HRA Agenda 09-07-1994AGENDA
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, September 7, 1994 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS: Chairperson Al Larson, Vice Chairperson Ben Smith,
Everette Ellison, Tom St. Hilaire, and Brad Barger.
STAFF: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and 011ie Koropchak.
GUESTS: Rick Murray and Bob Murray, Residential Development, Inc.
Jim Casserly, Developer's Attorney.
Steve Bubul, HRA Attorney.
Lenny Kirscht or Deb Gustafson, Public Resource Group,
Inc.
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 3. 1994 HRA MINUTES.
3. CONSIDERATION OF CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF THE PRELIMINARY
CONCEPT AND USE OF TIF (SOILS CONDITION DISTRICT) TO ASSIST
WITH THE SOIL CORRECTION EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT OF A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
4. CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT UPDATES:
a) Senior -Congregate Housing Committee.
b) Custom Canopy, Inc.
5. OTHER BUSINESS.
a) Monthly billinge from PRO and Holmes & Graven.
6. ADJOURNMENT.
z
MINUTES
MONTICELLO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Wednesday, August 3, 1994 - 7:00 p.m.
City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Al Larson, Vice Chairperson Ben
Smith, Everette Ellison, Tom St. Hilaire, and
Brad Barger.
STAFF PRESENT: Rick Wolfsteller, Jeff O'Neill, and 011ie
Koropchak.
GUESTS: Developers Rick Murray and Bob Murray and
Attorney Jim Casserly.
CALL TO ORDER.
Chairperson Larson called the HRA meeting to order at 7:00
p.m.
2. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE JULY 6. 1994 HRA MINUTES.
Ben Smith made a motion to approve the July 6, 1994 HRA
minutes as written. Brad Barger second the motion and with no
additions or corrections, the motion passed unanimously.
3. PUBLIC HEARING FOA AND CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION FOR
THE ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION OF RAW LANDS RELATING TO TIF
DISTRICT NO. 1-17.
Chairperson Larson opened the public hearing for comments or
opposition to the HRA's acquiring and disposing of raw lands
relating to TIF District No. 1-17 (Fay -Mar Metal Fabricators,
Inc.)
The public hearing notice appeared in the local newspaper
satisfying Statutory requirements. The project is proceeding
on schedule. The HRA will acquire the property from
Monticello Industrial, Inc. through an assignment of interest
to the purchase agreement and will dispose of the property via
a quit claim deed to Ronald S. Musich. The land title will be
conveyed upon compliance and execution of the Private
Redevelopment Contract., TIF Plan approval, and SBA
authorization/Bank closing.
With no public comments or opposition, the public hearing was
closed. Tom St. Hilaire made a motion to adopt the resolution
authorizing the acquisition and disposition of raw lands
relating to TIF District No. 1-17. Brad Barger second the
motion and with no further discussion, the motion passed
unanimously.
Page 1
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1994
CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE HRA AND RONALD S. MUSICH AS PREPARED BY HOLMES &
GRAVEN AND TO AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF SAID DOCUMENT.
Koropchak informed the HRA that the Private Redevelopment
Contract between the HRA and Ronald S. Musich had the
traditional terms and conditions of other approved contracts.
The land write-down assistance of $50,000 will be paid upon
conveyence of title. Construction to begin no later than
October 20 with minimum improvements completed by December 31,
1994. One major difference to the contract is site
improvements are to be completed one-year from date of
building permit Issuance. County Assessor Doug Gruber has
executed the Assessment Agreement which agrees to a minimum
estimated market value of $400,000.
Brad Barger made a motion to accept the Private Redevelopment
Contract between the HRA and Ronald S. Munich as prepared by
Holmes b Graven and authorized HRA execution of the said
document. Everette Ellison second the motion and with no
further discussion, the motion passed unanimously.
5. CONSIDERATION TO DISCUSS THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT AND USE OF
TIF (SOILS CONDITION DISTRICT) TO ASSIST WITH THE SOIL
CORRECTION EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.
Koropchak informed members that the HRA was being asked to
consider the use of Tax Increment Financing to assist with
soil corrections (Soils Condition District) necessary for
development of residential property. The HRA is not being
asked to make any formal approvals but only to indicate a
willingness to proceed with interest.
Developers Rick Murray and Bob Murray of Residential
Development, Inc. Chanhassen, MN, are requesting the
consideration of a pay-as-you-go TIF assistance. The
developers have a purchase agreement on the 74.7 -acre
Krautbauer property. The current plan shows a completed -
phased project of 87 Bingle -homes, 47 twin -homes, 2 commercial
facilities. 7 -acre park, and ponds. Projected base value of
single -home is $95,000 and twin -home Is $80,000.
Initially and prior to the HRA meeting, preliminary studies of
the 20 -year topographic maps indicated the need for TIF
assistance in the neighborhood of $175,000 for correction of
the mined gravel -pit. The mined gravel -pit is located within
the approximate 35 -acre township parcel. Of the total 74.7 -
Page 2
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1994
acre parcel, approximately 39.7 acres are located within the
city limits and 35 acres are located in the township. The
township parcel would constitute the need for annexation and
modification of the Central Monticello Redevelopment Project
boundaries.
The first issue is to determine the extent of the soil
deficiencies, area requiring remedial action, and physical
preparation costs, in order to meet the Statutory definition
of a Soils Condition District. It is upon the recommendation
of HRA Attorney Steve Bubul that the developer provide the HRA
with soil condition findings as determined by engineer and
survey expertise in order to determine Statutory compliance.
Jim Casserly, attorney for the developers, presented a
Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by Braun Intertec
Corporation. He summarized the report stating, "In addition
to necessary gravel -pit remedial action, the report indicates
evidence of soil deficiencies within the entire 74.7 parcel."
Based on the preliminary information received by Attorney
Bubul prior to the HRA meeting, he foresees the informational
findings sufficient for the establishment of the Soils
Condition District.
With the findings of the Geotechnical Evalution Report,
project costs have already escalated. After receipt of the
findings of the updated survey and the County Road 75 Access
Study, the developers may consider other options. Options
being to develop the entire area with TIF assistance, to
develop only the area which makes feasible sense without use
of TIF, or to not develop at this time. Valuation of twin -
homes now range between 880,000 to 9120,000 and the base value
of a single -home along the bluff is approximately $99,000.
The preliminary grading cost of $250,000 was determined using
a figure of 81.00 per yard.
Jeff O'Neill reported on the Planning Commission preliminary
eub-division approval based on the design plan only and
contingent upon: 1) Favorable report of the County Road 75
Access Study as initiated and paid for by the developers, 2)
Grading and drainage plane to accommodate a feasible
development, 3) Reduction of roadway from 38 ft to 32 ft with
the construction of sidewalks, 4) Development of a seven -acre
park development, 5 -acres flat and 2 -acres eloped, 5)
Preservation of trees, and 6) Development of three ponds.
Chairperson Larson felt the property had a leaser land value
and suggested re -negotiating with the landowner because the
Page 3
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1994
landowner had reaped the revenues from the mined gravel -pit.
Attorney Casserly understood a public entity must be concerned
not to enrich a landowner; however, felt the real question was
"Should the public invest to encourage an end -product?"
HRA members agreed that the development coat were high and
felt the gravel -pit depth was even greater. Tom St. Hilaire
was open-ended without knowledge of numbers. The developers
would like a decision of interest or no interest in TIP
assistance as soon -as -possible.
Jeff O'Neill reported the Planning Commission had not
discussed the development of only one-half the property. He
foresees development of one-half the property as feasible
without the use of TIP or a wait approach until the market
value of land increases to the point the property can develop
later.
Chairperson Larson reiterated that the market should dictate
development in a free -enterprise system. Tom St. Hilaire said
some costs do exist and wondered if this was an opportunity to
remove the gravel -pit.
The HRA reviewed the TIP policy considerations and determined
Items 1, Z, 4, and S as yea, Items 3, 7, and 8 as no, and did
not determine the fate of Item 7: The project shall
facilitate the "clean-up" of environmentally unsound property.
Ben Smith made a motion to adopt a resolution in order to
advance the process for development of the property and
pending receipt of further information would the HRA agree to
make a decision. The motion died due to a lack of a second.
Chairperson Larson recommended the item be tabled for two
weeks allowing time for additional information. Tom St.
Hilaire expressed a great interest in the project and the HRA
agreed to Chairperson Larson's recommendation.
Mr. O'Noill asked if the developers would guarantee a certain
value of home.
8. CONSIDERATION TO. AFgOIjiT Ti10 HR
.A j.?VELERS TO THE SENIOR -
CONGREGATE HOUSING COMMITTEE AND A PROJECT UPPAZ9.L.
In addition to Koropchak agenda background, Chairperson Larson
added the start-up board would be on rotating terms. Tom St.
Hilaire expressed hie oupport of the concept only if the
project was privately owned or a non-profit organization ouch
Page 4
HRA MINUTES
AUGUST 3, 1996
as the Guardian Angels of Elk River. Tom St. Hilaire made a
motion to appoint Al Larson and Brad Barger as RRA
representatives to the Senior -Congregate Housing Committee.
Ben Smith second the motion and with no further discussion,
the motion passed unanimously.
7. CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT UPDATES.
The HRA accepted the written project updates.
8. OTHER BUSINESS.
Again, Tom St. Hilaire reiterated the previous HRA motion: The
HRA authorizes no further payment to Public Resource Group
from the TIF District No. 1-7 or the HRA General Account for
the H -Window Company expansion. HRA members agreed.
9. ADJOURMENT.
The HRA meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
011ie Koropchak, HRA Executive Director
Page 5
J HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 7. 1994
3. Consideration of continued discussion of the preliminary
concept and use of TIP (Soils Condition Districtf to assist
with the soil correction expenditures associated with the
development of a proposed residential project.
Reference and Backqround:
In order to allow the HRA time to read the enclosed
information, I submit information available at this time.
Project changes and additional Information will be provided at
the HRA meeting.
As you may recall per the HRA minutes, this agenda item was
tabled in order to obtain additional information regarding
project revenues and expenditures. The proposed residential
development site is 71 -acres of the Krautbauer property lying
southeast of East County Road 39. The proposed purchase price
Is $343,000 or $4,830 per acre. Approximately 39 -acres lies
within the city limits and 35 -acres lies in the township. The
7 -acre mined gravel -pit lies within the township. The
development would consist of single-family homes, twin -homes,
2 commercial sites, 7 -acre park, and ponds. On the
preliminary observatinn of the Geotechnical Evaluation Report
as prepared by the Braun Intertec Corporation, the report
noted findings to support the establishment of a Soila
Condition District.
The developers are requesting a preliminary concept approval
for the use of TIP to assist with the soil correction
expenditures for development of a residential project.
Originally, fill material costs were baoed upon the 197010
topo maps. Upon completion of a recent field survey, the
required amount of fill material has increased. The survey
Indicated the gravel -pit floor was mined an additional 24 -feet
vertically and banks steepened to elopes of up to 1.5 feet to
1.0 feet, horizontally to vertically. See Exhibit A. (Sathre-
Bergquiet, Inc. letter).
In order to assist the HRA, city otaff inquired of the grading
coots asoociated with the residential developments of Oak
Ridge and Cardinal Hills (Phase IV, only). Coate wore
aparoximatoly 8250,000 for 80 loto or $3,125 per lot and
approximately $120,000 for 60 lots or $2,400 per lot,
reopectively.
Exhibit B is a copy of three scenarios for the propnsod
V development and TIP options ao prepared by Attorney Jim
Page 1
HRA AGENDA
SEPTEMBER 7. 1994
Casserly for the Developers Rick and Bob Murray. Option I,
slope correction at a road grade of 7%, up -front TIP
assistance. Project costs of $470,000 for 134 lots or $3,507
per lot. Option II, corrected slope ratio of 3:1, pay-as-you-
go TIP assistance. Project costs of $170,000 for 131 lots or
$1,298 per lot. According to City Engineer Bret Weiss of OSM,
the city typically prefers a corrected slope ratio of 4:1;
however, the 3:1 slope in the proposed park area is to
constitute the slide hill.
Attorney Casserly and the developers will highlight the
enclosed options, detail of project costs, and display project
maps at the HRA meeting.
Additionally, city staff obtained (Exhibit C) a copy of the
Reclamation Plan associated with the January 1990 Buffalo
Bituminous request for two Conditional Use Permits. One to
allow expansion of the mining operation on the property owned
by Robert and Betty Krautbauer and second, to place a
temporary hot -mix plant in the existing gravel -pit. It
appears that the proposed reclamation contours were not
completed as noted through the recent field survey. A copy of
14_, Exhibit C was given to Rick Murray on September 1.
In summary, the developers has been asked to demonstrate and
quantify the need for TIP assistance.
B. Alternative Actions:
1. A motion to approval the preliminary concept for use of
TIP (Soils Condition District) to assist with the
development of a residential project.
2. A motion to deny approval of the preliminary conceptual
use of TIP (Boils Condition District) to assist the
development of a residential project.
3. A motion to table the item.
C. Staff recommendation:
With the anticipation of additional information, otaff makes
no recommendation at this time.
D. Suvoortina Data:
Exhibits A. B, and C.
r
Page 2
August 12, 1994
SATHRE-BERGAUIST, INC.
150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA. MN 55391
(612) 476.0000 FAX 4764io4
Mr. Rick 0. Murray
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
15 Choctaw Grcle
Chanhassen, MN 55317
Subject Krautbauer Property
Dear Rick:
Lest week, you requested that we prepare a topographic survey of the mined portion of
the Kreutbauer property. The purpose of the survey was to enable us to accurately
calculate the additional fill needed to restore the area to estate In which future
development Is reasonable, when compared to a typical, non -mined site.
We have completed the field surveying, prepared a topographic map of the mined area
and have completed the volume calculations which analyze the mining that was done
from the 1970's, when the Gty's topographic map was prepared, until the present.
We have determined that 338,600 cubic yards of Ind material Is necessary to return the
slip to the state that It was in when the ortginel topographic map was made. The
material left In the large weal contral pile was deducted from the quantt y needed.
We have also roconfl►med that an oddltlonal 92,031 cubic yards of fdl material are
needed to roslopo the mined area, based upon the 1970's tope map.
The total quantity of fln material needed Is the sum of the two numbers above, or
430,531 cubic yards.
In our letter to you of August 3, 1994, same subject. we had estimated the above
quantities as being 150,000 cublo yards and 100,000 cubic yards respectively: for the
sum of 250,000 cubic yards. We had significantly underestimated the amount of
additional material needed to restore for the last 20 years mining act". The mine
floor was lowered through the years, but more sigi lcantly up to 24 feet of material has
mined vertically around the edges of the 1970's ptL The pit was expanded in size and
the banks wore steepened In the past 20 years. The new sunray shows slopes of up to
1.5 feet to 1.0 feet horizontally to vertically. This to basically as steep as 8 sandy
612-334-33E32 CRSSERLY MOLZRHN 270 PO2 AUG 19'94 11:5
. . _ -.
.-=. P . 03
material will atend due to We Internal angle of friction. This slope steepness Is a highly
erodable and potential hazardous one. We recommend a permeneM slope of 3.0 feet
to 1.0 teat, or Metter, be created.
Please let me know M you need addlUonal Bats, or have any questions.
Sincerely,
SATH BEROQUIST, IN .
Rtchartl W. Saliva P.E.
RWS/rs
v
Camerly Molzahn & Associates, Inc.
215 South 11th Street, Suite 300 • Minneapotis • Minnesota 55403
Office (612) 342-2277 • Fax (612) 334-3382
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: NONTICELLO HOUSING b REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FROM: Mary E. Molzahn
James R. Casserly
RE: Options for Redevelopment of Krautbauer Property
DATE: August 25, 1994
INTRODUCTION
Enclosed please find three scenarios for the proposed
redevelopment of Lho Krautbauer Property by Residential
Development Inc. (the "Redeveloper"). The general assumptions
which Options I and II share are listed below and are followed by
a brief discussion of each Option. Also enclosed is a chart
comparing Options 1, II and III.
Options I and II assume the following:
1. The creation of a Soils Condition TIF District with a
duration of twelve years total, or eight tax increment
years, and which terminates in 2005.
2. An original market value and original tax capacity for the
proposed TIF District of $409,900 and $2,099, respectively.
3. An inflation rate of 1.00% effective in the year 2003.
4. Admin/Program expenses based on 25.009 of the tax increment
generated to assist the City with potential losses in
LGA/HACA.
5. A present value rate of 8.508; the present value amount
generated by this rate represents the approximate principal
amount of either a bond issue or a revenue note.
17 6. The pay 1994 tax rate of 112.873%.
OPTION I
Option I corrects unusual soil conditions and addresses the
problem of the gravel pit by correcting the slopes to maintain a
road grade of 78. Roads would be constructed across the gravel
pit with homes, park, trail and holding pond constructed in and
around the pit. The previous land use will still be apparent,
but the site will be extensively modified.
Option I assumes the construction of 87 single family homes, 94
town home units and 2 commercial sites to be completed in years
1996 through 1999. Upon completion, this Option will have an
estimated market value of $19,652,400, an estimated tax capacity
of $285,850 and, based on the 1994 tax rate, projected property
taxes of approximately $322,648. The total amount of tax
increment generated approximates $1,512,396 and converts into a
present value of $780,761.
Option I expenses are estimated to be $470,000. The amount of
fill needed for this Option is in excess of 440,000 cubic yards.
Because of the substantial expenses involved in Option I, the
Redeveloper cannot afford to carry these amounts. Under Option I
it is necessary for the City to pay for the costs as they are
incurred. The City can either issue debt or may be able to
borrow from its fund balances to provide the necessary funding.
OPTION II
Option II also corrects unusual soil conditions throughout this
site and makes more modest modifications to the gravel pit. The
pit slopes will be corrected to a ratio of 3:1. A holding pond,
homes, park and trail will be located within the pit with road
access to them. Roadways will not traverse the pit as with
Option I.
Option II assumes the construction of 83 single family homes, 96
town home units and 2 commercial sites also completed in years
1996 through 1999. Upon completion this Option will have an
estimated market value of $19,312,400, an estimated tax capacity
of $280,490, and projected property taxes of approximately
$316,598. The total amount of tax increment generated
approximates $1,491,263 and converts into a present value of
$770,746.
