City Council Agenda Packet 08-24-1998
.
Low Density
Residential
200 acres
~arLLO
FUTURE LAND USE
,. ~ ........-.......... \
.:: ,..-- ~ -'-~'
.-..............-
Industri I
150acres
i 9 h Den s i ty
Residentia
(10du/ac)
150acres
.
~
..'l..<:
,
Low Density
Residential
550 acres
,
, ,
...
,
,
,
i.
....
Commercial
200 acres
I
i
'. 'j---
.....,j
Mid-Density
Residential
(5 du/ae)
150acres
Low Density
Residentia-I
(2 du/ae)
1000acres
.
Northwest Associated Consultants In
I
October 5, 1995
Sf1- \ S
Figure 6
- ..
1998 EXIST - 12300
2000 BUILD - 12922
2009 NO BUILD - 16139
2009 BUILD - 20488
.
-----
3"1.t
73"1.
SITE
TRAFFIC
DISTRIBUTION
\.
51. t
) \.
14"1.
1998 EXIST - 360
2000 BUILD - 452
2009 NO BUILD - 472
2009 BUILD - 1586
ADT - AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
350 II'.4estwood I..aka 0IIIc::0
6441 Wayz.al:;I ElOIAeviIld
Mlnneapol.. MN 55042C
812-641-4800
"hoodatu, 1",,- FAA 641-111l1l
INFAASlRUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PlANNERS
Gold Nugget Development
6"1. t
)
Monticello, Minnesota
"
..
8"1.
J CR 11 7
-
t 13"1.
51.
-
1998 EXIST - 834
2000 BUILD - 944
2009 NO BUILD - 1094
2009 BUILD - 2130
85th STREET NE
WSB PTqect No. 1089.10
Cly PTqec:t No. 266
Date: Augusl17, 1998
Existing & Projected ADT
Figure 5
S B- 1,--\
I
---.
~N 1 _u_,_____ II ' lI""
: ___11_ Icy'''
. ~ N:i.l'....JT;'I1;;.iJ.':rtii"[--<V - u 7. - 'u
II1II .;lJ"'." ,,;u.....,1 I
I ,,:. "
/llj....~.~'u-~'~~~'-'~!-: W:~:-.;..,~\~li..
. .J/;;'Ji' ;; uj,"'" / J ,,:.,. :-.~ : ' 'or:, '
I ,'to' ,-{. ~Ic' de _n Y ..,,,,l,/J:i!,A7;"'" .l.lJ.I.
. J;C 'I' ,:t:' 1.~;,: 'f ~{.l:i::.,~.';:'lJj ~~;"'r' .\.~7;""'i Ii
: c~~ ~1~A1'~~/!~~t
'.._.I':'~ .'(~~ 11:,,:'?::j:J/I~I~iit\~~
'.....,.;. .!..."...'.,;;'\."'~ ~".' -~" ,,,,~}.~ :
I. (.~...>,I..~!j C'l ~ I I 1..-:1'--1-_1...
i'UfU' ),;;,YI "T " '
,. ,j'.~,: "I~)r//, i?- f Iii ' !'''--11
,~. 7': :f;k- - :.
, ., . -/":"', I ,---..-I
/ ,..;;~?f' ":l,~rl.t1, /) .. . h. ~iJ
. . " ,r }",S ij.,F;m '01 ff... ~
,/ '.Jr.b, " "'//./: i" ii\i;Tj 17,:J(/l ' ... j ~~'~-~l
4J~:l'lii ," V~"i\';"'I'''~J''~'~'Y' ,,' -,...- '1~8}iJrt:~"'I' 1
.t"""'" .,.. ,,,,," i" ...' U - .- - ' ~. "'i"
, W N _". .... U ...- . r Ii)"
,. , ~'~~:f~, ~ J1 I(.~;l':\:::' 7r;:'~~ ,,'J:, il' ... o...J -~~ I~i! ~'\;Y' !{r
,. ;I~7j ,l'fil(/;J ",\,,?~~I' "11"'(' '0 - j .: ,.. ':.1.
,. _,' . ~ .1\)'.~j]e ~z ' ,... . '..' .1
'.-I.'f;:;Vl~~~{;~"'~ ~rJ~'t/~~~"K~~;3"~ .w.:.._..:._:r: 0::: :1{,ljy.~'d
.~ 1/:;1Ifl:t:l~/'i']'i; r. "Q:.ill.' I U U---- "..,11"1" '~1'
I ..._ i."!"'" ", ~ ..,:.. .1" , '" -. -r;. ",j; .1
;It :Z4fl",'1>4;.",#<,,#//I;""!"" I-r;~.bt ~ if
if, <,~W'~. : ;,rk<:'. '. 'I,.I:~ '. ..' ):""i'':'''-
..',dJ ~1/rrr!:!:WI''J:.'j.f'i.~ 0,'''''' ' ' ..1' : .;. "
, /'11 ~,~ ~, ~I"f ~'J' t~., [.,):..'(" · .',. ".',. '. " IX'.'..... "U '
. '.... ' ~';' .. ..., . ".: ,..~ir -..- '~. ' ~::
~I'" . . .,., ,f' ,.... ,.. .,'. .:,n, .~. . ..,.,.., " J
~/:'. . ,.., .,.. _ ,. ~".- " .' ,.;~' -::" .-::;l ;:.. -. ..ai:).,
Ijl~ ~~. .."r)IJ,;'~,fi.;j:'ff; ";&.~ ?~'I !:.'6j!q~~'~'::"!_
i ,';~. ': F .I~~~;f;~;lt;" ".':"'I!:rj,..,:~c,'~ ::;~,~~; !l:.,'.I:::,:,:~:.__
f'~ .~):t'i:~lL::E' 1lli!L"et;~
.. .~.~ ~~' ,', " 'I ID8. ':.. . .,.. . ~ -.C'.;< i.;". .'.~C:J'~
[.;6 . 1'" ...:.'. j , ,~nd-~ ... ... .
,_ ;'... . .~. . >." . .1.<.....:. .... u., b.... C".!
,I;; "'.%>.' .. .,!'.f.:1 . : ',.:" ."" .\,.C:... I:.; -.
I .~l' >: -~~/At ws~'If!, 1;1.,,, ':!L{,", ~~?c.,.;;.::..: ...: U + .,1
.. '.' 1'_1111' """ 1I:;7! i .Q.;o Chl;~' '_.',.l.;,..,..c".,.r, - "" N' !
'" ../ c-JT; IH .,.j !i!LI 1;,')', 'c. ..~ ' "., .., ,.,. ~ ,. I
. i~" '~'7.:::!-- . "I." ,PiW:V$~iJ' '1, ~. ," ~''''r. I ,"', ",*,' , " i
, .. .,. .. 'p ,. '" .h .', :.",," r-...... .""",.:, --,- ~""'" .,.. .,,!, ,
,... _ ..7.." ~. :iUf:~"'Pt ~:;' I '~'F"h'i~!;li:tf}ll;~;hM'!'l~ ,"'::.~, ~~ ~~1tll'&o ,~l~,'~I'" / ,- -
. ",;., ~.~' .;;'",c "In ,,':1'1; ~"(~ I, VI a ' ,~t~nt c\l!q) :F; ,'I "It
I .'~" ~ ' . ""'" ~f... . .,,. . . . .... . ..., ., ",,1;\,\;~ I I
. ~' . Ii: ' O'v 1 ,,. '" .... .'7' '"'" ...1" .,.. ; Ii: .., ,., "" ~ "'('m:' .. i ' i
,. / .: :,'-, " 10 J..-r ~;, j ~;,.",.'J )",", '.".r'I'-'~~\ :'", l' '. I' "l:! I I '
. ~] ./ ''', !~ ,.', "',N!(:-' .:1 'I't' ,.~' , .--"".:...;',,--,'" ;I i'lt':
&J'';;: ~I ':: 'J"" {~' ".~lo..l"'" " =,' -,:..-.' ~ i
. ,.,>...,. <.,'" .. .. ".' _' I I . -" ~.
,../\j_'-:'{~~;' ;'~'" _ -J --i:il:i.Jj5'11Ijl~:;:~"":;",~ kl'(,~":' i:I-./~': i~"I' M: : ;,: -:"ri--
,,' .1" .'I ; , =". d'- "'" I . I . . I .
.,' I:: It :-Vi...... ...t. r-o ~:f <", -;--, -tl---FQ . I. ! M ' f
, ,.,:.{ l~" . .; \.....:.i '~w '0'" '-.;c"^ \ , -1-------- ,''- ' lXl I'
". ,/"v 0." '.', "1.\ . l' ,..1.1'" " ~/ '\ ' I ' T \ .-----r~" . \
. . ..~. "U" -.,. . I ....'" .' . ,--'
./.. ___ _:-~~.,~ ,;.;:,~/f.:.;~\~; >W .,_.;-..:..~_....;~~ r/<... i7 "i ! t' :- n---j--
/ / I ... ../fJ:'("'-" W w!~ iW. ,- -------',. L! i \ i - \., I:
,. .... ,w,;;f#.!t ,/ u.. '" . ---I <' :
A. I' _ ,",.,. ;-~.<~"."./ ~ -,'" I . ~- : .-------i---~ -- I I' :
.' '.. ~$' ,:it":'<. ".",O:J i ' ,.; ! < : - ! ..--. n.--i l______ !
.i./ __!----'-!~'">\-.~:;c ,_~ ::? '-.,' I ~(lQ......'.uO..... .-~. - n -' --- H _ T i ' ! i : .,
,: \ i'/,;7~- ,:j ?~" t.. ~. n"_____n__-" ! i ' I i
/' , \ ,ili"f 1/,. / /1i II .............. ,/ ~ -' ------~---' I :
. ~, \ _ >. .~. ,.... ~ __<=I "
,.\.'" t.'. / ..,.' " .. -----"",,-----' , I
,'1.:.1. ,\. ,..;...\.\~"" '.@ ro - -_.-~.
"- _,...-'I...~ -~ <:: - .
.~. ,. .__- ~_____ .. I -;:: OJ
Q) S
"C1 p,.
-
-
.:::::::---
:;:;1,1011
..... .,L8
,~'
~,
;0;;-11 ~
.~.." .
/!.:ot. _
,..," : o~ I
,~~ ; ... .
. ,<!;
01 -,
6 ~
~ .eI
o t ~
:::a e!;j:~
l:) a:a::: ~
..6i~nl
-....
L
.
vN
=0..
rlNW
,-'
-~
:r", ~
I vW
,-'
-i
tX
N
0..
Llo
,......
tX
z co ~ I
< 0 ~.. ~ n
...I <( o w ~ z
I- 8 ! ~ ~ i ~ i i ~ ~
c. ...J 0 I
(/) ~
..J llJ m Z 0 co ~ i w t ;
a: z slil ~ ~ ~ ~ 5
W z 8 ~ ! ~ ~ ~ = f ~ ~ i ~ ~ !
~ 0 ..... ::!
::!: .... Il) ! ! ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
- <J ~ Q
~ ~ ~ 0 0 0
w t- . 5 0) .. .. S i ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
UJ >- ~~ 'P'"
Z I- >' ~ ~ ! ~ ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ !
0 z ~ .oJ
> ::J u :;) co co ~ ~ ~ w ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 II> ..,
a: ~ u 0
< l-
I- ::t: I I
.11 " ~ I I
- .... 0 I I
Z ~ z a I I
w
<( CJ I I . o . 0
w . I I
en ... i I I
_._~"'--,. - -. n__ -.-.. .--- -- I I
- __n
._'.'--'~-- ,,- - I I _L~_
I -..... ------ -",,_.- - - - - --
.._-..:- -'.'-',.~
'g; ~~/~<- ~l /_~
^~, 1/ I! II
A\~ 1// II
~ fP~~~~ J"81 ~ (", 'I
~ ~~;~K~ 1/ ~
=~ V~ f/ /I ' ~
~ ~ 'jJ~ 1'#
~ ~~ ;~ 'IV ~ · r/
3 ~~.,~ f ~ ""
1 ..,~ f~ J I I
~ ~Lli If ~
1 ~~r; fj / ?J
]
2 ~~~~~ (jL ~ I lOW
" ~~~~Ib ~{/~ ~ ;.! ~~
?/~~ 1 j' IJ ~~ I 21"
?~~ 7 . I (' ~ 4 ~ 'y
ltfJf! i- T~~ ;rrL~ I 1;j/
_ ~v> I r--
-' '-- ~.....J i~ Irf
_ 7 J yo' ~ I~ I i I
7 ,1l >--,~( I w
~ -/ p' S1 I ~I
I ~ ~ ... I W.....- U 1AllKI -'-I
J~ " r ~
. ~ ~ /... ....
~ I~~ I:
J
_I
..,-..
.... I
[J~
-
.'"
...J
...J~
f'..\' L' 7
\
t:: I- DJ::~ :;..--
~~~
::;., Tl \. -l I I II-
-u\).- *,'E
-
w
~ I- Y
-l I- .....:
~ <i.~ .1. J:::::: .' ~
>- zv> :=-~
...... - i-:: E-l
;c a I- If ~~ 00
~ ~ ~ ., -~. 0A ~ ~
U -l I(T1 - I- ~ 'i ~I
~ \ {:f ~~ ~ ~ II
, ~I~' L1~
'\ ~ ". V,,- . t
\\ \
~ I \ ~
-,..... V
...Jv /"')
~"' \
~
....
11
....
1\ I 11'1/
i.
-
..... c;: ~
~ ~ Ii
. ~~..-
~ :l:/i: '0: v
;.; iH- )/"')
I'"
tfL /' \
,,~n
/"') ~
-- .
~ ~;~nu~~ ~u~.~- 1~~ ~ ( j 1:
..... ::! ...... ~ I/...J 0 >
" U') U') <(
/ 'r1 t: /"') ~ ~
I
.
.
-
o
u
-
W
o
-I-
><z
Ow
Z:2:
00.
:EO
Z..J
OW
00>
o::W
<(0
UO
.W
0000
-0 -
000.. :!:
>-OIOc..
..Jo::Nc..
~o.~Z
<(I-;:Q
~~:r:j
-c>C>:!:
_~:J:E0:
W:J~~~
..JO..JZI-
000::0:J0:
<t- 0::<
1-<tC>I-e:..
.
en c::
0 :J
0 en 0) 0
N 0 N C") oi
0 :I:
W 0 CO
I- ..J
() :J 0:::
w al ;:, 0
.., 0 N It) 0
0 'I:t '"
0::: :I: M
c.. ,....
en 0:
0 ::l
0 It) ('") 0
N 0 0 N C") en
0 ..J :I:
W :J CO
I- al
() 0:
w 0 ::l 0
..., Z 0 0 .... ei
0 'I:t It)
0::: :I: M
c.. .....
0 0:::
0
0 :J <D It) 0
N 0 N (") en
0 Cl :I:
W :::! CO
I-
() :J
W al 0: 0
..., ::> (1') <D c:i
0 0 'I:t '"
0: :I: M
a. ,....
CO 0:
en :J (1') <0 0
en 0 N N en
,.... :I:
C!) CO
Z
~ 0:
~ 0
:J 0 <.q C
X 0 'I:t 'I:t
W :I: M
,....
"'0
0)
1Il
0
O-It)
eN
z a.:I:
I 0 .....1-
0..... ~
~ z 0
<( tOO "'0
() ro
ro ro 2 ,
0 a.w
..J 1Il1t)
0: ..... 0)'" N EN ~
'I:t E lii 'I:t ..... ~
0 ro:I:
wOE ....u...1-
l- S :r: 0- S en..... (j
c..
w Q.O).Q Q.cO (
(I) = 0) (1)::::000
() u..o> u .!!2 0) !
w (I) 0 Q) (l)xs:
0: o:~o o:w
.
,
co
~
t-
......
--
c:o
~
m
:J
o
.....
:<
s rs- l g
I-
Zz
~~
a.. ..
00
...J...J
w...J
>~
~i=~
cZU')
wO>
~U')~~
...J 0 .. z
mo..~<
<O>W
I-O::<(U')
0..;5:-
I-:I:O
w(!)z
(!)-
(!):I:
:J~
Zz
c:J
...Je:::
Ol-
e>
-I~
~o
Ean
Z..J
!I
oDJ
0'0
~o
~
..J
>ol~
III 0
Can
:s!..J
~I
oco
:$'0
NO
~
..J
:c Ilg
tDo
zan
tD..J
c
~I
>Cco
W'O
co
0)0
O)~
~..J
i;' I~
CO
tDan
C..J
;:;
.!!!I
Jjco
co '0
g:o
~~
..J
J
lX!0,....
!;;tanc.o
C!ano
frian,....
ll':!1'-;0,....
fg~c.oc.o
lX!~ano
U;~c.o,....
ll':!o,....
!;;tanc.o
lX!ano
~an,....
"?ll':!o,....
fg~c.oc.o
<C!C'\!ano
u;fgc.o,....
CC
1-1-
CI)CI)
~N<c(
tJ~
D.J:
:ELL
I
CO
-'0
~o
zan
;g..J
~I
cnCO
0'0
o
NO
~
..J
>.I~
III 0
Can
:s!..J
~I
0) CO
0'0
o
NO
~
..J
I
_CO
~'O
.21 0
Zan
3;!..J
~I
Oco
Z"t:I
~o
o ~
N..J
I
>0 CO
Ill"t:l
Co
~~
~I
ZCO
cn"t:l
00
~~
..J
j
j;I':'
r~1'^
'o.~
t."..~ " 0 ,....
frn 0 an (0
lO.'1O
'''':11)0
;1)an,....
"'":lOO,....
~lOC'OCD
ll':!"'":ano
~:g(O"'"
"'":0,....
~II)CD
~ano
frill)"'"
lX!lX!o,....
rofriCDc.o
<C!C'\!II)O
~roCD"'"
CC
1-1-
CI)CI)
~Nc:(c(
tJ~
Q.:r:
:ELL
I/)
"E
en
'0
c::
S
II)
<(
u
a..
:E
-
o
Q)
o
c::
en
'0
Q)
Q)
~
Q)
.s
Q)
>
~
Q)
II)
.0
c::
I/)
.$
o
c::
Q)
o
I
S B- \q,
co
~
~
-..
co
.
E
~.
a.
'-
Q)
"5
a.
E
o
o
ill
"0
o
:2
Q)
II)
.0
Z
o
IE
~
I-
o
N
ro
c
"E
.!9
II)
Q)
..c
......
c:
o
"0
2
::J
a.
E
o
o
~.
~
Q)
II)
"0
Z
.
.
.
5C.
A.
REFERENCE AND BACKGROUN :
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
ress
City Council is asked to review the 1999 M nticello Heartland Express Management
Plan and associated Transit Assistance appli ation for 1999. The application includes a
resolution approving City participation in fI ding the program. The proposed 1999
Management Plan does not have any signifi ant changes for 1999.
The City intends to renew the contract with oglund Transportation for an additional
year as provided in the current contract as 10 g as any increases do not exceed 4 percent.
The total cost to operate the Heartland Expr ss in 1999 is projected at $74,900, which
would amount to a 3.82% increase in the Ho lund Transportation contract. This
projected increase is included in the Transit ssistance application subject to approval by
the state.
The total projected budget of $74,900 woul be funded by $12,500 in farebox revenue,
$17,460 local share through the City of Mo ticello, and the balance of the cost ($44,940)
would be paid by state and federal sources. idership has maintained a steady usage with
the bus running continuously throughout the day. It is projected that the Heartland
Express will provide over 17,000 rides in 1998 with half of those being rides for the
elderly. About 4000 rides will be given to a ults and 4000 to children with the balance
being provided for disabled persons.
Additional marketing will be undertaken in 999 to increase exposure and awareness of
the Heartland Express bus service. We are oping to increase our ridership to 18,000 for
1999.
We will be looking at statistics during 1999 0 see ifthere is enough usage to warrant
addition of a second bus in the future years. Some future changes that may impact
ridership after 1999 are continued residentia development, annexation of Kjellberg's
West Mobile Home Park, St Benedict's Ce er senior housing project, completion of the
Community Center and downtown redevelo ment. It is anticipated that any or all of
these could increase demand noticeably. H wever, ridership may have peaked due
simply to the capacity of one bus. The bus urrently provide 6-7 rides per hour. New
demand may warrant another bus in the ye 2000.
5
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
.
B.
AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Motion to approve the 1999 Manage ent Plan and Transit Assistance application.
This option would provide a projecte budget of $74,900 to operate the
Monticello Heartland Express Bus, ith the city share at $17,460.
2. Motion to deny approval of the 1999 anagement Plan and Transit Assistance
application.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Alternative #1 is recommended. The Heartl d Express Bus is providing a cost-efficient
responsive transportation service to resident of the community. Cost increases have
stayed relatively low, while fares remain at 0 more than $1 per ride for city residents.
Reduced fare tickets are available in books f 40 for $25 and senior citizens receive 10
free tickets with each book of 40. We belie e the Heartland Express provides a valuable
service for the citizens of our community an should be continued.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
.
Resolution for adoption. (The Management Plan is available at city hall for review.)
.
6
.
.
.
CITY OF ONTICELLO
Resolved that
the Cit of Monticello
(recipient organization)
with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transpo ation, to provide public transportation service
enter into Contract Number 76784
III Monticello
(service area)
Further resolved that the City of Monticello
(recipient organization)
operating cost from local funds and 20% of the total apital costs. Further resolved that authorization to
40
percent of the total
execute the aforementioned Contract and any amend ents thereto is hereby given to the Assistant
Administrator or the Finance Assistant .
Further resolved that the Assistant Administrator
(title)
r the Finance Assistant is hereby
(title)
authorized to execute requests for reimbursement fro the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
CERTI leA TION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to
and adopted by
the Monticello Citv Council a a duly authorized meeting thereof,
held on the 24th day of August ,19 ~ as shown by the minutes of said meeting
. .
III my possessIOn.
(name)
Notary
(title)
EXHIBIT I
T A3.PPW
~~~
_....tL.....-
.
.
.
5D. Consideration of amendment to resolutio
Rid~e - Amend le~al description. (J.O.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUN
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
annexation of Wildwood
This is a housekeeping matter. The joint ci /township resolution supporting annexation
of the Wildwood Ridge property that was a opted two weeks ago needs to be amended to
include the entire plat and not just Phase 1. riginally, only the first phase of the plat was
set for annexation because further annexati ns throughout the MOAA are halted by
agreement if less than 50% of the annexed ea is not developed. Obviously, it is not in
the city's interest to annex portion of a plat hat is not being developed (Phase II).
However, in this case, more than 50% ofth total (76) lots at Wildwood Ridge will be
developed with completion of Phase I, ther fore, it should not be a problem to annex the
entire site including Phase I & II. Finally, t e township approved annexation of the entire
site in their action last Monday
B. AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to adopt amended joint city/ ownship resolution supporting annexation of
the entire Wildwood Ridge develop ent site.
2.
Motion to deny adopting amendedj int city/township resolution supporting
annexation of the entire Wildwood idge development site.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator recommends Altern tive 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Resolution & Excerpt from Joint Agreemen
7
.
.".' .' \ .,," ;~, ~ ". ' '~'.\
,'" "... '~,i "\
.~~f'.,...r(~'~~' e'~,'?;'; : '~!/ ,~.!~ ''''~:..,'':~'~!.\
," '.'.'.:'.",\, ~..,.fI \',-,;,.- '\ .', ..... ~
,,..,'(\....;1'}..,-~ . .~
\~\~.l.:~~t:~~~~~~~~~ '~E:~::::T~gNT::TWEEN
\~'", ,.' THE towN OF MO TICELLO AND THE
~>:";;~..,"'".. .....,".,e'C1TV OF MONTIC LLO, MINNESOTA
\ ,P-URSUANT TO MINNESOT STATUTES 414.0325, SUBD.l
TO:
Minnesota Municipal Board
165 Metro Square Building
St. Paul, MN 55101
The Town of Monticello and the City of Monticell hereby jointly agree that the joint resolution
between the Town of Monticello and the City of onticello designating an area for orderly
annexation dated March 6, 1998, be amended to i lude the following:
The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Q arter of Section 19, Township 24,
Range 121, Wright County, Minnesota,
.
