City Council Agenda Packet 12-10-1979
\".3"'.
~V1.
fI1
~~~.
VJ .--3.
{:\~~
t
t\ \ ~VJ IP:~
. ellrJ.
"if ~
~ 00 ~ 6. Consideration of Holding a Hearing on the Issuance of Industrial
Jl. ~ Revenue Bonds for Clow Stamping Company.
~ 7 Approval of Bills for December, 1979.
1~~~8: Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 26, 1979 and
0Y d f, / Special Meeting of November 28, 1979.
~v'~. c~osiderat'on of Retainage Amount on 78-1 Project for Northdale Construction.
~ "IV' ,
~, ~f/ Unfinis Business
~
f
.
......
....,.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING - MONT~CELLO CITY COUNCIL
December 10, 1979 - 7:30 P.M.
Mayor: Arve Grimsmo
Council Members: Dan Blonigen, Fran Fair, Ken Maus, Philip White.
Meeting to be taped.
Citizens Comments.
Consideration of Law Enforcement Contract for 1980 with Wright County
Sheriff's Department.
Consideration of Renewal of Club On-Sale Liquor License - American
Legion Club. tA t\)~~..~~U..~ ~ L~.s _,., ~..,elbK k..
Consideration of Changing Lighting on County Road 75 in Monticello
from Fluorescent to High Pressure Sodium.
Consideration of Extension of Time on Completion of Contract for the
1979-1 Improvement project.
Consideration of Exercising Option on Rick Cole property.
New Business -
AGENDA SUP~LEMENT
1. Consideration of Law Enforcement Contract for 1980 with Wright County
Sheriff's Department.
Purpose of this item is to consider a contract for law enforcement services
for the period from January I, 1980 through December 31, 1980 for the City
of Monticello.
Enclosed, please find a proposed law enforcement contract along with a
letter of transmittal from the Wright County Sheriff's Department explaining
the breakdown to arrive at the hourly figure as stated in the contract _
$11.50 per hour. Monticello's 1979 cohtract called for an hourly rate
of $10.50 per hour. Based on the City's current schedule which calls for
16 hours of daily patrol service from Sunday through Thursday and for 24 hours
of service on Fridays and Saturdays, the proposed contract would total
$76,912 compared to 1979's figure of $70,056. With the per hour rate adjust-
ment from $10.50 per hour to $11.50 per hour, the proposed contract calls for
an increase of 9~%. For your information, in the 1980 budget a projected
13% increase was figured, or a total of $79,175.
.
Currently, the hours of protection from Sunday through Thursday are from
12:30 P.M. to 5:30 A.M. and on Friday and Saturday, there is one patrolman
on duty from 9:30 A.M. to 6 P.M., another patrolman on duty from 6:00 P.M.
to 2:30 A.M., another patrolman on duty from 9:00 P.M. to 5:30 A.M.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of proposed contract for law enforcement
services for 1980.
REFERENCES: Enclosed letter from Darrell Wolff breakdown the Sheriff's
Office cost of $11.50 per hour and also a copy of the proposed
contract. *
2. Consideration of Renewal of Club On-Sale Liquor License - American Legion
Club.
The purpose of this item is to consider the renewal of a Club on-sale liquor
license for the American Legion Club.
License for the American Legion Club expires December 31, 1979. Annual license
fee previously has been $100 per year as set by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340.
In the 1979 session of the Minnesota Legislature, an amendment was made to
the statutes allowing a municipality to set a higher fee than $100 annually
if it so desired.
In addition to the consideration of the license fee, is the consideration of
running the license through June 30, 1980 to make it consistent with our
ordinance on the issuance of license to other on-sale establishments. It
.
*NOTE: For your information, Buddy Gay has been assigned to
Monticello to replace Don Hozempa as coordinator for
Sheriff's office.
COUNCIL AGENDA ~ December 10, 1979
should be noted that the American Legion Club had a liquor license prior to
the City issuing license to private on-sale establishments and this has
been the reason in the past for the two different dates. In talking to the
Liquor Control Commissioner's office and reviewing our ordinance, it would
make sense to have both the Club on-sale licenses and private on-sale
licenses expire at the same time.
As a result of the above, I would recommend that the City of Monticello
issue a private club on-sale license from January 1, 1980 to June 30, 1980
for $50.00. This fee is based on a $100 annual fee for 6 months. If the
Council should so desire to increase the fee for the next renewal at July 1,
1980, consideration could be given at that time to amending the current fee.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of club license for the American
Legion Club and determination of fee and period of time
license is to rUn.
3. Consideration of Chan in Li
Fluorescent to High Pressure
Road 75 in Monticello from
Purpose of this item is to consider changing the existing 19 overhead and
22 ornamental lights on County Road 75 between the Pinewood Elementary
and High School from Fluorescent to High Pressure Sodium.
.
Mr. Norm Ecklund, with Northern States Power, contacted me relative to the
possibility of the City changing their lighting on Highway 75 from fluorescent
to high pressure sodium. Primary reason for the changeover is that the
fluorescent lights are becoming obsOlete, are less efficient, and replace-
mentparts are becoming hard to find. Mr. Ecklund suggested that the City
of Monticello go to high pressure sodium lights similar to the lighting
that is on State Highway 25 in Monticello.
In 1977, the City of Monticello did convert its existing lighting on Highway 25
from fluorescent to high pressure sodium basically for the same reasons listed
above. Additionally, at the same time, the City of Monticello established
additional lights from the railroad tracks to Interstate 94 interchange in
Monticello. It is my opinion that these lights have been well received by
the community and are certainly an improvement from the fluorescent lights
that existed on Highway 25 before. Initially there was some concern about
how the people would react to the high pressure sodium, but no complaints
have eVer been registered at the Monticello City Hall with regard to the
lighting system itself.
Our Public Works Director, John Simola, and myself reviewed the proposed
changeover with Mr. Ecklund, and both the Public Works Director and myself
would recommend that the City of Monticello convert its existing fluorescent
lights to high pressure sodium. Additionally, we would recommend that the
City Convert to 250 watt high pressure sodium as opposed to 400 watt high
pressure sodium. For your information, the current lighting on Highway 25
is 250 watt high pressure sodium and produces approximately 6% more illumina-
tion than the existing fluorescent lights. This percentage factor of 6% is
based on the initial capacity of the fluorescent lights since they do diminish
in their illumination during the life of the light. High pressure SOdium,
- 2 -
COUNCIL AGENDA - December 10, 1979
however, maintains a rather constant output of illumination, and as a result,
the increased illumination may well be in the area of 15 - 20% Overall. The
possibility of going to 400 watt higH pressure sodium was discussed with
Mr. Ecklund, and he indicated that the illumination provided by 400 watt
high pressure sodium would be more than twice what the existing fluorescent
lights now provide.
