10. Consideration of Revisinq the City's License/Fee Schedule. (T.E.) Not long ago we renewed liquor and beer licenses throughout the City and at that time we discussed the possibility of increasing the rates. I think it would be best, if we are going to increase the rates, to increase them now and send notice to all license holders so that they have nearly one year to prepare for the new fees. Also, rather than adjusting only the beer and liquor licenses, we reviewed all of the license fees and made adjust- ments whereever it seemed appropriate. The City's ordinance code, in its text, refers to fees which will bo set from time to time by the Council. Hence, a simple resolution adopting the fees will suffice rather than the need to go through ordinance amendments for every item. The resolution is then attached as a part of the ordinance code. The one license that stands in question is that relating to transient merchants. Currently, we have a $2.00 application charge plus a $50.00 per day fee, which the City can waive for non-profit organization. 1 presume that we have this rather substantial fee for the purpose of discouraging transient merchants. Iiowever, in a technical sene:e anyone who acts up a stand becomes a tranniont merchant oxcludinq garage salus ar,d auctions. tel Wolter's inquiry into a flea market raised the entiro queution of transient morchant. The Planning Canmisnion is going to hold a public hearing an a proposed zoning nrdinm,ce amendment which would allow flea markets as a conditional ore in some particular zone. If that amendment In passed, any person who participates will still be subject to the transient merchant regulations. Ono alternative hero would be to charge the flea market operator a act fee per broth or vendor within his flea market. That would be a feu that would be incorporated into the zoning ordinance and only referred to in the resolution and fee schodulo. Tito problem that arises is that if the floa market ordinance is not adopted, what then do we charge for people who wish to just act up to loll their crafts or other goods. In a technical sense, our curront transient merchant ordinance would require that each vendor who participates in the various mall shown should be paying the transient merchant foo. Because thio is kind of a sticky problem, and I think it needs further study, especially since it dopondn upon t:ho decision of the Planning Csamiseion (and ultimately the City Council) concerning the otatun of like proposed ordinance amendment, I am suggesting that the fen stand an iu for the time being. If there in a radical change in the ordinance or a genuine demand to occamnodato a few 1N oplu who wish to act up on vacant lattd, then we will proceed to adopt an appropriate Council Agenda - 7/25/83 fee schedule. REFEREHCESt A copy of the proposed new fee schedule with comparison to the existing fee schedule. - lU CITY OF AiTICELLO Effective September 1, �3 FEE SCHEDULE CURRENT PROPOSED 3.2 Beer, On-Sale S 220/yr S 245/yr 3.2 Beer, Off-Sale 33/yr 500/yr P F� Liquur, On-Sale 3,000/yr 3,300/yr 0- Liquor, Sunday Sales 100/yr 100/yr (Statutory Limit) Liquor, Club 220/yr 300/yr (Statutory Limit) L:juur• Set-ups 220/yr 250/yr 1i#*#in.•.ua:rov#d#Yh*f ftrdddlf�fiif*MHR#'1\**i'Ff*fff*ff**♦f**f/f 3d33#'i#O*#h#�N Of***#HtfHfi R�►f*ff�WfN*•Yi*Mf*fffff#lf *•i-l. a Ncving Buildings 75 + expense., SAME Cuudittonal Use Permit 75 SAME Svtha,k Variance 25 SAME All ether Variances 75 SAME k"2,,ning Request 75 5 100 + necessary consulting enp. ,o. w.ii!dinF inspection - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - -25 for let two hours, 515/hr town-p,rmit related) thereafter Lingo•- - - - - - - - - 50/yr for "-re than 5 events - - - 75/yr for more than � events No fee fet 1• than 5 events 20/yr for 5 or less events .raveling Shows-- - - - •- - - - 100/first. Any �,Uidav thereaftor - - -SAME P,( Li.ense - - - •- - - - - -10. nne ti.,., ... ,: p.t .