Both the Town and the City agree that no a1teratio of the stated boundaries of this agreement is
appropriate. Furthermore, both parties agree that 0 consideration by the Board is necessary, Upon
receipt of this resolution, the Municipal Board ma review and comment but shall, within 30 days,
order the annexation of the following-described pr perty in accordance with the terms of the joint
resolution.
Approved by the City of Monticello this ~ da of A u(Jus7-, 19 'It.
'Al/L~~'
Mayor
.~
h. d.&d ~1LA''j
Town hair
Approved by the Town of Monticello this 11ft ay of ~ 191%
~~
own Clerk
50~\
.
.
.
of the land use plan must be consistent with e Southwest Area Concept Plan, where
applicable. Contiguous shall mean that the p operties have a conunOIl, overlapping
boundaxy of at least 66 feet. Said boundary hall be considered common if said
overlapping would otherwisc touch along thc lcngth of said common area but for the
presence of an intervening roadway or railro . Areas which the City serves with
sanitary sewer service pursuant to a Minneso Pollution Control Agency (ClMPCA")
order to SeJVC said properties need not meet e definition of contiguous set out in this
paragra h.
6. At least 50% of each parcel of property BJUle ed by the City must be served with
sandtary . . .. . .
the Ci etlan s which remain unfllled sh be excluded from said 50% service
ent. If any annexed property is not 0 served within 3 years of the date of
annexation, no future annexatioll5 of any pro eIty from the Township to the City may
occur Wltil said sanitary sewer service and m . cipal water service are extended to
50% of said annexed property. The restrietio s of this paragraph shall not apply to
any property meeting any of the fOllowing co ditions:
A. Extension of sanitary sewer service or m icipal water service to a particular
parcel of property is rendered impossible uc to a regulatory impossibility outside
of the City's control. (e.g. MPCA will not allow the annexed property to be
sewered within 3 yr, time period).
B. The cost of installing sanitaty sewer or m . cipal water service exceeds 150% of
the City Engineer's good faith estimate of the cost of installing sanitary sewer
service and municipal water service to sai property (being the same estimate as
that used for determining the amount of Ie er of credit or other surety required of
developer).
C. Cemeteries and parcels used primarily for water towers or wastewater treatment
plants .
D. Kjellberg's mobile home park (property P s #213100-154402 and 213100-
154401), provided it is first served with s 'tary sewer service over 50% oithe
property, in which case no municipal wat service requirement shall apply.
7. All property annexed from the OM shall be xed only in accordance with the
procedw-es detailed in tbe paragraph, unless e Township waives the requirements of
this paragraph via a separate joint resolution ti r the orderly annexation of a particular
parcel of property. The procedures below are isted in the chronological order in
which they must occur:
A. One hundred percent of the landowners of the parcel to be annexed shall first
submit an annexation petition to the City ( aid petition shall detail the intended use
3
5D-J-
,
.
.
.
5E.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
Consideration to ado t a resolution callin for a ublic hearin on the modification
of Central Monticello Redevelo me t Pro.ect No.1 and the establishment ofTIF
District No. 1-25. (O.K.)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKG
The City Council is requested to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing on
September 14, 1998, for modification fCentral Monticello Redevelopment Project No.
1 and the establishment ofTIF District No. 1-25. The proposed TIF District is an
economic district for construction of a 2,000 sq ft steel manufacturing facility by Blue
Chip Development Company. The fac'lity will be leased to B&B Metal Stamping, Inc.,
increasing the tax base and creating 8-10 new jobs for Monticello at an average wage of
$14.10 per hour without benefits. Calli g for the public hearing is a routine process for
establishment of a new TIF District. T e TIF Plan was distributed to the taxing
jurisdictions on August 14, 1998.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1.
A motion to adopt a resolution c lling for a public hearing on the modification of
Central Monticello Redevelopm nt Project No.1 and the establishment ofTIF
District No. 1-25.
2. A motion to deny adoption ofth resolution.
3. A motion to table any action.
C. RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator and HRA Execu ive Director recommend Alternative 1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the resolution for adoption.
8
CITY OF MONTICELL ,MINNESQT A
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A P UC HEARING BY THE Cfrv ON
TilE ADOPTION OF mE pROpO ED MODIFIED REDEVELOPMENT
pLAN FOR CENTRAL MoNTICE LO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
NO.l,AND THE PROPOSED TAX CREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INcREMENT FINANCING D STRlCI NO. 1-25 TllEREIN.
RESOLUTION
BElT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council" fortbe City of Monticello, Minnesota (the "City"),
as followS:
Sec,ion I. Public He.,i"". This Council shall meet on Monday, September 14, 1998, at
approximately 7; 00 I' .m,,1O bold a public bearing on th proposed adoption of the Modified Redevelopment
Plan for Central Monticello Redevelopment Project o. I, the proposed establishment ofTax Increment
Financing District No. 1-25, (an economic develop ent district), and the ptoposed adoption of a Tall
Increment Financing Plan therefor, all pursuant to and ccordan" with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.00 I
through 469.047, inclusive, as amended. and Min <sota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179,
inclusive, as amended, in an effort to encourage the evelopment and redevetopment of cenain designated
areas within the City; and
Section 2. N t' ce 0 Public Hear' Plan~ City staff Is authorized and directcd to work
with Ehlers and Associates. Inc., to prcpare the M dified Redevelopment plan and the Tax Increment
Financing Plan (thc "Plans") and to forward docu ents to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions including
Wright County and Indcpendent School District No. 82. The City Adm inistrator is authorizcd and directed
to cause notice oflhe hearing, together with an appr priate map as requi.ed by law, to be published at least
once in the oflOcial newspaper of the City not later an 10, nor more than 30, days prior 10 September 14,
1998, and to place a copy ofthe plans on file in the it)' Administrator's office at City Hall and to make such
copy available for inspection by tht public.
.
Dated:
Adopted:
-
Mayor
.
City Administrator
5t'\
A TrEST:
.
.
.
5F.
Consideration of acce tin bids and awar
Monte Club.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUN I
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
sewer extension ro . ect -
The low bid was submitted by Molitor Exca atin Inc. in the amount of $23.571.50.
This is an excellent price. Unfortunately, th project cannot be computed at this time
because the township will not agree to annex tion and the owner of the Monte Club
cannot afford to pay three times the normal r tes to hook-up with the facility remaining in
the township.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to accept bids and award to olitor Excavatin Inc. in the amount of
$23.571.50 contingent on annexation of the Monte Club property or contingent on
owner paying non-city hook-up fee r tes. Motion also contingent on execution of
Development Agreement per terms 0 Council meeting in December 1997.
2. Motion to deny award of bid.
3.
Motion to table.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The City Administrator recommends Altern tive 1.
SUPPORTING DATA: ,,,C;-' ,) ~J'\
'\,,\\)1 , "
Bid Tabulation \. \ -. rl)l).'
j) lV"-'" Wr '
/<'. (~ e It,''\') ri" (' c j(ft
I'y' ,Lv
1~ \~X f;
D.
9
7 JtL?
, ''1\
.
.
.
Monte Club
Sanitary Sewer Service and A opurtenant Work
City Project No.9-lIe
City of Monticel/t, MN
Bids Opened: 9:30 a.nt.
August 21,1998
Contractor
Northdale Construction
Schluender Construction, Inc.
Kuechle Underground, Inc.
LaTour Construction
Kramer Excavating
R.P. Utilities, Inc.
Breitbach Construction Co.
Barbarossa and Sons
R. Larson Excavating
Dunnick Bros., Inc.
Molitor Excavating, Inc.
Inland Utility Construction
Engineer's Estimate
Bid Securi(
6/.{
oK::...
() t",
,) ;:,.
at
o k_
It) Ie
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Project No. 1010.62
Grand Total Bid
Grand Total
Bid and Alt.
No.1
$ 3..5 ft 9 0 , .;;J,CJ
$ CH?
:; ~ I J If. .--~
$L{q. Y3{ 01
$ 00
3'1 9SS-
$ 0(;)
3Lf,103,'-
$ C,C)
115. 0.:.)5 .~
$
$
$ ?>.), ~;).5, /,0 $4') I~q, 14
$35 71l/.78 $1.r7/lodO..J3
$ $
$3(.,., 5.;;)f.t,. L.O $<'/5 373.:H,
$
$
$
$
$ J.5 57 I" S6 $ 31, '7..,3 .2!!-
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$ $
$29,500
$38,600
1 hereby certi'(Y that this is a true and correct tabulation
of the bids as received on August 21, 1998.
City Engineer
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
,.
· Dellotes correctedfigure..' ,
F"",,",M""''''''''''''~. ~ ~
Monticello T wnship
County Road 117
Monticello, Minne ota 55362
.
August 18, 1998
Rick Wolfsteller, Administrator
City of Monticello
250 E. Broadway
Monticello, Mn.
Dear Rick:
Bruce Gagnelius and Butch LindeQ elser appeared before
the Monticello Township Board on Monday, August 17th,
regarding their problem of a fai ed septic system at the
Monte Club.
After some lengthy discussion th Board came up with two
options for the City Council to consider.
.
The first option being that the Monte Club land be hooked
up to city sewer and remain in he township, until time that
the land to the north is annexe. This will not break the
agreement recently signed with city.
The second option is that' Monti
Monte Club to be annexed into t
providing Monticello Township r
property for 10 years, which Ga
Assistant Administrator Jeff 0'
would be willing to do. Furthe
to be annexed under this condit
precedence for future annexatio
contiguous with other city prop
Sincerely,
MONTICELLO TOWN BOARD
D6JS~
by clerk, Darlene Sawatzke.
copy: Bruce Gagnelius
.
ello Township allow the
e city of Monticello
ceive the taxes from the
nelius said that your
eil told him that the City
by allowing the Monte Club
on that this does not set a
s as this property is not
rty.
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
7.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
The City Council is requested to hold a p blic hearing and approve a resolution
modifying Project No.1 Plan and establis ing TIF District No. 1-24 for St. Benedict's
Care Center. The taxing jurisdictions rece ved a copy ofthe proposed TIF Plan thirty
days prior to the scheduled public hearing and a public hearing notice appeared in the
local newspaper at least 10 days prior to t e public hearing. Please open and close the
public hearing.
Enclosed you will find an overview of the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 1-24 as prepared
by Ehlers & Associates. You will note th overview outlines the project description and
required findings of the Council. Allen Back, on behalf of St. Ben's, submitted a
proforma with construction costs, rental r tes, and income levels satisfactory to meet the
qualifications of a "qualified housing dis . ct". The project will not be funded by tax
exempt bonds but will be financed by St. en's. The district, as a "qualified housing
district", exempts the City from the HAC Penalty and the "but for" test does not apply.
This TIF District is similar to the Mississi pi Shores district. Dan Greensweig of
Kennedy & Graven will be present at the ouncil meeting. A copy of the entire TIF
District No. 1-24 Plan and modified Centr 1 Monticello Redevelopment Project No.1
Plan are available at City Hall for your re iew.
The project area lies to the north ofthe pr posed St. Henry's Parish development site.
The Contract for Private Redevelopment etween the HRA and St. Benedict's Care
Center will describe the level of TIF assis ce and the terms and conditions of the
contract as prepared by HRA Attorney Ste e Bubul. At this time, the contract is under
preparation and is not finalized due to so e uncertainty and perhaps modification in the
allocation of TIF costs. Hopefully, this is etermined in time for approval of the district
on Monday night; otherwise, it is recomm nded the agenda item be tabled until
September 14. A building permit cannot e issued until the TIF Plan is approved.
The HRA agreed to pay-as-you-go TIF as istance for site and utility improvements and
land write-down in an amount not-to-exce d $440,000 Net Present Value over the life of
the 25 year district.
After closing the public hearing, please co sider the following alternative actions relating
to the establishment of TIF District No. 1- 4.
10
.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
B.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:
1.
A motion to approve a resolution adopting the modified Redevelopment Plan for
Central Monticello Redevelopme t Project No.1 and establishing within Central
Monticello Redevelopment Proje t No. 1 TIF District No. 1-24 and adopting the
related TIF Plan therefor.
2.
A motion to deny approval of a r solution adopting the modified Redevelopment
Plan for Central Monticello Rede elopment Project No.1 and establishing within
Central Monticello Redevelopme t Project No.1 TIF District No. 1-24 and
adopting the related TIF Plan ther for.
3.
A motion to table approval of the esolution until September 14.
C.
RECOMMENDATION:
.
As the proposed project will increase the ocal tax base and provide low and moderate
income housing and rental rates for senio residents, the City Administrator and
Economic Development Director recom end alternative no. 1 assuming the HRA
financial consultant has received financia information supporting the allocation of TIF
costs as eligible expenditures. If the fin cial information is not received, the
recommendation is alternative no. 3.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Overview ofTIF District No. 1-24, map i entifying the district location, and copy of the
resolution for approval.
.
11
.
.
.
-"- -
,;>/
,!/
';
A Ehlers and Associates
V Tax Increment Financing District Overview
City of Monticello - Tax Increment Financin District No. 1-24
The following summary contains an overview of the asic elements of the Tax Increment Financing Plan
for TIF District No. 1-24. More detailed information n each of these topics can be found in the complete
TIF Plan.
Proposed action:
Establishm nt of Tax Increment Financing District No.
1-24 and a option of a Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Development District:
Modificati n to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central
Monticello Redevelopment Project No.1.
Type of TIF District:
An Qualifi d Housing District
See attache legal description
To facilitat construction of 60 unit independent living
senior hou ing building in the City of Monticello.
Concurrent with the construction of the independent
living unit will be the construction of 60 units of
assisted Ii ing units, which will not be included in
District No 1-24. Both facilities are to be owned by St.
Benedict's Center
Legal Description
Proposed development and
Agreement:
Maximum duration:
25 years fr m receipt of first tax increment.
Estimated annual tax increment:
$53,390
Proposed uses:
The TIF PI n contains the following budget:
Land acqui ition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $140,000
Site Impro ements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220,000
Utilities.. ...................... 170,000
Interest/De t Service Reserve. . . . . . . 676,500
Administra ive Costs (up to 10%). . .. 133.500
TOTAL. ................... $1,340,000
Form of financing:
Pay-as-you go note
Administrative fee:
Up to 10% of annual increment, if costs are justified.
'1---\
,
,
II., '~._.".....
..~::'
.
TIF District :>Verview
LGA/HACA penalty Local
contribution:
Because Di triet No. 1-24 is a qualified housing district,
it is exemp from the LGAlHACA penalty.
Evidence
Required findings by the City
Council:
I. Finding that District No. 1-24 is a
qualified housing district as
defined in M.S., Section 469.174,
Subd. II and M.S., Section
273.1399, Subd. l(c).
1. District ~o, 1-24 consists of a portion of one parcel.
The dev lopment will consist of 60 units of senior
rental h using. The market value of non-assisted
housing :lr commercial property will be less than 20%
of the total fair market value of the planned
improve nents. The development in District No. 1-24
will con ist entirely of housing tacilitieswhich meet
all of tI e rent and income limitations for a low-
income lousing credit under section 42 ofthe Internal
RevenuE Code of 1986.
.
2. Finding that the proposed
development, in the opinion of
the City Council, would not
reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private
investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and, therefore,
the use of tax increment
financing is deemed necessary.
.
3. Finding that the Ta.'X Increment
Financing Plan for District No. I-
24 conforms to the general plan for
the development or redevelopment
of the municipality as a whole
4. Finding that the Tax Increment
Financing Plan for District No. 1-
24 will afford maximum
opportunity, consistent with the
sound needs of the City as a whole,
for the development or
redevelopment of Central
Monticello Redevelopment Project
No.1 by private enterprise
2. The Ci~ has determined that, in view of reduced
revenue from a housing facility intended for
oceupan y by low and moderate income persons, the
develop nent proposed in the Plan would n(lt be
financia Iy feasible without substantial public
assistan< e including tax increment financing. In
making this finding, the City has relied upon the
develop r's pro forma submitted to the City and
Authori v, requirements of other state and local
assistanc e to the development, and analysis of the
need for tax increment assistance prepared by Ehlers
and Ass ciales and on file in City Hall.
3. The Pial was reviewed by the Planning Commission
on Aug~ st 4, 1998. The Planning Commission found
that the Plan conforms to the general development
plan of he City.
4. Througf the implementation of the Plan, the City or
HRA w'll increase the tax base of the City, and will
increase the availability of safe and decent life-cycle
housing in the City.
Page 2
tt ~7-
.
.
.
TIF District
verview
Page
1,,3
,
I
,
.
-.,.
~
LECTION
UNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
Township of Monticello, Township of
-,f the Monticello-Big Lake Community
n of Hospital Board members to the
pital District shall be conducted In con-
!, November 3,1998.
~D ARE UP FOR ELECTION:
.
0;
..ego,
Big Lake, Township of Big Lake,
;cello,Townshlp of Sliver Creek,
0).
: for a term of four years, expiring Dec.
-hall be Issued a Certificated of Electton
-eptance of office In order to qu8l1fy for
~,fflce commencing January 1, 1999.
1 years of age on January 1, 1999 and
}spital District and desires to be a mem-
'nshlp seat open hls/her. residence. An
.fI\davlt For Candldacv. can be obtained
~sldes.
Board member position of CltyfTownshlp
ihe clty/townshlp where he/she resides
JUrln""al business office hours.
! nor_~~lness office hours. .
-;ltyfTownshlp office for their office hours.
DISTRICT COURT
TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
PROBATE DMSION
; AND NOTICE ON HEARING ON
IN FOR PROBATE OF WILL AND
~TMENT OF PERSONAL REPRE-
.VI: IN UNSUPERVISED ADMIN IS.
IN AND NOTICE TO CREDITORS
=:REDITORS
that on the Wi d~~~to~tst. mB. at
_ll-named Court at Innesota, for
ing to be the Will of the above-named dace-
appointment of NANCY HONEBRINK.
" Maple Lake, MN 55358, as personalrepre-
decedent In unsupervised administration,
-d with the Court. That, If proper and no
atlve will be appointed to administer the
bts, claims, taxes and expenses, and sell
~essary acts for the estate. Upon com ple-
Uile~1 file a final account tror the
to ons therunto entitled as ordered
liTO .lavlng claims against said estate
personal representative or to the Court- . .
,r the date of this notice or said claims Will
KIm R.Johnson
JUDGE OF DISTRICT COURT
:v LoralleJ;rawfmd.
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
CIlY OF MONTI EU-O
COUNTY OF WIGHT
STATE OF MINH SOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Co ncll of the City of Monticello, County
of Wright, State of Minnesota, will hold a pu IIc hearing on Monday, August 24,
1998, at approximately 7:00 p.m. at the Mo Icello City Council Chambers in the
Monticello City Hall, 250 East Broadway, Man cello, Minnesota, relating to the pro-
posal of the HRA to adopt the Modified Rede elopment Plan for Central Monticello
Redevelopment Project No. 1 and the Tax In rement Financing Plan (collectively,
the "Plans") for the establishment of Tax Incr ment Financing District No. 1-24 (a
qualified housing district), located within Cent al Monticello Redevelopment Project
No.1, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Se ions 469.001 through 469.047 and
Sections 469.174 to 469.179, all. inclusive, as amended. Copies of the Plans are on
file and available for public Inpspection at the office of the City Administrator at City
Hall. --
The property to be Included in Taxlncreme t Financing District No. 1-24 is locat-
ed within Central Monticello Redevelopm nt Project No. 1 and the City of
Monticello. The property proposed to be Inclu ed in Tax Increment FinanclnQ District
No. 1-24 encompasses all property and ad) cent and interior roads and rlghts-of-
w"a~~e\ndlcated by the parcel Identification umber listed below:
Numbers 1.Gal pescriotlon
155-092-001010 Lot 1, Block 1, Montie 110 Commmerce Center Third Addition
A map of Central Monticello Redevelopm nt Project No.1, and Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-24 within Central MI nesota Redevlopment Project No.1, is
set forth below. Subject to certain Iimitatio s, tax increment from Tax Increment
Financing District No. 1-24 may be spent 0 eligible uses within the boundaries of
Central Monticello Redevelopment Project o. 1. .
n". ..~.u~nk""T'1; CRN"tp.a A-r MONTICELLO JIOI.. ~
unR B'€i
All Interested persons may appear at e hearing and present their views orally or
prior to the meeting In writing. ..
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF' AE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
IslRick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
......UUH,I
NOTICE OF :
The Otsego Planning Commission v.
Septermber 2, 1998 at 8:00 p.m. at thE
Otsego, MN, or as soon thereafter as t
Otsego Planning Commission and Cit,
1. A Public Hearing to Review the
bf Otgego.
All interested parties are invited to a
and concerns/comments. If you woulc
described Hearings, please call the C
meeting.
(Aug. 13 & 20, 1998)
A
MONTICE!
DEVELOPN'
Monday, Au
C
MEMBERS: Chair Ron Hoglunc
Treasurer Ken Maus, Clint Her
Clarrin Lahr.
STAFF: Treasurer Rick Wolfste
Recording Secretary Nancy Wh,
1 . Call to order.
2. Consideration to approve the,
3. ConSideration of adding agen'
4. Citizens of request for a 30-do
Froslie).
5. Consideration of request for a
DMRF No. 102. (Steve John~
6. Consideration to approve dist
pletion of front facade impro\
7. Consideration to discuss aW2
in DMRF program and its crit
8. Consideration to review the <
funding procedure and its pI
9. Director's consideration of e:
10. Other business.
11 . Adjournment.
(Aug. 13, 1998)
Reach- YOl.
F
Ho
Ac
L
L
AI
Ph
~
0/. .ThrOl
Commur
Call the Mont.:
.
.
.
CITY OF MO TICELLO
WRIGHT C UNTY
STATE OF MI NESOTA
Council member
introduc d the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MODIF ED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
CENTRAL MONTICELLO REDEVEL PMENT PROJECT NO.1; AND
EST ABLISHING WITHIN CENTRAL ONTICELLO REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO.1 TAX INCREMENT FI ANCING DISTRICT NO. 1-24 AND
ADOPTING THE RELATED TAX INCRE ENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the" ouncil") of the City of Monticello, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1.
Recitals.
1.0 I. It has been proposed that the City Cou cil adopt the Modified Redevelopment Plan for the
Central Monticello RedevelopmentProject No.1 and stablish within Central Monticello Redevelopment
Project No. I Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-24 ("District No. 1-24") and adopt the related Tax
Increment Financing Plan therefor (collectively, the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conform ity with
applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sectio s 469.001 through 469.047 and 469.174 through
469.179, all inclusive, as amended, all as reflected in th Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02. The Council has investigated the facts relating to the Plans.
1.03. The City has performed all actions req ired by law to be performed prior to the adoption and
approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not Ii ited to, notification of Wright County and School
District No. 882 having taxing jurisdiction over the pJ1 perty to be included in District No. 1-24, notice of
a potential qualified housing district to the local coun commissioner, a review of and written comment on
the Plans by the City Planning Commission, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as
required by law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") r lating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated
therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and sub itted to the Council and/or made a part of the City
files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports includ data, information and/or substantiation constituting
or relating to the bases for the other findings and determ 'nations made in this resolution. The Council hereby
confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are he eby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this
resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full her in.
fl'<
N :\Minnsota\MONTICEL\TlFI-24\city _res. wpd
.
Section 2.
roval of the Plans.
2.0 I. The Council hereby finds that the lans, are intended and, in the judgment of this Council,
the effect of such actions will be, to provide a impetus for development in the public purpose and
accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Pans, which are hereby incorporated herein.
Section 3.
Findin s for the Establishment of ax Increment Financin District No. 1-24.
3.01. The Council hereby finds that Tax ncrement Financing District No. 1-24 is in the public
interest and is a "qualified housing district" unde Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. I I and
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. I(c).
3.02. The Council further finds that the p oposed development would not OCcur solely through
private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment financing
is deemed necessary, that the Plans conform to the ge eral plan for the development or redevelopment of the
City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maxi um opportunity consistent with the Sound needs of the
City as a whole, for the development of District No. I ~24 by private enterprise.
