Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
City Council Agenda Packet 07-24-2017
AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 24, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSHOP North Mississippi Room 5 P.M. Budget Workshop Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from July 10, 2017 • Regular Meeting Minutes from July 10, 2017 C. Consideration of Adding Items to Agenda D. Citizen Comments E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • 2017-2018 Monticello Royalty Introductions • Community Partnership Grant Presentation • Movie in the Park • Construction Update F. Council Liaison Updates • BCOL • Planning Commission • EDA • MOAA • Ellison Property Committee G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update • Wright County Sheriff Quarterly Update • FiberNet Quarterly Update 2. Consent Agenda A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-40 accepting donations for Farmers Market, Summer Movie in the Park, and 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament for total of $1,095 E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A F. Consideration of approving an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Development State PUD Review for multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highway Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andy/Crown Bay G. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 667 and Summary Ordinance 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts. Applicant: City of Monticello H. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 672 and Summary Ordinance 672A amending the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and amending the official zoning map for rezoning from I-2 (Heavy Industrial) to Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, to approve a Final Stage PUD, a Final Plat for the Spaeth Industrial Park, and Development Contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park. Applicant: Spaeth, Kenneth I. Consideration of authorizing a payment to Coalition of Utility Cities for city share of CUC membership dues in the amount of $26,419 J. Consideration of approving lighting upgrades by Wes Olson for the Community Center gym for $9,750, Community Center indoor playground for $3,010, and Hi - Way Liquors for $10,055.58 (total of $22,815.58) K. Consideration of approving UHL recommissioning proposal for cost of $26,900 L. Consideration of approving modification of Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) Guidelines reducing equity contribution and adjusting minimum interest rate M. Consideration of approving an additional performance bond fee of $3,825 to the original quote submitted by Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for aquatic play structure 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 673 and Summary Ordinance 673A amending the PUD, Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties B. Consideration of approving a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment reguiding Outlot C, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and adopting Ordinance 669 amending the official Monticello zoning map for rezoning the subject parcel from B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers/JX Bowers LLC; Applicant John Chadwick/John Chadwick Farms, LLC has withdrawn his application C. Consideration of approving a request for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for Vehicle Sales and Rental, Auto Repair — Minor, and Accessory Office and Retail Uses in a B-3 (Highway Business) District, including allowance for 130' flag pole height. Applicant: FRHP Lincolnshire, LLC D. Consideration of authorizing members of the City Council to participate in the upcoming I-94 Coalition lobbying effort (September 12 and 13) in Washington D.C. at an estimated cost of $1,000 per participant 5. Added Items A. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED MEETING Time: (After Regular Agenda) Topic: Sale of a portion of City -owned parcel: 213-100-081400 (former City bio - solids site) (Address: 1645 County Road 39 NE) 6. Adjournment AGENDA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORSHOP MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 24, 2017 — 5 p.m. North Mississippi Room, MCC AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Purpose of Workshop: 2018 Budget Presentations 3. Adj ournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 10, 2017 — 5:30 p.m. North Mississippi Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Angela Schumann, Shibani Bisson, Rachel Leonard, Tom Moores, Sarah Rathlisberger, Tracy Ergen, Matt Theisen, Carolyn Granger, and Jim Thares 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. 2. 2018 Budget Introduction Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, introduced budget discussion for 2018. He led the presentation with a projected schedule for the budget process, levy information, and potential budget impacts. These impacts include the possibility of additional police hours and new hires of Public Works Director, Engineer, and Full-time Fire Chief. The format for budget presentations will relate to the newly developed strategic goals. The goals are: Create and Preserve Sustainable Livability; Build a Connected Community; Strengthen Our Image as a Destination; Support a Vibrant Economy; Be a Regional Leader; and Invest in People. 3. Budget Presentations Wayne Oberg presented the Hi -Way Liquors budget. The presentation touched on the liquor store's involvement in the community and Chamber of Commerce, the contribution to city funds, and workload measures. Carolyn Granger, Deputy Registrar Manager, presented the DMV budget. She revealed performance measures for the DMV along with measurable workload items. Wayne Oberg commented that the DMV processes more transactions with fewer hours worked versus previous years due to the good management of the department. 4. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Council Special Meeting Minutes—July 10, 2017 City Administrator REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, July 10, 2017 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, and Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None. 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. All City Councilmembers were present. B. Approval of Meeting Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from June 26, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the June 26, 2017, special city council meeting minutes. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meetiag Minutes from June 26, 2017 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the June 26, 2017, regular city council meeting minutes. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Consideration of Adding Items to the Agenda • None. D. Citizen Comments • Sue Anderson, Monticello Soccer Club, acknowledges City Council and city staff for their efforts in the development of the BCOL Athletic Complex. E. Public Service Announcements • Anna Bohanon, Wright County, provided an update on: Live Wright; Regional Active Living; community health survey; and Regional Active Transportation. • Riverfest celebration is July 13-16, 2017. • The following movie in the park events are scheduled: Moana will be played on July 29 and is sponsored by Fibernet; and Sing! was rescheduled for August 11 and is hosted by Camping World and All Elements, Inc. City Council Minutes—July 10, 2017 Page 1 1 6 Bertram Blast is looking for volunteers for the race. Construction Update: Shibani Bisson, WSB/City Engineer, commented on TH 25/7th Street Intersection project which will be complete by end of the week. She added that the city is receiving positive feedback from the community in regard to the new monument on the corner of TH 25 and 7th Street. F. Council Liaison Updates • Highway 25 Coalition — Mayor Stumpf updated on the following items: 1) Distribution of Highway 25 Coalition Flyer; 2) Coalition's work plan for 2018; 3) Update on Monticello Downtown Area Study; 4) Coalition's budget for 2018; and 5) Updates from MnDOT and Tom Emmer's office. • BCOL — meeting was rescheduled for July 14, 2017. G. Department Updates Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, provided updates on the following: 1. The city has been contacted by Hillside Farms neighborhood in regard to information on installation of a trail. Mr. O'Neill will contact Wright County to find out timeline on roadway and will report back. 2. At a special City Council meeting on July 24, 2017, the Wright County Sheriff's Office will present a request for additional hours. Their quarterly update will be presented at the regular meeting. 3. City phones are in the process of being updated. Mr. O'Neill thanked staff, specifically Rachel Leonard, and Arvig for implementation. 4. A closed meeting is being scheduled for July 24, 2017 following the regular City Council meeting. The meeting is in regard to the sale of biosolids site. 2. Copsent Agenda Councilmember Fair moved to remove item 4A and list under the Consent Agenda as item M. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items I and J. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,382,001.50. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for MCC, Liquor Store, and Engineering. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: No report this cycle. City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 2 1 6 D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-30 accepting a donation from the Ellison family of property located at 707 West Broadway with an estimated market value of $169,600. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-30 accepting a donation from the Ellison family of property located at 707 West Broadway. E. Consideration of approving individual pension contribution amounts for Volunteer Firefighter Relief Association members. Recommendation: Approved setting the 2017 pension benefit level at $3,900 for current Fire Relief Association members and the deferral rate at 2.5% for past members with acknowledgement that future benefit levels shall be adjusted to maintain healthy surpluses and avoid deficits. F. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-39 approving the release of temporary easement located in Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-39 approving the release of temporary easement located in Lot 6, Auditor's Subdivision No. 1. G. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-31 calling for a public hearing on August 14, 2017, for vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements as legally described for Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Second Addition. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-31 accepting the petition and calling for a public hearing on Monday, August 14, 2017, to consider the vacation of a portion of drainage and utility easements over and across Lot 1, Block 1, Monticello Big Lake Community Hospital District Campus Second Addition. H. Consideration of approving amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Final Stage Planned Unit Development for entrance and building additions in a B-2 (Limited Business) District and an encroachment agreement for building entrance. Applicant: Lemke, Lenore — CentraCare Health Monticello. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-36 approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development Stage Planned Unit Development for CentraCare Health Monticello, contingent on compliance with the findings in resolution and conditions specified in Exhibit Z and approved the encroachment agreement for entrance canopy and drive area for CentraCare Health Monticello. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue) (estimated cost of $85,000). Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. Consideration to adopting Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) (estimated cost of City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 3 1 6 $35,000). Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-35 declaring the official intent of the City of Monticello to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city for Chelsea Road (west of Fallon Avenue to TH 25) utility and street improvements and 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) street improvements. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2017-35 declaring the official intent of the City of Monticello to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city for the Chelsea Road (west of Fallon Avenue to TH 25) utility and street improvements and 7' Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7 t Street) street improvements. L. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-37 accepting the bid and awarding a contract for the 2017 stoplight painting project to Pole Painting Plus of Albertville in the amount of $33,800. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2017-37 accepting the bid and awarding contract to Pole Painting Plus of Albertville, MN based on their bid of $33,800. M. Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment requiding Outlots C & D, Otter Creek Crossing from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Work' and a request for rezoning the subject parcels from a B-4 (Regional Business) District to a I-1 (Light Industrial) District. Applicant: Jim Bowers and John Chadwick. Recommendation: Item was tabled. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. I. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue) (estimated cost of $85, 000). Councilmember Gabler questioned the higher cost for the Chelsea Road feasibility report versus the feasibility report for 7th Street/Cedar Street. Shibani Bisson explained that the feasibility report for Chelsea Road is a more extensive report and the information is provided in the staff report. Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-32 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to Chelsea Road (between TH 25 and Fallon Avenue). Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a feasibility report for improvements to 7th Street (Cedar Street to west of City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 4 1 6 Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7th Street) (estimated cost of $35,000). Councilmember Gabler moved to adopt Resolution 2017-33 authorizing preparation of a Feasibility Report for improvements to 7' Street (Cedar Street to west of Washington Street) and Cedar Street (south of 7' Street). Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Hearing A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-34 anmoving the vacation of a nortion of the drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Applicant: Laurentian Properties, LLC. Angela Schumann provided background information and noted that the proposed vacation is requested to allow the current owner to improve the two properties in accordance with a conditional use permit granted in 2016. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved Alternative 1 - to adopt Resolution 2017-34 approving the vacation of drainage and utility easements for Lot 2 and Lot 3, Block 1 of Monticello Commerce Center Fifth Addition. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration, of adonting Resolution 2017-38 authorizing_ the is,sgance of conduit revenue bonds for the benefit of the SRCS Building_ Company Wayne Oberg presented the item and noted that the SRCS Building Company is issuing the bonds to refinance school facilities, finance certain capital improvement, and to pay the costs of issuance. There is no general or moral obligation of the City. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Gabler moved Alternative 1— to adopt Resolution 2017-38 authorizing the issuance, sale and delivery of revenue Notes and approving the form of and authorizing the execution and delivery of the Notes and related documents for the SRCS Building Company (Swan River Montessori Charter School). Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 5 1 6 Added Items Mayor Stumpf commented on Riverfest and reminded the City Councilmembers of the Open Meeting Law and to refrain from conducting any city business. Mayor Stumpf announced that Tim Hennagir is leaving the Monticello Times and acknowledged him for his years of work. Mr. Hennagir addressed the City Council. By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 7:22 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes —July 10, 2017 Page 6 1 6 Residential & Business Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Q2 - 2016 Phone Only 32 28 Internet Only 664 717 Television Only 74 73 Phone &Internet 164 I 156 Phone & Television I 44 42 Internet & Television I 316 I 280 Triple Play I 278 I 254 Total Subscribers I 1574 I 1550 Total Phone I 518 I I 480 Total Internet I 1424 1407 Total Television 714 I 649 I 253 July 1st 2016 215 A"ig's 1st Day Q3-2016 Q4-20161 Q2-2017 25 28 IQ1-2017 27 24 765 829 880 915 72 72 69 66 152 145 I 156 I 164 40 I 39 35 I I 34 281 I I 279 255 I 252 254 I I 253 230 I 215 1589 I I 1,645 1,652 I 1,670 471 I I 4651 448 I 437 1452 I 1,506 I 1,521 I I 1,546 647 643 I 589 I I 567 Business Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Phone Only 10 Internet Only 37 Television Only 1 Phone & Internet 70 Phone & Television 1 Internet & Television 3 Triple Play 15 Total Subscribers 137 Total Phone 96 Total Internet 125 Total Television 20 Residential Subscribers Service Q4 - 2015 Phone Only 22 Internet Only 627 Television Only 73 Phone & Internet 94 Phone&Television 43 Internet & Television 315 Triple Play 263 Total Subscribers 1437 Total Phone 422 Total Internet 1299 Total Television 694 Q2-2016 Q3-2016 Q4-20161 Q1-20171 Q2-20171 10 10 13 12 10 31 31 35 35 35 2 2 2 1 1 66 66 60 64 67 1 1 I 39 I 35 I 1 4 4 I 4 3 I 3 15 15 I 19 17 I I 16 129 I 129 I 133 132 I I 133 92 I 92 I 92 I 93 I I 94 I 116 I 116 I 118 I 119 I I 121 22 I 22 I 25 I 21 I I 21 Q2-2016 Q3-2016 Q4-2016'' Q1-20171 Q2-2017 18 17 15 15 14 686 734 794 845 880 71 70 70 68 65 90 87 85 92 97 41 I 39 39 I 35 33 276 I 277 I 275 I 252 249 239 I 239 I I 234 I 213 199 1421 I 1463 I I 1,512 I I 1,520 1,537 388 I 382 I I 373 I I 355 343 1291 I 1337 I I 1,388 I I 1,402 1,425 627 I 625 I I 618 I I 568 546 Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Netting Period: 4/01/2017-4130/2017 Revenues FiberNet Entity: Subscriber Billings 140,664.00 Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Total Revenues: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. 140,664.00 Expenses Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Subscriber Fee (62,645.10) Netting Period: Management Fee (12,875.00) Entity: Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Subscriber Billings 140,543.00 Total Expenses: Total Revenues: (133,870.10) Net Income 136,248.00 $ 6,793.90 Entity: FiberNet Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Subject: Monthly Netting Statement Netting Period: 5/01/2017 - 5/31/2017 Netting Period: 6/01/2017 - 6/30/2017 Revenues: Entity: Revenues: Entity: FiberNet Subscriber Billings 140,543.00 Subscriber Billings 136,248.00 Total Revenues: 140,543.00 Total Revenues: 136,248.00 Expenses: Expenses: Subscriber Fee (62,037.74) Subscriber Fee (61,380.13) Management Fee (12,875.00) Management Free (12,875.00) Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Fixed Fee (58,350.00) Total Expenses: (133,262.74) Total Expenses: (132,605.13) Net Income $ 7,280.26 Net Income $ 3,642.87 Entity: FiberNet Entity: FiberNet From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. From: Arvig Enterprises, Inc. Subject: Netting Statement Subject: Netting Statement Netting Period: 2nd Quarter 2017 Total Netting Period: YTD 2017 Total Revenues: Subscriber Billings 417,455.00 Total Revenues: 417,455.00 Expenses: Subscriber Fee (186,062.97) Management Fee 38,625.00 Fixed Fee 175,050.00 Total Expenses: (399,737.97) Net Income $ 17,717.03 Subscriber Billing 852,954.00 (Revenues: 852,954.00 Subscriber Fee (381,931.37) Management Fe J77,250.00 Fixed Fee (350,100.00 Expenses: (809,281 Income $ 43,672.63 Capital Expense Report; Budget versus Spend Q2 2017 Mapcom - Plant Records - 95,000 95,000 Total 56,754 259,900 (56,754) Note from 2016 CapEx Budget: Budget Spent Head End - Analog 29,500 8,984 20,516 Noted in Q1: * $20,516 Budgeted in 2016 We were able to update and condense this equipment for an additional outlay of only $806.39 in 2017. Leaving an unspent budgeted (favorable variance) amount of $19,710 (20,516 - 806) YTD - Q2 Budget Variance HE/CO Equipment 3,965 27,650 23,685 Drops - 44,750 44,750 CPE Equipment 52,790 55,000 2,210 Mediaroom (MMR) Transition - 37,500 37,500 $ 56,754 $ 164,900 $ 108,146 Mapcom - Plant Records - 95,000 95,000 Total 56,754 259,900 (56,754) Note from 2016 CapEx Budget: Budget Spent Head End - Analog 29,500 8,984 20,516 Noted in Q1: * $20,516 Budgeted in 2016 We were able to update and condense this equipment for an additional outlay of only $806.39 in 2017. Leaving an unspent budgeted (favorable variance) amount of $19,710 (20,516 - 806) Financial Projections PRELIMINARY January - June 2017 FIBERnet oeu.e.m ny arvig Prelim Budget Jan -June 2017 Jan -June 2017 Variance Projected Revenue: $852,954 $873,993 ($21,039) Expenses Subscriber COGS 381,931 $406,576 ($24,644) Fixed Cost 350,100 $332,609 $17,492 Cash flow from Operations $120,923 $134,809 ($13,886) Management Fee: Fixed 77,250 $77,250 $0 Adjusted EBITDA $43,673 $57,559 ($13,886) Management Fee: Incentive - 50% Capital Expense: (56,754) ($129,950) $73,196 City Cash Flow (13,081) (154,684) $141,603 Marketing Update Q2 FiberNet • FiberNet participated in the Movie in the Park and the Monticello Rock'n' Roll. We'll also have representation in the Riverfest parade. • FiberNet had success with the Gig Price For Life promo to residential. • FiberNet has been inserting, monthly, into the City of Monticello invoices. • FiberNet has been inserting, monthly, into the Chamber newsletter. • Created, updated and notified FiberNet customers re: the change to the MetaSwitch for phone service and the voicemail changes. • Created and updated FiberNet television materials to launch MMR Entertainment Plans. • Created FiberNet inControl (customers can set their TV recordings via the website) • Updated/printing FiberNet Hold Harmless Forms • FiberNet Facebook: o Total Number of Likes: 293 o Most engaged post: Get Gig price for life. 230 reached, post clicks: 20, comments/shares/reactions: 5 • Facebook Advertising — Gig price for life —110 ad recall lift, 1502 reach • Google Adwords (month of June) o Business Display & Search are running o Residential —Gig Price for life Display & Search with over 36,700 impressions and 91 clicks • Online form fills: o May: 13 o June:20 Monticello City Law Enforcement Quarterly Review 2nd QUARTER 2017 April 1 St -June 30th 2017 City of Monticello Activity for 2nd Quarter (April 1 St -June 30th 2017) Same time period comparison ! 2016 Activity (Time Period April 1sT -June 30th 2016) 3145 Calls For Service assigned in Monticello w 1673 cases assigned to patrol Property Crimes: - 6 Burglaries 10 Damage to Property • 62 Gen al Thefts w 9 T ft from vehicle - 3 Gas Drive -Off 15 Shoplifting 38 rug Complaints Juvenile Complaints 84 Motor Vehicle crashes (10 of those involved injuries) 5 Assault Complaint 62 Domestic Disturbance Complaints 660 Traffic Stops 246 Citations issued 3 individuals booked into jail 2017 Activity (Time Period April 1st -June 30th 2017) 3022 Calls for Service assigned in Monticello M 1679 cases assigned to patrol m Property Crimes: M 4 Burglaries m 30 Damage to Property • 42 General Thefts M 7 Theft from vehicle m 37 Gas Drive -Off m 16 Shoplifting M 28 Drug Complaints m 54 Juvenile Complaints m 78 Motor Vehicle crashes (7 involved injuries) M 11 Assault Complaint m 50 Domestic Disturbance Complaints 817 Traffic Stops m 317 total citations issued m 42 individuals arrested/booked in jail City of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity By Division w Patrol Division w 3022 Calls for Service which resulted inl 679 Patrol Cases � Criminal Investigations Division(CID) 38 cases assigned; /Fraud, Theft and CSC (Criminal Sexual Conduct) cases were the most frequent crime investigated Several victims of Identity Theft and scams (internet and phone) throughout Monticello and the surrounding area w Notable Investigations: Several counterfeit bills have continued to be passed at different businesses around the city. w Major Crimes Investigation Unit (MCIU) w 5 cases assigned CDP (Criminal Damage to Property), Death investigation, and assault were cases that were processed by MCIU this quarter. r of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity by Division (Cont.) w School Resource Officers w 39 Cases Assigned Theft, Social Media and Harassment continued to be the most common cases reported in the schools this quarter. Mental Health issues continued to be common problem in all the schools throughout the school year. w Special Investigations Unit 12 Cases Investigated w Majority are Drug Crimes r of Monticello Law Enforcement Activity by Division (Cont.) w Special Investigations Unit: (continued) 2 Controlled Buys 3 Narcotic Search Warrants Served .57 grams of Methamphetamine seized .26 grams of cocaine seized 8 Tabs of LSD seized 3 Felony Arrests for Controlled Substance Violations 4 Vehicles Seized QUESTIONS? City Council Agenda 07/24/2017 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $820,297.24. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 07/14/2017 - 1:34PM Batch: 00201.07.2017 - 201.07.2017 US Bank Invoice No Description Vendor: 2968 BOND TRUST SERV CORP - Wire Transfer 35948 33,275.00 Series 2010A GO Improvement & Refunding Be 35949 312-47000-461100 Series 2011A GO Refunding Bonds - Interest Check Total: Vendor: 2439 DEPT OF EMPLOYMENT & ECON DEVELO 7/10/2017 2,252.45 Qtr 2 2017 Unemployment Benefits 7/10/2017 101-45201-414200 Qtr 2 2017 Unemployment Benefits 07/15/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 3241 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 7/1/2017 July 2017 Check Sequence: 3 Check Total: Vendor: 1593 MN DEPT OF REVENUE - ACH June June Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor June June Sales Tax - Hi Way Liquor June Check Sequence: 4 June Use Tax - General June 07/15/2017 June Use Tax - General June June Waste Tax - General June 72.30 June Waste Tax - General June 101-00000-208100 June Use Tax - MCC June 07/15/2017 June Use Tax - MCC June June Use Tax - Water Fund June -0.35 June Use Tax - Water Fund Check Total: Vendor: 1426 CITY OF MONTICELLO UB May 2017 5002-000 1510 Hart Blvd sprinkler UB May 2017 5003-000 1460 Hart Blvd sprinkler Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 13,571.25 07/15/2017 317-47000-461100 33,275.00 07/15/2017 312-47000-461100 46,846.25 Check Sequence: 2 2,252.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-414200 270.19 07/15/2017 101-43120-414200 2,522.64 Check Sequence: 3 1,693.05 07/15/2017 101-00000-217066 1,693.05 Check Sequence: 4 2,904.84 07/15/2017 609-00000-208100 -0.84 07/15/2017 609-00000-362900 72.30 07/15/2017 101-00000-208100 -0.30 07/15/2017 101-00000-362900 717.35 07/15/2017 101-00000-208120 -0.35 07/15/2017 101-00000-362900 5,775.34 07/15/2017 226-00000-208100 -0.34 07/15/2017 226-45122-362900 1,546.84 07/15/2017 601-00000-208100 0.16 07/15/2017 601-49440-443990 11,015.00 Check Sequence: 5 6.27 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 6.27 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number UB May 2017 5004-000 1390 Hart Blvd sprinkler 5.45 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 5026 -000 Ellison Park 148.65 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5248 -000 Bridge Park 112.83 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5249-000 Bridge Park W. sprinkler 14.96 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5250-000 Bridge Park W. 107 River St 38.94 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 5637-000 Meadow Oak Dog Park 5.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 7224 -000 WWTP 1,716.96 07/15/2017 602-49480-438200 UB May 2017 7441-000 200 W Broadway sprinkler 7.51 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 7885-000 Help Center 22.67 07/15/2017 217-41990-438200 UB May 2017 8086-000 4th St Warming House 13.66 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8114-000 4Hi-Way Liquor 56.31 07/15/2017 609-49754-438200 UB May 2017 8117-000 MCC 962.56 07/15/2017 226-45126-438200 UB May 2017 8119-000 Fire Station 33.52 07/15/2017 101-42200-438200 UB May 2017 8120-000 Bldg. Inspection Garage 110.54 07/15/2017 101-41940-438200 UB May 2017 8177-000 Library 65.75 07/15/2017 101-45501-438200 UB May 2017 8394-000 Riverside Cemetery sprinkler 15.21 07/15/2017 651-49010-438200 UB May 2017 8488-000 Hillcrest Park sprinkler 54.33 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8533 -000 Chelsea Rd W sprinkler 6.27 07/15/2017 602-49490-438200 UB May 2017 8622-000 Pioneer Park bathroom 92.48 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 8631-000 Chelsea Rd. Animal Shelter 48.88 07/15/2017 101-42700-438200 UB May 2017 8674-000 Reservoir- 207 Chelsea Rd sprinkler 10.00 07/15/2017 601-49440-438200 UB May 2017 8903 -000 PW Shop/Clerical 190.70 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 8904-000 PW Vehicle Storage 14.96 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 8905 -000 PW Office 13.66 07/15/2017 101-43127-438200 UB May 2017 10063-000 Front St.Park sprinkler 11.24 07/15/2017 101-45201-438200 UB May 2017 10128-000 118 6th St W office 13.66 07/15/2017 101-41941-438200 UB May 2017 13953-000 SPR Hwy 25/SE Broadway -100 E. B 9.23 07/15/2017 101-43120-438200 UB May 2017 10267-000 Community Garden sprinkler 6.27 07/15/2017 226-45127-438200 Check Total: 3,815.19 Vendor: 2811 US BANK CORPORATE PMT SYSTEM Check Sequence: 6 07/06/2017 Facebook - Ad for Farmer's Market 4.95 07/15/2017 226-00000-220100 07/06/2017 Facebook- Wine Sale Promo. 25.04 07/15/2017 609-49754-434990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- tough tape; ( 27.68 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Runnings- (6) 32oz. multi -mix for sm. engines S 29.70 07/15/2017 101-42200-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's -ext. pole; floor squeegee; handle 30.57 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Mt. Olympus - Fraud charge -Credit next stmnt.- 34.16 07/15/2017 101-00000-115030 07/06/2017 Grady's- 8"pruner; pruner bypass forged; 6" prur 61.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #232 & shop- air filter; drain pan 61.85 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Industrl Hose; (2) scrub brush; (2; 98.11 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 ZEP- (20) 20oz. sunscreen 100.62 07/15/2017 101-45201-420650 07/06/2017 Wisc. Ducks - Fraud charge -Credit next stmnt.- 120.00 07/15/2017 101-00000-115030 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Applied Mntc.- 12pk black aerosol paint - Shop 128.20 07/15/2017 101-43127-421510 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (20) 10'R& 143.32 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Dyna -(6) Flap -Wheel High Density A/O;(50)cal 199.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (15) 10'R& 278.10 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 ZEP- (4) cs garb. bag;DZ Aero Erase; CS Hnd Si 423.90 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111 - credit -358.30 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti RV - propane 20lbs 18.80 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Big Lake Lumber- ZPARKS-ELLPRK-(3) Inv. - 2,000.00 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Winterland - credit from order 3/31/17 -17.78 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - (10) 6'U -Post 44.80 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Dyna - doz. Termi-Kleen PS Elec; (100) cable tit 341.38 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - return OSB - original purch. 6/8/1 -11.55 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(3) 20pk locking cable ties 7.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Olson & Sons - cord connect 7.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 DSG - 20 ft Core pipe 9.20 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Grady's - 4 oz lube; plug cored 10.08 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Gal.. Bushing; (2) PVC elb; adapt 12.51 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's -9v batteries 12.99 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(250) pk wirenut wire conn. 13.97 07/15/2017 101-43160-421530 07/06/2017 Grady's -wire stripper 14.95 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Hoglund Bus - #109- (11) Pin Slack 29.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- (10) grease for loader 31.40 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's 4105 (2) brooms; Hex Bushing; Strt Ell 33.46 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Martie's- (4) peony cage - Adopt -a -Park 35.96 07/15/2017 101-45201-440900 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (18.097) gal. unleaded @$2.459 44.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421200 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip 4215 (19.722) gal. unleaded @$2.4'_ 48.50 07/15/2017 101-45201-421200 07/06/2017 FirstSource - drug screen T. Moshier- Parks 50.95 07/15/2017 101-45201-431990 07/06/2017 NBP- (2) cleaner 51.29 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Martie's-25# Sunny Grass 58.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422500 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK-sleeve anchor 70.46 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 DSG -(3) galv. brs. seat;(3) teflon tape; etc 80.79 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale box limes; (12) lemons 97.88 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 G & K - mats- mv. #6043764178; 6043789897 113.13 07/15/2017 609-49754-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- palm nailer; 121.88 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 NBP- (2) bx gloves; ct disinfect. wipes; gal. clea 122.28 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Paypal-CSP Outdoors- ZPARKS-MOVTIV-(3) - 170.05 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- STORM -170611 224.30 07/15/2017 101-46102-421990 07/06/2017 Boyer Truck- #109- (4) Slack Adj - PW 263.96 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Moon Motors- Engine 1 fixed generator-carburc 279.23 07/15/2017 101-42200-440440 07/06/2017 Traffic Control Corp- (12) asst. LED lights 380.25 07/15/2017 101-43160-421530 07/06/2017 Monti Napa -(2) 35 T Service Jack 399.98 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Beacon Athletics -(4) pitching rubber 451.44 07/15/2017 101-45203-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- ZPARKS-MONTIVI-chain saw; blow 453.89 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 ESS Bros.- (6) Truncated Domes 2x2 486.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422400 07/06/2017 MN PCA- Hazz. Waste Fees-inv. #33643 570.91 07/15/2017 101-43127-443700 07/06/2017 Arctic Glacier -resale - inv. 1956714909;19567 1 997.27 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Target - Food for EDA Meeting 29.99 07/15/2017 213-46301-443990 07/06/2017 Target - Ear Buds 13.49 07/15/2017 101-41910-421990 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.275 gals @ $2.359 24.24 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 9.253 gals @ $2.299 21.27 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 8.144 gals @ $2.279 18.56 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 15.050 gals @ $2.299 34.60 07/15/2017 226-45126-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's - Keys (2) & Lock Ease 7.47 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Cement Primer, Pipe, Bolts, for FI 37.92 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Sand (2) for Farmers Market 13.18 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Wire Connectors; Grease 11.27 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Hose & Clamp for Faucet; Extension C 21.75 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Wall Anchors (5), Toggles (5) 13.05 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Belts (2); Screws (4) 18.58 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Painters Tape (6 pk) 17.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Nts (4); Screws (4) to fix C8 3.00 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - PVC Cap 1.79 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Kilz Primer/Sealer (1 gal) 18.74 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Grady's - Drywall Knife & Broad Knife 23.98 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Returned Extra Juice -7.62 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Batteries 23.56 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Walmart - Candy for Walk & Roll 21.90 07/15/2017 101-45130-444140 07/06/2017 Walmart - Sunscreen; Craft Supplies for FI 57.80 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - Candy for Walk & Roll 18.52 07/15/2017 217-41990-434990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - PVC Cap for Farmers Market 28.28 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Command Hooks, Washer, Cable 24.83 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - 1x6xl2 Boards for FI (2) 31.96 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Recycling Bins (13), 18' LED Rol 101.35 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - Ceiling Paint 37.03 07/15/2017 226-45126-440100 07/06/2017 Office Max - Foam Board (3) 26.94 07/15/2017 101-41910-443990 07/06/2017 Office Max - Poster Boards 14.29 07/15/2017 101-45130-444140 07/06/2017 Office Max - Staple Remover, Markers, Hanging 26.87 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - 19" LED Monitor 549.99 07/15/2017 226-45122-424100 07/06/2017 Amazon - Corkboards (2 - 4pks) 20.09 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Chamber - Advertising on Kiosk 30.00 07/15/2017 226-45124-434990 07/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (2 invoices) 96.04 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 70.82 07/15/2017 226-45125-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 237.24 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 602.06 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 33.86 07/15/2017 101-45501-421990 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 21 - May 20 26.02 07/15/2017 101-43120-432100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 11 - May 10 25.02 07/15/2017 101-43115-432100 07/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Services (CH) 17.55 07/15/2017 101-41310-431990 07/06/2017 Randy's - Shredding Services (DMV) 17.55 07/15/2017 217-41990-431990 07/06/2017 NBP - File Folders, Legal Pads, Paper, Spoons 74.42 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Post Its, Flags, Eraser 69.81 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Labels, Paper 76.06 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Scissors, Stapler, Staples, Tape, 107.46 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Chamber - June Lunch (RL) 15.00 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Super America - Windshield Washer Fluid 3.41 07/15/2017 217-41990-443990 07/06/2017 123 Sign Up Payroll Seminar 6/15 (RLC) 25.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 3M - Online Respirator Evaluation 29.00 07/15/2017 101-41800-431990 07/06/2017 JP Cooke - Custom Stamper LN 45.95 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 J C Penney - Field Trip T -Shirts for FI (32) 278.68 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Recreation Supply - Pool Wall Clock 46.62 07/15/2017 226-45124-421990 07/06/2017 Stellis Health - Vaccinations (2) KP 158.00 07/15/2017 101-42200-431990 07/06/2017 Domino's Pizza - Meal for Workshop Meeting (6 72.82 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Banners.com - Park Banners for Walk & Roll (2) 116.47 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Allied Parking - ZZZNEP- Annual P10 Training 7.50 07/15/2017 101-42500-433100 07/06/2017 Master CPE - CPA 12 Month Unlimited Subscril 149.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 APStylebook.com - 2017 AP Style Book (RL) 36.69 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Ballfield Concession Supplies: Can 54.63 07/15/2017 226-45125-425410 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Cupcakes 12.98 07/15/2017 226-45127-421460 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Cleaning Wipes 8.98 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Sam's Club - Annual Membership 100.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-443300 07/06/2017 Verizon - April 21 - May 20 140.04 07/15/2017 101-42200-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 11 - June 10 25.02 07/15/2017 101-42400-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 50.71 07/15/2017 101-42400-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 31.27 07/15/2017 226-45122-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 104.82 07/15/2017 101-43120-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 45.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-432100 07/06/2017 Verizon - May 4 - June 3 45.99 07/15/2017 602-49490-432100 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Concession Supplies 70.82 07/15/2017 226-45125-421990 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom & Locker Room Supl 780.69 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 37,888.82 07/15/2017 101-43230-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - Recycling - May 2017 12,597.00 07/15/2017 101-43230-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 35.80 07/15/2017 101-43127-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 47.74 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 113.38 07/15/2017 602-49480-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 208.87 07/15/2017 226-45126-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 11.93 07/15/2017 101-45501-431990 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 609-49754-438400 07/06/2017 Advanced Disposal - May 2017 23.87 07/15/2017 101-45201-438400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Walmart - Food for Volunteer Picnic 119.65 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Von Hansons - Burgers, Hot Dogs & Buns for Vc 219.96 07/15/2017 101-41800-443990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Desk Chair & Arms (SR) 358.31 07/15/2017 101-41520-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Measuring Spoons for Pool Chemicals 1.79 07/15/2017 226-45124-421990 07/06/2017 General Rental - CO2 for Coils 62.70 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Como Town - Ride Wrist Bands for FI 110.00 07/15/2017 226-45127-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Round Up Weed Spray; Multi Apl 25.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Ceiling Paint, Foam Roll Covers 53.61 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 G & K - Uniforms, Towels, Mops (2 invoices) 97.98 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Office Max - Computer Mouse (GH) 19.99 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - File Folders (10 boxes) 165.90 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Cragun's Lodging for State Conference (MRPA) 234.09 07/15/2017 226-45122-433100 07/06/2017 Wall Street Journal - Monthly Subscription (WO 36.99 07/15/2017 101-41520-443300 07/06/2017 Fastenal - (6) 5/16-18X1 5S/S FHSCS- Fire Dep 2.23 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 Fastenal -(100) for meters 3.89 07/15/2017 601-49440-422701 07/06/2017 Grady's 14 oz propane cyl. 3.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - nipple 4.99 07/15/2017 601-49440-422100 07/06/2017 Grady's - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- coupler 6.99 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 USPS- postage -chains for cutters edge 7.15 07/15/2017 101-42200-432200 07/06/2017 Grady's -AA battery 9.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- shed- screws 9.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - 2x8 Galv. Nipple 10.02 07/15/2017 601-49440-421990 07/06/2017 Auto Value - #105- Elec. Flasher 10.99 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #109- mirror 11.29 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Home Depot - bar & chain oil 11.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - hook knife; 5pk blades 13.58 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Auto Value - 7 RV Blade to 6 Pole 16.99 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #108- air filter 21.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Runnings- (10) 24pk water; (2) bowl cleaner; so: 29.57 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 Monti RV -(10) gal propene 35.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Runnings- (2) chain; 3pk files- trim saw 41.39 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Poly Scoop; bar/chain oil; leaf rat 42.92 07/15/2017 101-43120-421990 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale (40) limes; (12) lemons 43.48 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Auto Value - (10) Moly-Graph Ext. Pres. 54.90 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- flasher; (4.7) hyd. HD; (2) hyd hos( 58.07 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Active 911- (5) annual fire responders app 61.15 07/15/2017 101-42200-421990 07/06/2017 DISH- July 2017 service 64.16 07/15/2017 609-49754-432500 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- #117- (4) hyd. hose fit; (8) Hyd. HI 73.56 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (4) 165' Tyv( 76.37 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- screened cc 98.43 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Northern Tool -hitch- Dual Purp. Pintle w/2 99.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-422100 07/06/2017 Titan Mach.- FF coupler- Blacktop Mill 110.36 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Fastenal -(8) 3pc. Rainsuit 119.92 07/15/2017 101-43120-420650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 Runnings- (2) 201b propane; BBQ tool set; (2) a< 125.85 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Emergency Auto. Tech- #103- LED Beacon 135.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Dyna - (2) Flexmaster UV; (100) 501b cable tic; 152.23 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Central Hyd- swivel 90 elbow; female swivel; o- 162.77 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Home Depot - ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (2) pool trom 168.35 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111- 24SI HP AL; V -Belt 213.35 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Runnings-BloweerAttach. Helmet; 14" chain 221.89 07/15/2017 101-46102-421990 07/06/2017 Home Depot -(14) 12' Douglas Fir; Jig Saw blad 244.03 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- scaffold; bi 458.64 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Discount Steel - (5) galv. per£ tube- sign posts 727.82 07/15/2017 101-43120-422600 07/06/2017 WHCE- Sunset Ponds May usage (298) kWh 55.21 07/15/2017 602-49490-438100 07/06/2017 WHCE- 1645 & 1675 CR 39 54.50 07/15/2017 602-49490-438100 07/06/2017 WHCE- DMV 19.95 07/15/2017 217-41990-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 2171 W River ST- Parks 36.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 5980 Jason Ave- Water 19.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- MCC 27.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 207 Chelsea Rd 227.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 209 Cedar 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 132 E Broadway 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- 107 River St. W 19.95 07/15/2017 101-45201-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- Hi -Way Liquor - July service 21.32 07/15/2017 609-49754-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- MCC - July service 19.95 07/15/2017 226-45126-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE-200 Dundas - July service 29.95 07/15/2017 601-49440-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE-909 Golf Course Rd - July service 19.95 07/15/2017 101-43110-431900 07/06/2017 WHCE- General Street Lighting 1,334.00 07/15/2017 101-43160-438100 07/06/2017 Boyer- #111 - ECU Max: Lever -RF; return old o 4,966.78 07/15/2017 101-43120-422110 07/06/2017 Grady's - (2) 601b concrete mix 13.18 07/15/2017 101-43120-422600 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (6.156) gal.oxigenated @ $2.699- fc 16.62 07/15/2017 101-42200-421200 07/06/2017 Kwik Trip - (10.417) gal bio diesel. @ $2.399- fi 24.99 07/15/2017 101-43120-421200 07/06/2017 Runnings- Stihl- parts only 42.16 07/15/2017 101-42200-422100 07/06/2017 Runnings- 50' hose; chain sharpen; fitting pipe; e 85.18 07/15/2017 101-43127-422100 07/06/2017 Runnings- water pump- mist. coupler; adapt.; fit 93.39 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Clarke Mosquito Cntrl- (2) cs 4 gal. Clarke Flit 378.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421600 07/06/2017 Northern Tool- water pump 399.00 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Site One - Irrigation Pump 1,258.29 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Site One -relief valve repr kit; rbr prts; inlet sprit 368.00 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Site One -Freeway backflow -(3) sprinkler; (4) A 336.53 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 WHCE- Street Light contract 4/16-5/15/2017 1,964.05 07/15/2017 101-43160-431900 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Grout for Tile at Senior Center 42.69 07/15/2017 101-45175-440100 07/06/2017 NBP - Dictation Recorder, Tape, Pens 161.06 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Fingertip Moistener 115.57 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Staples 5.94 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 NBP - Paper, Pen Refills 11.71 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 07/06/2017 NBP - Returned Letter Sorter -32.92 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Coffee 114.88 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Amazon - Paper Plates, Paper Towels, Kleenex,1 122.14 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 7.628 gals @ $2.229 17.00 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Holiday - Unleaded Fuel 10.314 gals @ $2.259 23.30 07/15/2017 217-41990-421200 07/06/2017 Grady's - Lock for File Cabinet 13.99 07/15/2017 101-41310-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Carpet Sprayer 17.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Key 1.99 07/15/2017 226-45126-431990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Cable; Ferrule & Stop for Gator Repair 15.13 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Grady's - Snap Rings (10) for Hand Dryer in Wo 2.30 07/15/2017 226-45126-440440 07/06/2017 Walmart - Snacks & Juice for F. I. 33.88 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - White Board Cleaner for F. I. 5.94 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Walmart - Protein Bars for Concession 38.33 07/15/2017 226-45125-425410 07/06/2017 Cub - Snacks for Meeting 17.78 07/15/2017 101-41310-443990 07/06/2017 Cub - Milk for F. I. 8.96 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Target - Food for CC Meeting 29.99 07/15/2017 101-41110-443990 07/06/2017 Runnings- G. C for Safety Bingo Prize 40.00 07/15/2017 101-41800-421990 07/06/2017 Constant Contact - Monthly Email Service 60.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-430900 07/06/2017 Monti Printing - Plan Review Stamps (6) 199.00 07/15/2017 101-42400-421990 07/06/2017 American Red Cross - CPR Training for Guest S 108.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-433100 07/06/2017 Eventbrite - 2017 Accela Finance Nat'l Training 499.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 Eventbrite - Airfare to Accela Nat'l Training Pori 393.00 07/15/2017 101-41520-433100 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts 162.50 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 07/06/2017 Ausco - Kids Shirts for F.I (65) 552.50 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts (21) 178.50 07/15/2017 226-45127-421110 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Shirts (52) 338.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 07/06/2017 Monti Vacuum Center - Box of Bags for F.I Vact 17.95 07/15/2017 226-45127-421981 07/06/2017 Paula Paulson - Ceiling Drape for Wedding 425.00 07/15/2017 226-45123-431990 07/06/2017 Pier B Resort - Hotel for Excel Training (DC) 406.58 07/15/2017 101-42400-433100 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - Bathroom Supplies 33.86 07/15/2017 217-41990-421990 07/06/2017 Paypal-CSP Outdoors- ZPARKS-MOVTIV-(3) - -11.20 07/15/2017 101-45201-421990 07/06/2017 Monti Napa- pelican Mirror 11.29 07/15/2017 101-43120-422100 07/06/2017 Grady's - scrub brush for washing trucks 11.99 07/15/2017 101-43127-421100 07/06/2017 Walgreens - sharpies; wall calender 18.12 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Runnings- (4) 24pk water; charcoal- Montiview 18.45 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Von Hanson -Montivew clean up day 25.15 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Office Max - (2) sharpie; desk calendar 28.82 07/15/2017 609-49754-421990 07/06/2017 Facebook- Riverfest Promo. 31.89 07/15/2017 609-49754-434990 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Power Troi 60.06 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 General Rental -ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Screed Cor 76.00 07/15/2017 229-45202-453010 07/06/2017 Cub Foods- resale(145) limes; (12) lemons 96.88 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 G & K - mats- mv. #6043795590; #6043801259 106.77 07/15/2017 609-49754-431990 07/06/2017 Home Depot - Exp. Joint; (10) 24' stl. stake; (10) 119.54 07/15/2017 101-43120-422400 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 07/06/2017 Elk Rvr Landfill- ZPARKS-MONTIV- Clean-up 201.80 07/15/2017 101-45201-431990 07/06/2017 Sherwin Williams - (2) 5gal white 206.00 07/15/2017 101-45203-421990 07/06/2017 BigMouth.com- resale- (36) cooler bags 324.00 07/15/2017 609-49750-425400 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Parks 94.52 07/15/2017 101-45201-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Sewer 72.72 07/15/2017 602-49490-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - Water 72.72 07/15/2017 601-49440-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 - PW Uniforms 181.24 07/15/2017 101-43120-441700 07/06/2017 Aramark May 2017 shop towels 168.90 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Arctic Glacier - resale - inv.716310;716709;717. 771.43 07/15/2017 609-49750-425500 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - (10) 100pk can liner; hand soap, 580.24 07/15/2017 101-45201-421650 07/06/2017 Dacotah Paper - (6) cs paper towel; (2) cs cups; c 255.48 07/15/2017 101-43127-421990 07/06/2017 Midwwest Landscapers -Shrubs (69) asst. 2,200.65 07/15/2017 101-43120-422500 07/06/2017 Hillyard - Floor Cleaners 182.13 07/15/2017 226-45126-421990 07/06/2017 Walmart.com - Socks for Resale at Concession (1 17.88 07/15/2017 226-45125-425411 07/06/2017 Walmart.com - Cleaning Supplies 27.96 07/15/2017 226-45122-421990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Filters for Pool; Brushes for Tile 37.93 07/15/2017 226-45126-422990 07/06/2017 Grady's - Hardware for Garbage Door at Prairie 1 9.83 07/15/2017 101-41941-422990 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Clothing 5/20 Invoice 632.00 07/15/2017 226-00000-115030 07/06/2017 Ausco - Staff Clothing 5/20 Invoice 18.00 07/15/2017 226-45122-421110 Check Total: 93,757.75 Vendor: 2438 VANCO SERVICES LLC Check Sequence: 7 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 17.90 07/15/2017 656-49870-443980 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 60.16 07/15/2017 601-49440-443980 00008277830 Vanco - Gateway Exchange - June 2017 60.16 07/15/2017 602-49490-443980 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: 138.22 159,788.10 7 Reference ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/24/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/14/2017 - 1:34 PM) Page 9 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Julie.Cheney Printed: 07/19/2017 - 2:43PM Batch: 00203.07.2017 - 203.07.2017 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 1003 AM PROMOTIONS 7/10/2017 Bags for Power of Produce Kids Club Promotior Check Sequence: 1 Check Total: Vendor: 3878 ACI ASPHALT & CONCRETE, INC 61524 226-00000-220100 Resurface- Meadow Park Basketball Court 61525 Cracksealing; Resurface- West Bridge Park 61526 Resurface; Crackseal; Patching; Traffic Control Check Total: Vendor: 1021 AME RED E MIX INC 113742 False ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (11) CY 4000AE; (11) BG 1 113911 101-45201-440800 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (6) CY 4000AE; (6) BG Bu Check Total: Vendor: 1977 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC 70866 Stand. Palm Mic 07/25/2017 101-45201-453010 Check Total: Vendor: 3991 ANOKA RAMSEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE 7/11/2017 Seasonal Safety Training 6/5; AWAIR Training E Check Total: Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC 121809 False Filters 16x123 (6) 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Moiiii6effo Y Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: False 963.47 07/25/2017 226-00000-220100 963.47 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 561.63 07/25/2017 101-45201-440800 842.91 07/25/2017 101-45201-440800 47,906.39 07/25/2017 101-45201-453010 49,310.93 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 1,664.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 919.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 2,583.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 88.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-421990 88.00 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 1,350.00 07/25/2017 101-41800-431960 1,350.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 169.88 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 169.88 Check Sequence: 7 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description 3191660 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Check Total: Vendor: 4502 ARVIG 265114 June 2017- Calix; Border States; Adv. Media Tec 265115 Enetwork Supply; return Vecima Networks -orig Check Total: Vendor: 1061 BBF PROPERTIES INC TIF 1-22 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 Check Total: Vendor: 1064 BECKER SOD LLC 10855 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (450) yds sod delivered 10864 ACH Enabled: False ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (75) yds sod picked up 07/25/2017 213-46581-465110 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 59622400 resale - liquor 59622400 ACH Enabled: False freight 59743800 229-45202-453010 freight 59743800 07/25/2017 resale - wine 59743800 1,095.80 resale - liquor 96083600 resale - mix 96083600 Check Sequence: 11 freight 648.53 07/25/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S 73417 resale - pop, water, juice, milk 75742 609-49750-433300 resale - soda pop 75742 07/25/2017 resale -juice 75743 762.00 resale - beer 76389 Pop 7733 609-49750-425500 reslae - coffee 78763 07/25/2017 resale -juice 78763 1,723.38 resale - soda pop 78764 resale - beer 78932 Check Sequence: 12 reslae - pop, gatorade Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 233.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 233.50 Check Sequence: 8 ACH Enabled: True 15,270.39 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 806.39 07/25/2017 656-49877-421800 16,076.78 Check Sequence: 9 ACH Enabled: False 18,416.12 07/25/2017 213-46581-465110 18,416.12 Check Sequence: 10 ACH Enabled: False 942.50 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 153.30 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 1,095.80 Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: True 648.53 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 7.43 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 18.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 216.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 762.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 71.09 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 0.33 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,723.38 Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 596.42 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 123.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 16.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 1,765.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 160.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-421460 131.04 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 49.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 87.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2,792.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 307.50 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6,029.46 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) Print, Fold, Envel 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) Print, Fold, Envel 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) DMV Insert 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) FNM Insert 58158 UB June 2017 Invoices (3785) MCC Insert 217-41990-434990 Check Total: Vendor: 3632 BRIAN BRAMLEY 8994 Air Quality tst; Comprss. Srvc; (25) ACBA Flo -A 18.93 Check Total: Vendor: 4738 BRAND MANUFACTURING 57967 set of (2) stainless steel chutes- Fire Dept. Check Total: Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII 1080659005 resale - liquor 1080659005 resale - wine 1080659005 freight 1080659006 resale - beer 1080662296 resale - liquor 1080662296 resale - wine 1080662296 freight 766.47 Check Total: Vendor: 1084 BROCK WHITE COMPANY LLC 12798094 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (23) 30BX 10OZ. Limeston 12798816 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- Kure & Seal; concrete clear Check Total: Vendor: 2890 BROTHERS FIRE PROTECTION CO 104167 Maintenace on Fire Extinguishers (7) 609-49750-425100 Check Total: Vendor: 1091 CAMPBELL KNUTSON PA Amount Payment Date Acct Number 6,029.46 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 3 Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: False 554.69 07/25/2017 601-49440-431800 554.70 07/25/2017 602-49490-431800 18.92 07/25/2017 217-41990-434990 37.85 07/25/2017 656-00000-202099 18.93 07/25/2017 226-45122-434990 1,185.09 Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: True 2,389.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-440440 2,389.00 Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 766.47 07/25/2017 101-42200-421990 766.47 Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 2,542.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 644.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 33.84 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 182.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1,506.71 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 496.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 37.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,443.10 Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 158.73 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 242.91 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 401.64 Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 259.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 259.00 Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 2348-103G 114 FiberNet General 160.00 07/25/2017 656-49870-430400 2348-142G 1 Estate of John Ellison (Conveyance) 2,078.36 07/25/2017 400-43300-430400 Check Total: 2,238.36 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: True 1941547 resale - beer 12,539.55 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1941547 resale - beer n/a 181.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1941547 resale - wine 72.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1946552 resale - beer 10,753.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1946552 resale - beer n/a 279.55 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 23,827.52 Vendor: 1094 CAREFREE LAWN SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 16237 (2) mowings 6/7 & 20; Litter/Debris Removal 320.00 07/25/2017 101-45201-431050 16237 (2) mowings Riverside -6/17 & 29 1,100.00 07/25/2017 651-49010-431050 Check Total: 1,420.00 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 375-95 resale - beer 114.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 733197 resale - beer 82.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 196.60 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False 00091321 Monthly Tank Rental 45.00 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00129490 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (227 lbs) 72.40 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00131667 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (296 lbs) 86.20 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 00133195 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (352 lbs) 97.40 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 301.00 Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 7/1/2017 Digital Receiver 7.91 07/25/2017 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 7.91 Vendor: 4740 KEN CHRISTIANSEN Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False 7/17/2017 Reimburse Over Paid Membership Fees 11.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-347910 Check Total: 11.00 Vendor: 3883 CLAYTON'S APPLIANCE REPAIR Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 44169 Labor/Serv. Call- Refrigerator Knob replaced 119.00 07/25/2017 101-45201-431990 44169 Parts/Shipping- Refrigerator Knob replaced 45.67 07/25/2017 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 164.67 Vendor: 1973 CLIMATE MAKERS INC Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 55641 Repair A/C @ Prairie Center 424.35 07/25/2017 101-41941-431990 55811 Credit on Inv #55641 - Repair A/C @ Prairie Cei -108.23 07/25/2017 101-41941-431990 Check Total: 316.12 Vendor: 2511 CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER COMPANY L Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 101462 (53) 55gal Containers- Green 1,256.03 07/25/2017 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 1,256.03 Vendor: 1092 CSI SOFTWARE INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 92097 Annual Software & Hosting Fees 9,520.17 07/25/2017 226-45122-430900 Check Total: 9,520.17 Vendor: 4205 MICHAEL CYR Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-29 Pay As You Go 1st 2017 Principal 4,044.91 07/25/2017 213-46529-465110 TIF 1-29 Pay As You Go 1 st 2017 Interest 5,968.55 07/25/2017 213-46529-465110 Check Total: 10,013.46 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: True 1289431 resale - beer 23,649.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1289431 resale - beer n/a 295.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1289448 resale - beer 9,836.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152285 resale - beer credit inv. 151804 -51.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152429 resale - beer credit -56.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152493 resale - beer 397.85 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152646 resale - beer credit -7.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152652 resale - beer 1,180.00 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 152775 resale - beer 120.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152787 resale - beer 19,114.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152787 resale - beer n/a 144.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 152929 resale - beer 284.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 152929 resale - beer n/a 168.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 153037 resale - beer 315.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153191 resale - beer 817.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153376 resale - beer -20.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 153935 resale - beer 459.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 153955 resale - beer 460.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 7/15/17 resale - beer- (3) Mount. Ale 101.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 7/15/17-2 resale - beer -(5) Henry's Hard Grape 112.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 57,321.10 Vendor: 4475 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP Check Sequence: 32 D123858 Valve Flush Kits (3) 595.47 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 D133790 PVC Pipe - Various 336.33 07/25/2017 226-45126-421990 Check Total: 931.80 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 33 505339 201722 - KB Properties Hearing #702933 101.53 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505340 201721 - Larson Building Hearing Ad #702936 101.53 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505341 Outdoor Storage Hearing Ad# 702939 92.30 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505342 Small Area Business Hearing Ad# 702948 92.30 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 505343 2017011 - Camping World Hearing Ad# 705799 110.76 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 507773 201719 - PH Vacation of Drainage & Utility Eas 221.52 07/25/2017 101-41910-435100 509369 Ad #703088 - Riverfest 460.00 07/25/2017 609-49754-434990 511279 Ad #703087 - Sat. Shop & Save July Wine Sale 287.00 07/25/2017 609-49754-434990 Check Total: 1,466.94 Vendor: 2561 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #2516 Check Sequence: 34 0248031 (10) 150" Gskt; (25) 2 Rub DI Meter Gskt; (25) 101.16 07/25/2017 601-49440-422710 0249803 1 T10 Meter Ecdr Usg 1/Tip; LF 1 T10 MTR V4 605.72 07/25/2017 601-49440-422710 Check Total: 706.88 Vendor: 2273 FIBERNET MONTICELLO - ACH Check Sequence: 35 7/8/2017 City Hall Phone - July 2017 950.21 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 MCC Phone - July 2017 431.64 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Ballfields Phone - July 2017 19.42 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 DMV Phone - July 2017 279.48 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Phone - July 2017 286.39 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Fire Hall Phone - July 2017 242.31 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Public Works Phone - July 2017 290.62 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Parks Phone - July 2017 113.70 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Prairie Center Phone - July 2017 14.16 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 Sheriff Phone - July 2017 69.72 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 7/8/2017 City Hall Internet - July 2017 124.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 MCC Internet - July 2017 10.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7/8/2017 Ballfields Internet - July 2017 10.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 DMV Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Hi Way Liquor Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Fire Hall Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Animal Shelter Internet - July 2017 29.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Public Works Internet - July 2017 69.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 Sheriff Internet - July 2017 41.95 07/25/2017 702-00000-432300 7/8/2017 City Hall Cable - July 2017 12.95 07/25/2017 101-41310-431990 7/8/2017 MCC Cable - July 2017 319.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-432500 7/8/2017 Data Hosting - July 2017 500.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431900 7/8/2017 Service Contract - July 2017 250.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431900 Check Total: 4,192.64 Vendor: 1180 FIRST HOSPITAL LABORATORIES INC Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False FL00177040 DOT Urine Drug Screen- Roger H. 50.95 07/25/2017 101-43120-431990 Check Total: 50.95 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: True 7060577 June 2017 (319) tickets- 1/2 215.33 07/25/2017 601-49440-432770 7060577 June 2017 (319) tickets- 1/2 215.32 07/25/2017 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 430.65 Vendor: 4743 GRAND CASTLE Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 7/11/2017 Escrow Refund - 413 4th St W 2,000.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 2,000.00 Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 4097876 Pool Chemicals -48.09 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 4098335 Pool Chemicals -15.24 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 4106421 Pool Chemicals 786.93 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 723.60 Vendor: 1228 HERC U LIFT INC Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False W334140-2 Lift Motor Repair 238.14 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 238.14 Vendor: 3092 HIRSHFIELDS - MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: False 30044733 Picnic Table (2) 4gal dark green; (5) tray liner 102.43 07/25/2017 101-45201-421650 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Total: Vendor: 1239 HOGLUND BUS COMPANY INC 126757 Spartan Metro Star- Left Rear brake; brackets - I 170626121 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 000132 resale - beer 904218 resale - beer Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Total: Vendor: 1244 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 170626121 Pool Chemicals ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 3369 JAKE'S EXCAVATING INC 3183 Christenson 6/17/17 624.36 Check Total: Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING 2685219 resale - beer 2685219 Enabled: resale - beer n/a 2685219 07/25/2017 freight 2689763 resale - beer 2689763 07/25/2017 freight Check Total: Vendor: 1260 JME OF MONTICELLO INC 66586 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (117) Riverrock 66648 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (54) Riverrock 66650 Enabled: ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (12) Londonstone Riverfocl 180.04 07/25/2017 Check Total: Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 5763842 resale - liquor 5763842 freight 5763843 resale - mix 5763843 Enabled: freight Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 102.43 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: True 624.36 07/25/2017 101-42200-440500 624.36 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 994.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1,156.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 2,150.50 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 180.04 07/25/2017 226-45124-421600 180.04 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: True 450.00 07/25/2017 651-49010-431150 450.00 Check Sequence: 46 ACH Enabled: False 1,939.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 21.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 3.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 3,498.34 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 3.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,465.04 Check Sequence: 47 ACH Enabled: True 627.45 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 345.10 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 60.10 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 1,032.65 Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: False 8,777.08 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 95.40 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 70.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2.88 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 5765041 freight 87.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5765041 resale - liquor 7,603.70 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5765042 resale - Mix 124.05 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5765042 resale - wine 824.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5765042 freight 33.12 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5765043 resale - beer 153.93 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5767883 resale - liquor 1,937.90 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5767883 freight 8.15 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767884 freight 13.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767884 resale - wine 825.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5767885 resale - liquor 5,649.98 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5767885 freight 67.67 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767886 freight 7.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5767886 resale - mix 120.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5767887 resale - beer 123.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5769525 resale - ligiuor 6,710.64 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5769525 freight 81.12 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5769526 freight 90.01 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5769526 resale - wine 3,268.02 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5769526 resale - mix 171.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 5769527 resale - beer 65.97 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 5770836 freight 1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5770837 freight 18.72 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5770837 resale - wine 564.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 5773602 resale - liquor 6,124.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 5773602 freight 116.65 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5773603 freight 7.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5773603 resale - wine 237.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 632850 resale - wine credit inv. #5758245 -52.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 632850 freightcredit inv. #5758245 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633399 resale - wine credit inv #5720390 -13.15 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633400 resale - wine credit inv #5692842 -7.33 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633401 resale - wine credit inv #5758245 -9.65 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 633402 resale -Liquor credit inv #5762471 -76.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 633402 freight credit inv #5762471 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633775 freight credit inv #5763842 -4.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 633775 resale - ligiuort credit inv #5763842 -302.10 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 634027 resale - ligiuor credit inv #5763842 -238.29 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 634027 freight credit inv #5763842 -2.88 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 43,273.84 Vendor: 2641 JOHNSON MATERIALS INC Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 3009 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (70.3) CL5 Base 406.17 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3132 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (37.06) CL5 Base 214.95 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3133 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (20.22) Con Bit 219.39 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 3162 (17.76) CL5 Base 103.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 Check Total: 943.51 Vendor: 1274 KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION -NORTH CEN' Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: False 42224 ZPARKS-ELLPRK- (11.5)CY 4000 EXT; (11.5) 1,937.63 07/25/2017 229-45202-453010 Check Total: 1,937.63 Vendor: 4494 LAXMI HOTEL INC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-22.5 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Interest 4,335.39 07/25/2017 213-46585-465110 Check Total: 4,335.39 Vendor: 1292 LEROY JOB TRUCKING INC Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: True 18840 Animal Charge (2) 23.40 07/25/2017 101-42700-431990 Check Total: 23.40 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: True 1866 resale - beer 378.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 1952 resale - beer 495.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 873.00 Vendor: 1303 M AMUNDSON CIGAR & CANDY CO, LLP Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 241096 resale - cigarettes; juice 1,118.14 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 241096 resale - tobacco; soda pop; cork screws; can cool 420.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 1,538.82 Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False June 2017 Labor Relations Services - June 2017 72.84 07/25/2017 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 72.84 Vendor: 1229 MARRS ADVERTISING & DESIGN INC Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: True 1436 (500) business cards Matt T. 52.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-421990 Check Total: 52.00 Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 20360391 (500) gal. diesel @ $2.05 1,027.16 07/25/2017 101-43120-421200 20360401 (698) gal. unleaded @ $1.94 1,357.21 07/25/2017 101-43120-421200 Check Total: 2,384.37 Vendor: 1309 MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: False 344929 Cat Food; Salt Pellets (6) 65.04 07/25/2017 101-42700-443990 Check Total: 65.04 Vendor: 4742 DAVE & kATHY MATUSKA Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 - 2012-2017 Principal Pd c 497.42 07/25/2017 300-00000-361010 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 - 2012-2017 Interest Pd Stj 129.34 07/25/2017 300-00000-361020 Check Total: 626.76 Vendor: 1314 MCDOWALL COMPANY Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False 235236 Contract C0560- cooler fans iced up 1,082.18 07/25/2017 609-49754-440440 235238 Contract C0520 - Replace Spring Return Actuatc 557.58 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 1,639.76 Vendor: 3816 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT COMPAN Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 0380817 (10) Traffic Repair Kit for Pacer 2,011.80 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 0380819 (100) Cplug w/ Gkt- 3/4" Meter 917.01 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 0380853 Upper Valve Rod w/ stud & nuts 171.91 07/25/2017 601-49440-422220 Check Total: 3,100.72 Vendor: 1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False Qtr 2 2017 Community Water Supply Service Conn. Fee Qti 6,761.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-443750 Check Total: 6,761.00 Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False P00008086 15C004 - MNDOT Material Testing & Inspectioi 104.47 07/25/2017 400-43300-459014 Check Total: 104.47 Vendor: 1743 CITY OF MONTICELLO Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 7/17/2017 Sewer Camera Rebuild (MT) (1/27/17) 60.00 07/25/2017 602-49490-422100 7/17/2017 Refund to Customer - CC Was Charged Wrong A 1.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-202010 7/17/2017 AG Preservation Fee to County (JT) (4/12/17) 5.00 07/25/2017 229-45202-453011 7/19/2017 2 Pairs of IOlnAnkle Weights (1/24/17) 32.04 07/25/2017 226-45127-421720 7/19/2017 Ping Pong Balls (3/26/17) 6.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-421460 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 7/19/2017 FI Supplies - 5/19/17 10.79 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies - 6/1/17 20.85 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Crayons, Art Books, Bags) - 6/1/17 13.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Tinker Toys & Lincoln Logs) - 6/2/ 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Art Easel) - 6/2/17 18.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Lincoln Logs) - 6/7/17 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 FI Field Trip Lockers @ Como Zoo -6/20/17 10.00 07/25/2017 226-45127-441500 7/19/2017 FI Supplies (Misc Games) - 6/26/17 10.64 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 7/19/2017 Parking @ Rural Water School (3 Days - MT) (3 15.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-433100 7/19/2017 Light Bulbs (3) (4/10/17) 4.56 07/25/2017 101-43110-421990 Check Total: 227.27 Vendor: 1377 MONTICELLO SENIOR CENTER Check Sequence: 65 July 2017 Monthly Allocation - July 2017 4,880.00 07/25/2017 101-45175-444310 Check Total: 4,880.00 Vendor: 4186 MONTICELLO TOWING, LLC Check Sequence: 66 21732 Chip Seal Proj- Tow Commuter Lot- Civic Wind 150.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-440990 Check Total: 150.00 Vendor: 4549 ANN MOSACK Check Sequence: 67 6/23/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - 111.3 miles 59.55 07/25/2017 226-45122-433100 Check Total: 59.55 Vendor: 1687 NORTHLAND SECURITIES INC Check Sequence: 68 5013 Property Tax Abatement Project 1,750.00 07/25/2017 213-46301-431990 Check Total: 1,750.00 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 69 23039 June 2017 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 2,271.58 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 23040 201710 - Spaeth Industrial PUD Concept - June : 929.10 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201712 - Carlisle Paxmar PUD Amendment - Ju 81.50 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201716 - Red Rooster PUD Amendment - June 2 733.50 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201721 - Lamont Travel Center PUD - June 201 961.70 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201720 - Autumn Ridge PUD Amendment - Jun 978.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201717 - Mills Fleet Farm Sign PUD - June 201 782.40 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201720 - Weinand - Paxmar Residential Concept 423.80 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23040 201722 - Affordable Storage PUD - June 2017 1,320.30 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 23041 June 2017 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 150.00 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,631.88 Check Total: Vendor: 1775 NORTHWESTERN POWER EQUIPMENT CO 170298TE 07/25/2017 Well #2 Clay Valve parts- CSC swing ck; valve; 425.66 Check Total: Vendor: 4368 OFFICE DEPOT INC 942310227001 25 pk Menu pouch; 25 pk laminating pouch; (2) 101-43110-421990 69.46 Check Total: Vendor: 1412 OMANN BROTHERS INC 12787 1,792.00 (28) AC Fines mix 12798 1,792.00 (28) AC Fines mix 12804 641.28 (10.02) AC Fines mix 12812 128.64 (2.01) AC Fines mix 12820 288.98 (6.18) SPWEA240A 12833 64.64 (1.01) AC Fines mix 101-43120-422400 4,707.54 Check Total: Vendor: 1421 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC 218721200 19.84 Plumbing Items: Brass Closet Spud (1); Flanged 226-45126-422990 19.84 Check Total: Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO 8595817 1,556.99 resale - wine 8595817 20.00 freight 609-49750-433300 1,576.99 Check Total: Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO 2192011 1,858.54 resale - liquor 2192011 12.24 freight 2192753 71.04 freight 2192753 5,517.30 resale - liquor 2194614 908.37 resale - wine 2194614 46.60 resale - liquor 2194614 19.44 freight 2194615 17.28 freight 2194615 955.50 resale - liquor Amount Payment Date Acct Number 8,631.88 Check Sequence: 70 425.66 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 425.66 Check Sequence: 71 69.46 07/25/2017 101-43110-421990 69.46 Check Sequence: 72 1,792.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 1,792.00 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 641.28 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 128.64 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 288.98 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 64.64 07/25/2017 101-43120-422400 4,707.54 Check Sequence: 73 19.84 07/25/2017 226-45126-422990 19.84 Check Sequence: 74 1,556.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 20.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,576.99 Check Sequence: 75 1,858.54 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 12.24 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 71.04 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 5,517.30 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 908.37 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 46.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 19.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 17.28 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 955.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 2194616 resale - condiments 214.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-425500 2194616 freight 5.76 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2195621 freight 30.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2195621 resale - liquor 2,954.45 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2195622 resale - wine 1,185.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 2195622 freight 24.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196498 freight 10.31 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196498 resale - liquor 847.20 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2196499 freight 34.56 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2196499 resale - wine 1,303.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 2196499 resale - mix 64.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 2198019 resale - liquor 742.93 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2198019 freight 0.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 2198453 resale - liquor 8,386.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 2198453 freight 137.53 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 268522 resale - liquor credit inv. #2140127 -7.69 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 268523 resale - liquor credit inv. #2191256 -183.05 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 268523 freight credit inv. #2191256 -0.60 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 269046 resale - liquor credit inv. #2194616 -58.80 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 269046 freight credit inv. #2194616 -1.44 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 25,097.84 Vendor: 4741 AMANDA PRODOEHL Check Sequence: 76 7/12/2017 Reimburse for F.I. Supplies 47.34 07/25/2017 226-45127-421981 Check Total: 47.34 Vendor: 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC Check Sequence: 77 351296 License Fees - Sewer Piipeline Crossing 10/16/1 194.55 07/25/2017 602-49490-431990 351303 License Fees 194.55 07/25/2017 263-49200-431990 Check Total: 389.10 Vendor: 4739 RATWIK, ROSZAK & MALONEY, P.A. Check Sequence: 78 60768 Professional Employment Services 5,281.91 07/25/2017 101-41800-430400 Check Total: 5,281.91 Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 79 833933 Food for Concession - Resale 318.37 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 841520 Food for Concession Resale 396.90 07/25/2017 226-45125-425410 841520 Food for Parry 16.39 07/25/2017 226-45127-421460 841520 Food for Block Party 1,167.99 07/25/2017 101-45130-444210 Reference ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 841520 Food for Friendship Island 254.91 07/25/2017 226-45127-421990 Check Total: 2,154.56 Vendor: 4744 RJ MECHANICAL Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False 6/23/17 refund Refund Water Use Permit- Deposit $650-$518.6: 131.38 07/25/2017 601-49440-371120 Check Total: 131.38 Vendor: 4705 S2 SERVICES INC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False MN -0169 EnduraGlaze - Mens & Childcare Restrooms 2,422.50 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 Check Total: 2,422.50 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: True 7/6/2017 Mileage Reimbursement - June (280 miles) 149.80 07/25/2017 101-42700-433100 July 2nd Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,593.75 07/25/2017 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,743.55 Vendor: 3827 SAMBATEK INC Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: True 10023 Code Updates - Project Admin Services thru 6/2, 33.75 07/25/2017 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 33.75 Vendor: 2443 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA INC Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: False W5699272 6/24/17 - Security (5 hrs) 140.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-431992 W5709381 7/1/17 - Security (5 hrs) 140.00 07/25/2017 226-45123-431992 Check Total: 280.00 Vendor: 1484 SENSUS USA INC Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True ZA17022233 software support renewal 9/23/2017-9/22/2018 1,715.95 07/25/2017 601-49440-431900 Check Total: 1,715.95 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: False 965209 July 2017 cleaning service - Fire Dept. 100.00 07/25/2017 101-42200-431990 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 1903 LINDA SMITH Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False TIF 1-20 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Principal 638.00 07/25/2017 213-46520-465110 TIF 1-20 Pay As You Go - 1st 2017 Interest 3,310.35 07/25/2017 213-46520-465110 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 3,948.35 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: False 1537640 resale - wine 1,240.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1564191 resale - liquor 1,689.02 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 1564191 freight 17.97 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1564192 freight 13.54 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1564192 resale - wine 628.08 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566852 resale - wine 337.50 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566852 resale - liquor 1,342.95 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 1566852 freight 22.99 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1566853 resale - wine 1,430.48 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 1566853 freight 20.42 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 credits 7/10/17 resale - liquor credits -772.23 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 credits 7/10/17 resale - wine credits -666.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 credits 7/10/17 freight credits -7.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 5,296.97 Vendor: 3594 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT, LLC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 2898631 asst. bags; hand soap; multi -fold towels; canlinct 196.26 07/25/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 196.26 Vendor: 1518 TDS TELECOM Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True 763-271-3257 TDS 96.58 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-2005 TDS 19.51 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 763-295-3714 TDS 340.46 07/25/2017 702-00000-432100 Check Total: 456.55 Vendor: 4656 TRUE FABRICATIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 241119 resale - wine packaging items- twine; boxes; etc 187.46 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 241119 frieght- wine packaging items- twine; boxes; etc 28.13 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 241224 resale - misc. gift bags; bottle stoppers; etc 346.32 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 241224 labels 25.99 07/25/2017 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 587.90 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 7/11/2017 PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,785 pcs) (1/2) 857.31 07/25/2017 601-49440-432200 7/11/2017 PI 42 - UB June Billing (3,785 pcs) (1/2) 857.30 07/25/2017 602-49490-432200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 16 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO 1975120 resale - soda pop 1981438 resale - soda pop Vendor: 1567 Check Total: Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA 0183786 resale - liquor 0183786 resale - wine 0183786 freight 0184390 resale - liquor 0184390 resale - wine 0184390 resale - wine Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1561 WATER LABORATORIES INC 6270 June 2017 Water Testing 42460 Check Total: Vendor: 1567 WES OLSON ELECTRIC LLC 8292 Well #2- Solenoid Porblem- troubleshoot 8300 Labor - Mississippi Room Lighting 8300 Materials - Mississippi Room Lighting - Transfr 8320 Chelsea Lift Sta.- Trblshoot found bad Transforn Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference Check Total: Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY 42460 resale - wine 42460 freight 519.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC 7140460 resale - wine 7140460 freight Check Total: Vendor: 2645 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,714.61 Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 17 Check Sequence: 93 ACH Enabled: True 622.75 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 519.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425400 1,141.75 Check Sequence: 94 ACH Enabled: True 199.92 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 224.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 10.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 74.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425100 296.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 4.00 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 807.92 Check Sequence: 95 ACH Enabled: False 240.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-422740 240.00 Check Sequence: 96 ACH Enabled: False 72.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 396.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 65.00 07/25/2017 226-45126-431990 72.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-440600 605.00 Check Sequence: 97 ACH Enabled: True 722.67 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 8.25 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 730.92 Check Sequence: 98 ACH Enabled: False 1,718.74 07/25/2017 609-49750-425300 31.68 07/25/2017 609-49750-433300 1,750.42 Check Sequence: 99 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 17 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 2nd Half Payment Proj #2S 45.22 07/25/2017 300-00000-361010 7/7/2017 PID 155-062-001010 2nd Half Payment Proj #2S 4.97 07/25/2017 300-00000-361020 Check Total: 50.19 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 100 ACH Enabled: True 7/12/2017 Court Fines & Fees for June 2017 3,527.71 07/25/2017 101-42100-430410 July July 2017 Deputies Contract 101,470.00 07/25/2017 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 104,997.71 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC Check Sequence: 101 ACH Enabled: True 010148-000 1 201716 - Red Rooster Properties Plan Review - 456.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 010266-000 1 201721 - Crown Bay Retail - May 2017 51.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 01494-700 46 General WWTP -May 2017 5,411.25 07/25/2017 602-49480-430300 01494-800 41 100009 - CSAH 75/TH 25 Intersection Improves 468.00 07/25/2017 400-43300-430300 01494-950 33 14C002 - Phosphorus Construction Phase 4 - M 682.00 07/25/2017 602-00000-165010 01627-680 16 16D002 - Mills Fleet Farm Plan Review- May 2 2,552.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Project Mgmt - - 240.