HRA Agenda 12-07-1988AGENDA
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, December 7, 1988 - 7:00 PM
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chairperson Ken Maus, Lowell Schrupp, Ben Smith, Al Larson,
and Everette Ellison.
CITY STAFF: Administrator Rick Wolfsteller, Assistant Administrator
Jeff O'Neill, and HRA Director 011ie Koropchak.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 2, 1988 HRA MINUTES.
3. WORKSHOP: Conducted by Pat Pelstring, BusiLess Development Services, Inc.
Preliminary draft for consolidation of seven TIP Districts
into one TIF District and the expansion of the Central
Monticello Redevelopment Project/Plan boundaries.
6. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBLE VACATED HRA POSITION.
S. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW THE USE OF TIF FOR THE CONSTRUCTION FIVE
PROJECT.
6. CONSIDERATION TO UPDATE THE STATUS OF TIF DISTRICT 02 MODIFICATION 03.
7. OTHER BUSINESS.
8. ADJOURNMENT.
MINUTES
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, November 2, 1988 - 7:OOPM
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Ken Maus, Lovell Schrupp, Ben
Smith, Al Larson, and Everette Ellison.
CITY STAFF PRESENT: Kick Wolfateller, Jeff O'Neill, and
011ie Koropchak.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairperson Ken Maus called the HRA meeting to order at
7:03 PH.
2. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 5. 1988 HRA MINUTES.
Ben Smith questioned if the motion to contract Business
Development Services, Inc. at $75.00 per hour did not
include a not too exceed dollar amount. This contract is.
for combining the current seven TIF Districts into
one Development District and the expansion of the Central
Monticello Redevelopment Project/Plan boundaries. The
motion didn't include a not too exceed dollar amount
because Mr. Palstring couldn't state definitely the
hours roquired under the recommended agreement between
the HRA and BDS, Inc. Al Larson made a motion to
approve the October 5, 1988 HRA minutes, seconded by
Ben Smith and with no further discussion the minutes
are approved as written.
3. CONSIDERATION OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. INC. UPDATE
AND EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUS AND THE MONTICELLO NRA.
The HRA members having received a copy of the revised contract
between the HRA and BDS, Inc., Koropchak pointed out the
the rate of $75.00 per hour not too exceed 65 hours ($4,875).
The revised agreement written as per the October 5th HRA
motion was approved for execution by a motion from Al Larson,
seconded by Everette Ellison, and without further discussion
passed unanimously.
4. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AND
RELEASE OF FORFEITURE OF THE CONSTRUCTION FIVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEEMNT.
Ben Smith made a motion for the HRA to execute the Certificate
of Completion and Release of Forfeiture for the Construction
Five Development Agreement, this stating the completion of
a 24 unit and 30 unit apartment within TIP District 05. The
motion was seconded by Lowell Schrupp and without further
discussion, passed unanimously.
RRA Minutes - 11/2/88
5. CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT FOR A TAR INCREMENT FINANCE PIAN
PROPOSAL FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER.
The HRA received a TIF proposal for Northern States Power based
on current assumption and the HRA is to approve preliminary
concept for the use of TIF for this project. Assets associated
by the project are 1) retainment of 9 jobs with potential of
additional job creation, 2) increase of tax base, 3) retainment
of quick service to the community by NSP, 4) enhances continued good
public relations between the City and NSP, and 5) allows for a
home for the water department as the City would purchase the
existing NSP facility. The proposal indicates a gap of $5,200
based on land acquisition cost equal to current asking price
for City property across Dundas Road. Jeff O'Neill advised
the BRA members that NSP did not budget for this expansion,
therefore, the project will only occur if the land cost is
written down to $1.00. The County allows 35c per square foot
for the estimated market land value, the current price of the
land across Dundas Road plus Lot 4 public improvements is 19c
per square foot, and the original acquisition cost to the
City was 15c per square foot. The HRA agreed that the
westerly portion of Lot 4, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park
is an undesirable lot because of the natural gas pipe casement, the
city well setbacks, and the natural drainage easement. Also,
the HRA's consensus was that with the use of TIF would eliminate
the risk of NSP's maintenance department relocating outside
of Monticello, retain jobs with potential of future job
creation, and increase the local tax base. A motion was
made by Everette Ellison to approve the preliminary concept
for the HSP project and the use of TIF for this project,
directing city staff to establish a project budget allowing
the HRA to transfer the said land to NSP for $1.00. The motion
was seconded by Al Larson and without further discussion the
motion passed unanimously. NSP plans to construct a 5,400
square foot structure on the westerly 3.22 acres of Lot 4,
Block 3. Oakwood Industrial Park. Mr. O'Neill submitted
to the HM members copies of the written communications between
he and Mr. Ernie Hiatt of Northern States Power.
6. CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT FOR MODIFICATION PLAN /2 OF TIF
PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 15.
Roropchak outlined the TIF proposal for the modification plan
as received by the HRA and presented the preliminary sato plan
for the prposed project which was reviewed by the City Staff.
Roropchak indicated the developer (Construction Five, Gus and
Gary LoFromoise) were asking for assistance financing the storm
sever Installation, street small city storm sewer, developer's
site improvement (landscaping, exacavting, and parking lot
curb). The HRA may consider TIP for the undeveloped city park
within this district. The assets associated with this project
are the potential of 36 new jobs (16 leasaable boys times 2),
increase of local tax base, 3) the completion of development
within TIP District $5 boundaries, and 4) the potential axpansion
within our community of the leased businesses. Constaints of
the project are 1) potential excess use of TIF for one doveloper
HRA Minutes - 11/2/88
6. CONTINUED.
and 2) long term maintenance liability caused by the storm sewer
installation. The HRA discussed the public improvement benefits
to the developer which have been completed prior to this final
development proposal with a general consensus that the developer
may have received the full use of TIF. Construction Five is
most interested to use TIF for the storm sewer installation which
would allow them to construct the two office/storage buildings
and the two mini storage facility as laid out in the preliminary
site plan. Inorder to accommodate this plan and allow for city
parking and landscaping requirements Construction Five would need
to utilize the 47 feet of drainage ditch easement. Bud Schrupp
made a motion for the HRA to table the use of TIP for the
proposed Construction Five project until the Council determines
the need/benefit to the city for a storm sewer installation.
The motion was seconded by Everette Ellison and with no further
discussion passed unanimously.
7. CONSIDERATION OF CONCEPT TIP PROPOSAL FOR A FOOD PROCESSING PLANT.
Koropchak presented to the NRA a copy of the finance proposal
for the food processing company as an informational item and
for preliminary concept approval for use of TIF. The project
includes the construction of a 75,000 sq ft warehouse/refrigeration
building and a 3,800 square foot service garage on 25 acres
of industrial land. Potential jobs of 50-75. The projected annual
increment is substantically larger than most projects generate.
Koropchak advised the HRA that this was a very preliminary
project as the Washington company representatives have not
yet visited Monticello only the company consultant. The general
consensus of the HRA was for city staff to use the full potential
allowable increment for the developer's benefit as an incentive
to locate in Monticello. Suggestions were building permit cost,
water/sewer hook-up fees, employee's park, land acquisition, and
other developer's site preparation cost.
8. CONSIDERATION OF USE OF TIF FOR MARTIE FARM SERVICES.
Koropchak asked the HRA of their interest to use SIF for a
local commerical business which may elect to purchase industrial
land for their planned 1990 expansion. The general consensus
of the HRA was to deny the use of TIF for commercial development
unless the project includes the elimination of blight or need
for soil correction.
9. CONSIDERATION OF TIP DISTRICT 02 UPDATE.
Koropchak reported that all approvalsfor Modificiation 03 of
TIP District 02 have boon completed, purchase agreement options
signed, and the development agreement between the HRA and
Broadway Square Limited Partnership will be completed by the
and of November.
BRA Minutes - 11/2/88
10. CONSIDERATION FOR DISCUSSION OF TWO PRELIMINARY PROJECTS OF
FLOYD MARKLING AND JIM METCALF.