- - - - - SAME DcF Impoundment let occurence 10 3.SU/da_+ 12.50 + 4.00/day 2nd occurence 20 • 3.5U/da: 25.00 + 4.00/day 3rd occurence 30 3.50/ i} 35.00 • 4.00/day Sew.•r )look-up, Residential 100 SAME Swer (look-up, Petit 10/inbpcction SAME Water shut-off, then turned on 15 + delinqu,•t, y SAME txcavation Permit - - - - - - -10/permit - - - - - SAME Street Vacation- - - - - - - - - 50 deposit, fee .hall be tutal SAME cost incur•eJ by the City Transient Merchant .- - - - - - - - 2.00 application tee + 50/day - - - SAME - Scavenip.r _ - _ _ - - - - 50.00(0n,- tine f,c)- - - - _SAME • Water Nook-up, Residential 40 • City Cuut 50 • Material Coot Council Agenda - 7/25/83 11. Consideration of an Application for a 3.2 Beer On -Sale License St. Henry's Catholic Church, Fall Festival. (R.W.) As in the past years, St. Henry's Catholic Church is requesting a one day 3.2 beer license for their annual church fall festival scheduled for September 18, 1983. PJULIBLE ACTION: G-nuideration of approving issuing the one day license cantit.gent upon proper insurance coverage being provided. N Council Agenda - 7/25/83 12. Consideration of an Appointment of a Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator. (J.S.). The applications for Wastewater operator closed on July 12, 1983. We received 25 applications as of that date. Eight (8) applicants are from Monticello, eight (8) are from the nearby surrounding areas and the remaining nine (9) are from the Twin cities or out state area. We have selected five individuals for interviews that have some previous wastewater experience and who now hold a Class "D' or 'C" wastewater operator's license. Two of these individuals are or have been temporary City of Monticello employees. The other three are from the out state area. The interviews will be conducted on Friday and Monday. We (Tom, Al and myself) will mike a recommendation to the Council at Monday night's meeting. - 12 - k Council Agenda - 7/25/83 13. Consideration of an Initiating a Permanent Clerical Position in City Hall. (T.E.). At the July 11th meeting, I requee:ted that this item be postponed largely because we were unable to assemble the required material for your review. I was only half joking when I stated that wu simply didn't have the time and I rest my case. In the pre- paration of the formal job description that we are proposing, I requested that Rick address ammo of the specific provisions that would be required of such a position since he could more accurately address what precisely has to be done. It is in fact true that lack pimply did not have the time to got to working on a Jew e. mcrirtion. I could have made the time to write the entire j.ib description, but it is my opinion that it is absolutely critical that kick be involved in the design of such a position that will work so closely with him. In assembling supporting data to show the need for this position, we sometimes arrive at rather chaotic type of a presentation. Ono example of our being short handed has to do with the ro- assessment of the 1978 project. This reassessment has not gone one atop further than the action taken by the Council at the meeting where all of the details wore agreed upon. This typo of an unexpected, special project, will require submtantial f