City Council Agenda Packet 03-09-1998
.
.
.
AGEN A
REGULAR MEETING - MO CELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, March 9,1998 - 7 p.m.
Mayor: Bill Fair
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stum f, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2.
A.
Approval of minutes of the speci. I meeting held February 23, 1998.
B. Approval of minutes of the re ar meeting held February 23,1998.
C. Approval of minutes of the sped I meeting held March 2,1998.
3. Consideration of adding items to the a enda.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
5.
Consent agenda.
A. Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit allowing a
commercial planned unit develo ment. Location: Lot 1, Block 1,
Monticello Mall. Applicant, Ba Fluth.
B. Consideration of a preliminary lat and final plat request for a
residential subdivision to be kn wn as Eastwood Knoll Second
Addition. Consideration of rezo ing request to rezone from R-PUD to
R-1. Location: Outlot A, Lots 1 2, and 3, Block 3, Meadow Oak
Estates; and Outlot C, Eastwoo Knoll. Applicant, City of Monticello.
C. Consideration of approving fina plat and development agreement
governing River Mi1l3rd Additi n.
D. Consideration of a resolution ac epting a petition and authorizing
preparation of plans and specifi ations for the Kjellberg West sanitary
sewer extension.
E. Consideration of approving cha ge order #11 for Project 93-14C,
Wastewater Treatment Plant E pansion.
F.
Consideration of a request for a conditional use permit within the R-2
zoning district to allow a churc facility and a variance from the front
yard setback. Applicant, St. Pe er's Lutheran Church.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
March 9, 1998
. Page 2
G. Consideration of a conditional u e permit allowing a residential
planned unit development in an R-PUD zone. Location: Outlot D,
Klein Farms. Applicant, E & K evelopment.
6. Consideration of items removed from t, e consent agenda for discussion.
7. Consideration of a comprehensive pI amendment for the south and west
growth areas adjacent to the city of M nticello. Applicant, Monticello
Planning Commission.
8. Consideration of bills for the first half f March, 1998.
9. Adjournment.
.
.
.
MINUT S
SPECIAL MEETING. MONT CELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, February 23 1998. 5:30 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Brian Stumpf, oger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
Members Absent: Clint Herbst
A special meeting of the City Council was he d for the purpose of discussing
annexation issues in a closed session and dis ussing general items as brought
forward by Council members. The following terns were discussed.
1. The meeting was closed to the public t discuss with City Attorney Dennis
Dalen a potential joint annexation agr ement with Monticello Township.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STU PF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO ACCEPT THE JOINT ANN XATION AGREEMENT AS MODIFIED
BY THE TOWNSHIP. Motion carried u animously.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN D SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO
. REOPEN THE COUNCIL MEETING. Motion c rried unanimously.
2. City Engineer Bret Weiss presented i ormation regarding Monticello area
transportation improvements.
There being no further items to discuss, the eeting was adjourned.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
.
2-1t
.
.
.
MINU ES
REGULAR MEETING - MO ICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, Febru 23,1998.7 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Brian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
Members Absent: Clint Herbst
Mayor Bill Fair announced that the City Co cil met in a closed session at 5:30 to
discuss annexation issues with the City Att rney, after which the meeting was
reopened and the City Engineer presented i fonnation on area transportation
improvements.
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller also not d that the audio equipment was not
working; therefore, the meeting could not be recorded.
2.
A
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE THI LEN AND SECONDED BY ROGER
CARLSON TO APPROVE THE MINUTE OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD
FEBRUARY 9, 1998, AS WRITTEN. Mot on carried unanimously with Clint
Herbst absent.
3.
A. Update on small group discussi n regarding community center _ no
action taken.
4.
None.
5. Consent a2'enda.
Councilmember Bruce Thielen request d that item 5D be removed from the
consent agenda for discussion.
A. n li n
and Joyner Lanes. Recommen, ation: Adopt a resolution approving
the Lions Club application for ga bling license renewal at Joyner
Lanes and Hawk's Sports Bar. E RESOLUTION 98-5.
Page 1
2..8
.
D.
E.
.
F.
G.
Council Minutes - 2/23/98
B.
r i inE mi D n
Partnership ofWri~ht County. Recommendation: Approve
continued membership in the conomic Development Partnership of
Wright County at a cost of$l, 04.50 as invoiced with the Chamber of
Commerce responsible for the 500 balance of the membership dues.
C.
n I i il' li i D n r n
renewals. Recommendation: Formally indicate that the City of
Monticello does not waive the onetary limits on tort liability
established by Minn
H. li li li i n-- ri
Countv Ducks Unlimited. Rec mmendation: Adopt a resolution
approving the gambling license pplication for the Wright County
Ducks Unlimited. SEE RESOL TION 98-6.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CAR SON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO APPROVE ITEMS 5A, 5B, 5 , 5E, 5F, 5G, AND 5H OF THE CONSENT
AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED. Motion arried unanimously with Clint Herbst
absent.
.
Page 2
~f;
.
.
.
7.
6.
5D.
Council Minutes - 2/23/98
ron
Councilmember Bruce Thielen equested information on how the new
position would fit into the curre, t organizational structure.
City Administrator Rick Wolfst ller reported that the responsibilities
of the Development Services Te hnician had expanded, and staff felt it
was appropriate to retitle the p sition to Community Development
Administrative Assistant. AIth ugh many of the same duties would
remain with the Administrative Assistant, this position would also be
responsible for city participatio in special projects and community
events and would be more heav' y involved in the Parks Commission.
Therefore, some of the current ST duties would be assigned to a new
position entitled Community De elopment Secretary.
Councilmember Bruce Thielen s ggested that the City form a
personnel committee to address personnel and organizational
structure issues.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION AS MADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND
SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSO TO AUTHORIZE THE CREATION OF
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPME T ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
POSITION AS PROPOSED. Votin in favor: Bruce Thielen, Roger
Carlson, Bill Fair. Opposed: B . an Stumpf. Absent: Clint Herbst.
Motion carried.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUC THIELEN TO ESTABLISH A
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE TO P OVIDE INPUT ON PERFORMANCE
APPRAISALS, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND OTHER ITEMS
DEEMED NECESSARY OR APPR PRIATE BY STAFF. Motion died for
lack of a second.
No other action was taken at this time.
I n fill
n
r.
Mr. AI Deruyter updated the Council 0 the status of the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency and County oard actions to date regarding the
proposed expansion of the Superior La dfill and requested that Council
consider voicing their opposition to the Wright County Commissioners.
Page 3
tf,
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 2/23/98
Public Works Director John Simola al 0 noted his concern regarding the size
of the proposed expansion and recom ended that the Council ask the County
Commissioners to oppose such a large expansion.
After discussion, it was the consensus of the Council to direct staff to draft a
letter specifying the City's concerns re arding the landfill expansion for
review at the special meeting schedul d for Monday, March 2, at 7 p.m.
8.
Mr. Chuck Rickert ofWSB & Associat s briefly reviewed the School
Boulevard Traffic Study, which includ d School Boulevard from Highway 25
to County Road 118. The purpose of t e study was to determine the
operational characteristics of the road ay, including what recommendations
and/or improvements were required to safely and efficiently accommodate
vehicular and pedestrian traffic on Sc 001 Boulevard. The study included
review of existing conditions, develop ent offuture year traffic projections,
and roadway and traffic control analy es.
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller a ded that the Police Commission
reviewed the traffic study and recomm nded that it be forwarded to the
Council for consideration. He noted t t, although there was still mixed
opinion as to the conclusions presente in the report regarding stop signs
along School Boulevard, the Police Co mission did support the
recommendations as noted with the derstanding that traffic patterns
would be reviewed in five years to see 'fthe new high school traffic
warranted any other improvements.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS ADE BY BRUCE THIELEN AND
SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO A CEPT THE SCHOOL BOULEVARD
TRAFFIC STUDY AND RECOMMENDAT ONS AS FOLLOWS:
1. REVISE THE INTERSECTION T FIC CONTROL AT OAKWOOD DRIVE
TO STOP OAKWOOD DRIVE, ALL WING SCHOOL BOULEVARD TO BE
THE THROUGH STREET.
2, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL POLICE NFORCEMENT DURING SCHOOL
START AND END TIMES TO HEL REDUCE THE SPEED DURING THESE
TIMES.
3.
RAISE THE PEDESTRIAN CROSS NG SIGN AT THE MID-BLOCK
CROSSWALK TO MEET THE 7-FT MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT.
ADD AN ADDITIONAL CROSSW A K AT A MID-BLOCK LOCATION
BETWEEN EIDER LANE AND PE ICAN LANE IF NEEDED.
4,
Page 4
zh
.
.
.
Council Minutes - 2/23/98
5.
ADD "STOP AHEAD" SIGNS APP OACHING COUNTY ROAD 118.
6. REVIEW THE INTERSECTION 0 ERATION IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
TO DETERMINE IF ADDITION LANES MAY BE NEEDED AT THE
INTERSECTION OF OAKWOOD RIVE AND FALLON AVENUE.
MOTION ALSO INCLUDED DIRECTING STAFF TO FORWARD A COPY OF THE
STUDY TO THE COUNTY TRANSPORT TION COMMITTEE WITH THE
REQUEST THAT THEY REVIEW THE T FIC COUNTS ON COUNTY ROAD 117
FOR POSSIBLE CHANGING OF STOP S GNS AT COUNTY ROAD 117 AND
SCHOOL BOULEVARD. Voting in favo : Bruce Thielen, Roger Carlson, Bill
Fair. Absent: Clint Herbst. Opposed: Brian Stumpf. It was
Councilmember Stumpfs view that th stop signs at County Road 117 and
School Boulevard should be reviewed t the time the Oakwood Drive cul-de-
sac is completed. Motion carried.
9.
Public Works Director John Simola re orted that Superior Services has
requested that the curbside recycling ontract be renewed for two years
rather than three years, which would esult in the contract expiring at the
same time as the garbage hauling con ract with Superior Services. If the
two-year contract is approved, the con ract would increase 5% for both
individual and apartment pickup.
Simola also noted that Superior was c ncerned about the scanners the
recyclers must use to account for recy ing credits and would prefer to use a
route sheet similar to that used for ga bage pickup. Staff has worked with
Superior Services to establish a route heet with bar codes that could be
scanned in the office rather than with hand~held scanners in the field. He
reported that if the new in-office scan, 'ng system could not be accomplished
by June 1, 1998, Superior Services wo ld raise their price for individual
homes to $2 per month, which would i crease the contract by $8,568 per
year.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS E BY BRIAN STUMPF AND
SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO PROVE A NEW TWO-YEAR CONTRACT
WITH SUPERIOR SERVICES BASED UP N A 5% INCREASE ON BOTH
APARTMENTS AND SINGLE FAMILY, D AN INCREASE IN SINGLE FAMILY
TO $2 PER MONTH IF IN-OFFICE SC NING IS NOT COMPLETED BY JUNE 1,
1998. Motion carried unanimously wit Clint Herbst absent.
Page
2~
Council Minutes - 2/23/98
. 10.
Public Works Director John Simola re orted that the current irrigation
system at the biosolids site (Bohanon f: rm) would need to be upgraded in the
near future, which was estimated to co t $35,000. In addition, the well
upgrade would cost an additional $6,0 0 to $8,000. The current renter,
Ewing Farms, proposed to upgrade the irrigation system to a state-of-the-art
irrigation unit valued at $53,169 and i crease the rent paid from $100 per
acre to $140 per acre for a total of eigh years, during which time the City
would receive approximately $99,000 i rent and at the end of the lease
would own the irrigation equipment.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS E BY BILL FAIR AND SECONDED
BY ROGER CARLSON TO ENTER INTO 8-YEAR LEASE WITH EWING
FARMS, UPGRADE THE IRRIGATION S STEM, INCREASE THE RENT TO $140
PER ACRE, AND UPGRADE THE WELL. Motion carried unanimously with
Clint Herbst absent.
11.
.
Economic Development Director Ollie oropchak reported that the EDA
approved the year-end reports and bu get at their annual meeting on
February 17, and all Greater Monticel 0 Enterprise Fund (GMEF) loan
paybacks are current. She also noted hat the EDA met their objective of
becoming self-supporting in 1997 and 998.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER CAR SON AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO ACCEPT THE EDA BALAN E SHEET; STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN F ND BALANCE; 1998 CASH FLOW
PROJECTIONS; AND ANNUAL ACTIVI REPORT AS PRESENTED. Motion
carried unanimously with Clint Herbs absent.
12.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STU PF AND SECONDED BY ROGER
CARLSON TO APPROVE THE BILLS FO THE LAST HALF OF FEBRUARY 1998
AS PRESENTED. Motion carried una mously with Clint Herbst absent.
D SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
animously with Clint Herbst absent.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF
ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion carried
.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
Page
z-b
.
.
.
MINU ES
SPECIAL MEETING - MON ICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, March ,1998 ~ 7 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, rian Stumpf, Roger Carlson, Bruce
Thielen
Members Absent: None
2.
f
Assistant Administrator Jeff O'Neill ported that the small group charged
with establishing a common concept Ii r design and financing of the
community and training center agree on many points but did not come to an
agreement on the financing program. Following were the areas agreed upon
by the small group:
1. The basic design and mix of us s as recommended by the task force.
2.
The leisure pool and light fitne s areas are important ingredients to a
successful community center.
3. Downtown redevelopment and he comprehensive plan are well
supported by the proposed loca ion.
4. Other funding sources such as r quor store revenue and available TIF
dollars should be used to defra the tax impact. The concept of
establishing a sales tax should e shelved.
5. Reductions in the amount of$5 0,000 could be accomplished without
negatively affecting the design.
6. The latest finance plan alterna 'ves included estimated operation
expenses not covered by operati n revenue.
Two options were proposed by the sm I group for Council discussion. The
first option proposed building the core facility using lease revenue bonds and
allowing residents to vote on construe ion of a water park using general
obligation bonds. The second option as to build the core facility and the
water park using lease revenue bonds In lieu of sales tax, both options
proposed the use of tax increment fina clng and liquor store revenue.
Page
z.o
.
Special Council Minutes. 3/2/98
Assistant Administrator O'Neill repo ed that the City Administrator
recommended that because the water park would be vital to development of
an active community center and woul add a small percent to the cost of the
project when considering operation co tlexpense, from a business and
community development standpoint, he best option would be to build the
entire project under the lease revenu option. However, it was pointed out
that Council may wish to conduct a v te on a portion of the project for
legimate public policy reasons.
Rusty Fifield of Ehlers & Associates r viewed the proposed financing options,
which included building the core facil ty and voting now on the water park,
with a total project cost of $9,379,239; building the core facility and delaying
the vote on the water park, with a tot I project cost of $6,985,868; and
building the core facility including th water park, with a total project cost of
$9,379,239. Mr. Fifield also noted th t the information presented in the
Monticello Times was incorrect in tha the table included the projected tax
impact of the wastewater treatment p ant and the operations costs of the
community center rather than just th impact of the community center.
.
The Council then accepted comments nd questions from the public.
AFTER DISCUSSION, A MOTION WAS E BY CLINT HERBST AND
SECONDED BY BRIAN STUMPF TO PU THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY CENTER
PROJECT TO A REFERENDUM UNDER GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS.
Voting in favor: Clint Herbst, Brian tumpf. Opposed: Bill Fair, Roger
Carlson, Bruce Thielen. Motion faile
A MOTION WAS MADE BY ROGER C SON AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO REQUEST HRA FUNDIN USING LEASE REVENUE BONDS TO
BUILD THE CORE FACILITY AND THE ATER PARK, AND INCLUDE THE USE
OF LIQUOR STORE REVENUE AND T INCREMENT FINANCING AS
DESCRIBED IN THE FINANCE WORKS EET UNDER ALTERNATIVE #2.
COUNCILMEMBER BRUCE THIELEN OVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO
LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF LIQUOR STO E REVENUE USED FOR COMMUNITY
CENTER FINANCING TO $200,000 AND ADJUST THE LEASE REVENUE BOND
ACCORDINGLY. AMENDMENT WAS S CONDED BY ROGER CARLSON. Voting
in favor of the amendment: Bill Fair, oger Carlson, Bruce Thielen.
Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf Motion for amendment carried.
.
Voting in favor of amended motion: B 11 Fair, Roger Carlson, Bruce Thielen.
Opposed: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf Motion carried.
Page
zu
.
.
.
3.
Special Council Minutes - 3/2/98
Mayor Fair requested that Council c nsider approving a letter to the Wright
County Board of Commissioners opp sing the massive expansion of the
Superior Landfill.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE TH ELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO SUPPORT THE LETTER A DRAFTED AND DIRECT STAFF TO
SEND THE LETTER TO THE WRIGHT OUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS.
Mr. Wayne Yonak, former owner oft e landfill, noted his concern regarding
the City's letter opposing the expansi n. It was his view that many questions
remained unanswered and that addi onal meetings between the County and
the landfill owners should be held to ddress those questions and concerns.
Motion carried unanimously.
4.
'n
City Attorney Dennis Dalen reviewed the proposed City/rownship joint
resolution regarding annexation and oted that any motion made by Council
should be subject to review of exhibits by the City Attorney and City Planner
since they were not available at this t me.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HER ST AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO APPROVE THE ANNEXA ION AGREEMENT CONTINGENT UPON
EXHIBITS BEING REVIEWED BY THE ITY ATTORNEY AND CITY PLANNER.
Motion carried unanimously. SEE R SOLUTION 98-7.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN STUMPF D SECONDED BY ROGER CARLSON TO
ADJOURN THE MEETING.
Karen Doty
Office Manager
Page 3
~u
.
.
.
5A.
Council Agenda - 3/9/98
The Planning Commission reviewed th application and staff report and
recommended approval of the conditio al use request, which included a
revised site plan, subject to the conditi ns as noted. Please note that a
revised site plan was prepared that mi imizes parking loss while achieving
landscaping goals of the DA T and the lanning Commission. The proposal
submitted also enhanced the cornices s requested by the DAT on the front
corners but did not provide enhanced c mice treatment on the back side as
desired by the DAT.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the Planning C mmission recommendation, which is
to approve the conditional use p rmit request under the modified site
plan. Cub Foods supports the odified plan and associated conditions.
2.
Motion to deny the conditionalse permit.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planning Commission agenda supple ent; Revised site plan (3/5/98); Refer
to meeting minutes for more informati n.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda ~ 3/05/98
8.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Barry Fluth, owner of the Monticello Mall, h s submitted a request for approval of a
Conditional Use Permit allowing a Planned Uni Development on the mall site. The PUD
would facilitate the demolition of the Mall, and re lacement with a Cub Foods grocery store
and 8,900 square feet of leased retail space be een the Cub Foods and K-Mart buildings.
The PUD is necessary to accommodate a p oject with zero lot line development - a
property line exists between the K-Mart parcel and the Mall/Cub Foods site.
The project consists of the demolition of the xisting Mall, some reconstruction of the
parking lot surface and overlay of the remaindel , a new loading dock facility on the south
side of the building, a seasonal garden center in the parking lot, and the removal of the
landscaped island which generally separates th K-Mart parking area from the Mall parking
area. Cub Foods has expressed a concern wi h the total supply of parking, both on the
same parcel as their building, and near the front ntrance. The subject site and the K-Mart
site are covered by an agreement for shared p rking and access.
The design of the site provides for truck circul tion to a one half of the dock area which
requires access to the property from 7th Street a Walnut, circle around to the rear (south)
side of the building, then exit around K-Mart ba k to 7th Street. The rest of the dock area
would be accessed in the opposite direction. n the east side of the building, the trucks
would be driving between rows of parking, mo t likely used by store employees.
One of the concerns of staff is the amountf unbroken paving area surrounding the
project, and the objectives of the revitaliza ion plan for a more pedestrian-friendly
environment. While most grocery custome s are likely to utilize automobiles, the
landscaping in the parking area is important for th aesthetic and environmental reasons.
It is suggested that row of parking in this area be redesigned to accommodate a significant
landscaping element. This is particularly import nt on this side of the property where most
of the local views will be from Highway 25.
Also of high visibility is the truck dock area on th south side of the building. Working with
staff, the plans have been drawn to illustrate a bl ck screen wall on top of the retaining wall
adjacent to the east side of the dock. We ould further recommend a landscaping
treatment of the area behind the curb adjace t to the 1-94 ramp. Although this area is
narrow, a small planting of low shrubs would elp to screen the view of the dock area,
while retaining view of the bulk of the building and the store's south wall signage. The
proper plant material selection could also help 0 avoid erosion in this area.
