Loading...
HRA Agenda 03-03-1993AGENDA MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Wednesday, March 3, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. City Hall MEMBERS: Chairperson Al Larson, Vice Chairperson Ben Smith, Lowell Schrupp, Everette Ellison, and Tom St. Hilaire. STAFF : Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and 011ie Koropchak. GUEST: Brad Larson and Skip Sorenson. 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. CONSIDERATION TO HEAR SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONCEPT AS PREPARED AND PRESENTED BY BRAD LARSON AND SKIP SORENSON. 3. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 4. 1993 HRA MINUTES. 4. CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCE PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DISTRICT NO. 1-15 AND REQUESTING CITY COUNCIL TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING (Custom ' Canopy). S. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW INFORMATION ON THE RICHFIELD REDISCOVER CONCEPT AND TO AUTHORIZE FURTHER DIRECTION. 6. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW INFORMATION ON THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY PROGRAM AND TO AUTHORIZE FURTHER DIRECTION. T. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW THE YEAR-END SUMMARY OF THE NRA FUND AND TIF -DEBT SERVICE FUNDS. B. CONSIDERATION OF PROSPECT UPDATES: a) Wilson Tool International b) All -Temp Distribution c) Recreational Parte and Equipment 9. OTHER BUSINESS. 10. ADJOURNMENT. MINUTES MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Thursday, February 4, 1993 - 7:00 p.m. City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Al Larson, Vice President Ben Smith, Everette Ellison, and Tom St. Hilaire. MEMBERS ABSENT: Lowell Schrupp. STAFF PRESENT: 011ie Koropchak. STAFF ABSENT: Rick Wolfsteller and Jeff O'Neill. 1. CALL TO ORDER. Chairperson Larson called the HRA meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. 2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 6, 1993 HRA MINUTES. Tom St. Hilaire made a motion to approve the January 6, 1993 HRA minutes. Seconded by Ben Smith and with no corrections or additions, the minutes were approved as written. ' 3. CONSIDERATION TO ELECT 1993 HRA OFFICERS; CHAIRPERSON AND VICE -CHAIRPERSON. Tom St. Hilaire made a motion nominating Al Larson and Ben Smith as 1993 HRA Chairperson and Vice -Chairperson, respectively. The motion was seconded by Everette Ellison and with no additional nominations or discussion, the motion passed unanimously. 4. CONSIDERATION_ OF 4 SENIOR HOUSIJIG UPpgTE; a) Letter of Pat McCullough - The letter named the Guardian Angels Foundation and Elim Care, Inc. as parties interested in senior housing development and ownership. b) Schwientek Plans - Mr. Brad Larson, a local developer with senior housing development experience, has expressed an Interest in the HRA's concept for congregrate or assleted- living housing. With the combined above referrals, Barb Schwientek sees no need to advertise for a developer with senior housing expertise. At an upcoming meeting, the Hospital Board will consider their role in the development of a senior project: management/services. c) Discuss potential Bites - As the HRA may be involved in the acquisition and demolition of existing property for a senior housing project, the HRA briefly discussed the areas along Broadway to the east and west of the hospital and the Cedar Crest area. The HRA concluded that the site location may beet be determined by the market study or the developer. HRA MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1993 Next, members discussed the need for the HRA to authorize Phase I of the market study at 88,600, as this cost could be recovered through the project funding. A current market study is part of the project funding application requirement. Some members felt the HRA's role was complete as two excellent interested developers had been identified and the HRA primary purpose now is to encourage either developer to proceed and get the project rolling. Some members saw the need to authorize the market study and others felt a study may already be completed. To encourage project follow-through, the HRA members agreed to invite Mr. Larson and Me. Mills to make a presentation to the HRA on or prior to March 3. S. CO)iSIQERATION OF A REPORT AND FOLLOWUP TO THE NAHRO