Koropchak reported to the HRA that Mr. Markl ing had requested
her to run preliminary numbers for the use of TIF and to explore the
City interest to participate. Mr. Markling ie interested in
acquiring the property of Block 35, City of Monticello, with the
exception of the Downtown Standard property for demolition or
relocation of existing building to allow for development of
a 2-3 story office building with underground parking on the
northerly portion of Block 35 and on the southerly portion
the development of quality elderly housing. Without building
assumptions it becomes difficult to run any preliminary numbers
for the use of TIF, therefore the request has not been completed.
Jim Metcalf informed Koropchak of a potential townhouse or
multi housing development on West County Road 75 within the
area of the Baptist Church and Gills Auto. 21r. Gills would
be interested in relocating his business within Monticello preferably
with freeway exposure. Mr. Metcalf was is terested in the City's willi-
ngness to participate with TIF to clean up the blighted
area and excavating of a buried gas tank associated with the
Gills property. The first hurdle is this property isn't
within the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project/Plan, therefore, TIF
Isn't applicable. The HRA general consensus was supportive of the project t�
eliminate blight and recommended the City staff to research
possible relocation sites and the possibilities to -expand the
Project/Plan boundaries.
11. OTHER BUSINESS.
None.
12. ADJOURNMENT.
Bud Schrupp made a motion to adjourn the HHA meeting, seconded by
Everette Ellison. With no objections, the HM meeting adjourned.
011ie Koropchak
HRA Executive Secretary
4. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS THE POSSIBLE VACATED HRA POSITION.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND.
With the elections behind us and HRA Chairperson Ken Maus
as Mayor -elect. I suggest the BRA members 1) encourage Ken
to remain on the Board as his experience is most evaluable
and doesn't present a conflict as some City Councils also
serve as the HRA. 2) If Ken Maus declines the HRA suggestion
than discuss potential candidates to fall this position.
Letters were mailed to the following persons as recommended
names when Everette Ellison accepted his position.
Dr. C McCarty
Bob Weiman
Peter Becker
Jim Ridgeway
Con Johnson
HRA terms are for five years on a rotating basis. The HRA
recommends a possible candidate(s) to the City Council for
appointment. Current NRA members and the expiration dates
of their terms are as follows:
Al Larson December 1988
Lowell Schrupp December 1989
Ben Smith December 1990
Ken Maus December 1991
�t Everette Ellison December 1992
Also. I suggest the NRA strongly consider Al Larson for reappointment
to the HRA Board for another five years with an expiration date
of December 1993.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Ken Maus and Al Larson reappointed to the HRA.
2. Al Larson reappointed and recommend a candidate to replace
Nr. Maus.
3. Recommend two now candidates to the HRA.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Staff recommends alternative 1.
V
5. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW THE USE OF TIF FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
FIVE PROJECT.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND.
At the previous HRA meeting the members voted to table the
decision to use TIF for the proposed Construction Five project
until the City Council determined the need/benefit to the city
for the installation of the storm sever. Enclosed you will
find a copy of the November 14th Council agenda item and the
minutes from the meeting. Although, the Council didn't vote
on the need/benefit to the city for the storm sever installation,
the Council's consensus was that using TIF for the installation
of a storm sewer was not desirable.
Having called Mr. LaFromboise of the Council's recommendation,
the developer requested the street storm sever along Lauring
Lane be reconsidered for use of TIF and any other developer's
site preparation cost. As the HRA viewed the video at the
last meeting the asssumption of the members was that curb/gutter
and catch basin were installed. However, checking with John
Simola, he informed me the street improvement runs westerly along
Lauring Lane from the Washington Street corner for a short way
but doesn't run the full length of Outlet A street boundaries.
Mr. Simola will establish an estimated coat to extend these
improvements along Lauring Lane ending at a point of Outlet
A northwest corner. Mr. LaFromboiae didn't indicate
whether the development would or would not occur without
the installation of the larger storm sewer or without any
assistance to the developer's site preparation costs.
Also enclosed you will find a copy of the TIP District's
objectives, decription of public improvements installed,
and the coat associated with those improvements as indicated
In the Council agenda item. This information should help
the HRA'a decision process of whether to or not to further
assist the developer by the use of TIF.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS.