3.03. The City finds that District No. 1~24 's a qualified housing district and is exempt from state
aid losses in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, S ction 273.1399 subd. 6(c).
.
3.04. The Council further finds, declares nd determines that the City made the above findings
stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons a d supporting facts for each determination in writing,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 4.
A roval and Ado tion of th Plans
4.0 I. The Plans, as presented to the Council n this date, including without limitation the findings
and statements of objectives contained therein, are he eby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and
shall be placed on file in the office of the Executive irector of the HRA.
4.02. The staff of the City, the City's advis rs and legal counsel are authorized and directed to
proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to ne otiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for
its consideration all further plans, resolutions, docum nts and. contracts necessary for this purpose.
4.03 The Auditor of Wright County is reque ted to certify the original net tax capacity of District
No. 1-24, as described in thePlans, and to certify in ea h year thereafter the amount by which the original
net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the City of Monticello is authorized and directed to forthwith
transmit this request to the County Auditor in such for and content as the Auditor may specify, together
with a list of all properties within District No. I ~24, for which building permits have been issued during the
18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this esolution.
.
tJ~"
N: 1M innSOla 1M ONTICEL \ TIFI-24\cilY _res. wpd
.
I
.
.
.
The motion for the adoption of the forego ng resolution was duly seconded by Council member
, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: August 24, 1998
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Administrator
(Seal)
'l~q
N:IMinnSOlaIMONTICELITlFI -24lcity Jes. wpd
.
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION #
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the a option ofthe Tax. Increment Financing Plan for Tax
Increment Financing District No. 1.24, ("District No. 1.24") s required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
1. Finding that District No. 1-24 is a qu.alified housing istrict as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. II
and MS.. Seerton 273.1399. Subd. I (c).
District No. 1-24 consists of a portion of one parcel. The development will consist of 60 units of senior
rental housing. No portion of the property will be us d for pUrpOses other than low and moderate income
housing. TIle development in DistrictNo. 1 ~24 will onsist entirely of housing facilities which meet all
of the rent and income limitations for a low. income h using credit under section 42 of me Internal Revenue
Code of 1986.
2.
Finding that the proposed development, in the opi ion of the City Council. would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment w'thin the rea'ljOnably foreseeable future and, therefore.
the use of tax increment financing is deemed necess
.
The City has determined that, in view of reduced rev nues from a housing facility intended for occupancy
by low and moderate income persons, the develop ent proposed in the Plan would not be financially
feasible without substantial public assistance includ ng taX increment financing. In making this finding,
the City has relied upon the developer's pro forma ubmitted to the City and Authority, requirements of
other state and local assistance to the development, and analysis of the need for taX increment assistance
prepared by Ehlers and Associates and on file in Ci Hal\.
Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Pltm for istriet No. I ~24 conforms to the general plan for the
development or redevelopment of the municipality S' a whole.
The Plan was reviewed by the Planning Commissio on August 4, 1998. The Planning Commission found
that the Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City.
3.
4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Planfo District No. 1-24 will afford maximum opportunity,
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a w ole. for thtievelopment or redevelopment of Central
M07lCicello Redevelopment Project No. 1 by privat enterprise.
Through the implementation of the Plan, the City r HRA will increase the tax. base of the City, and will
increase the availability of safe and decent life.ey Ie housing in the City.
,.Jl
.
N;\Mil\ll\Olll\MONT1CEL\TIF1-Z4\~jIY _re~. wpd
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
8.
Consideration of reviewin six month Ii nor store financial re
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO D:
Liquor Store Manger Joe Hartman will be 'n attendance at Monday's meeting to review
with the Council the six month financial r port for the period ending June 30, 1998.
The operations of the Liquor Store contin e to do well and were certainly helped by the
warmer weather this spring and summer. verall sales for the first six months are up
$61,000 over last year which is a 7% incre se. Gross profit is also up $24,800 over last
year which is a 11.5% increase. With the perating expenses only increasing slightly by
$1,000 over the same period last year, the esulting operating income shows an increase
of$23,800 to a total operating income of$133,700 for the first six months.
In conjunction with the community center onstruction, the City will be acquiring the
Ferrellgas site from Burlington Northern ilroad. Preliminary discussions on
developing this area for retail uses by an in erested developer have occurred and we may
soon be investigating the feasibility of inc1 ding the existing Liquor Store site in an
overall development of this block. As Joe as mentioned in the past, space at our Liquor
Store is at a premium and ideally we may eed to look at increasing the size of our
facility in the future. The possibility exists that incorporating an expansion of our Liquor
Store with the development of additional r tail space in this area could be done as a joint
project allowing the City to either continue to own it's entire facility or possibly even
leasing additional square footage to give us the space we need. As ideas are further
developed, we may be bringing additional i formation back to the Council for review.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
The only action needed by the Council at t is time is to accept the financial report as
presented.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approve financial report as presented.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Six month financial report.
2
~-- -:--~~_.,-
MONTICELLO MUN CIPAL LIQUOR
GROSS PROFI BY PRODUCT
COMPARISON F R THE YEAR
. ENDING JUN 30, 1997 AND 1998
1997 1998
YEAR-TO-DAT YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT AMOUNT
Liquor Sales 246,121 258,083
Discounts
Cost of Sales 170,229 176,374
--------- ----------
GROSS PROFIT - LIQUOR 75,891 30.8% 81,710 31. 7%
Beer Sales 510,585 557,788
Cost of Sales 392,289 432,419
--------- ----------
GROSS PROFIT - BEER 118,297 23.2% 125,370 22.5%
wine Sales 90,140 93,731
Cost of Sales 72,256 60,600
---------- ----------
GROSS PROFIT - WINE 17,884 19.8% 33,131 35.3%
eiSC Sales 29,01 28,463
Cost of Sales 20,73 24,282
----------
GROSS PROFIT - MISC TAXABLE 8,28 28.5% 4,181 14.7%
.
Mise Non-taxable Sales 2,35 1,583
cost of Sales 2,29 515
-------- - ----------
GROSS PROFIT - MISC NON-TAXA 3.7% 1,068 67.5%
TOTAL SALES 939,643
TOTAL COST OF SALES 694,190
TOTAL FREIGHT COST 4,516
---------- -----------
TOTAL GROSS PROFIT 216,073 24.6% 240,937 25.6%
-------- -- ----------
------- ----------
.
~;\
-..........-:. --
MONTICELLO UNICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE ND EXPENSES
.
COMPARISO FOR THE YEAR
ENDING JUN 0, 1997 AND 1998
1997
YEAR-TO-
AMOUN
SALES
Liquor 246,1 1
Beer 510,5 5
Wine 90,1 0
Other Merchandise 29,0 9
Misc Non-Taxable Sales 2,3 8
Discounts
-------
TOTAL SALES 878,2 3
COST OF GOODS SOLD (662,1 9)
-------
GROSS PROFIT 216,0 3 24.6%
------- --
-------
4ItENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Personal Services
Salaries
PERA
FICA
Insurance
Unemployment Benefits
Severance Pay
EXPENSE
57,1 9
2,5 4
4,3 3
4,453
30
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
68,579
7.8%
Supplies
Office Supplies
General Operating Supplie
Other Supplies
.8%
TOTAL SUPPLIES
.
-'~-,"""',---
1998
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
258,083
557,788
93,731
28,463
1,583
939,643
(698,706)
240,937 25.6%
----------
----------
64,084
3,301
4,891
4,608
76,884
8.2%
388
2,876
3,265
.3%
,,)..
MONTICELLO M NICIPAL LIQUOR
REVENUE AND EXPENSES
.
COMPARISON FOR THE YEAR
ENDING JUN 30, 1997 AND 1998
Other Services & Charges
Professional Services
Maintenance Agreements
Communication
Travel-Conference-Schools
Advertising
Insurance & Tax
Utilities
Maintenance, Equipment
Maintenance, Building
Maintenance, Other
Depreciation--Acquired As
Misc Svc & Chgs
TOTAL OTHER SERVICES & CH
~TAL GENERAL & ADMIN EXPENS
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
Other Income (Expense)
Interest Income
Cash Long/Short
Sale of Property
Misc Income
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
NET INCOME (EXPENSE)
Transfers In/Out
ADJUSTED NET INCOME (EXPENSE
.
1997
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
30,7
106,1
109,9
-------
-------
10,4
( 1
10,2
120,2
-------
------.....
120,2
-------
-------
134
1,282
1,992
6,434
7,105
1,542
2,085
39
7,296
2,830
3.5%
12.1%
12.5%
1.2%
13.7%
13.7%
1998
YEAR-TO-DATE
AMOUNT
788
1,612
1,782
6,570
6,451
387
915
42
5,537
2,941
27,024 2.9%
107,173 11.4%
133,764 14.2%
----------
----------
17,662
25
362
18,048 1.9%
151,813 16.2%
----------
----------
151,813 16.2%
----------
----------
1a
.
MONTICELLO MUNICIPAL LIQUOR
BAL NCE SHEET
Current Assets:
Cash
Change Fund
Investments
Accounts Receivable
A/R - NSF Checks
Inventory
Prepaid Insurance
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
Fixed Assets
Land << Parking Lot
Buildings
Furniture << Equipment
less: Accumulated Depreciation
~AL FIXED ASSETS
TOTAL ASSETS
Liabilities
Accounts Payable
Due to EDA Fund
Sales Tax Payable
Salaries Payable
Accrued Vacation/Sick Leave
Other Accrued Expenses
TOTAL LIABILITIES
RETAINED EARNINGS
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE
.
57,740.64
1,600.00
708,028.60
(1,138.44)
261,078.64
41.08
1,027,350.52
46,591.03
234,104.13
88,181.65
(261,275.50)
107,601.31
1,134,951.83
------------
------------
302.36
2,181.38
4,575.85
26,527.16
1,725.64
35,312.39
1,099,639.44
1,134,951.83
------------
------------
~.,~
.
.
.
9.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGR
The National Guard has reviewed the a ion taken by the City Council on the draft
agreement and has taken action to appro e the attached agreement. Incorporated into the
agreement is 90/1 0 split on payment of aintenance costs for maintenance of the
National Guard space. This cost share fi rmula is weighted in favor of the National Guard
in exchange for the City being able to u e joint space (space funded by the Guard outside
office area) at any time (except one wee end a month). The City may charge others for
use of such space and retain all the reve ue without any going to the National Guard.
Under the Agreement, once signed, the 1.5 million dollar contribution is available to the
City within 21 days. The availability of hese funds help by allowing the City to delay
use of bond funds thus allowing the City to earn more interest on bond proceeds.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1.
Motion to approve agreement bet een City and National Guard regarding the
Community and Training Center evelopment.
2. Motion to deny approval of agree ent between City and National Guard
regarding the Community and Tr ining Center Development.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The City Administrator recommends Alte native 1. This item should not be tabled
because the National Guard is not likely t change terms and the City will lose three
weeks of interest income on 1.5 million d liars.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Dan Greensweig will be in attendance to swer questions.
13
.
.
.
Third Draft
August 19, 1998
DEVELOPMEN AGREEMENT
Byand etween
CITY OF MONTIC LLO, MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA STATE ARMO Y BUILDING COMMISSION
Dated as of:
This document was drafted by:
KENNEDY & ORA YEN, CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: 337-9300
~-I
.
.
.
DEVELOPMEN AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement is made s _ day of , 1998, by
and between THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, am nicipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota
(the "City") and the MINNESOTA STATE ORY BUILDING COMMISSION, a public
corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "Co mission").
WHEREAS, the Commission desires to onstruct and operate a National Guard armory
facility on a site within the City and legally descri d at Exhibit A (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to construct d operate a city hall, a multipurpose community
center, and an aquatics facility on the Property; an
WHEREAS, the City and the Commissio have determined that it is more cost-effective
and efficient, and generally improves the public h alth, safety, general welfare, and morals to enter
into an agreement by which they can share certain os15, responsibilities, and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Commissi n have authority to enter into this agreement
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 193 and innesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual obligations of the
parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant d agree with the other as follows:
DJG~143226
MN 190-66
1
.
....1..__._ ___u_
~,~
.
.
.
Section 1.1. Definitions. In this Agree ent, unless a different meaning clearly appears
from the context:
"Agreement" means this Agreement, as e same may be from time to time modified,
amended, or supplemented.
"Armory" means the portion of the Project 0 described on the Construction Plans_
"Authority" means the Housing and Red velopment Authority in and for the City of
Monticello, Minnesota
"Bond Documents" means the lease, grou d lease, indenture, and any other documents
deemed necessary or desirable by the Authority for e issuance of the Bonds.
"Bonds" means the lease revenue bonds t be sold by the Authority for the purpose of
partiall y fmancing the Project.
"City" means the City of Monticello, Mione ota.
"City Facilities" means the portion of the Pr .ect so described on the Construction Plans.
"Commission" means the Minnesota State
ory Building Commission.
"Construction Plans" means the plans, spec fications, drawings, and related documents on
the construction work to be performed on the Prope and attached as Exhibit B.
"Event of Default" means an action listed in
"Maturity Date" means the date that the
defeased.
"Parcell" means the real property described
construction of the Project, the term means Parcel 1
"Parcel 2" means the real property described
construction of the Project, the term means Parcel 2
. cle IX of this Agreement
onds have been paid in full, redeemed, or
such in Exhibit A of this Agreement. After
so improved.
such in Exhibit A of this Agreement. After
so improved.
"Project" means construction of a building onsisting of a National Guard armory, a city
hall, an aquatics facility, a senior center, a gymnasi m, meeting rooms, a parking lot, and related
facilities, all as shown on the Construction Plans, and is comprised of the Armory, the City
Facilities, and the Shared Facilities. .
DJG-143226
MN190-66
,
.
2
~,3
.
.
.
"Property" means the real property describ d as such in Exhibit A of this Agreement and is
comprised of Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. After constru tion of the Project, the term means the Property
as so improved.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Unavoidable Delays" means delays beyo d the reasonable control of the party seeking to
be excused as a result thereof.
DJG-143226
MN 190-66
~;~
3
..
.
.
.
ARTI LE II
Re resentations and Warranties
Section 2.1. Representations by the City. The City represents and warrants that it has the
power to enter into this Agreement and carry out i obligations hereunder.
Section 2.2. Re resentations and Warr nties b the Commission. The Commission
represents and warrants that it has the power 0 enter into this Agreement and carry out its
obligations hereunder.
010-143226
MNI90-66
1'~
.
.
.
Section 3.1. Status of the Property. As of t e date of this Agreement. the Property is owned
by third parties. Pursuant to the terms of this A reement, the City shall acquire fee title to the
Property, through purchase or condemnation or bo ,and convey Parcel 2 to the Commission.
Section 3.2. Proiect Costs. (a) The estim ed costs of acquiring the Property are $525,000.
These costs are hereby defined as the "Land Acqui ition Costs."
(b) The estimated costs of designing an constructing the Project are $8,500,000. These
costs are hereby defmed as the "Project Costs."
Section 3.3. Conditions of Ac uisition a d Conve ance The purchase price paid to the
City by the Commission for Parcel 2 shall be $1.0 (the "Purchase Price"), payable in cash, check,
warrant, or the equivalent on the Closing Date (as efmed in Section 3.7).
Section 3.4. Title Matters. The City shall, ithin a reasonable time after acceptance of this
Agreement, furnish an abstract of title and a regis red land survey for Parcel 2 certified to date to
include proper searches covering bankruptcies, s te and federal judgments and liens. Each party
shall pay an equal share of the cost of the survey. The Commission shall be allowed 20 business
days after receipt for examination of title and aking any objections, which shall be made in
writing or deemed waived. If any objection is m de, the City shall be allowed 20 business days
after receipt to undertake to cure such objections, rovided that the City shall have no obligation to
take any action to clear to do so. If the City fails t cure objections within 20 days after receipt of
the Commission's written objections, the Co mission may: (a) commence condemnation
proceedings, at its own expense, to cure such objec 'ons; or (b) take title subject to such objections.
Section 3.5. Conditions to Closing. The losing of the transaction contemplated by this
Agreement and the obligation of the City to sell Peel 2 and of the Commission to purchase Parcel
2 shall be subject to the terms and conditions of is Agreement. including without limitation the
following conditions:
(a) The City shall have acquired fee titl to the Property.
(b) The Commission shall have revie ed and approved title to Parcel 2 pursuant to
Section 3.4 herein.
Section 3.6. Environmental and Soil I vesti ation and Conditions. (a) Each party
acknowledges that the other party makes no repres ntations or warranties as to the condition of the
soils on the Property or its fitness for construction of the Project, or any part thereof, or any other
purpose for which the parties may make use of the roperty.
DJG-143226
MN190-66
5
11,
.
.
.
(b) Each party agrees that it will prote t, indemnify, defend, and hold hannless the other
party, and its governing body members, officers, gents, and employees, and the Authority and its
governing body members, officers, agents, and em loyees, from any claims or actions arising out of
the presence, if any, of hazardous wastes or po lutants on the Property to the extent that such
presence is caused by the intentional or neglige t actions or failures to act of the indemnifying
party. To the extent that such presence is caused y the acts of or failures to act by third parties, the
City and the Commission shall cooperate with e ch other in any efforts to pursue recovery from
such third parties and shall each pay an equal sh e of any remediation not paid by persons not a
party to this Agreement, provided that the parti shall jointly and severally protect, indemnify,
defend, and hold harmless the Authority and its governing body members, officers, agents, and
employees from claims and actions arising from e presence of hazardous wastes or pollutants on
the Property and caused by the acts of or failures t act by third parties.
Section 3.7. Closing. (a) The closing sha take place at the offices of the City on a date
mutually agreed upon by the parties but in no ase later than , 199_ (the "Closing
Date").
(b) On the Closing Date, the City sh deliver to the Commission possession of Parcel
2, and shall execute and deliver to the Commissio
(i)
All documents required to e executed and delivered under this Agreement;
and
(ii) A duly executed quit claim the "Deed") in substantially the form set forth at
Exhibit C. The Deed shall be in recorda Ie form and shall be promptly recorded in the
proper office for the recordation of deeds d other instruments pertaining to Parcel 2. The
Commission shall pay all closing and re ording costs, including any State Deed Tax in
connection with the conveyance of Parcel .
(c) On the Closing Date, the Commis ion shall pay to the City the purchase price set
forth in Section 3.3. and shall execute and deliver 0 the City all documents required to be executed
and delivered under this Agreement.
Section 3.8. Land A uisition and Pro 'ect Financin . The Commission and the City agree
that Land Acquisition Costs and Project Costs shal be financed through the following means:
(a) The initial $1,500,000 shall be paid by the Commission from the Commission's cash
reserves. This $1,500,000 shall be paid by the Co mission to the City within 21 days of execution
of this Agreement and used by the City, subject to ection 9.9(b);
(b) Any amount by which the combi ed Land Acquisition Costs and Project Costs
exceed $1,500,000 shall be paid by the City from ash reserves held by the City, proceeds from the
sale of the Bonds, other sources deemed accep ble in the sole discretion of the City, or any
combination of the foregoing.
Section 3.9. Records. The City and the Co
D1O.143226
MN 190-66
6 mission may each at all reasOliable times, afte~ J]
t.._
.
.
.
reasonable notice, inspect, examine, and copy all b oks and records of the other party relating to the
Project. Each party shall use its best efforts to ause the Project's contractor or contractors, all
subcontractors, and their agents and lenders to m e their books and records relating to the Project
available to the parties upon reasonable notice, for 'nspection, examination, and audit.
Section 3.10. Lease of ArmOry Soace. (a) Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this
Section 3.10 (the "Lease"), the City shall lease fr m the Commission and have exclusive
possession of the second floor of the Armory (the "Premises").
(b) The City shall pay to the Commiss'on an annual rent of $1.00, payable in advance
on or before January 1 of each ye this Lease is in effect.
(c) The Lease shall commence on the ate that construction of the Project is
complete.
(d) The Lease shall be for a period of ne year and shall remain in effect on a yearly
basis, provided that the City may t rminate the Lease at any time and for any
reason, or for no reason at all, by P oviding the Commission with 90 days advance
written notice.
(e)
The City may use the Premises for any purpose reasonably related to the City's
normal operations.
(f) The City may, at its sole discretion (subject only to a right of first refusal identical
in terms to the right of first refusal set forth in Exhibit E to this agreement), lease,
assign, sell, or otherwise transfer i interest in the Lease to any person.
(g) Except for the City's rights under is Section 3.10, the Premises shall be
considered and treated in all other egards in the same manner as the remainder of
the Armory for the purposes ofthi Agreement, and the Commission's
responsibilities for the Premises sh 1 be the same for the Premises as it is for the
remainder of the Armory, except at the City shall be responsible for paying all
telephone, cable television, satellit hook-ups, and other communication services
to the Premises as set forth in Section 6.3(d) of this Agreement and for furnishings
and supplies as set forth in Section 6.4(b) of this Agreement.
(h) Notwithstanding anything to the c ntrary contained in this Agreement, and not in
limitation of any other provision 0 this Agreement, this Section 3.10 shall survive
any termination of this Agreement d shall be binding on the Commission's
successors and assigns.
Section 3.11. Parking Agreement. The p 'es to this Agreement shall, prior to the
Closing Date, negotiate and enter into an agreeme t providing the Commission with reasonably
adequate parking facilities on the Property.
DJG-143226
MN190.66
~Jl
7
.
.
.
Construction of Mini
rovements
Section 4.1. Proiect Construction. Th Project shall be constructed substantially in
compliance with the Construction Plans. Neither arty shall make or authorize any material change
to the Construction Plans without the prior w tten authorization of the other party and the
Authority, provided that such authorization shall n t be unreasonably withheld.
Section 4.2. Commencement and Com 1 tion of Construction. Subject to Unavoidable
Delays, construction of the Project shall commenc by January 1, 1999.
Section 4.3. Certificate of Completion. pon the request of a party, the other party shall
provide a certificate in recordable form that shall be a conclusive determination of the certifying
party's satisfaction and termination of the agreeme ts and covenants in this Agreement with respect
to the construction of the Project.
Section 4.4. Pro.ect Mana ement. Cha e Orders. (a) The Commission acknowledges
and agrees that the City shall act as agent for the ommission in hiring and overseeing architects,
engineers, contractors, and all other persons or ntities necessary to construct the Project. The
Commission further acknowledges and agrees th t notwithstanding this delegation to the City of
certain authority, the Commission shall have e right to review and request changes to the
Construction Plans and the implementation ther of, subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.
(b) Any increase in the Project Costs . sing from a change in the Construction Plans
requested by a party to this Agreement shall be the responsibility of the party requesting the change.
If the change is mutually requested by the parti , each party shall bear an equal portion of the
increase in the Project Costs.
(c) Notwithstanding the Commission' delegation of authority to the City pursuant to
Section 4.4(a), neither party shall have any liabili y or other obligation to the other party, or such
other party's successors or assigns, for any defect i the Construction Plans, the Project, or any part
thereof, except to the extent that such defect i the direct result of the gross negligence or
intentional misconduct of the party against whom . ability is claimed; provided, that nothing in this
Section 4.4(c) is intended to create any right in an person not a party to this Agreement, except the
Authority, pursuant to Section 9.8 of this Agree ent; and provided further that nothing in this
Section 4.4(c) is intended to waive any immunity or limitation on liability to which either party to
this Agreement is entitled under law, except as to e Authority.
DJG.143226
MN190-66
t~
8
,
I
.
.
.
Insurance and ondemnation
Section 5.1. Insurance. (a) At all times pri r to the Maturity Date, the parties shall carry and
maintain casualty, public liability, property dama e, workers compensation, and other insurance
with respect to the Property and the Project in sue amounts and in such forms as may be set forth
in the Bond Documents. In addition, each party s all comply with any and all requirements in the
Bond Documents regarding the use or uses of proc ds from such insurance.
(b) Nothing in this Section 5.1 shall b construed as prohibiting either party from self-
insuring to the fullest extent permitted by law, sub"eet to any contrary requirements set forth in the
Bond Documents.
