HRA Agenda 09-06-1995AGENDA
MONTICELL.O HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, Septemher 6, 1995 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chairperson Al Larson. Vice -Chairperson Brarl Barger,
Everette Ellison, Tom St. Hilaire, and Roger Carlson.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: 011ie Kornpchek
CITY STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller
Jeff O'Neill
GUEST: ,Lim Harwood, Voctor Tool k Manufacturer
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE AIIOUST 2, 1995, HRA MINUTER,
3. PUBLIC HF.ARINO FOR THE ArQUISITTON AND DTSPOSTTTON OF RAW
LANDS DESCRTBF.D AS LOT 5, BLOrK 3, OIP AND CONSTDF.RATTON TO
ADOPT THE RESOL.UTTON RELATING THERETO.
4, rONSIDERATION TO REVIEW FOR FURTHER DIRF.rTION THE DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE HRA AND LARSONJMETrAT,F RET.ATTNr. TO A 20
FOOT EASEMENT.
e 5. rONRIDERATTON TO REVIEW FOR FURTHER DTRECTION THE rOMPARISON
RF.TWFEN THE TAX INCREMENT CUARANTP.E AND THE TAX INr.RF.MENT
RECEIVED RELATING TO CERTAIN TTF DISTRICTS.
6. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW FOR FURTHER DIRECTION THE TTP
RETMRIIRSP,MENT'R OF CERTAIN TIF DTSTRIrTR.
7. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS FOR FURTHER DTRECTION RURSTANnARD
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES POR POSSIRLP.RFnEVP.LOPMENT.
R. rnNSTDERATION TO REVIEW COMMENTS FROM ATTORNEY RURUT, RF.T.ATINr
TO THE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TO Ann AN ADDITIONAL rRTTERTA
TO THE I.nrAT. TTP POLICIES.
9. OTHER BUSINESS.
10. ADJOURNMENT.
MINUTES
MONTICEL.I.O HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
`1 Wednesday, August 2, 1995 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Al Larson, Everette Ellison
(tardy), Tom St. Hilaire, and Rogor Carluon.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice -Chairperson Brad Barger.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: 011ie Koropchak.
CITY STAFF: Jeff O'Neill.
GUEST: Jamos Harwood, Partner, Vector Tool & Mfg.
I nr. .
Steve Grittman, City Plattner, Northwest
Associates.
1. CALL TO nRDFR.
Chairperson Larsun called the HRA mepting to order at 7:00
p.m.
2. CONSIDERATION-.TO_APPROVE THE JUNE 6, 1998, HRA MINUTES,
Tom St. Hilaire made a motion to approve the June 6, 1995, RRA
minutes. Roger Carlson "cc -tided the motlun and wiLh no
corrections or additions, the minutes were apProvec9 as
writton.
3. CONSIDERATION_ TOACCEPT THE DECLARATION OF POTENTIAL CnNFLICT
RR
OF INTEST SUBM_ITTED BY COMMTSSTnNER BRAD BARCF.R.
HRA rummiseioners oonsld.rred the declaration dated July 1,
1995 from Cnmmissionor Rargnr. The HRA did not nrmuldo r the
declaratiun In July as requcoted because no HRA moetlnLj was
hold during the month of .tuly, 1996. Mr. Rargor submitca the
der.laration of pntcritiol conflir.t of lnterest as he is one of
the three partnors of Vuctor Ton] & Manufacturing, a huaioess
under cnnsideration to devclno in the City of Minticell.-r.
Tum St. Hilaire made a mutirm to accept the Doclaratinri of
Potontinl ConfI lut of Interest from HRA Commieutuner Brad
Barger. Al Larson socandud the motion and with no fu rthor
diecussion, the motion panacd. Yoas: Hilaire. Largon,
F..11ison. and Carlson. Nays: None. Ahsont: Brad Rarger.
Page 1
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 2, 1998
4. CONSIDERATION TO NPGOTTATE THE TERMS AND CONDI TI ONS OF THE
PURCHASE_AGREEMENT FO_R LOT 5.RLOCK 3; OIP;-AND CALL -FOR A.
UB
PLIC_HEARIBG ON_THE ACQUTSTTION_AND DISPOSITION OF RAW_LAND.
Chairperson Larenn welcomed .Tim Harwood of Vector Tool & Mfg.
Inc.
Koropchak reviewed the three options for land write -down hayed
on the assumptions as outlined in the agenda; informed the HFA
that the IDC Prospect Team had toured Vector'-:; existing
facility in Mal,le Grove, anti that Mr. Harwood and she met with
Attorney Bubul on July 26 to determine the terms and
conditions of the purchase agreemnnt. At the July 26 meeting;
Mr. Harwood requested the consideration of $30,000 as the land
purchase price in order for the project and proposed hrtyout to
occur.
Mr. Harwood indicatr:d the developers are proposing to
construct a 19,000 aq ft metal/stceel offJcelma nufacturJng
facility, 611 X 120 ft manufacturing and 28 X 64 ft office
space, on the most easterly portion of T-ot F. consideration
of the developers to subdivide the lot for a second business
was discussed. With the three partners buyout in 19AA; the
` company had border -line profits, the next, two -years were
prnfit.able, most recently the company has incurred 10110 -term
debt with the purchase of computers and equipment, and the
rompany's not worth hnnk-value is approximately S1.4 million
repnrted Mr. Harwood. Additionally, two of the thrce partners
of Vortnr aro nonatdering the buyout of tha third Itartner.
rrnnndhraaking anticipated 0ctoher 1, 1995.
Previously, the HRA estimated the purchase prico 0f thv land
at $96,n00 ($ vi,non X A.4 acrua) and considered a pnrnhasc
price of $40400 for the land haled on th" ronstruntinn of a
16.000 Rq ft roncrete f.telllty with high skill. high wage
employment ($12.00 ph). Chairpercaon Lars-nt ropnrtad V.r.tnr's
exlst.ing rental far_tllty la dated cramped. ;ind cmploya at
least fivt- Mt:mtine7)o people.
In order to attrar.t a grind company with A high t3kill, high
wage. employment Lase and to generate tax reveuuea from a tax-
exompt property, the HRA mumhere disnusocd and Agreed to the
following terms and nonditirnts: Pnrnhase Price for Lot A,
Rlnck 3, £33,000 (6.4 arres); retroar.tivo weigh ted-avcrayc
wage!henefits of 612.00 pur hrntr7 total empinyment of 30,
arrnuntahle 1n 2 yeare; for a period of five -yearn cell -off of
Lot 8 to other than oither partner nr hoth r. quiros HRA
approval; $33,000 purchase price Onod for 30 days, request
Page 2
NRA MTMITES
AUGUST 2, 1995
$5:000 earnest muncy; all lcual and aonument
preparation!closingrrrrordIng fees r•asponsiI,iIJty of th„
buyer. aper.Jal assessments responsibility of the buyer.
submittal of evidenne of construction financing; however: not-
limltr;d-t.o the ahove. Tom St. Hilaire made a motion to acc,:pt
the above terms and conditions as the terms and nonditinns of
the Purchase and Dovclopment Contract between the HRA and
Ventor Tnol & Mfg: Inr.., authorized the HRA GhaJrl,ersr,n and
Executive Director to execute said contract, and called for a
public hearing date of September S. 1995, for the anquisition
and disposition of raw lands. Al Larson sc•ronded the motion
and requested the HRA review the building and site plans.
Without further discussion, the motion pasecd unanimously.
CONSIDERATTnN OF A CO_MPREHENRTVE_PLAN UP DATE,�REDP_VR.LOPMFNT
CONCEPT t)TSCUSSION RY STRVP. GRITTMAN.
City Planner Rtevr Grittman gave an overview of the completed
prones to date (Attachment 1) and outlined activities
remaining (Attachment 3) prior to Comprr..h,rnsive Plan UpdatP
approval. Sine the City Commissioners meeting, two
neJghhorhood meetings wore held at the high school.
Attachment 2 list the iseru.,s discussed and the priorities
which resulted from the neJghhorhood discussJnnA. The planner
and Mr. O'Neill were romfortahl.,. with the attendance of the
neighhnrhood meetings. Chairparsnn Larson said, "He was
iaurprise,d that in addition to city staff, and cnmmiAr4ioners,
only, two other persons atter„9od the s,easJnn tip attend. --d."
"What efforts are h,>SnU done to nnnsult with area r.hurchcA and
other organizations?" was a quostinn posed. DisrusaJuns wrr•.•
held with Pastor Russet, of the.- Minist,::rial Assaniat,lr,n: other
nommiAAJcors r.nnthmo to meet: and a put,lic hearing will hi•
held prior to approval of the Cnmprehcnsivc Plan.
GrJttman said, "He was most surprised by this Jssur ra7serl
relating to th,r shortage of the labor supply within the area."
A fJAnal impart rel",rt Jt. ander preparatJon! cost of eervJnt,
In relationship to value of property. Crittman then reviewed
the land use mai', which propns,•d industrial land to the wont
and south of T-06 and rnmmorclal land to the south alrinu
Highway 25. GrJttman renponsod that an approved ComprehensJve-
Plan is a general plan used by management as a gulde fnr
enforrement of polJoy. The land use linPA may not he exant
but are transit.innal. Crlttman agreed with HRA members that
the dlenusAed outlet mall does not meet or endorne the
objectives as determined by t.hu resulte of the rnmmissionerm
voting At the city commissJnners maetJrtg.
Pour. 3
HRA MINUTES
AUSTIST 2, 1995
HRA members felt the city was being short-sighted as to its
projected growth, 101 housing starts Fier year for the next 20
years, as it relates to the expansion of the waste wat.cr
treatment plant and development of public utilities. Grlttman
outlined the proposed traffic patterns including County Road
118 as 4-6 lanes, School Boulevard completion, and Oakwood
Drive/Highway 25 intersection realignment at a point farther
south and extended westerly running parallel to I-94 to
Ornhard Road. Traffic, needs to he disbursed away from the
Interchange of I-94 and Hwy 25 therefore was the rational for
Industrial land to the west only.
HRA members felt the City needs to visJon the city as a major
square box and then to propose more than one traffic, pattern
which dJehurses traffit,. across and nnto I-94 and to proposo.
utility infrastructure under and beyond T -Q4 to serve the
square box. Other comments. It takes a Council with gats and
futuristic vision. A city does not exist without the supply
of land and Infrastructure to attract people (Jnrlustry,
commerce, and residr--nts), the people form a community and
request cniamunity services.