CONFERENCE. a) Minnesota Housing Finance Agency - Koropchak reported that this program provides dollars for loans to first-time home buyers. The program has more liberal limits on household income and acquisition costs than the Farmers Home Administration program, and the HRA can set additional requirements. NAHRO Executive Director Scott Knutson sees the program as an excellent public relations tool for a city or HRA and the program requires little administrative time. Koropchak informed the HRA that a couple of local banks expressed interest in the program; however, she had no idea if a need exist in Monticello for such a program. It was recommended to acquire additional information on the program. b) Section 8 - Koropchak informed HRA members that this rental housing assistance program Is available to Monticello residents through the St. Cloud HRA. Applications are taken the first of each month and a waiting list does exist. The program is not marketed by the St. Cloud HRA because of the high demand and limited dollars available. Section 8 is a "spot" rental assistance program. The program is for low and moderate household incomes and is popular because it allows renters an option to rent outside a multi -housing project.Dollare are only allocated to HRA's with an established creditability for administrating the program which requires an administrative staff. This an informational item only. c) Richfield Rediscover - The Richfield HRA markets and offers to purchase a substandard homes at fair market value, demolishe the homes, and sells the land at fair market value to an interested developer. The developer agrees to construct a new home based on Richfield's HRA requirements and the home is made available to first-time home buyers. HRA members were Interested in this program and requested Koropchak obtain additional information. Page 2 HRA MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1993 d) Wright County HRA - Koropchak reported that the Wright County HRA which had been established through a resolution adopted by the previous County Commissioners has now been relinquished by the newly elected commissioners. 6. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW RESULT'S OF THE ELIMINATION OF OTHER FINANCIAL PACKAGING FROM THE BDS/HRA CONTRACT. First, Koropchak provided HRA members with a copy of the letter mailed to Mr. Pelstring acknowledging the HRA's desire to delete "other financial packaging" from the contract between the HRA and BDS, Inc. Secondly, Koropchak informed members upon the HRA's direct inquiry of whether "other financial packaging" BDS charges were a legal expenditures under the 10% administrative allowance, Koropchak again contacted Mr. John Dean of Holmes and Graven. Koropchak apologized for the error stating financial consultant fees were legal expenditures and asked the HRA to reconsider and suggested amending the January HRA motion authorizing the transfer of $8,180.81 (SMM) and $14,981.30 (Aroplax) to authorization to transfer $6,123.71 (SMM) and $9,188.27 (Aroplax) from the Surplus Fund into a HRA Development Fund. The HRA still saw the BDS charges associated with other financial packaging as extreme and out - of -line and reaffirmed their desire to delete "other financial packaging" from the contract. Tom St. Hiliare made a motion to amend the January motion and authorized the transfer of $4,123.71 (SMM) and $9,188.27 (Aroplax) from the Surplus Fund into an HRA Development Fund. The motion was seconded by Everette Ellison and with no further discussion, the motion passed unanimously. The HRA wished retain the option to consider paying for "other financial packaging" for a real plum company. 7. QDl1SID,?RA�30N TQ I�U�HORIZE EXEC�1fION Of SHE QEVELOPMEHT CONTRACT CERTIFJCATE OF COMEELETION FOR AROPLAX AND SMM. As per the Development Contract, the HRA is to furnish the developer with Certificate of Completion upon the completion of minimum improvements and upon the final occupancy certificate Issued by the City Building Official. Koropchak provided a copy of the issued Certificate of Occupancy and attached "items to be escrowed" letter for the Aroplax and SMM projects. Ben Smith made a motion authorizing the execution of the Certificate of Completion for the Aroplax and SMM projects. Seconded by Tom St. Hilaire and with no further Page 3 HRA MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1993 