It should be pointed out that the City of Monticello does own the ornamental
lights, lights that have aluminum standards in the downtown area. The
overhead lights are Owned by NSP. As a result of the fact that the City
does own the ornamental lights, there would be a conversion cost of approxi-
mately $200 per light on the existing 22 ornamental lights, and there would
be no cost of conversion on the 19 overhead lights. Below is a cost
comparison of the ornamental and Overhead lights based on the existing
fluorescent, the 250 watt high pressure sodium and the 400 watt high pressure
sodium:
COST COMPAiRISON
MONTHLY UTILITY CHARGES
ORNAMENTAL
Fluorescent
250 Watt H.P. Sodium
400 Watt H.P. Sodium
OVERHEAD
. Fluorescent
250 Watt H.P. Sodium
400 Watt H.P. Sodium
CURRENT MONTHLY BILLING
19 OVerheads x $15.10
22 Ornamentals x $ 5.85
TOTAL CURRENT BILLING
BILLING BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS
18 Overhead x $10.40
1 Overhead x $13.55
22 Ornamentals x $ 4.50
$5.85
$4.50
$6.25
$15.10
$10.40
$13.55
$286.90
$128.70
$415.60
$187.20
13.55 (Hospital entrance to Cty.75)
99.00
TOTAL BILLING BASED ON RECOMMENDA- $299.75
TIONS
SaVings ($415.60 - $299.75) of $115.85 per month would
result in the estimated conversion cost of $4,400 being
recaptured in 38 months.
In reviewing the alternatives, the Public Works Director and myself
recommend that we go to the 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium as opposed to
retaining the existing lights or going to 400 Watt High Pressure Sodium
for the fOllowing reasons:
- 3 -
--
-)
.
"
\,> .,,:'
\I ,. ~\
~ V v'
v
\J
. ~\/.
~\
COUNCIL AGENDA - December 10, 1979
A. We believe the City of Monticello should set an example on energy
conservation.
I
B. The above table shows that the City will save in monthly utility charges.
C. The convers.ion cost of $4,400 for the ornamentals will be recaptured
in 38 months based on the above table.
D. Although the 400 Watt High Pressure Sodium would provide eVen additional
lighting, the 250 Watt High Pressure Sodium would still produce approxi-
mately 15 - 20% more illumination than we currently have.
It should be noted that one overhead is being considered for a 400 Watt
High Pressure Sodium in the area by the Hospital. This has been an area of
concern with the entrance and exit from County Road 75 and it was felt that
this area may be justified for a 400 Watt High Pressure Sodium Light.
According to NSP, the ornamental light conversion could take place within
two to three months, but it may take a longer period of time to change OVer
the overhead and this could be as late as September of 1980 due to the fact
that an extended arm has to be manufactured.
Currently, Paynesville and Cokato have high pressure sodium lights in their
community. Council may be familiar with these areas or may desire to visit
these areas to get a better concept of the lighting provided. However, I
do believe that the lighting on Highway 25 in Monticello gives you a good
idea of the effect of high pressure sodium lights.
4.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of changeover of lighting on Highway 75 in
Monticello from fluorescent to high pressure sodium.
Consideration of Extension of Time on Com letion of Contract for the
1979-1 Improvement Project.
Purpose of this item is to consider a request from Barbarossa and Sons
to extend their completion date on the above contract from November 1,
1979 to June 15, 1980.
Enclosed, please find a letter from Barbarossa and Sons indicating their
reasons for requesting an extension, which are as follows:
A. Two-week delay in the award of project.
B. Minor change orders.
C. Rain.
D. Delays in resolving the problem with the bituminous restoration.
In reviewing this request with Barbarossa and Sons, the Public Works Director
and our engineer, it was felt that the request was reasonable and prudent.
Enclosed, please find a letter from John Badalich indicating that it would
- 4 -
COUNCIL AGENDA ~ December 10, 1979
,....
be in the City's best interest to hold off this project until next spring
due to the cold weather for the correction of problems encountered with
the bituminous surfacing. Primary p~oblem with the project was with
H & S Asphalt, who was a subcontractdr to Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. on the
bituminous surfacing. H & S has indicated a willingness to review the
matter in the spring when a full winter's wear can determine any further
problems, and at that time the corrective measures could be more adequately
determined to remedy the situation. Basically, two alternatives will be
available to the City in the spring ~ one being a financial adjUstment could
be made in the contract, and the second, if the surfacing warrants it, it
would be removed and replaced.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of approval of extension of time for Barbarossa
and Sons, Inc. on the 1979-1 Improvement Project from
November 1, 1979 to June 15, 1980.
REFERENCES: Enclosed letter from John Badalich, City Engineer, and from
Barbarossa and Sons.
5. Consideration of Exercising Option on Rick Cole Property.
Purpose of this item is to consider exercising the City's current option
which was obtained and approved in November of 1979 for the Rick Cole
property.
.
As you recall, when this item was initially presented to the Council, an
option had been obtained that was effective through January 1, 1980, whereby
the City of Monticello could purchase the Rick Cole property, easterly 56'
of Lot 2 and the entire Lot 3 in Block D, for $29,900. An amount of $500
had been placed on the option which would be returnable if the City Council
did not approVe of the purchase. This option was obtained as a result of
the parking requirements needed in Block 34 that may result due to Mr.
Samuel Peraro's proposed office complex of 13,500 square feet at the
present site of Season All Sports and the Collectable Castaway Building.
As was indicated previously, this alternative could have included the
assessment of a portion or all of the cost of purchasing this piece of
property in Block D to provide additional parking, plus the improvements
which would total $15,000, for a total estimated assessment that would be
$45,000. Based on this first proposal, Mr. Peraro indicated he would be
reluctant to be assessed the total amount since he did not feel that he
could recover this cost adequately thro~gh the rents charged on his office
building.