Option II expenses, which include modifying the slopes and
providing drainage, will require in excess of an estimated
150,000 cubic yards with costs estimated at 1170,000.
The contours of the gravel pit and its previous use will be
readily apparent, but Option II will correct a potentially
� dangerous situation and provide almost as much density as Option
I. Because Option II is less expensive, the Redeveloper is able
�1 to pay for the tax increment eligible expenses and then be
reimbursed over time through a Revenue Note as increased taxes
are paid.
OPTION III
Option III assumes that the City portion of the site is developed
and the Township portion remains in its present condition with no
improvements being made to the gravel pit.
Option III assumes the construction of 47 single family homes, 32
town home units and no commercial sites to be completed in years
1996 through 1998. Upon completion this Option will have an
estimated market value of $8,140,000, an estimated tax capacity
of $105,920, and projected property taxes of approximately
$119,555.
Since a Tax Increment District is not created, no Tax Increment
will be available. This last option seems the least desirable
since it is unlikely that the gravel pit will ever be corrected.
CONCLUSION
Residential Development Inc. is presenting the Authority with an
opportunity to correct a safety hazard and a blighting condition,
and add over $19.0 million of market valuation to the City's tax
base. The Authority can assist by establishing a Tax Increment
District which would require approximately three (3) to five and
one-half (5-1/2) years of taxes. If the Authority does not wish
to assist, the City portion of this site will be developed and
ultimately the western half of the Township portion. The gravel
pit will most likely never be developed as the coat of correcting
the pit will become prohibitive as fill has to be imported from
off-site. The solutions suggested are reasonable, and certainly
Options I and II can be immediately implemented.
On behalf of our client, we wish to thank you for the substantial
time and effort you have already provided in trying to work out
solutions. we all look forward to a successful project.
7
4
OPTION I
OIIGINk MARKET VALUE 209,900
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY 2.099
ESTIMATED MARW VALUE
19,652.400
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
1.001 3.002 285,650
RDI/CITY OF MONTICELLO
2.001 4.603
TOTAL E!'iMATED TAXES
F' ED HONTICELLO HOUSING PROJECT
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS
87
TOTAL TOW HOMES WITS
94
8.503
PV RATE
ORIGINAL
ESTIMATED
COMM M
ESTIMATED
ADMIN/
AVAILA9LE
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
PROGRAM
TAIL
DATE
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
INCREMENT
EXPENSES
INCREMENT
SEMI -AMINAL
CUMULATIVE
12 / 1996
2,099
2.099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1995
2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1995
2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1996
2,099
2.099
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1996
2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1997
2,099
11,760
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1997
2,099
11,760
0
0
0
0
0
0
6 / 1998
2,099
127,890
9,661
5,652
1,363
6,089
3,056
3.056
12 / 1998
2,099
127,890
9,661
5,652
1,363
6,089
2,931
5.987
6 / 1999
2,099
217,170
125.791
70,992
17,748
53,244
36,609
62,596
12 / 1999
2,099
217,170
125,791
70,992
17,748
53,266
35,117
77,712
6 / 2000
2,099
285,850
215,071
121,379
30.345
91,036
57,593
135,305
12 / 2000
2.099
285.85D
215.071
121,379
30,345
91,036
55,265
190,550
6 / 2001
2,099
265,850
283,751
160,139
60,035
120,105
69.915
260.465
12 / 2001
2,099
265,850
283.751
160,139
60,035
120,105
57,065
327,530
6 / 2002
2,099
288,709
283,751
160,139
60.035
120,105
64,331
391,860
12 / 2002
2,099
288,709
263,751
160,139
40,035
120,105
61,708
453,568
6 / 2003
2,099
291,596
286,610
161,753
40,438
121,314
59,789
513.357
12 / 2003
2.099
291,595
286,610
161,753
40,438
121,314
57,351
570,709
_f, / 2004
2,099
294,512
289,497
163,382
40,645
122.535
55,567
626,276
2004
2,099
294,512
289,497
163,382
40,845
122,536
53,302
679,578
�/ 2005
2,099
297,457
292,413
165.028
41,257
123.771
51,644
731,222
12 / 2005
2,099
297,457
292,413
165,028
41,257
123,771
49,539
780,761
--------------------------------------------------------------------------"'----
2,016,529
504,132
1,512,396
----------__----------"'-
780,761
780,761
OIIGINk MARKET VALUE 209,900
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY 2.099
ESTIMATED MARW VALUE
19,652.400
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
1.001 3.002 285,650
2.001 4.603
TOTAL E!'iMATED TAXES
322.616
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS
87
TOTAL TOW HOMES WITS
94
TOTAL COMMERCIAL SITES
2
I
NSGI PREPARED BY CASSERLY KLZAHN • ASSDCIAIE3. INC. 24 -Aug -94
OPTION I CONT'D
ROI/CITY OF 1ONTICELL0
1 1 Y1N6TRlICTION START - RESIDENTIAL
t COMPLETION
4 SINGLE FAMILY
@
95,000
380,000
8 TON HOMES
@
80.000
640.000
1.020.000
1997 VALUATION
4 SINGLE FAMILY
@
1,180
4,720
8 TON HOMES
@
880
7,040
11,760
1998 TAXES PAYABLE
13,274
1995 CONSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1997 COMPLETION
24 SINGLE FAMILY
@
110,000
2.640.000
38 TON HOES
0
85.000
3.230.000
5.870.000
1998 VALUATION
24 SINGLE FAMILY
@
1,480
35.520
38 TOWN HOBS
@
980
37.240
72.760
1999 TAXES PAYABLE
82.126
1996 ODNSTTt11CTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1998 COMPLETION
30 SINGLE FAMILY
@
120,000
3.600.000
36 TON MOM
0
90,000
3.240.000
6.840.000
1999 VALUATION
30 SINGLE FAMILY
@
1.680
50.400
35 TON NOIES
@
1.080
38.880
89.280
200Q TAXES PAYABLE
100,773
19➢f'CONSTRIICTIOM START - RESIDENTIAL
1999 COMPLETION
29 SINGLE FAMILY
@
130,000
3,770,000
12 TON HOES
0
95,000
1,140,000
4,910.000
2000 VALUATION
29 SINGLE FAMILY
@
1,880
54,520
12 TON HOMES
@
1.180
14.160
68.6130
2001 TAXES PAYABLE
77,521
1996 ODNSTRUCTICN START - 009ERCIAL
1997 COMPLETION
LAND
SLOG TOTAL
LOT 1
89,000
354,400 "3.400
LOT 2
125,000
444.000 569,000
1,012,400
19913 VALUATION
LOT 1
18,796
LOT 2
24,674
43,370
1999 TAXES PAYABLE
4B.9S3
INFLATION
6/2003
1.005
ADMIN/PROGRAM EXPENSES
25.001
PV RATE
12/1994
8.505
PAY 1994 TAX RATE
1.12873
V
11561
PREPARED BY CASSERLY IQ2A1N A ASSOCIATES. INC.
24 -Aug -94
OPTION II CONT'D
RDI/CITY OF MONTICELLO
MNSTRWTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1 - COPLETION
4 SINGLE FAMILY ®
95,000
38D,000
8 TON LADES
80, OD0
610.000
1,020,000
1997 VALUATION
4 SINGLE FAMILY 8
1,187
4,720
8 TON IDES
890
7,040
11,760
1998 TAXES PAYABLE
13,274
1995 CONSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1997 COMPLETION
24 SINGLE FAMILY 8
110,000
2,640,000
38 TON IDES
85.000
3,23D,OD0
5.870,000
1998 VALUATION
24 SINGLE FAMILY 8
1,487
35,520
38 TON HOES
980
37.240
72.760
1999 TAXES PAYABLE
82.126
1996 CONSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1998 COMPLETION
30 SINGLE FAMILY 8
120.000
3.600.000
38 TON NOES
90.000
3.420.00D
7,020,000
1999 VALUATION
30 SINGLE FAMILY 0
1.680
50.400
38 TON HOMES
1.080
.