Seetion 5.2. Condemnation. At all tim s prior to the Maturity Date, any awards in
condemnation shall paid and used as set forth in e Bond Documents, except that this Section 5.2
shall not limit the rights of the City as to the Com ission or the Commission as to the City if one
party to this Agreement initiates condemnation pro eedings against the other.
OJG.143226
MN190-66
tlO
9
,
I
.
.
.
ARTIe E VI
o
Section 6.1. Maintenance and Reoairs. (a The City shall be responsible for the following
routine maintenance of the exterior and interior of he Project (except those parts of the Armory that
the Commission does not make accessible to the Cty):
(i) janitorial and cleaning se . ces, provided that the Commission shall return
the Shared Facilities to reasonably ood condition after using them;
(ll) light bulb replacement, pai ting, minor carpentry and masonry, and similar
tasks.
(b) Each party shall be responsible fo the cost of any repairs or maintenance required
by that party's negligence or misconduct.
(c) Each party acknowledges and agre that certain nonroutine maintenance and capital
repairs, including but not limited to roof repair , mechanical repairs, and plumbing and wiring
repairs will be necessary to maintain the Project in a serviceable and desirable condition. Any
repair or reconstruction of the Project estimate to cost more than $5,000 shall be deemed
nonroutine maintenance or capital repairs for pu oses of this Section 6.1(c). Each party therefore
agrees that such nonroutine maintenance and capi repairs will be undertaken upon the earlier of
the following: (i) as required by the Bond Docu ents; (ll) by mutual agreement of the parties; (iii)
when required by federal, state, or local law, rul , or regulation; or (iv) when deemed reasonably
necessary by at least two persons qualified in m 'ng the repair or reconstruction in question. The
Commission shall pay 10% of the cost of all nonr utine maintenance or capital repairs and the City
shall pay 90% of the cost of all nonroutine mainte ance or capital repairs.
Section 6.2. Grounds Maintenance and The City shall be
responsible for maintenance of the grounds and andscaping of the Property and for removal of
snow from all parking lots, sidewalks, and other a propriate areas of the Property.
Section 6.3. Utilities. (a) The City shall b responsible for providing or contracting for gas,
water, sewer, air conditioning, and solid waste ha ing.
(b) The City shall be responsible for roviding electrical service to the City Facilities
and the Shared Facilities and for all charges relate thereto.
(c) The Commission shall be responsi Ie for providing electrical service to the Armory
and for all charges related thereto.
(d) The City may, but is not required to, provide telephone, cable television, satellite
hook-ups, and other communications services to e City Facilities, the Shared Facilities, and the
Premises, at its own cost.
DJG.143226
MN190-66
__ __1-
,-fl
1
.
.
.
(e) The Commission may, but is not required to, provide telephone, cable television,
satellite hook-ups, and other communication servi es to the Armory Facilities (except the Premises)
at its own expense.
(t) If either party uses the other party's telephone, satellite hook-ups or other
communication services, it shall first gain consent and shall pay the incremental cost of such use.
Section 6.4. Furnishings. (a) The City hall be responsible for furnishing and supplying
the City Facilities and the Shared Facilities d shall have sole use and ownership of such
furnishings and supplies, provided that the Comm ssion may acquire furnishings or supplies for the
Shared Facilities and shall have sole use and own ship of such furnishings and supplies.
(b) The Commission shall be respons' Ie for furnishing and supplying the Armory and
shall have sole use and ownership of such fumis ings and supplies, except that the City shall be
responsible for furnishing and supplying the Prem ses during the term of the Lease.
Section 6.5. Use of Facilities' Schedu n. (a) The City shall at all times have sole
ownership, use, and control of the City Facilities.
(b) The Commission shall at all tim s have sole ownership, use, and control of the
Armory, except that control of the Premises is sub ect to the terms of the Lease.
(c)
conditions:
Use of the Shared Facilities shall be in accordance with the following terms and
(i) The Commission shall, on or before June 15 of every year provide the City
with a list of days during the 0 tober through September immediately next on
which the Commission shall use the Shared Facilities. In no case shall this list
include more than 30 days in any calendar year. On those days included on such
list, the Commission shall be entitl d to sole use and control of the Shared Facilities,
provided that it may in its disc etion permit the City to also used the Shared
Facilities on such days. In addi . on, and without limitation of the foregoing, the
Commission shall be entitled to s Ie use and control of the Shared Facilities when
such use and control is necessary r reasonably desirable because of an "emergency"
or "disaster" as such terms are efmed by state or federal law. ((BOB NEED
YOUR LANGUAGE).
(ii) The City shall be entitled sole use and control of the Shared Facilities on
all days on which the Commissio is not entitled to use and control of the Shared
Facilities pursuant to Section 6.5(c (i).
(iii) During any day on which e City is entitled to sole use and control of the
Shared Facilities pursuant to Secti n 6.5(c)(ii), or when otherwise permitted by the
Commission, the City may rent or lease the Shared Facilities to any person for a
period not to exceed 31 days an shall be entitled to all lease or rental payments
from such person. .
DJG.143226
MN190-66
11
,,,~
-....---
.
(iv) At such times that the Sha ed Facilities are not being used by the City, or its
tenants or lessees pursuant to Sec . on 6.5(iii) and the Commission is not otherwise
entitled to use the Shared Faciliti s, the Commission may, upon notice to the city,
use the Shared Facilities for mee gs, tours, and other similar activities, provided
that such use is on an occasio al, intermittent basis and the City, in its sole
discretion, does not determine tha such use interferes with its sole use and control
of the Shared Facilities.
(v) Nothing in this Agreeme t shall be construed as in any way limiting the
City's ownership of Parcel 2 or th Shared Facilities, which shall remain in fee title
ownership by the City, except that the Commission may use and control the Shared
Facilities to the extent and only to he extent set forth in this Section 6.6(c).
Section 6.6. Pa sessments. The City and the Commission agree
that if all or a portion of the Property or the Proj t at any time becomes subject to real estate taxes
or special assessments, such taxes and assessme ts, shall be allocated between the City and the
Commission in 'the following manner:
.
(a) All real estate taxes and special sessments properly assessed against or otherwise
attributable to the Armory shall be paid by the Co mission.
(b) All real estate taxes and specials sessments properly assessed against or otherwise
attributable to the City Facilities shall be paid by e City.
(c) All real estate taxes and special sessments properly assessed against or otherwise
attributable to the Shared Facilities shall be paid y the City and the Commission 'in the following
proportions:
(i) Ten percent (10%) of such taxes shall be paid by the Commission; and
(ii) Ninety percent (90%) shall be paid by the City.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing,' real estate taxes are assessed against all or a
portion of the property or the Project because of the activities of a party to this Agreement or its
successors or assigns, the responsible party shall e solely responsible for such taxes.
Section 6.7. Rene otiation of 0 eratin reement (a) Upon the earlier of five (5) years
of the date of this Agreement or the Maturity D te, the City and the Commission shall enter into
negotiations concerning an operating agreement i tended to extend or amend the provisions of this
Article VIT, such agreement to include at least the matters set forth in this Article VI and to
incorporate as accurately as possible the actual pro rata costs of operating and maintaining the
. Project and the Property.
(b) This Article VI shall survive a y termination of this Agreement that occurs
subsequent to the commencement of constructio of this Project, and shall not terminate without ~
DJG-143226 6,
MN190.66 I
.
.
.
.
.
the mutual written consent of the City and the Commission.
(c) The tenns, conditions, rights, d responsibilities set forth in this Article VI may not
be waived, tenninated, amended, or supers ded prior to the Maturity Date without the express
written consent of the Authority.
DJG-143226
MNI90-66
9---1'-/
13
.
.
.
.
.
ARTI LE vm
Prohibitions A
Section 7.1. Prohibition A ainst Transfe and Assi nment Prior to Maturit Date. Prior to
the Maturity Date, neither party has made or crea d nor shall make or create or suffer to be made or
created any total or partial sale, assignment, c nveyance, or lease (except NEED PARTY TO
WHOM COMMISSION WILL TRANSFER OWNERSHIP provided that such transferee or
assignee shall be bound by this Agreement) or a y trust or power, or transfer in any other mode or
form of or with respect to the Agreement or the operty or the Project or any part thereof or any
interest therein, or any contract or agreement t do any of the same, without the prior written
approval of the other party and the Authority.
Section 7.2. Conditions Of Transfer d Assi nment Subs uent to Maturi Date_
Subsequent to the Maturity Date, the City may sell, assign, convey, or lease Parcel 1 and the
Commission may sell, assign, convey, or lease P ce12 and the improvements thereon subject to
the following terms and conditions:
(a) Any such sale, assignment, conv ance, or lease (except a lease or rental of not
more than 31 days) is subject to the rights of fIrs refusal set forth in the Right of First Refusal _
Commission Property set forth at Exhibit D and t e Right of First Refusal - City Property set forth
at Exhibit E (the "Rights of First Refusal ").
(b) If the other party to this Agreeme t does not exercise its right of first refusal set
forth in the Rights of First Refusal, a party to this greement may sell, assign, convey, or lease all
or part of its interest in the Property in accord ce with the provisions of the Rights of First
Refusal; provided, however, the terms of this Agr ment shall remain binding on the successor or
assignee of the transferring party.
Section 7.3. Rights of First Refusal. Pri r to or simultaneously with execution of this
Agreement, the City and the Commission shall ex ute the Rights of First Refusal in the forms set
forth at Exhibit D and Exhibit E. Such Rights of irst Refusal shall be recorded with the Wright
County recorder. The City and the Commission sh 1 each pay one-half the costs for recording.
Section 7.4. Release and Indemnillcati n. In addition to any other release and
indemnification provisions set forth in this Agreem nt:
(a) The parties to this Agreement agree, no and forever, to indemnify, protect, and defend
each other, and the governing body members, office s, agents, servants and employees thereof, now
or forever, and hold the aforesaid harmless fro any claim, demand, suit, action or other
proceeding by any person or entity arising or purpo edly arising from the act or failure to act by the
indemnifying party with regard to this Agreement, e Project, or the Property; provided, however,
that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to waive any limitations on liability to which the
City or the Commission are entitled under Minn ota Statutes, Chapter 3, or Chapter 466, or
otherwise, except as between each other; and provi ed further, that nothing in this Section 7.4(a) ~'"
DJG-143226 1 .)
MNI90-66
14
.
.
.
shall be construed to create any right or entitle ent in any person not a party to this Agreement,
except as to the Authority as provided in Sectio 7A(b). The obligations set forth in this Section
7 A(a) shall survive termination of this Agreemen .
(b) The City and the Commission, r pectively, agree, now and forever, to indemnify,
protect, and defend the Authority, and the gove .ng body members, officers, agents, servants and
employees thereof, now or forever, and hold the oresaid harmless from any claim, demand, suit,
action or other proceeding by any person or ent ty arising or purportedly arising from any act or
failure to act by the City or the Authority, respec .vely, with regard to this Agreement, the Project,
or the Property; provided, however, that nothing this Section 7A(b) shall be construed to waive
any limitations on liability to which the City 0 the Commission are entitled under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 3, Chapter 466, or otherwise, ex ept as to the Authority; and provided further, that
nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to reate any right or entitlement in any person not a
party to this Agreement, except as to the Au ority as provided in this Section 7A(b). The
obligations set forth in this Section 7.4(b) shall su ive termination of this Agreement.
DJG~ 143226
MN190-66
q,f~
1
.
.
.
ARTIe E vm
Events of Default
Section 8.1. Events of Default Defined. e following shall be "Events of Default" under
this Agreement and the term "Event of Default" s all mean, whenever it is used in this Agreement
(unless the context otherwise provides), any failu e by any party to observe or perform any other
covenant, condition, obligation, or agreement on i part to be observed or performed hereunder.
Section 8.2. Remedies on Default. When ver any Event of Default referred to in Section
8.1 of this Agreement occurs, the non-defaulting p y may exercise its rights under this Section 8.2
after providing thirty days written notice to the d faulting party of the Event of Default, but only
subject to Section 9.7(b) of this Agreement and nly if the Event of Default has not been cured
within said thirty days or, if the Event of Default is by its nature incurable within thirty days, the
defaulting party does not provide assurances reaso ably satisfactory to the non-defaulting party that
the Event of Default will be cured and will be cure as soon as reasonably possible:
(a) suspend its performance under thi Agreement until it receives assurances that the
defaulting party will cure its default and continue i performance under this Agreement; and
. (b) take whatever action, including leg ,equitable or administrative action, which may
appear necessary or desirable to collect any pa ents due under this Agreement, or to enforce
performance and observance of any obligation, agr ement, or covenant under this Agreement.
Section 8.3. No Remedv Exclusive. No J1 medy herein conferred upon or reserved to the
City or the Commission in this Agreement is inten ed to be exclusive of any other available remedy
or remedies, but each and every such remedy shal be cumulative and shall be in addition to every
other remedy given under this Agreement or no or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by
statute. No delay or omission to exercise any righ or power accruing upon any default shall impair
any such right or power or shall be construed to a waiver thereof, but any such right and power
may be exercised from time to time and as often may be deemed expedient In order to entitle
either party to exercise any remedy reserved to it, i shall not be necessary to give notice, other than
such notice as may be required in this Article VIll.
Section 8.4. No Additional Waiver Im li d b One Waiver. In the event any agreement
contained in this Agreement should be breached y either party and thereafter waived by the other
party, such waiver shall be limited to the particul breach so waived and shall not be deemed to
waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequen breach hereunder.
.
D1O.143226
MN 190-66
i. _.__
~;11
1
.
Section 9.1. Conflict of Interests. Cit an Commission Re resentatives Not Individuall
Liable. The City and the Commission, to the st of their respective knowledge, represent and
agree that no member, official, or employee of the City or the Commission shall have any unlawful
personal interest, direct or indirect, in this Agre ment, nor shall any such member, official, or
employee unlawfully participate in any decision r lating to this Agreement which affects his or her
personal interests or the interests of any corporati n, partnership, or association in which he or she
is, directly or indirectly, interested. No mem r, official, or employee of the City or the
Commission shall be personally liable in the ev nt of any default or breach by the City or the
Commission or for any amount which may beco e due to any person or on any obligations under
the terms of this Agreement.
ovisions
eed. None of the provisions of this Agreement
are intended to or shall be merged by reason of y deed transferring any interest in the Property
and any such deed shall not be deemed to affect or impair the provisions and covenants of this
Agreement.
. Section 9.3. Titles of Articles and Sectio . Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and
Sections of this Agreement are inserted for conve . ence of reference only and shall be disregarded
in construing or interpreting any of its provisions.
Section 9.4. Notices and Demands. E cept as otherwise expressly provided in this
Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communic tion under this Agreement by either party to the
other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if 't is dispatched by registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delive d personally; and
(a) in the case of the Commission, 's addressed to or delivered personally to the
Commission at ;and
(b) in the case of the City, is addresse to or delivered personally to the City at City
Hall, P.O. Box 1147, Monticello, MN 55362-9245, Attn: City Administrator;
or at such other address with respect to either su h party as that party may, from time to time,
designate in writing and forward to the other as pro . ded in this Section.
(c) Prior to the Maturity Date, any noti e given or delivered under this Agreement shall
be copied to the Authority at: City Hall, P.o. ox 1147, Monticello, MN 55362-9245, Attn:
Executive Director.
.
Section 9.5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each of which shall constitute one and the same ins memo
17
~;(g
DJG~143226
MN190-66
"
.
.
.
Section 9.6. Recording. The City shall re ord this Agreement and any amendments thereto
with the Wright County recorder. The City and e Commission shall each pay one-half the costs
for recording.
Section 9.7. Choice of Law and Yen e' Alternative Dis ute Resolution. (a) This
Agreement shall be governed by and construe in accordance with the laws of the state of
Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claim arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in
the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all p "es to this Agreement waive any objection to the
jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on conv nience or otherwise.
(b) Prior to the commencement by 0 e party of litigation against the other party, the
City and the Commission shall follow the process et forth in this Section 9.7(b):
OJG-143226
MN190-66
(i) The City Administrator and the commanding officer stationed at the Armory
shall attempt in good faith to res lve any controversy or claim arising out of or
relating to this Agreement
(ii) If the City Administrator and the commanding officer stationed at the
Armory are unable to resolve the c ntroversy or claim, the disputing party shall give
the other party written notice of the dispute. Within twenty days after receipt of said
notice, the receiving party shall su mit to the other a written response. The notice
and response shall include a statem nt of each party's position and a summary of the
evidence and arguments supportin its position. Representatives of the parties shall
meet at a mutually acceptable tim and place within thirty days of the date of the
disputing party's notice and thereaf er as often as they reasonably deem necessary to
exchange relevant information and 0 attempt to resolve the dispute.
(iii) If the matter has not been r olved within sixty days of the disputing party's
notice, or if the party receiving s . d notice will not meet within thirty days, either
party may initiate mediation of th controversy or claim in accordance with any
mutually satisfactory procedures.
(iv) If the matter has not bee resolved 'pursuant to the aforesaid mediation
procedure within sixty days of the' itiation of such procedure, or if either party will
not participate in mediation, the p "es may mutually agree to continue negotiations
or either party may commence litig tion or take any other action permitted under of
this Agreement.
(v) The procedures specified' this section shall be the sole and exclusive
procedures for the resolution of isputes between the parties arising out of or
relating to this agreement; provide , however, that a party may seek a preliminary
injunction or other preliminary j dicial relief if in its judgment such action is
necessary to avoid irreparable dam' ge. Despite such action the parties will continue
to participate in good faith in the pr cedures specified in this section. All applicable
statutes of limitation shall be tolled while the procedures specified in this section are
pending. The parties will take SU:h action, if any, required to effectUate such tOI~ _( 1
..t ..._. ....__._________.....
.
(vi) Nothing in this Section 9.7(b) shall be construed as binding on the
Authority, which may at any time commence litigation or take any other action it
deems necessary to protect its ghts under this Agreement, including without
limitation the rights set forth at Sec ion 9.8.
Section 9.8. Third-Partv Rights. Nothing n this Agreement shall be construed to create any
third-party rights in any person not a party to the greement; provided, however, that the Authority
shall, at all times prior to the Maturity Date, hav the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any
right or obligation granted to either party pursu t to this Agreement, the Right of First Refusal
Agreements, the Deed, or any other agreement bet een the City and the Commission relating to the
Project or the Property. The City and the Comm ssion hereby agree that they may not in any way
waive, limit, amend, modify, or eliminate the Au ority's rights under this Agreement without the
express written consent of the Authority.
Section 9.9. Amendment and Termi tion of A reement. (a) During the period
commencing on the earlier date the Authority auth rizes issuance of the Bonds or the date on which
the City acquires any part of the Property, and te inating on of the Maturity Date, this Agreement
may not be tenninated, amended, or modified wi out the mutual written agreement of the parties
and the written approval of the Authority.
. (b) Except as provided in Section 9.9.(a), this Agreement may be modified or
tenninated upon the written agreement of the p es, provided that if this Agreement is terminated
prior to completion of construction of the Proj t in accordance with the Construction Plans but
subsequent to the Commission's payment to the C ty of $1,500,000 pursuant to Section 3.8, the City
shall return to the Commission all of such funds n t expended on Land Acquisition Costs or Project
Costs plus an amount equal to 90% of all of such unds so expended.
(c) This Agreement may be terminate by either party prior to issuance of the Bonds by
the Authority, without further obligation hereun er except as expressly provided to the contrary
herein, if the Authority notifies either party in ting that the Authority has determined in its sole
discretion that it cannot issue the Bonds in a timel or economic manner.
Section 9.10. Severability. Any term or rovision of this Agreement which is found to be
invalid or unenforceable by a court or other auth rity of competent jurisdiction will be ineffective
only to the extent of such invalidity or unenfor eability and shall not render any other tenn or
provision of this Agreement invalid or unenforcea Ie.
.
DJG-143226
MN190.66
~~b
1
.
.
.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties ha e caused this Agreement to be duly executed on
or as of the date first above written.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
C OF MONTICELLO, MlNNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Administrator
The foregoing instrument was ackno ledged before me this
, 1998 by and
Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Monti ello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
STATEOFMlNNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
Notary Public
MINNESOTA STATE
ARMORY BUILDING COMMISSION
By
Its
day of
, the
The foregoing instrument was acknowledg d before me this _ day of , 1998
by and , the d of the Minnesota State Armory
Building Commission.
DJG-143226
MNI90-66
.
.
By
Its
Notary Public
20
1~~t
.
.
.
Parcel 1
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Parcel 2
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DJG143226
MNJ.90-66
EXH IT A
Al
q ~;p..
.
.
.
NEED CONSTRUCTION PLANS
DJG143226
MN190-66
EX
ITB
~ ,;)3
B-
.
.
.
DEED
1HIS INDENI1JRE, between the City f Monticello, Minnesota, a statutory city and
municipal corporation under the laws of Minneso a (the "Grantor"), and Minnesota State Armory
Building Commission, a public corporation under e laws of Minnesota (the "Grantee").
WITNESSE1H, that Grantor, in considera . on of the sum of one dollar and nolI 00 ($1.00)
and other good and valuable consideration the eceipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does
hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim, and convey to th Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all
the tract or parcel of land lying and being in the Co nty of W~ght and State of Minnesota described
as follows, to-wit (such tract or parcel of land is heeinafter referred to as the "Property"):
NEED PARCEL 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTI N
To have and to hold the same, together with all he hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto
belonging in anyway appertaining, to the said Gran , its successors and assigns, forever,
Provided:
SECTION 1.
This Deed is subject to the covenants, onditions, restrictions, and provisions of an
agreement entered into between the Grantor an Grantee on the _ day of
199_ identified as "Development Agreement" by and between City of Monticello, Minnesota
and Minnesota State Armory Building Commission
SECTION 2.
This Deed is also given subject to provision of the ordinances, building, and zoning laws of
the City of Monticello and state and federal laws d regulations to the extent that they affect the
Property.
Grantor certifies that it does not know of an wells on the Property.
DJG143226
MN190-66
C-I
,.,;).~
.
.
.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor as caused this Deed to be duly executed in its
behalf by its Mayor and City Administrator and h caused its corporate seal to be hereunto affIxed
this day of , 199_.
C
By
By
STATEOFMINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNfY OF )
OF MONTICELLO
Its Mayor
Its City Administrator
On this _ day of , 199 , before me, a Notary Public within and for
County, personally appeared and to
me personally known who by me duly swo , did say that they are the Mayor and City
Administrator of the City of Monticello named in the foregoing instrument; that the seal affixed to
said instrument is the seal for said City; that said i strument was signed and sealed on behalf of the
City pursuant to a resolution of its governing body; and said and
acknowledged said ins ment
This instrument was drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 337-9300
.
Ii _____._, ._.___ _.._..".
Notary Public
c-
1~(
.
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL AGRE MENT - COMl\1ISSION PROPERTY
, 1998, by
This Right of First Refusal Agreement is ade this _ day of
and between TIffi CITY OF MONTICELLO, a m icipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota
(the "City") and the MINNESOTA STATE
ORY BUILDING COMMISSION, a public
corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "Co
A. The Commission is the fee owner of cena' real estate (the "Property") legally described as
follows:
.
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PA CEL 2
B. The City and the Commission have entere into that certain development agreement dated
. 1998 (the "Development Ag eement") pursuant to which this Right of First
Refusal Agreement has been negotiated.
C. The City and the Commission desire to e ter into this Right of First Refusal Agreement
concerning the Property.
1. Right of First Refusal, If the C mmission shall receive a bona fide offer to
. purchase, sell, transfer, lease or rent for a period of ore than 31 days, or convey all or a portion of
the Property from a third party (the "Third Party ffer"), the Commission shall ~ot sell, transfer,
.
.