~
One other possible alternative has been explored by the City's business and
industrial development committee, which would be to purchase the Cole property
and make the parking improvements of $15,000 for a total investment of
$45,000. Instead of assessing the entire $45,000 back to Mr. Peraro, this
cost could be paid off through the incre,ment and property taxes produced
by Mr. Peraro's office building over what currently is being paid by the
bUildings that are situated on the site - that is, Season All Sports and
Collectable Castaway BUilding. Currently, it appears that these sites now
,....
- 5 -
COUNCIL AGENDA ~ December 10, 1979
-
pay approximately $1,057 in taxation, and with Mr. Peraro's office complex,
the real estate taxes would be approximately $18,150. Through enabling
legislation, the City of Monticello ~ould, by fOllowing certain procedures,
establish tax increment financing districts, and could capture the incremented
taxes on this project of approximately $17,000, and use this amount of money
to retire the City's cost, or $45,000 plus interest, in the development of
a parking lot. However, the business and industrial development committee
still felt that the proposed development of Mr. Peraro should be charged
their fair share of the assessments of the existing parking lot, which would
be approximately $18,900. This proposal was presented to Mr. Peraro, and he
was receptive to the proposal; however, he is considering some other
alternatives at this time.
As a result then, the City may desire to not exercise the option and so
convey this intent in writing. However, the City may want to still review
the possibility of purchasing this p~operty and exercising the option for
possible future development of a par~ing lot for Block 34 with no commitments
made, or the possible future develop~ent or expansion of City facilities in
the City Hall area. Although I feel Ithere are some advantages to the City
purchasing this property, I feel that in light of the uncertainty of the
parking situation and the actual use of the property, it may be well for
the City to not exercise the option. This would allow the current owner
of the property to put it on the market again and still leave the possi-
bility open to the City to purchase the parcel, if available, at a later
date. One possibility could be the option to have the right of first refusal.
.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of exercising option to purchase the
Rick Cole property for $29,900.
REFERENCES: Further background information is available on the November 13,
1979 meeting, but is not enclosed with this supplement
6. Consideration of Holding a Hearing on the Issuance of Industrial Revenue
Bonds for Clow Stamping Company.
The purpose of this item is to consider setting a date for a Public Hearing
at our January 14, 1980 meeting to consider the issuance of Industrial
Revenue Bonds for Clow Stamping Compahy.
Clow Stamping Company is a precision stamping service and metal fabricator.
This firm manufactures small component parts for a variety of customers
including Xerox and NeR. Home office of the firm is near Brainerd at
Merrifield, Minnesota, and additionally, they have a plant at St. Louis Park.
Plans are to move the operations in St. Louis Park to Monticello, Minnesota.
Currently, the firm leases space in St. Louis Park, and would intend to
open a plant in Monticello by July 1, 1980. This plant would employ approxi-
mately 70 to 75 people. Of this number, company officials estimate that
50 employees will be brought from their plant in St. Louis Park and new
job openings will occur of 20 to 25 people. Wages range from $5.25 an
hour starting, to $11.00 per hour.
.
- 6 ..
COUNCIL AGENDA ~ December 10, 1979
Plans are for construction of a 30,000 square foot building in the Oakwood
Industrial Park. Industrial Revenue Bonds are being requested in light
of the current interest rates being c~arged to commercial entities for
real estate of up to 13% and for machinery of up to 18%. It is estimated
that the industrial revenue bonds will be sold for approximately 9%.
For your information, it appears that the amount of the issuance of the
bond will be approximately $825,000 and will include the following:
Land - $73,000
Building - $400,000
Landscaping and Grading - $4,000
Machinery - $200,000
.
Industrial Revenue Bonds do not become in any shape or form a liability of
the City and it is not legal, in fact, even for the City to use pUblic
moneys in case a particular company does go bankrupt. The City's tax
exempt provisions are used as the conduit to authorize the issuance of
bonds for financing the project. This same vehicle was used for financing
pollution control equipment on three occasions at the Northern States
Power Company, and for the Silver Fox Motel. It should be pointed out,
however, unlike the Silver Fox Motel where one of the features of the
Industrial Revenue Bonds was that it was in reality a tax exempt mortgage
which was purchased by a bank in St. Cloud, this would be a public offering.
Reason for the pUblic offering, according to representatives of the Company,
is to obtain 100% financing for the project. Miller and Schroeder are
handling the fiscal coordination of the project for Clow Stamping Company.
A meeting was held with our City Attorney and myself and the manager of
Clow Stamping Company, Steve Paumen, of Maple Lake, and two representatives
from Miller and Schroeder, to review various aspects of their proposal.
Financial statements that have been prepared by a CPA firm and certified
will be available for review.
According to the procedures set out in the Minnesota State Statutes, the
City Council has to conduct a public hearing before it considers the
issuance of industrial revenue bonds, and this hearing shall be published
in the paper with the notification that a draft copy of the proposed
application to the Commissioner of Securities, together with all attachments
and exhibits thereto shall be available for public inspection following the
publication of such notice and shall specify the time and place where and
when it will be so available. This information includes the following:
A. Name of firm.
E. Nature and description of firms business.
C. Scope of the project to be financed.
D. Proposed term of the revenue agreement.
E. Estimated dollar cost of project and allocation of bond proceeds.
F. Estimated number of new jobs to be created.
G. A resolution of the municipality giving preliminary approval to the project.
~
~
- 7 -
COUNCIL AGENDA.... December 10, 1979
-
H. Letter of intent to purchase the bond issue from an Underwriter or
analysis of a fiscal consultant is to the feasibility of the project
from a financial standpoint. .
I. A comprehensive statement indicating how the project satisfies pUblic
purpOse and policies of the Minnesota Industrial Development Act.
J. Preliminary opinion of bond counsel as to legality of issue.
This above information is in addition to the financial information that will
be provided by the Company and will be available for review at the
Monticello City Hall.
It should be pointed out that the calling for the hearing is somewhat of a
formality and no commitments obviously have to be made by the City Council
prior to the hearing. Once the City sets the hearing date, financial
information plus the above information will be forwarded to the City Council
for review.
On the surface, it appears that this company would certainly be an asset
to the community due to the following factors:
1. Increase in tax base.
.
2. Increase in employment.
3. Willing to make a commitment in terms of purchase of real estate as
Opposed to leasing real estate.