dlscussi on, the motion passed unanimously. The Certificate of Completion is to be recorded at the Wright County Recorders Office by the developer. CONSIDERATION OF PROSPECT UPDATES: a) Wilson Tool International - HRA members received a copy of the letter acknowledging the IDC visit to Wilson Tool on January 26, proposed project summary, the estimated TIF dollars available for direct assistance, and the two financial packaging options offered to Wilson Tool. Direct assistance based on tax increment generated over eight years for a 40,000 sq ft concrete mfg facility with the TIF Penalty reduction is $155,000. Koropchak submitted to HRA members the Wilson Tool marketirng pieces which depicts the similiarity to Remmele Engineering. The HRA was very supportive of the project and TIF level of assistance offered. Mr. Emery informed Koropchak that he had visited the Monticello industrial sites on Saturday and found Monticello's location excellent; however, other communities were being visited with data and financial propose 1e being reviewed and analyzed within the next few weeks. b) All -Temp Distribution - City staff continues to meet with Mr. Johrn Holman for development of the public improvements and to secure a future rail availablity commitment. Forth coming plane are to meet with the developer, Hoglund Family, City Engineer, BDS, and City Staff. c) Cust on Canopy - With a misunderstanding of the land price from the Oakwood Partnership, the company has contacted Mr. Pheffer regarding acreage within the Monticello Commerce Center, The Letter of Intent has not been received nor has a visit by the IDC been made. The HRA remains supportive of the annual 85,000 TIF pay-as-you-go assistance subject to development approvals. d) Recreational Parts and Equipment - Koropchak reported to HRA members, as per their request, that the company projects 50% ealee from retail and 50% sales from catolog with a fester growth in the catolog area. The company at this time will not be selling snowmobiles or motorcycles; however, would not commit to never selling snowmobiles or motorcycles In the future. The company requested TIF assistance and the HRA was requested to make a policy decision. Members considered the direct retail competition with existing businesses, unskilled labor wages associated with the proposed project, and the similia city to the Martie project. The HRA liked the concept of many small developments and agreed to TIF pay-as-you-go financial assistance for the recreational parts and equipment company based on the tax increment generated from the warehouse/catolog area only. Page 4 HRA MINUTES FEBRUARY 4, 1993 9. CONSIDERATION TO JtEVIEW AND ACCEPT THE 1993 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORK PLAN. Tom St. Hilaire made a motion acknowledging HRA acceptance of the 1993 Economic Development Work Plan and IDC Budget. Seconded by Everette Ellison and without further discussion, the motion passed unanimously. 10. QJHER BUSINESS. Koropchak informed HRA members that inorder to reschedule a public meeting by Law a 72 -hour notice must be posted. Through HRA Bylaws the first Wednesday of each month is designated as the regular meeting date at 7:30 p.m. Chairperson Larson and Koropchak encouraged regular attendance or sufficient notice of planned absentee. Everette Ellison acknowledged he would be out-of-town February 13 through March 18. In addition, Mr. Schrupp is out-of-town through March. Chairperson Larson informed members that the Monticello HRA was established through a City Council resolution adopted in November 1970 and first commissioners were appointed in March 1971. Chairperson Larson made a motion to amend the HRA Bylaws changing the regular meeting time from 7:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. ` Seconded by Everette Ellison and without further discussion, the motion passed unanimously. 11. ADJOURNMENT. The HRA meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. 