City Council Agenda Packet 06-08-1998
.
.
.
AGEND
REGULAR MEETING. MONT CELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, June 8, 1998. 7 p.m.
Mayor:
Bill Fair
Council Members:
Bruce Thielen, Clint Herbst, rian Stumpf, Roger Carlson
1. Call to order.
2.
A.
Approval of minutes of the specialjo' t commission meeting held May 21, 1998.
B. Approval of minutes of the special eting held May 26, 1998.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agenda.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and c mplaints.
5. Consent agenda.
A. Consideration of transient merchant rdinance amendment.
B.
Consideration of renewing contract fi r City Assessor services for 1998-1999 -
Kramber & Associates.
C. Consideration of a request for a rezo ing of East Oaks Meadows from A-O
(agriculture/open space) to R-l (sing e family residential). Applicant, Harold
Shermer.
D. Consideration of a request for a con itional use permit to allow a beauty and
tanning salon in a PZM (performanc zone mixed) zone. Applicant, Tom and
Susan Grossnickle.
E. Consideration of a request for a rezo . g, preliminary plat, and development stage
PUD for a 78-lot single family plat t be known as Wildwood Ridge. Applicant,
Darrell A. Farr Development Corpor tion.
F. Consideration of an amendment to t e zoning code providing for seasonal open
sales in the PZ (performance zone) a d in the B-1, B-2, B-3, and B-4 (business
district) zones. Applicant, City ofonticello.
Consideration of a zoning text amen ment in the 1-1 (light industrial) zoning
district to allow a go-cart track as a onditional use. Applicant, Russ and Paula
Adamski dba Monticello Roller . .
G.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
June 8, 1998
Page 2
H. Consideration of a request for a con ept stage approval for a planned unit
development to allow a senior resid ntial complex adjacent to the Church of St.
Henry site. Applicant, St. Benedict Center.
I. Consideration of approving simple s bdivision. Applicants, Monticello-Big Lake
Hospital District and Monticello Sc 001 District.
J. Consideration of resolution acceptin feasibility study and calling for a public
hearing on the Chelsea Road project
6. Consideration of items removed from the c nsent agenda for discussion.
7. Public hearing on the Marvin Road project.
8. Consideration of a request for a concept sta e planned unit development for a 220-acre
residential subdivision. Applicant, Gold Nu get Development, Inc.
9.
Consideration of renewing animal services a reement with Monticello Animal Control -
Patty Salzwedel.
10. Consideration of an amendment to the Mon icello Comprehensive Plan by adopting a
Comprehensive Parks and Pathway Plan. A plicant, Monticello Parks Commission.
11. Consideration of reviewing first quarter liqu r store financial report.
12. Consideration of bills for the last half of Ma 1998.
13. Adjournment.
.
.
.
MIND ES
SPECIAL JO T MEETING
MONTICELLO CITY COD elL AND COMMISSIONS
Thursday, May 21,1998.6 p.m.
Council Present: Bill Fair, Roger Carlson
Council Absent: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, Br ce Thielen
Planning Conunission Present: Dick Frie, Richar Carlson, Robbie Smith, Rod Dragsten
Planning Commission Absent: Dick Martie
HRA Present: Dan Frie, Bradley Barger, Steve drews, Darrin Lahr
HRA Absent: Bob Murray
EDA Present: Darrin Lahr, Barb Schwientek, Ke Maus, William Demeules, Roger Carlson
EDA Absent: Ron Hoglund, Clint Herbst
Parks Conunission Present:
Parks Conunission Absent:
Larry Nolan, Fran air, Rick Traver, Jennifer Fearing, Earl Smith
None
Police Conunission Present: Liz DesMarais, Da id Gerads, Brad Fyle
Police Conunission Absent: Bridget Baldwin, rian Stumpf
A special joint meeting of the City Council and c nunissions was held for the purpose of
reviewing the City's vision statement and progre s on meeting goals and objectives.
Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill reviewed th items from the project priority list that have
been completed as each relates to the vision state ent categories of aesthetic/environmental,
social/community, cultural, economic, recreation 1, and spiritual.
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller reported tha the financial condition of the City appears to be
healthy with a surplus of $13,557,875 in 1997, a d a five-year capital improvement plan is
currently being prepared. It was also noted that he City Council will be reviewing a
reorganization plan for city hall staffing needs, w .ch will include separating the fmance
department from the general office structure.
Mayor Bill Fair reviewed his list of additional pri rity items, which included preparation of a five-
year capital improvement plan, preparation of a . nagement plan for the community center,
reviewing costs for improvements to the entire ea near Marvin Road, updating the
comprehensive plan in the area of transportation looking at incentives for industrial growth,
considering referendum questions for the 1998 e ections, and increasing the Mayor's term of
office to four years beginning in the year 2000, hich the League of Women Voters will be
researching.
Pa e 1
oUr
.
.
.
Special Council Minutes - 5/21/98
Joint Commission Meeting
Representatives from each commission reported on rojects completed during the past year and
shared ideas on possible new initiatives. Barb Schw'entek suggested that, since the organizational
structure will soon be reviewed, it would be benefici I for customers to have a more detailed
structure as far as who to contact at city hall during rojects. Mayor Fair and City staff also
noted that extensive street resurfacing is being plann d for the near future and annexation of
property into the city will continue due to continued interest by developers.
There being no further business, the joint meeting w s adjourned.
Karen Doty
Deputy City Clerk
Page
;l*'
.
.
.
MINUT S
SPECIAL MEETING - MONTI ELLO CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, May 26, 1 98 - 6:45 p.m.
Members Present:
Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian tumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
Members Absent:
None
A special meeting of the City Council was held for t e purpose of considering the City Assessor's
report on recently-reviewed valuations.
The following parcels were discussed:
155-021-002470:
155-500-154400:
155-500-143400:
155-093-001100:
155-031-002040:
155-010-030021:
Recommended va1uat on be reduced to $113,800.
A MOTION WAS M E BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY
BRIAN STUMPF TO PROVE THE VALUATION OF $113,800.
Motion carried unan' ously.
County Assessor rec mmended valuations remain the same.
E BY BRIAN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY
ROGER CARLSON T ACCEPT THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S
RECOMMENDA TIO . Motion carried unanimously.
Recorrunended va1ua ion be reduced to $120,900.
E BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
BRUCE THIELEN T APPROVE THE VALUATION OF $120,900.
Motion carried unan' ously.
Recommended va1u ion be reduced to $68,100.
A MOTION WAS M
CLINT HERBST TO
Motion carried una
E BY BRUCE THIELEN AND SECONDED BY
PROVE THE VALUATION OF $68,100.
ous1y.
Recommended that he valuation remain the same at $66,900.
A MOTION WAS M E BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
BRIAN STUMPF TO ACCEPT THE ASSESSOR'S
RECOMMENDATIO THAT THE VALUATION REMAIN AT
$66,900. Motion c ied unanimously.
Pag 1
d-6
.
.
.
155-045-002030:
155-015-016010:
Special Council Minutes - 5/26/98
Recommended valu tion be reduced to $125,000.
A MOTION WAS M E BY ROGER CARLSON AND SECONDED
BY CLINT HERBST 0 APPROVE THE V ALUA nON OF $125.000.
Motion carried una ously.
Recommended valu tion be reduced to $79,700.
A MOTION WAS M DE BY CLINT HERBST AND SECONDED BY
ROGER CARLSON T APPROVE THE VALUATION OF $79,700.
Motion carried unan ously.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HERBST AND S CONDED BY BRUCE THIELEN TO
ADJOURN THE SPECIAL MEETING. Motion carri d unanimously.
Karen Doty
Deputy City Clerk
Page
~
.
.
.
SA.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
(R.W.)
A
Currently, the transient merchant ordinance llows the sale of farm or garden fruits and
vegetables from July 15 through October 15 subject to a daily $10 permit fee. Typically
one or two vendors have applied for this pe mit in past years with one primary vendor
being located next to Moon Motors on Hig way 25. When this section of the ordinance
was amended in 1990 to allow fruit and veg table stands, it was assumed that a 90-day
time period from the middle of July through October seemed appropriate to meet the
growing schedule of area farms. In recent y ars, vendors have started to grow sweet corn
and other vegetables earlier by greenhouse thods and are finding that an earlier start to
the marketing season would be more appro riate. In addition, most vendors are no longer
selling their merchandise after Labor Day, a d it would be easy to amend our ordinance to
simply allow this 90-day period of time to st t earlier and end earlier each season.
The ordinance amendment as proposed wou d simply allow this sales activity from June 15
through September 15 rather than July 15 tough October 15. This would still give us
the same 3-month period of time where this ales activity is allowed but I believe will
provide better dates for the vendors. In the ast number of years, we have not had any
permits issued after Labor Day, as the pro y activity seems to relate to sweet corn and
other garden vegetables that are easier to se during the summer months.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Adopt the ordinance amendment all wing the sale of farm or garden fruits and
vegetables from June 15 through Se tember 15 with all other provisions remaining
the same.
2. Do not amend the time period curre tly allowed from July 15 through October 15.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Since the original intent of this ordinance se tion was to simply allow farm produce to be
sold during the summer months, I would re ommend that the ordinance amendment be
adopted allowing sales to occur as soon as J ne 15 and end on September 15. This still
allows the activity to take place for 90 days ut better reflects when the fruits and
vegetables are available. The City usually h s only one or two vendors per year who apply
for permits for this activity.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of ordinance amendment.
.
.
.
ORDINANCE AME DMENT NO.
THE Cn'Y COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, M NESOT A, HEREBY ORDAINS THAT
ORDINANCE SECTION 3.10.3 (H), PERTAIN NG TO TRANSIENT MERCHANT
REGULATIONS ON THE SALE 0.' FRUITS ND VEGETABLES, BE AMENDED AS
.'OLLOWS:
3-10-3 (H): Sale of farm or garden fruits nd vegetables from June 15 throul;h
September 15 subject to the rovisions of 3.10- 2 (C) and the daily permit
fees established by Council.
Adopted this 8th day of June, 1998.
City Administrator
Mayor
~A~'I
5B.
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
With the 1997-1998 assessment process re ently being completed, Jerry Kramber has
indicated a willingness to continue serving s City Assessor for another year.
Mr. Kramber has presented a proposal bas g the compensation at $6.75 per parcel, a $.25
per parcel increase from the present agree nt. There are currently a total of 2,799
parcels, including tax exempt properties. or the year 1997, the total contract amounted
to $18,193.50, which included payment fo the 201 tax exempt parcels that were reviewed
as part of the overall assessment process.
The proposal for 1998-1999 assessment y ar would amount to $17,536.50 calculated at
2,598 parcels times $6.75 each. The lowe number of parcels excludes the tax exempt
parcels which are not billed unless they ar actually reviewed. In addition to this base
contract, we calculate at the end of the as essment year any additional new parcels that
may have been added because of new su ivisions or plats. As a result, it is likely that a
few thousand dollars more could be adde to the contract after additional subdivision lots
are added.
The Krambers have acted as our City Ass ssor since 1992, at which time the contract rate
was $5.25 per parcel. The City of Monti ello is required to have a licensed assessor
because of our population and commerci 1 values. In Wright County, the City of Buffalo
is the only other community that is requir d to have this licensed assessor, and they use
the services of the Wright County Assess r's office. Wright County contracts with a
number of cities and townships in Wright County for providing assessing duties, including
the cities of Albertville, Annandale, Coka 0, Rockford, and Buffalo. The current charge
by Wright County is $6.75 per parcel, an they are proposing to increase their fee to $7
per parcel for the 1998-1999 assessment ear. As a result, it appears that Mr. Kramber' s
proposal of $6.75 is in line with the char es that we would incur if we used the County
Assessor to perform our assessing duties
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Renew the contract for City asse sing services with Mr. Kramber for the 1998-
1999 assessment year at the $6.7 per parcel rate.
2. Do not renew the contract.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION
It is the reconnnendation of the City Ad . istrator that the contract for assessing services
be renewed with Mr. Kramber at the pr posed $6.75 per parcel rate. Over the past six or
seven years, I am not aware of any maj r problems that we've had using Mr. Kramber's
services; and in comparing the proposal for their services to what the County Assessor's
office charges, the proposal seems reas nable.
2
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
If the City did not renew the contract wit Mr. Kramber, the only other options would be
to either utilize the services of the Wright ounty Assessor (if available) or advertise for
contract assessor services from anyone els who is licensed. In the past, quotations we
had received to provide similar services ra ged from $6 to $9 per parcel, and it is unlikely
that we could find anyone else to provide he services for less than is being proposed by
Mr. Kramber.
.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed contract; Letter request' g increase.
.
.
3
CITY ASSESSOR DUTIES REQUIREMENTS
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
.
This agreement, made this 9th day of June, 1998, by nd between the City of Monticello, a
municipal corporation (hereafter referred to as "City" , and Jerry Kramber, of Kramber &
Associates, Inc. (hereafter referred to as "Kramber"), sets out the terms and conditions for the
general purpose of providing assessing services for t e City.
WHEREAS, the City desires and is required to perfo m assessing functions for determining
appropriate market values for all properties located ithin city limits;
WHEREAS, the City desires to provide these assess nt duties through the services of a
qualified private party which will be able to respond s needed under the general guidelines
established by the City, County of Wright, and State of Minnesota.
NOW, THEREFORE, in and for consideration of th mutual covenants and conditions hereinafter
contained, the parties hereto mutually agree as follo s:
la. The City in and for consideration of the sum of Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Thirty-
six Dollars and Fifty Cents ($17,536.50), pa able in nine (9) monthly installments
beginning June 30, 1998, through February 8, 1999, hereby contracts with Kramber for
the period of 12 months from the date of ex cution of this agreement for the services of
Kramber as City Assessor.
.
lb.
The contract amount is based on a contract ee of $6.75 per parcel times an estimated
2,598 parcels of record within the city.
Ie. The City agrees to adjust the final payment 0 reflect the actual number of parcel
assessment functions performed by the Ass ssor.
2. Kramber hereby agrees to perform substan ially the following services as Assessor:
a. Complete all necessary calculations and market values for tax parcels within the
city by prescribed date for year 199 as determined by Wright County Assessor.
b. Record individual parcel informati n in "field" books supplied by the County
Assessor, including sketch plan of II buildings and dimensions.
c. Provide a duplicate copy of new p eel information from field books or County
Assessor records and update annu lly all parcel information on City duplicate
records/files.
d.
Perform a physical review of appr ximately 25% of tax parcels annually, including
a report on the number and locati n of properties within the 25% that were unable
to be inspected internally.
513 ....1
.
Page 1
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\ASSESSOR.AGR: 6/4/98
.
.
.
e. Provide timely response to inquiries 0 residents regarding market valuations and
basis for same.
f.
Represent City at annual Board of Re iew established by City Council and provide
documentation for values assigned w en necessary.
g. Provide the City Council and adminis ration with status reports during the
assessment year which summarize the assessment activities performed to date.
h. Provide on a monthly basis, or when vailable, copies of all CRY's from County
Assessor.
1. All other duties and responsibilities n cessary to complete assessing function for
year 1999.
3. Kramber hereby agrees to utilize his/her own vehicle to perform the aforementioned tasks
and, further, to provide proper insurance cov rage to indemnify and hold harmless the
City from any claims or violations arising fro the operation of said vehicle.
4. The City hereby agrees to provide space, use of equipment, and access to Building Official
and/or other City records within City Hall w en necessary for Assessor to fulfill his/her
duties and responsibilities herein stated.
This contract arrangement may be terminate by either party, with or without cause,
provided the party wishing to terminate this greement shall provide written notice to the
other party at least sixty (60) days prior to t effective date of termination.
5.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have au sed this agreement to be executed in their
behalf by themselves and/or their proper officers by heir signatures the day and year first written
above.
Witness
Date
Witness
Date
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\ASSESSOR.AGR: 6/4/98
CITY OF MONTICELLO
City Administrator
Date
KRAMBER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Date
68....~
Page 2
Xamber & :JJssociales, gn .
.
REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS/ASSESSORS
P.O. Box 56
Montrose. MN 55363
(612) 675.3748
~ / / /'1y%'
~~~~
~$O g~~~ _'
~~'-7'r~
c?S-3G ~
~~~-uJ~~~(}~~
_.K/~:3 ~ / ,,(#..c. ~ P
~ /J-- ~r<J~ /</f'?
.1f' I:. ~>/ y:;~-
~~)
,~.~~
""""",. ~#-: 'h/
~<0-e.P4- /51 / ~ -
, .'; ',>i., ~~(;1:\ '1"<:', i::i.t:~:1} .".,~'.\l , .
\ ,:, ~_ 'i .~ : . '\ .,
.
66---3
. 5C.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A public hearing was held on this item by t e Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Adrninis rator recommend approval of the request as
identified in the attached staff report to the lanning Commission under alternative # 1.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the reconnnendati n of the Planning Commission.
2. Motion to modify the recommenda on of the Planning Commission or deny the
request.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
. 5.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
C
OJ)y
Harold Schermer.
Upon the annexation of the East Oaks Mead ws plat. the property must be rezoned to
permit filing of the fmal plat. Upon annexati n, the City's ordinance requires that the
property comes into the city with an agricult ral zoning designation. The Comprehensive
Plan has anticipated that the properties in thi area, including East Oaks Meadows, would
be zoned R-l, single family residential. That as the review standard used in evaluation
of the plat prior to annexation.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the rezoning to R 1, single family residential, based upon a
finding that the City's land use plan c Us for low density residential on this
property.
2. Motion to table action on the rezonin subject to additional information.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. As noted above, the Comprehensive Plan
calls for low density residential in this area, a d it is consistent with the surrounding land
uses in the area.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
None.
5C .., I
. 5D.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A
A public hearing was held on this item by th Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Adminis ator recommend approval of the request as
identified in the attached staff report to the lanning Commission under alternative # 1.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the reconunendatio of the Planning Commission.
2. Motion to modify the reconunendati n of the Planning Commission or deny the
request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
5
. 6.
"0
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98 ~ r
A
Tom & Lisa Grossnickle have applied for a c nditional use permit to allow the operation
of a beauty and tanning salon in the PZM Di trict. This use is a permitted use in the B-1
and B-2 Districts. Those commercial uses ar allowed in the PZM District by conditional
use permit. The proposed use would occup an existing residential structure at the
northeast corner of Broadway and Washingt n, across Broadway from the current High
SchooV Administration building.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that such us s meet the performance standards for
commercial uses and an additional require nt that the sale of any merchandise is retail
only. With regard to performance standards the primary impacts will be with relation to
parking, building code improvements, and 1 dscaping/screening from adjoining residential
uses. While the bufferyard ordinance would require a substantial bufferyard, the PZM
District states that there will no specific sta ards. Instead, the development of PZM sites
are to be evaluated against the City's plano' g intent for the area, using zoning district
standards as a guideline.
.
The Zoning Ordinance would typically requ' e approximately six parking spaces for a
commercial building of this size. The applic nts have proposed seven, including one
handicapped accessible space. The lot must be paved, and curbing is required to surround
the entire parking and driveway area. The pplicants have shown some curb on the plan.
The project should be developed in confor nce with all paving, striping, and curbing
requirements.
The normal bufferyard requirements would equire a relatively wide bufferyard between a
commercial use and adjoining low density r sidential. However, this would not seem to
be practical in the original plat area of sma lots and mixed uses. Instead, we would
recommend a substantial fence and landsca ed screen along the boundaries of the site with
adjoining residential property. This would elp to mitigate the conflicts of activity and
lights associated with a commercial use w ch would be incompatible with most residential
neighborhoods.
.
Finally, parking areas are required to be se
The site plan which was submitted is not a
be provided to the Building Official prior t
This inspection could be made a part of th
would typically be necessary for new co
back at least five feet from all property lines.
urvey. Verification of lot line locations should
installation of the parking lot improvements.
building code compliance inspections which
rcial development.
2
5b --I
.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
1. Motion to approve the conditional us permit for a beauty and tanning salon in a
PZM District, subject to 'the conditio s listed in Exhibit Z, based upon a finding
that the proposed use would be com atible with the intent of the Comprehensive
Plan and the PZM Zoning District.
2. Motion to deny the conditional use p rmit, based upon a finding that the proposed
use could not be made to be cornpati Ie with existing neighborhood land uses.
3. Motion to table action on the conditi nal use permit, subject to the submission of
additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the CUP. Wi h the substantial traffic along Broadway, a
lower intensity commercial service use woul be a reasonable use, particularly given the
fact that the existing residential structure wo ld be maintained. The entry into the
community via Broadway has an important isual impact, and maintenance of the existing
residential look is encouraged by the Compr hensive Plan. In addition, the
Comprehensive Plan encouraged retention 0 residential uses in this area. By avoiding
conversion of the building stock to more co rcial character structures, it is more likely
that existing residential uses will be comfort ble remaining in place. With the
improvement of Broadway as discussed in t e Comprehensive Plan and the MCP
Downtown Revitalization Plan, keeping the xisting residential building character will be
an important key.
.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Site Location Map
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval .
.