Mr. Steve paumen, manager of the firm, along with representatives from Miller
and Schroeder and our City Attorney will be available at the January 14, 1980
meeting. Currently, the firm's fiscal consultant is preparing a draft
resolution for the Council to consider at Monday night's meeting. This
resolution will be reviewed by our City Attorney prior to the meeting which
basically calls for the setting of the hearing date. It should be pointed
out also that any cost incurred by the City, such as attorney fees charged
to it, will be passed on to the applicapt as has been our policy.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of setting January 14, 1980 for the hearing
date for the consider~tion of industrial revenue bonds
for Clow Stamping Company.
REFERENCES: Copy of the booklet entitled.... Municipal Revenue Bonds _
issued by the Minnesota Department of Economic Development,
dated July of 1978; and COpy of the proposed resolution.
- 8 -
COUNCIL AGENDA .,., December 10, 1979
-
9. Consideration of Retainage Amount on 1978-1 Improvement Project for
Northdale Construction Company.
Pu~pose of this item is to consider the retainage amount for the unfinished
items on the 1978-1 Improvement Project.
This Project included sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer improvements
and street improvements to Country Club Manor, Kampa Estates, West County
Road #39, Riverside Addition, Ho1ker's Hillside Addition, Lauring Hillside
Addition, and Sandberg South. Except for some corrections on the
blacktop in Country Club Manor and reviewing the ditch for the Country Club,
this project is completed.
Initial contract amount was $1,087,044. Final value of work completed based
on actual quantities used is $1,065,106.72. In talking to John Badalich,
our City Engineer, it appears that a $4,000 retainer would be more than
adequate to cover the items remaining to be completed to our satisfaction.
As a result then, the City Engineer and myself would recommend that the
City Council retain $4,000 on this propect until the items are completed
to the City's satisfaction, and make payment in the amount of $29,078.12,
which, along with previous payments of $1,032,028.60, totals $1,061,106.72.
.
POSSIBLE ACTION: Consideration of Approval of retainer of $4,000 from
Northdale ConstructiQn Company on the 1978-1 Improvement
Project.
- 9 -
j
SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Court House - Wright COYnty
BUFFAl.O, MINNESOTA 55313
T,lephone682.1162
, .
............."i............;
. .
C .
OARRELLL; WOl.FF
County Sheriff
James F. Powers, Chief Deputy
Lt. Myron A Morris, Investigator
L t. EI Heberling, Civil . ~ 'H: .,
Novasber 26, 1979
Honorable Hayor
City Council
Encloserl find blank cont~~ct fo~~~r 1980. The cost of contract police service
for 19':'0 will be $11.50 plus all. fir,es per hour. L'his figure is established by
the ',;right L-ounty 'hoard of CO:7'J.~,issioners. You na3r ca.lculiotte the total for the
year ane retCirn the con:'~3.ct tb '::':-:e 3heriff. Fe 1,,'ill take th~ contrrtcts to the
Count~, Board for their Sisn."-ttlr8s [c:-::: holVe a signed copy returned to you.
.
The cost analysis for 1 '120 is ccrl~ut(;d as rolloFs:
Average Deptlty :3alar-.f for 19,:?O per ::our.
$9.00
Benefits:
Vacation 4.5%
Paid Holidays
Sick Leave
Uniforms
Insc:rance
rERA
5.5%
2.0%
1 .25;<:
.75,-;
12. OC;~
Total Benefits 26%
2.34
Car Expense
Avg. 25 ~?~ ~ .11~ ;er mile
2.75
Misc. clerical, prosecu:.i;'" expi~n.se
Total
Less allm-rance for f::nes returr:ed
City Cost for contract service
.70
14.79
3.29
11.50
EX: averlg8 anrnJ.:tl cost :or 8 r.o',,:,~s of patrol per day.
2920 X 11.50::::: ;"p.33,580.00
Ii X 365 da::rs = 2920 hours
.....
fiOU ,trlll.r
-:/'. ../
?:' / . . y'. -._ y;T
~ff /j ~c'f/!t#
Darrell ',olff
"h . " ~ ; ~ ~ht C t
,) erl..l.l, ,. r -'-I;' OU:1 ~'
-
/
..
LAW ENFORCEME~T CONTRACT
.
TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 10th day of December
19~, by and between the County of Wright and the Wright County Sheriff, herein-
after referred to as
"County" and the _I City of Monticello
to as the "~~nicip~1i ty" j
hereinafter referred
Ii'ITNESSETII:
I
WHEREAS, the municipality is aesirous of enterin?, into a contract with
the County for the performance of the hereinafter described la\" enforcement
I protection with the corporate limits of said municipali ty through the county
sheriff, and
I,
,I
, protection on the terms
I WHEREAS, such
WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering such services, and
and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
contracts are aUthorized and provided for by the nrovision
.
of ~Iinn. Stat. 1957, Sec. 471.59 and Laws 1959, Chap. 372, and Minn. Stat. Ann. 19 I
Sec. 436.05;
NOW nffiREFORE, pursuant to the terms of the aforesaid statutes, it is
II arreed as follows:
I
1. That the County by way of the Sheriff agrees to provide police
protection \d thin the corporate limits of the nn.micipali ty to the extent and in
manner as hereinafter set forth:
a. Except as otherwise hereinafter specifically set forth,
such services shall encompass only duties and functions of the tyue cominr.
within the jurisdiction of the Wright County Sheriff pursuant to
~linnesota Laws and Statutes.
b. Except as otherwise hereinafter provided for, as a standard
level of service provided shall be the same basic level of service
which is provided for the unincorporated areas of the County of l<!right,
State of Minnesota.
~
c. The rendition of services, the stand;wd of performance, the
discipline of the officers,and other matters incident to the performance
of such services and control of personnel so employed shall remain in
and under the control of the Sheriff.
.......
d. Such services shall include the enforcement of Minnesota
State Statutes and Laws and the mu~icipal ordinances which are of the
same type and nature of Minnesota State Statutes and Laws enforced by
the Sheriff within the unincorporated territory of said County.
.
3.
That the County shall IfurniSh and supply all necessary labor,
equipment, communicatio'n facilities for disp;Jl:ching, Cost of jail
supervLsion,
Idetention, and all supplies necessary tc maIntain the level of service to be
Irendercd herein.
!
