Loading...
City Council Agenda Packet 01-14-2019AGENDA REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, January 14, 2019 — 6:30 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Mayor: Brian Stumpf Council Members: Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE TO MAYOR AND ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance B. Approval of Agenda — Councilmembers or the City Administrator may add items to the agenda for discussion purposes or approval. The City Council may or may not take official action on items added to the agenda. C. Approval of Meeting Minutes • Special Meeting Minutes from December 10, 2018 • Regular Meeting Minutes from December 10, 2018 • Special Meeting Minutes from December 28, 2019 D. Citizen Comments — Individuals may address the City Council about any item not contained on the agenda. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes with a maximum of five speakers. The Mayor may allow for additional time and/or speakers. The City Council generally takes no official action of items discussed, with the exception of referral to staff for future report. E. Public Service Announcements/Updates • Holiday Hours — Martin Luther King Day F. Council Liaison Updates • EDA • Library Bard • IEDC • Planning Commission • I-94 Coalition • BCOL G. Department Updates • City Administrator Update 2. Consent Agenda — All items listed on the Consent Agenda are considered standard or may not need discussion prior to approval. These items are acted upon by one motion unless a councilmember, the city administrator, or a citizen requests the item by removed from consent for additional discussion. A. Consideration of approving payment of bills B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for City departments C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2019-01 accepting a donation of paint (value of $360) from Hirshfields for Monti Arts space at 349 W. Broadway E. Consideration of approving a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise license for Buffalo Body Therapy located at 133 Sandberg Rd. (Fitness Evolution) F. Consideration of approving DMV purchase of Chevy Equinox for $24,750 G. Consideration of approving Ordinance 705 adopting the 2019 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map H. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-02 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $72,617.99 to ASTECH Corp. for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16C003 I. Consideration of approving the preliminary plat and final plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition. Applicant: City of Monticello J. Consideration of approving the payment of $167,000 to Wright County for the discharge of stormwater from Carlisle Village development per the agreement with Wright County contingent on the approval of the city's petition to rescind the September 13, 2006 order transferring portions of County Ditch 33 to the city 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion 3. Public Hearings 4. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of approving annual appointments and designations for 2019 B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-03 — Findings of Fact for denial of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan reguiding a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live" and adopting Resolution 2019-04 — Finding of Fact for denial of an amendment to the zoning map of a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residence District" or to reconsider action on both the Comprehensive Plan and Rezoning requests for the subject parcel 5. Added Items 6. Adjournment MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, December 10, 2018 — 4 p.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler, Lloyd Hilgart Absent: None Others: City staff. Jeff O'Neill, Wayne Oberg, Rachel Leonard, Tom Pawelk, Sarah Rathlisberger, Ron Hackenmueller, Ann Mosack, Jim Thares, Rachel Leonard, Others Present: Sue Seeger, Arts Consultant, and Darek Vetsch, Wright County Commissioner 1. Call to Order Mayor Brian Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 4 p.m. 2. 4 p.m. City Administrator Evaluation — CLOSED MEETING 3. 5 p.m. Arts Consultant Space Discussion Rachel Leonard, Communications & Special Project Coordinator, provided background on how the Monti Arts Initiative is intended to use art as a catalyst for economic and community development. The focus of the projects is to drive downtown revitalization and create connections between people and place. Creative Arts Consultant Sue Seeger expanded on this idea to describe possible projects in 2019 and how the use of 349 West Broadway would provide the Arts Initiative space to complete these projects and incorporate the necessary public participation. The City Council discussed the space. Mayor Stumpf questioned if the area would be adequate space or if the program would require additional space in the future. Ms. Seeger responded that the space is sufficient. Mayor Stumpf noted that he is in favor of the program, however, not in favor of this specific space. There were questions why the initial costs of renovating the space were much lower than currently presented. Ron Hackenmueller, Chief Building Official, responded that they did not he did realize how the space was going to be utilized and underquoted the work that needed to be done. Tom Pawelk, Parks Superintendent, reviewed the scope of work that would need to be completed for the project. Tom Pawelk and Ron Hackenmueller reviewed the proposed renovation plans and support moving forward with the project. The item is on the regular agenda for approval. 4. 6 p.m. 2019 Budget Review Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, gave a brief overview of the 2019 Property Tax Levy and Budget. He reviewed the history of the tax capacity rate and the tax levy. The proposed total city levy is $9,962,000, an increase of 4.3%, and the proposed HRA levy is $348,000, a 7.7% increase. Also presented was the change in tax base. Specifically City Council Special Meeting Minutes — December 10, 2018 discussed was the Xcel nuclear power plant - its market value decrease and the portion of the city levy that now must be absorbed by residents. There was some discussion on the increase in city taxes versus county taxes. Commissioner Vetsch spoke on behalf of Wright County and noted that the county received additional mandates. The budget is on the regular agenda for approval. 5. Adjournment By consensus the meeting was adjourned at 6:15 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — December 10, 2018 REGULAR MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, December 10, 2018 — 6:30 p.m. Bridge Room, Monticello Community Center Present: Mayor Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, and Charlotte Gabler Absent: Lloyd Hilgart 1. General Business A. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Stumpf called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. B. Approval of Agenda Mayor Stumpf noted that Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-102 approving decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-20 was to be added to the agenda. Councilmember Fair moved approval of the agenda with the addition of this item. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. ADDroval of Minutes Special Meeting Minutes from November 26, 2018 Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the November 26, 2018 special meeting minutes. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Regular Meeting Mien ttes from November 26, 2018 Councilmember Fair moved approval of the November 26, 2018 regular meeting minutes. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. Citizen Comments County Commissioner Darek Vetsch commented that Trailblazer transit, St. Cloud RTCC, and St. Cloud APO are looking for public events to set up informational information. He will work with city staff to determine events. E. Public Service Announcements • City Holiday Hours — Rachel Leonard noted the holiday hours of the various city facilities. • Christmas Tree pick up will take place the week of January 7 — 12. F. Council Liaison Updates • Parks & Recreation Commission — Councilmember Fair stated that the commission reviewed the following: approval of columbarium at Riverside Cemetery; discussion on park dedication of Featherstone 4ffi Addition; Sue Seeger, Arts Consultant, gave a presentation; HVAC City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 1 1 7 improvements at MCC will be installed by end of year; and possible renovation of lower level of Prairie Center. • IEDC — Mayor Stumpf noted that the commission received a report from Mark Hanson regarding daycare needs within the City of Monticello. • Planning Commission — Councilmember Gabler provided an update of the meeting which included public hearing on map amendment for Featherstone 4th Addition, a rezoning in CCD district, and rezoning regarding dynamic display signs. G. Department Updates • Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator, gave an update on the following: 1. Registration is open for League of Minnesota Cities 2019 Legislative Conference which is on Feb. 20-21 in St. Paul. 2. There is a legislative forum on school issued sponsored by the school district on January 2. 3. Coalition of Utility Cities is holding a pre -session meeting on December 19. 4. Larry Cook has been assigned by Veolia to the WWTF. 5. Animal Control Officer has retired. Staff will be releasing request for proposals to replace the contract. • Angela Schumann, Community Development Director, provided an update on Safe Routes to School, specifically on the rapid planning workshop held on December 6 and 7. 2. Consent Agenda: Councilmember Gabler moved approval of the Consent Agenda excluding items J, M, N, and S and adding 2T. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. A. Consideration of approving the payment of bills. Recommendation: Approved the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $6,060,606.29. B. Consideration of approving new hires/departures. Recommendation: Approved the hires for Parks and Streets and departure for MCC. C. Consideration of approving the sale/disposal of surplus city property. Recommendation: Approved as submitted. D. Consideration of approving a special City Council meeting date of December 28, 2018 for approval of bills. Recommendation: Special meeting was set for December 28, 2018 at 7:30 a.m. E. Consideration of approving an amendment to schedule of business hours to allow for half-day closure for the DMV on Monday, December 24, 2018. Recommendation: Approved a half-day closure of the DMV on Monday, December 24, 2018. F. Consideration of approving the 2019 Regularly Scheduled Council and Commission meetings. Recommendation: Approved as presented. City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 2 1 7 G. Consideration of approving City Facility Business Hours for 2019. Recommendation: Approved as presented. H. Consideration of approving an application for a temporary charitable gambling permit for a raffle to be conducted by the Swan River PTO on April 13, 2019. Recommendation: Approving the charitable gambling permit for April 13, 2019. I. Consideration of approving a transfer of an on -sale intoxicating liquor license for River City Lanes, Inc. dba River City Extreme to Triple Shift Entertainment LLC dba River City Extreme located at 3875 School Blvd. Recommendation: Approved the liquor license for Triple Shift Entertainment LLC dba River City Extreme. J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-94 withdrawing from the Wright County Area Transportation Joint Powers Board. Recommendation: ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. K. Consideration of a request for Map Amendment (Rezoning) from A -O (Agriculture — Open Space) to R-1 (Single Family Residence) District, Development and Final Stage Planned Unit Development, and Preliminary and Final Plat for a 24 lot single-family development. Applicant: Novak -Fleck Inc. (Hort Graser). Recommendation: Approved the Development State PUD for Featherstone 4th Addition, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report and based on findings in Resolution No. PC -2018-032 and approved the Preliminary Plat for Featherstone 4th Addition, subject to conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report and based on finding in Resolution No. PC -2018-033. L. Consideration of approving Change Order No. 12 in the amount of $2,674.95 for the Fallon Avenue Overpass Project, City Project No. 16C006. Recommendation: Approved Change Order No. 12. M. Consideration of approving Lease Agreement between the City of Monticello Parks Department and the City of Monticello EDA for 349 West Broadway (Fred's Auto) and authorizing building renovations with cost not to exceed $17,815. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. N. Consideration of a request for Conditional Use Permit for Public Use in the F-3 sub -district of the CCD (Central Community District). Applicant: City of Monticello. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. O. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-97 establishing election precinct and polling place for 2019. Recommendation: Adopted Resolution 2018-97 establishing 2019 precinct. P. Consideration of approving 2018 Operating Transfers. Recommendation: 2018 Operating Transfers were approved. Consideration of approving Resolution 2018-98 accepting a donation of four iPads at value of $400 from Wireless World City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 3 1 7 for the Fire Department. Recommendation: Approved the donation. Mayor Stumpf recognized the donor. Q. Consideration of approving Resolution 2018-99 for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2010A for selected maturities. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2018-99 calling for redemption of outstanding General Obligation Bonds, 2010A Series for selected maturities. R. Consideration of approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertising of bids for construction of Fire Station. Recommendation: ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA. S. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-102 approving Decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-20. Recommendation: Approved Resolution 2018-102 approving decertification of Redevelopment TIF District #1-20. 2A. Consideration of items removed from the consent agenda for discussion J. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-94 withdrawing from the Wright County Area Transportation Joint Powers Board. Councilmember Hilgart removed the item to recognize County Commissioner Vetsch and his efforts with Trailblazer. Councilmember Fair moved approval of Resolution 2018-94 withdrawing from the Wright County Area Transportation Joint Powers Board. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. M. Consideration of 'approving Lease Agreement between the City of Monticello Parks Department and the City of Monticello EDA for 349 West Broadway (Fred's Auto) and authorizing building renovations with cost not to exceed $17,815 Mayor Stumpf removed the item to note that he will be voting against because he does not support the location as he does not feel the space is adequate. In addition, he does not support funding the renovations at this location. Councilmember Fair moved approval of lease agreement between the City of Monticello Parks Department and the City of Monticello EDA for 349 West Broadway and authorize funds for building renovations using a combination of city staff and contractors for a cost not to exceed $15,000. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against. N. Consideration of approving a request for Conditional Use Permit for Public Use in the F-3 sub -district of the CCD — Central Community District. Applicant: City of Monticello Councilmember Fair moved approval of request for Conditional Use Permit for Public Use in the F-3 sub -district of the CCD — Central Community District. Councilmember Hilgart seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-1; Mayor Stumpf voted against. City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 4 1 7 S. Consideration of approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement of bids for construction of Fire Station Mayor Stumpf removed the item for question in regard to glass doors and their durability, fading, frost, etc. Corey Brunton, Brunton Architects, responded that these doors have been installed on many fire stations. They have not seen any failure in the doors. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of plans and specifications and authorizing advertising for bids for construction of the fire station. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Public Hearings: A. Consideration of adopting Ordinance 704 amending Citv Fee Schedule for 2019 and adopting Summary Ordinance 704A for publication. Wayne Oberg, Finance Director, presented an overview of the 2019 fee schedule. Minimal discussion occurred. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. No one testified. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved to adopt Ordinance 704 amending City Fee Schedule for 2019 and Summary Ordinance 704A for publication. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-95 establishing_ the final tax levv for 2019 Wayne Oberg presented on the Truth -in -Taxation hearing and the final property tax levy for 2019. The proposed final tax levy is $9,962,000 which is 4.3% higher than the 2018 final levy. The proposed HRA tax levy is $348,000 which is 7.7% higher than 2018. The total proposed tax increase is 4.5%, the same as it was for 2018. Tax capacity rates and values were reviewed. Monticello has the lowest tax capacity rate in Wright County. Examples were presented relating to the impact of tax increases to residential and commercial properties. Specifically reviewed was the decrease in market value of Xcel Energy power plant and the change in city levy regarding the dollars that are now being absorbed by taxpayers other than Xcel. Mayor Stumpf opened the public hearing. The following individual testified: Daniel Gruhlke, 100 Kenneth Lane — Mr. Gruhlke spoke in opposition to the property tax levy increase. He stated that he has been a resident of Monticello for 25 years and his taxes have not decreased. Expressed concern that the city should better work in harmony with the county and school district to better control tax increases. Mayor Stumpf closed the public hearing. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of Resolution 2018-95 establishing the city property tax levy for 2019 at $9,962,000 and the HRA levy for 2019 at $348,000. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 5 1 7 4. Regular Agenda: A. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2018-96 approving the 2019 Citv budget. Wayne Oberg presented the proposed 2018 budget of $44,763,000. At tonight's meeting the Council approved the city levy and the HRA levy. Minimal discussion occurred. Councilmember Fair moved approval of Resolution 2018-96 approving the 2019 expenditure budget of $44,763,000. Councilmember Davidson seconded. Motion carried unanimously. B. Consideration of approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "Place to Shop" to "Places to Live" and a request for Zoning Map Amendment for rezoning from B-4 (Regional Business District) to R-4 (Medium -High Residence District) for a 125 unit senior living development. Applicant: Headwaters Development/Michael Hoa2ber2 Steve Grittman, NAC, introduced the application for Comprehensive Plan amendment and noted that the applicant's concept sketch plan was altered since the Planning Commission meeting by moving the building back from CSAH 39. Mr. Grittman provide the history of the plat noting that it was currently guided and zoned commercial. The site is approximately 5 acres in size and the project is proposing 125 mixed senior living units with construction being completed in two phases. The first phase would include 92 units with future phase of 33 units. Traffic generation is estimated at 500 trips a day, but could be as low as 300/day. Mr. Grittman noted that the Planning Commission recommended denial to both the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and rezoning. Their preference is to continue the Comprehensive Plan designation for commercial use and there were concerns regarding traffic management around the site and the developer's ability of meeting all zoning requirements. Staff recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the rezoning. Approval requires a super majority vote or 4/5 vote of the Council. Mayor Stumpf commented that regardless of what is developed on this parcel, he feels that upgrades need to be made to CSAH 39. Discussion ensued among councilmembers. Councilmember Hilgart stated that this use is far less intrusive than other commercial uses. Councilmember Gabler isn't convinced that this area should move from commercial. Michael Hoagberg, Headwaters Development, introduced himself. He briefly spoke of the considerations for the project. He commented on items that have changed since the Planning Commission meeting. These items included traffic study, setbacks and building height, the latter two being reflected in adjusted site plan. Mr. Hoagberg mentioned that there is a defined need for senior housing in Monticello. City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 6 1 7 John Tennesson, Von Hanson's Meats owner, spoke in support of the project and the benefit it would have to the area. His thought is the property will not be developed as commercial and will remain vacant. Jeff O'Neill commented that there is a softening in the commercial market. There is the possibility to look at commercial land in the future and possibly look at other uses. Wayne Elam, Commercial Realty Solutions, addressed the city council in regard to commercial land sales. He does not represent the buyer or the seller but feels it is important for the city to consider projects such as this because it is best for the city. There is not a lot of large acre commercial consumers. Councilmember Fair spoke in support of the proposal because of the expected demand for senior housing. Councilmember Hilgart expressed his support given the economic state the city faces in the future with a decrease in tax base. Councilmember Davidson added that the project is a good transition for the vacant property since the increase in traffic may be lower than is an alternative project was developed. Councilmember Hilgart moved approval of Resolution 2018-100 approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment reclassifying the subject property Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live", based on findings identified in the Resolution. Councilmember Fair seconded the motion. Motion failed 3-2 (as a super majority vote is required); Mayor Stumpf and Councilmember Gabler voted against. Mayor Stumpf voted against because of 1) increase in traffic, 2) does not meet criteria of Comprehensive Plan, and 3) availability of commercial property. Councilmember Gabler voted against because an additional river crossing has not been selected by the Highway 25 Coalition and Option D, if selected, would impact this site generating commercial development. Mayor Stumpf moved to deny Resolution 2018-101 and deny Ordinance 705 for rezoning. Councilmember Gabler seconded the motion. Motion carried 4- 1; Councilmember Fair voted against. 5. Adiournment: By consensus, the meeting was adjourned at 8:46 p.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Minutes — December 10, 2018 Page 7 1 7 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING — MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Monday, December 28, 2018 — 7:30 a.m. Academy Room City Hall - Monticello Community Center Present: Brian Stumpf, Jim Davidson, Bill Fair, Charlotte Gabler Absent: Lloyd Hilgart 1. Call to Order Mayor Stumpf called the special meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. in the Academy Room. 2. Consideration of approving payment of bill registers. Minimal discussion took place. Councilmember Fair moved approval of the payment of bill registers for a total amount of $2,849,427.66. Councilmember Davidson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned at 7:35 a.m. Recorder: Jennifer Schreiber Approved: Attest: City Administrator City Council Special Meeting Minutes — December 28, 2018 Page 11 City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 2A. Consideration of avvrovin2 vavment of bills (WO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: City staff submits the attached bill registers and purchasing card registers for approval by Council. The bill registers contain all invoices processed and the purchasing card registers contain all card purchases made since the last Council meeting. Subject to MN Statutes, most invoices require Council approval prior to releasing checks for payment. The day following Council approval, payments will be released unless directed otherwise. A credit purchasing agreement and policy was approved by Council initially and card purchases must comply with the policy. If Council has no questions or comments on the bill and purchase card registers, these can be approved with the consent agenda. If requested, this item can be removed from consent and discussed prior to making a motion for approval. Al. Budget Impact: None A2. Staff Workload Impact: No additional work required. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the bill and purchase card registers for a total amount of $1,339,926.51. 2. Motion to approve the registers with changes directed by Council. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1 or #2, per direction of Council. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Bill registers and Purchase Card registers Accounts Payable IT1�' OF Computer Check Proof List by Vendor iff( Moiiiiffo � User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 01/02/2019 - 2:41PM Batch: 00215.12.2018 - 215.12.2018 Xcel Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1102 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Check Sequence: 1 ACH Enabled: True 12/31/2018 5843395-4 - DMV -5.01 12/31/2018 217-41990-438100 12/31/2018 5863599-6 - Animal Shelter 141.12 12/31/2018 101-42700-438100 12/31/2018 5821009-5 - Fire Station 90.92 12/31/2018 101-42200-438100 12/31/2018 5864452-7 - Library 283.25 12/31/2018 101-45501-438100 12/31/2018 5788570-9 - Hi Way Liquor 196.43 12/31/2018 609-49754-438100 12/31/2018 5804618-6 - Parks 15.00 12/31/2018 101-45201-438100 12/31/2018 5768542-2 - City Hall 213.90 12/31/2018 101-41940-438100 12/31/2018 5768542-2 - MCC 4,946.35 12/31/2018 226-45126-438100 12/31/2018 5768542-2 - Senior Center 80.21 12/31/2018 101-45175-438100 12/31/2018 5768542-2 - National Guard 106.95 12/31/2018 101-42800-438100 12/31/2018 5828859-8 - Storage Garage 15.00 12/31/2018 101-41940-438100 12/31/2018 8235331-9 - Praire Center 98.98 12/31/2018 101-41941-438100 12/31/2018 8235333-5 - Prairie Center (U FAB) 30.14 12/31/2018 101-41941-438100 12/31/2018 8000015233-2 - WWTP 3,383.02 12/31/2018 602-49480-438100 12/31/2018 6401688436-9 - 103 Pine St (EDA) 21.26 12/31/2018 213-46522-438100 12/31/2018 5799425-3 - Public Works 110.27 12/31/2018 101-43127-438100 12/31/2018 5799427-9 - Public Works 15.40 12/31/2018 101-43127-438100 12/31/2018 5820786-1 - Public Works 16.13 12/31/2018 101-43127-438100 12/31/2018 5837384-6 - Public Works 599.71 12/31/2018 101-43127-438100 Check Total: 10,359.03 Vendor: 4394 DAXKO, LLC Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: True 35680 PWC CC Gateway Fee - Nov 143.70 12/31/2018 226-45122-443980 Check Total: 143.70 Vendor: 2405 WELLS FARGO - Monthly Charges/Retums Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: True December 2018 Wells Fargo account interest earnings -332.74 12/31/2018 101-00000-362110 December 2018 Wells Fargo account bank charges 1,278.97 12/31/2018 101-41520-443980 December 2018 MCC CC Fees (WF - Front Desk 0997) 1,401.70 12/31/2018 226-45122-443980 December 2018 MCC CC Fees (WF -Online- 0996) 89.06 12/31/2018 226-45122-443980 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/02/2019 - 2:41 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number December 2018 MCC CC Fees (iAccess -Fmrs Mkt - 1476) 207.13 12/31/2018 226-45127-431992 December 2018 Liquor Store CC Fees (WF - 0990) 7,131.93 12/31/2018 609-49754-443980 December 2018 City Hall CC Fees (WF - 0999) 205.54 12/31/2018 101-41520-443980 December 2018 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 960.98 12/31/2018 601-49440-443980 December 2018 Utility CC Fees (Bluefin) 960.97 12/31/2018 602-49490-443980 December 2018 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 62.86 12/31/2018 601-49440-443980 December 2018 Utility CC Fees (AmEx) 62.86 12/31/2018 602-49490-443980 December 2018 MCC ACH Returns 12/2018 485.50 12/31/2018 226-00000-115031 December 2018 NSF 12/2018 385.61 12/31/2018 601-00000-123010 Check Total: 12,900.37 Vendor: 1585 XCEL ENERGY Check Sequence: 4 12/31/2018 51-6572904-0 - WWTP 10/2-31/2018 12,437.15 12/31/2018 602-49480-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505905-0 - Water 10/2-31/2018 6,748.30 12/31/2018 601-49440-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505906- - Sewer 10/2-31/2018 1,602.32 12/31/2018 602-49490-438100 12/31/2018 51-0395766-0 - Pumphouse Ramsey 10/31-12/3 990.91 12/31/2018 601-49440-438100 12/31/2018 51-4271112-2 - Llibrary 10/31-12/3/2018 913.12 12/31/2018 101-45501-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots 10/28-11/27/2018 76.49 12/31/2018 101-43160-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505907-2 - Parking Lots 10/2-31/2018 73.25 12/31/2018 101-43160-438100 12/31/2018 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM - 51-6505908-3 Civil Defen, 18.36 12/31/2018 101-42500-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505909-4 - DMV & Food Shelf 159.39 12/31/2018 217-41990-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505910-7 - Hi -Way Liquors 10/2-31/2018 1,435.70 12/31/2018 609-49754-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505911- City Hall 1,528.53 12/31/2018 101-41940-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505911- MCC 6,923.35 12/31/2018 226-45126-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505911- Senior Center 359.65 12/31/2018 101-45175-438100 12/31/2018 51 -6505911 --National Guard 179.84 12/31/2018 101-42800-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505912-9 -Animal Shelter 120.90 12/31/2018 101-42700-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505913-0 -Fire Station 10/2-31/2018 704.84 12/31/2018 101-42200-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505914-1 -Shop /Garage 10/2-31/2018 1,077.72 12/31/2018 101-43127-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505915-2 -Parks 10/31-12/3/2018 855.22 12/31/2018 101-45201-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505915-2 -Skating Rink 10/31-12/3/2018 184.95 12/31/2018 601-49440-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505915-2 -Ballfield NSP Consc & Sec Ligl 73.52 12/31/2018 101-45203-438100 12/31/2018 51-6505915-2 -Ballfield NSP Softball Assoc. 10 219.33 12/31/2018 101-45203-438100 12/31/2018 51-0371645.4 - Swan Cam 10/2-31/2018 17.85 12/31/2018 101-45201-438100 12/31/2018 51-7780310-4 -Bldg. Inspec. Garage 10/2-31/20 51.48 12/31/2018 101-41940-438100 12/31/2018 51-9391437-3 -118 W 6th St. Bldg. 10/2-31/2011 297.95 12/31/2018 101-41940-438100 12/31/2018 51-0012349737-3 - new Chelsea Rd light 10/31- 10.97 12/31/2018 101-43160-438100 Check Total: 37,061.09 Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/02/2019 - 2:41 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Total for Check Run: 60,464.19 Total of Number of Checks: The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 1/14/19 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/02/2019 - 2:41 PM) Page 3 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List by Vendor User: Debbie.Davidson Printed: 01/09/2019 - 1:45PM Batch: 00204.01.2019 - 204.01.2019 AP Invoice No Description Vendor: 4313 ACCELA INC INV-ACC43271 2019 Annual Maintenance 515.22 Check Total: Vendor: 2820 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 20180395 515.22 FireDN-CARSRU- D.A. (28) hr; R.P. (34) hr Check Total: Vendor: 2087 ALL -WAYS HEATING AND AC INC 6654 PW annual maintc.- change filters; ck. belts; PR` 6655 Enabled: heater in old Fred's bldg.- rep. valve; set pressure 832.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1977 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC 84077 430.00 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM- Emerg. Resp Grant -(2) Imp 84080 101-45201-440100 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM- Emer. Resp. Grant- return ( 84186 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM -Emerg. Resp Grant- (2) stul 84186 Minitor VI Prog. kit 84197 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM - Emerg. Resp Grant- batter 84344 Wireless RSM accessory kit Check Sequence: 4 ACH Check Total: Vendor: 1030 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER INC 84278 101-42500-424100 Program page tones (2) radios 84526 replaced connector stand. auto kit- Pager 12/31/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 1036 APEC AQUISITIONS INC 122859 Filters - 20 x 32 Masterlink (4) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 1 28,295.00 01/15/2019 702-00000-431990 28,295.00 Moiiii6effo Y Reference ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 1 Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: False 515.22 12/31/2018 101-00000-222005 515.22 Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: False 832.00 12/31/2018 101-43127-440100 430.00 12/31/2018 101-45201-440100 1,262.00 Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: False 626.44 12/31/2018 101-42500-424100 -176.56 12/31/2018 101-42500-424100 58.00 12/31/2018 101-42500-424100 89.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-421990 192.11 12/31/2018 101-42500-424100 268.50 12/31/2018 101-42200-421990 1,057.49 Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: False 118.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-440440 13.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-440440 131.00 Check Sequence: 6 ACH Enabled: True 51.28 12/31/2018 226-45126-422990 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 1 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number 51.28 Check Sequence: 7 225.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-431990 275.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 500.00 Check Sequence: 8 950.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 272.74 12/31/2018 226-45126-422990 1,222.74 Check Sequence: 9 98.00 Check Total: Vendor: 5116 API COMPANIES 33888A Provided Recommendations to Clear Line 33895A Repair Faucet in Family Locker Room 67661700 Check Total: Vendor: 1039 AQUA LOGIC INC 48362 Replumb Return Pipe, Install New Heater Bypas 48376 Pressure Switch, Valve Top Replacement Kit, Go 67662800 Check Total: Vendor: 3491 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 3314752 resale- beer 3315589 resale- beer 3316394 resale - beer 445549 resale- beer credit inv. #3314752 Amount Payment Date Acct Number 51.28 Check Sequence: 7 225.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-431990 275.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 500.00 Check Sequence: 8 950.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 272.74 12/31/2018 226-45126-422990 1,222.74 Check Sequence: 9 98.00 Check Total: Vendor: 1065 BELLBOY CORPORATION 67661400 freight 67661400 resale - liquor 67661700 resale- liquor 67661700 freight 67662000 freight 67662000 resale - liquor 67662800 resale- liquor 67662800 freight 67703000 freight 67703000 resale - liquor 67750900 resale - liquor 67750900 freight 67797800 freight 67797800 resale - liquor 98803000 freight 98803000 resale -juice 98803000 resale - mix 98814500 resale - condiments 98814500 freight 98848100 resale - condiments Amount Payment Date Acct Number 51.28 Check Sequence: 7 225.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-431990 275.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 500.00 Check Sequence: 8 950.00 12/31/2018 226-45126-440100 272.74 12/31/2018 226-45126-422990 1,222.74 Check Sequence: 9 98.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 77.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 66.60 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 -34.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 207.60 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 2 Check Sequence: 10 22.36 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2,231.95 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 370.85 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 3.60 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 7.20 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 710.95 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 90.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1.80 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 8.10 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 200.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1,866.66 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 25.96 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 15.40 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 870.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 0.41 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 33.60 12/31/2018 609-49750-425500 56.65 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 73.85 12/31/2018 609-49750-425500 0.34 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 127.40 01/15/2019 609-49750-425500 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: True AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 2 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 98848100 resale - mix 98.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 98848100 freight 1.43 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 98848100 asst. bags 85.80 01/15/2019 609-49754-421990 Check Total: 6,902.31 Vendor: 1067 BERNICK'S Check Sequence: 11 ACH Enabled: False 16722 300 lb. ice machine w/ bin 500.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-424100 82466 resale - pop, juice, Gatorade, water 162.65 12/31/2018 226-45125-425410 85063 Resale - pop, water, Gatorade, juice 323.55 01/15/2019 226-45125-425410 85646 Resale - soda pop -9.66 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 85647 Resale - beer credit -87.72 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 85648 resale - soda pop 101.81 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 85648 resale -juice 65.60 01/15/2019 609-49750-425500 85649 resale - beer 4,019.50 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 5,075.73 Vendor: 1074 BOLTON AND MENK INC Check Sequence: 12 ACH Enabled: False 0227120 Walnut Street Improvements 222.50 12/31/2018 400-43300-431990 Check Total: 222.50 Vendor: 1075 BOND TRUST SERVICES CORPORATION Check Sequence: 13 ACH Enabled: True 47509 Agent Service GO Improve & Refunding Bonds 475.00 01/15/2019 317-47000-462010 Check Total: 475.00 Vendor: 4618 BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Check Sequence: 14 ACH Enabled: False 83071760 EMS Breather Pack; asst. med. supplies 528.55 12/31/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 528.55 Vendor: 1080 BRAEMAR MAILING SERVICE INC Check Sequence: 15 ACH Enabled: False 59467 UB Dec 2018 Invoices - (3739) DMV Insert 37.39 12/31/2018 217-41990-434990 59467 UB Dec 2018 Invoices - (3739) Parks Insert 130.00 12/31/2018 101-45201-434990 59467 UB Dec 2018 Invoices - (3739) Print, Fold, Stufl 783.41 12/31/2018 602-49490-431800 59467 UB Dec 2018 Invoices - (3739) Print, Fold, Stufl 783.42 12/31/2018 601-49440-431800 Check Total: 1,734.22 Vendor: 4328 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MN WINE & SPII Check Sequence: 16 ACH Enabled: False 1080908690 resale - liquor 7,541.30 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1080908690 resale - wine 1,395.76 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1080908690 freight 111.95 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1080908691 resale -beer 130.50 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 1080911861 resale - liquor 4,212.59 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 1080911861 resale- wine 883.90 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 1080911861 resale -mix 37.65 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 1080911861 freight 61.19 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1080911862 resale - beer 160.40 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 14,535.24 Vendor: 4978 BRUNTON ARCHITECTS, LTD Check Sequence: 17 ACH Enabled: False 94 18C003 - Fire Station Construction Documents; 117,971.41 12/31/2018 400-43300-452010 Check Total: 117,971.41 Vendor: 4646 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES L.P. Check Sequence: 18 ACH Enabled: True 2205026 resale - beer 15,358.20 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 2205026 resale - beer n/a 155.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 2207500 resale - beer 11,743.87 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 643-0476 resale - beer credit -148.45 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 27,108.62 Vendor: 1095 CARLOS CREEK WINERY INC Check Sequence: 19 ACH Enabled: False 16691 resale- wine 732.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 732.00 Vendor: 2619 WARD S CARLSON Check Sequence: 20 ACH Enabled: False 1/2/2019 Demolish Structure, Remove Debris, Fill Hole Ca 5,250.00 12/31/2018 213-46301-461500 Check Total: 5,250.00 Vendor: 4089 CARLSON & LYTER DISTRIBUTING, INC Check Sequence: 21 ACH Enabled: True 6170339 resale - beer 67.80 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 67.80 Vendor: 1106 CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Check Sequence: 22 ACH Enabled: True 00041171 Monthly Tank Rental 65.00 12/31/2018 226-45124-421600 00247964 Bulk Carbon Dioxide (649 lbs) 158.80 12/31/2018 226-45124-421600 Check Total: 223.80 Vendor: 4315 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS Check Sequence: 23 ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1/1/2019 Digital Receiver 7.97 12/31/2018 101-41110-431990 Check Total: 7.97 Vendor: 1973 CLIMATE MAKERS INC Check Sequence: 24 ACH Enabled: False 61036 Upgrade HVAC @ MCC - Payment #2 43,301.47 12/31/2018 226-45126-453010 Check Total: 43,301.47 Vendor: 1691 CUMMINS N POWER LLC Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: False E4-64487 Service Call on Generator - Reset Control, Set tc 950.65 12/31/2018 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 950.65 Vendor: 1129 DAHLHEIMER BEVERAGE LLC Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: True 1388529 resale - beer 10,136.80 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 1388529 resale - beer n/a 46.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 196345 resale - beer 422.40 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 196388 resale - beer 96.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 196445 resale - beer 10,151.85 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 196785 resale - beer 16,941.93 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 196785 resale - beer n/a 249.10 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 196836 resale - beer 1,680.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 197343 resale - beer 608.65 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 197431 resale - beer credit -129.25 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 Check Total: 40,203.48 Vendor: 1136 GORDON J DEHMER Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: False 7640 labor -(4) extinguishers recharged - ABC dry the 22.00 01/15/2019 609-49754-440440 7640 trip -(4) extinguishers recharged - ABC dry chem 25.00 01/15/2019 609-49754-440440 Check Total: 47.00 Vendor: 1151 EARL F ANDERSEN INC- DIVISION OF SAF Check Sequence: 28 ACH Enabled: False 119363 BCOL - (50) Orange Post Silver - split 713.75 12/31/2018 101-45201-421650 119363 (50) Orange Post Silver - split 713.75 12/31/2018 101-43120-422600 133803 (60) 8' x 2.5# Flat back galvanized; (14) 14ga Tu 1,636.70 12/31/2018 101-43120-422600 Check Total: 3,064.20 Vendor: 1153 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Check Sequence: 29 ACH Enabled: True 657879 18C003 - Fire Station PH Ad# 888020 101.53 12/31/2018 400-43300-452010 657880 201847 - Monticello RV PH Ad# 888023 110.76 12/31/2018 101-41910-435100 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 657881 Zoning Map PH Ad# 888026 92.30 12/31/2018 101-41910-435100 659714 18C003 - Fire Station Bids Ad# 892390 249.21 12/31/2018 400-43300-452010 661400 16C001 - BCOL Athletic Park Phase 1 Improver 406.12 01/15/2019 229-45202-453011 Check Total: 959.92 Vendor: 1165 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE Check Sequence: 30 ACH Enabled: True 103619 Engine 1 - install on -board compressor 1,641.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 103620 Tender 3 - install on -board compressor 1,641.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 103623 Engine 4 - install on -board compressor 1,641.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 104003 Engine 1- ck. & repair leaks; ck.& repair water li 507.56 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 104009 Tender T-7 - Onboard compressor - Purge valve 265.86 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 Check Total: 5,696.42 Vendor: 2174 FINANCE AND COMMERCE Check Sequence: 31 ACH Enabled: False 744091113 16C001 - BCOL Athletic Park Phase 1 Improver 210.25 01/15/2019 229-45202-453011 Check Total: 210.25 Vendor: 1179 FIRE SAFETY USA INC Check Sequence: 32 ACH Enabled: False 118511 pop up cone pk; wrench set; throw bag; etc 566.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 566.00 Vendor: 1662 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME COMPANY Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: False 35606 resale - mix 57.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425500 Check Total: 57.00 Vendor: 5086 FLATOUT TIRE SERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: False 15859 #103 - mount spare; dispose tire; o rings 253.05 12/31/2018 101-43120-440500 Check Total: 253.05 Vendor: 1413 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL INC Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: True 8120587 Dec. 2018 (24) - Water 16.20 12/31/2018 601-49440-432770 8120587 Dec. 2018 (24) - FNM 16.20 12/31/2018 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 32.40 Vendor: 1199 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSO( Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: False 0124003 Annual Membership Renewal - 2/1/19 - 1/31/20 190.00 01/15/2019 101-41520-443300 0124003 Annual Membership Renewal - 2/1/19 - 1/31/20 150.00 01/15/2019 101-41520-443300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 6 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 3126 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. 9307789438 banner replacement proj- (25) Philips Lumec Check Sequence: 37 Check Total: Vendor: 2895 GREATER MN PARKS AND TRAILS 2019 Membership 2019 Membership Dues 101-43120-422600 Check Total: Vendor: 5108 GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY 19-0004 Ladder 1 - repair 4 prong current rated switch Check Total: Vendor: 5262 CITY OF HANOVER 2019-01 FireDN-CARSRU (62) -traing hours SRU Check Sequence: 38 Check Total: Vendor: 1223 HAWKINS INC 4417540 Aluminum Sulfate Liquid - W WTP 101-45201-443300 Check Total: Vendor: 4218 HOHENSTEINS, INC 112827 resale - beer 114404 resale - beer Check Total: Vendor: 3356 INDIAN ISLAND WINERY 2460 resale - wine Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 2208 INITIATIVE FOUNDATION 10496 2019 Endowment Contribution Check Total: Vendor: 3971 INTL UNION OF OPER ENGINEERS LOCAL AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 340.00 Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: False 5,937.50 12/31/2018 101-43120-422600 5,937.50 Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: False 225.00 01/15/2019 101-45201-443300 225.00 Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: True 264.72 12/31/2018 101-42200-440500 264.72 Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: False 620.00 12/31/2018 101-00000-222005 620.00 Check Sequence: 41 ACH Enabled: True 6,453.30 12/31/2018 602-49480-421990 6,453.30 Check Sequence: 42 ACH Enabled: False 298.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 399.50 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 697.50 Check Sequence: 43 ACH Enabled: False 120.48 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 120.48 Check Sequence: 44 ACH Enabled: False 2,390.00 01/15/2019 213-46301-443300 2,390.00 Check Sequence: 45 ACH Enabled: False Page 7 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Feb 2019 February - Health Insurance - Union 17,360.00 01/15/2019 101-00000-217061 Check Total: 17,360.00 Vendor: 1259 JJ TAYLOR DISTRIBUTING Check Sequence: 46 2909718 resale - beer 2,485.11 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 2909718 resale - beer n/a 20.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 2909718 freight 3.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 2,508.11 Vendor: 1263 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Check Sequence: 47 1183890 freight 68.05 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1183890 resale - liquor 5,521.39 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1183891 freight 162.41 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1183891 resale - wine n/a 159.70 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 1183891 resale - wine 5,978.71 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 1183892 resale - beer 45.98 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 1187015 resale - wine 1,166.25 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 1187015 freight 19.37 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1187016 freight 66.29 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1187016 resale - liquor 5,362.10 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1187017 freight 41.71 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1187017 resale - wine n/a 59.20 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 1187017 resale - wine 1,413.38 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 1187862 freight 58.61 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1187862 resale - liquor 4,252.51 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1187863 freight 18.37 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1187863 resale - wine 520.81 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 1189519 resale - liquor 244.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 1189519 freight 2.98 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1189520 freight 29.80 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1189520 resale - wine 1,419.25 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 1189521 resale - liquor 7,173.37 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 1189521 freight 82.33 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1189522 freight 100.20 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1189522 resale - wine n/a 121.35 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 1189522 resale - wine 3,779.38 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 1189523 resale - beer 74.19 01/15/2019 609-49750-425200 1192015 resale - liquor 221.40 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 1192015 freight 2.98 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1192016 freight 47.69 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1192016 resale - wine 1,480.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 Reference ACH Enabled: False ACH Enabled: False AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 8 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 518240 resale- liquor credit inv. #1176428 -182.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 518240 freight - credit inv. #1176428 -2.98 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518241 freight credit inv. #1175691 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518241 resale- liquor credit inv. #1175691 -135.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 518242 resale -wine credit inv. #1175692 -48.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 518242 freight credit inv. #1175692 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518541 freight credit inv. #1172751 -6.46 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518541 resale - liquor credit inv. #1172751 -739.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 518542 resale - wine credit inv. #1172752 -68.13 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 518542 freight credit inv. #1172752 -1.74 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518543 freight credit inv. #1177376 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 518543 resale - wine credit inv. #1177376 -76.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 519696 resale -liquor credit inv. #1177375 -85.50 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 519696 freight credit inv. #1177375 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 519697 freight credit inv. #1177376 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 519697 resale - wine credit inv. #1177376 -48.25 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 519698 resale -liquor credit inv. #1177377 -22.99 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 519698 freight credit inv. #1177377 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 519785 resale - wine credit inv. #1178628 -57.90 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 519785 freight credit inv. #1178628 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 520034 freight credit inv. # 1183890 -0.50 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 520034 resale - liquor credit inv. # 1183890 -41.08 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 38,167.80 Vendor: 3829 STEVE LANGANKI Check Sequence: 48 ACH Enabled: True 1161 Porta Toilet Rental (5) 11/26-12/23/2018 403.75 12/31/2018 101-45201-431990 Check Total: 403.75 Vendor: 1290 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Check Sequence: 49 ACH Enabled: False 285381 2019 Leadership Conference (CG) 225.00 01/15/2019 101-41110-433100 Check Total: 225.00 Vendor: 3550 RACHEL LEONARD Check Sequence: 50 ACH Enabled: True 12/27/2018 Mileage Reimburse - Coalition Utility Cities Me 52.32 12/31/2018 101-41310-433100 Check Total: 52.32 Vendor: 4456 LUPULIN BREWING LLC Check Sequence: 51 ACH Enabled: True 12/20/18 credit resale - beer credit inv. # 5291; 5296 -114.