1. Continue use of TIP for District 05.
a) Large storm sever installation
b) Street storm sever and curb/gutter along Lauring Lane.
c) Other developer's site preparation costs (landscaping,
excavation, parking lot curb).
d) City undeveloped park.
2. Continuo use of TIP for District 05 with a selection from
a, b, c, and/or d listed above.
3. Discontinue use of TIP for District 05.
5. CONTINUED.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Staff recommends that the HRA could consider the use of TIF
or assessment to benefitting property owners for the installation
of the street storm sever and curb/gutter (along Lauring Lane)
if determined necessary after review of the developer's revised
site plan by our engineer consultant.
D. SUPPORTING DATA.
Copy of the November 14th Council agenda and minutes.
Copy of District 05 objectives.
Copy of the description of public improvements installed.
Council Agenda - 11/14/88
12. Consideration of Using Tax increment Financing for the Installation of a
Storm Sewer - Construction 5. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
The Tax Increment Finance Plan for Tax Increment Redevelopment
District 15 (Construction 5) was certified in 1985. The plan statement
of objectives were 1) to provide opportunities for development and
expansion of new business: 2) to provide employment opportunities through
the creation of new jobs; 3) to provide opportunities for growth and tax
baser 4) to assist with street construction, sanitary sewer and water
main construction, storm sewer, and other public improvements to
encourage redevelopment in the area; 5) to encourage the development of
additional rental housing in the city.
The development activities included the construction of an 18 -unit
apartment building in 1985. District site description is Lot 1, Block 2,
Outlet A, and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 1, Construction 5 Addition.
In 1987, the developer constructed an additional 24 -unit and 30 -unit
apartment building. The tax increment finance plan was amended and the
improvement budget was $93,000 for street construction, $100,100 for
storm sewer, and $65,500 for sanitary sewer and water. The total project
cost was $365,000.
" Construction 5 (Gus and Gary LaFromboise) have presented the City staff
with their preliminary site plans for the final proposed activity within
this Redevelopment District #5. Their plans include the construction of
an 18,180 sq ft office warehouse, the construction of a 13,900 sq ft
office warehouse, a 5,600 sq ft mini storage, and an 8,400 sq ft mini
storage facility. The two proposed office warehouse facilities include a
total of 16 bays which would be leased out to new companies. The
proposed plan utilizes the total 3.17 acres of Outlet A, inclusive of the
50 -foot storm sewer (ditch) easement along the easterly boundry of this
lot (516.61 feet). The developers have requested the use of tax
increment financing for the installation of the storm sewer. Direct
developers cost which can be considered for the use of tax increment
'financing are excavating and landscaping cost.
The HRA reviewed the plan at their November meeting and tabled the item
until the City Council determines the long term benefit and/or need to
the community for the installation of the storm ewer. The estimated
market value of the proposed development is $1,174,728, with an estimated
annual increment of $46,696, based on new tax capacity rates, which is
more than sufficient to cover the annual debt service. estimated
installation cost for the 60 -inch storm sewer pipe is approximately
$70,000.
-15-
Council Agenda - 1:/14/88
Pro's and Con's of Storm Sewer Installation as Determined and written by
John SLmla
The proposed project would consist of extending the existing 60 -inch
storm sewer pipe at the intersection of Washington Street and Lauring
Lane southerly to the I-94 right-of-way and interconnecting this pipe
with two pipes which come from the drainage areas lying south of 1-94.
This new 60 -inch pipe would parallel the existing sanitary sewer. The
storm sewer would be located approximately 15 feet west and south of the
sanitary sewer and approximately 8-10 feet above the sanitary sewer.
Once the storm sewer was installed, the ditch would be filled, the
sanitary sewer manholes raised, and the area could be blacktopped for
parking area.
Pro's
1. Installation of the storm sewer would result in a flat level surface
that may be more appealing to the eye than an open ditch.
2. Installation of the storm sewer would recover approximately 1/2 acre
of space which could be used for parking for the proposed project.
The space is currently not usable to the developer.