1tJ~
lease, or convey the Property pursuant to or in con ection with the Third Party Offer without first
D-l
.
offering the City the first right to acquire the ri hts to the Property pursuant to the tenus of the
Third Party Offer by complying with the provis'ons of this Agreement. The Commission shall
provide written notice to the City of the Third P
Offer within ten (10) days of the Commission's
receipt of the Third Party Offer, which notice s all include a complete copy of the Third Party
Offer. The City shall then have thirty (30) days af r receipt of said notice to accept the tenus of the
Third Party Offer by sending written notice of sue acceptance to the Commission. In the event the
City shall accept the tenus of the Third Party Of er, the Commission and the City shall close the
sale and purchase of the Property (or part the of) or execute the lease or other appropriate
documents pursuant to all of the tenus and con itions of the Third Party Offer, except that no
closing shall be required of the City sooner than s xty (60) days after acceptance by the City of the
.
Third Party Offer. In the event the City shall re se to accept the tenus of the Third Party Offer
(which refusal shall be conclusively established b the City's failure to accept in accordance with
the tenus of this Paragraph), the Commission sh I be entitled to sell transfer, lease, or convey the
Property (or the specified portion thereof) pursu t to the tenus of the Third Party Offer. Any
deviation of the tenus and conditions of the sale transfer, lease, or conveyance to the third party
from the tenus and conditions of the Third Party Offer shall require a new notice to the City and
shall entitle the City to a new right of first ~efus on the tenus of the modified or altered Third
Party Offer. Upon sale of the Property (or a portio thereof) pursuant to the terms a bona fide Third
Party Offer for which the City has been provide notice and has refused to accept the offer in
accordance with the tenu hereof, the rights of the City with respect to the Property (or the portion
thereof sold) shall expire, except that such rights all continue and revive at the expiration of any
. lease or other temporary transfer or conveyance, and the City shall continue to have any rights
granted by the Development Agreement to th Premises (as defined in tI:e Development
Agreement). In the event that only a portion O,f ~~ Property is sold transferred, leased, or conveyed ~~
...i..."...
.
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the righ of the City hereunder shall continue and remain
unimpaired with respect to the remainder of the P~ perty.
2. Term of Agreement This Agree ent shall expire on such date as the Commission
no longer has fee title to the Property, provided th t such termination shall not affect the rights with
respect to a Third Party Offer made prior to said d te.
3. Notice. Except as otherwise e pressly provided m this Agreement, a notice,
demand, or other communication under this A reement by either party to the other shall be
sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, or delivered personally; d
.
(a) in the case of the Commission, is addressed to or delivered personally to the
Commission at
and
(b) in the case of the City, is address d to or delivered personally to the City at City
Hall, P.O. Box 1147, Monticello, MN 553 2-9245, Attn: City Administrator;
or at such other address with respect to either s ch party as that party may, from time to time,
designate in writing and forward to the other as pr vided in this Paragraph 3.
4. Assignment. The terms and condi ions of this Agreement are hereby made binding
on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
5. Remedies. The Commission ac wledges that in the event that the Commission
shall breach its obligations hereunder, in addition 0 any remedies that may be available at law, due
to the unique nature of the Property and the Cit 's rights hereunder, the City shall be entitled to
injunctive relief against any proposed sale in vio ation of the City's rights hereunder without the
. necessity of posting any bond.
6. Third Party Rights. The Housing nd Redevelopment Authority in and for the City .)
of Monticello, Minnesota (the "Authority") Sh~l: during the time prior to the Maturity Date (as ,\,~I
.
.
.
defined in the Development Agreement), have the right, but not the obligation, to enforce any right
or obligation granted to either party pursuant to .s Right of First Refusal Agreement The City
and the Commission hereby agree that they ma not in any way waive, limit, or eliminate the
Authority's rights under this Agreement without th express written consent of the Authority.
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PA E IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
D
",it
.
I_ on ..__.._._
.
.
.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hav caused this Right of First Refusal Agreement to
be duly executed on or as of the date first above 'tten.
STATEOFMINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
C OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
By
Its City Administrator
The foregoing instrument was ackno ledged before me this
, 1998 by and
Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Mont" ello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
Notary Public
MINNESOTA STATE
ARMORY BUILDING COMMISSION
By
Its
day of
, the
The foregoing instrument was acknowled d before me this _ day of , 1998
by and , the d of the Minnesota State Armory
Building Commission.
This instrument was drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 337-9300
.
.---*----.....-.
By
Its
Notary Public
D-
,\,30
.
.
.
EX
A.
, 1998, by
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL A REEMENT ~ CITY PROPERTY
This Right of First Refusal Agreement is
and between TIlE CITY OF MONTICELLO, a unicipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota
(the "City") and the MINNESOTA STATE
ORY BUILDING COMMISSION, a public
corporation under the laws of Minnesota (the "Co
The City is the fee owner of certain real es te (the "Property") legally described as follows:
NEED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PA CEL 1
B.
The City and the Commission have ente~ d into that certain development agreement dated
, 1998 (the "Development A reement") pursuant to which this Right of First
Refusal Agreement has been negotiated.
C. The City and the Commission desire to nter into this Right of First Refusal Agreement
concerhing the Property.
1. Right of First Refusal. If the City shall receive a bona fide offer to purchase, sell,
transfer, lease, or convey all or a portion of the Pro rty from a third party (the "Third Party Offer"),
the City shall not sell, transfer, lease or rent for a period of more than 31 days, or convey the
Property pursuant to or in connection with th Third Party Offer without ~lfst offering the
Commission the first right to acquire the rig~ts E~ the pr~~~Y pursuant to the terms of the Thirct'1'J'
.
Party Offer by complying with the provisions of this Agreement The City shall provide written
notice to the Commission of the Third Party Offe within ten (10) days of the City's receipt of the
Third Party Offer, which notice shall include a complete copy of the Third Party Offer. The
Commission shall then have thirty (30) days afte receipt of said notice to accept the terms of the
Third Party Offer by sending written notice of such acceptance to the City. In the event the
Commission shall accept the terms of the Third Party Offer, the Commission and the City shall
close the sale and purchase of the Property ( r part thereof) or execute the lease, or other
appropriate documents pursuant to all of the term and conditions of the Third Party Offer, except
that no closing shall be required of the Commissi n sooner than sixty (60) days after acceptance by
the Commission of the Third Party Offer. In the event the Commission shall refuse to accept the
.
terms of the Third Party Offer (which refusal shal be conclusively established by the Commission's
failure to accept in accordance with the terms of this Paragraph), the City shall be entitled to sell,
transfer, lease, or convey the Property (or the sp ified portion thereof) pursuant to the terms of the
Third Party Offer. Any deviation of the term and conditions of the sale, transfer, lease or
conveyance to the third party from the terms and onditions of the Third Party Offer shall require a
new notice to the Commission and shall entitle th Commission to a new right of first refusal on the
terms of the modified or altered Third Party Offe. Upon sale of the Property (or a portion thereof)
pursuant to the terms a bona fide Third Party On er for which the Commission has been provided
notice and has refused to accept the offer in ac ordance with the term hereof, the rights of the
Commission with respect to the Property (or the ortion thereof sold) shall expire, except that such
rights shall continue and revive at the expirafon of any lease or other temporary transfer or
. conveyance.. In the event that only a portion of the Property is sold, transferred, leased, or
conveyed pursuant to the terms of this Agreeme t, the rights of the Commission. hereunder shall
continue and remain unimpaired with respect to t e remainder of the Property.
2
;,9-
,
.'
.
2. Term of Agreement. This Agree ent shall expire on such date as the City no longer
has fee title to the Property, provided that such te ination shall not affect the rights with respect to
a Third Party Offer made prior to said date.
3. Notice. Except as otherwise xpressly provided in this Agreement, a notice,
demand, or other communication under this greement by either party to the other shall be
sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatche by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid,
return receipt requested, or delivered personally; nd
(a) in the case of the Commission is addressed to or delivered personally to the
Commission at
and
.
(b) in the case of the City, is addre sed to or delivered personally to the City at City
Hall, P.O. Box 1147, Monticello, MN 55 62-9245, Attn: City Administrator;
or at such other address with respect to either such party as that party may, from time to time,
designate in writing and forward to the other as rovided in this Paragraph 3.
4. Assignment. The terms and con itions of this Agreement are hereby made binding
on the successors and assigns of the parties heret .
5. Remedies. The City acknowled es that in the event that the City shall breach its
obligations hereunder, in addition to any remed"es that may be available at law, due to the unique
nature of the Property and the Commission's rig ts hereunder, the Commission shall be entitled to
injunctive relief against any proposed sale in violation of the Commission's rights hereunder
without the necessity of posting any bond.
6. Third Party Rights. The Housin and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City
. of Monticello, Minnesota (the "Authority") sha 1, during the time prior to the Maturity Date (as
defined in the Development Agreement), have e right, but not the obligation, to enforce any right
or obligation granted to either party pursuant to this Right of First Refusal Agreement. The City fA, ~~
r3 ,';'
.
.
.
and the Commission hereby agree that they m y not in. any way waive, limit, or eliminate the
Authority's rights under this Agreement without e express written consent of the Authority.
[THE REMAINDER OF TIllS PA E IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK]
E4
~~~
.
.
.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties ha~ caused this Right of First Refusal Agreement to
be duly executed on or as of the date first above 'tten.
STATEOFMINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
C OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA
By
By
Its Mayor
Its City Administrator
The foregoing instrument was aden wledged before me this
, 1998 by and
Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Mont cello, Minnesota, on behalf of the City.
STATEOFMINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF )
Notary Public
MINNESOTA STATE
ARMORY BUILDING COMMISSION
By
Its
day of
, the
The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this _ day of , 1998
by and , the and of the Minnesota State Armory
Building Commission.
This instrument was drafted by:
Kennedy & Graven, Chartered
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 337-9300
By
Its
Notary Public
E-
~~~
.
.
.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
10.
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
The bids for the interceptor relocation pro' ect for the construction of the Monticello Civic
Center are due at 10 a.m. on Friday, Aug st 21, 1998. After comments from a previous
Council Meeting in regard to the sanitary ewer alignment compromising a good portion
of the property, the alignment was relocat d so that it touches only on the far southwest
comer of the property on which the civic enter is to be built, leaving almost all of the
property available for development. The ew interceptor alignment connects with 6th
Street near the west entrance to the Marq ette Bank. It then goes east along 6th Street to
Walnut Street, up Walnut Street to 5th Str et where it reconnects to the interceptor sewer.
This project not only involves the realig ent of the interceptor sewer, but also sewer
and water services for the new civic cente , and removal of all the street, curb and gutter
surfaces on Locust and 5th Street (between Locust and Walnut). Following is the low bid
amounts for the improvement project:
A.
Surface Improvements: This conta'ns such items as mobilization, removals of
sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, curb and gutter, and bituminous. Repaving of
the streets, transplanting trees, sod, sidewalk............................$115,332
B. Sanitary Sewer: This includes the realignment of the interceptor sewer and the
surface connects........................................................................ .$140,0 16
C. Water Main: This includes a new ater main and services as necessary to service
the civic center and reinstall salvag d hydrant..........................$ 37,080
D. Storm Sewer: This includes the rei stallation of storm sewer...$ 20,500
TOTAL PROJECT BID:............. ..........................................$312,928
Feasibility Study...................................................................... ..$200,000
The above costs do not include engineerin , inspect, etc. Of the above, surface
improvement costs under Section A, a port on of construction costs can be attributed to
the replacement of the street surface on 6th treet and Walnut Street. Section B, the
sanitary sewer, can only be attributed to th relocation of the interceptor sewer. Under
Section C, water main, approximately $2,0 0 could be considered an improvement to our
water system. Under Section D, storm sew r, all the costs can be attributed to the civic
center project.
14
.
The higher costs are due in large part to:
1. Selection of south alignment.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
2. Removal and replacement of 6th St eet.
3. Milling of the road surfaces that c nflict with the building.
4. Dewatering expenses that were no included.
5. Lengthened route along 6th Street.
B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS:
1. The first alternative would be to re iew the bids and, based upon the low bid
award the interceptor relocation pr ~ect the lowest responsible bidder and proceed.
2. The second alternative would be n t to award the trunk relocation project due to
budget constraints or other rational proposed by the City Council.
.
3.
The third alternative would be to in tall a slip liner and continue to use the
existing trunk sanitary sewer as is, d have contingency plans for by-pass
pumping and replacement if necess ry during the life of the building.
Under this alternative, the City wou d be responsible for paying for plans and
specification for the trunk line and t e cost to televise and install a liner in the
trunk line. This option would allo the project timeline to stay on track. This
cost is currently being analyzed by SB and will be presented at the meeting.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It is the recommendation of the City Admin'strator that Council select alternative 1 or 3.
The community center budget allocated $186,000 for this portion of the project, The net
impact of this project on the overall commu ity center budget is being analyzed and will
be provided at the meeting. The current co tingency with the budget is $225,000.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of the draft bid tabulation and letter fr m Citizens Group.
.
15
.
.
.
Bids Opelled: 10:00 a.lII.
August 21,1998
C(lI1tractor
Northdale Construction
Schlucnder Construction, Inc.
Kuechle Underground, Inc.
Kramer Excavating
Bauerly Companies
S.R. Weidcma
Barbarossa and Sons
R. Larson Excavating, Inc.
Dunnick Bros., Inc.
Inland Utility Construction
Engineer's Estimate
City Engineer
Realigll Sallitl ry Sewer
Locust Street to J a/nut Street
Community Center
City Project NI. 98-10C
City of Montic I/o, MN
Bid
Security
~
/(#/
;/'
IJ1SB & Associates, IlIc.
Project No. 1101.00
At aendu11l
No.1
AddendulII
No.2
Total Bid
$ i-2~ ,~~b 2.~
I
$
$
$
$
$
$ e~ I ~, C\ 2 ~ ., ,~
-r
$
.
$
$
$
$
$
$
$276,300
I hereby certifY that this is a true and correcttabulalion of
the bids as received 011 August 21, 1998.
Bret A. Weiss, P.E.
,
· Dellotes corrected jigllr\ () ~\
F:\WP"1M/ 1O/,OO\'/><cIJlIDTAB. WPD
.
.
.
August 20, 1998
Mr. William Fair, Mayor
Monticello City Hall
P. O. Box 1147
Monticello,:MN 55362
rvIr. Bruce Thielen
Monticello City Council
118 Hillcrest Road
Monticello, MN 55362
Mr. Roger Carlson
Monticello City Council
208 Kevin Longley Drive
Monticello, M'K 55362
Re: Monticello Community Cemer
Gentlemen:
Mr. Clint Herbst
Monticello City Council
9801 Gilland Ave. N,R
Monticello, MN 55362
M:r. Brian Sumpf
MonticeUo City Council
1535 Oak Ridge Circle
Monticello, MN 55362
Weare a group of citizens and taxpayers f Monticello who have continuing concernS
about the manner in which the Community Cente project is being rushed through the approval
process Qfthe City. It appears that decisions are eing made and monies expended in
anticipation that the Community Center project \1v 11 be fully approved. As this has not been
decided as of this date, we respectfully request th't the City Council delay the expenditure of
further City funds for construction until the proje t has been finally approved and fully financed.
it is our understanding that a trunk sewer elocation project is being considered by the
City Council which is only necessary if the Com! unity Center is in fact built and is built in the
exact location that has been discussed. This sew project would not go forward but for the
Community Center being constructed. Bids have been solicited which are scheduled to be
opened tomorrow, August 21, 1998, and a bid aw d is contemplated for August 24, 1998. It is
the bid award that we request be delayed until qu sti.ons are fully answered with respect to the
financing and construction ofthe COllul1unity Ce ter_
Our group has recently obtained access to City files on the Community Center proje(~t
and a variety of questions of surfaced, the answer' to which are not apparent in the City files.
A.roong our concerns are the following:
1.
Has the environmental condition of the ne\-\' site been fully ascertained, includinf.
the COsts of clean-up> if any?
\()~~
.
.
.
August 20, 1998
Page 2
2.
Have operational shortfalls been qu nntied once the building is complete and
what is the source for paying these hortfalls')
3. Has anyone obtained a legal opinio which confirms that a housing and
redevelopment authority has power 0 own and operate a public city hall?
4. Has anyone obtained a legal opinlo \....hich continns that a housing and
redevelopment authority has power 0 own and operate a recreational facility?
5. Has the City obtained a legal opluio to confirm that a City may enter into a 20-
year lease agreement using general t ::. levy funds to repay revenue bond
financing?
6. Has the City obtained a legal opinio that would indicate that the City of
Monticello may use this proposed ti ancing structure as a mechanism to avoid
issuing general obligation bonds eve though general levy funds will be used
(directly and indirectly) to finance t is project'!
7.
Does the City have a legal opinion a d/ol" analysis by the State Auditor's Office
that this financing structure will not ega.tively impact the City's levy limitation?
8. What, ifany, impact \\!ill this project have on the City's bond rating for future
projects? (There is an indication in Ie City tIles that the bond rating of the City
is likely to be downgraded and, if so, what is the contribution of this project to
that dovmgrading?)
We have raised other concenlS relating to th health and safety aspects of the project'
which remain unanswered. It \.vould appear that the project is being approved On a piecemeal
basis long before the final construction costs are det rmined and prior to ullly answering all of
the legal and financial questions that have been rais d. As you are about to approve another
approximate $150,000 expenditure on this project. having spent hundreds of thousands of dollars
already, it would appear that a hiatus to fully explor these questions would be appropriate.
Further, to go ahead without the answers would app ar wasteful oftlle taxpayers' money. Please
do not spend more rax dollars in the award oft11e se er relocation binds until all the facts are
HIlly known.
oneemed Citizens of MOnticello
....t I Co<.-\. ~I ( " I kJo -J ( /; if sJu-H ,Lcl I ~ ~.A.cf'-
PUlU,,!' c1,Nc( A <cr,J'"b'1J 8(1
5-19746\1 0731300-000100
\l\/3
...:
BRC FiNANCiAL SYSTEM
08/19/98 11:51:49
Schedule of Bills
CiTY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S V05.20 COVERPAGE
GL540R
.
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 0819
COMMENT... 8/19 CKS
OATA-JE-IO
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
0-08191998-598 8/18 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/07/98 12:21:36
Schedule of Bills
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL050S-V 5.20 COVERPAGE
GL5~OR
.
Report Selection:
RUN GROUP... 0807
COMMENT... 8/07 CKS
DATA-JE-lD
DATA COMMENT
-------------- ------------------------
0-08071998-593 8/07 CKS
Run Instructions:
Jobq Banner Copies Form Printer Hold Space LPI Lines CPI
J 01 Y S 6 066 10
.
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/07/98 12: 21: 36 Schedule of Bills GL540R-Y05.20 PAGE 1
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INYOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
DESCRIPTION
AME GROUP
WWTP-PLASTICIZE 273.04 MISC REPAIR & MTC UPPLI 436.49201.2299 214724 593 00001
PARKS-OP SUPPLIES 56.43 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 214788 593 00002
329.47 *YENDOR TOTAL
AMERICAN PAGING OF MINNE
JOHN M, RICH C 18.54 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 593 00003
MATT 45.53 TELEPHONE 602.49490.3210 593 00004
PATTY 16.00 TELEPHONE 101.42701.3210 593 00005
JOHN S 9.21 TELEPHONE 101.43110.3210 593 00006
GARY A 9.21 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 593 00001
TOM B 9.21 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 593 00008
ROBER M 9.21 TELEPHONE 101.43120.3210 593 00009
JOHN L 9.21 TELEPHONE 101.45201.3210 593 00010
126.42 *YENDOR TOTAL
ANKENY KELL ARCHITECTS,
COMM CENTER-ARCHITECT 89,498.80 PROF SRY - ARCHITE TS' F 461.49201.3020 APR & MAY 593 00011
.
BECKER/CITY OF
STORM-EQUIPMENT USE 1,060.00 1991 STORM DAMAGE XPENS 101.42501.4401 593 00012
~ELLBOY CORPORATION BAR
LIQUOR 383.00 LIQUOR 609.49150.2510 14681700 593 00014
TAXABLE MISC 502.01 MISC TAXABLE 609.49150.2540 28167700 593 00013
885.01 *YENDOR TOTAL
BERNICK'S PEPSI COLA COM
BEER 170.80 BEER 609.49150.2520 593 00024
MISC TAXABLE 80.00 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593 00025
250.80 *YENDOR TOTAL
CEDAR ST. GARDEN CENTER
PARKS-LANDSCAPE MATL 360.02 LANDSCAPING MATERI LS 101.45201.2250 593 00019
SHADE TREE-TREES 271. 53 TREE REPLACEMENT 224.46102.4391 593 00020
SHOP- TREES 593.15 BUILDING REPAIR SU PLIES 101.43121.2230 593 00021
1.224.10 *YENDOR TOTAL
CENTRAL MINN INITIATIYE
CMIF GRANT REIMB 1,100.21 GRANT REIMBURSEMEN 223.46501.6601 593 00022
CENTURY LABS
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 206.20 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43121.2199 15103, 13435 593 00023
COMPRESSOR SERVICES, LTD
WWTP-FILTERS 820.28 PROF SRY - CONSTRU TION 436.49201.3025 50730 593 00026
4111JONDON-SKELLY ANTIQUE CA
FIRE-ANTIQUE TRUCK INS 61.75 YEHICLE INSURANCE 101.42201.3630 593 00021
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTI CElli
08/07/98 12: 21: 36 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
DESCRIPTION
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 5,422.10 BEER 609.49750.2520 593 0002:
NON ALCOHOLIC BEER 179.30 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593 0002'
5,601.40 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 1,339.00 BEER 609.49750.2520 38760 593 00031
DAYTON'S OFFICE SOLUTION
CH-FURNITURE FIXTURES 4,046.09 FURNITURE & FIXT RES 240.49201.5601 190127, 122461 593 0003
EARL'S WELDING & IND SUP
SHOP-OP SUPPLIES 460.83 MISC OPERATING S PPLIES 101.43127.2199 593 0003:
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTW
ELECTIONS-PAPER 41.72 MISC OPERATING S PPLIES 101.41410.2199 593 0003:
ADM-UTILITY BILLS 1.057.12 PRINTED FORMS & APER 101.41301.2030 593 0003,
FINANCE-CHECKS 1,013.46 PRINTED FORMS & APER 101.41520.2030 593 0003:
2,112.30 *VENDOR TOTAL
ENNIS CABINETS
CH-FILING CABINET(OLLIE) 918.00 FURNITURE & FIXT RES 101.41940.5601 8580 593 0003i
eIR/WILLIAM
MAYOR-TRAVEL EXPENSE 26.32 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.41110.3310 593 0003'
GRIGGS, COOPER & COMPANY
LIQUOR 4,335.50 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 593 0003~
WINE 82.00 WINE 609.49750.2530 593 0003'
MISC TAXABLE 207.58 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593 00041
FREIGHT 63.75 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 593 0004
4,688.83 *VENDOR TOTAL
GROSSLEIN BEVERAGE INC.