Planner Grlttman presented four preliminary red ,:velopmc:nt
sketch options for consJdPratlon of a downtown redevNlnpmcnt
pro?r.•r.t. The sketch options resulted from ideas of
JndJvJduals In attendance at the neighhr,rhaod meerltigs. HRA
memhc:rs rnantlnnw were varlud. Some mcmhers wc•rv:• ennonragcd
by a possJhle downtown redevelopment r,rnj(•ct wl',ptlter It be• a
rennvatIon or demollshlon project. nthers wii.-t•e non -
Ek uJill .)rtive. Members dirt ..gree that the hest utJllzatJor, of
thr river front property was for pe,leetrran/park development
and tint for parking lots nr an Jre arena. Some., m,•mhara saw
the community center as a puhlrc building which would generate
addJtJonal motor traffic. to an .+]wady hJgh-dNnsJty traffic.
area. Ts the focus of the redevelopment projrrct for the
devNlnpment of a community center e.r tr, attract
c_nmmer•:�!tnurism thro,jgh the utilization of the river front?
Is a redevelor,mont r•,rojent foasable? One nautJoned not to
promotr� displanement of hustnessee. One memba•r hc,-llovcd thc_•
cart had boon placurl before the• horse and sugg,?st,rd
rnncr-ntrat ion he on Infrastructure/traffic and Industrial
development, and then rodoliclopmont. The city iweds th,-
revcnucs not more expcnAes.
With soms HRA membrars having left, no fnrmalizc•d cnnnluslon nr
recommendatinns wcrr; mad,:.
Pags 4
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 2, 1998
B. CONSIDERATION TO REVIEW COMMENTS FROM ATTORNEY BDBUL RELATING
TO THE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL CRITERIA
TO THE LOCAL TIF POLICIES.
Tabled to the next HRA meeting.
7. CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT UPDATES:
Tabled to the next HRA meeting.
B. OTHER BUSINESS:
Tabled to the next HRA meeting.
9. ADJOURNMENT.
The HRA meeting adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
011ie Koroprhak, Executive Director
` Page 5
I
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
4CT/V/77ES:
• STAFF DISCUSSIONS TO REFINE APPROACH AND IDENTIFY ISSUES
• "TACTICS" INTERVIEWS TO IDENTIFY ISSUES FROM BROAD SPECTRUM OF
COMMUNITY INCLUDING:
- BUSINESS OWNERS, INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES, STAFF, CITY
COUNCIL, COMMISSION MEMBERS, HRA, RESIDENTS, AND OTHERS
• ISSUES CATEGORIZATION TO COMBINE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TOPICS
INTO COMMON AREAS
• COMPLETE INVENTORY REPORT/ANALYSIS INCLUDING SECTIONS
SPECIFIC TO THE TACTICS CATEGORIES, AND APPENDIX OF INVENTORY DATA
IN TABULAR FORM
• FISCAL IMPACT REPORT FOR PC PRESENTATION ON 7/25 IN DRAFT FORM
• CITY WORKSHOP CONDUCTED TO IDENTIFY PRIORITY GOALS IN HOUSING
AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
• CONCEPT LAND USE SKETCH PREPARED TO ILLUSTRATE EFFECTS OF
CITY IDENTIFIED PRIORITIES
• "NEIGHBORHOOD" WORKSHOPS CONDUCTED TO IDENTIFY POPULAR
CONCEPTS OF COMMUNITY NEEDS
• SYNTHESIS OF WORKSHOPS PREPARED FOR PC WORKSHOP
• DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS PREPARED FOR PC
WORKSHOP
®-
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
OUTCOMES:
• ISSUES:
A) LAND USE MANAOEMENT/RA7E OF GRowTFI
B) OuALITT OF New DEVELOPMENT
W CosT/BENEFTT OF NEw DEVELOPMENT
W CoMMuNfTY FACILITIES - WHICH FACILITIES ARE PRIORITIES?
W ECONOMIC DEvELOPmFNT - WHERE TO Focus?
F) DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT - WHAT Is Cm's RoLEi
o) INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT - WHERE SHouLD IT E)IPANDi
PRIORITIES (IN NO PARTICULAR ORDER):
A) HIGHER VALUE HousING DEVELOPMENT
B) CONTINUATION OF CURRENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
W EXPANSION AREA FOR ADDITIONAL INDUsmLAL DEVELOPMENT
O) REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING FOR THE DOWNTOWN AREA
W INTENSIFICATION OF CITY RECREATION FAOLITIEB AND AMENITIES
F) FOCUS ON ENTERTAINMENT/RECREATIONXIM ACTIVITIES IN THE
DOWNTOWN AREA
G) GREATER UTILIZATION OF THE RIVER FRONT
H) ATTENTION TO TRAFFIC C1NCERNS (ESP. NWV 25 / BROADWAY)
1) BETTER ACCESS ACROSS 1.94 (Born PEmrry wi Am AUTOMOBILE)
J) MORE ATTENTION TO AEsTHEflCB IN NEW AND EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT
30v Slav 4poo
1~ 100
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
os oP Ac v71 /TIES:
DISCUSS ISSUES RELATED TO CONCEPT PLANS
SELECT PREFERRED CONCEPT OPTIONS
DISCUSS/EDIT INVENTORY REPORT
CONTINUING ACTIVITIES:
• SET POLICY APID GOALS FOR REMAINING ISSUES CATEGORIES
• DEVELOP CONSENSUS ON PROGRAM ELEMENTS
• PREPARE FINAL- DRAFT OF PROGRAM ELEMENTS, INCLUDING:
- LAND USE, TRANZPORTATION, PARKS & PATHWAYS, MOUSING,
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, ETC.
• HOLD JOINT COMMISSION/COUNCIL WORKSHOP ON DRAFT PLAN DOCUMENT
• REVIEW AND REVISIONS PER WORKSHOP CONCENSUS
• PUBLIC REVIEW AND HEARING
r
HRA AOENnA
SEPTEMBER 5, 1995
Public Hearing fnr__ the acquisitinn_ and disixs4ition of raw
lands described as Lot 5, Block_ 3, OM._ grad ,_�nsidarat_In_n to
adspt the re13olution relating thcret.o..
As a reminder to HRA members: Commissioner Barger will not
take part iu any action or discussion relating to thin prejoc:t
as stated in the arrepted neclaration of Potential Conflict of
Interest.
Reference and Barkijround_,_
PUBLIC RBARIRt1i
The HRA Chairperson shall open the puhlir hearing relating to
the aaqulsJtJon and dispooition of Lest 5, Block 3, OIP.
On August 2, 1995, HRA members and Mr. JamoR C. Harwood of
Vector Tool & ManufacturJng made adjustments and agreed to the
first draft of the Purchase and Development. Cnntrar.t hetweett
the HRA and Vector Tool & Manufacturing. The purchase price
of tho 6.4 arren of heavy industrial lands {I-2) as determin._d
by the HAA was $3:1,000, Vector Tool renponalble for a]1 legal
and closing oontn. The ontimated market value agreed at
$96,000 with a land wrJto down of $6:1,000. The proposed land
write-down Is based on Vector Tool employing 30 full-tlmu
personnel wlthin two yearn at an averago weJghted wagc!b, n, fit
cif $12.00 per hour and cone true tIng :, 15,000 e,1 ft.
offJro/manufacturing facJlity. The, HRA approved a motion
anrr_pting the agreed upon terms and rondltinnu of the Purr.har44:
:incl Development Contract and called for a p,u1,IJc hrarJng d+te
of September F, 1995, for the anqulstt.lon and dh4pnolt:ion of
raw land".
The puhlic he:,rin;i notine appeared In thn Monticello Tim,iu ori
August 24 .and 31, 1995, meetJng the hoar•Jng notice
rogrtirems,ntn .an rant by the Minneant.a Statutory.
Site plans are hoing reviewed by this City Engineer. htrlldlug
i'sl:+ns will he eubmJth•d 00011 to tho City Ruildinu offt,:i,,],
prolimtnary termt4 and con,tittons of the lending N"t.lt.ntlosn
ws•re oubmJttod to the psartnero, the psartnr-re art, prui,arintl ..,
ln.,n applicatlon for submittal to lit-) Central M1nnount.a
Ind f lat'No Fund, aril the Mont lr..s.11o EDA to .ntJcJpat ing
request for fundis from the Greater Muntieullo Enturpritie Fund.
Yut to hu ruuolved is the propof4i�d huyrsut rsf rsne rsf threw
partnrsru of Vector Tur,l.
Page t
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
Upon hearing comments from the general public, the HRA
chairperson shall close the public hearing and call for a
motion to adopt the resolution authorizing the acquisition and
disposition of the raw lands.
ADOPTIOX OF THE RM16 TIOW
Prior to the adopting the resolution, I recommend the HRA
review the Monticello TIF Policies for compliance. This t.n be
conslatent with other HRA projocts; although, this is not a
TIF project, the HRA Is still writing down the land cost.
B. Alternative Actions:
1. A motion to adopt Resolution No. 95-7 authorizing the
acquisition and disposition of raw lands described as Lot
5, Block 3, oIP t3 Vector Tool & Manufacturing.
2. A motion to deny adoptiun of Rcaolution No. 95-7.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. Recommendation:
Staff supports the HRA efforts in attracting a quality
manufacturing business; however, cautions the HRA to be clear
of Its rationale for the established purchase price.
11. Supporting_Data
Resolution for adoption, public hearing notice, Monticello TiF
Policios, and comparlson of offers.
Y Paye 2
HRA RESOLUTION NO, a5-7
A RESOLUTION BY THE HOUSING, AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA.
AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF RAW LANDS
DESCRIBED AS
LOT 5, BLOCK 3, OIP
WHEREAS; both the Housing and Rodevulolamcnt Authority in and for
the City of Montleello (the "Authority") and Jamey C. Harwood and
Bradley D. Barger, partners, agree to the terms of the Purchase and
Development. Contract between the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Monticello and Vector Tool A
Manufacturing, a Minnesota general partnership, (the
"Roduvoloper"), and all the eonvenants therein; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Monticello declares the said raw lands for acquisition and
disposition lies within the Modified Central Monticello
Redevelopment Plan of Redovolopmc�nt Project No. 1; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and RedRvelopment Artthority in and for the
City of Monticello owns the said raw lands and the parties agree to
an estimated market value of $96,000 for the said raw lands; and
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for tho
e City of Muntieullo deelareeii proper notice appeared In the
Monticello Tines relating to the public hearing held September A,
1995, for the acquisition and disposition of the said raw lands:
and
WHEREAS. the Housing and Rudevelupm-w Authority to and fur the
City of Monticello and Jamcra C. Harwood and Bradley D. Barger agrae
that the Redeveluper will ounst.ruct upon the said raw lands a
15,000 eq ft office and manufacturing facility for Vector Tool and
Manufacturing craating 30 full-time johe within two years at, an
average weighted wage!bunofit of $12.n0 pur hour; and
WHEREAS, the Honsiny and Redcvclnpmont Authority in and fur the
City of Monticello and the Redevoloper agree to a purchase pricy of
Thirty-three Thousand Dollar~ and No Cents (533.000) for the
acquisition and dithoc.ltlon of the r.w Iande duscrihad as:
Lot 5, Block 3. Oakwood Industrial Park,
City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of MJnnesota
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the gnvr:rnlny holy of the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority In and for the City of Mnntir:ello finita
the redevelopment tri be In the public interest, hcrausu:
1. It tri canolstunt with rhe City of Mnnt1cellu
y Comprehensiv,i Plan- and
2. It will dlsrr.,urago commorce: Industry: or manufacturing
from moving their operations to another state; and
�. It will result In increased employment in tho
municipality; and
4. It will result In prewervation and enhanrcment of the tax
base of the municipality.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Mnnticello, MlnneRnta, does hereby authnrize the dlepoaitlon of
described raw lands to Vector Tool a Manufacturing subject to
compliance of the Purchaeo and Development Contract dated
95.
Adopted by the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority t.hls
day of September, 1995.
ATTEST:
HRA Exocutivo Diroctor
t
HRA Chairperson
.L FOR BIDS
ill be received by the Monticello -Big Lake
Barbara Schwientek. Monticeno-Big Lake
55362, until 12:15 p re. Central Daylight Time,
wed atter this date and hme will be returned
after the date and hour listed above for the
e refereed to the Board of Directors for anay
eboard with. 30 d8
iy!
d Mmt.cell0- Lake Community
;tek, , elle Big Lake Commonly Hospital,
on rf ,ter
Hospital,;
a .. August 10. 1995
ospilal District reserves the right to reject any
egulmibes in the ridding
oard of Dreecims
,MENDMENT NO. 275
LO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
'N B (C), OF THE MONTICELLO CfTY ORDp
IS OF IO
OPERATN FOR LIQUOR LICENSE
-ED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:
Ther provided that no intoxicating aqua nary
directly, W indirectly, except between the
W aneo'clock (1:00) a re Monday, err then
'ood to pern,ns who are seated of and
If, day of Auoalsl, 1995
-Brad Fyle. Mayo,
'atom
iMENDMENT NO. 274
LO, MINNESOTA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
'ION 1, PERTAINING TO PENALTIES FOR
IOLATIONS, BE AMENDED TO READ AS
ter who is round to have vidatod an oder of
amply with any provision or INS ordinance and
mils issued hereunder shall be Med not less
no more than Five Thousand Dofws (115,000)
e vloatron shell occur Or continue shall be
e In addition to the feenal ies providad herein,
eyo fees, court Costs, Court reporters tees.
1 opiate action agalml the porion found to
oder. • repulauons, and pmmlts hwe0
ndd,tiot.. the chill penalties fxmdod for m
uovalons of this rndlnonce or who has a dm
ruction, damage, N othw impairment 10 the
dl became sable to the Cittyy Ia any expanse,
� w discharge The puecior may add 10 the
eased for pry cloanh0, repdr, monilving at
. caused by the NOIei on or diaChmge Arty
I conslitute a violation of this ordinance
.Ib day of August, 1995
- Bine Wyle, maw
mhe
PUBLIC NEARING
inmlrgs will be hold by aro City of Moeticell0
S, at 7 P in , In the Mentalis City "all to cm
nr a cnnddlenot use pormll no -
wing a
lopre-I In a R PUD lone Location
i Inc
oolmninery plat approval of the pia
:A on Outlol A, Klein Farms
Inc
u e slnll aisle and driveway conditional
nate curb reguh emenl m the non of
Loc often
Lot 5. Block J. Oakwood
nccepfed on ahow sutyeds, and an pwsam
toci$ will ho Mad at this meaning
ommm� -m will ho subject to W oval p
..d, day, Said
11, 1995. al 7o, ra , N
to,
housing resolution The general funcft description of the type end use of each
faldaty, the developer which currently owns a" facility. and Its tocetiw we as togowl
Devalopsirl Description-KIIINO. TO""ll, 311f.mlyw
tonhur
o.
Oubstaranrp Mortgspe Balssse.-SI,t10,00a
Owrr.r/Owwsf Perbnr(eJ211sitd. Properties, CyA1 Palmist. gen.nl partner
D�srelopsmsat Locos! 20Y Larding Lase, Mon leeno
The maximus egDegate face amount of bonds to be issued with regard to each
oI the above dovelopmenb win be the Proportionate Mare each oulaandtq ngrt.
gage balance represents of the total outstanding age balanoe (total of mors
gapes epproximatety $35.152,2 75) es a pwcentaps of new bonds to be issued
Pelves w hino to Comment on rhe proposed fnerloirlg may appear In person at the
hearing or may submit written comments to the uddertgrlaA prior to the hearing
-Kedudno G Fadtey, conmieNoner
(Aug 24, 1995)
Notice of Public Hearing
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CRY OF MONTICELLO-COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the H and Redevelopment Aungryty (are
'Authority') of the City of Monticello, County of Wflghl, State of Mlrmesote. will hold
=e puDtlt hearinp Wednesday, Sept 6, 1995 at approximately 7:00 p en , at the Cly
ALmdceno, Minnesota. '118"to the proposed action and disposition of
raw lards located within he
Modified Central Monticello Redevoldprtlern Plan for
R sidern•elopirmeni Project No 1.
The
proposed for acquisition we described as form
LCUWIMIQLrAm
Lot 5. Block 3. Oakwood trdisaial Park, City of Monticello.
County of YNIga1. State of Minnesota
-Ohs Koepchak, HRA Execuum Director
(Au, 2, A 3. 1995)
TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL
It is Ordered end Notice Is o
a m., a hearing win be held In Thi.
Buffalo, Mknesota, Ip the formal
win of the Decedent, doled Fedi
Rebecca E Oslund, whose Oddi
55320 es Personal Represerdat.
VISED edminishetton Any objet
WWior to Wal the hearing If prc
Representative win be appointed
the power to correct ire assets. to
sell real and personal property, m
Notice n also p,en that (subl
claims against the Eslate are i
Representative a to me Court Ao
Notice o, the claims will be banes
Dated. Aug 17, 1995
Attorney, to, Personal Represents
Paul W SIM
HALL A BYERS, P A
1010 W SI German, Suite 600
St Cbud, MN 56001
(61 21252 4414
ax 16121 252 4462
F,norney License No 104814
lAug 24 d 5;. ( 6651
You're always clo
A LETTER f
It you're leaving Minnesal
we'll help you keep in lout
back home. A terfer From
dealing lust with what you
well-informed GLeat gdjjL
A Latter From Minnesota, I I I
STATE FAIR
To F
The wall Inh Annrv6rsary 1
Free Recip
MernbershlF
• Free recipe
Over 100,000 rocq
end
For Furth
Independent in
4R;
Telophone (6
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
i
City of Monticello
TAR INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY
Program Purpose: The Monticello Housing and Redevelopment
Authority will utilize Tax Increment Financing to support the
community's long-term economic and housing goals.
Policy Considerations: The HRA will analyze and evaluate Tax
Increment Financing proposals based upon the following policy
considerations. Each project shall be measured against these
considerations and the project's value shall be determined, based
upon meeting these cone iaeratIons.
1. The project shall be consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
2. The project shall demonstrate long-term economic and/or
housing benefits to the community.
3. The project shall create and/or retain employment for
Monticello residents.
♦. The project shall increase moderate priced housing options for
IL area residents.
5. The project shall facilitate the redevelopment or elimination
of "substandard" or "blighted" areas as determined by the HRA.
6. The project shall facilitate the "clean-up" of environmentally
unsound property.
7. The project shall provide additional public funding for public
improvements including utilities and/or park development which
would not otherwise be available.
a. The project shall be deemed to promote additional doeired
"spin-off" development.
Lot 5, Block
3, OIP
HRA Mot.ion
HRA _Motion,
April fi, 1995
August 2, 1995
EMV $96,000
EMV $96,000
Purchase Price $60,000
Purchase Price $:13,000
Write-down $36,000
Write-down $63,000
(+$27,000)
15,000 sq ft metal office/
15,00n sq ft metal
manufacturing facility
office/manufacturing
facility
Totiant
Ownership
Existing Munticello
One partner existing
business
Manticollo business
Annual payroll, $632,31.0
Annual payroll, $748,800
38 X 2080 - 79,040 hours
30 X 2080 a 62.400 hours
X $8.00 over 2 years
X $12.00 over 2 years
(+$116,480 annually)
Growing, hard working company
Orowing, hard working
company
C
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER fi, 1995
Consideration to re_view_for further direction the Development_
4gLegment between the_HRA_and Larsnn_iMetcalf relating_ tu_a 20
foot easement.
Reference and_ Rar_kground_:
Within the last week Larson/Metcalf blocked off the access
from the Post Office to I.ncust Street. On January 11, 199f:
the HRA recommended Brad Larson address a letter to the Cinco
Corporation (owner of the post uffioe building) giving a 30 -
day notice to close the driveway. The HRA's objective wa-3 to
encourag,, the two property owners to rr_Knlve the problem ur
fnr Cinco Corporation to inquire to the city for purchase of
the old Hass Property. (Son encloried letter of April 26,
1995.)
As Jeff O'Neill indicated at the. January 11 meeting, rhe
public has the right-tu-cross. within the 1983 D,•velopment
Agreement between the NRA and Larsnn/Metcalf (the
"developers"), the developers agreed to file of rc-cord a
twenty (20) fuot wide easement fur purposes of ingress and
ogresu in favor of the City of Monticello to he approved by
the City Attorney. No record of the 2n foot eaaemout exi:yts.