time commitment, and neither Rick nor I aro able to simply suspend our other duties in order to go to work on this particular project. Granted, this project is only a temporary work overload, but it is an example of how under staffed we aro when we aro faced with a necessity of unexpected projects. Another temporary work overload is the revision of our entire filing system. As a result of our Wastewater Treatment Plant grant, we will be required to sot up a totally independent filing system that holds every document related to that project. o8M will be transferring to us all of their related eoeumante and that takes up, so I understand, throe full filing cabinets. Those records have to be filed to suit the Federal Agencies and bo made available for the next several years upon their requoot. Our regular City filing is in drastic need of revision and cleaning. In order for us to properly rofile and, perhaps, destroy unnucoaoary records, we are required to take a comylnto inventory of all documcnto and submit to the winneoota Historical soctuty before receiving pormiasion to destroy un- necessary dmnumnto. Wh.tln ouch a project is temporary, my boat ustlmatu Wood on other cities wluo have gone through this pro- , eoduro, the opuration cuuld take up to a year. Mother matter of cuncorn in the poucibility that the Director of Economic Devolopoont become a pormanontly financed position. Getting aside, for Cho time being, the question of how hia position might be financed, if it is financed, came clerical help will be required. Currontly, Harlon takoo caro of all -13 - Council Agenda - 7/25/83 correspondence for Rick, Gary, John Simola and myself. She is also responsible for agenda preparation for the Council, the Planning Commission, the HRA and the Business and Industry Committee. She also spends anywhere from 2 to 4 hours daily assistiny with deputy registrar duties. She is responsible for all budget preparation, as well, that is to say, the typing and preparation of the work sheets, compiling all data for those work sheets, typing and compilation of the preliminary budget document, editing and revising, and preparation of the final budget document. With respect to the new position, I have requested that the other office employees estimate the amount of hours in any given work day the new position might devote to particular tasks. Diane has estimated, and Marlene and Lynnoa have confirmed., that the average daily work load for filing reports for the deputy registrar department would be approximately 3 hours. I must emphauizo that this is an average. Soma days may be slightly greater, some slower days would be less. On sumo very slow customer days. Diane would be able to keep up with the reports herself. In talking with Lynnea, she felt that this person would put in approximately an hour a day being involved with City payroll and utility collection and billings. Again, I emphasize that this is determined to be an average figure. The parson would not necessarily put in an hour a day every day. Likewise, in speaking with Rick and Marlene, we figure that it would be an average of about 1 hour a day working on Rick's corraspondonco and financial report, that in, just the typing and mailing of corroopondanco and reports. Lastly, in dincusning with Rick the actual bookkeeping duties, he thinks that it would be easy to average out to at least 3 hours a day doing just that typo of work. As he in- dicatcd hu han more than enough to keep him busy right now and he upoendn moot of No time doing the actual bookkeeping, again, coding vouchers for the budyot, preparing