3
5'O~~
A COMPILATION OF RECORDS AS THEY APPEAR IN
',IGHT COUNTY OFFICES AND OTHER SOURCES.
,AWING IS TO BE USED ONLY FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES
1E COUNTY IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY INACCURACIE
.. NTAIN ED. THIS IS NOT A LEGALLY RECORDED PLAT.
~
.~
~
Site location
/Zf/ S'
S'/S'
S'/,/:)
1:>/
.
61>~3
Exhibit A - Site Location
.
rn
/0
D
J>
tj
~
J>
-e
.
.. \vi ASHING TON I ...
1
O'
[
. .
~
UI ru
"'!
~ I' (1\
W ~
n
~
tU
W ~
f
I SI E 'JALK J:
t .- '..J '..J JI>
...... sUl (J) '-.j
0
n
~:I: JI>
J>O -0
~ V)C ')
::tV) -
.......1T1
Z
Cl
-l ;u
0 tU
Z
W
~
",.
''1:
",.
''1:
r r
0 D
~ ~ .
t-" ru
~ :
Sf).;4
Exhibit B - Site Plan
--
.
.
.
CONDITIONS 0 APPRO V AL
BEAUTY AND TA NING SALON
Tom & Lisa rossnickle
1. The parking lot and driveway are paved, s ed and curbed in accordance with Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
2. Setbacks of new parking/driveway improve nts are maintained in accordance with the
ordinance standards, and verified by survey.
3. An intensive screening and landscaping bord r, including both planting and fencing, is
provided between this use and adjoining resi ential properties.
4. The structure is certified for commercial use y the City Building Official.
5. A residential building character is maintained to provide the appropriate streetscape and
compatibility with the residential neighborho d.
S/)-- ~
Exhi it Z - Conditions of Approval
.
.
.
5E.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A REFEREN E AND BA
The Planning Commission reviewed these r quests at a public hearing on June 2, 1998,
and acted to recommend approval of the pI nned unit development and preliminary plat
subject to the conditions noted on an updat d Exhibit Z. The rezoning request was tabled
by the Planning Commission pending decisi n-making on annexation by the MOAA.
Attached is the report to the Planning Co . ssion.
Subsequent to the drafting of the staff repo t to the Planning Commission, the developer
proposed to remove two of the 78 lots fro the site, which greatly increased the number
of conforming lots on site. With the chang proposed by the developer, there will be no
need for a reduction in the side yard setbac on the garage side of homes, and most of the
76 lots will meet standards with regard to I t width and area.
In addition, the street right-of-way width w s increased to 60 ft with a concurrent
allowance for a 5-ft reduction in front yard etback.
The Planning Commission also recommend d approval of an on-road pathway system as
an alternative to the sidewalk system propo ed in the staff report.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
DECISION 1:
1. Motion to approve the planned unit development and the preliminary plat of the
Wildwood Ridge and table the rezo ing request (pending MOAA action). Motion
contingent on conditions identified' the updated Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to deny the planned unit de elopment and preliminary plat.
3. Motion to table the matter pending dditional information.
DECISION 2:
Council may not act on the rezoning reque t identified in the report to the Planning
Commission because the request was table by the Planning Commission.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative # 1 under De ision # 1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Updated Exhibit Z; Planning Commission s aff report.
6
.
.
.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
WILDWOO RIDGE
DEVELOPMENT STAGE PU F/PRELIMIMARY PLAT
Farr Developme t Company
1.
Removal of two lots from plat resulting in 7 lots, which will allow adherence to side yard
setback standards.
2.
Identification of a natural trail through the h' side of Outlot B, with a connection to
County Road 118 across the northernmost 1 t - Lot 11 of Block 2.
3.
Sidewalk along Wildwood Boulevard and . dwood Way to Outlot C, connecting via
pathway through Outlot C to the City's wat r tower site, or development of a combination
on-road/off-road pathway.
4.
Redesign of the plat to show 60-ft right-of- ay width throughout, with an allowance for
25-ft front yard setbacks.
5.
Establishment of a deed restriction for the p rpose of identifying homeowner
responsibility for removing plowed snow fro the upper cul-de-sac and the turn-around
off of Marquette Drive.
6.
Modification of the plat to include radiuses t the intersection of right-of-way per public
works reconunendation.
7.
Provision of 60-ft radius on the cul-de-sac 0 of the west side of Marquette Drive.
8. Recommendation of the City Engineer on gr ding, storm water control, and utilities.
9. Park dedication consisting of outlots for pre ervation of trees and cash in the amount of
10% of the raw land value.
EXHIBIT Z
s-E --I
On
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/9~ J:> ".
. 9.
Farr Development Company has applied for preliminary plat and a PUD to allow a 78-
lot single family plat along County Road 118 southeast of the City's water tower site on
Monte Club hill. The project includes steepl -sloped woods on one-third of the subject
property. A single access from County Road 118 would serve the site. The existing home
on the property would remain adjacent to the access road, and future roadway extensions
are provided to the west and to the south.
Zoning and pun
.
The use of PUD is permitted by the Zoning dinance to allow flexibility in zoning
standards, subject to a requirement that the exibility results in a superior project not
likely or possible under the standard zoning gulations. PUD is being proposed in this
project to allow flexibility in lot sizes in retur for a greater amount of tree preservation on
the upland portions of the project. Over 750 feet of street frontage is consumed by
outlots, which will remain in their natural co dition. This distance would typically provide
street frontage for as many as 9 additional 10 s. Instead, the developer is requesting
flexibility on a number of lots.
The typical R-l standards require 80 feet of idth and 12,000 square feet of area. Of the
78 lots, 43 fail to meet one or both of the R-l standards:
Complies
wI all stds.
Complies
wi width only
Complies
wi area only
Complies
wI neither
35 lots
6 lots
1910ts*
18 lots
.
* Four lots at the top of the hill are "flag lot .. - narrow driveway access to a larger lot
area.
.
This table illustrates that the developer has rirnarily attempted to make up for the lost
street frontage by narrowing a number of th other lots. Thirty-seven of the
"substandard" lots are less than 80 feet in w dth. To accommodate this width, the
developer has suggested reducing the garag -side setbacks from 10 feet to 5 feet. The
lots proposed for this deviation are Lots 4, ,and 6 of Block 2; and Lots 8, 9, 10, II, and
13 of Block 4. One of the difficulties with arying standards in the same block is
administration by City staff; another is later requests by neighbors to construct additions
to standards in the neighborhood. Keeping hese details straight can be difficult for staff
specialists, let alone for other staff fielding uestions from the public. A consistent set of
regulations should apply, or a method of m nitoring varying setbacks should be
established.
8
o~-'~
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
The project includes a series of outlots whic would be preserved in their natural state.
Outlot A (3.62 acres) is a wetland and stor water control area. Outlot B (3.30 acres)
includes much of the wooded hillside. Staff econunends a natural trail through this area -
it would be unpaved and meander along the lope to the upper hill area. Outlots C and D
(.43 and .39 acres, respectively) provide spe ial tree preservation sites on the upper hill.
The developer proposes to dedicate these 10 s to the City, over and above the normal park
land dedication requirements. From Outlot ,an easement across the rear lot line of
Lots 1 and 2 of Block 6 would provide acce s from this development to the water tower
site and City park land.
The plat has been designed with 52-foot wi e rights-of-way with 32-foot wide streets.
Staff has suggested that the hillside street," ildwood Way," be platted at 60 feet but with
reduced front setbacks. The purpose in this proposal is to retain public right-of-way in the
area where the street curves back and forth p the hill. Allowing the lesser front setback
will accommodate the interest in reducing g ading in the rear yards, saving more of the
trees and the native slopes. The developer as indicated that these lots will be graded by
the developer to avoid builders overgrading the site and costing additional trees.
In the lower area of the project, staff has in icated that the 52-foot right-of-way would be
acceptable, subject to a requirement that the intersections be platted with a radius to
accommodate street signs and other necess y improvements. The Public Works Director
can provide direction on the size of the radi s necessary.
.
The developer has also proposed four "flag ots" at the end of the upper cul-de-sac. These
lots would have full-sized buildable areas an meet all setbacks. However, the driveways
would be located in narrow necks, increasin the number of curb cuts on the cul-de-sac.
This issue has led to staffs reconunendatio that a homeowner's association be
responsible for snow removal in this area. he seven driveways on the end of the cul-de-
sac eliminate any area for snow storage, an there will likely need to be regular removal of
plowed snow from the cul-de-sac area. T s would also be the case for the modified turn-
around space at the north end of Marquette Drive. The hillside prevents the construction
of a full cul-de-sac without a large retaining wall and significant grading. The City's snow
removal equipment is not suited for clearin areas of this design.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Decision 1: Consideration of Rezoning of Wildwood Ridge to R-l, Single Family
Residential.
1. Motion to approve the rezoning to -1, Single Family Residential, based upon a
finding that the rezoning would be c nsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan.
.
2.
Motion to deny the rezoning based n a concern that development in the area will
not comply fully with the R-l stand ds.
9
5E.-r3
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
.
3.
Motion to table action on the Tezo . g, subject to additional information.
Decision Two: Consideration of a Develo ment Stage Planned Unit Development.
1. Motion to approve the development tage PUD, subject to the conditions listed in
the attached Exhibit Z, based upon a finding that the project would meet the intent
of the City's PUD zoning requireme ts.
2. Motion to deny the development sta e PUD, based on a finding that the R-l
standards should apply, and that the rdinance intent for PUD is not met with this
project.
3. Motion to table the PUD, subject to dditional information.
Decision Three: Consideration of a Preli inary Plat for Wildwood Ridge.
1. Motion to approve the preliminary pI t, subject to the conditions listed in the
attached Exhibit Z.
2. Motion to deny the preliminary plat.
.
3.
Motion to table the preliminary plat s bject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff believes the intent of the Planned Unit evelopment ordinance is met with this
proposal, subject to some conditions. The d veloper's initial concept plan illustrated a
standard subdivision plan which would have ost a significantly increased number of trees
and required much more grading to accompli h. The Monte Club hill area is a unique
resource which can provide significant public benefit if properly developed and preserved.
It would be necessary to eliminate eight or . e lots from the plat as now designed to both
save the swre ~umber of trees and meet all R 1 standards. Since this design includes
several hundred feet of "unproductive" street construction, staff believes that the pun is
appropriate. The variation in side setbacks is the greater cause for concern. It would
seem to be difficult to manage the differences, either at the time of original building or in
subsequent years once the neighborhood mat es. Except for this issue, staff recommends
approval of the rezoning, PUD, and prelimin y plat, subject to the conditions found in
Exhibit Z.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
.
Exhibit A - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit B - Lot Conformance Map
Exhibit C - Tree Preservation Plan
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
10
5E,tf
....~. -,~...". ;y rr; '.. f '''', ....
:~-------
'.1
.
.
,
":-rt"!v :
~"'.1 20.-+
2
.
,
:'1
~
.t r.o
~
'J
" &~
, "
.~1
" :: I,.oeo tlq."
2
4
,.,.'
, ~"''''-'''''-'''-
.
,- 'f'. ,..~ . "If ~I f~ " , '1' ~:.
II~
III
~I
5 '\
rll.ISE I \
lOt"
PII.lSE II
6
OUTLOT B
i43.&CO Iq.f1.
J.JO 'OC";..
';l
"
..
..
I
.d"l' I
E I 6 '26' 26
I~I
;;
..
flf'
eo'
90'
+'-
J>
10
:!
oJ -
- oJ
t -;; i ;;
~ f ~ ~~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ - ~
2 9 2
6 7 8 9 10
,.' 7 ' 70' " 1 '
1:9~,e:g'
5
7"
.......~,~.... ~~.~ ':'f" "'~ "41 ./, &. "'-;"II! '/.
'.' ~!': '. . I~" II ..,
f:~W-l,:~I;.=";I;,i r!:~
I ~C~ct1 U:lffln 'HoU THIl, Pl"" "'-.S PQ(:F'4;ctt If 11( tl'"
1)h~~1i' N'f r11~t~!.;~~fq~'ISlC':.f.,,t;!~lJ~ '~~"'"1 ~N_'\ ~IJ\Y __ &, ~
,,"
I
f\1
II
I I
~, I I ,,'
-~ .'.. ...... - ~ .,' "," 1"'.. I
-s--
(i -
~ i
~ ~
':! ~
eo' eo'
421,60'
OUTLOT A
nl.!63 .'J.II.
J,U ac=ru
" .. I~
T,
~ f I~
~
':! I ::
1.~,
-..---.......
I
I
I"
I ;.
I ::l
I
/
/
/
"
"
..-
-
'-
\
',.,
",
"
"
"
./
,
.
t,
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
'"
'"
~
.....
"
:1l
..;
:;
./ t-
./ .,'.-
,/ ~,
" /
/ '/
"
"
.t.
I::
Ii ~
..
IS~'
/
"
"
.
'" '
", " "
"
"
-.CQ"p:
JJ JJ l'!tllt.f
il
I
j
I
i"
I
,
J
'. ','" -- ~. ::.
14.700 SQ.H.
<I
I~..'
14.700 sq,'I,
J 1i;J
let'
'4,700 Sq,'t.
2 ~
Ie..'
15,JCO 'Q.H, ,
,
,
:;: ,
,
,
1~J'
5~~s
Exhibit A - Preliminary Plat
-:'~ '..- '/
S":-:':~/";".'~/l/
-, \
..- II.-::"
~~';r~.~:~.C 11 , 'r C':t
--.-"--..
~
I
C27.U.
..---...
PHASE II
OUTLOT A
'~"_!!I6J sq.lI.
J,1$2 ocnl
t,
I
I
/
I
I
\
".3.800 Iq.",
3.30 ocru
o
'"
'"
~
N
I
I
I ~
I -
I i
I
I
I
/
/
/
r~
OUTLOT B
-(
/. ,
'" 0-7-~
/
/, I
/ ;/
"-
"
.
14,100 s~.ft_
4 li
18.,1' I
14,700 .q,lI,
1li I
:5 i
1!!14' I
I r....'.
1.4.,100 sq.'" I
2 li I'"
1~""
,
16..30Q ICI.", l
~ "g .
,
,
lU'
.......,:r~7=:.~!;- ,?~ ;~I- t ~ .,..<; n ~"4
'. 'l'\:::O-=-'::::tr,
W~/l
~
m
Meets Lot Area Only
M'~ets Lot Width Only
Meets Neither Width
I '~t"U' l:t~T1r1 f~"r tHI~ Pl~K \J.-S p~r::''';:;~D 'f ~ c~
t.I~'.:", 101'" (I!1O:~~!_~~~~:t\/I'\:.!O!",l!j_~_ '~~_f_J ~"'rA ~,1.,.Y.. . ~
nor Area
I
r-
.
5E,(,
Exhibit B .. Lot Conformance
/
\ \.
.
/
OUTLOT A
\
,- PRIVACY
F'ENCE
\
\
\
\
'X. WArc" UWL . tSf.'
f. nc~1. ~'1......a (i.(v ,4A(
:HC Pts:tARCI-<[;j Ih'
It54r .. ,<II:S:SOC.IH~, .
JJ
/ ..c.-
/ ~,.
/ ~
/ ,
/
"
/
LIMITS OF~
GRADIt G
-. . ... _. __._ '0.,_" e.
--
cnH::;P-4[D Iv
KOC
PIl\l[P~(i) 't w:. Ctil'
ll-ll!i. PLAN VA$. 1,&1'1 A ~u. r Ht
I "(lI(a,. ~~:~tT' s~;~~VI~'l~t:~~ u:,~N h.C L"....!j, cr ,
\1N~(!'r.IV(O L..t,NOSS.t."( "'-".'.
~~~~( Cf "':'I~n[)r!i
A ,~RA'I~7 ASSOCIATeS, I,l~
"",I r-l__ ~ ~ _
Preservation
E hibit C - Tree
JUN-05-1998 07:37
NAC
612 595 9837 P.02/03
N
N ORT H WE,ST'$ S oe'l ATED 'C 0 N S!..l L TAN TS
COMMU.NITY F'L..ANNING - DESIGN - ~ARKET RESEARCH
.
MEMORANDUM,
TO: Monticello ,Mayor and eit Council,
FROM: Stephen Grittman
DATE: June 4, 1998,
.' ,
RE: Monticello - 'Orderly Ann ation Board Process'
, FILE, NO: 191.06
.
Th~ MQntic.eIlQ Orderly Ann~xatiQn ~Q~ni m~t .. W~nesdaYI' June 3, 1998 to discuss the
Wildwood Ridge Preliminary Plat; and to ,consid I" itS findings related'to contiguity and Land
Use Plan consistency. SincePlanning,C,ommi sian Chair Dick Frie wa~ unable.to attend
the meeting, the City had just one representativ on the Board., Township S'upervisor Ted
Helker objected to the 'annexation afthEfWildwo Ridge pmjectan'the basis thaUne OM
Board had' not yet adopted 'a rand use, pia " and therefore~ could not consider the
consistency of the proposal. Instead, Mr. 'Holk I" and Commissioner Sawatzke suggested
that only lands within' the. ,previous' Urban ServiCe .Boundary.' would be eligible' for
consideration until such time as. the (JAA Boa adopted a,new'plan.'
, .
- . ,
The'Board spent some time discussing the'asp cts of'the SouthlWest Area Plan, and the
City's Comprehensive Plan for the area. , In ad 'ition, th,e City's, 1996 Plan was discussed,
as well as the OM Board~s land, use plann n9 done in 'previous years. Despite'the
existence of these planning efforts, Supervis rs Holker and Denn would not agree to
consider the Wildwood Ridge annexation,' holdl 9 the issue over . until August. when it was
thought that.a land u,se plan might be availabl . fo~ adoption. . '
, It was explained to,the Board. that the City had, nderstccd :the inte(im period between the
ratification of the new OAAagreement 'and the doption of the OM's land use plan to be
, one in which the OM Board would consider each proPosa,1 on,a'case'by ca,se t;lasis.
Indeed, one af the reasons the City loo,ked t withdraw from' the Urban Service Area
agreement was the inadequacy of the land w' in that bpund~~'_ It was also'suggested
that the res9urces' available to the OM Boar during the interim period should be more
than adequate to permit reasonable land use pi 'nning, and that the Board should be' able
to render s decision on the land use consisten issue. " . .
.
0'7 7 5 W A YZ AT A 80 U L.. E v A RD. SUI T E. o!S 5
ST:'L..OUIS
PARK', .MJ.NNESOTA 554 I 6
5,"-~
PH 0 N E 6 I 2 - 5 9 5 - 96 '3 6
FAX 6 12,-5.95-9.837
JUN-05-1998 07:37
NAC
612 595 9837 P.03/03
e.
Finally, tt was pointed Qut to the Board that the ew OM agreement grants the OAA Board
40 days to make its findings. Following the lapse of 40 days, a uno-decision" is to be
submitted to the Municipal Board for an arbitrat on of the findings. Therefore, in early July,
the 40 days will have run, and an August heari 9 for an OM plan delays the consideration
of the Wildwood Ridge project beyond the int nt of the agreement.
There did not appear to be any real argument at the OM Board had actual authority to
consider the annexation of the plat during e interim period. In fad, there was no
argument from the Board members as to the ppropriateness of the land use proposal in
WildWOOd Ridge. Even Mr. Holker agreed that ingle family residential was the appropriate
land use for the site. Nonetheless, he refuse to admit so in a formal finding. The very
fact that the agreement indudes the 40 day re iaw period indicates that the Board was to
consider annexations of eligible property during the interim. Despite this, all of the non-City
representatives on the Board voted to table co sideration until they could adopt their own
plan in August.
There wouJd appear to be no logical reason to old up ann~xation of the WiIQwooa Ridge
project. The Board's action would seem to b nothing more than an effort to harass the
City and this landowner. Despite the several m ths of negotiation, it does not appear that
the Board was bargaining in good faith. Sin the agreement does not compel them to
make a finding, they have decided to take all t e time they can (and even 30 days more)
to delay a project over which there should be bsolutely no argument.
e AI this lime, there does not appear t.obe .any ra. ourse for the Cijy or the landowner. The
landowner may request a reconsideration 0 thQ Board's action at its next meeting.
Following the July meeting, the agreement appe rs to indicate that the City and Township
are compelled to submit the issue to the Munici j Board for arbitration. Presumably, such
a request will take more than the 30 days r.qui d for the OM Board to consider its own
plan in August Of course, there is no guarante that the Board will actually adopt a plan
on the date they have proposed. The adoptio of a Comprehensive Plan requires a 213
vote (four of the five members).
In the event that the OAA Board does not adopt a plan within one year of the agreement,
it would be extinguished, and no Orderly Ann ation Area would exist. The OM Board
requested that the County Planning Director Tom Salkowski and myself work on a plan for
review at its July meeting. That Plan is expe ad to be based on the SouthIWest Area
Camp Plan Amendment recently adopted by t e City. Staff will keep the City Council
updated on this issue.
e
5E-'CJ
TOTAL P.12I3
:j
..