The City does own a small strip of property to the north of
the Larson/Metcalf office building; however, thr strip does
not run westerly to a point joining the property owned by
Cinco Cnrporation.
Brad Laraun has repeatedly regtleerod the HRA or City to
provide a temporary driveway for postal use with an anrea+--a to
Linn Street thrnrtgh the old Haus Property. PnetmaOter
Hutchinson has called Adminintratnr wolfnteller stating the
City promised US Post Office an Ingress and egress. AI though
City Adminlutratlon does support the HRA's rocommond.ation and
objectivr, they do fool t,ho puhlic hara the right-tn cross and
that the developers have nut complied with the Dovrlopmumt
Ayreument of October Al, 11A3.
After dleeuuuion, the HRA may wltAi to considi-r the follr,wlny
al toVila tIvos.
Altarn:itivu Actinnn:
A motion to stand firmly hohlnd hRA r11cnmm0nd.-4tlnn of
January 11, oncourabing t,ho two prop,rrty ownerw to
rvoolvo the lunue.
P.agu 1
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 5. 1995
2. A mntlon to obtain legal advise relating to poasihle
enforcement of the DrevPlnpment AgreemHnt.
3. A motion fur the HRA or City to providn a tompnrary
driveway through thc-: Hass prnporty with an accoan ro Ginn
RtrAnt.
4. A motion to take a "wait and ace" approach.
C. Staff recommendation:
Tt appears the HRA and City has harm thn aul,iont fnr mat
resolving thr. icssur_. Staff suppnrta altNrnativc, No. 2 ur 4.
D. DA -N _
Development Agreement, Map, and Letter of Apri] 75.
`+ Paye 2
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
�f
THIS AGREEMENT, executed this I�eay of October, 1983, by and between
the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (hereinafter referred
to as "the HRA") and Bradley V. Larson and James G. Metcalf (hereinafter
referred to as "the developers") set out provisions for the disposition
of lands and the orderly development thereof in accordance with the
Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan. The HRA and the Developers do
hereby agree as follows:
THE DEVELOPERS AGREE:
I. That development of land and all buildings shall be in accordance
with this agreement, the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan, and
all other applicable, municipal ordinances.
That for the purposes of establishing valuations for taxes payable,
the building and appurtenant facilities to be first constructed on
the following described real property, to -wit:
The Northeasterly Fifty Feet of L:ts Eight, Nine and Ten in Block
Fifty, of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof
on file and of record in the Office of the Wright County Recorder,
which parcel may also be described as follows: Commencing at the
Northeasterly corner of Lot Ten, Block Fifty, Townsite of Monticello;
thence Southwesterly along the Easterly line of said lot Ten a distance
of Fifty Feet; thence Westerly at a richt angle to the last described
line across Lots Ten, Nine and Eight in said Block Fifty to the
Westerly line of Lot 8; thence Northeasterly along the Westerly line of
Lot Eight to the Northwesterly comer thereof; thence Easterly along the
Northerly line of Lots Eight, Nine and Ten to the point of beginning,
all in Block Fifty, Townsite of Monticello.
2,—If
That part of Lots 9 and 10, Block 50, Tbwnsite of Monticello, described
as follows: Beginning at the SE-ly corner of said Lot 10; thence NE-ly
along the SE-ly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 102.84 feet to a line
parallel with and distant 82.00 feet SW-ly of, as measured at a right
angle to the NE-ly line of said Lot 9 and 10; thence NW-ly along said
parallel line, a distance of 40.21 feet to a line parallel with and
distant 7.00 feet NW-ly of, as measured at a right angle to the SE-ly line
of said Lot 9; thence SW-ly along said parallel line, a distance of 102.88
feet to the SW-ly line of said Lot 9; thence SE-ly along said SW-ly line and
the SW-ly line of said Lot 10, a distance of 40.20 feet to the point of
beginning.
shall be deemed to be totally complete and assessed as such as
of December 31, 1983.
3. That in the event the County Auditor or County Assessor will not
record evaluations for a complete building prior to its actually
being complete, Bradley V. Larson and James G. Metcalf will pay
to 11RA the difference between the tnx increment based upon the
partial building and the tax increment based upon the completed
structure.
4. That in any year in which the tax increment generated by the
development does not meet or exceed the amount required by the
HRA to meet its debt retirement demands, the developers shall
pay directly to the HRA the difference between the actual tax
increment collected, m d the required debt retirement payment,
said payment to be made no later than the 15th day of December
in the year in which the taxes are due and payable.
5. That they shall purchase from the HRA the following described
real property, to -wit:
The Northeasterly Fifty feet of Lots Eight, Nine, and Tien, in Block
Fifty of the Village of Montioello, according to the plat thereof on
file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for
said County.
on or before the 16th day of November, 1983, and they shall remit
payment in the sum of $10,000.00 to the HRA on the date of purchase.
6. That no "project land" acquired by the developers from the HRA
may be resold prior to improvements being made without the prior
written consent of the HRA.
7. That there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color,
sex, creed or national origin in the sale, lease, transfer or
occupancy of the property covered by this agreement.
8. That the property shall be devoted only to the uses that fall within
the scope of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Plan for a period
of twenty (20) years from the date of this agreement.
9. That, except where physically impossible, all public and private
utilities serving the parcels within this agreement shall be under-
ground.
CD. Developers agree to file of record a twenty (20) foot wide easement.
for purposes of ingress and egress in favor of the City of Monticell
to be approved by the City Attorney.
THE HRA AGREES:
1. That the HRA will convey to the Developer title to the following
described real property, to -wit:
The Northeasterly Fifty feet of Lots Eight, Nine, and Tien, in Block
Fifty of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof on file
and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County.
on or before the 16th day of November, 1983, for the sum of $10,000.(
2. That, prior to the conveyance of title to the developers, the HRA
will demolish existing structures and generally prepare the site
for new construction.
+ -2-
b
IIT
3. That they will provide a deed to the following described real
property, to -wit:
The Northeasterly Fifty feet of Lots Eight, Nine, and Ten, in Block
Fifty of the Village of Monticello, according to the plat thereof
on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and
for said County.
4. That for all sales of land referred to herein, the cost is the
total cost. No existing special assessments shall be transferred
to the developers, unless the developers request such transfer.
The HRA further agrees that when the price agreed upon herein
is paid by the developers to the HRA, the title to the parcel
will be transferred free of all encumbrances.
FOR THE HRA
X11 �7 A
Thomas A. Eiden
This day of November, 1987.
Notary Public '
INCTW &WOOMaLM.AmIl."S
A
XFOR T EVELOP RS
B� dlev W. Lao on
-3-
./Metcalf
PIDI 155-010-
162
I
I
I
JONES05014P
ENV 1a 1.800
0 T 1874.70•
� I
_ I
I
I
I
�s I \M
i •I
Y Ci TT'1or M*I
D 050010
ENV `I I . so01
Eaaagl
I I
1 I
� I I
v CULP) 050011
a DW 161,6W
T /t.770.11
. I
11
TIr REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 12 BOUNDARIES
DISTRICT DURATION 2010
T9 or BROADWAY SQUARE LIMITED PARTNEF
1 051020 Fero Y
I I I 3 0101 ary $eR9, 7oD Pou ,g
V 1S I I I c 1100. T 117.694.1$ �o�' h
PbsT GKiyc �++til • DIPT - osloeq
0! 70 I I 1 1'O p mfr a r ENV 1127.600
$197900 1 1 1 `I g T /2.1270.88
T 16,888.98 I I Fjj
V
3 6 1 7 O 99 /o
lyl
4au. 14r, %0
Broadway S\
S 2
a
u
I
` TANNER
QUIST 050610- m
ON $51,09D
O
Q,-
-
lq uSr11 �5ow1051111 d
-Os0170
EKO $46.901
T $647.68
a
EMV 161.100 C
T 1411.70
I
J�
RIVES PARR VIEW' 051170
T 1761.b6
'
CIV 1760:600
I
I
T $16,475.97
f
r
uo%le.-,6uk 050111
DIV
G i.
$14.6o00d
IIEASURE
T $905.90
/j
It 1p 0
IOSIEMv s1,SOO
T 11.455.4U
I I I
eRW�gl 6 mifE,Y71
I
o o
T9 or BROADWAY SQUARE LIMITED PARTNEF
1 051020 Fero Y
I I I 3 0101 ary $eR9, 7oD Pou ,g
V 1S I I I c 1100. T 117.694.1$ �o�' h
PbsT GKiyc �++til • DIPT - osloeq
0! 70 I I 1 1'O p mfr a r ENV 1127.600
$197900 1 1 1 `I g T /2.1270.88
T 16,888.98 I I Fjj
V
3 6 1 7 O 99 /o
lyl
4au. 14r, %0
Broadway S\
//�i�ca� � eLareon
ATTORNEYSATLAW
po. So' u!
W tint A-11.8,
MonticWa ww4w&SM0u6
JAMES 0. METCALF TELEPHONE
BRADLEY vLAasoN 295-3232
April 25, 1995 (61M�
ETRO
M1a 421•3M
FAX
Cinco Corporation
P. O. Box 185
St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302-1185
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that we are the adjoining land owners to
the east of the post office. I believe you own the building and
rent to the United State Post Office department.
Over the years we have had some discussion with your
predecessors in title with regard to the driveway that your
patron's use through our parking lot. In the past there has been
no desire on the part of you or your tenants to participate in the
cost of maintaining the driveway which exists primarily for your
benefit. Therefore, we are putting you on notice that on August
1, 1995, the drive will be terminated at our common boundary lines
unless, prior to that time, you contact us and we reach an accord
with regard to future sharing of expenses with regard to the
driveway and its maintenance.
Respectfully yours,
METCALF 6 LARSON
By: (/.�
Bradley V. L son, Esq.