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 17862 resale - beer 285.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425200 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 9 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor: 1305 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT LLC E00669 2019 Vactor 2100 Plus - cc 9-24-18 Check Total: Vendor: 2819 MADDEN GALANTER HANSEN LLP Nov 2018 Labor Relations Services - Nov 2018 12/31/2018 Check Total: Vendor: 3745 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 21115009 (200) gal. diesel @ $2.40 21115010 (698) gal. unleaded @ $1.84 Check Total: Vendor: 2111 MCFOA 1/8/2019 Clerk Certification (JS) ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 4667 MILLNER VINEYARD, LLC 2122618-4 resale - wine Check Total: Vendor: 3437 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES SOI -076379 (2) cs. Sani-Fresh; (2) cs. Urinal Screens Check Total: Vendor: 1330 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS 400451002583 Nov 2018 - Monti Pawn Transactions (212) ACH Enabled: Check Total: Vendor: 1738 MN DEPT OF HEALTH Qtr 4 2018 Comm. Water Supply Serv. Conn Fee Qtr. 4 201 Check Total: Vendor: 1349 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 171.00 Check Sequence: 52 ACH Enabled: False 442,290.00 12/31/2018 602-00000-165010 442,290.00 Check Sequence: 53 ACH Enabled: False 48.00 12/31/2018 101-41800-430400 48.00 Check Sequence: 54 ACH Enabled: True 479.62 12/31/2018 101-43120-421200 1,287.76 12/31/2018 101-43120-421200 1,767.38 Check Sequence: 55 ACH Enabled: False 36.00 01/15/2019 101-41410-443300 36.00 Check Sequence: 56 ACH Enabled: False 320.40 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 320.40 Check Sequence: 57 ACH Enabled: False 225.90 12/31/2018 101-45201-421650 225.90 Check Sequence: 58 ACH Enabled: True 190.80 12/31/2018 101-42100-431990 190.80 Check Sequence: 59 ACH Enabled: False 6,926.00 12/31/2018 601-49440-443750 6,926.00 Check Sequence: 60 ACH Enabled: False Page 10 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference P00009836 16C006 - MNDOT Testing/Inspections (Mat'l Cc 13,850.83 12/31/2018 400-43300-459018 Check Total: 13,850.83 Vendor: 1351 MN FIRE SERVICE CERT BOARD Check Sequence: 61 ACH Enabled: False 6306 MBFTE -(2) Instructor I Cert. Exam; (2) Officer 460.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 460.00 Vendor: 3017 THE MN TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE Check Sequence: 62 ACH Enabled: False P19-1073 Annual Membership - Jan - Dec 2019 365.00 01/15/2019 101-43111-443300 Check Total: 365.00 Vendor: 5160 MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. Check Sequence: 63 ACH Enabled: False 16024617 ZZZNEP-IMPLEM -Emergency Resp. Grant - (t 9,241.92 12/31/2018 101-42500-424100 41261011 New Ladder 1 radio- Cust. # 1036509430 0001 4,549.50 12/31/2018 703-00000-165010 Check Total: 13,791.42 Vendor: 5161 MPFF Check Sequence: 64 ACH Enabled: False 1/2/2019 2019 Legislative Conference- D.K. 1-29-19 Fire 60.00 01/15/2019 101-42200-433100 Check Total: 60.00 Vendor: 2518 NEOFUNDS BY NEOPOST Check Sequence: 65 ACH Enabled: False 1/3/2019 Postage DC - Reimbursed 12/11/18 Receipt #00: 8.15 12/31/2018 101-41310-432200 1/3/2019 Postage DD - Reimbursed 12/10/18 Receipt #00: 9.32 12/31/2018 101-41310-432200 1/3/2019 Postage Purchased 12/11/18 1,000.00 12/31/2018 101-00000-155010 1/3/2019 Postage for Pkg to Collection Agency - Dec 201 £ 7.10 12/31/2018 226-45122-432200 1/3/2019 Postage for Pkgs to Dept Public Safety - Dec 201 179.53 12/31/2018 217-41990-432200 Check Total: 1,204.10 Vendor: 1401 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Check Sequence: 66 ACH Enabled: True 23403 18C003 - Dec 2018 - Technical Assistance - Fire 980.00 12/31/2018 400-43300-452010 23403 Dec 2018 - Technical Assistance - City Projects 3,340.48 12/31/2018 101-41910-431990 23404 Engstrom Wetlands Bank - Dec 2018 313.50 12/31/2018 101-41910-431990 23404 201838 - Headwaters Senior Housing - Dec 201 £ 990.00 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 23404 201847 Lake Region RV Center - Dec 2018 1,848.00 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 23404 201851 - Featherstone 4th Addition - Dec 2018 165.00 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 23405 Dec 2018 - Technical Assistance - Meetings 300.00 12/31/2018 101-41910-431990 Check Total: 7,936.98 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 11 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1421 PARK SUPPLY OF AMERICA INC Check Sequence: 67 ACH Enabled: False 40867 Symmons Repair Kits (2) 116.84 12/31/2018 226-45126-422990 Check Total: 116.84 Vendor: 1273 PAUSTIS & SONS WINE CO Check Sequence: 68 ACH Enabled: False 36536 resale- wine 500.62 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 36536 freight 10.50 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 511.12 Vendor: 1427 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS CO Check Sequence: 69 ACH Enabled: False 2478656 freight 7.45 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2478656 resale - wine 960.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 2479326 freight 27.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2479326 resale- liquor 2,583.85 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 2479327 freight 91.38 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2479327 resale- wine n/a 117.50 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 2479327 resale- wine 3,612.08 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 2481339 resale- wine 662.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 2481339 freight 13.41 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2481340 freight 19.92 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2481340 resale - liquor 2,435.36 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 2481824 resale - liquor 3,581.06 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 2481824 freight 40.87 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 2482854 freight 16.39 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 2482854 resale - liquor 1,624.95 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 2482855 resale - wine 2,092.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 2482855 freight 53.64 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 2482855 resale - wine n/a 72.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 2484695 freight 22.35 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 2484695 resale- wine 672.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 316273 freight credit inv.#2471362 -4.47 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 316273 resale - liquor credit inv.#2471362 -359.10 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 316928 resale - wine credit inv. # 2475578 -48.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 316928 freight credit inv. # 2475578 -1.49 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 18,292.64 Vendor: 1450 RAILROAD MANAGEMENT CO III LLC Check Sequence: 70 ACH Enabled: False 385096 License #302018 4/12/19 - 4/11/20 8" Water Pipi 235.41 01/15/2019 601-49440-431990 Check Total: 235.41 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 12 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 4022 REINHART FOODSERVICE LLC Check Sequence: 71 ACH Enabled: True 560131 Food for Concession Resale 381.43 12/31/2018 226-45125-425410 574208 Food for Concession Resale 521.67 01/15/2019 226-45125-425410 Check Total: 903.10 Vendor: 4962 RENGEL PRINTING COMPANY, INC Check Sequence: 72 ACH Enabled: True 106422 Impound Reports - Animal Control (1,000) 426.00 12/31/2018 101-42700-421990 Check Total: 426.00 Vendor: 1474 PATRICIAA SALZWEDEL Check Sequence: 73 ACH Enabled: True 1/8/2019 Supplie: Batteries, Dog Food, Mop, Trash Bags, 176.20 01/15/2019 101-42700-421990 Jan 1st Semi Monthly Contract Payment 1,666.67 01/15/2019 101-42700-431200 Check Total: 1,842.87 Vendor: 2016 SCENIC SIGN CORPORATION Check Sequence: 74 ACH Enabled: False 45985 Hi Way Liquor Sign: Software Upgraded & Sign 6,624.00 12/31/2018 609-00000-165010 Check Total: 6,624.00 Vendor: 2192 SERVICEMASTER OF ST CLOUD INC Check Sequence: 75 ACH Enabled: False 135303 Cleaning Services - Jan 2018 - Library 1,769.62 01/15/2019 101-45501-431100 135303 Cleaning Services - Jan 2018 - MCC 4,193.00 01/15/2019 226-45126-431100 135303 Cleaning Services - Jan 2018 - City Hall 718.00 01/15/2019 101-41940-431100 135303 Cleaning Services - Jan 2018 - Prairie Center 536.00 01/15/2019 101-41941-431100 135303 Cleaning Services - Jan 2018 - Head End 606.38 01/15/2019 656-00000-202099 Check Total: 7,823.00 Vendor: 1490 CYNTHIA R SIMPSON Check Sequence: 76 ACH Enabled: False 965228 Dec. 2018 cleaning service- Fire 100.00 12/31/2018 101-42200-431100 Check Total: 100.00 Vendor: 3309 SOUTHERN GLAZER'S WINE AND SPIRITS. Check Sequence: 77 ACH Enabled: False 1769692 resale - liquor 2,742.19 12/31/2018 609-49750-425100 1769692 freight 31.39 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1769693 freight 33.25 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 1769693 resale - wine 1,715.96 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 1771058 resale - liquor 2,795.59 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 1771058 freight 27.76 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 1771059 freight 18.20 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 13 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1771059 resale -wine 1,014.35 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 8,378.69 Vendor: 4672 SPECIALTY SOLUTIONS LLC Check Sequence: 78 ACH Enabled: False I48413 (49) 50 lb. bags Eco Thaw 438.38 01/15/2019 101-43125-421700 Check Total: 438.38 Vendor: 3486 STATE CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS Check Sequence: 79 ACH Enabled: False 900548694 (2) cs. Aerosol Graffiti Remover- ST3 inc. 400.18 12/31/2018 101-45201-421650 Check Total: 400.18 Vendor: 1507 STREICHERS INC Check Sequence: 80 ACH Enabled: False I1345354 (5)badges 297.50 12/31/2018 101-42200-421990 Check Total: 297.50 Vendor: 1516 TASC Check Sequence: 81 ACH Enabled: False IN1418921 2/1/19 - 2/28/19 - Admin Fees 71.85 01/15/2019 101-41800-413500 Check Total: 71.85 Vendor: 1543 US BANK TRUST SERVICES Check Sequence: 82 ACH Enabled: False 5216731 G.O. Wastewater Bonds 2013B Paying Agent Fe 500.00 01/15/2019 602-49480-462010 5216819 G.O. Bonds 2014A Paying Agent Fee 12/1/18 - 1 500.00 01/15/2019 318-47000-462010 Check Total: 1,000.00 Vendor: 1544 US POSTAL SERVICE Check Sequence: 83 ACH Enabled: False 1/8/2019 PI 42 - UB Jan Biling (3,730 pcs) (1/2) 854.17 01/15/2019 601-49440-432200 1/8/2019 PI 42 - UB Jan Biling (3,730 pcs) (1/2) 854.17 01/15/2019 602-49490-432200 Check Total: 1,708.34 Vendor: 1550 VEOLIA WATER N AM OPERATING SERV L: Check Sequence: 84 ACH Enabled: True 90180311 Jan 2019 WWTP Operations & Maintenance 55,145.50 01/15/2019 602-49480-430800 Check Total: 55,145.50 Vendor: 1552 VIKING COCA COLA BOTTLING CO Check Sequence: 85 ACH Enabled: True 2275830 resale - soda pop 382.45 12/31/2018 609-49750-425400 Check Total: 382.45 AP-Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 14 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Vendor: 1684 VINOCOPIA Check Sequence: 86 ACH Enabled: True 223988 resale - mix 120.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425400 223988 freight 27.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 223988 resale- wine 516.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 223988 resale - liquor 538.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425100 Check Total: 1,201.00 Vendor: 3446 WARNING LITES OF MN INC Check Sequence: 87 ACH Enabled: False 207365 (100) traffic cones reflective 28" 1,299.00 12/31/2018 101-43120-422600 Check Total: 1,299.00 Vendor: 1572 THE WINE COMPANY Check Sequence: 88 ACH Enabled: True 88285 resale - wine 104.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 88285 freight 5.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 Check Total: 109.00 Vendor: 1573 WINE MERCHANTS INC Check Sequence: 89 ACH Enabled: False 7215854 freight 16.39 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 7215854 resale- wine 1,198.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 7216533 resale- wine 1,467.00 12/31/2018 609-49750-425300 7216533 freight 10.43 12/31/2018 609-49750-433300 7217351 freight 23.10 01/15/2019 609-49750-433300 7217351 resale - wine 1,200.00 01/15/2019 609-49750-425300 Check Total: 3,914.92 Vendor: 1577 WRIGHT CO AUDITOR-TREAS - ACH Check Sequence: 90 ACH Enabled: True January January 2019 - Deputies Contract 117,834.17 01/15/2019 101-42100-430500 July - Dec 2018 July - Dec Addt's Hours (736) per Amended Con 52,992.00 12/31/2018 101-42100-430500 Check Total: 170,826.17 Vendor: 1581 WRIGHT CO RECORDER Check Sequence: 91 ACH Enabled: False 201800000119 201843 - Monti HS Sign Amendment - A# 1385' 46.00 12/31/2018 101-41910-430400 201800000119 201843 - Monti HS Sign CUP - A# 1386614 46.00 12/31/2018 101-41910-430400 Check Total: 92.00 Vendor: 1611 WRIGHT COUNTY MAYORS ASSOCIATION Check Sequence: 92 ACH Enabled: False 2018 Membership 2018 Annual Membership Dues 200.00 12/31/2018 101-41110-443300 AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 15 Invoice No Description Amount Check Total: 200.00 Vendor: 1584 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC 002596-010 47 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - Nov 201 1,370.00 002596-010 47 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - Nov 201 1,370.00 002596-010 47 General Engineering Services Phase 7 - Nov 201 1,370.00 002596-030 35 Maps - Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements - Nov 124.00 002596-030 35 Maps - Nov 2018 992.00 002596-360 26 16C003 - 2017 Street Improvements - Nov 2018 330.00 002596-400 22 16C006 - Fallon Ave Improvements - Nov 2018 76,069.00 R010438-000 17 17C001 - Chelsea Rod Utility & Street Improver 2,546.50 R010663-000 7 18D003 - Carlisle Village 6th Addition - Nov 20 11,158.00 R011121-000 11 2018 Economic Development Services - Nov 2( 1,774.00 R011473-000 10 18C001 - 2018 Pedestrian Improvements - Nov, 992.50 R011673-000 8 18D004 - Briggs Properties Plan Review - Nov : 244.50 R011744-000 8 16C001 - BCOL Phase 1 Design - Nov 2018 11,450.00 R011923-000 3 201820 - Haven Ridge Plan Review - Nov 2018 81.50 R012098-000 8 18C002 - 2018 Street Lighting Improvements - P 610.00 R012157-000 6 18C003 - Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition 343.00 R012297-000 6 18C004 - Pioneer Park Splash Pad Feasibility St 2,347.00 R012471-000 5 18D002 - Haven Ridge EAW - Nov 2018 5,676.50 R012860-000 3 Engstrom Wetland Bank - Nov 2018 1,458.50 R013121-000 1 201851 - Featherstone 4th Addition -Nov 2018 1,986.75 Check Total: 122,293.75 Total for Check Run: 1,279,462.32 Total of Number of Checks: 93 Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 93 12/31/2018 101-43111-430300 12/31/2018 602-49490-430300 12/31/2018 601-49440-430300 12/31/2018 101-43111-430300 12/31/2018 101-41910-430300 12/31/2018 400-43300-459016 12/31/2018 400-43300-459018 12/31/2018 400-43300-459019 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 12/31/2018 213-46301-430300 12/31/2018 400-43300-430300 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 12/31/2018 229-45202-453011 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 12/31/2018 245-43162-453010 12/31/2018 400-43300-452010 12/31/2018 229-45202-431990 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 12/31/2018 101-41910-430400 12/31/2018 101-00000-220110 Reference ACH Enabled: True The preceding list of bills payable was reviewed and approved for payment. Date: 1/14/19 Approved by Mayor Brian Stumpf AP -Computer Check Proof List by Vendor (01/09/2019 - 1:45 PM) Page 16 City Council Agenda 1/14/2019 2B. Consideration of approving new hires and departures for Citv departments (TE) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to ratify the hiring and departures of employees that have occurred recently in the departments listed. It is recommended that the Council officially ratify the hiring/departure of all listed employees including part-time and seasonal workers. By ratifying departures, the council also approves the expenditure for final amounts due to terminated and otherwise departing employees. Al. Budget Impact: (positions are generally included in budget) A2. Staff Work Load Impact: If new positions, there may be some training involved. If terminated positions, existing staff would pick up those hours, as needed, until replaced. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to ratify the hire/departures of the employees as identified on the attached list. 2. Motion to deny the recommended hires and departures. C. RECOMMENDATION: By statute the City Council has the authority to approve all hires/departures. City staff recommends Alternative #l, for the Council to approve the hires and/or departures as listed. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • List of new/terminated employees NEW EMPLOYEES Name Title Department Hire Date Class Heide See Clerk Liquor Store 12/3/2018 PT Shelby Mootz Clerk Liquor Store 12/14/2018 PT Brayden VanHorsen Slide Attendant MCC 12/26/2018 PT TERMINATING EMPLOYEES Name Reason Department Last Day Class Clarke Andrews Voluntary MCC 3/31/18 PT Sam Dressler Voluntary MCC 8/16/18 PT Nick Dressler Voluntary MCC 8/23/18 PT Dylan Fyle Voluntary MCC 8/23/18 PT Kyle French Voluntary MCC 12/21/18 PT Isabella Johannes Voluntary MCC 12/26/18 PT New Hire and Terms City Council 2019.xlsx: 1/8/2019 City Council Agenda 1/14/2019 2C. Consideration of avnroving the sale or disposal of surplus Citv property (WO) There is no report this City Council cycle. City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 2D. Consideration of approving Resolution 2019-01 accepting a donation of paint (value of $360) from Hirshfields for Monti Arts space located at 349 W. Broadwav QS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is being asked to approve a donation from Hirshfields of three five gallon buckets of paint valued at $120 each. The paint was donated for the Monti Arts space at 349 W. Broadway. As required by state statute, if the City accepts the donation of funds, the City Council needs to adopt a resolution specifying the amount of the donation and its use. Al. Budget Impact: The donation of paint with value of $360. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Resolution 2019-01 accepting the contribution and authorize use of funds as specified. 2. Motion to not approve the contribution and return the funds to the donors. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommendation is to adopt the resolution accepting the contributions. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Resolution 2019-01 CITY OF MONTICELLO RESOLUTION NO. 2019-01 RESOLUTION APPROVING CONTRIBUTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Monticello is generally authorized to accept contributions of real and personal property pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections 465.03 and 465.04 for the benefit of its citizens and is specifically authorized to maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the terms prescribed by the donor. Said gifts may be limited under provisions of MN Statutes Section 471.895. WHEREAS, the following persons and or entities have offered to contribute contributions or gifts to the City as listed: DONOR/ENTITY DESCRIPTION 1 VALUE Hirshfields Paint $360 WHEREAS, all said contributions are intended to aid the City in establishing facilities, operations or programs within the city's jurisdiction either alone or in cooperation with others, as allowed by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that it is appropriate to accept the contributions offered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Monticello as follows: 1. The contributions described above are hereby accepted by the City of Monticello. 2. The contributions described above will be used as designated by the donor. This may entail reimbursing or allocating the money to another entity that will utilize the funds for the following stated purpose: DONOR/ENTITY Hirshfields PURPOSE/AMOUNT $360 in Paint for Monti Arts Space Adopted by the City Council of Monticello this 14th day of January, 2019. Brian Stumpf, Mayor Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 2E. Consideration to approve a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise license for Buffalo Bodv Therapv located at 133 Sandberg Rd. Fitness Evolution (JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: The City Council is asked to consider a Therapeutic Massage Enterprise Licenses for Buffalo Body Therapy, 133 Sandberg Rd. Buffalo Body Therapy will be renting a space in Fitness Evolution. The license, if approved, will be in effect immediately. The applicant for the business license will also be the sole massage therapist for the establishment. All of the following items have been received, reviewed, and verified: application completed by the applicant; license fee of $100; completed Background Information and Release Form and fee of $25; a completed Data Practices Advisory Form (Tennessen Warning) and a Certificate of Workers Compensation Insurance and/or Liability Insurance. In addition, an inspection was completed and approved by our Building Department. If the City Council denies a license they will need to provide findings of fact on the denial. Al. Budget Impact: None. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Minimal staff time was necessary to review the request and prepare this report. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise License for Buffalo Body Therapy, 133 Sandberg Rd., pending a favorable inspection. 2. Motion to deny. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Alternative 1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: • Application � CI TY 0F � VlonticeLo APPLICATION FOR 2017-2018 THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE ENTERPRISE LICENSE Date: ! 4 Application is hereby submitted for a Therapeutic Massage Establishment License within the City of Monticello, in accordance with the Ordinance of said City regulating the same. Enclose with the application: • The license fee of $100 + $50 per Massage Therapist (a separate application must be submitted for each therapist) • A completed and signed "background check authorization" form and copy of driver's license • A certificate of workers' comp. insurance or company name & policy # (if applicable) • A certificate of liability insurance 1. FULL Name of Business: ,� c 2. Chec :Individual �� Coruoration Partners Other 3. Address of the Business to be Licensed: 4. Legal Description of Premises and Description of the Premises to be Licensed (plan of the area showing 5. 0 dimensions, location of buildings, street access, and parking) and facilities and floor number, street number, and rooms where the massage services are to be conducted. s Jt v Business Number(s)• - (�� -�� f PNofie Minnesota Tax Identification No.: 1 7. Federal Tax Identification No. 8. Manager or Owner's FULL Name: 9. Manager or Owner's Date of Birth: _ 10. Manager of Owner's Place of Birth: son a.0, Ac,, Last Fir -,t MI �/a r .� If applicant is different from Manager/Proprietor, please fill out O's 10 through 15 11. Applicant's Full Name: Last First 12. Applicant's Phone Number: Cell Home 13. Applicant's Email Address: 14. Applicant's Home Address: 15. Applicant's Date of Birth: 16. Applicant's Place of Birth: MI 17. Is Applicant, or has Applicant been known by a name other than the current true legal name, and if so, what name(s), when, and in what capacity or place was such a name used. 18. Are you a U.S. Citizen or resident alien or has the legal authority to work in the United States? 19. The name and street address of the business if it is to be conducted under a designation, name, or style other than the name of the applicant, and a certified copy of certificate as required by Minnesota Statues, Section 333.02. 20. Applicant's Position with Company: 21. List the type, name, and location of every business or occupation Applicant has been engaged in during the preceding five years. ti�► '.r I—AC Z 7c� ,Icy._ i/w S S �;-1 d 22. Does Applicant have any training or experience in performing massage services, including any certi cation, degrees, diplomas, or educational coursework. &Z:�� !�ln e ,� o In., s -4'n C% ")X U ✓ gQ s 23. Full Name of Owner of Premises: (✓ I l�r, �J 24. Address of Owner of Premises: (If different from applicant): 25. Owners Phone Number (If different from applicant): 26. Amount of Investment (buildings, fixtures, furniture, etc): 27. If partnership, state names and addresses of all partners. Include a copy of the Partnership Agreement. 28. If corporation, state names, addresses and birthdates of all officers and directors. Include a copy of the Articles of Incorporation and Secretary of State's Certificate of Good Standing. Ordinance doesn't require this? No otherpersons than those named in this application have any interest in the management and control of such. business. 29. Description of services to be rovided and of goods, if any, to be sold: /fes 6-,o exp r a- 30. If goods are sold, source of supply: 31. Business Hours of Operation: 32. Other communities 'lwhere licenses are or have been held: -APlf.) a, //77li 33. Has Applicant previously been denied a license to perform massage services, or had a license revoked or suspended, and, if so, the circumstances of such denial, revocation, or suspension. ko 34. List below as to whether, within the preceding five (5) years, the applicant, and/or owner of the business has been convicted of any crime relating to theft, damage or trespass to property, sale of a controlled substance, or the operation of business; the nature of any such offense and the penalty assessed. 35. The names, residences and/or business addresses of three (3) persons, residents of the State of Minnesota of good moral character, not related to the Applicant or financially interested in the licensee's premises who may be referred as to the Applicant's character, or in the case where information is required of a manager, the manager's character. lvr4e-v - / Z 36. Do you reside in Monticello and have your home as a base for your business: Yes No X r DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY. The data supplied in this application will be used to assess the qualifications for a license. This data is not legally required but the City will not be able to grant the license without it. If a license is granted, the data will constitute a public record. I hereby certify that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that the giving of false information or the failure to give pertinent information constitutes cause for revocation of this pen -nit. Further, I agree to comply with all the provisions of the ordinance under which this license is granted. Applicant's Signature: -� Date: //�� \w � Subscribed and sworn before me, a notary public, on this i. day of 20�. �A 4 NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires: fjk —�!,k �3 Return completed application and requested information along with the fee to: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk, City of Monticello, 505 Walnut Street, Monticello, MN 55362 Phone: 763-271-3204 Approved by/Date Make check or money order payable to "City of Monticello' OFFICE USE ONLY This license will expire on June 30, 2018 E1' Stu NOTARY PUBLIC -MINNESOTA My Comrni%ion Expires Jan. 31, 2023 City Council Agenda: 01/14/2019 2F. Consideration of avvrovin2 DMV uurchase of Chevv Equinox for $24,750. (TM) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Prior to disrepair and this request, the DMV was using a 2008 Ford Focus on route pickup and delivery of licensing materials for dealership customers. With 116,000 miles, the Focus has become unreliable for daily use by a revenue generating entity. DMV staff drives approximately 320 miles a week. The recommended vehicle (Equinox) is not on the state contract. However, this SUV is either priced lower or is a better value than comparable models of other manufacturers included on the state contract. An economical SUV would provide better winter handling for staff while doing dealer runs. Because the DMV provides services to several dealerships it is not participating in the purchase of this vehicle_ City Engineer/Public Works Director will become the primary user of the Ford Focus and the pick-up truck he has been driving will go back to the Public Works Department for practical application. In addition to use by the City Engineer/Public Works Director, the Ford Focus will eligible for use by City Hall/MCC staff when available. Al. Budget Impact: The new 2019 Equinox, including the standard options package, is $24,750 not including taxes and licenses. Some other fees may apply. This vehicle will be purchased by the DMV Fund, which is an enterprise fund. The vehicle could be ordered for $1,570 less ($23,180) with a delivery time of six to eight weeks. The 2019 budget includes $28,000 for this purchase. The fuel economy of this AWD vehicle is 25 mpg city/30 mpg highway. The basic warranty is 3yr/36,000 miles and 5yr/60,000 powertrain. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Improve staff efficiencies with less equipment failure and safety. A3. Vehicle Comparison Information: Staff received the following vehicle quotes: a. Cornerstone Automotive - 2019 Chevy Equinox LS: $24,750 (1.5L) (MPG 25/30) b. State contract — Ford Edge: $27,471 (2.OL) (MPG 21/28) c. State contract — Dodge Durango: $24,560 — (3.6L) (MPG 18/25) B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve DMV purchase of Chevy Equinox for $24,750. 2. Motion to approve DMV purchase of Chevy Equinox for $23,180 with a delivery time of six -to -eight weeks. 3. Motion to approve DMV purchase of 4. Motion to deny the purchase of a new vehicle at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends Alternative #1. D. SUPPORTING DATA: 0 Quotes provided upon request City Council Agenda- 1/14/2019 2G. Consideration of approving Ordinance 705 adopting the 2019 Citv of Monticello Official Zoning Map. (AS) A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND The City Council is asked to adopt the City of Monticello 2019 Official Zoning Map. The map included for review reflects rezoning actions which have occurred since the adoption of the last official map in December, 2017. The map proposed includes those rezoning amendments adopted in 2018, as follows: • Ordinance No. 701 — Rezoning from CCD, Central Community District to Rivertown Suites Planned Unit Development The map also includes a correction to Parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, the City -owned parcels along Chelsea Road also known as the former bowling alley and future fire station property. The 2018 Official Zoning Map incorrectly illustrates this area as B-2. The parcels were rezoned to B-4 in 2014. As, such, the proposed map corrects the map error. Ordinance No. 589 for rezoning is included for reference. In adopting the Official Zoning Map, the City Council will also recommend adoption of the Shoreland Overlay District and Floodplain District map, the boundaries for which are in accordance with requirements of both State statute and the Zoning Ordinance. There are no changes to either at this time and therefore staff is recommending adoption of the current map with no amendments proposed. At the time FEMA and the DNR notify the City that the pending floodplain hazard maps for Wright County are approved, the City will amend the Shoreland Overlay District and Floodplain District map. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed City of Monticello 2019 Official Zoning Map and has recommended the map for adoption by the City Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the documents during the regular meeting on January 2nd, 2019 and held a public hearing on the proposed map. No public was present to comment on the item. The Planning Commission recommendation was unanimous. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 below. Motion to adopt Ordinance No. 705 for the 2019 City of Monticello Official Zoning Map, including Shoreland/Floodplain companion map, based on the findings in Resolution PC -2019-005. 2. Motion of other. City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of the City of Monticello Official Zoning Map as proposed. This draft represents Monticello's zoning based on a review of available records and ordinances. The City Attorney has advised that the City adopt an official zoning map each year. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution No. PC -2019-005 B. Ordinance No. 705 C. 2019 Official Zoning Map, Proposed (dated 12//18) D. Shoreland and Floodplain Boundary, City of Monticello (dated 2/12/14) E. Ordinance No. 701 F. Ordinance No. 589 0 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-005 RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP IN ITS ENTIRETY WHEREAS, the Zoning Map of the City of Monticello requires amendment; and WHEREAS, the proposed map would accommodate and further the intentions and policies of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed zoning would be consistent with the City's land use plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello finds that the proposed zoning map will be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive land use plan and proposed zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on January 2" d, 2019 to review the requests and receive public comment on the zoning map amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed zoning map has met the requirements for adoption as found in the zoning ordinance and state law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the zoning map amendment to be identified as Ordinance No. 705. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 2019 by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO P By:� pJ Brad Fie, ATTEST: Angela Schu 4munity Development Director COMMISS �'�f t ORDINANCE NO. 705 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND ADOPTING THE 2019 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map amendments attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" are adopted as the Official Zoning Map under Title 10, Section 3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Monticello. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall upon request. ADOPTED AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of January, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: VOTING IN OPPOSITION: ORDINANCE NO. 705 EXHIBIT "A" Following are the approved amendments to the Official Zoning Map • Ordinance No. 701 — Rezoning from CCD to Rivertown Suites Planned Unit Development for Lot 1-3, Block 36, Original Plat of Monticello • Ordinance No. 589 — Rezoning to from B-2 to B-4 for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Oakwood Industrial Park 0 ORDINANCE NO. 701 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY ESTABLISHING THE RIVERTOWN SUITES PUD AS A ZONING DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, AND REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM CCD, CENTRAL COMMUNITY DISTRICT TO RIVERTOWN SUITES PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: LOTS 1-3 BLOCK 36; ORIGINAL PLAT OF MONTICELLO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 2.4(P) — Planned Unit Developments, Title 10 — Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended by adding the following: (XX) Rivertown Suites PUD District (a) Purpose. The purpose of the Rivertown Suites PUD District is to provide for the development of certain real estate subject to the District for multiple family residential land uses. (b) Permitted Uses. Permitted principal uses in the Rivertown Suites PUD District shall be multiple family residential uses as found in the R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, subject to the approved Final Stage Development Plans dated , and development agreement dated , 2018, as may be amended. The introduction of any other use from any district shall be reviewed under the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 2, Section (0) — Planned Unit Developments for Development Stage PUD and Final Stage PUD. (c) Accessory Uses. Accessory uses shall be those commonly accessory and incidental to residential uses, and as specifically identified by the approved final stage PUD plans. (d) District Performance Standards. Performance standards for the development of any lot in the Rivertown Suites PUD District shall adhere to the approved final stage PUD plans and development agreement. In such case where any proposed improvement is not addressed by the final stage PUD, then the regulations of the R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District shall apply. (e) Amendments. Where changes to the PUD are proposed in the manner ORDINANCE NO. 701 of use, density, site plan, development layout, building size, mass, or coverage, or any other change, the proposer shall apply for an amendment to the PUD under the terms of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance, Section 2.4 (P)(10). The City may require that substantial changes in overall use of the PUD property be processed as a new project, including a zoning district amendment. Section 2. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from CCD, Central Community District to Rivertown Suites PUD, Planned Unit Development District: Lots 1-3, Block 36, Original Plat of Monticello Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 23"d day of July, 2018. Brian Stumpf, May r ATTEST: Jeff PNX�% inistrator AYES: Davidson, Fair, Gabler, Hilgart, and Stumpf NAYS: None. ORDINANCE NO. 589 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE REZONING A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1 OF OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FROM B-2 (LIMITED BUSINESS) TO B-4 (REGIONAL BUSINESS) PID 155-018-001020 AND 155-018-001012 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFMONTICELL0 HEREBY ORDAINS Section 1. The following lots are hereby amended to rezone from B-2 (Limited Business) to B-4 (Regional Business): All of Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, according to the recorded plat and survey on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, In and for said County, Less and except, the North 300.79 feet of said Lot 1, Block 1 and Less and except the following described parcel, to wit: Commencing at the Southwest Corner of the North 300.79 feet of said Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, thence in a Northerly direction upon the Westerly line of said described parcel 75.00 feet, thence Easterly at a right angle 100.00 feet, thence Southerly at a right angle 75.00 feet, thence Westerly at a right angle 100.00 feet to the point of beginning on the West Line, AND The South half of Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Section 2. The Official Zoning map under Title 10, Section 3.1 of the Zoning Ordinance shall be amended accordingly by adoption of Ordinance #589 to be approved by the Monticello City Council on January 1P, 2014. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. Revisions will be made online after adoption by Council. Copies of the complete Zoning Ordinance are available online and at Monticello City Hall. ORDINANCE NO. 589 ADOPTED BYthe Monticello City Council thisl3th day of January, 2014. CITY OF MONTICELLO 7 Clint Herbst, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Werlf, City Administrator VOTING IN FAVOR: Herbst, Hilgart, Perrault, Posusta, Stumpf VOTING IN OPPOSITION: None City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 211. Consideration of adopting Resolution 2019-02 accepting improvements and authorizing final pavment of $72,617.99 to Astech. Corp for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Proiect , City Proiect No. 16CO03SSBBZ A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: This project included street reconstruction and utility improvements for the following roadways: • Gillard Avenue, 95th Street, Haug Avenue and 901h Street (within City limits) • Mississippi Drive • Hart Boulevard • Sandberg Road, south of Chelsea Road Other improvements included: Microsurfacing of the existing pathway along Gillard Avenue New pathway along the north side of CSAH 75 from Highland Way to the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) administrative office building access Watermain replacement along Hart Boulevard between CSAH 75 and the hospital parking area to improve maintenance of the system Construction began in June 2017 and was substantially complete in the fall of 2017 with placement of the final lift of pavement and restoration. Items completed in the summer of 2018 included Gillard trail surfacing, sod replacement and driveway replacement work. The contractor recently submitted complete final paperwork listed below, therefore the Council is being requested to accept the project as complete and approve final payment to Astech Corp., in the amount of $72,617.99. The final payment request represents the final quantities completed on the contract and the release of the retainage on the contract. The final payment also includes a reduction in payment for liquidated damages totaling $43,500 due to the contractor not meeting the interim, substantial and final completion dates for the various stages of the project. The final construction cost totaled $1,372,420.60. The original contract amount was $1,450,162.61. Therefore, the final contract amount was $77,742.01 below the original contract amount. The following paperwork was recently submitted by the contractor for final payment to be released: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 4. Two-year maintenance bond. It should be noted that the maintenance bond will start and extend two years from the date of final acceptance by the Council. Therefore the two-year maintenance bond will expire on January 14, 2021. Al. Budget Impact: As noted above, the final payment due to Astech Corp., is $72,617.99. The total final project cost totaled approximately $1,811,000 which includes construction and indirect costs as detailed below. Construction Cost $1,372,420.60 Engineering- Feasibility/Design $194,317 Engineering- Construction Services $243,865 City publication costs, driver feedback $5,000 signs- CSAH 39 TOTAL $1,815,602.60 It should be noted that the estimated project cost at initiation was estimated between $1,500,000 and $2,000,000, the estimated total project cost in the feasibility report was $2,272,850 and the final project cost is $1,815,602.60. Special assessments totaled approximately $536,586. This project was funded using the 2017A issuance of street reconstruction and improvement bonds. Capital improvement funds, utility funds, and special assessments to benefitting properties are used for debt service payments. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Impacts to staff workload will be minimal and routine for the project. A. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-02 accepting improvements and authorizing final payment of $72,617.99 to Astech, Corp for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16C003. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 2019-02 at this time B. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends approving Alternative #1. C. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2019-02 B. Letter of Recommendation C. Construction Pay Voucher No. 6 (Final) CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-02 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT TO ASTECH CORP. FOR THE 2017 STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CITY PROJECT NO. 16CO03 WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract with the City of Monticello, on May 8, 2017, ASTECH Corp. was awarded, by low bid, for the 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project, City Project No. 16CO03; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved and that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract subject to receipt of the following: 1) Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC 134); 2) Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers); 3) Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety; 4) Two year maintenance bond to extend two years from the date of acceptance of the project by the City Council. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of January, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jennifer Schreiber, City Clerk 2 0 U 0. z W m U) C. 00 a Cl) L0 L0 z ui J 0 CL Q W z z 0 0 co W D to J W z W a a z W x 0 wsb January 14, 2019 Ms. Jennifer Schreiber City Clerk City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Construction Pay Voucher No. 6 (Final) and Final Project Close -Out Documents 2017 Street Reconstruction and Utility Improvement Project City of Monticello Project No. 16CO03 WSB Project No. 2596-360 Dear Ms. Schreiber: Please find enclosed Construction Pay Voucher No. 6 and final (in triplicate) in the amount of $72,617.99 for the above -referenced project. The final payment request represents the final quantities and the release of the retainage on the contract. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the contractor and WSB. We recommend that the City of Monticello approve Construction Pay Voucher No. 6 and final for ASTECH Corp. at the January 14, 2019, City Council meeting. Enclosed is the documentation required for releasing final payment for the above -referenced project as listed below: 1. Satisfactory showing that the contractor has complied with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 290.92 requiring withholding state income tax (IC134 forms). 2. Evidence in the form of an affidavit that all claims against the contractor by reasons of the contract have been fully paid or satisfactorily secured (lien waivers). 3. Consent of Surety to Final Payment certification from the contractor's surety. 4. Two-year maintenance bond. This project will be considered for acceptance by the City Council on January 14, 2019. The maintenance period will be in effect from January 14, 2019, until January 14, 2021. Please contact me at 763.287.7162 if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB L9 rsse►�. Shibani K. Bisson, PE Senior Project Manager Enclosures cc: Sarah Rathlisberger, City of Monticello Mary Aschenbrenner, ASTECH Corp. Lance Bemboom, ASTECH Corp. srb KA02596-360\Admin\Construction Admin\Pay Vouchers\2596-360 CST LTR VO 6 & FNL CTY-j schreiber-011419.docx WS 3Alp CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project 02596-36 - MONT- 2017 Street Improvements Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Contractor: Asphalt Surface Technologies Contract No. Corporation a/k/a ASTECH Corp Vendor No. NA P.O. Box 1025 For Period: 8/16/2018 - 12/3/2018 St. Cloud, MN 56302 Warrant # Date Contract Amounts Funds Encumbered Original Contract $1,450,162.61 Original $1,450,162.61 Contract Changes ($43,500.00) Additional N/A Revised Contract $1,406,662.61 Total $1,450,162.61 Work Certified To Date Base Bid Items $1,415,920.60 Backsheet ($43,500.00) Change Order $0.00 Supplemental Agreement $0.00 Work Order $0.00 Material On Hand $0.00 Total $1,372,420.60 Work Certified Work Certified Less Amount Less Previous Amount Paid Total Amount This Pay_ Voucher To Date Retained Payments This Pay_ Voucher Paid To Date 102596-3.6 $4,207.331 $1,372,420.60. $0.00 .. $1,299,802.61 $72,617.99. $1,372,420.60 Percent Retained:.0:0000% Amount Paid This Final Pay Voucher 1 $72,617.99 I hereby certify that a Final Examination has been made of the noted Contract, that the Contract has been completed, that the entire amount of Work Shown in this Final Voucher has been performed and the Total Value of the Work Performed in accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms of the Contract is as shown in this Final Voucher. Approved By Approved By Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation a/k/a ASTECH Corp County/Cit roject.Enginee Conctor December 6. 2016 )JI 4- -01-c"s Date - Date Construction Observer City of Monticello i December/6, 2018 Date Date Page 1 Page CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 02596w36 Pament Summary Work Certified Amount Retained Amount Paid No. From Date To Date Per Pay Voucher Per Pay Voucher Per Pay Voucher 1 06/26/2017 07/14/2017 $169,107.64 $8,455.38 $160,652.26 2 07/15/2017 08131/2017 $302,831.29 $15,141.57 $287,689.72 3 09/01/2017 09/30/2017 $527,684.93 $26j38424 $501;300.69 4 10/01/2017 10/3112017 $353,55 . 6.33 $17,677.82 $335,1378.51 5 11/01/2017. 08/15/2018 $15,033.08 $751.65 $14,281.43 6 0/1612018 12/03/2018 $4,207.33 ($68,410.66) $72,617.99 Totals: $1,372,420.60 $0.00 $1,372,420.60 02596-36 Funding Cateaorv. Report Funding Category Work Certified Less Less Amount Previous Amount Paid This Total Amount Paid No.. To Date, Retained Payments Pay Voucher To Date UNF 1,,372,420.58 0.00 1,299,802.59 72,617.98 1,372,4 . 20.58 Totals: $1,372,420.58 $0.00 $1,299,802.59 $72,617.98 $1,372,420.58 02596-36 Funding Source Report Amount Paid Revised Funds Paid To Accounting Funding This contract Encumbered Contractor 140. Source Pay Voucher Amount To Date To Date, UNF Unfunded 72,617.98 1,406,662.61 1,450,162.61 1,372,420.58 Totals: $72,617.98 $1,406,662.61 $1,450,162.61 $1,372,420.58 Page 102596-36 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units SCHEDULE A - STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% LUMP $0.00 5 MAXIMUM) SUM . 2 2101.502 CLEARING TREE 13 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 14 2101.507 GRUBBING TREE 15 2104.501 REMOVE CURB & L F $15,851.11 $1.10 GUTTER 0 16 2104.503 REMOVE BITUMINOUS S F 490 0 WALK 578 7 2104.503 REMOVE CONCRETE S F $61.13 871.46 WALK $4.40 8 12104.505 REMOVE CONCRETE S Y $5,639.66 $1.96 DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 0 9 1 2104.505 BITUMINOUS $165.00 . 0 .REMOVE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 1 10 12104.505 REMOVE BITUMINOUS S Y $0.00 41 PAVEMENT $2.97 11 2104.509 REMOVE CASTING EACH 112 12104.509 REMOVE SIGN EACH 1342 $20,411.82 SAWING CONCRETE 363001 13 12104.511 PAVEMENT (FULL LF 35634 $55,945.38 DEPTH) SAWING BIT 14 12104.513 PAVEMENT (FULL LF DEPTH). 15 :12104.523 SALVAGE CASTING I EACH 116., 2104.523 SALVAGE MAIL BOX 1 EACH SUPPORT 17 :12104.523'1 SALVAGE MAIL BOX J EACH 18 12104.601 1 SALVAGE 1:SUMP STRU.CTU ESLANDSCAPE 19 12104.607 1 SALVAGEAG REGATE 1 S(DRIVEWY 20 12105.501 COMMON 1 1 C Y EXCAVATION 21 1 2105:5071 DON 1 C Y EXCASUBGVA 122 + 2105.5221 SELECT BORROW GRANULAR(CV) 1 C Y 1 123 1 2112.501 1 DPREPARATION 1 RDST 1 AGGREGATE 24 12118.607 I SURFACING (CV) C Y CLASS 125 12123.6101 (WIITHEPIC IHOUR 1 UEP BROOM) 26 1 2130.501 1 WATER I MGAL 27. 12211.501 1 AGGREGATE BASE 1 TONCLASS 1 128 1 2215.501 1 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION 1 S Y 1 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount Unit Price Contract This This Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay To Date To Date Voucher Voucher $27,000.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $27,000.00 $432.00 15 0 $0.00 5 $2,160.00 $432.00 .15 0 $0.00 5 $2,160.00 $432.00 1 0 $0.00 1 $432.00 $3.19 3880 0 $0.00 4969 $15,851.11 $1.10 370 0 $0.00 2542 $2,796.20 $5.28 490 0 $0.00 578 $3,051.84 $6.71 1040 9.11 $61.13 871.46 $5,847.50 $4.40 370 0 $0.00 1281.74 $5,639.66 $1.96 2300 0 $0.00 3123 $6,121.08 $165.00 7 0 $0.00 1 $165.00 $27.25 48 0 $0.00 41 $1,117.25 $2.97 680 32 $95.04 631.51 $1,875.56 11.98 15401 0 $0.00 18601 $3,682.80 $187.061 351 01 $0.001 401 $7,480.00 $32.701 55101 $0.001 681 $2,223.60 $16.501 56 01 $0.001 681 $1,122.00 $5,000.001 11 01 $0.001 0.681 $3,400.00 $1.001 1451 01 $0.001 501 $50.00 $9.901 26601 01 $0.001 26601 $26,334.00 $12.101 7201 01 $6.001 2031 $2,456.30. $1430.1 2601 01 $0.001 291 $414.70 $165.001 701 01 $0.001 661 $10,890.00 $20.351 201 01 $0.00 20 $407.00 $148.501 421 01 $0.001 32.51 $4,826.25 $22.001 3601 01 $0.601 4101 $9,020.00 $15.211 33601 01 $0.001 1342 $20,411.82 $1.571 363001 01 $0.001 35634 $55,945.38 Page 3 102596-36 Project Material Status Line Item Description Units Unit Price 29 2232.501MILL BITUMINOUS S Y This This SURFACE (2.0") Pay 30 2356.604 MICRO -SURFACING SQ YD 3500 0 BITUMINOUS 1060 31 2357.502 MATERIAL FOR TACK GAL $0.00 $0.00 COAT $59,264.94 $8.80 930 TYPE SP 12.5 $0.00 32 2360.501 WEARING COURSE TON 0 $0.001 MIX (2,B) $2,790.00 $165.00 131 TYPE SP 12.5 0 33 12360.501 WEARING COURSE TON $2,200.001 MIX (3,C) 0 $0.001 TYPE SP 12.5.NON 34 2360.502 WEAR COURSE MIX TON 01 (2,B):. 171 $10,838.35 TYPE SP 12.5 NON 35 2360.502 WEAR COURSE MIX TON $0.001* (3,C) $16,228.80 $140.001 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING 36 12360.503 COURSE MIXTURE SQ YD $7,700.00 (2,B) 3.0" THICK 3151. 37 12502.601 IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS $15.401 1420 1 PROVISION $0.001 38 12504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE &TEACH 1 101 01 39 2505.601. UTILITY ILS 1 $18.101 COORDINATION 40 12506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY EACH 1,41 12506.521 INSTALL SALVAGED . 1 EACH I 24001 CASTING 42, 12506.6021'(EXTERNAL) HIMNEY SEA` EACH 1 $61.601 . 43 1 2521.501 14" CONCRETE WALK :1 S F 1 44: 12521.50116" CONCRETE WALK 1 S F 1 45 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & L F I 1 1601 GUTTER.DESIGN B6,12 $112.001 146 12531.501 CONCRETE CURBA 1 I L F 1 $0.001 GUTTER DESIGN 618 47 12531.502 I CONCRETE I L F 1 01 $0.001 DESIGN D (MODIFIED)7" 48 12531.5071 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 1 S Y 1 49 12531.603 17" CONCRETE VALLEY 1 LIN FT 1 151 GUTTER $27.501 50 12531.618 I ADA COMPLIASOR NCE 1,LS 1 $2,007.50 $168.951 SUPERV 151 12531.6181 TRUNCATED DOMES IS F 1 52 12540.6021 INSTALL MAIL BOX I EACH 1 01 SUPPORT (CLUSTER) 53 12540.6021 MAIL BOX EACH 1 54 12540.6021 MAIL BOX SUPPORT 1 EACH 1 11 55 12540.6021 MAIL I EACH 1 (TEMPORARY) $1.18 $2.75 $2.80 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 3500 Quantity Amount Contract This This Quantity Pay Pay $0.00 Voucher Voucher 3500 0 $0.00 1060 0 $0.00 2230 0 $0.00 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 3500 $4,130.00 1283 $3,528.25 2055 $5,754.00 $44.28 3010 0 $0.00 3026.91 $134,031.57 $52.37 1390 0 $0.00 1545.01 $80,912.17 $45.49 3290 0 $0.00 3627.42 $165,011.34 $54.50 1010 0 $0.00 1087.43 $59,264.94 $8.80 930 0 $0.00 1876 $16,508.80 $10,000.00 1 0 $0.001 0.2791 $2,790.00 $165.00 131 0 $0.001 201 $3,300.00 $2,200.001 11 0 $0.001 11 $2,260.00 .