8
SA- J
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda - 3/05/98
At staff's suggestion, the plans have been dra n to provide a more heavily landscaped
entrance into the project from Walnut Street. Th s entrance is intended to reflect the City's
interest in developing Walnut as its principal do ntown street. Since the Cub Foods store
will form the south terminus of this street, it is i portant to pay attention to how the store
fits into that scheme. The Design Advisory Tea has made a series of recommendations
to accomplish this objective. Many of these ave already been incorporated into the
design. Since the project is the direct recipi nt of City financial assistance, the CCD
language relating to OAT recommendations akes those recommendations binding,
subject to City Council reversal. The OAT reco mendations are summarized as follows:
· The main drive aisle from Walnut Stree should be lined with landscaped islands,
with no parking on the east side as sho n.
· Ornamental light poles line the main e trance, and match those to be used on
Walnut Street.
· Add a bench to the front of the building to accommodate Heartland Express riders.
· Landscaping should reinforce the Cub S ore as an integral "focal point" at the end
of the Walnut Street vista.
.
The building should be complemented wi a cornice detail, similar to the one used
on the Edina store viewed by the OAT embers.
The plans reflect the ornamental lighting, and xtend that lighting along the front of the
building as well. The parking lot lights will be of more standard height, but as designed,
should not interfere with the effect of the orname tal street lighting. The building has also
been modified from its original form to include a ised panel at the northeast comer. This
comer would be the terminus of the Walnut Stre t view. With the added cornice, the effect
of this view would be enhanced in keeping wit the goals of the Revitalization Plan.
On the main entrance area which is recomme ded for a broader island with no parking,
a reflection of the plant materials opposite the riveway, such as the Black Hills Spruce,
would help to frame the intended view. The rem inder of the landscape plan provides for
landscaping in the islands adjacent to the d iveway which parallels 7th Street. The
landscaping in this area would provide slightly ore than the replacement requirements
for the island which is being removed. Th additional landscaping on the east as
suggested above would help this project com closer to the intent of both the zoning
ordinance and the Revitalization Plan.
9
5*11- 2-
.
.
.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Planning Commission Agenda, 3/05/98
1. Motion to approve the Conditional Use ermit for a PUO to allow the Cub Foods
store and additional retail to be constr cted with a zero lot line, subject to the
conditions listed in Exhibit 0, based up n a finding that as amended, the project
would substantially comply with the inte t of the City's Comprehensive Plan and
Downtown Revitalization Plan.
2. Motion to deny the Conditional Use Per it, based upon a finding that the project
does not meet the requirements of the ity's plans and ordinances.
3. Motion to table action on the Conditi nal Use Permit, subject to additional
information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional U Permit PUD with the conditions outlined
in this report. Although there can be little rgument that the store is only a small
modification of franchise architecture, and would e wholly inappropriate in the heart of the
City's downtown, its location at the edge of he downtown, adjacent to the freeway,
modifies the concern over architecture somewhat The Revitalization Plan accommodates
differences such as these in its breakdown of t e area by block. As a result, we believe
that the Cub Foods store would fit reasonably ell in this location.
With regard to parking supply, it should be oted that the site is relatively close to
Ordinance requirements for off-street parking for retail establishments. However, grocery
stores commonly attempt to develop more arking than the Ordinance minimums.
Therefore, Cub is concerned about the amount 0 parking available, particularly near their
main entrance. We would note that while this is n issue, the aesthetic values of the site,
and the objectives of the Revitalization Plan sho Id not be abandoned merely to develop
more parking. The K-Mart side of the parking a ea is currently underutilized, and should
provide adequate overflow during peak times. As a result, we strongly encourage the
developer and the City to maximize the attracti eness of the project.
O. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site and Landscaping Plan
Exhibit B - Grading Plan
Exhibit C - Building Elevations
Exhibit D - Recommended Conditions of Appro al
10
011- 3
~. Ilbl~ ~ a id!:!1 ml'
I . = ~ II', II I
t ~ 11; I I I I I I I I I I !' 1I,IIil I '.
~! <J"<(]'<1~~(]""~ . J !
- .
I
'OTl3~ D~
"T1V'V'J 011 8LLNO~ ~ ;;~:J ~
NOll Y ^ 3ld 039QdOl,!d ~
.
I .
.1 it
1'111,
"iI'"
I III
.
II I
I I l, I I I
t I I'.
. i.11 "
I , I' I :, f
. ,I I '1\
i i ,( I, I
t I i Ii! ![i
I 'i If} I, f
.' f:!. .! I!! I'
\ I I' , .'J .
J f I I In.!
I 1 I '. I" I ',I I"
I I , II I Iii .
Ii. i' j Ilq!!
I:: II, Ii IIf 111:'
: II' 'i 'II if
i · Ii I II,' III Ir It
I I .1 ' ,I , \ I'
J ; :r' ! i Ill," I, III !
! I' 'I .. r"
I ' III I J ! 1\ ~~;
j j jl ; \ II I~ Ii illl
, I J I ,'II
J I r i' , i Ii II! [. !i
I ~ ~ :1 : : ~,l :! : : I ;l
,lpd~3~d
M _ .. ), .. ... .. ~ ... J. ".
'\
.
"; .'
.t_! . (,1
llP'i'jJPt
H~n:.d~n
:Jl.lIH!I!!1
., ,
I~H}~qi~~
liifl!UHI
.1.
" I
J" II
II .
!: I~
E I
5,
It,
m I
J
:J
[Z].. ~. to
ts=f ~ ,I ;i
S'c: ..,
-( "'-11
1i(J/1i
.)./. "'.Is
11
11
..1'
. .
u.
~
\ I ~
~~~
~
I
\
\
I
i\
I \
\
.'If
i'w.
.\
}
.r1
i~!
I-
W
W
0:::
l-
V)
J:
I-
Z
W
>
W
Vl
I,:" i "I: 'III!':
II'!: i II i iii' i III i
I' I I I' I : " ,I! I II : :
i: I i III1I11 i II: II:
1-"
0::: vi
<(0
:::<-
1"1
",:g
" ,:;'! I : I :i III I I II
,," iii, IIIIIII i I,I
Ii I : !I III II II I II I11I
Iii III i I i 1! i 1I11II111
I ~ i i I> I ; : i i ! 111 !
i i Iii,:!'! i i II,1 i II
I' i I'I'
\l! I : ~ i I I ! ! l 1111 ! ! ~
, i ~ I t I ! I I ! ! ! ! ! I : I I !: :' I
I 1 I I I I I I I I I I ~ ! I
1111I11111111 i I
: II111I111111111 i i II i IIII
v-
a>
>-
<l:
3:
I
o
J:
w
';:i
I-
Vl
0:::
W
I-
Z
~~" LL
\.1
u___ 1'1o..~I'~
,-_: :_~:<-,-~~~~~; = -.:;,;:~'" (",,~':.; (NO~,:;:~~.S~~"\~~,: ,:~~~
--.--" - ~i1f-'J$. t.;""OIf! ''<ll l.pII" j..Y'f1U] r'I')'I;,fo..lj
. "'I] At; I.~~.J:J pt;>~:;" (: l~~~I'>,~...ID~) iJ~1J ~t~i.~~~';;
11'9'0 ^~~ j;f(,.'~/( -'I~ ~"" !,rOIl! Illl} 111111 J.jlll.~ .(lJiJ,ilL./ I
Ii'/~~ ;I;IiHt'~} ~"IJ. "l~-j~ ,1.1
l.l-J;t~ "1"'''1''''''' ...Il......,.... 1/
(1(1T ~I'f'\~ "l''''''''-L ....'..~r..... '. ~",.
S/l~t-,;;'(Ht') r/.t!7..,,.,.rt' .')
oft!! ~""""'\Ii -..I~"'Ijj' ~
""......At' '''roa ,r
'"Ui-:s9iBi"o;,-;; 'V. iO~"i "'lIi{or
NVld !)NIOV~!) ~ ~tlNIViIl3~d
NOJYN
:~OJ
\' lOS31'NIi' 'OT1DIH'cH,
3tJ01S 500001 On:)
'1 ~' I, ,;Iol:'l~ '1~1
.
s ~
~
~
~
~
I-
I.>J
~
eo::.
<::I
..,'~
..!:'"
ili:s
. 0-
:::l
V'l "'1"
O'l
>-
<
~
I- :c
I.LI l.J
I.LI
CI:: =t% :l s:
I- <.. ~ :;
I/) ~:;: IJ.I
ct_ ~ I-
:c ", <
l- I-
Z V'l
IJ.I ~
> I.>J
I.LI l-
I/) l;;
.
\lllll 11111 11111 II ~
~ttttttt11tHtH1 mtttttttHtt-H
~
1- .
~~~
<sd
1~'!'
:.::,,1:
j
!
-ftj I
~
, --J'
\
"
'j' \
:i I.f) \
-~
.. 11;11' El ..,
! l\ 11:I1
fIt: ~ ''1'1
Jji II
1 ~11! 1111111111 !' ,II;'
~<fJ~<O<lI<fJ<fJ<fJ<l.l<l.l
.
rnl
~"I'I
I : It i:
I :'
I :
:~
1:.
l
:~:
i
.
.
....1.083 ri 'OTl3~ D~
.T1V~ 011 8L1NOV'l ~
NOI.l...." 3H C3SClcICllkI
~ ;
-~--
-- ~.~ -
I -~
12
.----- I
I--
-'-;-
i
- -.- 1_
I
- -
- ~_.- ,
I
I
:
I
-- --- i..
I
I
~
II;'
- --
5~
I
i ~
~
~
,
I
, f f
l-- ~'-
~j --.
! __. "r__
.
- ---..
.. .-.....
- ---
- ---
_.~-,- -.
H -
~
~
.:
.
I, I I
"'~ C\\ 1I
~S (L ~
5A-'-'(P
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda ~ 3/05/98
Recommended Conditions of Approval
Cub Foods/Barry Fluth Conditional Use Pe it PUD
1. Revised Landscaping Plan reflecting the following changes:
a. Additional landscaped island alo g the parking area edge, east of the
building and adjacent to the liCK" ot.
b. Additional landscaping along the outh boundary screening the dock area
from view of the freeway ramp. ow shrubs should be considered which
retain the view of the building itse .
c. Amendment to the plan reflecting a mirroring of materials in the expanded
island along the main entrance dri eway as suggested by the OAT.
2. Incorporation of the OAT recommend tions as listed in the OAT minutes of
February 12, and summarized in this rep rt.
Exhibit 0... Recomme' ded Conditions of Approval
5h
MAR-06-98 FRI 11:18
.=..=
~{fT
,
.
.
I
.
I
.
.
.
:
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
.
r- "..
. ".
, ..
: '-
1........_.,
.
.
I
.
,
~...._ l-
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
,
I
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
r..-..~
I
...oJ
itA
CD
AMCON CORP
""D '"
,~
56 CARS- \
C)
I-.._.._-~.._.._-.....
~ -................-..... -.-
-
I
-L
i
---r
-r@
\ ~ I
I
@
FAX NO. 6128900064
P,02
_A
=--='.1
2lIl .. ...... u
aw-.- ~.
_ "2-_"'7 j
,.. '12-81-\1:&' .
........ '
~
EXHIBIT D1
(\i ui
(CO',+-
1-0.-
KFC
LOT
PYLe\.
~
CK
LOT
39 CARS
/'"
/
~
NOTES:
1. ADO LOW SHRUBS PER CI1Y RECO~MENDAT10NS
2. EXPAND LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT SOUTHEAST PA KING AREA.
.' ADD 3 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS EAST OF BUILDING
. FLIP ISLAND SO THE PARKING 1$ ACCESSED F OM THF KF'C LOT
BY' I HE KFC OWNER
5. ADO BUS STOP BENCH
6, ADD CORNICE @ THE CUB
_ IJ:' AP~l::!OVE.O
~AIN ENTRY ($IMILA TO THE EDINA cue STORE)
SA- -1r'
~
&-
~-
&-
8._
&-
~-
~- ,
&-
J::._
A_
C'"'_~'
........ ............
_~..._~_IlI".
~..:I~-C~~
......~.~....IIIIt...'tI;IIt
~~~--
~a3IISII:""
,
...J
...J
<1:
~
2 g
~ ...J
o W ~
~ Q
~
fa ~
~ 0
~ ~ 0'
::E
CERTIfiCATION
,.c"'~-"'TI'wf.~
.....,...0"4!IIIo~ .............,
~rc:::lIII~- .
~~~~~~
--c.....
_.,
....
, ~rr,.':::;.o.l
tJiTt
3/5/98
D1
~~1lO.
.
.
.
8.
Staff'report on this item was presented by Seve Grittman. Steve Grittman reviewed a
new site plan made available by Dale Sonni hisen of Amcon, developer for Cub Foods.
The site plan addressed conditions identifie by both the Design Advisory Team (DAT)
and staff:
1. Alignment and site design elements ncluding ornamental light poles and
landscaping to coordinate with and xtend future Walnut Street improvements.
And elimination of parking stalls ba king into the lane of traffic on the Walnut
Street entrance by ''flipping'' the cu b island to the west and parking to the east
onto the KFC lot. Inclusion oflight poles and landscaping into the "flipped" curb
island area to mirror image the imp. ovements to the west.
2. Addition of a bench in front of the ub Store.
3. Inclusion of additional curb islands nto the parking area just east of the Cub Foods
Store.
4. Inclusion of a cornice detail extend' ng along the top of raised parapet at the front
entry area, and at the southeast an northeast corners of the building.
Chairman Frie opened the public hearing d recognized Mr. Brad Johnson, of Lotus
Realty and project Developer. Mr. Brad J hnson introduced the project and Mr. Dale
Sonnichisen of Amcon, developer for Cub Foods. Mr. Sonnichisen described the site
development in detail and agreed that the ite plan would be redesigned to incorporate the
elements described above. He explained t at the cornice detail would be difficult to
achieve in the southeast and northeast co ers ofthe building as material changes occur.
He added that additional landscaping wou d be provided at the new curb islands and area
behind curb to the east ans south of the C b building.
Chairman Frie recognized Mr. Dave He 'ng, owner of the Country Grill Restaurant. Mr.
Henning had concerns relating to visibilit , signage, lighting and access for trucks serving
his business. Staff reassured that additio review would be conducted to insure that the
concerns of Mr. Henning would be addre sed.
Commissioners generally made comment in favor of the plan.
Hearing no other comments, Chairman F . e closed the public hearing.
MOTION BY ROBBIE SMITH TO RE OMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BE LOWED FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE C FOODS STORE AND ADDITIONAL
RET AIL TO BE CONSTRUCTED WI H A ZERO LOT LINE, SUBJECT TO THE
CONDITIONS LISTED IN EXHIBIT , SUBJECT TO THE REVISED SITE PLAN
AS PRESENTED AT THE MEETING, AND SUBJECT TO STAFF REVIEW AND
~ff -,
.
POSSffiLE MODIFICATION OF THE PL TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THE
COUNTRY GRILL, BASED ON A FIND G THAT AS AMENDED, THE PROJECT
WOULD SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLY TH THE INTENT OF THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE DO TOWN REVITALIZATION PLAN.
MOTION SECONDED BY RICHARD C
Motion passed unanimously.
.
.
Page 8
~;.1 -' 10
.
.
.
5B.
CounciIAgenda-3/9/98
A
City Council is asked to review the astwood Knoll 2nd Addition, which
includes replatting of the original M adow Oak Estates, Lots 1, 2,
and 3, Block 2. This requested actio is essentially a housekeeping matter
stemming from development of the astwood Knoll subdivision a few years
ago. With development of the Eastood Knoll preliminary plat, it has always
been anticipated to realign property ines at the entrance to the Eastwood
Knoll plat in a manner that would al ow development of lots on both sides of
the Eastwood Knoll Lane entering t e Eastwood Knoll subdivision.
Essentially, the proposed plat takes ortions of Outlot C, Outlot A, and
remnants from Lots 1,2, and 3 to create three new residential lots that meet
minimum standards, along with pro . ding formalization of the roadway
connecting Meadow Oak Avenue to t e subdivision.
The Planning Commission recomme ded alternative #1 below.
B. ALTERNATNE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve the prelimi ary and final plat of the Eastwood
Knoll 2nd Addition subdivisio
2. Motion to deny approval of the Eastwood Knoll 2nd Addition
subdivision.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
This is essentially a housekeeping m tter. The design is consistent with the
approved plan for the Eastwood Knol subdivision. The lots created will meet
minimum standards and provide the pportunity for development of these
lots for new homes.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of Eastwood Knoll 2nd Addition plat information.
2
.
.
.'
\;.
1
~
KNOLJL
EA--8 _
OOD
D ADDITION
;~..-;:~."':~ ~.:'.t~~ ~'..v:'~:'-
. - . - ;,;
/
,... 10 ./
/,- /'
r~~;;'/ 10 /
.// ,... \
...---/ / '\
- , ,~
--- \ -"<' r
- [\ \/
C -1 r~\
r; ,,) I
\,.'
3:.:.:..:: .: ;,.-:-: _ ~: F;~~
=.!'-:=-;~s..:
/'
. ;~:w ~=""~~~ :~~
o ~/~ !N=" :JY' :,( lll,.':- ::;;:"." "':"'...:":,0'':' S!:
.t~.::; ,"'.:.=~E: 9'" _t:F:;U: -';:. :,';JS
--
~
~
--
--
.--
-
2 !"v1EACJO~AV'
.-.......- -.............-. - -- - -- -
,-
--
--
--
:<'
..1
~
\ 3 ,/'"
\ \
\
.;
\
------- --
-' ,-.'-"1111
tv1 E. t., L..) () V V
! ') -,
Co
3
i
~
r--
/
eN 8~.52.00. ~
" ~---- - -
III ,
;,. ~ I
~g ,
01'
."'2 I
1>), I
~. I
.I
....-
--
--
-
-
-
\-
--
:<'
..J
~J I ,';-: 0
Lv' ~-
,.
r-
1:>
<-
f1l
2
275.jj --
I
I
I
I
,--
I
,...- 11 (" -T. 1 11 1'-" ......,-.
C r-l ,),' V V r ) r ) I )
.. ......... _ 4....".P
r)
c.
/3
f(f\/r)i i
........ L..._ L.._
"\
~ OR:!NT4;TtoN:
~~~/:vi~r~f:Jje;:t~~~='E~
"'IAIUtES l.c 'EC~$ t.4ST_
~. .wNICJOf'A.
s-a -- /
. 5C.
.
.
CounciIAgenda-3/9/98
The City Council is asked to consider dopting a development agreement and
final plat governing the development f the River Mill 3rd Addition. The
subdivision consists of 17 single famil lots, which received preliminary plat
approval a few years ago. Approval 0 the final plat for the 17 lots as proposed
does not complete the River Mill proje t area. In the next few weeks, a
preliminary plat outlining the develo ment of the balance of the site (River Mill
4th Addition) will be presented to the lanning Commission and City Council.
Construction activity this spring will 'nclude both the development of River Mill
3rd and River Mill 4th Additions. Fin I platting of the 3rd Addition today will
enable construction to start on lots in iver Mill 3rd.
The method of financing will follow tn same program as the 1st and 2nd
Additions. The utility and road syste will be installed following a private
improvement process. This means th t the City will not be financing the
project, but the City will require that nds be set aside in a disbursement fund
sufficient to pay project and City insp ction expenses.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt development a eement and approve the final plat of the
River Mill 3rd Addition subject to City Engineer and City Attorney review
and approval and the following conditions:
a. Modify Lots 4 and 5, Blo k 4, by increasing the size of Lot 5.
b. Modify the intersection b reducing reverse curve.
c. Combine Mill Trail Driv and Mill Trail Lane into Mill Trail Lane.
d. Mill Trail Lane designat on for road up hill.
2. Motion to deny approval of the evelopment agreement and final plat of
the River Mill3rd Addition.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the Assisant Administrator that Council select
alternative #1.
D.
SUPPORTING DATA:
Development agreement; Copy of fina plat.
.
.
.
DEVELOPER'S GREEMENT
RIVER MILL 3R ADDITION
RESIDENTIALUBDMSION
THIS AGREEMENT, made and ente ed into this 9th day of March, 1998, by
and between the CITY OF MONTICELLO, municipal corporation organized
under the laws of the state of Minnesota (th "City"), and RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Minnesota corpoation (the "Developer").
WHEREAS, Developer has requested that City grant final approval to a plat
to be known as River Mill3rd Addition (the "Subdivision"), said land legally
described as set forth in Exhibit A attache hereto and made a part hereof
("Property") which Subdivision shall consist of 17 single family lots and two outlots;
and
WHEREAS, Developer intends to con troct, install, provide for, and
maintain streets, storm sewer, water main, igns, grading, and drainage activities
in accordance with the plans and specificati ns as hereinafter described, all at the
sole cost and expense of Developer; and
WHEREAS, the City has by resolutio adopted on the 9th day of March,
1998, granted final approval to the Subdivis on provided that the Developer enter
into the within Agreement and that Developer faithfully perform the terms and
conditions contained herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideratio of the premises and the mutual
promises and conditions hereinafter contain d, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Plat Approval. The City agrees to ap rove the Subdivision as requested by
Developer on the terms and condition as hereafter set forth. The Developer
agrees that the Subdivision shall be d veloped in accordance with the
exhibits attached hereto which are he eby incorporated by reference as if
fully set forth herein. The exhibits ar :
Exhibit B .. Final Plat
Prior to the date of filing the plat and protective covenants, Developer must
pay to City any and all outstanding e penses incurred by City for plat and
other development purposes includin ,but not limited to, engineering, legal,
and other professional staff fees.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
s-e -' I
Page 1
.