06-04-98 04:36PM FROM BFFALO CON OFFICE
DUPUC~JE
PO 1
WRIGHT SOIL NO WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
306C Brighton Avenue
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313
Telephone (612) 1S82~ 1933
682..1970
Fax (612)682..0262
June 3, 1998
Wanda Kraemer
City of Monticello
PO Box 1147
~ntlcello,~SS362
RE: WILDWOOD RIDGE DEVELOPME
MONTICELLO EAST, T.121N. .. R.24W.
Dear Ms. Kraemer:
.
After reviewing the preliminary grading plans, Wright SWCD has a nwnber of
concerns. In regards to the erosion and se t control measures, we would like to see a
more detailed plan including: exact locations 0 the proposed temporary, sediment basins,
their watersheds, outlet structure pipe sizes, e vations, etc. In several areas where silt
fence'is proposed, ,there is too much watershed fur silt fence alone to handle the runoff.
Two parallel silt fences spaced a certain distan apart in combination with bale checks,
etc. will help with sediment control, especially ound the Cty Rd 118 culvert and perhaps
around the wetland in the southeast corner.
Areas In Phase II that are exposed and abando must have temporary proteaion, i.e.
seeding, within the following time frames acco ing to NPDES:
. Steeper than 3: 1, within 7 days.
· Less than 3:1 but steeper than 10:1, within
· Flatter than 10:1, within 21 days
This may even occur prior to achieving final gr e. In other words, due to the steepness
of the entire site the responsible contractor sho ld be watched carefully for compliance
with the NPDES erosion and sediment control Jan.
'There is insufficient data given to adequately as els the effectiveness of Ponds 1 &, 2 to
retain the S micron control in accordance with DES water quality requirements. If the
City would like the District to evaluate these se iment ponds closer, we would need more
time. Pond #1 as mapped is owned in part by ts 3..9 and 12~16 which could pose a
maintenance problem. We would recommend i become an outlot. Pond #2 will be
tapping into the groundwater and thus could Ie to direct contAminlltiotL The City may
want to reconsider this proposal.
.
~-'1{)
.
.
.
06-04-98 04:36PM FROM BFFALO CON OFFICE
POZ
The plan also calls for filling in the wetland in. southeast comer of the property. Please
be advised the fill amount cannot exceed 2,00 square feet according to the Wetland
Conservation Act, Chapter 8420.0122, Subp 9. In addition the silt fence should be
plaeed on the wetland edae, not simply aro\md the culvert.
Lots 7 and 11 of Block 6, and Lots 1,2. and 3
propose to fill 8 feet or more on certain lots ju
problems are likely particularly since the .
strongly recommend that those lots become p
house on proposed Outlot C.
The District also recommends the City cons.
from this development reaching the natural po
It maybe a concern to the hoUJes located on
outlet cannot handle the additional water.
Bradley
Conserva. n Technician
questionable as well. The developers
to establish housing pads. Stability
back yards are extremely steep. We
of Outlot B perhaps in exchange for a
the effects of increased volume of runoff
in the northeast corner of this property.
north side of the natural pond uthat
'SE ""1/
. SF.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A. REFEREN E AND BA
A public hearing was held on this item by t e Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Admini trator recommend approval of the request as
identified in the attached staff report to the Planning Commission under alternative # 1.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the reconunendati n of the Planning Commission.
2. Motion to modify the recormnenda ion of the Planning Commission or deny the
request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recormnends alternative # 1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
. 12.
.
.
Displays. (F.P.)
This item was before the Commission on M y 5, 1998, and was tabled pending further
review by staff. That review has been comp eted and it is believed that the ordinance
hereby proposed is compatible with the ord' ances of the City. The City of Monticello has
been regulating and issuing licenses for outd or sales and display without the substance of
an ordinance for many years. This propose ordinance would give the City a legal basis
for such regulation. Transient Merchant bu inesses are currently regulated by other
ordinances also needing future amendment y City Council.
Outdoor sales are divided into three classes:
to- Temporary outdoor sales and dis lays are sales and displays conducted by the
operators of a legitimate established business, such as sidewalk sales and the like.
Such temporary sales and displays ould be allowed for up to 60 consecutive days
by the issuance of two consecutive O-day licenses.
to-
Seasonal outdoor sales/displays ar sales and displays conducted by the
operators of a legitimate established business, such as such as garden center sales,
and the like. Such seasonal sales an displays would be allowed for up to 120
consecutive days by the issuance of wo consecutive 60-day licenses.
to- Transient Merchants/Itinerant 0 tdoor sales and displays are sales and
displays conducted by persons othe than the operators of a legitimate established
business, such as artwork, flowers, arm produce sales, Christmas tree sales, and
the like, and engaged in a temporar business (five days or less per month
according to the definition provide by ordinance.)
It is the intent of this ordinance to regulate classes of outdoor sales and
displays in a manner that is as consistent as possible with the existing practices of the
Monticello business conununity.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACfIONS:
1. Motion to recommend to the City ounci! that the Ordinance establishing outdoor
sales and display regulations be ad pted as proposed.
2.
Motion to reconunend to the City ouncU that the Ordinance not be adopted.
S-F --I
.
c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/2/98
Staff recommends that the Planning Commi sion recommend to the City Council that the
Ordinance establishing outdoor sales and dis lay regulations be adopted as proposed.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of proposed ordinance; Copy of curre t City Ordinance regulating transient
merchants.
.
.
17
SF'2-
.
ORDINANC NO.
CITY OF MO TICELLO
WRIGHT COUNT , MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 2- AND ADDING SECTION 3-l1A OF THE
MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE BY E T ABLISHING OUTDOOR SALES AND
DISPLAY REGULATIONS.
THE CITY OF MONTICELLO DOES ORDA
Title 10, Chapter 2, Section 2-2, Subsections [TAl and [RH] are hereby added to the City Code
to read as follows:
fT AI]
IRHl
.
Title 10, Chapter 3, Section [3-IIA] of the City Code is hereby added to read as follows:
3-11A OUTDOOR SALES AND DISPLAY:
IAl
llll
.
LCl
SEASONAL.ORD: 5129198
~~
'-'
~
Page 1
.
.
.
IDl
IEl
Temoorary
Seasonal
UCENSE PERIOD IN
CONSECUTIVE DAYS
MINIMUM
LICENSE
fEE
~
license fees
shall be as
established
1u:..Q1y
~
Resolution
QQ
ADOPTED by the Monticello City Council this
This Ordinance shall become effective irrnnediately pon its passage and publication according to
law.
day of
1998.
City Administrator
SEASONALORD: 5f29I98
Mayor
~'1-
Page 2
.
.
.
SECTION:
3~10-1:
3-10-2:
3-10-3:
3.10-4:
3-10.5:
3-10-6:
3-10.7:
3~10-8:
3.10-9:
3-10~10:
3-10-11:
3-10-12:
3-10-1:
3.10~2:*
eHA
TRANSIENT ERCHANTS
Definition
Permit Required
Exemptions
Application
Religious and Charitable Organ'zations, Exemption
Investigation and Issuance
Duty of City Administrator to E orce
Revocation of License
Appeal
Reapplication
Expiration of Permit
Penalty
DEFINITION: When used in t s ordinance, the following term has the
following meaning:
(A) "Transient merchant" incl des any person, firm, or corporation,
whether as owner, agent, onsignee, or employee, who engages in a
temporary business (five ays or less per month) of selling and
delivering goods, wares, d merchandise, or buying and receiving
goods, wares, and merch dise within the city and who, in furtherance
of such purpose, hires, lea es, uses, or occupies any building, structure,
motor vehicle, trailer, ten, railroad boxcar, boat, public room in hotels,
lodging houses, apartmen s, shops, or any street, alley, or other place
within the city for the e 'bition and sale of such goods, wares, and
merchandise either privat ly or at public auction, provided that such
definition does not inc1ud any person, firm, or corporation who, while
occupying such tempor location, does not sell from stock but
exhibits samples for the pose of securing orders for future delivery
only, Location utilized by transient merchants shall be consistent with
uses identified as permitt d in particular zoning district and adequate
off-street parking is avail ble.
(10/11/93, #243)
PERMIT REQUIRED: It is un! wful for any transient merchant to engage in
any such business within the cit of Monticello without first obtaining a
permit therefore in compliance 'th the provisions of this ordinance,
(A) A daily permit shall be re uired for any "transient merchant" as
defined in Section 3-10-1( ).
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE III/Chpt 10/Page 1
.
.
\.
1.
An annual penni which may be issued only to the owner or
proprietor of a p 'vate premise such as motel, hotel, shopping
mall, banquet fa 'lity, service club, etc., wherein a transient
merchant as defi ed in Section 3-10-l(A) may lease or otherwise
occupy space to e gage in said temporary business. An
applicant for an nnual permit must provide the City with
assurances that ach transient merchant engaged in business
upon his/her pre . se meets the minimum requirements of this
and all other ap licable ordinance.
2. The transient ill rchant shall operate from within a permanent
structure on the remise. Outdoor sales from parking lots or
other open space is hereby prohibited under the provisions of
the annual pe t.
3, No holder of an ual permit shall allow in excess of 12
vendors, stands, ooths, or similar sales area to operate per day
without the writ en permissions of the City Council.
1.
(B) FEES: Fees shall be se and adopted by the City Council as follows:
Daily permit fee for a permit issued to a transient merchant
rmder the autho 'ty of the annual permit, said fees to be
collected by the older of an annual permit and remitted to the
City Administra or prior to the conduct of any business,
** . ., .
2.
3.
*(11/14/83, #129)
**(1/23/84, #131)
(C) PERMISSION OF PR, PERTY OWNER REQUIRED:
1. No transient me chant shall sell or offer for sale any goods,
wares, or merch dise within the city from a stationary location
or public or priv te properly without first obtaining the written
consent of the pr perty owner or occupant.
No transient me chant license shall be issued for sales from any
location which d es not have sufficient parking for customers
and for areas wh re customer parking would interfere with
normal traffic f1 w,
2.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
;'
TITLE IIVChpt 10/Page 2
. 3-10-3:
.
..
3~ 10-4:
3. Only one (1) transi nt merchant license shall be issued per
" location (property 0 ner) at any given time.
(8/13/90, #194)
EXEMPTIONS: This chapter d es not apply to the following:
(A) Vendors of milk, grocerie , bakery products, or other perishable
commodities; or vendors 0 soft water service or laundry and dry
cleaning pickup and deliv ry who make an uninvited call upon the
occupant of a resident as preliminary step to the establishment of a
regular route service for t e sale and delivery of such commodities or
the providing of such se . ces to regular customers; or for the sale of
goods, merchandise, or se 'ces to business, commercial, or industrial
users at their place ofbu 'ness.
(B) Sidewalk sales authorize by the City Council.
(C) Limited open sales and r 'ted rummage/garage sales. (See Permitted
Accessory Sales, Chapter 6, Section 3, of the Zoning Ordinance for
regulations governing op n sales and rummagelgarage sales.)
(05113/91, #209)
(D) Any bona fide auction sal by a city resident.
(E) Any sale under court ord r.
(F) The sale of regularly pub ished newspapers.
(G) The sale of goods or merc andise on behalf of bona fide charitable,
religious, civic, education or political organization subject to
provisions of 3-10-2(C) d 3-10-5.
(H) Sale of farm or garden 'ts and vegetables from July 15 through
October 15 subject to the provisions of 3-10-2(C) and the daily permit
fees established by Coun '1.
(8/13/90, #194)
APPLICATION: Applicants for a permit under this ordinance shall file with
the City Clerk a sworn applicat on in writing on a form to be furnished by the
City Clerk. The application s give the following information:
(A) Name and physical des 'ption of applicant;
(B) Complete permanent ho e and local address of the applicant and, in
the case of transient mer hants, the local address from which proposed
sales will be made;
(C) A brief description of the nature of the business and the goods to be
sold; ':.'"'~, .
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE IIVChpt 10/Page 3
.
:.
.
3-10-5:
(D) The name and address 0 the employer, principal, or supplier of the
applicant together with c edentials therefrom establishing the exact
relationship;
(E) The length of time for w ich the right to do business is desired;
(F) General description of items to be sold;
(G) The names of at least tw property owners of Wright Connty,
Minnesota, who will cert'fy as to the applicant's good character and
business respectability 0 ,in lieu of the names of references, such
other available evidence s to the good character and business
responsibility of the appl cant as will enable an investigator to
properly evaluate such c aracter and business responsibility;
(H) The last municipalities, ot to exceed three, where applicant carried
on business immediately preceding date of application and the
addresses from which su h business was conducted in those
municipalities;
(1) At the time of filing the plication, a fee of $3,50 shall be paid to the
City Clerk to cover the co t of investigation of the facts stated therein
plus a fee schedule adopt d by the City Connci!.
(11/23/81, #107)
(8/13/90, #194'
RELIGIOUS AND CHARITAB E ORGANIZATIONS, EXEMPTION: Any
organization, society, associatio ,or corporation desiring to solicit or to have
solicited in its name money, do ations of money or property, or financial
assistance of any kind, or des' . g to sell or distribute any item of literature
or merchandise for which a fee's charged or solicited from persons other
than members of such organiza 'ons upon the streets, in office or business
buildings, by house-to-house c vass, or in public places for a charitable,
religious, patriotic, or philant opic purpose shall be exempt from the
provisions of Section 4 of this 0 dinance provided there is filed a sworn
application in" writing on a fo to be furnished by the City Clerk which shall
give the following information:
(A) Name and purpose of the cause for which permit is sought;
(B) Names and addresses of he officers and directors of the organization;
(C) Period during which soli 'tation is to be carried on;
(D) Whether or not any co .ssion, fee, wages, or emolwnents are to be
expended in connection 'th such solicitation and the amount thereof.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
r
TITLE IIVChpt 10/Page 4
.
3-10-6:
.
3-10-7:
.
Upon being satisfied that uch organization, association, or
corporation is a religious, charitable, patriotic, or philanthropic
organization, the Clerk s all issue a permit without charge to such
organization, association, or corporation to solicit in the city. Such
organization, association, or corporation shall furnish all of its
members, agents, or repr sentatives conducting solicitation credentials
in writing stating the n e of the organization, name of agent, and
ptu'pose of solicitation.
INVESTIGATION AND ISSU
(A) Upon receipt of each application, it shall be referred to the City
Administrator, who will i ediately institute such investigation of
the applicant's business d moral character as he deems necessary
for the protection of the p blie good and shall endorse the application
in the manner prescribed n this section within 72 hours after it has
been filed by the applican with the City.
(B) If, as a result of such inve tigation, the applicant's character or
business responsibility is ouod to be unsatisfactory, the City
Administrator shall endo se on such application his disapproval and
reasons for the same and otify the applicant that his application is
disapproved and that no ermit will be issued.
(C) If, as a result of such inve tigation, the character and business
responsibility of the appli ant are found to be satisfactory, the City
Administrator shall endo se on the application his approval and
deliver to the applicant hi permit. Such permit shall contain the
signature of the issuing 0 cer and shall show the name and address of
said permittee, the class 0 permit issued and the kinds of goods to be
sold thereWlder, the date f issuance and the length of time not to
exceed one year from the ate of issuance that the same shall be
operative, as well as the p rmit number and other identifying
description of any vehicle sed in such licensed business.
Each peddler, solicitor, or transient merchant must secure a personal
permit. No permit shall b used at any time by any person other than
the one to whom it is issu d. The Clerk shall keep a permanent record
of all permits issued.
DUTY OF CITY ADMINISTRA OR TO ENFORCE: It shall be the duty of
the City Administrator to requir any person seen peddling, soliciting, or
canvassing, and who is not kno by such City Administrator to have
obtained a permit hereWlder, to roduce his permit and to enforce the
provisions of this ordinance agai st any person found to be violating the
same.
~.
"
;j'
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
TITLE III/Chpt 10/Page 5
.
.
....
3.10-8:
3-10-9:
3-10-10:
3-10-11:
3-10~12:
REVOCATION OF LICENSE:
(A) Permits issued under th provisions of this ordinance may be revoked
by the City Administrat r for any of the following causes:
1. Fraud, misrepres ntation, or incorrect statement contained in
the application fo permit;
2. Fraud, misrepres ntation, or incorrect statement made in the
course of carrying on his business as solicitor, canvasser,
peddler, transien merchant, itinerant merchant, or itinerant
vendor;
3. Any violation of t . s ordinance;
4. Conviction of any crime or misdemeanor;
5. Conducting the b siness of peddler, canvasser, solicitor,
transient merch t, itinerant merchant, or itinerant vendor, as
the case may be, i an unlawful manner or in such a manner as
to constitute a br ach of peace or to constitute a menace to
health, safety, or eneral welfare of the public.
APPEAL: Any person aggriev d by the action of the City Administrator or
the City Clerk in the denial of permit or revocation may appeal to the
Council. Such appeal shall be taken by filing with the Council within
fourteen days after notice of t e action complained of and a written
statement setting forth fully e grounds for the appeal. The Council shall
set a time and place for a he ng on such appeal, and notice of such hearing
shall be given to the appellant
REAPPLICATION: No permi tee whose permit has been revoked shall make
further application until at Ie st six months have elapsed since the last
previous revocation.
EXPIRATION OF PERMIT: annual permits issued under the provisions
of this ordinance shall expire t midnight the 31st day of December in the
year when issued. Other th annual licenses shall expire at midnight on
the date specified in the lie en e.
PENALTY: Any person who . olates any provision of this ordinance is guilty
of a misdemeanor and upon c nviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding $500 or by impriso ent for a period not exceeding 90 days or
both, plus in either case the c sts of prosecution.
MONTICELLO CITY ORDINANCE
(04/13/81, #97)
6F ., II;)
TITLE III/Chpt 10/Page 6
. 13.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
DB
The Comprehensive Parks and Pathways Pia includes an implementation
recommendation for the collection of fees in 'eu of dedication of park land. Rather than
base the amount of the fee on the appraised I nd value, the fee should be collected based
upon the number of housing units to be deve oped in a subdivision. This would bring the
fee into compliance with recent Court decisi ns which require that park dedications be
proportionate to the amount of demand on t e park system which is generated by the
development in question. The value of the d is unrelated (generally) to that proportion.
In recent surveys of other area communities, park fees are ranging from $500 per unit to
well over $1,000 per unit. The actual amou t should be based on the projected cost of
building the system and, again, the develop nt's proportion of the demand. We have
calculated a projected fee of $750 per unit b sed on generalized estimates of park
acquisition and construction and an estimate that approximately 75% of future park
construction will be attributable to new deve opment. This figure may be somewhat
conservative. However, it should provide a easonable starting point for the change in
policy.
As noted in the attached ordinance, the actu 1 fee would be set by resolution. Therefore,
it is expected to be monitored and updated ver time. The proposed ordinance eliminates
language in the current code regarding the n ed for appraisals of land value as a
prerequisite to establishing the appropriate fI e.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACfIONS:
1. Motion to recommend approval of t e amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance
based upon a finding that it more cIo ely reflects the expected costs of park
construction.
2. Motion to recommend denial of the mendment.
3. Motion to table action on the amend nt subject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Ordinanc . As noted, the Parks Plan establishes the
groundwork for this change, which is more onsistent with the legal requirements for park
dedication.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Proposed Ordinance Amendme t
~F...J/
18
.
.
.
. ORDINANCE AME DMENT NO.
City of Mo ticello
Wright County, Minnesota
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 11, CH PfER 6, SECTION 1, OF THE
MONTICELLO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE ELATING TO PARK DEDICATION
FEES IN LIEU OF LAND.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MO TICELLO, MINNESOTA HEREBY
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Chapter 6, Section 1 is amended to read as follows:
11-6-1:
DEDICA nON REQUIREMENT:
[A] Pursuant to Minn. Stat. &462.358 Subd. 2, th City Council of Monticello shall require all
subdividers requesting platting or replatting f land in the City of Monticello to contribute
an amount of land which is generally ten perc nt (10%) of the gross plat area. Said
contribution shall be dedicated for use as eith r parks, playgrounds, public open space, or
linear park and pathway systems. In the alter ative, the City shall have the option of
accepting cash in lieu of land dedication, or a combination thereof. The amount of cash
contribution shall be established by City Cou cil resolution. The amount of land or cash
contribution shall be reviewed and amended om time to time, based upon the City's
reasonable estimate of the cost of park devel pment and the subdivider's contribution to
proportionate demand on the City's park syst m. In the event a subdivider believes that
his or her proportionate contribution to syste demand should be set at a figure other than
that determined by said resolution or this Ord ance, the City may conduct a specific study
to determine the proper proportion in accord nce with the City's approved park plans.
The cost of any such special study conducte at the subdivider's request shall be borne by
the subdivider.
[B] Park dedication credit shall not include wetla d or ponding area necessary for the drainage
plan of the subdivision or other public uses. and to be dedicated shall be usable for
normal park purposes as determined by the P ks Commission, and shall exclude slopes of
more than twelve percent (12%) unless spec. cally approved.
[C] Land dedicated for park purposes shall be tra sf erred to the City by warranty deed.
This ordinance shall become effective from and after. s passage and publication.