$637.55.1 181 01 $0.001 171 $10,838.35 $386.401 351 01 $0.001* $16,228.80 $140.001 531 01 $0.001 551 $7,700.00 $.8.801 3151. 01 $0.001 01 $0.00 $15.401 1420 1 01 . $0.001 1-128.51 $17,378.90 $33.001. 101 01 $0.001 01 $0.00 $18.101 5560 01 $0.001 57151 $103,441.50 $15.401 24001 0 $0.00 30071 $46,307.80 $61.601 10101 9.11 $561.18 820.211 $50,524.94 $35.201 2001 01 $0.001 1601 $5,632.00 $112.001 11. 01 $0.001 11 $112.00 $49.051 1801 01 $0.001 1581 $7,749.90 $283.401 181 01 $0.001 151 $4,251.00 $27.501 81 01 $0.001 731 $2,007.50 $168.951 81 01 $0.001 201 '691 $3,379.00 $33.00 I 401. 01 $'0.001 $2,277.00 Page 4 r 102596-36 Proiect Material Status CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 73 $1,215.45 2 $20,601.00 1 $3,410.00 177.25 $5,742.90 23 $2,530.00 0 171 0.4675 1 68001 42 0 $0.00 2880 0 $0.00 01 0 $0,001 01 0 $0.001 418 1 Quantity Amount Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract This This LOG TYPE WOOD L F $3.25 3290 Quantity Pay Pay s 67 12573.535 _STABILIZED Voucher Voucher 56 2540.602 INSTALL MAILBOX EACH $16.65 58 0 $0.00 1 2573.602 1 ROCK DITCH CHECK EACH INSTALL DRIVER 5 69 1 2574.525 COMMON TOPSOIL C Y $32.70 57 2545.602 FEEDBACK SPEED EACH $10,300.50 2 0 $0.00 2575.505 1 SODDING TYPE SALT S Y SYSTEM 4650 # TOLERANT 58 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $3,410.00 1 0 $0.00 59 2564.531 SIGN PANELS TYPE C S F $32.40 156 0 $0.00 60 2564.536 INSTALL SIGN PANEL EACH $110.00 23 0 $0.00 TYPE D EROSION CONTROL 61 2571.501 CONIFEROUS TREE 8' TREE $508.21 5 0 $0.00 S Y $1.69 HT B&B 1400 62 12571.502 DECIDUOUS TREE 2.5" TREE $492.68 5 0 $0.00 $0.50 1 CAL B&B MULCH 103 12571.601 INSTALL LANDSCAPE LUMP $10,000.00 1 0 $0.00 SYMBOL).EPDXY STRUCTURES_ SUM 75 12582.5021 164 12573.502 ,SILT FENCE, TYPE MS LF $1.98. 14530 0 $0.00 165. 12573.530 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH $154.29 40 0 $0.00 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 73 $1,215.45 2 $20,601.00 1 $3,410.00 177.25 $5,742.90 23 $2,530.00 0 171 0.4675 1 68001 42 0 $0.00 2880 0 $0.00 01 0 $0,001 01 0 $0.001 418 1 0 $0.001 4287.51 SEDIMENT CONTROL i 166 12573.533 LOG TYPE WOOD L F $3.25 3290 FIBER . s 67 12573.535 _STABILIZED EACH $990.00 11 1 CONSTRUCTION EXIT 68 1 2573.602 1 ROCK DITCH CHECK EACH $330.00 5 69 1 2574.525 COMMON TOPSOIL C Y $32.70 710 BORROW _ j 70 2575.505 1 SODDING TYPE SALT S Y $6.81 4650 # TOLERANT EROSIONEROSION CONTROL 171 25:75.5231 BLANKETS CATEGORY S Y $1.55. 2390 3. EROSION CONTROL 72 12575.523 I BLANKETS CATEGORY S Y $1.69 I 1400 73 12575.5631 RAULIC MATRIX HYF S Y $0.50 1 8280 MULCH Z4' 12582.5011 PAVT MSSG.(BIKE EACH $269.501 6 SYMBOL).EPDXY 75 12582.5021 WHITE- L F LF $1.32 1 1700 EPDXY. 170 12582.502 OLID LINE WHITE- 1 L F $5.28 1 170 EPO ' 177 12582.502,1 �'BROKEN LINE LF $1.32 1 720 YELLOW-EPDXY 178 12582.5021 4" DOUBLESOLID LINE L F $0.51 1 8670 YELLOW-EPDXY Totals For Section SCHEDULE A - STREET IMPROVEMENTS: SCHEDULE B - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 79 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% LUMP $204.00 1 MAXIMUM) SUM 80 2104.501 REMOVE WATER MAIN LF $10.80 360 81 2104.509 REMOVE GATE VALVE EACH $507.60 7 i & BOX 3 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 73 $1,215.45 2 $20,601.00 1 $3,410.00 177.25 $5,742.90 23 $2,530.00 0 171 0.4675 1 68001 42 0 $0.00 2880 0 $0.00 01 0 $0,001 01 0 $0.001 418 1 0 $0.001 4287.51 $0.00 $8,375.56 $4,675.00 $13,464.00 $6,480.18 $9,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,668.60 $29,197.88 2251.6 $3,489.981 7342.121 $11,380.29 0 $0.001 0 $0.00 0 $0.001 91461 $4,573.00 0 $0.001 61 $1,617.00 0 $0.001 41341 $5,456.88 0 $0.001 3581 $1,890.24 0 $0.001 3011 $397.32 0 $0.001 83981 $4,282.98 1 $4,207.33 1 1 $1,126,459.09 0 $0.00 1 $204.00 0 $0.00 261 $2,818.80 0 $0.00 6 $3,045.60 Page 5 02596-36 Prolect Material Status Quantity Amount Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract This This Quantity Pay Pay Voucher Voucher 82 2104.509 REMOVE HYDRANT EACH $1,080.00 1 0 $0.00 83 2104.603 ABANDON WATER L F $5.40 420 0 $0.00 MAIN 184 2105.601 DEWATERING LS $0.01 1 0 $0.00 DUCTILE IRON 185 2503.608 FITTINGS-EPDXY POUND $6.65 650 0 $0.00 CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 1 $1.,080.00 520 $2,808.00 1 $0.01 762 $5,067.30 0 $0.00 1 $4,320.00 COATED . 9 $34,020.00 0 $0.00 1 86 2504:601 TEMPORARY WATER LS $4,320.00 1 $4,620.00 0 $0.00 2 SERVICE 0 $0.00 2 $6,696.00 87 12504.602 CONNECT TO EACH $3,780.00 6 0 $0.00 26 EXISTING WATER MAIN 0 $0.00 33 $2,316.60 88 12604.6.02 INSTALL HYDRANT EACH $5,616.00 1 89 12504.602 1" CORPORATION EACH $336.00 1 0 $0.00 286 STOP 0 $0.00 2 $1,100.00 190 12504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $1,540.00 1 101 12604.602 8" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $2,452.00 2 92 12504.602 12" GATE VALVE & BOX EACH $3,348.00 2 0 $0.00 93 12504.602 1" CURB STOP & BOX EACH $638.25 1 61 94 12504.603. 1" TYPE K COPPER L F $22.40 30 PIPE 95 2504.603 6" WATERMAIN L F $75.60 10 DUCTILE IRON CL.52 96 12504.603 8' WATERMAIN L F $70.20 50 DUCTILE IRON CL 52 97 12504.603 12" WATERMAIN L F $56.16 750 DUCTILE IRON CL 52 98 12504:604 4." POLYSTYRENE S Y $30.80 10 INSULATION Totals For Section SCHEDULE B - WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS: SCHEDULE C .'STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 99 2021.501 MOBILIZATION (5% LUMP $4,590.00 1 MAXIMUM) SUM 100 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE LF $8.72 250 (STORM) 109 2104.509 REMOVE DRAINAGE EACH $550.00 2 STRUCTURE . 102 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION. C Y $13.20 390 103 2501.511 .12" CS PIPE CULVERT LF $27:75 70 104 2501..511 15" RC PIPE CULVERT LF $38.88 1280 CLASS V 105 12501.511 18" RC PIPE CULVERT LF $46.20 70 CLASS V 11.06* 12501.515' 12" GS PIPE APRON EACH $198.00 4 107 12501.515 15" GS PIPE APRON EACH $246.40 1 1 108 12501.515 18" GS PIPE APRON EACH $330.00 4 109 12501.515 18" RC PIPE APRON EACH $770.00 2 110 2501.602 CLEAN PIPE CULVERT EACH $218.00 20 111 12502.541 6" PERF PVC. PIPE LF $12.10 1260 DRAIN CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 Quantity Amount To Date To Date 1 $1.,080.00 520 $2,808.00 1 $0.01 762 $5,067.30 0 $0.00 1 $4,320.00 0 $0.00 9 $34,020.00 0 $0.00 1 $5,616.00 0 $0.00 1 $336.00 0 $0.00 3 $4,620.00 0 $0.00 2 $4,904.00 0 $0.00 2 $6,696.00 0 $0.00 1 $638.25 0 $0.00 16 $358.40 0 $0.00 26 $1,965.60 0 $0.00 33 $2,316.60 0 $0.00 740 $41,558.40 0 $0.00 7.11 $218.99 $0.00 1 $122,591.95 0 $0.00 1 $4,590.00 0 $0.00 286 $2,493.92 0 $0.00 2 $1,100.00 0 $0.00 390 $5,148.00 0 $0.00 64 $1,776.00 0 $0.00 1239 $48,172.32 0 $0.00 67 $3,095.40 0 $0.00 4 $792.00 0 $0.00 1 $246.40 0 $0.00 31 $990.00 0 $0.00 21 $1,540.00 0 $0.00 61 $1,308.00 0 $0.00 23201 $28,072.00 Page 6 d y, CITY OF MONTICELLO 505 Walnut St Monticello, MN 55362-1147 Project No. 02596-36 Final Pay Voucher No. 6 02596-36 Pro'ect Material Status Quantity Amount Line Item Description Units Unit Price Contract This This Quantity Amount Quantity Pay Pay To Date To Date Voucher Voucher 112 2502.602. PVC PIPE DRAIN EACH CLEANOUT CLEANOUT $216.00 8 0 $0.00 21 $4,536.00 CONNECT INTO 113 2503.602 EXISTING DRAINAGE EACH $654.00 15 0 $0.00 10 $6,540.00 STRUCTURE. 1 114 2503.603 15" HDPE PIPE SEWER LF $24.20 55 0 $0.00 55 $1,331.00 115 2503.603 18" HDPE PIPE SEWER LF $29.70 80 0 $0.00 85 $2,524.50 CONSTRUCT 116 2506.501 DRAINAGE LF STRUCTURE DESIGN $356.40 90 0 $0.00 62.66 $22,332.02 48-4020 . RECONSTRUCT 117 2506.503 DRAINAGE LF $352.00 8 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 STRUCTURE CONSTRUCT 118 2506.602 DRAINAGE EACH STRUCTURE DESIGN $1,836.00 12 0 $0.00 14 $25,704.00 SPECIAL 1 CONSTRUCT 119 2506.602 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN EACH $1,526.00 3 0 $0.00 3 $4,578.00. SPECIAL 2 Totals For Section SCHEDULE. C - STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: $0.001 1 $166,869.56 Backsheet1 120 1981711 . I LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ILS J ($17,000.00):1 1 01 $0.001 1 1 ($17,000.00) Totals For Backsheet 1: $0.00 I . ($17,000.00) Backsheet 2 1.21 1 98171 1 LIQUIDATED. DAMAGES [LS I ($26,500.00)'1. 1 I 01 $0.001 1 [ ($26,500.00) Totals For Backsheet 2: I $0.00 I ($26,500.00) Project Totals: 1 1 $4,207.33 1 1$1,372,420.60 02596-36 Contract Chances No. Type Date Explanation Estimated Amount PaidAmount To Date BK1 Backsheet 8/15/2017 Liqu!dated,Damages Accumulated from 8/11/17 through 8/31/17 ($17,000.00) ($17,000.00) BK2 Backsheet 10/31/2017' :Liquidated Damages Accumulated from 9/1/17 through 10/31/17 ($26,500.00) ($26,500.00) Contract Change Totals: 1 ($43,500.00)1 ($43,500.00) Page 7 2I. City Council Agenda- 1/14/2019 Consideration of approving the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition. Applicant: Citv of Monticello. (NAC/AS) Property: Legal: Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Oakwood Industrial Park PID: 155018001012; 155018001020 Planning Case Number: 2018-050 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Deadline for Decision: Land Use Designation: Zoning Designation: Overlays/Environmental Regulations Applicable: Current Site Use: Surrounding Land Uses: North: East: South: West: Project Description: Replat to relocate an existing lot line to accommodate construction of a new municipal fire station. N/A Places to Shop (Commercial) B-4, Regional Business The purpose of the "B-4", regional business district is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. NA Community Recreation/Vacant Commercial/Industrial Industrial Commercial/Industrial Commercial The subject site currently consists of two parcels, both presently owned by the City of Monticello. The City proposes to construct a new fire station on the east portion of the subject property. The westerly portion is occupied by an existing building (formerly a bowling center), but which is now utilized by a local soccer club. The property line would be moved to the west, preserving the bulk of the existing parking area for the soccer club building, but add space for fire station construction and circulation. There would continue to be a total of 2 parcels, both owned by the City of Monticello. City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 ANALYSIS The platted area currently consists of two lots, Lots 1 and 2 of Oakwood Industrial Park. The westerly lot (Lot 1) currently has approximately 392 feet along Chelsea Road, and approximately 2.66 acres in area. The easterly lot (Lot 2) currently has approximately 360 feet along Chelsea Road, and approximately 2.47 acres in area. The replat would shift the dividing lot line approximately 87 feet to the west, decreasing Lot I to 2.05 acres, and increasing Lot 2 to 3.07 acres. The B-4 zoning district requires no specific minimum area or lot width for commercial parcels. The plat includes 12 foot wide utility and drainage easements along the perimeter lot lines, and 6 feet wide easements along either side of the shared internal lot line, in accordance with Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Other existing easements, including a 60 foot wide gas line easement that extends through Lot 2, would not be affected by the plat. As noted below, the gas line easement is a factor in the need to shift the existing lot line, in order to create adequate buildable area on Lot 2. Site Plan Review: The proposed fire station use is a permitted use in the B-4 District. The following notes are a summary of staff site plan review of the proposed development. While these comments do not affect the technical aspects of the plat proposal, they relate to the use of the new property for fire station purposes. The Commission should note that as a permitted use, site plan review is an administrative process, but the staff review of the plans is provided for Commission reference. Access/Drive Aisles The fire station site plan shows an exit apron from the station building to Chelsea Road. While the apron is wider than the code allowance of 24', wider curb cuts may be allowed by the City Engineer. The Engineer has reviewed this aspect of the project, and due the need for emergency exiting, the proposed width is considered acceptable. The drive aisle on west side of site is located within the required 6' side lot line drainage and utility easement. Encroachment into this easement is noted and allowed given the public use and ownership. No encroachment agreement would be necessary, until that westerly parcel is eventually sold to a private party. For the easterly driveway access to the fire station parking area, two-way traffic is allowed to provide both access and egress to and from the east parking lot. The required 24' drive aisle meets requirements. The circulation changes to allow for one-way traffic through northerly parking and drives of the site. Signage and/or pavement markings are recommended to notify vehicles of the changed condition. Parking The site plan illustrates compliance with dimensional requirements for stalls and circulation drives. For the proposed use, parking space count should be adequate given the use and square footage calculations. It will be important for the station to Oil City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 provide full off-street parking quantities necessary to account for all personnel as there is no reasonable parking supply on Chelsea Road, a collector roadway. The site plan shows all parking and drive aisles to be surrounded with concrete curb and gutter, as required by zoning regulations. Lighting The submission package includes a photometric plan showing light spread and intensity on the property. The plan is compliant with city standards with the exception of the west side of the fire station site, where the proposed lighting is higher than that allowed at the property line. However, City code allows for deviation for security purposes per Chapter 4, Section 5(G). In addition, given that the City owns both parcels (and both are zoned B-4), this lighting pattern is both common and acceptable. Detailed fixtures plans illustrate full -cut off fixtures for wall and pole lighting, as required. Poles are required to be no greater than 25 feet in height. Landscaping Perimeter buffer yard landscaping is required. The city is required to install 1/2 of the required perimeter buffer to supplement the buffer already in place on the east property line, which is considered a "D" level "opaque" buffer between civic/institutional and industrial uses. This landscaping is required in addition to the landscaping proposed. The City Engineer's office has provided comment on the relocation of the proposed landscaping to avoid easement conflicts. The balance of landscaping proposed is acceptable in terms of species, size and quantity. The landscaping plan should be revised to address the additional buffer planting materials. Grading. Drainage, Erosion Control & Site Utilities City Engineer's office has reviewed and provided comments in a separate letter included with this staff report. Accessory Structures The trash enclosure is located at the northwest corner of the northerly parking lot. The enclosure is required to be constructed of the same or similar building materials as the principal building. Screening The rooftop mechanical is proposed to be fully screened per ordinance requirements. 3 City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 Building Materials The building materials, which are proposed as pre -cast concrete panels with variation including smooth, sandblasted and exposed aggregate, with prefinished metal and aluminum accents. The architect should verify that the metal accents are a maximum of 15% of the building exterior. Signage Plans illustrate wall signage only. Wall signs are within the 15% of allowable square footage of faced fronting a public street. Based on the Chelsea Road facade, the building is allowed 716 square feet of wall signage. The proposed plan illustrates approximately 370 square feet. Staff understands a monument sign may be proposed. The site plan shall be updated to illustrate the location of the sign, which must meet total allowable area of 100 square feet and a maximum of 14' in height, as well as setbacks of 15' from the right of way and 6' from interior side property lines. Placement of any monument sign should be carefully considered to avoid visibility obstruction for emergency vehicles entering Chelsea Road. Planning Commission Review and Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the request and held a public hearing on the preliminary plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition on January 2nd, 2019. The Commission requested confirmation of the width of the drive aisle on the west side of the fire station site. Staff noted that the site plan illustrates the drive aisle at 17', which satisfied the concern over adequate width. The Commission also inquired as to the parking supply remaining on the adjacent west parcel. Planning staff noted that the proposed supply is 88 spaces. The zoning ordinance does not supply a specific count for the current use as an indoor soccer park. The Commission indicated some concern that the planning for the municipal fire station did not involve some Commission input prior to the proposed plat in terms of capital improvements. After discussion, the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat. The Commission did not make a recommendation on the final plat as it is consistent with the preliminary plat and is subject to Council decision only. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative #1 for decision below. Decision #1: Preliminary Plat 1. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, based on the findings in Resolution No. PC -2019-004, and contingent on the conditions in Exhibit Z of this report. L! City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 2. Motion to deny approval of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, based on findings as identified by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the Preliminary Plat, subject to additional information from staff. Decision #2: Final Plat 1. Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2019-05, approving the Final Plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, based on the findings in said resolution, and contingent on the conditions in Exhibit Z of this report. 2. Motion to deny adoption of Resolution No. 2019-05, based on findings as identified by the City Council. 3. Motion to table action on the Final Plat, subject to additional information from staff or applicant. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final as proposed. The conditions identified in Exhibit Z technically relate to development of the site rather than the plat, however, compliance with the recommended conditions are important to demonstrate the ability to use the property as intended. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2019-05, Final Plat B. Resolution PC -2019-004, Preliminary Plat C. Aerial Site Image D. Preliminary Plat E. Final Plat F. Site Plans, including: a. Exiting Conditions and Removals b. Details c. Grading and Erosion Control Plan d. Utility Plan e. Site Plan f. Surfacing Plan g. Architectural Site Plan h. Landscape Plan i. Building Elevation Plan G. City Engineer's Comments Z. Conditions of Approval 5 City Council Agenda— 1/14/2019 EXHIBIT Z Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4' Addition Parts of Lots 1 and 2, Oakwood Industrial Park PIDs:155018001012;155018001020 1. Signage and/or pavement markings required for one-way circulation at the north end of the site. 2. Landscaping plan shall be revised to illustrate required perimeter buffer yard planting. 3. Trash enclosure is required to be constructed of the same or similar building materials as the principal building. 4. The architect should verify that the metal accents are a maximum of 15% of the building exterior. 5. The site plan shall be updated to illustrate the location of any proposed monument sign, which must meet total allowable area of 100 square feet and 14' in height, as well as setbacks of 15' from the right of way and 6' from interior side property lines, to be located to ensure no visual obstruction. 6. Grading, drainage and erosion control and utility plans shall be revised to meet the comments of the City Engineer's office. 7. Sign permits are required per sign ordinance regulations. 8. Comments of other staff and Planning Commission. G CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-05 APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2nd, 2019 for the consideration of the preliminary plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition; and WHEREAS, after taking public comment, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the recommendation and findings of the Planning Commission and has approved the preliminary plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition on January 14th, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Monticello City Council reviewed the final plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, 2019 and has found it consistent with the preliminary plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition; and WHEAREAS, the preliminary and final plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition identifies the specific plans and uses for the proposed Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA, that the final plat of Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, with drainage and utility easements as required, is hereby approved contingent upon meeting all conditions of the subdivision ordinance; and the following conditions: 1. Signage and/or pavement markings required for one-way circulation at the north end of the site. 2. Landscaping plan shall be revised to illustrate required perimeter buffer yard planting. 3. Trash enclosure is required to be constructed of the same or similar building materials as the principal building. 4. The architect should verify that the metal accents are a maximum of 15% of the building exterior. 5. The site plan shall be updated to illustrate the location of any proposed monument sign, which must meet total allowable area of 100 square feet and 14' in height, as well as setbacks of 15' from the right of way and 6' from interior side property lines, to be located to ensure no visual obstruction. 6. Grading, drainage and erosion control and utility plans shall be revised to meet the comments of the City Engineer's office. 7. Sign permits are required per sign ordinance regulations. 8. Comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 14th day of January, 2019. CITY OF MONTICELLO Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-004 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to develop property identified by PID Numbers 155018001012 and 155018001020; and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request to replat said property into two lots commercial and civic uses; and WHEREAS, the site is guided for commercial uses under the label "Places to Shop" in the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Plat is consistent with the long-term use and development of the property for commercial and institutional uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 2" d, 2019 on the application and the applicant and members of the public were provided the opportunity to present information to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The Plat provides an appropriate means of furthering the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the site by continuing the development plans for the area. 2. The proposed improvements on the site under the Preliminary Plat are consistent with the needs of the development in this location as a fire station and for retaining commercial uses in the area. 3. The improvements will have expected impacts on public services, including sewer, water, stormwater treatment, and traffic which have been planned to serve the property for the development as proposed. 5. The plat facilitates improved public safety through development of a new fire station. 4.. The Plat is consistent with the intent of the City's development objectives, as well as with the intent of the City's zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-004 Monticello City Council approves the Preliminary Plat for Oakwood Industrial Park 4th Addition, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit Z of the staff report as follows: 1. Signage and/or pavement markings required for one-way circulation at the north end of the site. 2. Landscaping plan shall be revised to illustrate required perimeter buffer yard planting. 3. Trash enclosure is required to be constructed of the same or similar building materials as the principal building. 4. The architect should verify that the metal accents are a maximum of 15% of the building exterior. 5. The site plan shall be updated to illustrate the location of any proposed monument sign, which must meet total allowable area of 100 square feet and 14' in height, as well as setbacks of 15' from the right of way and 6' from interior side property lines, to be located to ensure no visual obstruction. 6. Grading, drainage and erosion control and utility plans shall be revised to meet the comments of the City Engineer's office. 7. Sign permits are required per sign ordinance regulations. 8. Comments of other staff and Planning Commission. ADOPTED this 2nd day of January, 2019, by the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. ATTEST: MONTICF�LO PLANNING CO M SION )( jjijj y 3 1 By: Br y it / 2 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PC -2019-004 Angela Schuma , Co unity Development Director City of Monticello - Request for Preliminary Plat Created by: City of Monticello PID: 155018001012&1550180010201101 Chelsea Road I Lengthy Legals - See City Hall PROPERTY DESCRIPTION All of Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, according to the plat and survey thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for said County, Less and except, the North 300.79 feet of said Lot 1, Block 1 and Less and except the following described parcel, to -wit: Commencing at the Southwest Corner of the North 300.79 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, thence in a Northerly direction upon the Westerly line of said described parcel 75.00 feet, thence Easterly at a right angle 100.00 feet, thence Southerly at a right angle 75.00 feet, thence Westerly at a right angle 100.00 feet to the point of beginning on the West line, Wright County, Minnesota. AND South Half of Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, Wright County, Minnesota. PROPERTY SUMMARY 1. Subject property's address is 101 Chelsea Road, Monticello, MN. 2. Subject property's property identification number is 155018001012 & 155018001020 3. The gross area of the subject property is 222,749 Square Feet or 5.114 acres. 4. Current Property Zoning: B-2 SURVEY NOTES 1. The bearing system is based on the recorded plat of Oakwood Industrial Park, having an assumed bearing of N88°37'30"E for the South line of Block 1. 2. The vertical datum is based on NAVD88. The originating benchmark is 8605 J, referenced form the MnDOT Geodetic Database. Elev. = 959.247 Benchmark #1 TNH at Southeast end of property on the north side of Chelsea Road. Elev. = 961.01 3. Field work was completed on 6/18/2018. PLAT AREAS Lot 1, Block 1 = 89,110 Square Feet or 2.046 acres Lot 2, Block 1 = 133,639 Square Feet or 3.068 acres ADDRESSES Owner: City of Monitcello Engineer/Surveyor: WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 McDonald's Z5 v SuperAmerlca O� itatlonstor,es JimrriyJohn's © U f ;l ©Dairy Queen Grill & Chill lcn�e�aa Chal- Rd © Pizza Ranch a >l, 3 SITE Iu ell N 57 NOT TO SCALE n Thomas Park Ur N88047'26"E 374.81 - - _ -•�•� - - N88047'26"E 360.00 N LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 J Q OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 33 33 /1 A I 1 A Unr\VVU\JL_J Fp. LS 41886 OWNER: ATTIC STORAGE, LLC I I o0 Cq ADDRESS: 102 THOMAS PARK DR C:) PI D: 155018001011 I (h I N I I O ZONING: B-4 I I N W I L O I I C,WW O I "-WOWNER: ATTIC STORAGE LLC I N '' ` M EO I M N ADDRESS: 118 OAKWOOD DR E O p PID: 155018001021 ZONING: I-1CD FD. IRPN PIPE 0 0 Io 1 0.5' N�{V OF PROPERTY CORNER I I U) Z III - FD. LS 15253 i U) 0.4'N OF PROPERTY CORNER I I L OWNER: BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE CO I N 1 r-\ 1 1 1 A I I EXISTING ADDRESS: 114 THOMAS PARK DR V I I I 11 V LA -ii, u t I 1n L_I I BUILDING I PID: 155018001031 r✓ N89°59'3 'E 100.00 N LINE OF THE O�rH - ZONING: I-1 FEET 1, BLO -C ClL �� ` w 3OAKWOOD NDUOSTRIAL PARK i t -L . Ls 41886 N LINE OF THE SOUT1 1 - - ^1 0 0.3'S OF PROPERTY CO NERI � r CD rn FD. LS141886 - T - - �`- - - OAKWOODpl 1 nr r S'T. 1, 96AOIt 1 ( _ --_�� - �----------INDUSTRIALPAFK OWNER: NORTHERN NATURAL GAS- - - - - - - - ° 1 I _ Gn /� }, ADDRESS 1050 OAKWOOD DR E t C) = _ `•. •' E 36"0 PID 155500141200 I / I W V U) - I I ; o r r -- 8 42 28 --- -- o r rr N8„ ZONING: B-2 < ,..\ \ G� I N88 47 26 E 281.9 7= ------- ---1 --=-=- -IVO 22'30"W�DRAINAl„T - =�� -5J"30'"E � � _ ` I � - - - � '� _� �� \ UTILITY EASEMENT VIZI �4()(lo(1(1'7(1°tA� d Z I i R C \ I� ° ,� ----- ---- I �--CONCRETE UTTER otj H � r� �- �_ / ,\ 2.10 a� C L,L_v\�r\ I -_a_ FD: IRONPIPE w ado 'W CORNER OF THE N. 300.79 FEET I Y LOT 6' TVW OF PROBE�t�Y C NER w U Q rn E CO OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1. o Y M \ - PER DOC.I 0�2225361 AMENDED ❑ 1 ;I LO I 50 J obi I O-_il_ I I- \N OWNER: SMA PROPERTIES LLC L70 U M \ �1 ib - N �� A / \ADDRESS: 50 CHELSEA RD w LOT 1 N i Q I o ,� \ \ PER DOC. NO.275301 F- - w PID: 155018001030 11 Q - I �I � F- }jti I' 06 O ZONING: 1-1 EXISTING BUILDING �- \ \ \ /Z co Ti Co 1 D I TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT �- N I J o / \\ OA ADDRESS: 51 SCOHEELSEARD Q I N '� oLIJ < Z PER DOC. NO. 226691, NI I ❑ I N �,\ 30 \ Q �� I p PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMEN �I I Lu O o \\ ❑ W C) �� \ m I O I w PER DOC. NO. 556631 of W Y o B LOCK '1 \\ Z I I �, \ J I I I W O DDRESST101 CHY OF OELSEA RD BITU ICJS SURFACE Q \ \ I \ I, Cl) PID 155018001012 DRAINAGE •5 UTILITY - � } EE 3EMENT � S LINE OF BLOCK 1 A \ �p0 (i 4033 6 - OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK °O 7 _J- 1 33 �I 6 UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. N .2/0s 3 FZAINA � & Jl hLITY-2I � --�asF�EC�t� �= - 36Q\00-- - - \ Tid�#Flft rte_ RI 965.30 It. -o -- G __-- '6� ' "F 705 0 ^ BI UMINOUS SURFACE _ g5$ - - _ _ ,r35 74 0 3 rr I \. I g66 I > �i ♦� - 'f= 960 > I \\ t �� 95 7 TRIM. 9CQV > IT - > - - -1 RIM: 964.91 661 1% INV: S 945.76 - INV: E 945.76 \ 11 L ( RI : S4.59 1 I INV: W 96094 INV: S 960.4 I I I I I I I I I I L - ----- - - - - - - -- _- ---- - -- ---- _ ------ - -9� _-r 960 \ Ig - ,.1 \ X - -- -. 95 t11/f\l16--- RIM: 9611§ I`.T^)I A I I �- x INlnl P ^) t /� f\ V V �/ l� LJ INV. E 937.62 I I V LJ l .: I I\ I n L_ \` \ 1 (� \ f L INV. W 937.62 \ RIM: 962.12 2 IM: 95 .80 \ I INV: N 959.34 L� L 1 v f \ \\ I V: N947.30 \ II V: S 47.40 IN W 47.40 \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ I \ \ LEGEND Graphic Scale (in feet) 0 80 160 1 inch = 80 feet ri PROJECT NO. P: 012157-000 DRAWING TYPE Preliminary Plat DCW REVIEWED DATE 12/10/18 SHEET 1 OF 1 0 FD MONUMENT O MONUMENT TO BE SET �s SANITARY MANHOLE D FLARED END SECTION ® CATCH BASIN sT STORM MANHOLE X WATER VALVE � WATER HYDRANT (w WATER MANHOLE X x WOOD FENCE CURB AND GUTTER �C� � o ) DECIDUOUS TREE EVERGREEN TREE Graphic Scale (in feet) 0 80 160 1 inch = 80 feet ri PROJECT NO. P: 012157-000 DRAWING TYPE Preliminary Plat DCW REVIEWED DATE 12/10/18 SHEET 1 OF 1 OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FOURTH ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, fee owner, of the following described property situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota, to wit: All of Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, according to the plat and survey thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds, in and for said County, Less and except, the North 300.79 feet of said Lot 1, Block 1 and Less and except the following described parcel, to -wit: Commencing at the Southwest Corner of the North 300.79 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, thence in a Northerly direction upon the Westerly line of said described parcel 75.00 feet, thence Easterly at a right angle 100.00 feet, thence Southerly at a right angle 75.00 feet, thence Westerly at a right angle 100.00 feet to the point of beginning on the West line, Wright County, Minnesota. AND South Half of Lot 2, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park, Wright County, Minnesota Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FOURTH ADDITION, and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for public use forever the public ways. In witness whereof said City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of , 20_ SIGNED: City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: , as STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20_, by I of City of Monticello, a Minnesota municipal corporation, under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Notary Public, County, Minnesota Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires Dallas Westerlund do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this Plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of Dallas Westerlund, Licensed Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 53797 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF , 20 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Westerlund, a Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires Notary Printed Name , 20_, by Dallas N88°47'26"E 374.81 — — _ —•� — — — N88°47'26"E 360.00 — — — — - N LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 J OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 33 33 I n A I t 1 A/ /1 /1 f1 I VV UULJ I� I - Fp. LS 41886 co M I co M I 0i N co I IN w I L� J of W o to I > M I p cn N o I - FD. IRpN PIPE NCD C:) 05N OF PROPERTY CORNER z i III - FD. LS 15253 i (CO 0 l i 0.4'N OF PROPERTY CORNER I I X__ IKIr-\I I^T�)I A I \01I I' I I I \1 U I I\ 1/-\ L_ N89°59'3?"E 100.00 N LINE OF THE NORTH - I 300.79 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 w OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARKI FD. LS 41886 0.3'S OF PROPERTY CORNER I N LINE OF THE SOUTH -1 ` _ _ _ C Ti o °'• FD. LS 41886 _ _ _ _ _ HALF OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 ^ I rte/ �0.6' N OF PROPERTY CORNER I — L OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK21 co I I N88047'26"E 281.96 � I - -- N88042'28"E 360.00 j:� A ----- C, ^'.00�------- --- �- ^' - -- -NO 2230"W� &�"T 12 S: ——�_ .�—�r__1 \ DRAINAGE I C� 12� N8 °59WtE - N00°00'30"W ------ I I ____ - — -1 43 \ UTILITY EASEMENT w z I I �� \ '�I /�/�I< �I 2.10 j I \ \ L�L_L/vr\ I- FD. IRON PIPE z _ \ \ I _ � 0.6' NW OF PROPERTY CORNER CR Of W I 11 Y LOT 2 \ \� Co SW CORNER OF THE N. 300.79 FEET o OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1. J ail v Q I \ = - APPROXIMATE GAS LINE EASEMENT N LO CD 50 I 061 I O a ti \ \ PER DOC. NO. 222536, AMENDED I w C) I LOT 1 Z) NI I °° N �� A L) It \ PER DOC. NO. 275301 F „ = oF- W nl\(\ \ \\ wz I o TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT N I LU N C Q 2 I N \ OM I PER DOC. NO. 226691, til I LL z I N \ \ 3� \ z U PARTIAL RELEASE OF EASEMENT NI w o N \ 3� \ W I O l UjOPER DOC. NO. 556631 zl o U)� Ujz zw BLOCK1o QU Q \ o}I cn \\ \ I \ \ Z ZDRAINAGE &UTILITY - I O \ \ I C o } I EASEMENT S. LINE OF BLOCK 1 - \ \ pp I I 6 �I OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK 33 33 /-6I \ \ 112 � I - UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 275353 I DRAINAGE & UTILITY 12 258 15 I L — = I ,� — — EASEMENT 36_0.\00= i—ice--- % N88°37'30 "E 705.04 \ � ,44.85•'' � \ \ N \ o ,155.73 00 i--ur_-� -C-A n n \\ \ \ 30'01" v� �1.._L....L_/1 RVP1L.J \ \ A I t I A /-\ r -\I IN I r1 I I^ T L) I A I \\ ~ A I\ r L \J v v r-\ r\ V V \J �/ LJ 1 1 v " I I\ 1 n L_ \ \ NI t /� \ L�L_u.�r\ \ \ 1 I I \ \ I\ \ I I I \ \ I I I \ \ I I I I \\ \ \\ LL \ \ N DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 53797. 0 DENOTES FOUND 1/2 INCH OPEN IRON PIPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK 1, OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A Graphic Scale (in feet) BEARING OF N88°37'30"E. 0 80 160 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION, MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Be it known that at a meeting held on this day of , 20_, the Planning Commission of the City of Monticello, Minnesota, did hereby review and approve this plat of OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FOURTH ADDITION City Council, City of Monticello, Minnesota By: Chairperson By: CITY COUNCIL, MONTICELLO, MINNESOTA Secretary This plat of OAKWOOD INDUSTRIAL PARK FOURTH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Monticello, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20_, and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. City Council, City of Monticello, Minnesota By: Mayor By: COUNTY SURVEYOR, Wright County, Minnesota Clerk I hereby certify that in accordance with the Minnesota Statues, 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of 20_ By: Wright County Surveyor COUNTY AUDITOR, Wright County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes on the land hereinbefore described on the plat and transfer entered this day of , 20_ By: By: Wright County Auditor Deputy COUNTY TREASURER, Wright County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable for the year 20 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid this day of , 20_ By: By: Wright County Treasurer Deputy COUNTY RECORDER, Wright County, Minnesota I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the office of the County Recorder for record on this day of , 20_, at o'clock M. and was duly recorded in Cabinet No. Sleeve as Document No. By: Wright County Recorder WSB SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS IIL ------------ II BITUMINOUS I >< II I BITUMINOUS I I L----------- — -- -- X II U X X X ---LI --- — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — X — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — >< OF 5„ 111 05 X 443.94' G 7" — X- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - X x X — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ �— 1 I -1 \ I I— - ------_______ ICONC BITUMINOUS -- ------------------------------------- -J E ------------------------------------J--C ]r -------------- -------- ----- REMOVE — REMOVE ALL PARKING L( STRIPING BY GRINDIf I I I F -1I u n ti Cels IN II 04" 0 6 x 08 0 5" 6 0 8" 07" X-- — —X — — X — /ALLEY GUTTER OF 04" X -�.�J" 0 5" 7 NOTES: 1. ZONING ON SITE IS B-4. 2. APPROXIMATE SIZE IS 444'X 300' 3. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE IS 3.0. REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT fV 12FIT" BITUMINO L------------------------� j ----- AC C AC I ^ \ \\ I I \ L --_J I I I SAWCUT FULL DEPTH I \\ \ ____ ---- ------ RIM: 961.27 I c ---�--------E , c------ -- C C r �" r. _ c --s---=---------- c C - c\ C Tc c- CC — C c - INV: BOT 958.17 ----------------- ^ - C C = CC C C C c C \ cC C C - F _ —�- ------ ------------ ---I--- C C C m— \— C _� C — C _ E C — F r J _F— --- — — — — I 1 ELEV: 967.80 ------------------------------------------ C —� — — C — C c — — — — F F _ E - --- v C C C -- CC CC �CI C —T— CC int. CfVIP 1=959.32 C C C C C C — C C — C C F F F %— r- F F E E F G E F CF F C E C C C C"- >> - C c� �i. nr� �. L � — F F F F F F E F E E_ C L 1 F F F- C C C C C ^ C C C C C C I— ` TI` C F F F F E E E E E m C C C r C_ _ C— C C— C---- r ( E E E F E F E F E E E E E E F F F F F F F F F F \\ F F F F F --F ---- G---G-- _� C — C . — C—--f-C---F�-- F — E E E F F F F \ G G L E-�f-- — E_TEE � F F F F F�\r F E E E E E F F F f F F r— E F E F E F FG F G F G F G F G —F VG G--- G--� G \ G G G G GG�G G—�'Si==S'==—Ci—=--- --- � --1�— \ m RIM: 958.47 —G G G G ------------------ _ ___-- — \ RIM: 958.94— — — — — — — — — — _ _ = _ _ _::_---�sRIM: 960.21\ IN 954.68INV: BOT 953.55I I I — RIM: 962.40 RIM: 961.13 INV: BOT 955.58 V INV: BOT 957.58 INV: BOT 956.16 I I v I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I --� REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER — \\ \\ \\ m BITUMINOUS 1 RIM: 961.62 \ BITUMINOUS (PROTECT EXISTING BITUMINOUS) \\ c, \ > > > > > I INV: E 937.62 �— > > INV: W 937.62 > \ > > > > V > > — > > \ \\m UNDE BIT > > _______----------�- — > > _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — \ > — — > - - / - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ \ XrG1 \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — \ /per — — — — — — — — \ m — I I—— I — I \ �� I 1=960.79 E— — E E E E E �� \ E E Imo\ E E E E E C E C C A I n — E— — E E — E E E E E E C 1=9k5.�3J«-�C » I 1-954C80 C C C C _ — — — — E I ------- — ------------------------ ---- - — E -- !: C :�E_� E E E E C C C C C C — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C— — — — C — — — — — — — c m E E E E E \ �Q Rrp1=960.7 E r ( C �Co oi% C C--- C---- C---- C ----C C \. /7 I I \ I \ OCIVIL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN 111=25'.O" m U O O M z(n M V M �o� O y z Us'T N 2 J � d m Y Lu 'o 6 0 17 { Z L0 O C WfI z=0.� d �n 2i FA M kJIO �o LU Lo Lo Lrr�� � z 0 � � o � m 'o) aom Z L0 d N z Q z � OZ J LLI 0 mei Z O E N C � T N o -o iv a m m w U = � O V CV m O m N 0 N - 3; 0LO m l0 E t ` m Q Ln o IL W U� O Q c y 20 W 11YLo x J 0U w E C o s > O C:)o x N x _ N M O � N C _A C 0 0 rT ami C) @ Z a c E m C m a> a) a� m z � OZ J LLI 0 mei Z 0 a CV 0 'Co W 0LO _ Q IL W U� O 0—J W J J W J 0U W C:)o V � 0 M U .O O This document is by Brunton Architects & z Engineers and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O Brunton Architects & Engineers personnel only. Any disclosure or distribution of this Immi document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of F= Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REVISION: F LA zNo.: 18410-1 Date: 11-12-2018 ODrawn: Checked: VProject Manager: MHA Project Status: PROGRESS SET Sheet Title: 0 CIVIL EXISTING LJL CONDITIONS AND F REMOVALS PLAN OSheet No.: z CO -01 3" BITUMINOUS TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) ��:Ie\��e\►I1ZK01L 1VAT Qrl*:/��IIJIL[eVAT eIel 538FILINNITA a BITUMINOUS TRAIL SECTION NOT TO SCALE 2" BITUMINOUS TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE (SPWEA240B) 2" BITUMINOUS TYPE SP 12.5 NON -WEARING COURSE (SPNWB230B) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 8" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (2531) 8" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE 5" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (2531) 6" AGGREGATE BASE, CL 5 (2211) (INCIDENTAL) SUBGRADE PREPARATION (2112) (INCIDENTAL) CONCRETE WALK NOT TO SCALE f► TYP 4" THICK CONCRETE PAD r-, ADAPTER WITH 4 EA #4� THREADED CAP 18" REBARS f 611 `)G 45° BEND \ FLOW WYE OR SADDLE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT NOT TO SCALE PIPE MATERIAL---,,,. AS SPECIFIED GRANULAR BEDDING AND ENCASEMENT MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED TRACER WIRE AS SPECIFIED, TAPE TO PIPE AT 5' INTERVAL, PLACE WIRE BELOW SPRING LINE COMPACTED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED OD+24" r_ 12"(MIN) OD 611 NON -RIGID SANITARY SEWER TRENCH NOT TO SCALE 4" 7" 1211 1/2" R (TYP) 00 rnr `n= Ln, 1 _ N c -I e e A r SLOPE 1.5:1J SLOPE 0.75" PER FT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL DESIGN S512 NOT TO SCALE 3" R SLOPE 0.75 PER FOOT 0.511 R 6" 0.5" R < e Q P A a r A% ° ° CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B612 NOT TO SCALE 3'-10" 31-011 511 — S CATCH BASIN PLAN IJ II MIN 3 MAX 6 ADJUSTING X RINGS < 0 GROUT INVERT %n SECTION �o m 41-611 BASE SLAB PLAN NOTES: 1. CASTING PER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 2. PIPE CUT-OUTS PER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 3. ALTERNATE CAST -IN-PLACE BASE CAN BE USED 4. MIN REINFORCING SHALL BE WIRE FABRIC HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.12 SQ IN PER FOOT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE DESIGN R-1 (2'x3') NOT TO SCALE MIN 3 CASTING AS SPECIFIED— MAX 6 CONCRETE ADJUSTING GRADE--iRINGS WITH NON -SHRINK t, GROUT AND PLASTERED 1/2" THICK INSIDE AND OUT Ir I PLACE BITUMINOUS MASTIC e BETWEEN SECTIONS SIZE AS SPECIFIED BRICK AND MORTAR r_ STEPS AS SPECIFIED LU afQ STORM SEWER PIPE GROUT INVERT PRECAST CONCRETE BASE (PER MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4011) TYPICAL DESIGN 4020 MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN NOTES: 1. AASHTO HS 25 LOADING MAX FILL HEIGHT 15' 2. THE # 4020 SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED ON THE TOP COVER 3. EQUIVALENT STEEL AREAS IN WIRE MESH MAY BE USED 4. REINFORCEMENT PER SPEC 3301, GRADE 60 A SINGLE HOOP OF 8ga STEEL WIRE BACKFILL WITH SELECTED MATERIAL FROM EXCAVATION COMPACTED BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED RC PIPE B, / � 12" (MIN) CLASS AS SPECIFIED DIA SHAPE BOTTOM TC MATCH PIPE OD, yj, �c �\ �\��� 0.15 Bc PROVIDE BELL HOLE AT EACH JOINT (IF B REQUIRED) PIPE DIA B 36" OR LESS Bc + 24" 42" TO 54" 1.5 x Bc 60" OR OVER Bc + 36" RC PIPE CLASS "C" BEDDING NOT TO SCALE h A I i DESIGNATION: DESIGN DIAMETER - STANDARD PLATE # DESIGN 48-4020 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE DESIGN 4020 NOT TO SCALE PLAN OF COVER TOP BARS NOT SHOWN COVER DIA REINFORCING AND EXTRA BARS (PER MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020) 2" MIN PLUG DIAMETER �n w J OPTIONAL HANDLING DEVICE U e• ° u ° REINFORCING e (PER MnDOT (SEE MnDOT STANDARD PLATE 4020) w STANDARD MANHOLE DIA � PLATE 4020) � c U SECTION A -A U o 0 M 0 z ) M V M J a�O �Y 4% C 2 LU o 0 ° Z`no aL-0 M 0 0 W`O z �; a 00 N 00 0 N N BITUMINOUS / I I 1 1 1 II \\ BITUMINOUSLi x tc _ ---- -- -_� 963'-----------------( ------------- --- �� I r- I X --------- 08 I , 962 -✓ 0 5" 0 7" 05" 6 0 8" �� ��_ co 04" / ------------------------------------------------------------- x. �X X x X- ��- - X- ' -- 961 960 woo .9101 - (MH -2) ---- BITUMINOUS R=960.63 �------------------ ------------- =957 ` I ^\/ � (MH 9 )�4-1-52SW I I II r- 959 - 961 __ _ �\\ i ���_ ( 1=954.83 15" S �� / I � III 961.26 L� 96 961-52 Ln I W \ 1 `IV -- __-- 00 � 961.52 � �/ 962 - '6' � 60 V ---_ - 1.69 tib/ - 6 \ `/ s \° fie • d . e ° < ° ° 960.5 \=960.51 I I 0 I II li I BITI 9 \ L e < _ d ° < ° ` • .I ° ° I 962.50 \\ 962.0 \ 1=95\63 15" N I d 962.4 / \I 1=957.05 15" NE ° d < < \e ° ° d I - I-954.3 15" S I/I ° •d dr �� V1,• r`� 1=956.95 15" S d a d <d d ° e/ \ • < a c d < d < d �\ P ea )r • I \\ 962.00 \ \ \ I I a ry. � m r,, age x I\ rn rn I I \ �a� �6, \ o o. I �� o as rn I I I /° 961.77 / I \ � I I /PROPOSED 2.10 \ 1 I X �,5� / \ \ , \ 1.41 % - /_ I \ \ \ \ T FFE - 963.20 i rn 10.76 Ln,\ III ✓ I / / / I • '� `••• \ \ \ X 961.65 \ \ 961.98 \ / ► / ss ,� MH -7 •d d°` I" am4A Lf) \ y^�e9 I R=962.68 <�-- d 4 4• °--/- d rn \ I \ I s� -----� 1=956.60 15" N / e' •a .• d` � a • 1=956.50 15" SE ° \. \ .. I. (. \ ° ° _= O1 d d ° d -\ "\ d o d � 6c0 - Jam^ R=958.99 1 di • e e e d \ ° \ / Qi Qi �Y .I •>>. •��= - - /� \ \ \ 1S„ 1=953.84 15�IIW 962.90 41, �- \ \ \\ ( `flsd, / _\ \ 1.50 9602 - - - - M H RCp \1=:953.74 15 S 4" ----- 963 -- -- -- _� ------ - �� \ -I \ 9\S9 --- \ R=359.52- -- 958 C - /-1�62.�9 _ --------- �---------- --- --'� \ - - --\--- --1=95'4.08 15"N ___❑ ___ ---- RIM:961.2�"1 - _ / '( X6.3 -" N_ ------- - T- C - /_'� _ / _ \��t- -- - - --_ _ - -- - --------( __L, Nl 2 958117 \} -------I �i= S�T.�� - - -- --- C - - -=---- _ -- ----- - _ �- - - C C -�- --�--� -- � � - - - --. �� _ N - C-���. �� �-'r- = r r _� -1 / c c _ -•c �s---- r c c _,-c .✓-\-� -- C c \ c�� c. - i - \ / ' \ c -T- C -170 P 1=95 32 - / _ c c c c C - -� G C ---- -- C C r c C - f -C C---_ � - - -TT--- --- e-- _ C - - C 1 - � » T c - - - I _ - - r FJ- - -� - - - -� t _ i r -t F - F- F . F F F - r - r F F F F - - - - - -� f- --- T` -t- F -� E - 'Q' E L c---/ t I F l E FC E E E E E E \ �E - - E E E E E --�--- ---� E E E , E E F G F G F F G F GI F F G F F -F - �`, IF F F F F ---f --fl \ F -F �F ` F F- �- �J _)_ F F- 'F --F -- F--- F -- _ :3 i _ _ _ ---------- -----� --/ \ \� -�E�C G G ----- -a \ 1 - - _� �/ G G - G - ---- _� G G _ -L- r r --- --- -- - -- c --� --------- - - =-[=J \ �� a= =� 961.21 �� -- ® ��.�---- --- RIM: 958.94 �' \ 8.47 - RIM: 962.40 4IM: 961.13 \ \ INV: BOT 954.68\ �, \ INV: BO 53.55 \ \ INV: BOT 956.16 \ INV: BOT 955.58 \ �' \ \ V \ INV: BOT 957.58 � RIM: 961.62 �\ \ \ \ -9s INLET PROTECTION l INV: E 937.62 > BITUMINOUS - \\ \ \\ m (TYP.) BITUMINOUS 3 / INV: W 937.62 - 960 96 \ ___- / ( ' \ y ` \ \UNDE BIT I \ / \m _ ' -\-- ---------7�------ �----------------- ---------------------------- ----�- �\/'_ /"�/ - - _ - ----------- \ - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- / - - - - - - - - - - / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ / - - - - - - - - - L ✓✓ r\ -----;Z- - - - - - - _ - _ - - - _ C _ I E E E E E E _ _ E - -E - - E �--� E E - - - E_ - - J� E E \\ E E �- E �- -� E \ ' \ N, %>E �/ E _ E E -E E t ---- - ��--- » » 19 8b \ - -�- _ 1=9. 5. 3 ��T.Q2 / 18' RCP 1=9CxQ7 ----_------ --- \ - ----- ------ ----- c c z--- c--- J c_ c___ _c_ c --e- --s-- c c�_c c c c c c 5 c P c 1 c \ c c .� - --------- �- \ I ^`L ��- - j ❑ \\\\ / `- \\\ >9c / \�-- RI :197.8 \ \ -- ---- \. INV: N 9417.30^ -�/ X X \ X// X X X X -X- \ INV: S�.947-40- - - A947.40 Iy9° I INV: W 947.40 A I\ \ OCIVIL GRADING PLAN 1" = 25'-0" NOTES: 1. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE COMPLETED IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINISH GRADING IS COMPLETED. 2. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AT ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. MNDOT SEED MIX 25-131 SHALL BE USED. 4. PROVIDE ADA COMPLIANT CURB CUTS AND T TAPER TO FULL HEIGHT CURB WHERE TRAIL MEETS DRIVE. MAXIMUM OF 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1.8% CROSS SLOPE. 2LJ 0 LUo 0 M :? rn M M z yrn�Z oo co WQ M NC r Woo 2�lJ Z ao c T M 0 III CD 0 W LO �Z a)� o Cn C) ztoCC) t �(LC.4z° Q O T 'O- C This document is by Brunton Architects & O O confidential information intended for use by a � 3runton Architects & Engineers personnel only. w�E0 Fy document or information contained herein, O Q NH ID without prior written consent of N N NZZN eL C fD m o L y 0 @LC) o Y N n a�x Q Ln 1LJL W C/) 9� x m. �g W x Z5 x J = VProject W vC) C:)o !E � w 7 > U a d0 CD O Z 4, CL L - U) NZ; U Z This document is by Brunton Architects & O O confidential information intended for use by O 3runton Architects & Engineers personnel only. a Fy document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of N Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. D M W 0 `o LOf Q 1LJL W C/) 0 OJ W J J W J = VProject W vC) C:)o V � O d a Z This document is by Brunton Architects & Engineers and contains privileged and O confidential information intended for use by O 3runton Architects & Engineers personnel only. Any disclosure or distribution of this Fy document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �, REVISION: V) ZNo.: Date: 18410-1 11.12-2018 ODrawn: Checked: VProject Manager: MHA Sheet Title: � CONTROL PLAN 0 Sheet No z C3-01 Project Status: pROGRESS SET O CIVIL GRADING LL AND EROSION Sheet Title: � CONTROL PLAN 0 Sheet No z C3-01 a N 00 0 N N — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — `� n —--------------------------------------------------------�— I L– � X — 05" 05" 05' ------------- _ ___ __ _ _ x_ �— 99"9 ✓IINOUS `� \ BITUMINOUS -------------------------------------------------------- (MH-2) ------------------------------------------------------- \ \ (MH - 2) — i T 04" G 8„ 7" 5" 6 0 8„ 07" —X — x (MH -9) Y 4 V h \ \ \ Id 4e ° V ° A. ° MH -3 Q e \ \ I BITUMINOUS L` ° Q ° \ e ° a d ° \ \ \ d° d N e °d ° ° ° ° ° ed° ° ° °°l ° ° Q°° °d A °° d ° ° ° ° ` d I d ° \ \ \ d A °° ° e d 4 ° Q r ° d d a d ° d °°°° e ° °Q \ \ \ I I \ \ \ PROPOSED FIRE STATION ° e d e \ \ r .Q° ° ° da < °d Q Q ° \ I d° ° Q \ \ dQ d \ L --J e ° P d ° ° ° ° e °44 A °° ° e ° d ^ n \ \ ] ° ice° ° ° A d ° d d \ \ JCC' Q 4 I ° d — 4" PV \ \ \ ,a 0 C SANITARY SEWER R \ 1\ \ RIM: 961.27 I C C - 4" 0 05" 04" X 2 1" x 05" 761 3" 1 4" 8 '-i 12HT" IH -4 1S„ RCP 4° *4" 4" 4" CMH - 5) I � „ 4„ 4 4 —� — --- r ----j f --- �,------ C ----C ----C --- C — C INV: BOT 958.17 .------------- �— ------------------- ----- -- - - ------ -- --- ---- --- — -- --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - C - t - - - - - - - I- - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ c C�^ —�� y � — C C CC C C , C C —�- C f C- C I I yC C C\ 11 v f — C `_ C C C C C C C C C Cr I C —Tgl' COMP /I 1=95 .32 U �^ �— C C _ C C C T C C _ C C — — C ^ C C — C C — C`" C — L �- yl C • - C C =f C — — r C - — f —C — C C — — — — E. - - C - — - -� C C �_-- �j� '� F F F F F F F- r r F F F F r\\ y F ,q=� G� E F E E E E F----1==------ -- F--, F i r E E E `— II' !1 ` F —F— —` —--=� F — E E E E EE E E S E E \ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F r F F F �' F F CF \ F C F F F- F I --F_-- F--- F--- F F F F rKUNJSED 6" DUCTILE 4ON W SCR4'ICC —� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ G G G LU G G G G �G` G -- Gr. G G G G G ® FIELD VERIFY LOCATION \ RIM: 958.94 \ \ M RIM: 958.47 RIM: 957.93 RIM: 960.21 \ INV: BOT 954.68\ \ INV: BOT 953.55 INV: BOT 953.00 RIM: 962.40 RIM: 961.13 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVICE STUB � INV: BOT 956.16 INV: BOT 955.58 I I I I I I I I I I I I— v INV: BOT 957.58 \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I \\ I D 4 \ \ RIM: 961.62 I \ FIELD VER Y LOC � INV: W 937..62 TION \ m BITUMINOUS INV: E 9372 BITUMINOUS \ CONNECT'F�O EXIST4NG SAI4I,TA1Y SERVICE STUB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-->—�> > > > \\ > > > > > > > > > >- > > > > > > > > > \\ \M UNDE BIT — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---------� ��------------------- - — — — — — — — \A / 1=960.79 - \ ✓( m — — -� \� 1 —AI— E E\ x. f :iE�� E E E Ems/ E E E E E E E E E F E E E E E E € E 1 \ E E E E E E E E E G—\\ T E E E \ D_ 1=961.02 18" RCP 1=960.7 ` C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C �5'�3�—�C P19C8C C C C C C C C °�� C C— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C m — — \ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — C J/ / C �• - ��- — F F--------- \ -7 ti _�----F --- F -f Chi 1----- ----> C/ I I \FE] I INV: N" 917.30^ X \ X \\ X X X X X X X X C I INV: S\947.40 �' \ / I A INV: W 947.40 I \ OCIVIL SITE UTILITY PLAN 1" = 25'.0" 0 2 < LUC) a z Cl) rn M V M Z �z J�0Z> dW M c W o (D 1 Z`oo c �fGfJl ?_�.