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 601-49440-430300 02596-010 29 General Engineering Services - Phase 5 - May 2 2,660.00 07/25/2017 602-49490-430300 02596-030 20 Maps - May 2017 488.00 07/25/2017 101-43111-430300 02596-040 23 GIS Support Services - May 2017 427.00 07/25/2017 702-00000-431990 02596-100 24 15C001 - 2016 Street Reconstruction Project - I 3,690.50 07/25/2017 400-43300-459011 02596-160 17 15C004 - 7th Street/TH 25 Intersection Improver 45,389.00 07/25/2017 400-43300-459014 02596-1907 ZVERIZ - Verizon Water Tower Plan Review -1\ 152.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2507 16D003 - School District PUD Plan Reivew 621.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2805 201638 - IRT Plan Review 608.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-2905 Monticello Business Center Drainage Study - M 2,156.00 07/25/2017 263-49200-431990 02596-3305 16D004 - Warnert/Sherbume Bank Plan Review 228.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-3408 2016 - 2017 Market Matching - May 2017 700.00 07/25/2017 213-46301-431990 02596-3506 17D001 - Camping World Plan Review - May Z 456.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-3608 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - May 201' 5,940.50 07/25/2017 400-43300-459016 02596-3903 201706 - Monticello Specialty Clinic - May 201' 1,604.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 02596-4005 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - May 2017 75,425.16 07/25/2017 400-43300-459018 02596-4203 201710 - Spaeth Plan Review - May 2017 3,232.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 R010149-000 1 201720 - Autumn Ridge 3rd Addition Replat - n 306.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 R010150-000 1 201715 - CentraCare Health Plan Review - May 380.00 07/25/2017 101-00000-220110 Check Total: 159,643.41 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 102 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 18 Invoice No Description 553870434 Contract #1562630 Well 2 Adv. Payment Requi Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total of Number of Checks: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 12,887.38 07/25/2017 601-00000-165010 12,887.38 660,509.14 102 The preceding list of bills payables was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 7/24/17 Approved by: Mayor Brian Stumpf Reference AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (07/19/2017 - 2:43 PM) Page 19 City Council Agenda 7/24/17 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #1, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Kara Ziemer Clerk Liquor Store 7/11/2017 PT Branden Lemke Clerk Liquor Store 7/14/2017 PT Nashelly Gomez Slide Attendant MCC 7/18/2017 PT Isabella Ward Guest Service 2 MCC 7/18/2017 PT Jayden Wistrom Climbing Wall MCC 7/18/2017 PT Name Noah Thompsen Nora Kowalke Involuntary Involuntary TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Reason New Hire and Terms City Council 2017.xlsx: 7/18/2017 Department MCC MCC Last Day 7/7/17 PT 7/11/17 PT Class Class City Council Agenda 07/24/2017 2C. Consideration of approving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 2D. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-40 accepting donations for the Farmer's Market, Summer Movie in the Park, and 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament for total of $1,095 (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is being asked to approve the donations/sponsorships for the Farmer's Market, the Summer Movie in the Park series, and the 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament. Sponsors of the Farmer's Market are Stephanie Ellingson and Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital Foundation. The sponsors for the movie are Camping World and All Elements. North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance is a Grand Slam level sponsor of the 2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation/sponsorship will pay for expenses of the run or movie programming. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff participates in the events. Our sponsors will be recognized in all our advertisement and banners. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt the Resolution approving the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2017-40 City of Monticello RESOLUTION NO. 2017-40 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY Stephanie Ellington Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital Foundation North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance Camping World All Elements Inc. DESCRIPTION VALUE Cash $75 Cash $225 Cash $200 Cash $297.50 Cash $297.50 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY PURPOSE/AMOUNT Stephanie Ellingson $75/Monticello Farmer's Market Allina Health System/Buffalo Hospital $225/Monticello Farmer's Market Foundation North Risk Partners/Apollo Insurance $200/2017 Mississippi Rampage Tournament Camping World $297.50/Movie in the Park All Elements Inc. $297.50/Movie in the Park Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 24th day of July, 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 7/24/17 2E. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation bonds, series 2017A (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The attached resolution authorizes the mayor and city administrator to approve the sale of $5,000,000 in bonds with a true interest cost not to exceed 3.5%. The bond issue proceeds will finance improvements related to the 2017 street reconstruction and utility projects throughout the city and Fallon Avenue overpass. The city has passed reimbursement resolutions for expenditures made in advance of the debt issuance. Further, the city is issuing debt to cash flow engineering and other street reconstruction costs until the next bond issue --anticipated for 2018. Debt service payments will be made with a mix of property taxes and a special assessment. The first interest payment is due June 15, 2018 and the first principal (plus interest) payment is due December 15, 2018. The 2018 draft budget includes debt service on this issue. Total annual debt service is estimated at $480,000 for the 2017 bonds. This debt issue maximizes the $5 million small -issuer exception for debt issued by the city in 2017. The small -issuer exception allows the city avoid costly future arbitrage rebate calculations associated with spend down requirement timelines. The city has secured the services of a pricing opinion provider to assess the competiveness of this negotiated bond sale. The approximate $2,000 cost of this service will be rolled into the bond issue. Al. Budget Impact: Detailed above. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Internal coordination of issuance - otherwise little to no impact on the staff. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS Motion to adopt Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2017A. Motion to deny Resolution 2017-44 approving the issuance of general obligation street reconstruction and improvement bonds, series 2017A. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City staff supports Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2017-44 B. Debt Calendar CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A ISSUER: City of Monticello, Minnesota BODY: City Council KIND, DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING: A regular meeting held on Monday, July 24, 2017, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Offices MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Documents Attached: Extract of Minutes of said meeting. RESOLUTION 2017-44 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such recording officer on July 24, 2017. City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, STATE OF MINNESOTA HELD: Monday, July 24, 2017 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Monticello, State of Minnesota, was duly held on Monday, July 24, 2017 at 6:30 p.m. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (herein, the "City"), as follows: The City Council hereby finds and declares that it is necessary and expedient for the City to sell and issue its fully registered general obligation bonds in the total aggregate principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 (herein, the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance infrastructure improvements and associated street improvements and the costs of issuing the Bonds. 2. The City Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation with Northland Securities, Inc. (herein, "NSI"). NSI will purchase the Bonds in an arm's- length commercial transaction with the City. 3. The Mayor and City Administrator are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $5,000,000 and to execute a bond purchase agreement for the purchase of the Bonds with NSI, provided the true interest cost is less than 3.50%. 4. Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Mayor and the City Administrator, the City Council will take action at its next regularly scheduled or special meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 5. NSI is authorized to prepare an Official Statement related to the sale of the Bonds. 6. If the Mayor and the City Administrator have not approved the sale of the bonds to NSI and executed the related bond purchase agreement by December 31, 2017, this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF EVENTS The following checklist of items denotes each milestone activity as well as the members of the finance team who will have the responsibility to complete it. Please note this proposed timetable assumes regularly scheduled City Council meetings. june2017 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat July 201 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Mon Tue Wed 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 August 2017 28 29 30 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Authorizing Resolution Adopted - 6:30 p.m. City Council Action, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 July 201 7 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat mtember 2fi Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 mtember 2fi Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Tax Abatement Approval Hearing City Council Action July 17th Trigger Resolution Sent to City for Council Packets Northland, Bond 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Date Action Responsible Party May 22 Call Public Hearing for Tax Abatement City Council Action May 27 -June 15th Publication of Notice of Public Hearing on Tax City Abatement June 26th Tax Abatement Approval Hearing City Council Action July 17th Trigger Resolution Sent to City for Council Packets Northland, Bond Finance Plan Sent to the City Counsel July 241h Trigger Resolution for Bonds Adopted City Council Action, Northland, Bond Counsel August 17th Preliminary Official Statement Sent to City for Sign Off Northland, City and to Rating Agency Week of August Rating Conference Call Northland, City, 28th Rating Agency September 14th Rating Received Rating Agency, City, Northland September 21St Bond Pricing Northland, City Bond Purchase Contract Signed September 25th Authorizing Resolution Adopted - 6:30 p.m. City Council Action, Northland, Bond Counsel October 24th Closing on the Bonds (Proceeds available) Northland, City Staff, Bond Counsel NORTHLAND ,-%r, SECURITIES 2F. City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 Consideration to approve an amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development, and Development Stage PUD Review of a multi -tenant commercial building in a B-3, Highwav Business District. Applicant: Larson, Andv/Crown Bav (NAC) Property: 110 Chelsea Road Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition Planning Case Number: 2017-021 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Project Description. Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development and Development Stage PUD approval that would accommodate the development of a 4,942 square foot multiple tenant retail building in the B-3 District. August 4th, 2017 Places to Shop (Comprehensive Plan) B-3, Highway Business District Vacant Mixed Use — Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel Commercial Lodging Multi -tenant Commercial Retail Convenience Retail/Motor Fuel PUD Development Stage - Site Plan Review Proposed Use. The applicants propose a mix of commercial tenants, including retail sales and services as allowed by the B-3 Zoning District, with the specific request that commercial office uses (allowed by Conditional Use Permit in the B-3) would be included in the initial approval. Commercial and professional office uses are compatible City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 with the proposed B-3 retail activities, and are present in other parts of the Travel Center complex. Parking requirements are similar, and no conflicts are foreseen. For other potential tenants, the applicants will be required to comply with the City's change of use permitting as tenants change over time, to ensure zoning compliance and compatibility. PUD Flexibilitv. The project proposes to utilize PUD flexibility to accommodate the need for cross -parking and access with adjacent uses, and potentially, for signage identification (discussed further below). Lot Size. The B-3 District provides for no specific minimum lot size, but requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet on a public street. The subject property is .75 acres in area, 32,723 square feet. The parcel has approximately 114 feet of frontage on Oakwood Drive, and 136 feet of frontage on Cedar Street. Site and Building Data. The proposed building is about 4,942 square feet in size. The applicants indicate that after development, about 87% of the lot area will covered with building or pavement, leaving 13% pervious green space. The site layout relies on access from a common driveway shared with the Holiday Station to the west with access from Oakwood Drive, and another common driveway shared with the retail center to the south, with access from Cedar Street. A service drive would also provide access from Cedar Street for delivery vehicles. The applicants show a trash enclosure adjacent to the south wall of the building with access from the south driveway. Parking bays are arrayed along the north and west side of the building, utilizing the west driveway access. Off -Street Parking. Parking supply for the site is proposed at 28 parking spaces. The requirement for commercial retail use is one space per 200 square feet, resulting in a parking standard of a minimum of 25 spaces. The site complies with this standard, provided no eating establishments are tenants of the facility. Because the facility is included in a shared/cross parking arrangement with the retail portion of the Travel Center to the south, the applicants could potentially request a future amendment that includes an eating establishment where parking supply could be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. As such, changes to the tenant mix that propose eating establishments would require a change of use permit, and possibly a PUD amendment. Landscaping. A variety of planting have been proposed on the site, including plantings along the perimeter of the site, within off-street parking areas and around the perimeter of the building. In regard to site landscaping, the following comments are offered. Caliper Inch Requirements. According to the Ordinance, 10 caliper inches (ACI) of tree planting (including at least one evergreen) must be provided for each acre of site area, plus 2 shrubs per 10 feet of building perimeter. Thus, the landscaping W City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 requirement for the .75 acre site would be 8 caliper inches of trees, and a total of 58 shrubs for the 288 feet of building perimeter. The landscaping plan shows 17.5 caliper inches of trees, plus one evergreen tree, along with 49 shrubs and 9 additional perennial grasses, meeting the requirement. Ground Cover. As noted, about 13% of the site is green space, including the planting areas with rock mulch, and lawn grass. The applicants have not noted whether the landscaped areas will be irrigated, although that would be recommended, given the materials and small areas. Buffer Yards. No bufferyards are required with all adjoining property zoned and guided for commercial uses. Building Size, Finish Materials. The proposed building is 90 feet in length by 54 feet in depth, with 2-3 separate retail tenant bays shown on the preliminary floor plan. The building elevations show a stepped parapet -edged building wall height of up to 28 feet (although the drawings appear to scale to 24 feet). Building materials include rock -faced concrete block along the base, below dominant glass windows on the front (north), as well as the west and east sides. The windows are divided by brick veneer pillars, with the upper portions of the fagade covered with stucco -finish EIFS. Primary entrances also include horizontal awnings. All materials are consistent with the requirements of the zoning ordinance for commercial structures. The south face (service side) of the building is rock -faced concrete block, with EIFS along the upper parapet. The drawings show that the trash enclosure will be constructed of matching block. Trash/Recvclin2. As noted, the applicant has proposed a trash handling enclosure adjacent to the south wall of the building which would be accessed from the driveway separating the proposed building and the adjacent retail building. Whtim A separate site lighting plan is included in the plan set. Building elevations indicate wall -mounted lighting on the brick pillars, and the site plan shows three 20 foot tall poles around the site to light the parking lot. The photometric shows compliance with the code requirements for light intensity at the perimeter. The applicants should verify that the light fixtures will be hooded or directed to cast light downward, and will not glare on adjacent property or the public streets. The lighting plan appears to be compliant with the applicable codes. Sianaae. Wall signs are proposed on all four walls of the building identifying the tenants. Based on 15% of the building walls facing the two streets, the applicants are permitted up to 465 square feet of wall signage. The plans show this amount. The applicants also City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 propose a monument sign near the main entrance from Oakwood Drive. For such signs, the code allows up to 100 square feet of sign area. The proposed plans identify this standard in a note, but the illustrated sign is approximately 46 square feet in area, and just under 10 feet in height. The plans show a rock -faced block base matching the building materials. The developer may choose to construct a compliant sign up to 100 square feet by sign permit at a later date without a PUD modification. In addition, under the original Planned Unit Development approval for this development, the adjoining property owner to the south retains a private easement right and approval to construct a 57 -foot tall pylon sign in the southeast corner of the site. The applicant has suggested that they may attempt to negotiate the termination of this easement in exchange for other Travel Center identification on the proposed monument sign. This would be consistent with the intent of the PUD treatment of the site. Grading and Utilities. The submitted grading and utility plans should be subject to review comment by the City Engineer. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed this item and held a public hearing on the amendment to CUP and Development Stage PUD on July 11th, 2017. Property owner Robert Lamont addressed the Commission regarding the proposed project. The Commission confirmed with Mr. Lamont that no drive-through facilities are proposed for the current project. Mr. Lamont confirmed that there are no drive-throughs proposed. Adjacent property owner Dan Mielke also addressed the Commission regarding the item. Mr. Mielke noted that there are existing cross easements within the original PUD which run with the land and govern the north/south and east/west access through the site and PUD. Mr. Lamont confirmed the easement for access remains in place. After discussion, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit. Final Stage PUD Application Following the City Council's decision on the Development Stage PUD, the applicant will be required to submit a Final Stage PUD application and plans meeting all conditions Development Stage approval. The Final Stage PUD will then be considered by the City Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS 2 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 The Planning Commission unanimously recommends Alternative #1 below for Development Stage PUD. 1. Motion to approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development PUD, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2017-017, and contingent on compliance with the conditions listed in Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny an amendment to Conditional Use Permit for Development and PUD, based on findings identified by the City Council 3. Motion to table action. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Alternative 1, approval of the CUP/PUD. The project is, with only minor notes, fully compliant with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for B-3 development. Moreover, it is consistent with the initial expectations of the original PUD approvals granted in 2005. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution PC -2017-017 B. Subject Site Aerial Image C. Applicant Narrative D. Applicant Plan Submittal, including: a. Title Sheet b. Certificate of Survey C. General Notes & Specifications d. Standard Details e. Grading Plan f. SWPPP g. Paving Plan h. Landscaping Plan i. Site Plan and Floor Plan j. Elevations k. Site Photometric Plan 1. Stormwater & Drainage Calculations, digital only E. City Engineer's Letter, dated 7/5/17 Z. Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda — 7/24/17 EXHIBIT Z Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development And PUD Development Stage Site Plan Review Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center Conditions of Approval 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B-3 District). 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. 3. Verification of executed cross -parking and access agreements within the Travel Center PUD. 4. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. 5. Compliance with comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated June 5th, 2017. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. 7. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. Con CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CROWN BAY, LLC LOT 6, BLOCK 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER 2nd ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to develop its property along Oakwood Drive and Cedar Street, Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is consistent with the original intent for the Monticello Travel Center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 11, 2017 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by constructing a proposed building for commercial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a commercial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels with cross access and parking, as well as joint signage, are consistent with the intent of the City's CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the original approved PUD plans. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the Monticello City Council approves the Development Stage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Proposed Tenants include those listed in the B-3 District as Permitted Uses, in addition to commercial and/or professional office space (a Conditional Use in the B- 3 District). 2. The applicants complete Change of Use process requirements as tenants change to verify continued compliance with zoning requirements. 3. Verification of executed cross -parking and access agreements within the Travel Center PUD. 4. Verification that lighting fixtures meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance as specified in this report. 5. Compliance with comments from the City Engineer in the Engineer's letter dated June 5th, 2017. 6. Payment of required development charges and submission of required landscaping security. 7. Other comments of the Planning Commission and Staff provided at the Public Hearing. ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 2016, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION LO -5 K Brad Fyle, Chair CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-017 Angela Schumann, Community Development Director Larson Building, Inc. -Request for Amdt. to Conditional Use Permit for Devel. Stage PUD Created by: City of Monticello Lot 6, Block 1 Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition 1155-202-001060 & 155-202-001061 June 5, 2017 To: Community Development Director, City of Monticello, MN To Whom It May Concern: Crown Bay LLC, fee title property owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition, petitions on behalf of Crown Bay LLC, for a CUP/PUD Development Stage Amendment. A CUP for a development stage PUD was previously granted by order on November 28th, 2005. It allowed for a drive-in convenience food establishment, motor fuel station/convenience store, car wash, joint parking and drives, open and outdoor storage and a retail commercial development on Lots 6 and 7, Block 1, Monticello Travel Center 2nd Addition. Lot 7 was developed, Lot 6 was not. This petition seeks to revitalize with amendment the earlier granted CUP/PUD for Lot 6. Though there are changes to the commercial development of Lot 6, such as building type, building design, and site layout, it still fully meets the criteria required to grant a CUP as set out by City code. Numerous site constraints have been overcome, limiting the request for PUD flexibility to one instance; a setback encroachment at the southeast building corner. The proposed 4,942 sq.ft. retail/commercial building is located in an existing 133- Highway Business zoning district and has two to three tenant spaces serving primarily "permitted" B3 uses. One possible exception is the "conditional" B3 use - office. Office use allowance exists in the adjoining development and is specifically requested in this petition. Any other conditional use will be by separate application. The excess on-site parking and the seven additional owner/tenant parking spaces available in the south Holiday lot gives flexibility for uses requiring additional parking. No tenants are secured at this time. Construction will begin in September or October 2017. Certain City Development Fees apply to the PUD (including those for SAC, WAC, Trunk Sanitary and Trunk Water). Submittal documents establish that CUP Approval criteria are met or exceeded. The proposed use is consistent with surrounding uses. The building's 3 -front design, material use, limited size and site placement complements and enhances the current and future adjoining development types and property values. The building is specifically sized and located to maintain visibility to the neighboring building to the south. (Jimmy John's). Future area development will likely consist of the same type of uses. The use provides improvement to the health, safety and welfare of persons, replacing the detrimental issues of the now vacant parcel with code -compliant features_ Existing utilities and roads are of current design; able to accommodate the use. The use meets or exceeds City code requirements. The use will not result in any nuisance nor impact natural features. The use adheres to criteria of Chapter 5 of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Thank You. Robert LaMont, Chief Manager, Crown Bay, LLC CROWN BAY RETAIL BUILDING PUD DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN - JUNE 5, 2017 Atti0 Mini 8 nrage Rr SU Alrrience u •r r r� e r 1 } R IMMN. ✓ R y� ti •, : Y. V CID!! r - 1 Jimmy John's ,R staurants ` • �f a AERIAL ,; 110 OAKWOOD AVE E 14 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 4 YSt nticello Country Club WB A� 7Monticello olf Course Rd GaffCourse Rd Gat Course Ry%6w3,d�fY�3 0 Monticello a �' aCammomtyeemer i 4 £E 7v 41 0 Moon Motoreport6 m CibFaod,il Si" YlY yt � v o 994 O�systatianst9res A 2�vndas Rd DuW.d Rd Dundas Rd u nde°Rd 0 0 s ReA River.. Entre eQ mead Dr o v' Aoo ichaeis m 3 AFI rl ng&Deeign R m �� -,gee shddla,dm� MAP DRAWING INDEX T1 TITLE SHEET SH 1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CIVIL C1 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS C2 STANDARD DETAILS C3 GRADING PLAN C4 SWPPP — NOTES C5 SWPPP — STANDARD DETAILS C6 SWPPP — PLAN VIEW C7 PAVING PLAN CL1 LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL Al SITE PLAN & FLOOR PLAN A2 ELEVATIONS ELECTRICAL E1.1 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN CONTACTS OWNER CROWN BAY LLC 2435 BARTON AVE NW BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.682.3790 CONTACT. ROBERT LAMONT GENERAL CONTRACTOR LARSON BUILDING, INC. 200 1ST STREET SOUTH BUFFALO, MN 55313 P H . 763.688.5430 CONTACT. ANDY LARSON ARCHITECT STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE 15001 140TH ST FORESTON, MN 56330 PH. 612.508.8099 CONTACT. ERIK JOHNSON CIVIL SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN 18 SOUTH RIVERSIDE AVENUE SUITE 230 SARTELL, MN 56377 P H . 320.339.0669 CONTACT. BRIAN SCHULTZ ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com 11 CARSON BUILDf NG No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL z O No. Date Issue Notes U I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision (� and that I am a duly Licensed Z Architect under the laws of the State O of Minnesota. U Signature O H O ZArchitect Erik P. Johnson T / \� /� Registration L1 J 0 50962 Date 0 JUNE 5, 2017 z Project Title CROWN BAY w RETAIL BUILDING C� Q Project ID 1020 z w Sheet Title J TITLE SHEET Ill / Sheet No. w Q D LEGEND • Found Iron Monument A Found Mag Nail ® Found Chiseled X O Set Iron Monument #41226 ID Water Gate Valve 1711 Sign ® Storm Sewer Manhole ❑ Pedestal ® Curb Stop 0 Light Pole � Fire Hydrant ❑ Catch Basin 0 Sanitary Sewer Manhole X Spot Elevation A Set Mag Nail UTILITY PIPE LEGEND (Pipe Size Type) Denotes "per city plans or record drawing" Existing Storm Sewer Existing Sanitary Sewer w Existing Watermain Electric Transformer--- 959.0 (Flow Line) At 375 SPRUCE AVENUE NORTH IIIII.- WEBB P.O. BOX 323 SURVEYING LLC MAPLE LAKE, MN 55358 1 763-898-9999 959.9 111 Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- RIM = 956.28 CER TIFICA TE OF S UR VE Y Catch Basin ,---Concrete Curb RIM = 955.90 .---Storm Sewer Manhole 956.0 RIM = 955.78 �r 956.1 r\ Coo 956.7 r\ Hefei \ \ 956.8 s�ao J a \� 956.8 Storm Sewer Manholer-- \J 00 RIM = 956.19 a \J 956.8 956.8 17, T_ ---Benchmark \ ' 1 ; / f (See Note 2) 956.7 \ \ 956.0 J \ r \ ' -' 957.2 \ \ 56.2 \ J \ J 956.6 \ ;' Concrete Curb \ J \ \° J \ 67.0' 956.6 956.9 \ I \ 956.1 C \ / r 000~e 956.3 Catch Basin \ r \ 56.2(Flow Line) 111, r Holiday Gas Station Sign RIM = 956.00 INV = 953.07 956.N Seo \ i� r 0, \ / kf n / 56.1 \ \ I \J X 56.5 r \J 957.3 70 etes�ae 6.6 G6y ti�1 r, 956.4 _ 5u6 I \J Sanitary Sewer Manhole Edge of Concrete--, oroC 956.7 O r Q \ \J RIM = 957.26 J C X., QG2� C1O1 /� r INV NW,SE = 942.26 �L n /dray -.,956.2 \ 57.1 956.6 \ \ \\ INV S = 944.26 Concrete Curb (6612) u5 \ 56.8 \ro , \ % 957.6 %��tum �. •• Storm wer b r V AJ �; .91 (15 HD r \ X956.3 / �, .,,6 , 957.6 I J \J !y 957.2 y►e�n ` tch Basin- \' \ cc 957.2 RIM = 9566 90 �8�5�� O `` INV =X53.25 Q ', O \ S 1 °0509 \ 956.8 i i 1 57.4 -7 957.2 i X 0.42 \ i� i J X 1 X 3/ \ 2�� \ oc957.5 �t v 957.5 �g 95 Vii /' ` \ ° O / X Oma\ �Sljo fest ^ \ \J \ r, i���` b� /� �, X i ID 958.4 6 S` V ao I J ❑ pQ O i •, C 7 957.2 t 6'. r \ U" -Concrete urb 6618 J and �sement 6� V A ;' ) \ 957.3 0 �7 i3 / ��' j perplat� �� V V J G° .' L56 957.1 / ^ J u ( Y ` \ \ •�. ••••'• /� �\ I 56.9 r \ 957.5 57.7 n /, / X958.7 F r / \' \� 9a. \ \ I sr \ o Lea�zn--' X Q 957.7 �� y 957.9 i ��X958.2 / 59.0 �, \. X958.7 \ r p� Catch Basin / X,_ / �, / u',. I\ 57.0(Flow Line) 957.9 / %� / \ `` \F`' • - Telephone RIM = 957.31 >( 958.6 ui�• ' •• p ^ \ \ 57.2 ` RIM Storm 957.61 Sewer Manhole <- 7.4 CO 958.3 �� 1 30' Front Setback- �� \9�'•. Manhole \ r < 958.0 ' / dge of Bitumi per Alta Survey X y INV 951.73 / / 957.6 nous ,� X \ ( ' I --Catch Basin Edge of Gravel/Dirt = 958.8 < � /' 9 / 959.2 \ UndQro�nd as pe s\. `' RIM = 957.43 958.9 J( gop qr one ma X ` ---Underground Fi er Optic a 957.9 a i X958.5 -1856 _ - - - I 9�58.� / per gopher on marks r 957.5 o r 10' Setback ` 958.8 ( \ Drainarid ljtility Easement ^ 957.3 _ _ er plat X ^ 958.2 / L - - - - Gravel/Dirt Area 20' Side Setback ....... I : X I 57.5 r i ¢-- per Alta Survey 585t \�� i O I I 958 6 /' r'r )( Drainage and Utility Easement vacated -----• -••,;, 1 I ti ? /� 959.2 �b "' Catch asin rr / 959.3 ® per City Resolution No. 2017-15 / �� h� X RIM 957.43 r 958. r / .,/ I 958 INV - 954.08 X 957.8 X959.2! C �/ X958.8 957.6 ^ r Storm Sewer Manhole r�58.3 / 959.9 n; / // )59.2 / roGirO 59.7 �� X LOT 6 �i Bituminous ce Imo: :� TDS Teleco 57 g - f RIM = 958.07 X �Ia �: Duct per go her �° J INV NE = 952.24 r _ one mark iI •0 i / ^ VN\V \ SW W=952.31Underground Electric Edge of Bitumino per gopher one marks wo �///958.5 096 ^�` 9589Line V \ r 6 Ir�tric Sin 960.4 �� _ _ ` _ _ - _ _ _ _ - / �° 8S6- - - �/V o ` / rf g X a�� \ \ /j Edge of Gravel/Dirt-' 960.5 / •� 958.5 X \ , )"-storm Sewer Manhole Q / 958.9 ', 99 Conc�te Curb (B618)--' .1 _ ��. 959. r � � X _ '\XI � I ,-c ,.,. I •,. X °� / 958.3 / v���• � RIM = 957.95 Bituminou Curb 960.3 X X9.0- 1 r 1 1 1 1 ; 1 \� ♦ o " %' ^ G 958. T 960.7 '\ - /' -1 _- T`/-1 T t 1`� T 11h: 1, N2.3�7 /• 1J°' (~r= ��i^��\��1 1 r ` x961.2\/ \•,, 9601X /'�; 9 7 ?9.. 959.2'` 1 ter- `/ r 96 °--Underground Telephone "�I / IM: I ^) �� 1 X 961.1 1 per gopher one marks li/ �: ^ QX 961.1 961.2 / / -I / I;�: \ I 8. X \ ReaSeitSack - - _ J ^ \ �� %� Z. 959.7 X960.5 I 959.5 per Alta Survey 960.3 - X X959.9 X / 960.0 I i h * I 58.4 960.0 \ ... Drainageand UtilityEasement \����� 960.6 960.8 / / \\ X9597/ O 9Q0. ` per plat 959.5 \ X � / S 83%21'22"� \ I \ ' I ' ` iyn Easement per Doc N%.,'(157614 / /19.69 E \ 960.0 959.3 59.8 60.226.10 X / / X j ro / 958 / ¢� 959.0 15.00 ! 957. X( 7 : lb<n ° 58.5 $ %o \ \� 957.1 O i A. 60.5 ?3'�2„ \ 4 Us Roaaw \ %! /x'5.3 G 958.8 ,,, \ X 2°3 ' W: • F' ay \ �,` /, 3 ' X9 6 - 'G 958.9 Par 14j-�t \ `� t. \� f i / X 960.4 kih8 43.096 Edge fB1turn no+�X\ / d e o •• ms`s ;• :Stalls : ' ; ' � � \ � ,••Water Service 959.8 959.6 �'�, ; � N 62°38'15"�W 10.10' "--' �^ per city plans � , 960.2 , ✓ rn 1 ; I958 8 Z, X c ^ , 56 8 59 � \ 1 / 59.6 ,,.. c° '-N.62° 8'15" W 21.50' '1_ _ - I 960.1 / 58 8 i r j t If' N62�\-- N 27%23'54" ; 13.09,; ' Electric � I �_- ` 8'7S,\ er _____________s N 26° 8" E ^ Sanitary Sewer F Trans former 959.6 /� $ s2a38, 11r4 j 8°7 I / / I city ty marks Service r rt9gUitan X 59.1 9 Underground Electric - 58.8 9 4 V° I / I 958.7 Concrete Curb---' per gopher one>.�arks / R•8 97 ^ / I •c 24" Surmountable Curb-- 9 .Q \\ Q• X Sanitary Sewer Manhole -- / a 58'9 ® RIM = 959.62-- 959 2 'Edge o W %> > �> 59.0(Flow Line) / Concrete Curb- -I / (6618)/X959.3 // I �/ 958.9 / / 1 / 1 / Sanitary Sewer Manhole RIM = 959.41 ^ / INV N = 945.11 I ,---Catch Basin RIM = 958.95 /Catch Basin - RIM = 958.97 Storm Sewer Manhole--:� RIM = 959.41 ` RCpJ Storm Sewer Manhole INV = 953.24 / RIM = 959.16 CLIENT: Andy Larson Larson Building, Inc. 3 Hwy 55 West Buffalo, MN 55313 PROJECT LOCATION: 110 Oakwood Ave E Monticello, MN 55362 PID NI 155202001060 & 155202001061 ch Basin I = 957.61 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C�` f"- `•UJB' Date: 01/31/17 Charles E. Webb, Jr. License No. 41226 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Lot 6 and 7, Block 1, MONTICELLO TRAVEL CENTER SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. NOTES: 1) The legal description as shown hereon was obtained from Title Commitment File No. NCS-808341-MPLS issued by as a proform by First American Title Insurance Company . The review and depiction of any easements other than the platted easements and sign easement was not within the scope of this survey. 2) Benchmark: Top nut of fire hydrant located on the northeasterly side of Oakwood Drive East as shown hereon. Elevation= 959.37 feet (NGVD 1988 datum) 3) Area: 32723 SgFt 0.8 Acres 4) Location of utilities existing on or serving the surveyed property as determined by observed evidence and markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources (are shown hereon), subject to the following restrictions: A. Utility operations do not consistently respond to locate requests through the Gopher State One Call service for boundary purposes such as this. B. EXTREME CAUTION MUST BE EXERCISED BEFORE AN EXCAVATION TAKES PLACE ON OR NEAR THIS SITE. BEFORE DIGGING, YOU ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE AT (651) 454-0002. C. The exact location of underground features cannot be accurately depicted without excavation or "potholing". D. Per Gopher State One -Call Ticket No. 170300505, the following utilities and municipalities were notified: TDS TELECOM 763-295-2301 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 800-778-9140 CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET 763-314-0113 CENTER POINT ENERGY 608-223-2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 651-366-5750 NORTHERN NATURAL GAS 651-674-4488 TDS METROCOM 218-821-7672 XCEL ENERGY 800-848-7558 A Drawn by: TTH REVISIONS Checked by: CEW Jr. INO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION 1 05/08/17 TTH Added City Resolution I I I I 19zefflgro etelur3a]=rl1z11bi SHEET: 1 OF 1 STANDARDS AND REFERENCES Materials and construction methods specified in the plans reference the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction. The Contractor shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and review the specification sections applicable to the plans. It is mandatory that the Contractor be knowledgable of the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with the applicable specification sections. Contractor shall refer to the geotechnical report for additional requirements and recommendations. EARTHWORK NOTES PROTECTION 1) The Contractor shall maintain all benchmarks, monuments and other reference points. If any are disturbed or destroyed, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2). The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any unknown functioning underground utilities are discovered during the course of the project, which may interfere with construction. The Contractor shall wait for instructions before proceeding. 3) The Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to functioning underground or overhead utility lines. Damaged utilities shall be repaired immediately and service restored at no additional cost to the Owner. 4) The Contractor shall provide barricades, shoring and other safety measures required by OSHA. 5) The Contractor shall protect all adjacent existing facilities from damage, including, but not limited to settlement due to excavations, erosion, etc. The Contractor shall be responsible for the repair of such damages. PROJECT CONDITIONS 1) The Contractor shall become familiar with the project site, and compare actual conditions in the field with those shown on the project drawings. The Contractor shall contact the Engineer immediately if any inconsistencies are found between the existing conditions and the project drawings. 2) No extra compensation will be allowed due to unusual conditions which could have reasonably been determined or anticipated by examination of the project site and project drawings. PLAN GRADES 1) Elevations shown on the project drawings are finished grade elevations, unless noted otherwise. Elevations not specifically indicated shall be determined by interpolation of uniform slope between spot elevations and/or contours, or between such points and existing elevations. Adequate slope shall be constructed to provide positive drainage away from structures. 2) If inconsistencies exist on the plans between contours and spot elevations, the spot elevations shall govern. TOPSOIL 1) Adequate imported and/or stockpiled salvageable topsoil shall be utilized for this project. 2) Topsoil shall be free of clay lumps, roots, brush, large stones, and debris, and shall have a minimum organic content of 5 percent. 3) Remove topsoil to its entire depth from areas, which are to be disturbed by new construction work. Existing lawn areas, which are not in the proposed construction area (s) shall remain in place. The Contractor shall field verify topsoil depths between any soil borings, and remove to greater depths than indicated in the soils report if such conditions are encountered. Salvaged topsoil shall be maintained in stockpiles. 4) Stockpiled topsoil shall only be used for finish grading of new lawn areas. Excess topsoil shall be removed from the site by the Contractor. 5) Protect all existing lawn areas, plantings, and other landscaping to remain in place. Any damaged areas shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. UNFORESEEN OBSTACLES 1) The Engineer shall be contacted immediately if any unforeseen major obstacles are encountered during excavation, such as abandoned wells, abandoned or functioning utilities, subsurface streams or rock, etc., which would add significant expense to the Contractor. 2) The Contractor shall still be responsible for completing all work required for this project where encountered conditions may be reasonably determined from a soils/geotechnical report and review of the project site and contract documents. DEWATERING 1) Surface drainage shall be provided during construction in a manner so as not to create a nuisance to adjacent areas. 2) All excavations shall be free of water during construction within the excavations. Dewatering shall be accomplished by pumping or trenching, and shall be conducted regardless of the cause, source, or nature of the water. 3) Berms, cofferdams, or piling shall be provided as necessary to protect excavations. 4) Excavations shall be sloped to drain, and necessary pumps, hoses and other equipment shall be provided to keep excavation free of water. 5) All temporary equipment used for dewatering shall be removed from the site when no longer necessary. FILLING AND GRADING 1) Rough grading of all areas within the construction limits, including adjacent transition areas shall be reasonably smooth and compacted. The rough graded subgrade surface generally shall not be more than 6 inches above or below the established subgrade elevations. All ditches, swales, and gutters shall be graded to drain adequately. The subgrade shall be evenly sloped to provide drainage away from building walls in all directions at a minimum slope of 1 %. The Contractor shall provide rounded transitions at top and bottom of banks and other breaks in grade. 2) Fill and backfill materials shall be inorganic soils free of roots, rocks, boulders, and debris. 3) Bedding material or granular backfill larger than 2" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 2 feet of new underground pipes. Material larger than 3" in its largest dimension shall not be allowed within 1 foot of subgrade elevation. 4) Imported compacted fill material shall have a maximum of 12 percent passing the #200 sieve, by weight. The proposed fill material shall be tested by an independent testing lab for suitability as compacted fill for this project. The Contractor shall pay for the testing services and provide a copy of the test results to the Engineer. 5) The Contractor shall fill and grade as necessary to bring surface to required elevations, and provide all materials necessary, whether obtained on or off the project site. 6) The Contractor shall place compacted material in uniform horizontal lifts not exceeding 8" in depth for clay soils, and 12" in depth for sandy soils, and compact as required to achieve specified density. 7) Compaction shall be obtained with the use of vibratory rollers or rammers. During compaction, fill material shall contain moisture content, as necessary, for the required compaction as indicated by an independent testing laboratory. The moisture shall be uniform throughout each lift. If the material is too dry, water shall be added with approved equipment and methods, which will not wash out fine material. If the material is too wet, it shall be dried by harrowing, disking, blading, or other approved methods recommended by the independent testing laboratory. 8) Areas designated for pavement in excavated (cut) areas shall be scarified to a depth of 1 foot. The Contractor shall bring the subgrade material to optimum moisture content as indicated by the independent testing laboratory, and compact the subgrade to the specified density listed below for soils underneath pavements. 9) The Contractor shall not place fill material when either the fill material, or the material on which it is to be placed, is frozen. Any soft or yielding areas appearing in the fill resulting from frost, rain, or any other reason whatsoever shall be scarified, removed, recompacted and/or otherwise rectified to the satisfaction of the Engineer before any new fill is placed. COMPACTION TESTS 1) Utility Trench Backfill: The Contractor's independent soils technician and approved testing laboratory shall perform in-place density and moisture tests at random depths in trench backfill at 100 foot intervals, or fraction thereof. Compaction of trenches shall be a minimum of 95% of the maximum dry density (as determined by the independent testing laboratory) in lawn areas, and at depths greater than 3 feet below areas designated for pavement. Compaction of trenches at depths within 3 feet of paved surfaces shall be a minimum of 100% of the maximum dry density. 2) Compacted Fill Under Pavements: Compaction tests shall not be required beneath new pavements. Adequate compaction of materials under pavements shall be determined by test rolling the subgrade, and checking for excessive rutting. Test rolling shall be performed as per MNDOT Spec. 2111. 3) Areas exhibiting a failed compaction test shall be re -compacted and re -m tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to acceptance of the project. 4) Copies of all compaction testing and test roll observation reports shall be provided to the Engineer. 5) Optimum moisture -density relationship will be determined by testing laboratory in accordance with ASTM D698 and maximum density determination made by Method D of ASTM D698 unless otherwise noted in these specifications. SUBGRADE PREPARATION 1) Finished subgrade elevations shall be as follows: a) Bituminous pavement: 9" below finish grade. b) Concrete sidewalk: 8" below finish grade (plus thickened edge). c) Lawn areas: 4" below finish grade. d) Planting areas: See Landscaping Plans/Details 2) The tolerance for areas to be paved shall not exceed 0.15 feet above or below plan subgrade. 3) The Contractor shall protect newly graded areas from erosion. Settlement or washing that occurs prior to acceptance of the Work shall be repaired and grades re-established. DISPOSAL OF EXCESS WASTE MATERIALS 1) The Contractor shall remove excess excavated material, debris, and waste materials, from the Owner's property and legally dispose of it in accordance with all governing codes. SPREADING TOPSOIL AND FINISH GRADING 1) Scarify subgrade to depth of 3" prior to placing topsoil. Spread topsoil evenly over complete subgrade as follows: a) Lawn Areas on Private Property: Spread 4" lightly compacted layer of topsoil. b) Lawn Areas in Public Right-of-way: Per City requirements c) Planting Areas: See Landscape Plan/Details 2) Finish grade accurately within 0.15 feet of finish grades shown on the project drawings, less the thickness of any sod where it is to be installed. Slope all grades away from buildings to provide positive drainage. 3) Prepare topsoil suitable to receive seed and/or sod. Grading of areas designated for topsoil shall be reasonably smooth and even, and in accordance with MNDOT Spec. 2105.3G and 2574.3A4. All debris and stones exceeding 3" in diameter shall be removed from the soil surface of these areas prior to seeding. Areas compacted by vehicles or storage of materials shall be plowed, disked and harrowed to match texture of other finish graded areas. 4) Grass seed shall be in accordance with MnDOT Spec. 3876, seed mix No. 25-131, applied at the rate of 220 pounds per acre or as indicated on the landscape plans. Mulch shall be applied and discanchored to all seeded areas and shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Spec. 3882, Type 3 or as otherwise indicated by the Engineer. UTILITY NOTES STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS 1) The following standard specifications shall apply to this project: a) Minnesota Plumbing Code - MN Rules Chapter 4714 (MN Dept. of Labor and Industry-MNDLI) b) Uniform Plumbing Code, latest edition (UPC) c) "What you need to know about utility service connections in the 2015 Minnesota Plumbing Code" http://www.dli.mn.gov/CCLD/PDF/pe_usc.pdf d) City Engineers Association of Minnesota (CEAM) Standard Specifications e) American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) f) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) g) American Water Works Association (AWWA) h) Minnesota Department of Transportation "Standard Specifications for Construction" (MN/DOT) 2) The Contractor shall comply with all local ordinances and codes 3) Certifications of all utility materials, as well as shop drawings, shall be submitted to the Engineer for review POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - SANITARY 1) Smooth walled polyvinyl chloride pipe and fittings shall consist of SDR 26 or SDR 35 pipe, unless noted otherwise, and meet the requirements of ASTM D3034 and Section 2621.2A5 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) All pipe and fittings shall be SDR 35 for depths of up to 20 feet, and SDR 26 for depths exceeding 20'. 3) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications. DUCTILE IRON (DIP) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Ductile iron pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A1 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.5 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. Stainless steel fasteners shall be prohibited. 3) 6" pipe shall be Class 52. 8" and larger pipe shall be Class 50. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (C900 PVC) PIPE AND FITTINGS - WATER 1) Polyvinyl chloride pressure pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 605.4 of the UPC, and Section 2611.3B of the CEAM Standard Specifications. GATE VALVES - WATER 1) Gate valves shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2C and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HYDRANTS - WATER 1) Hydrants shall meet the requirements of Sections 2611.2B and 2611.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Hydrants shall be Waterous WB67, or approved equal BLOCKING AND ANCHORING - WATER 1) Water main blocking and anchoring shall meet the requirements of Section 2611.3A4 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Provide thrust reaction blocking consisting of concrete with a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 2000 psi. 3) Place between undisturbed ground and the fitting to be anchored. Place thrust blocking so that the pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repair. 4) Mega -Lugs may be used in lieu of thrust block if allowed by local utility. WATER SERVICE PIPE AND CURB STOPS 1) Copper tubing for water services shall meet the requirements of Table 604.1 of the UPC, and Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) HDPE pressure pipe for water services shall meet the requirements of ASTM D2239, ASTM D2737, ASTM D3035, AWWA C901, CSA B137.1, and Section 2611.21D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Curb stops for water services Section 2611.2D of the CEAM Standard Specifications HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) HDPE pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM F2306, and Section 2621.2A8 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) Minimum wall thickness shall be 0.035 inches for 12 and 15 inch diameter pipe, and shall be 0.05 inches for 18 and 24 inch diameter pipe. 4) HDPE storm sewer crossing above and within 10 -ft of existing or proposed water main or services shall meet the following standards per the MN plumbing code: 4"- 10" Diameter: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" Diameter: ASTM F2306 Fittings: ASTM D3212 REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWER PIPE (RCP) AND FITTINGS - STORM 1) RCP pipe and fittings shall meet the requirements of ASTM C76, and Section 2621.2A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Pipe joints shall meet the requirements of Section 2621.3A3 of the CEAM Standard Specifications 3) The ASTM strength class of pipe shall be Class III unless otherwise shown on the Plans. 4) The pipe shall be drawn together by some approved method of jacking or winching. This pressure must be maintained until sufficient backfill is placed to keep the joint from opening. END SECTIONS - STORM 1) End sections shall be provided at all pipe inlets and outlets. 2) The end sections shall consist of material matching the material of the pipe, which it is being connected to. Materials and joints shall be as per the specifications described above for the applicable pipe material. 3) The last 3 joints of RCP shall be tied, and the end section shall the be provided with an approved trash guard. MANHOLES AND CATCH BASINS - SANITARY AND STORM 1) Unless otherwise noted, manhole and catch basin structures shall consist of precast concrete, and meet the requirements of Section 719.6 of the UPC (sanitary only), and Sections 2621.2C and 2621.3D of the CEAM Standard Specifications 2) Catch basins shall be provided with the following castings: a) Along curbline: 27" Structure: Neenah R -3075-L, 48" (or larger) Structure: Neenah R -3067-L b) Isolated (in paved area): Neenah R-2553 c) Isolated (in vegetated area): Neenah R -2560 -EA w/ type "C" grate 3) Manholes shall be provided with the following castings: a) Sanitary: Neenah R-1733 w/ concealed pick hole b) Storm: Neenah R-1733 lettered "STORM", center pick hole INSTALLATION 1) Unless otherwise noted, installation of all water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtenances shall be as per the CEAM Standard Specifications. TESTING REQUIREMENTS 1) Water and sewer pipe, fittings, and appurtances shall be inspected and tested as per Sections 2611.3E -2611.3H and 2621,3F -2621.3H of the CEAM Standard Specifications. 2) In the event of discrepancies between the testing requirements of the MN Plumbing Code and the CEAM Standard Specifications, the most stringent will govern. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTES STANDARDS 1) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, most recent edition. GRANULAR BASE COURSE 1) Compacted thickness of finished base course: 6' 2) Process material for aggregate base shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3138, Class 5.. 3) The subgrade shall be tested and observed to the satisfaction of the Engineer prior to placement of aggregate base material. Install base material as required to accommodate new plan grades. 4) Wet base material to approximate optimum moisture content either prior to delivery to job site or as soon as practical after being placed on subgrade. 5) Place in layers not exceeding 4" thickness (loose). 6) Compact with pneumatic or vibrating steel drum rollers. 7) After base course has been graded and compacted, thoroughly wet and slush roll with roller until all aggregates are thoroughly embedded. 8) Allow base course to cure for a minimum of 72 hours prior to bituminous course application. BITUMINOUS BASE AND SURFACE COURSE 1) Mix Designation Numbers for the bituminous mixtures on this project are per MNDOT Spec. 2360 2) Pavement smoothness requirements will be waived for this project. 3) Density for the bituminous mixture on this project will be the ordinary compaction method (MNDOT 2360.6C). 4) Bituminous Base course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPNWB330B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. Bituminous Surface course shall conform to MnDOT 2360, Type SPWEA340B and shall be 1J inches thick after compaction. 5) Place no asphaltic mixture when the atmospheric temperature is below 45 degrees and falling, nor should pavement be placed under wet conditions. 6) Mixing a) Paving mixture: Uniform mixture of course aggregate, fine aggregate, mineral filler and asphaltic material. b) Grading and mixing: Conform to applicable sections of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction, Section 2360. CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1) Properly clean base course and deliver hot mix asphaltic concrete in clean tight vehicles with covers if necessary. 2) Lay to a smooth surface without segregation of material and attain compaction as early as possible. Commence rolling while the material is hot, (minimum spread temperature 250 degrees F.) as soon as it will support the roller without undue displacement or hairline cracking and continue until a minimum of 96% of maximum has been attained, no further compression can be attained and all roller marks are eliminated. 3) The completed surface: Smooth, free of pockets that will retain water and shall not vary more than 1/16" per foot nor more than 1/4" under a 16' straight edge. Entire surface must drain. No flat areas are permitted. 4) Perform all Work in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Minnesota Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. PAINTED LINES 1) Special marking paint compound especially for striping bituminous paving in one coat. 2) Manufacturers: Pratt & Lambert, Inc.; Sherwin Williams Co. or DuPont Co. 3) Colors: Use white paint for concrete and asphalt. 4) All surfaces to be painted must be thoroughly clean and dry. 5) Lay out painted lines with chalk on pavement in accordance with Project Drawings. 6) Accurately apply paint to the chalk marks, using striping machines, 4" wide stripes. 7) Apply paint in strict accordance with the manufacturer's directions. 8) Protect all paint from damage by traffic until dry. 9) Apply handicap logo at handicap stall. FIELD QUALITY CONTROL 1) Aggregate Base Testing: a) The granular base course shall be test rolled and observed by the Contractor's independent soils technician as per MNDOT 2211.3C2 (Quality Compaction Method). Once the base course has been tested to the satisfaction of the Engineer, pavement may be placed. b) One mechanical analysis (ASTM D-422) per 500 cubic yards of base or fraction thereof. 2) Bituminous Testing: a) Test temperature of first truck. b) Ordinary compaction (MNDOT 2360.6C) CONCRETE PAVEMENT, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK STANDARDS 1) ACI 318, ACI 315, CRSI, ACI 301, latest adoptions. 2) Minnesota Standard Specifications for Construction, most recent edition GRANULAR BASE COURSE MATERIAL 1) Compacted thickness of finished base: 6' - Concrete Pavement/Aprons 4" - Concrete Sidewalk 2) Base material shall consist of MNDOT 3149.262 Select Granular Borrow. AGGREGATES 1) Coarse: MnDOT Spec. 3137. 2) Fine: MnDOT Spec. 3126. WATER 1) Clean, fresh and potable, MnDOT Spec. 3906. AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES 1) ASTM C260. 2) Provide entrainment of 4 - 7 percent by volume. PORTLAND CEMENT 1) ASTM C 150, Type I plus an approved air entraining agent, or Type IA air -entraining Portland cement. OTHER ADMIXTURES 1) MnDOT Spec. 3113. 2) Calcium Chloride or materials containing chlorides or nitrates shall not be allowed. PROPORTIONING AND DESIGN OF MIXES 1) MnDOT Spec. 2461.3 2) Concrete Classifications a) Curb and gutter, slip -formed concrete: 3A22 b) Sidewalk, aprons, incidental concrete, manual curb & gutter: 3A32 c) Concrete pavements or aprons: 3Y43 d) Repair concrete, fast strength concrete: 3Y43 3) Concrete Specifications: a) 3A22: 1-2" slump, 3900 psi, 4-7% air b) 3A32: 2-3" slump, 3900 psi, 4-7% air c) 3Y43: 3-4" slump, 4300 psi, 4-7% air d) Temperatures of all concrete during placement shall be 50 -deg F to 90 -deg F CONCRETE PLACEMENT 1) Place concrete as soon as possible after mixing. Place before initial set has occurred, and in no event after it has contained its water content for more than one hour. 2) Avoid overworking concrete or allowing concrete to fall unrestricted for excessive vertical distances, and other situations which can cause segregation of the aggregates. 3) Concrete pavements shall be placed in accordance with applicable portions of MnDOT 2301. 4) Sidewalks shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2521. 5) Curb and gutter shall be placed in accordance with MnDOT 2531. PROTECTION 1) Provide adequate protection against rain, sleet and snow before and during placement and finishing of concrete. 2) Protect concrete from premature drying. Provide temporary covering as required. Keep concrete continuously moist for 7 days. 3) Treat concrete with membrane curing compound in accordance with MnDOT 2531.3G. COLD WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is below 40 degrees F., or when the concrete is likely to be subjected to freezing temperatures within 24 hours after it has been deposited unless adequate temporary heating is provided. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from freezing for the following 5 days. 3) No frozen materials may be used in the concrete. Chemicals may not be used to prevent freezing unless approved by the Engineer. 4) Perform all cold weather concreting in accord with ACI 306. HOT WEATHER CONCRETE 1) Do not place concrete when the atmospheric temperature is above 100 degrees F. 2) Maintain concrete temperature of 40 to 90 degrees F. for 3 days. Protect from temperatures over 90 degrees for the following 5 days. 3) Thoroughly wet dry porous surfaces before concreting. 4) Water reducing admixtures with retarding properties are required for all concrete placed when the temperature exceeds 80 degrees F. 5) Perform all hot weather concreting in accord with ACI 305. FINISHING 1) Provide a broomed finish on exterior sidewalks and ramps unless noted otherwise. QUALITY CONTROL 1) The Contractor shall hire an independent testing firm to provide the following tests: a) The independent testing technician shall perform random field testing of the fresh concrete including slump, air content, and temperature. (ASTM C143, C173, C231 and C138). One series of the aforementioned tests shall be performed on the first load of concrete. b) The independent testing technician shall cast a set of four compression test cylinders for the first load of concrete as well as 1 set for every 100 cubic yards, or fraction thereof, of concrete thereafter. Compression tests shall be performed on one test cylinder at 7 days and two test cylinders at 28 days. The fourth test cylinder shall be retained in the event of failing compression tests on the 28 -day test cylinders. GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS Z 0Z D J02 Z O F - w U LU 0 cn U O N W U) O M J U c O O Z a N N N U U N N F 0 Q = N W F-- c/) Q F-- O N w0 U W O W J Ln(/ �C N (1) `t }- "- N O 0 00 w J 0 � QU W r/ o Z Q O O o0 Ln U O N? U 0 010 O 0 N Q CL N O m v (0 00 O Z or" i I N CY) CO > I..L Z (y) (0 c @) LLJ CD C f 2 w _ WQ_LLJ co CO N Z LL -c ' ^ v Q U O Z C W UJ N~ W Ax W 2 Q N V J N� > Z 1 -c O \ 0 N - \` O C0N � W W Z 0Z D J02 Z O F - w U LU 0 cn w J_ Z O o V) W F-- c/) Q F-- w0 LU O W Q Q:� Z N (1) `t V Z 0 J_ W F-- c/) Q F-- w0 LU W Q > Q Z ZZ Z 0 00 J 0 � QU W r/ Z U o0 3 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 a) Q U7 O N O r - Cl OF 7 USE NEENAH R -1642—A FOR LOW PROFILE APPLICATIONS USE NEENAH R1755—G FOR WATERTIGHT APPLICATIONS LETTERING TO READ: SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER OR WATER MAIN WHICH EVER IS APPLICABLE. KIPP'MAH R-1642 WITH 3 SOLID LID JE BEARING OR CONCEALED PICKHOLES (2) " EAT OPPOSITE SI EXCEPT FOR LETTERI 25 3/4 " CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BEARIN SURFACE 7 TO BE MACHINED 2521.3C2 COVER 24- 28 1/2 " 36" FRAME I Isle: Standard Frame andard Plate Library and Cover City of Monticello 03-05 Date: Plate No. Revised: 1002 03-15 I I A D A CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX O NEENAH NO. R -3067-V I I 4" CONCRETE COLLAR ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE IN CONCRETE COLLAR USE CONCRETE CURB MIX FOR COLLAR 35 1/4 43" ALL STORM SEWER CASTING ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED 0.10' BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION (SEE DETAIL 5003) i' '\ 24" k FINISH - GRADE 31" 2" 5" 3'- 6" 34" 4" MIN. 4" MIN. ' 4" CONCRETE COLLAR NOTES: SECTION A—A POUR A 3" TO 4" CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND RINGS EXTENDING FROM THE CASTING TO THE PRECAST SECTION CATCH BASINS LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE TYPE MnDOT DESIGN H. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Standard Catch Basin Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 -15 4002 0 TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE rTHE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) _�_A OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.2F GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello I Isle: Typical Trench Compaction and Class B Bedding Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-15 1007 A 35-1/4" 43" / t i PLAN CASTING TO BE SET 0.10' CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX BELOW GUTTER ELEVATION STANDARD CASTING - NEENAH R -3067-V ADJUSTING RINGS 4" MIN - 12" MAX ENCASE WITH CONCRETE MANHOLE COVER TO BE 48" DIA COLLAR 6" OP ENING TYPE II WITH 24"x 36" *15" 24" 9" CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 —15 4003 / -- TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE [T 6" PVC RISER FOR NON—RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND -- CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) /// WATER TIGHT GASKET / OR CEMENTED PLUG iF PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN—OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library for the City of Monticello BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION O Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3005 03--07 11" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP W EA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 11" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 6.. T �- 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE OTHICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK J, NOTES J' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 6' MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 3. MNDOT 8612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE 1 REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 Cl) • a' I� le .,a•..•a. .. •• ••� 1 _ _ 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT III—III-1 I—I I—I I—I I—III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —1 I— -� I— III—I I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER - III—I I 1- I I El I I-1 APPROVED COMPACTED `- 20" _ SUBGRADE 2 CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • ; r 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW I �—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I M —I I—I I—I I I—I 11-1 11-1 11-1 I—I I —I III -1 11-1 11-1 I I=— 11 —III =1 1 II I II IIl i lII �- -I II II I II APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. w 2521.3C2 4 NTS CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION J w *48"(TYP) _ > U N c� *DIMENSION VARIES O N BASED ON STRUCTURE O U DIAMETER CONCRETE DOGHOUSE REQUIRED ON OUTSIDE AND INSIDE OF STRUCTURE AND PIPE CONNECTION RCP PIPE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN MANHOLE J NOTES: AND BASE TO BE CRETEX TYPE 4338 OR APPROVED EQUAL 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOTH INVERT TO OUTLET. SECTION 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF PRECAST CONCRETE ONLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT STANDARD PLATE 4006L. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-4342. CATCH BASIN MANHOLES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN ECCENTRIC TOP SLAB WITH A 27" ROUND OPENING. THE CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R -3508-A2. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Catch Basin Manhole Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 0,3 —15 4003 / -- TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE [T 6" PVC RISER FOR NON—RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL VARIES 10' TO 20' 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BEND -- CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) /// WATER TIGHT GASKET / OR CEMENTED PLUG iF PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN—OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Standard Plate Library for the City of Monticello BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION O Title: Sanitary Clean -Out Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 3005 03--07 11" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SP W EA340B) TACK COAT BETWEEN BITUMINOUS COURSES 11" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 TYPE SPNWB330B) 6" MNDOT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE — PARKING LOT 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) 1" CHAMFER 6.. T �- 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. APPROVED COMPACTED 2521.3C2 SUBGRADE OTHICKENED EDGE SIDEWALK J, NOTES J' PER FT SLOPE 1. FOR AREAS WHERE DRAINAGE IS DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE CURB, THE GUTTER SHALL BE TILTED TO DRAIN FROM THE CURB CONCRETE 2. CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 6' MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A22 3. MNDOT 8612 CURB AND GUTTER SHALL MEET THE 1 REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD MNDOT PLATE 7100 Cl) • a' I� le .,a•..•a. .. •• ••� 1 _ _ 2" MIN. COMPACTED MNDOT III—III-1 I—I I—I I—I I—III CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —1 I— -� I— III—I I III BELOW CURB AND GUTTER - III—I I 1- I I El I I-1 APPROVED COMPACTED `- 20" _ SUBGRADE 2 CURB & GUTTER (MNDOT B612) NTS NTS 4" CONCRETE (MNDOT CONCRETE MIX 3A32) • ; r 4" MNDOT 3149.282 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW I �—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I I -1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I M —I I—I I—I I I—I 11-1 11-1 11-1 I—I I —I III -1 11-1 11-1 I I=— 11 —III =1 1 II I II IIl i lII �- -I II II I II APPROVED COMPACTED SUBGRADE STANDARD DETAILS NTS CONTRACTION AND EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PER MNDOT SPEC. w 2521.3C2 4 NTS CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION J �c0 STANDARD DETAILS NTS z 0z 0C) IJ 02 z O IL U LU LU 0 U O 0. CV w c0 0 >' co 't J �c0 O z L U N c� E' -U D_ N O U U J LU O 0:� 7- N M 't vJ s= Q � — } } — � N i3 w � C w0 LU o_ U} Q 70 Q o 04 Q i7 N N C U O O U LO O U O z 0 W 1L 1L •V/ �_ ' .L D J C — i n w 0 m `J 01:� I0O 0 O Z U 00 � U —:2 Z � (05 UJ CD o-0) w 17029 co ( N z a LL L N O UC N C O V z C2 of 7 W w N N 1 �~ �J ) � J a) 06 Q N rUn v L N O . LO 11z z O a� (\ \ \\ )N O N T) 00 T VJ VJ z 0z 0C) IJ 02 z O IL U LU LU 0 LU Z I-- 0 0 c� W LU O 0:� 7- N M 't z z W J Q W Q � � w0 LU w Q Q Z z CIO 0 z 0 00 J 0 �w QU 01:� Oz U o0 —:2 PROJECT NUMBER: '� 17029 a� 0 rn N O C2 of 7 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS, AND RIM AND INVERT ELEVATIONS, OF EXISTING DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURES. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING SANITARY, WATER, AND STORM SEWER STUBS, AND EXISTING GRADES SHALL ALSO BE VERIFIED. 2. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM A TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY PROVIDED BY WEBB SURVEYING, MAPLE LAKE, MN (763) 898-9999. 3. BENCHMARK: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF OAKWOOD DRIVE (SEE PLAN) - ELEV = 959.37 (NGVD '88 DATUM) 4. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY INCONSISTENCIES ARE DISCOVERED BETWEEN ACTUAL SITE CONDITIONS AND WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WHICH ARE SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH TO ALTER THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. 5. IF REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY STORM SEWER UTILITIES. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER ONE CALL AT (800) 252-1166 FOR A UTILITY LOCATE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION AND VERIFY LOCATIONS OF UTILITIES BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 7. SEE SHEET C2 FOR STANDARD DETAILS. 8. HDPE STORM SEWER CROSSING ABOVE AND WITHIN 10 -FT OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED WATER MAIN OR SERVICES SHALL MEET THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS PER THE MN PLUMBING CODE: 4"- 10" DIAMETER: AASHTO M252 12" - 60" DIAMETER: ASTM F2306 FITTINGS: ASTM D3212 SEE SHEET C6 FOR LOCATIONS OF NEW WATER MAIN AND SERVICES. 9. FINISHED ELEVATIONS OF LAWN/GREEN AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6" BELOW FINISHED FLOOR OR TOP -OF -BLOCK ELEVATION. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY EARTHWORK QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL BE BASED ON EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR 11. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE FLOW LINE AND/OR FINISHED GRADES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS ARE 6" ABOVE THE FLOW LINE SPOT ELEVATION SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. "EX" DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS 13. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE TOP OF PAVING OR GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ARE INTENDED TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS CATCH BASINS AND/OR OUTLETS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, WHICH WILL PROMOTE POSITIVE DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT SITE. NOTE: CADD FILES FOR ESTIMATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTORS FOR PREPARING BIDS. IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THE CADD FILES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NEED TO SIGN A HOLD -HARMLESS AGREEMENT PROVIDED BY SCHULTZ ENGINEERING & SITE DESIGN, AND AGREE TO PAY A $50 PROCESSING FEE. THE CADD FILES WILL BE RELEASED UPON RECEIPT OF THE CHECK GRADING PLAN c c� N O 0 20 40 80 r` U O C E�� 0 :U N N N 'U-0 U� N Q N Q E E O N O 4 a N N Q O 70 U O O -0 3 '5 Ln N N O � C L" w � O m` ol N Cl) 0 Z N N U J 0 O N 0 1010 O MF1 v w (5 00 O Z Z or" i W L-1) i N C0 (0 I..L Z c @) LL] CD c ffo 0c) w _ M CO N Z o Q_ li ' ^ v Q U O Z O C W w Z N~ (1) v z U W -12 Z) Ax W 2 Q 1N vJ L N� > z 1 � \ O 0 N — \` O 07N �WW z `^' 0z Q J� Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Q Z W L-1) Q w0 O o Q V) Z Im o Z O00 LU O 0 Q:� Z N (1) v V Z In J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C3 OF 7 Q W L-1) Q w0 LULU Q Qz Z Im o Z O00 0 � �U W i� O z U o0 -12 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C3 OF 7 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Description This project will consist of the construction of a new commercial retail building with an approximate footprint of 5,000 SF, as well as bituminous parking lot and concrete sidewalk areas. Disturbed Area & Impervious Surface Tabulation (within proposed construction area) Anticipated Disturbed Area 0.6 acres Existing Impervious Area 0.21 acres Proposed Impervious Area 0.48 acres Net Impervious Area Increase 0.27 acres Permanent Site Drainage The proposed project is designed to drain to an existing 15" storm sewer stub located near the north corner of the project site via new private storm sewer to be constructed as part of the project. Receivinq Surface Waters The following surface waters could receive storm water runoff from this project, and are within 1 mile of the project site: Surface Water Type of Impaired Special USEPA Approved TMDL Comments Surface Water Water? Water? for Impaired Water? Project not subject to NPDES Permit SEDIMENT AND OTHER POLLUTANTS This SWPPP has been designed mainly to provide erosion and sediment control of naturally occurring soils at this site (ie: sands, foams, and clays). Although this SWPPP does address pollution prevention of other man-made materials, it is assumed that these materials will consist of debris from existing structures and pavements to be demolished, or debris and chemicals (ie: fuels, new paints, etc.) resulting from new construction. There are no known solid wastes or hazardous materials buried below grade at this site. If such wastes or hazard materials are discovered during construction, the SWPPP Coordinator (described below) will be responsible for notifying the Engineer. This SWPPP will then be revised to address he presence and disposal of these additional pollutants EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS Standards and References Materials and construction methods of all BMPs included in this SWPPP shall be as per the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall obtain a current copy of MNDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction and familiarize themselves with the specification sections applicable to this SWPPP, as there are several BMPs that specifically reference these sections. The Contractor and SWPPP Coordinator shall be expected to be familiar with the applicable MNDOT specification sections during construction. No additional compensation will be paid to the Contractor for additional work due to unfamiliarity with these specification sections. Undisturbed Areas If shown on the plan, the Contractor shall delineate areas that are not to be disturbed on the site. This may be done with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc., and shall be completed prior to the start of any grading operations. Regardless of the delineation method the Contractor chooses to use, the Contractor must communicate to his/her personnel and subcontractors that these areas are not to be disturbed and construction equipment (including trucks and personal vehicles) shall not be allowed in these areas. The Contractor shall minimize compaction and preserve topsoil as much as possible at the site. In pervious ("green") areas that are not essential to the construction of the project, the Contractor shall avoid construction traffic and maintain the existing condition of these areas. Temporary and Permanent Stabilization All exposed soil areas (including stockpiles) shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 14 days of construction activity temporarily or permanently ceasing in that portion of the site. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches or swales, which drain off-site or to a surface water, and are within 200 lineal feet of the property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary or permanent cover within 24 hours of construction. Placement of temporary or permanent cover shall be initiated immediately upon suspension or completion of excavation operations. Temporary Cover: If the Contractor chooses to halt grading operations in a portion of the site (or the whole site) for a period exceeding 14 days, and grading operations (rough or finish grading) in the affected areas has not yet been completed, temporary cover shall be placed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water shall be provided with temporary cover within 24 hours of connection. Depending on the Contractor's schedule, the temporary cover shall consist of one of the following BMPs: 1). Discanchored Mulch a). Discanchored mulch may be used in an area of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively short, but exceeds 14 days. b). The mulch shall be Type 3 per MNDOT Spec. 3882 c). An adequate quantity of mulch shall be evenly distributed to achieve 90% coverage of the exposed soils. d). Mulch shall be placed as per MNDOT 2575.3F. e). All mulch shall be disc anchored as per MNDOT 2575.3G. Prior to the placement and discanchoring of the mulch, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.3B1. f). Any areas that are exposed as a result of wind action after the initial mulch placement shall be covered with additional mulch to maintain 90% coverage. 2). Temporary Seeding with Mulch a). Temporary seeding with mulch may be used in areas of the site (or the whole site) if the Contractor is halting grading operations for a period that is relatively long. Although mulch still needs to be applied as described above, once the temporary seeding/turf is established, the mulch will no longer need to be maintained. The temporary seeding/turf will require very little maintenance. b). Prior to the sowing of temporary seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. c). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mixes 100, 110, or 130 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for temporary seeding. d). Temporary seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. e). Once temporary seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above. Permanent Cover: Upon completion of finish grading and/or placement of topsoil, initiation of the placement of permanent cover shall begin immediately over all exposed areas. This includes areas designated for impervious surfacing (ie: buildings, pavements/gravel bases, sidewalks, etc.). Where the construction schedule will not allow for the placement of the permanent impervious surfacing within 14 days of the completion of finish grading, temporary cover shall be provided in these areas, as described above, until the permanent impervious surfacing can be constructed. Affected areas consisting of drainage ditches or swales connected to, and within, 200 lineal feet of a property line or surface water, shall be provided with permanent cover within 24 hours of connection. Areas designated for permanent turf establishment shall be provided with one or more of the following BMPs (see plan): 1). Permanent Seeding with Mulch a). Unless otherwise noted on the plans, all areas designated for turf establishment shall be provided with permanent seeding. b). In addition to the plan included as part of this SWPPP, the Contractor shall verify if a Landscaping Plan has been included in the plans by the Architect. If a Landscape Architect has specified higher quality permanent cover (ie: sod, hydroseeding, etc.), the Contractor shall provide this permanent cover in lieu of the permanent seeding specified in this SWPPP. c). Prior to the sowing of permanent seed, the soils shall be loosened and the area smooth -rough graded per MNDOT 2575.361. d). Contractor shall utilize Seed Mix 260 per MNDOT Spec. 3876 for permanent seeding. e). Permanent seeding shall be sown per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3D. f). Once permanent seeding has been sown, mulch shall be placed over the area as described above (under Temporary Cover), unless noted otherwise. 2). Erosion Control Blanket a). Erosion control blanket shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. These areas shall still be provided with permanent seeding, as described above, beneath the erosion control blanket. b). Erosion control blanket shall meet the requirements indicated in MNDOT Spec. 3885. See plan for category(s) of erosion control blanket. c). Erosion control blanket shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2575.3J2. d). Erosion control blanket specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading (including permanent seeding). 3). Riprap a). Riprap shall be placed in areas as shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). All riprap shall be underlain with Type 4 geotextile fabric. The fabric shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. c). Riprap materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3601, and shall be Class 3, unless noted otherwise on the plans. d). Riprap shall be considered "Random Riprap" and shall be placed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511. e). Although it is permitted for the riprap to be placed with machinery, it will be necessary for the Contractor to hand place some of the riprap in order to provide a dense, well -keyed layer of stones with the least practical quantity of void space. f). The minimum thickness of the riprap shall be 18 inches, unless otherwise noted on the plans. g). Riprap designated at the end of pipe outlets shall be placed within 24 hours of installation of the pipe outlet end section. h). Riprap specified in drainage ditches and swales connected to, and within 200 lineal feet, of a property line or surface water shall be installed within 24 hours of the completion of finish grading. Sediment Control The following sediment control BMPs shall be implemented as part of this project: 1). Silt Fence a). Silt fence shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Silt fence shall be machine sliced and materials shall meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). Silt fence shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3C1. d). Silt fence shall be installed prior to any upgradient grading operations, and shall remain in place and maintained adequately until upgradient areas achieve Final Stabilization (see below) e). Silt fence shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment on the upstream side of the fence reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. Repair or replacement of silt fence shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. f). Portions of silt fence may be removed to accommodate short-term activities, such as vehicle passage. Short-term activities shall be completed as quickly as possible, and new silt fence installed immediately after completion of the short-term activity. If rainfall is imminent or forecasted in the near future, new silt shall be installed regardless of if the short term activity has been completed or not. The Contractor is advised to schedule short term activities during dry weather as much as practicable. No additional compensation will be paid due to additional silt fence associated with short-term activities. g). Temporary soil stockpiles shall be placed on the site in areas upgradient from silt fence. Where the Contractor chooses to place temporary soil stockpiles outside designated silt fenced areas, the stockpiles shall be surrounded by additional silt fence. Under no circumstances shall temporary soil stockpiles be placed over surface waters, curb and gutter, catch basins, culvert inlets or outlets, or ditches. 2). Catch Basin Protection a). WIMCO Road Drain protection devices, as manufactured by WIMCO, shall be used for catch basin protection on this project. WIMCO can be contacted at (952)-233-3055, and their web page is www.roaddrain.com. b). "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be installed at all catch basin locations immediately after placement of the catch basin structures. "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until permanent surfacing is constructed (ie: curb and gutter, pavements, and/or gravel surfacing). In areas designated for turf establishment, "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas is established. c). Upon construction of the permanent surfacing, the "Road Drain Top Slab" devices shall be replaced with the WIMCO product specified on the plans. The WIMCO devices shall remain in place until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). The contractor shall install and maintain the catch basin protection devices as per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. 3). Culvert Inlet Protection a). Culvert inlet protection shall be provided at all culvert inlet locations immediately after construction of the culvert. See plan included in this SWPPP for culvert inlet locations. b). Culvert inlet protection shall consist of geotextile fabric wrapped around, and completely covering the inlet end section. The geotextile fabric shall be the same fabric used in silt fence applications and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3886. c). The culvert inlet protection shall remain in place and adequately maintained until Final Stabilization of all upgradient areas has been established. d). Culvert inlet protection shall be repaired or replaced if damaged during, or after, rain events, or if accumulated sediment reaches 1/2 of the diameter of the culvert pipe. Repair or replacement of culvert inlet protection shall be completed within 24 hours of discovery. 4). Temporary Rock Construction Entrance a). Temporary rock construction entrances shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. See detail for temporary rock entrance design. b). If the Contractor chooses to access the site from locations other than where temporary rock entrances are specified on the plans, additional temporary rock entrances shall be placed at these locations, as well. c). Temporary rock entrance shall be constructed prior to the start of grading operations, and shall remain in place and be adequately maintained until Final Stabilization has been established. d). Temporary rock entrances shall be maintained in such a manner that the entrances prevent sediment tracking onto adjacent streets. If a temporary rock entrance is found to be ineffective, it shall be replaced or improved within 24 hours of discovery. e). The Contractor has the option to place Type 4 geotextile fabric beneath the temporary rock entrance. The fabric may extend the life of the entrance as it will reduce rock "sinking" into the underlying soils. If the Contractor chooses to use fabric, it should meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3733 and shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2511.3B2. f). If sediment tracking from the site is discovered on adjacent streets, the sediment shall be removed with a street sweeper or other approved method within 24 hours of discovery. This shall be done throughout construction of the project. This sediment may be returned and graded over exposed areas of the site, or disposed of off site per MPCA requirements. The City may order street sweeping to be performed at the Contractor's or Owner's expense if City staff find that construction activities are resulting in sediment or debris being tracked onto City streets. 5). Filter Logs a). Filter logs shall be installed at the locations shown on the plan included in this SWPPP. b). Filter logs shall consist of Type Wood Fiber biorolls and meet the requirements of MNDOT Spec. 3897. c). Filter logs shall be installed as per MNDOT Spec. 2573.3-1. d). Filter logs shall be installed immediately after placement of erosion control blanket. e). Filter logs shall remain in place for the life of the project, and shall be allowed to degrade naturally. Dewatering If dewatering of sandy subsoils is required for this project, the pump discharge shall be treated prior to discharge off-site or into a surface water. Treatment of discharge shall be achieved with the use of a "Dandy Dewatering Bag" (or approved equivalent), as manufactured by Dandy Products,lnc. Dandy Products, Inc. can be contacted at (877) 307-0141, and their web page is www.dandyproducts.com. The "Dandy Dewatering Bag" shall be installed, utilized, and maintained per the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. Once dewatering water has been treated, it may be discharged off-site or to a surface water. The discharge shall be visually checked to ensure that it is relatively clean and not visibly different from any receiving waters. If discharge is noticeably "dirty", the Engineer shall be contacted as additional treatment methods may be necessary. Adequate erosion control shall be provided at the point of discharge if it is located in an area with exposed soils or established turf. This erosion control may consist of temporarily placed rip rap, or other approved energy dissipation measures. The type of erosion control measure shall be at the Contractor's discretion, depending on the location of the dewatering discharge and the unique site characteristics. The erosion control measures shall be effective and shall be maintained adequately such that no erosion occurs at the point of discharge. Pollution Prevention Manaqement Solid waste accumulated during construction, including collected sediment, construction materials, floating debris, construction debris, paper, plastics, and other solid wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements: 1). Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by a similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with storm water. 2). Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials shall be maintained under cover (e.g., plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to minimize contact with stormwater. 3). Hazardous materials, toxic waste, (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids) shall be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access storage areas shall be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials shall be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. 4). Solid waste shall be stored, collected and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. 5). Portable toilets shall be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. The Contractor shall take steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any area where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. The Contractor shall conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. The Contractor shall ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled mate(als. The Contractor shall report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. § 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing shall be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff from the washing area shall be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity shall be properly disposed of. The Contractor shall properly use and store soaps, detergents, or solvents. No engine degreasing shall be allowed on site. The Contractor shall provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. The liquid and solid washout wastes shall not contact the ground, and the containment shall be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes shall be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. FINAL STABILIZATION Final Stabilization shall be considered established once the following requirements have been achieved: 1). All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent of its expected final growth density over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions 2). The permanent storm water management system is constructed, and is operating as designed. Temporary or permanent sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins have been cleaned of any accumulated sediment. All sediment has been removed from conveyance systems and ditches are stabilized with permanent cover. 3). All temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs have been removed from the project site. BMPs designed to decompose on site may be left in place. SWPPP NOTES W U) J Q L m W a� 0 Z I n o- n Cn N O U O � C O 0 E R O E N N N U -0 U N Q N aE O N a N N i Q O 70 O N C Z) a U O O — Ln N 0 C N O N .— C N QQO)C C LU LU o_ O m` a` N M O Z V) N U J O N Ln 0 1010 O M� F1 v (0 00 O Z or" co (0 I..L Z c @) LTJ CD N ffo co) UJ _ MCO N Z li -c ' ^ v Q U O Z C W UJ N��~^ vJ C C J (D Ax W 2 Q N vJ _0 L LCO q N > Z 1 � \ O 4.1 0 N — \` O U) N CO�c� T-- Z O Q_ U LU cn w Z O o LU O � Z V Z LU Z 0^/ U PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 Q W 0 LU LU > Z Q Z 0b 0 00 00 a wm m c - y - U O 0 L m pi N o + U- C O I I mad C M U .D CL 0 0 -2 UU N p O C OO WN~ ai�U II II II II II I _O C2 E 01 I-alMOI�,� H Z - y - U O J 01 >1 z W¢¢ 7C) + >,7C3 M U- C O } J Q L W M� W 0 0 0:al ma G N p O C OO WN~ IY] _O C2 E w Q O O II w D' CLI Z UqL 7C)� N FD i QU-)(D ^/ L.L p 0 o 3 J W I >-3:Z/i00 O N _W I G m 0 �W 2 — i v> W < 17029 } J Iw-a p W OLy ZpW 0" � 3 II 'o j >? I I �' � M N co (fl W (D p� = W ZZ F- m O H ¢ N Q p U ww a U > O (qW -� rn •L c N p w II y Q m Z 6 W �' x FI.�WIZ fw— F W� w Of Cn Cr N � a <'> ti¢ Ld NQ~ J w� It� W LLI a Q II W r � U ~ O NF'p¢ > L% p Hw F W wm m Q p mW � C J 7 � N = O Zw ZO d~ ¢� p- OJ F In of II II a u,2 a( U Z W ¢p¢ pJ Z¢ n J W LLOQO� m J WN lea T I I W Ca L,W Q� SU Q lL 0 II 1 Z QQ O?m Li W � tr O<' wW p Z� I I UJ 0J ¢ a' W �j� W II L m LLJ (n mNQa Q� LWJQ a� Mm JP li '�' Q WW (np O~ II >N ww 0 �IUH Ld ¢� wW UO -= Y Z Z p O H W W Z W~~ a O [] F a a 0 W K Z E; w zN W JW JHS Q� pw� -m w W QW ¢3 �mU1 O r (, F- N N WWF �� �W Ja V) -j it �J O -J = 0of gO O �r 0 � � UJ D' v~iwa- Fmw Z� laWl JO W¢li �} wvHi m} �F aW NmN II I .m-. O� OF aaa� X¢U H~N co N �W 1wH JPO p¢ Hp �M O� WS ZO -O o Em O u p� z Q �N cVa. L, L, ¢O N?¢ �� II UU U ~OMw Boz a I ® a¢ I Nom ZF- o::� ��V-JjW 1�x w ,. - Z J mW ap w II ��� N a W m X (/) i i Q °° Ja_ wp �' ma OW oo �o xZ ZN.. Qa p� Na ~ II Z Q�mO (= o~ OWVI Zma0O U Q _ p I NpW Up NQ nw Um W ¢� �<n �ro� w w 0 m¢ n= ow O' °�d II W w9 �W a� ,= W c°;c 1 ' pvl �O Z N o II QUQ -7 �Op 'M �! U Qa m HJ w W —?�, mow I I N W Fa-•Wp pfz� Z z U wa pmQ 5l ww wN �0 0a' M II ` 1 o >' NOQa a Z �� Ii ocn N= ow w0 }W <W II II cn F-F�a ¢ IJ-ip O U J Q¢ M pQw I I CD F- } Wgd N zw WL -U � II N U, U 2 Q- W- O W Z O ON Ow¢ wZwO c I I o WCL U_ Zln� ZUw F-<��O OOlwi F -W 3 3 � J II II N -JDX afn 0a � _ ZfnZJ Z r H Z p _ U"f0 O U (n�f0 << zo) �IW ¢ W X >- �ZZVJIIII A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) v� x v) m IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Gravel pad(s) MnDOT Class CA -15 or CA -25 Riprap RPS nn PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. Title: Residential Building Erosion Control )ate: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 03-05 6006 03-15 Geotextile fabric NOTES: Channelize runoff to sediment trapping device CD z Cn xl w 11114 Match Existing Grade SECTION B -B (not to scale) Original grade Ribbed or Corrugated steel plates Original SECTION A -A grade (not to scale) Sediment Trapping Device 0 E 0 U O O U a a vi 1\191IL UI VVUy PLAN Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Commercial Gravel Construction Entrance Date: Plate No. 06-14 Revised'03-15 6002 \\1 Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert )ate: 03-07 I Plate No. Revised: 03-151 6004 10% MAX 0 + UJ-LLw EXISTING 11 ll PAVED 12' MIN ----I CONSTRUCTI❑N MATS, WOVEN OR TRM ROADWAY 50' MIN END OVERLAP 18' MIN TRM END OVERLAP WITH SPIKES OR STAKES STRAP CONNECTORS C❑NSTRUCTI❑N MAT END OVERLAP INTERL❑CK WITH STRAP CONNECTORS END OVERLAP, ° ° ° ° . ° i DISTURBED AREA, C❑NSTRUCTI❑N SITE, STABILIZED STORAGE AREA OR STAGING AREA SIDE OVERLAP SIDE ° ° 0 0 l ° C ° ° , OVERLAP _ 0 C ° ° J Q _U CL } 60 1 ° ° ° ° _1 0 ______________ PAD AREA (ANY SIZE) Standard Plate Library City of Monticello Title: Mud Mat Entrance Date: 06-14 Revised: 06-14 Plate No. 6003 OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD WING NUT/ ATTACHMENT HOOK • • SILT FABRIC SLEEVE ® . • , PER MnDOT SPECIAL • • • ® PROVISION 3886 1 • II I I A _ it Q A . 4 �- r ' d A. A OVERFLOW SLOT IN SHROUD SILT FABRIC SLEEVE PER MnDOT SPECIAL PROVISION 3886 - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Title: _ _ _ Inlet Protection Standard Plate Library Grate Inlet Cover City of Monticello Date: Plate No. 03-07 Revised: 03-15 1 6005 SWPPP DETAILS z O CL U LU LU D - y - U O J 01 W 7C) + >,7C3 M U- C O z Q L N N N U 0 M� W 0 0 G N p O C OO U J IY] _O C2 E w Q O LLJ }} — "- (U O w _� CLI Z UqL 7C)� N FD i QU-)(D ^/ L.L U)U U O O U .0 >-3:Z/i00 O N � o C N I O O.- L U C C m 0 NUMBER: — i v> W < 17029 (0 O (.000 U _Z Z � M N co (fl W (D o a� W U) N / Z a 0 U N Z O W �' fw— U) 1 � a : C 20,5C U Q N N r � U > L% Cr z � C 7 � N = O T- U) U) z O CL U LU LU D I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 LU Z F- _J M� W 0 0 W 10:L LLJ O m CLI Z CV M d I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 V _Z to _J M� W W 10:L Q m Z �0 3 v ^/ L.L U)U 0 I PROJECT NUMBER: n 17029 rn N O I— Q F— w� ww Z Q Z C 0 0� J � w Q 0z 00 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole SWPPP PLAN I 0 20 40 80 U O C O E R O cL- N N N U 0 U N Q O E JO Q N C) C) a Q�70 ON O U O O 0 5 Ln a� Lom.