.
.
The final plat and protective coven s must be approved and executed in
accordance with City and County or 'nances and filed in the office of the
Wright County Recorder at Develope's expense no later than June 1, 1998.
Failure to file the final plat and prot ctive covenants by this date shall
render this Agreement null and void n its entirety,
2. Representations of Developer, As in ucement to the City's approval of the
Subdivision and entering into this A eement, the Developer hereby
represents and warrants to the City:
A. That the Developer is the fee 0 ner of the Property and has authority
to enter into this Agreement,
B. That the intended use of the p operty is for single family residential
development.
C. That the Subdivision complies 'th all city, county, state, and federal
laws and regulations includin ,but not limited to, City subdivision
ordinances and zoning ordinaces.
D,
That to the best of Developer's knowledge, the Subdivision does not
require an Environmental Ass ssment Worksheet or an
Environmental Impact Statem nt, but shall prepare the same if
required to do so by City or ot r governmental entity pursuant to law
and shall reimburse City for al expenses incurred by City in
connection with the preparatio of the review, including staff time and
attorneys fees.
3. Develooer Imorovements, The Devel per agrees it shall construct, install,
and maintain certain public improve ents ("Developer Improvements") on
the Property, at Developer's sole cost nd expense, in accordance with the
following exhibits:
Exhibit C -- Building and Si e Design Plan
Exhibit D .. Construction P an
Developer agrees the Developer Impr vements shall be performed in
accordance with the plans, specificati ns, and preliminary engineering
reports approved or to be approved b the City Engineer and the City prior to
commencement of construction and t ereafter, in accordance with all City
rules, regulations, ordinances, and th requirements of this Agreement,
which shall include, but not be limite to, the following:
1.
Street grading, graveling, surf: cing, and stabilizing which shall
include curbs, gutter and drive ayapproaches.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
6C-,,2-
Page 2
.
.
.
2. Storm sewers, including all ne essary catch basins, and
appurtenances.
3.
Water main, including all app
4. Sanitary sewer, including all a purtenances.
5. Setting oflot and block monu
6. Surveying and staking.
7. Site grading, berming, and Ian scaping consistent with landscape and
the City Erosion Control Polic Residential Lots regulation.
8. Establishment of post office cl ster box stands with groups of four or
more in the single family resid ntial area, provided that each group
shall be no closer than 200 feet from any other group. Post office
cluster box stands in the twinh me area shall be in groups of eight or
more.
9. The City shall install street na e signs, stop signs, and other traffic
control signs at all locations de med necessary by City, at Developer's
cost and expense.
10. Sidewalk grading and paving a described on approved plans.
11. Boulevard tree plantings.
4. Permits. Upon execution of this Agre ment, Developer and other necessary
parties shall promptly apply for all pe mits, approvals, licenses, or other
documents from any and all necessa governmental agencies (which may
include the City, Wright County, PCA and DNR) so as to enable Developer to
construct the Developer Improvement as herein contemplated. Developer
shall use its best efforts to obtain the ame as soon as reasonably possible.
In requesting building permits from C'ty, Developer acknowledges and
agrees that a per unit lift station, tru water main, and sanitary sewer fee
shall be incorporated into each buildi g permit issued by City in an amount
of$475/SF, which Developer agrees is fair and reasonable. No grading or
building permit shall be issued by Cit unless the plans or application are in
conformity with the City comprehensi e plan, this Agreement, and all local,
state and federal regulations. The Ci shall, within fifteen (15) days of
receipt of plans or building per applic tions, review such submittal to
determine whether the foregoing req rements have been met.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
s-c ,- 3>
Page 3
.
.
.
If the City discerns said plans or app ications are deficient, it shall notify the
Developer in writing stating the defi encies and the steps necessary for
correction. Issuance of a grading or b ilding pennit by City shall be a
conclusive determination that the pI s or applications have been approved
as to the requested activity by Develo er and satisfies the provisions of this
section.
The City shall issue building permits rior to City acceptance of the
Developer Improvements provided th t the party applying for the building
pennit agrees to withhold requests fo occupancy until necessary Developer
Improvements have been installed, w ich include operational and tested
sewer and water systems, installation of sod in the front yard, and roadway
development sufficiently completed to support access by emergency vehicles,
snowplows, and garbage trucks, to be etermined by the City Engineer in his
sole but reasonable discretion. Until uch approval is granted, no dwelling
may be occupied on either a temporar or permanent basis, except that model
homes may be occupied by sales perso el for marketing and related
purposes.
Notwithstanding this provision, if the eveloper is in default of this
Agreement, as hereinafter defined, in ddition to any other remedy provided
by this Agreement, City may refuse toissue a certificate of occupancy for any
lot or parcel in the Subdivision until eveloper cures the default as provided
herein.
5.
Pre-Construction Activities. The Deve oper or his engineer shall schedule a
pre-construction meeting with City to eview a proposed schedule for
construction of the Developer Improve ents.
6. mm em n f n t ti n f D I r 1m r em n . Upon obtaining
all necessary govemmental approvals, licenses and pennits, subject to
Unavoidable Delays, Developer shall c romence construction of the Developer
Improvements within ten (10) days.
7. F' h1i P rn n f n r ti n f 1m r em nt . Developer shall
install, construct, and maintain the Su division Items and Developer
Improvements in accordance with the t nns of this Agreement. Developer
guarantees and warrants the workm ship and materials respecting such
Subdivision Items and Developer Impr vements for a period of one year
following City's acceptance of the same ("Guarantee Period").
The Developer shall repair or replace, s directed by the City and at the
Developer's sole cost and expense, any ork and/or materials that become
defective, in the sole but reasonable opinion of the City or its Engineer,
provided that City or its Engineer give otice of such defect to Developer
within three months following the end f the Guarantee Period. The
Developer, or Developer's contractors, s all post maintenance bonds or other
security acceptable to City to secure th se warranties. 5' C ' tJ
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98 Page 4
.
.
10.
.
8.
Inspection of Imnrovements. Develo er authorizes the City Inspector and
City Engineer to inspect construction of the Developer Improvements as
required by City and grants to them license to enter the Subdivision to
perform all necessary work and/or in pections deemed appropriate during
the construction of the improvements until final certification of acceptance is
approved by City for all Developer I provement items and expiration of any
applicable warranty period. Inspecti ns by the City are to be logged and
reported weekly to Developer.
Construction and installation plans s all be provided to City and shall be
reviewed by and subject to approval 0 the City to insure that the
construction work meets with approv d City standards as a condition of City
acceptance.
Developer shall cause its contractor t. furnish City with a schedule of
proposed operations at least five (5) d ys prior to the commencement of the
construction of each type of Subdivisi n Item and Developer Improvement.
The City shall inspect all such work i ems during and after construction for
compliance with approved specificati ns and ordinance requirements until
final certification of acceptance is app oved by City and expiration of any
applicable warranty period.
9.
Accentance of Improvement. Upon no ification by Developer that any of the
Developer Improvements have been c mpleted, within ten (10) days City
Engineer shall inspect the Developer mprovement and, at his sole
discretion, determine if the Developm nt Improvement(s) has been completed
in accordance with the plans, specific tions, and exhibits attached hereto.
If the City Engineer determines that he Developer Improvements have been
completed in accordance with said re irements, the City Engineer shall give
the Developer written notice of the Ci y's acceptance of the Developer
Improvements within seven (7) days e ective as of the date of the inspection.
If the City Engineer determines that e Developer Improvement(s) is not
completed in accordance with said req irements, the City Engineer shall
notify Developer in writing of the defi . ency and provide a reasonable date
upon which to cure the deficiency. F lure by the Developer to cure within
the stated time period shall constitute an Event of Default.
1 i n f D v 10 r I rov . Developer agrees to complete the
Subdivision Items and Developer Imp ovements on or before June 1, 1999.
The Completion Date as provided her in is subject to Unavoidable Delays as
hereinafter defined, in which event th completion date may be extended by
the period of such Unavoidable Delay .
For the purpose of this section, Unavo dable Delays means delays which are
caused by strikes, fire, war, road weig t restrictions, material shortages,
weather that renders construction pro ess impossible, causes beyond the
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
~ e ''S:age 5
.
.
.
Developer's control or other casualty .0 the Developer Improvements, or the
act of any federal, state, or local gove' ment unit, except those acts of the
City authorized or contemplated by t . s Agreement.
In the event Developer believes an ex ension is warranted, Developer shall
request such extension in writing to t e City Engineer and specify the
requested length of extension and the reason therefore. The City Engineer
shall determine the length of the exte sion, if any, in his sole but reasonable
discretion.
11. Ownershin of Improvements. Upon t e completion of the Developer
Improvements required to be constru ted by this Agreement, and the
acceptance thereof by the City, the D veloper Items lying within the public
easements and public right-of-ways a shown on the Subdivision plat shall
become City property without further notice or action. Within thirty days
thereafter, and before any security as herein required is released, Developer
shall supply City with a complete set freproducible "AS BUILT" and
"DEVELOPMENT PLAN" plans in a rm acceptable to the City Engineer,
without charge to City, which docume ts shall become the property of City.
12. Clean Un. The Developer shall prope ly clear any soil, earth, or debris on
City-owned property or public right~o way resulting from construction work
by the Developer, its agents, or assigns.
13. Main n n f ds Befi r A e ta e. Developer shall, at its expense,
prepare any streets located in the Su division for snowplowing and other
maintenance that Developer wishes C ty to undertake prior to formal
acceptance by City of such streets. T is preparation shall include, without
limitation, ramping any manholes as ecessary to avoid damage to
snowplows or other vehicles used in s reet maintenance. Should damage
occur to City snowplows or other vehi les during the course of snowplowing
or other maintenance procedures prio to formal acceptance of the street by
City, which damage is caused by Deve oper's failure to properly prepare or
maintain the same, Developer shall p y all such damages and shall
indemnifY and hold City harmless for 11 such damage, cost, or expense
incurred by City with regard thereto.
14. Erosion and Draina~e Control. The D veloper shall provide and comply with
erosion and drainage control provisio s in the landscape plan and City policy
requirements as described in paragra h 3(8) and as otherwise required by
City. As development progresses, the ity may impose additional erosion
and drainage control requirements if, n the sole but reasonable opinion of
the City Engineer, they would be usefi and appropriate in controlling
drainage and erosion. Developer shal promptly comply with such erosion
and drainage control plans and with s ch additional instructions it receives
from City.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
~c.., ~age6
.
15. Hold Harmless AlITeement. Develope acknowledges that its failure to
implement the plans and exhibits as ontained herein may cause flooding
and/or damage to adjoining property wners. In such event, Developer
agrees to hold City harmless and inde 'fY City from claims of all third
parties or Developer for damages aris ng out of such flooding and/or
damages.
The parties recognize that time is of t e essence in controlling erosion, In the
event of an emergency situation requi 'ng immediate action to prevent loss or
damage to persons or property, to be etermined at the sole discretion of City,
the notice and cure provisions of para aph 21 shall not apply and City is
authorized to undertake any correctiv action it deems necessary to prevent
or minimize any such flooding and/or amage. In such event, Developer
agrees to hold City harmless and inde 'fY City from claims of all third
parties for damages arising out of sai corrective action by City, and agrees
to reimburse City for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by City arising out
of the corrective action including, but ot limited to, any costs necessary to
re-Iandscape disrupted soils located 'thin the Subdivision.
16. Insurance,
A.
The Developer will provide and maintain or cause to be maintained at
all times during the process of onstructing the Developer
Improvements until six (6) mon hs after acceptance of all Developer
Improvements and, from time t time at the request of the City,
furnish with proof of payment 0 premiums on:
.
(i) Comprehensive general I ability insurance (including
operations, contingent li bility, operations of subcontractors,
completed operations an contractual liability insurance)
together with an Owner' Contractor's Policy with limits against
bodily injury, including eath, and property damage (to include,
but not be limited to da ages caused by erosion or flooding)
which may arise out of e Developer's work or the work of any
of its subcontractors,
Limits for bodily injury 0 death shall not be less than
$500,000.00 for one pers nand $1,000,000.00 for each
occurrence; limits for pro erty damage shall not be less than
$200,000.00 for each occ rence. The City, City Engineer, and
Developer's Engineer sh 11 be an additional named insured on
said policy. Developer s 11 file a copy of the insurance coverage
with the City upon reque t.
.
(ii) Worker's compensation i surance, with statutory coverage.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
5"c..,'7
Page 7
.
.
.
17. Securitv for Cost of Improvements. F r the purpose of financing the
construction, installation, and mainte ance of the Developer Improvements,
and to pay all associated costs and ex enses of City as described in
paragraph 18, Developer shall, upon e ecution of this Agreement, execute
and deliver to Century Bank National Association ("Lender") a Note and
Mortgage encumbering the property i an amount not less than $70,000
(includes amount 15% above construct' on cost plus trees). The proceeds of
this loan shall be escrowed by Lender nd disbursed only in accordance with
the terms and conditions of a certain isbursement Agreement attached
hereto as Exhibit H and incorporated y reference herein.
No work shall be commenced under t 's Agreement until the Note, Mortgage,
and Disbursement Agreement have b en executed and certified copies filed
with City.
18. ResDonsibility for Costs.
The Developer shall pay all cos s incurred by it or City in connection
with the development of the Su division, including but not limited to
construction of Developer Impr vements, legal, planning, engineering,
and inspection expenses incurr d in connection with approval and
acceptance of the Subdivision p at, the preparation of this Agreement,
and all reasonable costs and ex enses incurred by the City in
monitoring and inspecting dev opment of the Subdivision.
A.
The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted by the City within
thirty (30) days after receipt. I the bills are not paid on time, the City
may halt all plat development ork until the bills are paid in full.
B.
C. The Developer shall hold the C ty and its officers and employees
harmless from claims made by tself and third parties for damages
sustained or costs incurred res lting from Subdivision plat approval
and development. The Develo er shall indemnify the City and its
officers and employees for all c sts, damages, or expenses which the
City may payor incur in conse uence of such claims, including
reasonable attorneys fees, pro ded that nothing herein shall require
Developer to indemnify the Cit , its officers or employees from any
violation of law or from the consequences of their own negligence.
D. The Developer shall reimburse the City for its costs incurred in the
enforcement of this Agreement including engineering and reasonable
attorneys fees.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
s-~",cr
Page 8
.
.
.
19.
Required Tree Plantin~
./
The Developer shall be responsible fi r installation of boulevard tree
plantings as required by the city ord'nance. Required subdivision trees must
have a trunk diameter of at least tw inches (2") at one foot (1') above ground.
Required trees must be protected an supported by approved tree guards.
Not less than two (2) or more than tree (3) species of trees shall be planted
in any block, and neither less than t enty percent (20%) nor more than fifty
percent (50%) of the total trees plant d in a block may be of the same species.
On lots with a single frontage or for orner lots with double frontage on two
minor streets, two trees to be plante per street frontage. Trees must be
planted at a location between 4 feet nd 10 feet from the curb. The
Developer shall take into account th presence of utility systems when
establishing the precise location wit 'n the stated acceptable range from the
curb. In areas where sidewalk is bei g installed, trees shall be planted
between the curb and the sidewalk 4 5 feet behind the curb.
On lots with frontage on a minor street and School Boulevard, two trees
planted per the requirements in the aragraph above on the minor street
frontage and two trees planted in th School Boulevard boulevard at a
location determined by the City.
The Developer is free to direct builde s to plant trees as required under the
ordinance and this development agre ment; however, the Developer is
ultimately responsible for complianc with the tree planting requirement.
This expense shall be incorporated i 0 the disbursement agreement.
20. Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement shall be bindi g upon the parties, their heirs,
successors or assigns, as the c se may be.
B. Third parties shall have no rec urse against any party under this
Agreement. Future residents f the plat shall not be deemed to be
third-party beneficiaries of thi Agreement.
C. If any portion, section, subsect on, sentence, clause, paragraph, or
phrase of this Agreement is fo any reason held invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity oft e remaining portion of this Agreement.
D.
So long as the City uses its bes efforts to review plans and inspect
improvements, the Developer hall have no cause of action for
damages attributable to delays in the construction and completion of
said Items.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
5"c - 'I
Page 9
.
.
.
E.
No one may occupy a building r which a building permit is issued on
either a temporary or permane t basis until sanitary sewer and water
lines have been installed, hook d up, tested, and approved by the City.
F. The action or inaction of the Ci y as to the exercise of any of its rights
or remedies upon an event of d fault shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions 0 this Agreement as to future events of
default. To be binding, amend ents or waivers shall be in writing,
signed by the parties, and appr ved by written resolution of the City
Council. The City's failure to p omptly take legal action to enforce this
Agreement shall not be a waive or release as to any event of default.
G. This Agreement shall run with he land and shall be recorded in the
office of the Wright County Rec rder. After completion of all of
Developer's obligations hereun er, at Developer's request City will
execute and deliver to Develope a release of this Agreement in
recordable form.
H. Both parties to this Agreement cknowledge that they have been
represented by counsel, or are ware of their right to counsel, and have
entered into this Agreement fre ly and voluntarily.
21. nt. Developer represents and
agrees that (except for associating wit other individuals or entities), prior to
the completion of the Developer Impr vements as certified by the City:
A. Except only by way of security or, and only for the purpose of
obtaining financing necessary t enable the Developer or any successor
in interest to the Property, or a y part thereof, to perform its
obligations with respect to the onstruction of the Developer
Improvements nnder this Agre ment, and any other purpose
authorized by this Agreement, he Developer (except as so authorized)
will not make or create, or suffe to be made or created, any total or
partial sale, assignment, conve ance, or transfer in any other mode or
form of with respect to this Agr ement or any interest therein, or any
contract or agreement to do an of the same, without the prior written
approval of City.
B.
In the absence of specific writte agreement by the City to the
contrary, no such transfer or ap roval by City shall be deemed to
relieve Developer from any of it obligations. In the event that City
approves a substitute developer and the Property is transferred to said
substitute, the City agrees to re ieve the Developer ofliability from
performance as described in thi contract. Said substitute shall
assume all responsibilities and . ghts of the Developer under this
contract.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
S-c _/0
Page 1 0
.
.
.
22. Events of Default Defined. The follo 'ng shall be "Events of Default" under
this Agreement and the term "events f default" shall mean, whenever it is
used in this Agreement (unless the co text otherwise provides), anyone or
more of the following events:
A. Failure by the Developer to obs rve and substantially perform any
covenant, condition, obligation r agreement on its part to be observed
or performed under the terms 0 this Agreement, or the Disbursement
Agreement by and between Cit , the Developer and Lender.
B. If the Developer shall admit in riting its inability to pay its debts
generally as they become due, r shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or
shall make an assignment for t e benefit of its creditors, or shall
consent to the appointment of a receiver of itself or of the whole or any
substantial part of the property
C. If the Developer shall file a peti ion under the federal bankruptcy
laws.
D. If the Developer is in default der the Mortgage and has not entered
into a work-out agreement with the Lender.
E.
If the Developer shall fail to be 'n construction of the Developer
Improvements in conformance 'th this Agreement, and such failures
are not due to unavoidable dela s as defined in this Agreement.
F. The Developer shall, after co en cement of the construction of the
Developer Improvements, defa t in or violate its obligations with
respect to the construction of th same (including the nature and the
date for the completion thereof) or shall abandon or substantially
suspend construction work, and such act or actions is not due to
unavoidable delays as determin d by the City Engineer in his sole but
reasonable discretion and any s ch default, violation, abandonment, or
suspension shall not be cured, e ded, or remedied within the time
provided for in this Agreement.
23. Notice/Remedies on Default. Whenev r any Event of Default occurs, the
City shall give written notice of the E nt of Default to Developer by United
States mail at its last known address. If the Developer fails to cure the
Event of Default within fifteen (15) da s of the date of mailed notice, in
addition to any other remedy provided in this Agreement, and without
waiver of any such right, City may av '1 itself of any or all of the following
remedies for so long as the Developer i in default:
A,
Halt all plat development work nd construction of Developer
Improvements until such time a the Event of Default is cured,
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
~c.,,1I
Page 11
.
.
.
24.
B. Refuse to issue building permit or occupancy permits as to any parcel
until such time as the Event of Default is cured.
C.
Apply to a court of competent j risdiction to enjoin continuation of the
Event of Default.