checks, and the other duties have their peak periods and low periods so we aro using an average figure. To further illustrate the need, Rick's vacation record indicates that he has accumulated nearly 8 wooku of vacation. lie has not taken his vacation in many instances simply because the work would continuo to pilo up on hie dock.. As he stated he could take two or throe weeks off at a time, rather than one week, but that would only mean the pilo would be higher on his dock when he got back. I should also note that our auditors have recommended that a separate party be able to assume the bookkeeping rolou in Rick's absence. I do not moan to play down the importance of thin recommendation. I simply don't think It needs a lengthy discunsionp I do, how- ever, think it is very important. - 14 - Council Agenda 7/25/83 Another point, perhaps of limited importance, is that Rick has virtually no time to read professional journals, attend work sessions, or participate in professional organizations. This simply means that he is not really improving at his job. He Is simply going an in continuing to do the tasks the way he always done them. He has no opportunity to improve his skills and thus, improve the City's financial record keeping. With respect to Diane's service as deputy registrar, we have discovered that in 1983 she is consistently two to four reports behii.d. In some cases, when the reports gettoo far behind, she will take work home. In 1982, Diane worked overtime at home a total of 45 hours filing juut reports. So far in 1983, she already hes acquired 43 hours of oveatima. I should note that these are actual ovortime hours when she takeo reports hone and does not reflect time she spondee here in the City Hall when she will stay a half hour to 45 minutes lata (after the door is locked) to complete the day's work. I think one other labor aspect should he considered briefly, that being the eminent appointment of Gary as our City Assessor. This will certainly require some correspondence and additional clerical assistance on his behalf. nasically, all of the duties that are building up will have to be reassigned, and at this point, we simply do not have an adequate amount of poruonnel to assign all those duties. I think the above data adequately substantiates over request. to create a now clerical position for City Hall. I have fully taken into consideration that sumo of the projacte listed are of a somewhat temporary nature, but I conclude two things from thate Ona, spacial, unexpected projocts may occur on a regular basis. Two, if when the unexpected projects diminish or cease all together and we can no longer supply 40 houru worth of labor for this person, hours would have to be trimmed back to the necessary level. Thu nuidUun of lrluwinq hours, in not difficult and is considered on a regular basis when work load seems to be down. Thia clarical position would not be union and thus would not bu quarantoed a 40 hour work week by labor contract. 71w ouccouuful applicant would simply have to be made aware of that fact. hinally, thcuo aro tho haoic salary/financial conniderations. Thi I.reimot na3ory runqu for a utartinq clerical position is '05.60 per hour -16.u6 por 1x+ur. If we uhould hire someone relatively law in experience, such that the person would txtgin at the bottcmi ,end of the salary nealue tho i1ritnu City exponoo would be 614,796.00. Unto includes employer's Ohara of VM, social security and employee innuraneo. If we hiro a parson who is aubstantially skilled and wo place that peroon at the tap of the pay scala, the gross outlay from tho City would