-� N 0- u) u) w � V z 0. Z W (D W C/) Zw V Z Ww N J �06 U U) LU O U O\ CD � O c m o co O 0 r U C7 N i i � � co co co co O C&a) 0 co 00 N E LL � cD U E O U C O1 N 0) Q N Cf)� LFr z� -r :3 N = O CD N .1 00 rU)U) Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Z O o V) LU O Q:� z N (1) v V z n J_ im Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Z Q Qz z O00 � W 0 �U it O z o U o0 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N , Cf) SCALE: 1''=20' O C6 OF 7 Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 �\ UTILITY AND SURFACING NOTES: WATER AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITIES 1. WATER MAIN AND ANY WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL BE PLACED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 2. IF CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED WHERE WATER MAIN CROSSES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, SERVICE LINES, OR STORM SEWER, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED APPROPRIATELY WHILE STILL MAINTAINING A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 3. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM SEWER CROSSES SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN, OR ASSOCIATED SERVICES. INSULATION SHALL CONSIST OF AN 8 -FT X 8 -FT SQUARE OF 3" -THICK RIGID INSULATION. INSULATION SHALL BE PLACED BETWEEN THE STORM SEWER AND PIPE CROSSING WITH THE EDGES OF THE INSULATION PARALLEL TO THE PIPING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. 4. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICE LINE CLEANOUTS AS REQUIRED BY THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE 5. SEE SHEET C3 FOR STORM SEWER GRADING, AND SHEET C2 FOR MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS RELATING TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 7. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER, AND ORDERING ASSOCIATED MATERIALS, THE CONTRACTOR'S PLUMBING DESIGNER SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE TOTAL DRAINAGE FIXTURE UNITS (DFUs) FOR THE INTERIOR PLUMBING TO VERIFY THE CORRECT SIZING AND SLOPE OF THE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A PLUMBING PERMIT FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER OR WATER UTILITIES SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL AFTER THE PLUMBING PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED, AND ANY AND ALL PERTINENT COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED ON THE PLAN AND IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. SURFACING SUBGRADES SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND/OR COMPACTED AS NECESSARY TO ATTAIN THE REQUIRED COMPACTION DESCRIBED IN THE GENERAL NOTES (SHEET Cl). TEST ROLLING OF THE SUBGRADE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR TECHNICIAN. LOCATIONS EXHIBITING EXCESSIVE RUTTING (PER MNDOT SPEC. 21 1 1) SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE. COMPACTION TESTING IN UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING FIRM. 2. GRAVEL BASE COURSES SHALL BE ROLLED AND COMPACTED. TEST ROLLING OF THE GRAVEL BASE SHALL BE OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY. tch Basir 3. ALL EXISTING BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE EDGES, WHICH WILL ABUT NEW BITUMINOUS A = 957.4 OR CONCRETE SURFACING SHALL BE SAWCUT TO OBTAIN A VERTICAL EDGE. lanhole 4. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE NEW CONCRETE ABUTS EXISTING CONCRETE, AND AT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE SEPARATE CONCRETE POURS ABUT EACH OTHER. 5. SEE SHEET Cl FOR SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS, AND CURB AND GUTTER. UTILITY & PAVING PLAN I 0 20 40 is U O C O E R O cL- N N N U 0 U N Q Q E E 2 O O 4 0- N N Q O 70 O N a U O O -0 3 '5 Ln N N O � w � O m` 0 O N 0 1010 O LFF1 v w (5 00 O z Z" Z or W L/) 6 (o Cl) (0 I..L Z 5 w o o(.0� w _ co 00 N ZQ_ Q_ILLW ' ^ v Q U � O Z O C W w Z N��~^ (1) v z U vJ -12 06 Q N vJ L N� > z 1 � \ o� 0 N — \` O C0 N 00�c>� rWW z `^' 0z Q J� Z O F- 0 - U LU n cn w Q Z W L/) Q w0 O o Q V) Z Z O00 LU O 0 Q:� Z N (1) v V Z In J_ m PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C7 OF 7 Q W L/) Q w0 LULU Q Qz Z Z O00 0 � �U W i� O z U CD0 -12 PROJECT NUMBER: 17029 N kk SCALE: 1 ''=20' C7 OF 7 I Catch BasinConcrete Curb RTM = 955.9[1 � LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 2 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' 1 DN ADEBORAH NORWAY MAPLE �� �i�� �•y, 71Q[ely�[�L^L�7 7� j 1 I BH I BLACK HILLS SPRUCE ACER PLATANOIDES ORNAMENTAL TREES MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' CONIFEROUS TREES PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA SIZE REMARKS 2.5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2 5" B&B STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 2.5" B&BI STRAIGHT TRUNK NO V -CROTCH 6' HT.I FULL FORM TO GRADE tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 SHRUBS 01 N w 9 FG FOERSTER'S FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. O z Q L 2Oa�O U U SPEC. 17 BS TOR BIRCHLEAF SPIREA SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA'TOR' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. 1 O U J SPEC. 16 JB CRIMSON PYGMY DWARF JAPANESE BARBERRY BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON PYGMY' 18" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. SPEC. 10 CB CHICAGOLAND GREEN BOXWOOD BUXUS X'GLENCOE' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } } — � N O SPEC. 6 MP COMPACT MUGO PINE PINUS MUGO PUMILIO 'COMPACT SELECT' 24" HT., CONT. MIN. 5 CANES AT HT. } Q-0 - C } o 04 SPEC. tch Basir A = 957.4 lanhole NOTE: THIS PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS. FOR SPECIFIC LANDSCAPING METHODS, DETAILS, AND SPECIFICATIONS A LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL SHOULD BE CONTACTED LANDSCAPE PLAN I I I I 0 20 40 80 z O IL U LU LU (/) 0 U 01 N w 0 Cl) J b E c O O z Q L 2Oa�O U U N F 0 Q N 1 O U J LU O fl� z N cY) `t � } } — � N O w � U } Q-0 - C } o 04 Q U n C U O O O U O �3:Na�0 L L N Q CL O D C C — i n W m I'1 rno O 7 � 00 U Z CY) UJ CD o�� w c\I ( N Z a LL L 0 OC N C O V Z C Ww .N N E 1 �~ �/ ! C a) �C,6 = a N UO L (D N N (D > Lo °C oz �CY)� \ \\ O N ) 00 :3 eco T n VJ z O IL U LU LU (/) w Z F- 0 o LU O fl� z N cY) `t V z 0 co Q W V) � w0 1U w Z Q Qz z O00 � w 0 QU r Oz U o0 Q PROJECT ° NUMBER: 17029 NIL c J SCALE: N 1 "=20' O rl- CLI OF 1 i! 16'-0" I I I I I II I I 16'-0.. I- I �I I I... ----------- I I I I I I i i I ii I L.�.—.—._._._._._.-._1_._. I _I_ _.J._.I_._._.I i —�-�nL zo o SII I I I I I ;I I I j .I I I i t SII I I i l o I I i I' ii TENANT 1 TENANT 2 TENS I� , I i I, - � , O , I� , I ---------------------- ----- •----------------' I PROPOSED MECHANICAL AREA ; 42'-0" 24'-0" I 90'-0" 1 2 FLOOR PLAN Al Scale: 1/8" = V-0" CODE REVIEW NEW BUILD OCCUPANCY - M CONSTRUCTION TYPE - 2B BUILDING HEIGHTS AND AREA LIMITATIONS TABULAR = 2 STORIES / 55'/ 12,500 SF ACTUAL = 4,634 SQ FT / 1 STORY / UNSPRINKLED RESTROOM COUNT - TBD DEPENDANT ON TENANTS I I SITE SUMMARY PARCEL SIZE GROSS FLOOR AREA TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE PROVIDED PARKING SPACES ADDL' PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE TOTAL PARKING PARKING STALL/AISLE DIMENISONS ZONING 32,723 SQ FT /.8 ACRES 4,942 SO FT 87% 28 ON SITE (INCL. 2 H.C.) 7 SPACES @ HOLIDAY SOUTH LOT I35 SPACES AVAILABLE * 9'W X 20'D / 24' AISLE B3 * 4,634 SQ FT INTERIOR FLOOR AREA X 90% = 4,170 SF / 200 SQ FT PER STALL = 20 STALLS REQUIRED -THIS REQUIREMENT WILL BE DEPENDANT ON THE ACTUAL TENANT USE. SITE PLAN N �1 Scale: 1" = 20 ft 'q 1 (010 1 a 140 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LAR ON BUILDING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL I. 0 No. Date Issue Notes F -- U I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared �— by me or under my direct supervision (n and that I am a duly Licensed Z Architect under the laws of the State 0 of Minnesota. U ccSignature O IL 0 ZArchitect I Erik P. Johnson T Registration 0 50962 O Date JUNE 5, 2017 z Project Title CROWN BAY UJ RETAIL BUILDING C� Q C/) r1 Project ID Vj-J 1020 z w OSheet Title W SITE PLAN WSheet No. 0 Q D P1 .._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... —._._....... ...... ...... ...... ...... .._._........ I I --------------------------- -------------------- ' UGNAGIE :OGNAGE: ' 74 SO FT ; 50 SQ FT --------------------............ F-- --I I I I I I II II II II II I II II II II II II ' �- ------ 3 EAST ELEVATION 5-- A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" x 11 8 1 2 I � _,_,_,_,_,_,_ ,------------------------- --------------------- UGNAGE &IGN GE 56 SO FT '---------- --------- 35 SO FT ' ------------------- II II II II II II = 4 WEST ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 14 7\--O ------------- SNIGMAGE ' 35 SQ FT PARAPET EL. 28'-0 PARAPET I I EL. 22'-0" -------------------------, PARAPET L. ' E 19'-4 G Nk�I ----35-SQ FT----; PIER CAP EL. 13'-4 WINDOW HEAD EL. 9'-4" WINDOW SILL SLAB i -------------------------- / --------------- ------------ q I re -1-0 I a 10 0 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LA R SO ELEVATION KEY NOTES B U I L D I N G 1. EIFS (STUCCO APPEARANCE) 2. EIFS W/ PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE 3. EIFS PILLAR CAP W/ PREFINISHED MTL FLASHING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 4. AWNING - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 5. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 6. BRICK VENEER PILLARS 7. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOOR 8. PAINTED STEEL SUN SHADE - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 9. ROCKFACE BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PREFIN. MTL ROOF EDGE & PAINTED STEEL GATES 10. PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 11. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER PILLAR 12. PAINTED BOLLARD 13. WALL PACK LIGHT 14. DECORATIVE UP/DOWN ACCENT LIGHT SIGN SUMMARY BUILDING ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE TWO STREET FRONTS = 3,100 SQ FT z ALLOWABLE WALL SIGNAGE SQ FT = 15% = 465 SQ FT 0 No. Date Issue Notes FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 5/A2 I hereby certify that this plan, rr specification, or report was prepared I-- by me or under my direct supervision Cf) and that I am a duly Licensed T-8" Architect under the laws of the State PREFINISHED METAL O of Minnesota. BACKLIT BOX SIGN BY SIGN U MFR \ I �I rr Signature LL O Z Architect o NOT TO EXCEED t 100 SQ FT PER SIDE Erik P. Johnson T \ Registration O 50962 Date O JUNE 5, 2017 \ Project Title g CROWN BAY LU RETAIL BUILDING \ \ ROCKFACE BLOCK BASE Ill )( Ji Q Project ID i i V J 1020 z - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION LJJ OSheet Title 5 MONUMENT SIGN W ELEVATIONS A2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" WSheet No. 0 0 D 2 I I x 11 8 1 2 I � _,_,_,_,_,_,_ ,------------------------- --------------------- UGNAGE &IGN GE 56 SO FT '---------- --------- 35 SO FT ' ------------------- II II II II II II = 4 WEST ELEVATION A2 Scale: 3/16" = 1'-0" 14 7\--O ------------- SNIGMAGE ' 35 SQ FT PARAPET EL. 28'-0 PARAPET I I EL. 22'-0" -------------------------, PARAPET L. ' E 19'-4 G Nk�I ----35-SQ FT----; PIER CAP EL. 13'-4 WINDOW HEAD EL. 9'-4" WINDOW SILL SLAB i -------------------------- / --------------- ------------ q I re -1-0 I a 10 0 1 ARCHITECTURE © 2017 STONE TENT ARCHITECTURE, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED This drawing is an instrument of service and is the sole property of Stone Tent Architecture, any use of this drawing without written consent by Stone Tent Architecture is prohibited. The architect shall not have control or charge of and shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, deviations, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work, for the acts or omissions of the contractor, subcontractors or any other persons performing any of the work, or for the failure of any of them to carry out the work in accordance with the contract documents. Always use dimensions as shown. Drawings are not to be scaled. Drawing scales as indicated are for reference only and are not intended to accurately depict actual or designed conditions. Written dimensions shall govern. 15001 140th st foreston, mn 56330 ph. 612.508.8099 erik@stonetentarchitecture.com stonetentarchitecture.com LA R SO ELEVATION KEY NOTES B U I L D I N G 1. EIFS (STUCCO APPEARANCE) 2. EIFS W/ PREFINISHED METAL ROOF EDGE 3. EIFS PILLAR CAP W/ PREFINISHED MTL FLASHING No. Date Appr Revision Notes 4. AWNING - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 1 6/5/17 ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL 5. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER 2 6/20/17 REVISED SUBMITTAL 6. BRICK VENEER PILLARS 7. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS & DOOR 8. PAINTED STEEL SUN SHADE - COLOR TO BE COORDINATED WITH TENANT BRAND 9. ROCKFACE BLOCK TRASH ENCLOSURE W/ PREFIN. MTL ROOF EDGE & PAINTED STEEL GATES 10. PAINTED HOLLOW METAL DOOR 11. ROCKFACE BLOCK VENEER PILLAR 12. PAINTED BOLLARD 13. WALL PACK LIGHT 14. DECORATIVE UP/DOWN ACCENT LIGHT SIGN SUMMARY BUILDING ELEVATION SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE TWO STREET FRONTS = 3,100 SQ FT z ALLOWABLE WALL SIGNAGE SQ FT = 15% = 465 SQ FT 0 No. Date Issue Notes FREE STANDING MONUMENT SIGN - SEE 5/A2 I hereby certify that this plan, rr specification, or report was prepared I-- by me or under my direct supervision Cf) and that I am a duly Licensed T-8" Architect under the laws of the State PREFINISHED METAL O of Minnesota. BACKLIT BOX SIGN BY SIGN U MFR \ I �I rr Signature LL O Z Architect o NOT TO EXCEED t 100 SQ FT PER SIDE Erik P. Johnson T \ Registration O 50962 Date O JUNE 5, 2017 \ Project Title g CROWN BAY LU RETAIL BUILDING \ \ ROCKFACE BLOCK BASE Ill )( Ji Q Project ID i i V J 1020 z - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION LJJ OSheet Title 5 MONUMENT SIGN W ELEVATIONS A2 Scale: 3/8" = 1'-0" WSheet No. 0 0 D Luminaire Schedule Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number 3 CL1-90L-4K-4-BC Description Lamp Number Lumens LLF Wattage Mounting Height Lamps per Lamp CIMARRON CL1 90 LEDs - 4000K - 70 CRI 1 18194.73 1 205 20' IMARR N U1If T,p � SFORUL.01�� LED SPEClRII PRODUCT w4cpErfs) Congftctilm + LED W> yem have ouoiA powFr I;wr- •Stplishuerkallylinvisiddig- fftsold rmp v111a4e over-G4ergntprrlrarho¢I an ShDrt Yaousll'g for muim1iiii11 hffit tf wit: rirLlb FralerJion wilh sola r+�;auery Stop s cos um 01 Lin s'1g11111 debris from 9glflering on top of th e f alsM A + 1054 rru3 Myer available wilh 90L con. Nufmon ror in crea3itl lurneR OLOD(A +AuugggF h9l++e-die-[�896luminlinilea 1*0 vi sir�c arr�derat thermal managemerrr + 1_Ed el ectinwi 5. inadng PR mdoptirr&esPM2mdaplicalperrar- devioee,rgnyurrinnppmerin rn2r1 A 911il'aft' Eta69 ■ Sepmftoprcal errd eleetnciSoamper4- ■ RIC F%=eandesine �09eC" &Ad 910 LE} T4 U1E1h+ W LED rnUM tK gp¢r941m e4�rppgWi; p9rgogn P�Dy1dC8 i t51!d ISgN Rr4P�:1F rk 9*nm • Ulrel ppl1eas bra cul 5iliturle gas4let Enmrm Sw?e Lgcabpn C or ,'. TheISPO I, w6�IR9rprWmal smundeach desIlgWwlthAdAFV (if 1GIXIv If�9i�idu21 LED 18f IRE rdi: A4 312D@rk Lll�Ih�bit Gy i 32rd2rd �:'-;.� ■ &VdQhtGnhd;BCJDp4cd1ervn110t9eJDF 65% spllIigir9tlt00fl,,won't r .YE, Cnm fbmmeaperncearEPArelmmd Dmff:a e-T*YelrnrniRgytdn�r4. for Tpear!TyeIVdlebftbana PhD1o�etandc[[U rysamaraavailable for cur oto nrdrdf and drrnrnirlg aautta 13D LEO 110 u 1, + Stamped bagel pfovxlesmxhaniral canpression-taSe.8IME006alnR%Mry Lumenmainmmee; + 120 84 W.0IX0 BIp1rS J0QKtxI per IBM 094ENSOONB e CaFOKwn TW Humbal Sumwagt TI.I.111 aerie9 of aetdDDr 1rAJre9 lnslelleltion: •4YeI•45.0por.Inds,EPA •1.3IF•Twadie•cal.alurninumarm d99igns:The dKYaWarnloRersaMeakL+psweptlool4 kl Pl9rar �� ■ Suitable mr appIIcsUarrs r 3G W" "estralgMarmf0vMS WlenoL�xlgS Wsdrrg pre9enped by A?G 1 c�rr4Cglred IInert ro wnNuAy of We � Optica + FiAra shpe whh arm inglak4 far �e oif F • E�IUicaof 72rryhtrigr hmm LED umlip- irmWislianand mounts is 62 droit palm I ratioris WRh ifidI acIIC IEfm s tally he p !e7 tar IB y e II, III, W and ■ MI draeke6 mast arm IrWr and pale wd19 I�rllGpns a€> smr9e88feaftvanallie ahowlnQ.a molin1lpgfor VvKkEft I rE� 1 •,4em Dptl[5 desl ed farirnrlt mw 1A and My WPHMllon irlleriDr rarn5 2A9ee Ztrihu5 on Inder urwwgam page 3 F b t _ + Mf G I fxmOBa4 Pahl+ pOawdBt paIAL +OCT`.30001C 400mKrr-111 rxllahaDPIWatnornlral 5mlllhk;kness LEp n?'a purtlehiendl�Nlrberarmnly Fh a year Iimihed warranty lly ff rntse irdor- • {At 7f] Ir13hG[I vralt�rr=1,Yrx;r.nuhh@ArutdmLF.cartu lixilversal Irvul 4di8gIB 120-2771610, LhaNlg 5(YStl E# ■ Lks9eq 11r L1L15J9 and GSA C222a2%0- elep-darn transfoerner for 3+47.4f gaigrwet1q IMnI �& • Modal9 meal Dwe glllI CArrear- bum LCEnllallicalklns,tw1>>c7all kDEOX mgtorriKVa4KFCI]46C fACulfebslG`tarmor. Mbn:?PAWW.tlrSIdr'Aahts armn]pl ■ krtpmelic Mern191 Se2f-ploh54'ilDn ■ CA apwM d t IP66 • r)n44fo nid 1 greater than 9Crlro- JIRHar facbx antl less Clan 1 G% THD ■ OR9 x1an81 uAry oanbrlLh)aYal�Me d 0 ip 107 Dr C +wet C15h17 7mmidA TIMI: IlljfTLurq A,esr �,1a "M149 Y woo #I ORDERING INFORMATION stt Nw PACS 5PR1J1_DIRkG Sp" Long «gpi fillennluntk deuait • GreeGmllse, 9C 296Qf • Phone: 214 ri;'tl--..Wb�• l.. UMMO l Due le Uur{ulieuhlllr�Rti101q'IIour pifr]u�Os.L„dJu.1Wrlicalhfa ee2AkLILPLEe4`niCur'KAiL, au�■u LLahtlWo Q Ia' S SW-UMG LGFML 4 Wk.Il eeemd • W [ge.Flansim dih w rrt6¢M. xv jHWNprllrtH+pot'n r -.Si Q1 LGHM elrr ORW RIAW NVVMATION OitIDERrNG EXAMPL Ltrt-A 941.11 5It f7B APA3 1.1 i 71 s F --r--] - - F] 1 a a w - k CL1 b p1 LEL 9D4 Hyhhre}mhdeaiSr! � Lhr�7YY27L7FiQ i.e9.penuklrr� �C` [�cJigMcemml KHghlrepirrY.iL& ISM H[ IIC 900GrL 706frJrl�rrdeL @L,., -. 304 ;9C4gk4*-q'bre LEtq S 12W SK 51041 C4�co r CV Conlln.rr4•sdmmirq 2 2C8i AMWFMrim 11]6 1096 w9 ylfelhrawet W7�d!! � 9iQf911 q se wm A -vAnI*xMmebmk5�'s73MYumgell Ahl '11"�rmw girb III armmLiIt.acceptiIfor 90- M,r RPM 3`Roundpdeaoepier pr�il RPM 4'RVUWeaiapler (Arrroximpo 5 AIR N IC 1m1Yl b9hT,l AM V %yld pde PI AID M%W&R mrir,n7le# WI a: 6maa• F UN. 00 H7 6.k4aweoarmI&mr pL&ernr� 7�p,'�r� CIS lH'kHra,ar. RFM SrMind paoadapio- i m, UMN uralkr'Ial RCER (rapes X WR MM A WritfluxlQlmLurlrsliI re 91. Bkd nbue;1-120..2-20W. 2 'mrorlarm4lackel.indpdafi' WN YI 3'20Y,A-MV.5-4&045 i&*hl Agid &m s 11Xe I! GR f3.,. &134M 3 T li RS p4llnarrSNW SSB SiWntmL,% e14FI)omd PULE; A Typeru ao Ri6C 411 vinnl"ro SSS -20-40-1-A -,1m I�.muncOM CGNTRDL DPTIDNS 013-041 GS TYy)e V FB Fav!Greun SrPW 4 16.1-efri vmnu'°0lm WIR 'A'SCAPE 5W TS" 4 411de CC Ggldm coibr 1ki- ;wPLgtw9%=M;III4'&4WY 2L Tyw I1 hipIrC 97 MR Y11RP4: V1dChPE rnmlan oonlfar � a�T � raFro 0TWbe0m A IypIPP+ora4ad KilM HAIL TiMSmlrhdmodde 8 Fkd*oDwfolPIrhut"-I $CPk+ MWammehlamellGaow4V- 5. sriiaM kal,d r,rn to 2M 41L Type rp himud W W trererlS is 10%5 PhYnooF.niar<nrildmYaKl IOn Y d Peox-e"mi.ro*16101dNFA lIIIIIIliM 2R rypcll140.71 sgr60hl 7. kh"'�.+;Lf+.aAw. R■4{Uffr Irt6 4'.31.1 D - la; gcichrtafiri4xrieuveacviy■mtrdnv,l 3R TypeIIPUVAd GrFIGr1 trot+root,rdFlr'jitrm.nalogQmmPdarar&-gM AA r eNEWri ht P{1A W' ok NEAYITZ1�6cellre€�p1a€iB uTP1e;e N -mill ,off e MiSrT'i71FN'IeTr 1A A•Io-FrWRowTlpsl 11L1a1I-277.5=9911.6=347? 1AR AIFranrMwT1p9IROM W'nghl 10.1. Aub Fnwil Rx Tlqre I AUUW WL lett 2A A0 FM P;* TY" 1 2AA AM Prom Row TM 1 Rcmed 911` riI Ptd AMO Frmrt Row T1Pe 1 RociLad Jr1` InH ENEursAyNsaw 0 3Z 1 1 +0.1 +0.1 +0. 0.+0.1 +0.2 0 a 0.2 +0.2 +0.2 .2 +0.2 + +0. 51,0\ +0.2+0. +.3 0. + 0.6 0.7 0.7+.5+. ++ + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0.2 3 0 .8 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 . 0. + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.2 .3 9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 6 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + L J T 7 0.2 0.2 . 1.1 2.3 . 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 0. 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 . 0.3 .4 0. 1.3 3. 4.0 3. 1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 1.3 5 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 .3 0. 0.5 0.9 2 3.0 .0 4.9 .8 5.3 4. 4.1 3.9 3. .3 2.6 1.0 0. 0.3 + + + 10.210.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 .3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1 .7 .0 4.5 .4 6.0 6.3 6.6 5.9 5. 5.1 4 4.8 .9 4.2 �.9 2.2 3 0.2 + + \ } .3 0.3 . 0.4 0.3 .4 0.5 1.2 2.6 4.7 4.5 4.7 7.3 7.6 7. 7.0 6 4 6. 2 6.3 .8 5.1 4.7 3.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 +0.3+0.4+.5+0.5+0.4+0. I. +.8+1.9+3.3+3.5+.0+4.2+4.1 +4.5+5.3+6.8+7.4+6.8+.5+6.5 .0 .6 7.0+6. +4.7+3. +2.5+1. +.4+0.3+0.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4+ + + +0.1 0.5 0. 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 .6 1.1 2.2 3. 4.3 4.7 5. 4.3 4.2 4.4 5.0 6.1 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.7 7. .3 7. 5.2 4. 0.3 0.2 10.710 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +5.5+4.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.7 0 0.8+11.0 1.0 9 .9 1.1 2.0 2.9 3.7 4.2 5.3 6.9 .1 4.4 4.8 5.7 5.5 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 5.3 6.3 5.5 8 4.1 4. 1.1 .3 0.2 0.1 0.1 + + + + + + + + + 16.61 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1. 3.8 4.8 5.7 6.6 5. 5.3 5.5 5.1 4.5 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.6 5.6 5.2 4.3 1 4.0 4.1 3.7 2.0 0. 0. . 0.1 0.1 1 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.5 2. 2.2 2.3 3.3 +.3+5.4 6.1 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 .1 5.0 5.6 4.5 4. 5.1 3.7 3.3 1.7 0. 0. 0.1 0.1 0 +0.0 .2+1.9+3.7+4.0+3.9 4.1 + +3.4+2.8+2.2+.1 +2.8 .44.2 4.6 4.1 .4+3. 9+2.9+.9+3.0+3.2+3. +.2+5.2 4.6+5.7+6. +4.8+4.0+2.9+1.0+ +0.1 0.1 +0 0.0 .1 0.3 3.7 5.7 6.8 6.3 5.8 .6 4.3 2.9 2.1 2.5 .1 3. 3.6 3. 2 .5 2.4 .4 2.6 2.8 3. 3.5 4. 6 6.4 5.9 4. 3.7 2.9 1.7 0.1 0�0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 5.7 7.2 8.6 9.7 7.4 2.6 1.9 .7+3. 3.1 .7 0�\9 +2.0+2. 2.4 2. 2.9 3. 3.9 .6 4.6 .8 2.6 1.9 .6 0.2 '0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +4.6-4 + + + 0.0 0 0 .2 1. 5.1 7.6 11.711.1 8.0 4.8 3.7 2.4 1. .7 1.5 1. 1.6 1. 1.9 .1 2.2 .4 2.9 3.9 4.6 4. 9 2. 1. 1.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0. 0.1 0.3 7.9 6.6 7.9 8.8 7.9 4.6- 1 .3 1.4 1.5 .6+11.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 3. 3.2 . 2. 1.2 0.9 0. + ++ + + +AA4+ + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.1 3 7.8 6.6 6.8 8.5 8.0 5.2 3.8 2.7 .0 \ T \ 8 2. 3.0 3 2 2. .2 1.7 .3 1. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.5 4.2 6.4 6.9 7.1 9.0 7.5 4.9 .7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.5 \ + + + + + + + +11. + + + + + + /\ 0.0 .0+0.0+0 0.0 0 1 0. 6.0 7.9 11.9 9.4 8.7 .2 4.4 3.3 0 + +0. +0. + + + + + + +10.6'10.97.4 + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 .1 1. 5.9 7.2 10.010.9 7.4 4.4 3.4 2.6 1. 1.3 .3 1.1 +0�O(0.0+0.0+0.0+0. +0.1 10.2+ 2+4.7+6.7+7.7+7.8+6. +. +.1 +2.0+1 4g��/ �T +.9+0.8+0. .6+0 0.0 0:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 i0.3 .8 3.1 4.1 4.8 5.6 5.8 4.4 2.6 1. 1 7 0. 0.5 0.5 0. z� + + + t + + + + + + + + 28 ST�� + + \ o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.2 . 1.3 0. 0.6 0 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ON SITE/ + +0.4 + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.1 .4 0.4 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +7 OFF SITE + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.2 1. 1.6 3 3 0.3 + + t 10. 10. +0. +0. +0. t t + + + t + + + t t + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0. 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 0. 0.2 0.2 0. .2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 .3 0.4 0.5 0. 0.6 0.4 0 0.3 0. .2 0.2 0.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0. .1 0-0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.1 0. 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.1 0 .1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0+0.1 0 .1 S + + + + + + + + + + +0. +0. +0. + +0.0+0. + a h 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +0.1 +0. + .1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0%% +0.0 +0.0 + .0 + S � a < < +0.0 +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O. b + 0 .0 0.00.00.00.0 )z ' \ t+++++0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 _ \\\ 0 +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + +0.0 +00 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 /J + +0.0 +0.0 .0 LOT 5 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 N 1 " = 20'-0" x�W04 Z o Z flerfecmr CSS s x CoQ Tk w fiemmn¢ 010o111m Kl lf9r 1 +k d r J tl Ead4 b"64 Ii" i 11 lib YM wi TKNA 160L -W 14th l S7 133Cp 1 ZO42 13125 -131961 13675' 129.51 467KI rrA [971.-Ri 214 27 19664 19dpG 15212 -AW IN% 1�T3, 6�Tm4inA f9llL it•165 39& -383 Pm 2521 29P-0 26M] V445 6011150 nii 1301.-4E Td v Fiat 8109 8104 84471 6439 RM 207DNM Iax-M 1A0• 157 liM 1t4S 1203& 124361 12581 11Rm7 46700gLA I KL -49 2111- 227 17143 19973 17#0 185211 20224, 17394 607OW � I n.4•105 330 383 23496 23612 24199 24MI 25357 23129 "1161", I U,x N 97 4 805 4668 488641M dz? 4K11 7GAnp3 1 x L-311 1411, 157 ma 3175 9356 9499I Eat 8&141 4 mcnp; 1 % fir 214- 277 13350 19&31- 13575 1 9331 14004 tagm3jl- 7m0nna � lU-X- 9� -3-- 17M 1-412 - 174R" 179-A t13v1' 1 E0105 nu � At+?'UM1J'FrVF �€ALA4S!'!IP OF77CS is ■ ids ILILit Lou. Cdr Pr.Ito;noG-re f] oadafship bppiatltrls Sp&A9F19119r1Udg hes 8kc+51opdd Trm 4p1iC9 - aleagnaC roof minibad 2nd propet 4hmng of IRB aub tla2lot�ip iquO.Iaridu an d 1h9If ni.MIT 1AantliffWrlmrrows2R{SeeCL1 tliStrldJGonIlslmrin2:iNter JelaN Cow 1A ■ W gimum iifumin6linn an fFUFO FUW diSPIRY • W-Ximum paba spabrg Uplic 2A + Exaellentirorm row uluminaition and dnve lane • Qptirnal ureformdy for driMg tans and inperipr {ow5 AGCE95THEYS EE NIM PACE ! 1JLE31 4 Lyrting - 401 Wlennhlm God eu m Greanilla. SC 2DW • fhoare: 461&IND Del to tullFukJ IS lrfmiuo+Our kl aae-MraDsm dre erLle[t La$rrtlW lmke. • �i Fe.■hrrn ■ F11111111"LlI . , • urr enLel'J pna Lk1s. utJ wltrehL Q Cie" 5'kl WAG Lfr1115 {J Rrkh arir*�ed + ra ewr rJm�ax+' ■w ur ■etdt va'rFpmrr + }nL•tl r';E+4 aursaa� sna 0 3Z 1 1 +0.1 +0.1 +0. 0.+0.1 +0.2 0 a 0.2 +0.2 +0.2 .2 +0.2 + +0. 51,0\ +0.2+0. +.3 0. + 0.6 0.7 0.7+.5+. ++ + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0.2 3 0 .8 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 . 0. + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.2 0.2 .3 9 1.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 6 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + L J T 7 0.2 0.2 . 1.1 2.3 . 2.9 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.2 0. 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 . 0.3 .4 0. 1.3 3. 4.0 3. 1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.4 1.3 5 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 .3 0. 0.5 0.9 2 3.0 .0 4.9 .8 5.3 4. 4.1 3.9 3. .3 2.6 1.0 0. 0.3 + + + 10.210.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 3 .3 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.1 .7 .0 4.5 .4 6.0 6.3 6.6 5.9 5. 5.1 4 4.8 .9 4.2 �.9 2.2 3 0.2 + + \ } .3 0.3 . 0.4 0.3 .4 0.5 1.2 2.6 4.7 4.5 4.7 7.3 7.6 7. 7.0 6 4 6. 2 6.3 .8 5.1 4.7 3.2 1.2 0.3 0.2 +0.3+0.4+.5+0.5+0.4+0. I. +.8+1.9+3.3+3.5+.0+4.2+4.1 +4.5+5.3+6.8+7.4+6.8+.5+6.5 .0 .6 7.0+6. +4.7+3. +2.5+1. +.4+0.3+0.2 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 4+ + + +0.1 0.5 0. 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 .6 1.1 2.2 3. 4.3 4.7 5. 4.3 4.2 4.4 5.0 6.1 6.0 5.5 5.5 5.7 6.7 7. .3 7. 5.2 4. 0.3 0.2 10.710 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +5.5+4.8 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.7 0 0.8+11.0 1.0 9 .9 1.1 2.0 2.9 3.7 4.2 5.3 6.9 .1 4.4 4.8 5.7 5.5 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 5.3 6.3 5.5 8 4.1 4. 1.1 .3 0.2 0.1 0.1 + + + + + + + + + 16.61 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1. 3.8 4.8 5.7 6.6 5. 5.3 5.5 5.1 4.5 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.7 4.6 5.6 5.2 4.3 1 4.0 4.1 3.7 2.0 0. 0. . 0.1 0.1 1 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.5 2. 2.2 2.3 3.3 +.3+5.4 6.1 5.6 4.9 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.4 3.3 3.2 .1 5.0 5.6 4.5 4. 5.1 3.7 3.3 1.7 0. 0. 0.1 0.1 0 +0.0 .2+1.9+3.7+4.0+3.9 4.1 + +3.4+2.8+2.2+.1 +2.8 .44.2 4.6 4.1 .4+3. 9+2.9+.9+3.0+3.2+3. +.2+5.2 4.6+5.7+6. +4.8+4.0+2.9+1.0+ +0.1 0.1 +0 0.0 .1 0.3 3.7 5.7 6.8 6.3 5.8 .6 4.3 2.9 2.1 2.5 .1 3. 3.6 3. 2 .5 2.4 .4 2.6 2.8 3. 3.5 4. 6 6.4 5.9 4. 3.7 2.9 1.7 0.1 0�0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 5.7 7.2 8.6 9.7 7.4 2.6 1.9 .7+3. 3.1 .7 0�\9 +2.0+2. 2.4 2. 2.9 3. 3.9 .6 4.6 .8 2.6 1.9 .6 0.2 '0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +4.6-4 + + + 0.0 0 0 .2 1. 5.1 7.6 11.711.1 8.0 4.8 3.7 2.4 1. .7 1.5 1. 1.6 1. 1.9 .1 2.2 .4 2.9 3.9 4.6 4. 9 2. 1. 1.0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0. 0.1 0.3 7.9 6.6 7.9 8.8 7.9 4.6- 1 .3 1.4 1.5 .6+11.9 2.2 2.7 3.3 3. 3.2 . 2. 1.2 0.9 0. + ++ + + +AA4+ + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.1 3 7.8 6.6 6.8 8.5 8.0 5.2 3.8 2.7 .0 \ T \ 8 2. 3.0 3 2 2. .2 1.7 .3 1. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.5 4.2 6.4 6.9 7.1 9.0 7.5 4.9 .7 1.4 1.1 0.7 0.5 \ + + + + + + + +11. + + + + + + /\ 0.0 .0+0.0+0 0.0 0 1 0. 6.0 7.9 11.9 9.4 8.7 .2 4.4 3.3 0 + +0. +0. + + + + + + +10.6'10.97.4 + + + + + + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 .1 1. 5.9 7.2 10.010.9 7.4 4.4 3.4 2.6 1. 1.3 .3 1.1 +0�O(0.0+0.0+0.0+0. +0.1 10.2+ 2+4.7+6.7+7.7+7.8+6. +. +.1 +2.0+1 4g��/ �T +.9+0.8+0. .6+0 0.0 0:00 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 i0.3 .8 3.1 4.1 4.8 5.6 5.8 4.4 2.6 1. 1 7 0. 0.5 0.5 0. z� + + + t + + + + + + + + 28 ST�� + + \ o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.3 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.3 3.9 4.2 . 1.3 0. 0.6 0 0.4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ON SITE/ + +0.4 + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 1.7 1.1 .4 0.4 0.3 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +7 OFF SITE + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �.2 1. 1.6 3 3 0.3 + + t 10. 10. +0. +0. +0. t t + + + t + + + t t + + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2 0. 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.5 .4 0. 0.2 0.2 0. .2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 .3 0.4 0.5 0. 0.6 0.4 0 0.3 0. .2 0.2 0.2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0. .1 0-0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0 0.1 0. 0.1 .1 0.1 0.1 0 0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 .1 0 0.1 0.1 0 .1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.0+0.1 0 .1 S + + + + + + + + + + +0. +0. +0. + +0.0+0. + a h 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +0.1 +0. + .1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0%% +0.0 +0.0 + .0 + S � a < < +0.0 +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O.O +O. b + 0 .0 0.00.00.00.0 )z ' \ t+++++0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 _ \\\ 0 +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 .0 + +0.0 +00 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 /J + +0.0 +0.0 .0 LOT 5 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 N 1 " = 20'-0" 0 IIIIIIIII U x�W04 Z o Z o�1 CSS s x CoQ L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C 4� E�r'"W� W 0 IIIIIIIII U x�W04 Z o Z Fa.� �� CSS o x L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C LLI E�r'"W� W Ew-- W H 0 z� �..2dz�� w r�k 00 00 . o W ZX �QZ>a IY. L) W r�nU ■ z�OW aw�zE- x�W04 U) CO �aw�W Z Fa.� �� CSS E-�E�a�o U�D W x L���Qzz ca) � 7 Z > C LLI E�r'"W� W Ew-- W H 0 z� �..2dz�� w Mx�E E,Wrs. Z W ZX �QZ>a IY. ■ o t! LO C\2 C\2 E- LCA efl O ■ ■ O Q WO U� W ZZ O Z M ■ ■ Sheet Number 0 0 0 E - w a W E- �QZ>a L) W C)Qw w z U OEC W >Qd x <� x x W �:) E- ■ ■ ■ ■ O Q WO U� W ZZ O Z M ■ ■ Sheet Number 0 0 0 eosin . RIM = 956.91 INV = 95321 e� 'Rin'="ms.i n ee RM = 95l . 6M -h- 1 M1 RIM = 957. ..s 'M RIM = 957.91 RIM - 95761 Ot 1 5507900 1 t Printed: 2:06 PM, 6/29/2017 Page 1 of 1 M:\01272-03\Excel\LaMont SS_20140818 STORM SEWER DESIGN PROJECT NAME:LaMont Retail Bldg YEAR STORM: 10 DATE: 6/5/2017 NOTE: Pipe lengths are from center of I PROJECT LOCATION: Monticello, MN structure to center of structure DESIGN BY: BJS MANNING'S "N" 0.013 CHECKED BY: BJS Structure Number Offset to Length Area Area Area Total Te to Time " i " Runoff Slope Pipe Capacity Velocity Upper Sump Lower Upper Lower Upper Lower Structure PIPE NOTES From To Station Center Feet Acres "C" x"C" C x A Inlet in Pipe in/hr (cfs) % Dia. In. Q (cfs) V (fps) Invert Elevation Invert Casting Casting Build Cover Cover Dimension CLASS CB1 CB2 80 0.22 98 0.22 0.22 10.00 0.48 5.8 1.25 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 954.45 954.15 958.45 959.00 4.00 3.00 3.85 48" V CB2 CB3 50 0.01 61 0.01 0.22 10.00 0.30 5.8 1.29 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 954.15 953.97 959.00 958.25 4.85 3.85 3.28 48" V CB3 CB4 140 0.08 93 0.07 0.30 10.00 0.85 5.8 1.72 0.37 12 2.17 2.76 953.97 953.45 958.25 957.50 4.28 3.28 3.05 48" V RD CB4 70 0.11 98 0.11 0.11 10.00 0.29 5.8 0.63 2.00 6 0.79 4.04 955.35 953.95 N/A 957.50 N/A N/A 3.05 48" V CB4 STMH1 20 0.16 98 0.16 0.56 10.00 0.09 5.8 3.25 0.50 15 4.57 3.72 953.45 953.35 957.50 957.60 4.05 2.80 3.00 48" V Printed: 2:06 PM, 6/29/2017 Page 1 of 1 M:\01272-03\Excel\LaMont SS_20140818 WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 5, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Crown Bay Retail City Project No. 2017-021 WSB Project No. 010266-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the site and civil plans received on June 5, 2017 as prepared by Stone Tent Achitecture and Schultz Engineering and Site Design and offer the following comments. Site Plan 1. The existing northerly access from Cedar Street could pose traffic conflicts given the proximity to the intersection with Oakwood Drive and the southerly access drive adjacent to Jimmy Johns. The northerly access is being proposed as a service drive only for truck deliveries and trash service in order to separate these trucks from the heavier used southerly access. The proposed service drive should be properly signed as such. 2. Note on the plans that all sidewalk and pedestrian ramps shall comply with MnDOT and ADA standards. Grading Plan 3. This plan sheet includes removals and proposed storm sewer and should be labeled as such. 4. Label percent grades and show drainage arrows for the parking lot. 5. Provide detail on the type and color of the retaining wall. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 070517.docx July 5, 2017 Page 2 Utilitv and Paving Plan 6. The line type weights are all the same and difficult to decipher the actual proposed utility notes. A separate utility plan is preferred and will be required with the as -built drawing submittal. 7. Confirm the water service pipe size. The as -built indicate a 6 -inch service stub from the main. An existing 2 -inch water stub is identified on the plans. Depending on the use(s) of the building, the applicant should demonstrate that the proposed water service size is adequate for the user and if fire suppression is needed. If there are multiple tenants in the building, it will be required to split the service inside the building for each tenant and have separate meters for each tenant. 8. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations or pipe sizes and material types. These items shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 9. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 10. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Details 11. Detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website - Engineering department. Stormwater Management 12. We believe the existing 15" storm sewer stub that is extended to the site was designed to accommodate runoff from development of the site based on the capacity of the stub. So rate control will only need to be provided if you are exceeding the capacity of the stub. 13. The SWPPP indicates that the proposed site improvement does not create 1 acre or more of new impervious surface, thus volume reduction and water quality is not required. 14. Provide drainage calculations for the proposed storm sewer. 15. Identify all emergency overflow routes and elevations for the proposed parking lot catch basin on the grading plan. The EOF should be a minimum of 1.5' below the low building opening. 16. The minimum storm sewer pipe size shall be 15 -inch per City Design Manual. 17. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 0705l7.docx July 5, 2017 Page 3 control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website - Engineering department. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC Enclosure skb K:\010266-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Crown Bay 070517.docx City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 2G. Consideration to approve Ordinance 667 and Summary Ordinance 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts. Applicant: Citv of Monticello (AS) Property: City of Monticello Planning Case Number: 2017-020 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to review and adopt proposed amendments to the City's zoning ordinance for outdoor storage in the I-1 and I-2 industrial zoning districts, consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Recent discussions by the EDA and IEDC regarding the availability of industrial land and the tools needed to achieve the City's comprehensive plan goals for attracting and retaining living wage jobs and diversification and growth of tax base have led to a staff review of the current zoning ordinances pertaining to industrial use types and more specifically to outdoor storage. The use of land for the construction of bricks and mortar buildings which produce both jobs and tax base is at the core of the rationale for the proposed changes to the outdoor storage regulations. At present, the City allows outside storage in the I-1 and I-2 zoning districts as a permitted use (except when directly adjacent to residential uses) in an amount that may be as large as the principal building of the principal use of a parcel. As such, large amounts of industrial land may be used to support outdoor storage accessory uses rather than preserving land which could be used for new or expanded principal use buildings. One of the primary goals for the amendment is to balance the need for outdoor storage for industrial uses with the preservation of industrial land for buildings and jobs. In addition, the proposed amendments attempt to address the comprehensive plan goal of encouraging step-up development overall and with maintaining compatibility with other land uses. Finally, the standards for the storage in terms of screening, fencing and surfacing lack needed clarity and clear references to other sections of applicable code. The proposed amendments address these issues through the following: Addition of a requirement for conditional use permit for outdoor storage in where outdoor storage is proposed to be located adjacent to non -industrial uses in both the I-1 and I-2 districts. Limiting the allowable area for outdoor storage specific to the district. Less outdoor storage would be allowed in the I-1 unless authorized through conditional use permit, while the current allowance for outdoor storage in the B. City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 I-2 District (up to the size of the principal building) would be maintained. • Limiting the locations of outdoor storage to side and rear yards and side yards on double -fronting lots. Refined standards for fencing in both I -1 and I-2 Districts. Requires surfacing of outdoor storage and a reference to City codes for erosion control and stormwater management to support compliance with MPCA industrial stormwater permitting standards and City stormwater management best practices. Zoning ordinance definitions for light industrial and heavy industrial uses and allowable principal uses within each district are included for reference. Also attached are current examples of outdoor storage in Monticello. The examples vary in the amount of outside storage relative to the principal building. IEDC AND EDA Review The proposed amendments were reviewed by the IEDC in March and April. The IEDC recommended adjustment to the original amendment language proposed by staff. Staff had proposed language limiting outdoor storage in the I-1 District to 30% of the square footage of the principal building, with an allowance of up to 50% of the square footage of the principal building by CUP for the I-1 District. The IEDC recommended allowance for 50% of square footage of the principal building and up to the same square footage as the principal building by CUP. The EDA reviewed the proposed ordinance in May and concurred with the IEDC's recommendation to allow additional storage opportunity in the I-1. The EDA also requested some additional language clarifications and adjustment. As such, the EDA and IEDC's recommendations are reflected in the proposed ordinance amendments. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the attached staff report and materials for proposed amendments to outdoor storage ordinances in June. The Planning Commission acted to approve the proposed amendment, later rescinding the motion as the public hearing was not opened. The Planning Commission then held a public hearing on July 11th and held further discussion on the item. There was no public present to address the Commission on the item during either hearing. After discussion on July 11th, the Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve the ordinance amendments as proposed. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Planning Commission unanimously recommends alternative I below. Decision 1: Ordinance No. 667 Oil City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 667 for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 667 for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. Decision 2: Summary Ordinance 667A 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 667A for summary amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 667A for amendments to Monticello Zoning Ordinance Chapter 5, Section 3 for regulations for accessory use outdoor storage in industrial districts, based on findings in Resolution PC -2017-014. 3. Motion to table action for additional information. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the adoption of the proposed ordinance amendments. The proposed amendments support the comprehensive plan goals of attracting and retaining living wage jobs and diversification and growth of tax base through the maximization of industrial land for building and job creation. The ordinances also support a review for compatibility between differing land uses and maintenance of development requirements and standards. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution PC -2017-014 B. Draft — Ordinance No. 667, Outdoor Storage Amendment C. Draft — Ordinance No. 667A, Summary Ordinance Amendment D. Excerpt, Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 5, Section 3 E. Excerpts, Monticello Comprehensive Plan 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-014 RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE RELATED TO CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan provides for goals of attracting and retaining jobs and increasing tax base; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance serves as the primary implementation tool of the City's Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives; and WHEREAS, Chapter 5, Section 5(3)(D) of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance relating to Outdoor Storage within industrial districts has been identified as benefitting from amendment in support of these comprehensive Plan goals; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017 on the amendments and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendments improve the ability of the Planning Commission and City Council to direct land use and land use policy in the City. 2. The proposed amendments are consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Commission recommends that the City Council adopts the proposed amendments as presented and approved. ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2017 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2017-014 MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Brad Fyle, Chair ATTEST: Angela Schumann, Community Development Director ORDINANCE NO. 667 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, ADDRESSING CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) —ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: Section 1. Chapter 5, Section 3(D) — Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses and Structures is hereby amended to read as follows: (26) Outdoor Storage J%L (b) ft -_2 districts, the following shall apo (i) When abutting a zoning district or use of than industrial, roses distriet or r-esidefAial use, the outdoor sto use shallrequire authorization through a conditional use p it following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance. 14 (ii) The storage area shall be located within yard, except that an outdoor storage area may also include that area between the front building line and the rear yard along the interior lot side. Storage may not be located beyond the side building line on the street side of a corner lot. On a double fronting lot, outdoor storage may be located in the side yard only. (iii) In the I-1 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to 50% of the gross square footage of the principal building. Storage may be increased up to 100% of the gross square footage of the principal building by conditional use permit. (iv) In the I-2 District, outdoor storage shall be limited to an area not to exceed the gross square footage of the principal building. (v) In the I-1 District. outdoor storage areas shall meet the minimum building setback from all side and rear property lines per the requirements of this ordinance and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50' feet from the adjacent property line. (vi) In the I-2 District, outdoor storage shall be setback 10' from all side and rear property lines and when adjacent to zoning districts or uses other than industrial, shall be located a minimum of 50' feet from the adjacent property line. ORDINANCE NO. 667 (vii) The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring r-esiden4ial uses and from the public right of way in compliance with this section its sefflflrrarw i L OGC60. 4.1 a. In the I-1 district, screening shall consist of masonry walls or fencing constructed of wood or vinyl and shall provide for 100% opacity. Such fences or walls shall meet all other the requirements of Section 4.3 of this ordinance. b. In the I-2 District, metal fences may be permitted when the materials have been recycled and reprocessed to resemble new building materials and are designed for use as a fencing material, and when such materials are designed to resemble allowed materials as listed in section 4.3(J)(1). c. Additional landscaping of one evergreen tree per 6' of linear fenceline is required to be planted along the exterior of outdoor storage area in conformance with ection 4.1 of this ordinance. Trees may be staggered along fenceline. Fences and walls shall not exceed 15' in height as measured from the existing grade to the top of the fence panel. e. Height of storage may not exceed the screen in wall or fence, or the height of required landscaping. (viii) Outdoor storage shall be allowed only on improved surfa of asphalt or concrete. ft) Storage in shipping containers shall be prohibited unless h storage occurs within the screened outdoor storage area. (x) There shall be no storage of hazardous waste, as defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. (xi) Exterior storage areas shall comply with all applicable fire codes and no portion of the outdoor storage shall block access to hydrants, fire sprinklers, or other fire -fighting equipment. (Nifi) I,era (xiv) Vehiele storage sha4l not be pefmitted in front yards. (xv) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this ordinance. (xvi) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (xvii) Does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this ordinance. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 667 (xviii) Outdoor storage areas shall comply with all requirements for grading, drainage, stomrwater managment and erosion control per Section 4.10 of this ordinance. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance are available online and at " Ar- `iceno City Hall for examination upon requf A .4 MEV V & I ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 667A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR ADDRESSING CHAPTER 5, SECTION 3(D) — ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, Ordinance No. 667 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 667, the following Summary Ordinanc 66;heen prepared for publication as authorized by state law. 'Aj� The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments are to clarify various chapters and sections with changes to the following: 5.3 (D) (26). Outdoor Storage A printed copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complea ordinance be posted on the City's website following publication. -_ �M, APPROVED FOR PUBLYR 24'h day of July, 2017. L ATTE Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: A Monticello, Minnesota, this JNTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.1 Use Table Subsection (A) Explanation of Use Table Structure Vehicle fuel Sales C C CI 1� 5.2(F)(30) Vehicle Sales and Rental C 5.2(F)(31) Veterinary Facilities C 5.2(F)(32) (Rural) Veterinary Facilities C C C 5.20(32) (Neighborhood) Wholesale Sales P P P None Industrial Uses Auto Repair — Major C �P P 5.2(G)(I) Bulk Fuel Sales and P P 5.2(G)(2) Storage Contractor's Yard, Temporary 5.2(G 3 Extraction of Materials I I I 5.2(G)(4) General Warehousing C C P P 5.2(G)(5) Heavy Manufacturing C 5.2(G)(6) Industrial Services C P None Land Reclamation C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 5.2(G)(7) Light Manufacturing P P P 5.2(6)(8) Machinery/Truck Repair P P 5.2(G)(9) & Sales Recycling and Salvage C C 5.2(G)( 10) Center Self -Storage Facilities P C P 5.2(G)( I1) Truck or Freight C P P 5.2 G I2 Terminal Waste Disposal & IC 5.2(�(13) Incineration Wrecker Services C P 5.20(14) Commercial Day Care Commercial Lodging C P C C C P C none none 5.2(F)( 12 5.2(F)(8) City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 321 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section S.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (C) Table of Permitted Accessory Uses Indoor Storage P P P P P P 5.3(D)(20) Incidental Light P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(2 1 Manufacturing Machinery/Trucking C 5.3(D)(22) Repair & Sales Office P P P P P P none Off-street Loading Space P PC P P P P P P P 49 Off-street Parking P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.8 Open Sales P C C C 5.3(D)(23) Operation and storage of agricultural vehicles, P 5.3(D)(24) equipment, and machinery Outdoor Sidewalk Sales & P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(25) Display (businesses) Residential 5.3(D)(25)(a) Outdoor Storage P P P P P P P P P P Industrial 5.3(D)(25)(b) Park Facility Buildings & P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(26) Structures (public) Private Amateur Radio P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(B) Private Receiving Antennae and Antenna P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 4.13(C) Support Structures Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or P P P P P P C C 5.3(D)(27) industrial use) Shelters (Storm or P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(28) Fallout) Sign(s) P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(29) Solar Energy System P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(30) Swimming Pool P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(3 1 Taproom (Retail Sales Accessory to Production WF7 C C C C C C 5.3 D 33 Brewery) Large Trash Handling and P P P P P P P P P P P P 5.3(D)(34) Recycling Collection Area Page 370 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.8: Off - Street Parkinz CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (26) Outdoor Storage (a) In all zoning districts, all materials and equipment, except as specifically denoted in this ordinance, shall be stored within a building or fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties except for the following: (i) Clothes line pole and wire. (ii) Recreational equipment and vehicles, subject to off-street parking regulations in Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (iii) Construction and landscaping material currently being used on the premises. (iv) Off-street parking of passenger vehicles, emergency vehicles and -small commercial vehicles in residential areas, unless otherwise required to be screened according to Section 4.8 of this ordinance. (v) Propane tanks, fuel oil tanks, and other similar residential heating fuel storage tanks which do not exceed 1,000 gallons in capacity and shall not be located within five (5) feet of any property line. (vi) Wood piles in which wood is stored for fuel provided that not more than 10 cords shall be stored on any property. A cord shall be 4'x4'x8'. (vii) All wood piles shall be five (5) feet or more from the rear and side yard property lines and shall be stored behind the appropriate setback line in front yards. (viii) Solar energy systems. (ix) Wind energy conversion systems. (b) In the I-1 and I-2 districts, the following shall apply: (i) When abutting a residential district or residential use, the outdoor storage use shall require authorization through a conditional use permit following the provisions of Section 2.4(D) of this ordinance. (ii) The area is fenced and screened from view of neighboring residential uses in compliance with Section 4.1(I) of this ordinance. (iii) Storage is screened from view from the public right-of-way in compliance with Section 4.1(I) of this ordinance. (iv) Storage area is grassed or surfaced to control dust. (v) Vehicle storage shall not be permitted in front yards. (A) Noise shall be controlled consistent with the standards of this ordinance. (vii) All lighting shall be in compliance with Section 4.4 of this ordinance. (viii) Does not take up parking space as required for conformity to this ordinance. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 387 CHAPTERS: USE STANDARDS Section 5.3 Accessory Use Standards Subsection (D) Additional Specific Standards for Certain Accessory Uses (27) Park Facility Buildings and Structures Limitations on number and size for accessory buildings and structures shall not apply to active or passive public park facilities. (28) Retail Sales of Goods (as part of an office or industrial use) (a) Location: (i) All sales are conducted indoors within a clearly defined area of the principal building reserved exclusively for retail sales. Said sales area must be physically segregated from other principal activities in the building. (ii) The retail sales area must be located on the ground floor of the principal building. (b) Sales Area. The retail sales activity shall not occupy more than fifteen (15) percent of the gross floor area of the building. (c) Access. The building where such use is located is one having direct access to a collector or arterial level street without the necessity of using residential streets. (d) Hours. Hours of operation are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The provisions of this section are considered and satisfactorily met. (29) Shelters (Storm or Fallout) Storm and fallout shelters shall not alter the character of the premises with respect to the primary use as permitted in the district. (30) Sign(s) All signs within the City shall comply with the finishing standards contained in section 4.5: Signs Section 4.5, Signs. (31) Solar Energy Systems (a) All Solar Energy Systems (i) All solar energy systems shall be operable and maintained in good repair. (ii) Solar energy systems shall meet all required setbacks and height requirements of the underlying zoning district. (iii) Solar energy systems shall be an integral part of the structure to which they are attached. Page 388 City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance CHAPTER 8: RULES & DEFINITIONS Section 8.4 Definitions Subsection (B) Lots MANUFACTURING, HEAVY: The manufacturing of products from raw or unprocessed materials, where the finished product may be combustible or explosive. This category shall also include any establishment or facility using large unscreened outdoor structures such as conveyor belt systems, cooling towers, cranes, storage silos, or similar equipment that cannot be integrated into the building design, or engaging in large-scale outdoor storage. Any industrial use that generates noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulate that may be offensive or obnoxious to adjacent land uses, or requires a significant amount of on-site hazardous chemical storage shall be classified under this land use. This use shall include any packaging of the product being manufactured on-site. Examples include but are not limited to the production of the following: large-scale food and beverage operations, lumber, milling, and planing facilities; aggregate, concrete and asphalt plants; foundries, forge shops, open air welding, and other intensive metal fabrication facilities; chemical blending, mixing, or production, and plastic processing and production. MANUFACTURING, LIGHT: The mechanical transformation of predominantly previously prepared materials into new products, including assembly of component parts and the creation of products for sale to the wholesale or retail markets or directly to consumers. Such uses are wholly confined within an enclosed building, do not include processing of hazardous gases and chemicals, and do not emit noxious noise, smoke, vapors, fumes, dust, glare, odor, or vibration. Examples include, but are not limited to: production or repair of small machines or electronic parts and equipment; woodworking and cabinet building; publishing and lithography; computer design and development; research, development, testing facilities and laboratories; apparel production; sign making; assembly of pre -fabricated parts, manufacture of electric, electronic, or optical instruments or devices; manufacture and assembly of artificial limbs, dentures, hearing aids, and surgical instruments or parts; manufacture, processing, and packing of food products or cosmetics; and manufacturing of components, jewelry, clothing, trimming decorations and any similar item. MARQUEE: Any permanent roof like structure projecting beyond a theater building or extending along and projecting beyond the wall of that building, generally designed and constructed to provide protection from the weather. MAXIMUM DENSITY: The number of dwelling units allowed per gross acre of land as controlled by an individual or joint ownership group. MEAN GROUND LEVEL: The elevation established for the purpose of regulating the number of stories and the height of buildings. Grade shall be the mean level of the finished surface of the ground adjacent to the exterior walls of the buildings. MICRO DISTILLERY: A distillery that produces 40,000 proof gallons of liquor or less annually. City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Page 449 Ideally, the Comprehensive Plan does not have an Economic Development chapter. The Land Use Plan would be sufficient to channel market forces to meet the development objectives of the community. In reality, certain development needs cannot be met without public intervention. The Economic Development chapter of the Plan focuses on the aspects of Monticello's future that require particular attention and action by the City. These actions include: ► Attracting and retaining jobs ► Expanding the tax base ► Enhancing the economic vitality of Downtown ► Facilitating redevelopment Attracting and Retaining Jobs The creation and retention of jobs is one of the most important objectives for Monticello. Jobs, particularly jobs with income levels capable of supporting a family, are key to achieving many elements of Monticello's vision for the future. ► Jobs attract residents to the community. Jobs will pay a critical role in creating the type of "move up" housing sought by the City. ► Jobs provide the income needed to support local business and government services. ► Retention of businesses promote community stability by keeping jobs and residents in Monticello. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan contains a section on Employment. This section contains data about employment in Monticello and of its residents. Among the key findings in this section are: ► While the community added nearly 5,000 people between 2000 and 2010 according to the U.S. Census, it only added 1,430 jobs according to the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW). In 2010, the community had 6,992 jobs according to the QCEW but 7,093 people in the labor force according to the Census. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-1 ► The U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies' OntheMap website shows that in 2010 4,597 people leave the community each day to work, while 3,849 people come into the community to work. Only 835 both live and work in the community. ► Approximately 15% of residents in 2010 are employed within the community. This has dropped from 18% in 2002. ► As shown in Figure 4.1, 2012 data from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on their mnprospector.com website shows that Monticello is made up of a wide range of small to medium sized employers. Only 10 employers have more than 100 employees. Over half have fewer than four (4) employees. ► Workers for Monticello businesses come primarily from Monticello and the surrounding region. Nearly 75% of people working in Monticello live in Monticello, adjacent townships, or other places in Wright and Sherburne counties (2010 OntheMap). ► Nearly 40% of Monticello residents work in Hennepin County, with the largest percentage in Minneapolis, Plymouth, and Maple Grove. Another 15% work elsewhere in Wright County, including Buffalo and St. Michael. ► The 2007-2011 American Community Survey (ACS) Census reported a mean travel time to work of 28.5 minutes. This is up from the 2000 Census travel time of 24 minutes. The mean travel time in the 2007-2011 ACS was 29.7 minutes for Wright County and 24.5 minutes for the region overall. Figure 4-1:2012 Total Establishments by Size 1-4 Employees 254 52.05 5-9 Employees 97 19.88 10-19 Employees 64 13.11 20-49 Employees 42 8.61 50-99 Employees 21 4.30 100-249 Employees 7 1.43 250-499 Employees 2 0.41 500-999 Employees 1 0.20 Background Reports The City of Monticello conducts studies and assessments as needed to help guide its economic development efforts. The findings and recommendations of these studies are summarized below with the most recent provided first. 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research (BR&E) Report Monticello's Business Retention and Expansion (BR&E) program was initiated by the City of Monticello, the Monticello Chamber of Commerce and Industry, DEED, and the University of Minnesota Extension. It was also sponsored by over a dozen local businesses. Through the BR&E program, 60 businesses were visited. Findings from the visits and data analysis found: ► 78% of the visited businesses were locally owned and operated. ► 20% of businesses were in manufacturing, 18% in retail trade, and 13% in other services. ► The businesses employed over 1,600 full-time and 975 part-time employees, with a trimmed average (an average where the low and high were discarded to prevent skewing) of 15.38 full-time employees, slightly down from 15.52 three years ago. The firms also had a trimmed average of 7.76 part-time employees, up from 6.96 three years ago. ► Most full-time employees are in manufacturing, food and beverage, retail trade, and medical, while part-time employees are in medical, retail trade, and tourism/recreational services. ► Survey results indicated that the medical industry is the highest employer in Monticello, followed by retail trade and manufacturing. ► Businesses in the community are fairly stable with about half expecting some type of change. The BR&E identified four strategies aimed at helping businesses become more profitable. Each strategy was accompanied by a list of potential projects intended to be ideas for the community to explore. The implementation of the projects is intended to be a collaborative effort among the various sectors of the community. The four strategies identified included: 4-2 1 Economic Development City of Monticello ► Improve Business Retention and Expansion Through Technical and Development Assistance. ► Improve Labor Force Availability and Productivity. ► Improve Infrastructure to Help Move Goods, Customers, and the Labor Force More Efficiently. ► Improve and Promote the Quality of Life in Monticello. During the 2013 comprehensive plan economic development update process, it was noted that the 2010 Business Retention and Expansion Research strategies were similar to the 2008 Development Strategies. The review process identified the need to continue similar strategies into the future. Preceding the development of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan an assessment was conducted by St. Cloud State University to determine whether a bioscience park should be established in Monticello. At that time the bioscience industry was an economic development focus statewide. While the attraction of a bioscience business is not a particular focus of Monticello today, there are findings of that study that can be useful to consider in the overall development of economic development strategies for the community. Some of the Monticello's strengths for attracting businesses included: ► Land availability (compared to Metro Area). ► Access to major highways (I-94, U.S. 10 and STH 25). ► Regional growth of employment base. ► Development of local fiber optic system. ► Proximity to universities. ► Overall location. ► Expansive park system. ► Monticello Community Center. Recommended business development activities that apply to the attraction and retention of all businesses include ensuring that there are sites suitable and attractive to potential businesses available and ready for development. The community should continue to explore and establish partnerships with a variety of stakeholders that can work together to support business attraction and retention. This includes the identification of funding sources which may be an incentive for businesses locating in Monticello. When available the City should participate in special tax zones that have been made available at the state and federal level to support business development and retention. Expanding the Tax Base A traditional objective of local economic development planning is the expansion of the property tax base. Under the current system of local government finance, property taxes are the largest source of city revenue. For this reason, it is an important aspect of economic development planning in Monticello. Understanding the Property Tax System Effective strategies to promote the growth of the tax base require a clear understanding of the property tax system. Property Valuation There are three forms of property valuation. The foundation of the property tax system is Estimated Market Value. This amount is the value of a parcel of property as set by the County Assessor. In some circumstances, the State Legislature limits the amount of Estimated Market Value that can be used for taxation. These adjustments result in the Taxable Market Value. The value used to calculate property taxes is Tax Capacity. Tax Capacity Value is a percentage of Taxable Market Value. The percentage factors are set by the State Legislature and vary by class of property. Changes in the Tax System Traditional economic development theory seeks commercial and industrial development as a means of building tax base. Historically, the system supported this approach. A dollar of estimated market value of commercial -industrial property carried a higher tax capacity value than residential property. Over the past twelve years, tax "reforms" by the State Legislature have changed this situation. 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-3 Facilitating Redevelopment The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create a place where land use plans, policies, and controls work together with private investment to properly maintain all properties in Monticello. It is recognized that this approach may not succeed in all locations. Despite the best plans and intentions, properties may become physically deteriorated and/or economically inviable. In such places, city intervention may be need to facilitate redevelopment and prevent the spread of blight. This intervention may include: ► Acquisition of land. ► Preparation of sites for development. ► Construction or reconstruction of public improvements. ► Provision of adequate parking supply. ► Remediation of polluted land as needed. ► Removal of other physical and economic barriers to achieve community objectives. These actions may require the use of tax increment financing, tax abatement, or other finance tools available to the City. Development Strategies The following strategies will be used to implement the Comprehensive Plan in the area of Economic Development: 1. The City must use the Comprehensive Plan to provide adequate locations for future job - producing development (Places to Work). 2. The City should adhere to the Comprehensive Plan to encourage stable business setting and promote investment and expansion of facilities. 3. The City should coordinate utility planning and manage other development to ensure that expansion areas are capable of supporting new development in a timely manner. 4. The City will continue to work with existing businesses to maintain an excellent business environment, retain jobs, and facilitate expansions. 5. In addition to assisting business seeking to locate in Monticello, the City should actively target and market to businesses which will be a supplier, customer or collaborative partner to existing businesses within the community. 6. The City should target and market to businesses which would benefit from Monticello's utility and communications infrastructure. 7. The City will work with the CentraCare Health System to ensure the retention and to promote the expansion of health care services in Monticello. 8. The City will use the Comprehensive Plan to maintain and enhance the quality of life in Monticello as a tool for attracting businesses and jobs. 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2013 Economic Development 1 4-7 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 211. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 672 and Summary Ordinance 672A for amendment to the Monticello Zoning Ordinance and amendment to the Official Zoning Map for rezoning from I-2 (Heavv Industrial) to Planned Unit Development for the Spaeth Industrial Park, to approve a Final Stage PUD, a Final Plat for the Spaeth Industrial Park, and Development Contract for the Spaeth Industrial Park. Applicant: Spaeth, Kenneth. (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park PID: 155018003020 Planning Case Number: 2017-017 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Final Stage Planned Unit Development Final Plat Rezoning to Planned Unit Development Development Agreement Deadline for Decision: July 7th, 2017, extended to Land Use Designation: Places to Work Zoning Designation: I-2, Heavy Industrial The purpose of the "I-2," Heavy Industrial District is to provide for the establishment of heavy industrial and manufacturing development and use which because of the nature of the product or character of activity requires isolation from residential or commercial use Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Vacant Surrounding Land Uses: North: Industrial East: Industrial South: Multi -family Residential West: Industrial Project Description: The applicant is proposing a multi -lot and building industrial park. Each building is 6,976 square feet in area, for a cumulative total of 55,808 square feet of floor area. Because only the front two parcels front on City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Dundas Road, with 6 parcels served by an internal private common drive, the project requires PUD zoning. The layout of the project relies on a perimeter drive that provides access to, alternatively, parking areas serving the front access points of the buildings, then common truck courts that provide truck access to the service sides of each building. The parking and "front" access areas face outward to the north and south of the parcel, including toward Dundas Road on the north, and toward a stormwater pond and then the residential development to the south. The truck and service portions of each of the buildings is internal to the project. The project is anticipated to attract smaller individual industrial concerns that require spaces for office, fabrication, repair, warehousing, and possibly, limited areas of showroom. Occupants would have the opportunity to purchase individual lots subject to the overall PUD and association management requirements. Each building has about 12 parking spaces allocated to their parcel, however, it will be necessary that the parking and grounds will be commonly maintained under an association, so parking quantities would be shared between parcels. ANALYSIS Final Stage Planned Unit Development & Final Plat Ken Spaeth has submitted application for final plat and final stage PUD. The site and building plans continue to be consistent in configuration, scope and use as proposed under the development stage PUD. Planning Commission reviewed the Development Stage PUD, Preliminary Plat and rezoning to PUD in June, forwarding their recommendation for approval on to Council on the Development Stage PUD, rezoning and preliminary plat on June 26ffi. Council may wish to reference the staff report of June 26th, 2017 for the specific analysis of the uses and site plans within the plat and PUD. The final plat is consistent with the proposed preliminary plat in terms of lot configuration and size. The preliminary has also been revised to address the section line and plat boundary issue on the south side of the property. The final plat reflects the required boundary per the preliminary plat. 2 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Staff have reviewed the revised plans and corresponding comment response letter. The revised preliminary plat and final plat package include many of the revisions requested by the City Engineer as detailed in the applicant's comment letter. Minor revisions to the civil plans are still required as a result of the review of revised plans. The City Engineer has submitted a secondary letter addressing the remaining items to be resolved. Final plat and PUD approval are contingent on the reconciliation of these items. In accordance with requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2.4(0) for Planned Unit Development, the applicant has also revised their PUD plans to address the conditions of the Exhibit Z approved with the Development Stage application. The applicant has provided a revised landscaping plan, pavement marking plan and truck circulation plan as required in the development stage approval for the PUD. The applicant has further indicated that building signage or business signage signage will be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. The applicant has provided a cross easement and association declaration, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Staff has recommended revisions to the document in reference to the stormwater maintenance agreement and will require those comments be addressed as a condition of approval. Any approval is contingent on compliance with the remaining conditions of approval for the plan sets, those conditions which are on-going, and those as related to the final execution of the development contract and review for building permit. Rezoning to PUD The City Council considers rezoning to Planned Unit Development in conjunction with the review of the final stage PUD and final plat. An ordinance has been prepared for the rezoning of the proposed plat of Spaeth Industrial Park Planned Unit Development District. The ordinance outlines the allowable principal and accessory uses within the PUD, incorporating the development plans by reference. Development Agreement A draft development contract for the plat and planned unit development district has been prepared. Consistent with past agreement and City policy, the agreement outlines the responsibilities of the development in regard to the public improvements within the plat, including the public water main and sanitary sewer serving the development lots. Specific requirements relating to the private stormwater improvements are provided for in Section 15 of the document. The agreement also documents procedures for erosion control and grading of the site. The development contract provides for the payment of required development fees, including trunk area charges and escrows related to the inspection and administration of the plat and development. The agreement is currently structured to include 3 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 payment of trunk area charges for all lots, including the outlot. The development agreement currently allows for the developer to pay the trunk area charges at the time of final platting, or the charges may be apportioned based on square footage to each lot as an assessment. Security and insurance requirements are also included within the agreement. Payment and submission of these items is required at the time of final plat approval. The agreement is binding on all successors, heir and assigns, including those entities which may purchase or lease development parcels or buildings within the plat. Final comments from the developer have not been received as of the time of this report, and as such, minor revisions to the agreement may occur. Substantive changes will require review by Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The applicant is seeking a rezoning to PUD, approval of a final stage PUD, final plat, and corresponding development contract and PUD agreement. Planning Commission previously recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD, rezoning and preliminary plat. Decision 1: Rezoning to PUD and Final Stage PUD 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 672 approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, and to adopt Resolution No. 2017-41 approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 672 approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, and to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-41 approving a Final Stage Planned Unit Development for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 2: Final Plat and Development Contract 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-42 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. L! City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-42 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Spaeth Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 3: Summary Ordinance 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 672A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 672, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the revised plat and PUD plans submitted, staff recommends approval of the Final Stage Planned Unit Development, Rezoning to PUD District and Final Plat with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Further, staff recommends approval of the Development Contract as proposed and included for review with this report. As noted in the Development Stage PUD & Preliminary Plat analysis, the project varies from the standard zoning regulations in a few significant ways, but uses this flexibility in keeping with the City's overall development objectives. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2017-41 B. Resolution 2017-42 C. Ordinance #672 D. Summary Ordinance #672A E. Finance Plan — Spaeth Industrial Park F. Development Contract & Planned Unit Development Agreement — Spaeth Industrial Park G. Aerial Site Image H. Applicant Narrative I. Preliminary Plat, Revised J. Final Plat K. PUD Development Plans — Revised, including: a. Project Location Plan, Title b. Site Plan c. Grading and Drainage Plan 5 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 d. Sanitary & Water Utility Plan e. Landscape Plan f. SWPPP g. Existing Conditions and Removals Plan h. Details i. Phasing Plan j. Elevations k. Floor Plan 1. Photometrics L. ALTA Survey M. Fire Truck Circulation Plan N. Fire Hydrant Coverage Plan O. Pavement Marking Plan P. Truck Circulation Plan Q. Stormwater Calculations R. Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Agreement S. City Engineer's Letter, dated July 19th, 2017 T. Applicant Response Letter, dated July 12, 2017 U. City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Z. Conditions of Approval G City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 EXHIBIT Z Rezoning to PUD, Final Stage PUD, Final Plat for Spaeth Industrial Park The applicant shall revise plans to address the remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 2. The applicant shall execute and record the stormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The applicant shall provide additional language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the planned unit development per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall execute and record the covenants. 4. Outdoor storage shall be prohibited within the planned unit development. 5. Building or business signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. 7 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 APPROVING A FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A MULTI -LOT INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR SPAETH INDSUTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a final stage PUD and a request for rezoning to PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone its property to PUD, subdivide it into eight parcels, and develop it as a common industrial project; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for industrial City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the subject property is currentl3q official Monticello Zoning Map and ordinance, the la>3IPlaces to Work" in the I-2, Heavy Indust X ing to the R WHEREAS, the proposed PUD zoning will accommodate the flexibility from fhe otherwise application regulations to allow a development project consistent with the required on the Monticello Comprehensive Plan; and L WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 2016 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submit t Final Stage PUD plans in accordance with t e Development tuncil tage PUD, and 4 WH RE A , the City has considered all of the comments and the staff report for the Final Sta D, which are incorpor*y reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendatioIn of approval: 1. The PUkvides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by putting the existing and proposed buildings to industrial use. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as an industrial area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 4.. The PUD flexibility for the project, including parcels without public street frontage, are consistent with the intent of the City's economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Rezoning and Final Stage PUD for the Spaeth Industrial Park, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z as follows: A 1. The applicant shall revise plans to address the remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 6 2. The applicant shall execute and recolyd the stormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The applicant shall provide,*iditional language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required crossiaccess and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the Manned uflq&Lvelopment per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall eute an d the covenants. Admah.- 4L 4. Outdoor storage shall be prohibited within the pla d development. 4 A 5. Building or bus' ess signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and %t�reets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL K ATTEST: Jeff CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-41 Ul-A Brian Stumpf, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-42 APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017, for the consideration of the preliminary plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commis n recommended approval of the preliminary plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the rP Commission and approved the preliminary plat of Spaeth of the Planning on June 26th, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council rev d the final plat ofSdustrial Park on July 24th, 2017; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for the ustrial Park identles the specific plans and uses for the proposed Spaeth Indus ial Park; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY IN C IL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the final plat of the Spaeth Industrial Park, rainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the follovying conditions: 1. The applicant shall revise plans to address,remaining comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated July 19th, 201 2.applicant sh cute a ecord the tormwater facilities maintenance agreement. 3. The pplicant shall provide addit l language related to the stormwater maintenance system within the required cross -access and parking easements and maintenance covenants supporting the planned unit development per the City Attorney's recommendations and shall execute and record the covenants. 4. Outdoor storage shalLbe prohibited within the planned unit development. 5. Building or business signage shall be limited to entry and service doors only at this time. 6. Continue to coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. 7. The applicant shall execute and record the development contract with the City specifying and securing all relevant aspects of the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract and Planned Unit Development and for Spaeth Industrial Park," with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of July. 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 672 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM I-2, HEAVY DISTRICT TO SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PAJ&PUD. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOT 2 BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD JWPU L PARK THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF M�ELLO HER RDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Spaeth Industrial Park PUD Dis (a) Purpose. The purposeA7paeth ndus ial Park PUD District is to provide for the development of certain reestate subject to the District for industrial land uses. -'W(b) Permitted tses. Permitted principal uses in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall be indindustrial uses as found in the I-2, Heavy Industrial District of the ticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2017, as may be amended. The introduction of aby other use fromany district, including Conditional Uses in the I-2 I istrict, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned S46, Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage trictofthe S I (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to industrial uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans, but shall not include outdoor storage or other activities. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement or use is not addressed by the Final Stage PUD, then the regulations of the 1-2, ORDINANCE NO. 672 Heavy Industrial District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (0)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hep amendment to rezoned the following described parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industria Additio onticello (subject to the replat as Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth In strial Park). Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of tJ1jM Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary correc 'ons to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provid that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has be Zpted. Section 5_ This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello ' Council this 24th day of July, 2017. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor 2 ORDINANCE NO. 672 AYES: NAYS: SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 672A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 2.4 (0) — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS BY ESTABLISHING THE SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD DISTRICT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, Ordinance No. 672 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota Due to the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 672, the following Summary Ordinanc 672A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council am#s Title 10 of the Monticello Zoning Code. The general purpose of the ordinance amendments is to establish the Spaeth Industrial Park PUD District by adding the following section and to rezonthe affected parcels as noted. IF' 4iL Section 2.4(0) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: the CitM following Spaeth Industrial Park PUD striw* Rezone the following parcels from I-2, Heavy Industrial District to Spaeth Industrial Park PUD, P, Tanned Unit Development District: Parcels: Lot Blo , Oakwood Industrial Park Addition to Monticello (subject �g replat% Lots 1-8, Block 1, Spaeth Industrial Park) ad copy of the whole ordinance is available for inspection by any person during lar office hours. The complete ordinance will be posted on the City's website 20' day of July, 40 PU ATION by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this T CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: SUMMARY OF EXPENSES/FINANCE PLAN - v2 Full Development 6/12/2017 Total Acres in Development 4.4 gross 3.88 net Total Acres in Phase 4.4 gross 3.88 net Total Units in Development 8 Total Units in Phase 8 Trunk Area Charges & Dedication Assessment Park & Pathway Dedication 12.0% 0.53 Not applicable as of 2/24/16 for commercial/industrial Park Dedication Provided Lot 2 12.0% 0.53 Park Dedication Required (11 %) to be assessed against lot Lot 3 10.7% Park Dedication Deficiency $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 4 Park Dedication Deficiency as a % of total 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Prevailing Park Dedication 10.7% 0.47 paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Net Park Park Dedication Required per Unit Lot 6 10.7% 0.47 Total Park Dedication Required to be assessed against lot NA 16.6% Special Assessments $11,972 to be assessed against lot Lot 8 Road Reconstruction 0.73 NA to be assessed against lot Lift Station NA $72,117.68 Booster Station NA Sanitary Sewer (gross acres) $3,316 4.4 $14,590.40 2017 non-residential rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Watermain (gross acres) $2,452 4.4 $10,788.80 2017 non-residential rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Storm Sewer (net acres, base fee) $3,543 3.88 $13,746.84 2017 industrial rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Storm Sewer (net acres, alternate ponding fee) $8,503 3.88 $32,991.64 2017 industrial rate; paid at prevaling rate at time of platting Total amount to As $17,814 $72,117.68 Per Unit Assessment Lot 1 12.0% 0.53 $8,654 to be assessed against lot Lot 2 12.0% 0.53 $8,654 to be assessed against lot Lot 3 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 4 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 5 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 6 10.7% 0.47 $7,717 to be assessed against lot Lot 7 16.6% 0.73 $11,972 to be assessed against lot Lot 8 16.6% 0.73 $11,972 to be assessed against lot $72,117.68 City Fees/Deposit City Fee ( General overhead and Admin) 2.00% Legal 2.00% Planning 2.00% Engineering and Inspection Grading and Restoration 2.00% Streets and Utilities 5.00% GPS Locate $60 Total City Fees $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $2,805.40 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion Inspector/Engineer cost reconciled at project completion, Based $3,977.56 on cost of $198,878 $7,013.50 Inspector /Engineer cost reconciled at project completion 8 $480 Actual; cost reconciled at project completion $19,887.26 1 Improvement Construction Costs (Used to Calculate City Fees/Escrows/Securities) Notes Sanitary Sewer & Watermain Storm Sewer Roads, Driveways and Sidewalks/Trails Lighting, Street Signage, Mailboxes Grading Construction total (for purpose of calculating other fees) Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $300 8 Total Construction Cost for the purpose of calculating LOC Letter of Credit Amount (Total cost X 125%) Maximum allowable reduction prior to acceptance and bond ADDITIONAL REQUIRED LETTERS OF CREDIT Landscaping Prairie Restoration Tree Preservation Grading Total Additional LOC $140,270 NA NA NA $140,270 $2,400 $142,670 $178,337.50 90.00%1 $160,503.75 NA NA $3,000 4.4 $13,200.00 $52,000.00 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (Developer Installed Improvements) SPAETH IND USTRIAL PARK AGREEMENT dated , 2017, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and KENNETH J. SPAETH and THERESA L. SPAETH, husband and wife (collectively, the "Developer") REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat and Planned Unit Development approval for SPAETHINDUSTRIAL PARK (referred to in this Contract as the "plat" and the "Development") consisting of 55,808 square feet and 4.4 acres to equal eight (8) industrialial lots. The land is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: Lot 2, Block 3, Oakwood Industrial Park. 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within 100 days after the City Council approves the final plat or the execution of this Contract, whichever occurs later. 193238vl The City hereby grants approval to the Planned Unit Development provided the development is consistent with the conditions of this Contract and the specific City conditions, requirements and PUD flexibility as set forth in City Resolution 2017-0, adopted by the Monticello Council on July 24t1'„ 2017, and subject to the conditions of Exhibit Z of the Staff Report 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been submitted to the Wright County Recorder's/Registrar's Office, and 4) the City has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. PHASED DEVELOPMENT. If this plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases if the Developer has breached this Agreement and the breach has not been remedied. Development of subsequent phases may not proceed until the City approves Development Contracts for such phases. 5. PRELIMINARY PLAT STATUS. If this Plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, and the preliminary plat approval for all phases not final platted shall lapse and be void unless final platted into lots and blocks, not outlots, within three (3) years after preliminary plat approval as specified by state law. 6. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For two (2) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding 2 193238v1 anything in this Contract to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan. 7. ZONING. Except as otherwise provided herein, the subject property shall be subject to the zoning regulations for the Planned Unit Development District and the requirements and standards of the I-2 District, in effect at the time the final plat is approved. 8. CONDITION FOR SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS. No final plat for changes or amendments to this PUD Agreement shall be approved, nor shall construction commence for such additional land uses, until an amendment of the PUD Agreement is processed and approved, subject to the requirements of the Monticello Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 9. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. With the exception of Plans A and B, the plans may be prepared, subject to City approval, after entering the Contract, but before commencement of any work in the plat. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Final Plat Plan B - Final Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan Plan C - Project Location Plan Plan D - Site Plan Plan E - Existing Conditions and Removals Plan Plan F - Sanitary and Water Utility Plan Plan G - SWPPP Plan Plan H - Details Plan Plan I - Phasing Plan Plan J - Elevations Plan Plan K - Floor Plan Plan L - Photometrics / Lighting Plan 3 193238v1 Plan M - Landscape Plan Plan O - Signage Plan Plan P — Pavement Marking Plan 10. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall install and pay for the following: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Private Storm Sewer System D. Private Streets E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Street Lights G. Site Grading, Ponding, and Erosion Control H. Underground Utilities I. Setting of Iron Monuments J. Surveying and Staking The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City subdivision ordinance; City standard specifications for utilities and street construction; and any other ordinances. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The City may, at the City's discretion and at the Developer's expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all written instructions received from the City's inspectors subject to Developer's plans and specifications. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre -construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Council chambers with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) 4 193238v1 days after the completion of the improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" plans, an electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in an auto CAD.DWG file or a .DXF file, and two complete sets of blue line "as constructed" plans, all prepared in accordance with City standards. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.021, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: • Wright County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • Wright County Soil Conservation District • MnDot for State Highway Access • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permit for Stormwater Connections • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering • City of Monticello for Building Permits 12. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable county, state, and federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits shall also be strictly followed. 13. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by August 30th of the year following the year of recording of the final platThe Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be 5 193238v1 conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 14. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the platted property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 15. EROSION CONTROL AND STORM WATER CONTROL. A. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plans `B" and "G", shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if reasonably required. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall restored as identified in the Construction Stormwater General Permit/SWPPP, unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be maintained as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may provide Developer with written notice of default. If the Developer does not cure the default within two (2) days after receipt of such notice, then the City will take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City reasonably incurred for such work within thirty (30) days after receipt of the City's written request (which request shall include all supporting and related evidence necessary to substantiate the actual cost), the City 6 193238v1 may draw down the letter of credit to pay any reasonable and actual costs. No development, street or utility construction will be allowed unless the Plat is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. B. The Developer shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all proposed drainage improvements, including, without limitation, the private storm sewer and infiltration systems on the Subject Property. Operation and maintenance shall be as provided in the recorded Stormwater Maintenance Agreement for the Subject Property. C. Operations and maintenance of the private stormwater system shall be specified within and provided for in the private covenant and association documents applicable to all lots within the development. 16. GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading plan, stormwater control measures and erosion control plan as set forth in Plan "B" and "G". The plan shall conform to City of Monticello specifications. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City approves individual building permits (except as permitted by this agreement or the Building Official), the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Additionally, the "as constructed" grading plan will include a certification that the grading following construction activities has been undisturbed or has been returned to the state required in the grading plan. The "as constructed" plan shall include field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds; b) location and elevations along all swales, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas/stockpiles, and installed "conservation area" posts; and c) lot corner elevations, and building pads. The City will withhold issuance of building permits until the approved certified grading plan is on file with the City and all erosion control measures are in place as determined by the City Engineer. The 7 193238v1 Developer certifies to the City that all lots with building footings placed on fill have been monitored and constructed to meet or exceed applicable specifications. 17. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, home builders, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the plat, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. The Developer shall pay a penalty of $100.00 a day for each calendar day that the streets are not cleaned in accordance with this paragraph. If the Developer repeatedly fails to clean streets in accordance with this paragraph, the City may, in its discretion, perform the work or contract to have the work completed and bill the costs to the Developer. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days from the date notice of the amount owed to the City is mailed, the City may draw down the Irrevocable Letter of Credit to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Plat is in full compliance with the requirements of this Paragraph. 18. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. A. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action, with exception of the private streets and stormwater and stormsewer system. B. The City shall maintain the watermain and sanitary lines located within the easement in a safe and good condition, and shall maintain, operate, repair, replace and remove, if required, the watermain and sanitary sewer lines in compliance with all applicable governmental rules, regulations, and requirements. 193238v1 C. IF the surface of the easement area of any portion thereof shall be disturbed by the operation, maintenance, replacement or removal activities in connection with the use of the easement, said surface and improvements shall be promptly restored by the fee owner of the easement area to their condition prior to the disturbance. 19. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. A. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to the Public Improvements. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to Public Improvements, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be five percent (5.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $7,013.50 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development, to pay the fees owed to the City under this Section. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. The cost of the construction observation is included in the five (5%) estimate. B. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to grading and restoration of the Subject Property. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation related to grading and restoration of the site, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the 9 193238v1 City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), of the estimated construction cost of the Subject Property grading and restoration cost, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide an $3,977.56 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. C. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 20. CITY PLANNING, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATION. A. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees for City staff administration relating to processing of the Plat and associated administration. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. B. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City planning -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for 10 193238v1 this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. C. The Developer shall submit an escrow deposit for fees relating to City legal -related expenses associated with the Plat development. Fees for this service shall be at standard hourly rates per the City's adopted fee schedule estimated to be two percent (2.0%), or $2,000 minimum, of the estimated construction cost of the Public Improvements, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. Developer will provide a $2,805.40 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. This amount is subject to reconciliation based on actual costs at the completion of the project. D. The fees owed by the Developer to the City under this Section shall be paid from the escrows amounts. Any amounts not utilized from the escrow account shall be returned to the Developer when all the Development has been completed in accordance with this Agreement. If additional escrow amounts are required for such costs incurred beyond the escrow deposit, the Developer shall be billed directly for such costs and there shall be no issuance of occupancy permits until all such obligations have been fully paid. 21. CLAIMS. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that work required by this Contract has been performed, the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen, or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developer hereby authorizes the City to commence an Interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to 125 percent of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorneys' fees pursuant to this Contract. 1932380 22. STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a total storm sewer area charge of $46,738.48. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat less any area credit for pond area, and is calculated as follows: BASE STORM SEWER AREA CHARGE 3.88 acres x $3,543/net acre = $13,746.84 ALTERNATE STORM SEWER ARE CHARGE3.88 acres x $8,503/net acre = $32,991.64 The total storm sewer area charge for the Development of $46,738.48 shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 23. SANITARY SEWER AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a sanitary sewer area charge of $14,590.40. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 4.4 acres x $3,316/acre = $14,590.40 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal % shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 24. WATER MAIN AREA CHARGE. The Development is subject to a water main area charge of $10,788.80. The area charge is based on the gross area of the final plat and is calculated as follows: 12 193238v1 4.4 acres x $2,452/acre = $10,788.80 The Developer shall be assessed or shall pay the sanitary sewer area charge in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. The amount of the area charge shall be apportioned to each lot of the final plat based on square footage and assessed against each property if not paid by the Developer in cash at the time of final plat approval at developer's option. If assessed, an interest rate of 1.5% per annum over the prime interest rate as published in the Wall Street Journal shall apply. [See Paragraph 30(D).] 25. PARK DEDICATION AND TRAILS. Not applicable. 26. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the recommendations listed in the Monticello Resolution 2017- 0, dated , 2017. G. Developer shall prepare cross -access and parking easements with maintenance, covenants and improvements to ensure continued accessibility and operation. Said easements and declarations are subject to review and approval by the City. I. Developer shall verify internal trash handling equipment, and prohibit outdoor storage as a part of the project PUD approvals. J. Developer shall coordinate addressing and mailbox installations with City Building and Streets departments. L. The Developer shall post a $2,400.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 8 units at 13 193238v1 $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. M. The Developer is required to submit the final plat in electronic format. The electronic format shall be either AutoCAD.DWG file or a .DXF file. All construction record drawings (e.g., grading, utilities, and streets) shall be in electronic format in accordance with standard City specifications. The Developer shall also submit one complete set of reproducible construction plans on Mylar. 27. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. A. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract, payment of real estate taxes including interest and penalties, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank ("security") for $178,337.50, plus a cash fee of $19,887.00 for City engineering, expenses and administration and planning, legal and City administration expenses. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Sanitary Sewer & Watermain $140,270 Storm Sewer/Draintile/Infiltration Basin $N/A Internal Streets $N/A CONSTRUCTION SUB -TOTAL (ESTIMATED) $.00 OTHER COSTS: $ 00.00 Lot Corners/Iron Monuments $2,400.00 14 193238v1 TOTAL COSTS $142,670.00 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SECURITIES: Total Costs X 125% $178,337.50 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Administrator. The security shall be for a term ending when maintenance bond is posted. Individual security instruments may be for shorter terms provided they are automatically renewed on an annual basis until expiration. The City may draw down the security with 30 days written notice to Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty security is provided, and the public improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City standard specifications for utilities and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. B. The Developer shall also furnish the City with a Security for $13,200.00 for grading in compliance with approved Plan `B". This amount was calculated as follows. $3,000/acre X 4.4 acres = $13,200.00 C. The Developer shall furnish the City with Security for $38,800.00 to guarantee the completion of Subject Property landscaping improvements in compliance with approved Plan "O". This 15 193238v1 amount was calculated based on the Developer's estimate of Subject Property landscaping plan installation costs. 28. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City prior to the time of final plat approval: Legal $ 2,805.40 Planning $ 2,805.40 Engineering Administration, Inspection $ 7,013.50 Engineering (grading) $ 3,977.56 Administrative Escrow for City Administration $ 2,805.40 GPS Locate Fee $ 480.00 Total Cash Requirements $19,887.26 * Fees reconciled to actual expenses at close of project. 29. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for underground utilities is two years and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council. The Developer or its Contractors shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs to secure the warranties. Maintenance Bonds of the prime contractor maybe accepted subject to City approval. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. 30. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all actual costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the plat, the preparation of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and 16 193238v1 expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. The Developer shall deposit with the City the amount set forth in Section 28 to be used for the payment of these fees and enforcement fees. If the amount in the deposit account drops below 15% of the initial amount, the Developer will make additional deposits in amounts set by the City. At the completion of the project and following payment of all expenses related to the project, the City shall return the remaining deposit funds to the Developer. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by it and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including engineering and attorneys' fees. D. The Developer shall pay, or cause to be paid when due, and in any event before any penalty is attached, all special assessments referred to in this Agreement. This is an obligation of the Developer and shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells a part or parts of the platted land. E. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt plat development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year. F. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited to sewer availability charges ("SAC"), 17 193238v1 water availability charges ("WAC"), City water connection charges, City sewer connection charges, and building permit fees. 31. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty- eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 32. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the plat ceases to comply with county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. C. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. 18 193238v1 E. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer is well seized in fee title of the property being final platted and/or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. H. Developer or its prime contractor shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) month after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than 19 193238v1 $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the plat or when any construction commences, whichever later occurs. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council, unless such assignment is to a principal of Developer or another entity in which the Developer is a principal. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells part or parts of the platted land, until all conditions of assignment are met. 33. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Kenneth J. and Theresa L. Spaeth, 108 Meadowlark Road SE, St. Michael, Minnesota 55376. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Administrator, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Administrator at the following address: Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, Minnesota 55362, with a copy to the City Attorney by regular mail at: Campbell Knutson, P.A., Grand Oak Office Center I, 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290, Eagan, Minnesota 55121. 20 193238v1 Remainder of page intentionally left blank. Signatures on the following pages. 193238v1 21 CITY OF MONTICELLO Lo (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 22 193238v1 DEVELOPER: Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2017, by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, Developer. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association Grand oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, #290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 23 193238v1 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT , which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as document number , agrees that the Development Contract shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2017. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (Ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2 , by Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 24 193238vl IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, 'Drawn under Letter of Credit No. , dated 12 , of (Name of Bank) it, b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) . on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. Its 25 193238v1 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PROJECT: CERTIFICATE HOLDER: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 INSURED: ADDITIONAL INSURED: City of Monticello AGENT: WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: COVERAGE - Workers' Compensation, Statutory. GENERAL LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Expiration Date: Insurance Company: () Claims Made () Occurrence LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury and Death: $500,000 for one person $1,000,000 for each occurrence Property Damage: $200,000 for each occurrence -OR- Combination Single Limit Policy $1,000,000 or more COVERAGE PROVIDED: Operations of Contractor: YES Operations of Sub -Contractor (Contingent): YES Does Personal Injury Include Claims Related to Employment? YES 26 193238v1 Completed Operations/Products: YES Contractual Liability (Broad Form): YES Governmental Immunity is Waived: YES Property Damage Liability Includes: Damage Due to Blasting YES Damage Due to Collapse YES Damage Due to Underground Facilities YES Broad Form Property Damage YES AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY: Policy No. Effective Date: Insurance Company: (X) Any Auto LIMITS: [Minimum] Bodily Injury: $500,000 each person Property Damage: $500,000 each occurrence -OR- Combined Single Limit Policy Expiration Date: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each occurrence ARE ANY DEDUCTIBLES APPLICABLE TO BODILY INJURY OR PROPERTY DAMAGE ON ANY OF THE ABOVE COVERAGES: If so, list: Amount: $ [Not to exceed $1,000.00] SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL MAIL TEN (10) DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE PARTIES TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED. Dated at On BY: Authorized Insurance Representative 27 193238v1 Spaeth, Ken - Request for Rezoning to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat created by: city of Monticello Lot 2, Block 3 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-003020 1 107 Dundas Road f % 2401 15506000,1030 —1,5 5060001'040 1.55018DD2120 ° ' 1..550.1800211 D 1 '5060001020 1.55060001050 5506000.1010 DUN D 1 155018 - ;1'S523000001'0�,.. M 550 20 1155018003,0030 LU t I Cp:r-:�1 '' A "MR 30L�EN EAGLE Lir--,.... .._ f •i , T •+ yr lJt m. arca ! 3 1 J LU D �� -j Q� 'm�^551:330165 LV Z 1~ !r Z f m 1F l: 155098000030 p C EARMSTEADsDR 7-F 415518800100101 � r + 15509300002 • t At .11 Ken Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Rd. Se. St. Michael, MN 56557 612-889-3100 05-05-2017 City of Monticello The purpose of the project is to provide individuals or small companies with a land option where they can own or lease a building that makes it affordable for their business. The project would have small lots that will allow them to construct a 4,000-6000 sq. ft. building. The goal is to provide a cost-effective option that they can have ownership while keeping their payments to 3-4000.00 per month. The clients are anticipated to be small businesses that need an office and warehouse. Could be construction related or small business. There is a very strong need for this in the Monticello area without any current options. There are not many comparables for this type project. Pfeifer property management in Buffalo has something similar and it is full. The difference is that his buildings are only available for lease. He does not offer the option of a lot sale. His tenants are plumbers, electricians, computer I.T. and other small business owners. A PUD is required, for the subject property, because the project will have a private street vs. a public street. The requirements for public street would use up too much of the property. Also, a city street is more expensive and the goal is to keep the project affordable. The project will be governed by an association agreement that lease tenants and properties that are owner occupied will have to abide by. The concept is to not have a semi -truck park, but the site is designed to accommodate limited truck traffic. We don't anticipate any loading docks. The buildings will be post -frame buildings with 2 -tone metal cladding. Any building sides facing Dundas street will have a brick or stone wainscoat up 3-4 ft. We will bring sewer and water in from Dundas with individual meters for each tenant. Storm water will be handled on site. We realize that there are townhomes to the south of the project. We have a very extensive landscape plan for this area with a berm and trees. We will also have a chain link fence across the back of the property. Around the buildings we'll have a 3 ft. wide area for landscape rock and on the street side have shrubs. All grass areas will be sodded. All landscaped areas will be irrigated. I expect the project could take 3-4 years to complete. My goal is to own 2-3 buildings myself and sell the remaining lots to owner occupied users. My intent is to provide a small business park that both the city of Monticello and myself can be proud of. Thanks for your time. Ken Spaeth I I I I DUNDAS ROAD I I _ 1 I I ' 10" D.I.P. I �� NEW ACCESS 0 ' ' =� 4 ` ' 15� R.C.P �i > DRAINAGE AND SAN MH °p '�T i NEW ACCESS o UTILITY EASEMENT SAN MH I RIM ELEV.-960.04 RIM ELEV.=961.96 I I i (TYPICAL) INV. ELEV.=942.8 INV. ELEV.=943.7 j i - (S 90000'00" E Plat) N 88036'53" E ►- " "-©- ; "� T T - -iv T T T T T 1- r20.0- + 15 b. O 300,00 T T T T T T T y / T T20` %- TEL. RISER -- •'b r `\ O �1 I � 10.0-- U TILI T 4y1 o EASEMENT o Q \ \ w III it • IN �I \ p p I \ _ 11 I DRAINAGE AND DRAINAGEAND i I r - ___- _-__ ___ -___- _ ---' __ _ . - r= -____ __ - -_ -__ E=__�=__ =- =_- ____ _ ___�_ ---- =_ =__-_ _�__. -,;1 �' I m UTILITY EASEMENT Q o° ''r S UTILITY EASEMENT (TYPICAL) I i 109 icn 1 _ (TYPICAL) f 109 cn I i I it I li O li I i1 - li ii 1 '• �O II I II ii I O 11 . I 0.01-- I �� I I ; BUILDING A �,; BUILDING BI� L0 6,9 76 SF 6,976 SF ill LOT 1 F --5.oLOT 2 III III 23,100 SF 5 0~ 23,094 SF i 6.0 1+20.0 -*1 0.53 AC -- 10. 3- r- i IIB 0 II' 0.53 AC y ? 36.0 36.0 •----LIJE } i L \'-- o I O ica II- i I I 1 cr_ I i I j co i 150.0 i 150.0 i © III i I i p i i l III I, I i r 1 II MOW I i i LINE i• ii LOT 3 -- LOT 4 ill 20,400 SF O y20i -5.0 ,390 SF I I �, � �----mow III !II 0.47 AC 5.0- 0.47 AC 1'0.0, I p LINE 10.0- BUILDING C BUILDING D II I III C° 6,9 76 SF 6,9 76 SF LI I1 ' I iII I i I I I I i I I ,WD F -NCE ;_20.0 ' -���1� 0S�\�F'+ 6.-1,'I- 0 9.9NNE 109 x35.90 109_+_41 6. . Q -- 3 6. 0__jJ A + I i I I 1., -II C) I+�20.o-I+I __ 1 -1`--------------- __'== _'___-� A TH 1 1 (\ 11 A^ L) /1 A r-\ 0 1 �: I\ 00 0 (S 90°00' 00" E Plat �--EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT f CREATED BY THE PLAT OF N 88°36'53" E ;i OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK s ---300.00--- --- 92.13--- ♦ r/' o o \ 150.00 0 34.81 \ 150.00 - - - - - - ro N .:,___-_----DRAINAGE AND --rte ---DRAINAGE AND-- r`rj / UTILITY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT _ _ 2` -i 1 —� � i \ o / I 15 51 \ �,' rn I co I c 0)1 IN^ LO I I 1 _ WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 (FOUND P.K. NAIL) N 89'14'00" E -3123.56--- — I , I 1I--�55L-- -- -- -- __Ile� i o N N \ 149.95 1 % 150.00 i N 88'36'42' E i 1 I- N 8836'42" E ,'''---- ----- DRAINAGE AND ----------- - N z UTILITY EASEMENT5 5[ Q I- I I ; C)pz I3 I o 01 I ao I o o l I M Cfl tp N INDUSTRIAL PARK VICINITY MAP SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN 0 1000 2000 3000 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 1 INCH = 1000 FEET CHELSEA RD. 4 94 � I DUNDAS RD. 3 Q � I 'Z I II I -----29--y ----34--y1 _ _ _-�5 .5L-- -- -- -- o _ 149.91 U \\ 150.00 N 88'36'42" E o N 8836'42' E i ' '`_ _ _ _ _ DRAINAGE AND --''Lo 5 5� j i o _ O) . UTILITY EASEMENT --29-_- t- 00 C'20 I I L o n2 co I I I I me° o O N`p \`� co _ �z- :21 .. o / 5 00 0o i u p I (6 I P01 SERV 0 40 80 120 ----34- ---I / / �I I ��----''__-� > DRAINAGE AND I I UTILITY EASEMENT o GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I �_ 55 _ � - - - -- 1 /NCH = 40 FEET A.N N 149.86 + ;; --160.00 150.00 1 a I/ N 88.36'42" E I y ' • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND N 88'36'42" E N o N N N ' ' (6 O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 48664 -- -- —15 5F— i DENOTES CATCH BASIN TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT LOT CORNER �I DENOTES WRIGHT COUNTY ' I 0 'a MONUMENT FOUND wo A 1 1 I I 1= � I I: I BEARING ORIENTATION: o Z nI I °0 `a 8 I THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 7 o N N 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 IS 00 N "' NI I o I ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°14'00" E. �N1 I IZ I I \� 55 --- 105.65 --- - ---105.82--- - �� - - - -�- N 88736'42" E �� N 88'36'42" E \ / C I \\';=---DRAINAGE AND n UTILITY EASEMENT--_:, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, owners of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, Wright County, Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat. In witness whereof said Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife, have hereonto set their hands this day of 20 Kenneth J. Spaeth Theresa L. Spaeth STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, husband and wife. (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires I, Abram A. Niemela, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year, that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF WRIGHT Dated this day of , 20 Abram A. Niemela, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 48664 n The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by Abram A. Niemela, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 48664. EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--,' -SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST SECTION 1 T. R. 25 (FOUND WRIGHT COUNN TY MONON UMENT) 1 o 1 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 i o � ii N 89'14'00" E -�- ' ------ -- ��------------------ �— --- 1899.53--- -- --- -f ---- i 149.80 ! 150.01 — - • - ——,�,_—=+ — — — — — — 5. 0 (300.02 Plat) %'EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT N 89014'00" E `-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK CREATED BY THE PLAT OF (N 89°21'11" W Plat) (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) C L_ L_ I I �I r n Imo) A /l F- I _-- A --- T -- I /-\I \ IVI � L_� I/-\ I L_� n I n n n � I V L/ /-\ LJ J (Signature) (Name Printed) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a meeting held this day of . 20 Chairperson Secretary CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA This plat of SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Mayor Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY SURVEYOR I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20 Wright County Surveyor WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day of , 20 By: Wright County Auditor Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid this day of . 20 Wright County Treasurer By: Deputy WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this 20 at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. , Sleeve day of as Document No. Wright County Recorder KITTS -ON ROSEAU LAKE OF HE WOODS MARSHALL KOOCHICHING BELTRAMI PENNINGTON RED LAKE COOK [fi LAKE POLK ITASCA ST. LOUIS NORMAN (OMEN 7. LASS CLAY BECKER AITKIN �y GROW CARLTON OTTER TAIL :* WING PINE TODD MLLE GRAN T "OLIGLAS MOR Ri SON a ENTON {' POPE Bla'� STEARNS TONE URNS I9ANTI 1 SWIFT 'rte ANo �O � W RI G LAC HIPPE4hfA 4a'$RAMSEY QUIHENNE- PARLE ILT N WASHINGTON — , -1.1RENVILLE a 111R SOLIth Haven SQUthsidef Ineh1Laka Twp M— 44 - , ) CokatO Twp AL L IF --5tc Twrp SI®LEY LYON REDWOOD ICOLLET LE GOOl3HUE DEUR RIDE WABASHA BROWN �I HURRAY GWOOD - X11 ANN' EARTH °i� �fff� Oa0 OLMSTED O WINO NOBLES �r0 � MARTIN 1*000 -l' I POO MOWER FILLMORI, MINNESOTA Clearwater wparwazer Iwp Silver Creek Twp or nna Twp i, Maple Lake TwF Mapl e, Lake Albivii Twp Ichatham,WiTw6g:bLIA Midclleville Twp M.arysville Twp -Ve 111w ..,) fvlontrose HDvia rd; La ke Waverly —Victor,Twv Waodland�Twis I M1r�r�tic�ll�, Ta�r��:• f Al LN 13Dffialo Twp pro,St. Michael' I _ Han T� minklifivTwp, WRIGHT COUNTY SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT i5 � 64 00030, 4 c c' nrAnnn''In S MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA or ..4 `� ■�IfN1■I�w�MiM - SC H+ I 107 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN �4 W J � N 'o cC co CL o to I— z a; z w � �w �o �O oMUM CD ?a oc FAM UU Wy Q z (DCL zo � J U ct CL z 0 N 0 C) m o 0 LL, 0 Q o a v v FILE NO. 00640 co Proiect Location Plan I I ROADDUNDASI I I � 10" D.I.P. I I I I I 1 1 I I I I- II I I I I I � 15" R.C.P. I I > Q, ► o �� ► ► ► a� ► ► ► ► ; > -� QL "? SAN MH RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH' BUILDING ��' 11 1p i INV. ELEV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 SETBACK LINE + + + INV. ELEV.=943.7 I I -,, +� + + +� 30' FRONT 00' 0" E Plat) '+ + + , , ' / O \+ + + I; 7 (�! ., , _ N_88 3 53 EcD 14 -r T N�'-I- TFL RISER iV`_'`•J ' ';-�T -;T-'OT 14 150.0 150.0 7 -�- -300. 0=T__ T , T- 150.0 _T -T 1 _ --/ 20.,0-• �-- 14.b - c 20.0 i 1 �� + 16 d a -- c, }i i-6 0+u----------------------'---r--T- T � � f � f � � + +_+ I - ---------0000-- _ - i; + �Q_+ +_+ + + + ++ + `'+--�++-++ + + I+ + + + + + + + F + + + + +�+ `+ + {I + + 1+ + + + - + + + + + + +7+7 + + + I + + + + + + + + + 404+ + + + + + + + 4 + + + + 1+ + + ++ + F + + 9 + + + + 9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + p+ + + r + + + + + + ++ o+ + +13 IT T-11 +o+ + ++ + + ++ + + +__ -I.+_- _+ T +. + + +o+ + ++�0-+ _+ + + 9.0 + + + + + + [ ++-+ + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + 5 ++ + + + + + +6 + I '' ; Q / ; + +a + + + + +1 + + s+ \8 ,.+.. + � ++ + ; �3 6 m 13 +±vO v+Co o+ + + + + + + + + +�R++1w + + + + + 9.1 cr 1 1 ct _FA Q +� +, + + 11 cn, BUILDING + +1 + " ;+++I ++� 109 �, 109 + I+ +I BUILDING SETBACK LINE +I+++ +++ +'11 SETBACK LINE 15' EXISTING ++++'� F,}+J++ 1 o; 15' EXISTING INTERIOR SIDE � + 1++ +� �` + + , L� o }+1}+A � -5.0 BUILDING B � p1+++�++� �, INTERIOR SIDE 1 +}1+}+ BUILDING 6,9 76 SF 5.0� 6,976 SF 111+Ln + C T_ I + + + �1++++++;I t++�+} LOT 1 LOT 2 1.20.0+ t++►F++ 23,100 SF 23, 094 SF 11+ -6.0-? 10. + + +� ---20.0A 0.53 AC I I+ + I + 11 ;++' 0.53 AC 36.0 ,I 1-6.0+ANI 0 0 u .0006°-°-°-°-°-°-°1°,1°u°°° + + I + ;I I+ {F v o-O-o"O-ot Jquo:OvOv°u°u�o�0�0�0�0�000�000�00010 O O O O O O �%•� } 1F }II ` I U O.O_O-O-O"O`O"O.:OvOvOVOu�ODO�ODO�ODO�ODO�Ou O O O O O OI°O.. .f( +36. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 + + + + + + + + + + +1+ + + + +I +io 13 + T�� + + + + + + + + + + I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + O + +11 :+ + o + T + + + + + + + + +• + wF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + +11 13 W ++ +Qtr + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + Ii m 1 1+ + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + + of + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + +l I + + + + + + + T + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I,; d 1+ + + + + + + + + F + + + + + + + + + + + ..... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +" = 14 1 ++++++++++ 150.0 +++++,++++ ++� � T+++++1+ . T d i+ { + + + + + T T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t + it 14 +++++++++++++�+' ++T++++ +++++++ 150.0 ++++++++++++ ;+ * + + + + + + + + + + + +++ + + + + ++ + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + +;1+ + + + + + + +T4-.. + + +++ + 0''0- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 2 + + + + + + + + + II © 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o +1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + o. + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �' i ++ +� . + + + + + + + + + + + + +� + + + + + {_ * }---F---r-- T- -T - f- + + + + + + + + + iw�-r + + y +0-0"0"0"0"0 ++1+ +. -T t + + + + +(I++ + y J u o 0 0 0 - o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0.0.00 + +I +;+ } � +�$ av v u-o"O-O-O-O "O•'O"O�O�O°0°O 001000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o._o_O �� + +++��o°o°o°o°o°oo^000000000�0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0._ o_ 0 0 ° o + + MOW _-- 1 + + + LOT 4 + + + + + 111 LOT 3 LINE ; I + �+ + 0 ,F + + 20, 400 SF 20 390 SF ++ ++ I I + + + , � + +I + 11 ;�---mow 1F +1 + � , + 1+I 1 + I+ + � 0.47 AC 0.47 AC + + + ;1 LINE 'f + I + *' O o ; + y --5.o BUILDING D + �; + + + �I 1 +I + BUILDING C+ + Q0 i + + + ;� 5.0-- F 6,9 76 SF + + ++++++11 6 976 SF ill+ +I -FI + „ 1 1 + 4 + 14 M+ +1 + 11 ; 1--=20.0-*' 1 i*+ 4(t) F -NCE ++ s.oF-+7 Q y' 9.9 IM` �. W 0 109-j5 + + 11 w +, + n7E 109 1 35.9 + 11 Q 0.0 + + +11 -� X6.0 + p - '. 6.0 • J�' I l� �• ° : I + + + + +I 20.0 - �-�'• f'_7 + + + + + + +// Q�\j\+ + + + + + + + +� + 1 +;; o + + +7�' + + + I + + + +� + + .. . . + + + + + + � l! � + � r - -+ + + I I 1+ 1 li wCC) ;+ + 1� �,F + + + +� CJ �r + + + N +�+, + + + + + + + + + ��+ + 6 3 3 ' + +11 O ; + + + f + + I �i \ 6 + + 3 0- o + + + + + + + + + + j + + + + + + ^ 1+ + + + + + + h + r -0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + +11 I + + + + 5 + + + 9+0 � + + + + + + + + + + + +I + + +1 + I+ + + , �cot + + O I l 1 + + + + + + + �+ + + +� + + + + + + + + .} .' - 1_- - T �- + + + ) + + + O co �}- 1+ +oo+�++ +;Q3++++++1+++ +--+ +++N F ++. ++ +_ 1 }+}+}++ 7 F+++++++ , ++++ ++++++ �p ++ 00 Mid +��+++0+++7+ 9 150.0 F�+o++ ++ ++++++++ �g �` 1 I� 14d O d _ � I+ + + + + + + + + + �- + i T + + + + + + + +-p+ + + a o 1 + n O -O ° 0 14 i1 1 T T + +'+ + + + + + + KI + + +T+ + 9 150.0 7 + + + + + + o+ + +apt + r� I I 1 I I I I I I I I J� O F + + + + T7++ + + + 'b•+ + + + + +-+ + + + + +++ + + + + + + IF + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +ir + + I .-� - CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER I+ Q + a1 1 T + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ '� +! + + F ++ + + + F + + + + 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE + + + + + +' j + + ++ + + + + + + + 126 [F + 1 + F 3 + �� +1 + A +1 0 d + + F 8 �. + + 1-1 �I I I 1F ++ +� '- - + +I + ++ +11 f 109 �' + I+ f +1 + 109 + + + CHAINLINK ++1+++ o +++++_1 O c0 00 � FENCE + \- 1 + + + + + fi1 I 0 O ON LOT LINE. O 1+ ++ +++r�++';I 1 ) O o --5.0 BUILDING F + 1+ +11 ++; ++ BUILDING E F+ + + II + +II ++ ++ 6, 976 SF 5.0� 6,9 76 SF �+ + + ;; O + {IF + LOT 5 LOT 6+ + + I, 1++IF++ 20,384 SF 26'0 20.0 20, 400 SF 0.47 AC ~ 9.9 1 35.9�- I -t-1++ 0.47 AC _ + + 1i 6'0+ + o•o o'o 0 0�0°0"o e°s.� o`°'O�° ° ou00000000000000000000°0°0 0 0 0 0 0_0_0 + + + i O-O-O-O-O-O`O"O " O"O�0"0"606"606081808 . O_o_° 1+ �O O O O o o° />T --T ++ _i44 -36.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_0.0_ °T + `� + 1� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�cP +ii 1+ { + p +I + + + _�__+ __+ -� I I Y:P - . + + + '+ + + + + + + + + 1 + 1 + + + + + T + / ,�-, \� + + + + + +;; 0 1 + + Q�•+ + + + + + + + + + + + 0 + + + + . + + + + + + + + + + + + + ` L J+ + + + + + + :++I + �+ + + + +0+ + + + + + + + + + O- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + T + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1+ + + + + + + + + + + + + ... + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 11 d +++++++++++ 150.0++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++� 14 I+ + + + + + + + + + + + . + + + + + + 1 ' , T T T + + + + + + + + + + + it + II,iI - I + I a T T T + + + + +I + + + + " + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1f1 d 14 ;+ +, +"+ + + + + + +' +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + . 150.0 . + + + + + + + + + + + +;I + + + + + + + + + + + + a 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �, BUILDING ++ ++++++++++++++++++++++ T ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 ++++++++++++}.a + BUILDING ! } } } } } } } } 2 } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } + , } } } } } } �. }I SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE '; + + -p + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + _ ; I 1 + + +1 µ +, + 0' + + + + + + + + + + + +4 -�- F- �- + + T + + + + + + + + + + t ��,-�-O-a r +1 + ;; ° 15' EXISTING o y v u u° -O -O -O -O -O O O•'O O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • T� 1+ +�F--�--t + + + + + +� -t ✓u-�-o--'o, "�"0�0�0�0"0=0t o, o�O�O�0�0�0�O�0o000,,o O O�O,,,O„O.,O.O.o_o_r+ + +� 15 EXISTING ;� + + + a� °o°o°o°o°o°o°°° ° ° ° 0-0-0-0 ° ° O_o_°_° ;_ + + INTERIOR SIDE INTERIOR SIDE ;F +I + I LOT 7 LOT 8 + + + it 31,605 SF+i 1! I t++ 1 + A 1 31,398 SF " t+ + 0.73 AC +++ +'+ 1 0.72 AC I + + "ji + + 11 } } + + } BUILDING G y --5.0 BUILDING H `� +' k + + A 6, 9 76 SF , ;►I + ,F 1+ I~ + 11R i 6,976 SF 5.0-- l ,I+ + + 5.2 +\- { + + +� I r �'r+ + + IF + +i-- CHAINLINK :++V ++ 1 j i1,+++ ++Ico FENCE + �- I + + + J 1 r a + +I I r �,�-20.0 0.5 FT. WEST LO I+ + 14 C, 1 f �1 + IF +I N OF LOT LINE. oo . ++t++ 4 ' 109 109 9.8 +L+ ; O ; +I+-110.0 4I J1 35.8 N i++ 36.0+-- i 4� �' • ' �, - �: ° r e .. rc I +++ I ++i o --2101.0 , _ _ + + +a"+i`+�+'I lF + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + 1 ++ I+++ � ;1 , + + + + + + +,V +(,in+ + 4 +I + + + + + + + + + + + 1 +1 It 0 0 + + - + + + + + + \ 6 3 - + + -6.0 x-6.0 + + f® + 16 3 + +a + + + + + + + + + + + 5 + + + �1 + + + h 0 + + + o� +111 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I' + + +� 'A,� 0 + + I' + + R�� + + + + + IF + + + + + + + i + + + + + + + + + + + be + + + + + + ;; I 1 2 \f + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�+ + + + + + + + 7 + + + + +�+ + + + + + + 0 + + + + + +, 13 + + + 7 + + + + + + N + + + 1 + r + + + + + + + + + + l y; I + + + + + + + + +? + + + + + r + + + + 9 +++ 7 4 + + ... + + + + ; +�+ 4 + + + - + +__+_ ±+_O___E +.j + -` 1 1 1 + T - f-""�- + + + + + + + + + + fes' ------- \y + + + + +---+--- - f --T - T + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + , + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + f t--------- --*---�--f= t== __ _= Y == --------------- - -- �o 12 �-__-.�--L---1-_-�-- -- -- 00 00-__:.___::__:: __= ---------- .11 000-0000-- •o .11 - \i o LANDSCAPE - - -- --- ;� EDGING/MULCH - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; % --CHAINLINK CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- I STORM WATER 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 1 o MANAGEMENT BASIN � L -w -r- ' 1 0 o ,-- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I�--,. - 5� - - 15�- - - 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER _--\\ 1� =�- - - - - - - - - - - _ _ " N 89°14'00" E \ \ ` EASE _N \`� i --- 150.0 _ -t--0000-- _ -- ----- ------ - N 89°14 00 ` --------------------0000-- -- 149.8 -0- ---� 1899 53 0000- ----- -- ------3123.56----- ----�, . --- o 0000- 99.81 N °14'00" E - 0000 _ I >Oou° -_--> -----------0000-- - - �V - - - - 0 ° ,°°o°°°�° °a°\ °° MOW °° °d°°°°OO66, °° SHE C0LINE 13' cP - 13 13 SI " 13 �0 13 13 -CURB 13 13 13 --LANDSCAPE 13 �% ° 13 , STOP (N 89 ti , 1 1 W Plat ; RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -= ' ��'-- - CB � \ G OLDEN EAGLE ROAD - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EDGING/ROCK BUILDING - ELEV.=9.16- - \�'-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL 8c SHRUBS SETBACK LINE PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I 1 15' REAR %� 1 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 1 1 F-- - -- ------ F -- - - - - -I - I 1 A A H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ I F-"\ n F--'\ F'i I_T_ I /-`\ N i I PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SWj AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. LEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan EXISTING BOUNDARY BUILDING SETBACK LINE - - - -- PROPOSED LOT LINE PROPOSED FENCE ------------------------------ PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER -=-=-=-=-=-=-= --= PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER TIP -OUT FLOWLINE ® PROPOSED PARKING STALLS .............:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:al PROPOSED BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ° °-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°-°0000-° °°°°°°°°°°°°°° 00000000000000000000000000000 PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o°o s PROPOSED LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF SIDEWALK OR EXTERIOR OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCATION OF EXITS, RAMPS, CONCRETE APRONS AND STOOPS. 2. TACK SHALL BE USED ON BITUMINOUS EDGE PRIOR TO PATCHING. MATCH EXISTING GRADES. 3. ALL CONCRETE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARATED WITH A 2" EXPANSION JOINT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDUIT REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE LIGHTING, COMMUNICATION, SPRINKLER, ETC WITH OWNER PRIOR TO PAVING. 5. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BUILDING ENTRANCE (SEE ADAAG REQUIREMENTS). POLE MOUNT APPROVED SIGNS CENTERED ON STALLS. PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY ON STALL. 6. CONSTRUCT ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN RAMP PER ADAAG AND MNDOT STANDARDS INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING METAL TRUNCATED DOME PANELS. 7. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING WITH FIRE MARSHAL FOR POSTING OF FIRE LANES, CURB MARKING AND SIGNAGE IF NEEDED. 8. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF ALL EXISTING SITE FEATURES THAT INTERFERE WITH NEW WORK AS SHOWN. 9. ALL NEW UTILITIES MUST BE UNDERGROUND. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES. 10.SIDEWALKS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH CROSS SLOPE OF 1.5% WITH ADJUSTMENT +/- 0.5%. SIDEWALKS WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ANY SIDEWALK EXCEEDING 2.0% CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. GENERAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. NO CONSTRUCTION OR FABRICATION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR HAS THOROUGHLY REVIEWED ALL PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS APPROVED BY THE PERMITTING AUTHORITIES. 2. WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITY. THE SOILS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SET FORTH THEREIN ARE A PART OF THE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND IN CASE OF CONFLICT SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN SOILS REPORT AND PLANS. 3. SITE CLEARING SHALL INCLUDE THE LOCATION AND REMOVAL OF ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING, VALVING, ETC. 4. SITE GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING AND REPLACING ALL SOFT, YIELDING OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND REPLACING WITH SUITABLE MATERIALS AS SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A COMPACTION REPORT PREPARED BY A QUALIFIED SOILS ENGINEER, LICENSED WITHIN THE STATE WHERE THE WORK IS PERFORMED, VERIFYING THAT ALL FILLED AREAS AND SUBGRADE AREAS WITHIN THE BUILDING PAD AND PAVEMENT AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE SOILS REPORT. 5. THE LOCATIONS OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON FIELD SURVEYS AND LOCAL UTILITY COMPANY RECORDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES TO LOCATE THEIR FACILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR TO THESE FACILITIES CAUSED BY HIS WORK FORCE. 6. ALL EXISTING DIMENSIONS AND GRADES SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION FOR NECESSARY PLAN OR GRADE CHANGES. NO EXTRA COMPENSATION SHALL BE PAID TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR WORK HAVING TO BE REDONE DUE TO DIMENSIONS OR GRADES SHOWN INCORRECTLY ON THESE PLANS IF SUCH NOTIFICATION HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN. 0 30 60 90 � I � r i GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM SITE DATA: EXISTING ZONING: 1-2 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PID: 155-018-003020 EXISTING LOT AREA: LOT 11: 190,770 SF = 4.38 ACRES PROPOSED BUILDING AREAS: �4 64109 BUILDING 6,976 SF x 8 = 55,808 SF X EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.27. CL V W 001NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES J N O co PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% Q co man a 03 to W DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES X L 0 W ft PARKING DATA: W _ g REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: Z W C Q [zLij OFFICE @ 1 /200sf; 10% x 55,808 sf / 200 = 28 SPACES > WAREHOUSE @ 1 /2,000sf; 90% x 55,808 sf / 2,000 = 25 SPACES 0 Total= 53 SPACES O Za:man" �o PROVIDED PARKING STALLS: a. 00 9' x 20' SPACES = 90 SPACES (INCL 8 HC SPACES) r O 12 waft SETBACK: 1-2 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS W Lu m"^ LOCATION: BUILDING PARKING ''� v, FRONT EXISTING 30 6 Q STREET SIDE EXISTING 30 6 INTERIOR SIDE EXISTING 15 6 co INTERIOR SIDE PROPOSED 0 0 REAR YARD EXISTING 15 6 a o KEY NOTES: ° 0q) q) O BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT; SEE SECTION ON DETAIL SHEET ° -c I ,, Lo o E 0 Lo O CONCRETE PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY, WIDTH VARIES. 6" CONCRETE 0 2 I o "O c W/6 X6#�#10/10 W.W.M. CONST. JTS @ 12 O.C.) OVER 4 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE c BASE. MnC�'OT 2461 MIX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A o A I CO o on m.°' MANUAL PLACEMENT. y o W •� L O O W U O U 3 CONCRETE PAVEMENT LIGHT DUTY, MIN. 5 FT WIDTH. 4" CONCRETE o ` � cw° CL O W 6"X6"- 10 10 W.W.M. (CONST. JTS 6' 0. . SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4.0. a c a `� I o / # (C @ C C C a 100 0 MnDOT 2461 IX 3Y22A SLIPFORM PLACEMENT OR MnDOT 2461 MIX 3Y32A 42 o o P r -U I - c MANUAL PLACEMENT. INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS AN '� ° ac, v, �, a - ACCEPTABLE OPTION. ;, o ' OD412 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER �N' 3 ° r- MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) e 0 m MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) O D612 CONCRETE CURB WITH TIP -OUT GUTTER � a o MIX 3Y22A FOR MACHINE PLACEMENT (MnDOT 2461) MIX 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT MnDOT 2461) 3 � a NOT APPLICABLE WHEN INTEGRAL SIDEWALK WITH THICKENED EDGE CURB FACE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED. PED. RAMP - IN ACCORDANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT & MnDOT O6 STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 INCLUDING CONTRASTING DETECTABLE WARNING DEVICES. DEPRESS BACK OF CURB AT RAMP. O PAINT INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSABILITY WITH WHITE LATEX PAINT. OACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MnDOT NOS. R7 -8A & R7-813). CENTER SIGN ON O PARKING STALL. LOCATION PER GENERAL CONTRACTOR. MOUNT ON STEEL CHANNEL POST. O PAINT 4" SOLID STRIPE - WHITE LATEX PAINT. 10 EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. O11 EXISTING DRIVEWAY ACCESS AND CULVERT TO BE REMOVED. RESTORE GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING ROADSIDE DITCH. 12 EXISTING ADJACENT OWNERS FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 13 EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY TREES/SHRUBS TO REMAIN IN PLACE. 14 DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGN ON STEEL CHANNEL POST a STOP b DO NOT ENTER O c DO NOT EXIT d ONE WAY (WITH LEFT ARROW) 15 FENCE, CHAINLINK, 6.0 FT HEIGHT, INSTALL AT 1.0 FT FROM PROPERTY LINE V) 0 0 0o W W Q � v 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 Site Plan I I REGRADE DITCH; COORDINATE h O�^� WITH VENDOR UTILITY �h� RE -GRADE DITCH; DAYLIGHT PROVIDERS FOR RELOCATION )( DITCH FLOWLINE TO DRAIN; RCADOF UTILITIES \ COORDINATE WITH VENDOR 10" D.I.P. ' ' UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR i i r i RELOCATION OF UTILITIES " �7 \ �j 15 e 1< / 1 ���� / 0, "? �N MH o �; ► ► n I I- � FES -F I ,g6G FES -E )4 I SAN Mh' I • I h1'' o. `96o IE=958.50 960.0" i ° 959.9 IN IE=958.00 6 I FES -H '\ RIM ELE IE=959.70 co'`� J I ;0 96 1 FES -G QRn 56 -co,�� 6'-°' - -- ---= 3�= 9so4''�, ; -��p - - FESQliQ A7Q I / INV. ELLv.=y,,ri.i :(�' a, �'• IE=959.50 - CB -8 �I -� )( 960 =� _;` " *9 9--� �;* I / RE=961.10 (- _ _ x�;�o »-, »-�� _ X IE=958.00 I JI X ), uaSQ 3 +' ��.- » 959.7. T 959T2X IE=957.70 v 960 V T-,,°�'-�o, / -eg� RISER- - - 960.6 Xj �o� -T �; - - -. .. 960 T.� , x� 9F 0 - - - - - - - _� o r' ----------- --= ----------- yb 1--7--`�(- -,^-_ -IT»_ `9 - 962 ' 961 - t- - - - - - z - - ------ ,----tom`----1-' ---- - - --------- 0.- -■ ■ ■ CB -9 -t 3% - 962 - - mo---- �,q p �! QF1 F rea_ m,vX----rn----� �o�b1.5 e o -C -1 9 RE=961.20-�e -- - d'-- -- Y.��- - `�_'= e,------- ----=`6 sq`' o �' I' IE=958.00 P, �1 •'°�6 00� �(. ; �.4 ?° b' - , -9&2\ I 10 jI RE=961.20 I I l } 9 �p IE=956.50 IN l� r�� N g62 or�A IM o,�,'P °e - -oti l �- > IE=958.00 OUT --- - - - I I -g �2 gFWEASE}o�V 77962 ------ -- -- �- -- _o ,�", \. > �.- 'f? oo'►' _ _ - - r , '\ ofvry° ' � X 963.0 >C 962.9 x a63.'�_ _, \ `2.5% ' O I Q I�• �e'' 1 M7, I I I \n .lI 6 21I I X962.8x ( 096J96j.-- w ---- ---- -- `O ��------------------•-------- ----- -------- 0) 963 - - cr_ I II I'' I 109 109 Il I II I l 4P II ; 11 g .2 ' g , r !0z.o% 11 X 9 62.2 l I g621g1 \\ +i I UNDERGROUND w 11 e�tiIepl i / oEv BUILDING B I I 1 \61 SYSTEM �I BUILDING A 962 ;! X NWL = 958.00 \ i 9 2.5 I i 6,9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I I I 12 YR = 958.59 963.1 X) O 11 I II CB -16- I \\ 10 YR = 959.34 '-•2 11 I I RE=962.50I ; 100 YR = 960.73 FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 FFE=963.50 • I I lo,�� I SEE DETAIL THIS _ t o 6` 3 SHEET \ X 961.9 I I eee I 1 962.0 ! \ \ 3. \ �� u v-o"O-O'O"O"O"O O"'O"'O O O O„O_O_O 0 0 0 ° , �'o a �- 1 , o= o- O- a a O a O °oao boa„°„a O a O a O a •----------------------------- -- 7� --L1ME • - + I� - -°'6 I------- - - Io 0 la 1 963.7X X I I CO 1 / ----- 96�-.-.-�.-.-. -�-fir I �^ o �6� °e I m CB -2 963.7 9 6.5 �I �' I / . - . - . . - . - • Ir , I I .g, - oti° ,.�� Q��° �° (c=n RE=961.60 , - CB -1 1-r� h I I a ,'-� �o I I IE=956.50 1\ RE=961.60 I IE=958.20 I ni I ,�et➢ °l!- ��`------------- 60-60-8o; va oo O0 O0 O0�I a_ _ C O`•�O O 9OX I OaO"O OO"°o .go. A ° oogo;ouo RE=961.90 ° °0°oapa° °uu° 3.o °° °uoaoao°ao°oaoaoa I 960.9 MOW IE=958.70 II IIX \ 6 1 3.0% LINE I I I 6 I1. I \ r MOWI I I I QD Q0I I I I X 961 CY)�IX961.0 - xl 1.� \ LINE N i t �' I rn BUILDING C �� BUILDING D ;; I ;1 I II '+ I 'off' 2.o6'I X 960.6 I I rn I ' 964.5 X I I I II Myo I • / `�° 6, 9 76 SF 6, 9 76 SF I „ ,4 l/I X 9610.1• �^' X 96� 963.9 40' 2.0% � �} CB -17 Ill 198ti II I I I 8 I I 'I l I 98yyo1'1 / � RE=962.50 III n I I I I FFE=963.50 I WO FI_NCE FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 _ I I -- II I I Q I 964.4 1 °j � I CO , F4 + �- �/ 109 II 10' 1 Q 9 .2.. ON - 4- �1� LINE M I • v ca, 109 ,- I X 961.5 / I I \ I I --- ---- --- - bC{•4ti I I I I II 6 --- --- I ' \ r e _ I e ti: J 1:963 --�lf --------- ---- ----� 1 I I ^ I �►? -r---- ------ 963 .-- - I--- ---- ------ , - m r---- ------ I I' w� X96 o I X 95�. 611 \ IX X 963.8 I \ I 9d z.s I l , 9� 23 a rn I I p1 I e� - -------- - --- - - - --- - --- -`- - o� - l CB- X l.' -- 2.71 Ao g62 2.71 ??O °ec►'� X RE- 961.1096 963.8 CB -13 -�k'e` 62.31 2.77 ��,ti 2.71_, i I 0- IE=956.50 - I RE=961.10 -- -- I .4 �. 1 I IE=957.90 I 1 962 o`�-� --- x"61.4 --- '�e -- I I I•. ---,CHAINLINK I I °@ �` ory_-- -- 962.-_9�-�.4 4 e ------ I- -- ,; Id oo ------ FENCE CORNER + �- ------ -- 0 - o r- ----- t� , Io ` g0ti�' - ---- -------, - CB -12 "'� I I1�N�2.5% I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I rl RE=961.10\ \ I 2.5% I' _ I \ I I?59.0 \ \ IE -957.60 � \ I I \ \ \ X /X962.7 9�v,1 e 963.4 I d° • i i �90� --- --------��--, 963 -- -----� ----� ----�- o -i ------------- ---- -- -fin -�, 963 ---- I --- --- _ J it 01, I n I ► r \ a I I `J ^ I 0 I \\ 1 • Ill I 11 I I 1 \ 1110 I II 109 109 X 961 3 { it % I II \\ \\ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK 9 2 Il I' X 961.8 961.2 X ' 1 \ ONELIOT LINE. �o II /\ J �� i 2.0% 1 0 \ 1 \ rnX960.5 °;�I gz BUILDING E BUILDING F o • e I 76 SF I 1 1 X 958.6 69 I X 962.6 1 I /Ill j Q0 6,9 76 SF 1_ NII ° 1 II CB -18 C° Cri RE=962.50 i I I X 60.41 FFE=963.50 • Ill FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 I I QIP I 0 1 ' X 9 .91 00 -3.or � I I I �I''61 I� X 961.5 - I �---5.1-c`on � f': ' ' J i 0 �o u u o-o-o-o-o"o"o"o9090 , f- , 0 0_0_0_0_0_ - , 1 (J l 3.0% v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 . 1 1 ���/ --- - - --- - ---- -} - - --- _0 % 1 I 1 X 958.7 960, - . - . - . . - . -�� _I o'' °6� �1� e lCB-4 7 r� oo4,�cQ o,°g� 2.,9 / e'fi' - :i:�\ RE=961.60 1 CB- 15 1010_I la �2.17 • I IE -956a0�. 5 0 RE=961.60 °e = (o . 1 0IE=957.40 }g69CB-14 ' 96.49 X 961.34 RE=961.90 \ 1 ' rn IE= 958.70 --- --------------------z----------- � :932. r----�E-9 ��o-oa-° ° \ u o o -o -o -o o�o �\ �^ ____-_-__-_-_- 4 0� o-o-o`o8o"o"o"o o 0 0 0„0„0.0.01°0_°.� I t5�-- - - - - - o u a o o -o 0 0 00"0 o ;o m°o 0 0 0 0_0.0.0 O ��• Q, I / u v u u-o-o=o- -o"0 0-? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0.0.0 _ 0 91 2-g� e ? ; , I ,�oaoa�a ,a a„ ° a ° a ° a ° \ I -� i X 959.9 }} 1 .aye s0 I I� oll hX 961.0 1 l 1 X 11 961.3 'Co,\ I 0 I� 1 �� , 1 l yg s � ladti° 1,.a% I' I BUILDING G\ I ' _~ �� 7 � BUILDING H ., , I �pti�i. i 6 976 SF --- - �� 11 6,976 SF x 961 1 co , f I l s !11 l CB -19 � � � I I VIII I X 962. CHAINLINK --� X l962.3 Ill RE=962.50 \ FFE=963.50 I ! 0I1 a FENCE +�- I� 1 ;I I FFE=963.50 IE=959.00 \ I' 1/ X960.7 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. 'll 109 Y 109 1 0 I A I 1 I 2.0% e I ;1 I- -9_&3------- ------- �pIN 0 . (n e?3° 1 -------------�----��-- --- -------- - --- ,-- 1$ CB -6 ,O \ I ► Qp \ r J ep, , >< 9901.1 X 960.6 „° oraA \ QP RE=961.40 \ }ooM \ `�� 951.7 � eg / t IE=957.50 �b X 62.4 i `.9 ,5 ?o I I 1962�I - ' NI m ---------------------------- �. I°$ 962.9X 0.61 �° 0.e,7962.6x oy I -Y0.s,% I e----------------==- -- ° -----o----=__=- ___=_------------- r -------------------------- -_ -=- --- 0 RE 961 40 962---------------------------�C��962 ---� CY 960 ��I I IE=956.50 / , 0 1111 LANDSCAPE RE=961.40' , / -960 - - ��2 959 + IE=957.00 959,958 l� �� 958 957 - �\ 40 1 ,--EDGING/MULCH \ I 1 956 957 C =�, N ' 956 / $ �'+ ( - -_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- ,��^`1 $ �� 962.2 \ FES -BJ °e ' - � -�__ FES-C� � X ---_g \ ! =' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE IE=957.50 I 62 `- `, IE=958.50 $ O 967.2 ,\ FES -D _� ,' 96 -- SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \\ 9 ill\rn ` IE=957.00 X956 u Uk') a 956 dei �O-X 0- J CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + �- SIC ` 957 - \, 958 957 3 1\ l 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER L` `-T 959 958 ` g5c _ I , ' '960 - � N 89°14 00 E N 89°23.06--E -- `a,,� 962 960 -- -�---- n :an.,_--------- ------ 001------------=�n--�--- "-----_---- i ---- 1899.53------ , �, Uif C --- y 962 _ 1--------- - ----- 964.2x - AFS �' �/ JVG.J I o°o° ------------------------ -------------------�_ X -G9- �0 i��- X_ l `;� a�� --X961.3 - �- _ _--- 963.7 0 0 o a,, 63 _ F� y - - - L/L`�- -6� 1 _ / l o ` �3 �2" P - _�� -mow 962- 0 °a°a°o°o�° R�`__------------ --96 c� g6 o o _��__•6 a° - �E _ _ SHED - 2- - - 6 - _ LINEQFC\�� -,C 958.96 - - - - - - _ _ ��� _ X 961.6 - �q�`.�� l --- --�--- g61;'_ _�\-960- X960.2 o, STORM WATER N1CURB 960.5 XI -TEL. '-- LANDSCAPE �h 959�\Xlh INFILTRATION BASIN "\ STOP I RISER EDGING/MULCH �G X LANDSCAPE -= ' NWL = 958.50 CB 1 EDGING /ROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD 2 YR YR = 956.97 589 3 � LEV.=958.16- - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ _ _ _ _ _ - - 8c SHRUBS 100 YR = 959.49 1 � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO ;g X �� I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS SEE BASIN DETAIL -- 958.7 ON DETAIL SHEET I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) � --- 1-----� i---- i A r-, n H r� _T_ A I_T_ F__ ahs N I I I A F--'\ Fes► I_T_ I /--"\ N I I I I I 0 30 60 90 r i r GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NES, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for Monticello, MN, and the latest Minnesota Department of Transportation Specifications for Highway Construction and all NPDES requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" 48 hours prior to any excavation (1 -800-252-1166.) 4. The Grading Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction, and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. Erosion Control shall be constructed, as applicable, as sequenced below: A. Silt Fence. B. Rock Construction Entrance. C. Demolition D. Common excavation (grading). E. Seed and mulch or sod (See notes on Landscape plan). 6. Final Plat shall govern for easements and lot dimensions. 7. Any erosion control items necessary to protect adjacent properties shall be constructed by the Grading Contractor. 8. Erosion control maintenance shall be performed by the Grading Contractor, and removed as per the Contract Documents or as directed by the Engineer, followed by all necessary restoration of disturbed area. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 9. The Grading Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Within the upper 3' of streets, the Grading Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% of the optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with compaction meeting 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding this compaction by more than 1 %. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95% Standard Proctor Density, and be within 3% of the optimum moisture content. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. B. Grading tolerances for the remainder of the site shall be 0.25'. 10. All areas of unsuitable soils found in the pad described above that cannot be corrected shall be located in the field by the Grading Contractor. The Grading Contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of these areas and provide information as to their size and location. 11. The Grading contractor shall provide positive drainage on the site at all times. 12. The Grading Contractor shall keep public streets and travel ways clear of soil and debris. Daily cleaning at the construction entrance shall be performed, especially at the end of each day's work. 13. All silt fence shall be removed at project completion. 14. All proposed elevations are at flow line unless otherwise noted. 15. All erosion control best manage practices shall be per City standards. INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN LM ca W � N O (0 z mow, C Q J . soft (U a. p w �•+ z z UCo LU cc z :3 Z -a z_ o Cw .Q Q� IQ CL soft 00C �z ■�1 O Q C Q W 121:� ca UU C� _R"^ v, 00 a lZ 14 N �4 (n cp N C C ~ I p Lo E C44�co� I o p Lo r- -6 W o, c C W 00 Q� 3 CX C ti v1 I c 3 q)42 ° o CO2 V I� �CL tea,°w = g�� o S `�, 1-1 C� c co W q) O 3 a ° °' C t " o a) ° ZZ 11-, Q_ W 101 FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan (n O m O m O W p W ti 0 Q o a W v FILE NO. 00633 Grading and Drainage Plan I MH -1 48" DIA. CONCRETE WITH OUTSIDE DROP NEENAH CASTING R-1642 _- RE=961.50 IE(W)=943.54 (8" IN EX) IE(E)=943.54 (8" OUT EX) IE(S)=949.33 (8" IN) IE(DROP)=944.00 (8") DROP= 7.82 FT 00I s SAN MH h1 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �• INV. ELEV.=943.7 � � �11 -, ___� -, �_, CONNECT TO CITY 10" DIP WATER MAIN 8", GATE VALVE VALVE A DIT RISER DUNDAS ���� ROAD 1 ----�� 10" D.I.P. � o \ \ 15" R.C.P. °o i � � Nk \\ �_ o h END OF 60� �N MH - EXISTING WATER SERVICE p�' CULVERT ; /g RIM ELEV.=960.04 p 960.08 - / �6 959.90 INV. EL V.=942.8 I 61.11 i� 960.66 � 6 GATE VALVE - �( BURIED ,0�°'-960s0��= oo ��959.79 �c ' � 960 � � X 958.6 I r REMOVE EXISTING 6 EXISTING SANITARY - ♦95 -9 7 _ PLUG-- CONNECT WITH -T T -- T SEWER SERVICE - - T_ - - 6^6 / --SBoo- RISER REMOVE EXISTING STREET PAVEMENT AS / , �o o -T -6 T ,� ; _ - - X� 96 0 NECESSARY FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION; SAWCUT - 95°'3 -I 6;?o _ J » - - - - - -� �7 =-962 961 - - - 9s �' _ 8x6 REDUCER AND TO REMAIN WITH _ FOR CLEAN EDGE; REPLACE PAVEMENT TO MATCH-- _ �_ _ _ 8 DIP CL52 PIPE - - - I ____ NO CHANGES "- " > - - EXISTING MATERIALS, - --_=_ "`---'`_ ' _ - - - - �° - X 9 61.5 -� _=_ �m------_-- sX-------.6, 0--- \01.5 61�' SECTION AND ELEVATIONS. g - �o - u --- I - - �\\' 0 ALL WORK TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE 's, 8" DIP °�, I I WITH CITY STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A Ipi45' BEND \ '� o� �o �o - - - - - �° I TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR REVIEW AND }I �o CULVERj g62� _ _ _ \- 9 a- '0 n ,. _ ? , APPROVAL BY THE CITY, AND OBTAIN EXCAVATION I '9E%s?A - ?`' �°� EAS 9`°t » DIPr� 8" DIP T`Si do I > Y ti X 963.0 PERMIT FROM CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �;� ;.0_ °'`°� >C 9�.9 45' BEND �� ! X a63. r' 45° BEND} ;%° 1, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. " \96? 1;�� 7 I 1 1-- I i - - ' " " �T 9 I 0)62.11 X ^' Q A i�9 / �O1;M01�1� _ 631- �o- 20 LF - 6 PVC _ . 1 \ •I20 LF 8" DIP "LI ti PVC _ __-- SCH 40 C� 2.0% N I I � 1 I 11 00 --- -- � � 0 `L ;9- ------ -- SCH 40 ® 2.0% !I - - 45° BEND m . SLOPE OR GREATER Lr- If I ! SLOPE OR GREATER DOMESTIC SANITARY ! I = Q ! DOMESTIC SANITARY 1 l; IE=954.10 IE=954.10 �1 �o I• I 184 LF - 8" I 91>-1.2 h # I I I 6"x6" DIP TEE � \ PVC SDR 26 °tip II - 6"x6" DIP TEE - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ I X 963.5 9 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER \ \ ®0.40 16� 5° 6 " GATE VALVE AND RISER B �' I L D I N G B 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 x61.9 1 "� 1 9 1 B J I L D I N C / 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 � X 9 1,25 I DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6 976 Si DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE II I I 963.1 x ` o f III 6' 976 �1 SUPPRESSION SUPPLY SUPPRESSION SUPPLY \ \� / X 964.2 • I TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 \ \� FFE =963.E FFE =963. II ° \ w X 9 \I X 614-3 962S0I \ X 961.9 J 962.0 rn \ nLl ° u ° -o- -o-e"o-e"o-�e"ououoo_ 1 9 7 LF - 8 �� °_°_� -9� I \ ' MW' IU°uo°0°0°S°0°0°0°0°�°'•'4 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° . 6� MH -3 E PVC SDR 26 ° I O A° I Cr- 48" DIA. CONCRETE 1 Ro I I ®0.72! �� I m NEENAH CASTING R-1642 X 1 I X � � i o,`O I 'S 963.7 X % 1 1 / 1 -.-I.-.- 96� - �-'-��'- do g6 96, II' RE=963.05 96� 5 I �9 I 00 �. „ . 62. ti° ��' A6 ° _ MH -2 iF I s I / _. 06� �° -»----»--»--»--»--» -» �- � IE(NE)=952.05 (8 OUT) . \ 48" DIA. CONCRETE / �, \ 1 \ \ NEENAH CASTING R-1642 !'I ° I / g�� g6� I �' \ I \ RE=962.10 o „ „ \ F-- - 1 \ I - -- 96� ° . IE(E)=950.62 (8" IN) � � °' � � � _ ��, � 8x8 IE(S)=950.12 8" IN °' 9 • ,9" 8"x8" ----- -- 258 LF - 8 DIP CL52 ° u_o 0 o DIP TEE _-- '� ° ° e WATER SERVICE INSTALL AT �eoeo oeoeoeoeoe °° ' ( ) X •� 8-8"8"8"8 o�o o°o°o°o�� „o„o�o„o �� i.o�rO I I \ IE(N)=950.07 (8" OUT) I ss �; DIP TEE ° ° ° °- °- MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH ! ! I I � 960.94 I IX 1X9 LINE I I r 6"x6" DIP TEE I MOW I I I I I i II „„ 6»x6 DIP TEE ' 961.7 i/X96 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER \� LINE I I I \\ c,, I II <\� 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 \ I I I / nezo n „ , o , I I I I I I• I / 17 LF - 6 DIP CL52 B U I c D I N G D DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE BUILDING C DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE � X 960.6 1 1 964.5 I I" ��O I I C° 6, °a 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY 6, . 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY I I Q„i X 9 X 963.9 X I I 06' +f i TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 11 X 9�0. �I I 6�� I Ijl �5° TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 n I 1 ' i i 96 � / I I a) FFE-963.50 ! '' wo , .� INCE FFE=963.50 964.4 1 °j �j COI SER +\- - » ,l 40 LF - 6" PVC II I °' `' Q I a' I rn I �� g9p2 ON 1 LINE -4c 40 LF 6 PVC SCH 40 ®2.0% ' o V n O' n ' X 9F� .5 / a �.- 15\_1 I SCH 40 ® 2.0% 6 490 LF - 8 DIP I -- - - _ 963 -SLOPE {=-'9 r--=-.---_-_-_-_-_� L SLOPE OR GREATER 9 „ i ! w I I gb CL52 WATER SERVICE I1; II , ,962 _�_.._---=-- DOMESTIC SANITARY - I s��o ti• 1 363 --\ IE 954DOMESTIC0 SANITARY ;i . I9°tio� 96� I X" 61\ \ IX X 963.8 _ I INSTALL WATER ! 96 II 1 8o IE=954.10 - SERVICE AT MINIMUM \ III ?Oo• \o sort 9 !I I !{ I 1 0o I 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH �\\I -, 1, 30 , , 962 - \ ' 0 9 � 1# I I 6� 0 I.. ' = = -? I' o g 62 s 20 X 5 5 # v� 62.3»--» r- -�-»- X _ \ 19 n c z o I ° » » 790 LF 8 DIP CL52 WATER ' _Q6 ti`'°61.4 �6 I II SERVICE INSTALL AT MINIMUM 7.5 s 162 ` ob r ?o;°.. o i CORNER + I� / I FT BURY DEPTH \- 1 I I `r�' I I ` 31 9°� I a, I 5.1 1- I. LAS I UI- LOT LINE 1 » I I� 59.0\ \ \ \ \ .1 o 20 LF - 6 PVC 6 0 \ 963.4X X 962.7 1 I g62�°I I;Oo 20 LF - 6" PVC I I �'' =�60 . SCH 40 ®2.090 HYDRANT I ; --------------------.--SCH 40 ® 2.0% I1 I272 LF - 8" �`I I II / o SLOPE OR GREATER i 1 7 SLOPE OR GREATER �� o HNo. 2 PVC SDR 26 I !! DOMESTIC SANITARY II I I { = 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER �\ I„ I DOMESTIC SANITARY IE=954.10 = ® 0.40q 1 !I I IE=954.10 _ 12 LF 6" DIP CHAINLINK ---�� 9 2• 961.2 X " I; x 961.E � I i II 1 � 6x8 DIP TEE FENCE + \- I II I �/ / - 6"x6" DIP TEE I GROUND ELV.=963.00 ON LOT LINE. 1 �o I' // - 6��x6" DIP TEE \, 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER o \ \\ oX 960.5 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER I I \ \ I • 9y25B J I L D I N G E 43 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BL ILDINC F 43 LF - 6 DIP CL52 DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE X 958.6 6,976 SF 6, 9 76 S' SUPPRESSION SUPPLY ° \ I SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 �II I `\ 01 / II F TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 FFE - 963.0 Ili 1 11 X 60.4 \ FFE =963...0 " 0 , 0 1 I I1 X 961.5 -� X 9x.9,; I ss '4 61. I I 2•S0A# l u u o o -o -o-080-8 o i i J o X 962.6 [��. 1`; ° u ° ° ° ° ° ° » °°s°o°opo°o°o°o ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ,1 Pe' e"eueeoeoeoeoeoeoeoebeo°-0-0-0�� °_8.8.8.8_° ° 197 LF - 8�. , _,o 8 DIP • _------ PVC SDR 26 \ I x . o �. i 9 �, 45° BEND \ !96� u, 1 X 958.7 MH -4 I I 70 I I @ 0.40% \ i / 48" DIA. CONCRETE �� 6, . , . - - � ob g6� NEENAH CASTING R-1642 -' ?' 1 -' -' - g o° ,� I - y.° / 96�� ' \\ 967. I O 0l o 0 _ o \ RE= 9 61.85 1 90 \ / o°�� \ \ --° _... \ \ 1 i 9 I IE(E)=951.26 (8" IN) -¢ ) .I - ' _ - I �� Qo IE(N)=951.21 (8" OUT) a 960 �6� I g6� I ! _��I MH -5 i I - 961.4 X 961 ! I 9648- DIA. CONCRETE 8"x8" DIP TEE 1�`� \ x I 8 DIP 1 0 NEENAH CASTING R-1642 �o I \ _ 45° BEND o AND 8"x6" DIP �1 I °' _ x 2L:✓ ° ° e'e e e 8 8 8 8uo°0000e�e�e� �- I RE=963.05 .+-°� -- -- --___ u u-o-o-o"o"o"o"o"o"o'o u 8000000000000000"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �6�• REDUCER (SOUTH) 1 962 -°V°v°v°v ° ° ° ° ° ° ° e - I e IE(NE)=952.05 (8" OUT) 0 0 0 = I [ X 961.0 ' 68x6" DIP TEE - I 68x6" DIP TEE � 961.3 6 GATE VALVE AND RISER 1 I1 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 X 96ti1� I I. U 'L D I N G G 17 LF - 6" DIP CL52 BUILDING H DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 962.7 B DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE 6, <<76 SI- SUPPRESSION SUPPLY __ 5. P + \- II g\ II 6,,) 76 SF SUPPRESSION SUPPLY TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 1 , TOP OF PIPE = 956.00 I _i I 133 LF - 6" DIP CL52 WATER �I I \ FFE - 963.50 SERVICE INSTALL WATER SERVICE' _ ;; ! FFE=963.50 \ ;I I; I I I X 960.7 AT MINIMUM 7.5 FT BURY DEPTH 11 I \ II I o I OF LOT LINE. !! 1 �� 10 40 LF - 6 PVC ! I 1 �! 40 LF - 6 PVC "T .; \ 4 SCH 40 @ 2.0% a _ I y SLOPE OR GREATER �� N SCH 40 � 2.0% /�� co 96.2 I l f =_=_=-=_- -= - _. �" SLOPE OR GREATER =,-= .9 - - -- --'DOMESTIC 0 6 SANITARY DIP DOMESTIC SANITARY -o \ \ IE=954.10 I \ E=954. 10 \o \ 6o R 1.1 I 22.5 BENDo \� 6" \ 6ti °� x 960.6 ssl.so , 6ti. 6v }o �o� 951.71 1 62 0C6 t 10 X 962.4 9 .5 = I / g62 `I / 6� , I 6, �-� 6 s o 962.6X\ ' 6 `'0 ��' 6�� e- __________---------- -------------------- - 962.9 o o I ;--- 9 ------------ - _-y---------- �....� so o X--_ __________ -===-o-----------------------------_ ���r���962 L 962 e� ��6 o LANDSCAPE HYDRANT No. 1 e 1 Qhs I 960 959 4 I 'S 6" GATE VALVE AND RISER'/ /� i 960.959 X \�Z•� 958 957-9s \ +960) ; --EDGING/MULCH GROUND ELV.=962.65 958 957O I � ` 956 9S 9EO _ �e�' `� s g6\' ; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- / o , 962.2X\\ - - _ _ X 961.8 \6� 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 - ( �, � % °o - X` 96' �\\- -' �- +9'�0 96� 9 ; - SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \1 _ 956 r X Q A 9 74956 r 957 6/ - 1 121 R 25 n. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4' AND NE'r, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction (storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural gas, telephone, electric, etc.), and immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts. 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3 of streets private drives and parking lots Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% PP � P P 9 PP optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN/DOT "Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways. 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. City will not be responsible for costs incurred that are associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations are to be field verified prior to construction. 25. City will maintain sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. Property owners will be responsible for maintenance of storm sewer system. 26. Installation of fire suppression systems in buildings to only be installed when deemed necessary by building department based on building use and/or occupier activity. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- F�� - - - 957 I� _ - - `- �. 958 So I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. , I I 958 _ 959 - I , „ 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER --�. l O FT T'�. 959 _ - .960 �n 1 N 89°14 00 E O \ 960 ^ - X �dJ.4 N 89°1400 E _ ----- �o�-----r-�---- col ----- -- ��--- --- ----- ------ --------------------------- - - 962 ----- L y 9.6 ! N � 9 i 4 i� ii E ------ y 9 62 = No - j ----- _ ---- ------3123.56----- 964.2"\ - -- 963 \ ' 1[ *00_� _801 o "" _ ----------------------- -------------------- � x �-�� _��_/ �_ -� X- //, `� 961.3 ------963.7 �oY o�o a 96- 0- - - - - - - a MOW_, o °°�o� `��_-��R�`y - --- _ _ - - 7 _g61-�� SHED \962--��� _�`�66 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE- �,%'��_ 960= \�`�-TC 958.96-- __-______ ��_1 X961.6g61 \- X960.2 0�0��T \\\959 OhCv --TEL. STOP 960.5X I; T LANDSCAPE CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN X ;' _X 1 \\ I RISER EDGING/MULCH C2 GITE PLAN LANDRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN EDGINGSROCK GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD Chi '-,�\B �- - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � LEV.-9.16- _ _--SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL & SHRUBS PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--, 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) 1 I 1 C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN I -----I----------I------� \ I I I I I C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS F__n F-) I\ ,h �` Fr_ (` _T_A I�� C--�h� n I I� A n F`i I S I /� N I I I I I C 9 PHASING PLAN w ct kr) W � kr) O M ct N On ct Ct W O ct N z CIL 0 LO 0 L w� 4-1 � 1- z �z C j O li:� O C) -Q) Iz U CL 00 -� - O III Q) W Q �nn frr-cn vl u J a o 00 2 0 Q3 q) co N `oma'` o V L O Z W I OLO �-6 eDca00 4 Z3 0 o� o �CL (51 t v L �n5 O S � V , \. •c C m Q Q) a o -b -°c " o a3 ° � 3 w -'moi.., O Z 8 FILE NO. 00633 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan 0 0 ti 0 m Q o W a W v v FILE NO. 00633 Sanitary and Water Utility Plan I I I GFES-G; 15" RCP FES -F; 18" RCP INV=958.50 INV=958.50 WITH 2.9 CY CL3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,� - RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC- - - - - 40 LF 18 RCP CL3 » Ib ROAD PIPE ® 1.259; l 40 LF 15 RCP CL3 DUNDAS )(�' LENGTH INCLUDES FES l PIPE ® 0.50%; _ _ _ _ }<�' FES -E• 18" RCP LENGTH INCLUDES FES - „ I I I INV=958.00 � ,` I \I ,\ 10 O.I.P. I I I I I I I I i 1 FES -H; 15" RCP WITH 3.6 CY CL3 RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC INV= 958.70 � - � 15 R. C. P L _ � s � s � � - MH cl�SAN MH - 6\'�/ o _ 'c� `9so o`ti``� I g60 IM ELEV.=96 FES -A l _ h1 I I �g �6, �� 0.O�o i �� 959.9 INV. EL V 42 21" RCP RIM ELEV.-961.96 �� , - 9 961.11 960.66 -( - - > 6°' - 960 0 ; °0 959. / INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °� ,� _ _ - �< - - - - -�` 9600 ,�- - _ INV=958.00 ,( oro - - I RFd , _ _ - _ 9s8 4. 9- -I� - WITH 4.6 CY CL3 ___-96 - * /� 900 960 - » / °,so »-r- »-cw,�-1 _ X 958.6 , � - 144 LF 12 DUAL -WALL ----� _ -t - - -9 +� - RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC �. 9 959.7. _ 959.2X T _ �� x 9._5q .3 X60- s, sg800 RISER- - - HDPE PIPE @ 0.21 % _ 960.6 Xj,�o� °-Tod T T T - 960 - T T -'_ �' ��-T--960 _�6' - �a 16^�-o ----- ---- - ---- J.' 1, '961 '% 18 L 21" RCP L3 962 _ - 'w- �-�.----=-- -------------- -'9s »- » ° _ PIPE F ® 0.00q; C --� 96------- _----y `9 62 _ _ - 962.1 g- o - u--- ��T - - - -- LENGTH INCLUDES FES --- 001.5 pl 6'30 �ry' .5 �, I / / - ii JJ # 144 LF 12» CB DUAL -WALL � -8 -9 - - _ � �o � CB 1 / I /LLTO » 96 �bti; i11� » }I 9 HDPE PIPE ®0.21 % _ tia 48 DIA CONCRETE ? 60 DIA CONCRETE I`I = �� NEENAH CASTING R-3067 �, �ti° > NEENAH CASTING R-3067 CB -9 I X RE=961.106 I o RE -961.20 962.SX Q ;' �' -962 2'x3' PRECAST CONCRETE - - -�6�_ IE(S)=958.00 (12" IN) 9s i� I 0'62 ` X IE(S)=956.50 (36" IN) 9 / NEENAH CASTING R-3067 I �6ti� ____ _ �o �� �c w ,3 - - - - IE(W)=957.70 (12" IN) ?� m IE(W)=957.40 (12" IN) �o' RE=961.20 � l IE(E)=958.00 (12" OUT) IE(E)=957.70 (12" OUT) „ rr IE(NE)=958.00 (21 " OUT) Cn IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) 109 III 109 _I II L. 911 ).286 LF 12" DUAL ALL J# CB -16 _ - - - �6�oI ►`'�-� II h L,J 1i oiI ° HDPE PIPE @ 1.v1 "6-% - 27" DIA CONCRETE �o1I21y � 1�8 LF 36 PERFORATEDNEENAH CASTING R-4342 X61 Cp \\ 2. I BUILDING A 62 ' RE=962.50 I I I II X611.9 DUAL0 WALL HDPE PIPE X 6,976 SF ��9 IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) I FIILTRATIONITROCK 963.1 0 I \ TRENCH; SEE DETAIL FFE=963.50 1 THIS SHEET FFE=963.50 \� ' • " / \ -\ X 96 6, I �x - � X 61 \ X 961.9 3 9 \ I \ I I s2so'i, o" \ 962.0 0 \ \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0"'0' o o I oro , N I •J M�, v u O-O-O-O`O'Q O O•'O'"O O^O„O_O„O„O„O_O_�_O [^ n _ '/' � \ .606 08 2- 0"0"0'"0""o"o„o„o0 --LIE9s� 1 I I I I Ao ct I \\ I 963.7 X _/' I Ao / - - 96 - - t - 144 LF 12" DUAL -WALL 9 5 I m 1 I X 96 .5 ` I .�•-•-• •-•-•��•-•-I' oo HDPE PIPE @ 0.21% 0 6 96, 1 X\96118 963.7 • 962, �S / nj`.l° I oiro 96^New 40 >0 I \ \ n _-------------' -' 6 ------------- _ \ \ I I i 110 � / g�� - 96�, � I � � � � � N I 1 I \ 964.3 I 1 1 o CB -2 �P I 110) �� CB -10 �° I I 60" DIA CONCRETE CB_ 11, >1 g ' 96�ko X 9161.5'-I" " " 0 o_° 27" DIA CONCRETE is ° o =\,` ��,o I /� _ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °^ g� NEENAH CASTING R-2573 o° RE=961.60 2x3 PRECAST CONCRETE I 96 I RE=961.90 I I 96iIES =956.50 36" IN NEENAH CASTING R-3067 1 2so;.'- \ ^ I _ O ( ) l l 1 I IE(E)=958.70 (12 OUT) IE(W)=958.40 (12" IN) RE=961.60 IE(N)=956.50 (36 OUT) IE(E)=958.20 (12" OUT) l 1 _I I _ X 961.7 /X961.0 X'11 \ MI / c� ° r/ - •-1 I N LIQ IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) -nl^o n ry`' nl III nlnl� n d ; \' { rn I\ I I 1 I BUILDING C , 9 CB -17 11 'AI --96i /II X 960.6 I I 964.5 I I o I I CD 27" DIA CONCRETE I I �o I X 960. J �^' X 96,X 963.9 X I I 1 j„ 6, 9 76 SF >� , „ 162. ;� / �8 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I III 9 I I I I I j rn{ i-1 I g62y l/ 74 LF 12" DUAL-WALLfI RE=962.50 I III I I n I I I WOE F -NCE IF FE HDPE PIPE ® 1.89.% IE(E)=959.00 (12 OUT) I III �� I w \ 136 LF 36 PERFORATED 964.4 � � CO yEF' + �- / 109 III � I � � jj 109 II - I Q I DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE ~glj2._�ON-I:,O7 LINE u cF1 a o ®0.00% WITHIN _ I \ d' 4 ��-�-- 06 I I I w I INFILTRATION ROCK 136 LF 12" DUAL-WALL�_I �� 1 -�=F �F:963 --- - 6666 6666- 6666 ----�6 1f o 1 I 963.-- - _ 6666 --- 6666 96r----'---- 6666- - - ;;o�� 96 o I X'TRENCH; SEE DETAIL HDPE PIPE 00.22% III I I,\9s28� 6666-f =--- 6666 '- I \\ 23 I I 9 I _ THIS SHEET I \ 962 " 0 f I I I 00.1 O'' 144 LF 12" DUAL -WALL I II \ I +19 a6�h°6� 621 - = HDPE PIPE ®0.21% °ti�' =9�� CO I I I I } g - Ce �o ��o \ �0 9s,�o � " X � .511 I g6�j 6 I --'--'--'6666-'--'--'-' 6666 6 6 9T � X959. X 963.8 /illa I ____-_ _ %._._._._._._._._.-'-.-'--.-'-.-'- .-.-.---._.+-.._._._._. .666'6 ---- » » »- _...� ....... IQ, .. i 962 -- 6ti�j61.4 I s� 96titi° I �, CB�� 3 j CB -13 j�+I 1 I2 - - �6�6666- oo�- ` I r -- -- 962 .-_ 1 :r�,7, t I I I ?moo;'- °o I o 6 60 DIA CONCRETE + - " I'°�'-6� CB -12 I ti I I NEENAH CASTING R-3067 48 DIA CONCRETE I I 9 I 96 '` RE=961.10 NEENAH CASTING R-3067 11 I I \ 48" DIA CONCRETE j �; 5 „ _ \ �� RE=961.101 oo,' �,1� \ NEENAH CASTING R-2573 6? I II I� IE(S)=956.50 (36 IN) o I 8 T >( 962.7 I 6z \ (6u ---------- ---- _o IE(N)=957.90 (12" IN) �I 9 II o� ` ------- -•----4- 9- ---- � I IE(W)=957.30 (12 IN) / ,o------------------------- ------ - - 963 66 -- -_ RE=961.10 -II 01 1 IES =957.90 12" OUT I I II ( h T I I IE(N)=957.60 (12" IN) II �' I o IE(N)=956.50 (36" OUT) () ( ) / l Ijj i a IE(S)=957.60 (12" IN) II I I' IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) I °' II I 109 IE(W)=957.60 (12" OUT) a61 3 II 01.: > I I \ III I X961.8 , / ll I 1 o CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'2 FENCE + 74 LF 12" DUAL -WALL( \ \ ON LOT LINE. I ° III / HDPE PIPE @ 1.89% �° , , , ; , , / , I! \ \ oX 960.5 6ti. 111 i � w r. , o BUILDING E CB -18 I - 96ry 1 \\ 136 LF 15" DUAL -WALL �� I 962 /IIINt 6, 9 76 SF ` 27" DIA CONCRETE C° I I X 958.6 \ I / NEENAH CASTING R-4342 I 1 1 HDPE PIPE ®0.22% 1 I �// If RE=962.50 „ / 1 I FFE=963.50 IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) 0 136 LF 36 PERFORATED 1 ,� DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE - ; I s II X61.1 X 961.5 - X 9 �J.9 I � -, --5.'@ 0.00% WITHIN 62.50 I " ° ° ° ° ° ° , % ) 0 INFILTRATION ROCK X 962.6 (7 , rl 11 u u °- 0606o-o"o"'0"''0"0"0„0°0°0 00�000000o�o�or",o,",o"o°o°�S°o°ol°o°o°o°o°o�o°^°^°^°moo?O?O_°_°_°-p I _ I\ " u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' oj�o"o O O 040 0 0 0 0 0 0 °° TRENCH; SEE DETAIL °°°°°°°°°°° X u ��.8 i' \/ -9 7- l THIS SHEET \ .° / \ -144 LF 12" DUAL WALL - \ �6� 6�� ✓✓✓ l I IIX 958.7 l _ , `- . - HDPE PIPE ®0.76% I ^) 96,E I I� �i 7.90 � �6�' -'- -'- ------------------------ _ _._._............._ .. � 1 x _ _�_ I _ • a te« - - ........d � • I 6'� i i C9 II 96''0 C?I6� CB -14 -� III CB -15 \ ` 27" DIA CONCRETE 961.3 961 CB -4 " 11 �� \ NEENAH CASTING R-2573 96�' 60" DIA CONCRETE 48 DIA CONCRETE . I \I - 660 I \ NEENAH CASTING R-3067 °o' r ---X-962 RE=961.90 °"°uo°o °"°u°°°° NEENAH CASTING R-3067 f . 92. +_9 _ _ °_°_ °- °- ° ° ° ° ,00 6ti I I 0000000 0 0^O O� o .80.0.0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ RE=961.60 RE=961.60 1 1 9626 , IE(W)=958.70 (12 OUT) IE(S)=956.50 (36" IN) IE(N)=957.60 (12 IN) , II 961. IE(E)=957.60 (12" IN) \ I I IE(N)=956.50 (36 OUT) IX 961.3 IE(S)=957.40 (15" OUT) II ' I I \ I : 1 (.0 o oil X ,96ti�� 1 ISI. l BUILDING G ' 9CB-19 �- i I 962.7 1i o B 1 I° o 1j 6tih , 6,976 SF 1 27" DIA CONCRETE X 96�- II{ 962.3 NEENAH CASTING R-4342 CHAINLINK RE=962.50 151 LF 18" DUAL- WALL"1 -11 I FFE=963.50 \\ IE(E)=959.00 (12" OUT) Il I I / " I: � 151 LF 36 PERFORATED II HDPE PIPE ®0.26% ll I 86 LF 12" DUAL -WALL \ 109 f � DUAL -WALL HDPE PIPE OF LOT LINE. 1 I IHDPE PIPE @ 1.16% �T t I\ II ll C� 0.00% WITHIN N _ -�_--- --g63_---_-=_=,�L - --__---- =T-- �� 1 ' INFILTRATION ROCK 'TRENCH; SEE DETAIL I I �s- J-- X - --- _-- �96 �, THIS SHEET co 962.30 1 - ---- ry�o T \ T I 121 Ir jl lllOO \ 1 i \ �%;' I g6�'g0ii 6X9, -1 CB -6 � . X 960.6 961.80 , ti 6ti' » es' / CB -7 _ %��� }9� o II 48 DIA CONCRETE �� ;; I s �o NEENAH CASTING R-3067 06' ' 9 48 DIA CONCRETE � .5 ', •�o X 962.4 � f �'� „ CB -5 RE -961.40 ss' NEENAH CASTING R-3067 o� ' ( . ---96 : „ 60 DIA CONCRETE RE=961.40 \ o�. 1-----------sem-------------------6666-- ° IE(N)=958.00 (12 IN) � ________so ;NEENAH CASTING R-3067 IE(N)=957.00 (15" IN) ' 06 o��� -----____- IE(S)=957.50 (12 OUT) --6666-- - __ __ _ _ o ---------------6666-- - -- RE=961.40 IE(S)=957.00 (15" OUT) �� - M`962 -------------- 6666-- 6666-- . IE(SUMP)=954.50 (3' DEPTH) ! I s IE(S)=958.50 (18" IN) IE(SUMP)=954.00 (3' DEPTH) "�)� �/ s =� 9Fn QF�`F / 1 959, 958 IE(N)=956.50 (36" OUT) 15 LF 12" RCP CL3 \ 95 7 - s�so \ ��= IE(SUMP)=953.00 (3' DEPTH) @ 0.0% f J; I b� - / ,-- CHAINLINK /-LNCE CORNER + - 9s, LENGTH INCLUDES FES �� ; so ,/ 962 12 LF 18 RCP CL3 ; 961 8 +9g 16 LF 15 RCP CL3 X oo FES -C I 1 i @ 0.09 0,)\ j'so,''' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE ® 0.0% FES -D , i" 12" RCP _ j ,I LENGTH INCLUDES FES I FES- LENGTH INCLUDES FES .-SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 15" RCP _ 956 INV=957.50 �, V 56 r 957 / 18" RCP 114 OF SECTION 14 T. 121 R. 25 CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER - WITH 2.1 CY CL3 '� 958 ' INV=957.00T,�-; -�` 958 _ .959 INV=958.50 „ 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CC WITH 2.9 CY CL3, T �., 959 RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC.. '960 a�WITH 3.6 CY CL3 N 89°14 00 E N 89°14'00" E RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC'' 960 - x yn�.� 2 01 -X _ 601 -'----r--------6666 _--- .' _ _'6666-----.96 �_- -- RIP -RAP WITH FABRIC --- 1899.53---- -----3123.56----- 964.2 �><, -962 6666 y� I Ivy �uLi' t ---_L ( _._ -- - i - - - --- \_ 963 ^ - L, zS I r y O �( ��, u7 _�c� I �10,0:, o -=�� --6666----------� X'� �•��=---� - __-X/961.36666-- 963.ooo 0a6�_ �� _- - - - - - -- \ - l °o / S� MOW-, o o �°aQ-� \ER�-- - _ - - - _ _g61-�� SHED \962- '�-� o ,�- �� --.66 ---_LINE -960 Q�\\�� �C 958.96 - --- ���__- X961.6 g61 t� - v �\� CURB X i r, - - 960 x 960.2 Goho' X \\959 �`�� STOP 960.5 1 --TEL. LANDSCAPE _X X ; RISER EDGING/MULCH �Ib LANDSCAPE - GOLDEN EAGLE 1� OAD h�1 ��CB FL ',, �h EDGING ROCK C �LEV.=958 16 _ --_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - / PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO 8c SHRUBS SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) -- F ------I------1 \ I I/ JI F__ I n I I F__ A F-) A Fr_ (- _T_ A I_T_ F__ r- �h� �G N I n i A n h► I S I N I I I INFILTRATION ZONE 1 MNDOT SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED 1.5' ABOVE PIPE ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) 12" ABOVE PIPE t 1 INFILTRATION ZONE " TO 2" WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 24" TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 36" PERFORATED HDPE PIPE 1.0' BELOW PIPE r PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 1. Specifications applicable for this project: Current standard specifications for the City of Monticello, MN and all Minnesota Department of Health and MPCA requirements except where modified by these contract documents. 2. OSHA requirements shall be followed for all work on this project. 3. The Contractor shall notify "Gopher State One Call" prior to any excavation (651 -454-0002 or 1 -800-252-1166 out state.) 4. The Contractor shall verify all locations and elevations of underground utilities with utility companies prior to any construction storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water, natural as telephone, electric etc. and immediate) notify the Engineer of an conflicts. ( Y 9 P )� Y Y 9 Y 5. The Contractor shall protect all existing utilities and facilities to allow proper functioning during and after construction. Any required supporting structures shall be supplied by the Contractor as work incidental to the contract. 6. The contractor shall immediately notify the Engineer of any conflicts between existing utilities, and the proposed construction. The Engineer will coordinate with the Utility Company in question to determine the need for relocation of the existing utility. 7. Existing conditions such as sand in manholes or valve boxes shall be identified by the Contractor and these shall be reported to the Engineer prior to excavation by the Contractor. Once construction has begun, all damage to underground utilities will be assumed to have been caused by the Contractor, any repairs necessary shall be performed by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 8. Final Plat shall govern for easements. 9. The Contractor shall coordinate with the local jurisdiction to obtain permits and meter for water source. All associated costs shall be incidental to the Contract, including disposal of test water into City's sanitary sewer system. The Contractor shall not operate gate valves or hydrants on the City's water supply system. 10. The Contractor shall notify the City Engineer and the Project Engineer 48 hours prior to starting work or as required by the local jurisdiction or be subject to being shut down. 11. The Contractor shall keep access roads clear of soil or other debris, and perform daily street cleaning as required by the NPDES permit. Positive drainage, controlled with erosion control and erosion prevention measures as required by the NPDES permit shall be performed. Inlet protection shall be installed within 48 hours after inlet construction. Unless specified on the plans or as a bid item on the Bid Form, any temporary culverts, ditches, filter fabric, etc. necessary to accomplish this shall be performed as incidental to the Contract. 12. The Contractor shall preserve and protect the markers and monuments set for the subdivision of the land. 13. The Contractor shall schedule the soils engineer to facilitate certification of all controlled fills in a timely fashion. Density tests shall meet the following: A. Density tests shall be taken on all trenches at locations as determined by the Engineer or his representative. B. Within the upper 3' of streets, private drives and parking lots, Contractor shall utilize approved soils that are within 1% optimum moisture content as defined by the Standard Proctor Test -ASTM: D-698 with 100% Standard Proctor Density and not exceeding compaction by more than 1%. Below the upper 3', compaction shall meet 95%. Grading tolerances shall be 0.1'. 14. The Owner shall pay for all testing of soils compaction. Any areas which fail to meet the above standards shall be corrected and re -tested by the Owner's testing agent at the Contractor's expense. 15. All water main shall be installed with a minimum of 7.5 feet of cover. 16. Contractor shall provide temporary traffic control in compliance with MN DOT "TemporaryTraffic Control Zone Layouts Field Manual" most recent version for construction adjacent to travel ways. 17. Contractor shall be responsible for verification of the depth of existing stubs listed on this plan prior to the ordering of any fittings, structures, castings, etc. Engineer, Owner or City shall not be responsible for any discrepancies found as depths are estimated. 18. The contractor shall coordinate schedule with adjacent property owners to minimize disturbance for water shut down and temporary closure of access if necessary. 19. The contractor shall be responsible for coordinating with utility companies for power pole and/or line relocation required. 20. The contractor shall provide all necessary traffic control. 21. The contractor shall be responsible for all grading and restoration required to restore surfaces to like kind existing condition. 22. Existing curb and pavement damaged or impacted on adjacent property shall be restored with in-kind materials and section. All match lines are to be saw cut. 23. The contractor shall obtain a Utility Excavation Permit from the City Public Works Department prior to commencement of utility connections. CASTING I CASTING I INFILTRATION ZONE I INFILTRATION ZONE MNUVI DtLLUI GRANULAR MATERIAL MNUVI stLLUI GRANULAR MATERIAL 1.5' ABOVE PIPE (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED 1.5' ABOVE PIPE (NATIVE MATERIAL IF DEEMED ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEER) t 1 12" ABOVE PIPE I 1 21" RCP 12" ABOVE PIPE A OUTLET PIPE 36" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE 36" PERFORATED INFILTRATION ZONE HDPE PIPE" 958.00 HDPE PIPE J" TO 2" WASHED AND J" TO 2" WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 24" TO SIDES AND 24" TO SIDES AND 12" BELOW PIPE 12" BELOW PIPE Ii956.50 956.50, 956.50., I T_- I 1.0' BELOW PIPE r 1.0' BELOW PIPE r 36" SUMP 36" SUMP 953.5011r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW TYPICAL SLOPE TRENCH SIDES PER 111 -OSHA REQUIREMENTS - - Illi 12" MINIMUM / SELECT GRANULAR / SELECT 111111 -- MNDOT ABOVESPEC PPE92B FILL 111111// _ INITIAL ENCASE STONE - 24" 24" BACKFILL MATERIAL IN j D Illll HAUNCHING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MNDOT SPEC 3733 - 12" TYPE 1 111111 ll 11111 BEDDING 11111E IIIII®11111411116IIIII®11111= 1. BEDDING SHALL BE a' TO 2' WASHED AND CRUSHED STONE MATERIAL 2. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN 8" MAX. LOOSE LIFTS AND COMPACTED TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR. 3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE PLACE ON TOP AND SIDES OF TRENCH ONLY. NO FABRIC ON BOTTOM. INFILTRATION ROCK TRENCH DETAIL (INSTALL ON SELECT PIPES AS NOTED ON PLAN) 953.501( r s ALL SUMP STRUCTURES TO HAVE 2 - 3" WEEP HOLES IN BASE SLAB STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE SECTION VIEW CB -1 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN 0�4 �m LM CU W O an -an CC CIO CL ■ _ L ca W Z W � O a. "o o aqi 00 N0) N (/� co N C C I p Lo E I o V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 co ca ��- 'n0 coir U c o� c .� 00 O 42 J1 V 41Z 0 q,` U O O D Q a: y O N O 3 C 11-,O Q_ 2 0 N '113C z V (ag O � W� a: 0 oo 0 Q � c v v z_cr O � W V LJ Cn o mum c ::):�i r CL0:� O "o o aqi 00 N0) N (/� co N C C I p Lo E I o V L O Z W I OLO O�-6 co ca ��- 'n0 coir U c o� c .� 00 O 42 J1 V 41Z 0 q,` U O O D Q a: y O N O 3 C 11-,O Q_ 2 0 FILE NO. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan V U) 0 0 oo 0 Q o � a v v FILE NO. 00633 Storm Sewer Utility Plan 0 00 I I I I K I K I I I I K I I I I DUNDAS ROAD i - 10" D.I.P. 1 I I I �h�• I I I I I I I I T � �� 15" R.C.P. 00 �N MH s SAN MH�- ''ABM o I L96, �� I /96� RIM ELEV.=960.04 1 I �g `�� 960.0° 6 I RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��• I 6 - - - - - �6, _ - 959.90 INV. ELF�V =942.8 h 961.11 6 96 66 - -)� 960 ).� �, a,6°�= 960 so) (� - °o ' 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� - x _ _ ,' ��' ---_961''--- s*� 960 e!-__ -� �' 9�9»-�-� _ X958.6 T �T --T - T- p\ 60 - ��,` -T-I--Se.00 RISER - --, 962 - ----- - - 962_ y ''- --- !w�_�=----�--�= - _-?{--- �° '- X 961.5 962.1.= - - -----------=-- -� ` - --- _ _ .6- - - - �o - - - - \y°01.5 6`'�' 0 Iv •x`30��ti R I \ p 9 o I 6 9629 S �A I . - XII I 963.0;�X 363. t- O V^ 962.8x 96 62.K_SIN?I �^ X 9E2.9 O 6 m ------�- Li -% ---- 9 63 Y- 0 1 n ----- - -- 963 I S.I ONE 109 C7 109 C7 0 � - ' • f- f' � MULCH .6 ° I I , y -jibv' I POLY -------- 0 k; 9g2`5; \ ° I '- EDGING X 962.2 1 \ X 963.5 o - °--- II \ L`' M' 9625°;; BUILDING A 62� a6v� BUILDING B o I 11 x61.9 I \ `X. 913;2.15 I - K F G 6,976 SF �'g 6,976 SF 0 I I I\ I\ 963.1 X\ o I I II 3 2 i' o. l I \ / X 964.2 \ I' FFE=963.50 \ \ DS- FFE=963.50 ° w o 'll h I \ � x9 6, I . I 116�' I I 6 I \ 9s2s01 v 962.0 i ' ;, ! r' U U u o 0 -0 -o -o -O o od o•,o"ou ooa0000000000'0000' o 0 0 1T 1 ., u u 0-0-0-0 `'/"o'o"o"'0 0 0 0 0„°„0-0_0_�.� ° 7' L N I M�T ° a O ass° o O' O�O���O�o�o�o�o♦?0�0�090�0�� ° ° al°o ° , a -9 I \' �- O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n • 6L� I o 'Q61 0LI E I / :1 • z0 I • X o) qPO^� I 1 m 963.7X96 .5X I 1 / I 96%. -�-� I 96 .7 _ _.-.-.- - ° 96� X1961j8X963 K ' s-� �•• •-. . o r Iry ; I 96''0 964.3kr) tP I I N 9 I _g IN I I I I I I rn X 9f~' I •� • J u--U-O-OX-O9"O8i- . -0 0000o00 0O�OUvOO O0OO0Oo0 'or0g0o0000 O60o O o Of,o OOOOo0?900-n 9'9'. 1// _96_0.9_4 II1 IIIX \ X96MOW 60I �1 LINE I \ ® I \ I I I I I IIr- II I MOW X 961.7 /X1.0 1 1 I I Q0(0 I I I I I 96� 1•Q1 \1�- \ rn (y)I II / �.� 11 I ;�N LINE II I I � I� BUILDING C BUILDING IF QO 0 I;�bti`'j 11 X 960.6 1 li w X X 963.9 964.5 x I j �6�1° II! / 6, 9 76 SF ~ I ' 0 Ii 1962 `°I X960 �1 9638 I i i:i I O 9625°i V " I Wo 11 -NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 0 11 964\ I I ,coJI �I®C ' 109 0 II gi12ON �LINE 109 0 1I VCI aI ' I I X 961 9 o \6 4 btiI i ;I I I 1 I \ M 1I I II O" ' 963 - ---- -------- X 963-9sr--=-_-_-- X95.61 =----- 96 o \ I X 963.8 s° .0 96 I I0,/ I O V 1 I I I • \ \ I +�9 N�6ry. q6�• 62 /I I � � ti' ---`SINS 1 i FF ° \j 'Po 96 it \ X�'v X � 5�.5 I g6� 0 `10 ° 6�ti lad 62 X20 \ \ X62.31 0'6� \� q6��9 q �9 lir- 0959.4 X 963.8 ° it \ I j' • 196 I • ?`'° ✓tl ti�o �°°61.4 -962 9.g62 ti I __- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + c6o qC` o - I 1 T96ti°1 i1 rn I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE ►I 14= 6 \ 59.0\ \\ \ \ 963.4x / X 962.7' III I I I �91 6--°---------- --------- ----------------------��- -- 963 I -------- --- --- •---- 963 --------- ii�1 I I II \ \\ I h 0 1 \ \ \ \ 109 X 961.3 0 II I I I \\ \ \\ \X 962.4 / 109 / 0 Q I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9''2• III X 961.8 961.2 X / j / 0 II I I I FENCE + ON LOT LINE. 110 I1. /' o \. J �/ �'9o a \ \ rn X 960.5 CD O10I !!� CA 6250. BUILDING E BUILDING F • 9 976 SF o f I 1 \ X 958.6 6,976 SF 6' 0 1i I I� I I • 0 I 1 1 (ten I FFE=963.50 I I X �60.4 1 FFE=963.50 0 96�y� ; �-, 0 , I' 6 X 961.5 X 9 ,}� , rd --5.1 i 9l, 962.50'4I _ I / � v u v-O'O I X962.6 (� -'-t1T,°a °�0O°'°°°°ago°po°a° I v u u o 0 0 0 0 0"0"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 o v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0'"'0"'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o --7 / _ A I I \\ _I x Yo,�j.8 Imo' 1 • ° - \ X6.5. \ X 958.7 I � I� I 1 `- . . . . . r \ 9e, °� \ \ I q(°hti / 96''0 " a \ PO C) 96, I I_ - 961.4 A X 961.3 0 ! ; 96\ .4 Q 11 �� x I -°6�� I Ir i 12. r I o I \ � t o \ 1 O o 0 a 0 O a a o a°°°O°a°O°a° h° 1 I /\ , q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „0„0„0.0.0.0.0 ,�, I +- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 , 0 0 0 0,,,0,_,0°0°0°0°0 00°0000000,0„0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 moo` 9 i ° o_o_o n 0 �6 ! / ,9, , ® \ 1 I X 959.9 °I' 0 ! I I X 961.0 I I � II s I X 961.3 c II I I o I o ' I I �i E I ° i til ° F�� \ BUILDING H " 0 �� _ ,4t I X 962.7 q6 I- Q BUILDING G �� \ `° 0 ti' 11 - s F° U; 6 I I a 6,976 SF I 6,976 SF x ° \- II 9� II < 962.3 \ ^,I I II I ' ii I II ! ;; a CHAINLINK --� 6 2. 3 ; ;; �' \\ FFE-963.50 FENCE +\- 11 slll 4 FFE=963.50 - I 1 '1I I' I' X 960.7 \ 1 0.5 FT. WEST 109 II! o I OF LOT LINE. II 109 �° I i \ AL I I if (0 962.301 0 N � `\\0\1 11967.80 �/' I K I %9T5 962.6X ' oN 962.9x, - C U) �6 y _ 1 X 967.2 X (\\\ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- lel c 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER�� -- N 89 °14'00" E \ l AL I 1 I I I �--=--- ---- --- �; ego N o --------- Y I --- - ��� ---�-------- -- 2♦- T=-----�- I90L� i I % Cl) \ \ \ ° X 960.6 O \ O ro° 1' ' /: / I g01.8 1, _ X 901.1 I I 60 \ 6 I \ r0`L' `aPl'' I 96� } 0 �C6o I I I +o c 951.7 X62. ryti 2 i° I , i Oro ! ! 9 o �o X 962.4 LG ' g62/-9 s�6' ------------� I- O 0� 6' O S 0 __-___ Aft ___________ ------------------- ----- °'-------------------- r---------- ��� -,rte-- 962 �1 ter_+_________��y��y�r-•_- I - C i_ 1 131.) , . 9�Z.0 0 959 s° LANDSCAPE 0� 960.959 x \ I t; 958 957- ss \ +�6°I ; --EDGING/MULCH 956 11 956 e�' s \ �g6; -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- o �--�_°� _ / �� 962.2X____9 X961.8 �s; ;' 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE _ 1- I ' ° / °'1� " ' 960_9 ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 956 f\ X aFP � ��956 r 957 �'! ��-� I 957 _ _ 958 s0 1� I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 • - I N 89°14'00" E _- -----3123. �-_=------- i ------ 1899.53---- 9642 ° ° ' _ --------------- 2' =_ �_- -----ic� o ° °,.,°�°�Q.,� 6-- 963.7 I,-, ------ - / ° ° a s� P_-- o 0 8 O °° �- R -------------------961- ��,g6 _1 °o° 3 ___MOW -�� °�Q-- LE - - - - - SHED 2-- 1 - `I` -TC 958.9 - - - LINE- �;'- -_-_ X961._6961 - _ - - - - - 960 \� _ _ - C0` ' -960 X 960.2 OhO� CHAINLINK FENCE \ \ \959 OhOv 2 5 �� SL CHAINLINK FENCE L -TEL. LANDSCAPE X 6.0 FT HEIGHT -X 1 \Q�AT 6. 0.O FTFT HEIGHT 1\ RISER EDGING/MULCH EDGING, ROM LAND APROPERTYFLI E ADEN EAGLE ROADChi '�� LL PROPERTY LINE =SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL SAN MH - - - & SHRUBS I PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV.=958.59--\T958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) F -- -----I------1 \ F__ A F-) A Fr_ (` _T_ A I _T_ F__ �` �`��' �G n I I� i A n F-'� I -T- I I\ I I I I M + -W -' i a. 3 .0 i i MP -90 . � %6 (612) 599-8G75 AwEawaaj- 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. KEY QNTY SIZE ABM 6 2.5" BB LG 5 2.5" BB BHS 25 6' BB DS 104 #1 pot KFG 32 #1 pot LANDSCAPING NOTES NAME Maple, Autumn Blaze Linden, Greenspire Spruce, Black Hills Daylily, Stella Grass, Karl Foerster The landscape contractor must comply with all applicable federal, state, county, and local regulations governing landscape materials and work. All plant materials will be guaranteed for a period of one year from time of final acceptance from owner. Trees and perennials to be installed with suitable planting soil and fertilizer. Commercial black poly edging to be installed between turf areas and rock beds. 1.5"diameter river rock to be installed at 3"depth in all perennial beds over fabric weed barrier. All trees planted in turf areas to receive a 4' diameter mulch ring. Mulch to be shredded natural hardwood installed 6"deep with no mulch in contact with the tree trunk. Turf areas to be sodded with a locally grown bluegrass blend sod. Native seeding areas to be seeded with a native seed mix to be approved by the owner. Underground irrigation shall be provided for trees, shrubs, and sod areas. 1B• POLVPROPMEIE OR Z= DP) E- 1-1/2 W Pgv~i N[ a DOMBIE STRAND 14 OA. YM - 21xfaN7 (w a. �TIa' 3`0 120' MERVAL (TYP.) ITaY1 TT►J - I TREE WRAP lD FIRST aMROR TURNBUCKLE VEIN DOUBLE STRAND ' �7N[ �w To rwr awa /14 GAUGE Iw3 PER ll 1» wOOLii R a00�iw s SUM STAKE r nBa UNB 4'-!' LAYER OF SH EDDED HARDWOOD MULCH N SAUCER -EXTEND PAST STAKE WEItlQADE 70LA-111111! OF EORIGINAL. N aAllal-paN MR RAA[ alatrr a ar Ur APAW _. TER RML AT A a - a Ea Y&YW STAKES SET 120' APART . . _ _.�-_ - 0111BbE 71E BNL AT AIIdE - 3 PER e MIN NAMNN EL �" TREE 2' IN t /, LRm,AL Br � I y_ Nf , - ,..-..