� r)M 0 0 W m Z) rnL') > � Q o 0-m O � m c Qr iT� z aLo N Z d sa a> U d zThis O C T N and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O a Any disclosure or distribution of this w 0 C14 M W E O Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 6 N N IL WO C/) N _N L N J W C Q C m O Date: 6 YN v� co r O C N V J � )( CeSheet Project Status: PROGRESS SET Title: RN .O s C' CIVIL y x , o M = Baa m N (6 N C > U O C) °_> m -co- O Z CL a) m iv m — U 0) 0E 0 z Y OZ J UJI: 0 mei z U d zThis O and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O a Any disclosure or distribution of this Imml 0 C14 M W o� Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED IL WO C/) OJ J W J W J = Date: W v� co r ODrawn: V VProject � CeSheet Project Status: PROGRESS SET Title: O CIVIL O SITE UTILITY M Fm rAN 0 C4-01 11 U d zThis 0- document is by Brunton Architects & Engineers and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O Brunton Architects & Engineers personnel only. Any disclosure or distribution of this Imml document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of FM Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REVISION: ZNo.: Date: 18410-1 11-12-2018 ODrawn: Checked: VProject Manager: MHA CeSheet Project Status: PROGRESS SET Title: O CIVIL LL SITE UTILITY Fm rAN 0 C4-01 11 a N 0 0 N N ii --------------i I I l L— I I I I I II I II I I I I I II a II I I Ix I I I I II I i it x ---------------I II X x x X ---------— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1�----X — - ------------------- --------------- -------- I Ix x I X -- ----- —------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ —_�—--x----x—�� -—--—fix----47— - ------------- — ry I EXISTING LOT LINE (TYP:)�� \\ I I TRANSFORMER LOCATION I 0 _ _ -- L - - — ------------------- —-------------------- -- -- -------------------------------� \ \\ I PROPOSED LOT LINE — — — — — — TRASH ENCLOSURE LOCATION \S512 CONCRE 9 \\ \ AREA TO ALL( REMOVAL Q ___— __===x-17 I I I -J --------------------- --L-L-------------!---�!� I 9t GPS I I I - o •Y ° d • • d • d • • • ° • • ° •" \ A • • • • • ° • • d • • • d \ • °•. • • • ° • d ° • ° • ° \ I I 1� �I I �� II I I I Ix- x X0 r-') ri) x I( JRB AND GUTTER DR SNOW 2W Q WC) 0z Cl) rn M V M Lr) z�� �z J � g z - W C6 Q M N C Wo00 ZL0a� �aLr)� M 0 0 W z �;2i r` Q o 6� oIx I--�-� z Lo CL oa M o t6 N d - 3 N L o m o Y L N d C N J x x �aN N 6 N J C) Z U U) ot� 0 z M�d 0z 1- UJ J OE maw d 4 , J� " \/ \ ° • d • d d ° • • • • id " • e e \ \K O PROPOSED FIRE STATION \ I U �L1�111J 17' 20'-6-[-*-- 24' --"—� 20' -► I \ M I \ \ I W OU-) M I I \ \ DJ A W Z \ I � � \ PROVIDE KNOCK DOWN CURB Q ` I '-'-' o ` \ TO ALLOW FOR ANTIQUE FIRE TRUCK U� I d • • • • ♦ d ° ♦ \ \ \ \ 1 ° ° • d • ° • • • • d O J u J = I I • d L --.J d ° \ L . . 7 • A a d d d • \\ \ W O " I 6CONCRETE DRIVE FOR TRUCK ACCESS` \ \ 1 I-------\----- w \�- _--------------------------------------------------------- --------- - ------------------------------- -------- ---- --- - ----------------------- ----- ------------ - V J - U \ d — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — This document is by Brunton Architects & — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — \ Engineers and contains privileged and ��--1----------------------------------------------- � 0 confidennchlte — _-- Brunton ed for use b \ tial information intend \�� \ — — — — — \ — - — y Architects &Engineers personnel only. \ \ \ Any disclosure or distribution of th' \ ��---- 1-1 -----------------------\ OCIVIL SITE PLAN 1" = 25'.0" ---------- ------------------------------- L� is \ \ bn4 document or information contained herein, \ \ \ without prior written consent of \ \ \ Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. \ \ \ ©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED DEPRESSED CURB CA. ROW tYP.) \ \ \ \ D�`PRESSED CURB � �, REVISION: — — — — — — — — — — ----------------------------------.� \\—\------------- ------------------------------------------------�� \ /�—----------- zNo.: 18410-1 Date: 11-12-2018 \A --------------------- O Drawn: Checked: VProject Manager: MHA Project Status: PROGRESS SET CeSheet Title: O CIVIL LL SITE PLAN FM OSheet No.: z C5-01 M 13- 00 00 v N 0 N u I x IX ------------------ LJ X X1 X PARKING LOT STRIPING (TYP.) X \ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 \\\ x-- — —X— —X X- - \— -X — — - ------------------------------------------------ ---- - — —— \\ ----------------------------------------------- EXISTING LOT LINE (TYP.)\\\ \\ I \ x C ul C) 0 C 0 0 u �I____ -------------------------------------------------------- OCIVIL SURFACING PLAN 111=25'.O" BITUMINOUS TRAIL —/ EX. ROWTYP. ( ) N] z � OZ J LLI 0 mei P1 Z O E m c T N o4- a U m w = C U 0 m N °� 0 'Co W oL0 EL—am Q mLn o Li � o Q c y 20 W 11Y U-) x J = c)2 v w c o s > O �o x N x _ N M O � N c r N Q O) C O 0 rT ami C) @ Z a c ID c a) a> a� m ) z � OZ J LLI 0 mei P1 Z O a � C Cl) C/ 0 'Co W oL0 _ Q Li � o 0_J W J W J = c)2 W �o V � Z O U N O d zThis document is by Brunton Architects & Engineers and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O Brunton Architects & Engineers personnel only. Any disclosure or distribution of this Immi document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of F= Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. V© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REVISION: F LA zNo.: 18410-1 Date: 11-12-2018 ODrawn: Checked: --------------------- V Project Manager: MHA Project Status: PROGRESS SET Sheet Title: 0 CIVIL LCL SURFACING �=m PLAN OSheet No.: z C6=01 UPPER RTU WITH ROOF TOP SCRI \ \ LOWER RTU i `1P,', `u" F I� ':: FIJ .. I� �I ll a \ \ UPPER &LOWER PARAPETS __ - "•' - — Jai a _ _ _ _ n L �� + +'any \ NORTH PARKING D it \ SOUTH LOT CURB a � SIDEWALK ' I NORTH CHELStA KUAU PROPERTY LINE (APPROX. ELEV. 960.0) �, SITE SECTION A - NORTH / SOUTH LOOKING EAST 1/16" =1'-0" ---------------------- I -------------- w 0 ry n 75Q 0 - 2 T1-21 SOCCER FACILITY SNOW EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO \\ STACKING AREA BE REPLACED, REFER TO \ CIVIL & ELECTRICAL \ - — — — — — - - ------ BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURES, REFER TO ELECTRICAL TOP OF PRECAST 128'-0" PREFERRED \ \ TRANSFORMER LOCATION \ TRASH ENCLOSURE SECOND FLOOR 114'-0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" V1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS FOR: CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN (ZONING DISTRICT B-1) BUILDING USE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED OFFICE 3.0 SPACES PLUS (1) FOR EACH (300) SF OF FLOOR AREA INDOOR STORAGE / 5000:5 10,000 = 1.0 SPACES PER 750 SF OF FLOOR AREA VEHICLE REPAIR GROUP RESIDENTIAL 2.0 SPACES FOR EACH (3) PERSONS FOR WHOM SLEEPING (FUTURE SECOND LEVEL) ACCOMMODATIONS ARE PROVIDED STALL SIZE REQUIREMENTS: 7 REQUIRED: 9'-0" x 20'-0" PROVIDED: 9'-0" x 20'-0" NUMBER OF STALLS REQUIRED: 7, GROSS BUILDING AREA V1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS FOR: CITY OF MONTICELLO, MN (ZONING DISTRICT B-1) BUILDING USE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED OFFICE 3.0 SPACES PLUS (1) FOR EACH (300) SF OF FLOOR AREA INDOOR STORAGE / 5000:5 10,000 = 1.0 SPACES PER 750 SF OF FLOOR AREA VEHICLE REPAIR GROUP RESIDENTIAL 2.0 SPACES FOR EACH (3) PERSONS FOR WHOM SLEEPING (FUTURE SECOND LEVEL) ACCOMMODATIONS ARE PROVIDED STALL SIZE REQUIREMENTS: CV REQUIRED: 9'-0" x 20'-0" PROVIDED: 9'-0" x 20'-0" NUMBER OF STALLS REQUIRED: W GROSS BUILDING AREA STALL FACTOR NUMBER OF (TOTAL AREA) REQUIRED STALLS 10,337 SF (OFFICE) 3 + (10,337 / 300) 38 9,711 SF (APPARATUS BAYS) 9,711/750 13 2,953 SF (2) FOR EACH (3) 6 (UNFINISHED, FUTURE SECOND LEVEL) J TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED: 57 (57 REQUIRED) ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS 49 REQUIREMENTS PER 2015 MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, TABLE 1106.1 TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED 51 to 75 (3) INCLUDING (1) VAN -ACCESSIBLE SPACE SECTION 1106.5 -VAN SPACES. FOR EVERY SIX OR FRACTION OF SIX ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, AT LEAST ONE SHALL BE A VAN -ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE. DEPRESSED CURB FOR SNOW STACKING \ \ \ � __/// DEPRESSED CURB FOR \I A� AC GAS METER LOCATION®o 009'-0" WIDE HISTORIC - ®- — - \\ \ VEHICLE DRIVEWAY _� —----------------—---------------�-- \— --� -- — — — I - — — — — — I I\ — — — — \ \ \\ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---_____----_-----_-----__---- --�=� --- ��_-------- --- --_-- \ \ \ �__-____ \ CONNECTION TO \ EXISTING SIDEWALK \ \ o CHELSEA ROAD \ \ I \ \ (1) VAN + (2) CAR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES WITH 8'-0" AISLES ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN v 1„ = 30'-0„ co V CDN N PLAN NORTH 9 2 01] rr LU ¢ Irl o U) 7 M L M V U z- Z Z aM J�p� I`I a�iY LLJ� � W O C� 2 r K LOo c I,(f 2d2 M o 0 (0 L0 LUC.0 z z Ixrn p0o mY � M � eo zm0°� a2NO LL �ac,z o T U C (6 E O U as N C a� n E C: 4:- a) R 20o 0 ca a- W m MN Q m Q X s Ncc >N CU oa) R aF, `o ? o U �Q r�CL � 3 ¢ a r v Z ao m ai a`� a a) Z O Q CV M W Q oLo — Q C/) 0 0_j W J J W J = W vc) �o V 2 — F_ Z O M L This document is by Brunton Architects & gineers and contains privileged and nfidential information intended for use by Architects & Engineers personnel only. 3ment y disclosure or distribution of this or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Pru:non Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �EVISION: D A 8410-1 Date: 12-05-2018 1 Checked: 0 Manager: MHA Ut Status: PROGRESS SET ftitle: 'ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN & SECTION 1=21 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS:2 CDw MAI �,� CITY OF MONTICELLO ZONING ORDINANCE TABLE 4-4 LU � ■, r ` "' = P" 14.0 ACI OF CANOPY TREES INCLUDING AT LEAST 2 EVERGREEN TREES PER LO/ y 0 ko CIVIC & INSTITUTIONAL USES ( ) � z - ACRE + AT LEAST 1 SHRUB PER EACH 10 FEET OF A BUILDING PERIMETER o l W a REQUIREMENTS BUILDINGMIN # OF REQUIRED # OF '- .�'- -� ' =-• * � ,- tiLOT SIZE LOT PERIMETER REQUIRED ACI PERIMETER EVERGREENS SHRUBS 2 (�] (FACING RIGHT -OF -WAV) co v _d •T. •fir 3 ACRES 1,476 LF 230 LF 42 6 23 o L° i z LU PROVIDED 01 C6 ° CO ORNIMENTAL EVERGREEN z M _ SHADE TREES TREES TREES ACI # OF SHRUBS Z o m L 9 (@ 2") 2 (@ 1.5") 11 (@ 2,) 43" 23 � � a LO N z - 1. SHADE TREES SHALL HAVE A MIN. TRUNK SIZE OF 2 INCHES (MEASURED 6 ABOVE THE ESTABLISHED GRADE LEVEL. 2. EVERGREENS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM HEIGHT OF 6-0" F—„� " BLACK HILLS SPRUCE � AUTUMN BRILLIANCE � SPRING SNOW CRAB � NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE � ARBORVITAE HOLMSTRUP F NEARLY WILD ROSE 3 ORNAESTABLISHEDMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE A MIN. TRUNK SIZE OF 1.5 INCHES (MEASURED 6" ABOVE THE '" " G 4. WHEN FEWER THAN 20 TREES ARE REQUIRED ON SITE, AT LEAST 2 DIFFERENT SPECIES SHALL BE a) UTILIZED, IN ROUGHLY EQUAL PROPORTIONS. o N CD a U C aS ECU O N ... 3 to 0 20 Cl) C14 CU CID •• - ,r ti - s ca c ti ter. ' y,ri'•►. ' . _ I \ \ \ T 3 U ? o Ja r 2 a) Z I A A a) o 0 m ` co D A (2) \ ° ° L o ---- --- -- ? • v D jr • S 1 Y� _ �(5) \\ \\ \ CARADONNA SAGE JAPANESES RED BARBERRY ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA KARL FOERSTER GRASS \ \ \ 7 ■ /' 0 (3)—\ I A s \ \ _•3�'�. c. 1 a © (5) \\ K (3) V A\ 'DIV\ G ,� \ CO +�\ LO r` �(1) H 2 \ B UU C) LO Q EEI` (3) \\ Cw 0 LLJ L LU SEDUM "AUTUMN JOY" M PARDON ME DAYLILY N WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWER P [ K STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY ] ®' \ (1 \\ J U U \ Ii1 0 PLANT MATERIALS KEY �- _ _ _ _ _ v (3G v v vv V (2)/ ho (8) \ B MAX MAX G J K (3) P (5) \ \\ TYPE QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE HEIGHT SPREAD DESCRIPTION NOTES (6) (5) (3)°Z A 11 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUGA'BLACK HILLS' 6 FT 25-30 FT 10-15 FT EVERGREEN TREE '*.** _ P (5) \C O \ J B 4 AUTUMN BRILLIANCE AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA'AUTUMN 2 CALIPER 20-25 FT 20-25 FT SHADE TREE 0 K G K F(1) M\ (14) (3) © BRILLIANCE' INCHES(5) (8) (4) \ M (1 1 C 2 SPRING SNOW CRAB MALUS "SPRING SNOW" 1.5 CALIPER 25 FT 15 FT ORNAMENTAL TREE( 14) INCHES \ \ \ D 5 NORTHWOOD RED MAPLE ACER RUBRUM'NORTHWOOD' 2 CALIPER 50 FT 40 FT SHADE TREE — — — — — — — - \ — — — — — —1 ff INCHES \ PROPERTY LINE \ \ \ a E 8 ARBORVITAE HOLMSTRUP THUJA OCCIDENTALIS'HOLMSTRUP' 2 FT 5-10 FT 3 FT EVERGREEN SHRUB \\ \\ This document is on Brunton Architects & _ _ — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _\ _ _ gineers and contains privileged and F 4 NEARLY WILD ROSE ROSA'NEARLY WILD' #2 2-3 FT 3-4 FT ROSE SHRUB — — — — — \ \\ — — — — — — — — — — — - nfidential information intended for use by \ \ \ Architects & Engineers personnel only. G 30 CARADONNA SAGE SALVIA X SYLVESTRIS'CARADONNA' #2 30 IN 241N ORNAMENTAL \ \ ny disclosure anon contain of this GRASS \ � \ \\ ment or information contained herein, \ \ \ without prior written consent of \run o H 6 JAPANESES RED BARBERRY BERBERS THUNBERGII #2 4-6 FT 3-4 FT SHRUB n Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. \\ \ \\ J 10 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS #2 4 FT 4 FT SHRUB o CHELSEA ROAD ©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED \ \\ \ O X EVI ALL RI K 24 KARL FOERSTER GRASS CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA #1 2-3 FT 18" ORNAMENTAL \\ \ \ GRASS \ \ L 15 SEDUM "AUTUMN JOY" SEDUM "AUTUMN JOY" #1 241N 24" PERENNIAL M 24 PARDON ME DAYLILY HEM EROCALLIS'PARDON ME' #1 12" 18" PERENNIAL N 10 WHITE SWAN CONEFLOWER ECHINACEA PURPUREA'WHITE SWAN' #1 2 FT 241N PERENNIAL \\ \ \ P 25 STELLA DE ORA DAYLILY HEMEROCALLI S 'STELLA D'ORO' #1 18-24" 12-16" PERENNIAL � — — — � — — — — �\ � — — � — — — — — — — * MIN 2" CALIPER AS MEASURED SIX INCHES ABOVE THE ESTABLISHED GRADE LEVEL. \\ ® \ \\ 18410-1 Date: 12-05-2018 \ \ \ NOTES: ?�, ot Manager: MHA Checked: \ I\ 1. LANDSCAPING CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY/MARK ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. \\ 2. ROUGH GRADING/TOP SOIL MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3". SOD AREAS TO BE GRADED WITHIN 1 1/2" OF FINISH GRADE. PLANTING BEDS TO BE GRADED WITHIN 3" OF FINISH GRADE. \ \\ US'at' PROGRESS SET 3. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS. \ \ 4. ALL PLATING MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH SIZING AND GRADING STANDARDS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK." MUST MEET MINIMUM SIZE INDICATED \ \ IN THE ABOVE SCHEDULE. \ LANDSCAPE 5. SOD SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN BLEND OF IMPROVED KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS FREE OF INSECTS, DISEASE, WEEDS, UNDESIRABLE GRASSES AND EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL. CONTRACTOR TO \ � WATER SOD AT TIME OF INSTALLATION AND ROLL TO A SMOOTH SURFACE. STAKE SOD ALL SLOPES OF GREATER THAN 3:1. 6. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL PLANT STOCK AND SOD UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK BY ARCHITECT OR OWNER. PLAN 'PLAN ` 7. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO REMAIN ALIVE AND HEALTHY FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE BY ARCHITECT OR OWNER NORTH ` AND AGREE TO REPLACE/REMOVE AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL PLANT MATERIAL DETERMINED TO UNSATISFACTORY BY ARCHITECT OR OWNER AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION AND/OR END OF GUARANTEE PERIOD. LANDSCAPING PLAN 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO RE -SOD ANY DISTURBED AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION 11"=30'-O" ti 1=41 a co 2 66 co N N EXTERIOR FINISHES SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST - EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST - SMOOTH (REVEAL) PRECAST -SANDBLASTED PRECAST - VERTICAL RIBBED PREFINISHED MTL. BLACK ALUMINUM STORFRONT BLACK ANODIZED EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES: 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY, REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO BRUNTON ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. 2. SEE OTHER BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR MATERIAL NOT LABELED. CNORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 118" =1'-0" PRECAST APP BAYS 122'-0" CSOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 3 118" =1'-0.1 r4 1 Al -63 :CAST B APP BAYS 122'-0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" TOP OF FOOTING 96'-0" TOP OF PRECAST 128'- 0" LOW ROOF 115'- 0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" TOP OF FOOTING 96'-0" 2 fo Q C) L 0 0 M z � M v f� :M U ��z- Nrn coZ Z J.O� (L Y a wo0 00Lo -6 r z o c lfJ �a2 M C> 0 0 ll rn0,'6'2Z'2 _ r` Q o ,62,OM c� 4J Ix Z Lo 00 t a2N O LL �aNZ `o°2 T E T N co a 0 a U C RS E o U at N Q — O t0 W < o`o Lq t 2 o ca Q� M M N a (U jp to K s N c c W >.C4 Q: = O k co 0 o v� �o U n 75 Z a v a r m Z m C a ro ai Otf 0 Z O a W < o`o Lq Q� 77Q 75 LL (U jp OJ W J J W J = W v� �o V 75 Z O Im U N O a` This document is by Brunton Architects & gineers and contains privileged and nfidential information intended for use by Architects & Engineers personnel only. 3ment y disclosure or distribution of this or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Pru:non Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. ©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �EVISION: A 8410-1 Date: 12-05-2018 Checked: Ot Manager: MHA UtStat' PROGRESS SET IEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS qk2=1 1 EQ EQ r I /I O 3 00 FIRE DEPARTMENT DETAIL - APPARATUS BAY MFD SIGN (SOUTH ELEVATION) 3j 318" = 1'-0" C, DETAIL - CITY OF MONTICELLO FIRE DEPARTMENT LOGO SIGN 4 318" = 1'-0" DETAIL - MAIN ENTRANCE LOGO SIGN 5 318" = 1'-0" /�1'-3" 12" HIGH PREFINISHED ALUM. LETTERS DETAIL - APPARATUS BAY NUMBER SIGN 6 318" = 1'-0" 1'-3" EXTERIOR FINISHES SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST - EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST - SMOOTH (REVEAL) PRECAST -SANDBLASTED PRECAST - VERTICAL RIBBED PREFINISHED MTL. ALUMINUM STORFRONT M L K H G E11 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM LETTERS, FINAL DESIGN T.B.D. LOW ROOF 115'- 0" CEAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8"=11.0.1 TOP OF PRECAST ki 128'- 0" 1 1 2 1 A312 A513 A513 A3-11 CITY OF MONTICELLO FIRE STATION BLACK BLACK ANODIZED D EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES: 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY, REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO BRUNTON ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. 2. SEE OTHER BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR MATERIAL NOT LABELED. C B A O OB O D O o O O OL OM 1 2 1 A3-11 A5-13 A3-12 I I I I I I I I I C2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8"=11.0.1 TOP OF PRECAST 128'-0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" TOP OF FOOTING 96'-0" PRECAST a_APP BAYS 122'-0" LOW ROOF 115' - 0" FIRST FLOOR 100' - 0" TOP OF FOOTING 96'- 0" ! ul 11 W 0 M M V Ir Inj M 4Jz- Nrn �z Z JP'�O2 (L Y a W wo0 o t71 z�a) oc M C> 0 L0 Wz `0 .''2 , Q o I00 OM c� z Lo CO a=N O d N Z T E Eco T N o a m U C R -�Eo U CU n C �ECF R� -22> a� o M MN m o QcMOI X s N c c >N a o x co : 0 o U r � n 3 Q a r v Z a) o ca ai a`� a a) L � Z 0 a W < o`o Lq Q� 77<75 LL (U jp OJ W J J W J = W v� �o V 75 Z O M U N O a` This document is by Brunton Architects & 20 gineers and contains privileged and nfidential information intended for use by 5 Architects & Engineers personnel only. my disclosure or distribution of this ent or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Pr:unon Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. ©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �EVISION: A 8410-1 Date: 12-05-2018 Zi Checked: Ot Manager: MHA UtStat' PROGRESS SET 'WwAdTifl� EXTERIOR IELEVATIONS 2-1 2 a 0 N v co V CDN rn N ® LOW ROOF _115' _0"_ EXTERIOR FINISHES SPECIFICATIONS PRECAST - EXPOSED AGGREGATE PRECAST - SMOOTH (REVEAL) PRECAST - SANDBLASTED PRECAST - VERTICAL RIBBED PREFINISHED MTL. BLACK ALUMINUM STORFRONT BLACK ANODIZED F EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES: 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY, REPORT DISCREPANCIES TO BRUNTON ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS. 2. SEE OTHER BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR MATERIAL NOT LABELED. J J NORT11811=11-0HEAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION (4, 3D VIEW - MAIN ENTRANCE PERSPECTIVE 3 5 Al -63 Al -63 ' 3 _ 4.. A3-22 A3-11 j PARTIAL ENLARGED SOUTHWEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 'OP OF PRECAST AMW 128'- 0" SECOND FLOOR 114'- 0' /3 20 0 `+ PARTIAL ENLARGED SOUTHEAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 2 114" =1'-0" TOP OF PRECAST 128'-0" PRECAST @ APP BAYS 122'-0" SECOND FLOOR 114'-0" FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" TOP OF FOOTING 96'-0" TOP OF PRECAST 128'-0" SECOND FLOOR 114'-0" _FIRST FLOOR 100'-0" 2 01 Q Irl o U) t�] o 7 M L M v f� 'M U -z Z lid aM aiY LLIO C Wb0 r Z LO o c L{J �aL M o 0 IIII11 0 L0 -Z Z Ix.'2 °r' Q o O m 0 0o (0 U im Y o ZLom-r- jjr a 2 N O LL �ac�z o IMP T E T N o co U C � O E O U N to C c i:- a) 2 200 0 as >+ a O m MN � � m O Q C") co X L d c c >N az a) X a m a aa) L U Cn Of r-) Z 0 Q CV C) M W oLo Q G LL C/) 0 OJ W J J W J = W vc) �o V 7�; F_ Z 0 M U a) O a` This document is by Brunton Architects & glneers sand contains privileged and nfidential information intended for use by Architects & Engineers personnel only. 0ny disclosure or distribution of this ment or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Pamon Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. ©ALL RIGHTS RESERVED �EVISION: D A 84101 Date: 12-05-2018 n: Checked: t Manager: MHA Ut Status: PROGRESS SET itle: ft-XTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2-1 3 AC a C%4 0 N N 00 0 N N r Monticello Fire TYP SYMBOL AA Station (188098) LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION LAMP LUMENS Cree Inc OSQ-A-xx-3ME-K-40K-ULxxxxx CONFIGURED FROM OSQ-A-x 18339 Cree OSQ Series Area Luminaire MOUNTING/BALLAST LLF QTY 0.95 5 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 001 001 002 003 004 006 009 013 021 030 027 040 062 079 087 086 079 060 040 033 0,371 030 025 022 020 018 016 014 014 014 015 015 014 013 010 008 006 004 003 002 002 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + �_-+--+__+--I--��_--+ + + + + + + + + + + 001 001 002 003 005 008 012 017 026 031 042 060 097 140 145 146 137 092 062 048 045��,Q 0-36-433-4-30-026-�2 _0,H-0�`.-0-27-Ir-026 024 --TIT 13 009 006 04 003 002 002 001 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 001 002 002 004 006 009 014 023 035 054 058 0.81 123 173 247 �30 069 058 056 057 052 043 034 030 030 033 040 046 043 035 025 018 013 009 006 004 003 002 002 001 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 0 01 0 02 0, 03 0 05 0 07 011 018 0 29 0 50 0.82 0.87 125 1.75 3 55 3 71 AF2 321 1.62 1.33 14 1.05 0.79 0.63 0.53 0.49 0,+50 0,+50 0.48 0.48 0.47 0.44 0,+40 0.38 0.38 0.34 0127 021 015 010 0,+07 0,+05 0,+04 0,+03 0,+02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,100 0,100 0,100 0,100 0,100 0,100 0,100 + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,02 0,03 0,04 0,06 0,09 014 0,23 0,38 0,62 0,99 116 X201 289 404 3.33 368 3.92 285 2,03 1, 4\ 1280 1 95 0,82 0,74 0,69 0,66 0,62 0,70 0,66 0,59 0,59 0,58 0,54 0,48 0,38 0,36 0,34 0,23 016 011 0,07 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,03 0,04 0,06 0,08 012 017 0,27 0,44 0,69 1.14 1.44 1,89 2,24 2,50 2,44 2,50 2,46 2,32 2,06 165 49 131 128 123 117 111 0,96 0,69 0 71 0,97 104 104 0,99 0,00 0,65 0,42 0,30 0,32 0,22 015 010 0,07 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,00 0,00 0,00 + + + + + + + + + + + + t + - + + + + + + UTILITY TRANSFORMER - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O J3 0 J1 0.06 0.09 0.13 0.19 G39 0� 0.76 �u7 ��u _ 1+ -P' 124 2�0 2,71 2,� 2 51 2117 1.01 1�6� 68 191 1�+ 182 134 128 I, 1,6U 1,46 U,96 0,62 0,45 0,36 0,28 0,20 013 0,09 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,00 0,00 C.T. CABINET + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +�� ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,03 0,05 0,07 0,09 013 019 0,26 0,38 0,50 0,68 0,90 110 128 139 139 145 155 160 162 1 A IF 149 137 2 ' -2 E2 209 176 143 145 179 21 -4� - 4; L_184 0,64 0,57 0,38 0,26 017 012 0,08 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,04 0,05 0,06 0,09 011 015 019 0,24 0,29 0,37 0,47 ��58 0, 036 0,82 0,89 0,99 116 138 133 '65 2. 0 4.04 4,0PA4�15 3+84 2.50 2.14 2.15 2+68 4.20 3 10 --�' 3 46 172 1�`5 0 92 0�8��B�i2 0,34 0,23 016 011 0,09 0,07 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + -- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,03 0,04 0,05 0,07 0,09 010 012 014 017 0,20 0,24 0, 0,37 43 0', 56 033 0,95 127 143 9 3.18 4 25 3 58 413 4 45 3 75 3,02 318 3,90 4,50 3 62 3 87 3 89 2 82 11 120 103 0,66 0,45�-9�,l 0,23 017 013 011 010 0,08 0,06 0,05 0,04 0,03 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 0 01 U,f3 0 1 0,05 05 Tub U'u6 0,08 0,09 010 012 0,1 0,18 0, 0 0 0,64 0,88 132 160 2,05 2,38 2,66 2,68 2,88 3 01 3,26 3 21 3,24 3,24 3,04 235 2,63 2,42 219 185 149 1, 0,55 0,40 0S% 024 019 017 015 013 011 0,08 0,06 0,04 0,04 0,03 0,02 0 01 0 01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0�0:� 0,03 0.03 - 3 ��05 0,06 0,07 0,09 0.10 013 0,30 0 41 0,57 0,82 116 160 2,06 2,48 2,72 2,96 311 3,23 3 31 3,30 3,27 3,32 313 3,04 2,87 2,69 2,38 192 146 114 0,80 0,62 0 40 0.3 % 0129 0 25 0,22 019 016 013 0,09 0,07 0,06 0,04 0,03 0,02 0 01 0,02 0,02 0,02 02 TO a u3 U,04 0,05 0,05 0,06 0,08 0 0 018 0,25 0,33 0,44 0,55 0,72 0,96 117 136 150 156 167 178 183 189 187 182 174 162 152 146 132 114 0,92 0,75 0,65 0 61 0,57 4 0,49 0 4� 0.37 0,33 0,28 0,26 0 21 014 011 0,09 0,06 0,04 0,03 0,02 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + �+ + + + + + + + + + + + 0 01 0,02 0.02 02 ru2 a u3 u,03 0,04 0,04 0,05 0,07 9 11 014 n 1 q n PP n P7 n �� n 41 n 51 n �q n 75 n P7 n AA n q1 n q4 n q� n q4 H,95 H,96 H,94 1190 H,86 H,82 U34 U,63 0 3 0,47 046 0,52 0163 0 71 70 0,72 0 0 51 0,35 0,30 0,33 0,24 016 014 010 0,06 0,03 0,02 + + + + ±_ ±_ + + + + i+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.01 0.01 0.01 02 a u� a u� U,03 0.03 0.04 0.04 005- 07 0.09 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.33 0.40 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.47 0.47 0.4;i H,45 (148 (147 (144 (142 (143 (140 (135 31 0,3 0,35 0,46 0,65 0,196 11 108 67 0 51 0,38 0,34 0,35 0,24 0,22 015 0,09 0,05 0,02 + + + + + + + + + + + +' + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 01 0 01 0 01 01 0_02 a u2 U,02 0,03 0,03 0,04 0,05 05 0,06 0,07 0,08 0,09 010 012 013 015 017 0,20 0,23 0,24 0,25 0,25 0,24 0 2 20 23 0,25 0,26 0,25 0,25 0,24 0,22 0,20 0 3 0 0 40 0,66 112 1.47 1.36 118 0,76 0,65 0,50 0,36 0,34 0,32 0,23 013 0,06 0,03 0 01 0 01 0 01 01 a u1 a u� u,02 0,02 0,03 Hi Hi 04 0,04 0,04 0,05 0,06 0,07 0,07 0,08 0,08 0,09 011 013 014 014 014 013 011 012 013 014 015 015 014 13 013 014 17 24 67 126 180 196 219 22 114 0,82 0,49 0,37 0 41 0,32 017 0,08 0,04 + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + -4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 01 0 01 0 01 1 01 a u1 a u1 U,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0 05 0,05 0,06 0,07 0,08 0,08 0,07 0,07 0 06 0,06 0,07 0,08 0,08 0,08 0,08 0 0,08 010 01 0 0 \ 65 121 2 21 213 317 II 165 115 0,66 0 41 0,40 0,39 0 21 012 0,06 001 001 001 0 1 uu1 uu1 u01 001 001 002 u02 02 002 002 003 003 003 003 003 003 003 004 004 004 004 004 004 00z 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 006 007 011 01 03 1 111 219 231 322 4. 221 137 085 049 039 037 024 013 007 + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A + + + + + + + + + 0 01 0 01 0 01 1)1 a u1 a u1 a 01 0 01 0 01 Hi Hi 02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,N' 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03 0,03 0,03 0,04 05 0,06 0,09 16 30 100 174 2,77 2, 69 31 53 163 101 0,57 0,43 0,32 0,24 015 0,09 000 001 0.01 Oft uu1 uu1 u01 001 001 Hi Hi 9101 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001' 002 002 002 002 002 002 003 0 005 008 01 0 085 146 280 249 401 06% 157 105 062 049 032 022 016 010 000 0.00 0.00 001 uu1 uu1 u01 001 001 Hi Ht 1,01 001 001- 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 002 002 002 003 005 007 013 02 068 130 234 271 333 1 \+31 090 065 060 039 024 018 012 000 000 10 0-0 1 uuu uuu u00 001 001 Hi Hi 101 001 001- 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 002 003 00 007 011 0 8 56 107 191 290 280 203 13C; 087 054 066 047 028 023 016 000 000 000 001 uuu uuu u00 000 000 uuu uuu 00 001 001 001 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 0J) 001 0U� 001 0 002 003 05 0,,08 014 0 45 085 153 2,,70 2,,90 2 87 4 1.01 035 059 0.50 035 029 0.21 + + + +- +- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 010 u,uu u,uu U,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 u,00 1100 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 001 0,00 0 01 OJ 0 01 0 01 0 01 0.01 02 0,02 0, 011 018 0,64 122 2 21 3,02 23 2 1,8 \30 107 0 81 0,50 0 41 0,38 0,28 + + + + ±- ±- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + A + + + + + + 000 000 000 01D uuu uuu u00 000 000 uuu uuu 00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001" uuU uu uu) 001 001 001 001 0 1 002 00 0 5 4 049 097 186 2,,94 28 238 158 111 063 040 040 037 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 a uu a uu U,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 00 0 00 0 00 n 0� n �� � �n � n� � �� � �� � �� � �� � �� � �� � �� � �� n nn n nl 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,02 0 0,03 0,06 011 0 0.39 0.79 1.45 2,72 2 61 423 4` 2,03 134 0,79 0,45 0,35 0,39 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 000 000 000 001 nu uuu u00 000 000 uuu uuu 00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 002 003 005 009 17 32 064 9 217 282 3 36AA 250 151 092 050 036 031 + + + +I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +E "0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0 0n n nn n U,) a uu a uu a 00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 i 00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,'02 0�3 0 4 0,08 01 8 0,50 158 2,,84 2 51 37 3,89 14 159 100 0,50 0,37 0,26 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - +n. + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 '00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 i,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 ( 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 1 0.01 0.02 0.0 0J+7 013 0�2 0,31 0, 29 2 21 2,38 21 3 81 1 121 038 0,44 0,34 0,23 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 0 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 fl,00 0 0 00 0 00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,010 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 1 0 m 0.02 n �3 0 m 0.11 018 29 0 5 9 177 2,39 2 9 2,68 1 0,86 0,57 0,34 0,35 0,22 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +® + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0 00 0,00 0. U6 0,00 U,00 0.0 0,00 O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H O,H 0�G6 0. f O�b(1 U�l 0 0 00 0 00 0,+00 0,00 0,00 0 01 0,02 0,03 0,05 0,08 0 1 0� 0A2 126 216 198 196 1�2 70 0,49 0,27 0,30 018 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 000 000 000 000 000 00 000 000 0 0 000 000 000 000 0 000 000 000 000 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 002 004 006 010 029 051 88 1,,52 131 1. 6 097 076 047 029 022 014 000 000 000 000 000 0 000 000 0 0 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001. 001 002 003 004 007 012 020 033 0 093 126 1 089 061 036 024 016 011 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O,pO 0.00 0.00 Oi00 0.00 0.00 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0 n5 �q �_ 14_ g -0 3, I 0,59 0,82 O3 0,Y 0 4u 0 25 a i�118 0 00 0, 00_ 0 0.11M DQ-_ Q Qi1--D,�O 0.00 0.00 0 ` + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I + + + + + + + + + 0a' 000 O N H� 000 uuu uuu U00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 00( 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 002 003 004 007 010 016 02. 038 051 049 0 027 010 012 009 006 + + + + + 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 O OQ,;;- 0 00 0,00 0,00 0 00 `. m 0a- 0,00 0,00 0,00 On 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,0 0 0 00 0 00__0 0.0-_-94Q==_ O.OI1_=Il.QO_=-0=0�- _11 9==- 7k�k1===���__ �&4 _��� _ �0� �� � X05- �Hff ��f 7 0,26 0,34 0,32 02 018 012 0,08 0,06 0,05 --------------------------------------- - ------- ---- - + + + + „ + + + + + f --------------- -_-}_� + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + =-00€k==€ 0-- � �0�" 000 000 000 000 0.00 000 ffo` 000 0.00 0.00 OZTO 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 002 003 004 006 0,8 012 018 022 022 018 013 009 006 004 003 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 002 002 003 005 006 009 013 015 015 013 010 007 004 003 002 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 002 003 004 005 007 010 011 011 009 007 005 003 002 002 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 002 002 003 004 005 007 008 008 007 006 004 002 002 001 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + t t -- -I I rt + + + +�4O � - t t t 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 OO H Q L L q p� M9- 07J0 0 0.00 0 00 0 00 0��1 H� 0 00 U0 1 uU n uu I� UO 0 UO 0�0 0 00 1Q1 001 �il�� �� � �� 9�� 0�0 0 04 0 05 0 06 0�060 03 O,U2 O�U1 O�U1 + t -t + + + + + + + + + + t + 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 0 1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I'M 0 u6 O'66 0,00 nu U�UU U,00 0,90 O�00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,02 0,02 0 02 0�0 0,04 0,04 0 04! 0 0 03 0,02 0,02 0 01 0 01 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 002 002 0�0 003 003 0,0: 013 002 002 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 002 002- 002 003 UP 002 002 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 002 00� 002 00'- 002 001 001 001 001 000 + + t t + --1 11- -+ t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +--+ -+- +- + + 0,00 O JU 0.00 0.00 0"00- 0 00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 010 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 0100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,+00 I 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0 01 0,02 0,02 0,0 O d1I 0 01 0 01 0 01 0.00 0.00 000 Opo 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 00 001 001 001 000 000 + I + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 001 001 001 001 001 000 000 000 000 000 000 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 N (D SITE PH❑T❑METRIC PLAN SCALE 0 10 20 30 bu 11111111111 Associated C onsulting E ngineering, ncorporated 340 S. Phillips Ave. Sioux Falls, SD 57104 W W0 M S? r �nI rn co Z Z N w 0 m J CL M C W W o (D o Z U o c �aU co W `� Z ">M I '�Z6 Q CT W M Y CO C Q 0O a Z LOU-) LL rL N dZ O T N O 2 O N U `O O v/ ♦ 0 r N t o o a - N LLQ LU � N O Zw 'N J J I W O. 2 = T d v0 Co w Z Z 76 Z O Q � C14 v/ ♦ 0 W o LM `f' LLQ LU q OLU J J I W J = W v0 Co Z r•� 0 CL Z This document is by Brunton Architects & Engineers and contains privileged and confidential information intended for use by O Brunton Architects & Engineers personnel only. Any disclosure or distribution of this document or information contained herein, without prior written consent of Brunton Architects & Engineers, is prohibited. © ALL RIGHTS RESERVED V11) REVISION: ce F LA ZNo.: 118098 Date: 12-04-18 ODrawn: MCH Checked: KEL VProject Manager: KEL Project Status: PROGRESS SET IneSheet Title: O SITE LL PHOTOMETRIC PLAN O Sheet No.: (605) 335-3720 Fax 335-ei@ z SPPM1 E-mail acei@aceinet.com OSQ Series OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Product Description DA Mount The OSQTM Area/Flood luminaire blends extreme optical control, advanced thermal management and modern, clean aesthetics. Built to last, the housing is rugged cast aluminum with an integral, weathertight LED driver compartment. Versatile mounting configurations offer simple installation. Its slim, low -profile design minimizes wind load requirements and blends seamlessly into the site providing even, quality illumination. The 'B' Input power designator is a suitable upgrade for . HID applications up to 250 Watt, and the 'K' Input power designator is a suitable upgrade for HID applications up to 400 Watt. Applications: Parking lots, walkways, campuses, car dealerships, office complexes, and = 25.0" I� internal roadways (635mm) Performance Summary NanoOptic® Precision Delivery GridTM optic Assembled in the U.S.A. of U.S. and imported parts Initial Delivered Lumens: Up to 17,291 Efficacy: Up to 136 LPW CRI: Minimum 70 CRI CCT: 3000K (+/- 300K), 4000K (+/- 300K), 5700K (+/- 500KI Limited Warranty+: 10 years on luminaire/10 years on Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish t See http://Lighting.cree.com/warranty for warranty terms Accessories Field -Installed A Backlight Shield Hand -Held Remote OSQ-BLSMF XA-SENSREM - Front facing optics - For successful implementation of the programmable multi-level option, OSQ-BLSMR a minimum of one hand-held remote is required - Rotated optics Black Ordering Information Fully assembled Luminaire is composed of two components that must be ordered separately Example: Mount: OSQ-AASV+ Luminaire: OSQ-A-NM-2ME-B-40K-UL-SV Mount (Luminaire must be ordered separately)* OSQ- OSQ-AA Adjustable Arm Color Options: SV Silver BZ Bronze 050 -DA Direct Arm BK Black WH White * Reference EPA and pole configuration suitability data beginning on page 7 Luminaire (Mount must be ordered separately) 19.0" (482mm) 8.1 " --)- 206mm) 3.1" (79mm) - NEMA® Photocell Receptacle location (ordered as an option) 197mm1 (122mm) T Weight 26.5 tbs. (12kg) Oso A NM UL BK DIM 0-10V Dimming No Mount 2ME* 4ME* 86W 3000K Input Black - Control by others Color Type IV Product Version Mounting Optic Power CCT Voltage Options Options 4000K UH Bronze Designator 3ME* Z 57K Oso A NM Asymmetric B 30K UL BK DIM 0-10V Dimming No Mount 2ME* 4ME* 86W 3000K Universal Black - Control by others Type II Type IV K 40K 120-277V BZ - Refer to Dimmina spec sheet for Medium Medium 130W 4000K UH Bronze details 3ME* Z 57K Universal sV - Can't exceed wattage of specified Type III 53W 5700K 347-480V Silver input power designator Medium -Available WH F Fuse with B & K White - When code dictates fusing, use time Input Power delay fuse Symmetric Designators - Available for U.S. applications only 5ME 25D only PML Programmable Multi -Level, Type V 25° Flood up to 40' Mounting Height Medium 40D - Refer to PML soec sheet for details 5SH 40* Flood - Intended for downlight applications Type V 60D at 0° tilt Short 60° Flood PML2 Programmable Multi -Level, 10-30' WSN Mounting Height Wide Sign - Refer to PML spec sheet for details 15D - Intended for downlight applications 15° Flood at 0° tilt * Available with Backlight Shield when ordered with field -installed accessory [see table above) CL US M ® rte/, n US: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415 Rev. Date: V16 08/13/2018 Canada: www.cree.com/canada 09/06/05/04/03/02/01 Field Adjustable Output - Must select Q9, Q6, 05, Q4, Q3, Q2, or Q1 - Offers full range adlustability - Refer to pages 9-10 for power and lumen values - Available with B & K Input Power Designators only R NEMA® Photocell Receptacle - Intended for downlight applications with maximum 45° tilt - 3 -pin receptacle per ANSI C136.10 - Photocell and shorting cap by others RL Rotate Left - LED and optic are rotated to the left - Refer to RR/RL configuration diagram on page 2 for optic directionality RR Rotate Right - LED and optic are rotated to the right - Refer to RR/RL configuration diagram on page 2 for optic directionality CREE0'r' T, 1 T (800) 473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Product Specifications CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS • Slim, low profile design minimizes wind load requirements • Luminaire housing is rugged die cast aluminum with an integral, weathertight LED driver compartment and high performance heat sink • Convenient interlocking mounting method on direct arm mount. Mounting adaptor is rugged die cast aluminum and mounts to 3-6" (76-152mm) square or round pole, secured by two 5/16-18 UNC bolts spaced on 2" (51 mm) centers • Mounting for the adjustable arm mount adaptor is rugged die cast aluminum and mounts to 2" (51 mm) IP, 2.375' (60mm) O.D. tenon • Adjustable arm mount can be adjusted 180° in 2.5° increments • Designed for uptight and downlight applications • Exclusive Colorfast DeltaGuard® finish features an E -Coat epoxy primer with an ultra -durable powder topcoat, providing excellent resistance to corrosion, ultraviolet degradation and abrasion. Silver, bronze, black, and white are available • Weight: 26.5 lbs. (12kg) ELECTRICAL SYSTEM • Input Voltage: 120-277V or 347-480V, 50/60Hz, Class 1 drivers • Power Factor: > 0.9 at full load • Total Harmonic Distortion: < 20% at full load • Integral 10kV surge suppression protection standard • When code dictates fusing, a slow blow fuse or type C/D breaker should be used to address inrush current • 1 O Source Current: 0.15mA REGULATORY & VOLUNTARY QUALIFICATIONS • cULus Listed • Suitable for wet locations • Enclosure rated IP66 per IEC 60529 when ordered without R option • Consult factory for CE Certified products • Certified to ANSI C136.31-2001, 3G bridge and overpass vibration standards • 10kV surge suppression protection tested in accordance with IEEE/ANSI C62.41.2 • Meets FCC Part 15 , Subpart B, Class A standards for conducted and radiated emissions • Luminaire and finish endurance tested to withstand 5,000 hours of elevated ambient salt fog conditions as defined in ASTM Standard B 117 • Meets Buy American requirements within ARRA • DLC and DLC Premium qualified versions available. Some exceptions apply. Please refer to https://www.designLights.org/search/ for most current information • RoHS compliant. Consult factory for additional details • Dark Sky Friendly, IDA Approved when ordered with 30K CCT. Please refer to http://darksky.org/fsa/fsa-products/ for most current information AA Mount Weight 26.5 lbs. (12kg1 Electrical Data' Total Current (A) Input Power System Watts Designator 120-480V 120V 208V 240V 277V 347V 480V B 86 0.73 10.43 0.37 0.32 0.25 0.19 K 1 130 1 1.09 1 0.65 0.56 0.49 0.38 0.28 Z 153" 10.46 0.26 0.22 0.19 N/A N/A Electrical data at 25°C 177°F). Actual wattage may differ by -/- 10%when operating between 120-480V+/-10% "Available with ULvoftage only OSO Series Ambient Adjusted Lumen Maintenance' 25K hr 50K hr 75K hr 100K hr Ambient Optic Initial Projected' Projected Projected 2/ Projected2/ LMF LMF LMF Calculated Calculated LMF LMF Asymmetric 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00' 0.993 5°C (41 °FI Symmetric 1.05 1.04 1.03 1.03' 1.022 10°C Asymmetric 1.03 1.01 1.00 0.99' 0.98' (50°F) Symmetric 1.04 1.03 1.02 1.01' 1.002 15°C Asymmetric 1.02 1.00 0.99 0.98' (59°F) Symmetric 1.02 1.02 1.01 1.00' 0.99, 20°C Asymmetric 1.01 0.99 0.98 0.97' 0.96' (68°F) Symmetric 1.01 1.01 1.00 0.99' 0.981 25°C Asymmetric 1.00 0.98 0.97 0.96' 0.953 (77°FI Symmetric 1.00 0.99 0.98 0.98' 0.972 Lumen maintenance values at 25°C (77°F) are calculated per TM -21 based on LM -80 data and in-situ luminaire testing. Luminaire ambient ,tee,factors ILATFI have been applied to all lumen maintenance factors. Please refer to the Temperature Zane Referenerce Document for outdoor average nighttime ambient conditions. ' In accordance with IESNA TM -21-11, Projected Values represent interpolated value based on time durations that are within six times 16XI the IESNA LM -80-08 total test duration (in hours) for the device under testing RDUTI i.e. the packaged LED chip) ' In accordance with IESNA TM -21-11, Calculated Values represent time durations that exceed six times 16X1 the IESNA LM -80-08 total test duration lin hours) for the device under testing IIDUTI i.e. the packaged LED chip) Receptacle location (ordered as an option) W 3.8" c J (97mm) US: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (2621504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada CREE'ar"T. T (8001473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM -79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/osq-series 2ME ao•�[I n raanla ° Imax,m,mca e°p­I RESTL Test Report p: PLOB877-001 OSQ-A-**-2M E -B -30K -U L Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,381 �u�ll na ax,m�m as epo�'� CESTL Test Report q: PL07700-001A OSQ-A-**-2ME-U-57K-UL w/OSQ-BLSLF Initial Delivered Lumens: 22,822 3ME 3p°�[I Fonzonla g Imax,mum ca paver RESTL Test Reportp: PLOB876-001A OSQ-A-* *-3 M E -B-30 K -U L Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,421 Q,nzaala a °ammax1 1pl, ° h CESTL Test Report #: PL07699-001 A OSO-A-**-3ME-U-57K-UL w/OSQ-BLSLF Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,601 OSQ-A-**-2M E -B -40K -UL Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m1 A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,424 Initial FC at grade 120 106 80 60' 40' 20' 0' 2D' 4D' 60 80'100 120' aJS 60 i ID 244 ,5 183 40 l -1 102 61 2° - m 0. LURE LIN _ 61 o' I 122 60' I 183 ,80, I I b6 mos b 30.5 24.4 1fl3 121 AI Om Al 123 183 24.4 30.5 366 oozNon of v�acalpplane OSQ-A-**-2ME-B-40K-UL w/OSQ-BLSMF Mounting Height: 25'(7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,779 Initial FC at grade 120 100 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80'100 120 1 305 8c 60' b 1&3 LO' �_ - 12.2 z0' 1f 6, 20' :URB LINE\\ - 61 40 / 122 60' \ ifl3 e0' zab m' as 366 3]5 246 1&3 122 61 Qn 61 122 1fl3 L 30.5 366 PosiOono vert,cal plane of maximum candlepower OSQ-A-**-3ME-B-40K-UL Mounting Height: 25'(7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,424 Initial FC at grade 120 IM 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 110 120 100' aas 80' I 60° 266 60' I 1. LO' I 12.2 Si I 61 20' ILURa LINE - 61 122 6°'I= l ,B3 80' I 246 100' I 366 3] 5 24.4 183 122 61 Om 61 122 183/266 3] 5 3A6 OSQ-A-**-31vIE-B-40K-UL w/OSQ-BLSMF Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 9,019 Initial FC at grade Type II Medium Distribution BUG BUG 3000K 4000K Power 5700K Input BUG BUG Designator BUG Power Initial Initial Ratings" Ratings" Initial Ratings" Designator Delivered Delivered Per TM 15 11 Delivered Per Lumens' Lumens' 8,251 B2 UO 62 8,779 Lumens' 8,950 TM -15-11 TM -15- 12,312 132 UO G2 13,032 TM -15-11 TM -15-11 B 10,738 B2 UO 62 11,424 B2 UO G2 11,648 B2 UO G2 K 16,022 B3 UO G3 16,959 B3 UO 33 17,291 B3 UO G3 2 6,481 B2 UO G1 6,896 B2 UO 01 7,031 B2 UO G1 * Initial delivered lumens at 25'C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: Valid with no tilt https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt Type II Medium w/BLS Distribution 3000K 4000K 5700K Input BUG BUG BUG Power Initial Initial Initial BUG Designator Delivered Ratings" Delivered Ratings" Delivered Ratings" Ratings" Lumens' TM 15 11 Lumens* TM 15 11 Lumens' TM 15 11 B 8,251 B2 UO 62 8,779 B2 UO G2 8,950 B2 UO 62 K 12,312 132 UO G2 13,032 B2 UO G2 13,286 B2 UO G2 Z 4,980 B1 UO 61 5,299 B1 UO 31 5,402 B1 UO Gi * Initial delivered lumens at 25'C (77°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10°/1 of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: and +10% of initial delivered https://-.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt Type III Medium Distribution 3000K 4000K 3000K 5700K Input BUG BUG Input BUG BUG Power Initial Initial Ratings" Ratings" Initial Ratings" Designator Delivered Delivered PerPer Ratings' Delivered Per Lumens' Lumens' Delivered Lumens' Delivered TM 15 11 TM 15 11 TM 15 11 B 10,738 B3 UO 63 11,424 B3 UO G3 11,648 B3 UO G3 K 16,022 B3 UO G3 16,959 B3 UO 33 17,291 B3 UO G3 2 6,481 B2 UO G2 6,896 B2 UO G2 7,031 B2 UO G2 * Initial delivered lumens at 25'C (77°FI. Actual production yield mayvary lumens between -10 and +10% of initial delivered ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: 2 5,117 B1 UO G1 5,444 https://-.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt Type III Medium w/BLS Distribution 3000K 4000K 5700K Input BUG BUG BUG Power Initial Ratings" Initial Ratings' nidal Ratings" Designator Delivered PerLumens' Delivered Per Delivered Per Lumens' Lumens' TM -15-11 TM -15-11 TM -15-11 B 8,477 B1 UO 62 9,019 B1 UO 02 9,196 B1 UO 62 K 12,649 B2 UO G2 13,389 B2 UO G2 13,650 B2 UO G2 2 5,117 B1 UO G1 5,444 B1 UO G1 5,551 B1 UO 01 * Initial delivered Lumens at 25°C (77°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered Winners ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight -Uptight -Glare) Rating visit: https://www ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/-rM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt CREE= US: lighting.cree.com T (800)236-6800 F (262)504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM -79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/osq-series 4ME RESTL Tes� orto#! PL08878-001 Aoas OSQ-A-**-4M E -B -30K -U L Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,230 CESTL Test Report #: PL07692-001A OSQ-A-**-4ME-U-57K-UL w/OSQ-BLSLF Initial Delivered Lumens: 22,793 5ME RESTL Test Report* PLO8534-001 B OSQ-A-**-5M E -B -40K -U L Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,519 5SH CESTL Test Report #: PL10754-001 A OSQ-A-**-5SH-U-40K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 25,679 US: lighting.cree.com 129 109 80 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' Q 60' 80' 1W 12P opt I 5° 80' 26.4 Type IV Medium Distribution BUG bo' 1. 4° 122 BUG bo'I IST 5 I lea 3000K 4000K Ratings" 5700K Ratings" 40' Iz2 Input P Initial BUG Initial BUG Initial BUG ° em wer Ratings" Ratings" Lumens' Ratings" cuaeuNE o. 6, Designator Delivered Delivered B1 UO 02 Delivered Per ,22 Lumens' LumensPer' B2 UO G2 Lumens' B2 UO G2 °. 60' 10a TM -15-11 Mf-15-11 TM-15-11r 5,402 TM -15-11 I I eo' 36.6 244 30.5 266 143 122 61 Om 61 121 18a 246 30.5 366 B 10,738 B2 UO 62 11,424 B2 UO G2 11,648 B2 UO G2 orma.,m�m<a�alea�. K 16,022 B3 UO G3 16,959 B3 UO 33 17,291 B3 UO G3 Valid with no tilt Z 6,481 B2 UO G2 6,896 B2 UO G2 7,031 B2 UO G2 OSQ-A-**-4ME-B-40K-UL nitial Ratings ings" 40' 2.2 I Designator Delivered PerRat Delivered Delivered PerRa Mounting Height: 25'17.6m) A.F.G. * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°Fl. Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10%of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,424 lumens K 15,909 B4 UO 63 16,897 B4 UO G3 17,191 B4 UO G3 Initial FC at grade ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. https;//www.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no ti0t OSQ-A-**-4ME-B-40K-UL w/OSQ-BLSMF Mounting Height: 25'(7.6m) A.F.G. Initial Delivered Lumens: 8,779 Initial FC at grade Type IV Medium w/BLS Distribution 3000K 4000K 5700K Input BUG BUG bo' 1. 4° 122 BUG Power Initial Initial Ratings" Ratings" Initial Ratings" Designator Delivered Delivered PerDelivered bo' ,a * ._ 246 TM -15-11 Per _. i tart 366335 aaa ,ea,2z 61 0. 61 ,22 lea ua+f 3os a6b3°5 Lumens' TM 15 11 Lumens` TMr15 11 Lumens' TM 15 11 B 8,251 Bi UO G2 8,779 B1 UO 02 8,950 Bi UO 62 K 12,312 B2 UO G2 13,032 B2 UO G2 13,286 B2 UO G2 Z 4,980 Bi UO G1 5,299 B1 UO 01 5,402 Bi UO Gi * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight-Uplight-Glare) Rating visit: 122 aoK2_ 61 2o. NA� https://-.ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/TM-15-11BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt 60' 40' 20' 0' z0' 40' 60' 90� 'a35 Z, I m _ - - °'`1{r za6 Type V Medium Distribution bo' 1. 4° 122 3000K 4000K 5700K o, 9m Input BUG BUG BUG 20. CURBLINE �_ 61 40. 12,2 Power Initial Initial Designator Delivered ParRatings" Delivered Lumens` Lumens' Initial Ratings" Palings" Delivered Per Lumens' bo' ,a * ._ 246 TM -15-11 TM -15-11 TM -15-11 _. i tart 366335 aaa ,ea,2z 61 0. 61 ,22 lea ua+f 3os a6b3°5 B 10,232 B4 UO G3 10,867 B4 UO 33 11,056 B4 UO G3 e o.,e,on m.ldhlphn, ma='mum<a^ K 15,063 B4 UO G4 15,999 B4 UO 04 16,277 B4 UO G4 Z 5,257 B3 UO G3 6,086 B3 UO G3 6,192 B3 UO G3 OSQ-A-**-5ME-B-40K-UL Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,867 lumens Initial FC at grade ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight -Uptight -Glare) Rating visit: https://www.ies.org/wp-content/uptoads/2017/03/TM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt 0 60' 9 e0' 60' 4 20' 0' 20 0 12930.5 leo I m Type V Short Distribution 122 aoK2_ 61 2o. NA� 3000K 4000K 5700K om Input BUG BUG BUG UBBLJE 5 o' Power Initial Initial nitial Ratings ings" 40' 2.2 I Designator Delivered PerRat Delivered Delivered PerRa 60' ,a, Lumens* Lumens' TM 15 11 Lumens' TM 15 11 Lumens' TM 15 11 wI6 335 ub tea 122 61 °m 61 122 1ea n4 ms 3663°5 B 10,806 B4 UO G2 11,478 B4 UO G2 11,678 B4 UO G2 o mznmo vea^w10p1zne m K 15,909 B4 UO 63 16,897 B4 UO G3 17,191 B4 UO G3 Z 5,552 133 UO Gi 6,428 B3 UO G2 6,539 B3 UO G2 OSQ-A-**-5SH-B-40K-UL Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G. * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield may vary between -10 and 10% of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens:11,478 lumens Initial FC at grade ** For more information on the IES BUG (Backlight -Uptight -Glare) Rating visit: https://www ies.