3. There is come speculation that the filling of this ditch would result
in a safer environment for nearby residents. However, since this
ditch receives water during only the most heaviest rainfalls, and
then for only short periods of time, it is not more of a safety
concern than Otter Creek, the Mississippi River, or holding ponds in
our parks. If safety were to be an issue, chain link fencing could
serve as an added safety measure. The City, however, has not fenced
other areae like this in and about the city.
Con's
1. The installation of the storm sewer would result in a higher
maintenance cost to the City of Monticello in the future. The
developer is currently responsible for mowing and maintenance of this
ditch area. The City would only get involved with a cleaning of the
ditch should it become necessary sometime in the future. If the City
were to have a storm sewer in this area, the overall cost to the City
of Monticello for maintenance over the years would exceed those of a
ditch system. During the early years, velocities would not be such
so the pipe would be self cleaning. During periods of heavier flows,
the trapped solids then may wash out into the Burlington Northern
ditch or school property or it may be necessary to clean the
system. It is more costly to clean pipes than a ditch.
-16-
Council Agenda - 11/14/88
2.
By installing a storm sewer in an area where a ditch currently
exists, one loses that land area for absorption of water into the
soil for replenishing the ground water.
3.
Because of the close proximity to the sanitary sewer, the
installation of the storm sewer could hamper repairs or replacement
to the sanitary sewer system in the future. In addition, the
sanitary sewer manholes would be deeper than they are today and
provide a more hazardous atmosphere for the Cit; employees during
inspection and cleaning of those sewers every three years.
4.
At some time in the future, this storm sewer will have to be
replaced, along with curbing and parking lot. Sow much of the actual
replacement of the storm sewer will be paid for by the city in the
future.
5.
The cost of the storm sewer project exceeds the value of land in the
area.
1
After the City Council determines the benefits and/or needs for the storm
sewer installation, the HRA will consider the Tax Increment District
objectives, the previous developers benefits of the 1987 improvement
budget, and benefits of the present proposal (creation of jobs and
increase to tax base) to determine the use of the tax increment finance
and/or the budget coat.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. To determine the installation of the storm sewer as a long term
benefit and/or need to the community.
2. To determine the installation of the storm sewer as no benefit or
need to the unity.
C. STAPP RECOMMENDATION:
City staff reeommenda if the City Council determines the installation of
the storm sewer as a long term benefit and/or need to the community that
the project be completed in 1989 as part of the tax increment finance
budget cost and not es a future direct expense to the taxpayers.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Hap of the site locations Site plan will be presented at the Council
meeting.
-17-
Council Minutes - 11/14/88
12. Consideration of Using Tax Increment Financing for the Installation of a
Storm Sewer - Construction S.
Staff informed Council that the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority seeks guidance on a proposal to replace a ditch area with a
storm sewer utilizing TIP as the major funding source. The land area
reclaimed by installing the storm sewer would provide the developer with
additional area for parking and will thus allow space for development of
a larger structure. Council reviewed the proposal submitted by
Construction 5 (Gus and Wry LaPromboise) which includes construction of
an 18,180 sq ft office warehouse, the construction of a 13,900 sq ft
office warehouse, a 5,600 sq ft mini storage, and an 8,400 sq ft mini
storage facility. The two proposed office warehouse facilities include a
total of 16 bays which would be leased out to new companies. The
proposed plan utilizes the total 3.17 acres of Outlot A, inclusive of the
50 -foot storm sewer (ditch) easement along the easterly boundary of this
lot (516.61 feet).
Bill Fair stated that he is not convinced that this is the best use of
tax increment financing. Arve Grim= concurred and noted that it does
not appear that the feasibility of this project depends on the use of
TIP. It was the consensus of Council that using TIP for the above stated
purpose is not desirable.
13. Consideration of Authorizinc; Public Works Department to Install Christmas
Twinkle Lights Along Broa&a!r.
After discussion, notion by Fran Fair and seconded by Warren Smith
authorizing Public Works Department to assist with the installation of
twinkle lights and extension cords on the trees installed as part of
Streetscapes. voting in favor: Fran Pair, Bill Fair, Warren Smith, Arve
Grimsmo. Dan Blonigen opposed.