BEER 3,659.20 BEER 609.49750.2520 153777 593 0004;
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
WATER-T/POTABLE 48.00 MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 601.49440.3199 593 0004:
WATER-CHEMICALS 35.00 CHEMICAL PRODUCT 601.49440.2160 593 0004'
83.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
HENRY & ASSOCIATES
WATER-RESALE METERS 1,357.51 METERS & VALVES OR RESA 601.49440.2271 593 0004'
WWTP-EQUIP R & M 518.32 REPAIR & MTC - M CH & EQ 436.49201.4044 593 0004,
WATER-EQUIP R & M 217.69 REPAIR & MTC - M CH & EQ 601.49440.4044 593 0004',
WATER-WRENCH 60.93 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 601.49440.2410 593 0004,
WATER-UTIL SYS MAINT 324.88 UTILITY SYSTEM M CE SUPP 601.49440.2270 593 0004'
. 2,479.33 *VENDOR TOTAL
_~ - _"__m -~ ._."_.~ - -
- - -""_.~ - .-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/07/98 12:21:36 Schedule of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
DESCRIPTION
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
CEMETARY-OP SUPPLIES 13.74 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 651.49010.2199 593 00077
FIRE-CRABGRASS PREY 74.97 REPAIR & MTC - BUI DINGS 101.42201.4010 593 00078
LIBRARY-CRABGRASS PREY 74.98 REPAIR & MTC - BUI DINGS 211.45501.4010 593 00079
CH-BLDG REPAIR SUPPLIES 74.98 BUILDING REPAIR SU PLIES 101.41940.2230 593 00080
PARK-OP SUPPLIES 640.23 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 593 00081
878.90 *VENDOR TOTAL
MAUS FOODS
PLANNING 45.39 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.41910.2199 593 00082
AN SHELTER-SUPPLIES 48.27 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.42701.2199 593 00083
PW 5.54 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43127.2199 593 00084
LIBRARY-CLNING SUPPLIES 33.16 CLEANING SUPPLIES 211.45501.2110 593 00085
132.36 *VENDOR TOTAL
MENARD, INC
PARKS-OP SUPPLIES 253.33 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 593 00086
MIDWEST EXPO 98
LIQUOR-CONFERENCE 90.00 CONFERENCE & SCHOO S 609.49754.3320 593 00088
MINNEGASCO
.LIQUOR STORE 15.98 GAS 609.49754.3830 593 00089
MINNETONKA IRON WORKS, I
PARKS-POST CAPS 300.00 MISC REPAIR & MTC UPPLI 101.45201.2299 593 00090
MN DEPT OF TRADE & ECON
SCERT GRANT REIMB 2,483.45 GRANT REIMB - AROP AX 222.46501.6602 593 00091
MONTICELLO RV CENTER
STREETS-GAS LIGHTER 25.11 SMALL TOOLS & EQUI MENT 101.43120.2410 593 00092
MOON MOTOR SALES, INC.
FIRE-SAW REPAIR 52.75 REPAIR & MTC - MAC & EQ 101.42201.4044 593 00093
STREETS-BELTS 25.33 EQUIPMENT REPAIR P RTS 101.43120.2210 593 00094
PARK-MOWERS 1,464.11 OTHER EQUIPMENT 101.45201.5801 593 00095
PARK-VEH REPAIR PARTS 16.08 VEHICLE REPAIR PAR S 101.45201.2211 593 00096
PARK-EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 158.37 EQUIPMENT REPAIR P RTS 101.45201.2210 593 00097
PARK-OP SUPPLIES 98.71 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 593 00098
1,815.35 *VENDOR TOTAL
NAGORSKI/TERRY
TIF 1-22 N ANCHOR APPR 300.00 PROF SRV - LEGAL F ES 213.46522.3040 593 00099
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & AS
PATHWAY-OBS & STAKING 46.05 PROF SRV - CONSTRU TION 435.49201.3025 593 00100
~ILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
WINE 2,005.41 WINE 609.49750.2530 593 00102
LIQUOR 2,219.70 LI QUOR 609.49750.2510 593 00103
- ..- - -. -
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/07/98 12:21 :36 Schedule o Bi 11 s GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 6
.DOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F/P 10 LINE
DESCRIPTION
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
BEER 15,518.70 BEER 609.49750.2520 593 00126
MISC TAXABLE 108.15 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593 00127
15,626.85 *VENDOR TOTAL
U S POSTMASTER
FIRE~BOX RENTAL 6.00 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.42201.4399 (6) MONTHS 593 00128
VIKING COCA COLA
CH-POP 61. 77 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41940.4399 593 00129
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
MISC TAXABLE 373.95 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 593 00130
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TR
SCERG GRANT REIMB 2,760.51 GRANT REIMBURSEMEN ?22.46501.6601 593 00131
SHERIFF PATROL 27,776.40 PROF SRV - LAW ENF RCEME 101.42101.3050 AUGUST 593 00132
30,536.91 *VENDOR TOTAL
WRIGHT COUNTY DEPT OF HI
STORM-EQUIPMENT USE 11,638.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE XPENS 101.42501.4401 593 00134
~GHT COUNTY PARKS DEPT
TORM-LABOR & EQUIP USE 2,527.00 1997 STORM DAMAGE XPENS 101.42501.4401 593 00135
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN COOP ELE
STREET LIGHTS-GILLARD 9.00 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 593 00133
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC
STREETS-MISC OP SUPPLE IS 899.39 MISC OPERATING SU PLIES 101.43120.2199 593 00136
PARKS-MISC OP SUPPLIES 379.56 MISC OPERATING SU PLI ES 101.45201.2199 593 00137
1,278.95 *VENDOR TOTAL
lEE MEDICAL SERVICE
PW ADM-FIRST AID SUPP 94.97 MISC OTHER EXPENS 101.43110.4399 593 00132
LIQUOR-FIRST AID SUPP 36.63 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 609.49754.4399 593 0013(
131.60 *VENDOR TOTAL
.
- -.'- - ---_.._-,-,_.-~'~-,.--
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/07/98 12:21:36
.DOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT
244,158.14
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000139
Schedule of B.lls
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 7
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/07/98 12:21:39
'0 RECAP:
Schedule of Bills
FUND DESCRIPTION
----------------------------
101 GENERAL FUND
211 LIBRARY FUND
213 HRA FUND
222 SCERG (ECON RECOVERY GRANT)
223 CMIF (CENT MN IN IT FUND)
224 SHADE TREE FUND
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
435 93-08C PATHWAY PROJECT
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
461 98-03C COMMUNITY CENTER
601 WA TE R FUN D
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
651 RIVERSIOE CEMETERY
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
aK RECAP:
BANK NAME
----------------------------
GENt. GENERAL CHECKING
LIQR LIQUOR CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
DIS URSEMENTS
9.110.56
633.80
300.00
5.243.96
1.100.21
444.72
4,046.09
46.05
1.702.78
89.498.80
2,161.89
45.53
39.250.88
572.87
44.158.14
01 BURSEMENTS
04.907.26
39.250.88
244,158.14
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED BY
.
. ...... ........0........ ..... t.......
.. ....... ........... ......... ...... .....
.... ... t.... .........,.. 0.." ..........
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAPPAGE
GL540R
---~--'~- ,,-----.-....--.- .I,__'---'-_._~
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/19/98 11: 51 :50 Schedule 0 f Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 2
.NOOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE POll F /P ID LINE
DESCRIPTION
BITZER/GLADYS
CHAMBER - HELP 333.00 SALARIES. TEMPORARY RE 101.45172.1040 8/31 PAYMENT 598 00021
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, INC.
STREETS-OP SUPPLI ES 212.75 MISC OPERATING SUPPL ES 101.43120.2199 598 00022
CELLULAR 2000 OF ST CLOU
TOM B 80.06 TELEPHONE 101.43115.3210 598 00023
FIRE DEPT 2.36 TELEPHONE 101.42201.3210 598 00024
GARY A 85.07 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 598 00025
MA TT T 18.29 TELEPHONE 601.49440.3210 598 00026
185.78 *VENDOR TOTAL
COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPA
TACK OIL 118.91 MISC OPERATING SUPPL ES 101.43120.2199 598 00029
CULLIGAN
RENTAL HOUSE 24.92 RENTAL HOUSE EXPENSE 240.49201.4381 598 00030
DAHLHEIMER DISTRIBUTING
BEER 7,355.15 BEER 609.49750.2520 598 00031
NON ALCOHOLIC 115.50 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 00032
. 7.470.65 *VENDOR TOTAL
DAVE PETERSON'S FORD/MER
STREETS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 173.98 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2211 598 00033
DAY DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
BEER 1,381.60 BEER 609.49750.2520 598 00034
MISC TAXABLE 34.40 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 00035
1,416.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
EARL F ANDERSON & ASSOCI
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 1,328.16 MISC OPERATING SUPPL ES 101.43120.2199 598 00036
EHLERS & ASSOC,INC PUBLI
HRA-GENERAL 341. 25 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 101.41910.3199 598 00037
COMM CENTER 1.680.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 101.41910.3199 598 00039
MALL REDEV 52.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 213.46522.3199 TIF 1-22 598 00038
ALLIED 2,152.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL SE VIC 213.46523.3199 TIF 1-23 598 00040
4,226.25 *VENDOR TOTAL
ELK RIVER BITUMINOUS INC
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 505.88 MISC OPERATING SUPPLI ES 101.43120.2199 598 00041
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN
FIRE-TRUCK R & M 659.66 REPAIR & MTC - VEHICL ES 101.42201.4050 13130 598 00042
eGLE/GREG
GREG-TRAVEL EXPENSES 76.11 TRAVEL EXPENSE 101.42501.3310 598 00043
BRCFINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/98 11 :51 :50 Schedule f Bills
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION
KEN ANDERSON TRUCKING
(23) ANIMALS 126.50 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 101.42701.3199
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTE
HRA-GENERAL 269.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 101.41910.3199
COMM CENTER 1,495.65 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 101.41910.3199
MALL REDEV 470.38 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 213.46522.3199
2,235.03 *VENDOR TOTAL
KRAMBER & ASSOCIATES INC
ASSESSING SERVICES 1,948.50 PROF SRV - ASSESSIN 101.41550.3125
L & STOOL & DESIGN
SHADE TREE-BLADES&SHARPN 110.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 224.46102.3199
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC.
PARKS-OP SUPPLIES 271.96 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 101.45201.2199
LAKEVILLE MOTOR EXPRESS
REFUSE-FREIGHT FOR FILE 244.02 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 101.43230.2199
LITTLE MOUNTAIN FLOWERS
. CH-KRAMBER & SIMOLA 77.59 MISC OTHER EXPENSE 101.41301.4399
M.B.P.
FIRE-FUEL 131. 29 MOTOR FUELS 101.42201.2120
STREETS-FUEL 246.28 MOTOR FUELS 101.43120.2120
377.57 *VENDOR TOTAL
MARTIE'S FARM SERVICE
PARK-OP SUPPLIES 133.02 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 101.45201.2199
STREETS-PELLETS 7.35 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 101.43120.2199
SEWER-BUCKET 6.55 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 602.49490.2199
146.92 *VENDOR TOTAL
MCDOWALL COMPANY
LIQUOR-EQUIP REPAIR 489.48 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 609.49754.4044
LIBRARY-AC R & M 847.63 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 211.45501.4044
CH-AC R & M 307.00 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 101.41301.4044
1,644.11 *VENOOR TOTAL
MICHELS TRUCKING, INC
LIQUOR-FREIGHT 279.00 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330
MINNEAPOLIS EQUIPMENT CO
WWTP-EQUIP RENTAL 175.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 436.49201.4150
WWTP-OP SUPPLIES 69.11 MISC OPERATING SUPP IES 436.49201.2199
. 244.11 *VENDOR TOTAL
CLAIM INVOICE
TIF 1-22
AUGUST 1998
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 4
PO# F/P 10 LINE
598 00064
598 00065
598 00067
598 00066
598 00068
598 00069
598 00070
598 00071
598 00072
598 00089
598 00090
598 00073
598 00074
598 00075
598 00076
598 00077
598 00078
598 00079
598 00082
598 00083
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELLO
08/19/98 11: 51: 50 Schedule f Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 5
.ENOOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P ID LINE
DESCRIPTION
MINNEGASCO
ANIMAL SHELTER 9.59 GAS 101.42701.3830 598 00080
MIRACLE RECREATION EQUIP
PARKS-BENCH FRAME 133.06 REPAIR & MTC - OTHE 101.45201.4099 455322 598 00085
MN COPY SYSTEMS INC
FIRE-COPIER MAINT 31. 95 MAINTENANCE AGREEME TS 101.42201.3190 THROUGH 7/24 598 00081
MN RURAL WATER ASSOCIATI
HA TER-LI CENSES 185.00 LICENSES & PERMITS 601.49440.4370 598 00084
MONTICELLO SENIOR CITIZE
MONTHLY CONTRACT 2,833.33 SENIOR CENTER CONTR IBUTI 101.45175.3136 SEPTEMBER 598 00091
MONTICELLO VACUUM CENTER
LIQUOR-EQUIP R & M 62.52 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 609.49754.4044 598 00092
LIBRARY-EQUIP R & M 26.57 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 211.45501.4044 598 00093
89.09 *VENDOR TOTAL
MOONEY & ASSOCIATES
WWTP-BRACKET 85.70 REPAIR & MTC - MACH & EQ 436.49201.4044 6189 598 00094
~ORAN USA, LLC
LIQUOR-TAX MISC 40.74 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 00095
MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING,
PARKS-Z LAMP 137.48 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.45201.2199 53003 598 00096
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
WWTP-SIDEWALK DRAINS 875.75 PROF SRV - CONSTRU TION 436.49201.3025 598 00097
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS
PARKS-STRAPS 101. 15 SMALL TOOLS & EQUI MENT 101.45201.2410 19270321 598 00098
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO
WATER 672.99 ELECTRIC 601.49440.3810 598 00099
SEWER 8.41 ELECTRIC 602.49490.3810 598 00100
STREET LIGHTS 179.42 ELECTRIC 101.43160.3810 598 00101
CIVIL DEFENSE 4.85 ELECTRIC 101.42501.3810 598 00102
SHOP/GARAGE 415.11 ELECTRIC 101.43127.3810 598 00103
LI BRARY 728.17 ELECTRIC 211.45501.3810 598 00104
CH 1,153.17 ELECTRIC 101. 41940.3810 598 00105
PARKING LOTS 17.44 ELECTRIC 101.43140.3810 598 00106
AN SHELTER 166.13 ELECTRIC 101.42701.3810 598 00107
3,345.69 *VENDOR TOTAL
4111'ORTHLANO ELECTRIC
REFUSE-BATTERIES 61.34 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43230.2199 598 00108
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTI CELLI
08/19/98 11: 51 :50 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
DESCRIPTION
ONE CALL CONCEPTS, INC.
LOCATES 312.00 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 601.49440.3199 JULY 598 0010~
P & H WAREHOUSE SALES, I
PARKS-TRANFORMERS& FUSE 63.63 MISC OPERATING SU PLIES 101.45201.2199 8353101 598 00110
PATCH/FRED
FRED-CELL PHONE REIMB 17 .88 TELEPHONE 101.42401.3210 598 00111
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
WINE 1,297.10 WINE 609.49750.2530 598 00112
LIQUOR 843.19 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 598 00113
FREIGHT 28.47 FREIGHT 609.49750.3330 598 00114
2,168.76 *VENDOR TOTAL
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
MISC TAXABLE 392.80 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 00115
PIPELINE SUPPLY, INC.
STREETS-OP SUPPLIES 129.64 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43120.2199 598 00116
PITNEY BOWES
. CH-TAPE ROLLS 50.66 MISC OFFICE SUPPLI S 101.41301.2099 598 00117
PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMEN
WWTP-PROF SERVICES 4,459.57 PROF SRV - CONSTRU TION 436.49201.3025 598 00118
PRECISION MEASURING SYST
PW INSP-MISC OP 138.51 MISC OPERATING SUP LIES 101.43115.2199 598 00119
PREUSSE/JAMES L
CH 460.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODI L 101.41940.3110 AUG CLEANING 598 00120
DEP REG 120.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIAL 101.41990.3110 AUG CLEANING 598 00121
PW 150.00 PROF SRV - CUSTODIA 101.43110.3110 AUG CLEANING 598 00122
730.00 *VENDOR TOTAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GR
WWTP CONTRACT 35,360.50 PROF SRV - PSG, INC 602.49480.3080 SEPTEMBER 598 00123
SUNNY FRESH TESTING 1,346.40 MISC PROFESSIONAL S RVIC 602.49480.3.199 2ND QTR 1998 598 00124
36,706.90 *VENDOR TOTAL
QUALITY WINE & SPIRlTS C
LIQUOR 3,389.57 LIQUOR 609.49750.2510 598 00125
WINE 1,677.02 WINE 609.49750.2530 598 00126
5,066.59 *VENDOR TOTAL
R & 0 SALES, INC.
~ PARKS-EMBROIDER DESIGN 50.00 UNIFORM RENTAL 101.45201.4170 14425 598 00127
-----. .-.--. ----
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELi
08/19/98 11: 51 :50 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.ENDOR NAME AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
DESCRIPTION
ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIE
STREETS-KEY,RING,SEAL 117.63 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101;43120.2210 598 0012
ROGERS RADIATOR REPAIR
SEHER-EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 120.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 602.49490.2210 598 0012
RON'S GOURMET ICE
ICE 642.32 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 20095,19388 598 0013
ROYAL TIRE OF MONTICELLO
PARKS-EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 98.90 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.45201.2210 598 0013
WATER-TIRE REPAIR 23.85 REPAIR & MTC - V HICLES 601.49440.4050 598 0013
STREETS-TIRE REPAIR 8.00 REPAIR & MTC - V HICLES 101.43120.4050 598 0013
STREETS-EQUIP REPAIR PRT 633.39 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 598 0013
STREETS-EQUIP REPAIR 8.00 REPAIR & MTC - M CH & EQ 101.43120.4044 598 0013
STREETS-VEH REPAIR PARTS 162.02 VEHICLE REPAIR P RIS 101.43120.2211 598 0013
934.16 *VENDOR TOTAL
ROYCE ROLLS RINGER COMPA
PARKS-TISSUE DISPENSER 126.99 REPAIR,& MTC - B ILDINGS 101.45201.4010 6583 598 0013
RUSSELL'S LOCK & KEY
~ LIQUOR-FRT DOOR SERVICE 50.00 REPAIR & MTC - B ILDINGS 609.49754.4010 598 0013
AN SHELTER-REPAIR LOCK 63.71 REPAIR & MTC - B ILDINGS 101.42701.4010 598 0013
113.71 *VENDOR TOTAL
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
SHOP-MA 83.60 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 101.43127.3190 598 00141
SALZWEDEL/PATRICIA
PATTY-OP SUPPLIES 85.36 MISC OPERATING S PPLI ES 101.42701.2199 598 0008;
PATTY-POSTAGE 12.80 POSTAGE 101.42701.3220 598 0008'
AN CONTROL CONTRACT 1,197.49 PROF SRV - ANIMA CTRL 0 101.42701.3120 AUGUST 31 598 0008:
1,295.65 *VENDOR TOTAL
SCHARBER & SONS, INC.
PARKS-MOWER 9,952.42 OTHER EQUIPMENT 101.45201.5801 598 0014
SCHMIDT CURB COMPANY, IN
HHTP-REALIGN CURB&GUTTER 4,960.00 PROF SRV - CONST UCTION 436.49201.3025 598 0014:
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
MISC OP SUPPLIES 19.54 MISC OPERATING S PPLIES 609.49754.2199 598 0014'
MISC TAXABLE 50.55 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 415177 598 0014:
70.09 *VENDOR TOTAL
SUPERIOR FCR LANDFILL, I
. LANDFILL CHARGES 281. 03 MISC PROFESSIONAL SERVIC 101.43230.3199 JULY 598 OOW
-~----,-- -----------,-- --~,-,----,-"------,-~-"-,---,-
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM CITY OF MONTICELU
08/19/98 11: 51: 50 Schedu e of Bills GL540R-V05.20 PAGE
.
ENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ACCOUNT NAME FUND & ACCOUNT CLAIM INVOICE PO# F /P ID LINE
USI,INC
INSP-POUCHES 80.15 MISC OPERATING S PPLIES 101.42401.2199 1. 90314E+11 598 0018
VIKING COCA COLA
LIQUOR-POP 449.80 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 0018'
CH-POP 127.41 MISC OTHER EXPEN E 101.41940.4399 598 0018
577.21 *VENDOR TOTAL
VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL,
WATER-LINE REPAIR 1,700.00 MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 601.49440.3199 98225M 598 0018.
VNAM
PARKS-(2)CONF REGISTRAT. 170.00 CONFERENCE & SCH OLS 101.45201.3320 598 0018:
WATSON COMPANY, INC/THE
MISC TAXABLE 791.57 MISC TAXABLE 609.49750.2540 598 0018;
WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY
ZONING & PLANNING REPORT 292.86 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & suesc 101.41910.4330 59B 0018:
MN SESSION LAW 158.69 DUES, MEMBERSHIP & SUBSC 101.41301.4330 3/98 - 2/99 59B 0018
451. 55 *VENDOR TOTAL
~RIGHT HENNEPIN SECURITY
DEP REG 19.12 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 101.41990.3190 598 0018'
PARKS 15.98 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 101.45201.3190 59B 00191
WATER TOHER 21.25 MAINTENANCE AGRE MENTS 601.49440.3190 598 0019
56.35 *VENDOR TOTAL
Y M C A - NW
CONTRACT 625.00 MISC PROFESSIONA SERVIC 101.45177.3199 AUGUST 598 0019'
ZIEGLER POWER SYSTEMS
PARKS 100.46 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 101.43120.2210 MIRROR 59B 0019:
.
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/98 11:51:50
~......
eENDOR NAME
DESCRIPTION
REPORT TOTALS:
.
.
AMOUNT
251,496.69
ACCOUNT NAME
RECORDS PRINTED - 000191
Schedu1 of Bills
FUND & ACCOUNT
CITY OF MONTICELLC
GL540R-V05.20 PAGE 1C
CLAIM INVOICE PO# F/P 10 LINE
BRC FINANCIAL SYSTEM
08/19/98 11:51:53
-FUND RECAP;
FUND DESCRIPTION
----------------------------
101 GENERAL FUND
211 LIBRARY FUND
213 HRA FUND
224 SHADE TREE FUND
240 CAPITAL PROJECT REVOLVING FD
436 93-14C WWTP EXPANSION PRJ
601 WATER FUND
602 SEWER FUND
609 MUNICIPAL LIQUOR FUND
610 TRANSPORTATION FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
BANK RECAP:
BANK NAME
.---
GENL
LIQR
----------------------------
GENERAL CHECKING
LIQUOR CHECKING
TOTAL ALL BANKS
Schedule of Bills
ISBURSEMENTS
67.051.87
2,039.53
2,675.38
110.00
24.92
48,507.91
11,165.17
36,841. 86
77,241.28
5,838.17
251,496.69
ISBURSEMENTS
174,255.41
77,241.28
251,496.69
THE PRECEDING LIST OF BILLS PAYABLE W S REVIEWED AND APPROVED FOR PAYMENT.
DATE ............
APPROVED Y
.
................... .................
............ ...... ..++... ..........
.. ..... ......... ........... ..........
-
CITY OF MONTICELLO
GL060S-V05.20 RECAP PAGE
GL54 OR
.
-..
.-.
Mayor:
AGE DA
REGULAR MEETING - MO TICELLO CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, AU UST 24, 1998
Bill Fair
Council Members: Clint Herbst, Brian Stumpf, R ger Carlson, Bruce Thielen
1. Call to order.
2. Approval of minutes ofthe regular meetin held August 10, 1998.
3. Consideration of adding items to the agen a.
4. Citizens comments/petitions, requests, and complaints.
5. Consent agenda:
(61 Consideration of an amendment to he resolution authorizing eminent domain of
the Burlington Northern Property b adding vacated Linn and Locust Street
right -of-ways.
@
~/
\9
Consideration of accepting enviro
distribution to the Environmental
ent assessment worksheet and authorize
uality Board. Golden Nugget Development.
C.
Consideration of adopting a resolut on approving Monticello Heartland Express
1999 Budget and Transit Assistanc Application.
D.
Consideration of a amendment to l' solution supporting annexation of Wildwood
Ridge plat. Amendment revises th legal description of the land area annexed.
E.
Consideration of adoption of a reso ution calling for a public hearing by the City
on the adoption of the proposed mo ified redevelopment project No.1, and the
proposed tax increment financing p an for tax increment financing district No. 1-
25 therein.
Consideration of accepting bids an awarding sanitary sewer extension project -
Monte Club.
6. Consideration of items removed from the c nsent agenda for discussion.
7. Public Hearing to consider adopting a resol tion approving modification ofthe Plan for
Central Monticello Redevelopment Project No. I, establishment ofTIF District No. 1-24
and approving the Plan relating thereto. (8. Benedicts)
8.
Consideration of reviewing six month liqu r store financial report.
9. Consideration of approval of agreement be ween the City and National Guard regarding
the Community and Training Center devel pment.
.
.
.
Agenda
Monticello City Council
8/24/98
Page 2
10.
11.
. T'
I U C(
ID h .
Consideration of accepting bids and award ng project - Trunk Sanitary Sewer Relocation
Project #98-1 DC.
Adjournment.