HVL/gls
cc: United State Post Office
ATTENTION: Postmpstar
City of Monticello J
ATTENTION: Jeff O'Neill
Broadway Partners
Atc4 & Lauon
AT/DANEYSAT CAW
313 NrY BMW.My
P 0 Bm 446
MwocWa VAI -40 Y 55362-0448
BRADLEY LARSON TELEPHONE
JAMES G, METCALF. OF COUNML (612) 295,3232
,475-19 A FAX
August 31, 1995 (612) 295-3132
Carol A. Gabriel
Real Estate Specialist
United States Postal Service
6800 W. 64th Street, Suite 100
Overland Park, Kansas 66202-4171
Re: Monticello Post Office access
Dear Ms. Gabriel:
I am in receipt of your letter dated August 28, 1995, and a
copy of the deed whereby Monticello Ford reserved an easement for
ingress and egress over the 12' strip. I was out of the office on
August 29th. I do not know if the City or Monticello Ford ever
granted an easement to your landlord. when we constructed an
office building next door, the City caused us to relocate the
driveway. I do know the City and your landlord will not take
r- responsibility for the driveway that is primarily used by your
patrons. In any event, the easement reservation would appear to
be void as there was a historical gap between our office building
and your landlord's property. Neither Monticello Ford, Inc. or
the City of Monticello can grant or reserve an easement over
property that they never had title to. We have since acquired
that strip.
I have no desire to create a hardship for you or your patrons
but the failure of your landlord to communicate and the City's
position that it has no responsibility forces the issue. I am
willing to negotiate a driveway license agreement for your use of
the driveway. The various owners of our parking lot have spent
thousands of dollars over the years for snow removal and
maintenance. The traffic current flow also presents a safety
hazard. Your landlord can provide you with an alternative access
via adjacent City owned property and increased parking that would
facilitate a safer traffic flow onto another public street. I am
open to any suggestions but the barricade posts will remain until
a resolution is reached. I suggest your landlord approach the
City regarding an alternate access.
This action should come as no surprise to you since your
landlord, the Post Office and the City were put on notice of what
I intended to do back on April 25, 1995. I enclose a copy of that
letter in the event that you were not provided with one.
Carol A. Gabriel
Page Two
August 31, 1995
Please do not hesitate to contact me.
Respectfully yours,
METCALF, LARSON && M/UTH'j/J,',`/'—//
Y i
Bradley V. Larson, Esq.
BVL/91S
Enclosure
cc: Monticello Post Office
ATTN: Jack
City of Monticello
ATTN: 011ie
11
HRA AGENDA
r SR.PTEMBER e, 1995
5. Consideration to review for further direction the cnm_arison
between the Tax Increment Guarantee and the Tax increment
received relating_to certain TIF Diekrirts.
A. Reference and Background-
With
ackground:With the increased number of rrnated TIF Districts, changes in
Statutory lawn, and lncroaand ways of diabursing or
reimbursing TIB Funds; a summary of the TIF Plana and
Redevelopment Contracts was completed in order to imprnve- tho
monitoring of TIF projects.
With the completed summary, staff was able to identify which
contracts had prnvisinns of Tax Indrement (TI) Guarantees and
compared the TI Guarantees to actual TT received. You wlII
note on the enclosed TI Guarantee (Exhibit A) that District
Noe. 194 IXI (- $13,003.50), 8 NSP (- $3,255.x7), 9 Tappers (-
$2,724.03), 10 Remmela (- $8,817.56), and 12 Aroplax (-
$1,976.26) show a total shortage of $29,777.72 bptwosn the
guarantee and tax increment received. Generally, the TT
Guarantoe is a provision within the Private Rwdevelnpment
Contract for projects which received upfrnnt aanistanco.
For nlatrtcts t A 4 TXI, the TI Guarantee was $28,000 annually
commencing in 1989. With the purchase of the TXI property,
Mr. Morrell requested the E14V of the property tin Inwerod to an
amount consistent with the purchase price. The Aeacaamunt.
Agreement was oliminatod and the TI Guarantee of $28,000 was
reinstated. On May 8, 1996, Mr. Morrell received a lotter
from the City Adm.iniatratnr addrpsaing the than $12,817.93
shortfall. Mr. Morrell has not responded to the lotter.
In n ronversatinn with the County Auditor's Office, Diotrlct
8 NSP's TI decreased in year 1994 banause the classification
was changed from a preferred to a non-preferrod causing a
reduction in the tax rapacity. This will he o:orrer.tml for
taxes received 1n 1996. However, there still appearo to he a
shortage.
District 10 Remmele, some of the ahortagu m:ay he thea result, of
the cnmpany's deniainn to down -size the original project sizo
after approval of the TI Plan. The Increase in the TI
received in 1994 was due to the plant exivanaion.
In addition and fnr all the districts, the shortfallu may
rosult from the reduction In the preferred nlasNlflcatintn
rates for commercial and Industrial which was a Stato law
Pnoctod to roduvo the commercial/industrial prnporty taxes.
Page 1
HAA AGENDA_
f SEPTEMBER 61 1995
There are no discrepanencies between the ENV within the
Aasessmont Agreements and the tax_ books.
Although this does not cause the TI shortfall anti as an
example, the. 1993 Remmole property tax bill was $38,782.67;
however, the tax Increment received was $27,322.82. The major
difference being the 1990 tax rate of 81.84.14% is frozen for
purpose of TIP. Compare this to the 1993 tax rate of 107.327%
Secondly, TI is calculated from the captured tax capacity
only. Remember, a business only sees the property tax
statement and are unaware of the TI amount received by the
HRA.
The current shortfalls for each individual district may
correct itself by the time the district terminates. The total
TI received from all TI Districts show a surplus; therefore,
itIa apparont the HRA dope not need the dollars. According to
Attorney Rubul, the issue becomes an HRA policy question
whether to enforce the Redevelopment Contract - TI Guarantoa.
for Districts_ 1 6 4 which have terminated, annthor
conaideratinn is "Whether the district terminated with a
deficit?"
Other considerations relate to the cost associated with
enforcement of the prnvipinn vpraue the value of a Private
Redevelopment Contract. Maybe a notification letter annually
or upon termination of diAtrlct identifies the shortfall
without being forceful.
After dfsrueninn, RRA members should consider the following
altarnntive for further direction.
S. Alternative Actions:
1. A motion to continua for further consideration.
2. A motion to enfor ae the Redevelolmwnt Contrant - TI
Guarantee ProviAlon as determined.
3. A Motion to not enforce the Rodpvolopmont Contract - TI
Guarantee Provision.
C. Staff Rocommendationr
For endorsement of the Redovelopment Contract, tho HRA might
consider the issuance of an annual shortfall notice (not due
And payAhle) with a Axplanation that the MRA will review the
` total amount of Ti rocetved At the termination of tho district
`((� Page 2
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 5, 1995
"L.
along with the district deficit. Sind Mr. Morrell r.,tluested
to have the EMV lowered and the HRA agreed, a second effort by
the HRA to collect the shortage of $13,003.50 may he in order.
Staff does not recommend any hard-line enforcement since some
of the public Is aware of the TIF Surplus Fund.
D. Supuortinq Data:
Tax Tncrement Cuarantces, Letter to Mr. Morrell, anti
Agroomont.
IL
IPaye 3
START C04mA11r/ AgQJAL TUI n RECV9
DATE TAI DUCREIfiEIOT GUARAKTEE 1981
t86 FSI -113 128.0X70.00
in RECYD n RECYD
1985 1988
1989 Ib -tl _ S3_D30.16 55.991.10
IXl - 04 SOLO - 0-T
Total
1989 C -,v 5 - 05
1988 Raindanm -96
1989 NA WCO - 07
1991 NSP - 88
1992 Tapper -89
1997 Tapper -49
1992 Ra ete - 110
1994 Arppiat-812
1994 Suburban -814
TIGUARAN.WK4 0825195
528,000.00
53430.16
55.991.10
5537110.00
S-0-00 _
50.00
511500.00
SO.m
$0.00
530,900.00
$0.00
50.(0
56.913.00
S0.(0
50.00
526,100.00 ---
50.00
SOAK)
5341100.[0
1989
T.
5321100.00
50.00 -
S0.(0
S21 -SWM
SOLO
50.00
512500.001-
-- - 50.[70
$0.00
53430.16 55.991.10
i
535,05956
50.00
SOHO
50.00
50.00
50.00:
SOHO
50.00
50.(0
SO.00
50.00
50.00
535/5956
TAX INCREMENT GUARANTEES
TI RECYD
n RECYD
n REC7
n RECYD
n YD
REC
I
n Y
RECD
n RECTO
n RECV'D
RECD
n Y
TOTAL
1987
I=
1989
T.
1991
1992
199
;994
1995(11!)
14ORAG
I
THRU 1994
542,416.76;
550,739.321
547,528.23
545,739.591
547.737.41
552,816.481
555.716.661
SOAX)
$11.10
511.1X11,
50.00
527,150.45
S8,375.741
57,982.97 I
58,301.35
I
SO.(10
578.72452514.7233:0
S18.471.971S19.2294.92
SO.00I
5105,K753 71
S23,09981
5
526,45444
527$96.271
S22A70.04
527,775.67!
5().(X1I
S0.(MI
S13,(X)3.511
S15,111.68
516,165.101
S71,334.35I
562,49.271
566,173.401
569,919.601
572.485.441
S75364.181
537320.20
5(1.00 )
$0.00',
552,234.271
$53,051..'01
$50,976.731
553,458.021
562.631.481
$66532.03
_
$69.145.981
5342.54.95
50.(X)
50.00
50.00
$33,462.761
532,120.101
$33528.451
536,907.921
S3M.942..53
$19_86_335
534.945.25
51[1X)
S0.(X)
50.00
so -Vol
50.(01
$7,173.411
$6,673.061
$6,277.951
$4532.12
_ _$2,157.16
53,255.87
50.00
50.(0 1
50.CU 1
5(L(X) 1
$0.001
S25,628.141
525,322521
524.196.01
512.144.09
52,724.031
$0.001
50.001
50.001
501.(X) I
SO.001
$27)1,59.921
$2732L521
533.965281
517142.621
58,817.56
50.00
Saw i
Son I
SOIX) I
$0.00 l
$0.00 l
514.70 I
$19523.24 �
510,454.11 �
51,976.761
5(1.00
50.00
Saw!