//s//
6F,/~
EXHIBIT A
. 5G.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A public hearing was held on this item by t e Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Admini trator recommend approval of the requests.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the recommendati n of the Planning Commission as follows:
A. Approve the ordinance ame dment under "Decision 1" allowing a go-cart
track as a conditional use in an 1-1 zone.
B. Approve the conditional us permit under "Decision 2."
2. Motion to modify the recommenda ion of the Planning Commission or deny the
request.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
"
CO'
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/2/98 ~ r
. 14.
At the previous meeting of the City Council the City Council reviewed the Planning
Commission's recommendation for denial 0 the zoning text amendment necessary to
allow a go-cart to operate at the Monticello Roller Rink. Along with the information
provided by the staff and Planning Commiss'on, the Council received a request from the
applicant that the Planning Commission rev' w additional information regarding site
operation that was not available to the Plan ing Commission at the time of the original
deliberation. City Council responded to the applicant's request by sending the item back
to the Planning Commission for additional r view and consideration.
.
As you recall, one of the main reasons why he Planning Commission recommended denial
of the request was the testimony from an ad'acent property owner regarding the concern
over noise produced by the operation of the go-carts. In response to this testimony, the
applicant organized a demonstration of the peration of the facility, which was conducted
on May 28, 1998. In attendance at the de nstration were Steve Grittman, Wanda
Kraemer, and Dick Frie. In reviewing the d monstration, Steve Grittman reported that the
sound generated by the go-carts is consider bly less than the sound generated by the
nearby freeway. He also noted that when t e sound of the go-cart was obstructed by a car
or a fence that it almost became inaudible a a distance of 200 ft. Even without the
obstruction, the go-cart sound was almost' audible.
Planning Commission is asked to review thi additional information and other testimony
that may be provided by the applicant and c nsider making a different finding on this
matter.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
JIOI'
(.. v'\~ Decision 1: Amendment to allow outd r go-cart track use on subject site:
(~L """ ~ Q Motion to approve an amendmentt the Zoning ?,dinance to make outdoor go-
cart tracks a condItIOnal use WIthin he I-I, light mdustnal, dIstrIct, subject to the
same conditions as outlined for this se in the B-3 District, based upon a finding
that the use is consistent with the p rpose of the 1-1 district and Comprehensive
Plan objectives.
2.
Motion to. approve an amendment t the Zoning Ordinance to include outdoor go-
cart track uses within the scope of" musement places" based upon a finding that
the use is of similar character to tha of other uses so defmed and that the
amendment is consistent with the 0 'ectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
.
19
s-&, --I
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/2/98
3.
Motion to approve the rezoning of t e subject site from I-I, light industrial, to
B-3, highway commercial, based up n a finding that the existing and proposed use
of the subject is corrunercial in natur and that the amendment is consistent with
Comprehensive Plan objectives; and,
Motion to approve an amendment t the Zoning Ordinance making "amusement
places (i,e" roller rinks and dance h Us) and bowling alleys" a conditional use in
the B-3 district based upon a finding that said uses are commercial in nature and
are consistent with the purpose of t e B-3 district and Comprehensive Plan
objectives.
4. Motion to deny applicant's request ased upon a finding that none of the proposed
actions are consistent with the obje tives of the Comprehensive Plan.
Decision 2: Conditional use permit fo go-cart track in subject site:
CD
Motion to approve a conditional us permit to allow an outdoor go-cart track in
the 1-1 district based upon a finding that the proposed use has met or will meet,
with appropriate changes, the cond' ions as defined in the Zoning Ordinance,
including adequate screening to pro ect adjacent properties and adequate parking
to acconunodate the proposed use nd compatibility with the area and
Comprehensive Plan objectives.
2. Motion to approve a conditional u permit to allow an outdoor go-cart track in
the B-3 district based upon a findin that the proposed use has met or will meet,
with appropriate changes, the con tions as defmed in the Zoning Ordinance,
including adequate screening to pr tect adjacent properties and adequate parking
to acconunodate the proposed use nd compatibility with the area and
Comprehensive Plan objectives.
3. Motion to deny a conditional use rmit to allow for a outdoor go-cart track on
the subject site based upon a fmd' g that the proposed use cannot meet the.
requirements of the Zoning Ordin ce or objectives of Comprehensive Plan.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommendation remains the same a it was with the previous agenda item.
D, SUPPORTING DATA:
Previous agenda item
20
5' (; .... :).-.
COP~
Planning Commission Agenda -5/05/98
. 11.
Russ and Paula Adamski have requested Zoning Ordinance text amendment to allow
outdoor go-cart tracks as a conditional use w thin the I-I, Light Industrial District. This use
is currently only allowed by CUP in the B-3, ighway Business District. The purpose of the
request is to accommodate an expansion 0 the applicant's existing roller rink amusement
area, located at the southeast comer of COUll y Road 117 and Thomas Park Drive (zoned I-I
District), to include an outdoor go-cart tra k. As such, the applicants are also requesting
approval of a CUP for an outdoor go-cart track. However, any action on this request is
contingent upon the City taking one of t ee alternative actions to allow this use on the
subject property.
Rink.. (NAC)
1.
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
.
The applicants are requesting an a ndment to the Zoning Ordinance so that an
outdoor go-cart track can be devel ped on their property, which is currently zoned
I-I District. The applicants have r quested that outdoor go-cart tracks be made a
conditional use in the I-I District, su 1ect to the same conditions as provided for this
use in the B-3 District. Arrending th Ordinance to allow outdoor go-carts in the I-I
District increases the opportunity t establish uses within the 1-1 District that are
more cottnrercial in nature than indu trial. Therefore, the proposed amendment may
be co nsidered inconsistent with the purpose of the 1-1 District and Comprehensive
Plan.
A second option to accorrunodate e applicant's request is to amend Section 15B-
4[D] of the Zoning Ordinance" userrent places (such as roller rinks and dance
halls) and bowling alleys" as a c nditional use within the 1-1 District to include
outdoor go-cart tracks. This opt'on however is problematic in that "amusement
places" as currently defined relates t indoor type uses. Outdoor uses, including go-
cart tracks, raise different compatib 'ty issues such as screening, noise, lighting, etc.
Combining indoor and outdoor recr ational uses under the same conditional use may
result in problems ensuring that c mpatibility issues of potential uses is adequately
addressed. .
Finally, a third option to consider 's a rezoning of the applicant's property to B-3,
Highway Business District. The Ian s to the west of County Road 117 are zoned B-
3, therefore spot zoning would not an issue with this action. While the B-3 District
..
C:\SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO-CART.PC
S-,.-3
18
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda -5/05/98
allows outdoor go-cart tracks as a co ditional use, the applicant's existing roller rink
is not a conditional or permitted use in the B-3 District. As such, an amendment to
allow amusement areas as a separa e conditional use in the B-3 District would be
required. From a technical standp int this option is more appropriate given the
conunercial character of the indoor outdoor recreational uses. This option does,
however, result in a loss of industri zoned land.
2.
Conditional Use Permit - Outdoor o-Cart Track.
If the Planning Commission reco nds and the City Council acts favorably on the
rezoning issue, consideration of the roposed development of a go-cart track on the
applicant's property may occur. Ass ming that the Zoning Ordinance is amended to
allow outdoor go-cart tracks as a con itional use in the 1-1 District or the subject site
is rezoned to B-3 District, approval f a CUP for an outdoor go cart track is subject
to the following conditions, as outlin d in Section 13-4[N] of the Zoning Ordinance.
A.
The proposed use must mee all conditions of Chapter 3, Section 4[A].
Comment: This section reI tes to lot area and building size requirements.
There is no minimum lot siz required in the B-3 District and the minimum
lot width is 100 feet. The minimum lot size of the I-I District is 20,000
square feet and the minim lot width is 100 feet. The subject site is
approximately 107,250 squa e feet in size and has a width of approximately
225 feet at the front setbac line. As such, this condition is satisfied.
The Conditional Use Permit ill be reviewed yearly to determine whether or
not it is compatible with n ighboring properties and in conformance with
conditions of the condition 1 use.
B.
Comment: This statement will be included as part of the recommended
conditions of approval.
C. A solid six-foot high fence ust be part of the screening required when the
adjacent properties are resi ential.
The subject site is surrounded onI
However, to minimize the impact
properties, and to screen the use
landscaping should be provided. Th
be such that a dense planting w
impacts of the go-cart track.
C:\SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO.CART.PC
19
by conunercial and industrial zoned properties.
of noise from the go-cart track to any adjacent
om the public right of way a wood fence and
types and quantities of planting materials should
ultimately develops to further buffer the noise
~(;-,4
.
.
"-.
Planning Commission Agenda -5/05/98
D.
For dust and noise (70dB at resid ntial property line) must be controlled at all
times to the satisfaction of the ity.
Comment: The fence and plan ngs discussed above should be adequate to
address noise issues. However, eyond the noise of the go-carts, in no case
should any type of outdoor pub ic address system be utilized on the subject
site.
The submitted plans do not in icate the surface of the proposed go-cart
track. To control dust, the go- art track will be required to be concrete or
bituminous surfaced.
E. The provisions of Chapter 2 of this Ordinance are considered and
satisfactorily met.
Comment: Section 22 of the Zon 'ng Ordinance addresses compatibility of the
proposed use and compliance 'th Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
The subject site is in a location t avoid compatibility conflicts with adjacent
land uses.
Parking. The existing parking lot is bitumino s surfaced and striped. However, submitted
plans do not indicate the number of stalls wi bin the parking lot. Staff has estimated the
capacity of the parking lot to be at least 70 st , based upon the minimwn design standards
within the Zoning Ordinance. With the number of stalls to be provided, at least two must be
designated disability accessible with a 7 foot a cess strip in between for van accessability.
The Zoning Ordinance requires one space per 40 square feet of building area for roller rink
uses. Based upon this requirements and a buil ing size of 11,700 square feet, a total of 294
parking stalls would be required for the roller rink use alone. However, lTE data suggests
that the actual parking demand for the roller rink, based upon building size is actually 46
stalls. As such, 24 stalls would remain for the o-cart track use. At least on an initial basis,
this number appears appropriate. There is ad itional site area indicated on the site plan as a
proposed mini-golf area that could be devel ped as parking, if demand is found to exceed
supply. A condition of approval will be that th applicant must improve the existing parking
lot to provide at least 70 parking stalls, two f which must be disability accessible.
Mini.Golf Area. As noted above, the submitt d site plan indicates a proposed miniature golf
area. Development of this use on the subject site would require the applicant to request an
CUP amendment. Whether the miniature g If use would be allowed would be dependent
upon confonnance with Zoning Ordinance p ovisions, particularly parking.
C:'SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO-CART.PC
~,;S-
20
.
.
.
Planning Corrunission Agenda -5/05/98
Lighting. The submitted site plan does not' dicate if any exterior lighting is proposed to be
utilized to illuminate the go-cart track. The a plicant should revise the site plan to specify the
location of any and all exterior site lighting. Additionally, the applicant must provide details
regarding any proposed light fixtures, inclu ing photometric plans. All site lighting must be
subject to review and approval of the City ouncil.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Decision 1: Amendment to allow Outdo r Go.Cart track use on subject site:
Alternative 1. Motion to approve an llfI'rn nt to the Zoning Ordinance to make outdoor
go-cart tracks a condition use within the 1-1, Light Industrial District,
subject to the sam:: condition as outline for this use in the B-3 District, based
upon a finding that the use' consistent with the purpose of the 1-1 District
and Comprehensive Plan ob] ctives.
Alternative 2. Motion to approve an llfI'rn nt to the Zoning Ordinance to include outdoor
go-cart track uses within t e scope of "amusement places" based upon a
fInding that the use is simil character to that of other uses so defined and
that the amendment is cons' tent with the objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Alternative 3. Motion to approve the rew . g of the subject site from 1-1, Limited Industrial
District to B-3, Highway Commercial District based upon a finding that the
existing and proposed use of he subject is commercial in nature and that the
amendment is consistent wit Comprehensive Plan objectives; and,
Motion to approve an a ndment to the Zoning Ordinance making
"amusement places (i.e., ro r rinks and dance halls) and bowling alleys" a
conditional use in the B-3 istrict based upon a finding that said uses are
co~rcial in nature and are cons~tent with the purpose of the B-3 District
and Comprehensive Plan obj ctives.
Alternative 4. Motion to deny applicant's equest based upon a finding that none of the
proposed actions are consis ent with the objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Decision 2: Conditional Use permit fo go.cart track in subject site:
Alternative I. Motion to approve a Condi ional Use Permit to allow an outdoor go-cart
track in the 1-1 District based pan a finding that the proposed use has met or
C:\SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO.CART.PC
21
~, ,,,
.
.
...
Planning Commission Agenda -5/05/98
will meet, with appropriate ch nges, the conditions as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance, including adequat screening to protect adjacent properties and
adequate parking tp accomm date the proposed use and compatibility with
the area and Comprehensive lan objectives.
Alternative 2.
Motion to approve a Conditi nal Use Permit to allow an outdoor go-cart
track in the B-3 District based upon a finding that the proposed use has met
or will freet, with appropriate c ges, the conditions as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance, including adequat screening to protect adjacent properties and
adequate parking to accomm date the proposed use and compatibility with
the area and Comprehensive Ian objectives.
Alternative 3.
se Permit to allow for a outdoor go-cart track
on the subject site based upo a finding that the proposed use can not meet
the requirements of the Zo . g Ordinance or objectives of Comprehensive
Plan.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of a rezoning of the subject site to B-3 District and text
amend.trent to make "amuserrent places" as c nditional use within the B-3 District (Decision
I, Alternative 3) and a Conditional Use Per 't to allow said use (Decision 2, Alternative 2)
subject to the conditions included as an atta hment to this report as Exhibit C.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Site Plan
Exhibit C - Recommended Conditions of A pro va!
C:\SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO-CART.PC
G'""~ ~ 7
22
~e:..\.(;",)j':t:-:-'-'I'i"'I"':~'--:J,.li' ~' I ~.:::
, C "II ." ..Jl-' .,-/,
\ ! \ J' 'r-; --~.. ! I)
j! 1 t "I-n-..---_'n / ~ :-r .,.. . 1_:' I--_uk _\ ..u j/--'
) / ! ~l'g\ ~ '~l::"l k:m, '/
I .-.:.....r:: I. . . , '. . . ~/ / II.~ :
I. . :...,:..... ~~ - . ..._ '1'1'1" . - ......,.. ,. "!/i~ .___ .1,_______._.
/;' ,~.~~~ . '.- ~.-~tBi~7.~/--i .
. --.- '--~~ .\J./.' . _I> R/d'1i"0.... -l;::/" ,
! r--;~: ' I~:'" I~,. .~I,i-~~~~~i.\W ~
! . ~ ~ ~ "V' I . :1.1'1"1' ,~ ' ,'" !
I l=t: .... ~i~~Y . ~~,;rl.; ri-< \' _ . __.__i_________.,._
f i. 1/' 0-';
j~ @~ ~~~ I I '~:
./ .r:i~\,j/4'_J1 j: . .....~ :
./ -; ~~'!.lJ5;;JAt:Nit~ L! I .. ..
/ ...~.~. ':~N:t:.it:F. fA \ !.r'~~..'. . ~ <t> ",\\\\"I"i!~ I \ U'I
. , . . 'i ...., .", ~ ,\.-1 '
/ 'S> ," ..............'; 'X::.:::,; 'i-. ",,1 ~ :: ........( \ I'., :ti.. I ' i
. ,.' ; .......... . x'.': :,., ':, ( " -:1 F "'~ 1-<::: H _.___-----1 I
/ : ..>i;c:..... j';'7 '~IP:\'~W"""',R'
;" ~ ---- ''''';'''';;~:;;;!^'};'''r~j "j, ~\~.":.J ~ -; I
,/[1 \__ ",:,:;:~1W~!~]~f' II' ------ ':. f"d~ ! __n___
/ '_~" :,:-1 . "(.. ~,".<, . ';"e:,: ~-!I... ' , : :': : : -; I i
/ ~.~t,Q~~~~'1' '~'.> i~~),F\~~~~~:Y~I:}'~i?':~, 7f::':~ :":,fi~:"~:' -Jo -l ~ ::':: ~ t I I
Ilv ,t1,',Q-," .' ,: "",,:;'_.:~k i.:' f....,' /.,'. . ... .,..-'. . .:.'
. ':.. ::;:.." : '-'" .' .:" ..' :;,'. .. .' _.; : :.: ,..:; PI'
. . .~....': ,!J.t .:"., ;.:/ ;. ','.. .,,";. 0 ~ . .\:'\. ~. :~)\:.;.~ I r-- :::
'.. ~-...:;:: -......) 1& \ ,?:.... ":. >':":I: =-Ifi :"'/.5~ ~ ~
./',~., - ,~~",'<..,~ .': "U:4/'!{' V;+---. -":~;"'~'f"~lY----;'; ~. uUU_U_ -"4J ~~. _______~n--
. ......~. '":J / I""" c..1 r t .- ~. - - ;.~~~.. 1// :
'. ~', :. . ~ / .' 1 CQ '. -:- .-. ..:.... ..;;'.;...'..;.'.......-... I
:; ,:;~., ; '!;? /J. I . i - : r / C__~H.-~-;" ~L ~ / I
,....' " . ~.. .~ V '1 C:-'" 0( (,[,'1"";:-'';;'' '~:';:;:;,1lJ):' /-/:f.il =i I
. . -.# ~;'~~~i't~(,'-T'-~i:c~;~~;!O:'f~J;; ~ :;-'-"-I"'\)~- !-.- i
~ ~<::/~"i . . .' ....., ,:.,j)..' ...r_.;o'J\+..."..,.... ,..,.....t....... I',. , .;.\.,"'1:)1---;--'1. I .
~ ?f.'~t1 ..\\.(:",:;,..:\t;i",:~~j;5~;,Wl.~:~;2:,; :<.,:"~.;[,,~ . ~~,y.!\'I:;J' "t....... I
-, . . '!ii"- l ~:,'" \,,:.~ "';~"";"Jr,~.,.:t)." ,,;Ci- l' . ~:rI (1....' .':;-....."...J '
. . . . ~ ~ ": ~ .~~y::,~ ..: ;:cf'..;;: .'.:'~:\'~<:',~.;;'?:3i:i .;~:;/:;~.t.~,:,; .- . '.\.\'~, I;'" . .\~: ,". :~~"'i.;.r-:; ~
. 'r~.......,/,.. -.,;~~'t-ttf;;'(Jr~'"":. :{;j~\F;' ~~BS~~lrr:;~~n&. "if~"::: di..~;.:.,- ~ !,..-----
i.t::::"/ ~";:]~. I~,~ "':,"~:.::'::~'~:~.""3~.J~ \~~'li~. :;i;-.;r.~~~.~-C--;~:it~~..~. '~f;~~f ~~~~~,;~_,~:,~~' ___~n_u_!__~._~.._
. '~'/i'''' -.....L.c:-< ~ .,...... ,,' ,- ... . (.i":t.\~.~ " _. . I
:;Jfi:i, 'j;~"~L -":.:$"':'~ ,'. ~.:,1,,0::::,~l"J~~ ;f,.~. ~\i'f~~~ ,::::;l\-;-, d: "....~8
; ~ _' .~ G.:~~'~' ~ :..:,:'. ;:5;y~;,;;:)~!;;;};~,'~~I .... .' :...:; k' ..:~.(~~. . i. ~ \ -.
~ ....... if /-...q' -1'.';{~f.'!2:..: CD I ~.':'.' . c'.: :";',J,1':' ~;'::!":\:-i8, .,,,,'..;:. ~ . ~/;-=--- .,'" .~ ~
..~ ~ ,:. ".' 1_"'~i.';7)';;,' "':::l . ~>."''-:''~<~E;~;*''-(,',i', ',:::::ri:<\i: . .<.5--.:-,.....;,. " ::: ",
.
I
....~ r' - 'rh~~. i I .' ' .....-." ... ~ ", "'.: ~....r...:li~: ,.... .~....,.,..., " :'~" /,;~i/.
..... 'J fIi;:j <. I....Y -...:: -' . . . 'C,' 't-t~ ~p,\ "', -' " ...... ~ ','" '(. . ~i'!
~':J 1. ~ '. .'. '\"~ I . ..: :.;., ; '-.:;. ,. .,.:~ / .s ...:,41
....~ . ....'~:_./. .,,!,. l' ..: i .~.' I .... '.' ..;~.;\ .;. _,'. ""!J ~-'.:(.'" .;i~1/
~ ~} 'b~ {:...... ~ r-r.-~'t(" . . -.', ".. , .,.. -r, II':. \, "tt.:..'W. -
fl.wrr. . < "f<....r':--..: L ~ __.u I. ..1 ,,-:I: ~-. - .:_---j -~ ,-' ,:.:-:~:.-.:-f'.q~-f.-J~f:,-;:J 'Nf/!JltJ;
I. ~, ~ T--;--- ~,"<:; I" ..\. j 1 ~ :~.-:'.'" :~......:;.:. 7/:II.."f1t'oo" Il~" .-1
...... "_' .,'. J, ,I. ,.;,' ,.-.,..... ~.'l.;.,-l " .