be 415,973. -ls- Council Agenda - 7/25/83 Because we already have adequate space, furniture and equipment, I do not foresee any capital cost related to establishing this position. REFERENCE: Copy of tho proposed job description. - 16 - M of DKKt:F.P6A/A6t:RF ,ccountab. tot Finance Dire, r/Aust. admin. Primary Responsibilitip This position is raspcmeiblo for the keeping of the financial records for the city. Will include recorciling liquor and general bank statements; payroll assistancrr additional duties as may, frml time to time, be assigned by the Finance Director, City lvlministrator or City Council. Additional duties will include typing, filing, reception, telephone for the Finance Director/Asuistant Administrator. This person will also be responu;ble for acquiring a workinq knowledge of the duties of the Ilepury Pewliutrar with the exlross intent to asci:,t in thnsc dutiou during peak periods and during the absonce of other ,haft Ila•mlKra. Sime additicmal restmn^ibility will 1. lu Lu aro,, cd ul,llt; billing and I'aymrnt c1,111•c111.11. pal t,. At, I:: A :rumor illi Tcrlt, n•t 111 rim, ly Pr'•par.lri•al .a /.•I+al•. anll aa•.npmn•ut.:. - t:nuwleap: of •tunut 11 ,wc•,writinq pnnclplet: - Verification and clxlinq ,1f vwchoru for all chucks - Calculate and allorate omploy-- payroll to dllpropriatu departtmmts - Prepare bank dei—sits - Timely cagtlet.tun of total 1 ul.ulcial data packet f„r submitral to CMI'lttvr Service nureau Annual budget - I;arly preparation of Ixtdlrt workuhcut:i - Aecurato pr000nt.ation of current budget data - Monitoring dopartmont heads on bud'let selladulo - Timely completion of budget docutient Annual Audit - Preparation of year end financial relwrta and work papers neceonary for audit Financial Corresilindlh'ncu L'lurival - Neat, accurate letters and M111,r rl,rr,•:.pondencu - Timely cnml I, t lull 'd u11I tr••I,,n,11, m FI_u n' I l l •:1 (, 111 t l l l u L,nnit'n"duwr UI} „','dl .Ir ••411'11 11 1"I - ,�•rlu .,I, 1 • :lel ul 1 , , ,�•'l l . u I,1 111 1 • '1P1 I 1 Ill .u•I 1, 1. 111•11uI'l-& ;�• I_ !i -'T cl- urtolxt't i%itui, 1 O'Lt it t..1 11 A turate ca;.il t 11111 I'rltlli 1, 1, "UWL.. ,••m'1, 1, 1. 1, 11 '11 Irlllll;111 Iei41 t'tU tibcervatlt ut need fill' Ln•,Llzn•t aaniotanuu GENERAL - FUND - -ILL- AMOUNT (.111:CK MN. State Treasurer - Lievrist- 1'%,L- - vi-ri 11 i-I Car) I $ J.O0 17471 MN. State Treasurer - Dep. Reg. fees1 38. Ilk)1741: Inti-irnal Revenue Service - Lvvy proc-A.,; 3151.H41/47'1 Gwors Bateman - Animal control - June 222.86 74,. R"..'t i gis" i Ill,$ - Seumsol' ."llary 17*1.#,il Amanda Chowvn - 11 1'14. b9 11411, Charles Walters 173.60 17471 Craig Kondali - 5.1.611 11478 Chris Sarvela - 53.61) 1747u Mr. Art,) ll'iss, Plaii r,vi-v lar :41W his i Wing 473.22 17481) .terry fletme:; - Janitorial at Libtjry 125.00 174HI Richard Knutson, III,'. - Payment ill - h2-2 ProjliL 119,712.97 1702 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll dod. 144.04 17485 James Prous." - Cleaning City Hall 250.00 174H4 (:orruw Sanitation - Contract payment 3,761.50 17485 MN. state rreatiurvir - Dup. RvS. fet-ti 230.0(1 17486 Mr. Arve Griallinso - Mayor salary 175.00 17487 Mr. Dan Ittonigen - Council salary 125. 00 174MM Mrs. Fran Fair - Comicil salary 125.00 17489 Mr. Ken Mauti - Council tialary1 25.0:) 7490 Mr. Jack Maxwell - Cuuncil salary 125.11 � 7491 YMCA of Millis. - Contract payin.-rit 284. 1h 174-1.1 Monticello School Diutrict - 19HI Otimm-ir recreation ps,�Iram I 10.00().00 174^1 CormLasionscr of Revenue - SWT - June I ' 338.00 t749 4 Mrs. Lucy Andrews Inf. Center salary 117.00 1749, I-Irv. Ull Schafter Inf. Center j;a1al,y I ID.ols '14'Ji- 174'9- Wright Wright County State Bank - fVl' 1 '949. 