$(1.(X1)
50.001
50.001
$0.001
512,954721
$&149.061
SO.(X)
557,52444 5225,014.01. 5228,476.22 5217,340.631 5235,666.96; -,704$06.641 $320,390.021 5279549.351 5156.367.44 529,777.721
i I
v
Office of the City A dmin,scratut
May 5, 1995
250 Eric Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362.9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Mr. Jay Morrell
M & P Transport
1401 Fallon Avenue
PO Bo: 477
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: HRA assessment agreements for Lot 7, Block 3,
Oakwood Industrial Park
Dear Jay:
As you may recall, the Monticello HRA had recorded an assessment agreement covering
Lot 7, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park (former DCI property), which guaranteed the
HRA a minimum tar increment revenue from the property to support and retire debt
obligations. Upon your purchase of the property in 1988, you had requested and received
approval for a lower market value on this property from $879,400 to a value of $700,000,
provided that you agreed to enter into a separate agreement with the HRA that would
guarantee the HRA tar increment revenue annually of at least $28,000. If the $700,000
valuation did not generate at least $28,000 in tar increments for the HRA, you would be
required to pay directly to the HRA the difference between the amount collected and the
$28,000 amount.
Enclosed you will find a summary of the annual tar increments collected by the HRA for
the years 1989 through the district'e duration, 1993. Total increments collected from
your property amounted to $127,482.07, which is $12,517.93 short of the agreed-upon
amount of $140,000 based on $28,000 per year.
The recorded agreement dated May 30, 1989, which allowed your property valuation to be
lowered, indicated that any shortfall would be reimbursed to the HRA snnuaDy on the
16th of each December. Since the HRA knew there might be some fluctuation in the
amount of increments generated each year, it was decided that since the district would be
completed by the year 1994, we would wait until the final increment was received to
calculate the amount of shortfall, if any.
Mr. Jay Morrell
May 5, 1995
Page 2
Enclosed you will find a copy of the original agreements and correspondence firom May
1989 and a listing of the tax increments received from the Wright County Auditor's office
on your property. Please make your remittance out to the Monticello BRA in the amount
of $12,517.93 per the agreement. N you have any questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
FMYPF MONTICELLO
� W
W
City
RW/kd
Enclosures
a: DCI TIF District 44 File
Fj
THIS AGREEHEN^, executed this 30 day of May, 1989, by and between
the Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Autnority (hereinafter referred to as
^the BRA"), and John W. Plaisted (hereinafter referred to as ''the Developer")
set out provisions to establish a minimum guaranteed annual increment for the
described property located in the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State
of Minnesota, to -wit:
E 180 ft of Lot 7, Block 3, Exc N 175 ft, Oakwood Industrial Park, City
of Monticello.
Lot 7, Block 3, Exc 1BO ft, Ly S of N 175 ft, Oakwood Industrial Park,
City of Monticello.
The HRA and the Developer do hereby agree as follows:
THE DEVELOPER AGREES:
1. That he shall purchase the above described property from First Bank
- - - - — -National-Association, Minneapolis, for the sum of Five Hundred Thousand
Dollars and No Cents ($500,000).
2. That this agreement becomes void and of no further force and effect if
the above described property is not purchased.
3. That the minimum guaranteed annual increment for the above described
property be Twenty-eight Thousand Dollars and No Cents (S28,000),
commencing with the taxes payable in 1989 and existing through the
duration of the Tax Increment District, Year 1994.
4. That in any year in which the tax increment generated by the above
described property does not meet or exceed the amount required by the EIA
to meet its debt retirement demands ($28,000), the developer shall pay
directly to the ERA the difference between the actual tax increment
collected, and the required debt retirement payment ($28,000), said
payment to be made no later than the 15th day of December in the year in
which the taxes are due and payable.
5. That the acquisition of the above described property will comply with the
Monticello Zoning Ordinance and the Monticello Comprehensive Guide Plan.
6. That a reasonable minimum market value for the above described property
be established between the Developer and the County Assessor.
THE HRi� ArREES:
1. To terminate or eliminate the original Assessor's Agreement between the
Monticello HRA, Ronald and Dee Johnson, and the County Anaessor for the
above described property. The Aosesaor'o Agreement for Tax Increment
District 11 (easterly 1/2 of Lot 7) hes a minimum market value of
8209,400. And the Anaesser's Agreement for Tax Increment District 14
(westerly 1/2 of Lot 7) has a minimum market value of 8670,000.
- L�
7. That the minimum guaranteed annual increment for the above described
pcoperty be Twenty-eight Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($28,000),
commencing with the taxes payable in 1989 and existing through the
duration of the Tax Increment District, Year 1994.
7. That this agreement become void and of no further force and effect if the
Developer does not purchase the above described property.
4.. To file this said document with the County Recorder, Wright County
Courthouse, Buffalo, Minnesota.
FOR THE HRA
• kIIiA Ch rson
41n
011ie Roropchax, HRA Director
This 3 O1 day of May, 1989.
/::,
otaiy Publico
WRKWODUNrf
...)`F NOTARY AI
MY�COMM. FXV. AWE 11, "N
FOR ftD,>e,� W)
wner
This ::;,/'-*-day of May, 1989.
'Notary public
04.
NOTARY A
VOUGHTOOLIUrf YY 00141. BXV. AM 11, tw
ll
dh
r
Entry Date__J__J_
-77 y �.�..0 f,. �. Ey�r•+.t �. /��� Oi i/j�u, dor - J/�/"� �../>
J�,, -ro ofX,, Iv.,r✓S i/j/v/�� Il,v'lr.�o Vin,/
Ylr
/a/,3
J D /li'��sr �O��i/G vF COAn/ /ire /�//i% YAt la1 f f' J r J
Edit Dated / Run Croup Date / _I Authorizo Dato /
JOURNAL ENTRIES (Page _ of _)
Source Code_
JE-Date/;�
/ 's JE -ID tl
Data Comment
Reference Code:_ _ _
_ _ _ Authorization Code Name:
--------- ----------
DEBITS
- ---•------- -
--------------------- ----
---- -----------------------------------------
--- --- ---
CREDITS
- - - - -------------
-
NR
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NR
-
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
rACCv^I.TNT
JA >��i•J l�'_. ��,:
j_� %f d0
liiy/.t-i fjf�w�
I �f3 �0/nJ
Sl // y7, , / (s //
2.2 7l. e0
7,4 a.-.. E,,,4,p... _
13jV /o J
/n
C-r'Z•v0
95-s'3b y/O
r
Entry Date__J__J_
-77 y �.�..0 f,. �. Ey�r•+.t �. /��� Oi i/j�u, dor - J/�/"� �../>
J�,, -ro ofX,, Iv.,r✓S i/j/v/�� Il,v'lr.�o Vin,/
Ylr
/a/,3
J D /li'��sr �O��i/G vF COAn/ /ire /�//i% YAt la1 f f' J r J
Edit Dated / Run Croup Date / _I Authorizo Dato /
HRA ACP,NnA
SFPTP.MRF.R 6, 19g5
V
A. Cunsiderat inn t<r ravlrew fnr further direction rice TIP_
Ra1mbur3rmr�nts of curratn TIP DLetricts,
A. ReEerenr6 and Background_
Again with the r:umpleted summary of the TTF Plana and
Redevelopment Cnntractr+, staff was ails to went i fy and
improve mnnitnring of the the TIF reimbursamantR.
TTP DISTRTCT N0. 1-11 - MARTTF. FARM SP.RVTr,F.
The pay-as-you-go assistance iR an annual payment cnmmrncJnp
December 15, 1992, for sevan years. Annual payment from the
available TT in $2,5Oo. Tntal TT rncolvod through Dncrmher
1994 in $R,431.93 making an available TI of $7,5RR.74. Pant
due payment Is $7.600•
TiP DTSTRTCT NO. 1-1.1 - STANDARD TRON & WIRE WORKS, INC.
The pay-aa-you-go assistance in a semi annual payment
cnmmanc.ing Augue,t 1, 1995 through February 1, 2004 I,or
Contract payment schedule or of availahlo TT. TotaI
acar, intance not-tn excnnd $317,000 NT'V. TT rnnniv.rl
e $11.600.3,, payment of $10,544.77. "Available. TT" wars 13::11C'd nn
July 31 , 1 8!15.
TIF DTSTRTCT Nn. 1-15 - MISTOM CANOPY
Tb" pay-as-you-go naRistanco Ir+ an annual payment cnmmHewtnp
Decomho r 15, 1995 for olght yearn. Animal payment from thr,
available TT lens 6i,nA6.96, n1'rnn rrrreipt of 59.476.!19 (City
HACA Lnss) , and not to exouiod $7,496..'49 or $R, 496. 59 .u.rnr,rl ly.
First paymont der, nncr:mher 1995.
TTP DTSTRTCT NO. 1-iA RTVP,R MILLS
Tho pay-an •yrru-gn annlstancn in a nr ml-annua l l,,rym.•nt
commencing Augunt 1, 1998 through February 1, 20n4 per thr
Contraclt and rrf availahlo TT. Total ,aoulatanrn nnt• to excned
$102.000. First, payment Ane Aulluat 1998.
TIP DTRTRICT NO. I-In MISRTRSTi'PT RHnRP.S
The pay•aw you gn analntanrr to a somi annuril paymrmt
romm4inn int] August 1, 1997 through Fohruary 1. 2012 per tho
Cntltrar.t and of availahln TT, Tnt.il annintancu wit-to-rxcoerl
$.175,830 NPV. First lrayment. Otto Auguat 1997.
4
Papa 1
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMRF.R 6, 1995
TTF DISTRICT Nn. 1-7 NAWrn
The pay-as-ynil-gn aaaiatanre is a semi-anmial payment
commencing August 1, 1995 through Fr_hruary 1, 2003 per
Contract or paymr.nt srhedulo. Tntal assistanno. not-to-exoeed
$112,000 NPV for site improvement relating to the Hxpansiun.
First payment of $10.000 wan scheduled for paymont August 1,
1995; however, the rompany has not rnmpleted ttu: A1re.
iml,rnvr♦monts or provided a nortifieate nhi,wing evidence of
site Improvement payment. or completion.
Mr. Stpvc T.nmme has resigned from the company. I'm working
with Knut Flakk and John Babcock fair clostui3 of the Stato anti
SMEF i.oans and informed them of the TTF assistance. With thr•
completnd minimum improvemHnts, the 1995 TT is $69,A90.50.