41.040
91'"0
200X( TAXES PAYABLE
103,211
19 bOMSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1999 COMPLETION
25 SINGLE FAMILY 0
130,000
3,250,000
12 TON (IDES
95.000
•
1,140,000
4,390,000
2000 VALUAT ION
25 SINGLE FAMILY 9
1,880
47,000
12 TON HOES
1,160
14,160
61,160
2001 TAXES PAYABLE
69,033
1996 CONSTRUCTION START - COMMERCIAL
1997 COMPLETION
LAND
BLDG
TOTAL
LOT 1
89,000
354,400
"3,100
LOT 2
125,000
4",000
569,000
1,012,400
1998 VALUATION
NAT 1
18,796
LOT 2
24,574
43,370
1999 TAXES PAYABLE
48,953
INFLATION
8/203
1.002
ADMIN/PROGRAM EXPENSES
25.00S
PY RATE
12/1991
8.Sn
PAY 1994 TAX RATE
1.12873
V
HSG1 PREPARED BY CASSERLY M0LLANM A ASSOCIATES, INC. 24 -Aug -94
OPTION II
RDI/CITY OF MOiTICELLO
SED MONTICELLO HOUSING PRDJECT 8.502 PV RATE
ORIGINAL
ESTIMATED
CAPTURED
ESTIMATED
ADMIN/
AVAILABLE
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
TAX
TAX
TAX
TAX
PROGRAM
TAX
DATE CAPACITY
CAPACITY
CAPACITY
INCREMENT
EXPEM6ES
IMCREMW
SEIU-ANNUAL
CUMULATIVE
12 / 1994 2.099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1995 2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1995 2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1996 2,099
2, 099
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1996 2,099
2,099
0
0
0
0
0
0
6/ 1997 2,099
11,760
0
0
0
0
0
0
12 / 1997 2.099
11,760
0
0
0
0
0
0
6 / 1998 2.099
127,890
9,661
5,452
1,363
4,089
3,056
3,056
12 / 1998 2,099
121,890
9.651
5.452
1,363
4,089
2,931
5,987
6 / 1999 2,099
219,330
125.791
70.992
17,748
53,244
36,609
42.5%
12 / 1999 2,099
219,330
125,791
70,992
17,748
53,244
35,117
77,712
6 / 2000 2,099
280,490
217,231
122,5%
30,649
91,948
58,171
135,883
12 / 2000 2.099
220.490
217,231
122,598
30.649
91,948
55.800
191,683
6 / 2001 2,099
280,490
278,391
157,114
39,279
117,636
68,594
260,277
12 / 2001 2,099
28D.490
278,391
157,114
39,279
117,836
65,798
326.075
6 / 2002 2.099
283,295
278,391
157,114
39,279
117,836
63,116
389.191
12 / 2002 2,099
283,295
278,391
157,114
39,279
117,836
60,542
449,733
6 / 2003 2,099
286,128
281,195
158,697
39,674
119.023
58,659
508.393
12 / 2003 2,099
286,128
281,196
158,697
39,674
119,023
56.268
564,661
6 / 2004 2.099
288.990
284.029
160,296
40,074
120,222
54,518
619,179
2004 2.099
288,990
284.029
160,296
40,074
120,222
52,295
671,474
/ 2005 2.099
291,879
286,891
161,911
40,478
121,433
50,669
722.143
12 / 2005 2,099
291,879
288,891
161,911
40,478
121,433
48,603
770,746
------- »_.
------- ------------------------
----
»-------------------------
1,988,351
497,088
---'---_..__
1,491,263
------ -_-.-
770,746
770,746
ORIGINAL MARKET VALUE
209.900
ORIGINAL TAX CAPACITY
2,099
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
19,312,400
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
1.002
3.002
280.490
2.002
4.602
TOTAL ESTIMATED TAXES
316.598
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UNITS
83
TOTAL TON MOWS WITS
96
TOTAL COMMERCIAL BITES
2
V
Aml PREPARED 8Y CASSERLY NOLZAW 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. 24-A.0-94
OPTION III
RDI/CITY OF MONTICELLO
Iuu� ATED MARKET VALUE
1.002
3.004
8,140,000
ESTIMATED TAX CAPACITY
2.004
4.60i
105,920
TOTAL ESTIMATED TAKES
119,555
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY UWITS
47
TOTAL TOM IDES UMTS
32
TOTAL COlERCIAL SITES
0
1994 CONSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1996 COPLET ION
4 SINGLE FAMILY 0
95,000
380,000
0 TDM TOES 0
80,000
0
380,000
1997 VALUATION
4 SINGLE FAMILY 0
1,180
4.720
0 TDM NOES 0
S80
•
0
4,720
1998 TARES PAYABLE
5,328
1995 CONSTRUCTION START - RESIDENTIAL
1997 COMPLETION
24 SINGLE FAMILY 0
110,000
2,640,000
B TOM TOES 0
85,000
680.000
3.320.000
1998 VALUATION
24 SINGLE FAMILY 0
1,480
35.520
8 TOM HOES 0
980
7,810
43.360
1999 TAXES PAYABLE
48,962
1996 CONSTRUCTION STMT - RESIDENTIAL
1, XMETION
19 SINGLE FAMILY 0
120,000
2,280,000
24 TOWN LADES 0
90.000
2.160.000
4.440.000
1999 VALUATION
19 SINGLE FAMILY 0
1,680
31,920
24 TOM TOES 0
1,080
•
25,920
57,840
2000 TAXES PAYABLE
65,286
1997 CONSTRUCTION STMT - RESIDENTIAL
1999 COMPLETION
0 SINGLE FAMILY 0
130,000
0
0 TOM HOMES 0
95.000
0
0
2000 VALUATION
0 SINGLE FAMILY 0
1,880
•
0
0 TON HOES 0
1.180
0
0
2001 TAXES PAYABLE
0
1996 CONSTRUCTION STMT - COMMERCIAL
1997 COMPLETION
LAND
SLOG
TOTAL
0 LOT 1
0
0
0
0 LOT 2
0
0
0
0
1998 VALUATION
0 LOT 1
0
0 LOT 2
0
0
1999 TARES PAYABLE
0
P�,994 TAX RATE
1.12873
NSGI PREPARED BY CASSERLY MOLLAN A ASSOCIATES. INC. 304430.94
RDI/CITY OF MONTICELLO
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
ESTIMATED ANNUAL TAXES
ESTIMATED TAX INCREMENT
ADMIN/PROGRAM EXPENSES
AVAILABLE TAX INCREMENT
AVAILABLE FOR PROJECT EXPENSES
ESTIMATED PROJECT EXPENSES
TAX INCREMENT YEARS REQUIRED
FORM OF ASSISTANCE
COMPARISON OF OPTIONS
OPTION I OPTION II OPTION III
19,652,400
19,312,400
8,140,000
322,648
316,5981
119,555
2,016,529
1,988,351
***
504,132
497,088
***
1,512,397
1,491,263
***
780,761
770,746
ttt
470,000
170,000
***
5.5
3.0
***
t
tt
ttt
* Upfront - the City issues a Tax Increment General Obligation Bond,
or borrows from existing fund balances, to pay eligible expenses as
they are incurred.
** Over time - the City issues a Tax Increment Revenue Note to
reimburse the Redeveloper for eligible expenses out of taxes as
they are actually received.
*** No Tax Increment Financing District is created.
7 .
COMP1 PREPARED BY CASSERLY MOLEAHN 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. 30 -Aug -94
PLA:%:VLVG AND Zo .'`%�i.\ ;;
TOI I SALKOWSKI..\: NEN15TRA—.OP.
I:'ri;.. C••u r.:'. !.pro r: r:..u. r ':,i.,. `r::fir; ., ;r:
July 12, 1988
Mr. Robert Krautbauer
424 Riverview Drive
Monticello, MN 55362 .
RE: Buffalo Bituminous proposed bituminous plant placement
Dear Mr. Krautbauer:
The Monticello Orderly Annexation Area Board discussed,
but took no action, on the proposal by Buffalo Bituminous
at their July 6 meeting. The matter was continued to the
meeting at 8:00 p.m., August 3, 1988 at the Monticello
Township Hall.
Of great concern to the Board is the fact that parts of
the property have been used for improper dumping and that no
j reclamation plans exist for the property. It is likely that
i the Board will not approve placement of the plant unless you
have prepared and submitted a detailed plan for cleaning up
the dumpsites, and gravel pit reclamation plans as required
by Section 727 of the Wright County Zoning Ordinance. (attached)
Please pursue these matters as soon as possible, as staff in
this office must receive these plans by July 27 in order to
review them and report to the Board by August 3.
Sincere 'y, r ^
Tom a 1 k o w a k i
Planning 6 Zoning Administrator
TS:sa
cc: M.O.A.A. Board members
G. M4Alpine (Buffalo Bit.)
J. 0 Neil City of Monti
4
MONEd.
TICO ORDEiL: A171 MATION HOARD
y
The regular monthly meeting of the Monticello Orderly Annexation Hoard was held at the
Monticello Township Hall on County Road 117 at 8:00 p.m. on August 3, 1988, notice of
such meeting having been posted on the bulletin board for ten days prior to said meeting.
Presents Denn, Fhgatrom, Grimsmo. Abrent: Administrator Salkowski.
Meeting called to order at 8100 p.m. by Chairmen Denn. First item is the minutes of the
July o, Lytle meeting. Motion to approve the minutes as presented by Grim op seconded
by Engstrom and carried.
Item II is the request from Buffalo Bituminous for a conditional use permit to place a
temporary hot mix plant in existing gravel pit (Krautbauer Gravel Pit); part of SSS of M04
lying N of Interstate A, Section 18, Township 121. Applicant not present. Salkowski
told U1 Neil that ueorge McAlpine would De here tonight. board memoers agreed to pass this
item to later on in the agenda.
Item III is a public hearing for a conditional use permit for the City of Monticello for
an essential nu'lic service structure (standpipe reservoir) and subdivision for said use
in S 500 ft.of E 435.5 ft. of SE% of SL3j (Kenneth Schultz farm) Section 13, Township 121.