011ie Koropchak. HRA EKecutive Director Page 5 2. Consideration to hear senior housino development Droject concept as orenared and presented by Brad Larson and Skin Sorenson. A. Reference and Backaround. As background information to Mr. Larson's presentation, please read the information provided: First, the preliminary building and site plan concept was reviewed by Mr. Jeff O'Neill and Gary Anderson. Mr. Sorenson is Brad's architect. Secondly, Barb Schwientek, Hospital Administrator, was invited to the HRA meeting; however, she elected not to attend as the Hospital Board is scheduled to review Mr. Larson's concept on March 23. Barb has indicated to Mr. Larson that she is Interested in HUD funding which is a funding source available through Carol Mills. Thirdly, Carol Mills has contacted me and is very interested In making a presentation to the HRA; however, she must first bring the concept to the Guardian Angel Foundation Board on March 24. I did attend the HUD Seminar at the Hyatt Regency on February 11. Additionally, non-profit organizations are not exempt from property taxes but are exempt from income taxes. Although, there is a property tax reduction for senior housing Carol Indicates the each project in Elk River generates between $30,000 to $40,000 annually. This comparable to the Monticello - Broadway Square project taxes . Lastly, according to Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), Washington D.C., limited partnerships do not work with non-profit organizations. B. Recommendation. Recommendation is to listen to Mr. Larson's preparation and make no HRA commitment until after Carol Mill's presentation. Barb Schwientek Is Interested in HUD funding and the HRA's direction. C. Sucportina WA, Copy of letters mailed to Mr. Larson and Mrs. Mills. February 9, 1993 Mrs. Carol Mills Guardian Angels Homes 350 Evans Avenue Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Mrs. Mille: One of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) objectives for 1993 is to facilitate or investigate the need for senior housing. The HRA's primary housing interest is in congregate and assisted living with a combination of subsidized and market rental rates. In order to encourage a timely investigation for the need and development of a senior housing project, the HRA cordially invites you, an interested developer /owner. to make a presentation to the HRA prior to or at the March 3 HRA meeting. The HRA recognizes that their interest in congregate and assisted living must be confirmed through a current market study which Is also a component of the funding application process. Secondly, the HRA recognizes the need to work with a developer with previous senior housing development experience and expertise. Thirdly, the HRA recognizes the March presentation would be in a preliminary context. The presentation might include market study options, optional building plan concepts, site suggestions, funding options, and service/management options. Again, the presentation is requested by the HRA to encourage a timely investigation and development period, and to serve as a tool for any future HRA decision-making as may be required for the development of a senior housing project. Mrs. Mille February 9, 1993 Page 2 Carol, if you are interested, please call me at (612) 295-2711 to arrange a presentation date and time which is convenient to all Individuals. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 011ie Eoropchak Executive Director cc: Barb 8chwientek, Hospital Administrator HRA File I February 9, 1993 Mr. Brad Larson Attorney at Law Metcalf 6 Larson 313 West Broadway Monticello, MN 88362 Dear Mr. Larson: One of the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) objectives for 1993 Is to facilitate or investigate the need for senior housing. The HRA'e primary housing interest is in congregate and assisted living with a combination of subsidized and market rental rates. In order to encourage a timely investigation for the need and development of a senior housing project, the HRA cordially invitee you, an interested developer/owner, to make e presentation to the HRA prior to or at the March 3 HRA meeting. The HRA recognizes that their interest in congregate and assisted living must be confirmed through a current market study which is also a component of the funding application process. Secondly, the NRA recognizes the need to work with a developer with previous senior housing development experience and expertise. Thirdly, the HRA recognizes the March presentation would be in a preliminary context. The presentation might include market study options, optional building plan concepts, site suggestions, funding options, and service/management options. Again, the presentation Is requested by the HRA to encourage