TTF DISTRICT NO. 1-4 IXI
nn the May 15, 1995, the HAA recommended rollrinU thn
principal balance of approximate $90.000 lnao for the purrha"e
of Lot 8 & 6, Block 3, OTP. DiHhuraemont from the TTF Surlilun
Fund and to the City of MonticPllu. go evidence of such
tranr,fer twi, Lewis e&culwcd.
After dlsr.usalon, the HRA may wish to ronsidar tho following
aIternatIvus.
R. Alternative Actium:
1. A motion authorizing the paymunt of $7,500 to Russrll and
Sharun Marti.' and rcquusting evidonco of trannfrr from
the TTF Surplus Fund to the City of Mont ko llo for
rptiremont of the ioan balance fur purchase of T.nts 5 &
6, Black 3, OIP.
2. A motion to runtinaw fair furthor nonsidoration.
3. No motion would (odi:atN nn .ar.tton neurw3�lry.
C. Staff rncommondation-
Rnr.ommondatIon .1" for Alternative No. 1
n. Supporting Data:
None.
Page 2
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 6, 1995
Consideration to discuss fur further direction substandard
residential_ proMtties_iur poeaihle redevwlopment_.�
Reference and Background-._
Chairperson Larson requested some infurmation on the Olson
property along East Broadway for possible redevelopment.
Enclosed is an update of estimated market values for Olson,
Katzmarek and other residential property the HRA previously
has looked at.
A few years ago the City started condemnation procese on the
Olson property along Highway 25. The property was used as
rental property and the City determined it unsafe fur
occupancy, therefore, Mr. Olson demolished the structure. I
believe the house along Broadway is unoccupied, therefore, it
becomes difficult to condemn. The HRA can cnnsldcr purchasn,
demolition, and resale.
Pnge 1
PROPERTY
LOTS
F.MV '02
EMV '95
200 West River Str�.Nt
of 2 & 3
$54.000
$84.400
Hawkins
.Sn 1:2 of 1 & 2
$36.300
$44.500
Warner
No 1/2 of 1 & 7
$71:300
577.100
APARTMENT
34,&S
$1 RR . A00
200 Went Frnnt Street
some of R & 7
S14,0nO
Schleif
R & 7
$39.100
S56.6n0
n'Cunnor
7 & R
$52,-500
$61,00
Kruse (Fire)
No 9 & 10
$52.300
$17.200
Rust lc
So O & 10
39.1nn
$4R,A00
BLOCK RO (TIF 07STRIrT and good tie in
to Rlurk .11-51
300 WeKt Rivrr
Stra.nt
Solberg
3
Quist
Lor, 11 & 12
$51.000
4
$211300
Part of
Flurcll
.1
Hnllenhpnk
S 1/2 of 11 A
$:14,000
R & 7
$27,500
12
Tanner
Lot 13
$48.9n0
.7unpw
Lot 14 & 15
$R3,800
(Moat marketahle) 300 W River Street
Anderson
1 & 1/2 of 2
$43,800
$49,A00
14ollenheck (new sid)1/2
of 2 & 3
$54.000
$84.400
Puwwrs
4
$48,700
$5A.100
Pratt
5
$58,100
$73.600
300 W Front Street
Pratt
some of R & 7
S14,0nO
$14.000
Helm
othor 6 & 7
$47.10n
$83,400
Thlmmest
8
$46,000
$65.300
Schwletering
So 9 & 10
$71.70n
$81.100
Hass
No A A 10
S4n.400
$39,-5nn
(Moet subwtandard)
600 Wrest
6 Rtraat
Solberg
3
$2.1.4n0
524.200
nates
4
$211300
$24.200
Flurcll
.1
1,4n,8007
$43.100
n nicer
R & 7
$27,500
$33.70n
9
` Page 1
f - 5()n Wn t 6 StrPc t (Most :aubatandard
`�- Reed t , 7., 1 r 7 of 3 $ s . 6nn $71 .300
Munson $33,00n $41.50()
4M&QG mM (Moat substandard) 400 west 6 Str.xet
Rlalkc..
1
$44;000
$51.30n
Schultz
7
$48,100
$45.800
Glues
3
$77,4n0
$45,800
Allen
4 & some 5
$41,200
$43,300
RT.nCK 33 (rand ]ncatlon to commorclal,
zonod R4 tRoglnnal Buainvnril
Co_dar Street
between 3rd and 4th
Orandall
4, w 56 ft
$40,30n
$48.200
Tahr
8
$49,300
$58,900
T.lndberg
6 & 72ft of 7
$50,700
$63,500
BLOCK 3 (500
East Broadway Block)
Oleos
8, 7, 8 & 9
$47,900
$40.800
oxcopt W 28 ft
UNPLATTED LAND
State of MN (1.52 ac)
State of Mn (.25 ac)
Banya! (1.03 ac)
i� (2. 08 ac)
158-500-033400
159-800-033402
155-500-033401
155-800-033401
f/ LAND -HRA 9-1-95
` Page 2
11111 1495
$54.000 $61,900
$3.500 $.1,A00
$63,400 $54.7n0
$41,300 $43,300
A-
r � i
7f� i
r
r• t w' jtCC�::
/
i
i
RIVE i
44
41 0
HRA AGENnA
SF.PTEMRF.R 6, 1995
Consideration to revl_ew comments _-from Attorney Rubin relating.
to the_raquest for infurmatln_n to ad3_an additional r.r_irerla
to the _local TIP pp ii Glee_._
Reference and Background:.
This agenda item is a continuation from the August HRA
meeting. T'm anticipating the roceipt of written commentR
from Attorney Bubul as it relates to adding an additional
criteria to the local TIF policies. In May, Chairpurnnn
Laraon askod if there were. any legal ramifications fn adding
a nineth criteria: Tho prninct shall be doomed to demnnstrato
community Involvement and/nr oncourayN local residency.
Also to cunRicler iR the HRA b1111ngr4 ror .Tune and July
relatinn to thta inqulry. Tntal amount htlled iR n1..IAR.R0
for 21.6 hnurs and nu written responno hao be43n rrcaivnd. T
hrnught thiR to the att,�ntion of Mr. Ruhul anti an adjustmNnt
to the bll l my iR f'urthct.tming.
At, this time, Pncloscd is a ropy of the Juno and July
b.i111n9s.
Page I
SEP 01 '95 14:02 KENNET & GRAVEN
KFjgNwY & GxAvFN
011ie Koropchak
Econornic Development Director
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
RE: Tax Increment Policies
Dear 011ie:
P.2
I"= x TECau-M i
Jab V. T�
D. D L G"� GQ Mn
W awe
200t L D+vm�
1AIYIOIOM 6 LAW
T.LV Ward
You asked me to advise whether the Monticello HRA could add to its tax increment policies a
criteria or goal that businesses receiving tax increment assistance demonstrate community
involvement by encouraging City residency for the company's employees. I also understand that
such a goal would be one of many factors used to evaluate a talc increment request, and would
not by itself determine the HRA's decision on assistance.
In my view, such a requirement would be acceptable, with the following caveat. Any absolute
requirement that all or some stated percentage of employees of a business t,ceiving tax increment
assistance live within the City, or a similar requirement for contractors hired in TIN -assisted
projects, could raise constitutional concerns.
The United States Supreme Court has held that the opportunity to seek employment is a privilege
protected by Article W. Section 2 (the privilege and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution).
which can be abridged only if (1) non-residents of the suite constitute a "peculiar source of evil"
at which the regulation is aimed; and (2) the degree of discrimination bears a close relation to
the reasons for discrimination. United Building and Consmp-tion Trades Council of Camded
County and Vicinity Y. Mavor and Council of the City. -of Camden. 465 U.S. 208. 104 S. CL
1020. 1029 (1984). That case involved an ordinance requiring that contractors in any publicly -
funded construction project fill at least 40% of the jobs with city residents. The court round that
the ordinance might violate the privileges and immunities clause with respect to out-of-state
workers. The Minnesota Supreme Court similarly struck down a "local hire" ordinance on the
a.1\D)11.
—1go. J1
470 FM*M Cab, 110MCIP01b, tit. sm
(CM 3".2m
2001 A. Yq
Ron" LL M7'ry
i800ft (612) 737.1010
Ram L Mala
Ja CD.
DAKM J. n6lm1JWOG
co"M & OJW
D VMJ. LDO•�
CRUM L LAWWV s
WRHUI6 DMECT DILL
30601 IL LAftV" J<
aDmt x �•••••• •
(611) 317.ftta
M/aa C LAMG
September 1, 1995
011ie Koropchak
Econornic Development Director
City of Monticello
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
RE: Tax Increment Policies
Dear 011ie:
P.2
I"= x TECau-M i
Jab V. T�
D. D L G"� GQ Mn
W awe
200t L D+vm�
1AIYIOIOM 6 LAW
T.LV Ward
You asked me to advise whether the Monticello HRA could add to its tax increment policies a
criteria or goal that businesses receiving tax increment assistance demonstrate community
involvement by encouraging City residency for the company's employees. I also understand that
such a goal would be one of many factors used to evaluate a talc increment request, and would
not by itself determine the HRA's decision on assistance.
In my view, such a requirement would be acceptable, with the following caveat. Any absolute
requirement that all or some stated percentage of employees of a business t,ceiving tax increment
assistance live within the City, or a similar requirement for contractors hired in TIN -assisted
projects, could raise constitutional concerns.
The United States Supreme Court has held that the opportunity to seek employment is a privilege
protected by Article W. Section 2 (the privilege and immunities clause of the U.S. Constitution).
which can be abridged only if (1) non-residents of the suite constitute a "peculiar source of evil"
at which the regulation is aimed; and (2) the degree of discrimination bears a close relation to
the reasons for discrimination. United Building and Consmp-tion Trades Council of Camded
County and Vicinity Y. Mavor and Council of the City. -of Camden. 465 U.S. 208. 104 S. CL
1020. 1029 (1984). That case involved an ordinance requiring that contractors in any publicly -
funded construction project fill at least 40% of the jobs with city residents. The court round that
the ordinance might violate the privileges and immunities clause with respect to out-of-state
workers. The Minnesota Supreme Court similarly struck down a "local hire" ordinance on the
a.1\D)11.
—1go. J1
SEP 01 '95 14 e2 KENNET 8 GRAVEN P. 3
011ie Koropchak
Page 2
September 1. 1995
grounds of both privileges and immunities and equal protection. Construction and Gequg
Laborer Union V. City of St. Paul, 134 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. 1963).