Jeff O'Neil, Assistant Administrator for the City of Monticello, present to explain this
request. The water line to service this reservoir will go under county road 118. The
only question was whether or notthe city should own the access to this 5 acre parcel rather
'han have a perpetual easement across Mr. Schultz' property. The county ordinance
.quires owned accesses on all building sites. See Salkowski'e concern on this in his
,utaff report. The reservoir will have an 600,000 gal, capacity and will be slightly below
the level of the Monte Club facility; it will not encroach on their view. Denn was
concerned about a land locked parcel and thought the access should be owned by the City.
Grimsmo said the 5 acres is approximately 2 square blocks and there 13 ample room for
servicing and none of the area will over be developed. He asked if the communication
towers have owned access. Dene replied they do not own the land they are located on eo it
is a different situation. The concern is allowing the reservoir without an owned access
strip when all other Duildinge in Lha county are required to have owned access. urimsmo
stated he did not :mow if the city could go back and acquire the 33 ft. strip x 4uO ft, or
5W ft. O'Neil thought this wan a unique situation and would not be setting a precedent
for a municipality to nave a permanent easement rather than an owned strip. He was not
aura if Mr. Schultz has a clear right to sell this piece. Denn said the legal work on a
deed on an owned access strip versus a permanent easement should not make much differ-
ence. He asked who would oe responsible for the taxes if not owned vy the City. Grimmoo
stated the reservoir would be about 05 ft. above ground level.
Mary Lou Payk spoke in opposition to the reservoir as it would wreck the beauty of the
hill and nobody will want to live by it.
Motion by Engstrom, seconded by Grimnmo, eThat we continue this request for a standpipe
reservoir for a month to give the city an opportunity to see if they can acquire title to
the easement a•rtp". O'Neil stated the city is planning a referendum for the 13th of
September and the City will be doing their planning based on the assurance that the
conditional use permit will be granted. What if the City can't negotiate a reasonable
ice for the strip he said. Grimamo stated he has not heard anything in the discussion
'that this board would refuse the permit but he believes the City should make every effort
to meet the guidelines required of private individuals and the City will bring the inform.
ation back to this Board on September 7th. O'Neil asked if the Board would consider having
Monticello Orderly Annexation Board - page 2
the motion read contingent on the City acquiring this piece of property. Grimsmo stated J
it will accomplish the same thing but it will give the City a little more assurance that
instead of being delayed it could be contingent on the City acquiring actual fee owner-
ship and he asked for consiaeration of such an amendment to the motion on the floor.
Engstrom withdrew his motion; Grimsmo withdrew his second. A new motion offered by
Engstrom, seconded by Grimsmo, "That the request for a conditional use permit for the
City of Monticello for a standpipe reservoir on the Monte Club hill on a 5 acre parcel
purchased from the aenneth Schultz farm in Section 13 be approved contingent of the City
of Monticello acquiring the land for a 33 foot owned access stip to County road 118
instead of a permanent access strip." Motion carried unanimously.
----Back to Item II. Many people present on this request including Gary Anderson, City of
Monticello Building Inspector; Jeff Nelson, Kevin Tracy, Diane Anderson, Colleen Nelson,
Robert Krautbauer and George McAlpine.
McAlpine stated they are proposing placing the hot mix plant in the Robert Krautbauer
pit. He had a site plan he presented and Krautbauer presented a reclamation plan. The
permit request is from Sept. l to Nov. 15 of 1988 for the County road 39 project. The
location of the plant will meet all the setback requirements from the residences; there
are soave trees that will be a natural barrier and it will be in the low part of the existing
pit. Grimsmo wanted to know if MDOT would be taking material from this pit for the research
road proposed in t,ae east portion of our county. McAtpzne said this is supposed to oe
let for bid in 19YU and he had no idea where the material would came from. McAlpine
stated Buffalo Bituminous has only drill tested the portion of the pit that they will be O
removing material from. He further stated that the County, in this project, set this
pit as the material source and the County has set up a reclamation plan as part of the
contract that Buffalo Bituminous has to follow.�iimamo said he would like to ask Q
Krautbauer if all the demolition and other waste materials on site will be buried in a
manner approved of by the County Environmental Health Officer. Krautbauer stated he has
never allowed dumping but people menage to get into the property and do dump without his
permission. Orimsmo asked where the material already mined went and Krautbauer stated it
was used on the freeway and no other places and was never a gravel pit prior to the
freeway use.
O'Neil stated he reviewed the reclamation plan with Salkwski and Gary Anderson and it
appeared satisfactory. There will be a very mild elope which meets the standards for
reclamation (a 1 to h slope)i the final elope will be lees than that. Hie concern is
the long term enforcement of the reclamation plan at the time the land is totally mined
out; city staff and people in the area are concerned. Donn stated it would be the
responsibility of this Board through the Zoning Administrator.L:0'Neil was asked if the
reclamation plan Eoi-ei;Wd-tNe—W-t—irW--pIY of just this area where Buffalo Bituminous will
be mining and he replied_just the_gw%ion where they will be mining; the reclamation plan
basically shows what the pit will look like after all the mining is done and the second
phase is what it will look like after the Buffalo Bituminous portion in done(Foage 1 Is
overall and page 2 is Buffalo Bituminous portion McAlpine stated hie aampany has an
with Krautbauer to bury all debris when' they are done. O'Neil stated Buffalo
Bituminous Is wi u ing to survey the area where the debris is to be buried so the City
will be awn.ro of the area in the future for planning.
Gary Anderson addressed the Board and presented a petition from the neighbors. (petition
made part of these minutes). He said he respreeented some of his neighbors both in the
City and in the Township and to acting as a neighbor not a city staff person. He asked
why was this pit chosen and not another pit out away from the city and the residents.
There are many single family residents in the immediate area; he described the area the
petition encompasses. The petition requests denial of the conditional use permit to
Monticello Orderly Annexation Hoard - page 3
(kt1 Buffalo Bituminous; no reasons for requested denial given on the petition nor any
concerns they have relating to the plant. Anderson stated one concern is the debris
that has accumulated over the years and when it will be cleaned up and why the plant
can't be located elsewhere instead of in an area of so many homes. Be said that prev-
iously McAlpine had stated to the city staff that it would take appro:lnately 10 to 14
days to lay the blacktop. Why does the permit need to cover 21a months? The noise is
another concern of the petitioners and the working hours from 7 to 7 and the emissions
from the plant. They are also concerned about a possible fire because of the dry
conditions this year. Also they want to know about total reclamation; when will it
happen; not just reclamation of this portion used by Buffalo Bituminous. What enforce-
ment can be counted on to avoid having debris pile up in there again? Nixing could
continue long into the future; what provisions will be made for final cleanup and to
avoid continual requests for conditional use permits for temporary hot mix plants.
Jeff Nelson was very concerned about the fire hazard; he lives in Sandberg Peat. He
wants to know about the second wear coat to be bid and placed next year and if that
means another request next year. He also wants to see a final reclamation plan in
place.
Donn stated it could be years before all the material is removed; this is a private
enterprise.
McAlpine stated he could see no possible concern for a fire hazard. The water turns to
steam in the heating process. Water in entering the stack at all times. They have a
P,C.A. permit and are an approved plant. The permit request is to Nov. 15; the last
possible time of the year to work bituminous. Should the company encounter a prolonged
3 rainy spell to delay laying the mix it is possible they would let the plant set over
winter and would have to ask for an extension of time. They should be done in October.
The contract calla for the county to buy the material for this project from Krautbauer.
His company has no agreements to purchas-e ma�erial from Krautbauer.
Kevin Tracy is concerned about the amen. She drives the freeway and there is consider•
able odor from a plant as you near Osseo. Dene asked McAlpine if he knew of the new
state law that went into effect August let relating to odors. McAlpine replied that
they have received no information on any change in requirements frca either the P.C.A.
or their own trade group. In reply to a query from Gary Anderson about using another
pit for material McAlpine stated that in the Lerma of the contract the only pit the
material for this project could come from was the Krautbauer pit; no others. Grimsmo
asked how many loada would be hauled. McAlpine replied the bid calla for 25,000 tons
of material and Buffalo Bituminous trucks haul approximately 14 tuna a load.
Diane Anderson asked if only this pit was considered. Donn stated that whenever a
conditional use permit for a hot mix plant comes before the County Planning and Zoning
Board there are always people in the area that object. The coat of road construction
is a concern to everyone and locating the source near the need is a major consideration.
Colleen Nelson asked what is the purpose of having a public hearing if you Board members
have already made up your minds. Is there any guarantee of this being the only permit
or will we again have other plants and have to put up with the noise, odor and trucks.
Krautbauer stated he owns the property and has the right to sell gravel. He has
suggested the city could buy tre property is they so wished. McAlpine stated his
y company has the right to do business if they meet the qualifications of the zoning
ordinance and meet the requirements.
Grimsmo stated he didn't think the city was interested in buying a gravel pit located
in Monticello Township. The pit is already there. This project for County 39 cane
Monticello Orderly Annexation Board - page 4
-40
for material to be removed from this pit. We can't please everybody. Buffalo Bitum-
inous has met the requirements. It is a temporary situation.