a timely investigation and development period, and to serve as a tool for any future HRA decielon-making as may be required for the development of a senior housing project. Mr. Larson February 9, 1993 Page 2 Brad, if you are interested, please call me at 295-2711 to arrange a presentation date and time which is convenient to all Individuals. Thank you for your time and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 011ie Koropch" Executive Director cc: Barb Schwientek, Hospital Administrator HRA File Guardian Angels Foundation of Elk River, Inc. ELK RIVER NURSING HOME and RIVERVIEW APARTMENTS 4W &VANS AV8MU8. ilK RIVER. WNNMTA 55= TaLUM ME: (812) "1.1117 March 3, 1993 No. 011ie Koropchak, Director Monticello Housing Redevelopment Authority 350 E. Broadway Monticelo, MN 59363 Dear Ar. Koropchak: I have reviewed your letter of inquiry with Stewart Milson, President of the Board of Guardian Angels of Elk River, Ino., regarding Senior Housing tar Monticello. Mr. Nilson fools the entire Board of Directors should become involved with this decision. As I told you over the phone, the Board will not be meeting until March 34, 1993; therefore, we would not be able to respond to the time frame in your letter. We look forward to continued discussion on this matter. I will be contacting you following your meeting tonight. sincerely, _,may, - i 27 r.l�Jl Carol J. Mille l/v Executive Director Guardian Angels of Elk River, Inc. CJM:ii Consideration to adopt a resolution authorizing preparation of Tax Increment Finance Plan for Economic District No. 1-15 and requesting Citv Council call for a public hearinq. (Custom Canopy) A. Reference and Background. The HRA is to consider the adoption a resolution authorizing preparation of a TIF Plan for establishment of Economic District No. 1-15 and requesting the City Council call for a public hearing. On December 2, 1992, the HRA authorized BDS to prepare a TIF plan for Custom Canopy with a pay-as-you-go annual assistance of $5,000 subject to development approval. The original tax increment projections were based on the assumption of a three - acre parcel to the east of Martie Farm Service. However, the site location has changed to a five -acre parcel across from M & P Transport, Inc. With the projected increase of tax increment, Mr. Jeff O'Neill suggested the HRA consider additional TIP assistance as an incentive for the developer to complete a more extensive landscaping treatment along Fallon Avenue and to complete a 50% contrasting outside -wall material treatment to the Fallon Avenue and Dundas Road sides of the proposed metal facility. Although this is not required in the I-1 zoning, Mr. O'Neill's suggestion is to encourage an aesthetically -pleasing transition from the Light Industrial Zone to the Business Campus Zone across the street. If the HRA increased the annual TIF pay-as-you-go assistance from $5,000 to $6,000, the project would still generate an annual tax surplus of $3,600 after Administration Expenses and TIF Penalty are deducted. Once the HRA has determined the level of TIF assistance, they should consider adopting a resolution authorizing preparation the TIB Plan and requesting the City Council to set a public hearing date of April 12. The intent is for the TIF Plan to be distributed to the School District, Hospital District, and Wright County on March 10 to begin the thirty -day right to comment period. B. Alternative Actions. 1. Authorize level of TIF aselstanc a and adopt the resolution authorizing preparation of TIF Plan for Economic District No. 1-15 (Custom Canopy) and requesting City Council call for a public hearing on April 12. 2. Deny the use of TIP for Custom Canopy. C. Recommendation. Recommendation is to authorize an annual $6,000 pay-as-you-go TIF assistance and adopt the resolution. Suvnortina Data. Copy of the modified project summary, site map, $5,000 check for holding, and funding application schedule. The Letter of Intent has been returned for HRA execution, the IDC visited the existing Albertville facility, and the project funding has received preliminary approval by the bank. The resolution will be presented at the HRA meeting. Vhod: Sr;ed '10-%-" CUSTOM CANOPY 12903 MAIN STREET, SUITE 203 P 0 BOX 275 ROGERS, MN 55374 (6 12) 428-8678 OWNER: STEPHEN P. AND JOAN M. BIRXELAND, JR., HUSBAND AND WIFE. CONTACT PERSON: JIM BEYL EXISTING BUSINESS: EIGHT YEARS