4. T;le municipality shall no::' be liable for the direct p3yme:1t of any
5~13"!:'i<2s. wages, or other co:np2nsati n to <my personnel performing se-rv!.ces
h6~cin for said County.
5. The :nunicip::lli '.y shall not be li:Jble for cumpensation or indemnity
. to 3Dy of the 5hzr!ff's employees for injuries or si~knes5 arising out of its
i
i emp laymen::., and the County he :-eby .:Igrees tu hold ha nnless the mUilidpali ty
.
j:against .:my such claims.
r
I
j-J2emed tv assume any liability for intentional or negeligent acts of said
I municipality, or <lny officer. agent. or ernpl'.:>yee therc')f.
I.
i
6.
The County, Sheriff. his officers. and employees shall not be
..,
I .
The municipality shnll ddenu s:tiJ Sheriff, his officecs, agents,
i:or er.1!Jlo)'€es agains~. and hold harmless from, any claim for damag2s resulting
,
'I
Ii fcui':':
,
II
I'
I
I,
,
"
the enforce~enl of any duly enacted municipal ordinance.
s. This agreement shall he effective from
January 1, 1980
to
December 31, 1980
9. The municipality hereby agrees to pay to the County the sum of
$76,912.00
for law enforcement protection for
16 hours per day of daily patrol service and 24 hours call and general
; ser-vices from said Sheriff's office during said term of this agreement. Addi-
! tiona11y, 8 extra hours per day of service will be provided on Fridays & Saturda s.
i 10. If the anllual salaries of the deputy sheriffs are increased at any
I:
I
time curing the term herein stated, this contra~t shall not he incr8ased.
,.
, for an additionql successive twelve-month period. To exercise this option.
11. The municirality shall have the option of renewing this agreement
--'
the municipality shall notify the coun,ty admi.nistrator not later th,:m sixty days
l,prior to the expir.1tion date of this alreement.
i
12.. It i..r:;, l1fltl(1r~ "'nf""o~ "'I!'"1r1 .""II,-.,'t""M"o..........l ....\...~ '- .......__
.
.
.
I
i
I
j
lmaking it mandatory that the Count.y fourt remit to all municipalities within
I the s.1i.d cot.:ntv, one h3lf of all fines levied and collected from traffic vio-
I ,
! latiOD arrests made in said municipality. And,
I
I
13.
'lliereas; legislation has been enacted effective July 1, 1973,
the County
\-.'hereas; it is understlOd that the contract fees is based upon
receiving the entire amou t of all fines.
It is understood that he Municipality shall return to the
:~rlght County Sh2riff all fine mouies received from the County. Said Munici-
I l' 11 b k
pa lty sha remit y chec. no
later than thirty (30) days from when said fine
I .
:r.;onles
I:
are received by said Municipality.
14. For the purpose of maintaining cooperation, local control and
general information on existing complaints and problems in said municipality,
I
! one member of the municipal council, the mayor, or other person or persons,
:!
i
i:shall be ap?ointed by said council to act as police commissionerls for said
I ,
'munici~~lity, and shall ffi3ke periodic contacts with and attend meetings with
I
rthe she!"'!.ff or his office in rclntion to th2 contr.:1c!:. herein.
I' IN WITNESS ~HEREC~ the municipality, by resolution duly adopted by its
I:
igoverning body, ca~sed this a~reement to be signed by its mayor and attested ~y
i ts cle:-'~, ~nd t::n County of :,'rig~t, by the County Board of Com;;1issioners, h,1s
I,
I
icauscd these pre3ents to be sU~$cribed
I
I
by the \{righ t Coun ty She L iff and the
I
and. I
wn t ten 1
Chairman of said c::>,nG and the seal of sn~d board to be affixed thereto
[:ttestcd by the cle7~ of said board, all on t~e day and year first above
!
I
i
Mayor
,\t tes::':
': l e rk
BOA.,W OF L'RIGHT COUNTY CO\!MISSIONERS
BY
,
i:
I
j Attest:
Cha i. man
.
Consulting Eng/fleers
Land 5U1veyors
November 27,
ORR'~~v~;~~N~~~~~~Oc\~s~~~~~~~:S.INC.
1979
Mr. Gary Wieber
City Administrator
City of Monticello
215 E. Broadway
Monticello, MN 55362
Re: Improvement Project No. 79-1
Dear Gary:
Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter I received from
Barbarossa & Sons regarding their request for an extension
of time to complete Project No. 79-1.
.
As you are aware, all of the underground utility work has
been completed, inspected and in most cases approved. The
bituminous wearing coarse has to be placed on Dundas Road
and Cedar Street and we decided it best to hold this off
until next spring due to the cold weather entering our area
early in November. We also experienced some base failures
that need correction which also require warmer weather.
Therefore based on the meeting we had on November 13, 1979, and
the reasons stated above and in the enclosed letter, I would
recommend that Barbarossa & Sons be granted a time extension
until June 15, 1980 on Project No. 79-1.
Yours very truly,
RR-SCHELEN-MAYERON
_ 'P?:JXt'
John 1(fBadalich, P.E.
City Engineer
cc: John Simola, Public Works Director, Monticello
Paul Flykt, Barbarossa & Sons
Hank Wander, OSM, Monticello
JPB
File
....
~
2021 East Hennepin Avenue. Suite 238
('V1if)!IO~"/I-', Alfl)/iUSOld :)'")47
i' !
(",,,,,1 ".._c_
BARBAROSSA ADD SODS, 'DC.
.
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
PHONE 425-4146
PLANT DIVISION 425-7355
OSSEO. MINNESOTA 55369
Novembe~~, try~ ~ .~ I r: D
r\ 1:.: L; k-- r ~: ~.o,,'"
Mr. John Bada1ich P.E.
Orr-Sche1en-Mayeron & Assoc., Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55413
Re: Monticello, MN
ORR.SCHt:LErHF\';'f::'~': ; cssoc.
COfv'1M. J. Db<j'-30j'g"
f.l "'I~I 'l c,' 'I')-g
~v. 6 I i~1
Dear John:
i3"lri.//
l'~:-I' '. I ..
.,. '__~:"__" n ..,\_
, . I I
.
I apologize for the delay in submitting this request for an extension
of completion on Improvement Project No. 79-1. An extension until
June 15, 1980 would allow adequate time to complete the project.