Motion by Engstrom, seconded by Grimsmo, "That we grant a conditional use permit for
Buffalo Bituminous to place a temporary hot mix plant in Krautbauer's gravel pit
in Section 18 as regulated in Section 604.4 and 727 of the Wright County Zoning
Ordinance with the following conditions; (1) permit for the bituminous plant shall
expire on Nov. 15, 1988; (2) all demolition and other waste materials existing in the
pit and materials created by this project will be buried in a manner approved of by
the County Environmental Health Officer by Nov. 30, 1988; (3) no further dumping of
any demolition, waste, trash or other materials shall take place on the property
unless specific approval is obtained from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
the Monticello Orderly Annexation Board; (4) all current and future activities shall
,comply with performance standards for mining in the Wright County Zoning Ordinance
and the reglamation plans submitted and (5) that a survey be prepared indicating
where in the pit the material is to be buried." Motion carried unanimously. Engstrom
stated it was his intent that the permit start Sept let as that was what Buffalo
Bituminous requested but McAlpine stated that maybe it wouldn't start until Sept. 15th.
Item IV is final plat approval for The Ponderosa. Mark Woolston present on this
item. Denn stated the road isn't completed. Woolston will place $45,000 in escrow
for completion of the road. This item could be contingent on approval of the plat.
Woolston said his biggest problem is the sale of the Byron Hoglund house; he is facing (�
closing date on the sale of this house. Discussion an lack of most necessary signatures
before final approval. Motion by Grimamo, seconded by Engstrom, *That the final plat
for The Ponderoaa on County road 39 by Markus Land k 011 Co. be approved with all the d
conditions of the preliminary plat being met and the following signatures on the final
plat be obtained from (1) the Oanty Engineer; (2) the QzM Treasurer; (3) the County
Auditor; (4) the County Recorder; (5) Chairman of the O.A.A. Board; (6) park dedication
fees shall be cash as determined by the Planning and Zoning Administrator; (7) funds be
placed in escrow for completion of the road in the amount of $45,000 for protection of
the Townahip." Motion carried unanimously. Woolston wanted to know where the escrow
monies were to be deposited and was told the Wright County State Bank.
Item V. Rjellberg Park West problem reviewed by Jeff O'Neil. Donn asked how difficult
it would be to have the state fire marshall give some Input and possibly exert some
pressure on the violations on occupancy. Engstrom thought the only thing to do is to
get legal counsel. O'Neil mentioned Hayes. Grimsmo asked regarding Weingarden. It
would have a big impact if we could back up any legal pursuit with evidence of the state
fire marshall having chocked nut the occupancy. Grimamo said to be sure people are
occupying these quarters. Donn said people were living there on June 29, 1988 when the
county building Inspector was out there. O'Neil said he would contact Selkowskl and
have him contact the state fire marshall and keep up to date on the status of the
residents. Consensus of the Board that if necessary Salkaweki to contact weiagarden
after occupancy is reconfirmed and the state fire marehall Is contacted.
Item VI - Land Use Plan. O'Neil stated not much accomplished this past month and
thought was that both Salkowaki and himself should be present. Grimsmo asked that
something definite be on the September agenda on this item. He has announced that he
will not file for reelection.
No new business the meeting adjourned on motion by Engstrom, seconded by Grimm and
carried.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT CONDITIONAL USE PROCEEDINGS
APPLICANT: Buffalo Bituminous, Inc.
PROPERTY OWNER: Robert G. & Betty A. Krautbauer
Petitions for a Conditional Use Permit to place a temporary hot -mix
plant in existing gravel pit as regulated in Section 604.4 & 727.
of the Wright County Zoning Ordinance.
The above entitled matter came on to be heard before the
Monticello Orderly Annexation Area Board on 3rd day of August
1989 , on a petition for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the
Wright County Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property:
South Half of Northwest Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter all lying north of railroad, except for tract
described in Book 222 of Deeds, page 302, all in Section 18,
Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. (Monticello Twp
IT IS ORDERED that a conditional use permit be approved
upon the following conditions:
Monticello Orderly Annexation Area Board granted a Conditional Use Permit
for Buffalo Bituminous to place a temporary hot mix plant in Krautbauer's
gravel pit in Section 18 as regulated in Section 604.4 and 727 of the
Wright County Zoning Ordinance with the following conditions: 1) permit
for the bituminous plantshall expire on :November 15, 1988; 2) all
demolition and other waste materials existing in the pit and materials
created by this project will be buried in a manner approved of by the
County Environmental Health Officer by November 30, 1988; 3) no further
dumping of any demolition, waste, trash or other materials
tthhshall take place
on STATS pOT MINK SOTA) specific approval is obtainWRIG�mC8WTy* MICE
N ) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) OF PLANNING AND ZONING
I, Tom Salkowski, Zoning Adminstrator for the County of Wright,
with and in for said County, do hereby certify that I have compared
the foregoing copy and Order granting a conditional use with the
original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the
same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. A copy
of this Order has been forwarded to the applicant.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed y hand at
Buff a o, Mi nesota, in the County of Wright on the -7 day of
1970
Receipt a 30929 W ght Coubty Z'C�nind Administrator
Return to P & Z WCR
*Conditions continued:
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Monticello Orderly
Annexation Area Board; 4) all current and future activities shall
comply with performance standards for mining in the Wright County
Zoning Ordinance and the reclamation plans submitted and 5) that
a survey be prepared indicating where in the pit the material is to
be buried.
04P
467846
frf
='ICC iF C'CH f Y ;�::,p.t i�'iI'C^.S i',•. n':Ie: SAI'
ANJ/"a :cCfP�7F7 nv
90 AN -9 PM93j3
MISC.t1A(H�C1A`IA`NT�TQ.CO�.}"ECpnF 61
6 ' DEPUTY
*GA
R
STATE OF MINNESOTA MONTICELLO ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT CONDITIONAL USE PROCEEDINGS
PPLICANT: 11IN1UMA DEPARTVM OF TRANSPORTATION/ROSM 103AUi'BAUER
W
Petitions to extend the Conditional Use Permit issued on December 6, 1289 to June 30, 1994
to continue the land alteration and stockpiling as regulated in Section 604.4 and 72T of—the
Wright County Zoning Ordinance.
ORDER GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The above entitled matter came on to be heard before the Monticello
Orderly Annexation Area Board this 1st of July. 1992, on a petition for a
Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the Wright County Zoning Ordinance, for
the following described property:
South self of North ut Quarter and the eorumt Quarte of the SouUmst Quarter all lying north of railroad, eceot cart lyinq
northeasterly of the northeast right of Cay of County Niglnay 75 the lying mathreaterly of the southruterly nght of way of
Interstate 94, eaceot tract deacnhad in Boot 222 of CHOI. Nge 102 1e the Office of the eight County Recorder, Section 18.
Toiinhic 121. Range 14. Mot County. Nilineeata. lite Parcel 1211-000-I122UI
IT IS ORDERED that a Conditional Use Permit be granted upon the following
conditions or reasons:
Board gruted a coediticael no pe►ait for a tao-yur eitaneron to stoetstle eateriv at tee tnuthawr orourty,
`-1
SPATE OF MINNESOTA) WRIGHT COUNTY OFFICE
) sa.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) OF PLANNING AND ZONING
I, Tom Salkowski, Zoning Administrator for the County of Wright, with
and in for said County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing
copy and Order granting a Conditional Use Permit with the original record
thereof preserved in my office, and have found the same to be a correct and
true transcript of the whole thereof. A CODY of this Order has been
forwarded to the applicant.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereunto quPscribed my and at uffalo.
Minnesota, in the County of Wright on the day of
199?. !'
Vieviotit Couaty Z6 ng AIlnietrator
eyttw" tet wr4"t County PlaTine a Zoning
iY:.tl
520941
Off.%:4Of.CO. W_I'1T`YRECORO
NRCI.RTiCl1UNTY,MINNES
€A
SLED TOkFILED
M FS •4 pM 11= 14 y
KAMTT0.COSECOM
BY. Mm . DEPUTT
NIP
9
STATE OF MINNESOTA MONTICELLO ORDERLY ANNEXATION AREA
COUNTY OF WRIGHT CONDITIONAL USE PROCEEDINGS
APPLICANT: BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, INC.
PROPERTY OWNER: Rob_:t Krautbauer and Betty A. Krautbaue_
Petitions for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of the
mining operation as regulate din Section 505.2, 60-727 of the
Wrignt County Zoning Ordinance. (expansion to include land alteration
for stockpile storage area.)
The above entitled matter came on to be heard before the
Monticello Orderly Annexation Area Board on 6th day of December
19 89, on a petition for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to the
Wright County Zoning Ordinance, for the following described property:
South Half of Northwest Quarter and the Northeast Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter all lying north of railroad, except part lying
northeasterly of the northeast right of way of County Highway 75 and
lying southwesterly of the southwesterly right of way of Interstate 94,
except tract described in "Book 222 of Deeds, page 302 in the Office
of the Wright County Recorder, Section 1L, Township 121, Range 24,
Wright County, Minnesota. (Monticello Township)
IT IS ORDERED that a conditional use permit be approved
upon the following conditions:
1. Approval is for a stockpile site only, and mining on the property
is to remain strictly limited to the terms of the permit issued and
plans approved on August 3, 1988.