10 174-)7 MN. State Treasurer - FICA - Jun, 4,804.80 17491+ (Ven, Hati-man - Partial payment for duly animal -ioinl 1, 1741"+ voin Paul A. I..uretict, t*,-. paymi-lit ll.!ji - WW,l,l, M11. State Treasurer Pep. Rej. t I:ol3L-rt Dovdigliciater summes 134.Ho 1751,1 Amanda Cliowen 100.:4 Crai,,; Kendall . 16 . 8O 17505 Oiric OarvQlj 26.11u 1750f, Ch"irlet; Walters; 94.(m 17507 AW. 6tatc Treasurer D!I). r%L-ij. t t.cG 64.00 175011. Gwen Bagman - Animal imp. ,sil IIL:,, 150.U0 17509 State Qlatol Credit 'Inlon - Payroll dod . 144.04 1781n Jerry litirmors - JaniLarlat itt Imilaly 125.(jo 17511 ". :1. pool-M39f.ex - llunlaqe 370.00 17512 P43. ,,toLc Treavur,sr - PITA W/11 1.619.04 17513 Mrrl- LUCY "IdrCW11 - list- t701`ItVt L;,Al,lt',' 103.50 17514 Msru. W011.2 Schaflvr - Int. Center salary 1 123.75 17514 t1conah Foundry - Manhole cautingo for Wrijhtuo !,ower lino 138.58 i 17510 Bridgewatos, TeLephono - Pl,one liyqt.-n at. W. W. T. Plant 2"099.68 17517 Atlamii 14,t;t Control - (',,,ntrt,l at 341.75 17510 Local 049 - Unless dues 95.OU 17519 Star h Titibunti - WWTP ht' 114 wantcNl ail 40.40 i 17529 Dr. Joul Erickson - March - mane Vet. (cen 180.110 17521 worwiy lionland - PA,imb. for Piro Is, 1,t. rolkiII!, 6.11 175'.' BilliIIII31il- A- 111-1116tVidl lh.'V. C(ITTISTIll t, r - '41, 0. , 7,J11U.11(i 17').:1 lut. bank Mlslu. - Public activity 4,har,je 4.o(l 17524 Natitslial Lil'4, lnt,. ru. - T,.m I ph-m joli,i,ili 1.1.111 la-,p Ij ll".011 171,." Mrii. Marjorit, lkjotzke - OAA llv.ad ms-Litiq is j j". wo 17W4, Mr. Tom IJalkowuki - O&A Board metimi-, 125.11(1 175;.7 0RAI FlIk"' AMOUN I' CHECK Mr. Lorzy zn9sti -i - Ojv,,j ­jjtj 112.,t in is 1138.00 17528 2r. Franklin Dern OAA Board ri--- ,rot 75.00 1752 Mr. Nrv, i;r,m-. m, 41.1 P. tid tn.-t in,v. j 7".00 1753t, Banker'!: lal',- b: - r:L < ul .n.• 2,499.A1 17511 Pai:1 It. I.jurvnce il,�;. ul vor 1 1. il,,%!, ,.L till 'I I2jXU 175!2 Mr. Arco UrImsmo Mit-.agc L,- I %n, 23.75 175 t , Tom Eidem - Misc. miloago 51.17 17'. 0 tern Boll - Fit. 36.43 171135 Moon Motors Repair party Ent, Fit,- , 'rr,•,•• 71.In 17',3, Hanover Sand 1. Uravul - Sand for pall. 11,5,011 171,37 Phillipi* Petrolulan - Cot;, oil, repair - Svw.r/Watur IA-I-Lo. 87.12 171,34 ZLP Mf'). Co. - Supplies for S(:W,.I. 42.60 17530 Independent Uwlxr Misc. supplivo for all dqjtj. 138.33 17540 Harry's Auto Supply WWTP small tools- $85.135 - other depts. 190.49 17541 Monticello Office Products - 141ile. uupplicq for all depts. 91.86 1754 Wright Service oil - 55 gal. oil for Sever I)LpL. 201.70 17543 Water Products - 2 meters - Reittert Apt.u. 704.38 17544 Maus Foods - Supplies for all Depts. 129.00 17545 Share Corporation Weed control for parka 368.65 17546 Our Own Hardware Supplies - mower, rain suitu, tape, etc. 965.56 17547 Coast to Coast - St., Shop, Sewer, Library 104.81 1754R Lcef Bros. - Uniform rental j 124.00 17547 North Central Public Service - (:;P.wur plant - 1,168.36) 1,176.73 17550 Gordon Link - Diesel feel 490.50 17551 Monticello Ready Mix - Park supplies 513.38 17552 Monticello Times - Publishing, rtc. - June aiul duly 11011.51 17553 NaLiunal Buuhlnij - Rev. IlLvs lot plant ',715.28 728.82 17554 Biq Laku lumber - P.7(lwood lar parko I9B.91 17555 Vikinq Pip,.- Service - &-wtr roadinq 1,297.33 17556 0. K. Hardware - niuc. nap! lieu 10.52 1750 fritrc,ii Alloy-1 C,)rP. - Wol•l.iiq rods R11.23 1755H :tarc,.) Hiii,ji-ru; I 52..RB 175514 la 1-1, 1; 0. 11,1141 1751,1• 46M - �1-j 14P. to 1711e.) :,au. Tire buvicv - 1,11-j and lvjq:ir'l '4.00 17567 St. CIrKi.) P,re rqtitl7m; nt - fir,- l,xt . 