OLD BUILDING: OFFICE 1,320 SQ FT (60 X 22) NFG 8,000 SQ FT (80 X 100) METAL EXTERIOR 25 FT SIDE WALLS t (12 X 14 FT) OVERREAD DOORS LAND: 5.3 ACRES: Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park, PID* 155-018-002060. BUSINESS : PRODUCTION AND ASSEMBLY OF CANOPIES FOR SERVICE STATIONS JOBS: EMPLOY 11 FT PEOPLE (PROJECTED GROWTH 2-3 JOBS) WAGES: STARTING $8.00 PH (RANGE $9.76 - $18.00) OFF JAN -MAR CURRENTLY: LEASE OFFICE IN ROGERS AND LEASE MFG SPACE IN ALBERTVI LLE. TIME FRAME: Begin construction May 1, 1993 and complete October 31, 1993 . COMMERCIAL LENDER: Bank of Elk River, Pat Dwyer, 041-1000. Proposed Uses Proposed Sources $ 67,000 Land $266,000 Bank (70% appraised value) $313,000 Construction $ 42,500 GMEF $ 71.599 Eoulty $380,000 $380,000 TIF - PAY-AS-YOU-GO OF $5,000 ANNUALLY, NOT USED AS EQUITY BUT FOR CASHFLOW IN PROJECTIONS. ESTIMATED TAXES: BUILDING: OFFICE 1,320 SQ FT ® $30.00 - $ 39,600 MFG 8,000 SQ FT 0 $17.00 - 0136.000 LAND: 2 ACRES OR 87,120 SQ FT 0 $.40 0 9 34,648 3 ACRE OR 130,880 SQ FT 0 $.25 ■ S 32,670 $273.118 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE $270,000 $100,000 $170,000 .0300 ,0479 $ 31000 8 7,990 NEW CAPACITY VALUE $10,990 '93 TAX RATE (ESTIMATED) 1,0737. ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAXES $11,795 PAF -02 '9= TUE 15:1711 ID: E1-5 11 P_ _. TEL I:::�cc P02 -- TAX IN063EW FIWWINO EOTDNTE OF LOCAL QUVEFOW AIDS PEWITY CITY: 11711 m I. SALES RATIO: 1.001 80 XL DIST: 662 EDT TAX RATE: 14. W% TYPE OF DIST: EMN DEV/021T CANOPY TAX CSP RATE: 1.000 C%FRMD GAALIPYINO 904ML A04ATED TAX TAM TIP TAX F►K%--IN TAX GALES CIALIFYI70 FOIILTY DL v>ejT PAYAML CAPACITY PERMNTAM CAPACITY RATIO TAR CAPACITY TAX RATE FENALTY _0.00 1990 100.00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 24.006 1901 100.00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 21.8011 0.00 1992 100.00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 01.601 0.00 IBS3 0.00 100.001 0.00 1.001 0.00 M.60% 0.00 1994 0.00 100,0049 0.00 1.001 0.00 21.6011 0.00 1096 9,810.00 100.00% 0,070.00 1.001 9,860.11 24.601 2,426.69 1090 9,870.00 100.00% 9,870.00 1.001 9,600.14 14.00% 2,425.09 1907 9,870.00 100.00% 9,870.00 1.001 0,000.14 24.60% 2,425.60 1990 9,670.00 100.009 9.870.00 1.001 0,660.14 14.001 2.426.69 7999 0.870.00 100.002 9.070.00 1.001 0.60o. 14 21.6061 2.426.69 2000 9,870.00 100.001 9,070.00 1.001 9,800.14 24.60% 2,425.59 2001 0,070.00 100.009 9,070.00 1.001 0.800.14 24.60% 2.425.60 2002 9,870.00 100.00% 9,670.00 1.001 9.060.14 24, Opt 2,420.09 2003 100.0051 0.00 1.001 0.00 24.60% 0.00 2004 100.0011 0.00 1.001 0.00 14.609 0.00 2006 100.00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 24.601 0.00 2000 100.00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 14.60% 0.00 2007 100.0019 0,00 1.001 0.00 21.60% 0.00 IM IX -1w 0 M OIX X4.9N% 0.00 2009 100.0091 0.00 1.001 0.00 21.00% 0.00 2010 100,00% 0.00 1.001 0.00 21,00% 0.00 2011 100.0OY 0.00 1.001 0.00 24.60% 0.00 2012 100.00% 0.00 1.001 O.OD 24.60% 0.00 muc-ar.9/Omr�noaaraeeaoaar_rrltecaaean..:eraea.=nnn.cIIanr�mm...aanaam....... --- r,_.____s- TLE 15:01 ID:BDS III,:. TEL 110:784-K7;4 a.44. PAD- 'NBT- INOVVgT AFTER 1009 1f LOCIAL aodp0EM AT09 a-�••^•��c==-aIIiasa�zaasaaa�-===_ __ _zesa:::aeII-lnr=--cc aeaaa�r....aa� TM 6*OTi1MT® TMX CAPACITY IVTIL INCi9ENT 'PET' PATCD A014INI6TAATIW EXCESS IIA7'E IN0439OR PENALTY INDIEMENT PAMEHT INXPe IHCRM M .agaaaYp� 1.000 0.00 --.taacas--•-.n.- 0.00 aatII--.�_--iit=a-� 0.00 0.00 - arc=_ r 0.00 _---aamII3aaa 0.00 11000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000 to .600.00 2.425.69 6.234.01 0,000.00 1.066.56 9.699.64 1.000 10.661.00 2.425.60 6,734.01 6,000.00 1,005.90 9,607.64 1.000 10.601.00 2,426.60 0,234.01 6.000.00 1,005.90 9,619.04 1.080 10.010.60 2.425.69 0.234.01 6,000.00 11086.96 9.519.64 1.000 10 .60.60 21425.09 6.234.01 5,000.00 1,089.06 9,699.64 1.000 10 .561.60 2.425.59 6,294.01 5,000.00 11065.06 9,599.64 1.000 10.101.00 2,425.59 5.294.01 0,000.06 1,005.90 9,613.64 1.D00 10.651.00 2.425.59 6,294.01 6,000.00 1,Oe9.9e 9.509.64 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.080 0,00 O.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.060 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.M 1.000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.090 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OD 0.00 019.404.70 009,072.04 "8.000.00 U.527.00 020.740.12 ..