2. All topsoil stripped from the site must be saved for reclamation
of the stockpile site.
3. Dust control must be applied as necessary during future operations.
4. Highway access must be approved by the County Engineer.
5. This permit shall expire, and reclamation must be complete by
June 1, 1992.
STATE OF MINNESOTA) WRIGHT COUNTY OFFICE
) as.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) OF PLANNING AND ZONING
I. Tom Salkowaki, Zoning Adminatrator for the County of Wright,
with and in for said County, do hereby certify, that I have compared
the foregoing copy and Order granting a conditional use with the
original record thereof preserved in my office, and have found the
same to be a correct and true transcript of the whole thereof. A copy
of this Order has been forwarded to the applicant.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed hand at
Buffalo, Minnesota, in the 18Cou ty of Wright on the day of
tight C ty slag Administrator
ljeoelpt s 33899
Return to P 6 Z
467847
an Y.IhncS'.
is oxFL
90 JAN —9 PH MA R C A v 3: 03
MISS an co..nra 97.,pq 62
I Lco.
&l Z P U T Y
ftR
J E C TON or ! yl
Ru t /I
•I• �- O.nor.. a18nnp ao~l NOTl: M.ION w •Oboes al ee.lke
M pM10100 • •prepo000 10110nMnM1 CMIWe "I., 4,41806111
RDTE: 0t1011np ey11pe0 OIO Ilan M pylon wrvl/ pa� MORR /URD { I
I /0100 MIRO S olf Ie001 Hae along 100 1988610 .wye Ont
H0 NN1nInWl OIH x.10 IM00a a1 7/le/IWt
The Monticello Senior Housing Alliance met August 9, 1994 at 7:00 p.m in the Monticello -Big Lake
Community Hospital Board Room
In attendance were Shirley Anderson, 011ie Koropdmk, Helm Weidenbncli, Don Biske, Al Larson, Clirn
Herbst, and Barb Sehwientdc Brad Barger was absent.
Al Larson was elected Acting Chainean by consemus.
On site visits to Sernor Housing Developments were scheduled as follows:
Ao¢nst 15 - Leave City Hall Parking Lot at 10:45 am
I1*00& m : Lake Ridge Manor
% Ebenezer Cove= Home
310 Lake Blvd.
Buff do, MN 55313
Ma. Judy Hama, Director of Social Services/Assisted Living
Mr. John Rau, Interim Adawr 8/1/94
(612)682-1434
This is a 254)ed "ered caro living faality attached to the 604)ed nundng &mhty with shared services and
a:aff It is situated on a hill overlooking Buffilo Lake which provides infortndity and tranquillity to the
residents
Leave City Hall Parking Lot at 1:45 p.n.
2100„p,m,: Manitou Place
4615 Second Avemm
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Tani Meyer
(612) 4264054
egrnst 31 - Leave City Hall Parking Lot at 9:00 am
9145. gym• County Manor
520 Fust Sonet Northeast
Sartell, MN 56377
Gail
(612) 253-8450
I;00 p.m: Parltview, Court
Glenwood, MN
Pat rhasto
(612) 634.3234
Fadag lake in downtown Glenwood, ommeaed to nurdng hone. Assisted living FVJM In smaller
commwdty.
August 31 - (Com'd):
3:30 o.m.: Pleasant View
- 100 Barduson Stmt
Appleton. MN 56208
Sheila
(612) 289-1163
Sent. I - Leave City Hall Parking Lot at 9:00 am.
10:30 Lm.: Lutheran Home of the Cannon Valley
900 Cannon Valley Drive
Northfield, MN 55057
Mrs. Emelda Rasmussen
(507) 645-9511
This recently completed 26 -unit congregate and 20 -um assisted living fita7ity with a mul i -purpose chapel,
activities, and administration building. This is a similar project to the proposed Mo=Wdlo-Big Lake fiucility.
100 9.m : Eagle Ridge Place
12600 Eagle Ridge Drive
Burnsville, MN
(612)882-0223
Near intersection of Neollet Ave. and Burnsville Partway. Dakota County Congegate Housing project,
sinn7sr to that being discussed in Monticello.
All members are encouraged to join on these site visits if possible. Please call Barb Schwientck at 295-2945,
Ext. 211. if you "not be able to attend.
A roster of all',, members is attached.
The next meeting is scheduled for September 6, at 7:00 p.m. in the Monticello -Big Lake Community
Bub Schwieatek
Senior Housing Alliance Members
W
Al Larson Barbara Schwientek
P.O. Box 367 1013 Hart Blvd.
Monticello, MN 55362 P.O. Box 480
(W) 295-2552 (H) 295-2999 Monticello, MN 55362
Fax: 2954540 (W) 295-2945, Ext. 211
Fax 2954593
011ie Korgwhak Donald Biske
130 Jerry Liefert Drive 3097 -145th St. NW
Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello, MN 55362
(W) 295-2711 (1) 878-2636
Fax: 2954404
Helen Weidenbach Clint Herbst
9044 LaBeaux Ave. 9801 GUlard Ave. NE
Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello. MN 55362
(H) 441-1354 (H) 295.4983
Shirley Anderson Brad Barger
306 E. Broadway 301 CheL�ea Road
Monticello, MN 55362 Monticello, MN 55362
(ii) 295-2040 (W) 295.5635
'7
V
August 15, 1994
250 East Broadway
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello, MN
55362.9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333.5739
Fax: (612) 295-4404
Stephen P. Birkeland, Jr. and
Joan M. Birkeland
Custom Canopy, Inc.
219 Dundas Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Birkeland, Jr.:
The Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA)
thanks you for your investment into the City of
Monticello. It is our hope that Custom Canopy and your
industrial neighbors take pride in their investment by
helping to maintain an aesthetical and Quality industrial
park; therebye, protecting one's investment.
As per the HRA letter dated March 8, 1994, the HRA
extended the time for completion of the non screen -fenced
area and gate to July 1, 1994. with the non -completion
of the non screen -fenced area and gate, the HRA did not
approve the Certificate of Completion.
It is with regret, we must inform you that the HRA has
determined the Birkeland's in default of the Private
Redevelopment Contract. Therefore, the Birkelands shall
receive no annual TIF payment from the HRA.
14 Page 1
Stephen and Joan Birkeland, Jr.
August 15, 1994
If you have any questions, we'd be happy to sit down and
discuss the matter with you.
Sincerely,
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
l�
Al ason
HRA C^hairperson
(nv 0 `^'
011ie Koropchak
HRA Executive Director
cc: Pat Dwyer, Bank of Elk River
Jeff O'Neill, Zoning Administrator
Gary Anderson, Building Official
TIF District No. 1-15 File
Page 2
PUBLIC RtEznURCE
GROUP, INC.
It
Marketing, Development & Finance Specialists
August 16, 1994
Ms. 011ie Koropchak
City of Monticello
250 Fast Broadway
P.O. Bot 1147
Monticello, MN 55362
STA
.
�a
JNsfBOUenrneat or i� tSlstrra•tvo. i -t7 f'or Fa -- . -'
initial project structuring with business; preparation of TIF
data; deunnination of project future values and preliminary
TIF financial analysis; review aed conftnnation of TIF plan;
distribution of documents to County and School Districts; '
and certification of district.
'[TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
ONM OVER 60 OVER
$3,850.00
TERMS: NET DUE L'PON RECEIPT, 1.33% PER MONTH SERVICE CHARGE ON
PAST DUE ACCOUNTS
4205 Lancaster Lane North* Suite 1100 4 Minneapolis. Minnesota 5501 0 (612) 550.7979 0 (612) 550.9221 Fax
H0LME8 & GRAWN
ceA$TsasD
m reeb.r c..., rr.ro.s, Kb—W.
Tdwb—eivearare
August 19, 1994
INVOICE s 46850 t'�
MN190:41 ITF
CITY OF MONTICELLO Redeve10,
lopment — General
P 0 80% 1147 1hz0
MONTICELLO MN 55362-9.45
For All
Legal
Services From
July
7, 1994 Thru July 31,
1994 As Follows:
07/07:94
SJB
Phone call with
0. Koropchak re soils
0.20
24.:0
TIF Question
07/12/94
SJB
Phone call with
0. Koropchak re TIF
0.20
24 �U
projects
07/29/94
SJB
Phone call with
L. Kirchst: review
0.75
9C. 00
soils diskrict memo: research same
'ota.
Services:
$138.00
Name
Hours Rate
Amount
Stephen
J Oubul
1. 15 120. 00
138.00
Total Services And Disbursements:
S138. 130
1 dedmw eMm per," of WW
ft aWW^ deka a dsT$p
. and osmd aro dW ro pen
Mfrs Wenhwd4 :�
d CtsYsern
John 0 Dean
HOLMES & GRAVEN
cH4ersacD
asrew—T Crw, Wh—PWI4ler.0 em
Tdwh .ae/W4=
August 19. 1991
ENWICE s 46852
MN190:45
CITY OF MONTICELLO Fay — Mar TIF Project
P 0 BOX 1147 t;%
`r
MONTICELLO MN 95362-9.145 `
For All Legal Services From
June 2B. 1994 Thru July 31. 1994 As Follows:
07/12/94 SJB Phone call with 0. horopchak re
0.20
24.+)0
contract
07/13/94 SJB Review contract on TIF pian ens TIF
0.90
60.00
numbers
07/14/94 SJB Phone call with U. Koropchar
0.30
36.00
_ Total
Services:
61820
00
Name Hours hate
Amount
Stephen J Bubul 1. CO 120.00
120.00
For All Disbursements As Follows.