13.',0 .7 :•G3 tk-lyo Pljrttcl; - S.-Wel D"I'L. 1756-1 N. S. Kmor - litilitivo 7,414.1.5 BrId,jowater TrIopliono - 111-ilit.let I 194.45 17',11 PlacWuen FAsuilluxant - SL. in.13 17!,,,7 Wright County Auditor - It poli,:L. fliioti - iijiv, 878.20 17560 Fair's Garden Center - PoplacuLivait Lte.-:i 331.91 1751,9 Fidelity Bank & Trust - Interest on 71 Water h 71. 0. (V. tondo 2,444.22 17570 Int Batik St. Paul - Tntereot on 78 0.0. bond 23,933.95 17571 Wright Coonty Sheriff - Pollre runtract payuhnil -,Tulle 9,041.98 17572 NorWevt Batik Mplit. - 70, 77, 791, 8(1, 01 1%%nkl jujincilts i, Interest 162.569.20 17571 nroun I:mjineerinq - Testill(I at Mi,adow tkik prOji-cl. 684.81) 17574 Feed Rite Controls - Potablo namplu 7.50 17575 Central NW.owan Sewrr Dept. - 359.69, St. 1:! 363.00 17576 lut Bank Mpl- . 75 HLex. b 75 G. O. lit-iol %nLurCLIt payment i 18,344.80 171,77 Sherburne (Xjunty Vquipmant - St. t.upplavu 53.60 17578 Jerry Weill - Fire vchon), In St. Clnud relml). I 36.00 17579 rquttable Life Assurance Inu. W/H 40.00 17580 CM Elovotor - PrIntr. Public Wnt4, iwpt 7.50 171,61 IlJeUfj Je - IV&; jr.''al plaiii rajah 269.0 17592 W4. Vallci T,;Linq - N-roulvr rental t,, •.c%A,t dept. 60.00 17563 C) I f:E1:t:kA1. FUND 1 udio Communications - Repairs to pagers - 391 .95, truck radios " and switching radios in truckr. Davis Electronics - Pager repairs Foster Franzen Agency - '83 Chev. van s antique policies Mr. Al Nel::on - Sub. Monticello Printing - Bldg. Inup. b Office supplies Jim (latch Sales Co. - Gutter brava b wurk gloves Mobil Oil Corp. - Street and Fire yas The Plumbery - Park supplies Buffalo Bituminous - Clasm 5 b Cedar St. crossing const. Burlington Northern Railroad - Npense for flagging at crnsaing in Meadoa Oak project Central Eyewear - 13 pair safety ;lasses Walters Cabinet Shop - Hinges for Mtce. Bldg. 6indberg Paint - Sewer supplies Rick Wolfsteller - Mine. mileage Payroll for June AMOUNT CIIECK N 544.35 17584 51.50 17585 168.50 1758A 11.70 175H7 91.60 17588 320.33 1750') 110.59 17590 110.82 17591 6,191.80 17592 1,233.70 17593 157.00 17594 7.00 17595 35.97 17596 31.OU 17597 25,964.83 "Al. DISHIINSI{MISNTi IDR .1111.Y - 1"A i I .'498.111.46 0 l ltdv- -ua� LIQUOR DIB] :SEMEITPS FOR JULY - 1983 State Capitol Credit Union - Payroll drd. 20.00 cb miesioner of RCvunuc - SWT - June 320.00 MN. State Treasurer - F1C1, - June 643.76 Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor 1,277.71 i,rigys, Cooper b Co. - 1'Lluor 2,929.26 Vright County State Bank - FWT - June 612.90 State Capitol Credit Union - Paytoll ded. 20.00 MN. State Treasurer - PERA W/H 213.67 Let Bank Mple. - interest on 76 Liquor Store Fay. Bond 2,815.00 Onset to Coact - Misc. expense 2.77 Banker's Life Ins. - Group Ins. 276.58 Granite City Cash Register - Paper 53.97 7 Up Bottling - Misc. mdse. 413.80 Viking Coca Cola - Rise. mdse. 849.50 Lsvegren ice 00. - Ice 319.95 Judo Candy i 1bba=o - Misc. mdoe. 339.47 Old Dutch Foods - Misc. ales. 203.27 Tharpe Diet. Co. - Beer 6,522.15 Midland Beverage - Mine 56.25 Gsossloin Beverage - Hees I' 17,744.20 Day Dist. Co. - Boor 104.90 Dick Beverage - Beer 4,491.99 Dahlhoimer Dist. Co. - Boor 15.692.96 Ed Phillipe i Sone - Liquor 13,315.64 Griggs. Cooper b Co. - Liquor 2,902.20 Twin City Nino - Liquor 1,272.0E I NonCicelle Tim, --G - Pdv. - J mo, 267.40 tiorthem Staten Power - Utilitirn I1 (1211.67 YLnak Sanitatinn - Contract I,.ym•-nl H2.',0 1n:1141a.1 TruChim) - I'rC1•1111 '.2d47 Lio(••rt Trucklmi - Fr..•Glht 4it'..17 hrid, ji water luta. I'., )'7 411 f A :Ula• .1, +, Jl. Ill 'i'(."PAL I�ICII;�3C:I;Fi1•CIT, i . 1.lii !•)'