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/-rM-15-11 BUGRatingsAddendum.pdf. Valid with no tilt CREE'... T (800( 236-6800 F (262( 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800) 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM -79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/osq-series 150 CESTL Test Report #: PL07689-001A OSQ-A-**-15D-U-30K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,254 25D CESTL Test Report #: PL07687-001A OSQ-A-**-25D-U-30K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,265 40D CESTL Test Report #: PL07697-001A OSQ-A-**-40D-U-30K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 22,943 US: lighting.cree.com 2° ° 4° 6° °° 1°° 12° 14° 16° 15° Flood Distribution ° I I244 o1 1 3000K 4000K 5700K 1 6 Input Power Initial Initial Initial 16m Designator Delivered Delivered Delivered 1:: Lumens' Lumens' Lumens' 30 1 12 4 B 10,806 11,478 11,678 61 0m 61 122 133 244 305 366 42, 403 549 K 15,909 16,897 17,191 OSQ-A-**-15D-B-40K-UL Z 5,552 6,428 6,539 Mounting Height: 25'[7.6m] A.F.G., 60` Tilt * Initial delivered lumens at 25'C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,478 lumens Initial FC at grade 2° 4° 6° 3° 1°° 12° 14° 16 111125° Flood Distribution '1 133 <01 244 3000K 4000K 5700K Input \�\ Power Initial Initial Initial ) I Designator Delivered Delivered Delivered Lumens' Lumens' Lumens' B 10,806 11,478 11,678 61 Om 6a 122 133 244 any 366 4z2 48A 549 K 15,909 16,897 17,191 OSQ-A-**-25D-B-40K-UL Z 5,552 6,428 6,539 Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G., 60° Tilt * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield may vary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,478 lumens Initial FC at grade so 20 60 so 11)° 120 140 160 180-4 40° Flood Distribution 1122 --'\\ 3000K 4000K 5700K 16 1 Input Power Initial Initial Initial ly 6m Designator Delivered Delivered Delivered -I 112 Lumens' Lumens* Lumens' so 1 1 4 B 10,806 11,478 11,678 61 0m 61 122 133 264 305 366 42, 4°° 549 K 15,909 16,897 17,191 Z 5,552 6,428 6,539 OSQ-A-**-40D-B-40K-UL Mounting Height: 25' (7.6m) A.F.G., 60' Tilt * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,478 lumens Initial FC at grade CREE= T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (8001473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Photometry All published luminaire photometric testing performed to IESNA LM -79-08 standards by a NVLAP accredited laboratory. To obtain an IES file specific to your project consult: http://lighting.cree.com/products/outdoor/area/osq-series 60D 15o, 12489 1 o 12489 M zl a 2D Lo Lo ,o\I za ,Lo 140 18D 7 120' 6 *201,2,0.. om z' 4 CESTL Test Report #: PL08100-001 B OSO-A-**-60D-B-30K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 10,079 WSN CESTL Test Report #: PL07695-001A OSO-A-**-WSN-U-30K-UL Initial Delivered Lumens: 23,116 US: lighting.cree.com OSO-A-**-60D-B-40K-UL Mounting Height: 25' 17.6m) A.F.G., 60° Tilt Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,478 Initial FC at grade 40 Now x 60 xtar 12014a' 16o iao' 366 ao'I 333 W,` \ 2" 60 \ 18.3 40' 122 p' I 61 20' I 61 4122 6a' ' 183 W ' ( 44 100' I 31.5 1A' I 366 122 6.1 Un 61 122 183 244 31.5 3664274&8 Y.9 OSO-A-**-WSN-B-40K-1JL Mounting Height: 25' [7.6m1 A.F.G., 60° Tilt Initial Delivered Lumens: 11,478 Initial FC at grade 60° Flood Distribution 3000K 4000K 5700K Input Power Initial Initial nidal Designator Delivered Delivered Delivered Lumens* Lumens* Lumens* B 10,806 11,478 11,678 K 15,909 16,897 17,191 Z 5,552 6,428 6,539 *Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens Wide Sign Distribution 3000K 4000K 5700K Input Power Initial Initial Initial Designator Delivered Delivered Delivered Lumens* Lumens' Lumens* B 10,806 11,478 11,678 K 15,909 16,897 17,191 Z 5,552 6,428 6,539 * Initial delivered lumens at 25°C 177°FI. Actual production yield mayvary between -10 and +10% of initial delivered lumens CREE= T (800( 236-6800 F (262( 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800( 473-1234 F (800) 890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Luminaire EPA Fixed Arm Mount - OSQ-DA Weight: 26.5 Lbs. (12kg) Single 2 2 1800 2 2 90' 3 2 9o' 3 2 120° 4 2 90' -■ ■-■ I? or 0% ■ 0.74 1.48 1.19 1.93 1.63 2.38 Adjustable Arm Mount - OSQ-AA Weight: 26.5 Lbs. (12kg1 1.48 1.19 1.93 1.63 3.33 Single 22180' 2290' 3290' 32120° 32180° 42180' 4290' Tenon Configuration (0'-80' Tilt); If used with Cree tenons, please add tenon EPA with Luminaire EPA 0.75 -M 09--. 0% .1. Y 2.15 memo 5.84 PB -1A'; PT -1; PW- PB -2A*; PB -2R2.375; 20' Tilt PB-4A*(90); 1A3** PD -2A4(1801; PB -2A*; PD -2A4(901; PB -3A*; PD -3A4(90); PB -3A*; PT -30201 PB -3A*; PB -3R2.375 PB-4A*(180) 1.86 PT -2(1801; PW -2A3** PT -2(901 PT -31901 5.31 7.32 3.72 PD -4A4(90); PT -4(90) 0* Tilt 0.74 1.48 1.19 1.93 1.63 3.33 4.66 2.38 10' Tilt 0.75 1.48 1.49 2.23 2.15 4.22 5.84 2.98 20' Tilt 1.12 1.48 1.86 2.60 2.85 5.31 7.32 3.72 30' Tilt 1.46 1.48 2.20 2.94 3.56 6.34 8.68 4.40 45' Tilt 1.96 1.96 2.69 3.43 4.54 7.83 10.68 5.38 60' Tilt 2.33 2.33 3.07 3.81 5.11 8.94 12.16 6.14 70' Tilt 2.49 2.49 3.23 3.97 5.11 9.43 12.80 6.46 80' Tilt 2.58 2.58 3.32 4.06 5.11 9.71 13.16 6.64 Tenon Configuration (90' Tilt); If used with Cree tenons, please add tenon EPA with Luminaire EPA PB -1 A*; PT -1; PW- F'B-1PD-2A4(1801; PB -2A*; PB -2R2.375; PT -2(1801; PW -2A3** PB -2A* PB -3A* PB -3A*; PT -3020) PB -3A*; PB -3R2.375 PB-4A*(180) PB-4A*(90); PB -4R2.375 90' Tilt 2.61 2.61 4.44 6.05 5.11 9.79 13.28 10.39 * Specify pole size: 313"), 414"), 5 [5"], or 616"I far single, double or triple luminaire orientation or 4 14"1, 5 [51, orb (6" I far quad luminaire orientation ** These EPA values must be multiplied by the following ratio: Fixture Mounting Height/Total Pole Height. Specify pole size: 3 13"), 4 14"), 5 15"), or 6 (6" I CREE= US: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800) 473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Tenon EPA Part Number EPA PB -1A* None PB -2A* 0.82 PB -3A* 1.52 PB-4A*(180) 2.22 PB-4A*(90) 1.11 PB -2R2.375 0.92 PB -3R2.375 1.62 PB -4R2.375 2.32 PD Series Tenons 0.09 PT Series Tenons 0.10 PW-lA3** 0.47 PW -2A3** 0.94 WM-2 0.08 WM-4 0.25 WM-DM None * Specify pole size: 313"). 414"), 515"], luminaire orientation or414" ), 5151, or 6(6'1 for single, double or triple or 6 (6" 1 for quad luminaire orientation ** These EPA values must be multiplied by the following ratio. Fixture Mounting Height/Total Pole Height. Specify pole size: 3 (31, 414"), 5 15"), or 6161 Direct Mount Configurations Tenons and Bracketsf (must specify colorl Square Internet Mount Vertical Tenons (Steel) Round External Mount Vertical Tenons (Steel) - Mounts to 3-6" (76-152mm) square aluminum or steel - Mounts to 2.375' (60mm) O.D. round aluminum or steel poles poles ortenons PB -1A* -Single PB-4A*190)-90*Quad PB -2R2.375 -Twin PB -4R2.375 -Quad PB-2A*-180°Twin PB-4A*(1801-180°Quad PB -3R2.375 -Triple PB -3A* - 180° Triple Round External Mount Horizontal Tenons (Aluminum) Square Internal Mount Horizontal Tenons (Aluminum) - Mounts to 2.375' (60mm) O.D. round aluminum or steel poles - Mounts to 4" (102mm) square aluminum or steel poles or tenons PD -2A4190) - 90° Twin PD -3A4190) - 90° Triple - Mounts to square pole with PB -1A* tenon PD -2A411801- 180° Twin PD -4A4[901- 90° Quad PT -1 - Single (Vertical] PT -3(901 - 90° Triple PT -2(901 - 90° Twin PT -3(1201 - 120° Triple Wall Mount Brackets PT -211801 - 180° Twin PT -4(901 - 90° Quad - Mounts to wall or roof N/A WM-2 - Horizontal for OSQ-AA mount Mid -Pole Bracket WM-4 - L -Shape for OSQ-AA mount - Mounts to square pole WM-DM - Plate for OSQ-DA mount PW-lA3** - Single PW -2A3** - Double ✓ Ground Mount Post N/A - For ground mounted flood luminaires 4" Round PGM -1 - for OSQ-AA mount = Refer to the Bracket and Tenons spec sheet for more details Compatibility with OSO-DA Direct Mount Bracket Input Power Designator 2 fa 90° 2 fa 180° 3 fa 90° 3 fd 120° 4 fd 90° 3" Square B, K & Z N/A ✓ N/A N/A N/A 3" Round B, K & Z N/A ✓ N/A N/A N/A 4" Square B, K & Z ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A ✓ 4" Round B,K&Z ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 5" Square B, K & Z ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A ✓ 5" Round B,K&Z ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ 6" Square B, K & Z ✓ 6" Round B,K&Z ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ N/A ✓ ✓ ✓ US: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (2621504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada CREE= T (8001473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTm LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Field Adjustable Output (Q9/06/05/04/03/Q2/011 Option Description: The Field Adjustable Output option enables the OSQ area luminaires to be tuned to the exact needs of a particular application through multiple levels of adjustment. When ordered with the Q option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the selected Q setting and will be fully adjustable between the nine settings. Q Option Power & Lumen Data - Designator B System Lumen Values Q Option CCT Watts Optics Qualified on DLC QPL Setting 5SH& 2MEw/ 3MEw/ 4ME 120-480V Asymmetric 5ME Floods BLS BLS w/BLS Standard 30K 10,738 10,232 10,806 8,251 8,477 8,251 5ME (Full Power) (F 40K 86 11,424 10,867 11,478 8,779 9,019 8,779 N/A 57K 11,648 11,056 11,678 8,950 9,196 8,950 30K 9,449 9,004 9,509 7,261 7,460 7,261 5ME Q6 40K 77 10,053 9,563 10,101 7,726 7,937 7,726 N/A 57K 10,250 9,729 10,277 7,876 8,092 7,876 30K 8,913 8,492 8,969 6,848 7,036 6,848 5ME Q5 40K 72 9,482 9,020 9,527 7,287 7,486 7,287 N/A 57K 9,668 9,176 9,693 7,429 7,633 7,429 30K 7,731 7,367 7,780 5,941 6,103 5,941 5ME Q4 40K 62 8,225 7,824 8,264 6,321 6,494 6,321 N/A 57K 8,387 71960 8,408 6,444 6,6216,444 30K 6,550 6,241 6,592 5,033 5,171 5,033 5ME Q3 40K 53 6,969 6,629 7,002 5,355 5,502 5,355 N/A 57K 7,105 6,744 7,124 5,460 5,610 5,460 30K 5,476 5,218 5,511 4,208 4,323 4,208 5ME Q2 40K 45 5,826 5,542 5,854 4,477 4,600 4,477 N/A 57K 5,940 5,639 51956 4,565 4,690 4,565 30K 4,188 3,990 4,214 3,218 3,306 3,218 5ME Q1 40K 34 4,455 4,238 4,476 3,424 3,517 3,424 N/A 57K 4,543 4,312 4,554 3,491 3,586 3,491 Premium 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 150, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN CREE= US: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800) 473-1234 F (8001890-7507 OSQTM LED Area/Flood Luminaire - Medium Field Adjustable Output (Q9/06/05/04/03/Q2/011 Option Description: The Field Adjustable Output option enables the OSQ area luminaires to be tuned to the exact needs of a particular application through multiple levels of adjustment. When ordered with the Q option, the luminaire will be shipped from the factory at the selected Q setting and will be fully adjustable between the nine settings. Q Option Power & Lumen Data - Designator K Q Option System Watts Lumen Values Optics Qualified on DLC QPL Setting CCT 5SH & 2ME 3ME 4ME 120-480V Asymmetric 5ME Floods vv/BLS w/BLS w/BLS Standard Premium 30K 16,022 15,063 15,909 12,312 12,649 12,312 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 49 (FullPowerl 40K 130 16,959 15,999 16,897 3,032 13,389 13,032 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 600, WSN 57K17,291 16,277 17,191 13,286 13,650 13,286 30K 14,099 13,255 14,000 10,835 11,131 10,835 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN O6 40K 117 14,924 14,079 14,869 11,468 11,782 11,468 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K15,216 14,324 15,128 11,692 12,012 11,692 30K 13,298 12,502 13,204 10,219 10,499 10,219 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 400, 60D, WSN Q5 40K 110 14,076 13,279 14,025 10,817 11,113 10,817 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 55H, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K14,352 13,510 14,269 11,027 11,330 11,027 30K 11,536 10,845 11,454 8,865 9,107 8,865 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 04 40K 93 12,210 11,519 12,166 9,383 9,640 9,383 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K 12,450 11,719 12,378 9,566 9,828 9,566 30K 9,773 9,188 9,704 7,510 7,716 7,510 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 03 40K 80 10,345 9,759 10,307 7,950 8,167 7,950 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 55H, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K 10,548 9,929 10,487 8,104 8,327 8,104 30K 8,171 7,682 8,114 6,279 6,451 6,279 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 400, 60D, WSN Q2 40K 67 8,649 8,159 8,617 6,646 6,828 6,646 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 55H, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K 8,818 8,301 8,767 6,776 6,962 6,776 30K 6,249 5,875 6,205 4,802 4,933 4,802 5ME 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, 60D, WSN 01 40K 51 6,614 6,240 6,590 5,082 5,222 5,082 N/A 2ME, 3ME, 4ME, 5ME, 5SH, 15D, 25D, 40D, bOD, WSN 57K 6,743 6,348 6,704 5,182 5,324 5,182 (D 2018 Cree, Inc. and/or one of its subsidiaries. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.cree.com/patents. Cree®, NanoOptic®, and Colorfast DeltaGuard® are registered trademarks, and the Cree logo, Precision _ Delivery GridT" and OSQT" are trademarks of Cree, Inc. The UL logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. NEMA® is a registered trademark of CREE the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. The DLC QPL logo and the DLC QPL Premium logo are registered trademarks of Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships Inc. _.,f Us: lighting.cree.com T (800) 236-6800 F (262) 504-5415 Canada: www.cree.com/canada T (800) 473-1234 F (8001890-7507 From: Angela Schumann Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 4:30 PM To: Corev Brunton Cc: Jeff O'Neill: Matthew Leonard; rvan melhouse: Dan Klein Subject: Monticello Firestation Comments Attachments: SKM_C75918121311330.pdf Corey, Please find below City staff comments on the revised Fire Station drawings. Grading and Drainage 1. Since more than 1 acre will be disturbed an NPDES permit and SWPPP will be required. 2. Show drainage arrows and percent slope on East edge of existing pavement of the bowling alley site to confirm existing parking lot. 3. Show or make note that driveways can have a max slope of 2% where the trail runs. Utilities 4. Catch basins are to have a minimum depth of 4' per the Cities design manual. 5. Show slopes for all storm sewer. 6. Show sanitary manhole details. 7. Add sanitary cleanout max spacing is 70'. 8. Add note that storm casting needs updating in the driveway to a driveover casting. 9. Add note that the contractor must obtain a utility excavation permit prior to connecting to city utilities. 10. Watermain is to have a maximum 45 degree bend. Landscaping 11. Move trees that appear to be directly over the Northern Gas main to a different location. 12. Consider moving the 3 trees in the NW corner, these are right next to the snow storage area and may get damaged in current location. 13. Consider adding a vegetative barrier along West property line to prevent soccer users driving over curb during the winter. 14. Revise landscaping plan to include % the required amount of perimeter buffer requirement plantings. Plan may include a notation that planting is to be completed by others. Please see standards attached. 15. The City Engineer/PW Director may recommend a native seed mix on the yard portion of property east of the gas easement. More detail to follow on that item. General Comments 16. Confirm all requirements of Northern Natural Gas have been met. 17. Add all applicable city detail plates to the plans including but not limited to erosion control and trail. 18. Add note that all construction shall conform to the City Specs and Detail Plates. 19. Show ramps on front sidewalk to the Handicap stalls. 20. Contractor to coordinate with City on timing of changes or improvements to the leased parcel to the west, proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Oakwood Industrial Park Fourth Addition. 21. Sign plan subject to separate permit and review. 22. Proposed site lighting photometric compliance per City Zoning Ordinance 4.4(G). Please call or email with any questions. Thank you. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email correspondence to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices act and may be disclosed to third parties. City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 2J. Consideration of approving the pavment of $167,000 to Wright Countv for the discharge of stormwater from Carlisle Village development per the agreement with Wright Countv contingent on the approval of the citv's petition to rescind the September 13, 2006 order transferring portions of Countv Ditch 33 to the city (ML, JO) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: In 2005 the City petitioned Wright County to allow for the discharge of stormwater from the Carlisle Village development to County Ditch 33. The County permitted the City to use County Ditch 33 as an outlet form municipal stormwater from the Carlisle Village development with conditions. These conditions included the City utilizing the $167,000 that was collected from the developer to make improvements to the existing Mississippi River outlet or to install a new outlet that through the Hidden Forest and Niagara Falls developments that were being proposed at that time. The agreement indicated that if these conditions weren't satisfied within three years the City was to pay the County the $167,000 to be deposited into the County Ditch 33 fund. The City hasn't completed any improvements to County Ditch 33 to date. In 2006 the City gained partial authority for managing Ditch 33 in conjunction with the proposed Hidden Forest and Niagara Falls subdivisions. These projects stalled and the proposed improvements to Ditch 33 weren't made. Resolution 2018-51 authorized the City to petition the County to rescind the September 13, 2006 order transferring portions of County Ditch 33 to the City. At such time that the Ditch Authority conducts a public hearing on the assessment program for a future project, the City of Monticello will have the opportunity to comment on the funding formula and the manner in which the $167,000 is integrated into the project funding and assessment program. It is our hope that the funds would be identified as a credit against the City's pro -rata share of the cost. It is proposed that the City pay Wright County the $167,000 per the 2005 order for the discharge of stormwater from the Carlisle Village development if the County agrees to rescind the September 13,2006 order transferring portions of County Ditch 33 to the City. Al. Budget Impact: The payment will be made from the Trunk Stormwater Fund. A2. Staff Workload Impact: Staff impacts are expected to be minimal. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: 1. Motion to approve the payment of $167,000 for the discharge of stormwater from the Carlisle Village development per the agreement with Wright County contingent on the approval of the City's petition to rescind the September 13, 2006 order transferring portions of County Ditch 33 to the City. 2. Motion to deny the payment to Wright County at this time. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends the City Council approve the payment to Wright County as outlined in Alternative # 1. City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Carlisle Village outlet agreement B. Petition to rescind ditch ownership transfer R IN RE: A PETITION BY THE CITY OF MONTICELLO TO OUTLET STORM WATER INTO COUNTY DITCH 33 The above mentioned matter was considered by the Wright County Board of Commissioners (County Board), as drainage authority for County Ditch 33, at a public hearing held on August 16, 2005, with continued discussion by the Board at its meeting on September 6, 2005. The petition concerns a development known as Carlisle Village, located in Section 19 of Monticello Township (T.121 N. - R.24W.). Based upon the information provided by the City of Monticello (City), and upon other information available, the County Board makes the following FINDINGS: 1) That this matter has properly come before the County Board pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103E.411, with notice provided by publication three consecutive weeks in the Monticello Times, as well as mailed notice to all assessed landowners on the ditch. 2) That the City has shown the necessity for using the drainage system as an outlet and that using the drainage system will be of public benefit and utility. 3) That the area in question is part of the natural watershed for County Ditch 33 and has always drained to the ditch. 4) That the City is diverting storm water from a portion of the development to its existing municipal storm water system, specifically reducing the number of acres draining to the ditch from 125.85 acres to only 52.68 acres and reducing the volume of water going to the ditch. 5) That, through the use of storm water ponding, the City will be lowering the discharge rate from this area to below pre -development levels. 6) That the City appears to have satisfied MPCA and NPDES regulations in designing the storm water system for this development. 7) That, based upon a study by the City, the water from this area enters Branch 2 of County Ditch 33 and will not have an adverse effect on other areas of the ditch. 8) That the City has set aside approximately $167,000, paid by the developer, to be used for storm water purposes by the City. 9) That, while the City could , through the use of a pumping station, divert all of the storm water from the development so that it would not use the ditch, the storm water funds set aside could be better used by otherwise improving the drainage system in the area. 0 0 10) That, because of further planned residential development on County Ditch 33, the City expects to be constructing a new 48 inch outlet to the Mississippi River, along with additional impoundment of water in the area of the ditch, both of which would benefit the area of Carlisle Village, as well as other areas on the ditch. 11) That the County Board recognizes that the area of Carlisle Village drains into a wetland to the north of CSAR 18, and that keeping a portion of this development in the watershed for County Ditch 33 will help keep that wetland complex viable. Based upon the above findings, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the City of Monticello shall be permitted to use County Ditch 33 as an outlet for municipal storm water from the Carlisle Village development, with the following conditions attached: 1) That the $167,000 set aside from the Carlisle Village development shall be used by the City towards construction of a new storm water outlet, not less than 48 inches in size, to the Mississippi River. 2) That, as an alternative to Condition 1 above, the City shall use the $167,000 set aside for enhancement or correction of the existing outlet to the Mississippi River for County Ditch 33. Any such work shall be approved by the County Board. 3) That any new outlet to the river shall be completed by the City prior to any additional residential development in the County Ditch 33 watershed (other than Carlisle Village). 4) That, in any event, either Condition 1 or Condition 2 above shall be satisfied no later than three (3) years from the date of this approval by the County Board. Should the City default on this condition, the money in Condition 1 shall be paid over to the County for deposit in the County Ditch 33 fund. 5) That the City shall not be assessed an outlet fee, nor shall it be assessed for future repairs on the ditch, due to the following factors: A) The City will be contributing to either construction of a new outlet to the river or enhancement of the current outlet, pursuant to Conditions 1 and 2 above. B) The City, in the event of construction of a new outlet to the river, will be spending an estimated $200,000 to oversize that outlet so that it can handle the County Ditch 33 watershed. C) That, with respect to the new outlet and any future storm water work done by the City in the area, the City will be responsible for the repair and maintenance of that system, with no costs assessed to other landowners on County Ditch 33, unless such landowners further subdivide their property. D) That the City shall reimburse Wright County for administrative and publication costs and legal fees relating to this petition. SO ORDERED This 13 tk day of _Yi hp,Y' , 2005. _��� A� Chairperson, Wright County Board of Commissioners Drainage Authority for County Ditch 33 STATE OF MINNESOTA WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SITTING AS THE DRAINAGE AUTHORITY FOR WRIGHT COUNTY DITCH 33 In the Matter of: The Transfer of Portions of Wright County Ditch 33 to the City of Monticello PETITION OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO REQUESTING RE- OPENING OF PROCEEDINGS AND PARTIAL RESCISSION OF ORDER The City of Monticello (City), for its petition in the above -captioned matter states and alleges the following: 1. In 2006, the City petitioned the Wright County Board of Commissioners, sitting as the Drainage Authority for Wright County Ditch 33 ("CD 33"), to take certain actions related to CD 33. 2. Among other things, the City requested that portions of CD 33 be transferred to the City pursuant to statutes section 103E.812. 3. The City filed its petition in order to facilitate proposed residential development in annexation areas adjacent to the City under the belief that the development and annexation were imminent. 4. The City anticipated, and conveyed to the Drainage Authority, that with the development and annexation, the drainage system would be relocated, as part of the City's stormwater plan, to annexed portions of the City. 5. Upon findings and by order dated September 13, 2006, the Drainage Authority authorized transfer of portions of CD 33 to the City. 6. After transfer, the proposed development failed. 7. While the annexation did occur, the development that would have justified relocation of the drainage system did not occur. For this reason, the Drainage Authority's order essentially transferred portions of CD 33 lying outside of the City's boundary to the City. 8. Statutes section 103E.812 only allows the transfer of portions of a drainage system to a City when the portions to be transferred lie "within the boundaries of the city." [10496-0002/3032509/1] 1 9. For this reason, the City believes both its action in petitioning for the partial transfer and the Drainage Authority's action granting the transfer were improper and without legal authority. 10. The City, therefore, petitions the Drainage Authority for the following: a. To re -open the proceedings related to the City's petition to transfer a portion of CD 33; b. To notice and hold a hearing consistent with the requirements of statutes section 103E.812; and c. To rescind that portion of its September 13, 2006, order transferring portions of CD 33 to the City. 11. The City acknowledges that, as a governmental entity, no cash bond is required with this petition. However, pursuant to statutes section 103E.812, subd. 6, costs, including engineering and attorney's fees, related to the proceedings to transfer a drainage system must be paid by the proposed transferee and, pursuant to statutes section 103E.202, the City agrees to pay the costs incurred in the action. The City requests, however, to the extent CD 33 is benefitted by rescission of the order transferring portions thereof, that the Drainage Authority consider what portion of the proceedings may be paid for by the drainage system. 12. This petition is made and authorized by duly approved action of the City Council of the City of Monticello. M Brian Stumpf, Its Mayor Attest: Jeff O'Neill, Its City Administrator [10496-0002/3032509/1] 2 Dated: City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 4A. Consideration of approving annual appointments and designations for 2019 (JO/JS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statutes require that certain appointments be made at the first meeting of each year. Attached you will find a list of the designations and appointments that have been compiled by city staff. Council representatives that serve as voting members of a board are addressed in the agenda report. Council liaison assignments, which are appointed by the Mayor and then considered for ratification by the City Council, are noted on the attached 2019 Annual Appointments listing included in the supporting data. Included as an attachment is a general summary of the various commissions, committees, and organizations currently in operation that involve some level of participation from City Council, volunteer members, or city staff. Designations/App ointments : a. Acting Mayor: Lloyd Hilgart will serve as Acting Mayor. b. Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council: Jim Davidson and Bill Fair will serve as Council representatives on the Council. City Attorney: The firm of Campbell Knutson has served as the City's general legal counsel with Joel Jamnik being the primary attorney for Monticello. The City also utilizes Kennedy Graven for legal services particularly in areas such as economic development (Monticello EDA). It is recommended to designate both of these firms in the capacity of City Attorney for 2019. d. City Auditor: The Finance Department has retained MMKR to perform audit services and the Council approved a contract with MMKR for auditing. Council should designate MMKR for the official 2018 audit. City Depositories: The city utilizes one bank to provide banking services for the City which is Wells Fargo. In addition, under Minnesota Statutes 239, the Chief Financial Officer has also been designated the authority to name other official depositories for the purpose of investments. The motion would include the authorization for the Finance Director to designate other depositories when necessary for investment purposes only. f. City Planner: Northwest Associated Consultants has served as the City Planner for a number of years, with Steve Grittman providing direct services to the City. For 2019, city staff and the Planning Commission recommend that NAC continue to serve the City on day-to-day planning matters. g. Consulting Building Inspections: The Chief Building Official recommends continuing with Rum River Construction Consultants as a contract building code plan review and inspection service at this time. Rim River is used on an as - needed, on-call basis. The appointment item authorizes the 2019 contract for Rum River. With the exception of rate increase, services continue per the agreement at present. The rate increase is from $78 to $85/hour for on-call inspection and plan City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 review and meeting attendance and from $95/hour for after-hours inspections (before 7 a.m. and after 4:30 p.m.) to $105/hour. h. Consulting Engineer: Currently WSB & Associates serves as the City's consulting engineer for development review assistance and it is recommended that they continue to provide this service for 2019. For 2019 WSB requested an increase of 2.3% in their fee schedule. i. Economic Development Authority: 011ie Korophchak-White was reappointed to another term to expire December 2024. j. Financial Consultants: The City Finance Director recommends continuing with Northland Securities as a financial advisor to the City. The City is very satisfied with the services provided by Northland Securities. k. Health Officer: We recommend continuing with CentraCare Health Monticello Physicians Clinic as the designated health officer. 1. IEDC: The terms of Dick Van Allen, Darek Vetsch, Luke Dahlheimer, and Elizabeth Calpas all are recommended for renewal for terms to expire December 2021. In addition, it is recommended to appoint Randy Skarphol for first term to expire December 2021. In. Insurance Agent: We recommend Foster -White as our general insurance agent for 2019. North Risk Partners is recommended for Workers Compensation insurance and liquor liability coverage (Hi -Way Liquors). n. Library Board: Julie Spiers and Beth Metzger were recommended for reappointment for 3 year terms expiring December 2021. o. Official Newspaper: In the past the Monticello Times has been designated as the official paper. It is proposed to designate the Times as the official newspaper again for 2019. P. Parks and Recreation Commission: Brian Stoll and Anna Bohanon were reappointed to another 3 -year term expiring in December 2021. q. Planning Commission: Katie Peterson was recommended for a 3 -year term expiring December 2021. r. Public Works Building Committee: This committee will develop a recommendation for meeting facility needs for the Public Works Department. Councilmember(s) ? will serve as the council representatives who will work with staff on this committee f. Representatives to Other Multi -Jurisdictional Bodies: This appointment is for selecting the City representatives to serve on the Communitv Education Advisory Board and the Monticello Orderly Annexation Board. Members to the MOAA Board are appointed for one year with Brian Stumpf and Lloyd Hilgart proposed to serve in 2019 as the City's voting representatives. 2 City Council Agenda: 1/14/2019 B. ALTERNATIVE ACTION: 1. Motion approving the proposed appointments and designations for 2019, and any changes as recommended by Mayor and Council. 2. Motion of other. C. SUPPORTING DATA: A. List of 2019 Annual Appointments and Designations (proposed) B. Correspondence from: • Letter from WSB — 2019 Rate Schedule • Northwest Associated Consultants (NAC) 2019 Rates • Contract with Rum River DRAFT 2019 ANNUAL APPOINTMENTS & DESIGNATIONS Acting Mayor: Lloyd Hilgart Attorney: Campbell Knutson Kennedy Graven (EDA) Auditor: Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co (MMKR) Bond Counsel: Kennedy Graven Building Official: Rum River Construction Consultants Consulting Engineer: WSB & Associates Financial Consultants: Northland Securities Health Officer: CentraCare Health Monticello Physicians Clinic Insurance Agents: Foster -White (general liabiility) North Risk Partners - Apollo (Workers Comp & Liq. Liability) Official Depositories: Wells Fargo (Chief Financial Officer is authorized to designate other depositories for investment purposes only) Official Newspaper: Monticello Times Planner: Northwest Associated Consultants (Steve Grittman) COMMISSIONS/BOARDS NAME TERM EXPIRES Planning Commission Brad Fyle 3 yr 12/2019 (3 -year staggered terms) Marc Simpson 3 yr 12/2019 John Alstad 3 yr 12/2020 Sam Murdoff 3 yr 12/2020 Katie Peterson 3 yr 12/2021 Charlotte Gabler Council liaison Parks and Recreation Commission Julie Jelen 3 yr 12/2019 (3 -year staggered terms) Jack Gregor 3 yr 12/2019 Karen Vetsch 3 yr 12/2019 Lynn Anderson 3 yr 12/2020 Nancy McCaffrey 3 yr 12/2020 Brian Stoll 3 yr 12/2021 Anna Bohanon 3 yr 12/2021 Bill Fair Council liaison Library Board Teri Willenbring 3 yr 12/2019 (3 -year staggered terms) Jamie Driscoll 3 yr 12/2020 Shea Roskowiak 3 yr 12/2020 Julie Spiers 3 yr 12/2021 Beth Metzger 3 yr 12/2021 Charlotte Gabler Council liaison Economic Development Authority Jon Morphew 6 yr 12/2020 (6 -year staggered terms) Bill Tapper 6 yr 12/2021 Tracy Hinz 6 yr 12/2022 Steve Johnson 6 yr 12/2023 011ie Koropchak-White 6 yr 12/2024 Jim Davidson (voting) Council rep Lloyd Hilgart (voting) Council rep IEDC: Joni Pawelk 3 yr 12/2019 (3 -year staggered terms) Wayne Elam 3 yr 12/2019 Don Roberts 3 yr 12/2019 Kevin Steffensmeier 3 yr 12/2019 Steve Johnson 3 yr 12/2019 Andrew Tapper 3 yr 12/2020 Mike Carr 3 yr 12/2020 Christopher Church 3 yr 12/2020 VACANT 3 yr 12/2020 Dick Van Allen 3 yr 12/2021 Darek Vetsch 3 yr 12/2021 Luke Dahlheimer 3 yr 12/2021 Randy Skarphol 3 yr 12/2021 Elizabeth Calpas Chamber Rep 12/2021 Chamber Director ex -officio Brian Stumpf Council liaison Bertram Chain of Lakes Advisory Council Jim Hayes (at large) 3 yr 12/2019 (3 -year staggered terms) Tom Jahnke (at large) 3 yr 12/2019 Wes Olson (at large) 3 yr 12/2020 Lynn Anderson Parks rep 12/2020 Jim Lindberg (at large) 3 yr 12/2021 Jim Davidson (voting) Council rep Bill Fair (voting) Council rep Fire Relief Board of Trustees Jeff O'Neill Staff (annual) Wayne Oberg Staff Brian Stumpf Council Michael Mossey Fire Chief COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS BCOL Advisory Council (voting) EDA (voting) Emergency Planning - County Emergency Planning - Xcel Fire Relief Board of Trustees (voting) Highway 25 Coalition 1-94 West Corridor Coalition IEDC Library Board MOAA Parks Commission Personnel Committee Planning Commission Public Works Building Committee Xcel Public Relations 2019 Liaison Jim Davidson & Bill Fair Lloyd Hilgart & Jim Davidson Bill Fair Brian Stumpf & Bill Fair Brian Stumpf Brian Stumpf Charlotte Gabler Brian Stumpf Charlotte Gabler Brian Stumpf and Lloyd Hilgart Bill Fair Brian Stumpf & Charlotte Gabler Charlotte Gabler Jim Davidson NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 2019 CHARGE RATES Effective January 1, 2019 Employee Private City Alan Brixius, Principal 173.00 147.00 Stephen Grittman, Principal 173.00 147.00 Bob Kirmis, Senior Planner 157.00 134.00 Nate Sparks, Senior Planner 111.00 94.50 Dan Sjordal, Landscape Architect 125.00 125.00 Ryan Grittman, Planner 76.00 64.50 Myles Campbell, Planner 76.00 64.50 Ryan Saltis, Associate Planner 62.00 52.50 Secretarial 56.00 47.50 Dan Wilson, Financial Analyst 130.00 130.00 Mileage: Current IRS Rate Photocopies: 15 cents per page Supplies: Cost plus 15% wsb November 26, 2018 Mr. Jeff O'Neill City Administrator City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: WSB 2019 Rate Schedule Dear Mr. O'Neill: WSB is grateful for our relationship with yo;_:, your team and community, and we look for,A,ard to Continuing to build our relationship and support you to deliver your long-range community vision. 2018 has been a transformational year at WSB! We have updated our brand, including a new logo, but it's much more than that. Our rebrand represents the sum of all things WSB—our work, our people, our process—as well as how we sound and look. For the sixth year in a row we have been named a Top Place to Work, helping us retain some of the best talent in the industry. We have a passion for what is possible and are actively working to make that future a reality, you will see that in everything we do with you. There has been significant growth and investment in our Public Engagement services. Our clients are increasingly asking for help to reach, engage with, and inform their communities. Our team has grown to meet this need and provide expert level engagement leading to more informed and satisfied communities. We continue to invest in, and develop, our state -of -the art design services by incorporating leading edge technology like advanced visualization services, more realistic 3D and CAD imaging, innovative GIS capabilities and new methods that incorporate Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality. In our effort to keep moving forward, we have added additional testing capabilities at our AASHTO certified lab to better address the needs of our clients. Our lab is a premier testing center in the state and able to perform nearly any test. We attached our 2019 Rate Schedule for our typical services for your information. We are committed to providing the highest quality services at a reasonable price. To that end we are proposing an average increase of 2.3% for our 2019 rates. We're thankful for partners like you who have shared in our vision, passion and commitment to your projects. Thank you again for the opportunity to serve you. I would be happy to answer any questions regarding our requested rate schedule changes. Please contact me any time at 763.541.4800. Sincerely, WSB ` J"w A Shibani Bisson, PE Sr. Project Manager Attachment srb 2019 Rate Schedule PRINCIPAL $166-$185 ASSOCIATE I SR. PROJECT MANAGER I SR. PROJECT ENGINEER $150-$185 PROJECT MANAGER $132-$146 PROJECT ENGINEER $116-$146 GRADUATE ENGINEER $88-$109 SR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I SR. PLANNER I SR. GIS SPECIALIST $116-$146 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I PLANNER I GIS SPECIALIST $69-$109 ENGINEERING SPECIALIST j SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST $99-$143 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST $57-$94 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER $93-$118 SURVEY One -Person Crew $145 Two -Person Crew $190 Three -Person Crew $205 OFFICE TECHNICIAN $52-$92 wsl� Costs associated with word processing, cell phones, reproduction of common correspondence, and mailing are included in the above hourly rates. Vehicle mileage is included in our billing rates [excluding geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) service rates]. Mileage can be charged separately, if specifically outlined by contract. Reimbursable expenses include costs asso- ciated with plan, specification, and report reproduction; permit fees; delivery costs; etc. Multiple rates illustrate the varying levels of experience within each category. Rate Schedule is adjusted annually. WSBENG.COM AGREEMENT FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL SERVICES This Agreement for Building Official Services (the "Agreement") is entered into on this day of , 2019, by and between the City of Monticello (the "Municipality") and Rum River Ventures, LLC DBA Rum River Construction Consultants (the "Contractor"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Municipality is in need of professional services to fulfill the needs of their building inspection services pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 326B.133; and WHEREAS, Contractor has substantial experience as a Building Official and providing building department inspection services implementing the State Building Code and is otherwise qualified to assist the Municipality on an as needed basis for the same; and WHEREAS, the Municipality desires to contract with Contractor to act as a Building Official and/or provide building inspection services for the Municipality; and WHEREAS, Contractor is engaged in an independent business and has complied with all federal, state, and local laws regarding business permits and licenses of any kind that may be required to carry out said business and the tasks as set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Contractor is an independent contractor and may be engaged to perform the same or similar activities for other municipalities during the term of this Agreement, and that Contractor shall not work solely on behalf of Municipality. NOW, THEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made herein, it is agreed as follows: I. Services. Contractor shall provide services to the Municipality on an as requested basis for the prices set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Services"). Contractor shall perform the Services in the capacity of a Certified Building Official, at the direction of the Chief Building Official or Community Development Director, under Minn. Stat. § 326B.133, in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code, applicable Municipality Ordinances, and applicable Minnesota law. The Municipality agrees that all transportation expenses incurred in the course of performing the Services shall be paid to Contractor as set forth in Exhibit A. Contractor reserves the rights to change the prices and services offered on Exhibit A from time to time, and shall provide the Municipality 30 days written notice in advance of any such changes. Municipality agrees that in the course of performing the Services, Contractor is acting as a public official on the Municipality's behalf. II. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and shall continue for a period of one year therefrom, at which time the Agreement shall automatically renew on a yearly basis until or unless terminated as specified below. III. Performance. Contractor shall maintain licenses by the State of Minnesota as a Certified Building Official and by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a Certified Inspector for on-site septic systems. Contractor shall perform the Services in a manner consistent with that of a reasonable and prudent Building Official. Contractor shall maintain an adequate set of records in Municipality property files of all dates, types, and results of permits as required when inspecting permitted work. If any work is requested outside of the scope of the services set forth in Exhibit A, such work shall not commence until Contractor and the Municipality agree to the terms, scope, price, and other details in writing (including via electronic mail). Such additional work shall still be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. IV. Duties and Powers of Building Official. As provided by Minnesota Administrative rules 1300.0110, the Municipality and Building Official hereby appoint Rum River Construction Consultants and its employees as Subd. 2. Deputies, and extend the Duties and Powers of Building Official while providing services for the City of Monticello. V. Independent Contractor. Contractor shall perform the Services as an independent contractor and agent of the Municipality, and not as an employee. No withholdings or deductions shall be made from payments due to Contractor. Contractor shall not be eligible for benefits, workers compensation, or unemployment benefits. To the extent allowable by law, Contractor may subcontract the performance of certain administrative or other duties under the Agreement. VI. Insurance. During the entire term of this Agreement, Contractor shall maintain the following insurances and will provide the Municipality of evidence of the same upon request: (1) Commercial general liability insurance coverage with a policy limit of at least $1,500,000 per occurrence; (2) Business automobile liability coverage with a total liability limits of at least $1,500,000; and (3) Workers' compensation insurance. If Contractor is not required by law to carry workers' compensation insurance, in place of proof of workers' compensation insurance, Contractor may provide a written statement of exemption specifying the particular provision of Minn. Stat. § 176.041 that exempts Contractor from having to carry such coverage. If Contractor is required by law to carry workers' compensation insurance, Contractor shall, at the time of execution of this Agreement, furnish evidence satisfactory to the Municipality that Contractor maintains or is exempt from maintaining insurance coverage pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. VII. Amendments. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or changes of any provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing and signed by Municipality and Contractor. VIII. Regulatory Compliance. Contractor shall abide by all federal, state, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, and regulations now in effect or hereinafter adopted pertaining to this Agreement or to the facilities, programs, and staff for which Contractor is responsible. Contractor shall procure, at Contractor's expense, all permits, licenses, or other rights required for the provision of the Services. Any violation of federal, state, or local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations, as well as loss of any applicable license, permit, or certification by Contractor shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement, regardless of the reason and whether or not 2 intentional, and shall entitle Municipality to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date of such violation, failure, or loss. IX. Data Practices Compliance. Contractor will have access to data collected or maintained by the Municipality to the extent necessary to perform Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to maintain all data obtained from the Municipality in the same manner as the Municipality is required under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. Contractor will not release or disclose the contents of data classified as not public to any person except at the written direction of the Municipality. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to return all data pertaining to Municipality business within 30 days of Agreement termination. X. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to the other party 60 days prior to the termination. In the event of a material breach by either party, the Agreement may be terminated with 10 days written notice to the other party. In the event Municipality elects to terminate based upon an alleged material breach of the Agreement by Contractor, Contractor shall have 10 days (or the least amount of time reasonably necessary if longer than 10 days) to cure the breach. XI. Billing and Payment. Invoices shall be submitted periodically (customarily on a monthly basis) and are due and payable within 30 days of receipt by Municipality. Past due balances shall accrue interest at a rate of 1.0% per month (or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, if less). XII. Choice of Law and Venue. This Agreement is being executed in and is intended to be performed in the State of Minnesota, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with Minnesota law. The parties hereto consent and agree that any legal action arising from or related to the Agreement shall be venued in Wright County District Court, State of Minnesota. XIII. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable. If any part of this Agreement is rendered void, invalid, or otherwise unenforceable, such rendering shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the remainder of this Agreement. XIV. Merger. The Parties acknowledge and represent that no promise or representation not contained in this Agreement has been made to them, and acknowledge and represent that this Agreement contains the entire understanding between the Parties and contains all terms and conditions between them. XV. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. For purposes of this Agreement, the use of a facsimile, e-mail, or other electronic medium shall have the same force and effect as an original signature. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and executed this Agreement, both in duplicate, on the day and year first above written. MUNICIPALITY Its: Second Signature (if required by Municipality) Its: CONTRACTOR M Its: E Exhibit A Services • Building Inspection Services and Additional Requested Work. o On call and as needed general building inspection services will be billed at a rate of $85.00 per hour at the direction of the Chief Building Official. o Single -permit plan review will be billed at 85% of calculated fees as determined by the current fee schedule and will be assigned by the Building Official. o Single -permit complete issuance to certificate of occupancy inspection will be billed at 80% of permit fees. • After Hours Work. Inspections and/or other meetings requested outside of normal business hours, M -F 7:00 am to 4:30 pm will be billed at $105.00 per hour, and a 2 -hour minimum will apply. These terms can also be applied to emergency disaster response and the evaluation of buildings after natural or manmade disasters. • Transportation Costs. Contractor will provide transportation to meetings and site inspections at no cost to the Municipality, other than the standard billing rates set forth herein. • Attendance at Meetings. Contractor attendance at required workshops and regularly scheduled meetings will be billed at a rate of $85.00 per hour plus travel time one way from the Princeton office of Rum River Construction Consultants. 5 Council Agenda: 01/14/2019 4B. Consideration to adopt Resolution 2019-03 - Findings of Fact for denial of an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan reguiding a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square From "Places To Shop" to "Places To Live" and to adopt Resolution 2019-04 — Findings of Fact for denial of an Amendment to the Zoning Map of a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4. Medium and High Densitv Residential District" or to reconsider action on both the Comprehensive Plan and Rezoning requests for the subiect parcel. (NAC/AS) A. REFERENCE AND BACKGROUND: On December 10, 2019, the City Council took action to deny a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live" and to deny a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the subject parcel from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District". The applicant for the requests is Headwaters Development. Resolutions of findings of fact for the action to deny the requests have been prepared for consideration. The findings of fact for denial include those made during the Planning Commission consideration of the requests, the Council discussion of the requests, as well as the stated findings made by the Council in the motion. Staff has also been made aware that the Council may wish to reconsider action on the requests. Staff have therefore prepared a motion for reconsideration. Any motion for reconsideration of the actions would need to come before decision on the resolutions for finding of fact for denial of the comprehensive plan and rezoning actions. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS: Decision 1: Reconsideration of Action 1. Motion to reconsider action on the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Live' and the request for Zoning Map Amendment for Rezoning from B-4 (Regional Business District) to R-4 (Medium -High Residence Density Residence District) for the parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square. The motion to reconsider must be made by one of those Council members on the prevailing side of the prior motions of December 10, 2018. The motion to reconsider requires a simple majority vote. If the motion to reconsider passes, the Council may continue to consider the pending application and upon completion of its deliberations, consider motions to again deny the application or to approve the applications, with or without additional conditions. If the decision is once again to deny the applications, the following actions should be taken: Council Agenda: 01/14/2019 Decision 2: Findings of Fact — Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-03 — Findings of Fact for denial of an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan reguiding a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square From "Places To Shop" To "Places To Live", based on findings of fact therein. Decision 3: Findings of Fact — Amendment to Zoning Map from B-4 to R-4 1. Motion to adopt Resolution 2019-04 — Findings of Fact for denial of an Amendment to the Zoning Map of a parcel described as Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District" based on findings of fact therein. If the decision is to approve the applications, a motion to that effect, with any additional terms or conditions the Council decides to impose and resolutions including findings of fact from the prior meeting with any additional or revised findings to be stated should be adopted. Resolution 2018-100 to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Resolution 2018-101 to approve the Map Amendment for Rezoning, along with Ordinance No. 705 for Rezoning, are included with the December 10, 2018 staff report in the Supporting Data for Council's consideration if the decision is to approve. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Alternatives presented are consistent with the prior Council action and staff's understanding of a request for reconsideration. D. SUPPORTING DATA: A. Resolution 2019-03, Findings of Fact for Denial of Comprehensive Plan Amendment B. Resolution 2019-04, Findings of Fact for Denial of Rezoning C. Staff Report and Exhibits of December 10, 2018 City Council meeting CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGUIDING A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVERVIEW SQUARE FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO LIVE" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live"; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is intended to facilitate eventual development for a senior housing project; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 2" d, 2019, for the consideration of the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide the parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live"; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council acted to deny the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live" on December 10th, 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the denial: 1. For many years in the past, the subject property was zoned/guided in ways that accommodate the potential for mixed uses, including either (or both) commercial and high density residential. However, the City took specific steps in the Zoning Ordinance Update to remove the possibility of residential use from this site. 2. The subject property is bounded by commercial uses to north, northwest, and west, and is a part of a commercial plat that shares an intersection near the I-94 interchange. The Planning Commission recommended no change in the commercial designation of this site. 3. The proposed senior housing use, as conceptually designed by the current applicants, while meeting the technical requirements for height due to a "grandfathered" regulation, fails to meet contemporary height requirements of the Wild and Scenic River District regulations applied to other property. Moreover, the City Council is concerned that the project would not be able to meet the strict intent and requirements of the proposed R-4 zoning. 