(7;1(5
IAd" e t \yo t ~ 1/" r (f.f":J
.
.
.
MIN TES
REGULAR MEETING - MO TICELLO CITY COUNCIL
Monday, August 0, 1998 - 7 p.m.
Members Present: Bill Fair, Clint Herbst, Brian S umpf, Bruce Thielen
Members Absent: Roger Carlson
2. A roval of minutes of the s ecial meetin
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE T IELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO APPROVE THE MINUTE OF THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD ON
JUL Y 27, 1998 AS WRITTEN. Motion c ied with Clint Herbst abstaining.
A roval of minutes of the re ular meetin
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN S MPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO APPROVE THE MINUTE OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD
JUL Y 27, 1998 AS WRITTEN. Motion c ied unanimously.
3.
Consideration of addin
None
4.
Citizens comments
None
5. Consent Agenda
A. Consideration of a
Elections
B.
The council approved the list of ele tion judges for the Primary and General
election with the addition of Lynett Gilland.
Consideration of a
Festival
license - St. He's Fall
Recommendation: Approve the re olution for issuance of gambling license.
SEE RESOLUTION 98-
6)
.
.
H.
1.
.
C.
Recommendation: Approve incre se in service charges for delinquent charges
and increases fees for assessment s arches.
D. Consideration of are uest for a su division and conditional use ermit in an I-I
Zonin District to allow for a shar d drivewa . A licant Blue Chi Inc.
E. lat - Worth Estates.
Recommendation: Approve preli inary and final plat of Worth Estates based on
the finding that no new buildable p eels are created and there are no new impacts
on public services.
F.
Recommendation: Approve condi ional use permit based on the conditions
contained in Exhibit Z.
G.
lat for The Forest. A licant John
ment Inc.
Recommendation: Approve preli inary plat with the conditions listed in
Exhibit Z.
Recommendation: Approve the C P/PUD amendment subject to the conditions
listed in Exhibit Z.
standards for the erection of
Monticello.
of
GJ
.
.
.
Recommendation: Approve ordi ance amendment based on the finding that it is
consistent with the comprehensive plan and consistent with the character of the
residential neighborhood.
1.
Recommendation: Approve the r zoning from A-I (agricultural) to R-l (Single
Family Residential).
K.
Recommendation: Approve final lat, development agreement and joint
City/Township annexation resoluti n.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY B AN STUMPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO APPROVE THE CO SENT AGENDA AS RECOMMENDED
WITH THE ADDITION OF L YN TTE GILLAND AS AN ELECTION JUDGE.
Motion carried unanimously.
7.
annexation
Recommendation: Approve final plat, de elopment agreement and resolution supporting
annexation of phase 1. Authorize preparati n of feasibility report and plans and
specifications for booster station.
Deputy City Administrator, Jeff O'Neill d City Engineer, Brett Weiss presented the
staff report explaining the water pressure s.tuation in the development area and
identifying the water pressure zones. Bret eiss noted that the lots at the higher
elevation in the development would have r duced water pressure. The city staff had
looked at a number of options and recomm nded construction of a permanent booster
station. It was suggested that a service dist . ct be set up and the properties within that
district would bear the cost of the booster s ation which is estimated to run approximately
$750/10t. Clint Herbst asked if there was a ay that the charge for the upkeep of the
booster station could be added to the water ill. He was informed by the staff that it
could be done under the present utility billi g system. Bill Fair questioned whether the
charges for the booster station would be as essed or if it would be an up front cost. Brett
Weiss suggested that the City keep it as an p front charge. It was also recommended
that the city attorney be consulted about th legal procedure for establishing a service
district.
6J
.
.
.
Lucinda Gardner representing Farr Develo ment stated that the developer felt
comfortable with what the city was proposi g. There was additional discussion as to
whether the proposed booster station woul take care of the needs in the system or if
there would be any other problem areas in e system that would need to be addressed.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN ST MPF AND SECONDED BY BRUCE
THIELEN TO APPROVE THE FINAL PL T, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WHICH INCLUDES THE SERVICE DIS RICT AND A RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING ANNEXATION OF PHAS I AND TO AUTHORIZE PREPARATION
OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT AND PLA S AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR A
BOOSTER STATION. Motion carried un imously.
8. Consideration of establishin a referendum uestion on November 1998 eneral election
for allowin issuance of additional on-sale icenses.
Recommendation: The question of additio al on-sale licenses be placed as a referendum
question on the November 1998 general ele tion.
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller presen ed the staff report and informed the council
that there are currently six on-sale licenses. When the City's population exceeds 10,000
the City is eligible for another six licenses. Until that time the only other method for
increasing the number of licenses would be by referendum. The council discussed
whether to put the question on the ballot re uesting a set number of additional licenses.
Clint Herbst stated he preferred specifying set number of licenses and did not like to
leave it open ended. Rod Dragsten and Rit Ulrich representing the Monticello
Community felt that the additional liquor Ii enses would be helpful as a development
tool. The council discussed how many lie nses they felt should be added.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRIAN ST MPF AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO ADOPT QUESTION #2 FO PLACEMENT ON THE BALLOT WITH
SIX ADDITIONAL LICENSES IN EXCE S OF THE SIX LICENSES THE CITY
CURRENTL Y HAS FOR A TOTAL TWE VE LICENSES. Motion carried
unanimously.
9.
Consideration of discussin
im rov ments and ex ansion conce ts.
Although this item had been withdrawn fro the agenda, the council discussed it briefly.
It was suggested that before the City sells t e present city hall building, the City needs to
find out how much work needs to be done n the library. It may be that the present city
hall site would be suitable for the library. he council also asked whether the current
library site has adequate room for expansio . City staff responded that the item had been
pulled from the agenda so that the staff cou d get a fully detailed report on what is needed
to be done with the library building. Brian Stumpf asked how much money was allocated
for the repairs. City Administrator Rick W lfsteller informed them that nothing outside
the normal budget amounts had been alloca ed.
Q)
.
.
.
12.
10.
Consideration of an ordinance amendmen establishin a four ear term for Ma or.
The council discussed the amendment est blishing a four year term for Mayor. It was felt
that changing to a four year term would p ovide for some continuity in that position.
Some members of the council expressed c ncern that making it a four year term might
discourage people from running for the p sition. It was also questioned whether two
years is adequate time for a new person to become established in and acclimated to the
position. Bill Fair stated that if the counc'l was to consider this amendment he would like
to see it effective with 1/1/2000 election.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE T ElLEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO ADOPT THE ORDINANC AMENDMENT CREATING A FOUR
YEAR TERM FOR MAYOR EFFECTIV JANUARY 1,2000. Motion carried with
Clint Herbst voting in opposition.
11.
Consideration of an ordinance amendment ado
City Administrator Rick Wolfsteller info ed the Mayor and Council that if adjustments
are to be made in the compensation for M yor and Council it must be done by ordinance
amendment or resolution prior to any mun cipal election. He noted that the last change in
compensation had been set four years ago. Information from area communities on the
compensation they paid was also submitte with the staff report. Clint Herbst stated that
they were in line with what other commun ties paid and he did not feel that an adjustment
was necessary. Brian Stumpf indicated th t while he did not think the position was
overcompensated, he did feel that people ho filed for office saw it as a service for their
community.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HE ST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO NOT TAKE ANY ACTION ON THE COMPENSATION FOR MA YOR
AND COUNCIL. Motion carried unanim usly.
Bruce Thielen suggested that when the sta begins their budget deliberations they
consider adjustments in the compensation r the Planning Commission.
Consideration of a stud and modification f fees and char es for develo ment in the
City of Monticello.
Fred Patch explained the study that the Cit had conducted on building fees, subdivision
fees and utility fees. Northwest Associated Consultants did a study on the park
dedication fees. Clint Herbst asked if the c'ty received complaints about the amount of
fees charged. Fred Patch responded that co plaints usually resulted when fee increases
were given on short notice. He also noted t at another problem was with how trunk fees
were handled. Trunk fees are normally pai up front with the building permit but the
ordinance states the fees can be assessed. e council discussed whether the developers
should have the option of the trunk charges eing assessed or collected up front. The
~
.
.
.
staff felt that option should not be with th developer to decide in which manner to pay
the trunk charges but rather that the City as the option to offer the developer a choice
in payment methods. Brian Stumpf asked if there were any legal implications if the city
selects who gets assessed and who pays t e charges up front. The council also discussed
whether park dedication fees should appl to commercial/industrial property and whether
easements for walkways can be obtained hen commercial/industrial property develops.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE T JELEN AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO CHANGE FEES AND CH RGES AS FOLLOWS:
I. ADOPT THE 1994 UNIFORM BUlL ING CODE FEE SCHEDULE.
2. ESTABLISH A PARK DEDICATION FUND AND SET PARK DEDICATION FEE
ON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMEN AT $750/LOT AND MAKE PARK
DEDICATION FEES APPLICABLE ON Y TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF JA UARY 1,1999.
3. INCREASE THE UTILITY CONNEC ION PERMIT TO $50 FOR SEWER
CONNECTION, $50 FOR WATER CO ECTION AND $80 FOR COMBINATION
SEWER AND WATER CONNECTIO
Motion carried unanimously.
13.
Consideration of bills for the first half of
ust 1998
A MOTION WAS MADE BY CLINT HE BST AND SECONDED BY BRIAN
STUMPF TO PAY THE BILLS FOR THE FIRST HALF OF AUGUST, 1998 AS
PRESENTED. Motion carried unanimous y.
14.
Adiournment
Bill Fair noted that an update on the comm nity center was included in the council packet
and the staff informed the council that Burl ngton Northern granted approval to remove
the spur and that the City closed on the Gri smo property.
A MOTION WAS MADE BY BRUCE TH ELEN AND SECONDED BY CLINT
HERBST TO ADJOURN. Motion carried nanimously
Dawn Grossinger
Building Inspections Clerk
-----
SA.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
,-.
,.-...
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
The first hearing for the condemna ion was held before Judge Bruce Douglas on
August 14. No one appeared in op osition and Judge Douglas orally approved
the petition, including a possessio date in Early October. The City Attorney
subsequently discovered that 3 of e parties had been served with the
condemnation petition and motion nly 17 days prior to the hearing. The law
required 20 days notice. As a resul it was decided to continue the hearing until
September 18. If no one appears i opposition the court will consider the motion
on the evidence already present. I that event, the likely outcome will be approval
of the petition and possession in 0 tober.
We anticipate there will be no opp sition. The first hearing deals only with a
decision as to whether or not there s a public purpose, appointment of
commissioners, and approval of qu ck-take. The issue of damages will be
addressed at a later hearing. So far no one has objected to the taking and there has
only been discussion of value and ages. Failure to object at the first hearing
does not affect a parties right to p icipate in the damages portion of the action.
Our attorney has notified all interes ed parties of these facts.
The original resolution supporting t e condemnation did not include Locust or
Linn Street right-of-ways because a that time it was thought that these street
segments were not vacated. Later i was found that they were vacated and under
ownership by Burlington Northern d therefore they should have been included
in the original legal description. Th amended resolution simply adds the right-
of-way areas to the legal descriptio
The right-of-way areas were added the order signed by the judge who accepted
the vacated areas within the bound of the total area to be vacated. The action
requested simply cleans up the reco d.
On a side note, negotiations continu with Burlington Northern on land
acquisition apart from the condemn tion action. Under any circumstance, the city
will have the land by October 8, 1998.
2
.
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
B.
AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to amend resolution adopte on 5/26/98 authorizing eminent domain by
adding Linn and Locust Street right of-way areas.
2. Motion to deny resolution adopted n 5/26/98 authorizing eminent domain by
adding Linn and Locust Street right of-way areas.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The City Administrator recommends altern tive #1.
D. SUPPORTING DATA:
Amended resolution
.
.
3
.
.
.
CITY OF M NTICELLO
MINNE, OTA
A meeting of the City Council of the City of
Monticello, Minnesota, was called to order by
at p.m. in the Co~nc 1 Chambers of the City Hall,
Montic@llo, Minnesota on , 1998.
The following Council members present:
, the following Council members
were absent;
A motion to adopt the following r solution was made by
and seconded by
***********.*.******************* **.****************************
RBSOLUTION 98-
ANBNDINQ RilSOLU'T ON NO. 98-
WHilREAS, the City of Montie
Council, passed Resolution 98 -22 au
real property by. eminent domain
community center; and
WHEREAS, it appears there
description of the property intend
110, by ana through its City
horiaing acquisition of certain
or the pUrpose of building a
error in the legal
condemned; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ot t e City of Monticello wishes to
correct that error;
NOW, THEREFORB, it is hereby
1. The legal description att ched to Resolution No. 98-22 is
hereby amended to include vacated portions of Linn Street and
Locust Street adjacent to the prop rty described in Exhibit A to
Resolution 98-22.
2. This ~mendment shall rela e back to the 26th day of May,
1998 and be effective as of that date.
3. The actions of the Cit attorney and City st.aff to
~cquire the vacated streets describe above are hereby ratified ~nd
~pproved.
5f\- \
. The following Council vot!ld in
members favor:
the following Counc11 members vot d against:
the following Council members abs ained:
Whereupon the motion was declared duly pas8ed and executed.
Adopted this ____ day of
, 1998
Mayor
City Administrator
.
.
-;2-
5R" ?-
.
Resolution 98
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
Lots 6, 7, 8,9 and 10, Block 11, MONTICELLO, Wright County, Minnesota.
Lots 6, 7,8,9 and 10, Block 12, MONTICELLO, Wright County, Minnesota.
Lots 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 13, MONTICELLO, right County, Minnesota.
Lots 1,2,3,4 and 5, Block 13, MONTICELLO, right County, Minnesota.
Vacated Locust and Linn Street right of way betw en 5th Street and 5-1/2 Street.
~ Vacated portions at Linn Street and Locust Street etween 5th Street and 5-1/2 Street.
97408,96493
.
.
....J
&~~
.
.
.
5B.
distribution to the Environmental
(J.O)
A. REFERENCE AND BACKGRO
Council Agenda - 8/24/98
As you recall, some time ago, the City Co ncil granted concept approval of the Golden
Nugget Planned Unit Development. The evelopment consists of220 acres south of the
Kjellberg East Trailer Park. The Council i now asked to review the Environmental
Assessment worksheet which identifies v ious impacts of the development on the
environment. Once authorized by the Co cil, this document will be distributed to
various public agencies and will be availa Ie, for a period of time, for public review and
comment. After expiration of the comme period, the City Engineer will respond and
submit the information to the Council. Th Council will then consider making a
"Negative Declaration of Impact". If a ne ative declaration is made, the parcel can be
platted. Iif a negative declaration is not m de, an Environmental Impact Statement will
need to be prepared.
The Environmental Assessment Workshee was prepared by the City Engineer with
funding provided by the developer.
B.
AL TERNA TIVE ACTIONS:
1. Motion to accept EA W and authori e distribution.
2. Motion to deny acceptance of EA and deny authorization to distribute.
C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
The City Administrator recommends Alte
D: SUPPORTING DATA:
Copy of EA W
4
Environmental Assessm nt Worksheet (EAW)
mment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor.
mment should address the accuracy and completeness of the
the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the
and completeness of the information and suggest issues for
.E TO PREPARERS
worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental U it (RGU) or its agents. The project proposer must supply any
reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet, but is not to co plete the final worksheet itself. If a complete answer does not
fit in the space allotted. attach additional sheets as necessary.
For assistance with this worksheet contact the Minnesota Environmental uality Board (EQB) at (612) 296-8253 or (toll-free) 1.800.652-
9747 (ask operator for the EQB environmental review program) or consu t "EAW Guidelines", a booklet available from the EQB.
NOTE TO REVIEWERS
Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 30-day
(Contact the RGU or the EQB to learn when the comment period ends.)
information, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, an
scoping of an EIS (see item 4), comments should address the accurac
Investigation in the EIS.
1. Project Title
Golden Nugget Development
2.
Proposer
Contact person
Address
Phone
Golden Nugget Development Inc.
Horst Graser
8857 Zealand Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, MN 55445
(612) 424-4955
3. RGU
Con ct person
. and tie
Addr ss
The City of Monticello
Peter R. Willenbring
Vice President 1 WSB & Associates, Inc.
8441 Wayzata Blvd, 8te. 350
Minneapolis, MN 55426
(612) 541-4800
4. Reason for EAW Preparation
o EIS scoping . mandatory EAW 0 citizen petition 0 RGU discretion 0 Proposer volunteered
If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category number(s) 44 0.4300, sub.paragraph 190- residential development
.proJect Location
NW 1/4 Section 23 Township 121 Range 5W
NE 1/4 Section 22
County:
Wright
CitylTwp: Monticello
Attach copies of each of the following to the EA W:
a. a county map showing the general location of the project; (Figu e 1)
b. copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 minute, 1 :24,000 scale map (photocopy s OK) indicating the project boundaries; (Figure 2)
c. A site plan showing all significant project and natural features. ( Igures 3 and 4)
6. Description Give a complete description of the proposed project nd .ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary).
Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that ill cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce
wastes. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities.
The project proposes a full scale development in the year 2009, Incl ding: 339 single detached units, 238 townhomes. 22 acres city
park, and 5 acres of commercial development. The first phase of th project will include 55 single family detached units in the year
2000.
The site is generally bounded by State Trunk Highway 25 on the west, 511I Street Northeast (CR 1 06) on the south. Edmonson Avenue
Northeast on the east (CR 117). and the north line of Section 22 an 23 on the north.
Access to the parcel is proposed to be secured from the fatal acces point on State Trunk Highway 25 on the west, three points of
ingress and egress from 8511I Street Northeast on the south, and two points of access to Edmonson Avenue Northeast on the east.
The Developer intends to save the improvements and creating of the lots to allow for significant areas of this development to remain
undisturbed until the inventory for lots dictates additional expanslo of the development. It is anticipated that full build out of this
. development will take a number of years, estimated 2009, with the ti ing and duration of the construction activities dependant on the
need for additional lot inventory.
The extent to which sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and s ets are installed will also be dependant on the need to provide
adequate ingress and egress for safety vehicles and to ride public u i1ities pending new lead developing areas.
Page 1 of 8
en
.:> I~- \
....'.'
7.
Project Magnitude Data
Total Project Area (acres)
Number of Residential Units
Unattached
220 Acres
577
339
Attached
238
Commercial/Industrial/Institutional Building Area (gross floor space)
Total Acres;
Indicate area of specific uses:
Office Manufacturing N/A
Retail N/A
Warehouse N/A
Light Industrial N/A
Other Commercial (specify)
Building Height(s) ?
5,400 Square Feet
'.
Retail 5,400 Square Feet
Other Industrial
Institutional
Agricultural
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8.
Permits and Approvals Required List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, and funding required:
Unit of Government Type of application Status
State NPDES Permit To be obtained
State Change of use access and access permit To be obtained
City of Monticello Annexation To be obtained
City of Monticello Building Permit To be obtained
City of Monticello Preliminary and Final Plat Approval To be obtained
MPCA Permit Fee Sewer Extension To be obtained
MPDEF General Storm Water Permit To be obtained
MN Dept of Health Water Extension System To be obtained
9. Land Use Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility.
of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify
any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks.
In the past, this 220 acre parcel has been actively farmed. The proposed development on the site will convert this agricultural activity
to primarily single family and multi-family residential development. In the past, adjacent lands to the west, south and east have also
been farmed with the land immediately to the north being utilized for a mobile home park. The City of Monticello's Comprehensive
Plan anticipates adjacent and near-by land uses to be commercial to the north and west and mid-density residential to the west. It
also anticipated the proposed area to be developed for low density residential land use. As a result, it is not anticipated that any
potential conflicts with adjacent land uses will occur as a result of this development. Research into potential environmental hazards
due to past land use indicates that no soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks are present on the site. (See Figures 6 and 7
In the Appendix for future land uses and zoning.)
10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover typ~s before and after development (before and after
totals should be equal):
Before After Before After
Types 2 to 8 Wetlands 0 Urban/Suburban Lawn 0 172.2
Wooded/Forest 0 Landscaping
Brush/Grassland 0 Impervious Surface 0 47.8
Cropland 220 0 Other (describe) N/A N/A
Total 220 0 Total 0 220
.
11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources
a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on .or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any
measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
There are no rivers, lakes, wetlands, or woods on the project site. The area is currently being farmed. As a result, it is not anticipated
there will be any adverse effects on fish and Impacts t,o wildlife will be limited to those species that utilize farm land for food and cover.
Page 2 of 8
sr,-d-.
"
there will be any adverse effects on fish and impacts to wildlife will be limited to those species that utilize farm land for food and cover.
The proposed development has Identified approximately 22 acres be set aside for park dedication and other open areas will be
reserved for open space and storm water management purposes. T ase areas will provide habitat for the various species of fish and
wildlife. habitat which may be more suitable for some species than c rrentlyexisttoday. It is anticipated that some species of wildlife
may be impacted due to the lack of cover that would be lost as a ra ult of the residential development activity.
. b. Are there any state.listed endangered, threatened. or speciako cern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting
colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive cological resources on or near the site? Cl Yea . No
If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the roject. Indicate if a site survey ofthe resources was conducted.
Describe measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse i pacts.
12. PhY$ieallmpacts on Water Resources Will the proJed Involv the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream
diversion, outfall structure, diking, impoundment) of any surface wa (lake, pond, wetland, stream, drainage dlteh)? LI Yu .M No
If yes, identify the water resource to be affected and describe: the a ration. including the com;itruction process; volumes of dredged
or fill material; area affected; length of stream diversion; water 6UrfaC area affected; timing and extent of fluctuations in water surface
elevations; spoils disposal sites; and proposed mitigation measu to minimize impacts.
13. Water Use
1. Will the project Involve the installation of abandonment of any ells? 0 Ves . No
For abandoned wells give the location and Unique well numbe For new wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the
location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number 0 known).
2. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface tar (inclUding dewatering)? 0 Ves . No
If yes, indicate the source, quantity. duration, purpose of the ap ropriation, and DNR water appropriation permit number of any
existing appropriation. Discuss the impact of the appropriation on ground water levels.
3. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? Ves 0 No
If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit umber of the supply, and the quantity to be used.
Water will be supplied by the City of Monticello. It Is antlclpat that the propcsed residential full scale development will use
173,000 gallons of water per day and the commercial develop ent will use 5,000 to 15,000 gallons of water per day depending
on the type of retail development The DNR Waiar Approp 'ations Permit Number for the City of Monticello is
Improvemerns will need to be made In the form of a 5111 well in rder to adequately serve the prtlpoSed development
. WateNGlated Land Use Management Districts Ooes any part of the project site Involve a shoreland zoning district. a delineated
1 OO.y~ar flood plain, or a state or federally deilgnated wild or seen river land use district? [J V.. . No
If yes. identify the district and discu.. th, compatibility of the proJ with the land u.e rlltrictlons of the district.
15. Water Surface Use Will the project change the number or type of atereraft on any water body? 0 Ves . No
If yes, indicate the current 'and projected watercraft usage and any potential overcroWding or conflIcts with other users or fish
and wildlife resources.
18. SoU$ Approximate depth (in feet) to:
Ground water: minimum 6.6' below orade average....1L Bed k: minimum average
Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known. SCS Interpretations and soil boring logs need JJSU be attached.)
Soils on the site include the following:
EsA:
Eta:
EtB2:
EtC2:
Key/A;
WaA:.
Esterville loam: 0 0 to 2% slopes
Esterville sandy' am: 2% to 6% slope&
Estervllle sandy am: 2% to 6% slopes, moderately eroded
Estervllle sandy am: 6% to 12% slopes, moderately eroded
Terrill loam:
Wadena loam:
17. ErO$lon and Sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or e vated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved:
acres 220 ; cubic yards 300.000laooroximatel
Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible salls and identify the on the site map.
Describe the erosion and sedimentation mea&ures to be used durin and after construction of the project.