Long Distance Phone
B. 71
Total Disbursements:
$6.71
Total Services And Disbursements.
$12E.71
1 I dwfwo. ~ pmWy at I"
1 aw comas. dalm or do um
end oena Wd ow ro pen
as
John 0 Dean
HOLMES & GRAVEN
tassrsaw
August 19, 1994
iNvO10E N s68S1
MN -9n-44
CITY OF MONTICELLO r T1F tl1—lc — Scnulz�
P 0 BOX 114-
MONTICELLO MN 99362-92,15
For All Legal Services From
June 29, 1994 Thru July 31. 1994 As Follaws.
07/19/94 SJB Organize fire: send closing accuments
to HRA
0. 50 6J 00
Total Services
Name Hours Rate Amount
Stephen J Subul 0. 50 120.00 60.00
For All Disbursements As Fallows.
06/29/94 Parking expense 6.00
Postage 0.98
Total Dixbursements
Total Services And Disbursements
I I dsabe. endw pooft el lar
'tls eaoaan, dabs or do ww
9snd oared ft no psn
a clat,nro
John B Dean
6 -0. 00
so. 96
$66.08
612-334-3362 CASSERLY MOLZRHN
itDI/CITY OF 4ONfICEL10
v
[ ...................Carla I...................I
ADMIN ADMIN L.GkAWA LQkO ACA
Sou ANWK CUALATIVE sou AA46NL OIVIATIVE
DATE 6ALMIM &YANG[ DALMIQ 84A10E
12 / 1999
0
0
0
0
6/ 1995
0
0
0
0
12 / 199s
0
0
0
0
6/ 19%
0
0
0
0
12 / 1996
0
0
0
0
6/ 1997
0
0
O
0
12 / 1997
0
O
0
0
6 / 1998
1,363
1,363
1,932
1,932
12 / 1998
1.363
2.726
1,932
3,864
6 / 1999
17.746
20,474
25.158
29,023
12 / 1999
17,748
38,222
25,158
54,181
6 / 2000
30.345
68,567
43.014
97,195
12 / 2000
30,345
98,912
43,016
140,210
6 / 2001
40,035
139.947
56,750
196.960
12 / 2001
40,035
176,981
56,750
253,710
6 / 2002
40,03S
219,016
56,750
310.460
12 / 2002
40,035
259.051
56,750
367,211
6 / 2003
40.438
299/ 489
57.322
4241 S33
12 / 2003
40,438
379.927
67,322
401,835
6 / IOW
40.645
380.773
57,699
539.764
12 u
40.645
421,618
57,899
597,653
6 T UOS
41,267
462,876
58,483
655,136
U / 2045
41,157
504,132
MAW
714,410
-_-----�-_504,132
504, 132M�
714,619
714,619
U
302 PO4 SEP 07.94 15:50
[...................OaTm 11..................I
ADMIN ADMIN LCAAWCA IGAAW.A
Sou AWS AL CAUATIVE SE341 AA64ML 0,36A.ATM
BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE BILLA4m DATE
0
0
0
O
12 / 1994
0
0
0
0
6/ 1995
0
6
0
0
12 / 1995
0
0
0
0
6/19%
0
O
0
0
12 / 1996
0
0
0
0
6/ 1997
0
0
0
0
12 / 1997
1,363
1,763
1,932
1,932
6 / 1996
1.363
2.726
1,932
3,964
12 / 1998
17,748
20,474
25,158
29,023
6 / 1999
17,748
38,222
25,158
54,181
12 / 1999
30.649
66.872
43.446
97.627
6 / 20M
30.649
99.521
43,446
141,074
12 / 2000
39,279
138,800
55,678
196,752
6 / 2001
39,279
178.078
55,678
252,430
12 / 2001
39,279
217,357
$5,678
308,108
6 / 2002
39,279
256.636
65,678
363,'.'
12 / 2002
39,674
296,310
56,239
420,026
6 / 2003
39,674
US. 944
66.239
476,265
12 / 2003
40.074
376.059
56,606
531,071
6 / 2004
40,074
416.132
WON
669,677
la / 2004
40.676
456.610
67,378
647,265
6 / 2005
40,470
497, GM
57,378
767,633
12 / 2005
4971%,:: 497,068 704,633 704,617
N541 WEPANEO h CA33ERLT 4CLIAMN 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. 30-A.y-94
612-334-3382 CASSERLY moo-zRHN 302 P02 SEP 07'94 1S:49
Casserly Molzahn & Associates, Inc.
ue 216 South 11th Street. Subs 300 • Mhneepo0e • Wyea to 55409
Ofte (812) 342,2277 • Fax (812) 3943382
TO: Monticello Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: James R. Casserly
Mary E. Molaahn
DATE: September 7, 1994
RE: Impact of Local Government Aid Reduction for the RDI
Rousing Project
In our memo of August 25, 1994 regarding options for the
redevelopment of the Krautbauer property, we described two
options for using tax increment. Several years ago the
Legislature imposed new restrictions on the establishment of tax
increment districts. One of those restrictions is a penalty to
the municipality which creates the tax increment district. This
penalty is in the form of reducing the municipality'& Local
Government Aid or Homestead and Agricultural Aid (referred to in
this memo simply as LGA).
The amount of the LGA reduction is a function of the duration of
the tax increment district and the amount of tax increment
generated. The attached chart shows the LGA reduction impacts
for Options I and II. For purposes of this memo Option II only
will be analysed.
The LOA impact is calculated from the captured tax capacity.
The actual impact is represented by the column titled LGA/HACA
SEMI ANNUAL BALANCE. from the tax increment received by the City
in the first half of 1998, the LOA reduction represented by that
period would be 81,932. For the entire year it would be 83,864.
In 1999 there in substantially more value and the LOA reduction
for the entire year would exceed 850,000. The LGA/HACA
CUMULATIVE BALANCE column in simply the accumulation of the semi
annual balances. In the chart a line is drawn for the period
ending 12/2000. Based on our previous analysis, three tax
increment years represent assistance to the redeveloper of ovor
8190,000. Option II of the August 25, 1994 memo suggested a
maximum assistance to the redovoloper of !170,000.
4
612-334-3362 CASSERLY MOLZAHN 302 P03 SEP 07.94 15:50
It is possible to offset the LGA reduction by using the tax
increment funds from the same tax increment district for program
and administrative expenses (titled simply ADMIN in our chart).
The admin to 25• of the tax increment being generated and is
retained on a semi annual basis. The column titled ADMIN SEMI
ANNUAL BALANCE reflects those semi annual amounts. The column
adjacent to it titled ADMIN CUMULATIVE BALANCE is simply the
accumulation of each semi annual balance.
For the time period ending 12/2000 the ADMIN CUMULATIVE BALANCE
amount is $99,52S. As indicated above, the LGA/HACA CUMULATIVE
BALANCE amount is $141,074. The net loss to the City is the
difference between those two amounts which would be between
$41,000 and $42,000. However, the City would recover more than
that amount in the first year after the tax increment district is
decertified. The projected taxes on build -out exceed $316,000
and 1Sf of that amount, if that is the City's portion of the
property taxes, is in excess of $47,000. In short, the City will
more than recover its losses within a year.
SEP 07 '94 11:31AM 0 P.2/3
RNER MILL 0794
Morake0o. Minnesota
Rem Devalopnrertl. Uro. 11
v Prepared By: Sad" - Bergqulat, Inc.
Eat Will
Deaaiptiort unit MY Price Anmuet
SITE GRADING - Required To Restore Grovel Pit Area
Clear and Grub
L.S.
1
2,000.00
2,000.00
Erosbn Control
L.F.
2,000
2.50
5,000.00
Fig Required For E xistim Pit Area
C.Y.
90,000
1.05
94,500.00
Reslope Grovel Pit Walls
C.Y.
15,000
1.00
15,000.00
Respread Topsoil
C.Y.
10.000
0.50
5,000.00
Restoration
Aores
15
750.00
111250.00
TOTAL: 132,760.00
SEP 07 '94 11:319" 0
RIVER MILL
Monmccio, Mwoods
RasideMM 0; . „ Inc-
+4C'
nc.+1.' Prepared By: Sathre - Bergquist, Inc.
SITE GRADING -Entire Site
Clear and Grub
Erosion Control
Rodc Errtranoe Berm
Submit
Re:)read Topsoil
Reeknow
rl
V
P. 3/3
UL -7771"
Est Lwt
Lw oh► Price Arnourd
LS.
1
20.000.00
20.000.00
L.F.
3,500
2.50
6.750.00
EACH
3
1,500.00
4,500.00
C.Y.
230,000
1.05
241,500.00
C.Y.
30,000
1.50
45,000.00
C.Y.
45,000
0.50
22,500.00
Apes
65
750.00
48,750.00
TOTAL: 391.000.00
sz tfie owe