D. Exercise any and all remedies vail able to City pursuant to the
Disbursement Agreement. If t e Event of Default is the failure of
Developer to complete, constru t, install or COITect the Developer
Improvements in accordance th the plans and specifications and this
Agreement, City may perform t e construction or work and apply to
Lender pursuant to the Disbur ement Agreement to reimburse City for
its expenses. This provision sh II be a license granted by the
Developer to the City to act, bu shall not require the City to take any
such action. Developer consent to such action by City and waives any
claim Developer may have agai st City for damages in the event City
exercises its rights in accordan e with this provision.
E. Terminate this Agreement by .ritten notice to Developer at which
time all terms and conditions a contained herein shall be of no further
force and effect and all obligati ns of the parties as imposed hereunder
shall be null and void.
Miscellaneous.
A. This Agreement shall be bindin upon the parties, their heirs,
successors or assigns, as the ca e may be.
B. If any portion, section, subsecti n, sentence, clause, paragraph, or
phase of this Agreement is for y reason held invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of t e remaining portion of this Agreement.
C. The action or inaction of the Cit shall not constitute a waiver or
amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding,
amendments or waivers shall b in writing, signed by the parties, and
approved by written resolution fthe City Council. The City's failure
to promptly take legal action to nforce this Agreement shall not be a
waiver or release.
D. Future residents of this Subdivi ion shall not be deemed to be third
party beneficiaries of this Agree ent.
This Agreement shall run with he land and shall be binding upon the
Developer, its successors and as igns. The Developer shall, at its
expense record this Agreement 'n the Office of the Wright County
Recorder. After the Developer as completed the work required under
this Agreement, at the Develope's request the City will execute and
deliver to Developer a release in recordable form.
E.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
5C -;a!e~
.
.
.
F. All parties to this Agreement a knowledge they have been represented
by counsel and have entered illj 0 this Agreement freely and
voluntarily. I
25.
Notices. Required notices to the Dev loper shall be in writing and shall be
either hand delivered to the Develope, or mailed to the Developer by United
States mail, postage prepaid to the fo lowing address: 15 Choctaw Circle,
Chanhassen, MN 55317, Attention: r. Rick Murray. Notices to City shall
be in writing and either hand deliver d to the City Administrator or mailed
to City by United States mail, po stag prepaid to the address: 250 East
Broadway, PO Box 1147, Monticello, N 55362.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Develo er have signed this Developer's
Agreement the day and year first written a ove.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
By:
William Fair
Its: Mayor
Rick W olfsteller
Its: City Administrator
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was ackno ledged before me this day of
, 1998, by William Fair an Rick Wolfsteller, the Mayor and City
Administrator of the City of Monticello, a M nnesota municipal corporation, on
behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
5"c:. -13
Page 13
.
.
.
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was ackno ledged before me this day of
, 1998, by its of Residential
Development, Inc., a Minnesota corporation on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
This Instrument Drafted By:
Olson, Usset, Agan & Weingarden
6600 France Avenue South
Suite 590
Edina, MN 55435
'5 c ...1 'I-
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
Page 14
.
.
.
EXHIBI A
Legal Descl'ption
Outlot D of the River Mill subdivision
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
s-c... ' , S
Page 15
.
.
.
EXHIB B
Plat of River Mill 3rd Additio Residential Subdivision
See attach d plat
S-c "lip
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
Page 16
.
.
.
EXHmITS C AND D
Exhibit C
Building and Site PI
Exhibit D
Construction Plan
Exhibits C and D are available and on file t the office of the Monticello City
Engineer, WSB & Associates, Inc., 350 Wes wood Lake Office, 8441 Wayzata
Boulevard, Minneapolis, MN 55426.
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
5"C ,. 17
Page 17
.
.
.
EXH IT E
Disbursemen Agreement
See att ched
6~ " /fjf
RIVMILL3.AGR: 3/6/98
Page 18
.
DISBURSEMEN AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and e tered on March 9,1998, by and between
I
I
I
Residential Development, Inc., a Minnesot . Corporation ("Developer"), Century
Bank National Association ("Lender"), and he City of Monticello, a Minnesota
Municipal Corporation ("City").
WHEREAS, the Developer is the 0 er of the real property described in
Exhibit A attached hereto, commonly know as River Mill 3rd Addition
("Subdivision");
WHEREAS, on March 9, 1998, the D eloper and the City made and entered
into a Development Agreement, a copy of w . ch is attached as Exhibit B,
. ("Development Agreement") concerning the onstruction of certain improvements to
the Subdivision as described therein ("Devel per Improvements");
WHEREAS, on
, 1998, the Developer and the Lender
made and entered into a Loan Agreement (" oan Agreement") wherein the Lender
agreed to loan the sum of $270,000 to the De eloper for the purpose of constructing
the Developer Improvements and other relat d development costs;
WHEREAS, on
, 19 8, the Developer, as maker executed
and delivered to the Lender, as payee, a pro . ssory note in the sum of $270,000
with interest thereon payable as described th rein, and said note was secured by a
Mortgage executed and delivered by Develope , as mortgagor, to Lender, as
. Mortgagee, encumbering the Subdivision; an
RIVMILL3.DSB: 3/6/98
6"c ....'9
Page 1
.
.
.
WHEREAS, the parties desire to es blish procedures concerning the
!
disbursement of the funds under the Loan greement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideratio of the mutual covenants herein and
!
other good and valuable consideration, the eceipt and adequacy of which is hereby
I
!
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as ollows:
1. Security. The City hereby acc pts this Disbursement Agreement as
Security for the construction of the Develop r Improvements, including
I
establishment of required tree plantings, u ! der the Development Agreement. The
liability of the Lender to the City under thi Disbursement Agreement shall
automatically be reduced to the extent of a . ances made by the Lender under the
Loan Agreement for the Developer Improve ents, provided that said advances are
approved in writing by the City.
In the event of improper disburseme t, Lender shall be liable to City for any
damages arising from any improper disburs ment up to the amount of such
improper disbursement.
2.
En .
. Sathre-Bergquist, Inc. ("Private
Engineer") shall certify in writing to the De eloper, the Lender, and City the
progress of construction of the Developer 1m rovements at the conclusion of each
stage of construction. Such certification sh I set forth the quality of workmanship,
the stage of construction according to the pI ns and specifications, the dollar
amount of the Developer Improvements com leted to the date of such certification,
and the dollar amount of the disbursement ecessary to pay for the certified
Developer Improvements.
RIVMILL3.DSB: 3/6/98
5"c,,2D
Page 2
.
.
.
3. Anproval by City. Mter recei t of the certification by the Private
I
I
Engineer, the City shall give written notice: to the Developer and the Lender
whether the City approves or rejects the D eloper Improvement relating to such
certification. The City will use its best efro s to notify the Developer and Lender
within ten (10) business days after receipt f such certification by the Private
Engineer. The City may perform its own in ependent inspection of the Developer
Improvements.
4. Disbursements and Retaina2"e.' If the City approves a certification of
the Developer Improvement by the Private ngineer in writing, the Lender may
rely upon such approval and, if so instructe by the City, advance no more than
Ninety-five percent (95%) of the sum certifie by the Private Engineer for the
Developer Improvements. Five percent (5% of all certified sums of the Developer
Improvements ("Retainage") may be retaine until the final inspection by the City.
The Retainage shall be disbursed after the City completes its final inspection,
accepts all Developer Improvements and De eloper provides the necessary
maintenance bond to City. If the City reject any item of the Developer
Improvement in the certification by the Priv te Engineer, the Lender shall not
advance any funds relating to that item ofth Developer Improvements until the
5.
n
. The
City has given its written consent. Certifica . ons not relating to Developer
Improvements as referenced in the Develop ent Agreement shall not require the
5% retainage pursuant to this paragraph.
City may suspend or terminate the certificati n of the Developer Improvements by
the Private Engineer. In such event, the City shall give written notice to the 5"' Co, - 2.1
RIVMILL3.DSB: 3/6/98
Page 3
Developer and the Lender of such suspensi n or termination. Such suspension or
. termination shall not affect any certificatio; issued by the Private Engineer prior to
the receipt of such notice to all parties. Su:h suspension or termination shall be
i
prospective only. In the event of such susp I nsion or termination, the City shall
I
I
inspect the Developer Improvements compl ted, certify to the Developer and the
Lender the dollar amount of the Developer .mprovements completed to the date of
such certification and the amount to be adv nced to pay for the certified Developer
Improvements.
6. Final Inspection by the City. ursuant to the Development
Agreement, the City Engineer of the City sh 11 make a final inspection of the
Developer Improvements. The Private Engi eer shall have no authority to make
.
the final inspection on behalf of the City. T e City Engineer may object to any
construction defects discovered during the fi al inspection regardless of when such
defects occurred. The failure of the City to 0 dect to a prior certification by the
7.
r . If the Developer commits an
Private Engineer shall not be deemed a wai er of the City's right to demand the
correction of any construction defects discov red during the final inspection.
event of default upon its obligations as impo ed by this Agreement, or pursuant to
the Note and Mortgage executed by Develop r, or as defined within the
Development Agreement with City and does ot cure the event of default within the
time proscribed within the Development Agr ement, the City may give the
.
Developer notice of the City's intention to te 'nate the private installation of the
Developer Improvements and the City may p oceed to let contracts to complete the
RIVMILL3.DSB: 3/6/98
5 C, --- '2- 1.---
Page 4
;", .
--".-
Developer Improvements. The cost of said ontracts, pI us other obligations of the
. Developer under the Development Agreem nt, may be drawn from the remaining
unadvanced amount of Lender under this isbursement Agreement.
In the alternative, upon default by t e Developer of its obligations under the
I
Development Agreement following the ab01 described notice, the City may request
I
the Lender to advance the remaining unad 'anced funds under this Disbursement
,
Agreement directly to the City, which fund1 the City shall hold in escrow for the
exclusive purpose of completing the Develo .er Improvements and satisfying the
other obligations of the Developer under th Development Agreement.
Upon final completion of the Develop r Improvements, the City shall pay any
remaining funds to Lender to be applied as payment on Developer's behalf. The
.
notice of uncured default shall be signed by he Mayor or the Clerk of the City.
Copies of said notices shall also be served 0 the Lender.
In the event City does not recoup its c sts in completing the Developer
Improvements under the provisions of this p ragraph, as an additional remedy,
City may, at its option, assess the benefitted property in the manner provided by
Minnesota Statutes ~429.01 et seq.
8. Terms of A2Teement. This Agre ment shall expire on August 1, 1999.
This Agreement shall automatically be exten ed for successive six month periods
unless Lender gives written notice to the Cit 30 days prior to any expiration date.
If the Lender chooses not to extend the Agree ent, and the City desires continued
.
financial security for the Developer's obligati ns under the Development
Agreement, the City may request the Lender isburse to the City the remaining
unadvanced amount of this Disbursing Agree ent which funds the City shall hold
RIVMILL3.DS8: 3/6/98
6c."L,~ Page5
I
in escrow for the exclusive purpose of comp eting the Developer Improvements or
. other obligations of the Developer under th Development Agreement. Upon final
completion of the Developer Improvements ,and satisfaction of the Developer's
I
obligations under the Development Agree lent1 the City shall pay any remaining
I
funds to Lender to be applied as a paymentl on Developer's behalf.
i
9. Any request by the City oftheiLender1 which is authorized by
paragraphs 7 and 81 shall be honored by th' Lender within three (3) business days
after demand is made by the City.
10. Notices. Any notice provided fi' r in this Agreement may be delivered
or mailed as follows:
Lender:
1145 Viking Drive
Ede Prairie1 MN 55344-7247
I
Atte tion: Ken Brooks
.
Developer:
15 C octaw Circle
Cha hassen1 MN 55317
Atte tion: Mr. Rick Murray
City:
250 : ast Broadway
PO B x 1147
Mont cello1 MN 55362
Atte tion: Rick W olfsteller
Such notices shall be deemed to have een given when received by all
parties.
11. Governinl!' Law. This Agreeme t shall be governed in all respects by
the law of the State of Minnesota.
12. Assirnment. The rights of the ity under this Agreement cannot be
. assigned.
5C'~'f
RIVMILL3.DS8: 3/6/98
Page 6
.
.
.
13. Bindine- Effect. This Agreem nt shall inure to and bind the parties
hereto and their successors and assigns.
14. No Third Partv Rie-hts. This greement is made for the sole benefit of
the parties hereto. No other person shall h ve any rights or remedies under this
Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partie have made and entered into this
Agreement as of the first day and year abo written.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
William Fair
Its: Mayor
By:
Rick W olfsteller
Its: City Administrator
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INC.
By:
Its:
CENTURY BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIO
By:
Its:
RIVMILL3.DSB: 3/6/98
6 C,; ..:Z., S-
Page 7
~068S
~ - 0/:08 -<
o
'"
Vi
.... III :::J ;:
~::l~ iE r1~
.:l;'li'~"" ~
~:I:<:S I z .
o 0"" ll- :l: I ::J~~j
::E~IIl"J III I ....m ll-
l ~j!; '" g ZLaJ
.... ~;1;~f!! !1( iTI Cl :::J~
I z'" "
~ "4-tt~oC( ~ ~;;t3t5
__C\lZC I
~ fa d:i~J '" I ""~5i
zoiE i3 ::.=b~- I 51 ">- 0
~ nwt-'-~ti ~ <>@~ili
ZCfH.!) UJ -~ri-==~
f;l ~ffiz",~ 5 ~<'.i...Vl
C'4UOLl- I ~~~:
~::J~~", ~ I
<~ ~!'" I :r:lll~f!!
ID < Vl 0
~ I ;!;!i"'~
ol~~~ '" ~n IDffi~~
z j!;'" ~ I j!z-
lhlIJil~ I oi'J'"
0 ~ I W'l)d~
0 ~~<ffi
wz~j!;
<0::><0
-
....
"
~""
Q
~I?(>;
",,"~
~
~
o
'"
o
,.,
<>
g
""
-6'.('
.6'c'"
"i'$,
1-"
"
"
o~
I VI
'"
'"
"
\
I
"1 "
/,"( -
" J
I
""-&>
.9 <:r~
~" 0'
..~, .911;
::)
_" I
" -<'/;---I
" iv '<. \......
k: .s- ..,<:l \.} I
<f'~4' ('l J
.....4' -"/~
:::.<~ "'.... '<.1 V~I
~ <:. "'....
'~91>~
~11'"
~r<, ~
~0'.9.
~ '
,"
\
'"
~
'2
~
~
:;!
~ ~
~~
~ ~1.
,
-..)
-.l
st:
F
m
v'
I--
.......J
'i-
"'"
...
O").'f...
~9r
'1> ""
""1 \
o~~._
'h"'<
"
o
--.J
f-
.~~
I
'<
--
~::. .-
o
\
\
\
\
\ \
~ \ \
'" ~\ \
f..,c.'!\ \
N""\ ..., "> \ \
, . J o~ \ \
1- \ \
\ \
\1~.:!J:._">' "...-- __~---./l
_ _ _ .:::--:::; _ _~ -\7.0 .Ill! '< I
_----.-, r S1~O'9'\!;"'Il I
Iln I
~ I I I
f'!811 I Ill)
" I ~:Q' ! ..- \~
I
r
':}
l'l
'"
z
.,
I
I
I
o
"!
.
.
CounciIAgenda-3/9/98
5D.
(J.O.)
A
City Council is asked to consider orderi g plan work in preparation for
installation of the sanitary sewer line e tending from its present position at
School Boulevard to the northwest edge of the mobile home park. Initiation
of the project is consistent with the agre ment recently approved by the City
Council; therefore, this item is essential y a housekeeping matter. According
to the agreement, the City will install t e utility line once the agreement is
executed and a $225,000 escrow deposit is established. At this point in time,
the agreement has been signed and we re waiting for the funds.
Please note that the alignment for the s itary sewer will likely serve to
establish the future road alignment for chool Boulevard extending westerly
from Highway 25 through the 60-acre ci y property. The City Planner will be
working with the City Engineer in estab ishing a utility/road alignment that
results in the best potential for develop ent.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to approve resolution acce ting petition and ordering
feasibility study and plans and sp cifications for installation of
sanitary sewer service to the Kjell ergs West Mobile Home Park
contingent on I\jellbergs providing a $225,000 escrow deposit.
2. Motion to deny ordering feasibility study and plans and specifications
for installation of sanitary sewer s rvice to Kjellbergs West Mobile
Home Park.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Petition for improvements.
4
.
PETITION FOR LOCAL IMPROVE NT AND FEASffiILITY STUDY
TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF M NTICELLO, MINNESOTA
Address:
I (We)1 the undersigned owner(s) of the prope y described below petition for a
feasibility study pursuant to . 1 Chapter 429 (Local
Improvements1 Special Assessments)1 for the Howing improvements:
Please indicate with an "X11 the improvements equested:
x
Sanitary Sewer
Bituminous Surfacing
.
Water
Curb and Gutter
Storm Sewer
Street Lighting
I (We) agree to pay 100% of the cost of the feasi ility study. I (We) understand the
City Council may pro-rate the cost of the feasib lity study attributable to my
property if the scope of the study pertains to ot er benefiting property owners.
Description of Property:
;)-~/~/g
Date
Date
Date
IMPFEAS.PET; 12/10/97
Sb-J
rtkf)
,
(~s;,
~
.
.
.
5E.
A.
rP
(J.S.)
Council Agenda - 3/9/98
Among other items, Change Order No. 11 involves a change in the location of
disinfection of the wastewater using s dium hyperchloride or liquid chlorine
CPR #89. The original project propose converting the primary clarifier tank
(TK4100) and the intermediate clarifie (TK4200) to chlorine contact tanks.
After some additional study, it was de ermined by City staff, HDR, and PSG
that the future operation of the plant ould be better served by having
chlorine contact in a single tank and a lowing for future demolition of the
tanks TK4100 and TK4200 to provide dditional room on site. It was
determined that the north final clarifi r, which was to be used as a thickened
sludge holding tank, would make an i eal chlorine contact tank and would
allow us to bypass the chlorine contact tank operations during the winter
months when we are not required to d'sinfect our wastewater. The original
design would not allow us to bypass. ith this change, tank 6200 is
proposed to be used for the new chlori e contact tank, and tank 6100, which
was to be the gravity thickener, would be converted to the thickened sludge
holding tank.
When going through these changes, w had hoped that the change would not
result in a significant cost; however, s me of the bypass piping and valves,
which cost up to $6,000 a piece install d, did increase the cost of this change,
the total of which is $38,210 (CPR No. 89).
The following is a list of all CPR's incl ded in Change Order No. 11:
CPR # 47 Underground Plumbing lan, System 7000 Class A Heat
Pasteurization . . . . . . .. ....................... $5,145.00
CPR # 59 Add 12" plug valve on W S line outside of TK6000E . $8,183.00
CPR # 82 Extend valve stem on B 3108 for access ......... $2,691.00
CPR # 75 Condensate removal equi ment on the blower
intake, R329 .................................. $374.00
CPR # 89 Use TK6200E for chlorin contact, delete work in TK4100E and
TK4200E ................................... $38,210.00
CPR # 90 Revise pipe support type ear grid E3 on 24-SDL .... $849.00
5
.
Council Agenda - 3/9/98
CPR #92
Add support bracket for SBR ORP cleaning
solution tanks ....... ........................ $3,070.00
CPR #97 Insulation of HWS & H for HE8200 on MX82000 for 2nd
Stage Digester Tank. ............................. VOID
CPR #102 Blower training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $679.00
CPR #110 Administration Building - gutters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. VOID
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $59,201.00
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first altemative is to appro e Change Order No. 11 in the amount
of $59,201 regarding the chang in disinfection tanks at the
wastewater treatment plant, an those other items as listed above.
.
C.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
2. The second alternative is not to pprove this change.
It is the recommendation of the Public orks Director, HDR, and PSG that
the City Council approve Change Orde No. 11 as outlined in altemative #1.
This change brings the total dollar val e of all changes to date to
$195,718.50, leaving approximately $3 8,441.50 in the contingency fnnd.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy ofletter from Adolfson & Peterso ; Copy ofC.O. #11 from HDR; Copy of
WWTP Site Plan.
.
6
Adolfson
& Peterson
Construction
6701 West 23rd Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
(612) 544.1561
March 6. 1998
HDR Engineering, Incorporated
300 Parkdale 1 Building
5401 Gamble Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Attention: Bob Peplin
RE:
Monticello WWTP Expansion
HDR Project No. 08124-004-164, Ci
Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. Letter of
CPR #89 - Change Location of the
Project No. 93-14C
ebruary 13, 1998
hlorine Tank.
Gentlemen,
8
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9377
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
FAX (612) 525.2333
.
We have reviewed CPR#89 and have worked 'th the Owner to coordinate the yard
piping modifications. Some oftms work has een performed to accommodate use of tank
TK6100E as a temporary chlorine tank and w' 1 have to be paid for, even if this change is
not accepted.