The site is relatively nat, with' a shallow depression conversing wi the site approXimately equal distance from the west and east
property boundaries. Water based erosion should not be a critical ncem; however, due to the sandy nature of the soils on the site,
. wind erosion will be a primary concern.
erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after the nstnJction of the project will consist of the utillzatlon of the Best
Management Practices as required by the MPCA to secure a NPD 5 construction site permit It is also noted that the area will be
developed in phases which wlllllmit the amount of exposed soil to II It water and wind based erosion.
Page 3 of
S~-3
..
__U
18. Water Quality. Surface Water Runoff
1. Compare the quantity and quality of site nmoft befOre and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and/or treat
runoff.
This project is within the State Trunk Highway 25 watershed as deser1bed In the City of Montlcello's Stonn Water Management.
Plan for this area. Based on this plan, the stonn water discharge rate from the area must be limited to a peak-discharge rate of
approximately 2.5 cfs. In oreler to accommodate storm water runoff during a 10o.year return frequency storm. it has been
preliminarily by established that approximately 100 acre feet of stonn water storage will be required to be developed on site as
part of this development In addition, treatment for storm water runoff will need to be provided to the Nationwide Urban Runoff
Program standards which require dead-water storage to be developed to aeeommodate the total volume of runoff generated from
a 2.5-inch rainfall event The incorporation of these Nationwide Urban Runoff Program standards for quality and the development
of approximately 100 acre feet of live storage for quantity management will allow the peak-<lischarge rate from this area to be
limited to less than that of the site in its undeveloped condition.
2. Identify the route(s) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the
receiving waters. (lfrhe (Ufl(Jff may affecl a lake conau/t "EAW Guldflllne," about wheltrer. nutrient oudget ,nalysls is "eeded.)
Storm water Nnoff from thili area will be canied west to the State Trunk Highway 25 drainage system which will then carry the
water norther1y to the Minnuota River (the CIty of Monticello has anticipated the construction of a lift station to carry water from
these areas under 1-94 and into an existing stonn sewer system that will carry to the Minnesota River). The quality of water
discharged from this area, after being routed through the retention and treatment ponds on site as well as ponds downstream from
this site will allow for removal of over 95% of the total suspended solids and in exce&& of 60% of the total phosphorus generated
from the site.
19. Water Quality - Wastawat8/'$
a. Describe sources, quantities. and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters
produced or treated at the site.
Normal domestic sewage.
b. Desctibe any wastG treatment methods to be usecl and give estImatea of composition after treatment. or if the project involves
on-site sewage systems. discuss the suitability of the sIte condltlona for such systems. Identlfy receiving waterlJ (Including ground
water) and estimate the Impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If /he dIWt''9~ may ,ffoel a lake C<<I:Jull "EA W.
Guidelines. abcut whslhlJl a nlllrie,,1 budgel .nd MIa/yI/s if neetiMJ.)
The composition of discharge waste water is below regulated levels; therefore. on site waste water treatment facilities are not
necessary.
c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system. identify the system and discuss the ability of the system
to accept Ule volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary.
Waste will be discharged into the municipal sanitary sewer system with treatment provided at the Monticello Waste Water
Treatment Plant Improvements will need to be made to the sanitary S8WertnJnk lines In order to accommodate this development
(See Figure 8 located in the Appendix.)
20. Ground Water.. Potential for Contamination
iiI. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water.: ..!L minimum; ..JZ:... average.
b. Describe any of the following site hazards to ground water and also Identify them on the site map: sinkholes; shallow limestone
formations/karst conditions; salls with high infiltration rates; abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimize
environmental problems due to any of these hazards.
N/A
c. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent
them from contaminating ground water.
N/A
21.
Solid Waste8; Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks
a. Describe the types. amounts. and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated. including animal manures, Sludg~ .
and ashes. Identify the method and locatlon of dispo$al. For projects generating municipal solid waste Indicate if there will be
a source separation plan: list type{s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling.
A four-separation plan Is not required for this proposal. TIle only waste generated from U1is project IS generated by residential
and eight commercial users. .
P..... .t ft' I
s cs- '-\
- --~--
b. Indicate the number, location. size, and use of any above or b low ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products
or other materials (except water).
Not applicable
errafflc Parking spaces added ~ Existing spaces (if project inv Ives expansion) N/A Estimated total Average Daily Traffic
(ADT) generated 7,940 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic gene ted (if known) and its timing:~, P.M. Peak. For each
affected road indicate the ADT and the directional distribution of traffic wi h and without the project. Provide an estimate of the impact on
traffic congestion on the affected roads and describe any traffic Improve ents which will be necessary.
Peak Hour 4:00.5:00
raffle Generation
First Stage of Development: Year 2000
Single Family Detached Housing: 55 units
525
56
Full Scale Development: Year 2009
SinQle Family Detached HousinQ:
Proposed 339 units
346
Townhomes:
Proposed 238 units
129
City Park:
Proposed 22.0 acres
123
Gas Service Station with Convenience Market:
Proposed 2.5 acres
19
163
_laity Retail Center:
osed
2.5 acres
1017
123
Total Full Development:
7653
812
The estimated trip generation is based on information found in the 511l ed' on of the Instititute ofTransportation Engineers Trip Generation
Manual.
Figure 5 in the Appendix illustrates the existing and proposed full scale de elopment Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on the impacted
roadways as well as the estimated traffic distribution from the proposed d velopmenl The first stage of development was analyzed in the
year 2000 and full scale development in the year 2009.
The primary impacted roadways adjacent to the site area are Trunk High ay (TH) 25 on the west, County Road (CR) 117 to the east, and
County Road 106 (8511\ Street NE) to the south of the proposed developm nt. One direct access is proposed from TH 25 for the residential
development and one for the commercial development, two direct acee ses from CR 117 and three direct accesses from CR 106. A
change of use access permit for the direct residential TH 25 access will n ed to be applied for from MnlDOT along with an access request
permit for the commercial development. Wright County access permits eed to be applied for the CR 106 and CR 117 accesses.
Level of Service (LOS) analyses were run on each of the proposed acce es. The critical areas that would indicate operational problems
due to the traffic generated from the proposed development are the direct ccesses to TH 25 If granted by Mn/DOT. The proposed primary
access to the residential site Is from TH 25, which is a two-lane roadway (one lane in each direction). Trunk Highway 25 has scheduled
improvements in the year 1999 to improve the segment from the north sid of the proposed development to 1-94 from a two-lane to a four-
lane section. The taper to bring TH 25 from a two lane to a four lane se 'on is planned to begin just south of the proposed TH 25 direct
residential access. An access in a taper would cause driver confusion an crashes. The developer will need to coordinate with Mn/DOT
to either extend the four lane section past the site access or eliminate the ccess. Another concem Is the commercial access located just
north of County Road 106 at TH 25. The Intersection of TH 25 and CR 10 has a high crash rate and an access near the intersection along
with higher traffic volumes will only increase the crash rates. The Intersec on will need to be improved and the possibility of extending TH
~to a four lane section south of CR 106 discussed with Mn/DOT.
. regional impacts would be at the Intersection of TH 25 and Intersta e 94. The current Interchange experiences delays, especially
during the P.M. peak hour; however, the Interchange has scheduled i provements in the years 1999 and 2000. These scheduled
improvements are anticipated to accommodate the projected traffic volu es generated from the proposed development.
Based on this data, the proposed site traffic now and in the Mure, will ha e an Impact on the existing roadway systems. Coordination is
necessary between the developer, Mn/DOT, Wright Cou,nty and the City f Monticello to resolve the aforementioned issues.
Page 5 of
SB-S
u
23. Vehicle-related air emissions Provide an estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, Including carbon
monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. (If the project involves 500
or more parlcing spaces, consult .EA W Guidelines. about whether a detailed air quality anelysis Is needed.)
The proposed project will involve the development of 339 single family housing units, 238 townhomes, 22 acres of City park, and 5.C .
acres of retail. One hundred eighty (180) parking spaces will be added with the proposed site. An Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is not
required for this project because there are less than 2,000 proposed new parking spaces. However, a carbon monoxide analysis was
prepared to document compliance with applicable ambient air quality standards.
To screen the project for potential air quality conformance problems, the Mn/DOT simplified analysis procedure was utilized. Two
receptor locations were utilized for the analysis. The background carbon monoxide levels used for this analysis were non-rural one-
hour and eight-hour levels indicated in the MnlDOT guidelines which are 2.5 PPM and 1.5 PPM respectively.
The results of the analysis indicate that the roadways adjacent to the proposed development will be within the current MPCA gUideline
of 30 PPM for a maximum one hour reading and 9 PPM for an average eight hour reading. Table 1,Iocated in the Appendix, illustrates
the results of the analysis for the proposed project years.
24. Stationary source air emissions Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)?
DYes . No
If yes, describe the sources, quantities, and composition of the emissions; the proposed air pollution control devices; the quantities
and composition of the emissions after treatment; and the effects on air quality.
25. Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? . Yes 0 No
If yes, describe the SQurces, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse
impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors.
Dust
During construction, particulate emissions will temporarily increase due to the generation of fugitive dust. The following dust control
measures will be undertaken as necessary:
1. Minimize the period and extent of an area being exposed or regarded at anyone time.
2. Spraying construction areas and haul roads with water, especially during periods of high wind or high levels of construction activity.
3. Minimize the use of vehicles on unpaved surfaces.
4. Covering or spraying material piles and truck loads.
Odors
The construction and/or operation of this roadway are not anticipated to involve any processes or materials that would generate any odors.
.
Noise
The noise standards applicable to the proposed development are those developed by the State of Minnesota in its noise pollution control
regulations. The following table outlines those noise standards by land use type.
Noise Level Standards - Minnesota Pollution Control Aaencv (1)
General Land Use Types Daytime Noise Level Nighttime Noise Level
(10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.)
Category
NAC.1 Residential and L10 of 65 dBA L 10 of 55 dBA
Institutional L50 of 60 dBA L50 of 50 dBA
NAC.2 Commercial and L1 0 of70 dBA L10 of 70 dBA
Recreational L50 of 65 dBA L50 of 65 dBA
NAC.3 Industrial L 10 of 80 dBA L 10 of 80 dBA
L50 of 75 dBA L50 of 75 dBA
(1) MPCA- 2 Noise Standards; Minn. Rule 7010.0400
.
Existing (1998) and projected (2009) noise levels were determined for two receptors adjacent to TH 25. The Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) Level Two Highway Traffic Noise Prediction model, Stamina 2.0 was used for this analysis. The traffic noise model
on which this computer model was based on was developed by the Federal Highway Administration and Is documented In a report entitled
FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model (FHWA-RD.77-108).
Page 6 of 8
Sf1-lo
..
"
The model uses:
1. The volume and type of vehicles on the roadway;
2. Vehicle running speeds;
~? The physical characteristics of the roadway (e.g. horizontal and ve cal alignment); and
ny physical features between the roadway and the receptor that ay mitigate noise, such as buildings or noise walls. Output is
issued in the form of L 10 and L50 values.
Two receptors were used in this analysis:
Receptor NO.1 - Mobile home park north of proposed development, Ea t of TH 25
Receptor No.2 - Existing farmstead, West of TH 25
The noise level analysis for each receptor indicated that the levels will ncrease with the development from what they are today. The
existing (1998) results indicate nighttime noise levels in exceedence of PCA standards at receptor No.1. The projected 2009 full scale
build results show an increase of'1.5 decibels from the 2009 no build res Its. Table 2, located In the Appendix illustrates the results of the
existing, predicted and projected noise levels.
Abatement measures, by the use of noise barriers, have been considere for this project and have been determined infeasible because
of the proposed access along the corridor and the difference between e isting levels and projected levels. Noise level Increases of less
than 1 dBA are considered negligible when compared with existing and ure predicted levels. Noise level increases of 3 dBA or less are
considered imperceptible to the human ear. Access openings in the ba er severely reduce the noise reduction provided by the barrier.
This makes it economically unreasonable to construct a barrier for a sm II noise reduction.
Safety at access openings due to restricted sight distances is also a con em. The required minimum sight distance at the intersection of
the Kjellberg mobile home park with TH 25 is 125 meters (410 ft) to c ss the highway and 225 meters (738 ft) for right or left turning
vehicles. The mobile home park extends approximately 175 m (575 north and south of the. entrance. This makes it infeasible to
construct a noise wall to lower noise levels at the mobile home park.
If sight distance requirements are ignored, construction of a 5.5 m (18 ft wall would be required to decrease the noise level by five dBA.
Because of the grades of the proposed area, a 3.6 m (12 ft) wall would e the maximum build height. This 3.6 m (12 ft) wall will result in
a 4.5 dBA decrease in noise levels. The cost of the aforementioned wall ranges from $240,000-345,000, and have a cost effectiveness
of 270 and 343 respectively.
etement measures have been considered for this project and have bee determined infeasible according to the tore-mentioned reasons.
26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site:
a. archeological, historical, or architectural resources? 0 Yes No
b. prime or unique farmlands? 0 Yes . No
c. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails?
d. scenic views and vistas? 0 Yes . No
e. other unique resources? 0 Yes _ No
If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and iden fy any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any
measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
27. Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples Include: glare from Intense lights; lights visible In wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from
coo/lng towers or exhaust stacks.) 0 Yes . No
If yes, explain.
28. Compatibility with plans Is the project subject to an adopted loea comprehensive land use plan or any other applicable land use,
water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state, or 1 deral agency? . Yes 0 No
If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of th project with the provisions of the plan(s), and explain how any
conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will be resolved. If no, explain.
Yes, the future land use plan, identified in the Comprehensive Sa itary Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Monticello identified the
proposed site area as low-density residential.
29.
Impact on Infrastructure and Public Service Will new orexpande utilities, roads, other infrastructure, or public services be required
to serve the project? . Yes 0 No
If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure / set vices need d. (Any Infrastructure that Is a "connected acUon" with respect to the project must
be assessed In this EA W; see "EA W Guidelines' for details.)
.
Storm sewer, water main, sanitary sewer and electrical utilities will eed to be constructed to connect this site to trunk services which
have been designed to adequately serve the proposed developm nt. The site access (es) to TH 25, if approved by Mn/DOT, will
require improvements to TH 25 and the TH 25/CR 106 intersectio
30.
Related Developments; Cumulative Impacts
a. Are future stages of this development planned or likely? 0 Yes . No
If yes, briefly describe future stages, their timing, and plans fo environmental review.
Page 7 of 8
S \~- l
.'11
b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? 0 Yes . No
If yes, briefly describe the past development, its timing, and any past environmental review.
c. Is other development anticipated on adjacent lands or outlots? 0 Yes . No
If yes, briefly describe the development and its relationship to the present project.
d. If a, b, or c were marked 'Yes, discuss any cumulative environmental impacts resulting from this project and the other.
development.
31. Other potential Environmental Impacts If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed
by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation.
No additional adverse environmental Impacts were Identified.
32. Summary of Issues (This section need not be completed" the EAW is being done for E/S scoplng; Instead. address televant issues in tile draft Scoplng Deci$ion
document which must accompany tile EAW.) List any impacts and Issues identified above that may require further Investigation before the
project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and
issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as penn it conditions.
The environmental Impacts recog nized in this EA W for the construction and life of the proposed development In Monticello, Minnesota
are as follows:
Stonn water runoff volumes will increase
Increased water use and waste water discharge within the City of Monticello
As aforementioned, if MnlDOT grants the access permits to TH 25, coordination between the developer and Mn/DOT will be necessary
to make the necessary improvements to TH 25 and the TH 25/CR 106 intersection.
CERTIFICATIONS BY THE RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EQB acceptance of the EA W for publication of notice in the EQB
Monitor)
A. I hereby certify that the InfonnatIon contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge.
~~ .
B. I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are no ottier projects, project stages, or project
components. other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as .connected actions. or .phased actions,.
as defined, respectively, at Minn. Rules, pts. 4410.0200, subp. 9b and subp. 60.
Signature
C. I hereby certify that copies of the completed EAW are being sent to all points on the official EQB EAW distribution list.
Signature
Title of signer
Date
.
Page 8 of 8
S8- r
..
..
.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
TABLEl
TABLE 2
.
.
APPENDI
SB-~
\ .
--"-
......
:@>
l!I
:-+:
l:: 1
I
-r...ff'-r
"'I....-.-r
<=1
r.a.:.~
.
WSB
Gold Nugget Development
WS8 Project No. 1089.10
Cly Project No. 266
3SO 'Nectwood L.aka otllc:e
8<< 1 WaynJta Boukwatd
Minneapolis, MN 55426
County Location Map
Figure 1
e12.641-41OO
"~J"", fAX 641-1700
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlmNERS
Monticello, Minnesota
,
,
S~-\O
.~
350 Westwood LJIka 0ft'I0I!I
84.( 1 WayutA Bol.MvaId
Mi~1I. MN 5&426
WS8 Prqea No. 1089.1Q
Ciy Prqed No. 266
Dme:Au~17, 1998
e12-641-48O:1
4~.1.... f1Jl.1l41-17llO
INFRAS1'RUCTURE . ENGINEERS . PlANNERS
Monticello,
U.S.G.S. Map
Figure 2
..
..
_ ______ _ _ ___________ s \1- '\
";--" ~.:.--r-...... ......J.:.trT1:~ .. - . '. Bi ~
i \' ~ : "-l:1i.M ,
\ \ ~i~:I;/;... ~L
\ ~~~ _. - '_n_n_' ~.
__r-u----H , ' rr,.,.,.......
: \ o! ~'
~' : -6;. 'S;: Wtzn ?lZ1r~__
r~ . .'Ii~"'~ ~
i _~lIiIt<lI..w..I."'"'= ~ ... -- '''Iia:r,'1.1 m 1'7J11 -- ~~
- n ,:: /1. :: i ~}_ ~ /Oh' ":'fL./,t. In~
; \ \~.:.: .~t$~J,~~~~ 'fi~ .~~
\ : _ _ ___- f' ~ ~ j;';% ~..., ~ ~ f/);!!1. 'lii /.....XU~&7'-..
L____u_n-\- _ _~.. '.( '@!J .'UN. '-S - ~ ~~ ~ /
i ! ..'....., . i r---.; ~ ~/~' 'l5'~ ~~~.. .,.' ,
i ! 4~ : ~ '''1-_ ~~K~ h'; ;:;;.~~"-~,~
: i i I .........~ ~h~.n. .' ,~ ~,~
! ' , i H]CH"AY <j, f!:3 ~W ~il, ~~ . ,\. ~ ~ ~~7i
~---------: -- -----:- .--t:t?-~~------ l..JPy; -.. '. ~~i ~~' I:> ,~
: ' I ~ l;+- M ':J~ ~ 110 ',~ '
! ! ~~ # !\~. !I~~ '--.;:. I, 1"
~___ : i .. ~- V ~ i :ii:il1.1-! fr-.. ~ ~ i
,
,
! i i l!\ \7~f!fr :. ~ '. :. " 'l !
, : : l.-f I Ill'. 1-,'" "" 1 '
\__u_~__n~~:___~___: ! rn~~~ \ _,_n -c:: u -- ~~~'-~T. ~- !=;--~-- \) 'I' ~~_n_
, 'ft--... ~ 1 ~n"\ . A,
I I" I' ' --- ,
: : I I I . t I
I I!: -l ' . ! . :
: : :___ __n..+-n ':::':; !
r_n_n~n ! ' ' , ...... a..,.., U~~[fn_~_~-
i I'> i i i I:=:- .. ....7,' - ~1'~ ,,-C: D LJ. 'D gmc
, up .' '" 0) 'hi ,.. . . .,-, . ,':0+ ,"'" , ~
I U I I (. ~ ~ i ~ .,:~ - '. ". ~ ~ :! il/rg '<-,lJl1O:H
: : .hl I ~ ~ j :. . ~ ..' _- - : I \\lfl i lli =w ~ .
I I" ,. ~ !.' ..~.. u'. . " -Ii "lr 'VI. !.....
i"-~--_--n~ _n__ ----r-.--~-.-- f / .--:o\.-_u-~~l- n n~. ~.. R~~ -- ~)-. .....1 .....
" t1 "," l_l.1 ,- ,...". I .. .t '.~'
, . I J /11 ............. .. I .' ~~ I:' . . .,. ;: :. ...
I 1 ,rill.... ~_-.......... J .- +-' .' .....
: I i ~j)/ "5~' "''<-~" . .: :. rJ!%1~: i~ '," .,., ...-
I I / A 1'\."": I....... . . .. . ..
, , ''f'Y''~' -, n.~ .!)-.~. . . '
i -t' I" r I.. ..1,\' : .... ..i1F.1 N' . ,...,' ,1+
r.-----~-~- ____n___-j_'_ u "-iti 5-- - - -'
, " I I -q: pi
: : i i: : :~~i
1 i . i .L ;(0 i : ~ :
~___.__~-__--j----_--'- ,_n--P-ROJiECT-t.OCAffONn - ~n----1-~n_---n _______ I ~_u
I : I ,I '
! i A! i I ~I i ! !\l~
-f . - ---, -- I T -f ~ --, U .! u ~ _0 ___n_n_}-_~
If J S
.,..,., S J S
1Jk.."'h... Sip
p I
M;:h...
.
.
e12-641-ceoo
,,~lrtc. '>>1,5<1,..1700
INFRASTRUCTURE - ENGINEERS - PlNltoERS
Monticello, Minnesota
PROJECT LOCATION
Figure 3
....
WSB
350 Westwood lAke 0IIk:e
8441 Wayzata BoUewrd
MlnnellpOllt. MN 55426
Gold Nugget Development
WS8 Prcjed No. 1089.10
city Prcjed No. 266
..
..
'S,Q,- ,~
.
.
.
COUNCIL U DATE
August 24, 998
Council workshops (R.W.)
As you are aware, the City Council will need to adop a preliminary budget for 1999 by
September 15 and certify this amount to the Wright ounty Auditor's office. Unfortunately,
City staff is behind schedule on completing a prelim. ary draft of the proposed budget, but we
hope to have a preliminary budget completed by the nd of August. In addition, the first draft of
our five-year Capital Improvement Program budget ill also be distributed for review as part of
the budget process. This will leave approximately t 0 weeks for the Council to review the
preliminary budget.
While I realize there may not be more than one or tw workshops that can be squeezed into this
two-week time period, the Council will have more 0 portunities prior to our final adoption in
December to review and adopt a budget plan. If we e not able to have sufficient workshops
prior to September 15, I would suggest that we simpl indicate a proposed tax levy that is the
maximum allowable, as we will always have the abil ty to cut back from that point later on.
The Council should consider establishing one or mor workshop dates prior the 15th that may
work in your schedules. Possibly these workshop da es can be set at Monday night's meeting.
INFORMATIONAL I M ONLY
August 21, 19 8
Ollie Koropch
The Marketing Subcommittee members made up of commissioners Brad Barger and Darrin
Lahr and IDC members Dick Van Allen, Don Smith, d Tom Ollig requested the City Council be
updated on the progress for development of an industri development marketing program. As
you recall in 1998, $35,000 was budgeted by the City ouncil for marketing.
The subcommittee met several times and drafted a sch dule and plan for development and
maintenance of a City of Monticello industrial mark . g plan. The plan was approved by both
the lIRA and the IDC and shared with the Chamber 0 Commerce. City staff members Jeff
O'Neill, Karen Doty, Wanda Kraemer, Nancy Whalen and Koropchak are team members for
implementation ofthe plan. The plan designates indi duals, estimates time frames, and budgets a
dollar amount for completion of each phase. phase I: development or update of an industrial
brochure and Phase II: define target market for devel pment of a prospect list, are scheduled for
completion and unveiling at the IDC Banquet of Octo er 27, 1998. Request for proposals for
hiring a firm for development of concept and design f a brochure were mailed and three firms
responded for presentations on Friday, August 21.
Additionally, the development of the public relations ampaign has been implemented.
.
The other phases for completion in 1998:
Implementation of targeted marketing plan ( ro-active).
Response to industrial inquiries (re-active).
Development of city and industrial web site. (Completed)
Develop e-mail capabilities for use.
Phases targeted for completion in 1999:
Participation at trade show promoting indu rial development.
Erect industrial sign along freeway.
A copy of the four-page plan is available per your r quest.
.
.
I