��- T I WAS aa � �y5ti �• , b� —f:&' 'sil? 4s .o r� �i- I n i I �•..- �,`� _�•.:_ c wwn �J`l nlNl wMt Iles I rill .1 {Y� ^ "'�'T"-• tU{ifa tint■ ittlMAi:E U. rUinii. n[!, iiNt F wixi It-til0 Io �� t �'y-�•^= _ � � •IMINr.ttVrT.' tllHttt fN41NlltiML' xIYUl1!' ♦ j�',v / IAnh ,AXI C t a!L{ ., l� •-� li�l, l/�J g _!yr�e {nwwutl uu..n�./� ��\ arArt or rturuuo {.�>u rur�Y. INc. nublrc Y �"~/ 7' 'I UII{n � In M41tlf nlnut Wl• •Roll Al � h nlrinl � Q uit Pi C_'. 2 1 `b�.1f3tnlplpc_tu,_yt:1.—•.—.�-1'.y ` Jl,: h' r . "o w�a-- 1 (� 4r i p✓ � 2 tRtlPil$iU pPIKb'N�\ii ly II n lauw xui WNnl—f.lit`tT'` i r • aa, IANIU lu t. Fa�! � inVNb,N,>I. ,Nl.n.,•IA, I.INy{NT 1'unrx{i( +. �a},. $FCo �' I.N 1111 N•.IIIYa 1'RM IIn MIill ,_._•tY PUN'Pa5 .»r \t`` RD a , � `Cllr U! wwll lf.!{l0 Ill M • t ( (p(3 roef igiYt'••U i4fMNi o>l ill%in ' i{f1 ,,i0 n,N *. lutt✓:{INI trtuh+'U•1{ 111 (, IMttII l ItWa YIRI lul,. IMlNi11t1•I YYr 111 . ! .�..uN .u.. „�� fC;JJ F ran 11}raNu ruf nnuunNF+ • `�u e.aT ac { s = .._ L•r •....,1. •.I .Ila � I `` ! I _ 12045 CUSTOM CANOPY PO.801275 PH. 6124"78 reawen ROOMS. UN 55374 PAY It TOTHE ORDER I ss OLLARS %had FOR 1poliolosal 1:090038316: 00 898 Sr 0 Custom Canopy PROPERTY: Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park 155-018-002060 ENV = $27,700 Payable 1993 Letter of Intent and $5,000 check = February 16 Preliminary OMEF application Visit existing plant m February 25 Visit Bank = March 1 HRA adopt resolution authorizing = March 3 preparation of TIF Plan for Economic District No. 1-15 and requesting City Council call for a public hearing. Begin Development Contract preparation TIF Plan to school, county, and hospital = March 10 Conditional Use Application = March 15 City Council Calle for Public Hearing = March 22 OMEF Formal Application (EDA) = March 30 Public Hearing Notice o March 31 Planning Commission Meeting = April 6 Public Hearing Notice = April 7 HRA adopts resolution approving TIF Plan for District No. 1-15. City Council Public Hearing and adoption = April 12 of TIF District No. 1-15 Plan. City Council OMEF Review. Development Contract must be executed. OMEF Closing and disbursement = April 27 Begin Construction = May 1 I A RESOLUTION BY THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONT ICELLO, WRIGHT COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF A TAR INCREMENT FINANCE PLAN FOR TAR INCREMENT FINANCE DISTRICT NO. 1-15 AND REQUESTING CITY COUNCIL CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Rousing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA") , in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota, has received an executed Preliminary Agreement dated February 16, 1993, from Stephen P. Birkeland, Jr., Sole Proprietor, of Custom Canopy (the "Developer"), and WHEREAS, the Developer has delivered a check dated February 16, 1993, in the amount of $5,000 to the HRA; and WHEREAS, tha Developer has delivered a preliminary proposal for development (the "Building Plane") to the City of Mont 1cello (the "City") for review; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the Landowners have negotiated and agreed upon a selling price for Lot 6, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, the Developer has secured preliminary approval for project financing from the Bank of Elk River. Elk River, Minnesota, and has secured preliminary application approval for Greater Monticello Enterprise Funds; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Prospect Team visited the existing Custom Canopy manufacturing facility on February 25, 1993. NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority, in and for the City of Monticello, Minnesota: That the HRA authorizes Business Development Services, Inc. (BDS) to establish Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-13, an Economic District, and to prepare the Tax Increment Finance Plan relating to District No. 1-15 for Stephen P. and Joan M. Birkeland, Jr. (Custom Canopy). Page 1 2. That the HRA requests the Monticello City Council on Monday, March 22, 1993, call for a public hearing date of Monday, April 12, 1993, to establish Tax Increment Finance District No. 1-18 and adopt the Tax Increment Finance Plan relating thereof. Adopted this _fid day of March, 1993. ATTEST: HRA Executive Director HRA Chairperson Page 2 Consideration to review the vear-end summary of the HRA Fund and TIF -Debt Service Funds. Reference and Sackaround. Enclosed Is a copy of the year-end summary for the HRA Fund and TIB -Debt Service Funde as prepared by Rick Wolfeteller. Mr. Wolfeteller plans to join the HRA meeting after the Police Commission meeting for review of the enclosed summary. f� I aer n aur nIRICaIF1 1191 n aar as ur aa own oar n w a aur a OST sit out 111 =02 OW 013 ar oM Go ® LGf� EM Ma own, A WRWA HE I MEMW E9080! @SSE ammm tm Imu C—U,.