~ . ,_ : .., :.. A, I . -; ~''i. 7 'i.ir.:l:::'''''' : ::+A:f:~\q ~\~7 ~9 11'
~ ~ / ";' 'J . ~ ~\~Uth. \1.\. I.' f .'\ '1.,: \ ~ ~ . .'. " '<"~ i~;.~.f;; .::j~;. "i+1i.' i
to:: I . f"I.I.'~i'i: "~ '. \. ",' . :,:j... ,. .-,;:.....1\> ,.J.': (.':;;it 'J';:
;, - I,. ~: I . ~, t" '. " . I ~
~' _ .... 7J ;~VF': VJ . ~ .: - \ ........ : ::'. '. EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION I EXISTING ZONING
~" ~" I' r f'\ ...., -. ... - . -- . - . - . · - . I
.
s-,~~
.
a"
l'L1 fI,.
~
- .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;:) i
;:) I
.. ~i
...
'1
I '"
I I ~
1 I ~
~
fl ~
':t
lJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L.
I I
,..,""", J
------------~
.__._,--~.
...
o
-I
":i3.~
~
i
<I.
e~~_'., ~~
vo-."Ou~' -
- Rmos
00 '0.
.
~-.zo~ -'
?y~6'd'''';''!. '--~ 3'&'.7
...
.p :Rfod"c:>cyd""'v.'.j
0/.
~...\-t::'
.', ~~~.
()!: .:;
~ ,
~
co
"f
<:.:>
...
n,j ..'~~
,~ . ct
~Q
ct - ...
t- ~
I 21'-
I ~Cl ~~~
rl,. ctVl
~ "- ...:co ~ ~~
..; \[J
..,;
l~ I co ~~~
I '?
It ~ ~~
01
.5 ...t~
I
~----_._---
'.,
..
f.
v....~ '
." \. .. '. :--' "". '. '- ..........t.9 'crl ....'......
. ". .... '.'" , -...
~
~
'"
..,
><
'"
!
<t
:s
~
a
"7
\
\
",\"",\"."'''' '.' \.......',\', i .or1'..'.'....' "'.,.... '..' .....','
~
~
...
o
-I
'i
i
il
~
~
"-
III
r,:
1""" ~~~ ,.,~ IH~~~~ ~,..
If4JUU"""'". "",. '.U IlC ~/""."J7
,
I-~-----
_ _ _~.. _. __. ~_ :"JNJ:'~ "'/l.~
III ';pt
~ r"
r,:
5L",,'SCC I 3 .Sf. CC. f N
"" _L_
.._-~ ... .......--..-"""':":".--='- --=---,..!I!I:.::.....~.~--
d.
.I'rl~W; :.I'f..r-~'J'"
'\"-1
o
~
-,
,
,
I,; ,;l
I
.~
. ,
, ..,
~
!
.,',
,
I
,
l~-
'" II"'.
'J '
t:' I
~ :
;--il
\, I
li: ,
,
I
.
I
"T.
C\J'
.1
~I
C\JI
\
!
I
:!: I ~.>
· i
~I .
C\J
C\J
.
Ol
Q)
all}
....\
\
\
\
"
.'
'.
:--
!
i
I
.
V
I
,
I
l
J
:l
;;
OO'SL
rO
I~
f
~
~"T
~-
~
Q)
I
3 .SftZZ. f N
I ~
i ~g
I l:
, w
I
~ll
,;
~
:::: I__or;_~
~
~
1---
.
I
I
,
.
------- -1--
--- --
li:
~~-9
EXHIBIT B - SITE PLAN
.
.
'.
1.
The Conditional Use Permit will be revie ed yearly to determine whether or not it is
compatible with neighboring properties and in onformance with conditions of the conditional
use.
2. A solid 6 foot high wood fence be provided ound the rear yard of the subject property.
3. The applicant provide a landscape plan th t provides planing materials of the type and
quantity necessary to supplerrent the required ood fence as an effective screen/buffer. Said
landscape plan shall be subject to review and approval of the City Council.
4. The go-cart track be surfaced with concrete r bituminous material.
5. No exterior public address system or loud sp akers be utilized on the subject site.
6. The parking lot be improved so as to pro ide 70 parking stalls, two of which must be
disability accessibie with a 7 foot access Ian in between.
7. Any expansion of uses on the subject site shall equire an amendment to existing CUP subject
to compliance with Zoning Ordinance provisi ns, subject to review and reconnnendation of
the Planning Conunission and approval of th City Council
8.
The site plan be revised to indicate the locatio of any and all site lighting. Additionally, the
applicant shall provide details regarding exterior light fixtures including photometric
illumination fields. All site lighting shall be subject to review and recommendation of the
Planning Commission and approval of the Ci y Council.
9. Comments of other City Staff.
Exhibit C - Recommended Conditions of Approval
C:\SANDY\WORD\AGENDA\GO.CART.PC
f~ --/l)
. 5U.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
f
A
A public hearing was held on this item by th Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Administ ator recommend approval of the request for
the planned unit development. The Plannin Commission acted to table the rezoning
request. Following is a copy of the staff rep rt provided to the Planning Commission.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the recommendatio of the Planning Commission.
2. Motion to modify the recommendati n of the Planning Commission or deny the
request.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
9
. 8.
C
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/0ZQJC) r
St. Benedicts Center. a provider of housing r seniors, is proposing to develop a 120-unit
senior residential facility on a portion of the roperty being developed by the Church of St.
Henry. The project will also require a zonin amendment, as well as a plat to divide the
property from the Church site. Since the St. Henry's project is being reviewed and
possibly amended to best accommodate the treet system in the area, a precise legal
description is not available at this time. The efore. the zoning amendment and plat will
need to be considered at a future meeting. 's report will discuss the zoning, however,
as it relates to the development of this proje t.
Land Use
The site plan shows two 60-unit buildings, 0 e for "assisted living" and the other for
"independent living." Subject to final site pI nning adjustments, the site consists of
approximately 8.4 acres, a density of appro' tely 14.3 units per acre. This density will
require an R-3 zoning district or an amend nt to the current zoning (P-S, Public, Semi-
Public) to allow residential uses. The R-3 istrict would allow apartment style buildings
with few restrictions. This option would be the simplest process. Since the project will
require a PUD, the City should have adequ e site development control to avoid any
unintended consequences of a rezoning.
.
Site Concept Plan
The proposed project will be developed on lot which will have no direct public street
access. Therefore. the PUD will be require to accommodate the plat. Access to the
project will occur over an access easement om the new 7th Street. The plan shows
underground parking for the independent Ii ing building. 40 visitor spaces for the two
buildings, and 16 staff spaces adjacent to t assisted living structure. Due to the lack of
surface parking planned, overflow will occ adjacent to the driveways serving the project,
We would recommend that a "proof of par ing" design be shown on the site plan to
provide the ability to add parking if deman shows it is needed.
With the PUD, internal setbacks are not cr' ical, however perimeter setbacks must still be
adhered to. This project exceeds the R-3 s tback standards. Also at issue would be the
bufferyard requirements, An institutional se and a high density residential use are
required to provide a bufferyard with 40 p nt units per 100 feet. Under the PUD, this
planting requirement could be modified, b t the planting requirement should be
incorporated somewhere in the project. T 's will need to be shown on the landscape plan.
On the east side of the site, the project adj ins an industrial area. The Zoning Ordinance
.
6
6"11.,/
.
.
.
Planning Connnission Agenda - 6/02/98
assigns this a rating of "Significant" in terms f bufferyard requirements. A 3D-foot wide
landscaped buffer with 120 plant units per 10 feet is required. Since the property to the
east is undeveloped, this project will only be equired to install half of the bufferyard, with
the remainder being required of the adjacent roperty at the time of its development.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
Decision 1: Re7AJning of the site to R-3, ultiple Family Residential
1. Motion to approve the rezoning base upon a finding that the use would comply
with the intent of the Land Use Plan.
2. Motion to deny the rezoning based u on a finding that the rezoning could be
construed as a "spot zone", unrelate to adjoining land uses.
3. Motion to table action on the rezon' g subject to additional infonnation.
Decision 2: Concept Stage Planned Unit evelopment
Motion to approve the concept stag PUD, subject to the conditions listed in
Exhibit Z, based on a finding that th project is appropriately integrated with the
Church of St. Henry project.
1.
2. Motion to deny the concept stage P D based on a finding that the PUD is not
necessary to develop the site as pro osed.
3. Motion of table action on the PUD ubject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staffrecomrnends tabling of the rezoning u til such time as the St. Henry's project is
finalized and a legal description for the rez ning can be published. The concept PUD is
acceptable subject to certain conditions. ose are listed in Exhibit Z. As noted above,
the finalization of the Church of St. Henry roject will affect the location of lot lines, as
well as actual density and driveway locatio s. If those changes are significant and
negatively affect this project, the Develop nt Stage PUD may require additional or new
conditions not apparent at the time of this view.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Concept Site Plan
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
7
~H-"d-
.
.
.
'Ii t.I:::
II .:;;
~ ~(:
.. :., ~ ;.
::~ :~
."'. ~.
"c:.. i ~ e
c.;"..'
.c:........
.1:<Jn
e
u
u
.a
GaUl
Octl
.0
-~
G01
z
o
..
z
(Si~;
;/
.,
ZI-
co: a.
...Jw
a.u
w::
1-0
ViU
~
~
~
,
".
:Ol
o
,.J
......l
......:,
u
-
r
r
Z
o
~
1
~
~
c:::
w..:l
t--<
Z
w..:l
U
V)
t--<
U
CS
(..L;
z
w
c::l
t--<
C/)
,
/
I
/
l ~ /-:1.
j ;,. .;;iI
Exhibit A - Concept Site Plan
.
.
.
CONDITIONS F APPROVAL
CONCEPT SAGE PUD
St. Benedic s Center
1.
Platting of the property creating separate I ts for the St. Henry's and St. Benedicts sites,
with appropriate access easements.
2.
A conceptual site illustrating an additional 4 parking spaces which could be built under a
"proof of parking" agreement with St. Be diets. This total would accommodate one
space per unit for the assisted living projec , splitting the proposed visitor's parking
between the two buildings.
3.
Preparation of a landscape plan which incl des bufferyard plantings as required between
institutional and high~density residential pr jects.
4.
Preparation of a landscape plan which inc1 des one-half of the bufferyard requirements
between the high-density residential and in ustrial property on the east.
5.
Appropriate site grading and utility plans a proved by the City Engineer.
~J/ -' 1-
xhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
. 51.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A
The School and Hospital Districts request simple subdivision which would allow a
portion of the high school property to be s lit off and linked to the existing Hospital
District site. As you may know, a portion fthe current Hospital District parking lot is
actually leased from the School District an is currently part of the parcel on which the
high school now sits. The proposed simpl subdivision will not result in creation of a non-
conforming lot and, therefore, should be a proved.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The Planning Commission recommends a
1. Motion to approve the simple sub ivision request.
2. Motion to deny approval of the s' pIe subdivision request.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator recommends alter ative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of simple subdivision request.
10
.
~~
'.(~C:
-'~CI)
'eloo
)-u::c
~m
VI ~"
.... t
'I !!~
--- II: .:a I
Sill ._~ 1
. ~ !h ..
>-
. t:~
Z_
;: o=> a:
.J~""
. ..J~!!!
WOe
,t ~. ~Wc(
I o~t:
"IlI!:c(o..
j .....J(I)
c,~ ~ ~
t
L g$'
!t~
II
..)1
I
I
!
r
i
I
I
;.v
- "'.."'..
.
<c:
. "
Itl
Ifl
/'/ ./
/
/
/
/
. .
/
, ..'. , 'J ! 1 \ I
/C..C>~ 1. j
eOtHxe ~.
5\
;'
5"I - 1",
.. "-S:"':;~:'t~' p P I a
Fxhihit R - '. I '
. 5J.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A.
Sometime ago, Jerry Mathwig requested a fi asibility study to be conducted which
identifies costs associated with extending C lsea Road from County Road 117 to Cedar
Street. The feasibility study is now complet and submitted for your review. Council is
asked to consider accepting the feasibility st dy and calling for a public hearing on the
project. The resolution proposes that the p blic hearing be scheduled for July 13, 1998.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt a resolution accept' g feasibility study and calling for a public
hearing on the Chelsea Road improv ments between County Road 117 and Cedar
Street, including utilities.
2. Motion to deny accepting the feasib' 'ty study and do not call for a public hearing.
3. Motion to table approval of the reso ution.
c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
City staff recommends approval of the feasi ility study per alternative #1 and reconunends
that the City Council call for the public hear g to be held on July 13, 1998.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of feasibility study.
11
.
.
.
7.
A
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
(J.O.)
As you know, some weeks ago Stuart Hoglu d and Kirk Kjellberg petitioned for
improvements to Marvin Road. The petition as in conjunction with requests by John
Michaelis and Dean Carlson for improvement to access to their properties needed to
offset the pending closure of Oakwood Drive as a part of the Highway 25 project. At the
previous meeting, the feasibility study was ac epted and on Tuesday of this week, an
informational meeting was held with the affe ted property owners.
Council is asked to review the report and ass ciated assessment concepts and consider
further action. Such action could include mo ing forward by ordering plans and
specifications or table further discussion pen ing collection of additional data/input from
affected property owners.
Bret Weiss will be reviewing the design cone pts and assessment program. As you know,
the project requires a considerable investmen by the City and may be slightly premature
given the level of development pressure at t s location of the city. If the level of
assessments proposed exceeds the value ere ed by the assessments, a greater portion of
the project cost may need to be shifted to th City.
In the past few days, City staff has received dditional input from property owners that
Council should be aware of. John Michaelis and Dean Carlson have indicated that the
improvements are desired and are necessitat d by the closure of Oakwood Drive. In
addition, Steve Lyman, developer/Tony E rich (partnership in control of 250 acres of
former Hoglund/Rolstad property) have indi ated that they support development of
Marvin Road as proposed. Their develop nt concepts call for Marvin/Oakwood route
as being developed as the primary collector/ ontage road for the area. Chelsea Road
would become a secondary collector road. eetings with the Lyman/Emmerich group
have been planned to discuss road develop nt options further.
Another concept that has been discussed at taff level is to improve the Sandberg Road
access to points west. Perhaps changes can be made to Sandberg Road that will enhance
this avenue as the primary access to the wes. Such improvements could be made at a cost
considerably less than the cost to develop arvin Road. Marvin Road improvements
could be made at a later date in conjunction with development in the area. Improvements
to Sandberg Road to improve access to the est could consist of the following:
1. Design a free right turn at th intersection of the future Chelsea/Sandberg
Road.
Redesign the intersection of and berg Road and Oakwood Drive by
removing the "T" and replac g it with an intersection that allows a
continuous turn to the left. his would require purchase of a portion of the
Wendy's property.
2.
12
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
.
It should be noted that it does not appear t at Carlson or Michaelis support improving
Sandberg Road. This design has some Ion -term shortcomings, which Bret will describe
at the meeting.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to table further considerati n of construction of Marvin Road
improvements and direct staff to e aluate the cost and feasibility of enhancing the
Sandberg Road option and to eval ate concepts presented by the
Lyman/Emmerich partnership.
2. Motion to adopt resolution order' g development of plans and specifications for
the Marvin Road improvements as described in the feasibility study.
3. Motion directing staff to take no rther action on this project.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
The City Administrator recommends alter ative #1. It appears that there are other options
worth exploring that may provide adequa e access to the west for the short term at a
reasonable cost. In addition, ideas emerg' g from the Lyman/Emmerich group need to be
assimilated and incorporated into road sy tern planning for the area.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Please see feasibility study delivered with agenda packet from previous meeting.
.
3
. 8.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A
ND:
REFEREN
A public hearing was held on this item by he Planning Commission on June 2, 1998. The
Planning Commission and the City Ad . strator recommend approval of the request as
identified in the attached staff report to th Planning Commission under alternative # 1.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the recommendat on of the Planning Commission.
2. Motion to modify the recommend tion of the Planning Commission or deny the
req uest.
C. ST AFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of report to Planning Commission.
.
.
.
10.
Planning Conunission Agenda -9G)b
~
I
Develooment. (NAC)
Gold Nugget has applied for consideration 0 a residential PlaIU1ed Unit Development on
land it owns south of the Kjellberg East Mo ile Home park. The site consists of
approximately 220 acres between the Mobil Home park and 85th Street NE, east of
Trunk: Highway 25 and west of County Roa 117. The northeast corner of the site
adjoins the southwest corner of the Klein F ms single family subdivision. 85th St NE is
the south boundary of the Orderly AIU1exati n Area.
The project would consist of a combination f approximately 339 single family homes,
176 townhomes, 20 twin homes and 40 "de ached townhomes", a total of 577 units. The
developer has reserved 5.5 acres in the sout west corner of the project for commercial
use--a separate zoning action would be nee ssary to approve any commercial land. The
project would be developed in phases along a minor collector street extending from
County Road 117 on the east to the southw st corner of the project at 85th Street NE.
Procedurally, the City should consider the UD concept, making comments and
requirements for the developer's further pIa . g. Following the concept plan, the
developer will need to apply for a prelirnin y plat, a rezoning of the first phase, and a
development stage PUD. Although the ent" e project will be covered by the PUD, it is
expected that the City will zone specifically by land use. Therefore, the single family areas
will likely be zoned R-l, the townhome and twin home areas will be R-2, and a
commercial zoning designation will be give to the two commercial lots if approved. The
annexation of the first phase would occur ith the approval of the final plat and final
pun.
The review of the concept stage PUD is fo the purpose of identifying issues in the design
which would raise concern for the City. A PUD project is assumed to be a departure from
the zoning standards, but with a superior d sign and development not likely through the
strict application of those standards. Ther fore, the ultimate finding which the City must
make is that the project design meets the . tent of the PUD ordinance. This report
discusses the variation from strict zoning s andards which the developer proposes and how
those variations may be viewed in a PUD ontext. In summary, the City's action should
be a general comment on the acceptability f PUD and, if positive, direction on each of the
individual variations proposed.
Land Use and Density
The Comprehensive Plan calls for this are to be developed as low density residential. The
overall project density is approximately 2. units per gross acre, about 3.8 units per net
acre (exclusive ofroads and parks). This ensity would qualify for the City's application
of low density residential. The net densit of the single family area is 3.05 units per jcre,
" .,/
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
.
corresponding to an average lot size of appr ximately 14,263 square feet. As an average,
this would meet the minimum R-l standard ot size of 12,000 square feet. The developer
is asking for the PUD in order to vary the' ividuallot sizes to include a series of about
43 scattered lots which would be both narr wer in width and smaller in area than the R-l
standards, whereas others would be signific ntly larger.
The majority of the "substandard" lots are rogrammed for the periphery of the project,
particularly adjacent to TH 25 and the mob' e home park boundary. Some of these lots
would be deeper to allow greater buffering om the adjacent use. Scattering these lots
throughout the neighborhood is designed to avoid a concentration of small lots and homes
(and presumably lesser valued homes) in 0 area. The developer proposes a standard for
the smaller lots of 10,000 square feet and 6 feet in width.
In conjunction with the lot size adjustments the developer is proposing to use a smaller
side setback standard in that area. A reduc ion in the side yard setback to 5 feet on the
garage side of the home is proposed to allo greater buildable area. Throughout the
project, the developer is proposing a varyin front setback to create additional interest
along the street. Instead of the standard 3 feet, a range of 20- to 40-foot setbacks has
been proposed. At the preliminary plat sta e, the developer proposes to illustrate how this
standard would be applied to the individual lots.
.
With regard to the townhomes and other u it types, they range in density from just under
4 units per acre to around 6.5 units per acr . This density would be considered medium
density as a free-standing development. T e developer's proposal is to average the
density throughout the project to maintain density of less than four units per acre.
The commercial areas at the southwest cor er of the project represent a departure from
the residential pattern for the area. The de eloper has discussed a neighborhood oriented
commercial use, such as a convenience sto e/gas station or other similar land use. As a
"support" land use, the proposal could be onstrued to be acceptable under the concepts
discussed in the Comprehensive Plan. To much commercial at this corner, however, or
commercial uses which are more regional' scope, would appear to compromise the
intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The PI nning Commission should discuss the benefits
of commercial use at this corner and give orne reaction to the developer and to staff.
Project Design and Parks/Pathways
.
The project concept utilizes a "linear park' design concept throughout the subdivision.
The park would connect to the trail corrid r at the northeast corner of the plat and wind
through the project as shown on the attac ed exhibit. The park dedication equals ten
percent of the land area and is proposed t meet the full requirement of the Subdivision
Ordinance. The park area varies from a 1 a-foot wide corridor along the north boundary
to more than 300 feet in width at Street A (the collector street) back to around 100 feet in
width at the termination near the westerly townhome area.
/..: 1
....r-
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
.