-.... BAC*'LL wTH PLANING BDL 1 aonlulao >N• I h 2' ''"1r a[L ( KWITAN PEDESTAL OF I�D KRDISIUEOL I l NO R TWJ PLIERNAIE METIDDS CP TPfE STAKING PRE SHOMM. IT IS TIE C -A -'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HO -R, TIE CONIRACTIXV IS RESPWSIBIE POR TIE MAINTAINING MEES IN A PLUMB POSTW NII -T TIE CUARANT:E PE SCA- BOTTOM AND SIDES OP HOLE PRM TO PLANTNC. CONIIQ TO HAAS SHREDDED HPRDMWD MULCH UNUE onlw.. Nona. NO MULW TO BE IN CONTACT WTH TRUNK. CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NOTES: TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL (TYP.). SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL PAST ffrAKE KD SOL F INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Qz I -S < �CL J zCL C J Iz og CL a o (n O 00 a°i y m M r I L I Li +� N 0) N C' CI Q o a N p Lo0 E 0 4 �co� I o a�-6 I 0 () Ln 2 ti W oLo LO -renn vJ oY A I mm °CO °'E a ° O W 44 W U UO L lel U� � O C O Uo3 00 a� cl� U )10 CL 00 O -� 4-1 - O f K� a� r 0 J Ci a1 Q_ UJ V ° ° O v J Qz I -S < �CL J zCL C J Iz og CL a o (n O 00 a°i y m M m I L t +� N 0) N C' CI Q o a W v p Lo0 E 44 Wj �co� I o a�-6 I i o 2 ti W oLo oY A I mm °CO °'E a ° O 44 W U UO L lel U� 4j -p toy° � Uo3 00 )10 I _11'J S K� a� r 0 J Ci a1 ca IF V ° ° O q)- 3 L Q- Q t " o q, ° QL W 101 FILE NO. 00633 CS Landscape Plan (n O m o m o W a W ti 0 Q o a W v FILE NO. 00633 CS Landscape Plan I I � 1 DUN DASROAD xc�o 10" D.I.P. ROCK CONSTRUCTION o I I i 1 15" R.C.P. `ENTRANCE INLET , 00 o S 1 � C PROTECTION IN MH 00 \ o I v �6, 1, (TYP-) M ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH I - I �g6 �o� 96 .00 _ �,.V. ELE�V,.=942.8 RIM ELE I ) ( - ) - - '��°°°- 960°so) (, °° I `959.79 INLET 961.11 6 DIA. 0.66 `� 6 INV. ELE PROTECTION �° �- - - f BIO -LOG ___ _ -- 1--I ss ' --%* 9 {-'` SILT FENCE 1 TYP. q6�- AS ' - -- - - - - e gig- - ( ) 1 1-- * ,p -...- -- �uv yov - - �_-�s0 ._-T) --/ I X95�.� I • II 959.7. _ r x_959.3 °s+ 9 8 RISER 1 960.6 X -j nb.�% r�L -T �S7 i-�� T T - 960 - T T - T T rf J^\7�) g 1\'T� -96'0 -q`°_ - `'Q-� - -95: +-� ^ _�> ___J 961 ice; i y q - ---- --- - -- _ _ _ --- -•' -- - L 6_r , -yb�-- - �� uY Viz.=---�-f 962.1 962 ==--_ �� - - - _--- -�=_ --- - -i - -- - -- _ 6 „ IA - 5 - -��l i 61.5 04 �' ;9 X 9 g am_- u Y . �sX- - \ D . s.0 1. a6 � A ;1 1-T�tii Sts 4 �o - ASO /BIO -LOG i1 INLET I\ INLET INLET o o g _ _ �o PROTECTION 1 7 11 PROTECTION ,�o- PROTECTION s6 - cp _ -1,��- , (TYP.) I "1 -5 (TYP.) "g6 EASE (TYP_) 963.0 96 /�, % r X 9 E'2.9 \ I X ?63. 1' 962.8X Q - ?20�� �1 1 \ 96J96� ;6 \0, 62. � 1 �° �i2'9 IIr 0I e 6 0 >� N I I I I ti ----------'-- q- ------------------ ----- 963 - I 1 m I � • � III iq6-------- •------------- � --.963-'-�----. -- _ � 1 I ISI I I a i 1 = I IITIr 109 109 - I! SILT FENCE 1'll SILT FENCE � 62151' \ qro ; - BUILDING B ;; 1 ;� X61.9 \ �\ 9 1,2.15 �; BUILDING A �g62 ;; 6, 976 SF I 963.1 X) o I I II 6,976 SF I I f# \\ \, / X 964.2 \ � INLET , , 1 I PROTECTION 63.50 \ \� I 1 0 1' \ w X 96 6� �'- FFE=963.50 (TYP.) \ I 1:16ti�! 1; I �� I X 6".3 \I I s62s01 \ X 961.9 962.0 1 rn \ I \; 4j „ \ P q u u u o 0 0"0"0"0�0" o'"'o"ouou 0000000000000'0000' o 0 o \ i /I�\"o'"'o'"'o"o"ouo°o°o°o°oi"0400 Ooo'"o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \h M W ` JOOOOOOOOy0o0000000000 oOnO O O,�OCO„O,.O_O_o_n..n n 1 S ^� o I I LIME79s� A0 I. \\ �' I _ 963.7 96 .5 X ' / 1 g6�' -' -' - - o I � s67 , ca ca X1961j8X 963.7 t 1 I r-'-'-'- o o �; Ise .-.-. .-.-. ti = co try 4. .-.-.-._.._... � I INLET \ \ I.1 ° I S ;INLET N ;� \ 964.3 I I I INLET PROTECTION PROTECTION I (�•P) co tP1I I PROTECTION ` - _ °° I. �. 6 TYP. I I rn I (TYP.) _ 1 o 0 0 0- - 1.- 0 ononon0, O'�O�o_0 0 0 \ I 9'.� - o0 000000000000000000 0 --- X , uJo-0000000000,000oo0o_O_onnn 6 I I 0 0 0 0"O"O"0 o` n �O O- f,OrO O..O,.O,.O _ o_ o n ' i ,� 6? I / 000000„On0n0nO..O..Oe�O o . n n �+ flo, . (� fir' ' 1 960.9 4 I I < IX 96 MOW -�� s so,- 963� LINE MOW I I I I I y X 961.7 �IX96I.0 X ell I\�LINE `° SILT FENCE ,I Ii I / �,��°n .C5 BUILDING D 1 0 ;'°' ;I I I I I, I i BUILDING C ;�: 6 976 SF ��ti�l 9611 ;� X 960.6 I I w X x 963.9 0 1 •� 964.5 X I I I 11 1113 j;� C° 6, 9 76 SF I� 1962 `0 . I� X 960. 96�� SILT FENCE -I� I, iii I g625p� � INLET 963.50 ! " I I I I I -- WO ' F -N CE FFE = 963.50 PROTECTION I co (TYP.) , W 1 I I 964TH �1 CO 1� + \- li 109 4 II 1 °j Q I rn I rn I \-9.��2.,�ON 1,_��T LINE ucF+ 109 a e° II IA o I ry I X 9F1 .5 / 4 96ti• '1 0 l I . n 1 1 1 \ -_ 9 6 3 7- ----------------- - - ----- - --_- �__-O 963.-_.. ----_ ----------- ---s ---------96, o , X95 61 �9s28�== � I I a�° I � 3I ; � 96W o I \ \ I X 963.8 I \ I 9 \ 1 \ # ' \--- 0:I 1 'i 1 �o I II 62001, \\\ 1\, `IO° \q6��0 g6�h0 \ 96%iI� II I ti' \�• \ - �\`1 'ss�d qoq s?`0 1 96 7 1 '\ O X 5.51 gfON q6�' 962 21, - \\ X 9594 1 g X 963.8 7 I +Il ', '9 62.31 q 1 - .._._ _ q, __._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. ------ ,• »- M- »--» » --« - -M - C-» - »- »- »- -N- � o � U I I _ °;.-._.-._._._..-._.-._._I_._._._._._.-._.__962 -----+ ----. ..__. �° 5o I yo 1 1'I 11 96,, / ti_�°_ ��� _ I INLET ��=-----�6�'61.4 I 9s2� �hX 1�1 INLET AINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 6 r ti c FT. EAST OF LOT LINE � - .9 �. 0:' o c PROTECTION �1 INLET ! PROTECTION I o ° ; PROTECTION \ I 1 (TYP.) \% �I q I 1 (TYP.) 963.4 ,1 (TYP.) \ I i N1.0 \ I 96� 1 11 11 o p�y.0 X X 962.7 ; I 962 f 1 0 \ i 6 i I ------- _-z-I- _ =�i-- °\ ti \-- g- ---- -- a-----�--- =k-- -_ 963 ---- �9 I \ \ q�-------t--------- ----- --- I- - cam. 9 63 ------------------ Ir --- ----- ----- I - i=---- - I 1, Y 11 6'iI, � I I I \ \ \ \ \ / I I I 1 I\ \\ � o,`°III !I a� 109 X 961.3 II Q:1:1 I 11 \\ \ \\ \X 962.4 II 109 # I \ • I;; X 961.8 I ./ o I \ CHAINLINK 9'2' 9612 X \ \� FENCE + \- 1 1 �' # J �� 11 ��° 1 \ Qo ON LOT LINE. 110 11 / o \, / ;96 ! o SILT FENCE on X 960.5 6�. I .;�y� BUILDING F v 1I I g6ry�ol - 1 \\ o BUILDING E 962 ' , 6, 9 76 SF CO , ; I - o \ x 958.6 SILT FENCE 1 ��I CD 6,976 SF .al, INLET I 1 \ PROTECTION1 1 ; I X 60.4 X63 11 FFE=963.50 .50 16yy° 1 (TYPI . ) +9 1 X 961.5 I -� X 9Uy +, �- --5.1 A\ -Cs 1 1 962.50x )61.,' , ; 1 co I 14 i _ u u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' 'o"'o �� " v u o 0 0 0 0'"0' o'" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_0_0_0_ I X 962.6 f I v v u O O "0'"'0`''000000000 00Q_C98o8000000000n0 O �O OI�O O_O_O_o�n n 1 ,,,, 0 u U -o -o-030"0"0•`0'" o"O O Ono„0 O O O O_o_O-O_o n n 1 I 1 _ 1 �,' s�o I I \ 6�` 8 i q 9 X 958.7 7:�I.-•- 96��-'-4740 '-' I' o \ ti ssr \ s o 1 oti 0�Q o \ i1 6''so q6"'� 9 :• .q - •---------------------------------------- - �----' - \ I do rn \ Iil INLET -U� I INLET 0 PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION X 961.3 o ! 1 TYP. 1ti1 N PROTECTION \ _ i (TYP.) 11 = I \ I --- (TYP.) _q6� 1 I I o .9,2rrn (TYP.) i1 1' s?s,,✓� I -,„-- - ----"\ �.h 1!I 1 o0O0"0"0"0 o? s 1 1 X 959.9 0,1 961.0 X 961.3 r, O \ h. I X �6ti`h �'. I BUILDING G , •.;���°\ BUILDING H bry;+ " I I 962.7 f o B I q o I 6,976 SF 1 6,976 SF x 9616 ! ;; - -- 5• I + \- f1< 962.3 INLET '1 I 11 I CHAINLINK --� 'AI962.3 ; 11 1 \ 11 ! 11 o SILT FENCE PROTECTION 963.50 11 11 FENCE +\- 11 s 11 I FFE=963.50 (TYP.) 11 I 1 I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST 1 1 109 1 o I OF LOT LINE. =u1 I, 109 I �1�s 1 =_ -- --- 1 % N ° SILT FENCE0�2.(0� 0 g6I I ' 6 \ loci I .; I 961 901.1 1 `�. 0° I \ bti' 6�' ��\� •4 ! ii X 960.6 961.80 ` ' 6ti' �q6� ' i kq q C 951.7 g6ti' 'x-25" s `6?� �q I I °tij !; 1.9 5 It?130 ° X 962.4 I I INLET CP 96� 1 6h s 1---- PROTECTION i6 - -- 0 ! ss 0 I 6 1 ' ` q--------------------------------� LO 962.6X ' oNyo --------__________- � e I (TYP. ) 962.9X ---- - - - - qb� ------ ' ----------'--ti=---- r- 96 ------------ wt.�r-ter 's w ----------------��.�.962 - - - - - - - - r� - - - - - - - ,ice- ��I rn ---------------------- ------ I .960 - r -- 1Anincr\AE)r7 959 o :INLET X INLET '258 \ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PROTECTION y 957 - se EROSION CONTROL \ PROTECTION p o I 956 so l s0 0 / I43. (TYP,) J� = 90BLANKET MNDOT CATS )RNER + \- ^�1 I 9s (TYP.) o's x-- INLET+97 8 FT x 12 FT; , '00 INLET o 7VL.L \6s ; T LINE 967.2 X `\ INLET / PROTECTION I 962 PROTECTION °' INSTALL AT FINAL PROTECTION (TYP.) (TYp) t'� GRADING; STAPLE BLANKET OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- -,l 11 (NP) - _ - 956 957 - - Y gF?.3 958'. awl �j �6's0 1\ TO SECURE IN PLACE TION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER �Tr-T'�. 959 958 - 960 95c 9n:. \-�1 N 89°14'00" E ° l -. N 89 14 00 E - 960 - X 9n_�_ ; 99.53------ _ % X- ---_-- �✓1-'----r-------------_ - ------=-=y 962 J31 N 964.2��.� ,_.-- ----� ti L -- - --^ ---`_ _----------------------- ------------------ �<s�_ X - -0�``-��- �_6/�`�--X- - C / ° °� X961.3 X o o o 1,96 -- ----- ` %--lL`�- 1 ��0 s� -__MOW-,-_o o �o°`3Q- R�F�y ----- -----961- �a ,96 -�� °°° __��-,`36 ° _ `-- - - LINE �,%'� 96_0\\���-C 958.96 = Crr _SILT FENCE - ��' - -SHED 2-= - 61# - - X I X 961.6-961 _ 960 h��q�,.r � hw CURB 960.5 X ! -TEL.LANDSCAPE o,2 S9� STOP 1 X X \ \\ RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�. ' ��CB � �h EDGING/ROCK °' �LEV.=958.16- - _-=SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL � r- - - - - - -r - - - - - PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO & SHRUBS SAN MH X �� I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ELEV�958.59 -- .\ 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) �--I------- -----I- -1 I I � A F-) A Fr_ (` � A I�� �` �h�G n I I ! A F_'� h► I S I n N I I I IMPERVIOUS AND DISTURBANCE AREAS EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 2,822 SF = 0.06 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 150,032 SF = 3.44 ACRES >> 78.2% NET IMPERVIOUS AREA INCREASE 147,210 SF = 3.38 ACRES PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 41,800 SF = 0.96 ACRES >> 21.8% DISTURBANCE AREA 200,441 SF = 4.60 ACRES EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES ITEM: QUANTITY UNIT ROCK ENTRANCE 1 EA SILT FENCE 1,602 LF INLET PROTECTION 22 EA BIOLOG 6" DIA 30 LF BLANKET MNDOT CAT 5 96 SF SWPP NARRATIVE This project construction will consist of site clearing, grading, utilities, building, parking lot, drive aisles, and truck court. First, perimeter silt fence and inlet protection shall be installed. Then site work shall commence. The contractor shall dispose all debris off-site within 24 hours. Then the site can be graded, utilities installed, buildingconstructed curbing and pavements installed � 9 final grade tollerance, and landscape final stabilization. Once final grade is established and certified, the site shall be stabilized with seed and mulch or sod. Once vegetation is established, temporary erosion control measures shall be removed. RUNOFF ROUTING OFFSITE Downstream water bodies receiving storm water runoff from the project site: Storm water that is discharged from the site is routed into the existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road on the north side of the site. Discharge in the roadside ditch of Dundas Road drains east approximately 750 feet and discharges to City of Monticello designated existing north -south ditch/channel. Discharge in the ditch/channel drains north approximately 1,500 feet into a City of Monticello designated regional pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. Discharge from the City of Monticello regional pond drains approximately 3,300 feet to the north through a series of natural drainage ways and city storm sewer to the Mississippi River. POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES Solid waste: collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly off-site and must comply with MPCA requirements. Hazardous materials: oils, gasoline, paint, and any hazardous substance must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. External washing of trucks or other construction vehicles is not allowed on site. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. Concrete truck washout is not to be allowed on site unless washout waste is contained with no discharge to ground surface or site drainage facilities. Containment systems are to be located a minimum 50 feet away from drainage facilities and watercourses. Containment systems shall have an impermeable liner. Containment system shall be clearly marked with signage. All sanitary waste must be collected from portable toilet units on site by a licensed waste management contractor. The units must be secured and shall be maintained on a regular basis as needed to prevent overfilling. SOIL BED PREPARATION Prepare the soil surface to provide a smooth, moist, and evenly textured foundation before sowing seed or placing sod. Complete the tilling after applying soil amendments to the soil. Use cultivating equipment such as disks, harrows, field diggers, or tillers capable of loosening the soil to a depth of at least 6 in on all areas except for slopes steeper than 1:2 (V:H). Till the soil surface to remove track imprints from wheeled or tracked equipment. Operate cultivating equipment on slopes at right angles to the direction of surface drainage. Soil clods, lumps, and tillage ridges 3 in high may remain in place for seeding operations. Soil clods, lumps and tillage ridges 1.5 inch high may remain in place for sodding operations. Multiple passes of the equipment may be needed to meet these requirements. FA 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. All devices necessary to control erosion and sediment (I.E. perimeter silt fence, rock construction entrances, swales, ponds, berms, ETC.) shall be installed prior to any other construction operations. 2. After completion of final grading, exposed soils must be permanently stabilized within 7 days. Stabilization shall consist of disc -anchored seed & mulch, HECP with fiber reinforced matrix, erosion blanket with seed, or sod. 3. The site must be kept in a well drained condition at all times. The contractor shall be responsible for temporary ditches, or other means necessary to ensure proper drainage. The building pad must be provided with a positive outflow. This work shall be incidental to the grading contract. 4. Entering/exiting of the site shall occur only at rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt onto paved streets. Sediment tracked onto streets during working hours must be reclaimed via street scraping and sweeping at the end of each working day. 5. Stormwater discharge pipe outlet energy dissipation shall be provided by rip -rap with size, quantity, and placement in accordance with City standards. Rip -rap installation shall be within 24 hours of pipe installation. 6. Install silt fence around all temporary inactive stockpiles which are not place within existing silt fence area or other perimeter erosion controls. 7. Stabilization of temporary or permanent drainage ditches that drain water from the construction site must be initiated within 24 hours of connecting the drainage ditch to any storm water conveyance system and must be completed using erosion blanket. 8. Sufficient personell, equipment, and materials shall be mobilized within 24 hours of written order (ie. email) by the owner or owners representative to conduct corrective work and install temporary erosion control work in the case of an emergency. EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULE 1. Silt fence shall be installed or restored prior to any construction. Silt fence shall be located as shown to intercept runoff. The area located beyond the perimeter silt fence shall not be disturbed during construction. 2. Rock Construction Entrance shall be installed prior to grading operations. 3. All storm sewer inlets shall have inlet protection inserts installed. Inserts shall be "Road rain -Top Slab" or "Road Drain -Curb & Gutter" inlet protection devices as manufactured by WIMCO (or approved equal) and installed per manufacture's recommendations. 4. All erosion control installations shall remain in place and be maintained in good condition by the contractor until the site has been re -vegetated, at which time it shall be removed by the contractor. For proposed paved surface areas, the contractor may remove necessary silt fencing to construct roadway, while maintaining adequate erosion control in adjacent areas. 5. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 4" topsoil for disturbed areas to be re -vegetated. 6. The contractor shall schedule site grading, utility installation and roadway construction so that the general site can be mulched and re -seeded soon after disturbance. Areas that will not be subject to construction traffic shall be seed and mulched or sodded within 72 hours of final grading. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE 1. Erosion control measures shall be inspected by the contractor's representative and maintained by the contractor every Friday and within 24 hours after any rainfall event larger than 1/2" until the project is completed. Maintenance requirements are as follows: silt fence - 1/3 height of fence or damaged, remove sediment and/or repair fence within 24 hours; rock entrance - refresh as necessary to conform to detail; inlet protection inserts - remove sediment after each rain event, clean or replace filter when clogged; surface water - drain and stabilize, within 7 days of discovery; and street sweeping - remove all sediment tracked onto paved surfaces within 24 hours or as directed by City Engineer. 2. Replacement - Fabric shall be replaced promptly when it decomposes or becomes ineffective before the barrier is no longer necessary. 3. Any sediment remaining in place after silt fence is no longer required shall be dressed to conform with the existing grade, prepared, and seeded with appropriate seed mix, as directed by the engineer. 4. Removal of the silt fence- Silt fences shall be removed when they have served their useful purpose, but not before the upward sloping area has been permanently stabilized. VEGITATION GROUND COVER SCHEDULE 1. Stabilization of all exposed soil areas must be initiated immediately but in no case completed later than seven (7) days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased. 2. Permanent turf ground cover shall include all disturbed areas be covered with a minimum 4" topsoil and sodded or seeded as allowed by City, or as proposed on City approved landscape plan for the project. 3. Temporary ground cover shall be MnDOT seed mix 150 shall be applied at 100 lbs/ac, or equivalent as approved by City. MnDOT Type 1 mulch shall be applied at 2 tons/ac and disc anchored in areas not covered by sod or erosion blanket. 4. Fertilizer shall be MnDOT Type 1 10-10-20 and applied at 200 lbs/ac. Disc fertilizer into top 3" of soil. Specification reference is MnDOT 2575. 5. Dormant seed mix shall be used after November 1 or when temperatures do not exceed 40° F, using same rates specified above. No seed shall be placed on snow or ice greater than 2" in depth. 6. Any seeded areas that do not become established with vegetation shall be reseeded at Contractor's expense. 7. Erosion blanket shall be installed in seed areas with ground surface slopes of 4H:1V or steeper. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Contact information for the responsible party for erosion control is: TO BE DETERMINED INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Q) W Q U� 0� O Ld�z Q J Q OCL -� CL zoo U_ LLJ CLOS a Z 4 (n O aqi 15; 00 W O -4-; Q) W Q U� 0� O Ld�z Q J Q OCL -� CL zoo U_ LLJ CLOS a Z 4 (n O aqi 15; 00 1,°i y m M m o W a N � (� ca N O Q O O Its'' ,, W V p LOC) E 4 � WC;fj �co� I o a�-6 1 i o 2 0LO s' CX o a A I mm on Ej q) c 44 44 Com ` oaf N oOcu Q.CZ�� �00 poi �� S. tea) J S O ) � Co O q)- 3 a- t " o q, ° W is FILE NO. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan 4 (n O m o m o W a O Q O O Its'' ,, W V FILE NO. 00633 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan I � 1 I DUN DAS ROAD X , - I ----- - - - - 10 D.I.P. 15 °Q I CI_ C� �� G �_ o h END OF 6 AN MH 0o r7 - I 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 \- o _ ci _ 6' �, (�) CULVERT I / 1 SAN MH 1 1 96 z o o Z_ o co 960.04 1i 959.90 INV. ELFDV.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��h I 961.11 � � � � G s�6, j BURIED X < SILT FENCE •0.66, _ _ -� - - - -� )` - K- 959.79 , INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� - - i - -_-_- - - _ _ - = - - - - - - - - - - X - - _-- _ - - _ \ /� �r 1 ,� � - �' 1 - -960- - - - - - < _- -959 _ - - - - SILT FENCE _i X95 I ---961-- 959.2X X >� -- - _ �X959.3 x�=_T "� - 960.6 X - js N - � rr - X 959.7. _ T-�9Sg3�T 1 T ' T T �T- -960 RISER- _ _ - ----====yb"I-------------i�`9s N,. \ ---0-961--------,�>-� --- - -- --o --962------- - 961.9 �__(bX----X----- �.= X 961.5 962.1-�4-----_--- ---X- -_--__6' - �---�- 961.5 �, X 962.9 --_X_------ �- r\----------- 962.5 962.4 24" CMP \\�\` 'UTILITY CULVERT EXISTING - I ; 963_ _ EASEMENT _ _ _ ,�- DRIVEWAY X 963.0 Q ; 4\ =� J X 962.9 _ - - X 963.1- _ - ACCESS TO X 962.5 X' 0 1 962.SX 962 9 -- MOW REMOVE EXISTING - PUBLIC STREET 962'3 LINE CULVERT m I �' I � = I SILT FENCE _ SILT FENCE X962.2 \ I o X962.2 �_--- --� X 963.5 w X 961.9 X61.9 1 \\ �t X 962.5 �,962 CO I\ 1\ \ 963.1 X \ p \ ` X 964.2 1 \, \ w X96 Q \ I\ X 961.9 J O�� \962.0 X 961.3 Q0 I \ � N \ I MOW \\ I >o \ 1 ----LINE 1 c \ I I m 963.7 X 96 .5 X 964.3 I I h I tPl I rn1 X 961.2 11 X> 962.5 1 X 961.7 960.9 MOW I iX96� IX96" / \ I I I LINE I 1 r- I I I 1 � I 1 ., ��, 7X961 0 X 961.0 \I�-- MOW I I I \ c0 / c-= EXISTING VELI TATION ,' LINE I I I x'962.0TO BE REMOVED ��� ��196 6016T FENCEEX 963.9 964.5 X I jI / I �� . /I X 960. J1 X 96�� 3 SILT FENCE -I� I, // / I 11 I I 1 .--"WOOD FENCE w I I 11 964 1 °j CORNER I \ 1 962.5 ON\ LOT LINE X 961.7 /// o I I X 961.5 I I I \ \ X 960.4 w I I 4 �\ \\ �J�1 X 960.7 960.5- I X95.611 \I IIX X 963.8 �o I I \ \ 9 I \�_------� f I \ X 5.51 I 6� X 962.3 \ j X959.4 �1-�I g X 963.8 r0 961.4 \ - )� 961.4 I _-_ -\,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - I oo \ I a I I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I I CONCRETE I 59.0 X I SURFA CE I o I\ \ \ \ 963.4X X 962.7• I (APPROX.) I I I\\ \ \ \ .961 3 960.9 I II \\ \ \ \X 962.4 CHAINLINK ---�^ 962.5 ) X 961.8 961.2 I \ FENCE + \- //�� ON LOT LINE. / SILT FENCE rn X 960.5 I o REMOVE CONCRETE \\� 1960"91 I `\ X \ I SILT FENCE PAVEMENT `\ 0 1 \ 1 / I Q0 / 1 X 160.411 coo _X 961.5 X 960.9 --� - 5.1 \- X 961.8 � � - X 962.6 1� \\ 960.8 \ \ �967- EXISTING FENCE ON EXISTING FENCE ON \� \ �� o \ ADJACENT PROPERTIES � \\96' \ 11 TO REMAIN ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I \�� 961.4X X961.3 9 4 962.5 X 962.5 CONCRETE SURFACE X 959.9 (APPROX.) I�X961.0 \ 961.3 \ o I \ ° I \ X 962.7 \ I 1 X 961.3 __� -- 5. + \- ` X 962.3 1� CHAINLINK --� X 962.3 BROKEN \ a SILT FENCE FENCE + \- CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE I I X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE a o I OF LOT LINE. PAVEMENT � I I SILT FENCE \� 961.5 I REMOVE GARDEN PLOTS AND _X,X 61. n1.1 X 960.6 / SHRUBS/TREES I 962.5 X 96 .4I i -MOW 1 0 I :-�-.� N� i LINE j 962.6X CONCRETE I + + + ., 0 962.9><, SURFACE I i '+'+'+'+'+'+)�-� \I (APPROX.) I ill+'+'+'+�+++! 0`<�a +'+'+I+�, 2.6 -MOW i , + + + cam+ + I , + + + +, 0 LANDSCAPE ~962. i LINE i I+++++.��++++{ `r+;c��S'p� �;+ --EDGING/MULCH v }+ +��++++ +''- ++++N +l 6\ -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + BROKENMOW �` \ / \ ;++++++++ +++ ;++++++++a.,9 \- ,, ,,, ,� 962.2�r 4++++�C+961.8 ;+++++;�I I ' 1 X CONCRETE LINE� - _ - -9 ; +,+ + ++ t ,_ 1 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 `,\\ PIECE �l ,-1----= =P`� 1 62\ \ �, :+� +% E A p 9 \� i M 0 W E D _� A R E A --1 p R'�0 96_ SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST Ili - - -963- - - - - ----------------------+ ,-_ -- r-,-- r-,-----,--�C 962.3 _ 1 114 OF SECTION 14, T. 121 CHAINLINKFENCE CORNER + \- t } + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +� .+ + + + + + + +++++++i E D � 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER_\ II ^�� UTILITY- ++++++++++++++++++++++++GARDEN++++ +` ++++++++++; M 0 W \� I �- 1, N 89°14'00" E l '++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + 961.8 N 89°14'00" E EASEMENT \ i - I_ X 6 _ _ _ _-_____-__�__-X__- - - +++++++++++ ;+++++_f + ------ 1B99.53----- ----------- --- - ---- ---� -- --C I + . + + 299.81 N 89°14'00„„-E + + + �-962.6--- - �o_-------- ------ I _ +++++++*_;_, 1899 9642 ,- o r r - -+ �'=---------------- I_ - �✓ / -�-�J=L.JX . I I 000e'l-0 - -_� - -------------------tel - - � X _ -gam_ _ _ _ C� It, / � � 961.3 �P2_ _ - j-963.7°°04o`r6`3Q - - �_O�961- �9 - 1 / 00000 3 MOW_, SILT FENCE -"\ETC 8.96 - r1T - - - - - -'\ ---SHED 62- - - LINE �: � FENCE \��-_------ ----- _� i X961.6g61 toX _ y -SQA =�t -- _ _ _ '� �'� 1 --- --�--- i_ -960- X960.2 oho' \ \ \959 �`��vSTOP 960.5 Xj !--TEL. LANDSCAPE X X \ \\ RISER EDGING/MULCH �lb LANDSCAPE - GOLDEN EAGLE 1� OA h�- -��CB t �h EDGING ROCK C �LEV.=958 16 _ --_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL - - - / PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO 8c SHRUBS EXISTING TREES AT TOP SAN MH X 1 I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS OF BERM ON ADJACENT - - - - _ ELEV =958.59 -- . 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) PROPERTIES TO REMAIN I �, Ch I I/ _T_ A I_T_ F_ r-` �h� �G n I I� i A F--',\ h► I S I Report -Engineering Properties (MN) Map unit symbol and Pct, of Hydrolo Depth soil name map gic unit group 406 -Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent - slopes Dorset 80 6 in 0-11 11-20 20-38 38-79 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. DEMOLITION NOTES 1. Install perimeter sediment controls as soon as possible during clear and grub operations. See Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. 2. Provide air quality control measures at the request of the Engineer or City Representatives. Take necessary measures to keep dust levels to a minimum. Provide sweeping of adjacent paving as needed, or as required by the City Engineer. 3. Locate and protect all utility lines prior to and during demolition. Utility locations shown are based on best available information and are not guaranteed. Contact private utility service for disconnection and removal. 4. Remove or relocate all existing site features that interfere with the proposed construction. 5. Protect existing site features that are to remain during construction. Replace anything damaged with new construction. 6. Pavement shall be saw cut at limits of removal unless noted otherwise. Do not impede existing traffic circulation to adjacent businesses or streets. 7. Sufficient topsoil shall be stockpiled to allow for the replacement of 6" of topsoil in disturbed areas to be re-vegitated. 8. All construction and post -construction parking shall be on-site. At no time shall parking, loading, or unloading be allowed on public streets. 9. Storage of materials or equipment shall not be allowed within public Right -of -Way and shall be maintained on site within project boundaries. Engineering Properties (MN) -Wright County, Minnesota USDA texture Classification Fragments Unified AASHTO X10 3-10 S inches inches Pct Pct Sandy loam, fine SC -SM, A-2, A-4 0 0 sandy loam, loam Loam, sandy loam, coarse sandy loam Gravelly coarse sand, gravelly sand, very gravelly coarse sand, gravelly loamy sand Gravelly coarse sand, gravelly sand, very gravelly coarse sand, gravelly loamy sand Percentage passing sieve number- Liquid Plasticit limit y index 4 10 40 200 Pct 90-100 78-100 57-88 27-50 0-31 NP -10 Sc SC -SM A-6, 0 0 91-100 79-100 54-83 24-45 0-31 NP -11 A-2-4, A-4 SW -SM A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 79-92 54-77 24-41 5-15 0-0 NP SW -SM A -1-b, A-1 0 0-2 80-93 56-78 24-42 5-15 0-0 NP Data Source Information NRCS Web Soil Survey NOTE: FIELD GEOTECHNICAL SOIL BORINGS AND ANALYSIS SUPERSEED NRCS WEB SOIL SURVEY DATA. 0�4 �m LM CU W O N an -an CC 0 (0 0) a to .CU oftoLft �ft c a '~ Z Z Co W W Ca w � O 0 a 0 Q �1•+ � r O cu LLU0L CO co oz� QOQ_ C J z�> -v0 i zCr. CLWQ 2 0 0 0 0o W W 0 a v INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: o CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - -� - - - - - - C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C 7 C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN Existing Conditions and Removals Plan f _ FID,e HSA Nn orraA,•.s rxeANnlwH Nxs_na u.rs Tic ru Nn om1u9 sero eE ra raAews 1 L. ALL HAAS lIAu.L R rLm 1-5/t' ` 1 : ALL NAL �w�0 F01e`im fi,Yl R xnte M WO RU TOw PFwVrLO IRaw We [AGE Or an D aOH WrS g1rNLy fFlis NIrERHNL all mrA/N1f AU- [u Nq °tvaAr vNu K rRW [wmaxr v Imtn m THE —T — of aWRP UwISS drAwTON ARIA 04, , Raf.aw m[PA' FOR COOAPLETE TYPE "A" DROP SECT]nN — wR OU! I ANLL WA.,.>< 00Mr. "VoM . 5.ICvu.[D Wn0 TME eR1>Sne I,wE OF TR.9ra. TDV ,NE rH AH[` nV7 •J W! NK'LVOE THE MA '�rR Or nE STr�Er sTPAn fm rwRKxl M4NNaIr IlaOx, 1q FTPr. C, sfi•.: a �• iui°oR or., Noe o Ria00 nc°rdMirK a[.oG swu x rim rw ananrm rawE Allo cmT:R ¢ L • R,4, IF J — .— — — — cxeH UNE sET9R"EN HVE Axn L CASD MAPanNo RHOS S --T wrri Na, viu NcESAIRIELSHM1E +T 4- MN! - 17• A/N[ y m `y jEeS A o A A �IBOC1 wNArOAEE "PH STAHaeRD FRAIQ & COVER 1 ® m ; .. _ ••`! 8 Is 1/E • iS' 1'r [�.• u EXGHrrKfN IAEA xr vw xN } Rda qr suREAcE G r�' J' r Acne ORO` 5EGFOM YNA91 {' W111 12' ((mslAu INrn.. stem r O ;.; CVRa K[r r1W[ Nq Me °Wi O gq MILL ANO 019aAY AREA AANi R 5' ON pal E,TERNY CHW�T 9FAL� ! �E u t STANDARD PUTS i0M N ( .. >- I� �� 5 rrlrHw Na. R -son -r L FOR COVFR RFO111RE1CNF$ }PEI = •..•• xN.L CONSIRUCigH SINLL 6E dLA55 II _J — PRECAST PIPE. EkCEPT 'DA MAY BE -- °, ASTM C 478 aaNCRETE RPE. SEE MODai STAI°NRD 8• CAST^w-PLACE • • PLATE 7006 [Na rCNGaE ORMAI Ai TDP T. H ASNCEE 5EC ION W °E 300"ONSL1, ^,: CONCRETE aR BOiIOY DF illls sECIgN]). CRSC-IH-PULE g PLAN TM c-a%Ct.AY x • CRETE orAASOHRySTRUCTUNCRLV W RUN 9UCruE raH ,EE i' i0 i0' iiLST PLte510N - � NS OCY.] ALtaRLO CNLY IF APPRWEp PLAN cunERurc ROAN ER OtS LarC,N [YO'ggounNe ro K 9ET Ore•Ar G+ N LEA Or PtC r C mare pRTER aLPATRH SUTCVT BR BASE 1' FROM VICWNFCINCONCRETE OOaHO,1SE REGItED GI ,' eDNCRErr CGtLut NL SrDPM SEWER CASTNC nEMTxwi SAMCUT ell 'WEAR 2' FROM, ExCNATION EDriE a IDE ANO INSI E ar SIRVCMW '(] ® NtTx1 AFtu ?,�➢ rw Tri AA HAW BFLr NA " IM RA • W Cup AAI' "AAAI /e0 CAN 8GC ,SE R-2 AWTFORuAIAND PPE CONNECTION g (pTr suLE&INvOW1 rw lett - Ff 1Nfl R -]O ,To NAN Hoc l1LteAt lr�4 CWS r[ FDM Ce4M roz-sex .%5E L. APPRPm EW L o ° — f R.4.w eRC,ar G91ET C crS`t SHALL eI rFPm • cnM.NE,C HORS('J,pE A+a - ::• : S.• F.r+ „5. N• R. cnwicTroN PRE To wrelvlE3 cacxeTr wRru Au sees 'uor srRucruRE— TCH, L .I 67 POURED —RErE DVSE, FOR ALTEraurrTE PRE{YSt COTICAETE, • r � Hq NPO Ca1[CTAe ,NE rRlpw+c „EAR T,[ + A 91+¢i 9E nn bmw1�A. wAnA6Le ' I Y' RluS E AREA Te Pte rCEOIJInEO OW 11r - '• °RTrAT Ye TNC mmw[xc,Na 4nRrns aAsi caulhE ssaTnarrcss TACK COAs RuSUE Wpai sTANDARD PLAT[ W11 sladlvr DIAMETER AND y r NN s, N RXL GEPrN NK,R Or 9rWpVS BASE a Np r Ne}Tm EagwgN EOCE rwt N' � . • Lf 3 � nu xPrN x..cn °r arN.evs wx a sa.Rm Y +uNxw e,�'.nw Ence RR wETue COURSE GST NOrew SeelicN ;.-,�,• a - CCHi[ET 1a MN.a[I p _ _ COME DMNL�` 96' 64�E e°uRSE NAam aS AT 1r OC EACH MY wRI>i s(RER a PLLMERr� RSR-9u� PUHs FOR iE4'Trr AND p -- .••. I— (� MANHOLE SUPS SHHLL 6E CAST IRAN OR MA MODEL PS -I -Pr a � .,��.�� — � I J q�, 1 fey w NDuSTRUL HC.] CONFORMING TO ALL DSNA REGuLATONS Cp.CTErE eaLPA rnNCRLiE dTc�n S aF xwNa[L 7 te0x ST,V6IRP CUSi S I = - ReER aaC AND SPACED 16- OC- SECTION A -A ,HPE sa.!s ON rP` aram Earl r. Z. To wanm m Ewa A sNOnnF 3 I -- STANDARD MANHOLE FOR PRaCroR DENSITY STANDARD SM!'FARY SEWER [� WNIHIM 51EEL RONFORLfNENT a.:221 aAr�. Ha 54iE COMALENT STEEL AREA IN WIRE ,491 PLRSTEREO POUR A s TO W OwICRET[ COAUN SECTION t. aaE -0rAa f0 eE AOOA101 Rnru — — —J-11 Ex'TEAIOR OR 22Fe p siNO TO Tti cR(u5r 2cmlra `-95N STANQIRaPROGENERAL DIMEH.SIOnt F9R ConaREIE APPLE 614N gyCIH .___I I I- I I ,pn� illillilli TO BRICK AND CONCRETE AIASDI/E•r YNR - au CTCH O• -A4 WCP.TEO w alr.E-+9 5.riy er Trn[ Erna[ caval N T,c G1Cx MEw wiR�0.LS R[OUR[D w °KIN SPACES ;wu eE CVIRrRUCTPY OI p4C,1W1iNN1 AREA [1ROlH To INCONSTRUCTION ALSO. EXCEPT AS NOTED. G3W • yiy K WE— F -330E -At PKOTS! LdMAETE OraY w ALCORLv[E >tRt1 vVwl S[.AAWO MTC �OOk. 091A APPfN1RD YOPES 10 IXK ouri'ROA OR rrANmLl Fb+-Pr sow R aRICIC (Mn SPEC .Se1e) ROCK.NY.ro1R1RUL eIC] CCelr^^'.�_ m ALL 09r RE4uATIOf6lnA[O 1E' a [� f2- WaHIMVMEOR PRECAST, 3 aRICIG all IEA,OrRr CONSmLC1rON!A" Ra;N MHHHDIS AD°ATEa N OA ftn SWL ECAR`I IDROP d OPfiiER TNN 2i F,C•iv. u9E OYTSaE DROP, MRIIMVLI FOR NA.SanRr CONSTVCTICRI rrEH7ASPER M,,DOT SPED 9301. GRADE a0. rMn Atr' RpRA1 OFEIxOI I— Title: Title: TRIx Standard Manhole for TIDe Standard Tri Catch Basin Utility Excavation in Streets Standard Sanitary Outside Drop Section For Riprap Detail � `•� Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Standard Plate Library Manhole Sanitary Manhole Storm Sewer Catch Basin Manhole that are Less than 5 Years Old Citv of Monticello pole; Plate No. City of Monticello ; pate N°• City of Monticello cote: 03—D5 P,Ote Na• City of Monticello a3_DS Plate "° Citi' of Monticello �= p3-45 PI°t° "°• City of Monticello � 03-D5 �'°'° "° Citi° of Monticello oDte: fl3 �8 pl°ie H,. D3-05 D3-04 _ — — — - - - — = RaYhvd: 4001 sReMfesde 40Q9 -- RaNlsed: 4002 _ - 4003 R"lmd: 7007 aedtD3-15 3'0Q1 == __ R -""d:03-15 3002 43-17 03-15 63-17 03-17 03-17 J J J PaaNr ANT© sTARc SiRAx 1. YOOO 's " J 6' TO „ c DA N0.L EACLOSED MD RAST [C OR PDLrESTEN fW'rT]NG TYPE 2� SIOROLL DITCH CHECK. ueE d Rn1b. DRAOED AREAe 2' x tr LO[C Ua[Yix SfH AT 1 ip 9ryCUB Ayv,yy. STARS SHALL eE PHax Tlgo cM ENE .5 ovi Of Min, AiORO,p AT T wWAL Or 93 noels men Tet 10P a Tet SrAxf vaenno rsS1aEAHL EIDNp.L `RNmE e- Tv v' yr FAIPEOMENT vEm,rL .s' FLS ' [e• EH�wENi ¢PTA PIOROLL STAKING DETAIL ENTRENCH A MINI" OF 2• NOTE - WHEN MORE TNeN 1 BIGROLL ALOHFOST Ldp Is NEEDED, DVERP.AP ENDS A HINIKM OF 6• AND STAKE Title: Bio La Staking � g g Standard Plate Library Straw or Wood Bio Roll City of Monticello Data: Plate No, — D3-08 Raves 03-15 6009 r�r�r� r r� r�r� GRASS TURF J SEEDING AS � APPROPRIATE FOR BASIN Where the flow of water is sheeting, place sod strips perpendicular to the direction of water flow. SHINGLING SOD QF s s -s 1<MDTH VARIES s -s s 3:1 MAX 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE SIDE SLOPE UNDISTURBED AND/OR UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL � r y Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library' Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello note: Plata No. _ 03—D8 ReYiaad:03-15 6011 _j ELV =VARIES BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 956.00 6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER—EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI—COURSE WASHED SAND; 20%-30% J � ITEM 7. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: 1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. 2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES. 3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12" ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW—IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION To 01 1 SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO—TILL INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND ALL NON—NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED. 8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005 EDITION. 9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) ATA RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. I t a• MAk rR.RsrERsc ° euNr nTdnrx arAs 5�a - Hae e' Tv 1r APNOAa stH •Hoa 10- a AAacFn rPaaFc. I�' L A1NabR 9oP - a ev,n ew5 ,. Au TRAvr cuAtuts s+AiL ar rvA.wM2rA rnrn rNvncArlorr PER NnOOr BPEG 3391 a ]]94 I. AxNlEv ro nANW EW smlas u• vR uArm I, Au Nurs AND avLr ATrwwo rRASN cuARo TA Tit Fu#O aA SECTNxI StW.L BE Where the flow of water is a' concentrated, place sod slips STABILIZED TraRADE parallel to the direction of OVERLAPPING SOD water flow. NOTE: S Although pegging of sod is not specifically required it is understood that the will contractor will be responsible for the successful establishment of the sod including repair or of sod which becomes displaced or damaged due to lack Of protectian or proper core- wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR Tills: Standard Plate Library Sod Placement City aF Monticello •"' RTI" Date Plan No. SSa.E_410EB4e2 D3-07 � Remold: 6010 03-15 s s -s 1<MDTH VARIES s -s s 3:1 MAX 3:1 MAX SIDE SLOPE SIDE SLOPE UNDISTURBED AND/OR UNCOMPACTED INSITU SOIL � r y Title: Erosion Control Blanket Standard Plate Library' Stapling Patterns & Installation City of Monticello note: Plata No. _ 03—D8 ReYiaad:03-15 6011 _j ELV =VARIES BOTTOM BASIN ELV = 956.00 6) IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE INFILTRATION BASIN PRIOR TO INITIATING THE NEXT STEP IN THE INFILTRATION BASIN CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IF THE INFILTRATION BASIN HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO INFILTRATE STORM WATER: SEDIMENT THAT HAS BEEN WASHED INTO THE INFILTRATION BASIN DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS CAN SEAL THE PERMEABLE MATERIAL, SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCING THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE SOILS. 7) INFILTRATION BASINS SHALL BE OVER—EXCAVATED TO SPECIFIED DEPTH AND FILLED WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE OF 70%-80% SEMI—COURSE WASHED SAND; 20%-30% J � ITEM 7. TYPICAL INFILTRATION BASIN CROSS-SECTION NOT TO SCALE INFILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES: 1) INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES (IN ACCORDANCE WITH MnDOT GENERAL CONDITIONS 2573) PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION OPERATION THAT MAY CAUSE ANY SEDIMENTATION OR SILTATION AT THE SITE. 2) INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE STORM SEWER AND SEDIMENT LOADS TO DOWNSTREAM STORM WATER FACILITIES OR WATERBODIES. 3) IF THE STORM WATER BMP IS BEING DESIGNED TO SERVE AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, GRADE THE BMP TO WITHIN 12" ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL FROM CLOGGING. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IN THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO FINAL GRADE AND COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN. 4) GRADING OF THE INFILTRATION BASIN SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LOW—IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT COMPACTION OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS. SMALL TRACKED DOZERS AND BOBCATS WITH RUNNER TRACKS ARE RECOMMENDED. 5) EXCAVATE THE INFILTRATION BASIN TO THE SPECIFIED DEPTH (ELEVATION). ALL SUB MATERIAL BELOW THE SPECIFIED ELEVATION To 01 1 SHALL BE LEFT UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST. ALTERNATE OPTION IS TO IMPORT 3 INCH DEPTH MnDOT GRADE 2 COMPOST AND ROTO—TILL INTO TOP 9 INCH DEPTH NATIVE SOIL PROVIDED NATIVE SOIL IS CONFIRMED TO BE CLEAN SAND MEETING MnDOT SELECT GRANULAR SPECIFICATION AND ALL NON—NATIVE SOILS ARE REMOVED. 8) INFILTRATION BASIN TO BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 34-181 OR APPROVED EQUAL. SEEDING SHALL CONFORM TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING SPECIFICATION 3876, 2005 EDITION. 9) PORTIONS OF INFILTRATION BASINS TO BE SEEDED SHALL BE MULCHED WITH CLEAN GRAIN STRAW (MnDOT TYPE 3) ATA RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. 10) SEEDING AND INSTALLATION OF ANY EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NECESSARY SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN SEVEN DAYS (7) DAYS OF FINAL GRADING. I t a• MAk rR.RsrERsc ° euNr nTdnrx arAs 5�a - Hae e' Tv 1r APNOAa stH •Hoa 10- a AAacFn rPaaFc. I�' L A1NabR 9oP - a ev,n ew5 ,. Au TRAvr cuAtuts s+AiL ar rvA.wM2rA rnrn rNvncArlorr PER NnOOr BPEG 3391 a ]]94 I. AxNlEv ro nANW EW smlas u• vR uArm I, Au Nurs AND avLr ATrwwo rRASN cuARo TA Tit Fu#O aA SECTNxI StW.L BE \1 Ensnnc culls OVERFLOW 15 $ OF WE culla Bak HEIGHT PLAN x•IMCO RDAs aRARi Gti-Z3• HIGH FLOW l!Ex ppai[CiION CURS AND GLITTER EraaEL DEFLECTOR PLAiE c:r AQPRO,Ea EQUAL OkERFLOW IS h or THE CURB BDa NErf�Fi oAERrLow a, f— FiTER AssEMeLr F,LTER ASeEMIBLr alANE1EA, B, ON -GRADE 10 ' AT Low PANT r.pt-"Lox rAeRlc •FDR THE HEW R -3290 -Ya STANDARD G1S101C, INSTALL WIMP ROAD MWN cc -32e0 OR CITY APPRaved EnuAL. Title: Standard Plate Library Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Data: -Prat, No. Y' 03—D7 _ -- Rewsed:03-15 5Dl]4 nardPlateLibrary Trash [ward far End Section of Monticello Nat°:D3-o5P,°t.H0. ReNleed:D3-15 4�1 Match-------- vaj� Or ar Rghk of way Existing Geode PLAN TRI.: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello pole; 06-14 Plata Ha Rai1aed:03-15 600 GroNN pod[s] MnDOT Cross CA -15 Or CA_25 Riprop Bedding Geolexlae Kobelt Orlgind geode SEC ri�B=R (not In sctAe) fthed a Corrugated steel plates Original GeatextBe fohric 5£CTILUI A -A geode [not to scaee] NOTES= ChonneliEe runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping de+nee e RIbhM a Cnrvgoled steel plates I � AI� A � E vl o o 24' min. xSlope axoy from A++ � _ highway 50' min. _Y 2 tr f a' e STABILIZED TraRADE polo: Plata Na 03-05 nAkE:n ue srACIF1a 2004 � S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: EkiSTING P6vEa MSTRnCTIDn wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR ROADWAY � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. •"' RTI" � Epy pyE LABe oyEkLIYECLA 18' X]H— 11 ....... SSa.E_410EB4e2 ERN END dNERLAP YITN SP[KEs [R STAIC}:S ` �........... I F...... STRAP CaHNECrdlS 1011111: awsrRucnwT PULE END wEretw INTERLEIOK caro sraAP cERN1Ear[1Rs END dvERLAP Ensnnc culls OVERFLOW 15 $ OF WE culla Bak HEIGHT PLAN x•IMCO RDAs aRARi Gti-Z3• HIGH FLOW l!Ex ppai[CiION CURS AND GLITTER EraaEL DEFLECTOR PLAiE c:r AQPRO,Ea EQUAL OkERFLOW IS h or THE CURB BDa NErf�Fi oAERrLow a, f— FiTER AssEMeLr F,LTER ASeEMIBLr alANE1EA, B, ON -GRADE 10 ' AT Low PANT r.pt-"Lox rAeRlc •FDR THE HEW R -3290 -Ya STANDARD G1S101C, INSTALL WIMP ROAD MWN cc -32e0 OR CITY APPRaved EnuAL. Title: Standard Plate Library Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert City of Monticello Data: -Prat, No. Y' 03—D7 _ -- Rewsed:03-15 5Dl]4 nardPlateLibrary Trash [ward far End Section of Monticello Nat°:D3-o5P,°t.H0. ReNleed:D3-15 4�1 Match-------- vaj� Or ar Rghk of way Existing Geode PLAN TRI.: Commercial Gravel Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance City of Monticello pole; 06-14 Plata Ha Rai1aed:03-15 600 GroNN pod[s] MnDOT Cross CA -15 Or CA_25 Riprop Bedding Geolexlae Kobelt Orlgind geode SEC ri�B=R (not In sctAe) fthed a Corrugated steel plates Original GeatextBe fohric 5£CTILUI A -A geode [not to scaee] NOTES= ChonneliEe runoff to sediment Sediment Trapping Device trapping de+nee e RIbhM a Cnrvgoled steel plates I � AI� A � E vl o o 24' min. xSlope axoy from A++ � _ highway 50' min. _Y 2 tr PAD AREA ERNE SIZE) IRStindard Plate Library City of Monticello s}aE t � /dYCRLAP Mud Mat Entrance 06-14 plat 77 ` 60fl3 a6-14 IH msrr NmA er,oe - .nr.ot use TNAK s' 6urLNelxa ATeEA, adrsrRUErIDN sfrE, a' e STABILIZED TraRADE polo: Plata Na 03-05 nAkE:n ue srACIF1a 2004 � S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: EkiSTING P6vEa MSTRnCTIDn wTT3, VdVEN OR TRN MIX No. 3Y22A FOR ROADWAY � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. •"' RTI" � Epy pyE LABe oyEkLIYECLA 18' X]H— 11 ....... SSa.E_410EB4e2 ERN END dNERLAP YITN SP[KEs [R STAIC}:S ` �........... I F...... STRAP CaHNECrdlS awsrRucnwT PULE END wEretw INTERLEIOK caro sraAP cERN1Ear[1Rs END dvERLAP PAD AREA ERNE SIZE) IRStindard Plate Library City of Monticello s}aE t � /dYCRLAP Mud Mat Entrance 06-14 plat 77 ` 60fl3 a6-14 IH msrr NmA er,oe - .nr.ot use TNAK s' w rs+ux e•. a- . a- moa LEvi Two 6 a' e sTrNvraar la -Te atuo FrASrL FOW OR AFPRO.FA EpYL AneeA sFir_is .' AerAaln SE ANO Y •G C- IIRUA,pN REWREII FOR N4TF14MM wAM Kms," S' COULR N � AKAS AND IF � IN4'!ER �YEO ^.WTAttS. [, Title: Insulation Standard Plate Library Detail City of Monticello polo: Plata Na 03-05 Re,rleed:D3_ 15 2004 � Title: `� Standard Plate Literary R atermain Unset City of Monticelln Dot,: ❑3-0plot'p,aN,• Revised:03— ] 7 2445 V all a• N ercx WaAa M N CarCllrTl� OR Prism A� HrDANNOR C ",ERRa a-+ JT,WC 140 T11Laf OUT G OAttR TAO y ro R iO U. `�A�FR RyA.a. Cp[N 9 +ETw b�C+•nu. eaRe OR�CVTRR WE I D z�wwNw_ I ' r r en ribur, ` xA s�tw 1 urasoF - As [n ' oPAETFA eK Y aFP Prt RbEN rR➢AtlR �° xRN t!A '5M11 ruK BoMOPIMPT x HOMxAI Or. 1 C.r. 0 6E , NTIH ANOTECTA2 DO11N10 Af I-,�E• �Na CLFM 51 1. �� �AOtPrce A� I NLnN b a r r c aE r1E TIFIvar FTFE Ct Cn 0 T1tle: Standard Plate Literary Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello oDt,: 03-05 Rate Na. Ravised:03-17 2t)D1 00 L% � o� v� 1811 � —WHITE ON BLUE T PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY TOW A BLACK ON WHITE r NU ZONE FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.5" LETTERS LM V HANDICAP SIGN ccc a W _ THIS SIGN TYP @? EACH O HANDICAP PARKING SPACE '*--3" L FINISH GRADE L1 1-011 MANN LU IBBBBBB co M ca LU I I ° CONCRETE.: o � WCL �- `Rvro;cn sTaIN sENT;x e'x Y WauVRxH rwxm -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� F' HFIIWIc NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL t MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P � MANUAL PLACEMENT HAL .v.rrs wTNa ,v a . eoa slvu R NIa,RMrD u»rc Tec PmS. Title: `� Standard Plate Literary R atermain Unset City of Monticelln Dot,: ❑3-0plot'p,aN,• Revised:03— ] 7 2445 V all a• N ercx WaAa M N CarCllrTl� OR Prism A� HrDANNOR C ",ERRa a-+ JT,WC 140 T11Laf OUT G OAttR TAO y ro R iO U. `�A�FR RyA.a. Cp[N 9 +ETw b�C+•nu. eaRe OR�CVTRR WE I D z�wwNw_ I ' r r en ribur, ` xA s�tw 1 urasoF - As [n ' oPAETFA eK Y aFP Prt RbEN rR➢AtlR �° xRN t!A '5M11 ruK BoMOPIMPT x HOMxAI Or. 1 C.r. 0 6E , NTIH ANOTECTA2 DO11N10 Af I-,�E• �Na CLFM 51 1. �� �AOtPrce A� I NLnN b a r r c aE r1E TIFIvar FTFE Ct Cn 0 T1tle: Standard Plate Literary Typical Hydrant Installation City of Monticello oDt,: 03-05 Rate Na. Ravised:03-17 2t)D1 00 L% � o� v� 1811 � —WHITE ON BLUE T PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY TOW A BLACK ON WHITE r NU ZONE FINE UP TO $250.00 W/ 1.5" LETTERS LM V HANDICAP SIGN ccc a W _ THIS SIGN TYP @? EACH O HANDICAP PARKING SPACE '*--3" L FINISH GRADE L1 1-011 MANN LU IBBBBBB co M ca LU I I ° CONCRETE.: o � WCL W MOM I •, I I , O I I°00 mumTBIBB HANDICAP SIGN 2" BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE SPWEB240B MnDOT SPEC 2360 � 2" BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE � u SPNWB230B MnDOT SPEC 2360 6" CLASS V AGGREGATE BASE MnDOT SPEC 3138 -I � I -I � I -I � I -III III-IIIIII' =-I � I—I IM IM II—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP -I � MI I - III — CO CNoun to III=III 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS " CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT MNDOT SPEC 2461 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B WITH REINFORCEMENT; I' SEE DETAIL 6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B I � I -III -III -I I I� III -III -I I I UBGRADE PREPARATION TOP —III—III—III—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP " TO PASS PROOF ROLL II=III=III=I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: MNDOT SPEC. 2461 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 TRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C. ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS -SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY - 4 -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� 6 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM � 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS Ln \ 3" GALVANIZED STEEL POLE � CO CNoun to III=III 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOTE: SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS " CONCRETE PAVEMENT 6" CONCRETE PAVEMENT MNDOT SPEC 2461 4" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B WITH REINFORCEMENT; I' SEE DETAIL 6" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW MNDOT SPEC 3149.2B I � I -III -III -I I I� III -III -I I I UBGRADE PREPARATION TOP —III—III—III—III—III SUBGRADE PREPARATION TOP " TO PASS PROOF ROLL II=III=III=I 6" TO PASS PROOF ROLL NOTES: MNDOT SPEC. 2461 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2461 PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM PLACEMENT MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT SPEC. 2301 TRACTION JOINTS AT 6'-0" O.C. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT 12'-0" O.C. ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE ABOVE LISTED SPECIFICATIONS -SIDEWALK CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTY - 4 -III III S �II�IIIII�IIIIIII� 6 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE MIX SHALL CONFORM TO MIX No. 3Y22A FOR SLIPFORM P MIX No. 3Y32A FOR MANUAL PLACEMENT 2. CONCRETE PLACEMENT SHALL CONFORM 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL SPACE THE CON 4. SOILS SPECIFICATIONS SUPERSEDE A CONCRETE PAVEMENT INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN C1 SITE PLAN C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN C8 DETAILS C9 PHASING PLAN O � m m O m Q � v 0 o a v FILE NO. 2 O 00633 • 1' DEPTH AMMENDED SOIL MEDIUM; SEE GENERAL NOTES Details I I � 1 I I I DUN DAS ROAD x� ' 1 - ----_�\ - - 10" D.I.P. 1 O I ' 15 R.C.P. 00 � �, N MH 000 S"T I �' I �1� I 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 SAN MH 1 ; • I g6�� 6�� �� 960.Oo - - °s 959.90 INV. ELFDV,.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 �h I I 960.66 `� �6 )-�' - - 6°�= 960°s )�� - o ' 959.79 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °��° 1�,0 y 9s� �� 961_11 i )< - - - - - - - -)` 960 s ° q - - - '� 61�'°6- - - �'s r 900 960 - -I - - _ _ /`8so �59»_-n- _ _ _x 958.6 I - -9 �1 g - 959.2X < X I - - - 95n X 9._59.3 960.6 X_ o� ���' T° ( 959.7. - T T T T T T - T T y 960 ; - - _--T- q6�- -tea' -- 800 RISER- - - I * I6^j - sem° ----- - 960 - - - - -_- ?j 1., - X961960 ;--- ----- - - - 962.1 962 1 _�- yb 1- - - --=_j------__ -_-- _ ---<------ -- - »- » - X 961.5 _ �, _ _ 962 - --- -- ---- - - - ° ) ssg-- kSr��� - - -6' ---�� �� 01.5 96,�II -a Ery. 9 E,� 4 - I I� I I 0 C, / 962 EA,0�t(`� 2,� !� q6� X 9E'2.9 _ _- - - X a63. _ oti I 0 �1 963.0 i 962 I '' - I _ - 962.SX Q �' 2o��MI 1 9631 \\7 6,'62.; Lj_jI N 111 L�7�' ti - 06� ---- �-- ----- �'r`=� ' 963 -- --- -- -- -- -- mo' .0q -------- --T-' i"I x.963 -------------------- --------� 1 I. �_ 109 109 I II IIS. 9+. ).2 �6��I ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND I61`h - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - - I ! I 86215; \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO 5 62'2 I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o f� o ; o°- - ; ; BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W 862 I' / ab BUILDING B QO I ;; 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 8215 I� BUILDING �g62 6,976 SF I it I ISI PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS I I; 6, 9 7 F � I 963.1 X\ O I I ; ; I I ;' \\ I / X 964.2 \ I FFE=963.50 \ I I I o I' / \ W X '9 6� FFE=963. II � I \ I 1 _ \_x i I ' 16 I X 61; \ 6�j� \1 i 96,,. \ X961.9962.0 uuo0 oOoOo'O�o�O�oI I I rn \ v u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 'o"o o�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N I I AA/I lit U u u-O"O-O- O" O8O"'Ogou0Uou000000000ep0 Oo o'o`o O O o-00.O,.O_O_4-O-o n _ 9''/• ' IVI IIIVVV - v -o -o -o -os o"o0 0 0 0„0♦?0„0_0_0_0_� n n � O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 Oho n • 6'� I II O --LI E''= 9sA \ j I ° I .A° o' \\ o I I X 0 qro I I GoIf \ I 963.7X96 .5x / 1 / I 96�, -.-� I g6 I .7 1 ' 9-� '�'-' '-'-' ° I I 963 ti o .y. •>o 62 6 -96 q I •• q I I \\\ \\ \\ ) b5 964.3 I I iiiniiiiii -.4 I �����--+--� , \ I � I �P Ij� I I I co I ° I X _ 6 i u u u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0„0_0_ X 9c�. ��O o O O O o O o O o 000 ,oOgoo0oo0000�0�0�0 0 0 0 090 0 o O o 0 0 ' obti I I \ u U U"O-O-O"O�O O Ou0U0 O„ ,�O O O„O,-O,.O-O.O n r OOOo0o0nonon0„O..O,.O..O.• .0.0 n !+ nK 960.94 I IX g IX96� MOW --, 9s?so' \ II I I I I 6�� LINE 11 - \-____ MOWI I I 1 II I 1.7 //X961.0 � Ix',1 \ILINE I • II �I �i i- If ' N neo n • BUILDING C BUILDING D I II I I o II � `° I�,bti�'� X961 i X 960.6 1 1 w X g X 963.9 6 9 76 SF 964.5 X I 1 1�6�, II ► 6,976 SF I II 1962 �� Il n X 960. �I 6_�6 I I I 1 i °• , I 11 ; I 1 g 1 1 I WO F =NCE FFE=963.50 FFE=963.50 964\ C96O iI1�^ \ F _---------- n - i;I1{;I1 II 109 Cn/ ' 1 ON :�T LINE 109 Og,x 9 , 111 I I CaNOi i1 1 II 1 6 5 . 963 --------------- 916 'o X9 .61 X 963_ -------------- - 9 ---- --------==\F I 1 X 963.8 I 16° 23 I 1 LO I o I tib° �\\tib° 96, l' I II }19 q6 �q6 I 62 �; } 10 - I iI i �' 1 I I I I I o s?ao } 9 ti° �o \ ?�0 9s, I� Xc X� 5�.5 1 g6�j 0 6, �� 62.3I °'`°g6ti�q6� g6ti 962 I 20 }' \ o 959.4 �\ X 963.8 I \ I ' II 962 ` o o °tip° sF_� �� �`����-_'' so'- 1! oo ,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +�- I� °° I `� I 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE • I 220 _ f °� -�- �_� -�� I I i / 0 i i \ I g6ti 59.0 1 \ g 963.4 �I . � r I\\ \ \ \ X X 962.7 } I 962ii I16��---------- ------------ --- - 96 ----------------... ---- - -- 963 �` I II do / I / e --- ----�` II !----------- I rl T I 1 a � , I I II 1' O \ \ 1 109 X 961.3 I I I I 1 \\ \\ \X 962.4 11 109 �� Q•�'> I I \ CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'42• �III X 961.8 61.2 X j / I I I \ FENCE + ON LOT LINE. I" �10 II / \ / 1:96ti ,o 0 1 1\ \\ oX 960.5 q6 IIS q6� BUILDING F I ;I I q62 g62� BUILDING E 976 SF `° I II I' I \ Q- 6,976 SF x 958.6 ' � 1 1 FFE=963.50 I x960.4 1 I FFE=963 I II )61. X 961.5 X 9 s Z/ 62.5014 u v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0' 'o"'o ,: o ��y�u�y�0�0 O� O�O�O�O"C} X 962.6 I �` v v u 0 O O O O`O "'O OUO-00000 000 0000000 0 0 0 �� V�n 0 00 01 I I I v u u-O-O-O-O-O"O;O"'O�'O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O_O_O-o n =�,8 cy ( . I 1 • _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \.9 1 I • I I M I X, 8 i °' X 958.7 MEN i MINES 9s ° ti 6 / o o ACCESS DRIVE AND 1 , 6 q `I 9O q6� �,9 do I I 11 ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND I - - BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO a9s'>o g6� ��� g6� I II'I I PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF / I_ 961.4 X 961.3 0 : I', 961 .4 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \ I1 %o - X I 06��-- 1.91 ` I o' r- --�E-9 J o o= o ,o 1 6 v u o o -o -O o O In o 0 0 0�0 0 0 0 0 0- , q v 1 0, o O"O O o O O O O O 0 0 0 0 -01=o -O n O �6�• I -t- - -- U O-O"O-O-O�O"O�O�OuO O_ 0 0 0 O O / �O"O"O�Ou0'O„O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �O "OD O�O900000,�0„O 0 0 0 0 0 0-O.n n ss?s0 X 959.9 X_961.0 I ,I I X 961.3 (; I ;/� ii I \ �1 I;0, I X li 4D �'- I BUILDING G ���\ BUILDING H �6 = ry,�;+ 0 I 1 962.7 fi 962�o i B \I 6,976 SF x as . q6 0 I, 6, 9 76 SF / 11 I \ 111 I I I CHAINLINK --� A1962.3 s II 1 I FENCE +�- 1I \\ FFE=963.50 : ;I / FFE=963. I ''I / X960.7 A 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NEj, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE PHASE 1 2017-2018 PHASE 2 2018-2019 PHASE 3 2020-2021 PHASE 4 2022-2023 MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS 0.5 FT. WEST II I \ IIt I \ 109 I OF LOT LINE. II 1 109 � ° � 162..30,--- --- f � o 9fi3 1 ` 00) , ', 1.46-- ---------' ----- -- ' 6, �-- --------- 0Ei� 01 2 I ' i /I_901.1 X 960.6 961.80 „0 6ti \ 96� I I �9 ° C 951.7 96y� °tip ?2 I I I 9s o o c 9 X\`. 5 \ o X 962.4 1 �- 962 -� /_9 'ss '�co`� j 6 1 _ ra ' 1 ------------- L° 962.6xq----------- 0) o 962.9X 962 9 J F 960.959 So 0 LANDSCAPE �I 1 960.959 x 152.0 958 \ +9 I \ \11 �( /// 958 ! 957- s� \ s0---EDGING/MULCH \) /l I I c�/ 856 957 �� , 3�1 j \ 956 s so I l I S°g6\ -_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - /� so 962.2 \ _ 9s1 \ �/ X- 96 X961.8 \ sol / 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 X «' ; / \ - J 956 '�0 9 0 : - SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + �- lit\ 958956 957 f `_ \ ` X Q6� �.958r 957 ''so I� \ I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER I �T'r T'�. 959 _ 960 959 ' ` ��L� _ 1 N 89°14'00" E 11^ \ 960 ^ - x 9n3.4 GG1-------------- ---- ----- ------ N 89°14 00 - --- ' 001-_ -------- -_ ------ _ ------ _ ----r 3123 56 -- a - 962 _�--------- =Lys -psi iv �(yuci' E -1 - i - - ---- y 962 ,o ------ - 9642X -- 963 o°o° ------------------------ -------------------- x ���9j-=Lam'--LKS- X- © / �;--X961.3 _----963.7 i' o-cOo°o as> 6�3 - _ - - - \ / o o°o 3 MOW-, --o o °aQa°o°o°_�- R --- --- -------961- _�� .o o �� _,.6 Z' M- - \�TC 958.96 - �- - - - - - - �� -SHED \962- _-;,- 6 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: - - LINE -e 1,--96 0-�\�� ,t 958.9 --- _-- �� I -i X961.6g61 60- X CIO SP `\�� CURB X. I - - `-_9 ANDSCAPE2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN X \959 �`�� STOP 960.5 I --TEL. _X X �\ RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN �lb LANDSCAPE-I'GOLDEN EAGLE ROADOF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN h�1 �CB _ � SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT �h EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16 r-------r- SHRUBS 1 '-------PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN &� SAN MH X I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.-958.59--�,958.7 �� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Ga I I I I I I I C8 DETAILS I I/ JI F__I n I I F__n F -)A ,h �` F �` _T_n I�� �` �h� n I I� A n� I _T_I /� N I I I I I C9 PHASING PLAN w � ct kr) W 0 kr) O M •� ct N On WO� ~ c, N w ( p L Q cj� Lo -+_j W p Zi CL Ld Ow= .v o CL CL 00 o0 u J co a o -;I- No) N co (o N lb � '2 >, Lo E a o "W W Lj ' °coin I o V U Oc) Lo §�� U �-6"oo tiw'�x I a� cE a2i mm L O O `� o, oma c ,� � Li o ma ai 3 o 4 j - C 00 o t o ° V I �� �a� , 1 cl J Q IZ c Z m 2 O 3 Q Q O Q: 4z o 2 O FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan 0 o ti 0 m Q o W a W v v FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan O 100 I_ SAN MH1I RIM ELEV.=961.96 Ch1 I I 1 INV. ELEV.=943.7 , °��°°• 9s� ` I / I ` 1 ___-961 960.6 Xr959.7. co r- - - 962.1- i A ' I DUNDAS ���� ROAD I I I X I 10" D.I.P. ! ! ! ! ! ! \ ! ! ! ! ! 1 \ I 15 " R.C.P. -�-�� 1 00 -5AN MH CL o �6 �6, Ov I /96 RIM ELEV.=960.04 �g6 ��� 960.00' _ � mss° 959.90 INV. ELEV =942.8 1 961_11 960.66) `fl 60 ) - - )�-06° - 960 so (; - �o° 959.79 g - 959.2xX00 960 - < _x\ j _ _ - _ _`8so ��9i- X 958.6 T T T - 960 T T _ T T t-� 960 _ _ XGA `X 959.3960 96160 9s�a-9S800RISER- - - ---- ��'. c -- - ---yb"1--961 --------- -- 77962 ------- - »-» ---- ,I 962 -_ ,-------= ----_- �-- r--=----_----_'-_ -- - - Y----- - - - - - - - - - - -�o - X 961.5 T Y Xi -�si-=-----so \' SII �I- -- � , 9f,�'• 4 'moo �� _ - __q, o tNQ1 "s / I' Q 4,Ci,s9 6 .(`� 2 ' 0 aEASF9,t_.'-_-, !N6ti�o I > X 963.0oXX a63.:i� o I9 962.Sx o,'62.; X o' W C C 9 ti , • � JIIII II I----- - --- -- _ - --------•---- _963 I Cil I .0 •'. I b I I • I a d Y I � I / I 1y 109 I rl III 109 ! _�_ I I .2 _ _ - - !; I �# ACCESS DRIVE AND ACCESS DRIVE AND :1 4113 II' I _ _ _ - - - - - - - / - i I g6215i# \ ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO o f9 I p! 62.2 °-- BUILDING B t BE INSTALLED AS PART OF BE INSTALLED AS PART OF W I; i g6� I ' / 96� `o H 61.9 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS I ; BUILDING �g62 1 I I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS 9 �2 ;5 l° 6,97 F 6,976 SF I I I II \ 963.1 X\ o I I Il�' I I I i1 / \\ / X 964.2 �o FFE=963.50 \ I I FFE=963. w II h° , \ � X 06'rn • I I _ _ �x i Nip � X 61- � � � \I .1 9625II,. I \ X 961.9 962.0 o�o�o I i� 6, II V v u-O-O'O (� O OOOOVO�OOOOOOOOOOOO�OOO u u-O"O-O- O"O�O"O�O'�O on000�0,0 •.O O_ o_o_c n �\/I� vOOn�O^DO�O�O�ODO�OnO'�:oo�no On00„O�On n . �- . - S� ° I (�• - -LIE'= sn \ i - I o I ' /I ct� I 10 Go 963.7X96 .5X' II 1 / I g6�.-.-.-.-.-.- -� I c)� .7 .-.-.- ° 0 96, X196118X963 I I , 96 r o ° eJry ,> ' i 1 .2 ,s I / 061 � --- --- --- 06� eb oC/� I_.� 961' �:_. _ _._._._._._._._ / • \A�� " 964.3 I ; I - III I-[. fi o I 1 I c9 co , o I, M x 6 �p' u n o 0 0 0 o"o"o,ko o„o`o 0_o806 0 8080'o 0' / \ 9 ' .� ,.0�1 V v n o -O -O -O- o�o�ouo�o. o_6 8 8 o�go ����,�n�, 0,0 Oho ;_ Oo: O n o V O -o -o -o -o MOW ``` i• 96 SI% o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i �- I 960.9 4 I iX g6 1X 96 a,' II I LINE ; \I I I �� MOW II I 1 rn (y LINE 7 /X 96 j 1. \ 1 I I I 3/ rn I I I �,ne�o nBUILDING D II l I II I,1 , I; BUILDING C 6 976 SF (�6� ! 9611 ; I X 960.6 I I °' X X 963.9 964.5 x II i II #�6�1° y�;! CO 6,976 SF III I g621°i' '� n X 960. jI '9638 I I 1; I 962• I + II F`/ FE= 963.50 Wo�� NCE FFE=963.50 N I! W I964.4 COI109 II 0) ON o LINE 9 1099 2.; I QQ I o II I I INI , II11. / �I I aX9 96 -a-r .- -_ • • I \• a CJL{L`Y t • 9 11 17 I I II ^6�. - - --, . Fi 5 3 I �\ I I . , I.9s _ 4363 .__ __ • ---_- 9 ?8\ 6� 1 96hI X95 1.61 I X 963.8 Oi s ZE 0 231 I1 i`°e° 9s I I �\I F I 9�,ti -- s��° 196, I �' CR X 5 .5 a6� .. -«g62 --» --» 2O *-� \ X Ig X 963.8 1�9 2.3I ° 0,6� _»_-_N-- N-_»-_»-_» »--»-- -r I959.4 iI _ _._._._.-._._._._. _._._._._._._._._ _._ ._ _ _ +.._._._._.._._ _._ �- I I � 9 962.... i, oo ,CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- °96ti°j i• I a-)5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I \ / / ,iI I I �� II11II11I ° 8; a a � �' -v• ' ° .e - I _i I�°•• .. e\ 3 1I 96 I i' 1 IIiIi I� Ii� oI ?59. 0 59.0 I 11' 963.4X X 962.7• ti ? I 1[ 963 �------------ o --- - o X 961.3 II\II I \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\\ \\ \X 962.4109 /0) CHAINLINK ---�^ 9'4'2A III I X 961.8 I 61.2 X FENCE + \- I II _ J l i SII o 1 \ o ON LOT LINE. I Ito III // \. �� II96��I 10 o \ \\ yo 960.5 1 I' ��'� BUILDING F - BUILDING E �f' i i - °'6ry i I \ I v `°it,- 1 \ X 958.6 • 6, 976 SF _ / Il. 6, 9 76 SF I I - ! 11 I ; II I 1 1 FFE=963.50 "6� - x9,60.4 11 I FFE=96 3 I 1 0 1 1 ! p; h Q. 9 jl)61 X 961.5 I � x 9 9 ,' II --5.1 \-cnZ/ 62.1k I v u o 0 0 0 0 0 0" o" o i J 1 o I X 962.6 (j . I 1 n o 0 0 o o O o v n o o"'o'' 0 0 0 0 0' o 0 0�o S°o ol°0 0 0 0 0 o_o_n ^ \' v u u o-o-o-o-o-o'''o'''o o„0 0 0 o„A,. c._o_o _o_o O n I. I` v u O-O-O-O-O"O�O"O�O''O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n Zy I _O"O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! ; 1 Xuo; 9 �1 �.8 X 958.7 / f " ° Now967 ■ I \ 1 1 96,9 y' 1-cp °6 o. �,._. o ACCESS DRIVE AND it O _ 06 g �+ \-. _._._.. I 1 �,_ -.._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.__._._._.._._._._.._ ._._._._. fi ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO ACCESS DRIVE AND -¢ " -' "-». I �� rn I 1 6 �� r, I BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ASSOCIATED UTILITIES TO a9'�o g6� �� g6� I II PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS BE INSTALLED AS PART OF ; / / 961.4 TX 961.3 0 ! 1 961 .4 PHASE 1 IMPROVEMENTS \�11 � v \ x I 1 Ij -,v I ! v u o o -o -o -o oY go 1 F 9'• - �o�o poOo onon0 0 0 0 0 �, 1 Ojb "o�o,,,,o„ „o-O_oO^O.O.O_n , Io"o-o"o"o"ovou000000000000000�o;,o 0 1 962so I \ I I I \ X 959.9 < [ X_961.0 it I1 I X961.3 1 BUILDING H X 962.7 gotiy BUILDING G 6,976 SF 11 6, 976 SF x a61. li I CO { CHAINLINK l962.3lI FFE=963.50 lI l FENCE + FFE=963. I I/ X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST 109 ;I I II OF LOT LINE. 109 1 I 'I ^3 I , , - a\ • e• Y Z I cn 04 0 962.3°I I I -- ---3 ==- - --� _.► s -- - _ 9�i bti��l % rn O) - I I �s-- 6° X � 1.1 � i I I 6° \\ 6° I \ 6L' 6`1'' nCi.;• % ! i i X 960.6 1961.80 ` �G 96ti' �0'6� I I k9 0� 951.7 961 I i \\� 2 4 I I I �o`1'j •`gyp I I 0 ! 9 ii o 20 X 962.4 I ! I 6, /. 9 5 � / h I I -------------- ----------- ! 9 ` ' ------------------ -------------- o / 6 6 s' 962.6X s o1h° �� o61h I _ 61�__________________ - - 962.9 _ 61 ------------- o ------------ 's = ' x ��c�r��� 962 - ------ - ° o 962-----�---------""IL .---------- "- - I C' � 1 .960 \ I �I, . c 960 P62 IZ 959 958 �� s° LANDSCAPE \ I \II �( 959 958 x ' 957- s� \ \\�+9s°I EDGING/MULCH 957 956 s so I l I S° 61 0 ,-_ CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + - �� 1 ► >6�� 9S� 956 _ �,o^� so / 962.2 \ - M +96 9 \ .°° XX961.8 \ s°I 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE 967.2 ; - ! \\ / r'�/ 956 +��'�096� 9 ---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST \� _ _ 956 u QA9 3 957 . 1 I 121 R 25 V 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW41 AND NES, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. � w � ctW kr)~ O W) ' M ct ct C\� W O ct cn ~ c too co Lu � N O co mow, M .cu a. O W w PROJECT PHASING TIMELINE c CD c o PHASE 1 2017-2018 WORK TO INCLUDE: MASS GRADE PHASE 1-4 AREAS; INSTALL SANITARY, WATER, LV c __j CL AND STORM SEWER ON PHASE 1-4 AREAS; INSTALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT z c� BASIN; INSTALL TEMPORARY 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL AND ESTABLISH TEMPORARY TURF W O z WITHIN PHASE 2-4 LIMITS; INSTALL BUILDINGS G AND H, CONCRETE CURB, AND p � m IQ PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 1 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH ,V TOPSOIL, LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN()c00 C PHASE 1 LIMITS Z v- O CL PHASE 2 2018-2019 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH uu PHASE 2 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS A AND B, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 2 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, Mom LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 2 LIMITS C� PHASE 3 2020-2021 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH PHASE 3 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS C AND D, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS PHASE 4 2022-2023 WORK TO INCLUDE REMOVE TEMPORARY TURF AND TEMPORARY TOPSOIL WITH PHASE 4 LIMITS, INSTALL BUILDINGS E AND F, CONCRETE CURB, AND PAVEMENTco o IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS; INSTALL PERMANENT 6" DEPTH TOPSOIL, c:y LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS, AND ESTABLISH PERMANENT TURF WITHIN PHASE 3 LIMITS o N o (oN o U W O w Fr I -02 �d U U) o z � W ° S � MARKET CONDITIONS MAY RESULT IN MODIFICATION OF Q� q m o PHASING TIMELINE AND PHASING OF SITE IMPROVEMENTS. r o ( 1 w °o 4�Q: Lo! a, Q_ c 3 N ►� '00 ra o O � J 'ti -z-,, ta \ m O 3 a - o ai q) CHAINLINK CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- �IiC E`'T - - - 958 957 ` �' _ - - 959 958 SO \ 1 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. , 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER l i T'�. 959 .960 9n1.�' -� N 89°14 00 E „ x �0J.4 ! N 89°14 00 E- X01 960 ---r----- --------- o -------------- --X--- _---- i ----- ------ ------------- ------962-----2yy1 w 14Uu" E----- 9962 �O_,1----- - ------3123.56-- -- �.� ---- -- 963 T -- 1 [ - - - --- 964.2 X ,, J O O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- Z x 9�. ��---- X C It / X 961.3 L _ _ _------ 963.7 6�- - \���y - - - - - L = - 61-_962- mow1 / o 3 -, -;° ° °a°°° _�_ R ---_ _-- --9 ca`___ --�-�-- 6 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: Q6 - - LINE - -e--960 ; Q�\\���� qC 958.96 = _ _ _ _ _ ` _ _SHEDX961-6-961-f-- '960. 961.6 g61 - - _ '` ��T S \�\� CURB xi (- - ``__9 ANDSCAPE2 CO PROJECT LOCATION PLAN Goh°' X \9,59, Oho STOP 960.5 i --TEL. _X X �\ RISER EDGING/MULCH C1 SITE PLAN �1b LANDSCAPE -I GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD h�1 ��CB � ', _ • O � SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL C2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Oh EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16----= � r-------r- 8c SHRUBS I � PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO C3 SANITARY AND WATER UTILITY PLAN SAN MH x I NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS I I I C4 STORM SEWER UTILITY PLAN ELEV.=958.59--. 958.7 I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I C5 LANDSCAPE PLAN - - F -- - - - - -I- - - - - -C6 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN C7 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN �`'I I I I I I C8 D ETAI LS I I/ I I I F__n F -)A ,h �` 11- �` _T_n I� F_ r- °h� �N I I n n� I _T_1 C9 PHASING PLAN FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan m o m o W a W ti 0 Q o a W 6 FILE NO. 00633 C9 Phasinq Plan TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A' TRUSS BRN�. ELEV. 109'- " CORNER TRIM FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NOi OF NORTH BUIDINC SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP 3C,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" EEL SIDING COLOR "A" CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-O" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR "f CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" ,AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" METAL WRAP j C ,4 L: I/ 8 = I'— V ,JbTRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-O" STEEL SIDING COLOR " CORNER TRIM STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" �JhFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" SCALE: 1/8" = I' -U" METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-O" F�E,4R ELEV/4T10N SC,4LE: 1/8" = 1'-O" fv � I.I.I N w ZH GJ s s z CK m 0 m w F ro,leat No. °2 1,101,91 0 C Iasue Dzte ?-?? J C oc iment S t: V???? 0 w 0 J d TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 109'-0" CORNER TRIM 10• I AFIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" CULTURED STONE PROVIDED ON NORTH WALL OF NORTH BUIDINGS AND SOUTH WALL OF SOUTH BUILDINGS ONLY TRUSS BRN� ELEV. 116'- -- 2 1:2 12 STEEL SHAKE SIDING WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" FfP,,0 NT ELE\/� SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 12 / TION �i STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" TRUSS BRNGG,-NP�I ELEV. 109'- b ------- CORNER TRIM CORNER TRIM ,,—STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" FIN. FLOOR FIN. FLOOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ------ ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-0" SIEDE ELEVATION SIIDE ELEV74TION WOOD POST SCALE: 1/8„ , „ „ , = I O SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0” „ 4:: TRUSS BRNG. ELEV. 116'-0" J STEEL SIDING COLOR "A" } CORNER TRIM i STEEL SIDING COLOR "B" q FIN. FLOOR ELEV. 100'-0" _= awi WOOD POST W/ METAL WRAP RE,,4R ELE\/�TI0N SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4:1: TRUSS BRNG ELEV. 109'- ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i J_ r � Z --I ■ 0 ■ z s U z rn, i�Ti •7R���� I'10i9 0 C Issue Otte; w ??-;?-?? C oc ime nt S t: ■ ■ �i 109'-01, 61_01; 2,_3„ 12,_6„ 3,_3„ 61_01, 6,_O„ 6,_O„ 2,_9„ 12,_6„ 2,_9„ 3,_311 12,_6„ 2'-3" 6'-O" 6'-O" 6'-6" ®EM�® 3070 I mmm mmm 3070 3070 INSUL. U L ®■® - - INSUL. - - - INSUL. - - - STEEL J x I IXI I F #� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Iw I • Ix] 1 Ixl x Ixl I I #� IXI I I )CI I I Iw Ixl 1XI �F ° _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �lxl 1XI I ________ IXI I ?� I — 4020 `—� `I `— ----4020 �_� �t —I, I_ ABO 4020 U) ABOVE I ABOVE I I ABOVE I I I I I I U Ep � U o�c I o�c I I o�2 ODl9 9) al ��� u / \\ I I I I I I / \ � Ln y� 0 I I I I I I I I d N 3 I I X 3 I I I I I I ap I, I I I I y I I 12' x-14' O.H.D. 1 12'_x 14' O.H.D. I 12'—x 14' O.H.D. �- � I I — E +' i c p I X X I 10 v y y N I I U u' a m I m _ E Q a l y a u> m I v' Q �-N ' 7 QI y � " WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE WHAREHOUSE _ $ .' _ 1 I �I y E r 8,_2,. �,_1„ 1q,_6„ �,_6„ 81_211 8,_2„ 5,_�„ 18,_O„ 1q,_6„ �,_1„ R '01 ME 73 q)57< X X m v \\ \\ aSL W 73 F O � I � 0 I n I (n (n (n x (LLJn cLU LU n cn X '.. a- a- 0- I 3070 II t INSUL. 3070 r= II - ----- --I 3070 oo I- U v' :STEEL �, IF INSL.��FNSUL. Z pv 1-- -STEEL -STEEL - \ X R-STROOM I RES fR00M RESTROQM \ X 4,-- * ------ ---' * i 3070 3070 3070 INSUL. INSUL. INSUL. STEEL STEEL STEEL L O r O - 0 — z C5.. OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE z o O ao z 4020 4020 - 4020 4040 / v / v / v_ABOVE / / �v / v 4040 / v / �v / �v ABOVE _,' �v �v / v ABOVE _1_ v / �v / �v 4040 X I I j l XI I I IXI I 1 .. � SITE NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR A COMPLETE AND FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. 2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH CODES, UTILITY REQUIREMENTS, LAWS AND ORDINANCES OF FEDERAL, STATE, OSHA AND LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CODES AND STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT THAT ARE LISTED BUT NOT LIMITED TO: NEC, NFPA, NEMA, ANSI, IES, IEEE, NFPA LIFE SAFETY 101, ASHRAE 90.1, IECC ENERGY CODE AND IBC BUILDING CODE. 4. PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING, TRENCHING, ETC. CONTACT ALL LOCAL UTILITY COMPANIES AND MUNICIPALITIES AND CONFIRM EXACT LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 5. MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED AND/OR LABELED BY UL OR ANOTHER NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY. 6. ALL MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, WIRING DEVICES, ETC SHALL BE NEW, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS EXISTING TO BE REUSED. 7. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED, HANDLED, ERECTED, INSTALLED, CONNECTED, CLEANED, ADJUSTED, TESTED, CONDITIONED AND PLACED IN SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS DIRECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 8. COORDINATE THE UTILITY COMPANY SERVICE FEEDS AND INSTALLATION. 9. ALL POLE FIXTURES TO BE LOCATED 4' AWAY FROM EDGE OF CURB. 10. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES TO BE CONNECTED TO A COMMON EQUIPMENT GROUND. USE #8, TYPE THWN. 11. ALL CIRCUIT TO BE PLACED IN 1" CONDUITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CIRCUIT TO USE COPPER WIRE, TYPE THWN. 12. THE CONTROLLING LIGHTING CONTACTORS SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE THE BUILDING WITH TIME -CLOCK CONTROL & REMOTE PHOTOCELLS LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING WALL. INSTALL PHOTOCELLS AT LOCATIONS WHERE BUILDING OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR PROPER OPERATION. FINAL BRANCH CIRCUIT SUPPLY CONNECTIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE BUILDING ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 13. MIN. BURIAL DEPTH FOR THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT SHALL BE 24". A SLIGHT DECREASE IN DEPTH IS ALLOWED WITHIN 10' OF THE POLES. 14. VERIFY CONSTRUCTION AREAS ON OTHER SITE PLANS FOR POTENTIAL OBSTACLES AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. ELECTRIC GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES. 2. ENERGY CODE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASHRAE 90.1 2010. 3. COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL OTHER TRADES. 4. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. ALL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN APPROVED RACEWAYS. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOCATIONS. 7. ALL MEASUREMENTS TO TOP OF BOX. RECEPTACLES SHALL BE 20" A.F.F. SWITCHES SHALL BE 48" A.F.F. 8. GFI PROTECT ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6' OF EVERY SINK. II II �I t1 II T -rte �� '-----------------------------� II II 11 I I II II II 1 II I I n +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 II + + + + + +0 + + + \ 10. + +0.71 1 1� 02dI 0.4 05 0.4U0 0.5 0.6 0.5 03 0.7 0.7 06 0.6 1,0 0. 1 i�a1 ii \ II II II + + + + + + X11 + 11 + 0.1 11 0.3 .5 2.8 1.3 6.4 1.0 6.2�, AA 2.6 l!l2 0.1 1 0.1 ii O AA AA n AA " AA qA" II i0.1 .111 0.2 11 0.1 +0.3 11 0.1 i I I 0.2 .1 11 11 I /� II +0.1 +0.11 +0.7 l i 1.2 BUILDING A ; BUILDING B +2_i +0.9 i i '122 +0.1 I I 1 i, J.2 II SAA 11 AAc 6 976 SU 6,976 SC ;; 11 0.2 +0.1 t)` I 1.3 i +4.-/ 9 +30 +0.9 +0.2 +0.1 11 + +0.211 ill i ii 10.2 + � II + + I + 1 + _V1 0.1 +0.211 0.6 n. 0.9 0 0.3 11 II I j 1 II 0.1 ii 11 I i I to.1 7W11 i i +0.2 +d'� AA + a +„ + + u + + + + + 1.7 4.7 1.6 0.7 3.1 3.3 1.7 4.7 1.1 + 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 i i l 0.1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + .1 11 0.2 0.8 2.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 0.8 1.0 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.7 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.7 0.2 11 111 0.1 l i !I 11 II+ + + + + + + _ _ _ _ _ - - -- - ---- � - 1 n --_F -F--- + + + + + + Q1 11 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.7 1.1 + + + + 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.2 11 0.1 10.1 + II 1 0.1 II 1 11 0.2 0.9 2.9 1.8 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.2 3.6 ¢'.0 3.8 1.8 0.8 3.0 2.9 1.5 4.4 _+1.2 0.2 1111 +�Oi1 1 - O O 1 11 // n n L --- O -- ___� I L - -_� L -_-J 0.1 +@i 11 +0.2 �I"+0.2--- ---� 1 J 11 +0.411 II +0.3 i i +C2 +0.1 0.2 �.1'II II I I 1 1 I II II n n I 1 ! 11 +0.1 +2 +0.5 11 +0.8 i 1.9 { { 1.0 i i +6112 +0.1 0.2i1' " BUILDING C BUILDING D H 9 76 SC SAA 11 ii .3 +0.1 +0131 i 1.0 i i+6 c 6, 9 7 6 S C 9 +4.4 111 1.5 111 +0.3 +0.1 0.2 10. 11 0.3 +0.1 +012 Iii +0.7 }2.0 i +0.8 1 +0.6 i i +0+Q.2 +0.1 III II 1 I I I II -01 }0.211 II I i 1 11 II 1111 �+ T0. + AA + IAA' + ii ii 11 `AA AA +O.Q Iii +0.3 11'1+0.4 u uAq 0.2 1.9gq 7.1 9 8Y + + 0.4 + 10.11 .1 11 0.2 it 0 0.1 0.1 II _ =�__-___= _�_-===�-T=====__� + + - Lr+- ----+- + + + + + + + + +� + + +14 + + 0..1 0.1 0.2 1.4 2.8 L 11 11 i 11 9 1.3 1 3 2.1 0.6 LO 1.8 0.8 1 U 1.0 1.0 1 4 0.4 I I 0.1 0.1111 � \ I I 11 + I + + + + + + + + + + +\ + + + + 0.2 0.3 0.3 ' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.� 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 +0.1 11 II II _._.- -------- i -- - - - - - ---_-._._._._ - --- -- - ---_- - - u-- - - - - -- #----4 ----+ _ + _ + -+ + + + + + + + + + + 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 II II II rrf � II n �' 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 \ \D 0.4 0.5 0. 0.4 0.7 0.5 \\ 0.6 0.6 0.8 i1 0.3 I 0.1 11, � 111 II II ii I� \ 11 II II IIL � -_ "kms =_ _� --=t=- �L k __ _ _ _-___ -_ +- _ �++ +-_ -+- �- + + +0.1 2 LT�� r� 1 =_- - - 5.1 0.6 1.3 7. O.5 0.1 11'+0.1 0.1 I I OAA X0.1 i i i i AA 0 AA AA _ n AA AAo II II I I I I 1 II 11 0.1 +0.1 '0.1 1 i +0.2 2 i 1 '0.2 +0.3 110.2 +0.1 + II +0.1 0.2 11 0.1 0.1 11 0.4 0 2.0 11 1.6 0.4+0.2 +0.1 + + ' 11+ �I BUILDING S + 17- +0.211 BUILDING E SAA 11 + + 0.311+ 11 AAc 6 9 76 SU 1 6 9 9 76 SC 1111 + Illill -0.2 + 0.1 0.2 11 0.7 5 9 2.6 1.9 �.4 0.1 0.2 10.311 1 II II I I I II + + I+ +I + + 0.1 0.1 10.2ii 0.5 1i 1 0.4 11 2'0.1 0.1 I I III II I I I I II r '01 r ---r I r ---r 0 1 11 U V i +0.1 • 1+0.2 +0 u.2 " +2.6 + . 1.4 3.6 2.6 +0.4 I .1 0.1 +0.1 n 1 +0.1 111+0.2 +0.5 1.9 +2.3 1.5 +2.4 1.1 +0.8 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.8 +0.8 1.0 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 +0.4 14.1 +0.1 +0.1 ; I I 0.1 0.1 911111@.r ---0.'t---0.8---.6_- 1.0 1.0 0.8 --0.7 0.9 1.1 1f 1.1 1.0 0.7 ---0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.4._._._111_,. n n 1 n 0.1 10.1 + F + + + + + + + + + ' + + + + + + + + + 0.1 1 110.1 0.4 1.5 2.2 1.4 2.5 1.2 0.7 2.2 2.4 ! 2.3 2.8 0.8 1.4 3.4 1.4 2.7 2.5 0.4 �1 �0.1 0.1 11 0 I�--- A L 1 I -- IL - 0.1 0.1 0. - 1.a .4 �---� ' ` - I 1. I 1 11+0.2 11 0.1 +0.111 I� ii it i0.1 II II I I 1 I II II +0.1+ 0.2 1 11.1 +oi +0.2+0.1 °•211 BUILDING G BUILDING H + 11 SAA ;; ;II 0.2 +0.1 00.4 +2.11 AAc 6 976 S C 1+3.2 +0! +0.1 1 ;1 6, 976 SC 9 10.211 .1 0.2 i I I +0.11.4 1.� i.6 i 1 1.0 +Oil 0.2+0.1 0.211 11 I I I 1 ! I I q1 F + r 1 ! 0.1 +0.1 0.1 '�.2 +0.� 1.2 u F j AAu u AA AAu Y0.9 S.2 +0!1 +0.1 + l u AA AAu AA 111 1 i0.1 0.1 �i1 0.11 0.5 115 1.5 1.� 3.5 0.9 34 1.21 I 0.6 27 1.3 22 0.9 2.2 1 0.9 0.1 I \� 11 � � 1 � � I /i 1 N i \ II + + + + + + ! + + + + +0 II 0.1 ) 0.4 '0.4 0.L 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 '0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 1 ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.1 SCALE: 1" = 30' 0 15' 30' 60' LIGHTING LEGEND F-7-1 RECESSED 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE Z RECESSED 2x2 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 INDICATES NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE ® INDICATES EMERGENCY/NIGHTLIGHT FIXTURE I� SURFACE MOUNT 1x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE D HIGH BAY 2x4 FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE SURFACE CEILING MOUNT FLUORESCENT FIXTURE 0 RECESSED DOWNLIGHT + SURFACE WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURE SURFACE MOUNTED PENDANT FIXTURE OUTSIDE POLE -MOUNT LIGHT FIXTURE EXTERIOR GROUND MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE LED EXIT SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE LED EXIT/EMERGENCY SIGN -SHADED AREA INDICATES ILLUMINATED FACE EXTERIOR EMERGENCY EGRESS LIGHT SINGLE POLE SWITCH $2 2 -POLE SWITCH $3 3 -WAY SWITCH $4 4 -WAY SWITCH sp SWITCH W/PILOT LIGHT OS1 WALL MOUNTED SINGLE LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR FO -S2 WALL MOUNTED DUAL LEVEL OCCUPANCY SENSOR OS CEILING MOUNTED OCCUPANCY SENSOR NL INDICATES FIXTURE TO REMAIN ON FOR SECURITY PURPOSES A,B INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE SWITCH -LEGS P -X INDICATES PANEL AND CIRCUIT NUMBER O INDICATES LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE EX INDICATES EXISTING FIXTURE RL INDICATES RELOCATED FIXTURE TC INDICATES FIXTURE CONTROLLED BY TIMECLOCK EM INDICATES EMERGENCY FIXTURE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE TYPE LAMPS WATTAGE DESCRIPTION NOTES AA LED 26 LED WALL PACK, 4000K - NOTES: WPLED26 F I Projrct: Typo: Prepared By: Oats: Driver Info LED tela Type: Corstant Current Wars- 21 4'0 121111: 0211A Color Tel 500DK 2D6V- 0.16A Color Accuracy. 70 CRI 24611- 0.14A L7o Lhilitil 100000 21711:0.12A Lumens: 2.662 Inpvl Watts: 30W Elncacy: 90 LPW LED 26W Wallpacks. PA -1: Pending Ilrerrrral managerl system. 1f10•a00 hour Eflfclerl 88% L7011fespan$ Year Warranty. Color Ill Weigni 7.5 lbs Technical Specifications z Listings Ambient Tamporature: Country of Origin: UL Listing: Suitable for use in old°C ambienl lemperelwes. Designed by RAB in New Jersey and assembled in the Sullable for wet Iorallpns Suitable far moungrlg vat Cold Weather Slarll ng: USA by R9B's IBEW LWAI3 markers. 1.2m (4a) of the gmurM. Country of Origin: Dark Sky Approved: The minimum starting IampereWre is 40.6. Thermal Management: Designed by RA13 In New Jersey and assembled in The Internallbnal Dark Sky Assmalron has approved Taiwan. this Product as a full -toff, lolly shielded fumineire. Cast aluminum Thennel Management system forTrade Agreements Act Compliant: DLC Listed: optimal heat Sinking. The LPACK is designed for coal operation, most efficient oulpol and maximum LED life Thig product is a product of Taiwan and a "oesignaled TMs product Is on the Deatgn Lights CMSorl (DLC( by minimizing LEDjunctim tampetALUM. col end product that camptles w11h rile Trade Oualfaed Products List and is eligible fa raberes from Green Technology: Agreements Aa- DLCMember utilities. w GSA Sichedul0: DLC Preduat Code- Pa000170I Mercury and uV free. RoH3 car lianl components. U LED Charactaristica PplyEsler powder coat finish formulated wftout the Suitable in accordance vin FAR Subpar 25.4. O use of VDc or toxic Heavy metals. Equivalency: Lifespan: For use on LEED Buildings: to 175W Molal Halide. 100,0Mhour LED lifespan basad on IES LM -80 IDA Dark Sky means foal dos fhQure can ba Optical Opdea[ results and TW21 nal-ulatluna. used 10 ecmave TEED Credits for Light Pollution a LEEDl Calor Consistency: Reduction, BUG Rating: 7 -step Machdam Edlpse Wring to achlave oonsistanr Eloctrioal B1 U0 Go fl dune-ro-0alure -tor. Driver! BUG Rating: Color Stability: MuQicMp 26W high oulput long life LED Driver 61 Lia Go LED color tamperatum is warranded! Io shift no more Constant Current, 720rnA, Class 2, BkV Surge ii 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. Protection, l llDV-277V, 50.89 Mg. 100.24011.4 AMPS. Color Uniformity: THD' RAB's range of CCT (Correlated Color Temperature] 7.5% at 12W, 11%at 27711 follows trm g"'IdInes of he Amarican National other 5lonrded for Spedrmdon5 for rhe Chrom irity of Solid Slate Lignling 1831] Products. ANSI C7a.977- California Title 24: 2015. Sea WFLE02r><PC for a 2013 California Tfte 24 Construction compliant modal. IP Rating: Patients: Ingress Protection rating or IKE for dust end water Th. WPLED design ie protected by U.S. Pat. D594878, Canada Pat 134878, CNna Pat. Finish; CN301949IXi45. Cor envimnmenuft friendly polyester powder coatings are lormilill for high -d rmblll and long-lasting calor, and contains no VOC a twcic heavy metas. Need harp? Tach help line: 1886) FLAB- 5000 Email: ealss@r.1-Bl .corn Wabslla: www.rahwah.com Copynghl l 2014 RAB Llghfu+g Inc. AN Rights Reserved NMB: sperigcatill am subject W change at any are without notice WPLED26 ❑irnensions IIvlrte lfreR fkt�Ya __4 Jrrna. ao.r pL rdW Ordering Matrix Family watts Color Temp -PLED I 211= 2fiW Blank = ii (Cocl) V = 3DWK (Warm} N = 40ODK lNeutral) Pegs 1 or 1 Features kfign performance LED right engine Nsainlaina 70% of initial -mens at 100,0010 hauls WealheprdOf high temperature silicone gaskets Supanor heal Sinking with die cast aluminum Musing and external fins 1Da up to 277 Vohs `✓year Warrarry Sensor Filml Prow l Dimming Blank = No Sensor Blank - Bnonm Blank = No Photocell Blank = No Dfmmlrrg MS = Mini Sensor W = white Me = 12011 Button 1610 = Dlmrrlable ]PCS = 120V Swivel Ill = 277V Budde Need relp? Te h holy tine (seal RAB-t000 Email. sales*rabwub.com Wobsnel www.rabwob.com Copyngh192014 RAB Lighting Inc. All Rights Reserved Note: Specifioauons are subject to change at any time will real w a 0 w a z z 0 U Cn LLJ 0 z 0 Ld IY •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn M w Q W U M M o O Lv Lv In O LIJ U J J � Z z = Q w 0 •• z O = LL_ CD U W W D F__ O Cn z Q W U O o J J ry In O c U 0 LLI 3 z W SHEET N0. E1.1 ALTA I NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR KENNETH SPAETH I � r� I ol: `, h I - - 10" D.I.P. l i- \ ® 15" R.C.P. m a ro cl� _P, o 0END OF { �N MH i i - - s 1 960 RIM ELEV.=960.04 00' SAN MH DUNDAS ROAD o z 60 0 0 0 0,, -CULVERT < o BURIED 960.0 959.90 INV. ELE)�.=942.8 RIM ELEV.=961.96 ��� 961.11 / 960.66, , ��p D - ' 'I 6 ) ( - ) ( ) ` 959.79 i INV. ELEV.=943.7 °� _ _ _ _ - ( �\ - 960-(S 90°00 00 E Plat) _ ". _ x 958.6 _ - -959- - - i - -961- 1�1 X 9.7 959.2X N 88°36 53 E 9 - '�C 959.31 T - T= cv - 960.6 X #� oNt --fi T T T 300. ooh - S9 �T� -I�� �� q�n_ EL. RISER -� I- - - - - - - , L -0-961-- X_-- ---o -962----�- 961.9 6� � X - X - `� X961.5 962.1 962.9__" __--�C-- - -- - -_ _ rt� - ---�--J�61.5 0,`� i 962.5- 962.4 24" CMP -962- _ I\� '-UTILITY CULVERT \- --96,3- EASEMENT- - - - - _ DRIVEWAY 963.0 X 962.9 ` _ X 963. f-_ ACCESS TO X 962.5 > o 962. 9 962.8X Q 9 \--MOW -963- _ - PUBLIC STREET 962.3xI LINE °D cl� c 1 Q X962.2 -_// \ I T T o X962.2 X963.5 X 961.9 X61.9 l 962.5 / 963.1 X � o / ` 1 1 X 964.2 r - \g ` / 1 \ I X \ U 09 X 961.9 / 962.0 X 961.3 X 96�]Q 5 \ � \ I N ��ti Mow \ \ I 0963.7 X it X 961.5 96.5X i X 9B11 BX 963.7 0 964.3 h �o I X 961.2 - X 962.5X 961.7 I III \ MOW, l i 960.9 �C9 �C96� 0 0 LINE LEGEND -T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WA TERMAIN i X961.7 rX961.p X961.0 \i�-MOWI I ❑ LINE I \ I � I / 962.0II II I 964.5 I I / / \96�\ i X 960" X 950. ? U X 96X 963.9 X I ,--WOOD FENCE 964.4 I CORNER +\- I I I I `/ .1(� -962.5 ON LOT LINE X 961.7 I 1 2 -950- - X 961.5 X 960.4 I I I I 96� X 960.7 - X959.6 IX 960.5' 0 I X 963.8 - - - - -952- W \ , PILE OF BRUSH/SMALL a' \ / TREES (RECENTLY - �\ o� x 961.1 p Imo•• CLEARED FROM SITE) '� X X 59.51 196�� po �o X 962.3 I \�9U 9. ( X 963.8 o p i I 961.4 961.4 I\ I co \CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- ❑ oil � , �� I - CONCRETE ^ 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE I SURFACE 59.0 \ \ \ 963.4X / X 962.7 I / (APPROX.)Q 1 o i 961\3960.9 �I a' = \ 962.4 Il CHAINLINK -y= 962.5 X 961.8 \� / 961.2 ° ° } co W o\ \ \\ FENCE +\- / co Q) ON LOT LINE. < \ / p1 \ oX 960.5 960.9• I \O I '/ �O X 956.6 SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN HYDRANT GATE VALVE WATER SHUTOFF 0 - CHAIN LINK FENCE ❑ WOOD FENCE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB INDEX CONTOUR - - - INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR SPOT ELEVATION CUL VERT TELEPHONE RISER POWER BOX SIGN BI TUMINOUS SURFACE L� Lr °°?00 700170 �°�°0o°°°°° o LANDSCAPED AREA X 961.8 X 961.5 / J X 960.9 F X 962.6 v \ / 1 I TILLED GARDEN -o I I L-- -J \ K 960.8 / / \961, , ' I1X 958.7 ° ° ° ° CONCRETE SURFACE / 1 o � o 1 961.4 X X 961.3 9611.4 962.5 X 962.5 \ CONCRETE-- o \ 1 \ SURFACE (APPROX.) / 1X 959.9 \ X 961.0 \ 961.3 a o X 962.7 \ \ -y -+\- CHAINLINK -y X 962.3 BROKEN \ o % FENCE + \- CONCRETE-- X 962.3 X961.3 5.� \ X 960.7 0.5 FT. WEST PIECE OF LOT LINE. \- `J \ 961.5 0 \ X 961.7 X962.4 1 r- 962.5 -MOW I � CONCRETE-. I ',---�.�\ �\ 11 LINE 1 962.6X 962 9 SURFACE \ (APPROX.) 0 �I i c) �� o �1��f�1 962.6 ;-MOW i i Q 1 -- � � LANDSCAPE \\�\���/ ��v a ra/� ),-962 .0-+ II LINE i i QO _\ 9/�'�,-EDGING/MULCH f 1V X�'6 CONCRETE �E �� _ -'�/ / Y 962.2 ._ _96 xgs g \\��`--_ 1\`> 1 O' i 5.8 FT. EAST OFLOT NK FENCE CORNER +\ EAST QUARTER CORNER OF--\ -- QUARTER CORNER OF 967'2 X- °` �\ PIECE ----- I / `� ,' A \ 9 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 l i M 0 W E� /AREA = A Rg6 - FOUND WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT) E �_ 0' SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + l -963- - - Sp i -------------------- ------------- Y 962.3 p I 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 ( I�\ (FOUND P.K. NAIL) \ UTILITY --4;, R7V��FR GARDEN I M 0 W E �b_ �' t i N 89'14'00" E 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER ^� 1 \ N 89'14'00" E � o� EASEMENT �` + _ i yF4D_ _ X 963.4 _ _ -_ _ _I _ _ - _ 961.8 / i ---1899.53--- ---- il ---3123.56--- 964.2 �r x --- o - > ---299.81 N 89'14 00' E--- 1 962.6 �- -- ~� 11��i lam! ° X- - 9f3.7_ ° ° - 299.8 R °'� 961.3 - °° MOW -i ° °° °°oa63A- _ - - 961,_ ` X96 I ° 9. s�`�� 3s LINE -� TC 958..96 -� -(300.02 Plat) �\ SHED 2- - s -98� ---'� - - `S 89°14'00" W-\� - i X96�g61 �` X960.2 _ - r - X960" (N 89°21' 11" W Plat � -CURB 960.5 Xi 1 -TEL. \- LANDSCAPE �Go X X STOP RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE -' GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD 4�. �- CB EDGING/ROCK °' LEV.=958.16-SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL _ - & SHRUBS SAN MH x I NORTHPARK (DL NE#OF7THE3PLAT OF KLE NAS N F RMSLSO ELEV.=958.59-- 958.7 ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I T I - �� T I I L _ r - II r- I n I I r- A ) A �l I �- T A LT_r- ��,� I\ I n A F� r� I T I r 4_ F/ -\I I V I/-\ I I L_ X I � Ia E I I I I I Ticket Check Status Ticket Number: 170740852 As of 3/21/17 13:15 CDT, participating facility owners have responded to Ticket Check as follows: Company Name Typesy Status Time Comments TDS TELECOM - Marked 03/16/17 BRDGWT01 9:06 AM CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS - TV,FO CHACAB03 Not yet 03/15/17 responded 1:18 PM CITY OF MONTICELLO/FIBERNET E,FO,S,W Non- 03/16/17 (SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN - CMTCLO01 Excavation 11:23 AM AS -BUILT PLANS PROVIDED) CENTER POINT ENERGY G Clear/No 03/21/17 Clear gas and power. - MINGASO4 conflict 11:25 AM verified prior to any excavation by NORTHERN NATURAL Clear/No 03/16/17 list of utilities & response to ticket G GAS - NNGAS03 conflict 8:30 AM Datum) XCEL ENERGY - XCEL01 Clear/No 03/21/17 conflict 11:26 AM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 2, Block 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Wright County, Minnesota. PARCEL ID#. 155-018-003020 SURVEYORS NOTES: 1. Matters of record are shown according to Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Preferred Title, Inc., Order Number: 6321428, Reference Number: 04001-17, Effective Date April 04, 2017. 2. Gross land area=4.40 acres 3. Underground utilities are shown according to ground markings per Gopher State One Call Ticket Number 170740852 (non -excavation request). Meyer-Rohlin Land Services is not responsible for utilities that were not marked on the ground. Location of underground utilities must be verified prior to any excavation by contacting Gopher State One Call @ 651-454-0002 or gopherstateonecall.org. See "Ticket Check Status" on this drawing for list of utilities & response to ticket provided by Gopher State One Call. 4. Project Benchmark: Mn/Dot Geodetic Monument "8605 S" Elev. 966.55 (NAVD88 Datum) 5. Bearing orientation is based Wright County Coordinate System, NAD 83 Datum (86 Adjustment). 6. Rights of Way, easements, and servitudes listed in Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment for Title Insurance (refer to Note #1): Exception 9. - Utility easements as shown on the recorded plat of Oakwood Industrial Park are indicated on this drawing. 7. According to the property description of the plat of Oakwood Industrial Park, the south line of the plat is the south line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14. However, the south line of Oakwood Industrial Park is monumented southerly of the south line of the Northeast Quarter, as indicated on this drawing. We recommend that the property owner contact a real estate attorney regarding possible property rights to the strip lying between the monumented plat boundary and the south line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 14. 0 40 80 120 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES CAST-IRON MONUMENT FOUND A DENOTES P.K. NAIL FOUND REVISED 06114117 (SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE) To Kenneth J. Spaeth and Theresa L. Spaeth, and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company. This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items 1, 4, 5, 8, 11 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed between March 22 and April 5, 2017. Date: April 18, 2017 Abram A. Niemela License No.` 48664 li •IIIIIIIII 1111111 II Illi Ul;;\iw L' . iwl 111` REVISIONS 06ZI4/17 AW '''-11 LANA SERVICES 708 1 ST AVENUE NE, #' 1 BUFFALO, MN 55313 GATE 0411 8I 17 PH. 763.682.1781 WWW.MEYERROHLIN.GOM DRAWN BY BOOK 387 SHEET 1 OF FILE NO. AAN PAGE 40 1 SHEETS 17168 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 0 00 DUNDAS ROAD I 1 I I I I . I I I _ I I 10" D.I.P. 1 LO � 15" R.C.P. SAN I . � � SAN MH EAIll lied 4 n fi�¢iy,titi! o (2)I VIM ELLV. =9 C RIM E I � ;Wv. LLLV.=9 INV. ELEV.=943.7 -- »` ,►- », T I�T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T r—rr N i -TEL. RISER 1 , R T■ i I �—UTILITY EASEMENTo vi 10 -- o Ld .I -1N \ ' "ii I -------- �___--------� --------- -- i---=----` -�__ ------ � \-----------••---- ----------------------- -- ----------- - r--------- �—T-7-----------------� m � ' 'I i •' i a I it � C/) 109 109if II II � I I I; BUILDING A BUILDING B O MOW LINE MOW LINE I "' iNE + II ;1 I Q • -5N 11-07 LINE 109 109 ,II I a -- ---- ---- _ -------- �I I_ — - ------------ ------------------ '�'— ---- --------- ---= _ ----—I III i ��___- -----• •--------- - it � - /�_' ____-� / I 1 I I I EXISTING I I I HYDRANT — — — — — I I ' I I I ' I ' 1 ' I ' I - I I , I , ' - I I I 1 I o S "n 0 SAN MH RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 I it T N• I rl■ l■/ I -T- R=100 R=200 --------- R= 300 R=300 R=200 I I ' � ;I W II I � ; 1 I I I RO' D DUNDA S , ;10" D.I,P. t� I 15" R.C.P. I Q I 63 , II 11 1 i TT--r�T T T T T T T __ T / I T TT�—N �� T T , T T T T T _''-UTILITY EASEMENT \\ An -_=_- a � D_o_o_o n I OF FENCE + \– I 0.5 FT. WEST III OF LOT LINE. me ISI 1� SII I I 'I II L1 `11 PROPOSED HYDRANT CHAINL K FENCE CORNER + \– '��'�' 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER kLITY- N 89 °14'00 E EASEMENT ' ------ 3123.56-- -------------1�- i-------------------- ---�� . ---- ----- 99.81 — — — — — — — — — — -------f---------------- MOW G f• 0°0�0°°o°d°°� � I � LINE --' Or ' d°°o0°0°s- ���, m Sed\ — ---_ LANDSCAPE—,GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD EDGING/ROCK & SHRUBS F-- — — — — —I— — — — —-- I I I I SAN MH ELEV. = 958 r-- — — — — —I-- I I I I A ,h rt— r --IA 6000000- ° 1, a SAN MH RIM ELEV=960.04 INV. ELEV.=942.8 EXISTING HYDRANT R=100 I 1 I -MOW , j LINE -------------- --------------------- --- I I I 1 I 1 I w R= 300 I I � Q W C I U W •y � N _ OLn 0 30 60 90 I GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. CE O u C � U W •y � N _ OLn o a.c ti I V) (o N C vii Oi W 4_, i— �, 2� E o o 2— � 1): C� U X j �o q O c� a� W [rT U •� C -0 CL _V oc: ' Q CL I W 4� — o Q) W CE O u \ q LANDSCAPE z o ---EDGING/MULCH CHAINLI NCE CORNER + \– cz i EAS OF LOT LINE -- SOUTFa ! '" T' 'r 'IORTHEAST 1/4 0— R=300 -.121, R. 25 V) I � 1 ----------t-------- I N 89°14'00" E o � a -------__ _- ------ + ------1899.53 ------ _ � � m m ^` 0000—_— — — —/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O m Q Lw o o a Y 66' I, Q cj W I Q o v TEL LANDSCAPE I RI R EDGING/MULCH FILE N0. 00633 --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I i I I I I I n l n I- hI I S I Fire Hydra t Coverage Plan •y V L o a.c ti I V) (o N C vii Oi W C'-- 44 1, �, 2� E o o 2— 613p� 1): C� U X q) y q I N Imo y O y W [rT U •� C -0 ' Q CL I W Q ZZ ) I -Z co � �q) �( ��. N Q� p Oy O G� 3 p 0: cj_ \ q LANDSCAPE z o ---EDGING/MULCH CHAINLI NCE CORNER + \– cz i EAS OF LOT LINE -- SOUTFa ! '" T' 'r 'IORTHEAST 1/4 0— R=300 -.121, R. 25 V) I � 1 ----------t-------- I N 89°14'00" E o � a -------__ _- ------ + ------1899.53 ------ _ � � m m ^` 0000—_— — — —/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O m Q Lw o o a Y 66' I, Q cj W I Q o v TEL LANDSCAPE I RI R EDGING/MULCH FILE N0. 00633 --_SOUTH LIN OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK (DO .# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO NORTH LI E OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) I I I I I i I I I I I n l n I- hI I S I Fire Hydra t Coverage Plan PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; -- WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) I j I I II DO NOT EXIT SIGN it ■ PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) �41 DIRECTIONAL SIGN I "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW I PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) u DUNDAS v su-u'o--o--o o-"c�o"o"c o o�c�o"o�o�o�o�0000�o�o oao°o°o°o05oc'a ,0000ooa 1600000°o00iolo000°Qo,i k rl-- T n — — — — — — — — — — — 4 — — ROAD DO NOT ENTER SIGN 0 %TOP PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROWS; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DO NOT ENTER SIGN - STOP SIGN PAVEMENT MARKING; 24" LETTERS; 24" WIDE SOLID STRIPE; WHITE LATEX PAINT PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW; WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) DIRECTIONAL SIGN "ONE WAY" WITH LEFT ARROW PAVEMENT MARKING DIRECTIONAL ARROW, WHITE LATEX PAINT (TYI CAL) A I'do ------ — — — — -------- �°°°°°°° p000 00000° i r— rel i --- i 0 30 60 90 I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. met � O two co o c c Q.W � m m o O I N %Nam N No co a LZ Q. o W) ,cu tufttwo C co W V •p z No z cs 11i 44 w o c: >W O � p m � oC ao � •— , O o 3 waft 00 4Ci J O r cu 1 LW v, N a � O o c c � m m o m I p C N � Q 1 NM (o N a LZ W C� 10 �0 1 CO Ln 10 3 C cn 0���� V •p s W (.5A I x N I �j O 'I) 44 100 N 41Z�� ti � tij 0 3 lW��ai3 n , O o 3 00 4Ci J O r 1 an O (YI q 3 4� o ti - � O � m m o m o a Q � � Q v V FILE NO. 00633 1 /1 Pavement Markinq Plan 449 I 0 00 SAN MH I RIM ELEV.=961.96 INV. ELEV.=943.7 CHAINLINK ---� FENCE + \— ON LOT LINE. CHAINLINK --� FENCE + \- 0.5 FT. WEST OF LOT LINE. CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER +\- 0.4 FT. WEST OF LOT CORNER N 89 °14'00" E ------ 3123.56---------------- - DUNDAS ROAD 1 Q 4 I W _ 155 - -1 1 Max 10' Vert a Q ' .SS.S ' 4 "- 2 w 0 55.000ft Overall WiN 8.500ft Overall Body Heiqht 12.052ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.334ft Max Track Width 8.500ft ` 6.00s 0-0-0 17,90° 0 ----; -- 0 In � LC SCO d U 0 0 --5.1 +\- 0 0 0 I kLI TY---..; - - -- -- --- ;--. --- -- -- -- --- -- EASEMENT - - , -------- ice- ----------------------- i --------------------t-------- ----- 99.81 N °14'00" E -- _�U CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.1 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE LANDSCAPE --EDGING/MULCH -- CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER + \- 5.8 FT. EAST OF LOT LINE Ir o a_ ,---SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T. 121, R. 25 N 89°14'00" E 1899.53 G �F� MOW ; f"Ooo °°°d°a°o i Vow 0LINE - D'�s'-��`O�O�g��'�� © -- SHED 1 ,a0_0� ' 13�6 6 ' --CURB STOP '--TEL. LANDSCAPE RISER EDGING/MULCH LANDSCAPE- GOLDEN EAGLE ROAD �----CB � It EDGING/ROCK ELEV.=958.16 _ _ �'�--_SOUTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL SHRUBS SAN MH i PARK (DOC.# 275353) AS MONUMENTED; ALSO ELEV.=958.59 NORTH LINE OF THE PLAT OF KLEIN FARMS �� I ESTATES 2ND ADDITION (DOC.