4. Although the subject property has remained undeveloped despite many years of commercial designation and zoning, much of that period encompassed a significant slowdown in development pace due to the "Great Recession" period, similar to many other commercial properties in the City. 5. The subject property is near to several commercially designated parcels, including those directly fronting County Road 18, I-94, and other roadways with superior access and visibility, and once developed, will increase the demand for commercial use on this parcel. 6. Current conditions at the intersection of Hart Boulevard and County 39 create potentially unsafe visibility and driving conditions for senior residents and other area traffic. 7. The parcel is located in the area of a potential Mississippi River crossing study site, which would negatively impact the property if developed residentially. 8. Given the location of the subject property, the subject property should be considered as "prime" for commercial development. 9. The rezoning of the site from B-4 to R-4 (and the concurrent reguiding from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live") is not supported by the City's requirements for considering the redesignation of prime commercial land for high density residential uses. 10. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan that promotes a more concentrated mixed high density residential and commercial development of its downtown area as a primary objective, suggesting that competing locations outside of the downtown area should be discouraged from redesignation to senior housing uses. 11. The proposed senior housing land use would result in a significant underutilization of the property, leaving much of it green space rather than in development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby adopts the findings of fact for denial of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan re -guiding the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live". ADOPTED this 14ffi day of January, 2019, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE DENIAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVERVIEW SQUARE FROM "B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT" TO "R-4, MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District"; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is intended to facilitate eventual development for a senior housing project; and WHEREAS, the Monticello Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 2" d, 2019, for the consideration of the request for Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District"; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council acted to deny the request for Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from "B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District' on December 10"', 2018; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the action for denial: 1. For many years in the past, the subject property was zoned/guided in ways that accommodate the potential for mixed uses, including either (or both) commercial and high density residential. However, the City took specific steps in the Zoning Ordinance Update to remove the possibility of residential use from this site. 2. The subject property is bounded by commercial uses to north, northwest, and west, and is a part of a commercial plat that shares an intersection near the I-94 interchange. The Planning Commission recommended no change in the commercial designation of this site. 3. The proposed senior housing use, as conceptually designed by the current applicants, while meeting the technical requirements for height due to a "grandfathered" regulation, fails to meet contemporary height requirements of the Wild and Scenic River District regulations applied to other property. Moreover, the City Council is concerned that the project would not be able to meet the strict intent and requirements of the proposed R-4 zoning. 4. Although the subject property has remained undeveloped despite many years of commercial designation and zoning, much of that period encompassed a significant slowdown in development pace due to the "Great Recession" period, similar to many other commercial properties in the City. 5. The subject property is near to several commercially designated parcels, including those directly fronting County Road 18, I-94, and other roadways with superior access and visibility, and once developed, will increase the demand for commercial use on this parcel. 6. Current conditions at the intersection of Hart Boulevard and County 39 create potentially unsafe visibility and driving conditions for senior residents and other area traffic. 7. The parcel is located in the area of a potential Mississippi River crossing study site, which would negatively impact the property if developed residentially. 8. Given the location of the subject property, the subject property should be considered as "prime" for commercial development. 9. The rezoning of the site from B-4 to R-4 (and the concurrent reguiding from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live") is not supported by the City's requirements for considering the redesignation of prime commercial land for high density residential uses. 10. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan that promotes a more concentrated mixed high density residential and commercial development of its downtown area as a primary objective, suggesting that competing locations outside of the downtown area should be discouraged from redesignation to senior housing uses. 11. The proposed senior housing land use would result in a significant underutilization of the property, leaving much of it green space rather than in development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby adopts the findings of fact for denial of the amendment rezoning the subject property from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District". ADOPTED this 14th day of January, 2019, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL Brian Stumpf, Mayor ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator 4B. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Live' and a request for Zoning Map Amendment for Rezoning from B-4 (Regional Business District) to R-4 (Medium -High Residence Density Residence District) for a 125 unit senior living development. Applicant: Headwaters Development/Michael Hoagberg (NAC) Property: Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square (southeast quadrant of County Highway 39 and Hart Boulevard) The property consists of approximately 5.2 acres and is currently vacant. Planning Case Number: 2018-038 A. REFERENCE & BACKGROUND Request(s): Comprehensive Plan Amendment from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live", Rezoning from B-4, Regional Business to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential District The proposed use will require a conditional use permit in the R-4 District, for which the applicant may apply pending the outcome of the current considerations. Deadline for Decision: October 20th, 2018, extended 60 days to December 19th, 2018 Land Use Designation: Places to Shop Zoning Designation: B-4, Regional Business, and the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River Overlay District The purpose of the "B-4" Regional Business District is to provide for the establishment of commercial and service activities which draw from and serve customers from the entire community or region. The purpose of the Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River district is to protect and preserve the scenic, recreational, natural and historical values of the Mississippi River in the city by carefully controlling City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 development of this river corridor consistent with the state Wild and Scenic River Act. Current Site Use: The site is currently undeveloped. Surrounding Land Uses: North: County Highway 39, Single Family Residential, R-1 East: Church and Twin Homes — R-1 South: Retail and Service — B -2/B-3 West: Retail and Gas/Convenience - B-4 ANALYSIS Land Use Plan and Rezoning. The applicants seek to reset the land use and zoning designations on the property — currently designated for commercial uses (Places to Shop)— to high-density residential (Places to Live) and R-4, Medium -High Density Residential. The proposed project would consist of a single building containing senior housing units of approximately 125 units — 92 in the initial phase, and a subsequent second phase of 33 units. The applicants indicate that the initial project would include 14 memory care units on the first floor, with a mix of 78 assisted and independent living units on the upper two floors of the three-story building. Underground parking would serve the tenants who drive, and a surface parking lot would accommodate staff and visitors. The applicants have prepared a sketch plan of the project to illustrate the general intent of their layout, although a final Conditional Use Permit is not ready for consideration as the CUP requires full civil engineering, site planning, and architectural design submissions. However, the concept site plan conveys the intent, which is to site the building in the north portion of the property, with access points along Hart Boulevard across from both the partially developed Broadway Market property and the Kwik Trip site (formerly O'Ryans). The Zoning Ordinance identifies a series of conditions under which the City might consider amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Those are as follows: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error or addresses the need resulting from some changing condition, trend, or fact arising since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan; City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 (b) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the guiding principles of the Comprehensive Plan; (c) The extent to which the proposed amendment addresses a demonstrated community need; (d) Whether the proposed amendment will protect the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the public; (e) The impacts on the natural and built environments, including air, water, noise, stormwater management, wildlife habitat, water quality, vegetation, drainage, streets, and other engineering design or environmental factors; (f) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses surrounding the subject property; whether the proposed design and land uses are appropriate for the land; and whether the proposed amendment will maintain or improve compatibility among uses and ensure efficient development within the City; (g) Whether the proposed amendment will result in a logical, orderly and predictable development pattern; and (h) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the purpose of this ordinance. The zoning ordinance also provides criteria for consideration of map amendments (rezoning) as follows: (a) Whether the proposed amendment corrects an error in the original text or map; or (b) Whether the proposed amendment addresses needs arising from a changing condition, trend, or fact affecting the subject property and surrounding area. (c) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with achieving the goals and objectives outlined in the comprehensive plan. In 2013, another developer sought approvals for a residential project on this site — similar in some ways, but distinct in a critical aspect. While that project was multiple family, its market focus was for general market rate apartments, rather than restricted and designed for seniors. The City denied that project, and the developer moved to a separate site with a larger market -rate project. One of the primary objectives for housing in the Comprehensive Plan is to "Provide for housing suited to the needs of an aging population." The Plan also includes a number of City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 policies related to life -cycle housing, incorporating a significant accommodation for housing stock that address the full range of life-long needs, specifically, adequate quality housing for elderly persons requiring additional care and/or reduced maintenance. Density. The proposed full build -out project would have 125 total units, many of which would be occupied by only single tenants. This is a gross density of 24.9 units per acre, and a likely population on the site of fewer than 150 persons. For the adjoining Mill Run twin homes, the developed density of this neighborhood is roughly 5.0 units per acre. Traffic and Parking. Senior Housing of the mixed type proposed by the current developer differs from market -rate housing in a few critical ways. First, its tenants are far less likely to drive, and as such, many do not own cars. Thus, parking demand is significantly reduced for these projects, leaving much more of the site in green space rather than occupied by parking lot. While the City has significant strictures on surface parking for multiple family development, the overall quantity of parking is as little as 30% to 40% of market rate multi -family housing. The concept plan illustrates a significant supply of underground parking as well, limiting the need to construct large surface lots, and following the direction of the R-4 zoning requirements. This provision not only limits surface parking, it increases green space (thereby reducing stormwater), and is notably more attractive. Finally, it is consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan policies of improving quality of housing choices, not merely quantity. This (the reduced impact of senior housing) is also true, in a related way, of trip generation. The bulk of the traffic generation for mixed senior housing is from staff and the independent living seniors in the building, although even then, independent units often have just one driver occupant rather than two or more in market rate housing. Thus, expected traffic volumes generated both to and from the site are expected to be reduced in comparison to market -rate housing on the site. The more relevant comparison, however, is to the current zoning, which would support a five acre commercial development, including retail, office, or restaurant. Trip generation for senior housing would forecast approximately 5.5 trips per unit, a total of approximately 500 trips per day for the initial phase, and just under 700 trips per day for the full build -out of 125 units. Retail projects on a five -acre site would likely range from more than 1,000 trips per day for an office use to over 3,000 trips per day, depending on the type and intensity of retail traffic. As such, a senior housing project would generate only half to less than one-fourth of the traffic volumes for Hart Boulevard. In the past, traffic volumes on Hart Boulevard and congestion/sight lines at the County 39 intersection were raised as points of concern City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 for previous development proposals. Senior Housing is likely among the least generators of traffic from this standpoint. Market Need. The applicants further note that current market studies show a high rate of demand for senior housing in the community. Long-term demographic studies indicate that this demand is likely to continue to grow, both to existing population trends and local migration from rural to more urbanized communities. Monticello's retail and medical services are both factors that are likely to fuel additional demand for senior housing. Environmental Factors. The project site is located within the Mississippi Wild and Scenic Recreational River District, a special overlay district that is designed to protect the riverway from encroaching development that is incompatible with natural river use and restoration. It is important to note that Department of Natural Resources staff tasked with monitoring the City's enforcement of the Wild and Scenic regulations supported the previous land use proposal, with an understanding that final development plans would be reviewed for consistency as well. At the time of the Planning Commission report preparation it was noted that the building may require a height variance. DNR staff has indicated in other non -riparian situations that such height variances were reasonable, although the specifics of this proposal would need to be judged on their own merits. Compatibility with Existing and Proposed Uses. Of primary concern in the previous application was the compatibility issue, largely related to traffic concerns, but also related to building massing and bulk. The surrounding buildings largely consist of single and two-story buildings. The applicants in this proposal seek a three story building, but one which covers a significantly lower percentage of the site. The proposed building has a 31,000 square foot footprint, with three stories over that area. Reducing the height of the building to two stories, but retaining the same total square footage, would require a footprint of approximately 47,000 square feet. With a two story design, roof area would also increase, resulting in a building with more mass overall. With a smaller footprint, the applicant is further able to keep the building to the north of the site, maximizing its separation from the medium density twin homes to the south. Further, the senior -living use provides an appropriate transitional land use between the Mill Run residential neighborhood to the east and the commercial uses located to the west and south. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 Planning Commission Review and Recommendation. The Planning Commission considered this application at a Public Hearing on October 2, 2018. There were limited public comments made during the hearing, focused primarily on traffic visibility and volume issues at the intersection of Hart Boulevard and County Road 39 along with concerns regarding the current vacant property maintenance, as well as submitted written concerns related to competitive land uses, traffic, and other site considerations. This is contrasted with the 2013 application which generated significant levels of neighborhood concern and opposition. Planning Commission discussion focused on land use and traffic. Particularly, it was noted that traffic entering County 39 from Hart Boulevard has limited visibility to traffic approaching from the east. The addition of this project would result in additional congestion at that intersection. While traffic received the bulk of the concerns, at least one commissioner felt that the commercial land use designation was important for land use consistency and long-term needs in that area. As such, his opposition to the amendments was based not in traffic but in the need for additional commercial development. Other concerns related to the following: Potential impacts of the Wild and Scenic River District height restrictions. Ability of the applicants to revise the site plan and meet required setbacks. Following the hearing and the Commission's discussion, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to recommend denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, based on a finding that the request was inconsistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Supplemental Analvsis To follow in italics is supplemental analysis provided by staff. Also included in the Supporting Data is supplemental supporting information provided by the applicant, property owner, and public since the time of the public hearing in October. Traffic. Staff continues to believe that the proposed site has merit as a Senior Housing property. As noted in the body of the report above, any use of the site will generate traffic that will need to be addressed — regardless of the volume. And also as noted — this particular use would generate far less than most uses currently allowed in the B-4, which include Retail, Commercial Recreation, Restaurant, Office, and Convenience Gas — some of the highest traffic generating land uses. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 That being said, it should be noted that changes to both the roadway and the site can be made which will mitigate the concerns over traffic. First, the County is planning to restripe the traffic lanes to add a center left turn. This will allow passing traffic to avoid stacking in the County 39 right of way waiting to turn into Hart Boulevard. This, in turn, will clear the intersection for Hart Boulevard traffic that currently must wait to exit the area. Other comments from the City engineering department include: The County restriping project will address the merging traffic issue on eastbound County 39 east of Hart Boulevard by reducing the thru lane traffic from two lanes to one lane to accommodate a center left turn lane. The crash history at the intersection of County 39 and Hart Boulevard does not pose a concern at this time. City staff will discuss installation of dynamic speed signs or other devices to control speed if it is deemed necessary. Moreover, the applicants have agreed that they would make changes to the condition of the site that will facilitate better visibility for turning traffic. Since the County 39 frontage comes with a required 100 foot setback for R-4 development, there is ample room to regrade the frontage and remove existing vegetation (which is one of the primary culprits in obstructing traffic views). Site planning considerations also impacts traffic in other ways. While the Senior Housing proposal retains a large percentage of the site as green space, it is contrasted with the typical B-4 lot coverage of upwards of 90% and allowances for setbacks as little as zero feet for buildings and parking — raising much more problematic issues for site use and visibility. Site Planning. In addition to site modifications that would facilitate traffic safety, the applicants have indicated that they will work with the City to ensure that circulation, site planning, and building design all meet the City's zoning expectations. This includes meeting the required setbacks from all streets and property lines, and complying with height limitations as required. In that regard, staff has confirmed that the applicable Wild and Scenic River District height limitation for this site is 35 feet, rather than the common 25 foot maximum. This is due to an interpretation by the DNR that since the applicable height limitation for this area was 35 feet at the time the Wild and Scenic regulations were first adopted in the 1970s for both commercial and high density residential, that same 35 foot standard is "grandfathered " as the applicable allowance on this property. It is expected that the applicants will meet the 35 foot standard without need for variance. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 Further, as a proposed senior living facility, the project will allow residents to enjoy the view of the river as a long-term benefit and added value. It is questionable whether a commercial development at this location would benefit from the river view in comparison. R-4 Rezoning Considerations. There are other important factors to consider for this site as a Senior Housing property. After the City adopted the R-4 zoning district, it conducted a study of lands in the community that might be eligible multi family sites. The R-4 District includes the following language in its purpose statement: In making a determination as to the suitability of a site for R-4 rezoning, the City will prioritize the following site and area factors: Replacement Land Uses. R-4 zoning fits the following zoning categories and circumstances: • Land already zoned for R-3 • Land currently zoned for commercial uses, but which would not be considered 'prime " commercial (the City would like to protect 'prime commercial areas that show the most promise for that use in the future). However, no additional land was zoned R-4 at the time. Instead, the City chose to consider R-4 requests on a case by case basis. In this analysis, staff believes that the subject site fits the description of the second bullet - point. Because it is separated from Broadway (County 75), and either Interstate 94 or Highway 25 frontage, the subject site is not a 'prime " commercial property. Moreover, there are currently more than 260 acres of vacant available commercial land in the City —most of which would be considered to be superior to this site from an access and visibility standpoint. This includes the commercial parcel to the southwest, which remains undeveloped at this time. Mapping of available commercial property within the City is attached for reference. Transportation and utility infrastructure to serve the parcel has long been in place. The proposed development will utilize these existing investments. The development of the property at this time also has tax revenue implications in terms of allowing for development within the next year to two years versus an unknown timeline for commercial development. The use of the site for residential purposes will also add to the population base of the area to support and reinforce the viability of existing and future commercial in the area. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 Neighboring Land Uses. Although the subject property would provide (whenever developed) new commercial opportunities to this portion of the community, there are already significant developed and undeveloped commercial lands that can and do serve that purpose, including Kwik Trip and the Target/Home Depot projects, all within a quarter -mile of this site. There is also available commercial property directly adjacent to the subject site. Further supporting the Senior Housing use on the site, the project would have some of the closest proximity access to the hospital and clinic area, just half a mile to the west of the property. Zoning History. Finally, the site has a history of zoning that would accommodate residential use, including an R-3 designation dating from the 1970s, and a mixed-use PZM designation up until the recent update of the zoning ordinance. It was only when the PZM district was abolished as a part of the update that residential was removed from the site as a development option. Process. Because the applicant is not seeking a PUD, but rather agreeing to abide by the R-4 zoning regulations, this issue has come before the City without benefit of a concept review. As such, many of the site planning issues which would be raised by concept PUD review are being addressed as first impression issues under the Comp Plan and Rezoning amendment process —prior to the formal Conditional Use Permit site plan review. The applicants have agreed to abide by those regulations — and they should be able to do so given the nature of the parcel and the example plans they have prepared to date. Furthermore, the property is a platted lot, requiring no preliminary and final plat process. Summarv. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is a policy -laden decision for the Planning Commission and City Council. The elements noted above are designed to help the City officials determine whether a proposed change is needed and justified. It is important to note that as the site has been vacant for a number of years, the relevant question is which land use is most appropriate for the site — the proposed, or the existing land use designation (commercial). There is often a tendency to measure impacts of the current proposal against vacant land — this should not be the City's standard. Instead, the site could accommodate an intense commercial development at any time under its current land use designation and zoning — this is what the change should be measured against. Conditional Use Permit. A multiple family building, Assisted Living Facility and Nursing/Convalescent Home in the R-4 District is allowed by Conditional Use Permit. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 As noted above, adequate information for a full CUP consideration is not yet available and would be required pending the decisions of the present Comprehensive Plan and Rezoning considerations. However, staff would make the following notes for the benefit of the Planning Commission, City Council, and applicant in considering both the land use changes and potential subsequent CUP consideration. 1. Setbacks. The R-4 zoning district requires a 100 foot setback from the principal frontage, and a 40 foot setback from the side street on a corner lot. Technically, the principal frontage for this parcel is County 39 (even though it can not gain access from that minor arterial). As a result, the street setbacks shown on the original concept plan submitted would be required to be reversed. The applicant has provided a revised concept plan which meets the required setbacks. This plan provides additional building setback, furthering enhancing site lines along the CSAH 39 frontage. 2. Building Height. As noted previously, the building will likely not require a height variance to the Wild and Scenic height limitations. Instead, it is noted that DNR staff has informed the City that given the conditions and history of the property in question, the previous 35 foot height requirement would apply. It is noted that building height is measured from the average grade to the average building height (not to the peak), so the applicants can factor this in to their design. Regardless of the standard, staff encourages the developer to consider architecture that minimizes building bulk and height, and meets the R-4 requirements for variable building facade and roof -lines. In addition, the proposed three-story height will minimize the footprint on the site, providing more open space and minimizing impervious surface. 3. The plan shows additional parking to the south side of the property if needed. Staff would encourage the bulk of the parking to be concentrated in the north end of the property. 4. There is a service area on the west side of the building, facing Hart Boulevard. It will be important this this area is architecturally screened to present a more appropriate view from the roadway. 5. Screening overall will be a consideration to ensure compatibility and to minimize impacts to the neighboring properties. It is noted that with lower traffic volumes, headlight impacts should be likewise reduced for the street and neighborhood. 6. It is noted that the south driveway aligns with a driveway that serves the Kwik Trip property. While this access point appears to serve as a public street, and minimizing traffic flow to County 39 is positive, this drive is private property, and should not be seen as a public route to Broadway. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 7. Civil engineering — utilities and stormwater management — are critical considerations of future CUP consideration. It is presumed that additional work on this aspect of the plans will add detail as needed. The City's discussion at this point should be focused on land use and impact. B. ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS The Planning Commission recommends Alternative 2 for Decision 1 & 2. Staff Recommends Alternative 1 for Decisions 1 & 2. Decision 1: Resolution approving a Comprehensive Plan amendment reclassifying the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live" Motion to approve Resolution 2018-100 approving the Comprehensive Plan amendment reclassifying the subject property Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live", based on the findings identified in the Resolution. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2018-100 amending the Comprehensive Plan by reclassifying the subject property Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live", based on findings to be made by the City Council and to direct staff to prepare formal findings of fact for consideration at the next available City Council meeting. Motion to send the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment back to the Planning Commission for review and consideration based on the supplemental data provided. This action may only be taken if the applicant agrees to an extension of the timeline for agency action. Deadline for agency action is December 191h, 2018. 4. Motion to table action on the request, pending additional information as identified by the City Council and staff report. This action may only be taken if the applicant agrees to an extension of the timeline for agency action. Deadline for agency action is December 191, 2018. Decision 2: Rezoning to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential 1. Motion to approve Resolution 2018-101 and adopt Ordinance No. 705 approving the Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential based on the findings identified in the Resolution. 2. Motion to deny Resolution 2018-101 and to deny adoption of Ordinance No. 705 for Rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2, Riverview Square to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential, based on findings to be made by the City Council and to direct staff to prepare formal findings of fact for consideration at the next available City Council meeting. City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 3. Motion to send the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment back to the Planning Commission for review and consideration based on the supplemental data provided. This action may only be taken if the applicant agrees to an extension of the timeline for agency action. Deadline for agency action is December 191h, 2018. 4. Motion to table action on the request, pending additional information as identified by the City Council and staff report. This action may only be taken if the applicant agrees to an extension of the timeline for agency action. Deadline for agency action is December 191, 2018. If the City Council motion is to deny either or both actions, Council is asked to direct staff to prepare a resolution including Council's stated findings of fact for consideration. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Land Use amendments and rezoning applications are policy -heavy decisions, for which there are rarely right or wrong choices. As noted above, the proposed land use change from commercial to multi -family residential would have observable changes in traffic and other impacts, and in some cases would likely lessen the impact on the City's infrastructure. As noted in the text of this report, the Comprehensive Plan is filled with objective and policy direction to seek opportunities to provide for a full range of housing choice in the community, specifically noting the need to accommodate senior housing choices for an aging population. In addition, the Comprehensive Plan, as now amended with the Monticello Small Area Downtown study, can be read to support the rezoning, by taking steps that have the impact of focusing commercial development toward the downtown area, away from competing nodes. While this does not require the City to rezone undeveloped commercial land in any way, the proposed rezoning for this site can at least be viewed as being consistent with the City's land use policies in that way. In some manner, the subject site should be able to function well under either commercial or high-density residential regulations. While there are several areas of the community that are zoned and can accommodate commercial land uses, the options for multiple family residential are extremely limited. Existing development patterns can often inhibit infill higher densities, and finding compatible high-density sites can be a challenge. This "alternative locations" factor supports the idea that rezoning to residential can be viewed positively. Further, the R-4 zoning district suggests that certain commercial properties are considered as appropriate candidates for rezoning to R-4 when they are not considered City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 "prime", as in, they do have access or exposure to the City's primary commercial corridors. The subject property is one such parcel. Moreover, senior housing is both in high demand, and creates fewer traditional land use conflicts. The proposed site has been undeveloped as a commercial site for many years, and indeed, a more high-profile commercial property to the west continues to sit only partially built. While the market changes regularly, these conditions do not appear likely to change soon. Senior housing on this site seems to be a reasonable consideration, given the high-volume roadway location, transitional land use considerations (commercial to medium -density residential), and potential for increased green space and low impact, even after full development. Finally, although only generally related to this proposal, the City has adopted the R-4 District that establishes a zoning district that allows higher density residential development, but also places extensive requirements on that development to meet the Comprehensive Plan goal of higher quality development in all categories. Development of multiple family structures under the R-4 district permit higher densities, but also apply greater performance standards (along with a requirement for Conditional Use Permit review) to ensure that the subsequent development proposal is consistent with the City's objectives. As a result, staff is supportive of the rezoning. There should be few, if any, negative impacts on surrounding land uses. The comprehensive plan supports land use decisions that have the effect of encouraging commercial development in the downtown area. There are several options for commercial development in the City, but relatively few competitive sites for high-density residential. And finally, the City's updated zoning district helps to ensure that multiple family residential development will be done in a high-quality manner and be a credit to the community. D. SUPPORTING DATA A. Resolution 2018-100 for Approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendment B. Resolution 2018-101 for Approval of Rezoning C. Ordinance No. 705, Draft D. Aerial Image E. Applicant Narrative F. Applicant Site Aerial G. Applicant Area Aerial H. Site Concept Sketch 1. Land Use Plan J. Zoning Map K. Comprehensive Plan, Excerpts L. Consulting City Engineer's Letter, dated 9/26/18 City Council Agenda —12/10/2018 M. Letter of Public Comment, Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, Mielke Development — Entered into the record at 10/02/18 Planning Commission Meeting N. Planning Commission Minutes, October 2" d, 2018 O. Supplemental Data - Provided Post -10/02/18 Planning Commission Meeting a. Commercial Inventory Map b. Headwaters Development Additional Information Narrative Exh A - Ebenezer Management Overview Exh B - Neighborhood Meeting Letter Exh C- Traffic Study Exh D- River View Square Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions & Easements Exh E - Proposed Site Traffic Patterns Exh F- Updated Proposed Site Plan c. Property Owner Narrative d. Letter of Public Comment, Shawn Weinand CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-100 Date: December 10, 2018 Resolution No. 2018-100 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REGUIDING A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVERVIEW SQUARE FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO LIVE" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to reguide a parcel from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live"; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is intended to facilitate eventual development for a senior housing project; and WHEREAS, the property has remained undeveloped since its designation for exclusively commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, the City currently has more than 260 acres of undeveloped commercial lands in nearby and other areas ; and WHEREAS, the use of the land for senior housing purposes would create lesser impacts on public services and infrastructure, including streets and traffic congestion, than would the current commercial designation; and WHEREAS, the conversion of the land, as non -prime commercial property, for multiple family housing is supported by both Comprehensive Plan policy and zoning ordinance requirements; and WHEREAS, the development of the land for senior housing will facilitate improvements in traffic visibility and intersection congestion; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendment to the land use plan is consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed uses are consistent and compatible with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are less than those anticipated by the previously approved land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The site and building improvements resulting from development under the "Places to Live" land use category are consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 5. The existing conditions include substantial street, utility, stormwater, and grading improvements sufficient to accommodate the use of the property as senior housing. 6. The site and building improvements are able to meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan re - guiding the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live" as submitted, adopting the findings of fact herein. ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL ME ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-101 Date: December 10, 2018 Resolution No. 2018-101 Motion By: Seconded By: A RESOLUTION OF THE MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING MAP OF A PARCEL DESCRIBED AS LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVERVIEW SQUARE FROM "B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT" TO 64R-4, MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT" WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a request for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone a parcel from `B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District"; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment is intended to facilitate eventual development for a senior housing project; and WHEREAS, the property has remained undeveloped since its designation for exclusively commercial land uses; and WHEREAS, previous zoning history of the property includes both Multi -Family zoning and mixed-use zoning that would accommodate the proposed senior housing land use; and WHEREAS, the City currently has more than 260 acres of undeveloped commercial lands in nearby and other areas ; and WHEREAS, the use of the land for senior housing purposes would create lesser impacts on public services and infrastructure, including streets and traffic congestion, than would the current commercial designation; and WHEREAS, the conversion of the land, as non -prime commercial property, for multiple family housing is supported by both Comprehensive Plan policy and zoning ordinance requirements of the R-4 District; and WHEREAS, the development of the land for senior housing will facilitate improvements in traffic visibility and intersection congestion; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all of the comments and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into the resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Monticello makes the following Findings of Fact in relation to the recommendation of approval: 1. The proposed amendment to the land use plan is consistent with the requirements of the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed uses are consistent and compatible with the existing and future land uses in the area in which they are located. 3. The impacts of the improvements are less than those anticipated by the previously approved land uses and are addressed through standard review and ordinances as adopted. 4. The site and building improvements resulting from development under the "R-4" zoning district are consistent with the intent of the Monticello Comprehensive Plan. 5. The existing conditions include substantial street, utility, stormwater, and grading improvements sufficient to accommodate the use of the property as senior housing. 6. The site and building improvements are able to meet the intent and requirements of the applicable zoning regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota: The Monticello City Council hereby approves the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan rezoning the subject property from "B-4, Regional Business District" to "R-4, Medium and High Density Residential District" as submitted, adopting the findings of fact herein. ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Monticello, Minnesota. MONTICELLO CITY COUNCIL 1.2 ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, City Administrator Brian Stumpf, Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 705 CITY OF MONTICELLO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE MONTICELLO CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REZONING THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY FROM B-4, REGIONAL BUSINESS DISTRICT TO R-4, MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENCE DISTRICT: LOT 1, BLOCK 2, RIVER VIEW SQUARE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTICELLO HEREBY ORDAINS: Section 1. The zoning map of the City of Monticello is hereby amended to rezone the following described parcels from B-4, Regional Business District to R-4, Medium -High Density Residence District: PID NUMBER: 155-117-002010 Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2, River View Square, Monticello Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mark the official zoning map to reflect this ordinance. The map shall not be republished at this time. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to make the changes required by this Ordinance as part of the Official Monticello City Code, Title 10, Zoning Ordinance, and to renumber the tables and chapters accordingly as necessary to provide the intended effect of this Ordinance. The City Clerk is further directed to make necessary corrections to any internal citations that result from said renumbering process, provided that such changes retain the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance as has been adopted. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. The ordinance in its entirety and map shall be posted on the City website after publication. Copies of the complete Ordinance and map are available online and at Monticello City Hall for examination upon request. ADOPTED BY the Monticello City Council this 10th day of December, 2018. ATTEST: Jeff O'Neill, Administrator AYES: NAYS: Brian Stumpf, Mayor Headwaters Development/Michael Hoagberg - Request for Comp Plan Amend & Zoning Map Amend Lot 1 Block 2 River View Square I PID 155-117-002010 Created by: City of Monticello Headwaters Develovment - Monticello Senior Living Proiect Summary To: City of Monticello, MN 21 August 2018 From: Headwaters Development The following describes the overall project summary. The Reauest for Re-Zonine: The 5 -acre site for the proposed senior living development at the corner of Hart Blvd and Riverview Drive NE is currently zoned B4 which is a Business District. The adjacent properties have a range of zones - B-2, R-1, R-2, and R-3. This existing site has been left un -developed for years and it is not considered prime commercial compared to other areas in Monticello. A senior living facility in a R-4 zone creates a natural transition zone from the B, Business zoning, that is closer to the highway to the R, Residential zoning, that is closer to the river and further away from the highway. The benefits of the proposed site layout in a R-4 zone include: • Substantially better access to public pathways and open spaces in a R-4 zone compared to what a B-4 zone does not include. The benefit of going up with a three-story building and providing underground parking is that it achieves approximately 60% to 65% of open green space. This would provide a significantly greater amount of green space versus a B-4 zone which would typically have 10% to 15% green space depending on the layout, storm water control, and the landscape requirements. • The setback benefits of the R-4 zoning versus the B-4 zoning are the substantial setbacks in a R-4 zone that include a 100 -foot front yard setback, a 40 -foot side yard setback, and a 40 -foot rear yard setback to the building. This allows for more open space. The B-4 setbacks and open space requirements are zero or minimal depending on necessary buffer space landscaping. • The R-4 zone with this proposed project will include increased landscaping and special landscape features including water features, gazebos, patios, and walking paths. • Traffic for a senior facility is substantially lighter than a B-4 business and the direct access to Hart Blvd and out to the intersection with Riverview Drive NE will allow traffic to easily go north and east towards the main highway with minimal traffic going into the residential areas to the west. Residents living within the assisted living and memory care portion of the facility do not drive and the independent senior residents tend to drive less and use the facility van for trips to church, shopping, events, etc. • The re -zoning to a R-4 would also have a "Condition Use Permit" which provides the "City with an opportunity to review a proposed use in order to establish reasonable conditions necessary to ensure compatibility between the proposed location and use and surrounding properties." (per the Monticello zoning ordinance) The Request for Comurehensive Plan Amendment: • The City of Monticello Comprehensive Plan shows this existing 5 -acre site as "Places to Shop" and the adjacent areas as "Places to Live" and "Places for Community" (the adjacent church. Since this site is too far away from the major highway and there is also an additional street intersection away from Broadway Street East (County Road 75 NE) so the distance to visibility has prevented this site to be developed as "Shops" in the past. We believe the highest and best use of the site is a transitional use like a senior assisted living facility that provides services to seniors in the community while providing a place for seniors to live and be cared for. • A quote from the Comprehensive Plan text states "The emphasis behind Places to Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods." We believe that adding the mix of the senior living facility offers that full range of choice for Monticello's residents. • Another quote from the Comprehensive Plan text states "It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density housing to ... provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population." This proposed project is ideally located to fill a need within the community (see the Market Study Demand notes below). The Location and Demand: This proposed senior living project is a 5 -acre parcel at the corner of Hart Blvd. and Riverview Drive NE in Monticello. Monticello is an appealing location as it combines a picturesque rural character with the charm of the Mississippi River. Additionally, there is excellent access to shopping and services in the surrounding area via local connections and access to Interstate 94. We anticipate that a new senior housing development in Monticello will attract many existing local senior residents along with drawing other residents currently living outside the community. The new development is a great benefit to the City of Monticello community as it will allow senior the ability to stay in Monticello as they age and need assistance. Based on the characteristics of Monticello, community orientation, proximity to other senior housing properties in the surrounding area, geographic barriers, and our knowledge of senior housing draw areas, we estimate that a senior housing development on the Site in Monticello would attract approximately 67% of its residents from a draw area (Primary Market Area, or "PMA") that includes the adjacent communities. The remaining portion of the senior housing demand (33%) would come from outside the PMA, particularly parents of adult children living in the PMA. The preliminary senior housing study was completed by Viewpoint Consulting Group, Inc. Based on pent-up demand and the growth in senior households, the Market Study identified an unmet demand for independent senior living units, assisted living units and memory care units. These numbers conservatively reflect a capture rate of 30% of the market area excess demand. The senior population is projected to continue to see an increase for the next five years. This provides for a very healthy and growing senior population. The Proiect: The proposed senior living development will be managed by Ebenezer and will have 92 units in the first phase with an additional 33 units planned for the second phase. The total units master planned for assisted living, independent living, and memory care suites will total 125 units. The first phase of 92 units will consist of approximately 14 memory care units on the first level and a blend of 78 independent and assisted living units on the first, second, and third levels. The rent structure is comparable to neighboring facilities and other new campuses that are currently being constructed across the region. The building will incorporate typical senior building amenities such as dining rooms, family dining room, multi-purpose rooms, beauty shop, activity rooms, theater room, medical clinic space, therapy, library, fitness room, spa room, pantry, management office and commercial kitchen. It will also have underground parking. The exterior of the three-story building will incorporate brick, stone and Hardi-type siding (cementitious siding) with a sloping asphalt shingle roof. The building will be setback off of the two adjacent streets with extensive landscaping, patios, gardens, walks and courtyards. The three-story building height can be designed with either a flat roof or a pitched roof (the pitched roof is preferred at a 5:12 pitch). The flat roof design would be approximately 34 to 35 feet in height and the design with a pitched roof would be approximately 46 to 47 feet in height (40 feet if measured from the mid -span of the 5:12 pitched roof). The Management Team - Ebenezer Senior Services: Founded in 1917 by Minneapolis Lutherans to provide community -centered care for homeless older adults and others in need, Ebenezer Senior Services programs and services today include: • Independent Living (including condominiums, cooperatives and senior apartments) • Assisted Living • Memory Care • Transitional and Long-term Care • Adult and Intergenerational Day Programs • Community-based Services • Management and Consulting Services • The Ebenezer Foundation Part of Fairview Health Services since 1995, their combined resources and expertise offer access to a full range of choices for vibrant senior living. In partnership with the University of Minnesota, they are also part of an academic health system improving the patient's clinical experience, conducting nation -leading research and achieving academic prominence. Ebenezer will assist in analyzing the market, establishing a strategic marketing plan, producing sales collateral, coordinating a public relations plan, and training sales staff. Through Ebenezer's system for managing leads, maximizing sales, and monitoring programs to reach occupancy projections, the new development hopes to exceed projected occupancy. Ebenezer will provide effective on-site management as well as consulting services in all areas of management. Ebenezer has proven that quality patient care and a positive bottom line can go hand- in-hand. Ebenezer will also continue to assist Headwaters Development in evaluating the facilities' strengths and weaknesses. In doing so, they will assess current programs, any service gaps, as well as opportunities and threats in the external market environment. From this, recommendations for new service options tailored to the needs of seniors will be developed and include an individualized implementation plan. The anticipated number of employees for the proposed Senior Living project will be approximately 50 employees (including full and part time positions). This will include an executive director, a clinical services director, mix of RN's and/or LPN's, nursing assistants, and staff for activities, marketing, dietary, housekeeping, maintenance and other administration. We are excited about the opportunity to work with the City of Monticello and its residents to bring this special new project to the community. Upon review of our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, 17 0 W FV f i qVFRV�Ew��....E-� � mwmmmmmm�� Ji �_7M7 _� =rw— i-.10 SLOPE DOWN 49AI 55plir,o20 NORTH) `EXISTING "SITE PLAN" IATFR SLOPE DOWN 55_lTr7fY(W2 1• WL10 August 2018 Ae WN low Obi I" _�L�. .Mmllw.