There are three conunents regarding the par and pathway design which the Parks
Commission and staff have made in review 0 the project. The Parks Commission was
concerned about the "remoteness" of the bu of the park area. They encouraged a
greater exposure of the park land to the stre t, particularly at the crossing of Street A.
They did note that the width of the park her mitigated this concern somewhat. However,
they preferred to have broad park exposure n at least two streets, in addition to the
pathway connections as shown.
The second conunent relates to the western erminus of the park. Since this area "dead
ends" at the townhome project, we would e courage a larger focus for park use on this
end. Converting the four to six lots adjacen to the end of the linear park as shown on the
park exhibit would create a small "green" w 'ch could serve as the primary active open
space for the western portion of the plat. T 's area would comprise around two acres
which could be used both for neighborhood ark use and an important focus for the linear
park system as a whole.
The third conunent regards pathway connec ion to the north. Staff debated the concept of
providing street access to the north along T 25 as a frontage road connection past
Kjellberg East. This concept is not shown n the proposed plan, but it should be replaced
with a pathway connection to the northwest as shown on the parks exhibit.
.
The park system as proposed would includ a pathway, potentially lighted, throughout the
development. The wider area near the cros ing of Street A would accommodate an
informal playfield, and several locations in t e system could accommodate smaller play
structures. The townhome projects should onsider inclusion of private recreational
amenities to mitigate impacts on the public acilities in the project. At a build-out
population of around 1,300 persons, the pr ject will place significant demands on public
recreation facilities in the area. For the sou hern townhome project, a public pathway
connection through to the cul-de-sac from he main park should also be included.
Streets, Utilities, Sidewalks
The majority of the streets in the project w uld be local streets, with 60-foot rights-of-way
and either 30- or 32-foot street widths. Th specifics would be identified at preliminary
plat stage; however, we have included a st et exhibit with planning staff's understanding
of the application of the City's policy on st eet widths to this project. The minor collector
would require 70 feet of right-of-way and ould be constructed at least 36 feet in width.
The City Engineer should conunent on the street widths as well.
.
The developer is proposing the pathway c nnections in the park in lieu of sidewalks which
would otherwise be required on most stree s. The exception would be a recommendation
for a sidewalk along the minor collector to accorrunodate pedestrian or bicycle traffic
along the busier route. This should be loc ted on the north/west side of Street A to give
easiest access to the townhomes along the west boundary and connection to the pathway
leading to the School complex.
,3
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
.
A series of small ponds are scattered through ut the development. Engineering staff will
have to review the drainage plan to ensure pr per stormwater control. At this time, it is
the City's understanding that there are no we lands on the site. The linear park follows a
drainage swale for much of the east half of th project.
Staff has also discussed the requirement for e trance monumentation to the project to add
identity to this large neighborhood. There ar three main entrances to the project: One
from TH 25 (to be conftrmed by MnDOT), 0 e from 85th Street NE, and one from
County Road 117. Three other minor entran e roads also serve the project. As an
additional note, the City will need to work w' h the Township on improvements and
maintenance of 85th Street.
With regard to utilities, the City Engineer sh uld review the utility planning and advise the
developer as to infrastructure improvements ecessary for the project. Staff has discussed
a phasing plan which would encourage devel pment from the northeast corner to the
northwest corner frrst in order to provide wa er main looping as quickly as possible. The
next priority would be to provide additional cess to the project from the external street
system
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
.
Decision 1: Concept Stage Planned Uni
1. Motion to approve the concept stage lanned Unit Development for Gold Nugget
Development subject to the condition listed in Exhibit Z. This motion should be
supported by a fmding that with the c nditions, the project would meet the intent
Of the City's Zoning Ordinance and P D regulations by providing for a project
which is superior in quality and desig than would be otherwise developed under
the strict application of the City's zo . g standards.
2. Motion to deny the concept stage PU based upon a finding that the project
would not meet the intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance and should be
redesigned to comply with the strict s andards of the R-I Zoning District.
3. Motion to table action on the concep stage PUD subject to the submission of
additional infonnation.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
.
Staff recommends alternative # 1, approval w th conditions. As noted in the report, the
intent of PUD is to require a superior project in trade for flexibility in standards. Staff
believes that the flexibility proposed with thi project will result in a superior project.
Clearly, the land could be developed accord' g to pure R-l and R-2 regulations.
However, the intermixing of diverse housing styles should add variety to the streetscape,
particularly when coupled with the variation front setbacks.
14
,'/ -4
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 6/02/98
The reduced lot width on a portion of the lot would be a component of this concept.
However, the developer has also asked for a educed side setback (five feet on the garage
side) to accommodate the narrower lots. Thi varying standard could be a problem for
staff to manage, particularly given that calls ill come in to city hall requesting setback
information without a thorough description 0 the location, or a requirement that
individual plats be checked for different stan ards. The City will need to develop a
process for dealing with the problem that var ed setback standards will create.
The development of the linear park system p ovides convenient park access to the entire
project but does not chop the system into as ries of separate small tot lots. This design
aids in park maintenance by minimizing the a ount of equipment loading for the same
amount of maintenance area. With the reco nded conditions attached in the exhibit,
we believe the project complies with the PU intent.
With regard to the commercial land, staff be eves that a very limited amount of
commercial may be appropriate given the s' of the project and the proximity of other
convenience neighborhood services. The na ure and extent of this use should be heavily
managed, however, to avoid conflicting with the land use plan and competing
inappropriately with the more intensive co rcial areas of the community.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Exhibit A - Concept Plan - Parks
Exhibit B - Concept Plan - Streets
Exhibit Z - Conditions of Approval
15
,/. ~
",., tJ
~ ~~ i
~;I:I l'I~ ~
&~I~ si'~ ~;i~
.~i1e ~~1~ hJ~
~l~ ~~l~ 9 &
gdi gill ~~!~
~
I
!
~
i
f
.
~ ~
~ j
it t II
. I,
- t n-
Ar tl
- t
U 'j
ill !i
n .,
J-I;
fl ;;i
r.1 ,t
. :u
~a ..
JJ ~t
;11 dt
tiH
'a ,
iJ ;1
II if
HH
Ul
X
.....
ro
a.
c::
.2
U
ClJ
c::
c;
o
U
>-
r1l
::
~
iil
a..
u---:---u;rru--:-Ul
r - ::: o~ -. i
: .~-. a:.. l
I '. . ':' ....,... I ::I
: -":', :1: \.', !
I '''~~.~J:l;-,~~~,,:,:'~=i ~ .
tu_u -"iTrn : n
:::aoo; - I tl
:! -.'. : !
: ~ .~.: ~:'! --
.. \., I -:i .
: u_u-J !!
,............... :
': .0; I ~ .
11 ...~" : i
f-_~. . I "::',...-_1 11 l?
: ':-_ , In_:_,,-~~_~
I ',-{, -;-n_.... -1 ~
: ..L _u_u , ~
f--~~u_u j -~~ _; !
! . ~..., : . , I
' . . I '':~''':
! '-.:_~,: '-' J
L.. ulu.. u
->4.
~
a.
"';ij
c;
.g
'6
-c
<(
]!
I ~
I ~
c:
ro
ii:
-
a.
Q)
o
c:
o
(.)
<(
-
:0
:E
><
LLJ
w
o
>-
\~
U
U
:;,
z
ifl
z
:'J
"
(
;/p
.
~l ~&
f~h f~lv 1
~iJ4 ~t'4 ~;~"l
~~1g Gdg ~; ~
~~~ft 1~~ft II~
gdl adl ~e!~
~
t
!
!
~
~
!
'I
I
" n !
~ ~ ~~2111 I E n I
~ :;:; I
. ~ e I,
1 ii l ~ ~a II
r iI!bH ~ ~~ II
ij ...."",..,.lOftl"l n
i ~~~=~Jl1 n
.
~
9 ·
II ,~
11 t II
.. i,
l f II i
-! Jt
~! l~
III ~!
J. it
II "1
I II.
~j It
.:/ JI
1 '1
.] "
:11 h
Ii l~
1:\ i1
n ;1
I' H
II H
"it'~ "_
....r. -- __- _ _
....
r----:-'-"m ----:---l
I ..":. ::: .t.~ _ :
i -;'. a: -.' I
: ,,~~~ f::: ....;..,:
I ". - 'I' ,-,-" I :1
t '" 'w"., 1,1 . 5
............-------ill.......---...---::=i G
; g;r;.-::} i ~ ~ ~
~~ :. \.1: % b Vi Vi
I }----"----1 H Vl
-==, ~I . - ~ (U Iii
... 1.0: i 1 0 \,) \,)
t....::.~,~ :: ..;~ _"~ 1: I ~ ~ ~
I -":'>-'::::::""",~'l:. n J<! -0 i-, b
: "I tiN. U M M
L ._..___.1.._____...-1 a
! -.;;, ! -:';-, III 11111
I . "'! ." ~-'" ' :
L..____~:.l____:~~.J . ~
IU~
,,. = - ~i
Ul
...
0>
0>
;:
en
c:
co
a.
....
c-
O>
o
c:
o
U
co
...
:.a
:E
)(
w
I-
W
"
"
~
z
ig
x
~
n.
l-
n.
w
<)
Z
"
u
~
I
\~
:\
I
J I
II
'}
II
!I,
."
Iii
r I ~
!Il
'tl
.' ,
Q, ~
Jt~
'..
(-7
.
.
.
CONDITIONS OF CONCEPT T AGE PUD APPROVAL
Gold Nugget De elopment
1.
Provision of a landscaped buffer between th project and the adjacent uses on the west
(TH 25) and the north (Kjellberg East). Thi need not be an opaque screen but should be
a reasonable green, visual buffer.
2. No more than the proposed 43 lots fail to et the R-1 minimums, and of those, the
minimum standards would be 10,000 square eet and 65 feet in width.
3. Reduction in side yard setback standards w' only be applicable to the blocks which
contain the smaller lots.
4. Townhome types will not exceed the densitie proposed in the concept plan.
5. The commercial areas are limited to the size' dicated on the concept plan and are limited
to neighborhood related uses.
6. A paved pathway is included in the project in lieu of sidewalk in most other areas.
7. The pathway is accompanied by low levellig ting for those areas internal to the project,
remote from the street.
8.
The park area is widened at the collector stre t as indicated on the park exhibit. This area
should be graded to accommodate an infor 1 playfield for neighborhood use.
9. The park area is expanded to create a comm n green near the western townhomes as
indicated on the park exhibit.
10. The park area is connected to the northwest ia a pathway connection as shown on the
park exhibit, as well as to the southern town me cul-de-sac.
11. The collector street through the center of the project is platted at a 70-foot right-of-way,
with a street construction according to the Ci y Engineer's recommendations.
12. The r~mainder of the streets are platted at 60 foot rights-of-way, with 30- or 32-foot
street sections as shown on the streets exhibit
13. A sidewalk along the north side of the collect r is developed as a part of the project.
14. Engineering and utilities meet the requiremen s of the City Engineer.
15. Phasing which provides looping of water and additional major street access as soon as
possible.
.,;.
~
~,.~
,^
Exhi it Z - Conditions of Approval
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
. 9.
A.
For the past ten years, the City has had an. dependent contract arrangement with Patty
Salzwedel to perform animal control duties or the City, including daily pound
maintenance. The last revision in the comp nsation package occurred in March 1996,
effective July 1996. At that time, the mont ly contract amount was increased to
$2,259.40 per month for both the animal co trol services and the impound maintenance.
The increase at that time amounted to a 2.7 0 increase on the base amount that had been
in effect since the year 1993.
.
The annual one-year agreement is auto mati ally renewed unless either party wishes to
open up the negotiations. Since the agree nt has normally been up for renewal in July,
Patty has requested that the agreement be r viewed for possible adjustments. In March
1996, during the last contract review, the C uncil had suggested that increases be
discussed more frequently, such as annually rather than waiting too long and then being
faced with larger adjustments. In this regar , Patty is requesting an adjustment to her
monthly contract to compensate for inflatio ary cost increases since July 1996. Based on
cost of living adjustments the City has used for salary adjustments over the past two years,
this would amount to approximately a 6% . crease based on inflation at approximately 3%
a year. Total increase would be $67.78 per month based on the current fee arrangement.
For budgeting purposes, our animal contro budget had included a 5% increase for both
1997 and 1998.
.
Also enclosed with the agenda you will fin some historical information on the City's
animal control program for the past two ye s, including our total revenue and
expenditures for each year and the net cost to the City. Our net cost of running a program
for 1997 was $14,777, slightly higher than he past year's average of approximately
$10,000 to $11,000. Because of the reven es we are able to receive from other
communities which utilize our animal contr I shelter facility, we are able to keep our cost
at a reasonable level when considering the vel of service we are receiving for our own
animal control program For example, app oximately 125 of the 400+ animals per year
are city dogs and cats; and if we were to h use and dispose of these animals through a
contract arrangement with another facility, he cost of housing and disposal alone would
be in excess of $10,000 per year based on ur last quotation from the Pups facility in
Maple Grove. This was the only facility th t we were able to even get a quotation from
when we discussed the need to build a new facility. In addition to the housing and
disposal costs, we would have also had cos in transporting the animals to another facility
and would also have labor cost for someon to pick up and handle the animals. Basically,
our cost would be at least equal to what w are currently spending on an annual basis, and
we would still not have had any animal co ro1 officer to handle our own calls or do
patroling within the city.
15
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
With our new animal control shelter now' full operation, Patty will be in attendance at
the meeting to answer any questions on ho the operation is going and update the Council
on our current animal control efforts. Fro what we have heard from our contract
communities, everyone is very pleased wit our new facility, and we think: it's a great asset
to our community.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Council could renew the animal co trol agreement with Patty Salzwedel for an
additional year and adjust the mont ly compensation to reflect the estimated cost
of living for the past two years at 6 o.
2. Renew the contract for an addition one year and adjust the compensation based
on the cost of living estimated for t e next year at 3%.
3. Adjust the contract renewal compe sation in some other amount to be determined.
c. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Although the Council had previously reque ted that increases in our animal control
agreement be considered more frequently, atty did not bring forward a separate request
last summer for one reason or another. Pa ty was heavily involved in working with Fred
and John on the design and construction 0 our new animal shelter and simply decided to
let the contract renew automatically. Fro a cost of living standpoint, 3% per year seems
appropriate, and I would therefore reco nd adjusting the contract by this amount. If
the Council is looking at a cost of living ad ustment only from today through the contract
period ending July 1999, then a 3% adjust nt would seem more appropriate.
.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Statistical data on animal impoundments; greements for services.
.
16
.
.
.
ANIMAL CONTROL/SHEL TER REPORT
1996
1997
Total Revenue
Expenses
Net cost to City
20679.00
31664.00
] 0984.00
20110.00
34888.00
14777.00
Animals impounded
Animals claimed
Animals adopted
Euthanasia
408
75
183
*150
429
72
201
*156
* 1996 euthanasia total includes 116 animals th at were feral cats, road kills, sick, old or
injured animals, and dangerous animals. The nll mber for 1997 includes 112. That drops
our euthanasia rate to less than 10%. The national rate is 64%, so we are doing a good
job of placing adoptable animals.
Changes for 1998:
1. We have three new communities that have signed up with our new animal shelter in
1998. Those communities are:
· Rockford Township
· City of Ostego
· Sherburne County Sheriff Dept.
2. We have regular public hours at the new shelt ~ Monday through Friday.
3. Key at City Hall police desk so police departn ent has 24-hour access to animal
4. Rate increase from 9.00 to to.OO for boarding, disposition fee raised from 27.00 to
29.00. Fee charged ifanimal if not claimed il 99.00 per animal.
I .
.,/
.
.
.
12 hours
feeding and caring of animals, de . ng and maintence of kennels, cages,
equipment and vehicle.
20 hours
responding to citizen complaints 0 reports of leashing, unsanitary dog
kennels, barking dogs, animal bite , animal abuse, animal neglect, injured
animals, dangerous dogs, nuisance dogs(chasing bikes, people on street),
wildlife complaints, dead animals n the road, etc...
5 hours
taking in dogs from other commu 'ties, releasing dogs to their owners,
showing impounded dogs to possi Ie owners, and other kennel
attendent type duties.
5 hours
releasing animals to adoption agen ys for adoption and euthanasia of
unadoptable animals.
5 hours
picking up of dogs running at larg , patroling problem areas.
5 hours
filing lost and found reports, recor keeping, picking up supplies,
livetrapping, returning phone and ager messages, public educatio~
ordinance revisions, licensing, rabi s updates, trips to veterinarian, etc...
52 hours total
I am on call M-F 8:00am til6:00pm, every other aturday, Sundays and evenings are
limited to emergencys only. The average evening or middle of the night call out is twice a
week. The kennels are taken care of everyday inc uding holidays.
A days work varies so much depending on what ails come in that day. Some days may
consist mainly of patroling and impounding of do s. Especially if it's a nice day or
garbage day. The next day a lot of time would b spent cleaning the kennels and
returning dogs to their owners, updating lost and ound reports or calling adoption groups
to save a spot for the dog.
..
...,~
.
.
.
AGREEMENT OR SERVICES
This agreement, made this 1 st day of ApI" , 1998, by and between the City of Monticello,
a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to a "City"), and Patty Salzwedel, an individual
(hereinafter referred to as "Salzwedel"), sets out t rms and conditions for the general purpose of
providing animal control to the residents of the ci y.
WHEREAS, the City has a duly adopted rdinance regulating animal control, and
WHEREAS, enforcement of said ordinanc cannot be restricted to standard employee
scheduling procedures, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to provide s ch enforcement through the services of a
private party which will be able to respond as nee ed under the general guidelines provided by the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, in and for consider tion of the mutual covenants and conditions
hereinafter contained, the parties hereto mutually gree as follows:
1. The City, in and for consideration fthe sum of
($ ) per month payable on t e last business day of each month, hereby
contracts with Salzwedel for the pe iod of twelve (12) months from the date of
execution of this agreement for the services of Salzwedel as Animal Control
Officer.
2. Salzwedel hereby agrees to perfor substantially the following services as Animal
Control Officer:
Provides prompt, timely res onse to animal calls (complaints, reports of
loose animals). It is conside ed reasonable to respond to routine calls
between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m, onday through Friday, and every other
Saturday. Response to calls on Sundays shall be limited to emergencies
only.
a.
KAAEN\OFFICE\AICK\ANIMAL.AGA: 6/4198
, .", 3 Page 1
b.
Maintains and enforces sec ity measures as prescribed by City
Administrator, Public Work Director, and/or Superintendent of
wastewater treatment facilit .
.
c. Conducts random patrol ru s at own discretion but within prescribed limits
set by City Administrator.
d. Monitors care of kennels an animals.
e. Conducts periodic observat on of animals in impound for sickness, injury,
etc.
f. Promptly notifies an animal health professional when an animal is
determined to be distressed
g. Serves as regular attendant of impound facility during "public hours," said
hours to be determined by ity Administrator. Current public hours are
10 a.m. to 2 p.m., Monday through Friday.
h.
Provides timely response t requests to reclaim animals from and/or
impound animals at the fac 'ty other than during "public hours." (It is
considered reasonable to r spond to requests for impoundment of animals
from other contracting age cies between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday. Requests om the general public to reclaim animals
between 8 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Friday, is also considered
reasonable.)
.
1. Exercises care to ensure t e humane treatment of animals both in transport
and during impoundment.
J. Ensures collection of fines and impound fees prior to release of animals.
k. Maintains accurate, curre t records for each animal.
1. Maintains orderly records filing systems for easy retrieval of information.
m. Promptly transports uncia d and/or severely distressed and suffering
animals to euthanization f dlity.
n. Makes timely submittal 0 logs and records to the City finance department.
o. Provides animals with fre h food and water each afternoon.
p. Conducts cursory c1eanin (waste removal, etc.) as needed, each afternoon.
.
q.
Maintains and submits on a monthly basis a complete record of animals
adopted, which includes approved "release form" signed by the adopting
party.
~, .11
" 7
Page 2
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\ANIMAL.AGR: 6/4/98
.
.
.
3.
Salzwedel hereby agrees to provid service seven (7) days per week. If Salzwedel
cannot be on call for any period of time, Salzwedel hereby agrees to provide and
pay for an approved replacement d ring such period.
4. Salzwedel hereby agrees to utilize is/her own vehicle to perform the
aforementioned tasks, and further, 0 provide proper insurance coverage to
indemnify and hold harmless the Ci y from any claims or violations arising from the
operation of said vehicle (certificate of insurance to be provided to City). The City
agrees to pay mileage to and from v terinary clinics outside the city of Monticello
when approved by the City Adminis rator. The payment shall be at $0.25 per mile.
5. The City hereby agrees to provide d maintain appropriate insurance coverage for
all City owned facilities and for all c ims arising from charges of neglect or
inhumane treatment of animals, prov ded that Salzwedel, as Animal Control
Officer, observes and exercises all pr per means of fulfilling the duties herein
stated.
6. The City hereby agrees to assume th cost of animal food and incidental health
supplies and pound maintenance sup lies and operating equipment.
7. The City hereby agrees to perform or have performed all essential maintenance
tasks that lie beyond the scope of the uties outlined herein or as can be reasonably
expected as routine custodial mainten nee.