{pr ,t,ro 9ILM II&M 113.A7s pUta1) WA" t7JAm 02111 (C.'e) 95.00 MMU91 0.3 .0 111]19 WAQ tl 11 1..1] 0a1.647 .CvaAm r{1.s tl 11W W tl SD 80 W W 95 L V�� 95]+11 1u.195 Tu marc W tl 1aa...a W 132111 W 17].010 tl IA.]G soW 12131 I11Jr W UO3W.m tl W , firltl 12195 95 W 11195! IYlJm {11.00 Bon'r1¢ee W 6 ® 10 ® ® B 10 IIa� B IID,® 9,95.0f1 "0114 W 95..0 112110 MWO 670.= MCI 13M.1r Sign m,m W.m ILsn I'Mom tl smm0 sn.13. "'IV. COT.&" PM Cw sae fIH Ca. nal M.1an 1311 1311 M r1..C�••1tl{ Win 00. "ces Rd ..ncor•.p am IAA's W.r. T1.a.MLunV6Ti00{ 113 100 LpY01EYHP 11Y 12M 011 R.p.n1'L95 1103 m 1111 D,MrrMo�P Rd ..r.[e••1n{[ s{i.w 11aa1 92J.3 {73.J.. w.O s6��s••aWi I',M 111.111 11 sm 11.,110 RR{d.N��••a.b 11AU 111.111 am {11,111 T 1.nW iea.a.l.w 621.621 m.m Ulm% mus mAW law� t^.a..1tl Y{[dTr sales ` •11{ � � 1� 113 IW Td ten NI,®) 111111 tYJ11 l.nl riWe, imm S'r m Toru 1103 IWA11 4am mo WIM LUAM mAm 93 173.00 1:1.195 11]1..]1 tl sC..11 11.01 601,611 Cad, wdr a..tu'rn�ro MA" M$a 1111 am (111.$1 CIJT mAr CIA's 111 C,n1 011.1]0 oar! 1'IAY CW -a ", 1']= MI.Ou �rn'noM.a norca O{wd l.se {yrs' CJme 1111y1 Cam OiGesnYr'aw {M[� tl 11100 110111 Us= sad 101191 N— 103 00 WIN 1x111 C..1 1LOAMA1. TW - 0E9T SERVIC p$ 12MAR 19900 I6u 1990. Ix54 Im 191A 79179 193.1 RIEIMA F1 191 1927D TaTALS IOIART ES AWDAMM OOWJT S MAwCO ELDERLY I13D iAPM MVPLAE SL7 SAM ALL 1 mm C40 %",h. Vow) 1I V1 REVONE: 0.80.54 807.17.33 163.3721 $27..11.0 19.420.56 100.548.77 $0.00 $000 1205.277.22 127.32423 T1vuI.l In aim Mill 0.6600 L34.225 00 152.75.00 18.30000 1a.15.m 03.075,00 $0.00 so DO 12..15000 $107,W.7a 054 Y.crmulta) xn.m Inc" man 81,48741 $1.354.1 575447 W911! 11..40.35 sm HA $6.19578 $1954 TOTAL REVEISIE 93267.29 135.022.41 03.4062 19.284.7 17,518M 65315.35 sow $000 1]0.3,78 1107.701.1 ( �N" EWENSE3 Pnm"PIpam am= 110.000.9 830.9.00 113.00000 $5.000m $0.00 i00.Om00 1000 Mum Em9ue 6.137-00 12537600 10.019 $10.07260 12..9.00 0.777.83 $110.31503 11MS.00D Pg1n0 Ago F.ms NSA 543$.M $829.40 WgUl Ham 9.06.32 52,M60 $37796 TOTAL ED04NWS 0,117.75 10.01141 60.671.81 15.761.97 17.87101 17,110 05 1103.01163 M.917 m UP &.041001M) 1701197 W,1 i u 27'.21125 "Max 830.907.1 12x.0511. 60,000,77 $000 1000 142.5.N.77 MAN 15 AWKWAL M017% 010" mw 0aO1 $16.9000 W0.000,m 16.1.00.= $133.00000 100.009 439.000.00 1125,00000 175.00000 69.0009 Wm.r4m16ond OM W.m000 631011009 176.00000 6110.0000 155.01M00 637.000.00 1125.00000 175.0990 69.00000 a 01 17771192 Pl,m "In 1000 P1uc10r 0.00.00 $10.00.00 637.009 6..'0.0000 95.=00 6000000 $000 $000 03.00000 Muco 1750,00 03.x6,00 118.0100 "Ango SMOMM 0,671.00 95.04300 13.01447 Mad: 00 Paying AAAI F.p 66000 6039 601.0 $.6.00 54/09 62x00 Moo 1000 am 00 BDS February 26, 1993 Ms. 011ie Koropchak City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 STATEMENT Business Development Services, Inc. Consulting Services --January 15, 1993 through February 14, 1993 Marketing --Not Billed 01/27/93 LPK--Wilson Tool Proposal, followup w/Patrick & 011ie. 1.25 01/28/93 MAM--Proposal. Wilson Tool. 2.50 LPK--Wilson Tool Proposal, Revisions, Sales Tax refund info., fax to 011ie. 2.50 01/29/93 MAM--Wilson Tool. .25 LPK--Wilson Tool Proposal. Totai Mb:rteting•-riot Billed Hums: NIT CHARGEABLE HOURS: -0- Net Chargeable Hours ® 575/Hour $ _0 - TOTAL AMOUNT DUE CURRENT OVER 30 OVFR 60 QVFR $_0_ 8990 -0- 8990 Sprinpbrook DrivaeSuite 230WInneopolls, MN 55433ePhone: 6121786.6151•Fax: 786.9034 February 2, 1993 Ms. 011ie Vjwopchak City of Monticello 250 East Broadway P.O. Box 1147 Monticello, MN 55362 STATEAI T f Auslness Dat+ebprams! SeMeos lac. Consulting Services—December 15, 1992 through January 14, 1993 Marketine—Not Billed 12-30.92 PWP—Follow-up on prospects w/011ie. 1.75 Total Markedng—Not Billed Hours: Im NET CHARGEABLE HOURS: -0- Net Chargeable Hours ® s75/Hour �¢ TOTAL AMOUNT DUE CLMENT OVER OVER b0 QY Lm s-& TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS 6090 vW00110ON mm 0 UM m 0 MNNEA90A M sun 0 P010w 61UM4151