14. Consideration of awarding logo development contract.
Assistant Administrator O'Neill reported progress made by the Logo
Development Advisory Committee and informed Council that the Committee
has recommended that Henning and Associates be hired to design the new
City logo. The new logo design will be based on input from the committee
and others. After discussion, motion by Fran Fair and seconded by warren
Smith to award the logo development project to Henning and Associates for
an amount not to exceed the sum of $3,650. Motion passed unanimously.
15. Consideration of setting a meeting for the purpose of establishing the
1989 salary/wage polis/.
After discussion, a meeting date was act for 6:30 p.m., November 28,
1988.
0
ev
Taz Increment Redevelopment District Finance Plan
T A. Statutory Authority
The Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Authority") and
the City of Monticello are authorized to establish a tax Increment district
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.71-78.
B. Statement of Objectives
1. To provide opportunities for development and expansion of now
business=
7.
2. To provide employment opportunities through the creation of new
jobs;
3. To provide opportunities for growth in the tax base=
'C 4. To assist with street construction, sanitary sewer and watermain
construction, storm sewer and other public Improvements to
encourage redevelopment in the area.
5. To encourage the development of additional rental housing In the
`s City.
C. Development Program
�d
1. Description of tho Development Activities:
Construction Five (the "Developer-) plane to construct an le-unit,
e 24-unit, and a 30-unit apartment buildings. Appropriate zoning
standards in the City provide for those developments which will
be located near the highway in an area that encompasses both
light industrial and residential uoes. The developer will be
assisted with public Improvomento to service the buildings with
tax increment revenues. The 18-unit building In expected to
complete construction in 1989, and the 24 and 20 unit buildings
will complete construction In 1987.
2. Other Development Not Under Contract Reasonably ttxpeoted to Occur
In the Projoctl
11
The development program may include a future 25,000 aq ft office
building located in the tax Increment redevelopment district.
The geographical boundaries of the district are not expected
to change due to this development.
I
�. SCHEDULER
Description of Public Improvements
Tax Increment District 05 public improvements are along Lauring
Lane, Washington Street. and Fallon Avenue. The project consists
of construction of a new section of Leuring Lane through the
gravel pit ending near the current civil defense siren site.
Fallon Avenue will be upgraded to a 36 -foot roadway with curb
and gutter with a new entrance approximately 75-100 feet south
of the existing entrance near the railroad tracks and Washington.
Washington will also .receive curb and gutter from the railroad
tracks to Lauring Lane on both sides and will be upgraded to a 9 -ton
roadway.
The open ditch now existing on the east aide of Washington Street
will be filled and a 60 -inch storm sewer and a box culvert system
will be installed in this area. A smaller storm sewer, 30 inches
In site, will be built along Lauring Land from Washington Street
easterly toward the civil defense siren site.
A 12 -inch water main will be constructed on the new Lauring Lane,
and a 6 -inch water main will loop through Fallon Avenue, providing
service for Malones and future development of the Rand Mansion site.
Sanitary sewer will be constructed on Louring Lane, with a short
section extending off of Lauring Lane to serve the Malone home.
In addition, another short section of sanitary sewer will be built
on the north end of Fallon to serve davelopment of the Rand Mansion
site in the future.
11
285 FEET ALONG LAURING LANE
\146, Storm sewer cost 285 ft z $43.00 $12.255.00
Manhole 1,000.00
Restoration 1,000.00
SUBTOTAL $14,255.00
27% bonding, engineering 3,848.85
TOTAL COST $18,103.85
JOHN SIMOLA RECOMMENDS DOING THE PROJECT NOW AND CAN BE A
CHANGE ORDER TO ANOTHER CITY PROJECT.
$43.00 per foot for 30 inch RCP (Reinforced Concrete Pipe)
includes installation
6. CONSIDERATION TO UPDATE THE STATUS OF TIF DISTRICT f2
MODIFICATION i3.