The additional cost involved with making this hange is $38,210.00. This cost includes a
variety of added changes and deletions to our ontract as listed on the attached cost break
dO\\tl1 sheet and the included subcontractor's q otes.
The Bloomington Electrical price included in his cost of $6,425.00 was provided to A&P
by BEe as a lump sum quote and is not to be ater run on a T&M bases.
The concrete portion of the change resulted' additional work, adding material and labor,
with the cost item including the adds and ded cts for this work. We did not include
fillingileveling of the sludge hopper in the ceo er of the existing tank floor.
A&P has not included any dollars to perform y coating removals and or any recoating of
the existing structures, walls, slabs, etc.; ifthi is required then this will be an add to this
quoted price.
.
5"€ .., I
.
.
.
03/06/98
A&P #3458
Monticello WWTP
2
Per verbal direction from John Simola we are n t performing the following work items.
Removal of the Outlet box outside oft e southwest comer ofTK4000E
(TK6200E) by saw-cutting (Drawing D 5, exhibit 89-0-5). This will change the
lay-out of the 8" drain line and the 18" ftluent line. These lines will be rerouted to
enter the tank on the north side of this ox, the 8" closer to the center of the tank
and the 18" just exterior of the box, still keeping it in the effluent discharge area.
Demolish all concrete weir troughs in T 4000E by neat saw-cutting as close as
possible to the face of wall (Drawing D 6). A&P is to hand form concrete wall
over and around these areas. We did n t apply any type of drill-in anchors, rebar,
bonding or chipped-in keyways around hese troughs where we pour around.
A&P did allow drilling the bottom ofth se weir troughs with 1 1/2" holes, 12
each, see the breakdown sheet.
Existing railing was not used, the price i eludes all new railing to meet the code
and the specifications.
The reinforcing was figured to be a sing e curtain or mat in the new tank walls,
typical.
The electrical quote does not include th reinstallation of the light pole that was
removed to allow for the install the 18" iping along the north side ofTK4000E,
TK6200E).
The electrical quote does not inelude an cost or work by Automatic SysteIl)s Co..
We removed the existing baffles in the d chlorination tank and did not replace with
any type of baffle system.
Receiving direction on this change is extremely mportant to our schedule. A&P needs to
either start the demolition work items per the 0 ginal contract or, with an approval of this
work change, start on these items immediately. Either way this change is holding up work
items that will effect the final completion dates fthis contract. Please forward direction
as soon as possible.
@
5~-,~
-~.....
c
03/06/98
A&P #3458
Monticello WWTP
~
~
~
Final approval of this change will be by Clyde erwey, who will be available next week for
revIew.
Thank you,
ADOLFSON & ETERSON, INC.
n/
Bob Sykes,
Project Supt.
cc: file
Clyde Terwey
John Simola faxed 271-3272.
Copy faxed to Bob Peplin
~
5€ .....3
_.~-- -~. -.. --. --... -..
--
Ado'fson & Peterson, Inc.
Change Order Pricing
Page:
Date:
.
Project: Monticello WWTP
CPR #89
Subject: Chlorine Tank changes
Revised Mar 5, 98
Yard Piping - Landwehr Is 1 0 0 36,613
Reinforcing Steel Material - Ambassador 0 1,B32 0
Reinforcing Installed - Bald Eagle 1 0 0 295
Steel/Alum Matis" Std Iron Is 1 0 2,805 0
SteeVAlum Install - KMH Is 1 0 0 1 ,400
Eliminate Cover Termacon Is 1 (2, 00) 0 (14,725)
Mechanical - Harris Is 1 0 0 (16,012)
Electrical - BEC Is 1 0 0 6,425
Concrete Work Net Change Is 1 11, 13 5,351 0
Drill 1 1/2"holes Weir Trough ea 12 25 00 10 120 0
Remove Clarifier Eq Int. & Prima~s 2 -1200 (2 400) 0 0
Remove Clarifier Eq Final Is 1 1200 1200 0 0
Demo Baffles @ Declorine Tk Is 7 320 2240 50 350 0
Demo Concrete Intermediate Is 1 (2,000) 0 (1,500)
Demo Concrete Primary Tks Is 1 (320) 0 (500)
Plug piping Is 2 -35 (70) (15) (30) 0
Is 1 0 0 0
Is 1 0 0 0
Field Engineer mh 16 35 560 0 0
Superintendent mh 24 60 ,440 0 0
SUBTOTAL 1 ,763 10,428 11 ,996
Small Tools (7% Labor) 753
Safety
As BL!i1t D_rawings
e;UBTOTAL 11,516 10,428 11,996
H & P (15% on Lab & Mat, 5% on Subs) 1,727 1,564 600
Permit Fee (1%) Nonei eluded Assumed not required
Bondllnsurance 1% 378
TOT AL ESTIMATE 3,244 12,371 12,596
,c'
A TIME EXTENSION of x DAYS WILL BE REQUIRED
.
(00.'\
~
1 of 1
06-Mar-98
36,613
1,B32
295
2,805
1,400
(16,725)
(16,012)
6,425
17 ,164
420
(2,400)
1,200
2,590
(3,500)
(820)
(100)
o
o
560
1,440
33,187
753
o
o
33,940
3,891
o
378
$38,210
5'E-tf
.
.
.
MI=F1 06 '98 11: 44 FR HIR ENGI lEER I NO INC 61 ~ 591 5413 TO 92713272 P.01/02
H)~ ~
Change Order No. i1~
I'roject Name: Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion ~DR PI'Cjeet No.: 08124.01)4.164
Project QlM'1er: City of Monticello, MN OWner's Project No.: 93.14C
Date of Issuance: 31G198
Pi'oject Contractor: AdoIfson and Peterson Date of Contract 12/18/96
Period; 12/18196.10115198
It is agreed to modify the Contract referred to above as to I owa:
tern No. Item and Description of Changes Contract Price Contract Time
Decrease Increase Decrease Increase
1 CPR No. 47 0 $5 145 o days o days
2 CPR No. 59 0 $8. 183 Odave o davs
3 CPR No. 75 0 $2691 Odavs o daYs
4 ....PA No. 82 0 $374 o days o days
5 PR No. 8Q 0 $38210 Odavs o days
6 PR No. 90 0 $849 OdaVS o days
7 PR No. 92 0 $3.970 Qdays o days
8 PR No. 97 VOID VOID VOID VOID
9 PR No. 102 0 $679 o days o days
10 PR No. 110 VOID VOID VOID VOID
Sut Tolal 0 $59.201 o days o days
Dilferenc :e Net Odavs o dayS
Summary: h Is agreed to modify the Contract referred to I bon .a follows:
Contract Price prior to this Change Order Contract Time prior to this Change Order
[1,419,717.50 Interim Completion Dates:
February 1,1998, March 1,1998 and April 1. 1998
Final Completion Dale: October ]5, ]998
Net Increase (decreaSe) of this Change Order Net Increase (decrease) of this Change Order
1$ 59 201 0 I
Revised Contract Price with aN approved Change Orders Revised Contract Time with all approved Change Orders
~ 11,478,918.50 Interim Completion Oates:
febltlary 1,1998, March 1,1998 and Aprilt. 1996
Final Completion Date: October 1.5, 1998
The changes Included In this Change Order are to be lece mpllshed In accordlllnee with the terms. stipulation. and
condltkm8 of the original Contract as though Included the 'eln.
I I
Accepted for Contractor by: Date
L I
Recommended for Approval By (HDR Engineering, Inc.) Date
I I I I
Approyed for Owner by: Attest Date
Distribution: LJowner L-jCootracto LJofflce L-field L-Jother
FORM 1II.5()20-2(V<nion 1.00.:' '10) To" ~20 m.S020-2
COPl'Tish11991 HDR ""Ii....ring. 'AC.
~ ---s-
.
.
.
MRR 06 '98 11:45 FR HDR ENGINEERING INC 61 591 5413 TO 92713272
Item
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
CPR No.
102
110
Change Or r No. 11
Wastewater Treatmen Plant Expansion
Monticell , MN
47 underground Plumbing Plan, System 7
59
ptlon
Add 12' plug vdve on WAS loa outsld of TK6COOE
82
Extend v(j.je stem on BTV31 08 for ace ss
Condensate removd eqlip't on the war ~take, R329
75
89
Use TK620QE for chlorine contact. dele e work In TK41 OOE md TK4200E
90
Re\llse pipe support type near grid E3
92
Add support bracket for S8R ORP d
97
solution tanks
P. 02/02
Amotm
$ 5,145
$ 8,183
$ 2,691
$ 374
$38,210
$ 849
$ 3,070
InSlJaflon of HWS & HWR for 1-11:8200 on MX8200 for 2nd Stoge Digester Tank. VOID
$
Blower Training
Administration Bldg. - gutters - VOID
Original ContnMll Amount:
01... Order No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9R
10
11
$11.263,200.00
$0.00
($4,687.00)
$4,839.00
$10,376.00
$10,635.00
$12,682.50
$39,982.00
$25,643.00
$0.00
$37,047.00
$ 59,201.00
$185,718.50
Revised Contraot Amount: 11478918.150
Total CO No. 11:
1.73% of original c tract amount
Page 1 of
$ 679
$
$ 59,201
3/6/96
** TOT~L PAGE.02 **
5E" -lD
@"~"""'='i...
"\
," '~
;:..,"
.;
I
)
4" SEWER &.,/.
u~/
------.
/-
~----
\
"
~,~ ,..---~._~~-
~,,--/
-------.--
/-~--
c::J/
_/
.....
J r-r
r
I""""'-'--- _________ ~ ~ ~_
.
.
--
~'
CounciIAgenda~3/9/98
5F.
A
The Planning Commission reviewed t is item at its regular meeting and
recommended (4-1) approval of the re uested conditional use permit. There
was no neighborhood opposition to th plan. No Council action is needed on
the associated variance request unles there is an appeal of the Planning
Commission decision.
B. AL TERNATIVE ACTION~:
1. Motion to accept the Planning C mmission recommendation and
finding, which is to approve the onditional use permit request
(alternative #1 under decision # of the Planning Commission agenda
staff report).
2.
Motion to deny the conditional u e permit.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planning Commission agenda suppleme t.
7
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda -3/05/98
6.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Variance
St. Peter's Lutheran Church has requested a va 'anca to allow an expansion of its church
facility at 413 E. 3rd Street. The current building i' not handicapped accessible, and it has
become difficult to accommodate the entrance and exit from the current building. The
building expansion would extend to within 2.7 fe t of the public right of way. The request
for the variance raised the issue of the lack of Co ditional Use Permit for the church use _
a requirement in an R~2 District. As an existing u e, the church would be "grandfathered"
in to the zoning district in its current conditio s. The CUP is necessary to allow the
expansion of the facility.
Variances are considered where a property can not be put to reasonable use under the
existing zoning standards. Staff views a m dification to meet ADA handicapped
accessibility rules as being reasonable use. e issue would relate to other potential
options for the modification which would avoid t e need for, or lessen the amount of, the
variance. The architect for the building has in luded a statement which describes the
design process which was used to establish the proposed plan.
Additions to either side of the existing church w re considered and rejected for various
reasons. An addition to the east was technically ossible, but interfered with the ability to
provide off-street parking, planned for a future project. An addition to the west was
considered but had technical problems in accom odating the interior use of the existing
building. Coupled with these problems were ar; hitectural concerns which would have
severely compromised the aesthetic value of the uilding - an important consideration for
a church in a residential neighborhood.
Conditional Use Permit
As noted above, churches require Conditional U e Permits in R~2 zoning districts. The
primary issue related to the approval of a CUP ~ r this facility would be the issue of off-
street parking. Currently, the church relies entirel on street parking for its needs. A site
plan which illustrates a plan for off-street parking of over 30 spaces is attached. The
church has requested a deferral from the require ent for immediate construction of the
parking area. Due to limited funds, and the need t construct the ADA-compliant access,
the Church is not in a position to undertake the pa ing lot at this time. Staff has discussed
a deferral of this project with them, and is sugg sting a four-year deferral, or at a time
when the Church undertakes additional site impr vement and/or construction projects.
3
S-F --I
.
.
.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Planning Commission Agenda -3/05/98
Decision 1: Conditional Use Permit for a Ch rch in an R-2 Zone.
1. Motion to approve the CUP, subject to a ndition which would require construction
of off-street parking in an arrangement imilar or superior to the drawing attached
as Exhibit A, with a deferral of the parki g requirement for four years.
2. Motion to deny the CUP, based on the i ability to strictly comply with setback and
parking regulations as provided for in th zoning ordinance.
3. Motion to table action on the CUP, subj ct to additional information.
Decision 2: Variance from the front yard setb ck requirement of 30 feet.
1. Motion to approve the variance for a setb ck of 2.7 feet, based on a finding that the
expansion is necessary to comply with A A and make reasonable use of the site.
2. Motion to deny the variance for a setback of 2.7 feet, based on a finding that there
should be alternative solutions which wo Id require no variance, or less variance.
3.
Motion to table action on the variance, p nding additional information.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of both the CUP a d the setback variance. The CUP has
become an issue for the Church due to its attempt to comply with handicapped
accessibility regulations. The deferral of the park ng should not impact the neighborhood,
since the Church has no off-street parking at t is time, and will be working toward this
project at a later date.
With regard to the variance, staff believes that the design as presented is positive in
maintaining the "urban" character of the traditional Monticello neighborhoods. While it may
be technically possible to construct an addition hich avoids the need for a variance, it
would compromise both the interior utility of the existing building and the exterior
architectural aesthetics.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Site Plan
Exhibit B - Building Elevation
4
hibit C - Floor Plan
SF --2-
0" 0 IIiIl =\I\t-lII -n/ ~.~.":':
aI I · 0l:I 'I"" ..... 'I"P .;r,...,
j, .. . -- , :.;:... '"=
...
.
::r
i
N
N
~...J
w...J
- i!
;!till
-j
t...J
--L
gtn
-j
Q
~
'i
\D
:u
-j
~
--J
:.t
:::>
'/)
q:
~
:.::
...:
-j ~~
-~
-- -:/
~,
.J ~
--1
>-
q:
n:
,10 ,9 ,91
-j
---
-j
~~
-~
!~
~
\
-j
in
. :", .-;-'".........
"J.~I'" 'O".?IJ.NO\i
H~? ~:JKIJ11
....?I'."""^" ~.."-'-"-' '.~
If ,Le,aO.Le S
IE: '99 I "a]cJnStI]W 00 'f;9 I " 1 tl7d
~
"<.
:~::'.~</:\:
--.
.'... '-': '.', '.
~ .....:-. '.-.-' ':J.
.;...... '..i~
. 'l.-
. ..<.... w~
.' 9\1:1
. . IflX
;Ow
-H
N
Z.....
if
f>)
15
~
i5
I--
tj
...: Ct:
IflZIl'l'
- III )- r---
~T'1
H.
~
~
Hi
-
~
r: Ii
N EJ
[l-: ~
)tM3alf JJ. :w.:;, 'J.J Ii ,L.9'(,j ~::.. ~
L5.
~?G:
~- \0
If)
~g ! o::,Cu
0::,\0
"<i<:
~~ ; \0
ru
'" >-
.. ~
.. n:
'"1.1
~
-'
<'
i.
z
-.., QoSl
: ~~g
1 ~~Ifl
y-~/
...... I ~'-.~
: \0
-l---'--
I -.::--..:.
1 ',...;---'
- I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_....l
"<t
!
;,
t:
~
l1)
--.-
;Dt1J mM
It< ,'re
.. -
n
l!
~ ' 're
H" Mt JtCJ U l.
t5 ~ ...
~ l! ~
:;
~ ..,
"'. ~
..... ....
"
~ ~
Ii ~
i l:
..
'"
-
~
..
..
Ii:
..
l!
..f'llttjt/i Jl:H:l1 'J..J,
Iv '99 I :: (JJ~nSVJH 00 'f;9 I :: 1 V7d
] ,oc,or.g N
1JJ~lS N01N]f! SV (J]11 tl7d
\/
133CJ1S
113N
,. ....;)
bilWI"'iJi w.:,Jo'\l'~-,l1f u, Ll.\'II-\o'\'~,HII ~4
,W.., . ~'"' ......;:~~=
If! . ."" "W1lIIl;JiT
. . . .-.. . '''P'I' '."""'''
.
.
.
=
~~
"L
~~
7. .
.......~iU -
-\.(\~u...
;;!il- .,
\>,\\.\,lI..
~
""
I\..
!
)
~ \ ~
~~
,
'1_ ~
/ I$~
L ",:)..,
", 16 \U i
- ..n't
"Z.,.
}i;
-'\1.;-;'\
Ii
~
1/
V
Ii~
-~
fu-..,\
"'.L~rH 'OT1~?"HOH
H::>>n<? ~tr1
iV?I14;~Nl: "'1IIaJ.~ 'J.C
- .. ---....- ..~---'t "-
,"7 I a I lei)..
-.. ! -... -. .. ..-,. '1-
'" '. .
. . .-
-,,~,. - ----- ._~. .
....-"-..-:~l
.. - ~ I
~
~
-;-
- - - - - -~i-
1:3-
-- ..... - u_ -:4--
"'- I
I
I
I
-0;:, ~ I
""'"
,-- -
I
I
I
I
~.
IU _ ~
~~ ?
~~; .' ~.
~ is ~ 1..~ ~
- 3-~ ~o~.- - _ _ :;_~_')-:. ~jl ~I-
::'; !) !,' I-
:Ill' 1':\'
~ '.. 'J
II
Ii
-.{'IL
~~
.//
~I ~d-----
~
~
II
"
Ci'
-~
~d~
;rit;~ . I
-~-----'--'----"'............-.~,--,. --..
-~- -"----
+-~I
J.-
I
~ "8001.. .I.~l"
..
~
~~
I
I
n%
11\
4;
~~
..::,
,-
cr-
t;!.'.
?
"
el"_I'1 tlaO-lU-m'''j _-1'1-",...- ._m..v?'-~'~'-'-
.j,I nnt '"a'III ....O't"~ VJ.~IH 'OTl2?'lJ.NOW
11' I oa '11'" '"'" """ .')Pl,"", t<J..l. ~?>I<l<<I ......:>>wr1
.. . __ , ~~ ""'9/" ""?11;l"""'-"I ;."""""" "w
~Oll"',\;n~ 'tI():laJ..XI1
.
.
(,
-~
?if
u. .
l~
J..
\J
~
~
\U
~:
-:l
irr
~. i1
r-11
.
.
.
.
5G.
CounciIAgenda-3/9/98
A
Planning Commission reviewed this atter at a public hearing on March 5,
1998, and voted to recommend approv I of the conditional use permit/PUD
and requested that the preliminary pI t for the development be tabled until
such time that modifications to the pr liminary plat could be made which
would incorporate conditions of condit onal use permit approval. Attached
for your information is the report from Steve Grittman describing the
development proposal along with an 0 tline of conditions for approval of the
planned unit development concept. PI ase note that the developer has
reviewed the conditions of approval a d has indicated a willingness to
change the plan accordingly. Due to t e fact that the changes to the PUD
concept may impact the preliminary p at, it was determined by the Planning
Commission to table the preliminary p at approval until such changes could
be made.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt the Planning C mmission recommendation, which is
to approve the conditional use p rmit with conditions as outlined in
the Planner's report and table a proval of the preliminary plat.
2. Motion to deny or table approva of the conditional use permit and
deny or table approval of the pr liminary plat.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the conditional use permit allowing the planned unit
development be approved with the con itions as noted. The developer has
indicated a willingness to adjust the pI n as outlined in the conditions as
noted and expressed by the Planning ommission.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Planning Commission agenda staff rep rt; See meeting minutes for
additional detail regarding discussion.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda -3/05/98
7.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
E&K Development has submitted plans for t e proposed development of Klein Farms
Estates 3rd Addition. This project is locate between Farmstead Drive and School
Boulevard, adjacent to Edmonson Avenue (Co. Rd. 117). The single family development
of Klein Farms 2nd Addition abuts the east b undary of the project area. The proposal
consists of 34 twin home and quad units - 8 in home buildings and 5 quad buildings.
The project is zoned appropriately for this use, ut requires the approval of a PUD due to
its design utilizing a private street and townho e lots without direct street frontage.
The gross density of the project is listed at 3 96 units per acre. However, a significant
portion of the project site is encumbered by th power line easement adjacent to School
Boulevard. That area would also include a larg ponding and drainage control area. If the
drainage area on the south side of the project is excluded, the net density is approximately
4.92 units per acre. This calculation is impo ant in that the Klein Farms Estates 2nd
Addition project (which did not get approval) wa~ evaluated for density excluding a similar
drainage area. That project was proposed in he neighborhood of 7 units per acre. The
City's Comprehensive Plan considers projects nder 5 units per acre to be low or low/mid
density.