8. It is hereby agreed by both parties tha this agreement may be terminated at any
time by either party, with or without y reasons, provided that the party wishing
to terminate this agreement shall provi e written notice to the other party at least
thirty (30) days prior to the effective d te of the termination.
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\ANIMAL.AGR: 6/4/98
.~ ~
/;/, - Page 3
.;
.
.
This agreement shall run for the period frrst s pulated above and shall automatically renew
itself for a like period unless a thirty (30) day written notice is given that one of the parties hereto
desires to engage in discussion concerning the terms nd conditions stated herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties heret have caused this agreement to be executed
in their behalf by themselves and/or their proper offi ers by their signatures the day and year frrst
written above.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
City Administrator
Witness
Date
INDIVIDUAL
Patty Salzwedel
Witness
Date
.
/~
...~
page 4
'II' ,"!I'
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\ANIMAL.AGR: 6/4/98
'!'
.
.
.
AGREEMENT F R SERVICES
This agreement, made this 1 st day of April, 1998, by and between the City of Monticello,
a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'City"), and Patty Salzwedel, an individual
(hereinafter referred to as "Salzwedel"), sets out te ms and conditions for the general purpose of
providing humane animal impoundment.
WHEREAS, the City has a duly adopted or inance regulating animal control, and
WHEREAS, enforcement of said ordinance annot be restricted to standard employee
scheduling procedures, and
WHEREAS, the City provides such enforce nt by way of a contract for the services of a
private party, and
WHEREAS, the City owns and operates an nimal impound facility, and
WHEREAS, the City desires to operate said facility in such a manner as to assure safe,
sanitary, and humane treatment of impounded an's.
NOW, THEREFORE, in and for considerati n of the mutual covenants and conditions
hereinafter contained, the parties hereto mutually ag ee as follows:
1. The City, in and for consideration of he sum of
($ ) per month payable on th last business day of each month, hereby
contracts with Salzwedel for the peri d of twelve (12) months from the date of
execution of this agreement for the se vices of Salzwedel as Animal Impound
Officer.
2. Salzwedel hereby agrees to perform s bstantially the following services as Animal
Impound Officer:
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\PQUND.AGR: 6/4/98
7-7
Page 1
Custodial
.
a.
b.
c.
d.
.
e.
Daily removal of animal wast .
Daily washing, rinsing, disinfi cting of animal pens.
General work area will be ke t neat and clean.
Supplies, tools, etc., will be ept in proper storage when not in use.
Immediate reporting to City dministrator of needed repairs, mechanical
problems or failures, and ot r maintenance problems which should be
referred to the public works epartment.
Maintain neat, clean appear ce of outside area in the immediate proximity
of the impound facility.
f.
Animal Care & Feeding
a. Daily disposal of food and ater from previous day's feeding.
b. Daily washing and disinfect g of food and water dishes.
c. Provide fresh food and wat r daily.
d. Daily disinfectant of litter ays.
e. Replace cat litter daily.
f. Routine observation of a' Is for sickness, injury, etc., and prompt
reporting to proper authori y (veterinarian, Animal Control Officer).
g. Will allow dogs into outsid kennel area daily.
Recordkeepin~
a.
b.
c.
Maintain accurate, up-to- ate records of hours and tasks performed.
Maintain orderly records e for easy retrieval of information.
Prompt submittal of logs d financial records to the City Finance Director.
Q!heI
a. Maintain a suitable invent ry of food, litter, cleaning supplies. Custodian
shall be authorized to e such minor purchases at own discretion.
b. Prompt reporting of any' egularities in facility or general operation.
c. Assist (as needed and up n reasonable request) the Animal Control Officer
in the performance of his er duties.
d. Maintain and enforce sec rity measures as prescribed by the City
Administrator, Public W rks Director, and/or Superintendent of
wastewater treatment fac' 'ty.
3. The City hereby agrees to provi e and maintain appropriate insurance coverage for
.
all City owned facilities and for II claims arising from charges of neglect or
inhumane treatment of animals, rovided that Salzwedel, as Animal Impound
Officer, observes and exercises II proper means offulftlling the duties herein
stated.
.l)~...... r
' ,:1
, ."
;
Page 2
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\POUND.AGR: 6/4/98
4. The City hereby agrees to assume t e cost of animal food and incidental health
supplies and pound maintenance su plies and operating equipment.
.
5.
The City hereby agrees to perform r have performed all essential maintenance
tasks that lie beyond the scope of t duties outlined herein or as can be reasonably
expected as routine custodial maint nance.
6. It is hereby agreed by both parties t at this agreement may be terminated at any
time by either party, with or withou any reason, provided that the party wishing to
terminate this agreement shall prov' e written notice to the other party at least
thirty (30) days prior to the effectiv date of the termination.
This agreement shall run for the period firs stipulated above and shall automatically renew
itself for a like period unless a thirty (30) day writt n notice is given that one of the parties hereto
desires to engage in discussion concerning the ter and conditions stated herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties her to have caused this agreement to be executed
. in their behalf by themselves and/or their proper 0 cers by their signatures the day and year first
written above.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Witness
City Administrator
Date
INDIVIDUAL
Witness
Patty Salzwedel
Date
.
KAREN\OFFICE\RICK\POUND.AGR: 6/4/98
(),1
Page 3
. 10.
.
.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A REFEREN E AND BA
The Parks Commission has been working n the development of a Comprehensive Parks
and Pathways Plan over the winter. A cop of the draft plan is included under separate
cover. This plan is designed to provide a comprehensive inventory of community parks
and recreation facilities, establishes policie and strategies for the location and siting of
new park facilities, and identifies a park sy tern within which all park facilities, existing and
new, will be coordinated.
By establishing policies for new park locat on, both the City and developers will have a
clearer idea of when land or cash park ded cation requirements will be imposed. This
should help the City better coordinate its r creation system and should help developers
streamline their planning process. In addit on, the Plan makes the case for a new park
dedication fee structure. That issue is ad essed in a companion proposal with an
amendment to the City's Subdivision Ord' ance. The companion proposal was tabled by
the Planning Commission pending review f additional information on development fees
charged by other communities.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend approval 0 the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
based upon a finding that the ame dment will provide greater consistency in the
planning process for the provision of park, pathway, and other recreation facilities
in the community.
2. Motion to deny the amendment.
3. Motion to table action on the ame dment subject to additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the amend nt. This Plan, as noted above, should help
streamline the development process as th community grows into the Orderly Annexation
Area, and also lays the groundwork for c ntinuing investments in the City's open space
resources. Staff understands that the Cit Council may want additional time to review the
document; therefore, it makes sense to ta Ie its action.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Draft copy of Comprehensive Park Plan.
17
.
.
.
11.
Council Agenda - 6/8/98
A.
(R.W.)
Liquor Store Manager Joe Hartman will b in attendance at the Council meeting Monday
evening to review the liquor store operati n's first quarter [mancial report.
As you will note, sales for the fIrst quarter of 1998 were up almost $19,000 over the first
quarter last year, and this resulted in a gro s profit increase of over $11,000 compared to
last year. Total operating income after de ucting expenses indicates an operating income
total of $48,544. This is up $6,000 over t e same period last year. This seems to fall in
line with our expectations, as Joe has indi ated that he believed traffic and volume were
higher than usual for the first quarter, pos ibly due to the warmer winter we experienced.
After reviewing the report with Joe, Cou il can simply accept the report as presented. In
the meantime, if anyone has any questions regarding the report, feel free to contact Joe or
myself for additional information.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of first quarter [mandaI report.
18
MONTICELLO UNICIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PR FIT BY PRODUCT
.
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING MAR 31, 1997 AND 1998
1997
YEAR--TO-D TE
AMOUNT
1998
YEAR-TO"-DATE
AMOUNT
Liquor Sales 112,58 118,102
Discounts
Cost of Sales 80,41 83,132
--~--~-~ - -~--~--_._-
GROSS PROFIT - LIQUOR 32,16 26.9% 34,969 29.6%
Beer Sales 211,96 224,635
Cost of Sales 162,95 162,715
-~-~--~...... - ---_.~-~-~--
GROSS PROFIT - BEER 49,011 23.1% 61,920 27.6%
Wine Sales 42,878 44,097
Cost of Sales 35,406 36,264
-~-~------ ._-~~--.._~~--
GROSS PROFIT - WINE 7,472 17.4% 7,833 17.8%
.se Sales 9,630 9,608
ost of Sales 7,048 10,733
-..........~-~-........_- -~----~-~-
GROSS PROFIT - MISC TAXABLE 2,583 26.8% ( 1 , 1 24) --
Mise Non-taxable Sales 1,315 645
Cost of Sales 479 250
---~----~ -'-~-~--~~~
GROSS PROFIT -- MISC NON-TAXA 836 63.6% 395 38.8%
TOTAL SALES 378,375 397,087
TOTAL COST OF SALES 286,307 293,094
TOTAL FREIGHT COST 1,968 2,686
--.........~----,~-- ~~-~_.~-~--~-
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT 90,099 23.8% 101,306 25.5%
-........-....------ ----------
---.......------ -----~---._~
.
/1-1
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
.
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING MAR 31, 1997 AND 1998
SALES
Liquor
Beer
Wine
Other Merchandise
Mise Non~Taxable Sales
Discounts
TOTAL SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GROSS PROFIT
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
.ersonal Services
Salaries
PERA
FICA
Insurance
Unemployment Benefits
Severance Pay
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
Supplies
Office Supplies
General Operating Supplie
Other Supplies
TOTAL SUPPLIES
.
1997
YEAR-TO"'D TE
AMOUNT
112,58
211,96
42,87
9,63
1,31
378,37
(288,27
90,09
======== =
EXPENSE
26,81
1, 18
2,04
2,22
3
32,29
9
1,410
86
1,506
23.8%
8.5%
.4%
1998
YEAR'.TO...DATE
AMOUNT
118,102
224,635
44,097
9,608
645
397,087
(295,781)
----------
----------
101,306 25.5%
31,284
1,596
2,387
2,299
37,566
322
1,381
1,703
9.5%
.4%
II "J....-
MONTICELLO UNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE ND EXPENSES
.
COMPARISO FOR THE YEAR
ENDING MAR 1, 1997 AND 1998
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
Maintenance Agreements
Communication
Travel-Conference-Schools
Advertising
Insurance & Tax
Utilities
Maintenance, Equipment
Maintenance, Building
Maintenance, Other
Depreciation--Acquired As
Misc Svc & Chgs
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH
411PTAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
Cash Long/Short
Sale of Property
Misc Income
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
Transfers In/Out
ADJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE
.
1997
YEAR-TO--
AMOUN
14,1
47,9
42,1
~-~----
-------
46,966
----------
----~---_........
46,966
------~---
----------
5
9
2,6
3,0
2
1,9
3,5
1,1
4,952
(1 1)
4,813
1998
YEAR--TO,.DATE
AMOUNT
309
869
1,215
2,316
3,128
387
754
2,761
1,757
~~-~~-~---
3.7% 13,495 3.4%
12.7% 52,764 13.3%
---'_.................-~~~
11.1% 48,542 12.2%
----------
----------
8,320
17
1
(90)
1. 3%
8,247 2.1%
12.4%
56,789 14.3%
-----------
----------
12.4%
56,789 14.3%
----..------
---~------
11--:3
.
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BAL NCE SHEET
IMar98
Current Assets:
Cash
Change Fund
Investments
Accounts Receivable
A/R - NSF Checks
Inventory
Prepaid Insurance
244,988.74
1,600.00
530,062.50
(996.02)
240,752.67
2,512.06
------~-~~-~.......-
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
1,018,919.95
Fixed Assets
Land & Parking Lot
Buildings
Furniture & Equipment
less: Accumulated Depreciation
46,591.03
234,104.13
88,181.65
(259,418.85)
~OTAL FIXED ASSETS
.....-.......-......._-~~----
109,457.96
------.......-........-.--.........
TOTAL ASSETS
1,128,377.91
-------------
------------
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Due to EDA Fund
Sales Tax Payable
Salaries Payable
Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave
Other Accrued Expenses
302.36
14,367.84
4,575.85
26,527.16
1,725.64
-~~~~--........~~~-
TOTAL LIABILITIES
47,498.85
RETAINED EARNINGS
1,080,879.06
------------
.
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
1,128,377.91
------------
-------......----
/1- If
eRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/01/98 11:12:42
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MON ICELLO
GL050S-V05.20 CO ERPAGE
GL540R
.
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 0529
COMMENT... 5/29 CKS
OATA-JE-lO
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ----------~-~~----------
0-05291998-493 5/29 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
---. -~-- .-.-
-~- -- ._-'~.~
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01/98 11:12:43 Schedule of Bill GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
V_NAME
IPTlON AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
BILL MALONE
SNOW & ICE-BOX REPL 55.25 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 1 1.43125.2299 493 00086
BOSE/TOM
TOM BOSE-BOOTS REIMB 76.99 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 1 1.43115.2111 493 00015
BRC - ASSIST CENTER
COMPUTER M/A 1,818.00 PROF SRV - DATA PROCESS I 1 1.41920.3090 APRIL 493 00019
CEDAR ST. GARDEN CENTER
DEP REG-LANDSCAPE SUPP 85.16 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 1 1.41990.4010 3449 49300023
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOU
TOM B 89.58 TELEPHONE 1 1.43115.3210 493 00024
FIRE DEPT 3.86 TELEPHONE 1 1.42201.3210 493 00025
GARY A 111.45 TELEPHONE 1 1.42401.3210 493 00026
MATT T 32.26 TELEPHONE 6 1.49440.3210 493 00027
237.15 *VENDOR TOTAL
CHASKA CHEMICAL CO., INC
AN SHELTER-CLEANING 142.48 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1 1. 42701. 211 0 21481 493 00028
COUNTRY LUMBER
~ELTER-REPAIR 14.10 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 1 1.42701.4010 213438 493 00031
CULLIGAN
RENTAL 23.86 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSES MAY 493 00032
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 14,826.16 BEER 493 00033
NON ALCOHOLIC 442.10 MISC TAXABLE 493 00034
BEER-CREDIT FROM 1120055 338.40CR BEER 493 00035
14.929.86 *VENDOR TOTAL
DALE AND IRIS HARRIS
SNOW & ICE-REPLACE BOX 34.99 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 1 1.43125.2299 493 00070
DAVE PETERSON'S FORD
STREETS-REPAIR SUPPLIES 8.47 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 1 1.43120.2211 80686 493 00036
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT C
WATER-SUPPLIES 270.27 UTILITY SYSTEM MTCE SUPP 6 1.49440.2270 93762 493 00037
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 1.160.35 BEER 6 9.49750.2520 493 00038
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT
STREETS-PAINT 108.04 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 1 1.43120.2199 52522 493 00039
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01/98 11:12:43 Schedule of 81 ls Gl540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
V. NAME
_ RIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
DISCOUNT PAPER PRODUCTS,
LI QUOR-SUPPLI ES 246.45 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 186045 493 00040
DUANE'S TRACTOR PAINTING
WWTP-BLAST PLATE & CAP 40.00 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPLI 436.49201.2299 493 00041
DYNA SYSTEMS
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 399.50 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43127.2199 636324,629716 493 00042
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCI
STREETS-STOP SIGN SC/Al 709.44 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 8066 493 00043
EHLERS & ASSOC,INC PUBLI
HRA-AMOCO REDEV 105.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVI 101.41910.3199 493 00044
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES,
LI QUOR- RAGS 112.69 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 493 00045
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA
SEWER-NOZZLE & ADAPTOR 80.27 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.2210 4460 493 00046
FLICKER'S T.V. & APPLIAN
BlDG INSP-VIDEO TAPES 6.91 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.42401.2199 493 00047
GA.IZERS, INC
WWTP-STEEL PLATES 85.53 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 436.49201.3025 38540 493 00048
GARTNER'S OFFICE PRODUCT
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,134.89 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41301.2099 493 00049
GATEWAY 2000
DATA PROC-COMP EQUIP 2,308.93 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 101.41920.5702 493 00050
GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS
CH-OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.68 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 101.41301.2099 20362650 493 00051
GENERAL RENTAL CENTER
PH INSP-CONCRETE BLADE 69.97 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 101.43115.2410 493 00052
PARKS-SEEDER 122.48 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 101.45201.4150 493 00053
WHTP-ElECTRIC PUMP 62.65 MISC REPAIR & MTC SUPPL 436.49201.2299 493 00054
SHADE TREE-OP SUPPLIES 390.69 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 224.46102.2199 493 00055
645.79 *VENDOR TOTAL
GLUNZ/RAYMOND J
(3) O~ENINGS 975.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.49010.3115 493 00056
GOULD BROS. CHEV-OLDS. C
FIRE DEPT-SWITCH 107.75 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.42201.4050 47140 493 00057
.
---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01/98 11:12:43 Schedule of Bil s GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
V. NAME
RIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
GOVERNMENT TRAINING CENT
PARKS COMM-REGISTRATION 104.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 01.41910.3320 493 00058
GRAINGER/W.W.
PW-CLEANING SUPPLIES 45.06 CLEANING SUPPLIES 01.43110.2110 493 00059
PW-DOOR STOP 40.06 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 01.43110.2199 493 00060
85.12 *VENDOR TOTAL
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
FREIGHT 69.00 FREIGHT 09.49150.3330 . 493 00061
LIQUOR 3,888.85 LI QUOR 09.49150.2510 493 00062
WINE 1,085.03 WINE 09.49150.2530 493 00063
MISC TAXABLE 459.11 MISC TAXABLE 09.49150.2540 493 00064
BEER 20.40 BEER 09.49150.2520 493 00065
5,522.39 *VENDOR TOTAL
GROOTERS LEAPALOT TIDEMA
JEFF O-SEMINAR 35.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 01.41301.3320 493 00068
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 11,101.15 BEER 09.49150.2520 493 00066
MISC TAXABLE 5.40 MISC TAXABLE 09.49150.2540 493 00061
11.113.15 *VENOOR TOTAL
GR~URSERY CENTER
SHADE TREE-TREES 4,129.60 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 24.46102.2410 105040 493 00069
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
WATER-T-POTABLE 12.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 01.49440.3199 493 00011
WATER-CHEMICALS 3,189.90 CHEMICAL PRODUCTS 01.49440.2160 493 00012
3,261.90 *VENDOR TOTAL
HERMES/GERALD T
CLEANING CONTRACT 221.50 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 11.45501.3110 5/16 - 5/31 493 00013
HOGLUND BUS COMPANY
STREETS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 60.19 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 01.43120.2211 493 00014
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
FIRE-MOTOR FUEL 19.81 MOTOR FUELS 01.42201.2120 493 00015
HOME JUICE
TAXABLE MISC 11.55 MISC TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 493 00076
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
LIBRARY-COPIER M/A 47.50 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 11.45501.3190 APRIL 493 00079
LIBRARY-COPIER M/A 44.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 11. 4550 1. 3190 FEB 493 00077
LIBRARY-COPIER M/A 44.00 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 11.45501.3190 MARCH 493 00018
. 135.50 *VENDOR TOTAL
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01n8 11: 12 :43 Schedule of Bil s GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 5
V. NAME
__ RIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT .NAME UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POlt F/P 10 LINE
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
FREIGHT 97.82 FREIGHT 09.49750.3330 493 00080
LIQUOR 3,153.73 LIQUOR 09.49750.2510 493 00081
WINE 1,047 .06 WINE 09.49750.2530 493 00082
4,298.61 *VENDOR TOTAL
KING/JAMES W
FIREHALL 37.27 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 01.42201.3199 LAWN MAINT 493 00020
LI BRARY 47.93 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 11.45501.3199 LAWN MAINT 493 00021
LIQUOR STORE 42. 60 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 09.49754.3199 LAWN MAINT 493 00022
127.80 *VENDOR TOTAL
KINNARD/DAVE
STORM-FIRE STATION REP 278.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE EXPENS 01.42501.4401 493 00084
KOVICH/PATRICA
PAT K-TRAVEL EXPENSES 70.96 TRAVEL EXPENSE 01.41301.3310 493 00083
LAKE STATE REALTY SERVIC
TH 25/APPRAISALS 3,325.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 50.49201.3199 80029,80074 493 00085
MN CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
RICK-DUES RENEWAL 70.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 101.41301.4330 493 00087
MN~RKS & FIN OFFICERS
KAREN-MEMBERSHIP 30.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & suesc 101.41301.4330 493 00089
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGE
JOHN M-SEMINAR 150.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 602.49490.3320 493 00088
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 1,567.52 ELECTRIC 601.49440.3810 493 00129
SEWER 141.12 ELECTRIC 602.49490.3810 493 00130
STREET LIGHTS 635.53 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 493 00131
DEP REG 79.80 ELECTRIC 101.41990.3810 493 00132
DEP REG 934.45 ELECTRIC 101.45201.3810 493 00133
CIVIL DEFENSE 14.27 ELECTRIC 101.42501.3810 493 00134
SHOP/GARAGE 428.78 ELECTRIC 101.43127 .3810 493 00135
FIRE DEPT 212.52 ELECTRIC 101.42201.3810 493 00136
LI BRARY 518.04 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 493 00137
CITY HALL 860.64 ELECTRIC 101.41940.3810 493 00138
PARKING LOTS 106.66 ELECTRIC 101.43140.3810 493 00139
LI QUOR 1.045.19 ELECTRIC 609.49754.3810 493 00140
AN SHELTER 83.34 ELECTRIC 101.42701.3810 493 00141
6,627.86 *VENDOR TOTAL
NORTHWEST MINNESOTA CHAP
INSP/BI-MONTHLY 10.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 101.42401.3320 493 00091
.