1. Council authorizing the development of demolition plane
and specifications for demolition of Jones' Manufacturing,
Stelton's Laundry, and O'Connor's Garage. (City Council
agenda item for December 12, 1988).
2. Copy of support letter to USDA (bid opening December 6, 1988).
3. Copy of a portion of the bid
a) Project site available May 1, 1989.
b) Anticipated start construction date is after Nay 1 but
no later than June 1, 1989, with project fully completed
and ready for occupany by November -15, 1989.
4. Development Agreement has been received from Holmes and Graven
and a copy to Metcalf and Larson on December 7, 1988.
5. Anticipating bond sale in ;i=h,h,~T989.
i
Johnson, sheldoa 6
soreness
ARCHITECTS Inc.
mina »1" ebcb A,Ir�
m�It.ll• 220Y1, mn. -3717
w ]20 617 •97--47]7
JSS Project No. 88-100
ARCHITECTURAL ADDENDUM NO. 1
TO DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR GENERAL CONSTRUCTION WORK
INCLUDING ALL PLUMBING, HEATING,
VENTILATING AND ELECTRICAL WORK
BROADWAY SQUARE APARTMENTS
MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
DATE OF ORIGINAL DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS: November 11, 1988
DATE OF THIS ADDENDUM NO. 1: December 2. 1988
TO: ALL BIDDERS AND ALL OTHERS WHOM
DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE
BEEN ISSUED BY THE ARCHITECT
THIS ADDENDUM FORMS A PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. IT SUPPLEMENTS THEM
AND MODIFIES THEM AS FOLLOWS:
e CHANGES IQ MME DRAWINGS &Q SPECIFICATIONS
Item Ug- 1
Seo attached Bid List for current planholders.
item so- 2
Section 0100, Special Conditions, item 09, Work by Others, Demolition,
paragraph 8, change to:
All existing on alto utilities including serer, water, gas and telephone is
to be relocated or removed and terminrted at a location that does not hinder
the construction of this project.
Item Na. i
Section 0101, Summary of Work, item /7. Start and Completion, paragraph A.
change to:
For the work of the project. the project site will be available as of M"
IL 1285 and work shall commonco as noted below:
Paragraph D. change to:
The anticlpatod start construction date is to be after May 1. 1989 but no
later than Juno 1. 1989. The work of this project shall be fully completed
-7 and ready for occupancy by Novcmbor 1S. 1989 unless expressly stipulated to
the contrary on the Bid Form.
Fhoos (812) 295-2711
Natm (912) a3"M
City o/ Monfice[[o
MONTICELLO, MN 65382.9245
Copy
By:
Arve A. Grimsno, Mayor
By:
011ie Koropchak, HRA Director
I
250 Ent aroa0aq
Aon a=,74tt•926�
USDA
Arve (Ammo
District Office
012 outtou:
3700 West Division
awngsn
Suite 112
Fran Fair
St. Cloud, MN 56301
WIUIam Fait
Warren Smith
Attn: William M. Slininger
District Director
Riot WattsbWw
RE: Broadway Square — Section 515 ural Rental
AUNRM amArkWV8orr
Housing Project for Seniors in Monticello, Minnesota
FhnNtq a zadw.
,taro'Nam
Dear Mr. Slininger:
Fustic Workr
JohhSinvia
The City of 11onticello is pleased to be informed that bid
BUNIng mow`
Gary Andwson
openings for roadway Square are scheduled for December 6, 1988. We
are writing to you to inform you of cur concern and desire that this
�,Devo A1014:
elderly project be obligated for 1989 construction. We are concerned
because the City and the HRA has already made significant and substantial
commitments toward land acquisition and demolition in this blighted area.
Our community dearly needs this senior housing. Please advise us if there
is anything we can do to expedite this or be of assistance.
'Runk you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
CITY OF M=MIA
By:
Arve A. Grimsno, Mayor
By:
011ie Koropchak, HRA Director
I
250 Ent aroa0aq
Aon a=,74tt•926�
MICROFILM TITLE PAGE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Housing & Redevelopment
Authority (HRA)
Agenda Books
1989
t'N4n.mhMlfAofJloQY4�wfil� IM4 pp