# 753470) r— n n n ,h rt— n l r— IA r--,\ rte► I I 0 30 60 90 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET SURVEY DATA SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: MEYER ROHLIN LAND SERVICES 708 1st AVENUE NE BUFFALO, MN 55313 DATED: APRIL 18, 2017 BENCHMARK: MN/DOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "8605 S" ELEVATION = 966.55 NAVD88 DATUM PROJECT LOCATION PART OF THE SW4 AND NE4, SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 121, RANGE 25, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 2, BLOCK 3, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. .5 14 Aq F 49 z 0 � w � W ct �1 0 ct O U ct WOC/� ct IIU W N _ O _Tj� 0 cl� °� cl� z CL W C: o ~� O ° ca v CL00 U .v _ C: -,-— ° � W � 09 a 4 I I IIMax 56' Horiz _ 155 - -1 1 Max 10' Vert a S ' 10.4 4.R ' ' .SS.S ' 4 "- 2 WB -50 - Intermediate Semi -Trailer Overall Len th 55.000ft Overall WiN 8.500ft Overall Body Heiqht 12.052ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.334ft Max Track Width 8.500ft Lock -to -lock time 6.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual) 17,90° z 0 � w � W ct �1 0 ct O U ct WOC/� ct IIU W N _ O _Tj� 0 cl� °� cl� z CL W C: o ~� O ° ca v CL00 U .v _ C: -,-— ° � W � 09 a a Cn 4.o j L •y rA V I ` m m p Q C m 0 I N 'Lo) v0 Q W In � LC SCO d U V � O L(0C: i� 0 o X I N a A I m O 4�� Iwa�N3 �ti y � w J'0 r. t i 13 I� •C�' j p Chi p O q 3 4� o ti FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 WB50 Truck Circulation Plan Cn o � m m m Q Q Q � v 0 o a FILE N0. 00633 -1 /_1 WB50 Truck Circulation Plan Spaeth Industrial Park Site Improvement Project 108 Dundas Road Monticello, MN DRAINAGE ANALYSIS Prepared for: Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlake Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: (612) 889-3100 spaethmasonry@gmail.com Prepared bv: Civil Engineering Site Design Attn: Scott Dahlke PO Box 566 118 East Broadway Street Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com May 08, 2017 July 03, 2017 revised CESD Project # 00633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative o Proposed Project o Site Location o Requirements o Rate Calculations o Existing Site Conditions o Proposed Site Conditions o Volume Abstraction and Water Quality Calculations o Soils Data o Summary o Certification Appendix A — Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations o Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix B Proposed Condition Drainage Calculations o Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map o 2 -Year (2.81 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 10 -Year (4.18 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event o 100 -Year (6.93 -Inch), 24 -Hour Event Appendix C Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface o Infiltration Worksheet o Stage -Storage Containment Volume Appendix D — Soils Data o Soils Data per Web Soil Survey Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 2 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system with overflow storm water routed to existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road. SITE LOCATION: The site address is 108 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN. The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the Monticello. Stormwater requirements for the project as received from City staff are as follows: Stormwater management for the site must provide volume control (i.e. infiltration) and meet water quality requirement per the City's stormwater checklist. RATE CALCULATIONS: The storm water runoff and calculations of this report are based on Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and the Soil Conservation Service Synthetic Unit Hydrograph Method incorporated into the software program HydroCad 10.0. Rainfall precipitation depths used in calculations are current NOAA Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates for Monticello, Minnesota for the 2 -Year (2.81 -inch), 10 -Year (4.18 -inch) and 100 -Year (6.93 -inch) rainfall events. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: The existing site is vacant property that has been designated as industrial development property. Most of the existing site has grass turf coverage. Small areas of concrete pavement exist at various locations at the site remaining from previous industrial site activity. Existing storm water runoff for the site is primarily directed by natural topography to adjacent property to the east, small areas of runoff drains north to Dundas Road ditch, and a small area drains south to adjacent property. Existing Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix A. The flow rates from the existing site are summarized in the table below: Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 3 EXISTING FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81") Runoff 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93") Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) NORTH 0.00 0.00 0.23 EAST 0.03 0.68 6.53 SOUTH 0.00 0.00 0.07 TOTAL EXISTING 0.03 0.61 6.59 CONDITION PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS: The site is proposed to be improved with multiple buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated site improvements. Storm water improvements for the project are needed provide volume control for water quality requirements. Rate control is provided by City regional pond located north of Chelsea Road and west of Fallon Avenue. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system. A surface infiltration basin is provided at the south end of the development and is connected to the storm sewer system. The infiltration basin provides additional storm water storage volume and additional system infiltration capacity. Storm water overflow is routed to Dundas Road ditch at the north east corner of the site. Proposed Conditions Drainage Area Map and associated HydroCAD Analysis calculation model printouts can be found in attached Appendix B. The flow rates from the proposed site are summarized in the table below: PROPOSED FLOW RATES DISCHARGING OFFSITE 2 -Year (2.81 ") 10 -Year (4.18") 100 -Year (6.93") Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) Runoff Rate (cfs) NORTH (DIRECT) 0.04 0.12 0.32 NORTH (DRAINAGE 1.04 5.07 14.55 SYSTEM DISHARGE) EAST 0.00 0.00 0.06 SOUTH 0.00 0.00 0.03 Total Proposed 0.04 0.12 4.03 Conditions Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 4 VOLUME ABSTRACTION AND WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS: Volume abstraction is required to be provided for 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface. Storm water system improvements are to incorporate infiltration ability with volume and capacity necessary to satisfy this requirement. The proposed site impervious surface is 150,032 sf. The project proposes collection of storm water runoff into catch basins and storm sewer with routing to either an on site infiltration basin, or an onsite underground system with perforated pipe and an outlet control structure with an elevated discharge outlet pipe. The elevated discharge outlet pipe provides containment of storm water volume within the system and allows infiltration of storm water into natural granular soils at the site. Pretreatment of storm water runoff within the system is provided by sumps incorporated into catch basins that collect runoff into the system. Infiltration Worksheet and Stage -Storage containment volume data printouts can be found in Attached Appendix C. The following table summarizes the calculation of required and proposed infiltration volumes: VOLUME ABSTRACTION 1.1" INFILTRATION Item New Impervious 1.1" Runoff 48 hr System Storage Surface Area Volume Infiltration Volume Below (sf) Required Volume Outlet (cf) Capacity (cf) (cf) Infiltration 150,032 13,753 28,211 23,720 Basin and Underground Infiltration System Since abstraction of 1.1" rainfall on new impervious surface is achieved, City of Monticello standards for water quality are also achieved. SOILS DATA: Geotechnical analysis has been completed at the site with completion of 6 soil borings and 1 double -ring infiltrometer test. Soils at the site have been found to be uniform and have been classified as SP type soils by Geotechnial Engineer. Infiltrometer test was completed in the location of the proposed infiltration basin at elevation 957. Infiltrometer test result is 54.01 inches/hour. Due to high infiltration rate, infiltration basin is proposed to be constructed with 1.0 foot of amended soils in bottom of basin consisting of 70%- 80% sand and 10%-30% compost MNDOT Grade 2. Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis Page 5 Based on geotechnical analysis, soils in the project area are understood to be hydrologic Group A. Type A soils at the site allow for an infiltration rate of 0.8 in/hr allowed by the MPCA Minnesota Storm Water Manual. Soils data for the site as obtained to date can be found in attached Appendix D. SUMMARY: The calculations show that the proposed design provides reduced stormwater runoff flow rates, achieves required volume control, and required water quality control for the proposed condition. The project improvements and drainage analysis satisfy the City of Monticello requirements for storm water management. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Scott Dahlke, P.E. Reg. No. 24348 Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis 07/03/2017 Date Page 6 APPENDIX A Existing Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis (S3) Ex Cond Onsite Ex Cond Onsite Draining East S2 Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 North Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Ital Project SubCat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Ex Cond Prepared by Hewlett-Packard, Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.02" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 576 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 13.38 hrs, Volume= 1,271 cf, Depth= 0.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 3,704 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 62 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.26 hrs, Volume= 18 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.20" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf Outflow = 0.61 cfs @ 12.43 hrs, Volume= 5,056 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Ex Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 2.34 cfs @ 12.39 hrs, Volume= 12,053 cf, Depth= 0.82" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 2,822 98 Impervious, HSG A 174,456 39 Pervious, HSG A 177,278 40 Weighted Average 174,456 98.41 % Pervious Area 2,822 1.59% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 4.19 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 15,456 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 93,042 39 Pervious, HSG A 113,928 50 Weighted Average 93,042 81.67% Pervious Area 20,886 18.33% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Ex Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.23 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 695 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Pervious, HSG A 11,215 39 Weighted Average 11,215 100.00% Pervious Area Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Ex Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by Hewlett-Packard Printed 4/18/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Ex Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 207 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,336 39 Weighted Average 3,336 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,757 sf, 7.75% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.12" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf Outflow = 6.59 cfs @ 12.35 hrs, Volume= 28,410 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs APPENDIX B Proposed Conditions Drainage Calculations Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis : ,► Ii - ♦ 1 1 r'iF �dol ' jr �� ••� ►PAA II' I►ff�' 1 S lu o ►,¢�g/IIIvqPON Alolo FIR WA U '" / a>/��'o%%rCel�/r.k�/II� ' . ly��,�I I � ���3�• f/ glll �I I i. �//�/}��i' I� 'I��.I' ���34, r♦:*'��11 lobi �/ .� � � �`/YI71�v°s �I► _ 1 11 Y4 II 52 �a?aaiaiaa®a®�, aaea•� I♦aaa MMMA, aaaa. •.a.���a�.. � //��►aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ��% ♦aaaaaaaaaaaaaa ♦aaaaaaaaaaaaa� �/ �`�a�•�aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa� +.aaaaaaaaaaaaa ���aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaae, ��aaaaaaaaaaaaaa� ♦aaaaaaaaaa♦aaa ,�♦aaaaaaaaaaaaa� iaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ' �iaiaiaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aiai! �aiaiaiaiaaaaaa�ii�iaiaia� - - - �aaaaaaaaaaaaa'�►aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa,� . �iaiaiaiaiaiai�►aiaiaiaiaiaiaiai! aiai�►aiaiaiaiaiaiaia� . ���a�a�a�a�a�aaaa���,• , L S2a Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 S3 Pro Cond nsite Draining rth S1 � GS Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Under G and System Pro Cond Onsite to System S2b Infiltration Basin ,ZZ Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 :af�O'roject Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for 00633 Pro Cond Prepared by CESD HydroCADO 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 16,606 cf, Depth= 1.98" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 13.36 hrs, Volume= 558 cf, Depth= 0.06" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 86 cf, Depth= 0.46" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf, Depth= 0.00" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 2.50 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 8,228 cf, Depth= 1.17" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.19" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.04 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 4,924 cf Outflow = 1.04 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 4,924 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.54" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.50 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 8,786 cf Outflow = 0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs, Volume= 8,787 cf, Atten= 95%, Lag= 180.0 min Discarded = 0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs, Volume= 8,787 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 956.97' @ 15.30 hrs Surf.Area= 6,371 sf Storage= 5,411 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Center -of -Mass det. time= 503.5 min ( 1,344.5 - 841.0 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 0.67" for 2 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.12 cfs @ 15.30 hrs HW=956.97' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.12 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' TW=955.50' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.59' @ 12.59 hrs Surf.Area= 7,602 sf Storage= 8,948 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 432.4 min ( 1,222.0 - 789.7 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.67" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 6.93 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 16,606 cf Outflow = 1.18 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 16,607 cf, Atten= 83%, Lag= 24.7 min Discarded = 0.14 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 11,769 cf Primary = 1.04 cfs @ 12.59 hrs, Volume= 4,838 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.59' @ 12.59 hrs Surf.Area= 7,602 sf Storage= 8,948 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 432.4 min ( 1,222.0 - 789.7 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW=958.59' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.14 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=1.04 cfs @ 12.59 hrs HW=958.59' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 1.04 cfs @ 2.19 fps) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 11.19 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 27,575 cf, Depth= 3.29" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.37 hrs, Volume= 20 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 0.59 cfs @ 12.42 hrs, Volume= 3,587 cf, Depth= 0.39" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 226 cf, Depth= 1.20" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 8 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 13.24 hrs, Volume= 16 cf, Depth= 0.07" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 4.95 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 16,000 cf, Depth= 2.27" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.58" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 5.10 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,742 cf Outflow = 5.10 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,742 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 5.39 cfs @ 12.31 hrs, Volume= 19,586 cf Outflow = 0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs, Volume= 19,587 cf, Atten= 97%, Lag= 334.3 min Discarded = 0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs, Volume= 19,587 cf Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 958.13' @ 17.88 hrs Surf.Area= 8,263 sf Storage= 13,892 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Center -of -Mass det. time= 997.3 min ( 1,829.4 - 832.1 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 1.11" for 10 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.15 cfs @ 17.88 hrs HW=958.13' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.15 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=956.00' TW=955.50' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.34' @ 12.32 hrs Surf.Area= 8,492 sf Storage= 11,941 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 299.5 min ( 1,079.3 - 779.8 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.11" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 11.19 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 27,595 cf Outflow = 5.23 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 27,595 cf, Atten= 53%, Lag= 9.0 min Discarded = 0.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 13,104 cf Primary = 5.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume= 14,491 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.34' @ 12.32 hrs Surf.Area= 8,492 sf Storage= 11,941 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 299.5 min ( 1,079.3 - 779.8 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=959.34' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.16 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs HW=959.34' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 5.07 cfs @ 3.55 fps) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Subcatchment S1: Pro Cond Onsite to UGS Runoff = 19.62 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 50,145 cf, Depth= 5.99" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 90,193 98 Impervious, HSG A 10,336 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 100,529 92 Weighted Average 10,336 10.28% Pervious Area 90,193 89.72% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2a: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S1 Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.22 hrs, Volume= 224 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Pervious, HSG A 3,612 39 Weighted Average 3,612 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S2b: Ex Cond Offsite Draining East to Area S6 Runoff = 4.08 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 14,966 cf, Depth= 1.63" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 20,886 98 Impervious, HSG A 89,430 39 Pervious, HSG A 110,316 50 Weighted Average 89,430 81.07% Pervious Area 20,886 18.93% Impervious Area Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S3: Pro Cond Onsite Draining North Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 594 cf, Depth= 3.15" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 1,052 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,213 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,265 66 Weighted Average 1,213 53.55% Pervious Area 1,052 46.45% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S4: Pro Cond Onsite Draining South Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 94 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 1,517 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 1,517 39 Weighted Average 1,517 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S5: Pro Cond Onsite Draining East Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.14 hrs, Volume= 182 cf, Depth= 0.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Area (sf) CN Description 0 98 Impervious, HSG A 2,942 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 2,942 39 Weighted Average 2,942 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Subcatchment S6: Pro Cond Onsite to System Runoff = 10.20 cfs @ 12.29 hrs, Volume= 33,355 cf, Depth= 4.74" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 58,779 98 Impervious, HSG A 19,242 39 Pervious, >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A 6,422 49 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG A 84,443 81 Weighted Average 25,664 30.39% Pervious Area 58,779 69.61 % Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, User Defined Summary for Reach 1 R: Total Project Inflow Area = 305,624 sf, 55.92% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.27" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 14.73 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 57,755 cf Outflow = 14.73 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 57,755 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 194,759 sf, 40.90% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.98" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 14.15 cfs @ 12.30 hrs, Volume= 48,320 cf Outflow = 2.81 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 48,322 cf, Atten= 80%, Lag= 38.1 min Discarded = 0.19 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 26,324 cf Primary = 2.62 cfs @ 12.93 hrs, Volume= 21,998 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 959.49' @ 12.93 hrs Surf.Area= 10,396 sf Storage= 26,284 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Center -of -Mass det. time= 696.3 min ( 1,514.6 - 818.3 ) Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description Inflow Depth = 2.91" for 100 -Year event #1 956.00' 44,682 cf Infiltration Basin (Conic)Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq -ft) 956.00 4,819 0 0 4,819 957.00 6,422 5,601 5,601 6,444 958.00 8,142 7,265 12,866 8,190 959.00 9,133 8,633 21,499 9,234 960.00 11,796 10,436 31,935 11,922 961.00 13,722 12,747 44,682 13,889 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 956.00' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.50' 18.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 17.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.50'/ 958.50' S=0.0000? Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.77 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.19 cfs @ 12.93 hrs HW=959.49' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.19 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=2.62 cfs @ 12.93 hrs HW=959.49' TW=959.22' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 2.62 cfs @ 3.00 fps) Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.73' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 18,413 sf Storage= 15,877 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 144.8 min ( 952.4 - 807.6 ) Volume Summary for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Inflow Area = 298,900 sf, 56.83% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.91" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 19.67 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 72,366 cf Outflow = 14.89 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 72,367 cf, Atten= 24%, Lag= 4.3 min Discarded = 0.34 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 15,483 cf Primary = 14.55 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 56,884 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.73' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 18,413 sf Storage= 15,877 cf Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: outflow precedes inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 144.8 min ( 952.4 - 807.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 955.50' 8,514 cf 7.00'W x 571.00'L x 4.00'H Rock Encasement Z=1.0 25,321 cf Overall - 4,036 cf Embedded = 21,285 cf x 40.0% Voids #2 959.50' 4,122 cf 14.50'W x 571.00'L x 1.50'H Sand over Rock Encasement Z=1.0 13,741 cf Overall x 30.0% Voids #3 956.50' 4,036 cf 36.0" Round Pipe Storage Inside #1 L= 571.0' 16,673 cf Total Available Storage Spaeth Ind Park, Monticello, MN 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 955.50' 0.800 in/hr Exfiltration over Horizontal area #2 Primary 958.00' 21.0" Round Pipe Outlet L= 18.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 958.00'/ 958.00' S=0.0000'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 2.41 sf Discarded OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=960.73' (Free Discharge) L1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.34 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=14.54 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=960.73' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) L2=Pipe Outlet (Barrel Controls 14.54 cfs @ 6.04 fps) APPENDIX C Volume Abstraction 1.0" Rainfall on New Impervious Surface and Stage -Storage Containment Volume Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis SPAETH INDUSTRIAL PARK, MONTICELLO, MN INFILTRATION WORKSHEET Requirements: Infiltrate runoff generated from a 1.1" rainfall over the applicable new impervious surface within 48 hours. Step 1: Determine areas of impervious surfaces area and effective infiltration. New impervious surface area = 150,032 sf Effective Infiltration Area = Underground System + Infiltration Basin Underground System = 571 if x 7 ft = 3,997 sf Infiltration Basin = 4,819 sf at bottom contour 956 elevation Total = 3,997 + 4,819 = 8,816 sf Step 2: Calculate runoff volume from increase impervious surface generated by 1.1" storm. 150,032 sf x 1.0 x 1.1 inch x lft/12inch = 13,753 cf Net Increased Coefficient Rainfall Volume Impervious Required to be Surface Area Infiltrated Step 3: Calculate volume capacity of being infiltrated on site in 48 hours. Use infiltration rate for Type A soils = 0.80 in/hr. 8,816 sf x 0.80 in/hr x 48 hrs x lft/12inch = 28,211 cf Effective Infiltration Volume Infiltration Rate Capacity Area in 48 Hours Step 4: Compare volume capacity to volume required to be infiltrated. 28,211 cf > 13,753 cf Volume Volume Capacity Required to be in 48 Hours Infiltrated 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage -Area -Storage for Pond IB: Infiltration Basin Elevation Surface Horizontal Storage (feet) (sq -ft) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) 956.00 4,819 4,819 0 956.10 4,969 4,969 489 956.20 5,121 5,121 994 956.30 5,276 5,276 1,514 956.40 5,433 5,433 2,049 956.50 5,592 5,592 2,600 956.60 5,753 5,753 3,168 956.70 5,917 5,917 3,751 956.80 6,083 6,083 4,351 956.90 6,251 6,251 4,968 957.00 6,422 6,422 5,601 957.10 6,585 6,585 6,252 957.20 6,750 6,750 6,918 957.30 6,917 6,917 7,602 957.40 7,086 7,086 8,302 957.50 7,257 7,257 9,019 957.60 7,430 7,430 9,753 957.70 7,605 7,605 10,505 957.80 7,782 7,782 11,274 957.90 7,961 7,961 12,061 958.00 8,142 8,142 12,866 958.10 8,239 8,239 13,685 958.20 8,336 8,336 14,514 958.30 8,433 8,433 15,353 958.40 8,532 8,532 16,201 958.50 8,630 8,630 17,059 958.60 8,730 8,730 17,927 958.70 8,830 8,830 18,805 958.80 8,930 8,930 19,693 958.90 9,031 9,031 20,591 959.00 9,133 9,133 21,499 959.10 9,384 9,384 22,425 959.20 9,638 9,638 23,376 959.30 9,896 9,896 24,353 959.40 10,157 10,157 25,355 959.50 10,422 10,422 26,384 959.60 10,690 10,690 27,440 959.70 10,961 10,961 28,522 959.80 11,236 11,236 29,632 959.90 11,514 11,514 30,770 960.00 11,796 11,796 31,935 960.10 11,982 11,982 33,124 960.20 12,170 12,170 34,332 960.30 12,359 12,359 35,558 960.40 12,549 12,549 36,803 960.50 12,741 12,741 38,068 960.60 12,934 12,934 39,352 960.70 13,129 13,129 40,655 960.80 13,325 13,325 41,978 960.90 13,523 13,523 43,320 961.00 13,722 13,722 44,682 00633 Pro Cond MSE 24 -hr 3 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by CESD HydroCAD® 10.00-18 s/n 01607 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage -Area -Storage for Pond UGS: Under Ground System Elevation Horizontal Storage Elevation (feet) (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) (feet) 955.50 3,997 0 960.80 955.60 4,113 162 960.90 955.70 4,228 329 961.00 955.80 4,344 500 955.90 4,460 677 956.00 4,576 857 956.10 4,692 1,043 956.20 4,808 1,233 956.30 4,924 1,427 956.40 5,041 1,627 956.50 5,157 1,831 956.60 5,273 2,064 956.70 5,390 2,322 956.80 5,507 2,596 956.90 5,623 2,885 957.00 5,740 3,185 957.10 5,857 3,497 957.20 5,974 3,818 957.30 6,091 4,148 957.40 6,208 4,487 957.50 6,325 4,833 957.60 6,442 5,187 957.70 6,560 5,547 957.80 6,677 5,913 957.90 6,794 6,284 958.00 6,912 6,661 958.10 7,030 7,043 958.20 7,147 7,429 958.30 7,265 7,818 958.40 7,383 8,211 958.50 7,501 8,607 958.60 7,619 9,005 958.70 7,737 9,404 958.80 7,855 9,805 958.90 7,974 10,206 959.00 8,092 10,607 959.10 8,210 11,007 959.20 8,329 11,403 959.30 8,448 11,796 959.40 8,566 12,180 959.50 16,965 12,550 959.60 17,082 12,800 959.70 17,199 13,054 959.80 17,316 13,311 959.90 17,434 13,572 960.00 17,551 13,836 960.10 17,669 14,104 960.20 17,786 14,375 960.30 17,904 14,650 960.40 18,022 14,928 960.50 18,140 15,210 960.60 18,257 15,496 960.70 18,375 15,784 Horizontal Storage (sq -ft) (cubic -feet) 18,494 16,077 18,612 16,373 18,730 16,673 APPENDIX D Soils Data Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Drainage Analysis H U GO IATA a ■ June 27, 2017 Mr. Ken Spaeth Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 HGTS Project Number: 17-0518 Re: Geotechnical Exploration Report, Proposed Spaeth Industrial Park Development, 107 Dundas Road, Monticello, Minnesota Dear Mr. Spaeth: We have completed the geotechnical exploration report for the proposed Spaeth Industrial Park development at 107 Dundas Road in Monticello, Minnesota. Development plans include 8 new buildings, parking lots and drive lanes, utilities and an infiltration pond. A brief summary of our results and recommendations are presented below. Specific details regarding our procedures, results and recommendations follow in the attached geotechnical exploration report. Six (6) soil borings were completed for this project that encountered about 1 to 2 feet of topsoil and existing Fill over glacial outwash sands which extended to the soil boring termination depths. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger removal from the boreholes. The topsoil and existing Fill are potentially compressible and unsuitable for building support. These soils will need to be removed from below the building and oversize areas and replaced with compacted engineered fill. The underling outwash sands are generally suitable for building support. With the building pads prepared as recommended it is our opinion that the footings for can be supported on the native outwash soils or compacted engineered fill designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Brett Maki at 612-269-4027 or Paul Gionfriddo at 763-954-1101. Sincerely, HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC Brett S. Maki, P.E. Project Engineer Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, Mild 55407 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROJECT: Proposed Spaeth Industrial Park Development 107 Dundas Road Monticello, Minnesota PREPARED FOR: Spaeth Masonry 108 Meadowlark Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 PREPARED BY: Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC 2825 Cedar Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55407 Haugo GeoTechnical Services Project: 17-0518 June 27, 2017 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Gionfriddo, P.E. Senior Engineer License Number 23093 Expires June 2018 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Site Description 1.4 Scope of Services 1.5 Documents Provided 1.6 Locations and Elevations 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions 3.2 Groundwater 3.3 Laboratory Tests 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction 4.2 Discussion 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations 4.4 Below Grade Walls 4.5 Interior Slabs 4.6 Exterior Slabs 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage 4.8 Utilities 4.9 Bituminous Pavements 4.10 Soil Infiltration 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation 5.2 Observations 5.3 Backfill and Fills 5.4 Testing 5.5 Winter Construction 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification 6.2 Groundwater Observations 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations 7.2 Review of Design 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations 7.4 Use of Report 7.5 Level of Care APPENDIX Soil Boring Location Sketch, Figure 1 GPS Boring Locations, Figure 2 Soil Boring Logs SB -1 thru SB -6 Infiltrometer Test Descriptive Terminology 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 9 9 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 11 11 11 11 12 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description Spaeth Masonry is proposing to construct an Industrial Park development at 107 Dundas Road in Monticello, Minnesota. Development plans include 8 one story buildings, each with a footprint of about 7,000 square feet, bituminous parking lots and drive lanes, underground utilities and an infiltration pond. 1.2 Purpose Spaeth Masonry retained Haugo GeoTechnical Services to perform a geotechnical exploration to evaluate the suitability of site soil conditions with respect to foundation support and pavement design of the proposed Industrial Park. 1.3 Site Description The site was vacant at the time of our exploration and was mostly grass covered with a few small trees on the south end of the lot. The lot was bordered by commercial or industrial buildings to the east and west and by a residential development to the south. The site topography is relatively flat with ground surface elevations at our soil boring locations ranging from about 961 1/2to 963 feet mean sea level (MSL). 1.4 Scope of Services Our services were performed in accordance with the Haugo GeoTechnical Services LLC proposal and under the terms of our General Conditions. Our scope of services was limited to the following tasks: • Completing six (6) standard penetration test borings, extending each boring to a nominal depth of 20 feet. • Obtaining ground surface elevations and GPS coordinates at the soil boring locations. • Visually/ manually classifying the samples recovered from the soil borings. • Performing laboratory tests on selected samples. • Preparing soil boring logs describing the materials encountered and the results of groundwater level measurements. • Preparing an engineering report describing soil and groundwater conditions, and providing recommendations for foundation support. 1.5 Documents Provided We were provided with a civil plan sheet C2 prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design titled "PUD -Development Stage Grading and Drainage Plan' dated May 8, 2017. The 1 plan shows the approximate locations and grades of the new buildings, parking lots, underground utilities and infiltration pond. Specific design information for the proposed building such as building structural loads were not available at the time of this report. 1.6 Locations and Elevations The soil boring locations were selected by HGTS based on the anticipated construction and site access. The approximate location of the soil borings are shown on Figure 1, "Soil Boring Location Sketch", in the Appendix. The sketch was prepared by HGTS using the civil plan sheet provided as a base. Ground surface elevations at the soil borings were obtained by HGTS using GPS measuring equipment. Elevations were based on MN County Coordinates System mean sea level using the GEOID09 (Conus) model. GPS coordinates at the boring locations are provided in Figure 1 in the Appendix. 2.0 FIELD PROCEDURES Six (6) standard penetration test borings were advanced on June 8, 2017 by HGTS with a rotary drilling rig, using continuous flight augers to advance the boreholes. Representative samples were obtained from the borings, using the split -barrel sampling procedures in general accordance with ASTM Specification D-1586. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, a 2 -inch O.D. split -barrel spoon is driven into the ground with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of an 18 -inch penetration is recorded as the standard penetration resistance value, or "N" value. The results of the standard penetration tests are indicated on the boring log. The samples were sealed in containers and provided to the HGTS office for testing and soil classification. A field log of each boring was prepared by the HGTS drill crew. The logs contained visual classifications of the soil materials encountered during drilling, as well as the driller's interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples and water observation notes. The final boring logs included with this report represent an interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on visual/manual method observation of the samples. The soil boring logs, general terminology for soil description and identification, and classification of soils for engineering purposes are also included in the appendix. The soil boring logs identify and describe the materials encountered, the relative density or consistency based on the Standard Penetration resistance (N -value, "blows per foot") and groundwater observations. 2 The strata changes were inferred from the changes in the samples and auger cuttings. The depths shown as changes between strata are only approximate. The changes are likely transitions, variations can occur beyond the location of the boring. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Soil Conditions The soil borings encountered about 1 foot of surficial topsoil. Boring SB -3 encountered about 1 foot of poorly graded sand with silt Fill over about 1 foot of buried topsoil. The topsoil consisted of silty sand which was black in color, while the Fill was grey in color and contained traces of gravel. Underlying the topsoil and Fill, native glacial outwash sand soils were encountered to the soil boring termination depths. The outwash sands consist mainly of poorly graded sand, with some areas of poorly graded sand with silt. The sands were brown in color, and contained variable amounts of gravel. Penetration resistance values (N -Values), shown as blows per foot (bpf) on the boring logs, within the native soils ranged from 5 to 31 bpf. These values indicate the soils had a loose to dense relative density, with the majority of the soils having a medium dense relative density. 3.2 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. Groundwater monitoring wells or piezometers in conjunction with deeper soil boring(s) would be required to more accurately determine water levels. Water levels were measured on the dates as noted on the boring logs and the period of water level observations was relatively short. Seasonal and annual fluctuations in the groundwater levels should be expected. 3.3 Laboratory Tests Laboratory moisture content tests and percent passing the number 200 sieve (P-200) tests were performed on selected samples recovered from the soil borings. Table 1 below summarizes the results of the laboratory tests. Results of the laboratory moisture content tests are also shown on the boring logs adjacent to the sample tested. Table 1. Summary of Laboratory Tests Boring Sample Depth Moisture P-200 Number Number (feet) Content (%) (%)* SB -5 S-34 121/2 71/2 21/2 SB -6 S-42 15 5 5 *Values rounded to the nearest 1/2 Percent 3 3.4 OSHA Soil Classification The soils encountered in the borings were mainly poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt soils corresponding to the ASTM classification SP and SP -SM. The soils identified in the borings will generally be Type C soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Proposed Construction Development plans include constructing eight (8) one story commercial buildings, each with a footprint of about 7,000 square feet. The development will also include bituminous parking lots, underground utilities and an infiltration pond. Specific design information such as building structural loads were not available at the time of this report. We assume each building will be a slab on grade structure and will be constructed with concrete or masonry block foundation walls supported on concrete spread footings. We assume above grade construction could include masonry exterior perimeter walls or pre -cast concrete wall panels, interior steel columns with steel roof trusses, metal decking and a ballasted rubber membrane roof. Based on the site plan provided we anticipate the main floor for each building will bear at elevation 963.5. With the ground surface currently ranging from about elevation 961 1/2 to 963 we anticipate fills on the order of 2 feet will be required to attain site grades. Based on the assumed construction we anticipate that soil bearing pressure(s) up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf) will be required for adequate foundation support. We have attempted to describe our understanding of the project. If the proposed loads exceed these values or if the design or location of the proposed building changes, we should be informed. Additional analyses and revised recommendations may be necessary. 4.2 Discussion The soil borings in the proposed building area generally encountered 1 to 2 feet of topsoil and Fill over glacial outwash sands which extended to the soil boring termination depths. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered during construction The topsoil and Fill are potentially compressible and unsuitable for building support. The underling native outwash sands are generally suitable for building support. Soil 4 corrections will be required to remove the vegetation, topsoil and Fill soils. Engineered fill would then be placed for building support. The following sections provide recommendations for site development. 4.3 Mass Grading Recommendations Excavations We recommend that all vegetation, topsoil and Fill be removed from the proposed building and oversize areas. Table 2 below summarizes the anticipated excavation depths at the boring locations. Excavation depths may vary and could be deeper. Table 2. Anticipated Mass Grading Excavation Depths Fill Material Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, non- organic mineral soil. Site soils identified as poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt (SP and SP -SM) are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (wetting) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The topsoil, including soils that are black in color, removed during soil corrections are not suitable for re -use as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. Following soil corrections, we recommend that the exposed soil in the base of the excavations and any soils disturbed during excavation activities be surface compacted prior to placing the footings or additional fill to increase their density and uniformity. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain foundation grades be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698) and that backfill placed to attain floor slab grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Remaining fill soils, if any, should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin 5 Measured Anticipated Anticipated Boring Surface Excavation Excavation Number Elevation Depth (feet)* Elevation (feet)* (feet) SB -1 962.0 1 961 SB -2 962.9 1 962 SB -3 961.4 2 9591/2 SB -4 961.6 1 9601/2 SB -5 961.6 1 9601/2 SB -6 962.5 1 9611/2 *Excavation depths and elevation were rounded to the nearest 1/2 foot. Fill Material Fill required to attain site grades and may consist of any debris -free, non- organic mineral soil. Site soils identified as poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt (SP and SP -SM) are generally suitable for use or re -use as fill or backfill provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious material. Some moisture conditioning (wetting) of these soils will likely be required to meet the recommended compaction levels. The topsoil, including soils that are black in color, removed during soil corrections are not suitable for re -use as fill or backfill. It may be possible to re -use these materials in "green areas' on the site such as landscaping berms. Following soil corrections, we recommend that the exposed soil in the base of the excavations and any soils disturbed during excavation activities be surface compacted prior to placing the footings or additional fill to increase their density and uniformity. Backfilling We recommend that backfill placed to attain foundation grades be compacted to a minimum of 98 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698) and that backfill placed to attain floor slab grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. Remaining fill soils, if any, should be placed within 3 percentage points above and 1 percentage point below its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. All fill should be placed in thin 5 lifts and be compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode. Foundations We recommend the perimeter footings bear a minimum of 42 inches below the exterior grade for frost protection. Interior footings may be placed immediately below the slab provided construction does not occur during below freezing weather conditions. Foundation elements in unheated areas should bear at least 5 feet below exterior grade for frost protection. We anticipate the foundations and floor slabs will bear on compacted engineered fill or native glacial outwash sand soils. With the building pad prepared as recommended it is our opinion the footings can be designed for a net allowable bearing pressure up to 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). We anticipate total and differential settlement of the foundations will be less than 1 inch and 1/z inch, respectively, across and approximate 30 foot span. 4.4 Below Grade Walls We anticipate that the proposed buildings will be slab on -grade structure with no below grade or basement levels. Estimated soil parameters and recommendations for below grade wall design and construction can be provided if requested or required. 4.5 Interior Slabs The anticipated floor subgrade is sand soils. It is our opinion a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 250 pounds per square inch of deflection (psi) may be used to design the floor. If floor coverings or coatings less permeable than the concrete slab will be used, we recommend that a vapor retarder or vapor barrier be placed immediately beneath the slab. Some contractors prefer to bury the vapor barrier or vapor retarder beneath a layer of sand to reduce curling and shrinkage, but this practice often traps water between the slab and vapor retarder or barrier. Regardless of where the vapor retarder or vapor barrier is placed, we recommend consulting the floor covering manufacturer regarding the appropriate type, use and installation of the vapor retarder or vapor barrier to preserve the warranty. We recommend following all state and local building codes in regards to a radon mitigation plan beneath interior slabs. 4.6 Exterior Slabs Exterior slabs will likely be underlain by slightly to non- frost -susceptible soils consisting predominantly of poorly graded sand and poorly graded sand with silt. This being the case, it is our opinion that special subgrade improvements in excess of removing the M existing vegetation and topsoil in advance of slab construction will not be required. However, we recommend sloping exterior slabs to drain away from the building. 4.7 Site Grading and Drainage We recommend the site be graded to provide positive run-off away from the proposed building. We recommend landscaped areas be sloped a minimum of 6 inches within 10 feet of the building and slabs be sloped a minimum of 2 inches. In addition we recommend downspouts with long splash blocks or extensions for each house. We recommend the lowest floor grades be constructed to maintain at least a 2 -foot separation between the lowest floor slab and 100 year flood levels of any adjacent water features such as storm water ponds, detention basins and ditches. 4.8 Utilities We anticipate that the utilities will be supported on native glacial outwash sand soils which in our opinion are suitable for pipe support. We recommend removing all existing vegetation, topsoil or other unsuitable soil, if encountered, beneath utilities prior to placement. We recommend bedding material be thoroughly compacted around the pipes. We recommend trench backfill above the pipes be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent beneath slabs and pavements, the exception being within 3 feet of the proposed pavement subgrade, where 100 percent of standard Proctor density is required. In landscaped areas we recommend a minimum compaction of 90 percent. Groundwater was not encountered in the soil borings while drilling and sampling or after auger withdrawal from the boreholes. We do not anticipate that groundwater will be encountered. 4.9 Bituminous Pavements We were not provided specific information regarding traffic volumes, vehicle types, vehicle distribution or projected growth rates. We anticipate the parking and drive lanes will be used automobiles and light trucks as well as heavy duty single unit and multi- unit (tractor -trailer) trucks so that both heavy duty and light duty pavements will be required. Based on the assumed traffic types and the number of parking stalls we estimate the parking and drive lanes will be subjected to less than 70,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL's) over a design life of 20 years. We recommend removing all vegetation, topsoil and Fill from beneath the pavement subgrade. Prior to placing the aggregate base (Class 5) we recommend the subgrade soils be surface compacted with a large self-propelled vibratory compactor operating in vibratory mode.to identify soft, weak, loose or unstable areas that may require additional subcuts. 7 Backfill, if needed, to attain pavement subgrade elevation can consist of any mineral soil provided it is free of organic material or other deleterious materials. Granular fill classified as SP or SP -SM should be placed within 65 percent to 105 percent of its optimum moisture content as determined by the standard Proctor. We recommend that fill placed to attain pavement grades be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its standard Proctor density (ASTM D 698). The upper 3 feet of fill and backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of its standard Proctor maximum dry density. R -Value testing was beyond the scope of this project. The soil borings mainly encountered poorly graded sand soils corresponding to the ASTM Classification SP. These soils typically have R -Values ranging from about 50 to 70. We recommend using an R -Value of 50 for the sand subgrade soils for pavement design. It should be noted that the pavement section presented below are not absolute. Depending on serviceability expectations, material availability, and cost, there will be circumstances under which alternative sections will be more practicable. For a light duty car parking lot with limited truck traffic, we recommend the pavement section consist of 3 inches of bituminous wear and 6 inches of aggregate base. For drive lanes and areas of heavy truck traffic, we recommend the pavement section consist of 4 inches of bituminous (2 inches of bituminous base and 2 inches of bituminous wear) and 8 inches of aggregate base. We recommend aggregate base meeting MN/DOT Class 5 aggregate base. We recommend the aggregate base be compacted to 100 percent of its maximum standard Proctor. We recommend that the bituminous pavements be compacted to at least 92 percent of the maximum theoretical density. We recommend specifying concrete that has a minimum 28 day compressive strength of 4,000 psi, and a modulus of rupture of at least 600 psi. We recommend Type I cement meeting the requirements of ASTM C150. We recommend specifying 5 to 7 percent entrained air for exposed concrete to provide resistance to freeze -thaw deterioration. We also recommend using a water/cement ratio of 0.45 or less for concrete exposed to deicers. 4.10 Soil Infiltration Based on the Site Plan provided, the project will include a storm water infiltration pond at the south end of the site. The bottom of the pond is anticipated to be constructed at or near elevation 957. Soil borings were not performed specifically for the storm water infiltration pond. However, based on the results of the soil borings completed for the proposed buildings, we anticipate that soils at the pond bottom elevation will consist of poorly graded sand or poorly graded sand with silt meeting the ASTM Classification SP or SP -SM. These soils are generally free -draining materials and generally well suited for storm water infiltration. We performed a double ring infiltrometer test within the proposed basin areas on June 21, 2017 to further evaluate the infiltration rates of the in-situ soils. The results of the infiltrometer test indicated an infiltration rate of 54 inches per hour (in/hr). We assume that compost will be blended with the upper sands to reduce the infiltration rate in the pond. 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 5.1 Excavation The soil borings indicated that at the anticipated excavation depths the soils in the sidewalls of the excavations will be primarily Type C soils under Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) guidelines. Temporary excavations in Type C soils should be constructed at a minimum of 11h foot horizontal to every 1 foot vertical. Slopes constructed in this manner may still exhibit surface sloughing. If site constraints do not allow the construction of slopes with these dimensions then temporary shoring may be required. 5.2 Observations A geotechnical engineer should observe the excavation subgrade to evaluate if the subgrade soils are similar to those encountered in the borings and adequate to support the proposed construction. 5.3 Backfill and Fills Portions of the sand site soils that will be excavated and reused as backfill and fill appear to be below their assumed optimum moisture content. We anticipate it will be necessary to moisture condition (wet) these soils to achieve the recommended compaction. We recommend that fill and backfill be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 to 12 inches, depending on the size of the compactor and materials used. 5.4 Testing We recommend density tests of backfill and fills placed during grading activities. Samples of the proposed materials should be submitted to our laboratory prior to placement for evaluation of their suitability and to determine their optimum moisture content and maximum dry density (Standard Proctor). 9 5.5 Winter Construction If site grading and construction is anticipated to proceed during cold weather, all snow and ice should be removed from cut and fill areas prior to additional grading and placement of fill. No fill should be placed on frozen soil and no frozen soil should be used as fill or backfill. Concrete delivered to the site should meet the temperature requirements of ASTM and/or ACI. Concrete should not be placed on frozen soil. Concrete should be protected from freezing until the necessary strength is obtained. Frost should not be permitted to penetrate below the footings. 6.0 PROCEDURES 6.1 Soil Classification The drill crew chief visually and manually classified the soils encountered in the borings in general accordance with ASTM D 2488, "Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)". Soil terminology notes are included in the Appendix. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review of the field classification by a soils engineer. Samples will be retained for a period of 30 days. 6.2 Groundwater Observations Immediately after taking the final samples in the bottom of the borings, the holes were checked for the presence of groundwater. Immediately after removing the augers from the borehole the holes were once again checked and the depth to water and cave-in depths were noted. 7.0 GENERAL 7.1 Subsurface Variations The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based on data obtained from a limited number of soil borings. Variations can occur away from the borings, the nature of which may not become apparent until additional exploration work is completed or construction is conducted. A reevaluation of the recommendations in this report should be made after performing on-site observations during construction to note the characteristics of any variations. The variations may result in additional foundation costs and it is suggested that a contingency be provided for this purpose. It is recommended that we be retained to perform the observation and testing program during construction to evaluate whether the design is as expected, if any design changes have affected the validity of our recommendations, and if our recommendations have 10 been correctly interpreted and implemented in the designs, specifications and construction methods. This will allow correlation of the soil conditions encountered during construction to the soil borings and will provide continuity of professional responsibility. 7.2 Review of Design This report is based on the design of the proposed development as related to us for preparation of this report. It is recommended that we be retained to review the geotechnical aspects of the design and specifications. With the review we will evaluate whether any changes have affected the validity of the recommendations and whether our recommendations have been correctly interpreted and implemented in the design and specifications. 7.3 Groundwater Fluctuations We made water level measurements in the borings at the times and under the conditions stated on the boring logs. The data was interpreted in the text of this report. The period of observation was relatively short and fluctuations in the groundwater level may occur due to rainfall, flooding, irrigation, spring thaw, drainage, and other seasonal and annual factors not evident at the time the observations were made. Design drawings and specifications and construction planning should recognize the possibility of fluctuations. 7.4 Use of Report This report is for the exclusive use of Spaeth Masonry and their design team to use to design the proposed development and prepare construction documents. In the absence of our written approval, we make no representation and assume no responsibility to other parties regarding this report. The data, analysis and recommendations may not be appropriate for other structures or purposes. We recommend that parties contemplating other structures or purposes contact us. 7.5 Level of Care Haugo GeoTechnical Services, LLC has used the degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar circumstance by members of the profession currently practicing in this locality. No warranty expressed or implied is made. 11 APPENDIX i....... ,x4..... DUNDAS ROAD t. [t' ���Ypa f - • 1 ----_ SB -1 SB -2 q5QO-W .3 SF G9?8 9` Y r J SB -4 i .. SB -3 PUL ING E a,lgl Sr- f t �m�G x _ FFF-Ga'l50 FSE-9P$.GG [rc K ��• { Jw y LF } SB -5 SB -6 9.976 Y -963[ .-... FFE-MAb t, ' • _: UY [ 43 '. 4 W-+ = Approximate Soil Boring Location E S Haugo GeoTechnical Soil Boring Location Sketch Figure #: 1 Services. Spaeth Industrial Park Drawn By: RD Date: 6/6/17 2825 Cedar Avenue S. Monticello, Minnesota Scale: None Minneapolis, MN 55407 Project #: 17-0518 H U GO HGTS# 17-0518 Figure 2: GPS Boring Locations Referencing Minnesota County Coordinates Basis - Wright County (GEOID09 Conus model). 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 Elevation Northing Easting Boring Number (US Survey Feet) Coordinate Coordinate SB -1 962.0 213956.982 523113.056 SB -2 962.9 213956.201 522967.980 SB -3 961.4 213708.151 523044.951 SB -4 961.6 213726.837 522908.908 SB -5 961.6 213534.714 523122.152 SB -6 962.5 213520.903 522947.587 Referencing Minnesota County Coordinates Basis - Wright County (GEOID09 Conus model). 2825 Cedar Avenue S, Minneapolis, MN 55407 AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -1 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 962 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: (18) AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 13 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 2 20 40 60 80 AU 1 - (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, with Gravel brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 2 5-6-7 (13) SS 4-8-10 3 (18) SS 7-10-14 4 (24) SS 3-5-5 5 (10) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 6 Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 2-4-5 (9) SS 2-4-4 7 (8) A AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 BORING NUMBER SB -2 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 GROUND ELEVATION 962.9 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 11 feet w o z A SPT N VALUE A U o U) w 20 40 60 80 =O O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ ~m LU J > a �z� O Q w^ w PL MC LL R o � ��� LuJ g o O- z m 0> M z 20 40 60 80 CD z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) 1[8 - - (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, i- - brown, moist, loose to medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 9 - - (0) s 5.0 SS 7-10-10 10 (20) i 7.5 i SS 7-10-11 11 (21) 10.0 SS 5-6-7 _ _ i \ 12 (13) 12.5 SS 4-8-12 13 (20) 15.0 ' SS 3-5-6 14 (11) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES BORING NUMBER SB -3 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.4 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 12 feet uj a o z A SPT N VALUE A O U =O of CO > _ LU U) w �z� U w^ w 20 PL 40 60 80 MC LL 0_0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION J g > O O Z Q W o J o S - 0—of m 0> 5 z 20 40 60 80 CD z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to medium grained, trace - Gravel, grey, moist. (FILL) AU 15 — - Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) (SP -SM) Poorly Graded Sand with Silt, fine to medium grained, 2.5_ trace Gravel, brown, moist, loose. (Glacial Outwash) SS 2-3-4 16 (7) s 5.0 SS 2-2-3 17 (5) i (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, 7 5 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 5-10-8 i 18 (18) 10.0 SS 8-10-8 i 19 (18) 12.5 SS 4-6-8 20 (14) i- 15.0 ' SS 3-5-7 21 (12) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -4 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.6 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 17 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 23 (13) 2 20 40 60 80 AU 22 4 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - with Cobbles at 10 feet, brown, moist, medium dense to dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 23 (13) s 5.0 SS 5-10-12 24 (22) i 7.5 SS 12-16-15 25 (31) 10.0 SS 4-7-10 i i 26 (17) i 12.5 SS 3-5-8 27 (13) 15.0 ' SS 4-7-7 28 (14) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 4 AUGD Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC NOTES U 2 Lu CL O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION CD c9 0.0 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) BORING NUMBER SB -5 PAGE 1 OF 1 PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN GROUND ELEVATION 961.6 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches GROUND WATER LEVELS: AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 12 feet uj o z A SPT N VALUE A a H of U) ? 20 40 60 80 Lm Lo �z� of _j�Q L w PL MC LL J� > o 5 O- m O> M z 20 40 60 80 z U z 3-8-7 Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 30 (15) 2 20 40 60 80 s 5.0 AU 29 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace Gravel, - - brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 SS 3-8-7 A 30 (15) s 5.0 SS 6-8-9 31 (17) i (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, 7 5 i brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 6-8-6 32 (14) A 10.0 SS 5-7-7 i 33 (14) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to coarse grained, trace Gravel, 12.5 1 brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) SS 3-5-8 34 7 5 (13) (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - i brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) -- 15.0 ' SS 3-6-7 35 (13) i Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. AUG(3 Haugo GeoTechnical Services 2825 Cedar Ave Minneapolis, MN 554057 Telephone: 612-729-2959 BORING NUMBER SB -6 PAGE 1 OF 1 CLIENT Spaeth Masonry PROJECT NAME Spaeth Industrial Park PROJECT NUMBER 17-0518 PROJECT LOCATION Monticello, MN DATE STARTED 6/5/17 COMPLETED 6/5/17 GROUND ELEVATION 962.5 ft HOLE SIZE 3 1/4 inches DRILLING CONTRACTOR HGTS GROUND WATER LEVELS: DRILLING METHOD Hollow Stem Auger/Split Spoon AT TIME OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered LOGGED BY MS CHECKED BY JC AT END OF DRILLING --- Not Encountered NOTES AFTER DRILLING --- Not Encountered with Cave -In Depth of 10 feet w o z A SPT N VALUE A U o U) w 20 40 60 80 =O O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION _ ~m LU J > a �z� w^ w O Q R o � PL MC LL ��� Lu J g o_� O- z m0> Mz 20 40 60 80 c7 z U z < Lu o ❑ FINES CONTENT (%) ❑ 0.0 2 20 40 60 80 Silty Sand, black, moist. (Topsoil) AU 36 (SP) Poorly Graded Sand, fine to medium grained, trace Gravel, - - brown, moist, medium dense. (Glacial Outwash) 2.5 SS 5-7-9 37 (16) 5.0 SS 5-12-12 _ _ 38 (24) 7.5 SS 13-12-10 _ _ 39 (22) 10.0 SS 15-10-11 40 (21) 12.5 SS 7-10-8 41 (18) 15.0 SS 4-7-8 5 42 (15) Bottom of borehole at 16.0 feet. 0 d T O L O — S w c O O O O O N r N Y C E u N L y N W 3 O � L 2 N > > N v L @ U O ALL. I m y c y o 0 0 E a 0 o F E E c M O d C D L 0 f7 p F 0 i y V A A 1 N M N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •� C � ; NC M 07 A A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O- C t M t0 A O N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r U d C = C O t c E C > Ci o a :5uZ �_ 0 0 3 4 LL a O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M O M .O LL '� c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 c0 L C O q J W J u s o d N' c a N F^ E o m uoi w uoi m c o M C LL C m yL+ m W N > c N U1 rn c � y a C � @ O C o 0 0 0 y 3 0 0 0 0 C 'Q LL M N N N c @ d -i 00 o rn E @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c @ c c u c m 'v � c v d C N lU O lU lU ................... O ..................... d F � N 7 y o a m J U c 3 O ° m Z E� M oibioibim000 M O O m °f O U N .@. K @ °J��' ° 3 dG 00000000 A V7 ❑ N tD N t0 N t0 N tD O.. .� L N N F > u ig y F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F~ F F a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a c y v U) W U) W U) W U) W U) W U) W y (n W y (n W y U) W y A W y A W y A W y (n W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y N W y M W 9 p O O J IO N d > O L @ d N M a N l0 A W A N M V u1 d A O N N N N N N LL d y � a`w c ■ SERVICES Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests a m Gravels MH More than 50% of .c coarse -fraction a a', retained on c No. 4 sieve 0 GG a,Zri, N Sands m 6 50% or more of iz 0 0 LO coarse fraction v o passes L No. 4 sieve m Group MH Silts and Clays o m m Liquid limit Co m m less than 50 Poorly graded gravel' GM c � o 6O GG N Cn E Silts and clays `o z Liquid limit iz 0 0 LO 50 or more Highly Organic Soils Clean Gravers I G;�t 4 and 1< C< 3 c 5°a or less fines<4 and/or 1 >cC�>3 c Gravels with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH More than 12% fines a Fines classify as CL or CH Clean Sands ( C„> 6 and 1 < C� <3c 5% or less fines ' C,< 6 and/or 1 > Cc> 3 c Sands with Fines Fines classify as ML or MH r More than €12°%' Fines classify as CL or CH inorganic € Pt > 7 and plots on or above `A" line PI < 4 or plots below "A' line' Organic Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried inorganic P1 plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Organic Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75 Liquid limit - not dried Primarily organic matter, dark in color and organic odor Descriptive Terminology of Soil Standard D 2487 - 00 Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) Soils Classification Group MH Symbol Group Naive b GW Well -graded gravel GP Poorly graded gravel' GM Silty gravel df? GG Clayey gravel 1151 SW Well -graded sand" SP Poorly graded sand " SM Silty sand'9" SC Clayey sand''' CL Lean clay " ML Silt " ' , OL Organic clay ' OL Organic slit k a, Based on the material passing the 3 -in (75mm ) sieve. b. If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both. add `with cobbles or boulders or both' to croup name, c G = C3�1 D o C� = (D.)' D,, x D. d r soil contains>15 % sand, add `with sand' to group name. _ e Gravels with 5 to 12% Fines require dual symbols-. GWGM well -graded gravel with silt GW -GC well -graded gravel with clay GP -GM poorly graded gravel with silt GP -GG poorly graded gravel wilhl�lay f. If fines classify as CL -ML. use dual symbol GC -GM or SC -SM. g. If fines are organic, add `with organic Bnes'to group name. h. If soil contains Z 15% gravel. add "with gravel' to group name, i- Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SVV-SM well -graded sand with silt SW -SC well -graded sand with clay SP -SM poorly graded sand wlh silt SP -SC poorly graded sand with clay I- IfAtterberg limits plot in hatched area. soil is a CL -ML. silty clay. k It soil contains 10 to 29% plus No. 200, add -with sand' or "with graver whichever is predum inant. I- It sol contains�tW%plus No. 200, predominantly sand.. add "sandy'ta group name. m. It soil contains> 30% plus No. 200 predominantly gravel, add gravelly to group name, n. PI Z 4 and plots on or above 'A' fine. o. PI C 4 or plots below "A' line p. PI plots on or above "A" Eine. q. PI plots below "A' line 60 ZV 50 - o.41 40 - X 0 � 30 Zcl,-MH r OH 10 - , 7 - ML or OL 4 GL -r ML 0 I I 0 10 16 20 30 40 5o 60 70 80 90 100 110 CH Fat clay K ' m MH Elastic silt"'' OH Organic clay "' in, o OH Organic silt PT Peat Liquid Limit (LL) Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................... over 12" Laboratory Tests DD Dry density, pct OC Organic content. % WD Wet density, pcf S Percent of saturation. °o MC Natural moisture content, °% SG 5pecificgravity LL Ligiuid limit. % C Cohesion, psf PL Plastic limit_ % 0 Angle of internal friction PI Plasticity index. °% qu Unconfined compressive strength. psf P200 % passing 200 sieve qp Pocket penetrometer strength, tsf Particle Size Identification Boulders ............................... over 12" Cobbles --.-'----'------------- ----- - 3" to 12" Gravel edium......_........................... Medium.. ... . . Coarse ............................ 314" to 3" Fine ..--.----'---- ---------------- No_ 4 to 314" Sand Very stiff ................................... Coarse ....................:....... No. 4 to No. 10 Medium ........................... No 10 to No 40 Fine ................................. No. 40 to No. 200 Silt ....................................... No. 200, P!< 4 or below "A" line Cray ---------- ------ ------------------<No. 200, PI>4 and on or above "A` line Relative Density of Cohesionless Soils Very loose ................................ 0 to 4 BPF Loose -`------------ - - - - 5 to 10 BPF Medium dense ............. . .... 11 to 30 BPF Dense ...................................... 31 to 50 BPF Very dense ............................... over 50 BPF Consistency of Cohesive Soils Very soft -------- ------- ------ ------ ---' -- _ 0 to 1 BPF Soft ....................... ............... 2 to 3 BPF Rather soft ............................... 4 to 5 BPF edium......_........................... Medium.. ... . . 6 to a BPF Rather stiff ............. .................. 9 to 12 BPF Stiff --------------------------------------- 13 to 16 BPF Very stiff ................................... 17 to 30 BPF Hard ....................................... over 30 BPF Drilling Notes Standard penetration test borings were advanced by 3 114' or 6 114" ID hollow -stem augers unless noted otherwise; Jetting water was used to clean out auger prior to sampling only where indicated on logs. Standard penetration test borings are designated by the prefix "ST" (Split Tube). All samples were taken with the standard 2" OD split -tube sampler, except where noted Powerauger borings were advanced by 4" or 6" diameter continuous- fiight, solid -stem augers. Soil classifications and strata depths were in- ferred from disturbed samples augered to the surface and are, therefore. somewhat approximate- Power auger borings are designated by the prefix "B." Hand auger borings were advanced manually with a 1 112' of 3 114" diameter auger and were limited to the depth from which the auger could be manually withdrawn. Hand auger borings are indicated by the prefix H BPF: Numbers indicate blows per foot recorded in standard penetration test, also known as "N" value. The sampler was set 6" into undisturbed soil below the hollow -stem auger. Driving resistances were then counted for second and third 6" increments and added to get BPF. Where they differed significantly. they are reported in the following form, 2112 for the second and third 6" increments, respectively. WH: WH indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of hammer and rods atone; driving not required. WR: WR indicates the sampler penetrated soil under weight of rods atone; hammer weight and driving not required. TVV indicates thin-walled (undisturbed) tube sample. Note: Alf tests were run in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards. Rev 7107 Spaeth Industrial Park Site Improvement Project 108 Dundas Road Monticello, MN STORM SEWER PIPE SIZE ANALYSIS Prenared for: Ken Spaeth 108 Meadowlake Road SE St. Michael, MN 55376 Phone: (612) 889-3100 spaethmasonry@gmail.com Prepared bv: Civil Engineering Site Design PO Box 566 118 East Broadway St. Monticello, MN 55362 Contact: Scott Dahlke. Phone: (763) 314-0929 sdahlke@civilesd.com July 03, 2017 CESD Project # 00633 TABLE OF CONTENTS Narrative - Proposed Project - Site Location - Requirements - Summary - Certification Pipe Size Calculation Tabulation (Rational Method) - Model results generated by AutoCAD Sanitary and Storm Analysis for 10 yr rainfall event based on ATLAS 14 data Pipe Size Drainage Areas - AutoCAD Sanitary and Storm Analysis printed graphic - Pipe Size Drainage Areas Map Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 2 NARRATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT: The project proposes site improvements for multiple small industrial buildings. Site improvements include new buildings, pavement, utilities, and associated items. The project proposes collection of impervious surface drainage with storm sewer routed to a combination of an on-site stormwater management basin, and on-site storm sewer configured to function as an underground infiltration system, with overflow storm water routed to existing roadside ditch of Dundas Road. Stormwater in Dundas Road roadside ditch ultimately drains to an existing city regional storm water management pond located off-site. SITE LOCATION: The site address is 108 Dundas Road in the City of Monticello, MN. The project is in the SW 1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 14, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, MN. Access to the site can be achieved from Dundas Road along the north boundary. REQUIREMENTS: Stormwater management design for the project is subject to review by the City of Monticello. Pipe size analysis for on-site storm drainage is required. According to the Monticello regulations, the goal for the pipe size design is to control storm water runoff for the 10 -year storm event using ATLAS 14 rainfall data. SUMMARY: The attached pipe size calculation tabulations propose to satisfy the City of Monticello requirements. IN 21 A 0 1 a WIN 0 Is] ki F I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 07/03/2017 Scott Dahlke, P.E. Date Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello, MN Pipe Size Analysis Page 3 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Project Description Site Development Project File Name............................................................................. 00633 SPS Analysis 2017-07-03 plans.SPF Description............................................................................ Spaeth Industrial Park, Monticello Project Options FlowUnits............................................................................. CFS ElevationType...................................................................... Elevation Hydrology Method................................................................. Rational Time of Concentration (TOC) Method .................................. User -Defined Link Routing Method............................................................. Kinematic Wave Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes ...................................... YES Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods ............................ NO Analysis Options Start Analysis On.................................................................. Jul 03, 2017 00:00:00 End Analysis On................................................................... Jul 04, 2017 00:00:00 Start Reporting On................................................................ Jul 03, 2017 00:00:00 Antecedent Dry Days............................................................ 0 days Runoff (Dry Weather) Time Step .......................................... 0 01:00:00 days hh:mm:ss Runoff (Wet Weather) Time Step ........................................ 0 00:05:00 days hh:mm:ss Reporting Time Step............................................................ 0 00:05:00 days hh:mm:ss Routing Time Step................................................................ 30 seconds Number of Elements Rainfall Details Return Period........................................................................ 10 year(s) 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Qty RainGages........................................................................... 0 Su b b a s i n s.............................................................................. 26 Nodes.................................................................................... 24 Junctions...................................................................... 22 Ouffalls......................................................................... 1 FlowDiversions........................................................... 0 Inlets............................................................................ 0 Storage Nodes............................................................. 1 Links...................................................................................... 23 Channels...................................................................... 0 Pipes............................................................................ 23 Pumps.......................................................................... 0 Orifices......................................................................... 0 Weirs............................................................................ 0 Outlets.......................................................................... 0 Pollutants.............................................................................. 0 LandUses............................................................................ 0 Rainfall Details Return Period........................................................................ 10 year(s) 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin Summary Site Development Project SN Subbasin Area Weighted Total Total Total Peak Time of ID Runoff Rainfall Runoff Runoff Runoff Concentration Coefficient Volume 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 (a0.00 (daYs0 1 OffsiteToBasin 745.02 0.0500 0.93 0.05 O.V j0.24 00:10:00 2 OffsiteToCB07 37223.98 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.04 0 00:10:00 3 OffsiteToCB09 3610.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.02 0 00:10:00 4 OffsiteToCB11 7978.01 0.3500 0.93 0.33 0.06 0.36 0 00:10:00 5 OffsiteToCB13 26374.01 0.5800 0.93 0.54 0.33 1.97 0 00:10:00 6 OffsiteToCB15 37993.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.04 0.24 0 00:10:00 7 toBasin 17818.00 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.02 0.12 0 00:10:00 8 toCB01 2426.99 0.7000 0.93 0.65 0.04 0.22 0 00:10:00 9 toCB02 9701.99 0.7700 0.93 0.72 0.16 0.96 0 00:10:00 10 toCB03 10509.98 0.7300 0.93 0.68 0.16 0.99 0 00:10:00 11 toCB04 92113.02 0.7800 0.93 0.73 1.54 9.24 0 00:10:00 12 toCB05 7853.00 0.7100 0.93 0.66 0.12 0.72 0 00:10:00 13 toCB06 9624.02 0.8000 0.93 0.75 0.17 0.99 0 00:10:00 14 toCB07 8260.98 0.6800 0.93 0.64 0.12 0.72 0 00:10:00 15 toCB08 19762.00 0.7900 0.93 0.74 0.33 2.01 0 00:10:00 16 toCB09 2941.00 0.6200 0.93 0.58 0.04 0.24 0 00:10:00 17 toCB10 17209.99 0.8500 0.93 0.79 0.31 1.88 0 00:10:00 18 toCB11 10325.99 0.7300 0.93 0.68 0.16 0.97 0 00:10:00 19 toCB12 20571.99 0.8000 0.93 0.75 0.35 2.12 0 00:10:00 20 toCB13 11111.98 0.6900 0.93 0.64 0.16 0.99 0 00:10:00 21 toCB14 17209.99 0.8500 0.93 0.79 0.31 1.88 0 00:10:00 22 toCB15 9786.02 0.7400 0.93 0.69 0.16 0.93 0 00:10:00 23 toCB16 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 24 toCB17 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 25 toCB18 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 26 toCB19 689.99 0.0500 0.93 0.05 0.00 0.00 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Link Summary Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Element From To (Outlet) Length Inlet Outlet Average Diameter or Manning's Peak Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time Reported ID Type (Inlet) Node Invert Invert Slope Height Roughness Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Depth Depth/ Surcharged Condition Node Elevation Elevation Ratio Total Depth Ratio (ft) (ft) (ft) N (in) (cfs) (cfs) (fUsec) (ft) (min) 1 BasintoFES-B Pipe Basin FES -B 141.04 956.00 958.50 -1.7700 0.000 0.0150 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 CB01toFESA Pipe CB -01 FES -A 18.00 958.00 958.00 0.0000 15.000 0.0130 0.52 0.48 1.08 0.47 1.25 1.00 43.00 SURCHARGED 3 CB02toCB01 Pipe CB -02 CB -01 148.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.88 1.73 1.08 0.36 3.00 1.00 15.00 SURCHARGED 4 CB03toCB02 Pipe CB -03 CB -02 136.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.96 1.81 1.08 0.38 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 5 CB04toCB03 Pipe CB -04 CB -03 136.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 1.96 1.81 1.08 0.43 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 6 CB05toCB04 Pipe CB -05 CB -04 152.00 956.50 956.50 0.0000 36.000 0.0130 0.52 1.71 0.31 0.56 1.03 0.34 0.00 Calculated 7 CB07toFES-C Pipe CB -07 FES -D 16.00 957.00 957.00 0.0000 15.000 0.0130 0.55 0.51 1.08 0.55 1.25 1.00 18.00 SURCHARGED 8 CB08toCB01 Pipe CB -08 CB -01 144.00 957.70 957.40 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 2.55 1.00 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 9 CB08toFES-C Pipe CB -06 FES -C 15.00 957.50 957.50 0.0000 12.000 0.0130 0.31 0.29 1.08 0.67 1.00 1.00 13.00 SURCHARGED 10 CB09toCB08 Pipe CB -09 CB -08 144.00 958.00 957.70 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 0.25 1.63 0.15 2.67 0.26 0.26 0.00 Calculated 11 CB10toCB02 Pipe CB -10 CB -02 144.00 958.70 958.40 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 4.01 0.94 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 12 CB11toCB13 Pipe CB -11 CB -13 136.00 958.20 957.90 0.2200 12.000 0.0130 1.29 1.67 0.77 3.79 0.66 0.66 0.00 Calculated 13 CB12toCB03 Pipe CB -12 CB -03 144.00 957.60 957.30 0.2100 12.000 0.0130 1.76 1.63 1.08 3.63 1.00 1.00 3.00 SURCHARGED 14 CB13toCB15 Pipe CB -13 CB -15 136.00 957.90 957.60 0.2200 15.000 0.0130 3.28 3.03 1.08 3.02 1.25 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 15 CB14toCB15 Pipe CB -14 CB -15 144.00 958.70 957.60 0.7600 12.000 0.0130 1.85 3.11 0.60 5.92 0.55 0.55 0.00 Calculated 16 CB15toCB07 Pipe CB -15 CB -07 151.00 957.40 957.00 0.2600 18.000 0.0130 5.85 5.41 1.08 3.63 1.42 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 17 CB16toCB08 Pipe CB -16 CB -08 86.00 959.00 958.00 1.1600 12.000 0.0130 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.83 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 18 CB17toCB12 Pipe CB -17 CB -12 74.00 959.00 957.60 1.8900 12.000 0.0130 0.00 4.90 0.00 0.98 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 19 CB18toCB12 Pipe CB -18 CB -12 74.00 959.00 957.60 1.8900 12.000 0.0130 0.00 4.90 0.00 0.98 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 20 CB19toCB06 Pipe CB -19 CB -06 86.00 959.00 958.00 1.1600 12.000 0.0130 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.83 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 21 FES-BtoCB05 Pipe FES -B CB -05 12.00 958.50 958.50 0.0000 18.000 0.0130 0.00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 22 FES-CtoBasin Pipe FES -C Basin 38.82 957.50 956.00 3.8600 0.000 0.0150 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 23 FES-DtoBasin Pipe FES -D Basin 96.11 957.00 956.00 1.0400 0.000 0.0150 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 0710312017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin Hydrology Site Development Project Subbasin : OffsiteToBasin Input Data Area (ft') ....................................................... 745.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) .......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in) ............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.01 Rainfall Intensity ........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 745.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 745.01 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in) .......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in) ............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.01 Rainfall Intensity ........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB07 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 37223.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 37223.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 37223.98 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB09 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 3610.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 3610.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 3610.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.02 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB11 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 7978.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.3500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 3298.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 4680.00 - 0.00 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 7978.01 0.35 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.33 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.36 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.3500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB13 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 26374.01 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.5800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17588.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 8786.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 26374.01 0.58 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.54 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.97 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.5800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : OffsiteToCB15 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 37993.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 37993.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 37993.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toBasin Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft') ....................................................... 17818.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 17818.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17818.00 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.12 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB01 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 2426.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 1957.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 469.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 2426.99 0.70 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.65 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.22 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB02 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9701.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7700 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8762.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 939.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9701.99 0.77 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.72 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.96 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7700 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB03 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 10509.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8934.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1575.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 10509.98 0.73 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.68 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB04 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 92113.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8439.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 774.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9213.03 0.78 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.73 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 9.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB05 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 7853.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7100 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 6501.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1351.01 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 7852.99 0.71 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.66 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.72 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7100 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB06 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9624.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8990.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 634.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9624.02 0.80 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.75 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB07 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 8260.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6800 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 6492.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1769.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 8261.03 0.68 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.64 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.72 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6800 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB08 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 19762.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7900 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 18300.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1461.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 19761.99 0.79 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.74 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 2.01 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7900 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB09 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 2941.00 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6200 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 2093.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 847.98 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 2940.99 0.62 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.58 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.24 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6200 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB10 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 17209.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17209.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17209.99 0.85 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.79 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.88 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB11 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 10325.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8765.01 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1561.02 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 10326.03 0.73 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.68 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.97 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7300 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB12 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 20571.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 19232.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1339.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 20571.99 0.80 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.75 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 2.12 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8000 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB13 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 11111.98 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6900 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8934.98 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 2177.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 11111.98 0.69 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.64 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.99 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.6900 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB14 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 17209.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 17209.99 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 17209.99 0.85 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.79 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 1.88 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.8500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB15 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 9786.02 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7400 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 8445.02 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 1340.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 9786.01 0.74 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.69 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.93 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.7400 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB16 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB17 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB18 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Subbasin : toCB19 Site Development Project Input Data Area (ft2)....................................................... 689.99 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Runoff Coefficient Area Soil Runoff Soil/Surface Description (ft') Group Coeff. Impervious 0.00 A (0-2%) 0.85 Pervious 689.99 A (0-2%) 0.05 Composite Area & Weighted Runoff Coeff. 689.99 0.05 Subbasin Runoff Results Total Rainfall (in).......................................... 0.93 Total Runoff (in)............................................ 0.05 Peak Runoff (cfs)......................................... 0.00 Rainfall Intensity........................................... 5.604 Weighted Runoff Coefficient ........................ 0.0500 Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) ...... 0 00:10:00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Junction Input Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Invert Ground/Rim Ground/Rim Initial Initial Surcharge Surcharge Ponded Minimum ID Elevation (Max) (Max) Water Water Elevation Depth Area Pipe Elevation Offset Elevation Depth Cover (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) ft) (ft) (ftp) (in) 1 CB -01 956.58 961.20 4.70 956.50 0. 0 961.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2 CB -02 956.50 961.60 5.10 956.50 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 CB -03 956.50 961.10 4.60 956.50 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 CB -04 956.50 961.60 5.10 956.50 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 CB -05 956.50 961.40 4.90 956.50 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 CB -06 957.50 961.40 3.90 957.50 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 CB -07 957.00 961.40 4.40 957.00 0.00 961.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 CB -08 957.70 961.10 3.40 957.70 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 CB -09 958.00 961.20 3.20 95.80 -862.20 961.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 CB -10 958.70 961.90 3.20 958.70 0.00 961.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 CB -11 958.20 961.60 3.40 958.20 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 CB -12 957.60 961.10 3.50 957.60 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 CB -13 957.90 961.10 3.20 957.90 0.00 961.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 14 CB -14 958.70 961.90 3.20 958.70 0.00 961.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 15 CB -15 957.40 961.60 4.20 957.40 0.00 961.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 16 CB -16 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 CB -17 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 CB -18 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 19 CB -19 959.00 962.50 3.50 959.00 0.00 962.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 FES -B 958.50 960.50 2.00 958.50 0.00 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 FES -C 957.50 960.50 3.00 956.00 -1.50 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 FES -D 957.00 960.50 3.50 956.00 -1.00 960.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Time of Time of Total Total Time Max HGL Peak Flooded Flooded Occurrence Spaeth Industrial Park Volume Occurrence (days hh:mm) (days hh:mm) Monticello, MN (min) 0 00:03 0 00:11 0.97 44.00 0 00:05 0 00:10 0.41 Site Development Project Junction Results 0 00:09 0.45 17.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.04 17.00 SN Element Peak Peak Max HGL Max HGL Max Min Average HGL Average HGL ID Inflow Lateral Elevation Depth Surcharge Freeboard Elevation Depth 0 00:10 0 00:00 Inflow Attained Attained Depth Attained Attained Attained 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:07 Attained 0.02 5.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 (cfs) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 CB -01 3.70 0.22 961.20 4.70 0.00 0.00 958.13 1.63 2 CB -02 4.45 0.96 961.60 5.10 0.00 0.00 958.45 1.95 3 CB -03 4.52 0.99 961.10 4.60 0.00 0.00 957.35 0.85 4 CB -04 9.36 9.24 961.60 5.10 0.00 0.00 956.58 0.08 5 CB -05 0.72 0.72 958.50 2.00 0.00 2.90 958.50 2.00 6 CB -06 0.99 0.99 961.40 3.90 0.00 0.00 958.03 0.53 7 CB -07 6.65 0.96 961.40 4.40 0.00 0.00 957.06 0.06 8 CB -08 2.24 2.01 961.10 3.40 0.00 0.00 958.01 0.31 9 CB -09 0.26 0.26 958.27 0.27 0.00 2.93 958.00 0.00 10 CB -10 1.88 1.88 961.90 3.20 0.00 0.00 958.71 0.01 11 CB -11 1.33 1.33 958.87 0.67 0.00 2.73 958.21 0.01 12 CB -12 2.13 2.12 961.10 3.50 0.00 0.00 957.62 0.02 13 CB -13 4.17 2.95 961.10 3.20 0.00 0.00 957.92 0.02 14 CB -14 1.88 1.88 959.26 0.56 0.00 2.64 958.71 0.01 15 CB -15 6.03 1.18 961.60 4.20 0.00 0.00 957.62 0.22 16 CB -16 0.00 0.00 959.03 0.03 0.00 3.47 959.00 0.00 17 CB -17 0.00 0.00 959.02 0.02 0.00 3.48 959.00 0.00 18 CB -18 0.00 0.00 959.02 0.02 0.00 3.48 959.00 0.00 19 CB -19 0.00 0.00 959.03 0.03 0.00 3.47 959.00 0.00 20 FES -B 0.00 0.00 958.50 0.00 0.00 2.00 958.50 0.00 21 FES -C 0.31 0.00 958.50 1.00 0.00 2.00 957.51 0.01 22 FES -D 0.55 0.00 958.25 1.25 0.00 2.25 957.02 0.02 Time of Time of Total Total Time Max HGL Peak Flooded Flooded Occurrence Flooding Volume Occurrence (days hh:mm) (days hh:mm) (ac -in) (min) 0 00:03 0 00:11 0.97 44.00 0 00:05 0 00:10 0.41 21.00 0 00:04 0 00:09 0.45 17.