The plans propose a single cul-de-sac privat street to provide access to the buildings,
with the exception of the northernmost qua building. For that structure, two of the
buildings are shown to access Farmstead Driv . Since one of the concepts of PUD is to
provide for designs which create superior, cohesive neighborhoods, we would not
recommend this proposal. Moreover, this desi n results in a driveway for two of the units
which is less than eighty feet from the prima street access for the rest of the project.
Although the density is reasonable for projl cts of t.his type, the project should be
redesigned to accommodate all unit drivewa s on the primary street, or these end two
units should be dropped from the project.
The plan illustrates buildings setbacks which m et the perimeter setback requirements on
all sides. Internal setbacks have been designe to provide common access drives for the
quad units, and a minimum of 25 foot setbacks from the curb line for the twin home units.
Due to the mix of buildings, however, this proj is likely to feel somewhat more "spacious"
than the first Klein Farms Estates project.
In the twin home section of the project, there a e some concerns due to building spacing
and garage orientation. The design of the unit results in a 44 foot wide paved driveway
5
~b--I
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda ~3/05/98
for each building. This expanse of paving can e unattractive, and problematic in the cul-
de-sac area. Around the cul-de-sac, four of he buildings would result in a continuous
"curb cur' with small triangles of green space se arating the driveways at the building lines.
These extensive pavement areas should be mitil ated in some fashion. One concept may
be to consider quad units in this area as well. his would have the effect of reducing the
impact of a streets cape made up of garage d ors, and could also reduce the amount of
paving at the curb line. In any event, we wouldecommend extensive landscaping in these
areas to mitigate the domination of pavement n the cul-de-sac area.
Other landscaping issues relate to the treat ent of the drainage area, and pedestrian
access in and through the development. Sin e the project is a relatively short private
street, it would appear unnecessary to requir sidewalks in the development. However,
a pathway connection to School Boulevard fro the cul-de-sac area would be important.
In landscaping the drainage area, the developer should consider the use of natural wetland
tolerant plant materials which would not req ire mowing. The area would look more
attractive as a "wild" area with appropriate plantings, rather than attempting to mow a
grassy area which is otten too wet to use acti ely. The primary constraint in this regard
would be the power lines, and the need to utili e low-growing materials in that area.
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to approve the Concept Stage PUD and Preliminary Plat, subject to the
conditions as described in Exhibit B, ased upon a finding that the zoning and
density are appropriate for the project.
2. Motion to deny the Concept Stage PUD nd Prelim inary Plat, based upon a finding
that the design of the project does not re ect the intent of the City's PUD regulations
or the area in which it is located.
3. Motion to table action on the Concep Stage PUD and/or the Preliminary Plat,
subject to additional information and alt rations to the project design.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff believes that the project can be approved i concept. The land use is generally a low
density design, and should be compatible with it location adjacent to two major roadways
and a low density single family neighborhood. ere are design changes which we believe
would improve the project's appeal, particula Iy from the street view, however. These
include a reduction in the number of driveways and width of continuous pavement) in the
twin home portion of the project. This could be elped by leaving a planting strip between
the driveways of the common wall units, or com ining some of the twin home buildings into
6
S-~ -2...
.
.
.
Planning Commission Agenda #3/05/98
quad buildings. There are also some chang s which we believe are necessary for the
project to qualify for the flexibility granted undel a PUD. These include the elimination of
the driveway onto Farmstead, intensive Ian scaping in the areas where twin home
driveways result in more pavement than gree area (e.g. around the cul-de-sac), a well
thought-out landscape plan for the drainage rea, and a pathway connection to School
Boulevard. With these changes, the PUD Con ept Plan would meet the requirements for
design which is superior to standard subdivision and development, a PUD minimum
criterion. If the Planning Commission and Cit Council agree with the recommendation
which would convert some of the twin homes i to quad buildings (assuming no increase
in unit count) it may be appropriate to approv the PUD with conditions, but table action
on the preliminary plat.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit B - PUD Conditions
7
S-G-3
FEB-27-199S 09:51
'I ~l ....
~..~\ ti ~l .
.I. I
\I
~
.
z
0
-
E-
-
~
A
-<
0 z
'"
...J
" ll...
C":l ,.. ..
t-
::; i-
f:: ';:l
en :'.
:::> i: :;;:.
~ Q .,.
E-o z (; ~
0( ..,~
< 1- =C:::i
E:-o ~ i- '
ll. ~ ~
en ...
,.. F
~ Q: :r.
0{ c:
z ;::;
. en s:
::i
- .....
~ '"
c:: ll.
-<
~
Z
-
~
....J
~
:' :f
! ;~,: ~'! l:ti.
. ;" ;\~ ~ : !.\~ 1 ;
'''l.'~lll:l' i ~ g I
.' ,.,'.11," '.',. -~ ~.
/:"':~~~' f7'i ~~
'1 . ". '..( I'
.
612 595 9S37 P.02/05
I n~~ I; r:.~~ij I, _{.
I .h'! .n."
. I ..; ji
...:-- ~
'"
..
~3
....
,- Ei
I i
I
I
1
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NAC
I ,.J
I :
.-l ' ,
------- '." I
~Il I
f: v ,I .!~ ~ ~ _...1. ri
_........~::;.",.. \: I.,,~w.'. t
",7.'0'.'" ,l',';\
. ~ It \
~ I
. '.: .....- .-.' -rl- v~,
.~,..". ...'I\'---~~
/.... I P 0 ,~.<.. .~~., .,
....-4" I'./! SG_I..4~~' ~o~ " ).7.1
.... l lI' ...... '>"'f .;,.. ,.1' \ .
-'..~'.-;'>:':~'~" ..~-
':._'- __~. 0- ~ ~'1'1-jt,'1"".' :...1 ..J'
.: ":"" . . . .... \ ......., IN' ~I
'.._:......... "\ i "
.... ,.
-- 5 I ~ :':: ~ ~~Q~i..rr'.... .
~ 11I1I1;.:..~~ILH111l~
""' 111",Z~IIIl)lllll\
I::: :1~1 ~'i~:::: ~: I
,. 1IIHhIlIIlIIlIIV'"
~ 11l1'lllllHnl,.F
~ ~,~~t:~:~~:I'
"'1111111)"
. "'lY" ,
IllL
lnl
1::1 '"
"I
I
I
, I .-
I
I : l....
;...
i 1-..
Iii
I I.'~
I 'i I
~.
~' ,
!I I ~
~1! I iI' c::::
,.: I
I!U ...:1 I I '
I"I~I' I I c::.
'\:. ~'i ! f...I
'~I__~"';""i':'~.. I~ ~
,.. .. [: j -
I. . WJ
IJ' I:":"
I
I . ~
!\oJ
"
1
I\\:~.
1111
Inl
111"1
i;.:;~;
111\
11111
HIli
11111
Hill
tHI
.:.: :~'
h~ I{
_.._~.,,;...\..J
. .'
,
,.
'}\' 'I '-
:':1
~ : i c:.
~i. 1 CI'~
I ',:.:
, I c::.
,. 1-
" 1 I ~
I'
I i Iol
);
I. ,
:,: I
, .
, ,
~
..
;,
a
.1
-------
J ~
I :.~:~
: ~i;~
: =Hl!
:. .=.,...,
~ :~~i
.~ i .8
:~!
::I" i E ~ ~i "
. . ..~
:: t · .,
~:;; ~t ~ ~ ....
- . .s'
~ ; ~ ,. ~~c
..: ..
" ,
~ j
. ~
,.
"
\1\ .
~
~
;
~.. "
" "' ;
~ ~ ;i ~ 3
~ r. I=i ..
rl :. !\ilr ~,!
lit s IIQ'"".o iIII
~ 1'0 -~.. ~.~ :l:
" ~ Ed ~,. ~
~~f~i!~::
~i~~
li;d
i~': r
:.:,;1
t~~::v
l.~,~"
-
Ii
,
l; .I ~I
~. I~"
r.
~
~
~i
~ t~
:;:;
~~
. I" ,'.
:...
"T,
\oJ
:.:
~
.' ! .,
to ..:: · i
~ ! i!; f
.. , I ~..
I, ~ ~~ ;H
w,.:.tI!~.d
.s : !! = '6
'ti: ~ ~ r.t.\.
!. .."!., "':i
i~ ! ~. \. 1""
;; II~ ~;..;~
~.o:~ ~..i. '':~ :;.,.
J' ~ "'" ~ ...-...
.; fIi'" . ...
~ b]~' :':"~"
ti .., !. ".
t!. ".'
~ .' '.:. '
0;' , .
~
~
~l
~.
0.2
~
~
" ~~j?
~'jJ.~~:
, .
, ,I~ .: .
-.....~ .
I ,. .. I
l' .J.nIJ.U ZJ.,.i/IIJ ;,
. J.
~..
:~.,=
!~:g
1f;':.~~
",.I'I::~:'
c:~.::~
I~: 1;1
1~:1 ~:.
w iii ~1.1II.
., ti~H"
~ .....,:;;;~
i:'.=:;'III..:r.
.li
~
!
~ ~
:i!
I:
t
';)
~ II'
i ~. p
;-,!; ,=
t; (~..~ '
~ o1.J.,.,
'" '1 II; . .
3 .!'~. !:
~
Exh bit A - Preliminary Plat
---
'I
l'
.'
.
.
.
FEB-27-1998 09:52
NAC
Conditions of PUD Concept Approval
612 595 9837 P.03/05
Planning Comm;ssion Agenda ,3/05/98
1. Reorientiation of northeast quad unit to r uire all driveway locations to access the
internal street.
2. Reorientation of twinhome areas to avoid continuous "curb cuts" of wide driveways.
Consider the combination of some of th e units into quad units if unit count is not
to be reduced.
3. Landscape front yards intensively in th twin home area to reduce the impact of
wide driveways and extensive paving.
4. Provide natural vegetation of drainage rea to avoid the urge to cut and maintain
wetland grasses. This should include a ixture of trees, shrubs, and ground covers
or grasses which can thrive in the envir nment being created there.
S. Provide a pathway connection between the cul-de-sac and the School Boulevard
Pathway system.
6.
Revise Preliminary Plat drawings to co espond with revised Development Stage
PUD Plan.
Exhibit B - Conditio' s of PUD Concept Approval
../1- ,-:.
-'
MAR-06-1998 10:34
MIDWEST LS &. CE
612 786 9208
)
~T
:! .1 ~
;~-li
..(
:z
o
-
~
..........
Q
~
<r.
.<:
~
...
~
3
~
CF) ~
.;
~ ~
UJ is
~ ;;i
..",
Cf.:l ....
:::&l !:f
~ ~
~ ~
~
M
""
,.
~ !
u -
:!l
~2!:8
23 l:S
,:
,....
i
z
-
:::3 r:::::>
~ '\'
...
--.L
W <t)
1lI
0-..... ~
'\ I U
6 j 0....
a.. ~
v <
-+' 0
. - \t
e ,
~ I ~
; ~~ ~ :!
i JI S! S~.
-s II iWi
d ~= ;~ ~~:
~ - .. ~
i
i
!
I
!
'I
~
i
.
"''1 ~
ill
~5 !S H
u !~ ;i ~
~; ~; ~ II
,- ,..
~I...ii i
.." ,.\
: \ j'; '.'\
"S".. '. ..',
t~:
'." " -
\..~
~ ~ ~
. ~;"'4Iir
~';o.
-~
J'I! .,.
~"""\. :": j
_--------e.~
~~
oj._.~..
}~,
~. ~:~
i
.... ~\
I" ~,.
" .
,,~- ~.
.' ',). \'\ ::J
".
"
-- \ "'\
'-. ':.....
,'*- ..
-:,", ~. ~'.
" .. iid \',~ Ii _;
::I ~
~~;!! i
.llj"; ~. ~ ~ l'! H Ii !
ii, n.~ j-!. ..., 01 I' 1,.~.B_i .~. i;
,,"'an :;"i
i; :!!ji-;;' j~=!~ ~~ii il!~gl!!- 8t~ ~
_~o~ '" '" '" i i ~ i a i ~ i: f.>: i ~~
:1 !! I i ~ ~ II i ~ i i i ~Ib ~
~~ !!Ii
U 'I "'J(....r l!i
:: :: ~ . .' ~ n <
5C,.-./P
i
:" !ii~
'.. ~..
r::- i
I ~
r
I
I
I
I
l .Ii
I ".
I
I .,.
I
I
I ::>
I ,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r ,"
<01
~
P.02/02
'i : I
.r:,.-E I'
~ig I ~
~.~.: l: ~'
. - ~ c
,,~I:>. '"
h~); ..1'~
iI!,~; 1: t
ii~.sE ~1~;
:: ~.~.J; ~ _
..--~ = -
!HH i ii
~' "b];' '. .~';
!!! f ~
iii ' - t - - ~
... .
'"",
i1
~
s;
~ .
l!l:.!
~
~
'I
,..
~U
"1 ~I;ii
-1*
i.:i
\~ ~
..~ .
t
- ia
i ;~I~
,~i iiji
I SKi I"IIC'II
.J~' U Iii
lW\:adt" ml
la.~.liIUaii'
~.:. 001 ..:....... ..;
t.-
:1:
~::,
:1:
!
.
Ii \'
*2\ '
iii ~'I.\\
~ '-\\.
iii \,~
\
\ \
\ '
oil ~J
! ~i
I "
~ :;
'P ! I
~ I ~I
i d!
II~ ~;
.. ;ll~.:,J
:>I .:!I!o<.2
~o
t})
TOTAL P.02
.
7.
Staff report on this item was presented by Seve Grittman. Mr. Grittman described the
proposed housing development as Klein Fa s Estates 3rd Addition, a planned unit
development (PUD) being considered unde a Conditional Use Pennit within the R-PUD
zoning district. The project site is located etween School Boulevard and Farmstead
Drive, adjacent to Edmonson Avenue (Co. d. 117).
Grittman stated the development meets the equirements for low density residential
development in accordance with the Comp hensive Plan of the City.
Mr. Grittman identified his concerns with t e project as:
1.
2.
3.
. 4.
5.
6.
.
Driveways serving residences along Farmstead Drive should be accessed off of the
private street internal to the project
The driveways and curb cuts along he cul-de-sac should be re-oriented to avoid
the appearance of continuous curb uts.
Additional landscaping should be p ovided in the twin home area to reduce the
impact of wide driveways and exte sive parking.
Drainage area should be provided ith natural vegetation including a mixture of
trees and other plant materials appr priate for their planting location.
A paved pathway connection betw en the cul-de-sac and the School Boulevard
pathway system should be created.
The preliminary plat drawings mus be revised to correspond with revised
Development Stage PUD Plan.
Mr. Grittman advised the Commission tha it would be appropriate to recommend
approval of the Concept Stage PUD; how ver, he recommended that action on the
preliminary plat be tabled pending a final I t arrangement and revised plan.
Chairman Frie opened the public hearing d recognized John Anderson of Midwest land
Surveyors, representing E & K land devel pment. Mr. Anderson responded to the
concerns raised by Grittman:
1.
2.
Drives would be moved off of Fa stead Drive and access the internal street.
Drives off of the cul-de-sac are no easily rearranged, cause floor plan problems
and drives that would extend arou d the buildings into what would otherwise be
back yards.
Additional landscaping would be dded to mitigate the crowding of driveways and
parking.
Natural vegetation will be added t the natural drainage area
3.
4.
S"--7
.
5.
A pathway will be added per the sk tch presented by Grittman.
Mr. Bill Gleason and Mr. John Gleason de cribed their project in detail.
Hearing no other comments, Chairman Fri closed the public hearing.
Commissioners generally spoke in favor of the project. Rod Dragsten questioned the mix
of uses in the area of this development. ttman responded that the use is allowed and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan fo development in the area.
MOTION BY ROD DRAGS TEN TO RE OMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT
THE CONCEPT STAGE PLANNED UN T DEVELOPMENT BE APPROVED
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS DES RIBED IN EXHIBIT B FROM THE STAFF
REPORT, BASED ON A FINDING THA THE ZONING AND DENSITY ARE
APPROPRIATE FOR THE PROJECT.
MOTION SECONDED BY DICK MART E.
Motion passed unanimously.
.
.
Page
~~ -- 'j'
.
.
.
CounciIAgenda-3/9/98
7.
A
Planning Commission conducted a p blic hearing and reviewed comments by
Dick VanAllen, Dan Goeman, and J hn Chadwick regarding the southwest
area planning study. After discussi n, the plan was recommended for
adoption by the Planning Commissi n.
The details of the amendment are povided in Steve Grittman's report.
Please note that a major change to t e original plan calls for development of
an industrial area along the freewa between Oakwood Drive and West
County Road 39. Under the previou plan, this area was guided for
residential uses. Given the contigui y of this area to the city and close
proximity to city services, it is an ar a ripe for industrial development. The
IDC would like more industrial land Attached are comments from Dick
VanAllen, representing the IDC, wh'ch request greater levels of industrial
zoning which, if accepted, would dis lace commercial and residential uses at
I-94/Highway 25.
B. ALTERNATNE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to recommend approv . of the amendments to the
comprehensive plan as propos. d in the "Southwest Area Plan."
2. Motion to defer amendment 0 the comprehensive plan at this time
pending additional discussion nd/or information.
C. STAFF RE
Staff recommends alternative #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Staff report to Planning Commission Letter from Dick VanAllen on behalf of
IDC; Map.
!
f,
.
.
.
10.
Oon of
areas a
Monticelloo (NAC)
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND:
Planning Commission Agenda - 3/05/98
The City's Comprehensive Plan includes land u e planning for areas south and west of the
current City boundaries. As you may recall, a significant concept of the Comprehensive
Plan is to direct future growth to the south and est of the City by investing in infrastructure
improvements which would serve growth in that direction rather than to the east. Over the
past several months, staff has conducted a mor detailed study of the issues which would
affect land use patterns in that area, including t ansportation, utility corridors, physical lay
of the land, existing land uses, and Goals and Policies from the current Plan. A concept
land use plan was developed with these issues n mind, and which has been discussed at
staff level, with other City organizations, and a a public open house.
The purpose of the plan amendment is to allo the City to plan for both long- and short-
tenn infrastructure improvements which would b needed to serve the area. Although the
plan would have no legal effect as things now st nd, a component of the proposed Orderly
Annexation Area agreement with Monticello T wnship would include the adoption of the
City's land use plan in the revised OM. As a esult, the City's Comprehensive Plan and
its component "SouthlWest Area Plan" would rm the basis for any land use decision in
the OM, preserving the various properties fo the City's long-term intended use. This
OM agreement has been tentatively approve by both parties as of this date.
Since the OM agreement in not in final form, there is still a slight possibility that some
event could interfere with final approval. In the vent the agreement failed to be finalized,
the Land Use Plan for the area is still important r the City. It could serve as the basis for
the City's request of the OAA Board for an a endment to its land use plan. Even as
infonnation for that Board, and the Board's admi istrator (County Planner Tom Salkowski),
the land Use Plan would provide important gu dance for land use decisions in the extra-
territorial areas adjacent to the City. Finally, it n provide direction for future development
of land in those areas when land owners are s eking annexation.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
1. Motion to recommend approval of the a endments to the Comprehensive Plan as
proposed in the "SouthlWest Area Plan.
2. Motion to defer amendment of the C mprehensive Plan at this time, pending
additional discussion and/or informatio .
12
--I
.-
.
.
.
c.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission Agenda - 3/05/98
Staff recommends approval of the Compreh nsive Plan amendment for the South and
West growth areas. We believe that this plan best reflects the policies and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan, and City's future gr wth. The plan permits the City to grow in
a manageable fashion, and allows for the logi I, incremental extensions of infrastructure
to accommodate the natural growth and de lopment of the community. Moreover, it
provides clear guidance for development pr posals in the extra-territorial area. This
guidance is important both to direct land use in reas scheduled for future annexation, and
to direct development proposals-from land ow ers seeking annexation to the City.
D. SUPPORTING DATA
Exhibit A . SouthlWest Area land Use Plan
191.06-97.19
13
...2.-
.
.
.
SOUTH/WEST AREA
LAND USE PLAN
BACKGROUND
The City's 1996 Comprehensive Plan
includes a land use plan which reflects the
various goals and policies of the City.
Included in the land use plan element is a
specific plan and discussion of the City's
southwest area (within orderly annexation
area).
The southwest area of Monticello overlays
that portion of the City lying south of
Interstate 94 and west of TH 25. Generally
speaking, the area is characterized by
farmlands and wetlands. Some pockets of
rural residential development have been
established, particularly to the west. As
noted in the Comprehensive Plan,
incremental growth in this area is encouraged
both for financial and social reasons.