The project was delayed as a result of 1) two-week delay in award of
project, 2) minor change orders, 3) rain, 4) delays in resolving a
problem with the bituminous restoration. Barbarossa and Sons, Inc.
started work on the project July 16, 1979 and continually pursued the
pipe portion of the project until it was complete in the first part of
November.
We encountered a substantial number of rain days this fall slowing Gown
completion of the pipe work and creating poor conditions to build the
streets. A result of these poor conditions, soft and wet sub base and
base led to the bituminous problem. As I stated in my letter to you on
October 31, I was in contact with H & S Asphalt attempting to resolve
th is.
As you are aware, there were delays in getting a meeting scheduled to
resolve this problem with H & S. The meeting was held November 13, 1979.
At that meeting it was agreed that any work that could be done this year,
weather permitting, would be done and the remainder be completed next
Year. At that time the questionable areas would be reviewed and any
corrections necessary would be made and the job completed.
As I stated previously, an extension until June 15, 1980 would allow time
to finish this project to your and our satisfaction. Your cooperation is
apprec i ated.
Very truly yours,
.
>>:QOSSA
Paul Fly'
5, INC.
PF:cw
"1
Phone 295-2711
etg 01 monticello
250 East Broadway
MONTICELLO, MINN. 55362
Metro 333-5739
To:
........,.
&*<1
~J"':f ,
, /'
/? I'-V;;i e
Date
./ ) --, '""\ ,.,i'
/" ;':;"',~. ,.' ./,r~... ,IiI' i
FROM: Gary Wieber, City Administrator
SUBJECT:
c~ ,
~. ^' <. ,(,,:>E9
/t1!; /7'/1,-:1-,-
.. .)':1-'t.~ W S'
b;'"
/0:;;-.
--,
4,....),.:.J.J
MESSAGE:
1"'
'-'./,....1-'
7~
/C~5 j I...., T/'-'Aj
S,4'.J1
(~).'"
A'
/A.-lOl-;' #//!J.;tZ1/2...;..F
/" .' / ,
/ 1/
r;:. .,-r /1._" .h ~ ."""'1.'
~y
..
I"
t!.?? 7'.'l',,,~ / J,
/(/<<:-1....
J/
/''"A.~~
-1t!'~"""/l' .v~
t(Ai~. ('/"
~
/" /"
(' lit
':'::'"1 Cl.... I {',I
i
:.> ,.,.;",
"~/ ,<
(,{../, //
...-;;."~.(;~~.,,,/
,I:, /A<~'"
........ I, ,.......
/l-'o 1'. ( <"
/
IN;!",;'
,"<,
,i.~,
~"'''':F? .;;,~..~.... ,.. t)
,1/,rI""',~f
,,:7 ,.rJ,..~'. 2,.,~*t.. I ,,,
':., "7'-y
, /,.
l /,:,....
I
/'
/ Y
," .",:;; ," .
F'
f.';- ?~-
.I I'
.If.,l <t '?.r~. ,.) \....
f
/) ./ ;';1.... "'.c~
~
/...",;.., ,,,.,
/;",;./:
.'
. -> .,/.'
,~.-~'.,p'!"".,rll.i ,,'I-t',,' ~~
,""/:':'"'j " ,<. .., 1,,--""" ,in
White
Mailing Copy
Yellow - File Copy
.
.
.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HT~ARING
ON PROPOSED INDUSTlIAL REVENUE BONDS
FOR CLaW STAMPING CO.
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of t,he City of Monticello, Minnesota,
as follows:
WHEREAS, the 1967 session of the Minnesota Legislature enacted
Chapter 474 Minnesota Statutes entitled the Municipal Industrial
Development Act; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Act is the promotion, attraction,
encouragement and development of economically sound industry and
commerce; and
WHEREAS, the further purpOse of the Act is to improve the use of
marginal and undeveloped lands and increase job opportunities; and
WHEREAS, said Act grants to municipalities the authority to issue
reVenue bonds and to finance the cost of construction, engineering and
other incidental expenses connected with the development of industrial
property; and
WHEREAS, such industrial bonds do not involve pledging the full
faith and credit of the municipality; and
WHEREAS, Clow Stamping Company has made a proposal to the City of
Monticello to issue Industrial Revenue Bonds on their behalf in an
amount not to exceed $1,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the 1979 session of the Minnesota Legislature, Chapter 306
1979 Session Laws, requires a municipality to hold a public hearing on
such a proposal;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council ot Monticello to
hold a public hearing on the above proposal at 7:30 P.M., January 14, 1980,
at the Monticello City Hall.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, THIS 10TH DAY OF
DECEMBER, 1979, ON A MOTION BY , SECONDED BY
VOTING IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
Gary Wieber,
City Administrator
~
LIQUOR FUND
DECEMBER LIQUOR DISBURSEMENTS - 1979
AMOUNT
.
CHECK
NO.
.
Yonak Sanitation - Contract
Wright County State Bank - FWT
A. J. Ogle Co., Inc. - Beer
Old Dutch Foods, Inc. - Misc. Merchandise
7-Up Bottling Co. - Misc. Merchandise
Viking Coca Cola Bottling Co. - Misc. Merchandise
Thorpe Distributing Co. - Beer
Day Distributing Co. - Beer & Misc. Mdse.
Dick Beverage Co., Inc. - Beer & Store Expense
Northern states Power Co. - Utilities
Void
Old Peoria Company, Inc. - Liquor & Wine
Griggs Cooper & Co., Inc. - Liquor
Twin City Wine Co. - Liquor & Wine
Johnson Brothers Co. - Wine
Ed Phillips & Sons, Co. - Liquor, Wine & Misc. Mdse.
Persian's Office Products - (1) Ribbon
Twin City pricing - Label Gun & Machine Labels
Bridgewater Telephone - Telephone
Berg's Office Supply - Cash register tape
Jude Candy Company - Misc. Mdse. - Store Exp.
Dahlheimer Distributing - Beer & Misc. Mdse.
Grosslein Beverage- Beer & Misc. Mdse.
Monticello Times - Advertising
398.22
2459.93
1815.70
131. 03
5251. 02
6.00
44.86
47.49
54.41
418.97
2349.79
9160.32
512.03
40.00
414.50
357.75
119.36
175.75
297.05
1955.05
190.93
4755.20
413.83
Payroll for November
2446.03
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS
$33,815.22
.