._". ~,_.,---' ~---_._._-
;RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICEllO
6/01/98 11:12:43 Schedule of 8ills Gl540R-V05.20 PAGE 6
I. NAME
RIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
)'NEIll/JEFF
JEFF O-TRAVEL EXPENSES 252.23 TRAVEL EXPENSE 10 .41910.3310 493 00094
JEFF-PHONE REIMB 166.17 TELEPHONE 10 .41910.3210 493 00095
JEFF-INTERNET REIMB 50.80 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 o .41910.3199 493 00096
JEFF-SEMINAR 53.20 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 10 .41910.3320 493 00097
JEFF-OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.10 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 .41910.2099 493 00098
JEFF-COMM CENTER REIMB 14 .56 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 46 .49201.4399 493 00099
JEFF-SURVEY SITE REIMB 2.80 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 o .41910.3199 493 00100
563.86 *VENDOR TOTAL
ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC.
LOCATES 552.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 6 1.49440.3199 APRIL 493 00092
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
PATHWAY-OBSERVE & STAKE 271. 50 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 4 6.49201.3025 17 493 00093
PATCH/FRED
FRED-UNIFORM REIMB 123.60 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 1 1.42401.2111 493 00101
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
FREIGHT 134.17 FREIGHT 6 9.49750.3330 493 00102
LIQUOR 2,884.49 LIQUOR 09.49750.2510 493 00103
WINE 3,442.75 WINE 09.49750.2530 493 00104
. 6,461.41 *VENDOR TOTAL
PREUSSE/JAMES L
CITY HALL 460.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 01.41940.3110 CLEANING 493 00105
DEP REG 120.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 01.41990.3110 CLEANING 493 00106
PUBl1C WORKS 150.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 01.43110.3110 CLEANING 493 00107
130.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
LIQUOR 213.87 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 493 00108
WINE 516.45 WINE 609.49750.2530 493 00109
130.32 *VENDOR TOTAL
RON'S GOURMET ICE
LI QUOR- I CE 694.95 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 493 00110
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
PARKS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 63.14 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.45201.2211 493 00111
SEWER-VEH REPAIR PARTS 147.53 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.2211 493 00112
210.67 *VENDOR TOTAL
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA
AN SHELTER CONTRACT 2,259.40 PROF SRV - ANIMAL CTRL 101.42701.3120 MAY 493 00090
SIMPSON/CYNTHIA R
.HALL 50.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.42201.3110 CLEANING 493 00113
- ,--,_.- --'---- - .-.-- - .- -~--- -- -.- ._~ -,,- ,- .._~---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01/98 11: 12:43 Schedule of Bi ls GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 7
V. NAME
RIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
TOS TELECOM
PARKS 125.04 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 493 00142
C lTY HALL 1.634.31 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 493 00143
FIRE DEPT 54.20 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 493 00144
AN SHELTER 38.78 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 493 00145
WATER 31.06 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 493 00146
PUBLIC WORKS 430.39 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 493 00141
DEP REG 115.15 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 493 00148
PI'! INSP 10.20 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 493 00149
COMPUTER 10.20 TELEPHONE 101.41920.3210 493 00150
LIQUOR STORE 106.11 TELEPHONE 609.49754.3210 493 00151
LI BRARY 55.51 TELEPHONE 211.45501. 3210 493 00152
2.611.13 *VENOOR TOTAL
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 21,639.85 BEER 609.49150.2520 493 00114
MISC TAXABLE 358.20 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 493 00115
21.998.05 *VENOOR TOTAL
U SLINK
CITY HALL 28.91 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 493 00123
WATER 3.38 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 493 00124
PUBLIC WORKS 1.34 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 493 00125
.CTIONS 9.63 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 493 00126
REG 1. 31 TELEPHONE 101.41990.3210 493 00121
PW INSP 1.95 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 493 00128
52.58 *VENOOR TOTAL
VIKING COCA COLA
PUBLIC WORKS-TAX MISC 402.60 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 493 00111
OEP REG 82.01 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.43110.4399 POP 493 00116
CITY HALL 39.19 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 POP 493 00118
523.80 *VENOOR TOTAL
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
GEN OPERATING 13.50 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49154.2199 493 00119
MISC TAXABLE 686.64 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 493 00120
700.14 *VENOOR TOTAL
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
BOHANON FARMS 8.19 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 436.49201.4399 ELECTRICITY 493 00121
Y.M.C.A. OF MINNEAPOLIS
CONTRACT 625.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.45111.3199 MAY 493 00122
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/01/98 11:12:43
V. NAME
_ ....RIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
~
l ~
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
969,852.33
RECORDS PRINTED - 000152
Schedule of Bi ls
FUND & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 8
POI F/P 10 LINE
~~--'_.~.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
06/01/98 11: 12 :45 Schedule of B l1s GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
aECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION DISBURS MENTS
-....'--- -----------------------
101 GENERAL FUND 19,5 6.28
211 LIBRARY FUND 9 4.54
224 SHADE TREE FUND 5,8 6.35
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD 3.86
265 WATER ACCESS FUND 2.3 5.00
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ 606,4 9.55
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR 3.3 5.00
456 97-08C PATHWAYS IMPR 2 1.50
458 97-04C KLEIN FARMS 4(LION'S) 235,9 6.35
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER 14.56
601 WATER FUND 9,98 7.89
602 SEWER FUND 6,8 8.92
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND 77,16 7.53
651 RIVERSIDE CEMETERY 97 5.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 969.85 .33
a.CAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURSE ENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
892,68 .80
77,16 .53
TOTAL ALL BANKS
969,85 .33
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEW 0 AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
..... ................... ....... ... .....
..... "'...... ................... .....
... t , .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.
~.~'--'-' ,-- -
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/0l/98 14:03;13
Schedule of Bills
.
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... M5310 COMMENT... 5/31 MANUAL CKS
DATA.~JE.-ID
DATA COMMENT
.,.__"'V'''~ ~~.___~'_.~. ,~_~~._~.".'~~.""~_..~ -~' .w_....._w-~....~~.
M-0531199S-478 5/31 MANUAL CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq 8anner
I
.J
Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI
01 Y S 6
.
.
CITY OF MON ICELLC
GLOSOS-V05.20 CO ERPAGE
GL540R
lines CPI
066 10
-- - ,--~
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
06/04/98 14;03: 13
VE.NAME
'-""
JESCfiIPTI ON
88F ENTERPRISES/MASTERS
HRA., ESCRO REIM8
DINO'S DELI & GIFT SHOP
COMM CENTER-FOOD
FAIR/lvILLIAM
MAYOR-TRAVEL EXPENSE
G & KSERVICES
RICH C, JOHN M
RICH C, MATT
,JOHN S
ELMER, TOM 8
STREETS
JOHN L
SHGf-) RAGS
DEP REG '" RUGS
U Q STORE RUGS
ENV CHARCE, SALES TAX
I c.' C MTN'NcSOT,A ~Tr'
!..,..l.". I 1.1 I 1... I V ~ I i..
F NNUAL CONFERENCE
JEFF-ANNUAL MEETING
ROGER CARLSON-MEETING
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS
8RUCE-CONF REGISTRATION
KAREN-CONFERENCE
WANDS--CONFERENCE
METRO SEAMLESS GUTTERS
WWTP-GUTTERS
MN BUILDING OFFICIAL
GARY-BI-MONTHLY MEETING
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
WATERCRAFT TITLE
REGISTRATIONS
WATEf~CRAFT TITLE
REGISTRATIONS
WATERCRAFT TITLE
REGISTRATIONS
:."[)~OACT T'TI C
~ ........!\ I I .i._....
RA TI ONS
Schedule of 8ill
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
1,572.55 ESCROW DEPOSITS
51.82 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
52.32 TRAVEL EXPENSE
130.71
121.97
55.14
185.28
354.54
~71 00
.; I I. Uv
92.05
73.78
131 ~ 36
179.94
1,705,75
~.~ ~~
(..I.)V.I,lV
250.00
:40.00
540.00
130.00
270.00
1'71"1 nn
" I U. uu
570.00
pi NO & ACCOUNT
2 3.22011
4 1.49201.4399
1.41110.3310
UNIFORM RENTAL 5 2.49490.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL S 1.49440.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 1.43110.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 1.43115.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 1.43120.4170
UNIFORM RENTAL 1.45201.4170
MISe OPERATING SUPPLIES 1.43127.2199
REPAIR & MTC' BUILDINGS 1 1.41990.4010
REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 5 9.49754.4010
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 1 1,43120.4399
"'VENDOR TOTAL
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
"'VENDOR TOTAL
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
*VENDOR TOTAL
1 1. 4240 1. 3320
1 1.41301.3320
101.41110,3320
101.41301.3320
101.413C1.3320
101.41910.3320
852.00 PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 43 ,49201.3025
15.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
101.42401.3320
771.00 DNR PAYABLE 101 .20811
2,349.00 DNR PAYA8LE 101 ,20811
951. 00 DNR PAYABLE : 0 I .20811
1,133.00 DNR PAYABLE 101. 2CB 11
1,110.00 DNR rAYA8LE '0 011011
: u ! . '-U'J t I
2,763.00 DNR PA,YABLE 1 n1 ')(\011
I v I. ,,"VU I .
1/269.00 DNR PAYABLE 1 n .20811
IV
1,239,00 DNR PAYABLE 10,.20811
i1r585.00 "'VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
CLAIM INVOICE
PO# FIP ID LINE
478 00051
478 00010
478 00004
UNIFORMS 478 00083
UNIFORMS 478 00084
UNIFORMS II .,. c, Mno.
"'I"rU ,-/vuUo,j
UNIFORMS 4~0 00086
IV
UNIFORMS "'0 00087
~IV
UN I FORMS 470 00088
IV
UNIFORMS .70 00089
~IV
UNIFORMS 470 0OO0A
IV UUV.JV
UNIFORMS 478 00091
UNIFORMS 470 00092
IV
478 00002
478 00003
478 00006
478 00057
478 00059
478 00050
478 00058
478 00007
478 00008
478 00009
478 00052
478 00053
478 00051
478 00052
478 00079
,'; 70 ilnn 1)1"1
"t ! U VI)\;l.Iv
8Re PINANCIAL SySTEM
06/04/98 14:03:13
V. NAME
DESCRIPTION
MN RECREATION & PARK ASS
PARKS~OUES RENEWAL
MONTICELLo/crTY O~
PRIZE MONEY-WALK & ROLL
PRIZE MONEY REfEREES
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
CK 44361--..,.....VOID
CK 443S1"""Ho.VOID
::K 44351-....,YOID
CK 44351 VOID
CK 443S1."'-"~VOID
CK 4435 1-----VO I 0
CK H351 "'-YOID
CK 44351...VOID
CK 44351'-''''''~'VOID
CK 44361'---YOIO
CK 44351 ~-YOIO
C~~ 44351 "","-. -.va I 0
i'JA fER-YOlO
.,YOID
~ I LIGHTS-YOlO
PARKS, VOID
CIYIL DEFENSE-YOlO
SHOP/GAr(AGE'YOIO
FIRE DEPT.-YO I 0
LI8RARYYOIC
iX-YOID
PARKING LOTS-VOID
AN SHEL TER"YOID
INSP-CLOTHING REIM8-YOID
i'iATER
SEWER COLLECTIONS
STHEET LIGHTS
ri^OltC
';>";1\1\\..1
CIVIL DEFENSE
SHOf' /GARAGE
FtRE DEPT
~I8RARY
!'W
vi,
PARKING LOTS
AN SHELTER
'OWER OYNAM I CS, I NC
wWTn-NcnnocNc cTRlpc
,.,."'."''''''!..'"' 'J
Schedule of 8il, S
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-Y05.20 PACE
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
UNO & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INYOICE
PO# FIP 10 LINE
210.00
DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 01.45201.4330
478 00054
250.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41910.2199
50.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41910.2199
300.00 *YENOOR TOTAL
478 00081
478 00082
958.42CR ELECTRIC 5 1.49440.3810 po onn 11
[U <,JV I t
943.35CR ELECTRIC 502.49490.3810 po n ~I {', ~ 'f';
'U V\J\.IIt;..
5,S33.0SCR ELECTRIC 1.43160.3810 478 00013
188.42CR ELECTRIC i ,.45201.3810 478 00014
11.13CR ELECTRIC , 1.42501.3810 po 00015
IU
592.93CR ELECTRIC 1.43127.3810 A~O 00016
~ I U
220.14CR ELECTRIC 1.42201.3810 478 00017
559.91CR ELECTRIC 2 1.45501.3810 478 00018
117.49CR ELECTR I C 1.41940.3810 478 00019
18.75CR ELECTRIC 1.43140.3810 478 00020
83.83CR ELECTRIC 1.42701.3810 478 0002,
123.50CR CLOTHING SUPPLIES 1.42401. 211: po 000?2
I U
958.42CR ELECTRIC 5 1.49440.3810 478 00023
943.36CR ELECTRIC 5 2.49490.3810 4~Q 00024
IU
5,533,08CR EI CI'TOT!' 1 1.43150.3810 478 00025
~I,..."""'II\.I.'V
188.42CR ELECTRIC 1. 1.45201.3810 4' .~ /lfl('iI)C
I Iu vvv"v
11" 13CR ELECTRIC 101.42501.3810 478 00027
592.93CR ELECTRIC 101.43127.3810 478 ('o('HII)C
liVV," ...1
220.14CR ELECTRIC 101.42201.3810' 478 00029
559.91CR ELECTRIC 211.45501 ~38~O 478 0003e
717 .49CR ELECTRIC 101.41940.3810 478 nnn~l
'.H/U\J I
18.15CR ELECTRIC 101.43140.38,0 4H n I'll". ""'1
IV UVv.,;1,...
83.83CR ELECTRIC 10 I .42701.3810 478 00033
123.50CR CLOTHINC SUPPLIES 10 I .42401 .2111 478 00034
958.42 ELECTRIC SO .49440.3810 A70 nnn~~
"t!l.) V!JVV<J
943.35 E~ECTRIC 50 .49490.3810 po onr'~A
IU 1,,1 V V "I'
5,533.08 ELECTRIC 1 0 .43150.3810 po 00065
IV
188.42 ELECTRIC 111 .45201.3810 418 00056
IU
11 1 ~ ELECrr<IC 10 .42501.3810 470 00057
I I. hJ IV
592.93 ELECTRIC 111 .43i27.3810 A70 00058
IU ~[W
220.14 ELECTRIC 10 .42201.381C 478 00069
559.91 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 478 nnl17n
VVVfv
717.49 ELECTRIC 101.4194C.3810 478 onn74
Vv i :
18.75 ELECTRIC 101.43140.3810 478 00072
83.83 ELECTRIC 101.42701.3810 470 00073
I U
10, 174.5SCR ~YENOOR TOTAL
36.53 PROF SRY -- CONSTRUCTION 43 6.49201.3025 '70 nnn,11
-t!I.,I VVVc,lV
--. -..- ~_.. --.----. .--
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
05/04/98 14~03: '13
"iE.NAME
DESCRIPTION
RESURRECTION LUTl~ERAN C~
REIMB FEASIBILITY STUDY
REIM8 FEASIBILITY STUDY
RITZE TRUCKING
SHADE TREE'-TREE STORAGE
SERVICE SALES CORPORATIO
LIQUOR-'OP SUPPLIES
U S POSTMASTER
CITY NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
3RD CLASS MAILING FEE
WOLFSTELLER/RICHARO
RIC~-TRAVEL REIMB
RICK-PHONE REIM8
RICK...CC EXTENSION CORD
RICK...DESK CALENDAR
1.10, '.1'01 'N TV A'Ir1 TTI"\R..TR
"1.1., V VI I I VIJ.I. I v I \
LIQUOR~T08ACCO LICENSE
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
METHODIST-PERM RECORDING
METHODIST-TEMP RECORDING
RESURRECTION-PERM RECORD
RESURRECTION.-TEMP RECORD
WRIGHT COUNTY TREAS/AUDI
RESURRECTION-PERM FILING
RESUi<RECTION-TEMP FILING
METHODIST-PERM FILING
METHODIST-TEMP FILING
WRIGHT TITLE GUARANTEE C
HRA-HAWKINS PROP PURCH
.
Schedule of 8i 1 ,S
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
1,425.00
7,000.00
8,425.00
PROF SRV --. ENGINEERING F
ESCROW DEPOS ITS
"'VENDOR TOTAL
463.92
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
UNO & ACCOUNT
01.43110.3030
01.220 "
24.46102.4150
77.48 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 509.49754.2199
491.52 NEWSLETTER
85.00 POSTAGE
575.52 *VENDOR TOTAL
265.09 TRAVEL EXPENSE
7.60 TELEPHONE
7.44 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
4.46 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES
284.59 *VENDOR TOTAL
75.00 LICENSES & PERMITS
1 1.41301.3195
1n1.4130i ~3220
1.41301.3310
1.41301.3210
1.41110.4,199
1 1.41301.2099
6 9.49754.4370
19.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 1.41910.3199
19.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 1.41910.3199
19.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 459.49201.3199
19.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 4 9.49201.3199
78.00 "'VENDOR TOTAL
6.55 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 45 .49201.3199
5.55 MISe PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 459.49201.3199
5.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
6.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.41910.3199
26.60 *VENDOR TOTAL
56,368.17 LAND
_.___~__on_ __,_._.__
21 .46522.5101
CLAIM INVOICE
4/15/98--4/99
TIF 1-22
CITY OF MONTICELLO
8L540R--V05.20 PAGE
PO# F/P ID LINE
478 00055
478 00055
478 00005
478 00043
478 00049
478 00044
478 00045
478 00045
478 00047
478 00048
478 00074
'10 M~1,
'flU \.J\JV.J..J
~78 00036
178 00037
478 00038
478 00039
478 00040
478 00041
478 00042
478 C0001
-----'.-'.-' -----'--' ,-
8RC FINANCIAL SYS~EM
06/04/98 14;03;13
\I~.NAMC
. _ l, I....
DESCRIPTION
:~EPORT TOTALS;
.
.
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
747002.79
RECORDS PRINTED - 000088
Schedule of Bin
FI NO & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
PO~ FIP 10 LINE
8Re FINANCIAL SYSTE~
05/04/98 1~:03:15
.
Schedule of
<11_
I ! I~
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAP PAGE
GL540R
::UN D RECAP:
tUNC DESCRIPTION
DISSUR EMENTS
----_.-.._.-.--- .,--.-----_...._~_...._~
:01 GENERAL FUND
211 LISRARY FUND
2:3 HF~A FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUNC
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
459 98..01C RES CHURCH SS & WM
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
601 WATER FUND
502 SEWER FUND
16, 30.47
59.91 CR
58,040.82
463.92
888.63
52.30
1 00
I. W{..
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
8 6.45 CR
8,2.65 CR
2 3.84
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
74,0 2.79
BANK RECAP:
BAN:< NAME
DISBURSEMENTS
.......--..........
SENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
y? 11 .95
I.J,! I
28 .84
74tOO .79
TOTAL ALL BANKS
THE PRECEDING LIST OF SILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEW D AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
:)ATE ............
APPROVED 8Y
. -... . + +....................."..
.. +..................,..... ..+...
......, -...."........... -.. ..+ +..
.
.
.
.
COUNCn. INFO MATION ITEM
June 4 1998
T
. (R.W.)
The Coalition of Utility Cities representatives rece tly had another meeting with our lobbyists,
Tim Flaherty and Jim Asplund of the law firm of herty and Koebele, to discuss strategies for
dealing with the 1999 legislators concerning perso al property tax issues.
One of the items we discussed was setting a budg t for the fmancing of our lobbying activities
from now through the 1999 session, developing st ategies on how we should approach our
lobbying efforts, and I thought it would be a very ood idea if Mr. Flaherty and Mr. Asplund
could briefly meet with the Council as a whole to pdate you on what's happened and what to
expect in regard to future deregulation of the elec ic industry and the potential for loss of
personal property tax for host communities like au selves. Since a meeting with our lobbyists
would likely take an hour or less, I suggested that his would be a good topic to discuss at our
next Council workshop at 5:30, June 22. I have te tatively set this time and confirmed this date
with Tim and Jim; and if the Council would prefer meeting with our lobbyists at a different time,
please let me know as soon as possible, and we ca arrange a different date. If no one has a
problem, this will be our topic of discussion for 0 next workshop session.
COALlTIO.UPD: 6/4198