This amendment to the City's Comprehensive
Plan is intended to build on the foundation
established in the 1996 Plan. The plan
amendment itself identifies conceptual street
layouts, including westerly extensions of
Chelsea Road and School Boulevard. While
the Comprehensive Plan provides generalized
street and land use depictions, a refinement
of the plan taking into account more detailed
information (Le., wetland boundaries, power
line locations, soil conditions, etc.) is
necessary to achieve eventual plan
implementation.
SoulhlWesl Area Land Use Plan Page 1
LAND USE PLAN
Design Parameters. A variety of area
features serve to influence the street and land
use depicted upon the refined southwest area
land use plan. These include Interstate 94
visibility and accessibility, existing and
planned interchange locations (accessibility),
existing land uses, property lines, and street
patterns, wetland and drainageway locations
and finally overhead power line routes.
Street System. As shown on the land use
plan, a major collector street has been
proposed which would parallel Interstate 94.
The street also follows an existing overhead
power line route. The collector street would
serve to link a future interchange at County
Road 75 (l20th Street) with the existing
interchange at Highway 25 and would
provide connection to existing Chelsea Road.
In addition to the Chelsea Road extension, a
westerly extension of School Boulevard has
also been proposed. This extension would
link 90th Street and Highway 25.
The land use plan makes note of a future
interchange at County Road 75 (l20th Street)
and Interstate 94. It is envisioned that the
interchange would be utilized by the majority
truck traffic associated industrial uses in the
vicinity.
Monticello Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~ 1998
_.
....
.
LAND USE
Low Density Residential. As shown on the
attached land use plan, a substantial portion
of the study area is shown as low density
residential use. It is anticipated that single
family growth in this area will be comprised
of residents who have few natural ties to the
community. The area's street system (and
arrangement of land uses) is such that area
residents will be "funneled" into
Monticello's commercial areas by virtue of
their routine use of Highway 25 and/or
County Road 39.
.
To the extent possible, low density
residential uses have been located or oriented
such that the incompatibilities with higher
intensity uses will be minimized.
Specifically, features such as wetlands,
power lines and transitional uses have been
used to mitigate adverse impacts. The
majority of the lands south of the current
City boundaries (generally the north halves
of Sections 22,23, and 24) are programmed
for low density residential land use. It is
expected that this will consist of single
family development, with a possibility of
limited twin-home or low-density townhome
development mixed in.
Mid-Demity Residential. In addition to low
density residential uses, mid-density
residential uses have been proposed within
the study area. Specifically, these uses are
proposed along the School Boulevard
extension east of 90th Street. Mid density
residential uses overlay approximately 90
acres of land and are expected to have
densities of generally 4 to 8 dwelling units
per acre. This translates into over 500
.
South/West Area Land Use Plan Page 2
medium density units within the study area.
Commercial. As shown on the land use
plan, commercial development has been
proposed directly south of Interstate 94 and
west of Highway 25. This use designation is
intended to reinforce Highway 25 as a
commercial service corridor of the
community and supplement the downtown
commercial area. It should be noted that
immediate "infilling" of the 173 acres of
commercially designated lands is not
anticipated. In fact, it is the intent of the
plan to designate "long term" locations for
commercial development and confine such
uses to the Interstate 94/Highway 25
interchange area, and the Highway 25
corridor south of the Interstate.
There has been some discussion of extending
commercial uses to the west along the
freeway frontage. However, this plan
attempts to follow the direction of the 1996
Comprehensive Plan in preserving
commercial land for the development of
locally oriented retail and service uses as
opposed to highway oriented commerce.
Too many of the highway oriented uses
would compete with downtown revitalization
efforts, particularly in the areas of food and
lodging. As a result, the commercial areas
shown are intended to encourage a long term
supply of general/regional business locations.
Industrial. The industrial land use
designations shown on the land use plan are
intended to take advantage of visibility
associated with the interstate corridor and
coincide with the future construction of a
west Monticello interchange at 1-94 and
MonticeUo Comprehensive Plan Amendment ~ 1998
.&
I
.
County Road 75/0rchard Road. Industrial
uses have purposely been guided in the
northern portion of the study area to avoid
the interspersement of industrial truck traffic
with residential/commercial traffic at the 1-
94/Highway 25 interchange area. In total,
the land use plan designates approximately
310 acres of land as industrial use.
.
An area of industrial land use is planned for
the freeway frontage just west of 90th Street
along the westerly extension of Chelsea
Road. This area would be quickly accessible
due to the location of streets and utilities.
U ntH the street connections and the Orchard
Road interchange are completed, this area
would add industrial traffic to the 1-94ffH 25
area. It is anticipated that the improvements
along TH 25, and the signal at Chelsea Road,
will help to manage the impacts of this traffic
until the west interchange is a reality.
Public/Semi-Public. The land use plan
illustrates a large area of park and open space
between 90th Street and Highway 25. Of the
approximately 100 acres, about 60 acres is
wetland. Aside from the obvious active
(Le., ball fields) and passive (walking trails)
recreational opportunities offered by the
park, the use is intended to serve as a
unifying element for abutting low density
residential, mid-density residential and
commercial land uses.
The park has been located such to provide a
visual connection from Highway 25, a
transition from uses of differing intensity,
and finally to provide direct active
recreational opportunities to abutting
residential uses. It is anticipated that the
more active spaces will be able to utilize
.
South/West Area Land Use Plan Page 3
power line corridor as parking area, with
athletic fields flanking the parking. The
more passive areas would be located around
the ponds and wetlands, with pathway
connections to the Chelsea Road and School
Boulevard areas.
Also to be noted is the existing Cemetery
located along 90th Street and the proposed
Chelsea Road extension. The cemetery's
proximity to adjacent low density residential,
commercial and industrial uses allows it to
serve as a highly visible "green area " (due to
street corner location) which will provide
visual relief to the area.
Monticello Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 1998
;!,.,
- '-:'.
.
.
.
Thursday, March 05,1998
IDC befare the City PI nning Cammissian
First af all I want to. make sure that l hen we think indnstrial we are nat
thinking smake stack and rust belt. Last Sa urday a 30 minute taur af the Ramsey
and Anaka Industrial Parks revealed this p~ rtiallist af accupants, all added within
the last two. years.
ANOKA I lAMSEY
300 + Acres
LUNDS j ccent Hame Kitchen Center
Una Clad Capper Sales I eritage Millwark
Reliant Engineering & Manufacturing ). utamated EDM Incarparated
( 8:lectrical Discharge Machining)
Carbide Taal Services , valf And Assaciates, Architects
Rayal Engineering and Manufacturing
Artam Inc. Precisian Machining
First Team Sparts
Pianeer Printing and Packaging
Internatianal Building Cancepts
Central Pawer Distributars
Rainbaw Signs
1- IDC recammends Planning cansider a do. g leg af industrial zaning beginning to.
the west alang I 94 as has been prapased; cantinuing to. 25 and I 94 and then
heading sauth alang 25 to. include the "0.1 Remmele praperty".
Alang with that recammendatian we suggest hat:
a) Area set aside far the prapased 83 acre industrial site be expanded to.
encampass the pawer lines that ru 1 alang ane side and enaugh land to.
pravide a raw af industrial sites to. the sauth af the pawer line
b) That we need to. be very sensitive t [) needs af cammercial property awners
at the carner of I 94 and 25 provid . ng reasonable access to. their places af
business.
c) The "Old Remmele Praperty" no~ owned by the City shauld be zaned
Industrial, praviding;
1) Easy land access
2) Immediate availability < f larger parcels far same industries
3) the potential to. use land under pawer lines an this property far
Industrial Parking
4) a natural runoff callect< r and drainage to. the pond adjacent
to. paved industrial area .
5) Beneficial use of this civ owned parcel.
""- i
A:IDCplng , ."",
..
-- --". --.-- -- ,.. ----.... -
ft;
.
.
.
d) We believe this is a beginning an brings the need for the Planning
Commission to consider the following ques .ons
2- QUESTIONS
a) How much Industry do w want?
b) How much will it take?
c) How soon?
d) If property is zoned Indus rial can you build commercial?
A:IDCplng
~7
SOU DWEST AREA CONCEPT PLAN
,
NaG
November 1997
o 1000 2000 3000
r.;...
SCALE IN FEET
-rr
. "..,... _ w ~ _ _ .... _ ...
.
D Low Den5ity Re5idential
_ Medium I High Den5ity Re5idential
_ Commercial
_ Indu5trial
Public! Semi Public
~ Future Street
1-'1
.NANCIAL SYSTEM
.,98 13:34:30
CITY OF MONT CELLO
GL050S-V05.20 COV RPAGE
GL540R
Schedule of 8ills
{eport Selection:
RUN GROUP... 0226
COMMENT... 2/26 CKS
OATA-JE-IO
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
0-02261998-346 2/26 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq 8anner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
---- - - -,-
- -- -- -... --, -.. ..
-,- ---- ---, "'--, -'.._, ,,-
BIlllfNANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
0< '98 13:34:31 Schedule of Bi 18 GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 1
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
A T & T WIRELESS SERVICE
RICK-CELLULAR 12.02 TELEPHONE 101.41301.3210 346 00001
JEFF-CELLULAR 26.34 TELEPHONE 101.41910.3210 346 00002
GARY-CELLULAR 27. 16 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 346 00003
65.52 *VENDOR TOTAL
ADCO PUBLISHING COMPANY
LIQUOR-ADVERTISING 49.80 ADVERTISING 09.49754.3499 346 00004
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
TAX MISC 672.90 MISe TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 27169800 346 00005
GEN OP 14.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 09.49754.2199 27169800 346 00006
686.90 *VENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
BEER 263.20 BEER 609.49750.2520 346 00009
MISC TAXABLE 49.40 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 346 00010
312.60 *VENDOR TOTAL
CAMPBELL ABSTRACT COM PAN
.OF TITLE 675.00 PROF SRV - LEGAL FEES 4 0.49201.3040 346 00007
CENTRAL MINN INITIATIVE
CCIF GRANT REIMB 1,100.21 ' GRANT REIMBURSEMENT 2 3.46501.6601 346 00008
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 2,069.13 BEER 609.49750.2520 346 00011
NON ALCOHOLIC 45.35 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 346 00012
2,114.48 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 309.70 BEER 60 .49750.2520 3.6 00013
DUANE'S TRACTOR PAINTING
SAND BLAST BRIDGE RAILS 300.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 10 .45201.3199 346 00014
~CONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRT
EC DEV-MEMBERSHIP DUES 1,004.00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 10 1.46501.4330 346 00015
-IRSTAR BANK
GO WATER SYS BONDS 260.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 354.47001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00016
GO INSPR BONDS 1991A 185.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 326.47001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00017
GO TAX INCRE BOND 1990C 260.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 382 47001. 6201 AGENT FEES 346 00018
GO TAX INCRE 1989A 260.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 380 47001. 620 1 AGENT FEES 346 00019
GO IMPR BONDS 1989B 262.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 377 47001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00020
~X INCRE 1985 262.50 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 323 47001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00021
PR BOND 1992A 185.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 327.47001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00022
GO TAX INCRE BONO 19900 260.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 382.41001.6201 AGENT FEES 346 00023
1,934.50 *VENDOR TOTAL
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
o 798 13:34:31 Schedule of Bi 15 GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P ID LINE
FLESCH'S PAPER SERVICES,
OP SUPPLIES 178.80 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 1010750 346 00024
FOSTER-FRANZ EN-CARLSON A
WWTP-BOILER & MACH INS 2,603.00 MISC GENERAL INSURANCE 436.49201.3699 346 00025
GCR MN TRUCK TIRE CENTER
FIRE-TIRE & LUBE 670.21 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICLES 101.42201.4050 67678 346 00027
GLUNZ/RAYMOND J
(5) GRAVE SITES 1,655.00 PROF SRV - EXCAVATION 651.49010.3115 346 00026
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
FREIGHT 106.00 FREIGHT 09.49750.3330 346 00028
LIQUOR 6,385.18 LIQUOR 09.49750.2510 346 00029
WINE 1,151.06 WINE 09.49750.2530 346 00030
MISC TAXABLE 50.75 MISC TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 346 00031
7,692.99 *VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
. TAXABLE 16,935.45 BEER 09.49750.2520 346 00032
144.00 MISC TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 346 00033
17,079.45 *VENDOR TOTAL
HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
*FY* WWTP - DECEMBER 38,402.32 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 36.49201.3030 346 00034
HOLIDAY CREDIT OFFICE
FIRE-MOTOR FUEL 45.73 MOTOR FUELS 101.42201.2120 346 00035
HOMETOWN EYE CARE, INC
WATER-EYECARE SERVICE 156.00 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2111 346 00036
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
FREIGHT 50.96 FREIGHT 6 9.49750.3330 346 00037
LIQUOR 3,540.65 LIQUOR 6 9.49750.2510 346 00038
WINE 717.23 WINE 6 9.49750.2530 346 00039
4,308.84 *VENDOR TOTAL
K MART STORE
PW-ADM OFFICE SUPPLIES 86.21 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 1.43110.2099 346 00040
FIRE-CRIMPING TOOL 5.31 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 1 1.42201.2410 346 00041
91. 52 *VENDOR TOTAL
L 'N' R SERVICES - LOCKS
~AN SHELTER-DOOR SUP 308.22 BUILDINGS 1 1. 42701. 5201 346 00042
LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE
STREETS - VEH REP PARTS 22.63 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 1 1.43120.2211 346 00043
WATER-OP SUPPLIES 8.52 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 6 1.49440.2199 346 00044
LIQUOR-OP SUPPLIES 47.03 MIse OPERATING SUPPLIES 609.49754.2199 346 00045
._." - _n __._ _." ._._ ._ _
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
o ~98 13:34:31 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME UND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
LARSON'S ACE HARDWARE
BLDG-REPAIR & MAINT 313.62 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 01.42201.4010 346 00046
AN SHELTER-REP & MAINT 24.19 REPAIR & MTC - BUILDINGS 01.42101.4010 346 00041
LIBRARY-CLNING SUPPLIES 10.61 CLEANING SUPPLIES 11.45501.2110 346 00048
WATER-SMALL TOOLS 14.29 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 01.49440.2410 346 00049
SHOP-EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 53.20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 01.43121.2210 346 00050
PARKS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 1.41 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 01.45201.2211 346 00051
PARKS-OP SUPPLIES 48.50 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 01.45201.2199 346 00052
CH-MISC OP SUPPLIES 8.51 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.41940.2199 346 00053
618.51 *VENDOR TOTAL
LITTLE MOUNTAIN FLOWERS
FIRE-PLANT/LABREE 18.64 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.42201.4399 346 00054
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
WATERCRAFT TITLE 258.00 DNR PAYABLE 1 1.20811 346 00056
WATERCRAFT REG 512.00 DNR PAYABLE 1 1.20811 346 00051
SNOWMOBILE REG 49.00 DNR PAYABLE 1 1.20811 346 00058
ATV REG 112.00 DNR PAYABLE 1 1.20811 346 00059
931. 00 *VENDOR TOTAL
MN~ OF TRADE & ECON
SCERG GRANT REIMB 2.483.45 GRANT REIMB - AROPLAX 2 2.46501. 6602 346 00055
MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASS
FIRE-MEMBERSHIP DUES 80.00 DUES. MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 10 1.42201.4330 346 00060
NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNIT
*FY* AN SHELTER-OFF FURN 556.85 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 101.42101.5601 346 00062
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 1.414.98 ELECTRIC 60 .49440.3810 346 00063
SEWER 292.56 ELECTRIC 60 .49490.3810 346 00064
STREET LIGHTS 5.483.96 ELECTRIC 10 .43160.3810 346 00065
DEP REG 63.05 ELECTRIC 10 .41990.3810 346 00066
PARKS 884.83 ELECTRIC 10 .45201.3810 346 00061
CIVIL DEFENSE 9.42 ELECTRIC 10 .42501.3810 346 00068
SHOP/GARAGE 121.30 ELECTRIC 101.43121.3810 346 00069
FIRE DEPT 358.13 ELECTRIC 101.42201.3810 346 00010
LIBRARY 823.03 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 346 00011
CITY HALL 619.49 ELECTRIC 101.41940.3810 346 00012
PARI\!NG LOTS 82.35 ELECTRIC 101.43140.3810 346 00013
10.219.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
~ILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
.~T 29.81 FREIGHT 609 49150.3330 346 00014
1.201.68 LIQUOR 609 49150.2510 346 00015
WINE 131.25 WINE 609 49150.2530 346 00016
1.968.80 *VENDOR TOTAL
-" _.,,- -~.- - -..-. -
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
Oc 798 13;34;31 Schedule of Bil ls GL540R-Y05.20 PAGE 4
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME UNO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
PHOTO I
BLD INSP-FILM DEV 31. 58 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 01.42401.3199 345 00078
PITNEY BOWES
PW-POSTAGE MACHINE RENT 129.47 EQU I PMENT RENTAL 01.43110.4150 1/25 TO 5/15 345 00077
PREUSSE/JAMES L
CITY HALL 460.00 PROF SRY - CUSTODIAL 01.41940.3110 346 00079
PUBLIC WORKS (LESS $15) 105.00 PROF SRY - CUSTODIAL 01.41990.3110 346 00080
PUBLIC WORKS 150.00 PROF SRY - CUSTODIAL 01.43110.3110 345 00081
715.00 *YENDOR TOTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
WWTP - MARCH 37,563.50 PROF SRY - PSG, INC 02.49480.3080 346 00082
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
LI QUOR 209.95 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 346 00083
WINE 143.00CR WINE 609.49750.2530 346 00084
66.95 *YENDOR TOTAL
R~E DATA CORPORATIO
DEP REG COMP TO ST 433.00 PROF SRY - DATA PROCESSI 101.41920.3090 20980 346 00085
RIYERSIDE OIL
STREETS - FUEL 1,758.44 MOTOR FUELS 101.43120.2120 346 00086
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE 37.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 6298 346 00087
ROWEKAMP ASSOCIATES, INC
PW INSP-ARCCAD SEMINAR 550.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 101.43115.3320 9800020 346 00088
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA
AN SHELTER-FACE PLATE 75.00 BUILDINGS 101.42701.5201 346 00061
SCHARBER & SONS, INC.
ICE & SNOW-OP SUPPLIES 750.09 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43125.2199 346 00089
ICE & SNOW-BLOWER&PLOWS 800.85 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43125.2210 346 00090
PARKS-YEH REPAIR PARTS 578.44 YEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.45201.2211 346 00091
ICE & SNOW-SKID STEER 34,070.41 HEAYY MACH INERY 101.43125.5401 346 00092
36,199.79 *YENDOR TOTAL
SIMONSON LUMBER COMPANY
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 27.57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 101.43120.2199 346 00093
AN SHELTER-SUPPLIES 133.89 BUILDINGS 101.42701.5201 346 00094
. 161.46 *YENDOR TOTAL
SIMPSON/CYNTHIA R
FIRE HALL CLEANING 50.00 PROF SRY - CUSTODIAL 101.42201.3110 FEBRUARY 346 00095
-.-- -.. - -.- -. .-.-.. .."- .-.-
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
o. 798 13:34:31 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 5
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME UND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
MISC TAXABLE 171.89 MISC TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 346 00096
SUPERIOR FCR LANDFILL,
LANDFILL CHARGES 1,052.71 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 10 1.43230.3199 JANUARY 346 00097
TDS TELECOM
LI BRARY 68.52 TELEPHONE 21 1.45501. 3210 346 00098
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 6,511.85 BEER 6 9.49750.2520 346 00099
MISC TAXABLE 48.25 MISC TAXABLE 6 9.49750.2540 346 00100
6,560.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
SHADE TREE-TOM&JEFF G 145.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 2 4.46102.3320 346 00104
UNOCAL
*FY* FIRE-FUEL 18.84 MOTOR FUELS 10 1.42201.2120 346 00105
U1IIII{ER-WATERPRO
-METERS 581. 24 METERS & VALVES FOR RESA 60 .49440.2271 384488 346 00101
US WEST DIRECTORY ADVERT
LIQUOR-ADVERTISING 33.60 ADVERTISING 60 .49754.3499 346 00102
JSA WASTE SERVICES, INC
REFUSE THROUGH 1/15 1.780.30 PROF SRV - REFUSE COLLEC 10 1.43230.3100 346 00103
lIKING COCA COLA
LIQUOR-TAXABLEMISC 395,40 MISC TAXABLE 60 9.49750.2540 346 00106
I S DARLEY & COMPANY
*FY* WWTP-SUPPLIES 97,57 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 43 6 49201.2199 227243 346 00107
ATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
MISC TAXABLE 157,93 MISC TAXABLE 60 9 49750,2540 346 00108
iIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TR
SCERG GRANT REIMB 2,760.51 GRANT REIMBURSEMENT 22 2,46501. 6601 346 00109
TAX-CARDINAL HILLS 4TH 255.95 MISe OTHER EXPENSE 10 1.45201.4399 346 00111
SHERIFF PATROL 27,776.40 PROF SRV - LAW ENFORCEME 10 1. 2101.3050 FEBRUARY 346 00110
30,792,86 *VENDOR TOTAL
IGHT COUNTY MAYOR'S AS
~-DUES 150,00 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 10 1. 1110.4330 346 00112
.,.,
IGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
30HANAN FARMS 8.79 MIse OTHER EXPENSE 43 6. 9201.4399 346 00113
B.NANCIAL SYSTEM
o~ 798 13:34:31
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
*FY* TH 25/CHELSEA ROAD
*FY* TH 25/CHELSEA ROAD
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPAN
OP SUPPLIES
ZIEGLER, INC.