7
9008
9009
9010
9011
9012
9013
9014
9015
9016
9017
9018
9019
9020
9021
9022
9023
9024
9025
9026
9027
9028
9029
9030
9031
GENERAL FUND
DECEMBER - 1979
AMOUNT
.
Government Training Service - Tax increment seminar
Lindsay Bro. Co. - PVC valve - reimb. by Irv Kallin
Wright County Sheriff - Police contract p,yment
Dept. of Nat. Resources - Dep. Reg. fees .
Matt Theisen - Reimb. for sewer school seminar
James Preusse - Cleaning city hall
Gwen Bateman - Animal IMp. expense
Arve Grimsmo - Mayor salary
Dr. Phil White - Council salary
Ken Maus - Council salary
Mrs. Fran Fair - Council salary
Dan Blonigen - Council salary
Ind. School Dist. #882 - Library rent
Yonak Sanitation - Contract
Dept. of Nat. ReSources - Dep. Reg. fees
Barbarossa & Sons - Sewer repair by Dairy Queen
North Central Chemical - 24-5 gal. pails & 1- 30 gal. drum deo
Our Own Hardware - Flash lite, super glue, bolts, wire, bulbs
Tri County Lumber - Treated boards for 6th St. sewer repair
Maus Foods - Hilex, towels, window cleaner, coffee
Broadway Rental - Christ. lites installation _ rental of equip.
John Simola - Mileage & safety flairs & mud flaps
Stephens-Peck, Inc. - Dep. Reg. Book
Wright County Sheriff - Police contract payment
Coast to Coast - Paint, pails, keys made, STP, silicone seal
F'ireap Assoc. - 1 2 way radio for street dept. trucks
State Treas. - Surplus Fund - Gloves and book ends
VOID
Preusser Sand & Gravel - Salt and sand mix _ 199.7 tons
Dr. J. Erickson - Euthanize 39 dogs - Oct. & Nov.
Monticello Printing - Envelopes, Letterheads, Civ. Def. notice
Carlson Welding - Misc. welding for St. and Sewer Depts.
National Bushing - Wind. washer fluid, reprs. for loader
Harry's Auto Supply - Filter, muffler, pipe, clamps, hose, etc.
Feed Rite Controls - November testing
Gould Bros. - Repairs to van & sludge trucks
Suburban Gas - Gas for dog pound
O. K. Hardware - Reducer & caulk for loader
Foster Ins. Agency - 3 yr. premo for Liquor store mgr. &
Asst. Adm.
John's Discount - Dog food, pinesol, towels, etc. _ dog pound
Drew Chemical - 55 gal. drum of Drewfloc chemicals _ WWTP
Northern States Power - Utilities
Duro-Test Corp. - Bulbs for Christ. decorations
Water Products - 2" meter & 12 resetters
Wright County Auditor - ~ police fines for Nov.
Gary Wieber - Mileage - November
Hoglund Bus. - Gauge & parts for Int. trucks
Geyer Rental, Inc. - Air compressor rental - 6th St. sewer
OSM - Misc. eng. fees and meetings for October
Wright County State Bank - FWT tax for Nov.
.
......
-
7
185.00
36.06
5838.00
166.00
112.22
180.00
383.50
125.00
100.00
100,00
100.00
100.00
147.00
3124.50
53.00
1016.71
1640.66
124.22
243.84
51. 94
460.58
46.00
22.50
5838.00
45.79
687.84
6.25
1347.98
235.00
262.35
9.00
99.60
181. 71
77 .50
148.60
57.90
8.29
507.00
99.58
673.86
2856.82
269.54
504.47
2121. 25
35.50
11. 68
30.38
29500.97
2409.10
CHECK NO.
12320
12321
12322
12323
12324
12325
12326
12327
12328
12329
12330
12331
12332
12333
12334
12335
12336
12337
12338
12339
12340
12341
12342
12343
12344
12345
12346
12347
12348
12349
12350
12351
12352
12353
12354
12355
12356
12357
12358
12359
12360
12361
12362
12363
12364
12365
12366
12367
12368
12369
.
.
.
.."" "-"-,,.,--~._.,._-,.,...,.~.,_._-~~--~,
GENERAL FUND
December - 1979
Independent Lumber - Plywood for rink; door strips, level, Ins 1.
Johnny's Implement Service - 5' hose for tractor repair
Moon Motor Sales - Rpr. parts for J. Deere Tractor (4) coupler
Audio Communications Co. - Repairs to pager
Gross Industrial Services - Laundry - UnifOrms - Nov. 79
Monticello Times - Publishing costs - Nov. 79
Amoco Oil Company - Gas
Payroll - November 1979
TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS
, '" ,.:~
'> . j,
. ,i"',~,~,
~~.......'."."
'M.;".",;.t.lJ.:
~",,':+.I,~l..i:.
7
AMOUNT
387.33
3.25
31. 20
9.50
99.20
386.55
168.85
14055.79
$77,524.36
CHECK NO.
12370
12371
12372
12373
12374
12375
12376
I
\
December 10, 1979
COUNCIL PPDATE
.~ 1. Sewer and Water Billing Receptacle.
Bruce Wachter has been contacted and will be installing a custom-made
sewer and water billing receptacle for the Monticello City Hall _
estimated cost to be less than $200. This estimated cost is quite a bit
less expensive than those receptacles I have reviewed in various catalogs
that the City has. Mr. Wachter will start on this project in two to three
months as he is currently quite busy.
2. Resi nation of Lois Schoe f from Busi ess & Industrial Develo ment Committee.
Lois Schoepf has resigned from the Business & Industrial Development
Committee due to her planned move to California. Members of the Business &
Industrial Development Committee will be asked to Suggest names to the
City Council to replace her on this committee. This will probably occur
at the January 14, 1980 meeting where the City Council annually appoints
and reestablishes any existing committees. For your information, a letter
of thank you will also be sent to Ms. Schoepf.
3. Fuel Assistance.
~
Wright County Community Action out of Waverly, Minnesota, is handling the
fuel assistance coordination for Wright County. Every Tuesday, from 8:00 A.M.
to 4:30 P.M., a representative from the Wright County Community Action is
available for those who have questions relative to the program and who would
like to make application.