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.04 17.00 0 00:00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:03 0 00:10 0.08 14.00 0 00:02 0 00:10 1.11 19.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.03 6.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:08 0 00:10 0.01 3.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.02 5.00 0 00:07 0 00:10 0.06 6.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:08 0 00:10 0.03 4.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:10 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:04 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0 00:03 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Pipe Input SN Element ID 1 BasintoFES-B 2 CB01toFESA 3 CB02toCB01 4 CB03toCB02 5 CB04toCB03 6 CB05toCB04 7 CB07toFES-C 8 CB08toCB01 9 CB08toFES-C 10 CB09toCB08 11 CB10toCB02 12 CB11toCB13 13 CB12toCB03 14 CB13toCB15 15 CB14toCB15 16 CB15toCB07 17 CB16toCB08 18 CB17toCB12 19 CB18toCB12 20 CB19toCB06 21 FES-BtoCB05 22 FES-CtoBasin 23 FES-DtoBasin Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project Length Inlet Inlet Outlet Outlet Total Average Pipe Exit/Bend Invert Invert Invert Invert Drop Slope Shape Roughness Elevatii(on Offset Elevation Offset Losses Flow (()) Barrels Height 141.Oft4 956.0 0.00 9585ft0 0.00 -25ft0 -1.7700 Dummy 18.00 958.00 1.50 958.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 148.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 136.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 136.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 152.00 956.50 0.00 956.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 16.00 957.00 0.00 957.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 144.00 957.70 0.00 957.40 0.90 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 15.00 957.50 0.00 957.50 0.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.00 0.00 957.70 0.00 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.70 0.00 958.40 1.90 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 136.00 958.20 0.00 957.90 0.00 0.30 0.2200 CIRCULAR 144.00 957.60 0.00 957.30 0.80 0.30 0.2100 CIRCULAR 136.00 957.90 0.00 957.60 0.20 0.30 0.2200 CIRCULAR 144.00 958.70 0.00 957.60 0.20 1.10 0.7600 CIRCULAR 151.00 957.40 0.00 957.00 0.00 0.40 0.2600 CIRCULAR 86.00 959.00 0.00 958.00 0.30 1.00 1.1600 CIRCULAR 74.00 959.00 0.00 957.60 0.00 1.40 1.8900 CIRCULAR 74.00 959.00 0.00 957.60 0.00 1.40 1.8900 CIRCULAR 86.00 959.00 0.00 958.00 0.50 1.00 1.1600 CIRCULAR 12.00 958.50 0.00 958.50 2.00 0.00 0.0000 CIRCULAR 38.82 957.50 0.00 956.00 0.00 1.50 3.8600 Dummy 96.11 957.00 0.00 956.00 0.00 1.00 1.0400 Dummy 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Pipe Pipe Manning's Entrance Exit/Bend Additional Initial Flap No. of Diameter or Width Roughness Losses Losses Losses Flow Gate Barrels Height inl J0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 nO No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 36.000 36.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 15.000 15.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 18.000 18.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 12.000 12.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 18.000 18.000 0.0130 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 0.000 0.000 0.0150 0.5000 0.5000 0.0000 0.00 No 1 Pipe Results Spaeth Industrial Park Monticello, MN Site Development Project SN Element Peak Time of Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Travel Peak Flow Peak Flow Total Time Froude Reported ID Flow Peak Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Time Depth Depth/ Surcharged Number Condition Occurrence Ratio Total Depth Ratio (cfs) (days hh:mm) (cfs) (ft/sec) (min) (ft) (min) 1 BasintoFES-B 0.00 0 00:00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 CB01toFESA 0.52 0 00:47 0.48 1.08 0.47 0.64 1.25 1.00 43.00 SURCHARGED 3 CB02toCB01 1.88 0 00:11 1.73 1.08 0.36 6.85 3.00 1.00 15.00 SURCHARGED 4 CB03toCB02 1.96 0 00:09 1.81 1.08 0.38 5.96 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 5 CB04toCB03 1.96 0 00:20 1.81 1.08 0.43 5.27 3.00 1.00 12.00 SURCHARGED 6 CB05toCB04 0.52 0 00:20 1.71 0.31 0.56 4.52 1.03 0.34 0.00 Calculated 7 CB07toFES-C 0.55 0 00:02 0.51 1.08 0.55 0.48 1.25 1.00 18.00 SURCHARGED 8 CB08toCB01 1.76 0 00:09 1.63 1.08 2.55 0.94 1.00 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 9 CB08toFES-C 0.31 0 00:03 0.29 1.08 0.67 0.37 1.00 1.00 13.00 SURCHARGED 10 CB09toCB08 0.25 0 00:11 1.63 0.15 2.67 0.90 0.26 0.26 0.00 Calculated 11 CB10toCB02 1.76 0 00:12 1.63 1.08 4.01 0.60 0.94 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 12 CB11toCB13 1.29 0 00:10 1.67 0.77 3.79 0.60 0.66 0.66 0.00 Calculated 13 CB12toCB03 1.76 0 00:09 1.63 1.08 3.63 0.66 1.00 1.00 3.00 SURCHARGED 14 CB13toCB15 3.28 0 00:13 3.03 1.08 3.02 0.75 1.25 1.00 4.00 SURCHARGED 15 CB14toCB15 1.85 0 00:10 3.11 0.60 5.92 0.41 0.55 0.55 0.00 Calculated 16 CB15toCB07 5.85 0 00:12 5.41 1.08 3.63 0.69 1.42 0.94 0.00 > CAPACITY 17 CB16toCB08 0.00 0 00:11 3.84 0.00 0.83 1.73 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 18 CB17toCB12 0.00 0 00:10 4.90 0.00 0.98 1.26 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 19 CB18toCB12 0.00 0 00:10 4.90 0.00 0.98 1.26 0.02 0.02 0.00 Calculated 20 CB19toCB06 0.00 0 00:11 3.84 0.00 0.83 1.73 0.03 0.03 0.00 Calculated 21 FES-BtoCB05 0.00 0 00:00 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 22 FES-CtoBasin 0.31 0 00:03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 23 FES-DtoBasin 0.55 0 00:02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Calculated 07/03/2017 CESD No. 00633 Ito A!077 NVId SV3tlV 3'JVNIVIi0 w°''va°�'^"^^"` i i uvv� I laar. o> = vvr c 3ZI$ 3dld W1i01$ I9C659�n o9e�quoryd — W 3]WJS ]YOLLb3A 3]WJS ]YINOZIbOH 4$ A8 Q3NO3N0 W O N 4 -—N9/S3Q 3175 a— \ vl Z9S49 N'-116013uoyy as ,�a aaNslsaa P hl supun90l ONIN33N/'JN37/AL7 L9 a3aYd]ad po Q � eo se un z $ NHVd ivialsn(Ml N �b as a NMYdO o o H13`ddS A >,u ,liq woe�ie :o. y >, w i s ec woW nyi low yya ,rvany / 4 T t Z p E 3 a r O LO Ln r fId (reserved for recording information) STORMWATER FACILITIES MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and , a Minnesota limited liabilitv companv ("Owner"). 1. BACKGROUND. Owner is the fee owner of certain property located within the City of Monticello, County of Wright, State of Minnesota legally described as follows: Parcel ID No. Lot X, Block X, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract/Torrens Property) having a street address of , Monticello, MN 55362 ("Subject Property"). Owner is intending to construct certain private stormwater facilities on the subject property as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". The private stormwater consists of an underground and above ground infiltration system and sump catch basins. Drainage of stormwater from the site consists of stormsewer at a shallow grade. The Owner is responsible for inspecting and maintaining the entire system. Owner will be responsible for ensuring the system is designed to visually verify that it is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less and there is adequate maintenance access. Documentation of inspection and maintenance is required 1 and shall be furnished upon request by the City. The MPCA Stormwater Manual will be used for reference for this operation and maintenance plan. The recommended frequency of inspections is outlined in the MPCA Stormwater Manual and there are templates that can be used for documentation. This agreement is in accordance with the City of Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 4: Finishing Standards; Section 4.10 Grading, Drainage, Stormwater Management and Erosion Control; Maintenance of Private Stormwater Management Facilities. 2. MAINTENANCE. The Owner shall inspect, maintain, operate and replace in a good state of repair and safe condition all stormwater facilities, including, without limitation, drainage swales, storm sewer systems, infiltration basins, sedimentation basins and ponding systems on the subject property to ensure that the stormwater facilities ("Facilities") function as intended. Now, therefore, it is mutually agreed by and between all parties: A. Owner, at its expense, shall be responsible for the inspection and maintenance of the Facilities so that the Facilities function properly. Owner shall submit a report to the City, upon request, that includes the inspection date(s) of the Facilities, conditions of the Facilities, testing of the Facilities and any corrective actions taken. B. Owner shall annually in the Fall inspect and document inflow points and infiltration surface for buildup of road sand associated with spring melt period, remove as necessary and replant areas that have been impacted by sand/salt build up. C. The following operational maintenance activities shall be performed on all Facilities on an annual basis or as needed: 1. Removal of trash and debris, 2. Inspection of sump catch basins, inlets and outlets monthly, 3. Removal of sediments when the storage volume or conveyance capacity of the stormwater management system is below design levels 4. Ensure systems designed for infiltration are drawing down within 48 hours, infiltration testing is performed as identified in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Stormwater Manual and 5. Stabilization and restoration of eroded areas. 2 D. If the Facilities are not functioning as designed and permitted, operational maintenance must be performed immediately to restore the system. If operational maintenance measures are insufficient to enable the system to meet the design and performance standards of this chapter, the permittee must either replace the system or construct an alternative design. E. In the event the Owner fails to maintain the Facilities in good working condition acceptable to the City, the City may enter upon the Property and take such steps as are necessary to correct deficiencies identified in the inspection report and to charge the costs of such repairs to the Owner. This provision shall not be construed to allow the City to erect any structure of permanent nature on the land of the Owner for the stormwater facilities. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City is under no obligation to routinely maintain or repair said facilities, and in no event shall this Agreement be construed to impose any such obligation on the City. The Owner grants to the City, its authorized agents and employees, a non-exclusive, perpetual easement over, across, under and through the Property for such purposes. This maintenance agreement is a personal obligation of Owner and shall be binding upon the executors, administrators, successors, heirs and assigns of Owner. 3. RECORDING. This Agreement shall be recorded against the title to the subject property and shall be binding upon Owner, its/their assigns, heirs and successors in interest. CITY OF MONTICELLO BY: (SEAL) Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument ,20 , by THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 SRN:ms PROPERTY OWNER: was acknowledged before me NOTARY PUBLIC 5 this day of EXHIBIT "A" SKETCH DEPICTING STORMWATER FACILITIES WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. July 19, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spaeth Industrial Park Final Stage PUD- Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 02596-420 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the revised civil plans and stormwater report, dated July 3, 2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below noted in orange to the applicant's July 12, 2017 responses noted in blue. Stormwater Management 1. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Response: Geotechnical report with field soil borings has been completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services. Soils as identified in the report are consistent with type A soils and were found to be consistent across the site. Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal Spaeth Industrial Park July 19, 2017 Page 2 2. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: Response: Geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services included a double - ring infiltrometer test at the location of the proposed south infiltration basin. Result of the double -ring infiltrometer test is 54.01 in/hr. The applicant proposed to amend the soils of the infiltration basin. Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. 3. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. Response: Amended soils are proposed to be placed in the bottom of the south infiltration basin to reduce infiltration rate. Amended soils are to consist of 70%-80% sand, and 20%-30% compost MnDOT Grade 2. Surface area of stormwater control measure (BMP)(W) < 1000 1004 to 5000 5000 to 10000 5161016 Barings Pits Permeameter tests 1 s 5 2 2 10 3 3 15 41 41 2C' - Ian additional soil boringvr pit should be oampleted for each additinnar 2,500 ft} above 12r560 fe San additional fare permeametertests should be completed for each additionA 5.000 ft' above 15r0 13 ft° Infiltration rates in infiltration areas should be verified in the field after soil amendments are implemented. 4. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. Response: Hydrocad model calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. Modifications have been incorporated with increased discharge to Dundas Road K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal\LTR-a-Schumann-Spaeth PUD071917.docx Spaeth Industrial Park July 19, 2017 Page 3 roadside ditch that ultimately drains to city regional pond. Discharge from 2yr storm event proposed conditions is slightly higher than existing conditions (0.04cfs vs 0.03cfs). Discharge from 10yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (0.12cfs vs 0.61 cfs). Discharge from 100yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (4.03cfs vs 6.59cfs). Update table in memo indicating the total discharge rates leaving the site, including discharge from the perforated pipe system. Regional ponding is required as rates are not being maintained onsite. Grading and Drainage Plan 5. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Response: EOF overflow elevation has been added to the plan. The EOF should be clearly called out on Sheet C2. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 6. An 8"x6" tee should be noted on the plans instead of 6"x6" for the water services to the buildings. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. i, e. oql Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\02596-420\Admin\Docs\070617 resubmittal\LTR-a-Schumann-Spaeth PUD071917.docx Civil Engineering Site Design 118 East Broadway St., PO Box 566, Monticello MN 55362 Phone: 763-314-0929 www.civilesd.com July 12, 2017 City of Monticello Attn: Ms. Shibani Bisson, City Engineer 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Spaeth Industrial Park Dear Ms. Bisson, This letter is written with item by item responses to comments dated 05/31/16 by WSB and Associates which is a review of plans by CESD dated 05/08/2017. Responses are in blue color text. Revisions have been incorporated on site plans with revision date 07/03/2017. Stormwater Management 1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with 0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant, such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake. Ultimately the proposed stormwater management Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 2 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 system is privately owned and maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent properties if properly maintained. Response: Discharge of stormwater to Dundas Road roadside ditch is the only viable option for the project. Storm sewer routing has been modified to direct as much site drainage as possible to the infiltration basin at the south end of the site. Discharge pipe from the basin along east side has been increased in size, and outlet elevation at Dundas Road roadside ditch has been adjusted to provide increase discharge rate for large rainfall events. System will be privately owned and maintained and will not impact adjacent properties. 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and repair problem areas if the system fails. Response: Understood. 3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the system must be designed for adequate maintenance access. Response: Catch basins or catch basin manholes are provided throughout the system that will function for monitoring and maintenance access. 4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. Response: Geotechnical report with field soil borings has been completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services. Soils as identified in the report are consistent with type A soils and were found to be consistent across the site. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 3 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes. Response: Soil borings completed at the site by Haugo Geotechnical Services found no evidence of ground water with 15 feet of the ground surface. Therefore, there is no ground water within 3 feet of the infiltration practice. 6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: Surface area of stormwater control measure (BMP)(ft) < 1040 1000 to 5000 5000 to 10000 710000 Barings 1 Pits 1 Perm eameter tests 5 10 15 2 2 3 41 3 41 201 tan additional soil boring ar pit should be completed for each additional 2,500 ftx above 12,540 ft, San additional fare permeametertests should be completed for each add itional5,04fl ft; above 15r404 ftp Response: Geotechnical report by Haugo Geotechnical Services included a double -ring infiltrometer test at the location of the proposed south infiltration basin. Result of the double -ring infiltrometer test is 54.01 in/hr. 7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 4 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 Response: Amended soils are proposed to be placed in the bottom of the south infiltration basin to reduce infiltration rate. Amended soils are to consist of 70%-80% sand, and 20%-30% compost MnDOT Grade 2. 8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: • The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. • Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps • Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps Response: Rational method calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. 9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. Response: Hydrocad model calculations dated 07/03/2017 have been submitted. Modifications have been incorporated with increased discharge to Dundas Road roadside ditch that ultimately drains to city regional pond. Discharge from 2yr storm event proposed conditions is slightly higher than existing conditions (0.04cfs vs 0.03cfs). Discharge from 10yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (0.12cfs vs 0.61 cfs). Discharge from 100yr storm event proposed conditions is less than existing conditions (4.03cfs vs 6.59cfs). 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual - updated May 2017 located on the City's website- Engineering department. Response: Understood. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 5 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 HvdroCAD Model 11. The proposed stormwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year HWL elevation. Response: Further discussion is needed. Given the existing soils at the site, capacity for infiltration, and system volume capacity, limiting starting water elevation to 958.7 is not appropriate. 12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South). Response: Discharge rates to various directions has been indicated in Drainage Analysis report dated 07/03/2017. 13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed subcatchments based on land cover and average slope. Response: Time of concentrations used in the model are understood to be appropriate for development proposed. 14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY). Response: Modification has been incorporated. SWPPP Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements. 15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as necessary. Response: Additional notes to be added to the plan. 16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil Response: Additional notes have been added to the plan. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 6 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. Response: Understood. 18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the south property boundary. This note is incorrect. Response: Notes have been modified. Site Plan 19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site, however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area. Response: Vehicle circulation plan dated 07/03/2017 using WB -50 Truck has been submitted. Grading and Drainage Plan 20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Response: EOF overflow elevation has been added to the plan. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as - built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. Response: Note added. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 7 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. Response: Undertood. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. Response: Understood. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Response: Understood. Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan 25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience. Response: Pipe manufacture/supplier confirmed the perforated pipe is designed to handle H-25 loading. 26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5. Response: Pipe label has been added. Site Details 27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007. Response: City detail 4007 has been added. 28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance. Response: City detail 6003 has been added. 29. Include City Detail Response: City details as appropriate have been added. Response to City Engineering comments 05/31/2017 Page 8 of 8 Spaeth Industrial Park July 12, 2017 30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Response: City details as appropriate have been added. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding the responses to comments and/or revised plans. Sincerely, Civil Engineering Design, LLC Scott Dahlke Professional Engineer Cc: File 00633 1WSB Building a legacy — Your legacy. May 31, 2017 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Spaeth Industrial Park Preliminary Development Stage PUD -Site Plan Review City Project No. 2017-017 WSB Project No. 02596-420 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the civil plans, dated May 8, 2017 and the drainage analysis dated May 8, 2017, as prepared by Civil Engineering Site Design and offer the following comments below and on the enclosed is a stormwater plan review checklist. Stormwater Management 1. Proposed stormwater management for the site includes an underground infiltration system consisting of perforated storm sewer under a majority of the paved areas with 0% grades and an infiltration basin along the south property line. The ultimate discharge elevation of this system to the ditch along Dundas Road is at an elevation of 958.7 feet which is 1.7 feet above the infiltration system elevation of 957.0. This creates a situation where, apart from infiltration, runoff will only leave the site after water builds up 1.7 feet. In the event that the infiltration system plugs up and fails, the underground pipe network will be filled with water. Flat pipes across the entire site will likely result in maintenance problems. This is not an ideal or a recommended design if not properly maintained, as it could create a risk for on-site flooding. City staff has discussed alternate stormwater management techniques with the applicant, such as outletting the system to the south east corner of the property and directing it to the ditch/channel that serves the industrial park or filling the site to provide a positive outlet. There are additional property constraints and costs associated with these alternatives that the applicant has reviewed and has chosen not to undertake. Ultimately the proposed stormwater management system is privately owned and maintained and should not impact the City's ditch/channel system and adjacent properties if properly maintained. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\02596-420\Adm1n\Docs\050817 submittal Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 2 2. An operation and maintenance plan for the stormwater management system is required. The City will provide an operation and maintenance plan for the owner to sign. At a minimum the plan will include: an inspection schedule/frequency for the infiltration system and maintenance schedule for cleaning out the sumps. The proposed site design must provide for a means to visually inspect and maintain the entire system. This will require visual ports throughout the site, in order to locate and repair problem areas if the system fails. 3. The infiltration system should be designed to provide a means to visually verify that the system is discharging through the soil surface within 48 hours or less. Also, the system must be designed for adequate maintenance access. 4. The NRCS Soil Survey indicates HSG B soils throughout the site and contributing offsite area. The HydroCAD model and narrative should be updated to reflect type B soils. Infiltration rates surrounding the perforated pipe system should be updated according to those listed in the Minnesota Stormwater Manual. 5. Depth to groundwater and bedrock must be confirmed in the proposed infiltration areas to ensure infiltration is not being proposed within 3 feet of the seasonally high water table or bedrock. This information should be obtained from a soil boring investigation. Soil classifications from the investigation can be used for preliminary design purposes. Soil borings should extend to a minimum of 5 feet below the bottom of the infiltration practice. The lowest (i.e. most restrictive) infiltration rate within 5 feet shall be used for design purposes. 6. Because the entire site is underlain by the infiltration area, confirmation of design infiltration rates during construction should be completed. The infiltration system needs to be confirmed that it will function as it was designed with preliminary estimates. This can be accomplished by performing infiltration testing, such as double ring infiltrometer tests. The MPCA guide for determining the number of infiltration tests and borings is provided here: 7rereaitormwater control measure (BMF)(ft) i000 to 5000 50M to 40000 (>1©U00 borings Fits Fermeameter tests 5 2 2 10 3 3 15 41 41 202 'an additional soil boring or pit should be completed for each additional 2,509 fr above 12,500 fit= tan additional five permeameter tests should be completed for each additional 3,W ft2 alawe 15,004 dtt KA02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 3 7. Soils that have infiltration rates more than 8.3 inches per hour must be amended to slow the infiltration rate below 8.3 inches per hour, per the CSWGP. The CSWGP does allow for the local unit of government (the City) flexibility with this rate criteria. 8. Provide rational method calculations confirming adequacy of the storm sewer design for the 10 -year storm event. Calculations should adhere to the following guidelines: • The rational method runoff coefficient (c) is designated by land use and should be assigned a value no less than 0.7. • Minimum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 3.0 fps • Maximum allowable velocity in closed conduit = 12.0 fps 9. Rate control is assumed to be accommodated in the existing north -south ditch/channel and downstream pond located on the north side of Chelsea Road, just west of Fallon Avenue at the City's water reservoir site. The applicant has indicated they are providing rate control with the infiltration system and shall revise the system as needed. 10. Grading, drainage and erosion control shall comply with City's zoning ordinance. See Chapter 4, section 4.10 related to grading, drainage, stormwater management and erosion control and the City's Design Manual- updated May 2017 located on the City's website- Engineering department. HvdroCAD Model 11. The proposed stoimwater management system (as it currently is designed) should be modeled with a starting water elevation of 958.7 feet for establishing the 100 year HWL elevation. 12. Proposed discharge rates exceed existing in the 2 -year event. Rates should be summarized at each point of discharge from the site (North, East and South). 13. Time of concentrations should be updated to more accurately reflect the proposed subcatchments based on land cover and average slope. 14. There is a discrepancy in the primary outlet device from Pond Pl, labelled 15" in the model and 18" in the plans. If the pipe is designed to be an 18 -inch RCP, additional rip -rap is required (3.6 CY rather than 2.9 CY). SWPPP Refer to the MPCA's SWPPP Checklist for a complete list of requirements. 15. Describe the procedures to amend the SWPPP and establish additional ESC BMPs as necessary. 16. Describe methods used to minimize soil compaction and preserve topsoil K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\SpaethDmInageReview 053117.do Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 4 17. Since 1 acre or more of the site is being disturbed, a NPDES/SDS Construction Storm Water General Permit and SWPPP shall be provided with the grading permit or with the building permit application for review, prior to construction commencing. 18. The SWPPP mentions select roof drainage is directed to the wetland adjacent to the south property boundary. This note is incorrect. Site Plan 19. Provide a truck turning template for a semi -truck accessing the truck access areas on the site. The applicant has indicated that semi trucks will not be entering the site, however it does, the City would like a template showing how circulation will be accomplished and the ability for trucks to be contained within the curbed area. Grading and Drainage Plan 20. Clearly define an emergency overflow elevation (EOF) on the plans. Sanitary and Water Utilitv Plan 21. A note should be added to the plans that the City will not be responsible for any additional costs incurred that is associated with variations in the utility as -built elevations. These elevations shall be verified in the field prior to construction. 22. The development agreement will include language on City maintenance of the sanitary sewer mainline and watermain system within the site. 23. A utility excavation permit must be obtained from the Public Works department prior to commencement of utility connections. 24. Provide an as -built utility plan once construction is complete. Storm Sewer Utilitv Plan 25. Confirm that the HDPE perforated pipe being proposed under pavement throughout the site is designed to handle the loads it will experience. 26. Label the storm sewer pipe between CB -3 and CB -5. Site Details 27. It is recommended to add a trash guard for flared end sections per City Detail 4007. 28. Include City Detail 6003- Mud Mat Construction Entrance. K:\02596420\Admin\Docs\050817 submittal\Spaeth Dr inageRevie% 053117.doa Spaeth Industrial Park May 31, 2017 Page 5 29. Include City Detail 30. Applicable detail plates shall be updated per the City's April 2017 General Specifications and Standard Detail Plates for Street and Utility Construction located on the City's website- Engineering department. Please have the applicant provide a written response addressing the comments above. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE City Engineer cc: Steve Grittman, NAC skb K:\0259"20\Admin\Docs\0508175ubmittal\SpaethDrainageReview 053117.doa t ;•«.- =..r i �'� �r Jst <rtt w... 4',t• ra la-:.. � •tr« i •{���a`.,, . .- . 41. ;'•i/r9 .7 �{:;e � _'`. 'i'r �:! .•�`r T e«."•'• +•1��� . -. - .. ..�ra - 1Qwk • f� >�<-tit ' }'- � • .t�„ ` '�t ..`, •w ! , �, tt ,r•'�''. :i"<'"1's: i� p tl�►r ,ri �:. i1, •'".: �• ,t►+. `�. _ - m s s, • t"iit T's".�v�i ., r" •ii � , c � a M � ' • • i �.'r , � is ir•�, r1 >•�/�+. �`f t AMoCIiiAo City of Monticello — Stormwater Site Plan Review 107 Dundas Road, Address: Monticello, MN Permit No: PID: I Date Approved: Date Received: 5/12/2017 Signature: Area of Site Size (acres): 14.40 Disturbance(acres): 1 4.60 ExistingI Proposed Impervious (acres): 0.06 Impervious (acres): 1 3.38 A Stormwater Management Plan is required for: Any land disturbing activity that may ultimately result in the addition of one acre or greater of impervious surfaces, including smaller individual sites that are part of a common plan of development that may be constructed at different times. The construction of any new public or private road; or - Any land disturbance activity, regardless of size, that the City determines is likely to cause an adverse impact to an environmentally sensitive area or other property. Submittals Received Date Document Author 5/8/17 Preliminary Plat, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/8/17 Civil Site Plans, Spaeth Industrial Park Scott Dahlke, Civil Engineering Site Design 5/Scott Dahlke, Civil8;'17 Drainage Analysis, Spaeth Industrial Park Engineering Site Design 5/5/17I Spaeth Project Narrative I Ken Spaeth, Ken Spaeth Masonry General Site Plan Yes No 1. Scale of Survey. Minimum scale 1" = 50'. Maximum size plan sheet 24" x 36" ® ❑ 2. Survey signed by a registered survey with elevations in NGVD-1929 datum for the following locations: • Each lot corner ® ❑ • Grade elevation at the foundation and elevation of top of foundation of structures on N ❑ adjacent lots • Grade elevation at the foundation, elevation of top of foundation and garage floor of © ❑ proposed new construction • Lowest point of entry (i.e. door sill or top of window well) of proposed and existing © 7 construction • Lowest floor of proposed and existing construction ® ❑ 3. Any proposed retaining wall must have a top and bottom elevation and bottom elevation ❑ ❑ would be finish grade. Also, no retaining wall is allowed to be built on private property October 2016 4. Retaining walls greater than 4.0 feet in height have been designed and certified by a ❑ ❑ licensed professional engineer and a building permit has been acquired 9. Waste control 5. All drainage and utility easements are shown? N ❑ 6. Easements are clear of any encroachments? N ❑ 7. New curb cuts proposed? ❑ ❑ 8. If new curb cut is proposed, stamp all survey maps with the curb cut stamp. Also, write a N ❑ note on the Residential Plan & Routing Approval form reminding the builder that a curb ❑ ❑ cut permit is required if the driveway is moved or a new driveway is added N ❑ 9. Low floor a minimum of 4.25' (feet) above the sanitary sewer invert elevation N ❑ Comments: N ❑ Erosion/Sediment Control Plan Yes 1. SWPPP notes provided on the plan 2. Temporary stabilization measures provided 3. Erosion control blankets provided on all slopes greater than 3:1 4. Perimeter Control i.e., Silt Fence, Filter Log, etc. 5. Phasing for sites that are > 1 acre 6. CB Inlet Protection 7. Dewatering 8. Sediment control 9. Waste control 10. Concrete washout 11. Rock entrance N N El N N 12. Street sweeping schedule ❑ 13. Permanent restoration plan N 14. Erosion protection at all outlet pipes N 15. SWPPP includes an erosion and sediment control inspection schedule and person ❑ responsible for maintenance Comments: A street sweeping schedule needs to be added to the SWPPP. FI Provide the name and contact information of the person responsible for SWPPP implementation and long term operations and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management system, including certification number. Stormwater Management Plan '1 Yes 4 No 4 1. Delineation maps for existing and proposed conditions N ❑ 2. Modeling calculations for existing and proposed conditions using Atlas 14 storm events with an MSE3 type distribution. • 2 year 24 hr. (2.84"), 10 year 24 hr. (4.22"), 100 (6.87"), 10 -day snowmelt (7.211) N ❑ • Modeled direct connected impervious separate N ❑ 3. Off-site drainage included N ❑ 4. Wetlands shown on plans and wetland permitting completed ❑ N 5. Pretreatment N ❑ October 2016 6. Skimmer structures provided on the outlets of all ponds. ❑ ❑ 7. Soil borings ❑ N 8. Design Infiltration Rate Determination — Geotechnical Report or Infiltration Testing ❑ ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria provided ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? 9. Seasonal High Water Elevation ❑ 10. Open channel flow calculations ❑ 171 11. Storm sewer calculations — 10 year event ❑ N 12. Narrative describing the following: a. Existing Conditions: Yes b. Proposed Conditions: Yes c. Stormwater Management for Proposed Site: Yes Comments: Separation distance from bottom of infiltration features to seasonally high water table and bedrock must be determined. Amended soils are being proposed within infiltration basin, but soil borings should be taken to confirm infiltration rates of the soils surrounding the perforated pipe (MRCS soil survey indicates HSG B) Provide operation and maintenance plans for the sumps and infiltration system. Water Quality and Volume Reduction "The Chy of Monticello has adopted MPC4 Minimal Impact Design Standards in Chapter 4 of Monticello Zoning Ordinance Section 4.10. MIDs Infiltration design criteria as described in the MPC4 Stormwater Manual .shall be followed for the proposed project. " Yes 4 No � 1. Volume control provided as per the City's Engineering Design Standards and M1DS (1.1" ® ❑ over new impervious surface) 2. Impervious area equal to or greater than the net increase in impervious surface is routed ® ❑ through infiltration BMP 3. Sequencing provided for alternatives where infiltration is infeasible ❑ ❑ 13494 4. Required Volume Reduction: Cf 5. Provided Volume Reduction: 35993cf 6. Separation to groundwater and/or bedrock is a minimum of 3 feet from bottom of ❑ infiltration BMP 7. Drawdown time for infiltration BMP is within 48 hours N ❑ 8. Proposed ponds meet or exceed NURP design criteria ❑ ❑ 9. If infiltration of LF' is not feasible, water quality goals are met with NURP pond on site? ❑ ❑ Comments: Rate Control I Yes J No 4 1 October 2016 1. Peak Proposed Discharge Rates < Existing ❑ N 2. Existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 year storm? ❑ ❑ 3. Existing infrastructure and EOF for proposed 100 year peak discharge rate? ❑ N 4. Proposed flow patterns do not create flooding impacts for structures adjacent to the N ❑ property? Comments: Rates exceeded in 2 -year event Provide rational storm sewer design sheet to demonstrate existing infrastructure can accommodate peak discharge rates for 10 -year Define an EOF for 100 -year event Yes J No 1. Building Opening: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of local basins, wetlands, & infiltration basins N ❑ • 2' above the 100 -yr flow elevation of a swale or channel at the point where the swale N ❑ channel is closest to the building 2. Low Floor Elevation: • 2' above the critical 100 -yr HWL of major basins N ❑ • 2' above EOF of major basins ® ❑ • For landlocked basins: 2' above the HWL from back to back 100 -yr rainfalls or 2' above the HWL from the 100 -yr 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. Starting elevation of the basin/waterbody prior to runoff is one of the following: o Existing Ordinary High Water level established by the Minnesota Department ❑ ❑ of Natural Resources o Annual water balance calculation approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Local observation well records, as approved by the City ❑ ❑ o Mottled soil ❑ ❑ October 2016 City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 2I. Consideration of authorizing a vavment of to the Coalition of Utility Cities for citv share of CUC membership dues in the amount of $26,418 (JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider granting formal approval of payment of 2017 membership dues relating to participation in the Coalition of Utility Cities organization in the amount of $26,418 As you know, the Coalition of Utility Cities is comprised of communities that host nuclear and coal generation facilities. For years, the host communities in this organization have pooled their resources in support of maintaining a coordinated and unified voice at the State Legislature on issues of common concern. The subject matter most commonly addressed by the organization, that have a direct impact on host communities pertain to property valuation and taxation along with environmental and regulatory topics. For more detail regarding coalition objectives and activities, see the annual report at the end of the agenda. As you may recall, last year and the year before, the CUC lobbyist was highly involved in development of legislation that would have had a major impact on the method used for establishing valuation of electrical generation facilities. This legislation has not been adopted by the State Legislature but remains in play so it is very important to monitor and help to shape the law. You may recall at a meeting early in 2017, Carol Jackson, our representative from Flaherty Hood provided a presentation on the activities of the Coalition in 2016 along with plans for 2017. Her presentation outlined the Coalition mission and activities.. Investment in CUC is akin to having good insurance program. In the face of efforts of others to erode host community tax base, it can be shown that over the years, the investment in CUC and associated legislative efforts, has resulted in preservation or a reduction in the diminishment of tax revenue for host communities. Thus the CUC investment serves to pay for itself. The bulk of the funding goes toward paying for the services of Flaherty Hood which serves as the organization's legislative consultant. The annual contribution share is based on the relative value of the electrical generation facilities in each community. It is the intent of the group to continue to maintain a pattern of asking for an annual appropriation from each City based on a projected budget, but provide a reimbursement to member cities when the fund balance hits a certain threshold. Based on the 2017/18 budget .the projected reimbursement is $20,956 which will result in a net cost of $5,462. Al. Budget Impact: This expenditure was included in the budget. Host city dues are established based on the tax capacity value of the facility located in the host city. City Council Agenda: 07/24/17 A2. Staff Workload Impact: Participation in at least three regular meetings per year. Additional impromptu meetings are scheduled as needed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve payment to the Coalition of Utility Cities in the amount of $26,418 for CUC membership dues for 2016/2017. 2. Motion of other. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. CUC Dues statement B. CUC Annual Meeting Info (Included at the end of Agenda packet) Coalition of Utility Cities - Dues Based on Actual Pay 2017 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). Elec. Gen. Est. Mkt Value for CUC Members Dues Pay 17 Becker $ 461,789,900 Cohasset $ 326,264,100 Granite Falls $ 3,664,900 Hoyt Lakes $ 29,473,000 Monticello $ 704,557,800 Oak Park Heights $ 191,881,900 Red Wing $ 696,778,700 Approved Assessment 1 $2,414,410,3001 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). 0.003572301% Base Fee of Generating Mach Dues MV $1,250 $16,497 $17,747 $1,250 $11,655 $12,905 $1,250 $131 $1,381 $1,250 $1,053 $2,303 $1,250 $25,169 $26,419 $1,250 $6,855 $8,105 $1,250 $24,891 $26,141 $8,750 1 $86,250 1 $95,000 Total dues of $95,000 each city's assessment is based on: * A 1,250 base fee (currently there are 7 members for a total base fee of $8,750) * The remaining amount of the assessment comes from a percentage of the city's electric generation machinery market * The remaining amount is calculated by subtracting the total base fee from the total dues ($95,000 minus $8,750=$86,250) and creating a uniform percentage of market value so that the percentage times the market values in each city equals a sum total of $91,250 (the portion of dues not covered in the base fee). City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2J. Consideration of approving lighting upgrades in the communitv center gvm for $9,750.00, community center indoor plavground for $3,010.00 and Hi-Wav Liquors for $10,055.58 (total $22,815.58). (AM) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving lighting upgrades in the MCC gym, MCC indoor playground, and Hi -Way Liquors. The lighting upgrade will consist of replacing the current lighting with an energy efficient LED system. Energy paybacks and rebate information are attached. Quotes have been requested from three contractors and two have been received for the lighting upgrade work. The lowest bid is highlighted in yellow. The goal is to have the entire project finished in August of this year. These quotes were received as follows: Quotes for Lighting Upgrade Project CONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION TOTAL QUOTE Donovan Construction Replace the current lighting MCC Gym: $19,656.00 with energy efficient LED MCC Indoor Playground: lighting for the MCC gym, $3,800.00 MCC indoor playground, and Liquor Store: $11,954.00 liquor store. Wes Olson Replace the current lighting MCC Gym: $9,750.00 with energy efficient LED MCC Indoor Playground: lighting for the MCC gym, $3,010.00 MCC indoor playground, and Liquor Store: $10,055.58 liquor store. Olson and Sons Electric Replace the current lighting No quote received. with energy efficient LED lighting for the MCC gym, MCC indoor playground, and liquor store. Al. Budget Impact: The 2017 MCC budget includes $42,500.00 for building repairs and maintenance. Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). Hi -Way Liquors has sufficiently budgeted for this item through repairs/maintenance and capital improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve lighting upgrades in the community center gym for $9,750.00, City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 indoor playground for $3,010.00, and Hi -Way Liquors for $10,055.58 (total $22,815.58) by the lowest bidders as highlighted in yellow as identified in the previous tables. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Quotes B. Energy payback and rebate information 2 to, XceiEnergys 911FORSIBLI !Y N,1PUII1- Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate d Rebate equals 36% of installed cost. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savin¢s Pavback $10,055.58 $3,644.95 $6,410.63 $2,595.66(x) 2.5 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW/kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $216.30 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 32 month term $219.52(b) 2.7 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $6,610.63, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsis Demand (KW) Energy (KWb) Existing Lights 9.892 New Lights 3.379 Estimated Savings 6.513(a) 50,708 17,634 Anntial cost. 4,127.27 33,073 $29595.66(a)t CO2 (lbs) . 86,203 29,979 56,225. * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? 9 Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an Increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." ¶ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. ¶ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov or wvaw.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, whore Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (11 [00,001 [01 [00,001 [00] [False] [3.464KW] ) Liquor Store City of Monticello -v2 WesOlson Program 1134 Xcel Acct# 515 Pill Page 2 Customer Repoli (07/07/2017 15:42) 1 -79070 11 302425130 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Xcel Energys RtIPOMfIi AA RY NAFRAE' One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savines Pavback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $11,954.00 Utility Rebati $3,295.44 Your Final Cost After rebate $8,658.56 $2,464.22(4) 3.5 years b Rebate equals 28% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kl kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $205.35(a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 46 month term $209.21(b) 3.9 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $8,858.56, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis., Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annual Cost; Existing Lights New Lights Estimated Savings ,9.770 3.741 6.029(a) 50,173 $4,094.14„ . 19,220 $1,629.92 30,953 $2,464.22(a)t ',;' CO2 (lbs) 85,295 32,674 52,621 * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an Increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and Implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov, or w .epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of gam to 9pm. (12 [12,12 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [3.464KW] ) Liquor Store City of Monticello -Donovan Program 113q Xcel Acct# 515 Pine St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:26) 1 -79070 11 302425130 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XcelEnergyo SeNtON1late SY NAID"t. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Lighting Upgrades Costs Annual Savinias Payback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $9,750.00 Utility Rebate* $5,850.00 Your Final Cost After rebate $3,900.00 $3,624.79(a) 1.1 years d Rebate equals 60% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re- verdfcation of eligibility, kWlltWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $302.07(1) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 13 month term $325.17(b) 1.2 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $4,100.00, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less f=inancing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy(KWb) Annual Cost CO2 (lbs)',' Existing Lights 10.896 59,656 $5,413.33 101,415 New Lights 3.600 19,710 $1,788.54 33,507 Estimated Savings 7.296 39,946 $3,624.79(°)/ 67,908 . * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? ¶ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes In precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as 'climate change." ¶ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. I Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.eia.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates arc based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (t l [06,03 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [7.296KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2-Gym-WesOlson Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:39) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 a,lSra Nilett sr N,rrael- Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Area A: Gym Lights Project., 91 Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire 24 454 MH 40OW STD1 1 L Totals (Including special orders) Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:40) One -Stop Efficiency Shop Recommended Lighting Projects Schedule Name Installed Estimated & Hours/year Cost Annual Selected of Operation (Without Rebate) 'I, Savings 15 H5,475 ours per Day x 7 $9,75Incl Spec 51000 ar $3,624.79 rg❑Q Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 24 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W- $9,750.00 $3,624.79 City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2-Gym-WesOlson Piogi am IDR Xcel Acctld 505 Walnut St 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XcelEnergys 111#0Ntllrtl IT NkPa Al• Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate b Rebate equals 33% of installed cost. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savings Pavback $19,656.00 $6,544.51 $13,111.49 $3,624.79(``) 3.6 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1 010112 01 7, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW9(Wh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $302.07(a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 47 month term $308.17(b) 4.0 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $13,311.49, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Fina) terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analysis Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annual Cost CO2 (lbs) Existing Lights 10.896 59,656 $5,413.33', 101,415 New Lights 3,600 19,710 $1;788.54 33,507 Estimated Savings 7.296 39,946 $3,624179(°)4 67,908* * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? I Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." I Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity In the U.S. I Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmisslons and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: wvnv.eia.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (12 [12,12 ] [0] [00,00] [00] [True] [7.296KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St 303021733 Monticello, MN 55362 Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:29) Program ID# 64222 �I ' Xcel Energy' One -Stop Efficiency Shop 111#4144 Ill1 8Y NBraa!- Recommended Lighting Projects City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut Sl Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:30) 1 64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Schedule Name Installed Estimated Recommended Lighting System Upgrades & Hours/year Cost Annual Selected of Operation (Without Rebate) Savings Area A: Gym Lights Project: #1 15 Hours per Day x 7 $19,656.00 $3,624.79 0 5,475 hrs/yr Incl Special Order FQty Watts EXISTING Luminaire Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 24 454 MH 40OW STD1 1L 24 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W- Totals (Including special orders) $19,656.00 $3,624.79 City of Monticello City Hall -Phase 2 -Gym -Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut Sl Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:30) 1 64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 At It ON t l ite NY Her II A I" Lighting Upgrades Total Installed Cost Before rebate Your Final Cost After rebate d Rebate equals 60% of installed cosi. One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated Costs Annual Savines Pavback $3,010.00 $1,806.00 $1,204.00 $1,129.76(a) 1.1 years (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1010112017, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request all extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, kW/kWh savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $94.15 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 15 month term $96.81(b) 1.3 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $1,404.00, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (Including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not less Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by lender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsls Demand (KW) Energy (KWh) Annpal.Cost CO2 (Ilrs) Existing Lights 2.724 14,914 ` .'- $'d;353,:33 :, - 25,554 " New Lights 0.450 2,464 $223,.57 41188 Estimated Savings 2.274 12,450 $1129.76 (a)t : 21,165 * How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase In the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluorlde, HFCs. PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.ela.doe.gov or www.epa.gov (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months peak rate hours of 9am to Spm. (I1 [00,00 ] [01 [00,00] [00] [True] [2.274KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Indoor Playground -Wes Program IDH Xcel Acct! 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Repoli (07/07/2017 15:37) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 xcelEnergy° senaw:nde aw xarune• Recommended Lighting System Upgrades Area A: Indoor Playground Lights Project: #1 Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire 6 454 MH 40OW STD1 1 L- Totals (Inchiding special orders) Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:37) One -Stop Efficiency Shop Recommended Lighting Projects Schedule Name Installed & Hours/year Cost of Operation (Without Rebate) 15 Hours per Day x 7 I $3,010.00 5,475 hrs/yr Incl Special Order I Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 3 150 LED High Bay Flxture 150W- $3,010.00 Estimated Annual Selected Savings $1,129.76 $1,129.76 City of Monticello City Hall -Indoor Playground -Wes Program ID# Xeel Acct# 505 Walnut St 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Xcel Energy° A ri f 9Ms l IL! AT I r a ne" One -Stop Efficiency Shop Summary of Recommended Lighting Upgrades Lighting Upgrades Estimated Estimated g g pg Costs Annual Savines Payback Total Installed Cost Before rebate $3,800.00 Utility Rebate* $2,039.78 Your Final Cost After rebate $1,760.22 $1,129.76(a) 1.6 years b Rebate equals 54% of installed cost. (Including special orders) *Job must be completed and invoices submitted within 90 days or by 1 010112 01 7, whichever comes first. One -Stop reserves the right to withdraw this rebate offer after expiration. You may request an extension, which includes re - verification of eligibility, MIM savings, installation costs, estimated rebate, and program rules by One -Stop. CEE Financing Option Estimated monthly savings $94.15 (a) Monthly loan payments at 3.9% for 21 month term $97.48"' 1.8 years (b) Estimate based on a loan amount of $1,960.22, including a $200.00 loan origination fee. Mortgage, (including Loan flood and title fees may apply. The loan term has a maximum of 5 years, with monthly payments not loss Financing Charges) than the estimated monthly savings. Final terms and conditions set by tender upon loan approval. Utility Cost Analvsls Demand (KW) Energy(KW]i): Annual Cost CO2 (lbs)" .' Existing Lights 2.724 14,914 $1,;35.3.33 25,354' New Lights 0.450 2,464 $223.57', 4,188 Estimated Savings 2.274 12,450 $1,119.76("rA 21,165 . How do CO2 emissions affect me and my business? $ Rising concentrations of greenhouse gasses (GHG) produce an increase in the average surface temperature of the Earth over time. Rising temperatures produce changes in precipitation patterns, storm severity, and sea level commonly referred to as "climate change." $ Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and four groups of fluorinated gases (sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, PFCs and CFCs) are the major GHG. In the U.S., GHG emissions come primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in energy use. CO2 emissions from coal-fired electricity generation comprise nearly 80 percent of the total CO2 emissions produced by the generation of electricity in the U.S. $ Installing energy-efficient lighting and implementing other conservation measures that reduce electric energy use significantly reduces GHG emmissions and mitigates global climate change. Read more at: www.ela.doe.gov or www.epa.gov, (a) Savings estimates are based on standard engineering calculations and are NOT guaranteed. Your actual savings may be higher or lower depending on various factors, including how you operate your lights and other electric equipment in your building. Electric Utility Rates = $0.0620/KWh and $13.11/KW, where Demand cost savings occurs primarily during the summer months penk rate hours of 9am to 9pm. (12 [-17,-171 [01 [00,001 [00] [True] [2.274KW] ) City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Program ID# Xcel Acct# 505 Walnut St Page 2 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 XCelEnergyo One -Stop Efficiency Shop NEEPGNSIi EE .r NBraEE. Recommended Lighting Projects City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Prognun IDR Xcel Ace(# 505 Walnut St Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Schedule Name hrstalled Estimated Recommended Lighting System Upgrades & Hours/year of Operation Cost (Without Rebnic) Annual Selected Savings Area A: Gym Lights Project: #1 x7 15 Hours5,475 $3,800.00 $1,129.76 Q hrslyry Incl a100 der Qty Watts EXISTING Luminaire Qty Watts NEW Luminaire 6 454 MH 40OW STD1 1L 3 150 LED High Bay Fixture 150W - Totals (Including special orders) $3,800.00 $1,129.76 City of Monticello City Hall -Ind Playgrd-Donovan Prognun IDR Xcel Ace(# 505 Walnut St Page 3 Customer Report (07/07/2017 15:35) 1 -64222 11 303021733 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Lighting upgrades will qualify for significant rebates from Xcel Energy. Below is information showing upgrade costs, rebates and energy payback. Liquor Store: Total Installed cost before rebate: $10,055.58 Utility Rebate: $3,644.95 Final cost after rebate: $6,410.63 Payback: 2.5 years MCC Indoor Playground: Total Installed cost before rebate: $3,010.00 Utility Rebate: $1,806.00 Final Cost after rebate: $1,204.00 Payback: 1.3 years MCC Gvm: Total installed cost before rebate: $9,750.00 Utility Rebate: $5,850.00 Final cost after rebate: $3,900.00 Payback: 1.2 years City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2K. Consideration of approving UHL Recommissioning Proposal for cost of $26,900) (AM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the UHL Recommissioning proposal. UHL is the current provider of our energy management system. Recommissioning typically saves between 15% and 20% of building energy costs, while improving occupant comfort and improving operations. A 15% energy savings based on our current utility cost would be an estimated savings of around $27,000.00 annually. The total cost of the recommissioning is $26,900.00, but we have been pre -approved for $11,075 worth of rebates through Xcel Energy and CenterPoint Energy. Our total cost would then be $15,825.00 for the recommissioning project. The recommissioning will identify energy conservation opportunities (ECOs) that we may implement. There are additional bonus rebates after implementing the energy conservation opportunities from the study totaling $10,000.00. This would reduce our total out of pocket cost to $5,825.00. The implementation will also include an upgrade to our current energy management system which has a cost value of $5,800.00. Partial or complete cost of this upgrade could be offset by completing more of the recommended ECOs and would further reduce our net out of pocket costs. Al. Budget Impact: The 2017 MCC budget includes $42,500.00 for building repairs and maintenance. Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Motion to approve the UHL Recommissioning proposal for a total of $26,900.00. If Council selects this option the net total would be $15,825.00 after rebates for the recommissioning project with a possible $10,000.00 in additional rebates towards implementation of the ECOs. Total net cost would be $5,825 after implementation rebates. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative 1. City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Recommissioning Flyer B. Return on Investment History Sheet C. Example of Energy Savings Tune-up your building for Peak Efficiency Even if buildings were properly commissioned during their design, construction and start-up phases, as buildings age, changes in their use and operations can usually lead to degraded building performance, especially if proper maintenance is not performed. Re -commissioning consistently saves between 5% and 20% of building energy costs, while improving occupant comfort and improving operations. Xcel Customer Rebates: • Re -Commissioning- Up to 75% of study cost (not to exceed $25,000.) • Implementations rebate with paybacks of 9 months -15 years $400/kW or $0.0456/kWh whichever is greater, with a maximum of 60% of the measure cost. Process Includes: • Executive Summary • Equipment Re -Commissioning • Controls Point to Point Functional Testing • Verification and Calibration • Compare Operation and Control to Original Design Intent • List all Deficiencies with Proposals to Correct • Lighting and Electrical Review • Operations Trends and Data Logging • List of Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) with Proposals to Implement, Energy Reduction, Savings, and Rebates • Current Energy Star Rating • Building's Energy Utility Report using UtilityTrac • Measure Cost Avoidance (Weather Normalized) of Implemented (ECMs) using UtilityTrac Program Energy Recommissioning Study Savings Cost of ECO's Rebate Payback Annual Savings Large Church $144,786 $188,060 $19,007 1.17 37% Medical Center Phase-1 $224,009 $147,130 $46,621 0.45 4% ISafety Training Facility $13,724 $27,865 $5,288 1.60 33% Large Corporate Building $154,257 $79,995 $6,061 0.48 30% Health Clinic $14,671 $13,250 $3,911 0.64 10% Church $8,766 $35,341 $3,276 3.47 22% Large Office Building $119,954 $85,510 $8,734 0.64 8% Large Office Building $3,838 $13,280 $4,764 2.22 5% University Hall $104,095 $175,180 $33,674 1.36 21% Large Corp Office $58,929 $65,590 $3,562 1.05 31% Corporate Plant $124,478 $79,020 $11,263 0.54 10% Park Office Building $21,719 $51,740 $10,462 1.9 30% Large Office Building $190,598 $650,690 $84,125 3.0 28% High School $108,137 $433,280 $52,544 3.6 39% Medical Building $78,793 $184,170 $24,086 2.0 28% Office Building $10,177 $37,201 $9,758 2.7 48% Office Building $18,690 $132,210 $12,513 6.4 38% Medical Center Phase-2 $320,586 $346,709 $25,365 1.0 6% Large Medical Office $80,582 $127,990 $19,281 1.3 22% 1 Middle School $53,861 $162,290 $49,823 2.1 26% Gov. Center $69,141 $68,370 $7,313 0.9 36% Senior Care Center $51,513 $200,720 $21,007 3.5 19% 1Large Corporate Building $202,057 $312,920 $62,730 1.2 9% Office Building $26,427 $63,060 $24,263 1.5 5% Middle School $13,277 $68,290 $12,984 4.2 12% Medical Clinic $38,501 $108,350 $24,413 2.2 21% 1Prison $45,593 $90,280 $29,727 1.3 3% Condo Building $2,697 $17,000 $1,814 5.6 2% Church $24,794 $97,160 $26,975 2.8 19% Library $11,475 $25,400 $8,758 1.5 13% �Elem. School $11,735 $47,050 $14,959 2.7 16% Secondary School $35,724 $138,570 $26,502 3.1 22% Medical Center $47,933 $66,420 $14,387 1.1 30% Hospital $49,232 $97,960 $25,361 1.5 13% Plaza $53,114 $137,062 $18,882 2.2 37% Middle School $56,670 $119,810 $25,918 1.6 27% Tech Center $69,560 $66,150 $14,760 0.7 15% Library $9,528 $12,300 $5,240 0.8 24% Community Center $39,591 $106,810 $37,112 1.8 9% Office Building B $76,781 $133,120 $44,110 1.2 12% Church $15,500 $55,619 $7,021 3.1 18% 1 Middle School $44,751 $114,380 $23,782 2.0 28% University Science Building $42,466 $223,680 $14,832 4.9 16% Elementary $33,270 $117,098 $12,613 3.1 20% I Community Center $20,104 $52,870 $14,374 1.9 38% City Hall $10,873 $45,000 $10,785 3.2 20% Office Building A $70,840 $223,140 $63,909 2.3 7% jArt Center $109,942 $227,570 $73,755 1.7 21% Church $18,562 $80,574 $3,502 4.2 22% Large Office Building $126,465 $113,490 $28,366 0.7 27% Medical Center $36,855 $128,120 $34,960 2.5 12% Middle School $38,816 $97,150 $27,315 1.8 18% Headquarters Office Building $218,020 $462,160 $147,325 1.4 9% Large Office Building $49,105 $110,634 $26,885 1.7 21% Large Office Building $30,582 $71,980 $21,460 1.7 46% High School $79,757 $238,960 $60,092 2.2 26% Large Bank Building $105,544 $160,020 $45,723 1.1 17% Aircraft Building $95,190 $258,790 $34,958 2.4 17% 1Public Works $24,769 $55,410 $18,376 1.5 25% Hotel $117,087 $253,370 $74,610 1.5 23% UHL Company Place: [GOVTCNTR] xx Government Center Energy: All Utilities 1600 Start of Place Energy Profile I Implementation +j W in D 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Place Energy Profile NORM - 03 End of Implementation Jan Feb filar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Ilc: Dec Month -+-2011 2012 X2013 X2014 X2015 9/18/2015 9:12:38AM Page 3 Use in MMBTU Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2011 1,436 1,223 1,189 799 645 687 844 773 701 754 999 1,562 11,611 2012 1,302 1,140 957 751 667 654 782 762 635 774 1,056 1,359 10,838 2013 1,351 1,111 1,232 1,018 698 628 727 753 672 715 913 1,235 11,053 2014 1,307 1,109 1,124 682 529 476 565 580 477 476 565 677 8,569 2015 679 591 526 626 462 473 544 0 0 0 0 0 3,900 Totals 6,074 5,174 5,027 3,877 3,002 2,917 3,461 2,868 2,485 2,719 3,533 4,834 45,971 -+-2011 2012 X2013 X2014 X2015 9/18/2015 9:12:38AM Page 3 City Council Agenda: 7/24/17 2L. Consideration of Modifving GMEF Loan Guidelines reducing equity contribution and adiustin2 minimum interest rate (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The EDA took action at its regular July 12, 2017 meeting recommending a modification of the GMEF (Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund) Loan Guidelines to better meet prospective borrower's needs. The proposed changes relate to the required equity contribution. The recommended change is to reduce the minimum owner equity contribution from 10 percent to a range of 5 to 10 percent while also adjusting the minimum interest rate upward for borrowers who provide less than 10 percent owner equity. This flexibility will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. The interest rate differential for lower equity contributions will serve as risk - offset feature. Standard credit and financial underwriting focusing on acceptable cash flow analysis for the loan repayment will still apply. Reducing owner equity requirement as proposed will not appreciably add to risk that is already present. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact related to consideration of modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines as proposed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. 2. Motion to table modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines for further research. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. The proposed modification is related to the equity contribution requirement which currently stands at 10 percent. The proposed language (Section 5 d. 2) adds flexibility in equity requirements by stating a range of 5 to 10 percent which will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. The interest rate adjustment (Section 5 d. 4), increasing the rate for borrowers providing less than 10 percent equity, will serve as risk reward offset as well. All loans will continue to be appropriately collateralized and properly underwritten. There is not a requirement to hold a public hearing to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. GMEF Loan Guidelines proposal (markups language added) B. EDA Staff report r ..a Monticello 1. PURPOSE GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND GUIDELINES The purpose of the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund (GMEF) is to encourage economic development by supplementing conventional financing sources available to existing and new businesses. This program is administered by the City of Monticello Economic Development Authority (EDA) and participating lending institution(s). GMEF Loans are made to businesses to help them meet a portion of their financing needs. The loans are meant to be a secondary source of financing, provide gaps in private financing, and assist in securing other grants. All loans must meet four or more of the criteria established in the Definition of Public Purpose section. 2. ORGANIZATION The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is administered by the EDA. It is the responsibility of the EDA to assure that loans meet the public purpose standard and comply with all other GMEF policies as defined in this document. 3. GMEF GUIDELINE MODIFICATION At a minimum, the EDA shall review the guidelines on an annual basis. Changes to the GMEF guidelines require approval by the City Council. 4. DEFINITION OF PUBLIC PURPOSE GMEF Loans must meet at least one (1) of the following public purposes (if the EDA finds that the public purpose described in b. is met, the EDA must find that the GMEF Loan meets at least one additional public purpose): a. To provide loans for credit -worthy businesses which create new jobs. 1. One job is equivalent to a total of 37.5 hours per week. 2. At least 90% of the jobs created must pay at least 160% of the federal minimum wage, exclusive of benefits, for individuals over the age of 20 during the term of assistance. Annual written reports are required until repayment of the assistance. Failure to meet the job and wage level goals requires partial or full repayment of the assistance with interest. b. To provide loans for credit -worthy businesses that would increase the community tax base. c. To provide loans to credit -worthy industrial or commercial businesses (new or existing) that would allow the ability to improve or expand their operation. Factors including but not limited to the following will be taken into account: 1. Type and size of the business 2. Product or service involved 3. Present availability of the product or service within the City of Monticello 4. Compatibility of the proposed business as it relates to the comprehensive plan and existing zoning policies, 5. Potential for adverse environmental effects of the business, if any. d. In the event job creation is not a viable option, credit -worthy businesses have the ability to demonstrate public purpose by means of job retention. 5. GREATER MONTICELLO ENTERPRISE FUND POLICIES a. Business Eligibility: 1. Industrial and commercial businesses. 2. Businesses currently located or to be located within the City of Monticello. 3. Credit -worthy existing businesses. 4. Start-up businesses with worthy business plan and/or pro forma in a form acceptable to the EDA (historically non credit -worthy businesses will be denied). b. Acceptable Private Financing Methods: 1. Companion Direct Loan: The GMEF is subordinate to the primary lender. 2. Participation Loan: The GMEF participates in a portion of the loan. 3. Guarantee Loans: The GMEF guarantees a portion of the bank loan. a. Interest rate cap is subject to EDA approval c. Use of Proceeds: 1. Real property acquisition, development, & rehabilitation improvement costs including but not limited to the following: a. Land Acquisition b. Engineer/Design Inspection Fees c. Building Permit Fees d. Architect Fees e. Building Materials f. Soil Borings g. Construction Labor h. Appraisal Fees I . Landscaping j. Legal Fees k. Grading 1. Environmental Study in. Curbing/Parking Lot 2 n. Recording Fees o. Title Insurance 2. Machinery and equipment: a. Personal property used as an integral part of the manufacturing or commercial business, with a useful life of at least three years. Acquisition costs would include freight and sales taxes paid. As a general rule, office equipment would not qualify. d. Terms and conditions: 1. Loan Size: Minimum of $25,000 and maximum not to exceed 50% of the remaining GMEF balance 2. Leveraging: Minimum 60% private/public Non-GMEF, Maximum 30% GMEF, Minimum 110% equity. 3. Loan Term: Personal property term not to exceed life of equipment (possibly up to 10 years). Real estate property maximum of 10 -year maturity amortized up to 30 years. Balloon payment at 10 years. 4. Interest Rate: Fixed rate not less than 2% below prime rate or 1 % below prime if equ contribution is less than IV pUrUCHL uIrtotal 71� - as published in the Wall Street Journal on date of EDA loan approval, with a minimum interest rate of 1.0% Wntrih„ti— is lace than 1 Q percent of total fin 5. Loan Fee: Minimum fee of $500 but not to exceed 1.5 % of the total loan. Fees are to be documented and no duplication of fees between the lending institution and the GMEF. Loan fee may be incorporated into project cost. EDA retains the right to reduce or waive loan fee or portion of loan fee. Fee to be paid by applicant to the EDA within 5 working days after City Council approval of GMEF loan. The fee is non-refundable. e. Pre-pavment Policv: No penalty for pre -payment f. Deferral of Pavments: 1. Extending a balloon payment will require a verification letter from two lending institutions stating the inability to refinance and is subject to approval by the EDA. 2. Monthly payments may be deferred for a determined period of time upon approval by the EDA. g. Late Pavment Policv: 1. Failure to pay principal or interest when due may result in the loan being immediately called. In addition to any other amounts due on any loan, and without waiving any right of the Economic Development Authority under any applicable documents, a late fee of $250 will be imposed on any borrower for any payment not received in full by the Authority within 30 calendar days of the date on which it is due. Furthermore, interest will continue to accrue on any amount due until the date on which it is paid to the Authority, and all such interest will be due and payable at the same time as the amount on which it has accrued. h. Assumabilitv of Loan: None i. Business Equitv Requirements: Subject to type of loan. The EDA will determine appropriate and applicable business equity requirements on a case by case analysis, utilizing normal lending guidelines. j. Collateral: 1. Liens on real property in project (mortgage deed). 2. Liens on real property in business (mortgage deed). 3. Liens on real property held personally (subject to EDA approval, homestead exempt). 4. Machinery and equipment liens (except equipment exempt from bankruptcy). 5. Personal and/or corporate guarantees (requires unlimited personal guarantees). k. Non -Performance: An approved GMEF loan shall be null and void if funds are not drawn upon or disbursed within 180 days from date of EDA approval. 1. Non -Performance Extension: 1. The 180 -day non-performance date can be extended up to an additional 120 days, upon approval by the EDA. 2. A written request must be received 30 days prior to expiration of the 180 -day non-performance date. m. Out of Pocket Fees: Responsibility of the GMEF applicant. n. Equal Opportunity: The Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund is operated as an equal opportunity program. All applicants shall have equal access to GMEF funds regardless of race, sex, age, marital status, or other personal characteristics o. Participating Lending Institution(s): 1. Participating lending institution(s) shall be determined by the GMEF applicant. 2. Participating lending institution(s) shall cooperate with the EDA and assist in carrying out the policies of the GMEF as approved by the City Council. 3. Participating lending institution(s) shall analyze the formal application and indicate to the EDA the level at which the lending institution will participate in the finance package. p. Loan Administration: 1. City Staff shall collect applicable GMEF payments. 2. City Staff shall assure City compliance with all applicable terms and conditions of the approved loan. 3. All loan documents shall include the following: a. Definition of loan default, agreements regarding notification of default b. Copy of primary lenders documents C. Provisions allowing the City to inquire on the status of the primary loan 6. LOAN APPLICATION PROCEDURES The EDA desires to make the GMEF loan application process as simple as possible. However, certain procedures must be followed prior to EDA consideration of a loan request. Information regarding the program and procedures for obtaining a loan are as follows: a. Citv Staff. City Staff shall carry out GMEF operating procedures as approved by the EDA and City Council. Staff is responsible for assisting businesses in the loan application process and will work closely with applicants in developing the necessary information. b. Application Process: 1. Applicant shall complete a preliminary loan application. Staff will review application for consistency with the policies set forth in the Greater Monticello Fund Guidelines. 2. If applicant gains initial support from lending institution and if the preliminary loan application is approved, applicant is then asked to complete a formal application. Formal application shall include a business plan which will include its management structure, market analysis, and financial statement. Like documentation necessary for obtaining the bank loan associated with the proposal is acceptable. Attached with each formal application is a written release of information executed by the loan applicant 3. If the preliminary loan application is not approved by staff, the applicant may request that the EDA consider approval of the preliminary application at the next regularly scheduled meeting of the EDA. 4. City staff shall analyze the formal application and financial statements contained therein to determine if the proposed business and finance plan is viable. City staff shall submit a written recommendation to the EDA. A decision regarding the 5 application shall be made by the EDA within 60 days of the submittal of a completed formal application. 5. The EDA shall have authority to approve or deny loans; however, within 21 days of EDA action, the City Council may reverse a decision by the EDA, if it is determined by the City Council that such loan was denied/approved in violation of GMEF guidelines. 6. Prior to issuance of an approved loan, the EDA Attorney shall review and/or prepare all contracts, legal documents, and inter -creditor agreements. After such review is complete, the City shall issue said loan. 7. REPORTING City Staff shall submit to the EDA and City Council a semiannual report detailing the balance of the Greater Monticello Enterprise Fund. 8. HISTORY Public Hearing and Adoption the 31St day of August, 1999 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 8th day of November 2000 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 24th day of April 2001 Public Hearing and Adoption of Amendments the 13th day of December 2005 Public Hearing and Adoption the 23rd day of March, 2009 Adoption the 22nd day of April, 2013 Adoption the 27th day of February 2017 Co EDA Agenda: 7/12/17 Consideration of Modifvinu GMEF Loan Guidelines (JT) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Staff is proposing to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines to better meet prospective borrower's needs. The proposed changes relate to the required equity contribution which currently 10 percent of a total finance package. The GMEF Loan program is a gap funding tool. The purpose is to fill the 15 to 30 percent of funding that a bank cannot or will not fund. Several recent prospective borrowers have inquired as to the possibility of accessing GMEF loans with an equity contribution of less than 10 percent. As per discussion at the June 14, 2017 EDA meeting, staff is proposing to add more flexibility to the Guidelines by adjusting the equity requirement to a range of 5 to 10 percent. This flexibility will allow more borrowers to consider using the GMEF Loan Program. Interest rate differentials are also proposed for lower equity contributions as per comments from the EDA. Standard credit and financial underwriting focusing on acceptable cash flow analysis for the loan repayment will still apply. Al. STAFF IMPACT: There is minimal staff impact in considering modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines. A2. BUDGET IMPACT: There is a no budgetary impact due to the EDA's consideration of modifying the GMEF Loan Guidelines as proposed. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. 2. Motion to table modification of the GMEF Loan Guidelines for further research. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the EDA modify the GMEF Loan Guidelines as presented. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. GMEF Loan Guidelines proposal (markups language added) City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 2M. Consideration of approving an additional performance bond fee of $3,825 to the original quote submitted by Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for aquatic plav structure. (AM/JO) REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City Council is asked to consider approving the addition of the fee for a performance bond to the original aquatic play structure quote from Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC (the Company). In essence this additional fee represents a change order to the original quote accepted by the City Council at the previous meeting The original accepted quote for the aquatic play structure is $99,765.00 and does not include the cost of a performance bond. The company is requesting a 50% deposit payment due upon execution of the proposal with 10% of the total payment held back prior to acceptance. This project is a custom made aquatic play structure and it is common request to provide a 25-50% upfront deposit for the construction materials. Due to the risk associated with these terms, we are requesting a performance bond. The quoted cost to add a performance bond to the project is $3,825.00. If this additional expense is approved the bid is still $11,491.50 less than the next lowest quote for the project. Please note that according to the City Attorney, a performance bond is not required by statute for projects under $100,000 however he recommends a performance bond unless a large share total payment is held up until completion. In this case, under the terms desired by the Company, only 10% of the total will be held back. This company has been operating successfully for a number of years and has provided a list of references for our review. Additionally, the project manager, Jay Webber is known by Tom Pawelk as being an effective and reliable project manager as Jay Webber has been involved with installation of numerous outside play structures over the years. Thus we have a high level of confidence that the project will get completed in a satisfactory manner. Al. Budget Impact: Amounts expended above the budget are financed through the fund balance (prior year accumulation of revenues in excess of expenditures). This project will be funded through the Community Center's fund balance, since the 2017 budget has been expended for building improvements. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff time will include overseeing the project and working with the contractor to finalize the project. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the addition of a fee to include a performance bond to the City Council Agenda: 7/24/2017 original quote from Recreation by Lemmie Jones LLC for a total of $3,825.00. 2. Motion to authorize moving forward with the project under the terms identified by the Company which include 50% down, 10% payment amount held until completion and no performance bond. 3. Motion to deny and requote the project for next year. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Administrator and MCC Director recommend alternative 1. Although this is a highly reputable firm and we have had good experience with the project manager, the payment terms, the Council should consider adding the performance bond. The quote amount is good relative to the competitors and who knows if the project will come in lower if bid out next year. In addition, a later installation would require diamond patching over diamond bright surface being installed this year. In the future we will be sure to identify payment schedule and performance bond expectations with the quoting process. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Reference List 2 Partial list of Projects that Design2Play, LLC provided design, manufacturing support and install supervision for: • Great Wolf Lodge- The Dells: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Lake Delton, WI -USA 2005 • Legoland California: Large Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Carlsbad, CA- USA 2006 • Great Wolf Lodge- Grapevine: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Grapevine, TX -USA 2006 • NRH20 Water Park: Medium Outdoor WetScape Attraction- North Richland Hills, TX- USA 2007 • Dollywood's Splash Country: Outdoor Interactive WetScape Features- Pigeon Forge, TN- USA 2007 • Water World Water Park: Custom Themed Interactive Circus Animal Features- Federal Heights, CO- USA 2008 • Great Wolf Lodge- Grand Mound: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Grand Mound, WA -USA 2008 • Louisville Zoo- Custom Themed Outdoor Interactive WetScape- Louisville, KY- USA 2008 • JW Marriott San Antonio Hill Country: Custom Themed Large Outdoor Interactive Lazy River Features- San Antonio, TX -USA 2008 • Great Wolf Lodge- Concord: Large Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Concord, NC -USA 2009 • Six Flags Great America: Large Outdoor Interactive Buccaneer Themed Attraction / Water Features- Gurnee, IL -USA 2009 • Valley of the Springs: Large indoor Themed Lazy River Water Features and Hotel Theming- French Lick, IN- USA 2009 • Magic Planet Kids: Large Indoor Interactive Aquativity Tables and Features- Mirdif City Center -Dubai, UAE 2010 • Legoland California Water Park: Themed Super Splash Tower and Aquativity Tables- Carlsbad, CA- USA 2010 • Six Flags Great America: Outdoor Interactive Lazy River Features- Agawam, MA- USA 2010 • Texas State Aquarium: Large Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Corpus Christi, TX -USA. 2011 • Legoland Florida Water Park: Outdoor Themed Aquativity Tables- Winter Haven, FL- USA 2011 • Moody Gardens: Large Outdoor Interactive Lazy River and Wave Pool Features- Galveston, TX -USA 2011 • Aquariaz Water Park: Medium Indoor Interactive WetScape and Play Structure- Avoriaz-FRANCE 2012 • Dallas Arboretum: Large Outdoor Water Based Educational Exhibits- Dallas, TX- USA 2013 • Legoland Malaysia Water Park: Outdoor Themed Aquativity Tables- Johor- MALAYSIA 2013 • Walvis Bay Water Park: Small Outdoor WetScape Attraction- Namibia, AFRICA 2013 • Great Wolf Lodge New England: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Worcester, MA -USA 2014 • Madame Tussands Wax Museum: Designed many Interactive Features in the wax museum- Orlando, FL 2014 • Lego Discovery Center: Medium Custom Water Table Exhibit- Chicago, IL USA 2015 • The Crayola Experience: Small Custom Interactive Kinetic Ball Machine Exhibit- Orlando, FL USA 2015 • Kalahari Resort: Large Indoor Custom Water Table Attraction- Poconos, PA USA 2015 • Lego Discovery Center: Medium Custom Water Table Exhibit- Atlanta, GA USA 2016 • Louisville Zoo- Recondition of original Outdoor Interactive WetScape- Louisville, KY- USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge Colorado Springs: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Colorado Springs, CO -USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge Traverse City: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Traverse City, MI -USA 2016 • Great Wolf Lodge LaGrange: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- LaGrange, GA -USA (currently in production) • Great Wolf Lodge Traverse City: Indoor Interactive WetScape Features- Gernee, IL -USA (currently in production) • American Dream Mega Mall: Custom Lazy River Features- Meadowlands, NY- USA (currently in production) City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 4A. Consideration to approve Ordinance No. 673 and Summary Ordinance No. 673A for Amendment to PUD, Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corner for Office, Service, and Warehouse Uses in the Red Rooster Planned Unit Development. Applicant: Red Rooster Properties (AS) Property: Legal: Lot 1, Block 2 (with exceptions), Oakwood Industrial Park; PID 155018002012 Address: 100 Chelsea Road Planning Case Number: 2017-016 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND: Request(s): Request to subdivide an existing parcel with multiple buildings to accommodate a new user on the western parcel, and development of a new principal use building and accessory use storage building on newly subdivided parcel for commercial/industrial purposes, through an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development. Deadline for Decision: July 101h, 2017 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: PUD, Planned Unit Development The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District is to provide greater flexibility in the development of neighborhoods and non-residential areas in order to maximize public values and achieve more creative development outcomes while remaining economically viable and marketable. This is achieved by undertaking a process that results in a development outcome exceeding that which is typically achievable through the conventional zoning district. The City reserves the right to deny the PUD rezoning and direct the developer to re -apply under the standard applicable zoning district. Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: NA Current Site Use: Commercial/Industrial buildings for storage and office Surrounding Land Uses: North: Commercial City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 East: Industrial South: Industrial West: Vacant Commercial Project Description: The applicant is seeking approval of a subdivision to separate a portion of the existing development, with multiple buildings, to accommodate occupancy of a portion of the property by a new user, and development of new buildings for the applicant's commercial/ industrial uses. Both sites would contain a combination of office and storage uses for separate businesses. ANALYSIS Final Stage Planned Unit Development & Final Plat Red Rooster, LLC has submitted application for final plat and final stage PUD. The site and building plans are consistent in configuration, scope and use as proposed under the development stage PUD. Planning Commission reviewed the Development Stage PUD for amendment to PUD and Preliminary Plat in June, forwarding their recommendation for approval on to Council on the Development Stage PUD and preliminary plat on June 26th. Council may wish to reference the staff report of June 26th, 2017 for the specific analysis of the uses and site plans within the plat and PUD. The final plat is consistent with the proposed preliminary plat in terms of lot configuration and size for the two proposed parcels. Staff have reviewed the revised plans submitted for the final plat and PUD. Minor revisions to the civil plans are still required as a result of the review of revised plans. The City Engineer has submitted a secondary letter addressing the remaining items to be resolved. Final plat and PUD approval are contingent on the reconciliation of these items. In accordance with requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2.4(0) for Planned Unit Development, the applicant has also revised their PUD plans to address the conditions of the Exhibit Z approved with the Development Stage application. The lighting plan is being revised at this time and as such, the condition for compliance remains in the Exhibit Z. It should be noted that the applicant proposes to surface with a chip seal material (or acceptable alternative) to the rear of the proposed office building and accessory building with the construction of the accessory building. Further, the applicant has provided two alternative building front elevations for the Council to consider as Oil City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 related to the proposed office building exterior facade. The applicant is seeking Council direction as related to these presented alternatives. The applicant has provided a cross easement and association declaration, which has been reviewed by the City Attorney. Staff has recommended revisions to the document in reference to the private utilities system and will require those comments be addressed as a condition of approval. Any approval is contingent on compliance with the remaining conditions of approval for the plan sets, those conditions which are on-going, and those as related to the final execution of the development contract and review for building permit. Amendment to PUD An ordinance amendment has been prepared for the amended Planned Unit Development District. The ordinance outlines the allowable principal uses within the PUD per the proposed amendment, incorporating the development plans by reference. Development Agreement An amendment to the development contract for the plat and planned unit development district has been prepared. As the area within the plat is fully developed, no additional trunk charges are payable; however, WAC and SAC charges are applicable for the proposed building expansion. Escrow deposits related to the inspection of utility connection work at Chelsea Road, as well as site grading and restoration inspection are required. Standard landscaping and lot monument securities are also required. The agreement is binding on all successors, heir and assigns, including those entities which may purchase or lease development parcels or buildings within the plat. Final comments from the developer have not been received as of the time of this report, and as such, minor revisions to the agreement may occur. Substantive changes will require review by Council. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The applicant is seeking approval of a final stage PUD for amendment to PUD, final plat, and corresponding development contract and PUD agreement. Planning Commission previously recommended approval of the Development Stage PUD for amendment to PUD and preliminary plat. Decision 1: Final Stage PUD and Amendment to PUD Ordinance 3 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 1. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 673 approving an amendment to PUD, based on the findings in Resolution 2017-45, and subject to the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z, with building facade design as directed by the City Council. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 673 approving an amendment to PUD, based on the findings in Resolution 2017-45, and subject to the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 2: Final Plat and Development Contract 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2017-46 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Chelsea Corner, based on the findings in said resolution, and the conditions attached to this staff report as Exhibit Z. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2017-46 approving a Final Plat and Development Contract for Chelsea Corner Industrial Park, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request, based on findings to be stated by the City Council. Decision 3: Summary Ordinance Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 673A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District. 2. Motion to deny Ordinance No. 673A, a summary ordinance for publication approving a rezoning to PUD for the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District, based on the findings to be made by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the request. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the revised plat and PUD plans submitted, staff recommends approval of the amendment to PUD for Final Stage Planned Unit Development and Final Plat for Chelsea Corners with the conditions in Exhibit Z. Further, staff recommends approval of the Development Contract as proposed and included for review with this report. D. SUPPORTING DATA L! A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. Z. City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 Resolution 2017-45, PUD Amendment Resolution 2017-46, Final Plat Ordinance #673 Summary Ordinance #673A Amendment to Development Contract & Planned Unit Development Agreement Aerial Site Image Applicant Narrative/Letter Final Plat Preliminary Plat PUD Development Plans — Revised, including: a. Title and Index Sheet b. Site Plan — Overall c. Site Plan d. Grading and Erosion Control Plan e. Utility & Removal Plan f. Landscape Plan g. Details Sign Plan Lighting Plan Elevations, a. Alternative 1 b. Alternative 2 Phasing Plan Drainage Report City Engineer's Letter, dated July 19th, 2017 Response Comment Letter, dated June 23, 2017 City Engineer's Letter, dated May 31, 2017 Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda — 07/24/2017 EXHIBIT Z Amendment to PUD, Final Stage PUD, Final Plat for Chelsea Corners Any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 3. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. G CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO PUD FOR FINAL STAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR RED ROOSTER - CHELSEA CORNER PUD WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted an application for approval of a Final Stage PUD for amendment to an existing PUD, Planned Unit Development District; and WHEREAS, the applicant concurrently proposes to develop the property for business office and accessory storage and industrial service uses, in additio rincipal storage for organizations with no other presence on the property; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and A WHEREAS, the proposed PUD, along wit)the companion PlaNareonsistent with the long- term use and development of the property for commercial uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6, 201 on the Development Stage PUD and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the applicant has revised and submitted Final StageUD plans in accordance with the Develop � nt Stage P ,and WHEREAS, the City Council has onsidered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into thWlution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The PUD provides an opriate means of furthering the intent of the mprehensive Plan for e site by putting the existing and proposed ines to limited use. 2. ThilWof the site for storage for non-profit organizations is consistent with the interest in promoting civic charity work and community pride. 3. The proposed improvements on the site under the Development Stage PUD are consistent with the needs of the PUD in this location as a transition between commercial and industrial areas. 4. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The PUD flexibility for the project, including modifying pavement requirements and storage uses, are consistent with the intent of the City's CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 economic development objectives, as well as with the intent of the PUD zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, The Monticello City Council hereby approves the Final Stage PUD for amendment to the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District, subject to theco ons listed in Exhibit Z as follows: 1. Any expansion of self -storage activities in the P strict beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage iden in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD ZoningDi shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may e additional improvements, including, but not limited to, pavi=curbing, water, and screening. 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equip nl materials shall be permitted in the PUD. 6 3. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shal be reo be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zom rdi ce. 11 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall e consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 5. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner pf the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. SignageVte e requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The appmply with the recommendations of the City Enginee, perr dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the K CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-45 review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATI Jeff MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-46 APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR RED ROOSTER — CHELSEA CORNER WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 6th, 2017, for the consideration of the preliminary plat of Chelsea Corner; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat the Chelsea Corner to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the Commission and approved the preliminary WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council 2017; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for uses for the proposed Chelsea Corner al plat of of the Planning 26th, 2017; and Corner on July 24th, Corner identifies the specific plans and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY C*CIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the final plat of Chelsea Corner, with drainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the follo ing conditigns: 1%1. An ansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory nn --commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to an amendment to Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. f 2. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment or materials shall be permitted in the PU Fg 3. Lighting and li plans in the PUD shall be revised to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 5. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated July 19th, 2017. 8. The applicant enter into an amendment to PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. 9. The applicant shall record cross -access and parking and utility association agreements for the two parcels. Such agreement shall be subject to the review of the City Attorney and shall include language for utilities as recommended by the City Engineer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELL0, MINNESOTA, that the document titled "Development Contract and Planned Unit Development and for Red Rooster — Chelsea Corner Planned Unit Development District," with assignment of the specific terms and conditions for public improvements and the specific terms and conditions for plat development, is hereby approved. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 24th day of July, 2017. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator ORDINANCE NO. 673 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK TO BE PLATTED AS CHELSEA CORNER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MON ,J a LELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: i Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: 4 (XX) Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District (b) Purpose. The purpose of the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for office-comrrrLnd industrial services land uses. (c) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District shall be office -commercial uses as found in the B-2, Limited Business District and industrial services uses as found in the I-1, Light Industrial District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated May 23rd, 2016, the amendment to Planned Unit Development dated July 24th, 2017 and development agreement dated July 25th, 2016, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district, including Conditional Uses in the B-4 District, shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 673 Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this day of , 2017. Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: A Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES NAYS 2 1w SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. 673A CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A SUMMARY ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO ZONING CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE RED ROOSTER PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on July 24, 2017, finance No. 673 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. Due to he lengthy nature of Ordinance No. 673, the following Summary Ordinance No. 673A has been prepared for publication as authorized by state law. The ordinance adopted by the Council amends Title 10 The general purpose of the ordinance amendments is to amend district. Section 2.4(P) — Planned UDevelopments, Title 11 amended by the following:,, Red Rooster/Chelsea Corner PUD District ng Code. as a zoning is hereby Permitted uses in the following parcel shall be office-gommercial as found in the B-2, Limited Business District and industrial service found in I-1, Light Industrial District: A Parcel: Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park to be platted as Chelsea Corner. A printed copy of the whole ordin - avv ble for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. The complete nce will be posted on the City's website following publication. Im APPROVED FOR PUBLICATAA by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, this 24th day of July, 2017 CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: (reservedfor recording information) AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT RED ROOSTER — CHELSEA CORNER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT LOT 1, BLOCK 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK THIS AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ("Amendment") is made this day of 2017, by and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("Developer") RECITALS A. The City and Developer previously entered into a Planned Unit Development and Development Contract dated July 25, 2016 and filed of record on August 5th, 2016 with the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as Document Number A1321232 (the "Agreement") B. The Developer is the fee owner of the property located at 100 Chelsea Road within the City of Monticello, Wright County, Minnesota, legally described as: 193051v2 Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South 100 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West of and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. (the "Property"). C. The Developer has requested an amendment to the Agreement to subdivide Lot 1, Block 2, Oakwood Industrial Park as legally described into two lots, to be platted as Lot I and Lot 2, Block 1, Chelsea Corner. D. The Developer has requested an amendment to the Agreement to construct a multi - tenant commercial building and accessory use building on Lot 2, Block 1, Chelsea Corner. E. Pursuant to City Code, Chapter 2, Section 2.4, a PUD Amendment may be approved by a simple majority of the City Council after public hearing and recommendation of the Planning Commission. The Developer shall follow the procedures and requirements of the PUD Development and Final Stage. A PUD Amendment shall be memorialized with an Amendment to the Development Contract and Planned Unit Development Agreement, executed by the City and Developer, and recorded against the Property. F. The City Council reviewed and approved the preliminary plat of Chelsea Corner on June 26th, 2017. G. The City Council reviewed and approved the proposed PUD Amendment per Ordinance No. 673 on July 10th, 2017, subject to conditions in Exhibit Z of the staff report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 193051v2 1. The City hereby approves the subdivision of the existing Property and the construction of a multi -tenant commercial building and accessory building consistent with the plans provided by the Developer and approved by the City on July 24th, 2017. 2. Developer agrees that any expansion of self -storage activities in the PUD District beyond the limited accessory non-commercial self -storage identified in the PUD Site Plan and Narrative, as approved in the PUD Zoning District, shall be subject to a further amendment to the Planned Unit Development and may require additional improvements, including, but not limited to, paving, curbing, stormwater, and screening. 3. No outdoor storage of materials or equipment shall be permitted in the PUD. 4. The future building made a part of this PUD shall be consistent in materials, height, design, and color with the currently proposed building. 6. Paving or alternative paving material shall be extended to the rear corner of the new office building and shall be further extended to the rear corner of the future storage building at the time of construction of said future building and shall be subject to the prior review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. Developer shall submit, for City approval, a site and full civil plan set showing the full set of existing, currently proposed, and future building and site improvements as a part of the record Final Stage PUD, including phasing of such buildings and improvements. 8. Lighting and lighting plans in the PUD shall be revised, and approved by the City, to be consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 9. Signage shall meet the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 19305M 10. Paving and circulation on the site shall be subject to the review, comment and approval of the City Engineer. 11. Developer shall comply with the recommendations of the City Engineer, per the letter dated 12. Developer shall enter into a PUD and Development Agreement for the site specifying for the allowable uses and conditions. The Development Agreement shall be accompanied by recordable cross -access and parking agreements for the two parcels. 13. Developer shall comply with the conditions recommended by other City staff or the Planning Commission. 14. The Developer shall furnish the City with a cash security, in the of $400.00 for installation of site landscaping in compliance with the approved Landscaping Plans. 15. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to inspection and observation of the grading and restoration of the Subject Property. Developer will provide an $1,000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for grading and restoration for this Development. The Developer shall pay for inspection and observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. 16. The Developer shall pay a fee for the City's engineering administration as related to inspection and observation of directional boring and installation of site utilities. Developer will provide an $5,000.00 escrow, which is separate and in addition to any other escrow funds for this Development. The Developer shall pay for inspection and observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation will be billed on standard hourly rates per City's adopted fee schedule. 19305M 17. The Developer shall post a $600.00 security for the final placement of interior subdivision iron monuments at property corners. The security was calculated as follows: 2 units at $300.00 per unit. The security will be held by the City until the Developer's land surveyor certifies that all irons have been set following site grading and utility and street construction. 18. Except as otherwise specifically amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment shall be binding on the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns and shall be recorded against the Property in the office of the Wright County Recorder/Registrar as promptly as possible after it has been executed by the parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed this day of , 2017. [Remainder ofpage intentionally left blank. Signatures contained on the following pages.] 193051v2 CITY: CITY OF MONTICELLO (SEAL) :14 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Brian Stumpf Mayor Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017 by Brian Stumpf and by Jeff O'Neill, respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 193051v2 DEVELOPER: RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC. Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) [print name] [title] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by , the of RED ROOSTER PROPERTIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 19305lv2 MORTGAGE HOLDER CONSENT TO AMENDMENT TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT RED ROOSTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT , a , which holds a mortgage on all or part of the property more particularly described in the foregoing Amendment to Planned Unit Development and Development Contract, which mortgage is dated and recorded as Document No. with the office of the Wright County Recorder/Registrar, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does join in, consents to, and is subject to the foregoing Amendment to Planned Unit Development and Development Contract; and agrees that the Amendment shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated: 92017. By Its And Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2017, by and , respectively the and of , a , on behalf of said Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 JJJ 193051v2 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Monticello, Minnesota 55362 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated , 2 , of (Name of Bank) it b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Administrator of the City of Monticello. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2007. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Monticello City Administrator that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Monticello City Administrator, Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362, and is actually received by the City Administrator at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. mm 193051v2 Its Red Rooster Properties, Inc. -Request for Amdt to PUD, Development Stage PUD, & Preliminary Plat Lot 1, Block 2 Oakwood Industrial Park 1155-018-002012 1 100 Chelsea Road Created by: City of Monticello April 8, 2017 Request: To split lot into two lots, add PUD amendment to accommodate split, to add building on new lot to east. Purpose: To accommodate sale of west portion of property and to make a more efficient use of property that was formerly used as a lumber yard as it is unlikely that a lumber yard will be needed in Monticello. Narrative: Last year Red Rooster applied and was granted a PUD for this property to allow excess space to be used for office, warehouse and self -storage uses. The permitted uses also included limited non-commercial self -storage as an accessory use. We realized that to best utilize this property it would make most sense to split property into two parcels and sell one parcel to someone with a similar business and with similar needs. We have a purchase agreement with Jovan Properties/DBA ProTech. They would be purchasing the main building and the building to the south of the main building.They are a restoration business with 6 to 8 office employees and 6 outside sales agents. They have similar needs as they need office space and warehouse space for equipment and supplies. They have outgrown their current location and would like to expand further in the future. This purchase would allow that. The construction side of their business takes place at customers locations as well as the material deliveries so their need for warehouse space is to accommodate equipment and leftover supplies. Their outside sales agents meet once a week at the office. The level of activity on site would be minimal. The split would accommodate Red Rooster as we could build a new building matching our needs and utilizing the excess space without leasing out as self storage which we do not want to do. Our needs are similar as we have to accommodate a lot of maintenance equipment but also restaurant equipment for replacement and repair, which takes up one of the existing buildings and then some. We are presently donating space to the Monticello Lions and the Monticello Chamber of Commerce which basically uses the second building. If we are to continue donating the space for the Lions and Chamber we would like the ability to also build on the existing slab in the future to accommodate our growth in the future. We are proposing this without improvements to the area around that building as it is not accessible to the public, gets minimal traffic, currently has hard packed gravel base, and has a buffer of asphalt existing before it leads to Chelsea so it doesn't leave mud or debris on the road. We propose to split property North to South at the entrance and have a shared access on the new property line to the South accommodating both parties that both parties would agree to maintain. We feel that the uses described would be a good transition and fit in the current zoning and could be accomplished with an PUD amendment and new plat. Th� nl�lfgu To H I aus Red Rooster Properties, Inc. May 5th 2017 Red Rooster Properties, Inc. understands the financial requirements for the development of the PUD of Chelsea Corner and the financial guarantees for the completion of such improvements. Tom Holthaus President May 15, 2017 RE: Application review Dear Mr. Thunander, Please find response to application review letter dated May 111h, 2017 Clarification of development schedule Plan to start construction as soon as possible after final plat recording. Completion in aprox. 90 to 120 days. Future building on existing slab to be built when necessary not known at this time. Clarification of the types of uses Aside from Red Rooster Properties there will be one tenant Wright Sherburne Realty taking space shown on floor plan already submitted. Exterior lighting Enclosed Specific flexibilities We believe that basically building the same type of building that exists we are complying with the zoning, adding stone, and architectural steel on front as shown on plan. Provide title information Enclosed SWPP Enclosed Trash handling Inside building workshop as shown on floor plan Site plan signatures and setbacks Enclosed Cross Access Agreement Enclosed Thanks, Tom CHELSEA CORNER KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, fee owner, Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota Non—profit Corporation, contract purchaser; Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, contract purchaser; and Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, mortgagee, of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to—wit: Lot I, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South 100 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as CHELSEA CORNER and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . 20 Richard Hobbs, President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires , 20 . by Richard Hobbs, President of Simonson Lumber of Monticello, Inc., a In witness whereof said Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota Non—profit Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of . 20 Denny Lindquist, Elder Dan Miles, Elder—Chair STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Non—profit Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Non—profit Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 . by Denny Lindquist, Elder of Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota 20 , by Dan Miles, Elder—Chair of Quarry Community Church, a Minnesota In witness whereof said Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of . 20 Tom Holthaus, President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 . by Tom Holthaus, President of Red Rooster Properties, Inc., a Minnesota In witness whereof said Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Mlnnesoto Corporation, mortgagee, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of . 20 Darren Heying, President Doug Danielson, Senior Vice President STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 . by Darren Heying, President of Sentry Bank FKA First State Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Bank of St. Joseph, a Minnesota Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires 20 , by Doug Danielson, Senior Vice President of Sentry Bank FKA First State CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the land, or directly supervised the surveying and platting of the land described on the plat as CHELSEA CORNER; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey, that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; as of the date of this certification, all wet lands and water boundaries and all public ways are shown and labeled as defined in Minnesota Statutues 505.01, Subd. J. Shannon Bollman, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 44360 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 20 . by Shannon Bollman, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 44360. (Signature) (Printed Name) Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires_ City of Monticello Planning Commission Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota at a meeting held on the day of 20 Chairperson Secretary City Council of Monticello We do hereby certify that on the day of 20. the City Council for Monticello, Minnesota approved this plat. Chairperson Attest County Surveyor I hereby certify that in accordance with the Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. I1, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of . 20 Wright County Surveyor County Highway Engineer This plat recommended for approval this Wright County Engineer day of , 20 County Auditor Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on this plat and transfer entered this day of , 20 Wright County Auditor By.• Deputy Coun ty Treasurer Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9. taxes payable in the year have been paid this day of 20 By Wrigh t Coun ty Treasurer Deputy on lands hereinbefore described County Recorder I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this of 20 at o'clock _M., and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Document Number Wright County Recorder day Sleeve . as Sheet / of 2 Sheets B0 WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. v� PARK DR. Site 0 0 DVNDAS RD. I I I I I I I I IN I I I I I NO SCALE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25, Wright County, MN VICINITY MAP LEGEND. • Denotes found iron monument O Denotes set iron monument CHELSEA CORNER % / \523 } N9( '000'00 "E 151.66 N90°00'00 "E 178.22 -f \P / south line of — Lot 1, Block 2 — N90"O0'00"E 332.27 — ------------ N90°00'00"E 33/.50 — CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 — II II II --12�---� L----+12_ NOT TO SCALE f Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also \P �� being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot \q3 062 lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown / '-A'0 on the plat. of � 0 50 ff of o I l Inch = 50 Feet 0 0 z. Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets BOGART, PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. 14 I - PID 155-0/8-00/0/2 City of Monticello .4 ' PID 155-018-00/020 — � City of Monticello — CH=2/.73 S81 °45'00 "W L=21.81 R=75.73 I „ , ,-, .. �- �. ,. r, A =16°30'00" \CID \ 'y N73°30'00 "E . N90°00'00 "E I 1 �? N90°00'00 "E 9� � � 25.78 l3/. 06 - - 14a87 \ N90 000'00 "E 331.50 — — 1/2tOpen _ I ----------I �1----- —T-------�- 3 I N I I I ('21 `— north line of I Lot 1, Block 2 l I I I —loft utility easement per d I OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK „ 50,11 2 331.50-------------------- I I I I I IN I 2 I —/00-- II I M I A II I tv 04 I Ln dry/ S88038'45"E 16.92.--, I I I er „ O41 P I os i J — _ �50ft transmission I I line easement per I I —1-50— Doc No 55663/ I I O I II 2 o --66---� I I I I O Block I One I o I z I I i I I I : 40 iJ A -4i i i OI I I I N I I o1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I north line of the I I I — South /00 feet of I I I I Lot 1, Block 2 — --- ---------J L ---1 ------------J 3 % / \523 } N9( '000'00 "E 151.66 N90°00'00 "E 178.22 -f \P / south line of — Lot 1, Block 2 — N90"O0'00"E 332.27 — ------------ N90°00'00"E 33/.50 — CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 — II II II --12�---� L----+12_ NOT TO SCALE f Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also \P �� being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot \q3 062 lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown / '-A'0 on the plat. of � 0 50 ff of o I l Inch = 50 Feet 0 0 z. Sheet 2 of 2 Sheets BOGART, PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. v� PARK DR. —T4 Site I -r1NDA5 RD. I I I I I I I I IN I I I I I NO SCALE Sec. 14, Twp. 121, Rng. 25, Wright County, MN VICINITY MAP I hereby certify that a boundary survey has been completed for the preliminary plat of CHELSEA CORNER, Wright County, Minnesota. Signed: Shannon Bollman Date: 6/20/17 Lic. No. 44360 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. (from Title Commitment No. 03063– I7) Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, according to the plat on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for Wright County, Minnesota, except the South /00 feet thereof. And also excepting: That part of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, City of Monticello, that lies East of a line drawn 331.5 feet West pf and parallel to the East line of said Lots as measured at right angles thereto, according to plot on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for the County of Wright, State of Minnesota. PROPOSED PARCEL AREA: Lot 1, Block 1-1.79 acres (77,968 SF) Lot 2, Block 1-1.88 acres (81,970 SF) SURVEYORS NOTES. I) Parcel address: l00 Che/sea Road Monticello, MN 2) PID No /55-0/8-0020/2 3) Trees were located individually for the purposes of this survey. 4) The preliminary plat includes topography collected April 2017 5) Existing sanitary line and water line are shown approximately per as–builts provided by WSB (City Engineer). Said as–builts are very difficult to see and exact location said utility lines can only be verified by uncovering them. We have only shown services we are aware of and their locations. 6) Underground telephone (as marked and located for the current preliminary plat) exists outside the existing drainage & utility easement along the north and west side of subject property. LEGEND: • Denotes found iron monument — sBL Denotes building setback line Denotes bituminous surface I II II 12 * O Denotes set iron monument of way lines m Denotes electrical cabinet a ° a Denotes concrete surface lines, unless Denotes sanitary manhole on the plat. pQ Denotes waterva/veDenotes wood fence rQ, Denotes power pole —0-0 Denotes chainlink fence Denotes guy wire Denotes retaining wall ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal — — — UT — Denotes underground Telephone ® Denotes electric meter — — — OHE — Denotes overhead electric Denotes hydrant — — — UE — Denotes underground electric 7{X Denotes light pole — — — W — Denotes underground gas line ® Denotes well Denotes easement ® Denotes air conditioning Denotes right of way ® Denotes Bollard — — Denotes major contour D> --Q Denotes cu/vert — — Denotes minor contour Denotes Tree, Coniferous > Denotes sanitary sewer Denotes waterline >� Denotes Tree, Deciduous — Denotes existing adjoiners LS 8194 Denotes John Oliver, LS LS 15233 Denotes Dennis Taylor LS CHELSEA CORNER (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PID /55-0/8-00/0/2 City of Monticello CITY OF MONT/CELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MN CURVE INFORMATION Cl Delta=16030'00" L=21.81 R=75.73 LINE INFORMATION L/ N73°30'00" 25.80 PID /55-0/8-00/020 City of Monticello 0 50 I Inch = 50 Feet I I i I I I A f-1 /1 A r1 DO 62 > 1> ./> j i/> i > gb3> > > � 90v0 �4"IjAJ `L � 19686'Dl. ut II — —/?B/L 6 "7— I I TL(a BL 1 _ C14W I — north line of Aj) Lot 1, Block 2 loft utility easement per I T; pr posed parking 1 �OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK $ I -� „ proposed drainage & utilitv easement I I I T 965 001 f----33/.50--------------------------- II I' IN I —100— — \ �.• l o-- - F I l0 I proposed) buildlr7g o I it /0 I I m fi a N I ° V I ►, r �� I � �� I D , y proposed drainage % o I I I \ I h & \ utility easement�o, g pole building / 0, S8eo38'45 I m .. ' • / 16.92 o\\d 1 / --I I I •} ' • .• L_ UT 51.6 f •.. L 2 - I —�J V proposed drainage to �� 50ft transmission utility easement �_ o line easement per 4134.5 �I —50— Doc No 55663/ I� , — 66— << I I I ' PID 155-0/8-0020/1 p IF I 96'8 I I a W K Properties LLC o0 Block N One of m I I I pole building P ( 2 I • I I I , I , arD I I z �1 �Ji 'cel,• -G-9 ' r 1( IFI I I Im I Ih II I pole building NSI oN o l I ZI DO i I r i I N pole building % C � - -► I I Lu IO 965 II J north line of the ob propoled drainage — 6� South feet of & util�ty easement 9 mI 963 0 /, Bl d I— lases I �6�les rL \523 PID /55-0/8-0020/3 o I I Chihos Equities LLC 0 0 O I south line of Lot 1, Block 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3�0 ,� N90 °00'00 "E 332.27 •T N90 °00'00 "E 33/. 50 \ 121 \P \g2 r SOILS CHART (Entire site is comprised of the single following soil type) Map symbol & soil name Hydrologic Water table group dep th (cm) 406, Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes B >200 BO WART PEDERSON, & ASSOCIATES, INC. For the purpose of this survey, the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK, has a bearing of North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East based on the Wright County Coordinate System NAD83 (1986). O Denotes 1/2 inch x /4 inch iron monument set with a plastic plug stamped R.L.S. 44360. • Denotes iron monument found. Denotes cast iron monument. Drainage and Utility Easements are shown thus: II 6 II II II 12 NOT TO SCALE Being 12 feet in width and adjoining right of way lines and plat boundary lines, also being 6 feet in width and adjoining lot lines, unless otherwise indicated, as shown on the plat. REFERENCE BENCHMARK: MnDOT Geodetic Database Station 8605 J, Stamped 8605 J 1967 Elevation = 959.25 (NAVD 88) PROJECT BENCHMARK: Top of Hydrant 30 ft north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 ft east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elevation = 962.48 (NAVD 88) OWNER & DEVELOPER: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus 9495 Deegan Avenue NE Monticello MN 55362 SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS.• Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. 13076 First Street Becker, MN 55308-9322 763-262-8822 ZONING: B-2 Limited Business District Red Rooster PUD MINIMUMS: 100 feet Width Denotes Building Setbacks: SBL SBL 30' from front 20' from rear 10' from interior side, 20' from street side DATE: 5/5/17 FIELD DATE: 4/10/17 BK/PG: – DRAWN BY: ssb CHECKED BY: ssb, jd DWG FILE: 17-0112.00 FILE NO: 17-0112.00 REVISIONS: 17/6/19 add notes, add information per as–built provided by city engineer I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed: Shannon Bollman Date: Lic. No. 44360 BOGART, PEDERSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING 13076 FIRST STREET, BECKER, MN 55308-9322 TEL: 763-262-8822 FAX: 763-262-8844 PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Tom Holthaus City of Monticello Wright County, MN PROJECT BENCHMARK.• Top of hydrant, 30 feet north of centerline of Chelsea Road and 420 feet east of centerline of Edmonson Avenue Elev. = 962.48 Feet (NA VD 88) CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 TITLE & INDEX SHEET SITE PLAN - OVERALL SITE PLAN OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK o CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA FOR RSD ROOSTER PROPERTIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN UTILITY & REMOVAL PLAN LANDSCAPE PLAN DETAILS PINE ST. A j�F ST 2 3 C! 5 I� ITC TE�a T, V Q � Y OQ ry IQ � �n U PARK DR. HIGN ��AY94 CHELSEA RD. fSite W m Q i U Z O � J Q J A Q Z LL A DUNDAS RD, WRIGHT COUNTY Section 14 Township 121, Range 25 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE W a 0 Ljo wry Z r- cn o cn O N "' Z in O 00 0000 W of N V) Y W W N L r nj� C5 p WLLI O O Z �'(2) o U I I� m O m m p Ld 0 J (D Z Z Y � LLJ U C� F-- U) Q w w Q W a� _ J 0 0 0 U LL- C m U O L- U 0 ° O ° U c N L o d L ° N +' O Ln �o—o.0 C Cc) o o C Z ° L •- �WC 000 O � .� �z ocf) (np ��� W N 0 '� U) 0 U .� C N Q-•�= J ° L 0-0 - ) 41 L N � L L T Z� N O N "' Z in LU 00 0000 W of n r7 N W n Z1 in LU r W H W V) Y W W m n V(Z3 Z i jN OC7 z� w, In Ldw V) ww jz �N nj� C5 p WLLI (nwz O Z �'(2) O z�JW � M .. W Q of JUS n� Z � 0 In V) Ld ry p WLLI Z Z � 0 O � U 0 Q w Z LLJ U J � LTJ m U :2O U 9 b W o r- n rn r� I > > C� I D UE — — uc — UE — — — UE — — — UE — — UE rg I o �I T SBL SBL SBL SBL I I S a S L SBL I I ts� I r I I I I i I �' II r i ► W W III\I� I I II •.:...... I o M �� I ► I IIIA rim- I m / `/ / •/ / / / •� ~ • d I I W I l a n I I I LT — La / 0 UE I N — E EXIS IN BUI DING o m / to \ .�I �I ICn Lu II N II II W UT I I I I 5/.6 r---J` I I I I I WI I� >>I I; ;I 0 a 1�c Zd III I I i II i 1 O I I WI Im .. d 34.5 1 I IN d� d •d I I I I I I I I / •/ / •/ / •/—GL W I I - > I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m I I 2 Il; 1 I O I�\ I l o I II Ir' Block"' 1 One I I I I I I ; I II I I I I I I I m I I' I I of • Ip I I I - a •. �J �, 1 I I I I d' I I N I II II II I I rI IN01 I EXISTING BUILDIN 3I I I l LU I I II I I � I II W I I O IPI III � I I b L ---- W M: — n i 'I I II I I / v I I I II I 1 I II I I gas I— -as las --1----------------J I n n n n n - rw A / ©I I I I I I / rw A / / / •/ ./ O 00 0000 W of N i > A C14 II, I m 0 0 L c� de (n w �I O O m M U - J d o Lu Q Q W O � z z Y E <L J ww ,E \I m r O I i Q LTJ of _ J Cn 1= 2 O L / II- I I I I I I• I i I I � N J IW IN I I II II I 1 I C has gas -ias las lTb I L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I— — — C - n n n n `PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING `EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING 8 N90000'00"E 33/.50 30 0 30 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: III = 30' z O m U Cn Li 0 W Q ZN LO N O N Z" 6 O 00 0000 W of N I.V > _ C14 O ZZO m 0 0 L c� de (n w �I O O m M U - m o Lu Q Q W O � z z Y E <L J ww � i LJ i Q LTJ of _ J Cn 1= 2 O L / L 0 ° 0 -° M U�°c O c ° N m7o�° L. 0+' 0 0 O Ln ° O— °o °o•a�c Z °E2c:E z 6 p O 0 O ° p Q� o0.°aQi° Q• 0V) (n N uo) �� M v��0 U 0 U �N CO 0 °•`J o � LT ai °� O i1— — O E -0 + (n ZN LO N O N Z" i jN W 00 0000 W of n LO N W n Z" i jN W Mnp r W H W I.V Y W W _ m n VCD i jN OCD Z LJ 00 M �w I.V w w W jz �N ZZO z L c� de (n w �I O C) J[Z � .. W >Q of JUS —)� Z 0 Q W Of W C) LiJ ZZO L LL1 O O I (n U - Z CD Q Q W Z � U —j J ww � i O mU:2 Cn SHEET NO. 2 / > > ' ' > z — > > > ' O 10 0 10 U SCALE IN FEET w 0 DRAINAGE AND SCALE: 1'' = 10' UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED PARKING SUMMARY W POLE Conventional Spaces 20 HandicaDDed Spaces 2 UE UE UE UE UE \ UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE UE •�.'�: UE UE UE Total Spaces Provided 22 > O s � Z TAPER CURB Cn o Cn o �T = = _ —U� _ --� k� — — UT — — — .— =�1% UT UT UT -- — Ui — • A N DT � U T T'EF��T — — �T — -- UT — — --- — UT — - _ 1 I I PROPOSED SITE DATA_ r o I Building 27,126 SF o 40 15 15 ' I Parking Areas l0, 000 SF co I I 1 c Concrete Areas 10,57/ SF m I i 51 i Greensnace Area 34.273 SF 00 Z o-j o Total Parcel Area 81,970 SF I � Y z a W�= 3 J O 0 0 0 U 0 LL_ N � SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL SBL I I �L�� SBL SBL SBL SBL :BL SBL BL SB 0 L N I I � o� I O 1 PROPERTY LINE aL a I1011 ► 1 10 EXISTING ZONING: B-2 (Limited Business District) o Q, z Minimum Lot Area: No Minimum o E 2 w .c 0D i I N , 9 Minimum Lot Width: l00 feet o 0 I I I _ (TYP) o R4.33 — — Denotes building setback lines: o Q o o Q I SETBACKS �� 9 o � o I I (2) PROPOSED PARKING I,.. B612 CURB, TYP. (B-2) Limited Business District a� f) N ISTALLS, TYP . �, Front Yard Setback: 30 feet a Cn ICD I I N 1r SideYard~ ISL f°i m , Rear Yard Setback: 20 feet v o N I I Cn R 1.17 ,� L U N �, I Q.� J O 1 ) _UE-0 in o WI I r 1 r OROPOSED / 1 Z V N N 1 SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES O Z 100 BITUMINOUS 1 O I I A V E M E N T1. All dimensions are to top back of curb unless ro N HANDICAP SIGN TIP—OUT CURB 1 otherwise noted. �N (SEE DETAIL) (SEE DETAIL) 2. A// Z� N proposed curb to be MNDOT Design B-6/2 Q W except where noted. W w PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE I I I J. All parking lot striping to be marked with a Q w< olkyld-based paint and MnDOT 2564 specific with 0° In N I 2 coats and at least 4" wide. zz w� Jas WW °e ° b 1 4. All concrete ramps, sidewalks and van accessible �W �� NN handicapped parking stalls to conform to current a Djz C5 �N I -o4 ° Q _ N A �, A.D.A. requirements. wz o LJ a 5. Typical full size 90° parking stall is 9' X 20' 0 _� �r I , ° z>< PROPOSED DRAINAGE I I I 70' unless otherwise noted. o� Q ow a fn AND UTILITY EASEMENT m I 1 I DEPRESS CURB 1 MILD AND MATCH I1 PROPOSED a LEGEND: AT PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE a I I E BITUMINOUS � ° Denotes sanitary manhole PAVE DENT SECTION a CURB RAMP SIDEWALK y N ° (SEE DETAILS) ° Denotes telephone pedestal I _ a ° ° I Denotes culvert I I 6I I O d ° ° 1 Denotes Tree, Coniferous I I I Denotes Tree, Deciduous N J L °° I -r X X —I- r �' Q / / I X —__ X �� I o Denotes bituminous surface Z I I° 0 a I I I 1 a s W , Denotes concrete surface ��/ W LL IDenotes wood fence o w z Io Denotes chainlink fence Z LLI —� Denotes underground Telephone O T Denotes underground electric — W m N 1 - - - - - - Denotes easement _ Z II 1 I Denotes right of way Q Q � Denotes building setback c� w w J I 1 I ZCn U� Parking Stall Count J _J w z w Proposed Flared End Section = O Proposed light pole SHEET N0. Proposed storm sewer 3 0 Q > INSTALL 10'' FIBER LOG, TYP. j963 �962� IE=959.60 962 10—LF 15" RCP @ I.00i f � UE UE UE UE U UE ' UE UE I UE UE -- - UE UE UE UE / UE — 'WO — UE� - — INSTALL EROSION 962 CONTROL BLANKET — --u---= 962 ---------- UT----- 77T _�— UT — �~6U— UT ----- UT (- --- —_ —---------� — --. - .. I I — — — •9631_�J 962 963 I ✓� a(. - .963-- 0.9% 963__0.9% STORM CB RE=962.2( I I IE=959.70 I I —964 I �o i ��0 PROVIDE ROCK CO\ISTRIUCTION 11' ENTRAN�E (S -E DLTAILS) I I I I �� X63 ° d ° ° d 4J FFE=965.6 I I I I I \ I I INSTALL 10" FIBER LOG, TYP. 111111110 EOF=962.80 O N yv 964.26 �� ��\ X = X . 63.58 I I (M EI ) / I I I I I I ROOF SLOPE i ROOF SLOPE I I I d I I I I I I I I I J I I I a / I d / X Z 0 10 0 10 w U SCALE IN FEET 0 SCALE: I" = 10' Gradina & Erosion Control Notes LU I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction Q limits shown. o 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water Permit requirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all LU oz Permit requirements. 3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours Z Q 0 Q of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device \ U N or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices N C • shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of 0 0 p Termination is submitted to the MPCA. Z W Z : m 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the m m o J p Z potential for site erosion. Z z Y E Z 0 Q U) Q w U w U Z o ( 5. The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and o 0 o U I LJ_ < maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). C of 00 U O L 0 SHEET N0. 6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained 0 L. ° o until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. L- CE ° N 7. All soils tracked onto pavement or any other off—site areas shall be removed °`° ° — ° O `n daily. o'0) c Z WC: aE�� z 8. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control v, -0c c o O measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent °.°a) z vegetation in said areas. v o - o -C a,�, -o ° a cno 9. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated r >� M as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within 3 0 w cv 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. 0 W ° +' c �I -0 0 0 3 ° 10. All disturbed areas shall be revegetated with seed mix, mulched, fertilized (D _0 ° iv & disk anchored. tLT�m Cn O 11. Backyard drainage swales shall be graded at a minimum 1% slope. 12• Inlet protection devices shall be placed in all storm drainage structures until vegetation is established on slopes. Z 13. Grading limit area is 0.42 acre. V O ZI N m� co 0000 14. All spot elevations are to top of pavement elevation. (ME) indicates match oN existing pavement elevation. W Z O W W H J1- W j� Y W W M SEEDING SCHEDULE O C7Z zo' i jN fyoW 00 Seed mix 25-121: 61 Ib/ac. W >-w LU LU>Z �N Fertilizer 22-5-10: 350 Ib/ac. Q y 0 Mulch Type 1: 2 T/ac. DZ0 �LdZ Q QC) O a_ M W JUS � Q .. OJ n I--- LEGEND: Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Proposed Rip Rap X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation Proposed Drainage Flow Proposed Silt Fence Proposed Fiber Log SO0 Proposed Major Con tour 800 Proposed Minor Contour Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Proposed Bituminous Surface Proposed Rock Construction Entrance I Proposed Concrete Surface 4 � Z Q Z Q U Q_ QL U) • U p W Z W Z : OU p Z J Q 0 Q W (D Z U Z ( Q I Z < T of 00 U :2 0 SHEET N0. 4 -q" 0 EX SAN MH A A RE=961.65 i r- -�-i ii ori i ii i i �_ -► / `-► L/ PE 940.15+/- EX 1011D SC BORE EXISTING �y WET 3AP EXISTING SERVICE SANjT/AR Y > > > A LE FOR 411 REMOVE 30ZF INSTALL LEXIBLE PE SANITARY I o I - 96`�� EXISTING URB SEWER I I �-\ PROPOSED —9W� MANHOLE IE=942.00 BOOT CONNECTOR �'l�?-�-� STa �^� (FIELD VERIFY) _ -REM OVE FENCE TYP. — II I UE ut UE - iu�� „`9 UE UE —�0�— \ — I I 962 DIREC I ZONAL BORE ter �— —— — — — — —u-- — Ju _ _ I� _ 962= _--------- ----— I 963 I I 96,3 I I 4XI 60 LF - 4 HDPE I I �I I - , SDR 26 LU I � I I ► � � I, = i l * * I 964 o I; I I * i i I s PROTECT FENCE, TYP. I ,Iri I I DIRE41ONAL BORE I I I II .1340 LF - 111 TYPE 111 0 1 a ' REMOVE PARKING STRIPES '1K11 COPPER I77� I\ II SAW CUT AND REMOVE 157 I I � DIRECTIONAL BORE SY EXISTING BITUMINOUS 60 LF - 411 HDPE I I f I SDR 26 @ 2.00% \ $0 �,9s I — il\ 1 s� REMOVE FENCE s / _ �. DIRECTIONAL BORE W � PR�1 EC FENCE I MECHANICAL TO MA E - - 11 6 I � � � � 36 LF 4 HDPE CONNECTION, TYP. SDR 26 @ 2.00% o d ° LU 1 o d ° -}- I - ® i d °i ° dI 411 CLEAN OUTS, TYP. I o=1 I 1 °° I • J II I 1 � i J1 10' 1 i I I — I— — dm / // do dd I E III o ° o W ° ° ° o ° d 4 4 ° °o ° °o ° ° o ° °0 o ° o ° o• ° d ° d °d °o °o° ° ° ° ° ° o° o d e° ° r7 ° o o d ° o I I I ° a d • ° ° ° ° ° d I I I I I I I I °°° °° d ° ° ° o ° d A ° ° ° ° ° d o � ° o I F- I I I I ° I I ° ° d ° ° o ° d Al 0 ° O A w I I o I I d ° ° o o d ° o ° II ° ° o ° d ° o ° UT UT / e � � ° o ° o d ° ° ° ° $ d \ I I I I I 1 I 4 o o ° o ° ° ° d° °• d° ° d °° Io I I •d ° ° ° o °d ° o I I r ----J I I I o o ° I I I I °° • ° ° $ ° ° ° d °° • • o O d • I I� \o I � I 1 I I1 I o I I I � I � to , I I I I I I I d° ° o °° 34.5 t o o d ° a ° ° I °/ "°/ iid / i / i ° — — — :\7r� tc�/ I I I �0 I I I 1 = II I l,0 � I =W, lock ne I P °°o d I I I I I FA I ° °or I I I X 20 0 20 SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I11 = 20' UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES I. Underground utilities shown hereon are as per available utility maps and measurements to visible On-site locate markings. 2. The contractor is specifically cautioned that the location and/or elevation of existing utilities as shown on these plans are based on records of the various utility companies and limited measurements taken in the field. J. The contractor must call the appropriate utility company at least 48 hours before any excavation to request exact field location of utilities. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to relocate all existing utilities which conflict with the proposed improvements shown on the plans. The location of utilities shall be obtained by the contractor by calling Gopher State One Call at I-800-252-1166 or 811. 4. Prior to construction, the contractor shall obtain the necessary federal, state and local permits for the proposed work or verify with the owner or engineer that permits have been obtained. Permit fees shall be the responsibility of the contractor unless otherwise arranged with the owner. 5. All electric, telephone and gas extensions and other service lines shall be re-routed and constructed in accordance with the specifications of the appropriate utility company. The contractor shall coordinate the service line construction with the utility companies. 6. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main installations shall be in accordance with the city's requirements and the current building and plumbing code requirements. 7. All sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main construction shall conform to the City Engineers Association of Minnesota Standard Specifications, 20IJ Edition. 8. Coordinate installation of new utilities with the Mechanical plan. 9. A minimum vertical clearance of l8 inches is required at all wa term cin and sewer main crossings. l0. Manholes in paved areas shall be sumped 0.04 feet and catch basins in gutters sumped 0.10 feet. Rim elevations shown on these plans reflect sumped elevations. Il. All disturbed roadway areas shall be restored to some thickness and quantity. 12. Tracer wire shall be installed along all proposed watermain and sanitary services. 13. Provide minimum 8 feet of cover on all watermains. Insulate any watermains that have less than 8 feet of cover. 14. Traffic control shall conform to the requirements of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). 15. Contractor to obtain a utility excavation permit from the Public Works Department at least 48 hours prior to commencement of excavation for utility connections. LEGEND: co EE Denotes electrical cabinet ® Denotes electric service C Denotes light pole Q Denotes hydrant Denotes sanitary manhole N Denotes waterva/ve --07- Denotes sign Denotes power pole r - Denotes telephone pedestal ® Denotes electric meter ` Denotes Flared End Section po-�� Denotes culvert O Denotes Tree, Coniferous (o Proposed Sanitary Cleanout z O a - U w 0 Lv Q 0 I\ co 0 co O C'4Z "' - r W Y w� M ij" O 00 0000 I,J � of N Q CO)ww Denotes jz 410 a Co Q C7 D r - m m concrete surface w M 0 w .. O Z Z Y E ��- Denotes c� Q W Z 0 LJ chainlink fence Q W [if _ 3 J O O O U O L_ CF - — U - Denotes underground Telephone (n U O oW v — — Denotes M ° ° c Q O c ° °oma° - Denotes N a ° +' a)0 w U O LO O — C: Denotes underground electric p SEC) cc >- Z Ld - easement _j w ~ z — z Denotes a cc O _ 0 O ° �Q) QIP Denotes aQi° m < L_ U) 0 W a- a) Denotes sanitary sewer 3 N v � 0 t. U N storm sewer � 1 Denotes waterline L 0-0 / T N � +� o t T— _ `O Eve cn o Z" LO N zN W O C'4Z "' - r W Y w� M ij" O 00 0000 I,J � of N WZ LO N zN W W a H a - r W Y w� M �v Denotes Tree, Deciduous Z 2 ij" O Z� I,J � Ljw Q CO)ww Denotes jz HN a Co Q C7 U)wz m 5Oz>a- � .. _jQ o U� nI— W Denotes Tree, Deciduous 1 Q Denotes bituminous surface 0 _j Q 0-U)0 Denotes concrete surface w W ��- Denotes wood fence Z o Denotes chainlink fence w ():f x Denotes barbwire fence - — U - Denotes underground Telephone (n U O z — — Denotes overhead electric Q Q w - Denotes underground fiber optics z w U — — — — Denotes underground electric — (n >- - - - Denotes easement _j w ~ z — Denotes right of way _ = O Denotes major contour m U Denotes minor contour Denotes sanitary sewer SHEET NO. Denotes storm sewer 5 1 Denotes waterline / E:3 / > > > > ' > > >NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR z > / ALL UNDERGROUND LOCATE REQUIREMENTS. O _ ry — — — CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING: w � -PROPOSED MAPLE GOPHER STATE ONE CALL � TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 OR 811 . j 963 962� TREE, TYP. MINNESOTA TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 OR 811 1-962 — — — � w Q UE UE UE I i� Z UE U UE UE UE UE UE - UE UE Z --— UE — '� UE UE ��tlE►� UE -96/- j O . 962 / 1 MONUMENT SIGN u1 ur ��--96--------- — — I- (n 0 (n O Q rt7T-UT UT-— — UT UT -- UT �- O 10 0 10n963 - ci i -0 O I I I SCALE IN FEET m J SCALE: 1'' = 10' z y o I I �� Q w U w I I Q W�_ J o 0 o U o� I I L PROPOSED TREE SCHEDULES ° aLaL_0 O c, E= c z I ate, _� !�o° oo MAPLE (2" DIA.) a QTY. 2 ° 0 °' �•- oc/) (n 0 I I , ICO wN I I .. C L U N U N J ° N I I I �L�a� HARDCOVER CALCULATIONS: DESCRIPTION EX. AREA PRO. AREA PERCENT Z ti N I Z PERVIOUS AREA 10,560 SF 10,950 SF 13.4% 0 100 IMPERVIOUS AREA 71.410 SF 71.020 SF 86.6% ori GROSS SITE AREA 81,970 SF 81,970 SF 100.0% LO(0 I W LO 04 LV W wX °° I I I LANDSCAPING NOTES O z_z w( ° n ° ° ° 4,q ° ° ° ° ° c ° I. Areas not paved and to be landscaped shall receive minimum of (� jz NLli 04 ° ° a ° ° ° a ° G ° ° ° ° ° ° ° e ° 4" depth as measured in place of topsoil. All graded slopes greater than or equal Q y o'er NN ° ° ° to 4: 1 shall be covered by erosion control blanket after topsoil has been placed. �wz �(0 d A I LJ ° 0 p a_ G ° m _'a onw JUS -� I , I � I I I I � I I I I I �— LI I I ,I d° as 4 I I ] C ° da ° X --�X / I I W Of z I I I I Z J LLJ 0:� Q_ O p LLJ U 1 I i I 0 Q W Q W (� U J I o _j �woz mU� J / J I / I SHEET N0. I 6 0 Q PAVEMENT MAXIMUM RED COLOR SLOPE 2% IN ALL DIRECTIONS. CONCRETE WITH TRUNCATED DOMES PER ADA SPECIFICATIONS , _ „ — „ SIGN POST WITH s -0 5 0 6 o J ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL (TYP) d< a d e c ,SLOEE UP eSLOk UP a 1: 12s 1:12 a • e ° a ° ° a e c e • �� �• a ° a° e ••P• •�22 e e FACE OF WALK a ::: ::: ::.::.:a ° a ✓ ° OR CURB 4" WIDE YELLOW IPES PAINT STIR (TYP.) 96" min. FOR VAN ACCESS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. SEE DETAIL Ck 96" min. _ INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY; YELLOW -4" PAINTED STRIPING 1'-6" O.C. AT 450 (YELLOW REFLECTIVE) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AND HANDICAP RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY A SIGN SHOWING THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY COMPLYING WITH ANSI 4.28.8. SIGNS SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY A VEHICLE PARKED IN THE SPACE. 3011 6011 411 ANSI 4.28.5 FINISH AND CONTRAST s POSTS TO BE THE CHARACTERS, SYMBOLS AND BACKGROUND PRE -PAINTED GALVANIZED STEEL OF SIGN SHALL BE EGGSHELL, MATTE, OR OTHER NON -GLARE FINISH. CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLS w SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND, WITH EITHER LIGHT CHARACTERS ON A DARK BACKGROUND Of OR DARK CHARACTERS ON A LIGHT BACKGROUND. 12 a � 1 Proposed signs to be placed in accordance BLUE- — =_ with the Minnesota Manual on Uniform 0 Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). 10 WHITE— Ljj REFLECTIVE FACE MATERIAL ACCESHU O PMMG 80 Go. Alum. O • HANNEL POST - (2# Ft.) 5'-5' LONG, to C� _, Ic a W 6 MIN iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii• Z SURFACE 4' 4" SLOPED INCRETE `lo 0 o i 'I > o io a' `�o� o o°0o �g i ,Q'4 o ob� a 0s 16" ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL s PAVE WEAR COURSE s 1' WIDE MILL 1 " DEEPj JII\P11V111 LIIVL J/"�YYVVI EX. BIT. FOR REMOVAL PROPOSED WEAR COURSE, - BASE COURSE & AGGREGATE BASE REMOVE C FROM CUR CONCRETE 36 1/2" 35 1/4" CURB BOX ADJUSTABLE 6" TO 9" - 1 7/8" 5" 6 11 17 3/4" i w 15 1/2" 2411 -IN 11111- 31'1 s 36113111- 4,311 CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R -3067—L OR EQUAL STANDARD INLET CASTING 1 n A s e A p I 1 - 1 1/2" BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 - SPWEA240B) TACK COAT (Mn/DOT 2357) -211 BITUMINOUS MAT (Mn/DOT 2360 - SPNWB230B) 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (Mn/DOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (Mn/DOT 2105, 2111) TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES BROOM FINISH `SLOPE VARIES a a° e a ° 4" CONCRETE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 95 % MODIFIED PROCTOR TYPICAL SIDEWALK SECTION TYPICAL MATERIAL SECTIONS a NOTE: CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF M ON TI CELLO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TOP OF CURB CONCRETE GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER TAPER DETAIL OUTFALL GUTTER I 6" I �I/2"R TOP BIT. MAT �� 311R 3 i \—,3 R r 3/4" PER FT. — --r—---- -- 04I 1/211R BASE I I I 1211 — I _ 811 I — — — — — — — I ---� STANDARD GUTTER 6— II j I /—I/2"R T — - TOP BIT. MAT I F- a 3/8"311R 31 ° \-3"R I I — — J= 3/4" PER FT. fl I I I � II �I 1/2 R BASE I I I I I I 1211 I 811 I B-612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 12" THICK— RUNOFF WATER 1811 MINIMUM WITH SEDIMENT 0— -_ —__� 4mm III, 1 I1 1 IIII I —III_ SEDIMENT FILTERED WATE PIPE SIZE d o < 30" 3" i jN O Z [IfW 3011 6011 411 >-LLJ > 6011 6" UJli W LLI >z w a(A HN Of a � a �� 0 � Ljj Lj Lj O Z O I/8 COVER OVER PIPEr O (n 0 (n C� Q W 6 MIN iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii• Z lij O NU) N J w Z i/O _ = O W -CAREFULLY COMPACTED iii .TiiGRANULAR :2 o SELECTED iBc iii. MATERIAL. iiii, KD m 00m o J0�0 0 0 C �/6 Bc i�U)00000 0 0°0°0°0 cn Q w U w n d n n If — 0.5 B ---I c I I U L� If -0.5 Bc�l c o �•' L N o� °� O THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH SHALL ~- N BE SHAPED TO FIT THE PIPE BARREL FINE GRANULAR FILL MATERIAL FOR AT LEAST 50% OF THE L ° a� ° 0 O O CAREFULLY COMPACTED OUTSIDE PIPE DIAMETER. .a ° - c o THE MAXIMUM SIZE PARTICLE ALLOWED IS 3/8". o f= w E Z °- >, *- z 6) o'_ O Q) OVER EXCAVATED TRENCH CONDITION STD TRENCH CONDITION =-a 0 0 o v� Q) a) < oQ2o � �z � ��oCf) L > L (/)O REFERENCE: NOTE: FOR ROCK OR OTHER INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS, THE Q) 3 U) � C V CONCRETE PIPE DESIGN MANUAL TRENCH SHOULD BE OVEREXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 6 c o PREPARED BY AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE INSTITUTE AND REFILLED WITH GRANULAR MATERIAL. o as (D 3 � N Q_•- J L N +, L CLASS C PIPE BEDDING ZN N O "' Z W COW of r) N n W ZI in W r W W a a j� Y W M LED 90° SHOEBOX NOTE: CHECK WITH OWNER FOR SUPPLIER OF LIGHTS AND MATERIALS CLEAR ROCK (3/4" TO 1 1/2") 4" PVC OVERFLOW PIPE WITH 1/211 PERFORATIONS • �i��i��i��ii 0i��i��i��i��ii��� WIRE MESH (1/2" BY 1/2") CATCH BASIN SEDIMENTATION BARRIER POLE HEIGHT LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION ABOVE ° a ° a GRADE a a BASE HT. a BELOW a ° GRADE a / w ° as LIGHT POLE DETAIL n o C7Z i jN O Z [IfW 00 >-LLJ UJli W LLI >z a(A HN Of a � cowz �� O QJE (or .. W >Q of JUS � Z Ld Of C) w z Z � Ljj 0 O U C� Q W Z lij U N J w Z a _ = O W m U :2 o I COm m E m N M Mm0rn N t0007NON Q f[ 7 mo } c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 yO L CL EM pM7 O 7 0Y ��� U U ° a °- Vj 01�N aizU II w z O N I 1a MU IS �= z M Mm0rn N t0007NON p f[ 0 t0 W } c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 x ^ to W 6 6 N 00 W N d pM7 I- ? � ��� w a = ~ 00 MM Vj 01�N II O W w z O N I O g o W M 0 W` Hm V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 M 0,03 S O ZW Ill Tm c3c iiof N p Lq 7 OtON7pmNnOM t° n n W ZIn o U EW �= aro U ~ J a UO_ W o OOO�MtD LIJ vi° II ii LD O�IiU m LLL C x m a > o} L >< NW to -0 C wow O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! II 0 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C aJJF,=Q — arn W g wW x �p N ii g mLa rw,nato01MwN77nt°77oto W rNNNM7 W U W II ~ O~ ao o•� J W W m Q�Q t0 OO W MONNNMMaN O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T UNM7,n (nr ZZ Zp 00n a� 0 M OJ F W m W xm I I II IM n c6 W W O� U Cno LL M oac�5� O- aQ O Q w= >16 �7ooMrn7�ulm7rn,n,nmo00 H W �a Z II'\ 0) Z 00 0000 A n W JOS O LL a SOV N,M<,t Z" W m Oi.-,7,(iNN in W 1Ld vl g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 W 0 w W SV r H Cj Lj p 3 l Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe UO H� op r�[n o7dza aFpn O zm �QJ pQ HW �d zW w4a zm o x ii ; d WM 0NNM7NtOm�M)tG LLJ ,•i,66nNriaa O!lM U W x2 OS m WZ o+ II v 1n 2-t2 Z. Z. aaW W� �� a. Mm H ZN00 W Ka iiW a�a Fn p a5 Q N N notcNpppp70.N7lo N M M 7 71n U_Z JO n 00 0! wQ W} O= U) 5R W 0 WQ <W >,- WW Uap WW ~ vo Z Z O m O F aa2 J O WW 4 W WZ W= U W= �� m t y C ENa3 O_ H z ov) ` ui W S U ¢j zw mJ ww Q a3 �Mo W n °.y' U MM �c a zZQF S F W W M W U x aZ 3 ocmrn 0 N 0n FV10 41Wd Fm zm �sW LLI�J3J0 WQIi a �> Wt~i! mY W~ OJ N ° ii I B� C� Z oF�� 0. xaU W~W �W Kr M V) p 1' OW OQ w Wo o a p� s a W2 ZO E 00 ° p m II o° UU O w- O_Nam -a WOW mow N J d NO ° OwI1y� U*16rk< ® aQ W WK ow �� W W (9 Z� go jL J W M: 0 Wm< 7'L W W pm J - 7X xW K/ Q U. m ga i.. mZ J� o= _� LY �o I z Q�7a OUi w� ='^ .. O Qp WQ Wm II W ��W d'(G OQm d Q I Q W =W VO W O 'l' a3 iWM c0W a I W WK W z mp M a W U O O Q W C ii v • W D O K K Ll�< W 7 O S W W Z> c o I m J O W O U m a H W H F O W 0 8 W ii ( D_ .� WLM Z9 Z I j02 ap N0 II •' , WOa� Z wR lia N= a NO o zW II N F_ II O0. W '. vq�a j a ion WW M N n a I Z w r:. WZUp zw ao°vS owa oZZ WZEEcn 3 ii Ow.�Ji z0l` �W� O F �.• 7WJm WI -N p II V II N ZWO x aoE z_ Z�'i! o, Wi O U xO O U v�,37o moo' 9w w a = A CALL TO GOPHER STATE ONE (454-0002) W x W m IS REQUIRED A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION. L Title` Residential Building Standard Plate Library Erosion Control City of Monticello Date: 03_05 Plate No. Revised: 6006 03-15 j SPECIAL NOTE: SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID WHEN INSTALLING DRIVEWAYS TO NOT UNDERMINE OR DAMAGE EXISTING SIDEWALKS. 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK—,,- / 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE`6R APPROVED EQUIVALtNT TAPER DEPTH AND WIDTH IN 10' SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER 70, 2S' \ / Miy/MSM 3" OF 1-1/2" ROCK OR 6" CRUSHED CONCRETE OF 1EIGHT PLAN WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -23* HIGH FLOW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL DEFLECTOR PLATE OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. OVERFLOW IS Y2 OF THE CURB BOX HEIGHT OVERFLOW AT TOP OF FILTER ASSEMBLY /--CURB * FOR THE NEW R -3290 -VB STANDARD CASTING, INSTALL WIMCO ROAD DRAIN CG -3290 OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL. Standard Plate Library City of Monticello �a FILTER AS DIAMETER, 6" ON -GRADE 10" AT LOW POINT HIGH-FLOW FABRIC Title: Inlet Protection Catch Basin Insert lR ate: 03-07 Plate No. evised:03-1 5 6004 TOP OF PROPOSED SUBGRADE THE TOP 3' SHALL BE COMPACTED AT A MIN OF 100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) A MAX OF 2' LIFTS TO BE WETTED AND CONSOLIDATED BY VIBRATORY MEANS AND COMPACTED TO A MIN OF 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY (MN/DOT 2105) 4' COVER COMPACTED TO 95% OF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY WITHOUT THE USE OF HEAVY ROLLER EQUIPMENT 0.. GRANULAR BEDDING AS PER MN/DOT 3149.21' GRANULAR FOUNDATION WHERE ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER SHOVEL, PLACE, AND HAND COMPACT AROUND PIPE TO 12" ABOVE PIPE. VIBRATORY COMPACTION REQUIRED EACH SIDE OF PIPE, AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 6' TO 7" DIA. ROLL ENCLOSED IN J PLASTIC OR POLYESTER NETTING TYPE 21 BIOROLL DITCH CHECK USE ON ROUGH GRADED AREAS 1" X 2" X 18" LONG WOODEN STAKES AT 1' 0" SPACING MAXIMUM. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGH THE BACK HALF OF THE BIOROLL AT AN ANGLE OF 45 DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THE STAKE POINTING UPSTREAM. BIOROLL N45'PROVIDE 8" TO 10" OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH. FLOW 8" - 10" EMBEDMENT DEPTH BIORCLL STAKING DETAIL NOTE, WHEN MORE THAN 1 BIOROLL/COMPOST LOG IS NEEDED, OVERLAP ENDS A MINIMUM OF 6' AND STAKE Standard Plate Library City of Monticello ENTRENCH A MINIMUM OF 2' Title: Bio Log Staking Straw or Wood Bio Roll Date: 03-08 Plate No. Revised:6009 03-15 6" MAX TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS 5/8 FOR 18" TO 27" APRONS 3/4 FOR 30" & LARGER APRONS. i—� 16" ANCHOR TOP J & BOTH ENDS NOTE: 1. ALL TRASH GUARDS SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER MNDOT SPEC. 3392 & 3394. 2. APPLIES TO FLARED END SECTIONS 12" OR LARGER. 3. ALL NUTS AND BOLT ATTACHING TRASH GUARD TO THE FLARED END SECTION SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED W H Z Q O W O W J CD — z a� O a �" �u W �O$ �$ obo oY3 otic y a w O m o oo o oo m I w O OV Q 77 VD VD VD Vr g 7 O O CL ¢ M ° o0 0 00 ooC z a it Q w m p a c� � 1 `ma a D > "ZW o x ZO 3 6� WW aDWWO W it W = a N a N 0 W fV W W JO NWW L J U O O t W c W x 9Z p r_''�,0 �Ty7% o o w W 7 O'� N O = W U Z O N U W O N wL>O g00 W KQ o'a mQw ° �Z wa zOa z ¢=w a N¢� O O �cl� z 0 a a.J 0 W J O o_ U a 0_ Of OL 01 > ' U OH xgo W z O ii U n U M Mm0rn N t0007NON p f[ 0 t0 W ao7tcrnon0m7Na M mbmNO09 c0 N ? N 7p N M M c0 x ^ _I p }7 to W 6 6 N 00 W N d pM7 NI�Oi�MI� � "NN 00 MM Vj 01�N II O W U — N --- O g o N V)_ C) V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 Z U W �il}Mn M N p Lq 7 OtON7pmNnOM t° n n W ZIn o U M U W W ZJp��tV SHEET N0. OV N)7,t)tC (n Q W OOO�MtD LIJ — aO�n >N O�IiU 0 LLL C O L > ANN +' L N C7 N -0 C O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! II 0 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C — — — 0001vtrimmoi - toa (� Io g mLa rw,nato01MwN77nt°77oto Z rNNNM7 W U W II ON Q� ao o•� — ^�K — — — W t0 OO W MONNNMMaN O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T UNM7,n Na 00n W M NOO �,n M 071001 Mt001 IM n c6 t`!Cn „M Oi W O� U Cno �NNM ,nm ,n,n n x >16 �7ooMrn7�ulm7rn,n,nmo00 Z 0) DO 00 0000 A n W JOS O LL U SOV N,M<,t Z" t6 m Oi.-,7,(iNN in W = vl g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 tON 0 W " � n QC) 6 - - c` aOle NN NM M Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe UO H� op r�[n Oto O 01MOtO Ot000D 000000�01n M71nO MM 7 C)Ja d WM 0NNM7NtOm�M)tG Z —W >Q JUS ,•i,66nNriaa O!lM ISO W �NM77amn 0 2-t2 a ZN00 W Ka NM71n a�a Fn p a5 m2 N N notcNpppp70.N7lo N M M 7 71n w t0 n 00 0! 0 Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' N W z Y U L o N N �a a� =o r Oz F W zo W W Wm W Lx J W3 m z Title: Riprap Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009 03-15 / TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BENDS l CONCRETE ENCASEMENT \ 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: Title: Title: Title: Residential Gravel Typical Trench Compaction Trash Guard for Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding A,,:,Standard Plate Library End Section �� Standard Plate Libraryy City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Clt of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03-0503-05 03-05 Revised: 6001 Revised: 1007Revised: 4007 Revised: 3006 -- 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � z O a - Of U W W �1 g,n Q Q N Z�r .- WO W Ol fV Y 4 mol 0 c0 N 0 1M to W 6 6 N 00 ODN70,n j > F U > aU � In In N M M M N ZN II O � — N --- O g o N V)_ C) V) (n Uo =n p e�r� }mNOt°m7tONmt07m00 Q) 1 Z U W N W d � M Nf I,-0---Mo00wo ^ N N M M I n t° n n W ZIn o U M U o SHEET N0. (n Q W 0 LIJ — — — — Q 0 LLL C O L > S x O +' L N C7 N -0 C O Ii >N 1n W t0 N° 1°! OY 7 d• tO OR t0 O— C °! W Z7fV N)�tLi �Ooa�c E C 0001vtrimmoi Z toa (� >^ U Z rNNNM7 W U W II ON Q� ao o•� — — — — W � o Oar'� O O --p +' L.L M O U =a o O rLi�T 70100 Na 00n W M NOO �,n M 071001 Mt001 IM n c6 t`!Cn „M Oi W O� U Cno �NNM ,nm ,n,n n x Z 0) DO 00 0000 01 17 N n W Z" in W Hr W g W O jna0Fr000l W �In 00M Of lON00010 tON 0 ri W J0^Na6,6066 p n QC) 6 - - c` aOle NN NM M Q 1 0- W II U vy� Lj WDoe li W L.,.-1 > ZH �/r U aQ op T O ina 0001 1�a Ot000D U)WZ M71nO MM 7 C)Ja C Awa riu500 Z —W >Q JUS ,•i,66nNriaa o� �NM77amn 0 a�'L a ZN00 W Ka NM71n G00 In ,n MOO t0 n000�NMN N,n N007 Of i Standard Plate Library City of Monticello USE 4" OR 6" CISP PLUG AND CAP, TOP TO BE 1/2 " BELOW FINISHED GRADE VARIES 10' TO 20' N W z Y U L o N N �a a� =o r Oz F W zo W W Wm W Lx J W3 m z Title: Riprap Detail Date: 03-05 Plate No. Revised: 4009 03-15 / TIES REQUIRED TO CLEAN OUTS FINISHED GRADE 6" PVC RISER FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL 4" PVC RISER FOR RESIDENTIAL 4" OR 6" VERTICAL WYE (PVC) 1/8 BENDS l CONCRETE ENCASEMENT \ 12" ALL AROUND (INCIDENTAL) WATER TIGHT GASKET OR CEMENTED PLUG PVC HORIZONTAL WYE (PVC) THRUST BLOCKING FOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT 1. PAYMENT FOR 6" RISER PIPE, 6" VERTICAL WYE 45' BEND AND PLUG WILL BE PAID FOR AT UNIT PRICE BID PER EACH. 2. CLEAN -OUTS REQUIRED AT 70' INTERVALS FROM MAIN SEWER LINE. Title: Title: Title: Title: Residential Gravel Typical Trench Compaction Trash Guard for Sanitary Clean -Out Standard Plate Library Construction Entrance Standard Plate Library and Class B Bedding A,,:,Standard Plate Library End Section �� Standard Plate Libraryy City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. City of Monticello Date: Plate No. Clt of Monticello Date: 03-05 Plate No. 03-0503-05 03-05 Revised: 6001 Revised: 1007Revised: 4007 Revised: 3006 -- 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � � 03-15 � z O a - Of U W W Q Q C) _j/^' I..L W � Z � In In O Z O � � N O O N V)_ C) O V Q) 1 Z U W � I r M m Q LLI Z W __J O M U o SHEET N0. (n Q W 0 LIJ Q Ll -I Of _ J 0 0 0 0 0 LLL C O L +' L N C7 N -0 C O C N O 0 O Ln O— C O �Ooa�c E C Z 0 + W - Z -0 p O 0 O d p N 0 --+° ON Q� ao o•� Q• o� (n N Oar'� O O --p +' L.L M v�_W�o t'U N U �N CO � L T _ 01= _0 Cno ZN C14 O Z 0) 00 0000 01 17 N n W Z" in W Hr W W W0 '1 DID n QC) V(D Z 040 i j00 W � Lj WDoe li W L.,.-1 > ZH �/r a U)ZU 04 N fir) U)WZ LL co O C)Ja (r M W Z —W >Q JUS r .. on n I--- Q Z V _j/^' I..L W � Z W � O O V) U V W Z U D � I � - Lv Z = O w M U o SHEET N0. 8 _Q Q0 6A nn{ J 9focl w a d U � U 3� 4.1.mu.W :, q—a 1Otluew o �1a40:""'Jld LLOULL&A-a M.0 •e ARn U3znoa Lnalv� BupyBr7 --3 a•c7a4O :aweN 4-P U-10--M-od pdedmd !€i .. � .. .• i,�-{ - F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 6`-4 : 60 • fits - iib : •�� �iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• F O L, E N E N w >- J- 'k ' 60 • fits - iib : •�� �iN ,;, ,•N � : a.`�' -• V 00 i---^`'-+,-.,fir--�"-�'•--.-�,L�- - : _ M. N ��.-._..:_ .��:.-:'._,. iV R • N C, LI) ..O':': Lo:'"' yN . �N •N. •(N •� +� 1 40 -j •C) �D C) •CD •p, �p F O L, E N E N w >- t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C� O W a w x -� D W x Q I I I I I I I I n L — L _ / L — / I -uT — — — — — — - Ar www I II I j I EJ SBL SBL * SBL BL I I r r- 'N n r� / I l / / I L / I S13L SBL I ' I I PHASE 1 I w i1 �i IN I � I EXISTING BITUMINOUS I I w� I I \I I PARKING SURFACE a c I N I\ I EXISTING FENCE AND GATE I o �' I / TO REMAIN FOR PHASE I I' III I �— H I I Imm o I \ I I I I I I I I Ap i UE1 I � EXIT(BU LDINQ FUTUf � I I FHASI I u) 0,� J / / 2 \ • d I O .: • d d •d b y • d I / / r , m. '• •e .e •d• d d • d WI I I m 44 = I I to I I I I • e I a. 4 ♦ e . q . , f •e w UT / , III , 5/.6 r --i d I 11 F— I I I I I I I O I I CD I N I I I I I I I I =w1 I I I I I I I I I EXISTING (GRAVEL I I I I I l o I I (TYP) I N I J Block W I I I I I I IlO jCn OX I / �i IN ' I I I I I I I ly I wi I mi IN J xi b 01 I 11 I I EXISTING BUILDINSI I I 4 I° I m I I I I W d. o I II I I I N I II WI � I I II W� I IP i N i II � � les I— les les hl-------I---------------J w x 91 d d • 4. d d • , • •d • •d • /J!\X, 8 PHASE I PARKING (SEE CIVIL PLANS) PHASE I BUILDING (SEE CIVIL PLANS) FUTURE PHASE PARKING (CHIP SEAL OR OTHER CITY ENGINEER APPROVED SURFACING ALTERNATIVE) FUTURE PHASE BUILDING (ON EXISTING CONCRETE PAD) I� 34.5 I _ II� I; O T---�`-EXISTING BUILDING A II ,";y 1. I' I ImI W II C I I I I I �I ly IW C has -les-les las l®S L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I C EXISTING BUILDING N90000'00"E 33/.50 O 30 0 30 U SCALE IN FEET w _ o SCALE: 111 = 30' W Q C) > O W n n N "' n n n n n n n n n n n n. n r II it N I I Q �wz c� �o ~ O � i O XJ W EXISTING BUILDING N90000'00"E 33/.50 O 30 0 30 U SCALE IN FEET w _ o SCALE: 111 = 30' W Q C) > O W N O N "' Z Q W 00 0000 W 01 O a a W O m Of N H N I Q �wz c� �o ~ O � � O XJ W 0 a- I r - (� m m C Z m o w (n -J LLJ O z Z Y � Lij c� Q w 0 W Q Li of _ J 0 0 U L- <= O L D -O N O 1 °c O m7EO aL C, °+ N 0 Q): L0 ° O— Q) 41 p c)E Z 41 W - z O 0 O ° p oa.°ami° a).T0V) m-0 (,n O U a) y Q) °-•` J o L a> -0 a) L a) +� t >,— - 0 1=-0� ■ Z ♦ ♦ N O N "' Z Q W 00 0000 W 01 n r7 N W In � �N Z Q W � � W �r W a a Y w� U) m n (3 Z i j(-4 OC7Z z� W� >-- W li W L�-I U) > Z Of Z H N I W �wz c� QJ� O �� 0 Z5a- J6:<2 r .. W > OJ L')� Z Q 0 W Of Z C) W ~ O C O XJ W 0 Q W (� Z C Z 0 _j (n -J LLJ O m C :2QL Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. LAND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEERING MAPPING DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS for 100 Chelsea Rd. Drainage to Chelsea Rd. ROW City of Monticello, Wright County, MN Prepared for: Red Rooster Properties, Inc. Date: June 21, 2017 Prepared by: Jeffrey Swanson I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Engineer under the State of Minnesota Statues Sections 326.02 to 326.16 M";j el�� Jeffrey Swanson, P.E. Date: 6/21/2017 Reg. No. 50203 Main Office: Becker Phone: 763/262-8822 13076 First Street Toll free: 888/210-8301 Becker. MN 55308 Fax: 763/262-8844 1. SITE LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS: Site location: The site is located on Chelsea Road in the City of Monticello. Existing Site Conditions: The site is currently vacant. Total site area = 1.88 acres. Surrounding Land Uses: The property is part of an business/industrial park. Onsite Soils: The onsite soils are primarily Dorser sandy loam. These soils are considered a hydrologic group type `B". 2. PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS Proposed construction includes an office building, serviced by the proposed paved parking lot in front of the building. The total new impervious area will be 0.24 acre. Grading will take place on 0.35 acres on the site. 3. STORMWATER MANAGMENT Curb and gutter of the proposed parking lot will contain runoff from the driveway and the parking lot. The catch basin will discharge the runoff from the parking lot to the road ditch. A swale will be constructed east of the parking lot and building which will drain to the roadway ditch and prevent any roof runoff from draining east on to the neighboring property. The HydroCAD analysis is attached for the existing and proposed conditions. The Rational Method 10 year peak flow through the catch basin is 1.68 cfs @ 5.3 fps through the 15" RCP pipe. The discharge rate of the road ditch east of the driveway entrance is as follows: Ditch Discharge Summary Table Discharge 2 year event 10 year event 100 year event Existing (0.5 AC) 0.83 cfs 1.42 cfs 2.78 cfs Proposed (0.9 AC) 2.05 cfs 3.31 cfs 6.01 cfs The discharge rate of the undisturbed area south of the proposed building that flows to the eastern property is as follows: Offsite Discharge Summary Table Discharge 2 year event 10 year event 100 year event Existing (0.9 AC) 2.61 cfs 4.06 cfs 6.91 cfs Proposed (0.5 AC) 1.42 cfs 2.18 cfs 3.68 cfs 4. NPDES CONSIDERATIONS Since the project will disturb less than 1 acre, a Stormwater Permit for Construction is not required. NW. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. :h E of Driveway To E. of Site Subcat Reach on Link Routing Diagram for Existing I Prepared by BPA, Printed 5/4/2017 HydroCAD®10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Prepared by BPA HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.085 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (3S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1 S) 0.529 96 Gravel surface, HSG C (3S) 0.590 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S, 3S) 1.445 90 TOTAL AREA Existing Conditions Printed 5/4/2017 Paqe 2 Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Outflow=0.83 cfs 0.063 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Primary=2.61 cfs 0.177 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.240 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.99" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Depth= 2.26" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.49" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 of Outflow = 0.83 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.063 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 of Primary = 2.61 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.177 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.61" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Outflow=1.42 cfs 0.105 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Primary=4.06 cfs 0.283 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.388 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.22" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parkinq, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Depth= 3.61" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.49" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 of Outflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.105 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68'@ 12.09 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.61" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 of Primary = 4.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.283 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10,522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11,491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=40,933 sf 34.66% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.34" Tc=15.0 min CN=95 Runoff=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Outflow=2.78 cfs 0.200 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Primary=6.91 cfs 0.496 of Total Runoff Area = 1.445 ac Runoff Volume = 0.697 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.78" 59.20% Pervious = 0.856 ac 40.80% Impervious = 0.590 ac Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 11,491 98 Paved parking, HSG C 11,491 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Depth= 6.34" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 14,188 98 Paved parking, HSG C 23,042 96 Gravel surface, HSG C 3,703 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 40,933 95 Weighted Average 26,745 65.34% Pervious Area 14,188 34.66% Impervious Area Existing Conditions Existing Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 5/4/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.505 ac, 52.20% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.76" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 of Outflow = 2.78 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.200 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth 962.2 Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �__2=962.2_ 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.940 ac, 34.66% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.34" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 of Primary = 6.91 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.496 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Aic 2R N. Ditc *Driveway Driveway � S N. Culvert NW. Ditch CB 3P 2S CB to N. Ditch NW. Ex. Parking 3S 3BS Drainage to CB Drainage to Swale 4S To E. of Site NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Subcat Reach on LinkRouting Diagram for Proposed I Prepared by BPA, Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCADO 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by BPA HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 0.094 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (313S, 4S) 0.242 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1 S) 0.278 96 Gravel surface, HSG B (4S) 0.452 98 Paved parking, HSG B (3S, 4S) 0.264 98 Paved parking, HSG C (2S) 0.115 98 Roofs, HSG B (313S, 3S) 1.444 90 TOTAL AREA Proposed Printed 6/21/2017 Paqe 2 Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 3 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.79 cfs 0.057 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.81" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.35 cfs 0.023 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.58" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.37" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=2.05 cfs 0.148 of Outflow=2.05 cfs 0.148 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.55' Inflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=0.05 cfs 0.006 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.20' Inflow=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Outflow=0.87 cfs 0.062 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Primary=1.42 cfs 0.098 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.246 of Average Runoff Depth = 2.04" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.30" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 0.79 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.057 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 0.35 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.023 af, Depth= 1.81" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 5 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Depth= 2.58" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Depth= 2.37" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.87" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 2.05 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.148 of Outflow = 2.05 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.148 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 6 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.30" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Outflow = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.55'@ 12.12 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=961.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.05 cfs @ 1.62 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.58" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Outflow = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.062 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.20'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.87 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.20' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 0.87 cfs @ 2.81 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 2 -Year Rainfall=2.81 " Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 7 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.37" for 2 -Year event Inflow = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 of Primary = 1.42 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.098 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 8 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.91" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.18 cfs 0.087 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.09" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=0.59 cfs 0.039 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.94" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.72" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=3.31 cfs 0.239 of Outflow=3.31 cfs 0.239 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.68' Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Outflow=0.25 cfs 0.018 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.33' Inflow=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Outflow=1.30 cfs 0.095 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Primary=2.18 cfs 0.154 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.393 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.27" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 9 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 0.91" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.087 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 0.59 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth= 3.09" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 10 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth= 3.94" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Depth= 3.72" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.03" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 3.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.239 of Outflow = 3.31 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 0.239 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.91" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Outflow = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 0.018 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.68'@ 12.09 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.25 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=961.68' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Inlet Controls 0.25 cfs @ 1.62 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.94" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.33'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=1.30 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.33' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.30 cfs @ 3.07 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 11 24 -hr 10 -Year Rainfall=4.18" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 12 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.72" for 10 -Year event Inflow = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 of Primary = 2.18 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.154 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 13 Time span=1.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7101 points Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff Area=10.522 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.65" Tc=15.0 min CN=61 Runoff=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff Area=11.491 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.97 cfs 0.147 of Subcatchment 3BS: Drainage to Swale Runoff Area=6,600 sf 57.27% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.75" Tc=15.0 min CN=90 Runoff=1.06 cfs 0.073 of Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff Area=12.630 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>6.69" Tc=15.0 min CN=98 Runoff=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Runoff Area=21.657 sf 38.19% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.45" Tc=15.0 min CN=96 Runoff=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow=6.01 cfs 0.435 of Outflow=6.01 cfs 0.435 of Pond 1P: N. Culvert Peak Elev=961.88' Inflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Outflow=0.82 cfs 0.053 of Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Peak Elev=960.55' Inflow=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Outflow=2.17 cfs 0.162 of Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Primary=3.68 cfs 0.267 of Total Runoff Area = 1.444 ac Runoff Volume = 0.702 of Average Runoff Depth = 5.83" 42.49% Pervious= 0.614 ac 57.51% Impervious = 0.830 ac Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 14 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: NW. Ditch Runoff = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Depth= 2.65" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 10,522 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 10,522 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: NW. Ex. Parking Runoff = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.147 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) 11,491 11,491 Tc Length (min) (feet) 15.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Paved parking, HSG C 100.00% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 313S: Drainage to Swale 1.06 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.073 af, Depth= 5.75" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 3,780 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,820 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 6,600 90 Weighted Average 2,820 42.73% Pervious Area 3,780 57.27% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 15 Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Drainage to CB Runoff = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Depth> 6.69" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 11,410 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,220 98 Roofs, HSG B 12,630 98 Weighted Average 12,630 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) Oft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: NE. Ex. Parking & Building & Conc. Runoff = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Depth= 6.45" Runoff by SCS TR -20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted -CN, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Area (sf) CN Description 8,270 98 Paved parking, HSG B 12,115 96 Gravel surface, HSG B 1,272 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 21,657 96 Weighted Average 13,387 61.81 % Pervious Area 8,270 38.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Reach 2R: N. Ditch E of Driveway Inflow Area = 0.947 ac, 67.65% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.51" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 6.01 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.435 of Outflow = 6.01 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.435 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HvdroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 16 Summary for Pond 1 P: N. Culvert Inflow Area = 0.242 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.65" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Outflow = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume= 0.053 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 961.88'@ 12.08 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 961.45' 15.0" Round RCP -Round 15" L= 41.0' RCP, end -section conforming to fill, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 961.45'/961.03' S=0.0102'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.20' 6.0' long x 6.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.37 2.51 2.70 2.68 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.67 2.69 2.72 2.76 2.83 Primary OutFlow Max=0.82 cfs @ 12.08 hrs HW=961.88' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 1=RCPRound 15" (Barrel Controls 0.82 cfs @ 3.30 fps) L2=Broa-d-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond 3P: CB to N. Ditch Inflow Area = 0.290 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.69" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 of Outflow = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.162 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 960.55'@ 12.06 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 959.70' 15.0" Round Culvert L= 10.0' RCP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet/ Outlet Invert= 959.70'/959.60' S=0.0100'/' Cc= 0.900 n=0.012 Concrete pipe, finished, Flow Area= 1.23 sf #2 Primary 962.30' 4.0' long x 0.5' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 Coef. (English) 2.80 2.92 3.08 3.30 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=2.17 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=960.55' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) �11=Culvert (Barrel Controls 2.17 cfs @ 3.45 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Proposed Proposed Type 1124 -hr 100 -Year Rainfall=6.93" Prepared by BPA Printed 6/21/2017 HydroCAD® 10.00-19 s/n 02381 © 2016 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 17 Summary for Pond 4P: To E. of Site Inflow Area = 0.497 ac, 38.19% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 6.45" for 100 -Year event Inflow = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 of Primary = 3.68 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.267 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs STORM SEWER DESIGN SHEET - RATIONAL METHOD Project Name: Chelsea Corner UPSTREAM Date: 6/21/2017 Actual UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM IE STIR. ID. Dia (in) Wall Lgth(ft) Grade I%) V(fps) Assumptions: Qcap(cfs) HGL HGL(%) HGL Thicknes (ft) CB 959.70 CSTG THICKNESS (IN) 959.60 APR 15 0.188 10 1.00% 5.3 6 MH DIA FL TO TOP OF PIPE RING THICKNESS (IN) 4 27 0.83 (CSTG+RING) 48" DIA COVER (IN) 6 48 1.33 (CSTG+RING+COVER) LARGE COVER THCK (IN) 8 54 1.50 (CSTG+RING+COVER) CATCH BASIN CALCULATIONS STRUCTURE D.S. Travel ID STRUCT DA(acre) tc(area) Time tc(cb) i -10yr C CA SUM(CA) Road Road MH DIA RIM MIN. RIM RE DIFF (min) (min) (min) (in/hr) ID Station ELEV ELEV. CB 0.38 15 15.0 4.9 0.90 0.342 0.34 — N/A 27 962.20 #N/A #N/A APR 0.0 PIPE CALCULATIONS UPSTREAM HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS STIR. ID IE DOWNSTREAM CIR. Actual UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM IE STIR. ID. Dia (in) Wall Lgth(ft) Grade I%) V(fps) Q (cfs) Qcap(cfs) HGL HGL(%) HGL Thicknes (ft) CB 959.70 1.68 959.60 APR 15 0.188 10 1.00% 5.3 6.47 959.61 0.07% 959.60 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota N N m 4363W 436600 436900 437200 437500 437800 438100 438400 438700 45° 18' 4" N _.: 45° 17'1"N 436300 438600 436900 437200 4371500 437800 438100 438400 438700 3 Map Scale: 1:13,900 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters N 0 200 400 800 1200 diet 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: URI Zone 15N WGS84 G}DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 3 M M m 439000 45' 18' 4" N a iq ® 45° 171" N 439000 3 M 5/1/2017 Page 1 of 3 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Spoil Area Soil Map Unit Polygons im 0 Soil Map Unit Lines 0 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Vo Blowout Water Features Borrow Pit Streams and Canals Clay Spot #_F4 Closed Depression r•,,r Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Background Marsh or swamp + Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water M Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip oa Sodic Spot Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. UUP Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 IiiiiiiiiiConservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot 4�, Other •� Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation #_F4 Rails r•,,r Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background ® Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 16, 2012—Apr 6, 2012 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. UUP Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 IiiiiiiiiiConservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Wright County, Minnesota Map Unit Legend usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Wright County, Minnesota (MN171) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 260 Duelm loamy sand, 0 to 2 4.2 0.6% percent slopes 406 Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 571.7 76.3% percent slopes 441 Almora loam, 0 to 2 percent 10.2 1.4% slopes 1015 Udipsamments (cut and fill 8.2 1.1% land) 10876 Angus-Malardi complex, 2 to 6 0.0 0.0% percent slopes 1288 Seelyeville and Markey soils, 19.6 2.6% ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 13626 Angus loam, 2 to 6 percent 2.1 0.3% slopes 1368 Southhaven loam, 0 to 2 5.2 0.7% percent slopes 13776 Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 2 72.1 9.6% to 6 percent slopes 1377C Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 6 33.9 4.5% to 12 percent slopes 1377D Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 12 2.2 0.3% to 20 percent slopes 1377E Dorset -Two Inlets complex, 20 20.1 2.7% to 35 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 749.6 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Wright County, Minnesota 406—Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2wOm2 Elevation: 660 to 1,710 feet Mean annual precipitation: 25 to 33 inches Mean annual air temperature: 37 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 120 to 170 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Dorset and similar soils: 80 percent Minor components: 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Dorset Setting Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Loamy glaciofluvial deposits over sandy and gravelly outwash Typical profile Ap - 0 to 11 inches: sandy loam Bt - 11 to 20 inches: sandy loam 2Bk - 20 to 38 inches: gravelly coarse sand 2C - 38 to 79 inches: gravelly coarse sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s Hydrologic Soil Group: B usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 Map Unit Description: Dorset sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes ---Wright County, Minnesota Other vegetative classification: Sloping Upland, Neutral (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Corliss Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Rise Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: Sandy (G091AN022MN) Hydric soil rating: No Oylen Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Flats Landform position (three-dimensional): Talf Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification (G091AN002MN) Hydric soil rating: No Forada Percent of map unit: 3 percent Landform: Swales Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Linear Other vegetative classification: (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Forada, occasionally ponded Percent of map unit: 2 percent Landform: Depressions Down-slope shape: Concave Across -slope shape: Concave Other vegetative classification: (G091AN003MN) Hydric soil rating: Yes Data Source Information Sloping Upland, Neutral Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Level Swale, Low AWC, Neutral Soil Survey Area: Wright County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 19, 2016 usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/1/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r~ I I I ,AREA 1 a I I I I I \I\y III I I AREA 2 I AREA 3� I III I I I I i \ I I ° •• - a• ,� o I � IIII �ic� X Z 0 20 0 20 U N W SCALE IN FEET SCALE: I" = 20' LEGEND. © Denotes electrical cabinet o ® Denotes electric service ® Denotes sanitary service Denotes sanitary manhole �Z ►1 Denotes watervalve Denotes sign N o N o0 14k> Denotes power pole Denotes guy wire \ o ❑T Denotes telephone pedestal 0 ® Denotes electric meter m o w 12 Denotes cable television box Z J F0 Denotes fiber optic service box 4i Y Z uc as Denotes under9 gas a W x 3 0 0 0 cx o ® Denotes mailbox Denotes soil boring - ® Denotes well - o _o?o N AC Denotes air conditioning voi �o © Denotes gas meter �•�, Z ► Denotes Flared End Section -�° EYw go --q Denotes culvert an c o A Denotes Wetland a ,°-, a, Z � Denotes Tree, Coniferous t o o w rn N •Anaat N Denotes Tree, Deciduous aT Denotes bituminous surface rn Ev'5 N Denotes concrete surface Z ti Denotes gravel surface 0 Denotes wood fence Z Denotes chainlink fence Q W — x x Denotes barbwire fence LU J Denotes stone wall d a uLL — — — — Denotes underground Telephone V mN Denotes overhead electric 0 zg wm — — — Dotes underground fiber optics (n > w — — • — Denenotes underground electric — — + — Denotes underground gas line a oma mn iWYY1 Denotes tree line fn -------- Denotes easement Denotes right of way Denotes major contour Denotes minor contour Denotes sanitary sewer Denotes storm sewer Denotes waterline — — — — Denotes existing adjoiners .. Denotes wetland Denotes open water z X 948.0 Proposed ground elevation F Q e�= Proposed Drainage Flow Q J - Proposed Silt Fence 0 Ld X800— Proposed Major Contour U) LLJ � � QProposed Minor Contour w Z Q Proposed Erosion Control Blanket Ld Q Proposed Bituminous Surface (n O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 Proposed Rip Rop 0 Q LJ U Z LJ U Z J LLJ Z (n 5 = O X M U :2 LLJ XSHEET N0. 2 X 20 0 20 Z 0 SCALE IN FEET L U SCALE: I" = 20' o f / Gradina & Erosion Control Notes I. Contractor shall confine construction operations to the construction limits shown. - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — N 2. All work shall conform to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Storm Water w Permitrequirements. Contractor shall obtain NPDES permit and comply with all Permit requirements. 0 3. Contractor shall inspect the entire site at least every 7 days and within 24 hours of any measurable rainstorm. Damaged silt fence or other erosion control device �o or practices shall be repaired immediately. Inspection and maintenance of devices o:Z �l shall continue until the site has undergone final stabilization and a Notice of I Terminationis submitted to the MPCA. 0 n rn o rn 00 4. All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the N L_ ♦/ L- I / I l/ / I L/ O I >10 potential for site erosion. 1 5. The site soil erosion and sediment control facilities shall be installed and �� > > > maintained to conform with the standards specified by the (MPCA). w o Z Z Y i Z >0961.912 096.446 Z. w I I > > > 6. Silt fences shall be installed prior the disturbance of any areas and maintained fn a w ca w 1 a w o x 3 96,-- 64i until all tributary disturbed areas are restored. o 0 o U o 1 / �/ 7. All Bolls tracked onto pavement or any other off-site areas shall be removed —� daily. RCP FES _0° 0 ' I 5 �g� — 0 -LF 12' RCP O 3.00% _ IE=9590 -5 e o O l — — _ — — — - _- -- — _ _ _ _ _ _ 8. The site sediment control facilities for the project must be installed prior to any site grading operation. Contact the Soil and Water °- c °� Conservation District (SWCD) once said facilities are installed and before any m Z° _— uz--=�au-- grading can take place. aTa o _ Z R E A` 'r I E `F'ry R° 9. The Contractor shall be responsible for the removal of all erosion control ° °°- ° z I ) sTo Mae measures, including silt fence and bales, upon establishment of permanent o a`o_ m o I 3 l� * h I RE 62.30 I vegetation in said areas. w a oN cn l I I_� I _ I IE= 59.30 g62.9 10. All ditches and areas disturbed during construction shall be restored and vegetated o s d o as soon as possible. Any finished areas shall be seeded and mulched within 14 days after finished grading is completed accordance to Mn/Dot 2575. ;; a2� o c U a ^I I $ II. Construction sediment shall be removed from