ICE & SNOW-MISC OP SUPP
STREETS-EQUIP REPAIR
.
~
.....
Schedule of Bflls
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
32,279.50
1,251.47
33,530.97
- --'-. -'--'-._. ---- --- - -'--
FUND & ACCOUNT
PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 450.49201.3030
MISC OTHER EXPENSE 450.49201.4399
*VENDOR TOTAL
48.69 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 09.49754.2199
1,142.36
42.06
1,184.42
MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
*VENDOR TOTAL
01.43125.2199
01.43120.2210
CLAIM INVOICE
57688326
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 6
PO# F/P 10 LINE
346 00114
346 00115
346 00116
346 00117
346 00118
8.- NANCIAL SYSTEM
Q 798 13:34:31
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
223
Schedule of 8; 15
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
253,241.26
RECORDS PRINTED - 000118
~---;:n;1Ooni\-l o1:UiTiI'i \ - o7iri'1"li'",,--
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 7
PO# F/P 10 LINE
.NANCIAL SYSTEM
o ,98 13:34:33
Schedule of Bi ls
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURSE ENTS
101 GENERAL FUND
211 LI BRARY FUND
222 SCERG (ECON RECOVERY GRANT)
223 CMIF (CENT MN INIT FUND)
224 SHADE TREE FUND
323 1989-1,-2,-3 G.O. BOND FUND
326 1991A- 1,-2,-3 G.O. BOND FD
327 1992A CHILLS/SCHOOL BLV BD
354 1988 WATER SYSTEM BOND FUND
317 TIF 1985 (VEIT) BOND FUND
380 TIF 1989 (ELDERLY) BOND FUND
382 TIF 19900 (REM/TAP) BOND FD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
6~IVERSIDE CEMETERY
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
84,72 .74
902.16
5,243.96
1,100.21
145.00
2 2.50
1 5.00
1 5.00
2 0.00
2 2.00
2 0.00
5 0.00
41 ,1 1. 68
34,2 5.97
2,1 9.03
37,8 6.06
42,2 0.95
1,6 5.00
253,21.26
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
DISBURS MENTS
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
211,0 0.31
42,2 0.95
TOTAL ALL BANKS
253,2 1.26
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVI WED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
..... ............... ......... ++++
. ............ ............+...... >.
....... +... +. .............+.......
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
--_.'-'-~._' .---.-
8RC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:30
.
Schedule of 8ills
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... M228D COMMENT..- 2/28 MANUAL CKS
DATA-JE-IO
DATA COMMENT
------~---~--- ------------------------
M-02281998-329 FE8 MANUAL CKS
CITY OF M NTICELLC
GL050S-V05.20 OVERPAGE
GL540R
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
_.'_ - ____n_
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:31
.OR NAME
DESCRIPTION
ADAMS NUT & BOLT CO
*FY* AS-ANCHOR VOID
ALLERGY FREE
AIR FILTER VOID CK
ANDERSON/DONNA
*FY* WWTP-PAYMENT #10
WWTP-PAYM~NT #11
BARRETT MOVING & STORAGE
ESTIMATE FEE
CARLSON/ROGER
IOC BANQUET REIMB
*FY* IOC BANQUET REIMB
FROSLIE/KATHLEEN A
EDA-DMRF #101 & 103
.RNMENT TRAINING CENT
ANN lNG-WORKSHOP (4)
PLANNING-(ADDT) SEMINAR
GWASHY'S PllZA SUBS & MO
CC-EARLY CC MEETING
IRWIN HAWKINS
TIF 1-22 EARNEST MONEY
KOROPCHAK/OL I VE
TRAVEL EXPENSE
LOCH JEWELERS
*FY* EC DEV-PLAQUE
*FY* EC DEV-PLAQUE
MARQUETTE BANK MONTICELL
4M FUND
TRANSFER FEE
GMEF #014-AROPLAX
SMITH BARNEY
WIRE CHARGE
.
Schedule of ills
AMOUNT
ACCOUNT NAME
410.40CR BUILDINGS
FUND & ACCOUNT
101.42701.5201
42.95CR REPAIR & MTC - BUILDIN S 609.49754.4010
624,107.13
296,943.93
921,051.06
PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTION 436.49201.3025
PROF SRV - CONSTRUCTIO 436.49201.3025
*VENDOR TOTAL
100.00
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 450.49201.3199
75.00CR MISC OTHER EXPENSE
75.00 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
J.OO *VENOOR TOTAL
3,000.00 GRANT REIMB -
250.46501.4399
101.46501.4399
250.46501. 6602
320.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 101.41910.3320
111. 00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 101.41910.3320
431 .00 *VENDOR TOTAL
23.96 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41110.4399
100.00 LAND 213.46522.5101
81.46 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.46501.3310
49.46CR MISC OTHER EXPENSE 250.49501.4399
49.46 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.46501.4399
0.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
300,000.00 INVESTMENTS 955.10401
15.00 BANK CHARGES 101.41520.4398
87,500.00 LONG TERM REC-TJ MARTI 250.18310
103,500.00 INVESTMENTS 955.10401
15.00 BANK CHARGES 101.41520.4398
491,030.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 1
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
329 00001
329 00039
329 00015
329 00048
329 00012
329 00030
329 00035
329 00009
329 00010
329 00038
329 00045
329 00002
329 00023
329 00033
329 00037
329 00021
329 00022
329 00044
329 00046
329 00047
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:31
eOR NAME
OESCRI PT ION
MAUS FOODS
tFY* OLLIE~PASTRY
*FY* OLLIE-PASTRY
MINNEAPOLIS VAN
TRANSPORTATION CHARGES
MN DEPART OF NATURAL RES
WA TERCRAFT TITLE
WATERCRAFT REG
SNOWMOBILE REG
ATV REG
WATERCRAFT REG
SNOWMOBILE REG
ATV REG
WATERCRAFT REG
SNOWMOBILE REG
ATV REG
MN MUNICIPAL BOARD
.LING FEE
MONTICELLO CHAMBER OF CO
tFY* IDC BANQ TICKETS
*FY* IDC BANQUET TICKETS
MONTICELLO DEPUTY REG #0
FEES-98 TOWMSTR TRAILER
MONTICELLO RV CENTER
LAND PURCHASE
NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNIT
*FY* AN SHEL -VOIO~
NORTHWEST MINNESOTA CHAP
FES 6 MEETING
PREUSSE/JAMES L
CH CLEANING VOID CK
DEP REG CLN VOID CK
PUBLIC WRKS CLN YOlO
.WINE COMPANY
.NE YOlO #19231
AMOUNT
Schedule of ills
ACCOUNT NAME
27.67CR MISC OTHER EXPENSE
27.67 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
0.00 *YENOOR TOTAL
'UNO & ACCOUNT
250.46501.4399
101.46501.4399
100.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERV C 450.49201.3199
42.00
609.00
1,541 .00
126.00
770.00
887-00
72.00
352.00
621.00
166.00
5,186.00
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
ONR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
DNR PAYABLE
*YENDOR TOTAL
15.00 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
375.00CR MISC OTHER EXPENSE
375.00 MISC OTHER EXPENSE
0.00 *YENDOR TOTAL
390.13 LICENSES & PERMITS
16,250.00 LAND
556.85CR FURNITURE & FIXTURES
10.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS
460.00CR PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL
120.00CR PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL
150.00CR PROF SRY - CUSTODIAL
730.00CR *YENDOR TOTAL
144.00CR WINE
101.20811
101.20811
101.20811
101.20811
101 .20811
101. 20811
101.20811
101. 20811
101.20811
101.20811
101.41910.4399
250.46501.4399
101.46501.4399
101.45201.4370
450.49201.5101
609.49754.5601
101.42401.3320
101.41940.3110
101.41990.3110
101.43110.3110
609.49750.2530
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-Y05.20 PAGE 2
CLAIM INYOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
329 00029
329 00034
329 00013
329 00005
329 00006
329 00007
329 00008
329 00018
329 00019
329 00020
329 00024
329 00025
329 00026
329 00003
329 00032
329 00036
329 00028
329 00011
329 00027
329 00004
329 00041
329 00042
329 00043
329 00040
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:31
.OR NAME
OESCR I PT ION
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TR
HRA-PROPERTY TAX
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
EASEMENT-MEADOW OAKES ES
EASEMENT-MEADOW OAKS EST
.
.
AMOUNT
Schedule of 8.11s
ACCOUNT NAME
644.25 PROPERTY TAXES
19.50
19.50
39.00
FUND & ACCOUNT
213.45301.3710
MIse PROFESSIONAL SERVI 439.49201.3199
MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVI 439.49201.3199
*VENOOR TOTAL
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
CLAIM INVOICE PO~ F/P 10 LINE
:329 00014
329 00015
329 00017
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:31
.OR NAME
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
REPORT TOTALS:
1,436,577 .66
Schedule of ills
ACCOUNT NAME
FUND & ACCOUNT
RECORDS PRINTED - 000047
.
.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
- _..~. -- ~.. -- ._-" ..-. ---
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
03/02/98 10:48:32
.
FUND RECAP :
Schedule of 8ills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
FUND DESCRIPTION
----------------------------
DIS URSEMENTS
101 GENERAL FUND
213 HRA FUND
250 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTH FD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
439 93-12C M.O. TRUNK STM SEWER
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
S09 MUNICIPAL lIQUOR FUND
955 INVESTMENT HOLDING FUND
5,554.28
744.25
8 ,972.87
92 ,051.06
39.00
1 ,460.00
743.80 CR
40 ,500.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
l,436,577.66
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
----------------------------
DISBUR EMENTS
.
GENERAL CHECKING
LIQUOR CHECKING
~,437, 21.46
43.80 CR
TOTAL ALL BANKS
1,436, 77.66
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIE ED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
........ ....... -............
..,........................ .
.............. .+.........,.. +....
-
-
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM
03/04/98 14:28:25
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V05.20 CO ERPAGE
GL540R
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 0304
COMMENT... 3/04 GEN CKS
DATA-JE-ID
DATA COMMENT
0-03041998-356 3/05 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
03/04/98 14:28:25 Schedule of Bil 15 GL540R-Y05.20 PAGE 1
YENDOR NAME
OESCRI PTlON AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME F NO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INYOICE POll FIP 10 LINE
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY I
REFUSE-GARBAGE CARTS 14,077.97 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 1 1.43230.2199 42104 356 00001
AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNE
JOHN M & RICH C 18.38 TELEPHONE 6 1.49440.3210 PAGERS 356 00002
MATT 27.24 TELEPHONE 6 2.49490.3210 PAGERS 356 00003
PATTY 15.92 TELEPHONE 1 1.42701.3210 PAGERS 356 00004
JOHN S 9.19 TELEPHONE 1 1.43110.3210 PAGERS 356 00005
GARY A 9.19 TELEPHONE 1 1. 42401. 321 0 PAGERS 356 00006
JOHN L 9.19 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 PAGERS 356 00007
TOM 8 9.19 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 PAGERS 356 00008
ROGER 9.19 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 PAGERS 356 00009
107.49 *YENDOR TOT AL
BELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
TAXABLE MISC 672 .90 MISC TAXABLE 09.49750.2540 27169800 356 00011
GEN OP 14.00 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 09.49754.2199 27169800 356 00012
686.90 *YENDOR TOTAL
BEIIIIt'S PEPSI COLA COM 946.85 BEER 09.49750.2520 356 00017
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOU
TOM B 3.69 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 CELLULAR 356 00013
FIRE DEPT 0.86 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 CELLULAR 356 00014
GARY A 15.84 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 CELLULAR 356 00015
MATT T 5.92 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 CELLULAR 356 00016
26.31 *YENDOR TOTAL
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 12,168.99 BEER 609.49750.2520 356 00018
NON ALCOHOLIC 261.20 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 356 00019
12,430.19 *YENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 1,022.70 BEER 609.49750.2520 356 00020
FIRST TRUST CENTER
96B 125.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 385.47001.6201 ADM FEES 356 00021
96C 125.00 FISCAL AGENTS' FEES 360.47001.6201 ADM FEES 356 00022
96A 125.00 fISCAL AGENTS' fEES 330.47001.6201 ADM FEES 356 00023
375.00 *YENDOR TOTAL
FOSTER-fRANZEN-CARLSON A
~SCHEOUlE BONO 195.00 MISC GENERAL INSURANCE 101.42201.3699 3300 356 00024
GAT AY 2000
COMPUTER EQUIP 12,798.13 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 101.41920.5702 356 00025
- -'- --- - - -. - -.'-' -.. ...
:.NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
3/04/98 14:28:25 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
IENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
,RIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
FREIGHT 226.00 FREIGHT 60 .49750.3330 356 00026
LI QUOR 5,685.07 LI QUOR 60 .49750.2510 356 00021
WINE 510.47 WINE 60 .49750.2530 356 00028
MISC TAXABLE 249.50 MISC TAXABLE 60 .49150.2540 356 00029
6,671.04 *VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 13,208.10 BEER 60 .49750.2520 144491 356 00030
MISC TAXABLE 131.25 MISC TAXABLE 60 .49750.2540 144491 356 00031
13,339.35 *VENDOR TOTAL
HERMES/GERALD T
LIBRARY CLEANING 227. 50 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 21 .45501.3110 3/1 TO 3/15 356 00032
HOGLUND COACH LINES LTD
HEARTLAND EXPRESS 5,234.11 PROF SVR - HEARTLAND BUS 61 .49801.3060 FEBRUARY 356 00033
HOME JUICE
eISC 17. 55 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 92013 356 00034
JOHNSON BROS WHOLESALE L
FREIGHT 128.12 FREIGHT 6 9.49750.3330 356 00035
LIQUOR 3,152.31 LIQUOR 6 9.49750.2510 356 00036
WINE 2,911.20 WINE 6 9.49750.2530 356 00037
6,191.63 *VENDOR TOTAL
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTE
EC DEV-LEGAL FEES 564.25 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 1.46501.3199 356 00038
KOROPCHAK/OLIVE
TRAVEL REIMB 35.08 TRAVEL EXPENSE 1 1.46501.3310 356 00087
MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC.
STREETS-SWEEPS CLINIC(2) 80.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOOLS 1 1.43120.3320 356 00039
MIDDENDORF/JOHN
SAFETY BOOTS REIMB 90.00 CLOTHING SUPPLIES 6 1.49440.2111 356 00040
MONTICELLO SENIOR CITIIE
CONTRACT 2,833.33 SENIOR CENTER CONTRIBUTI 10 1.45175.3136 APRIL 356 00041
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 813.86 ELECTRIC 01.49440.3810 356 00042
.T LIGHTS 887.21 ELECTRIC 02.49490.3810 356 00043
128.52 ELECTRIC 01.43160.3810 356 00044
CIVIL DEFENSE 4.85 ELECTRIC 01.42501.3810 356 00045
SHOP/GARAGE 524.34 ELECTRIC 01.43127.3810 356 00046
PARKING LOTS 25.16 ELECTRIC 01.43140.3810 356 00047
LI QUOR 809.56 ELECTRIC 09.49154.3810 356 00048
3,193.50 *VENDOR TOTAL
-----..-- --,--'~- -~-'..'- .._,._.~-' ,-,,-~ -_._-~-" .--
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
03/04/98 14:28:25 Schedule of Bill GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 3
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME F NO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
NORTHWEST CARPET & UPHOL
LIQUOR-CARPET CLEANING 308.85 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 6 9.49754.3199 356 00088
FIRE-CARPET CLEANING 153.36 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 1 1.42201.3199 356 00089
462.21 *VENDOR TOTAL
OHNSTAD/ELMER
WWTP-TRAVEL REIMB 22.96 TRAVEL EXPENSE 4 6.49201.3310 356 00049
PAUSTIS & SONS
WINE 1,554.54 WINE 6 9.49750.2530 356 00050
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
FREIGHT 80.80 FREIGHT 6 9.49750.3330 356 00051
LIQUOR 4,172.97 LIQUOR 6 9.49750.2510 356 00052
WINE 2,302.52 WINE 6 9.49750.2530 356 00053
6,556.29 *VENDOR TOTAL
QUALITY WINE & SPIRITS C
LIQUOR 254.33 LIQUOR 6 9.49750.2510 356 00054
e 1,935.63 WINE 6 9.49750.2530 356 00055
2,189.96 *VENDOR TOTAL
RON'S GOURMET ICE
LIQUOR- ICE 84.00 MISC TAXABLE 6 9.49750.2540 6796, 5817 356 00056
SHUMAN/CATHY
TRAVEL REIMB 37.96 TRAVEL EXPENSE 1 1.41520.3310 356 00057
TRAVEL REIMB 24.64 TRAVEL EXPENSE 1 1.41920.3310 356 00058
62.60 *VENDOR TOTAL
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
MISC TAXABLE 129.64 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 356 00059
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 22,280.70 BEER 609.49750.2520 356 00060
U SLINK
CITY HALL 69.08 TELEPHONE 101.41301. 3210 356 00061
FIRE DEPT 0.29 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 356 00062
AN SHELTER 2.55 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 356 00063
WATER 1. 09 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 356 00064
WATER 3.44 TELEPHONE 10 .43110.3210 356 00065
LI QUOR 8.29 TELEPHONE 60 .49754.3210 356 00066
84.74 *VENDOR TOTAL
WAe COMPANY, INC/THE
MISC TAXABLE 208.28 MISe TAXABLE 60 .49750.2540 510837 356 00067
WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY
PARKS 15.98 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 10 .45201.3190 356 00069
B~NANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
03/04/98 14:28:25 Schedule of Bill GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME F NO & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
WRIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY
DEP REG 19.12 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS 1 1.41990.3190 MONITORING 356 00068
35.10 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
STREET LIGHTS 9.00 ELECTRIC 1 1.43160.3810 356 00010
WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC.
GEN ENG SERVICES 487.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00071
ST AID NETWORK 343.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00072
RESURRECTION CHURCH 207.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1. 4311 0.3030 JANUARY 356 00073
SR HIGH 422.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00014
MAPS 247.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00075
ST HENRY'S 45.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00076
BIG LAKE HOSPITAL 90.50 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 .43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00077
BIG LAKE HOSPITAL-DEC 3,592.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 1.43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00018
POST OFFICE REVIEW 45.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 .43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00079
ANNEXATION 316.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 .43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00080
COMM CENTER 1.151.25 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 .43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00081
. OAKES 2ND 432.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 44 .49201.3030 JANUARY 356 00082
FARMS 3RD 3,024.00 PROF SVC-ENGINEERING REI 10 .43110.3035 JANUARY 356 00083
SCHOOL BLVD TRAFFIC 133.00 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 10 .43110.3030 JANUARY 356 00084
TH 25/CHELSEA 37,502.75 PROF SRV - ENGINEERING F 45 .49201.3030 JANUARY 356 00085
48,040.75 *VENDOR TOTAL
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
GEN OP 22.10 MISC OPERATING SUPPLIES 60 .49754.2199 54128370 356 00086
.
~NANCIAL SYSTEM
03/04/98 14~28;25
VENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME
162,886.75
RECORDS PRINTED - 000088
Schedule of Bill
F ND & ACCOUNT
CLAIM INVOICE
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 5
PO# F/P 10 LINE
~NANCIAL SYSTEM
03/04/98 14:28:27
Schedule of B lls
FUND RECAP:
FUND DESCRIPTION
DISBURS MENTS
----------------------------
101 GENERAL FUND
211 LIBRARY FUND
330 1996A G.O. IMPR BONO
360 1996C SEWER INTER REFUNO BD
385 TIF 1996B G.O. REFUNDIND BD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
447 96-02C BRIAR OAKES 2ND
450 96-04C HWY25/MNDOT IMPR
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
610 TRANSPORTATION FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
.
BANK RECAP:
41.7 0.31
2 7. 50
1 5.00
1 5.00
1 5.00
2.96
4 2.00
37.502.75
929.25
14.45
75. 58.42
5. 34.11
----------------------------
DISBUR EMENTS
BANK NAME
GENL GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
87. 28.33
75, 58.42
162. 86.75
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
.
... ..... ..... ..... ........ .........
.. ... ..... ... .... .... ...+... .....
.. . ...... ....... ........ .... ....
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R