4. De-Watering for Ritze Manor Plat.
As you may recall, at the last meeting the City Council discussed with our
Public Works Director and City Engineer the problems incurred in providing
sewer and water service connections to some lots in the Ritze Manor addition _
one specifically discussed was the connection for Bud Kline. Subsequent to
the meeting and at the request of Charles Ritze, a meeting was held with
Mr. Ritze, his son Phil and Casey Kjellberg to explain the City's view-
point of this matter. Emphasis was placed on how Mr. Ritze could resolve
this problem in the future, and it was suggested that the next time that
the City of Monticello - possibly in 1980 - has an improvement project that
would involve dewatering, notification could be given to Mr. Ritze and he
could contact the same contractor to have the dewatering done for the
remaining lots that necessitate it. This would result in a substantially
reduced cost savings to Mr. Ritze since a great share of the expense in
dewatering is getting the equipment out initially, and in very many cases
with dewatering, two or three lots could be dewatered at the same time.
5. Reimbursement to Mr. & Mrs. James Preusse for Sewer Clean-u
Street.
Front
As you may recall, this item was discussed at a recent Council meeting where
a concern was expressed for reimbursement to Mr. & Mrs. Preusse for cleanup
to several homes along Front Street that was caused as the result of a
sewer backup due to the malfunction of a lift station. Jim Foster Insurance
.
.
.
COUNCIL UPDATE ~ 12/10/79
Agency has been contacted and the problem has been resolved and Mr. & Mrs.
Preusse may already have been paid or will receive payment shortly.
6.
Tax Increment Financing.
Tax Increment Financing appears to be a tool that the City could use for
development and redevelopment. Simply put - tax increment financing allows
the City to spend moneys on a project whereby the ultimate cost to the City
of the project can be repaid by the ultimate increase in property taxes
that were caused by the improvement project itself. Currently, I am doing
a study on tax increment financing and I will send a summary report to the
Council on this item. Additionally, after this report is released, a meeting
will be attempted to be arranged with a representative of the League of Cities
and the Council may be interested in attending such a meeting and notice will
be given to them.
- 2 -
.
. ....
,-/d~
J
CP.
- .~:.".,-, "".-- - .-.- - .. ,'r~_. ~
/tJ-lf-7'
Se--I.r~ .......
'///F 7 ~
~ L:u
~~
o /ij~~ ~.rrs
~
/$' ) /;- %r /....._ '
Lp7 t4J f-/. l" ~ ., r. ~..
Z~O (
r
() 1/. -p-':;'
- ~~J~L~l
~ z.-.:; 0 ~ 5~
f,J,
lit>>
J/ ttf9/ ,.A,~
,vo ....-
/J/~
@
-----------_..-~
~
\,
\\
\\
I
/
,/
I(
I
~ {. II:!! / dv
~ ~.,~~
~ ~,,~-~ >
~/.
JA 1./"" J, '-
[J 1# J J,JiJ
/.1 ,0' , j' -'"
V "
(~I f~.
h "IJ /' //
~
70J . 1. Sl.?
-.-,- --.. ~_.._-- ~" .~_..
.,...........,_,.,~'--:.,._'~_~--::r-....--:-
:zt
~
~
4-"""
,::GA.
~ "1..0
J-Y' A.-t,
..
~~
~
~
<:J / /.,!L40 /JI...J p r~~$
4~ ~ "p pi r,.,..",.._
CLAk f~,.. -_J>").
~ ~.,.
~~~ - ~.. - .....'-
"'_""'~ AJ ~
- .,.
~ ~ ,-& "-c.. ,., ,t: .
54J;;""1~ ,qL.H~sr
/J:' (5~ :rLLIIA4/~--
/9 1)1/ ~$D .54./___ '> ~" IV 7.;' /""
21- c:J_~ ('... ZjZ> .14f'/...) /7tI' /4
~--s;.- g"". ~))../" A P...
z-z.. X e,r $~ '1'1"" ~ If 1 -=-., '1
IINJ r
-
.e.." .. - r~..... ,
I~
~ IP S J .4~.$.J ~ ,tJf,-N I.r..-
'Z"2- ~ '-1.0 G~tYt;. C-,.....
'-Ivvp
r
-
5'1' a..s:
"" J"u
.
,~
,
8'7. :Jo
2 ,. 70
Yj/9C7D
~-
~~r /Al,.".".;4
.
- 6.ID
51... "0
---
~.o. ~
..-r..:
,..,.
eN'} 0/ r/l/onficetf!
250 Eust Sr'uddv";I\,
MO NT I c: r t I CJ, 0JI I\J ~-i~,J(;;)
TELEPHONl )::J~) 2711
MFHW I liJf >;:;:3 (",7:39
. G It/C L(
'~~\. .~.~~./"
I . -/;',
, ,
( j
MONT/CiL.LO
d' 1'I.'/ItUIY old {'ily
with a fI(j,Jear aye vit'W
TO M~YOR & CITY COUNCIL:
Attached is an additional item which has been added to the agenda to
accommodate Mr. Wulf's desire to build yet this winter.
If he must wait for the next meeting to be on the agenda, it would
be January 15, 1980 before construction could start and frost
could be a problem
LOREN KLEIN
COUNCIL AGENDA - 12/10/79
.
ADDITIONAL ITEM FOR AGENDA
Request for Subdivision of Lot by Mr. Marv Wu1f.
Mr. Marv Wulf would like to subdivide his lot as shown on the enclosed
material.
Presently, Mr. Wulf owns the East 1/2 of vacated Cedar Street and Lots 1 & 2
abutting that property to the east. (The Cedar Street mentioned here is not
the street the old City Hall is on, but is the street which was vacated near
the High School in the east part of towh). His proposal is to divide the
vacated street and the two lots into two buildable parcels, one lot being
the vacated portion of Cedar Street and approximately 43' of Lot 1, and
the other lot being approximately 23' of Lot 1 and all of Lot 2.
Under Monticello Ordinances, both of these new lots would meet and exceed
what our ordinance requires for size.
If this subdivision is approved, Mr. Wulf plans to sell the prescnt home
on the East lot and build a new home on the newly created West lot.
Issuance of a building permit would be contingent upon proof of recording
these two lots at the recorders office.
4It POSSIBLE ACTION: Approve or deny subdivision request.
REFERENCES: Enclosed certificate of survey.
4It
.