A local residency preference may or may not withstand scrutiny, depending on the nature of the
requirernent and the factual context. The Camden court recognized that cities have considerable
leeway when seting conditions on the expenditure of their own funds. In this case. the HRA has
a strong interest in seeing that its economic development funds yield the greatest possible benefit
to the City. Encouraging City residency for employees of TIF -assisted businesses directly
contributes to economic development goals, as residents increase the tax base and the overall
level of economic activity in the City. The HRA would have a strong argument that its local
residence policy is closely tied to the goals of the tax incrcrr=t assistance, and any abridgement
of non-residents rights is therefore reasonable.
Nevertheless, a strict residency requirement at least raises the possibility of a challenge. This
would most Wwly be avoided as long as local residency is simply one of many factors in
evaluating tax increment assistance, as the NRAis ow contemplating. I would recommend rhtsl
the HRA cast the new tax increment maria as eneral concept of "conununity involvement.
That is, one factor in assessing whether to prov' assistance is the degree to which the business
adds to the local economy and community bcxjdes the mcm fact that it is located in the City.
This could be demonstrated in various ways, including the residency of the company's owners
and employees, residency of the contractors involved in the project, membership in local business
organizations, and similar factors. These measums would not be an absolute requirement, and
could be outweighed by other factors.
1 hope this letter provides some general guidance. If you or any commissioners have further
questions, or would Wee me to review some policy language that you develop, please let me
know.
VCZY.kdy yours,
9 -
Stephen 1. Bubul
SJB:Sak
0":03772
"1-4 1
KENNEDY at GRAVEN
`\ Ourtwed
200 Souffi R xth Saen, Suis 470
MkmeapaW, MN 55402
(612)537.9500
July 20, 1995
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
MN190-00041: Redevelopment - General
Invoice # 3570
0-9
Through June 30, 1995
For All Legal Services As Follows:
06/02!95 JPF Research constitutional issues re City TIF 4.30 266.60
ordinance
06/04/95 JPF Research constitutional law issues re ordinance 3.50 217.00
concerning nF
06/05/95 JPF Research constitutional law issues re TIF ordinance 4.00 248.00
06/11/95 SIB Research TIF criteria question 0.50 62.00
Total Services: S 793.60
Attorney Summary
Stephen Bubul
For All Dishumments As Follows:
05/31/95 Photocopies
Total Disbursements:
� 1 drw. uMw DSM o11aN
p. �=W M dtm or daeaM
bp+ppip �0t1`�}andd mm W
11.900 62.00hr
731.60
0.50 § 124.00rar
62.0
1.00
S
1.00
Total Services And Disbursements:
%.0
S 794.60
m
HOLMES at GRAVEN
Chwtend
200 Sada Skil sora, SWu 170
Mhurapoilb, KN 55102
(612)537.9300
lune 15, 1995
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
MN 190-00041: Redevelopment -General
Invoice # 2672
Through May 31,1495
For All Legal Services As Follows:
05/08/95 SIB Phone cell with O. Koropchak re TIF
0.50
62.00
05/12/95 SIB Phone call with O. Koropchak re TIF legislation
0.30
37.20
status
05/17/95 SIB Phone call with O. Koropchak and L. Kirscht re
0.30
37.20
TIF modifications
05/24/95 SIB Review TIF bill and draft summary
0.40
49.60
05/25/95 SJB Draft Summary of TIF Bill
1.00
124.00 I
05/26/95 SJB Finish TIF Summary
1.00
124.00
05/30/95 SIB Meet with law clerk re TIF policy question
0.30
37.20
1-05/30/95 JPF Research re constitutional limitations of ordinances
1.50
93.00
with local hiring preferences
05/31/95 PF Research constitutional issues re ordinance TIF
7.50
465.00
provision x.30
Total Services:
S
1,029.1.0
Attorney Summary
Judite P. Fluger 9.000 62.00/hr
559.00
Stephen Bubul 3.90 124.00/hr
471.20
Total Services And Disbursements:
' Idogs y.WWW oruarmlaw
tl , occoum. maim at among
a ne coi aM mm no or!
ashmbwp.e
6i�....�
$ 1,029.20
i
PUBLIC RESOURCE
GROUP, INC.
August 23, 1995 Marketing, Development & Finance Specialists
Ms. 011ie Koropchalt
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Montioello, MN 55362
STATEMENT
Consulting Services—July 16, 1995 through August 15, 1995
7-18-95 LK—ReviseTFF schedule for Standard Iron, follow-up with 011ie lA0
7-20.95 LPK—Review H -Window financials, prepare report and memo for EDA 1.25
tiCP' 7-21-95 LPX—Repos revisions, follow -tap with 011ie
ft �c
NET CHARGEABLE HOURS: 2.75
Net Chargeable Hours ® f90/Hour $247.50
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE Ed=
CURRErQ OVER 30 OVER 60 OVER 20
$247.50
TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
4205 Lancaster Lone Nonh ♦ Sune 1100 • Minneapolis, Minnckxa 55441 • (61:15547070 •1012155092:1 Fox
r
1
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
KENNEDY a GRAVEN
dtatvw
200 South Shah Sn K Sia 470
Mnnexmas, MN sm
(612) 337-9300
MN190-00042: Standard Iron TIF
August 15, 1995
Invoice # 5118
Through July 31. 1995
For All Legal Services As Follows:
07/14/95 SJB Phone call wtih O. Koropchek re Standard Iron 0.25
07/18/95 SJB Review TIF numbers and contract 0.50
Total Services:
Attorney Summary
Stephen Bubul 0.75@ 124.00/hr
Total Services And Disbursements:
I dnd ^ undo? P^ L"' 0 1--W
Utas ;tburt, cl7.m a 1e.�Raxl
is (u01 end coRand W avt
of
map a Cement
S
S
31.00
62.00
93.00
93.00
93.00
\ ��1 PUBLIC RESOURCE
GROUP, INC.
June 30, 1995 Marketing, Detxlopment & Fftwwe Specialists
Ms. 011ie Koropchak
City of Monticello
250 East Broadway
P.O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
STATEMENT
Consulting Services --May 16, 1995 through June 15, 1995
4-30.95 LPK--Information regarding costs of TIF modifications, memo to 011ie M
NET CHARGEABLE HOURS:
Net Chargeable Hours ® $75/Hour
.75
$56.25
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE eta
CURRENT OVER 3Q OVER OVER
$56.25
TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
4205 Lancuter lane North Suite 1100 4 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 4 (612) 5%7979 4 (612) SSO.9221 Fax
f
PUBLIC RESOURCE
GROUP, INC.
June 5, 1995 Marketing, Dewlopment & Finance Spe=hm
MS. 011ie Koropc6ak
City of Monticello
250 Fast Broadway
Y.O. Boa 1147
Monticello. MN 55362
STATEMENT
Consulting Services -April 16, 1995 through May 15, 1995
4.2095, LPK-Follow-up with 011ie and Dean Hogland regarding
Decorative Services •.75
4-21-95 LPK-Follow-up with 011ie regarding Decorative Servioa
follow-up with Moen Leuer (developer prospect) .50
445-95 LPK-Cash flow statement for Decorative Services. facility 1.00
4.27-95 LPK-Loran Brueggeman regarding Decorative Services, fax
information and financial information 1.00..'
5-2-93 LPK-Decorative Services follow-up developer contacts .75
5.4-95•: •.f LPK-Follow-up with 011ie. Jennifer Host regarding
y Decorative Services, status of Project -
NET CHARGEABLE HOURS: .4.73
Net Chargeable Hours ® S75/Hour 5356.25
TOTAL AMOUNT PAST DUE: $356.25
TOTAL•AMOUNT DUEQ
CURRENT OVER 9-YELA OVER SQ
5356.25 $356.25
TERMS: NET DUE UPON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
4205 Lanwater Lane North * Suite 1100 0 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55441 • (612) 5547979 0 (612) 550.9221 Fax
KENNEDY 8I GRAVEN
Ourtvvd
200 SWM Strm SnK iWn 470
^1 a Kmwpofb. MN SS402
f
J
\" (612) 337.9300
r✓
1995
July 20,
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello. MN 55362-9245
MN190-00048: Senior Housing TIF
Invoice0 4954
Through Jvne 30,1095
For All Legal Services As Follows:
06/01/95 SJB Draft Resolution; review PRG TIF proceedings
0.50
62.00
06/02/95 SJB Revise Connect
1.50
186.00
06/04/95 SJB Finish revisions to Contract. Subordination
3.50
434.00
Agreement, and Housing A p,=nt; letter to
client
06/06/95 SJB Phone call with 0. Koropchak re contracts
0.50
62.00
06/07/95 SJB Review City TIF resolution; phone call with 0.
0.30
37.20
Koropchak and D. Gustafson
06/07/95 SJB Review City TIF resolution; phone call with 0.
0.30
37.20
Koropchak and D. Gusmfson
06/08/95 SIB City resolution re Development Contract
0.20
24.80
06/14/95 SJB Review contract changes
0.30
37.20
Total Services:
f
880.40
Attorney Summary
i
Stephen Bubul 7.10 124.00/lr
880 40
i
For All Disbursements As Follows:
06/04/95 Photocopies
63.00
06/05/95 Messenger Service
37.61
Total Disbursements:
S
100.61
I t r
v., upfM+M d Total Services And Disbursements:
$
981.01
p�
=mum. ftm 0,1f9MWd
d Wet �0 totnel MO tlW OYr
ae
crannnu
HOLMES at GRAVEN
avu+ed
200 Sw1h Sbmh SUU% & tt 470
Mkw*wokKN SM2
(M) 317.930D
June 15, 1995
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
Monticello, IYN 35362-9 1 q
MNI : Senior Housing TIF QST N 0 `'
Invoice # 2907
Throug,h Stay 3:..995
For All Legal Services As Follows:
05/31/95 SJB Phone call with O. Koropchak and D. Gustafson m 0.60 74.40
TIF modiflcadon
Total Services:
Attorney Summary
$ 74.40
e Stephen Bubul 0.60 Q 124.00/hr 74.40
Total Services And Disbursements: $ 74.40
' 1odw. uttlw Dinartr of I�w
d aft womm. CW" or der"W14
..,Mot tn0 eortoa tno tMt no GM
p hp Oo�n Oetd
a►6Y�neq