- - . lw MS��NQPJ\ oN � Zg PPRK\NG 91 P"/ �2a CONC-fPT/, SITE PLAN SSOCIATES 10 _,,,„sr 2018 limp"mok Ism BLDG SET 'oo. - a A , 9 ”' 9pf, ppyyN I z X31 I I I I i I 4 I x v 01-0 0 � \ \ G OG 9 y' ✓ 'oo. - a A , 9 ”' 9pf, ppyyN I z X31 I I I I i I 4 FA ILA Birch Lake ° a North 106 e E' Lake 0 Cc 0 0.25 0.5 1 s Miles ► ° a Data Source: MnDNR, Sherburne County, Wright County, and WSB & Associates. June 9, 2014 Amended by City Council Resolution 2014-062, June 9, 2014 Legend Places to Live Lake Qr) + Places to Shop i Places to Work Places to Recreate - L 'p + Places for Community ?r Lake�) + Downtown Mixed Use o Interchange Planning Area a Urban Reserve Infrastructure 0 0� ^- Rivers and Streams iPublic Waters Inventory Wetlands (National & Public Waters Inventories) D root Potential Greenway Q J Potential Interchange ° Future Bridge *%a* Existing Arterial or Collector Road 1 'j*,* Proposed Arterial or Collector Road ^�� Powerline Monticello City Boundary Orderly Annexation Area c "' I I NE � 1�, o Land Use Plan Legend L ty Ut 1v1U11t1Lt!LLU IS, I ia Zonin a 0 C I I M 9 P \ \ o I I \ m , \ s I \ m I \ I \ , I \ I � I — — — — — — — — — — — —I \\ ram H� W E NX \ - , , 414 \ = as • , \ \ 1\ e — I \ c I \ I l BASE ZONING DISTRICTS \\\ \ y Residential Districts Business Districts -- Low Residential Densities B-1 pa w3�S ��♦,�. \•� \ � � s,, moi►' . � � \ A-0 R -A R-1 Medium Residential Densities TI R-2 R -PUD --High Residential Densities R-3 R-4 OTHER M -H Water B-2 B-3 B-4 CCD Industrial Districts IBC 01; Swan River Monticello High School Mills Fleet Farm Red Rooster PUDS ;--�--; Spaeth Industrial Park Camping World Affordable Storage M$ Autumn Ridge OVERLAY DISTRICTS Performance Based Overlay District Special Use Overlay District ;Mississippi Wild, Scenic & Rec Overlay District Shoreland District Freeway Bonus Sign District ANI W aw, ► r��' sir,•,;, �i�� ' � \ . 18 8 <t D �3 ELIELIED ANEW Al \ 11 II -- --------------------------- - - - - -- I I _ I I I I -_________- z a 95th S, 11F 1130-171 Figure 3-3: Land Use Plan - Places to Live The remainder of this section describes the categories used in the Comprehensive Plan in greater detail. Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to create and sustain quality places for people to live in Monticello (see Figure 3-3). This category designates areas where housing is the primary use of land. The emphasis behind Places to Live is to help ensure that Monticello offers a full range of housing choices, while preserving and enhancing the quality of neighborhoods. Although a single land use category, Places to Live does not suggest housing is a homogenous commodity or that any type of housing is desirable or allowed in any location. When someone says "house" the most common image is a single family detached dwelling. This housing style is characterized by several features. There is a one-to- one relationship between house and parcel of land - the housing unit is located on a single parcel. The house is not physically attached to another housing unit. The housing is designed for occupancy by a single family unit. The typical neighborhood in Monticello is made up exclusively of single family detached homes. The primary variables become the design of the subdivision, the size of the lot and the size and style of the dwelling. Many older neighborhoods in Monticello (north of Interstate 94) were built on a traditional grid street system. Over the past thirty years, development patterns have moved to a new suburban curvilinear 2008 Comprehensive Plan - Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-5 pattern, characterized by curvilinear street layout with the use of cul-de-sacs. A variety of factors, including consumer preference and housing cost, have increased the construction of attached housing in recent years. Duplexes, twin homes, quads and townhomes are common examples of this housing style. Although the specific form changes, there are several common characteristics. Each housing unit is designed for occupancy by a single family. The housing units are physically attached to each other in a horizontal orientation. Places to Live will include some neighborhoods designed to offer a mixture of housing types and densities. Mixed residential neighborhoods create a pattern that combines single-family detached housing with a mixture of attached housing types. Using good design and planning, these mixed residential neighborhoods can achieve a higher density without compromising the overall integrity of the low-density residential pattern. This integration strengthens neighborhoods by increasing housing choice and affordability beyond what is possible by today's rules and regulations. It also avoids large and separate concentrations of attached housing. It enhances opportunities to organize development in a manner that preserves natural features. A complete housing stock includes higher density residential areas that consist of multi -family housing types such as apartments and condominiums. In the near term, the Comprehensive Plan does not anticipate expanding the existing supply of higher density housing. It is likely that Monticello will need additional higher density housing to: ► Provide housing suited to the needs of an aging population. ► Facilitate redevelopment in the Downtown or in other appropriate locations of the community. ► Provide housing needed to attract the work force required to achieve economic development goals of the City. Higher density residential land uses should be located and designed to be compatible with nearby residential or mixed uses, on lots able to accommodate larger buildings and added traffic generation. In addition, siting factors for high density residential uses will prioritize access to services and amenities including public utilities, parks, trails and open space, and commercial and/or medical services. It will be important, when considering potential designation of high density housing development, that the parcels meet the specific standards of the zoning district, and such development can be accommodated in accordance with the policies in this Plan. While these comments and the comments in the zoning ordinance are intended to be instructive they are not necessarily the only factors that might come into play on specific properties. Policies - Places to Live The Comprehensive Plan seeks to achieve the following objectives for residential land use in Monticello: 1. Provide a range of housing choices that fit all stages of a person's life -cycle (see below). 2. Support development in areas that best matches the overall objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Develop quality neighborhoods that create a sense of connection to the community and inspire sustained investment. The Comprehensive Plan seeks to maintain the quality and integrity of existing neighborhoods by encouraging the maintenance of property and reinvestment into the existing housing stock. Changes in housing type should be allowed only to facilitate necessary redevelopment. 4. Create neighborhoods that allow residents to maintain a connection to the natural environment and open spaces. 5. Seek quality over quantity in residential growth. Achieving the objectives for quality housing and neighborhoods may reduce the overall rate of growth. 6. Reserve areas with high amenities for "move up" housing as desired in the vision statement. These amenities may include forested areas, wetland complexes, adjacency to parks and greenways. Some of the City's policy objectives require further explanation. 3-6 1 Land Use City of Monticello Figure 3-4: Life Cycle of Housing Supply IIII IIII IIII I �; IIII II I ��,� _ Mild �®LL 1 Lt- Life Cycle Housing Housing is not a simple "one size fits all" commodity. Monticello's housing stock varies by type, age, style and price. The Community Context chapter of the Comprehensive Plan describes the characteristics of the housing stock based on the 2000 Census and recent building permit trends. The concept of life cycle housing recognizes that housing needs change over the course of a person's life (see Figure 3-4). Young adults may not have the income capacity to own the typical single family home. This segment of the population often seeks rental housing. Families move through different sizes, styles and prices of housing as family size and income changes over time. With aging, people may desire smaller homes with less maintenance. Eventually, the elderly transition to housing associated with options for direct care. As noted in the Vision Statement, Monticello's population will continue to become more diverse. This diversity will be seen in age, race, culture and wealth. These factors will influence the housing needs of Monticello. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes these differences and seeks to create a balanced housing supply that encourages people to move to and stay in Monticello. This balance may not be achieved solely by market forces guided by this Land Use Plan. Actions by the City may be needed to promote the creation of housing in underserved segments of the market. Neighborhood Design A priority for the community is diversification of the housing stock by providing more "move up" housing. In this context, the term "move up" housing refers to larger homes with more amenities in structure and setting. This type of housing may not be exclusively single-family detached or low density. Attached forms of housing with medium or high densities may meet the objectives for move up housing in the appropriate locations. In this way, the objectives for move up housing and life cycle housing are compatible and supportive. While every community wants a high quality housing stock, this issue has particular importance in Monticello. It is a key to retaining population. Without a broader 2008 Comprehensive Plan — Updated 2017 Land Use 1 3-7 variety of housing options, families may encouraged to leave Monticello to meet their need for a larger home. It is a factor in economic development. One facet of attracting and retaining professional jobs is to provide desirable housing alternatives. It must be recognized that creating move up housing requires more than policies in the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides a guide for achieving the desired results. The desired outcomes require private investment. This investment occurs when demand exists or the City can provide an incentive to attract investment. Part of attracting move up housing comes from creating great neighborhoods — places that will attract and sustain the housing options sought by the City. Neighborhoods are the building block of Places to Live in Monticello. The goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to create and maintain attractive, safe and functional neighborhoods. The following policies help to achieve this objective: 1. Neighborhoods should incorporate the natural characteristics of the setting. Trees, terrain, drainageways, and other natural features provide character to neighborhoods. 2. Housing should be oriented to the local street, minimizing access and noise conflicts with collector streets. 3. The City will use public improvements to enhance the appearance and character of a neighborhood. Some examples of improvements that define an area include streets with curb and gutter, trees in the public boulevard, street lighting systems, and storm water ponding. 4. Sidewalks, trails, and bikeways will connect the neighborhood to other parts of the community. 5. Every neighborhood should have reasonable access to a public park as a place for residents to gather and play. All of these elements work together to create a desirable and sustainable place to live. Figure 3-5: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Parkway y Figure 3-6: Relationship Between Development and Natural Features - Trail Corridor h ;I Balancing the Built and Natural Environments The natural amenities of the growth areas (west and south) in Monticello should serve as a catalyst for residential development. The Bertram Chain of Lakes Regional Park offers the dual assets of natural features and recreational opportunities. Lakes, wetlands and other natural amenities exist throughout the orderly annexation area. Studies have shown that parks and open space have a positive economic effect on adjacent development. An article published by the National Park and Recreation Association states that "recent analyses suggest that open spaces may have substantial positive impacts on surrounding property values and hence, the 3-8 1 Land Use City of Monticello WSB Building a legacy — your legacy. September 26, 2018 Ms. Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Headwaters Development Senior Living Concept Plan Review City Project No. 2018-038 WSB Project No. 12792-000 Dear Ms. Schumann: 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 We have reviewed the concept plan dated August 10, 2018 as prepared by Ayres Associates and offer the following comments. 1. Wright County is planning to stripe a center left turn lane along CSAH 39 (Riverview Drive) from Hart Boulevard to the east for construction in 2019. The City will submit the proposed concept plan to Wright County for their information and review to determine if additional County right of way is needed. We understand there are concerns with sight lines at the intersection of Hart Boulevard and CSAH 39 and merging traffic on eastbound CSAH 39 that the City will coordinate with Wright County to address. 2. It is not anticipated that there will be a need for turn lanes or other operational improvements on Hart Boulevard based on the traffic generated from the site. The proposed accessing spacing aligns with existing access points on the west side of Hart Boulevard to aid in eliminating turning conflicts. 3. A pathway is shown on the north side of the site along CSAH 39. This should be 10 -foot wide trail in accordance with the City's pathway connections guide map. A crosswalk should be included at Hart Boulevard. 4. A pathway is proposed along the west side of the site adjacent to Hart Boulevard. City staff will evaluate future needs to connect this pathway. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K:\012792-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Headwaters 092618.docx September 26, 2018 Page 2 5. There are platted drainage and utility easements on the easterly property line of the site that contain sanitary sewer and storm sewer pipes that should be considered with the site plan. 6. Sanitary sewer and watermain services are extended from the mains within Hart Boulevard to serve the site. The watermain should be looped within site. 7. The applicant will be required to submit a stormwater management plan for the proposed development (including future building addition and parking lot) in accordance with the requirements in the City's Design Manual. 8. Proposed runoff rates shall be less than or equal to existing runoff rates. 9. The proposed development discharges to a regional infiltration basin east of the A Glorious Church site. This regional basin was designed for a maximum of 2.2 acres of impervious surface from the proposed parcel. Any impervious area beyond that will need to be infiltrated on site. 10. Runoff from the site needs to incorporate pretreatment measures (i.e. sump manholes) prior to discharging to the regional infiltration basin. 11. Underground parking is proposed for the site. Consideration shall be given in the design such that the garage area will not be at risk of frequent flooding. It's recommended that trench drains, a sump pump system and secondary containment of the 100 year runoff volume be considered in the design. 12. The proposed development falls within the DNR Wild and Scenic River District for the Mississippi River and must incorporate best management practices (BMPs) in accordance with the NPDES/SDS permit for construction. 13. A more detailed review of the development plans will be completed when the applicant submits complete civil plans and a stormwater management report. Please give me a call at 763-271-3236 if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter. Thank you. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Shibani K. Bisson, PE Senior Project Manager K:\012792-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Headwaters 092618.docx September 26, 2018 Page 3 skb K:\012792-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-a-schumann-Headwaters 092618.docx Info for staff and planning commission's consideration as it relates to Headwaters Development request for rezoning of Lot 1, Block 2, River View Square. Public hearing- Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:00 pm Submitted by- Development team (Trident development, Tealwood Senior Living, Mielke Development) 1 00 OCT 2 21118 FILE COPY Is rezoning in the city's best interest? FACTS AND POINTS OF CONSIDERATION: Headwaters Development is asking the city to REZONE a prime (B-4 regional business) parcel to (R-4 high residence density) to accommodate a 3 story, 125 unit senior living facility. Virtually all the same arguments IRET used a few years ago to justify the rezoning of this same parcel is being used again by Headwaters and its supporters. After great controversy and opposition the city council denied IRET's request to rezone this parcel. THE RESULT - 1. IRET purchased property on the south side of 1-94, more appropriately suited for high density housing and built a much nicer, larger complex. IRET and general public WON 7 Tkn f-ity crnt n cl Inarinr nrniort nnrl m11r-k hinkpr tw k--3co Tho t-it%t \A/r)KI L. 11IG l.Ry sVl Q JuI./G11V1 r.Jl V,L. t.l a11V 111u%.11 IIIs11L1 ban IJQJG. 1 ll%- %,I --y vvvly 3. The parcel neighborhood did not get a 3 story high density housing project plopped on them. The Neighborhood WON 4. By not rezoning the parcel, the city still has a prime 5 acre regional business parcel in its commercial inventory. The city WINS again. As with IRET, there are many other properties in Monticello better suited for Headwaters Development project. Some argue nothing has developed on this parcel in 10 yrs, it should be rezoned. We had a major recession in 2008. There are commercial properties all over in Monticello, the county, ctata Anri rni intro that hada cat thara 1(1 %irc The rnmmarrial market is ii ict rnmino hark I � �. ...,. ......,..... T ....... ..... , ... .,.... I.- - -- Y. `.. ..... ... .... � .., ....... ....,....., � .... � ...,., . ........ � ... O ...,...... Monticello is going to continue to grow to the east. If the city would rezone this prime regional business property now (short term thinking) for high density housing that can easily go elsewhere, there will soon be a time when the city will wish they still had this business property in their inventory. In order to accommodate Headwaters Development project on this small parcel - a. it will take much more than just a simple rezoning. b. This property is in the Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River district. This project does not meet the height restrictions, etc. �- 1 IEZ I lnitc is ro -al ticrht nn tkic nnrr-nI nnA xAAII IiLaly noon nl lmornl lc ntknr vnrintinnc �,. J.L.J u1111J IJ 1 C.QI L1511l V11 Ll Ili pul ul lu vvlll lllxl-Iy lit -%-U 11U111%_1 VUJ Vll It.l vul IQ {.IVI IJ, deviations from city codes (setbacks, etc.) Monticello Senior Housing Market. St Benedicts has been the primary Senior Living Provider. Our team (Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, Mielke Development) did a Senior Living market study in October 2017. Tealwood manages over 50 senior living complexes. Mn, Iowa, Wisconsin, South Dakota Closest to Monticello is The LEGACY in St Michael. One of our older projects. The study estimated the Monticello market has a projected need for an additional 120 to 150 senior living units in the next number of years. This estimation is similar to the need outlined in the ritv of Mnnti�Plin'r, market rti Ax/ ...- .-. � 7 .... .....-. Y. We acted on this, purchased property, have presented concept plans, made EAW application and Concept Review application. Will be in front of planning and council Monday Oct 8. In 2019 we will be bringing in an additional 136 senior housing units to Monticello. Two ,^-Jnr-4-� 7iii ..r.itr -,,;,+-A -- - 7 GG ..r.i+ I;,ii__ --+ -.r + .)1=tlC11 dlC L)U11U1116J. 1. /U U1111-1 LC11 C L. UU U1111 JCI IIUI IIVI116 CIPOI 1111C1 Il building with underground parking. Location; north side of new 1-94 overpass. West of St Henry church. Just under 9 acre complex. We will be satisfying Monticello's needs for additional Senior Living units for the next number of years. We have room to expand. HUGE CONCERN: overbuilding the Monticello Senior Living Market Assuming St Benedict continues to operate. We (Tealwood Sr Living) meet the projected market studies needs with our 136 units Who is going to fill Headwaters 125 units? QUESTION: Why would a city rezone a prime regional business parcel knowing it will result in an overbuilt senior housing market and in the process take a prime business parcel out of its inventory? Our team has been watching this Headwaters proposal and questioning- have they done a market study? Of do they know something about the market we do not know? Today we learned Headwaters used the same market study we originated and paid for, for the Monticello market area. (Viewpoint Consulting Group, Inc.) So there clearly is not enough market share in Monticello for St Benedicts, Us (Tealwood Sr Living) and Headwaters. We believe when all is said and done, we will have the strongest project. Location, access, a proven leader in the Senior Housing Industry, top notch buildings, amenities, spacious campus, peaceful surroundings, room for expansion. We originally looked at the parcel Headwaters is asking the city to rezone. We decided not to pursue it for the following reasons - 1. The city denied IRET a rezone of this parcel and ended up with a better project. Why would they rezone for us and a similar type use? 2. The height restrictions, etc. with this parcel being in the Mississippi Wild Scenic district Q It %ecni 1111 hn roolly ticrht to crnt mnvthincs nvnr 00 1 mite nn 0110 cito tecitkni It ncWncr tho rite ..P. IL vVW%AI%+ N�. 1�-UIIy L1511t. w 5%-L uIIyLIIIII j %JV% -I .iv UIIItJ v11 1.11%- aI« vvIuIW%AL UJI%III5 Lila- %'ILr for lots of variances, special allowances, etc. Not sure could get them. No room to expand. 4. Did not want to antagonize the neighborhood residents. The site we are working on certainly has some challenges, topography, historic house, etc. But when all is said and done, our site is a great location for senior housing situated on a beautiful campus. Provides the city with probably the most viable project on this site. Thank you for considering our thoughts, Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, Mielke Development ! /fit DT-,1vr Qi.� v+s colol'►OElo�I ui�0D �,�Ali 0 R v�s�/( i'�1i Lit 1>Ci/rl�P rU % v U Ni T S'rw l a k 144) ct.• I A16r- C�9 1vl PV S C2 6GLI L 0 /V 6: s j uG€Qv ✓ ao .RICI J.II'OII.'MII[C .. VM m 1 1 Z.. i r o1r. ♦-'y '• I a s tu z �slu z r 0 Do MA L- ----------- M. «� : UA A PPL 1 c 1+r1O 1V3, A 4 l: IA/ UMWC-pfNi � r 2 r z PRr5r_N�71AJCr 7-o P)ANIVING Y- CUC(AIcfL C?C7 8- Angela Schumann From: Dan and Linda Mielke Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 12:43 PM To: Angela Schumann; Jim Thares; Matthew Leonard; WSBshibani Cc: 'Roger Fink'; 'Lee Mielke' Subject: RE: Concern about overbuilding Monticello senior housing market Angela, Please do forward the email and attached info from our team to the Planning Commission. My wife will also be dropping off an envelope later this afternoon with duplicate information as a backup. If you have any questions, or need further clarification on anything, please call. Thanks. From: Angela Schumann [mailto:Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 11:53 AM To: Dan and Linda Mielke '°m Thares <Jim.Thares@ci.monticello.mn.us>; Matthew Leonard <matt.leonard@ci.monticello.mn. us>; WSBshibani <sbisson@wsbeng.com> Cc: 'Roger Fink' >; 'Lee Mielke' Subject: RE: Concern about overbuilding Monticeiiu senior housing market Dan, Are you requesting that staff provide the attached and email below to the Planning Commission this evening, or will you be providing this information to them? Angela Schumann Community Development Director City of Monticello www.ci.monticello.mn.us 763-271-3224 Email corresponse to and from the City of Monticello government office is subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices act and may be disclosed to third parties. From: Dan and Linda Mielke Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 10:01 AM To: Angela Schumann <Angela.Schumann@ci.monticello.mn.us>; Jim Thares <Jim.Thares@ci.monticello.mn.us>; Matthew Leonard <matt.leonard@ci.monticello.mn.us>; WSBshibani <sbisson@wsbeng.com> Cc: 'Roger Fink' <. 'Lee Mielke', ' Subject: Concern about overbuilding Monticello senior housing market Everyone, FYI attached are some Facts and Considerations for your review and contemplation As you all are aware, our team (Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, Mielke Development) is working to bring 136 units of senior housing to the Monticello market 2019. Applications are in. A few weeks ago we became aware of Headwaters Development looking to bring an additional 125 units of senior living to Monticello. Our 136 and there 125 = 261 new units. Our philosophy is NOT to come in to a market and knowingly overbuild it, expecting to take out any competitors who may already exist because we think we can, with a modern, higher quality campus and the depth of our overall organization. We contracted with Viewpoint Consulting Group, Inc (our go to market study firm, they have done many for us, and have never been wrong) to determine if the senior housing market in Monticello is large enough to support the existing St Benedict senior housing complex and ourselves. Our project of 136 units is based off that market study. We build to the market and 5 to 10 years down the road. We have 50 plus campus's. Some 200+ campus's and some 90 unit campus's. So we have been paying great attention to this Headwaters project. Have kept asking ourselves, do these guys know what they are doing, have they done a market study, if so do they know something about this market we do not know. Yesterday, to our surprise we got the answer. We learned Headwaters is using the same Market Study from Viewpoint Consulting Group, Inc. that we originated and paid for to make our determination. The report does not include our 136 units or there 125 units in the calculus. We contacted Viewpoint about this and got this answer, " they had not heard that we were moving on this project, so charged them for it". Double dipped. Needless to say we are not happy Viewpoint did not check with us prior to handing the study to someone else. (that's our issue). The point is there is not enough senior living market share in Monticello now and in the next few years supported by the Viewpoint and City market studies to support- ST Benedicts, ourselves (Tealwood senior living) and Headwaters. Someone will likely not survive. Does Headwaters know about us? Our view is if the city rezones the prime business parcel for them and grants them waivers, (ex. Mississippi Scenic River overlay height restriction) etc. to make the site work, that an uneven playing field has been created. If the parcel is not rezoned for Headwaters and they choose to develop on another property in the Monticello market like IRET did a few years ago when they were denied rezoning on this same parcel, then that is free enterprise and we just have to have the best campus with superior service and someone will not survive. N Attached are some Facts and Considerations for your review and contemplation For a healthy city and competitive environment, Our team (Trident Development, Tealwood senior living, Mielke Development) PS please contact us with any questions or concerns MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - MONTICELLO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, October 2nd, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. Mississippi Room, Monticello Community Center Commissioners Present: Brad Fyle, Sam Murdoff, Marc Simpson, John Alstad, Katie Peterson Council Liaison Present: Charlotte Gabler Staff Present: Angela Schumann, Steve Grittman (NAC) 1. General Business A. Call to Order Brad Fyle called the meeting of the Planning Commission to order at 6:00 p.m. B. Consideration of approving minutes a. Regular Meeting Minutes — August 7, 2018 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 2018. KATIE PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION. b. Special Meeting Minutes — August 7, 2018 MARC SIMPSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 7, 2018. KATIE PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION. c. Special Meeting Minutes — September 4, 2018 KATIE PETERSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2018. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-0-1 WITH SAM MURDOFF ABSENT DURING THE MOTION. C. Citizen Comments None. D. Consideration of adding items to the agenda None. E. Consideration to approve agenda N/A. 2. Public Hearings Sam Murdoff joined the meeting. A. Public Hearing - Consideration of a request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment from `Places to Shop' to `Places to Live' and a request for Zoning Map Amendment for Rezoning from B-4 (Regional Business District) Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 1 1 6 to R-4 (Medium -High Residence Densitv Residence District) for a 125 unit senior living development. Applicant: Headwaters Development — Michael Hoagberg Steve Grittman introduced the application and indicated that if approved, the applicants would need a Conditional Use Permit for a multi -family development in the R-4 District. The proposal estimated about 125 mixed senior living units with construction being completed in two phases. The first phase would include about 92 units with future phase of 33 units. Grittman provided the history of the plat noting that the area was currently guided and zoned commercial. Grittman summarized the zoning ordinance and comprehensive plan standards for map and text amendments. The Comprehensive Plan has a number of objectives that relate to how land use is be developed in the community. Grittman noted that it explains the need for additional senior housing. Grittman also noted that there are a number of vacant commercial parcels near the site that have remained under or undeveloped. Grittman summarized the importance of having transitional uses between two zoning districts and explained that senior housing may be a suitable use. It was noted that senior living facilities are not as intense of a use as other high density residential projects and have relatively lower traffic impacts compared to commercial developments. Grittman then went into further detail about the parking and noted that the applicant provided onsite parking. He explained that the amount of greenspace provided exceeded a commercial project, which typically consume 80-85 percent of the land with hard surface. He said that typically senior living uses require 1 to 1.5 stalls per unit, but most of the parking is used by visitors or staff. Grittman stated that the site is located in the Mississippi River Wild and Scenic District and has additional review factors such as height limitations. It was noted that a variance may be required if the building exceeds 25 feet, but that staff would need to confirm the requirement. City staff recommended approval of the application. Grittman stated that the developer would need to make some sight plan changes including shifting the buildings to meet the R-4 standards. Sam Murdoff asked why the Wild and Scenic District height would possibly not apply. Grittman explained that it had to do with the timing of the implementation of the ordinance. He stated that if it was zoned or guided for commercial uses after the time the City adopted the special district, then a 25 feet restriction would be in place. Staff would complete more research. Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 2 16 Charlotte Gabler also asked about the timing for implementation of the Wild and Scenic District. She asked about the Highway 25 Coalition and if there has been any selections for where a possibly new bridge overpass would be located. Angela Schumann indicated that the coalition is investigating five options and will need to finalize their review in the next year. Brad Fyle opened the public hearing and invited the applicants to speak first. Michael Hoagberg, Headwaters Development, introduced himself. He briefly mentioned the considerations for this project in Monticello. He explained the importance of keeping the natural components on site and stated that sixty percent of the site would remain green space. He also summarized that the use would be a good transitional use from retail to residential. He also explained the importance of the appeal of the building and being a good fit into the community. Marc Simpson asked how many other complexes the company owns and/or operates. Hoagberg responded that this would be their fifth community with their newest and closest facility in Eagan. Hoagberg added that the developers held a neighborhood meeting for property owners within 500 feet of the proposed development. Hoagberg stated that those comments would be incorporated in the final site plan and design if possible. Sam Murdoff asked how the developer decided on this property. Hoagberg cited personal connections to the current owners. Hoagberg also added that they wanted to expand to the northwest metro area and Monticello fit a lot of the criteria they were looking for in a site. Murdoff asked if the developer has looked at other sites in Monticello. Hoagberg declined. Katie Peterson asked where the clientele would be coming from. Hoagberg stated that they would estimate 2/3rds of residents would come from Monticello or the surrounding area. Peterson asked if traffic was a concern. Hoagberg stated that traffic was a concern, but was manageable. Simpson asked when they completed the market study. Hoagberg stated it was completed in the last six months and was validated by a third -party. Peterson asked if there was any concerns of noise. Hoagberg stated that was a consideration and would be accommodated. The use of higher proof windows was a mitigation example. Murdoff asked how the developer would deal with the regulations of the Wild and Scenic regulations. Hoagberg stated that they needed to see what the DNR came back with. He mentioned the importance of having three stories and maintaining adequate green space. Murdoff asked about how they would meet the other setbacks. Hoagberg noted that they would meet all of the setbacks for property. Fyle asked about the future phase timing. Hoagberg estimated the earliest would be five years from the completion of the first phase. Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 3 1 6 Peterson asked about the type of amenities offered at the facility. Hoagberg explained that the facility would offer full service dining/kitchen, spa, fitness center, theatre, and community spaces. Simpson asked about the capacity of St. Benedicts. Schumann stated that they could provide that information to the Commission at a future meeting. Roger Pribyl, 6184 Mill Run Road, had concerns with traffic, the intersection of Hart Boulevard and County Road 39, street lighting, and the speed limit on Country Road 75. He believed there were other areas that this development could locate. Pribyl also noted that the vacant lot and other lots in the vicinity have not been mowed. Angela Schumann entered into the record that a public comment letter was received from Trident Development, Tealwood Senior Living, and Mielke Development. This letter was distributed to the commissioners. Charlotte Gabler asked if the proposed amendment to Comprehensive Plan would change the total acreage of commercial. Grittman noted that only the five acre parcel would be converted. Gabler asked if any other R-4 zoning districts are located in the city other than Monticello Crossings/IRET. Grittman declined. Gabler asked if the applicant has toured any other sites in Monticello. Hoagberg stated that he has seen the progression of the City and has seen vacant lots in Monticello, but would like to use this site for development. Gabler asked if Hoagberg was familiar with the Highway 25 Coalition planning. Hoagberg confirmed. Gabler asked if the developer would be interested in partnering with the city to increase safety near the site. Hoagberg said that they would be open to it. Gabler asked why a concept design meeting was not held. Schumann summarized that option was only available for Planned Unit Development. Schumann explained that the consulting engineer (WSB) submitted a comment letter that addressed configuration concerns with the intersection of Country Road 39 and Hart Boulevard. Fyle had concerns with left hand turns unto the site and traffic. Hoagberg stated that the design was only a concept and they would be flexible. Peterson asked what would happen if the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning would pass, but the senior living development would fall through. Grittman stated that the next step for any developer would be for a Conditional Use Permit, which would allow the City Council authority on any proposal. Hearing no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Murdoff summarized that in his view this was not the right place for a senior living facility and was worried about removing a commercial zone, especially as Monticello continues to grow. Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 4 16 Simpson reiterated increased traffic concerns and agreed that it was not the best location for a senior living facility. Katie Peterson asked for the history of zoning requests for the site. Grittman explained before the Zoning Ordinance was updated in 2010, the previous code identified the areas as PZM (Performance Zone Mix), which allowed either commercial or high density residential. All of the PZM district was converted to commercial with the update. Peterson noted concerns with traffic, but recognized that a development would eventually occur. She asked if it would be a problem if vehicles cut through the private street. Grittman stated that it would be an owner issue. Decision 1: Resolution of Recommendation for Comprehensive Plan amendment reclassifying the subject property from "Places to Shop" to "Places to Live", and Rezoning to R-4, Medium -High Density Residential. SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO DENY RESOLUTION 2018-027 RECOMMENDING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT RECLASSIFYING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM "PLACES TO SHOP" TO "PLACES TO LIVE", AND REZONING TO R-41 MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, BASED ON FINDINGS OF NON -CONGRUENCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. MARC SIMPSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 4-1 WITH BRAD FYLE IN OPPOSITION. 3. Regular Agenda A. Consideration of the Communitv Development Directors Report Angela Schumann provided the Community Development Directors Report. Schumann provided an update on a request the City received regarding the sign ordinance for dynamic displays in residential districts. Schumann stated that staff would put together information where civic and institutional uses are located in the city and what zoning districts they are located in. Then, the Planning Commission could decide if they would like to call for a Public Hearing to amend the Monticello Zoning Ordinance. Marc Simpson asked when the new liquor sign would be placed. Schumann estimated this fall. Charlotte Gabler asked when the street banners would be installed. Schumann explained the banner project and estimated a fall timeline. Simpson asked when Chelsea Road be opened. Schumann noted November. 4. Added Items N/A. 5. Adi ournment SAM MURDOFF MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 7:52 P.M. KATIE PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED, 5-0. Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 5 16 Recorder: Jacob Thunander Approved: November 5, 2018 Attest: Angela Sch a ommunity Development Director Planning Commission Minutes — October 2, 2018 Page 6 16 CITY OF Monticello : 4/2018 J y PID Owner Size (Acres) 2018 Taxes Zoning _. ..............................Oce110 LLC.................................................................................................11.8.5..........................................$6 447 B-3 2.........155.-.125-,000070 .............................. Ocello, LLC.................................................................................................12.96..........................................$7.,050........................................ B.-3................. 3.........155-500-,142210 .............................. City..of.Monticello...........................................................................4.1.1..............................................$0......................................................B.-3................. 4,........155-.151-003010 ..............................Biadley.&.Shaion. Larson.....................................................1.78..............................................$2.,.734........................................ B-4 .............. 5.........1.55.-.157-00.1010 ..............................Ohana.. Properties. Family... LP...........................................1.55.............................................$5.,.894........................................ B.-4................ 6..........155. -.1.7.1-.0.0.1.02.1 .............................. .41.34..D.eegan..Avenue..NE..LL.C...................................... L.16 ............................................. $.4,892 ......................................... .-................. .7..,.........155.-.1.74-.0.0.1.0.10 .............................. (Ohana..Prop.erties..Family.LP...........................................0..90.............................................$.3,.9.62........................................B.-4................ 8..........155.7.15.1 -.0.0.4.0.10 ............................... Ohana..Prop.erties..Family...LP........................................... 037 ............................................. $.2.,230 ........................................ B.-4................ 9..........1.55.-.193-00.1.020 ............................... Highland..Rank.................................................................................... 7..02 ............................................. $.7,2.34 ........................................ B-4 ................ 10......155.-.1.64-.0.0.0.030 ............................... ity..of.Monticello...........................................................................7.20.............................................$0......................................................B.-4................ 1.1.......1.55.-.164-0.0.0.0.50 ...............................City.. of.Monticello........................................................................... .2.,.1.4 ............................................. $.0. ..................................................... B.-4................ 12......155.7.1.647.00.0.040 ............................... City..of.Moxatireho............................................................................ 6,14 ............................................. $0...................................................... B.-4................ .13......1.55.7.1.767.002.0.1.1 ................................ City ..of.Moxaticello............................................................................ 1..29 ............................................. $0. ..................................................... B.-4................ _14......155.-.1.76-.0.0.1.020 ............................... City..of.Moxaticello........................................................................... 2..70 ............................................. $.0. ..................................................... B.-4................ 15......155.-.1.64-.0.0.0.020 ............................... City. ..of..Monticello........................................................................... 2..83 ............................................. $.0. ..................................................... B.-4................ .16.....1.55.-221.-.000010 ..............................Quad.Dev..elopment.LLC......................................................3,.8...0...............................................$6.,.474........................................ B-4...............- _17........155..227-.0.0.0.0.10 ..............................Ocello..LLC ..................................................................................4.1J..............................................$.2.6.,.060....................................B-4................ _18......155.-.5.00-.1.42.4.00 .............................. John..& Mary1u.ndsten............................................................3&8.7.........................................$.1,.72.1........................................B.-3................ .19.....1.55.-.5.00-142.3.03 ...............................Cid..of..Montic.e1.1.o. ........................................................................... 3.,07 ............................................. $.0...................................................... B.73 ................ 20......155.7.5.007.1.42.3.00 ............................... City..of.Moxaticello............................................................................ 120 ............................................. $0. ..................................................... B.-3................ 2.1......155.-.5..00-1.42.1.04 ............................... Premier.BankMinnesota.....................................................18.31..........................................$29.,960....................................B-4...............- .... 22.155-079-001010 .... ........... .. , .............................................................................................. IyotiRPatel 0.79 .............................................$1,947........................................8.,3................ 23 ..1.5.5 .0.18.00.1.020 ........................... City.of.Moxaticello................................................................ 5..1.1 .............................................. $.0. ..................................................... 8-2................ 24,....1.5.5.-06.8..-.00.1.01................................. iv...erwood. Bank ................................................................................19.35 .......................................... $25,120..................................... .-3................ 25.....1.55 ..029...002.050 ............................... Kenneth..Mau,s....................................................................................... 5.40 ............................................. $.4,.0.7..0 ........................................ IBC ............... 26......155.-.050-.0.0.0.020 .............................. Bluffs... in..Monticello.. LLC.......................................................3...13 ............................................. $.1,0.13 ........................................ IBC ............... 27.....1.55.-029-.002.130 .............................. Maass.. Automotive.. Group.. LLC....................................4...18..............................................$3.,641..........................................I..B...G............... 28.....1.55.-029-.002.12................................ aass.. Automotive..Group.. LLC...................................2..03.............................................$2.,376........................................IBC............... 29.....155...029...0.02.1.10 .............................. Maass.. Automotive..Group. LLC...................................2,11.............................................$.1.,.8.38.................. ...................... IBC............... 30......1.55.-.029-.0.02.1.00 .............................. Maass.. Automotive..Group.. LLC...................................2.,20.............................................$1.,.9...16........................................IBC ............... 3.1.....1.55.-029-.002090 .............................. Maass Automotive LLC...................................2,28..............................................$.1.,.986.........................................I..B...G..............- 32 ...1.55 212..001010..............................Ryan.Companies US..INC....................................................1.54.............................................$.12,232....................................B-4................ 33.....1.55.-241.-.002010 .............................. Mills. Fleet,.Farm................................................................................2.39.............................................$7.,.742........................................ $.-4...............- 34.....155-241-001020 ..............................Mills Fleet Farm................................................................................2.74..............................................$..6.,302........................................B.-4................ 35 ...1.55 241...000010.............................Mi11s.Fleet Farm...........................................................................2.33.............................................$3,278........................................B-4............. 36.....1.55.-011-.0..0..0.111 ............................... Monticello.. Industrial. Park. Inc....................................40.83..........................................$36,148....................................IBC../. B-2 37.....155..0.37..00.1.0.10 ..............................Kean of Monticello.Inc..................................................192..............................................$4,532........................................B-2............. 38......15572.05-..0.0.1.030 .............................. Ryan. Companies. JS,.INC....................................................1.87.............................................$.18,650.....................................B.-4................ 39......155.2.14-.0.0.1.020 .............................. PRC..Acquisitions. VI..LLC.................................................. 3.39.............................................$5.,250........................................ B.-4................ 40.....155.-117-.002010 .............................. MMC..Land,. Company. LLC.............................................. 5.04.............................................$8.>.906........................................ B.-4................ 41 1.55 117-.001030 Kwik Trip Inc..... ......... ... 2.24..... $4,674 B-4 .............. 42.....1.55.-086-000010 .............................. SPO. LLC.......................................................................................................0.95.............................................$995.............................................. B.-2................ HEADWATERS DEVLLOPMLNT— November 28, 2018 City of Monticello 505 Walnut Street Suite 1 Monticello, MN 55362 Re: Land Use Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment/Rezoning PID# 155-117-002010 /Planning File: 2018-038 To the Distinguished Mayor and Council Members of the City of Monticello; Headwaters Development, in conjunction with the current owners, is seeking to rezone the subject property from B4 to R4 to accommodate a 125 -unit senior living community. This letter and supporting documentation are provided to the Council in response to feedback received during the public Planning Commission hearing on October 2, 2018 and for further consideration by the Council in advance of the public City Council meeting scheduled for December 10, 2018. There is significantly more information available now than was available in advance of the October 2 Planning Commission hearing. During our meeting with the Planning Commission, we heard three primary concerns regarding the proposed rezoning and use of this site: 1. Structure Height 2. Traffic Impact 3. Structure Set -back Requirements Feedback was provided by the Planning Commission members and one resident at the time of the hearing. It later came to our attention that one additional individual submitted public information the afternoon of our Planning Commission hearing, which we respond to in this letter. This letter confirms the following: 1. No height variance is required 2. Proposed use creates the least amount of additional traffic by a large margin 3. Building is situated within all set -back requirements 4. Feedback from neighbors was considered and will be addressed in the design 5. The proposed use is the best solution for a site that has been underdeveloped for more than 20 years Headwaters Development, LLC Page 2 BACKGROUND November 28, 2018 Before directly addressing each of these items, additional background will clarify events that led to the upcoming Council meeting and provide a more robust description of our proposed use. Headwaters Development has been working with the land owners since early 2018. At that time, Monticello was identified as a community that would benefit from our type of development. We anticipated that Monticello would welcome the addition of a senior living community that was owned by an ownership group which is a long-term investor and operated by Ebenezer Management, the most respected senior living management company in the state of Minnesota (est. 1917) (see EXHIBIT A for additional information on Ebenezer Management). In anticipation of our Planning Commission hearing on October 2, Headwaters Development coordinated a neighborhood meeting held on September 26, 2018, where we invited all the neighbors within a 500' radius of the property (58 letters were mailed to surrounding neighbors — EXHIBIT B includes the letter sent on September 10, 2018). This was a forum where all neighbors were invited and encouraged to voice any concerns with the proposed project. Seven neighbors attended the meeting and voiced the following concerns: 1. Increased traffic at the corner of Hart Blvd. and Riverview Dr. 2. Water run-off and landscape screening on the East edge of the property All other comments at the meeting were in support of the project and the attendees were excited to have a new senior community as neighbors; seniors tend to be very good neighbors! We assured the two individuals at the meeting with concerns that Headwaters Development would do the following; 1) increase landscape screening on the East side of the property; 2) ensure site run-off was properly captured in catch basins and funneled to properly sized local water run-off areas; 3) perform a traffic study to identify the potential traffic impact and compare to current zoning estimates and explore all options available to minimize the impact of traffic at the identified corner and 4) work with the City to identify any potential improvements that may be available. At the public hearing on October 2, we were pleased to hear positive feedback from the public regarding the proposed project. There was only one resident, who did not attend the neighborhood meeting on September 26, but voiced his only concern related to increased traffic at the corner of Hart Blvd. and Riverview Dr. To our surprise, the Planning Commission began publicly discussing comments from a memorandum they received from Mr. Dan Mielke and his development team. At the time we were unaware of any comments from Mr. Mielke. He chose to not publicly disclose any comments at the Planning Commission hearing. We subsequently discovered that Mr. Mielke sent his concerns directly to the City late in the afternoon of October 2, which did Headwaters Development, LLC Page 3 November 28, 2018 not allow the City enough time to disclose the information to Headwaters Development or the Owner. The Planning Commission did have time to review his comments in advance of the hearing. Headwaters Development believes certain members of the Planning Commission may have based their decision on this memorandum. After the meeting concluded, we received a copy of the information provided to the Planning Commission by Mr. Mielke. Unfortunately, Mr. Mielke's information was not factually accurate and included some inflammatory language which was misleading and could have persuaded certain outcomes without proper facts being considered. PRIMARY CONCERNS Structure Height The subject property is located within the Mississippi Wild Scenic and Recreational River District (the "MWSRR"), which states, among other considerations, that all structures built within the district are restricted to a height of 25'. This height restriction can be a limiting factor to higher density communities as the structure typically needs to go vertical in order to accommodate the number of units, or the building would be spread so wide on the site that greenspace would be very limited. This limiting factor was referenced in the Planning Commission hearing and was considered that our proposed use would require a variance from the 25' restriction; this was not factually accurate. Upon further review with the City and confirmation sent on October 16, 2018 from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the subject site is governed by a 35' restriction based on what was in place at the time the City adopted the MWSRR and therefore our proposed use WOULD NOT require a variance from the current MWSRR restrictions. Our proposed use will be within the 35' requirement. Furthermore, based on feedback received from the neighbors, we have put great effort into making the roofline aesthetically appealing and varying in height and shape to give the building the best look from the neighboring properties. The exterior product variation and roof lines will limit the impact of a three-story structure on the subject site and will fit nicely within the surrounding environment. Traffic Impact Headwaters Development heard concerns about the potential traffic impact to the intersection of Hart Blvd. and Riverview Dr. We inherently understand that the traffic impact of a senior community is far less than almost any other use (including all uses considered in a B4 zoning), we realize that further support of our assertion is helpful and necessary. Accordingly, we commissioned a third -party traffic study from SRF Consulting Group, a local firm specialized in studying traffic impacts related to proposed developments (see EXHIBIT C — Traffic Study). The traffic study confirmed that the potential impact to traffic in this area is far less than the current B4 zoning. The study, which was based on 125 units, indicates a 95% reduction in traffic from the highest use in B4. Daily trips are estimated at 298 (including 11 / 6 trips in and out in AM rush hour; 12 / 17 trips in and Headwaters Development, LLC Page 4 November 28, 2018 out in PM rush hour) compared to 6,300 estimated trips at highest use (including 135 / 90 trips in and out in AM rush hour; 278 / 267 trips in and out in PM rush hour). As indicated in the report, the proposed Senior Community would create drastically fewer visits per day than any other proposed use in the current B4 zoning. The reduced trips are a result of few drivers residing in the proposed building; moreover, the drivers that do reside there do not travel during peak hours. The majority of all vehicular activity is limited to employees at the facility. Furthermore, following the Planning Commission hearing on October 2, it came to our attention that as an owner of the subject site, we have access to the private drive that connects Hart Blvd. to Cty. Rd. 75 at the Southeast corner of the subject site (immediately in front of the Kwik Trip located at 9855 Hart Blvd.). This access is agreed to in a declaration titled Riverview Square Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements dated December 21st, 1999 (see EXHIBIT D). This declaration will allow us to direct traffic on our subject site in a way to encourage drivers to use the private driveway to access Cty. Rd. 75 instead of using the Hart Blvd. / Riverview Dr. intersection. Our proposal would have one "Entry Only" driveway at the Northwest corner of the subject site and one "Entry / Exit" driveway at the Southeast corner of the subject site, directly aligned with the private driveway (see EXHIBIT E for site traffic patterns). Headwaters Development believes that the minimal number of daily trips and the proposed traffic pattern on the subject property, should eliminate any material concern related to increased traffic in this area, especially when compared with the alternative uses in B4 zoning. Headwaters Development remains committed to working with the City to come up with additional, creative methods to improving the Hart Blvd. and Riverview Dr. intersection. Structure Set -back Requirements Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, Headwaters Development was under the impression that the set -back requirement for the subject site was 40' from the Northern property line and 100' from other property lines. This was inverse to the actual requirement. In the attached EXHIBIT F, a revised site plan confirms the building position within the required 100' set -back from the Northern property line and 40' from other property lines. This site plan was slightly modified to accommodate the proper set -back, although no material changes were made to the overall building and the proposed use. REZONING CONSIDERATIONS Headwaters Development understands that rezoning a given parcel of land within the City can be a challenging decision and the outcome of a rezoning application may impact residents in different ways. However, it's important to consider that the subject site has a lengthy history of rezoning. Indeed, the City and Owners have struggled to determine the right identity for this parcel of land. Headwaters Development, LLC Page S November 28, 2018 The current land owners have held this site for 20 years, they purchased 17 acres in 1998 and subsequently subdivided into various parcels. The subject site had been once zoned PMZ, which allowed for residential use. It was later changed to B4 zoning, in hopes that it would attract commercial business suitors. This was also beneficial to the City as the new zoning allowed for the site to be included in the special assessment charge to help fund the new interchange that was ultimately completed near the site. A few years ago, the land owners contemplated a sale to develop a large multi -family apartment complex, which ultimately failed due to perceived height restrictions, high- density and traffic complications. While the residential nature of this project appeared to be a great fit, it was not approved. This project is different. The proposed project, unlike the initial multi -family project, will not require variances and will have far less impact to the area and surrounding neighbors. Moreover, it will fit within the scope of the MWSRR and preserve far more greenspace that other proposed projects. Headwaters Development believes they have the best solution for this piece of land and all stakeholders will benefit: 1. The City — a. Utilization of vacant land b. Major increase to tax base c. More residents can stay within Monticello as they age d. Additional jobs created in the City (long-term stability) e. No variances required, works within already existing ordinances 2. The Neighbors — a. Friendly new neighbors that have very low impact to the area b. Best proposed traffic use of all viable alternatives c. Creative use of land maximizes greenspace, minimizes impact of building 3. The Land Owners — a. Two decades trying to find a solution comes to an end b. Monetize the value of the land they have held and paid taxes on for years For two decades, the land owners have tried to either develop the site or sell to a developer that would build a functional building or business. This effort has been unsuccessful, and many times the owners have run into roadblocks that prevented them from doing anything with the site. Based on all the considerations discussed in this letter and the proposed use of the site, Headwaters Development believes the owners finally have the best use for this site and have found the right identity for the land that had been missing for so long. SENIOR HOUSING DEMAND Headwaters Development has gone to great lengths to understand the Monticello market and potential demand for Senior Housing. As was pointed out in our Planning Commission hearing, the City of Monticello currently has unmet demand for additional senior housing Headwaters Development, LLC Page 6 November 28, 2018 units. This is also identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan as a long-term need for the residents of Monticello. Our goal is to build enough units to make sure every resident wishing to stay in their home city of Monticello has that opportunity. We wish to see that these residents have a place they can call home and get the precious care they need later in their lives. Our full-service community will provide that service to these residents. Benefits of our proposed new community: 1. We will offer Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Memory care, all in one building. It is our strong belief that seniors should be able to "age in place" and our community allows them to do that. In other words, we bring the care to them, with no need to move as they age. Unlike other communities that mandate their residents move to a different wing of the community or an entirely separate building as their need for care increases. This disruption forces residents to move from friends and neighbors as they age and is incredibly disruptive and unnecessarily stressful. 2. Ebenezer Management will run the day to day operations of the facility. Not only are they considered the best operator in the state of Minnesota, they also have a distinct advantage from their partnership with Fairview Health Systems and access to some of the world's best staff and clinical systems. 3. Our community will dedicate units to those in need. We will be licensed and ready to work with residents that have lower assets and income than market -rate residents. These residents will be a part of the State of Minnesota's Medicaid Waiver program and will be accepted into our community. We understand there is another concept plan in the City for 136 additional senior living units. While that concept is nice to be aware of, it is far from being built and operational. When we consider supply and demand, we do not consider unapproved developments which may never be approved or funded or built. Given where this project and other potential developments are in the development process, Headwaters Development believes it is prudent for the City to move forward with our plan as proposed. CONCLUSION The benefits of our proposed project are many. First, the City will not have to consider or accept any variance from its ordinances. Second, the project fits within the City's desired scope. Third, the City will not have to make any unusual exceptions for Headwaters Development or be concerned about setting a negative precedent. Fourth, the residents of Monticello will enjoy the ability to age in the community they love. It is clear the City has been uncertain about how they wanted this site to be developed (residential, commercial, or both) and the history supports this conclusion. Given the uncertainty and the willingness historically to zone either way, the proposed project is the perfect solution to this site. It is ideal for the City, its residents and the current land owners -- it is truly a win -win-win solution. Headwaters Development, LLC Page 7 November 28, 2018 We understand the Planning Commission had a duty to recommend based on the existing ordinances in place and the information they had available at the time of consideration. However, that information was incomplete and inaccurate. Accordingly, it is ultimately the Council's duty to decide based on accurate and complete facts. Headwaters Development respectfully requests that the Council take the facts presented here into consideration and rezone and approve this project. We believe this is best for the City's residents (including the current land owners). We are excited about the opportunity to become a part of the Monticello community -- we look forward to calling this home. Thank you for all your time and effort as you consider this proposed rezoning and potential senior housing project. Sincerely, ichacl J. H berg Managing Member Headwaters Development, LLC MHoa2beriz a,headwatersdevelobment.biz Headwaters Development, LLC Page 8 EXHIBIT A Ebenezer Management Company Overview November 28, 2018 EBENEZER Choices for vibrnnrt senior living The following pages are a summary of Ebenezer and its qualifications. Todd Willett, CFO E, BENEZER Choices for vibrant senior living A Brief History of EBENEZER SOCIETY Norwegian Lutheran immigrants to America established Ebenezer in 1917. Pastors were troubled when the number of aged poor grew in the congregations. There was o place but "going over the hill to the poor house." "Many of these places were a disgrace to a civilized community, a dread to old people," wrote N.N. Ronning, editor of the 25th anniversary edition of the Ebenezer magazine (May 1942). Ebenezer began with members of six Lutheran Church Bodies, all Norwegian, on its board of directors. The church bodies are listed as United Norwegian Church, Norwegian Synod, Lutheran Free Church, Hauge Synod, Eielsen Synod and Society of Brethren. The congregations who are historically affiliated with us come from these roots. In the first 25 years, the management of the Home rested on the Executive Committee of the Board. Most of the responsibility rested on the President of the board. He would visit the home nearly every day. Mile - Posts Along the Road - First 25 Years 1916 - Minneapolis was selected for the Home. Sister Caroline Unhjem was called as the first Matron 1917 - The first Ebenezer Home opened on May 7 to ten old people housed at 3017 Portland Ave., a rental property. The Auxiliary, through Congregations, raised $8,322 to begin this work. 1919 - Main building of what is now Ebenezer Hall was erected. It would house about 40 old people and workers. This is what is the center section of Ebenezer Hall. On December 15th, 15 residents moved into the new home. Several new residents were also admitted. 1920 - New building at 2545 Portland Ave. was dedicated. 1921- Arrangement was made with Fairview Hospital and Deaconess Home and Hospital to care for residents who needed hospitalization. Our partnership with Fairview really began 79 years ago. 1923 - Home continued to admit only destitute people. Talk began about putting up a new building with a chapel. (North Wing) 1924 - Chapel was built and dedicated. Cost was not more than $45,000. 1926 - A new wing was discussed. There were no 110 residents. A waiting list of 60 forced the issue of paying down debt to move ahead on building. Also a publication called Ebenezer was begun. 1928 - A second wing (south wing) with Hospital was erected. Cost: no more than $60,000. Need was to care for more six people. Residents numbered 98. 1929 - It is reported that the medical services to residents were rendered freely and cheerfully by doctors of the Sivertsen Clinic and then by Dr. C.M. Roan's Medical Staff. The new wing had housing capacity of 52 residents. There were 136 Norwegian residents living at the Ebenezer Home. Only four were born in the USA while 132 were born in Norway. English was the second language. Institute of Health funded it. This grant enabled Ebenezer to provide services to seniors in their homes. Because of abuses of power exercised by attorneys and other who took advantage of elderly seniors in those days, Ebenezer used this grant to write that became the Conservatorship Law in the State of Minnesota. Pastor Al Brakke, who was both an Ordained Lutheran Pastor and Social Worker, directed the project that wrote what is Minnesota State Law today. 1974 - Adult Day Care was established, the first program of its kind in Minneapolis. 1979 - Ebenezer Ridges Care Center in Burnsville, MN was founded. 1977 - Ebenezer built the first senior co-operative housing in Minnesota at 7500 York, Edina 1978 - Ebenezer Park Apartments opened as the first apartment project in Minnesota designed to accommodate wheelchair-bound and hearing impaired residents. 1982 - Ebenezer Foundation was established. Over 10 million dollars has been raised since. 1994 -Luther Hall built a new addition replacing Field Hall. 1996 - Ebenezer formalized a relationship with Fairview Corporation to provide a system wide continuum, of care. Ebenezer brings expertise and services working with the needs o folder adults to a hospital system focused on critical care. Though incomplete, this snapshot gives a glimpse of Ebenezer's proud history. Ebenezer Society has grown from a "Poor House with Christian Compassion" to a complex system of senior housing, nursing services, transitional care, adult day centers, and senior management resources to serve people in the 21St Century. Ebenezer Hall, the Grand Old Lady of Ebenezer Society, still stands strong as a place where the mission of Ebenezer continues after more than 80 years. In 1998 a 1.2 Million Dollar renovation project was completed to make a new entrance and canopy plus redecorate the entire 144 resident rooms. Work continues to maintain the building and make it even better an before. Ebenezer Hall, rooted in its history, offers a spiritually based holistic approach to care including opportunity for massage therapy, healing touch, intergenerational programming, horticulture therapy among other services and resources that treat the human spirit as well as the body, Spiritual care at Ebenezer, rooted in the Lutheran Christian tradition and respectful of diversity in faith and culture, seeks to help foster meaning and bring significance to those living at the end of the human life span. Ebenezer Society leaders had a history of seeing human needs and meeting them. Values of compassion, caring, respect, dignity, services and careful stewardship of resources rooted in the Christian faith of past Ebenezer leaders and workers are values that continue to be important in the Ebenezer organization of today. Today we call these values Compassion, Integrity, Service and Dignity. They are rooted in Christian Caring, loving that motive the first Ebenezer founders. Ebenezer Executive Team 2017 Mark Thomas Chief Executive Officer Mark also serves as the President for Fairview Health Services Senior Services Division, where he has oversight of Fairview's Homecare and Hospice, Fairview Partners and Senior Services. Mark holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration and a Masters of Business Administration from Minnesota State University — Mankato. His post graduate studies in long-term care administration are from the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota. Mark has served as the Chair of Aging Services of Minnesota as well as serving over 10 years on ASOM's executive committee. In the past Mark has chaired ASOM's Government Affairs Steering Committee, and served as a member of the Imperative Steering Committee setting legislative policy direction for both ASOM and Care Providers of Minnesota. Mark has also served as a delegate for LeadingAge and as a board director for the National Chronic Care Consortium. He currently serves as the Chairman of the Board for Fairview Homecare and Hospice, and board member for Healthsense Care Alliance. Mark has over 30 years' experience in the health care field focused on services to older adults. Jonathan Lundberg Chief Operating Officer Jon has more than 28 years of out -state and metro facilities experience as a Long Term Care Administrator for properties ranging in size from 50 to 500 beds. He has a wide breadth of experience in both for-profit and not-for-profit facilities and organizations. In addition to being an accomplished Administrator, Jon has extensive experience in the field of older adult services, including operations work for multiple types of senior housing, assisted living, transitional care and other senior programming. Jon has served as the Board chair of Care Providers of Minnesota, the state representative to the American Health Care Association Council of States, and has served as a member of the Long Term Care Imperative. He currently serves as the Chair of Leading Age MN's Board of Directors. Jon received a Bachelor of Arts in Speech Communications with a minor in Aging and graduated from the Long Term Care Program at the University of Minnesota. Todd Willett Chief Financial Officer Todd joined Ebenezer in October 2016 to lead all financial aspects of Ebenezer's parent corporation and affiliates, including internal and external audit reporting, budgeting and financial analysis, cash and investment management, revenue cycle management, audits, and risk management. He has over nine years of experience in the health care industry, both in public and private accounting. Prior to joining Ebenezer, Todd was CFO at Walker Methodist. His professional experience includes finance roles at Sholom and ChftonLarsonAllen. Todd graduated from Minnesota State University Moorhead, with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Accounting. Todd is a Certified Public Accountant licensed in Minnesota, a member of the Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants, currently serves on the Finance Committee for Leading Age of Minnesota and served previously on the Finance Committee at CareChoice. Susan C. Farr Vice President of New Business Development Susan has more than 28 years of experience in the senior housing industry. Her experience spans both metropolitan and rural communities, as well as two states, and includes a number of influential roles in senior housing development and management. Susan earned her degree in Retail Merchandising and Management/ Business Administration from University of Wisconsin -Stout and received training at Dale Carnegie Leader- ship Training for Managers. Susan was voted one of the Top Women in Business in 2014 by the Minneapolis/ St. Paul Business Journal. She serves as a board member both at Normandale Community College and the University of Wisconsin -Stout. Her role at Ebenezer includes seeking out new business and management services, as well as working with architects, contractors, financial companies and designers to develop great senior housing opportunities. With her team, Susan has helped design and develop 15 new properties within the past two years. Communities with which Susan has collaborated have won many awards, including Best Design at York Gardens in Edina, Minnesota. C+ EBENEZER Choices for vibrant senior living Ebenezer Executive Team 2017 Mary Sanders Vice President of Human Resources Mary has more than 20 years of experience in Human Resources. In her role she provides consultation and leadership in all areas of human resources for Ebenezer including employee relations, performance management, Affirmative Action, management training and development, and implementation of employment policies and practices. She holds a Bachelor's degree from the University of Minnesota, Duluth, national certification as a Senior Professional in Human Resources with SHRM, and has continued post -graduate education in leadership development and employment law. She is certified by the American Council on Exercise as a Personal Trainer and Group Fitness Instructor. As an advocate for personal and organizational health, Mary has a commitment to creating environments that promote effective working relationships. She assists in the accomplishment of the organizations goals through development and implementation of initiatives that support a strong and effective workforce. Mary Chapa Vice President of Strategic Development Mary's broad experience includes long-term care, community-based services, and home care and hospice, as well as sales and marketing for a private engineering and manufacturing company. She works with senior services business leaders to develop, coordinate and implement processes to support Fairview system strategies. She oversees emerging technology-based care strategies that support seniors who want to remain safely independent in their home. Mary provides direction and support for business project management in optimization of Health Information Management (HIM), positioning the organization for health information exchange (HIE) and implementing technology-based care strategies to improve patient experience, quality care and reduce the total cost of care. Mary is current board chair for Nucleus Clinic in Coon Rapids and an advisory board member for Performance Excellence Network. Mary holds degrees in Nursing, Chemical Dependency and Social Work as well as certificates in business, sales & marketing, engineering and technology from the University of St. Thomas. She is currently enrolled in the Business Architect Certificate Program at Metropolitan State University. Sue Olson Director of Compliance & Corporate Services Sue is responsible for coordinating, implementing and overseeing multiple levels of corporate services. This includes coordinating the organization's communication efforts, providing support to the board of directors, managing projects for the Foundation, facilitating the organization's strategic planning process and overseeing corporate office administrative services. Sue is trained in providing personality profiling utilizing the Insights profile tool and Myers -Briggs tool as well as trained in co -active coaching. She is also responsible for sponsoring the customer service initiative for the organization. Sue holds a degree in organizational communication from Metropolitan State University, St. Paul, MN, and has received certification in Fairview's Green Belt process improvement program. C+ EBENEZER Choices for vibrant senior living C+ EBENEZER Dignity. Integrity. Service. Com r r ' n. Innovation. Ebenezer Management Services is guided by these core principles in everything we do. For each project we undertake, we look for business partners who align with our mission/vision to help make the lives of seniors more independent, healthful, meaningful and secure. From our beginnings as a group of Lutheran churches in 1917, to the over 75 senior housing sites and 7,000 seniors we serve today, one thing has not changed. The name Ebenezer comes from the bible, and means "Stone of Help". Ebenezer has been a trusted source of senior housing and services for more than 95 years. Ebenezer VALUES Building on our heritage, we... • Respond to the physical, psychological, social and spiritual dimensions of the whole person. • Welcome persons of diverse cultures and faith traditions. • Practice responsible stewardship of human, property and financial resources. • Encourage continuing learning and innovation. • Strive for excellence. VISION Ebenezer is widely recognized for driving innovation and providing choices for vibrant senior living. CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE Ebenezer demonstrates service responsiveness to our customers through our mission and value -based culture. QUALITY PERFORMANCE Ebenezer provides excellent, safe and reliable care. EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Ebenezer employees are highly engaged, committed and customer responsive. BREAKTHROUGH PRACTICES Ebenezer identifies and implements innovative programs and services that sustain our leadership status in older adult services. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT Ebenezer continually expands and enhances its portfolio of products and services consistent with the objectives outlined in our business plan. FINANCIAL HEALTH Through achievement of business plan objectives, Ebenezer exhibits the financial well-being needed to sustain our mission, and invest in our people, services and communities. Ebenezer has engaged staff, experts in their respective areas, ready and willing to make this exciting new project a success. RESULTS ORIENTED Ebenezer Management Services can take a building project all the way from concept and market research, to design and financial feasibility, to financing, marketing, and operations. We know the regulations in the industry, and no other organization has our connection to Fairview Health Services. Our 90 plus years of experience results in high occupancy rates, improved operating results, and the assurance of quality service to seniors. During this turbulent time in the economy, the strength of Ebenezer's financials and our solid reputation in the industry gets projects financed. Ebenezer has the knowledge and expertise to help you succeed. s OL C � WE I j fill � m n —13 Zi Ls p. if 2 v _j� 4 iE CL fY W W W W 8; 4� ICY GL Ira. In12 o rE 814 CL [ •_ i�LuQ. E . nn j �e v0. -I r4 aw ry ham° I > 0"� w TF q A N 1 J Y] q4ILmz z LAAO Headwaters Development, LLC Page 9 EXHIBIT B November 28, 2018 Neighborhood Meeting Letter Dated September 10, 2018 17550 Hemlock Avenue Lakeville, MN 55044 (952) 378-4386 mhoagberg@headwatersdevelopment.biz September 10, 2018 Dear Property Owner: HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to the City of Monticello seeking approval of rezoning for the following described property: Lot 1, Block 2, River View Square, Wright County, Minnesota (PID# 155-117- 002010) — Senior Living Community Site located near the Southeast corner of Riverview Drive and Hart Boulevard. We are asking the City to approve this application which will ultimately allow the development of Lot 1, Block 2, River View Square into a 92 unit senior housing community providing Independent Living, Assisted Living, and Memory Care Services for our residents. A Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully informed of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to offer comments and suggestions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on September 26, 2018 at 5:30pm at the Monticello Community Center, Bridge Room, 505 Walnut St., Monticello, MN 55362. At this meeting we will make every effort to show you how the property is intended to be developed and to answer any questions. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Michael J. oag rg Headwaters Development, LLC Managing Member Headwaters Development, LLC Page 10 EXHIBIT C Traffic Study November 28, 2018 049 Trip Generation Review SKF No. 09892248 To: Michael Hoagberg Managing Director Headwaters Development From: Tom Sachi, Senior Engineer Matt Pacyna, Principal Date: October 17, 2018 Subject: Monticello Senior Living Trip Generation Review Introduction SRF has completed a trip generation review for the proposed development (PID 155-117-002010) in the southeast quadrant of the Riverview Drive (CSAH 39) and Hart Boulevard intersection in the City of Monticello. The purpose of this review is to compare the estimated trip generation of the proposed 125 -unit residential senior living development with other allowable uses of this site. Proposed Development The project site is currently a vacant parcel zoned B4 Commercial. The proposed development is requesting a change to R4 Residential zoning. Currently, there is no maximum floor -area -ratio (FAR) for B4 zoning in the City Code, however, other nearby B4 zones have approximately a maximum of a 0.3 FAR. The FAR is the ratio of total gross floor area to the total area of the site. The site under review is approximately 196,000 square feet. Based on the 0.3 FAR, there is the potential for a 59,000 sf retail development on the proposed site under current B4 Commercial zoning regulations. Trip Generation To understand the potential impacts of the proposed land use change, a trip generation estimate was developed to compare potential land use scenarios. The trip generation estimates were completed using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition for both the proposed residential development and other allowable land uses of this site under current zoning code. The trip generation estimates are shown in Table 1 for comparison. ONE CARLSON PARKWAY, SUITE 150 1 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55447 1 763.475.0010 1 WWW.SRFCONSULTING.COM Michael Hoagberg, Headwaters Development Monticello Senior Living Trip Generation Review Table 1: Proposed Development Trip Generation Estimate A.M. Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size Peak Hour Trips In Out Proposed Land Us I&I Congregate Care Facility (253) 47 units 2 1 Assisted Living (254) 78 beds 9 5 Total Site Trips 11 6 r Allowable Land U� Free Standing Discount Store (815) Shopping Center (820) Supermarket (850) Findings October 17, 2018 Page 2 59,000 sf P.M. 21 Peak Hour Trips Daily 3,134 59,000 sf Trips In I Out 117 4 4 95 8 13 203 12 17 298 59,000 sf 48 21 142 142 3,134 59,000 sf 34 21 108 117 2,227 59,000 sf 135 90 278 267 6,300 The results of the trip generation estimate indicate the proposed senior living development is expected to generate 17 a.m. peak hour, 29 p.m. peak hour, and approximately 298 daily trips. In comparison, other allowable land uses for the site could be expected to generate between 55 to 225 a.m. peak hour, 225 to 545 p.m. peak hour, and 2,227 to 6,300 daily trips. The proposed development is expected to generate between 38 to 208 fewer a.m. peak hour, 196 to 516 fewer p.m. peak hour, and 1,929 to 6,002 fewer daily trips. Thus, due to the minimal amount of new trips generated by the proposed senior living development, it is expected to have minimal impact to overall area intersection capacity. H.'\Pmjectr\ 12000\ 12248\TS\Report\ 12248 Final MonticedloTripGenAevieav_181017.doex Headwaters Development, LLC Page 11 EXHIBIT D November 28, 2018 Riverview Square Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Easements dated December 21St, 1999 RIVER VIEW SOUARE DECLARATION Ol• COVENAN'i a, RESTRICTIONS AND EASE14'IENTS Made By MMC Land Company, LLC,, a Minnesota limited liability companN, On December 21 ", 1999 � ltjr,%!,, p; y ! R30H39IAOMA A114AM Y T I I T.30 y" RIVER VIEW SOUARE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS. RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS THIS DECLARATION ("Declaration") is made this ZP day of December, 1999, by MMC Land Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, ("Developer") WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner of certain property located in Wright County, Minnesota, ("Property"), which is legally described in the attached Exhibit A, and WHEREAS, Developer has obtained final plat approval from the City of Monticello for the subdivision and development of the Property as River View Square ("Subdivision"), which is depicted in the attached Exhibit B, and WHEREAS, Developer desires to establish certain protective covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements to ensure proper use, enjoyment, development and improvement of the Property and Subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, Developer hereby declares that the Property and the Subdivision shall be subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements for the benefit of and as a burden upon the Property and Subdivision, which shall run with the land and with each and every portion thereof, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of each and every successor in interest of the Property and the Subdivision. 1. Definition of Terms. a. "Lot' means any plot of land shown on the recorded Subdivision map of the Property, including any further division thereof, whether by re -platting or simple subdivision. Page 1 of 10 b. "Owner" means any party or parties, their respective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, who hold legal or equitable title to any part or parcel of the Property, but does not mean the mortgagee of any portion of the Property unless and until such mortgagee has acquired title thereto pursuant to foreclosure of said mortgage and all applicable redemption periods have expired or terminated or pursuant to a deed in lieu of foreclosure. Where any portion of the Property is being sold under a contract for deed to a contract vendee who is entitled to possession of that portion of the Property, the contract vendee and not the contract vendor shall be deemed the owner of that portion of the Property upon recording of the contract for deed. c. "Developer" means MMC Land Company, LLC, and any successor developer specifically designated in writing by MMC Land Company, LLC, as such. d. "Property" is defined in Exhibit A. e. "Subdivision" is defined is Exhibit B. f. "Declaration" means this document in its executed and recorded form, and any validly executed and recorded amendments and addenda thereto. g. "Building" means any structure or facility constructed upon the Property, and any attachments or additions thereto. h. "Improvement" means a Building and ancillary or appurtenant land alterations such as outbuildings, fences, signs, parking areas, lawns, landscaping, dump stations and the like. i. "Public Street" means Hart Boulevard as shown on the recorded plat. j. "Private Street" means the roadway across Lot 2, Block 1 which shall connect Hart Boulevard with County State Aid Highway No. 75. k. "Street" means either or both the Public Street and the Private Street. 1. "Roadway Easement" means the tract of land being 40 feet in width upon which the Page 2 of 10 69 8125 rel 1 Private Street is located. m. "Proportionate Share" means a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of Lots owned by an Owner divided by the denominator of which is the total number of Lots then in the Subdivision. n. "Hazardous Materials" means any dangerous, toxic or hazardous pollutants, chemicals, wastes or substances as defined in the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), or the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 ("RCRA"), or the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 115A ("MERLA"), or any other federal, state or local environmental laws, statutes, regulations, requirements and ordinances, and also including formaldehyde, urea and asbestos. 2. Permitted Uses. a. All Lots in the Subdivision shall be used for commercial retail purposes. b. Commercial retail shall include the sale or rental of goods and services to the public. c. All Buildings shall be constructed and maintained in a state of good condition at all times, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 3. Prohibited Uses. a. No Lot in the Subdivision other than Lot 2, Block 1 may be used as a gas station, or as a convenience store or as a car/truck wash. b. No noxious or offensive uses shall be permitted on any Lot in the Subdivision. c. No unlawful activities shall be conducted on any Lot in the Subdivision. d. No Hazardous Materials shall be used, made, stored, treated, disposed or handled on any Lot in the Subdivision in violation of any applicable environmental rules and regulations. e. No Improvement shall encroach or overhang upon an adjoining Lot or Street. Page 3 of 10 6 9 8 1 2 5 4. Excess Fill. a. Should any Owner in the Subdivision have any excess dirt, gravel, fill or the like upon its Lot, then Developer shall have a right of first refusal to take and use same at no charge. 5. Private Street. a. Developer, or Developer's designee, shall construct a Private Street upon Lot 2, Block 1. b. The Private Street shall be constructed to approximately 30 feet in width and shall be located within the Roadway Easement which is a tract of land being 40 feet in width, adjacent to the Southeasterly boundary of said Lot 2, Block I and extending from the Southwesterly boundary line of Hart Boulevard to the Northeasterly boundary line of County State Aid Highway No. 75. c. The Private Street shall be a perpetual, non-exclusive roadway providing vehicular and pedestrian access to and from Hart Boulevard and County State Aid Highway No. 75 and shall be for the benefit of all Owners in the Subdivision, and their employees, agents, guests, invitees and licensees. d. The fee simple title to the land within the Roadway Easement shall remain vested with the Owner of Lot 2, Block 1, subject to the rights and privileges created herein. e. The location and dimensions of the Roadway Easement is depicted upon Exhibit B. f. The use, enjoyment, improvement and maintenance of the Private Street shall be governed by this Declaration. g. The Private Street and the Roadway Easement may not be used for parking, storing, building, or recreation. h. No party shall create, suffer or permit any hazard, contamination, obstruction, interference, impediment or encroachment to the Private Street or Roadway Easement. i. No party shall create, suffer or permit any overburdening of or to the Private Street or Page 4 of 10 Roadway Easement by causing unusual increases in traffic volume. j. Developer shall construct the Private Street using a crushed rock base and blacktop wear course, and, in addition, shall install concrete curb and gutter to match the existing such improvements along Hart Boulevard. All such work shall be performed in accordance with municipally approved plans and specifications at Developer's sole risk and cost. k. All Owners in the Subdivision, by virtue of merely acquiring title to a Lot, hereby agree to jointly maintain the Private Street, and to share equally the work and cost of any such maintenance. Such maintenance shall include repair or replacement of street signs and markers, crushed rock, blacktop, concrete curb and gutter due to normal wear and tear resulting from use, vandalism, weathering, erosion or other causes, as well as cleaning, sweeping, sealing, resurfacing, restriping and snow removal, as necessary. The Owner of Lot 2, Block 1 shall have the sole discretion to determine if any such maintenance becomes necessary, and to determine the manner of performance of such maintenance and the payment thereof. The Owner of Lot 2, Block 1 may from time to time bill the Owners of the other Lots in the Subdivision for their Proportionate Share of the cost of maintenance. If payment thereof is not paid within 10 days thereafter, the Owner of Lot 2, Block 1 may pursue collection thereof, together with costs of collection, including, but limited to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. 1. All Owners in the Subdivision further agree to pay their Proportionate Share of any real estate taxes and any liability insurance premiums allocable to the Private Street and the Roadway Easement. m. All Owners in the Subdivision further agree that any damage caused to the Private Street resulting from the use thereof by an Owner's construction vehicles and heavy equipment shall be the sole responsibility of said Owner and the cost to repair or replace the Page 5of10 698125, (0� 11 " damaged roadway shall be the sole liability of such Owner. n. In the event that the Private Street should at some time in the future become a public street, then the provisions of this Declaration with respect to the Private Street shall cease to be enforceable and shall be terminated upon a valid public dedication of the roadway. 6. Miscellaneous Provisions. a. Enforcement. This Declaration may be enforced by the Developer or by any Owner of a Lot in the Subdivision, or their successors and assigns, for the maximum period allowed by law by an action for injunctive relief or for money damages or both. The failure to enforce any provision of this Declaration upon any violation, or alleged violation thereof, shall not constitute a waiver of the right to do so for any subsequent such violation. b. Duration. This Declaration shall be and remain effective for a period of thirty (30) years from the date of execution hereof and shall be automatically renewed and extended for successive ten-year periods unless otherwise terminated in the same manner as provided for amendments to the Declaration. c. Amendment. This Declaration may by amended by a 75% majority vote of the Owners of the Lots in the Subdivision. Any amendment must be recorded to be enforceable. d. Severabilitv. The invalidation by judgment, court order or otherwise, of any one of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations or easements in this Declaration shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. Page 6 of 10 698125 W- IN IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Developer has executed this Declaration as of the day and year first above written. MMC LAND COMPANY, LLC By:a0W4 '14/ By: - Richard E. Williamson� V. Its: Chief Executive Manager Its: V. maul Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2_i__ day of December, 1999, by Richard E. Williamson and John V. Ryan, Jr., the Chief Executive Manager and the Chief Financial Manager, respectively, of MMC Land Company, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. RETURN T0:, This Instrument Drafted Bv: Bryan Wm Huber, Attorney HUBER LAW OFFICE, P.A. 1107 Hazeltine Blvd., #496 Chaska, Minnesota 55318 Telephone: (612) 448-8815 Facsimile: (612) 368-9848 Notary Public or other Public Official Page 7 of 10 •• MICHAEL P. KOSHOSHEK NOTARY PUBLIC - MINRESOTA My comm. Expires Jan 31 2000 698125 40 ra CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE The undersigned, Highland Bank, a Minnesota Banking Corporation, Mortgagee in those certain Mortgages dated May 12`h, 1999 and recorded May 18`h, 1999 as Document No. 678445 and dated October 28`h, 1999 and recorded November 8`h, 1999 as Document No. 694669 in the Office of the County Recorder of Wright County, Minnesota and encumbering all or part of the land located within Wright County, Minnesota and legally described in the attached Exhibit A, does hereby consent to the making and filing of the foregoing Declaration, and all covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements set forth therein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Consent as of the &L day of December, 1999. Highland Bank, a Minnesota Banking Corporation By: r Its: Senior Vice -President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _� 1 !- day of December, 1999, by, Todd K. Anderson, the Senior Vice -President of Highland Bank, a Minnesota Banking Corporation, on behalf of the corporation. 19 Nip AM C MWNESSOOT Notary Public or other Publ�al SHEERSURNE COE UNTY i .Muwary3120S.W Page 8 of 10 696125 V r"I'll EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter being part of Lot 15 of AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO. ONE of Section 13, Township 121, Range 25, Wright County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 49 minutes 42 seconds East along the east line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 295.08 feet to the former centerline of County State Aid Road No. 39 as shown on HOGLUND ADDITION according to the recorded plat thereof being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 85 degrees 31 minutes 32 seconds West along said centerline of County State Aid Road No. 39 as shown on said HOGLUND ADDITION, a distance of 370.73 feet to the northwesterly right of way line of County State Aid Highway No. 39 as shown on WRIGHT COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 6; thence southwesterly along said northwesterly right of way line being a nontangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 863.51 feet and a central angle of 41 degrees 39 minutes 46 seconds, a distance of 627.90 feet, the chord of said curve bears South 56 degrees 44 minutes 27 seconds West; thence South 35 degrees 54 minutes 35 seconds West tangent to said curve and along said northwesterly right of way line, a distance of 177.88 feet; thence South 75 degrees 42 minutes 51 seconds West along the northerly right of way line of said WRIGHT COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAT NO. 6, a distance of 39.05 feet to the northwesterly right of way line of County State Aid Highway No. 75; thence South 54 degrees 05 minutes 25 seconds East along said northeasterly right of way line, a distance of 959.55 feet to the south line of the Northeast Quarter of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 45 minutes 34 seconds East along said south line, a distance of 262.94 feet to the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, thence North 0 degrees 49 minutes 42 seconds West along the east line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 1018.81 feet to the point of beginning. The foregoing legally described property has now been platted as River View Square and consists of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, as well as portions of County State Aid Highway No. 39 and Hart Boulevard as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. Page 9of10 69 8 1 2 5 ?01"N 140+ EXHIBIT B PLAT OF RIVER VIEW SQUARE CO3. 39 \AN Page 10 of 10 698125 Headwaters Development, LLC Page 12 EXHIBIT E Proposed Site Traffic Patterns November 28, 2018 t ti ■lkMm■.r SITI SSOCIATE-c-3:28 NOVE 5 1 1 'WE ILI .�. 4 Headwaters Development, LLC Page 13 EXHIBIT F Updated Proposed Site Plan November 28, 2018 I f' Or e. 4, or � *j W. *�-_ #� 'x 4W 11V JdL Or G I g. m G-) 0 > cn > ci) C-) ;u > w 0 i Ali L(4 To: Monticello Mayor and City Council From: MMC Land Holdings, LLC Members Developers of Riverview Square John Ryan, phone: 612-558-1283, email address: JohnVRyan@Live.com Date: November 28, 2018 Subject: Headwaters Development request for rezoning River View Square lot -1, block 2 from B-4 to R-4 for the building of a Senior Assisted Living Facility for Ebenezer Management When Headwaters Development came to us with their plans for building a senior living facility for Ebenezer Management on this site, we all agreed that finally we have a perfect fit. It separates the B-4 business from the church and residential properties that abut our property. It will create minimal traffic and noise. Because of concerns we have with the outcome of the planning commission meeting on Tuesday, October 2, we respectfully request that you review the following: • In 1998 we purchased these 17 acres primarily because Hwy 75 was the access onto and off of Interstate 94. The huge daily car count in both the AM and PM, plus the weekend up north traffic, was the reason we made this purchase and built O'Ryans convenience store. When the new interchange was opened we lost significant gallons and sales. At that time you also changed the zoning to B-4 on our 5 acre parcel, which until this time had been zoned PZM. This was done so our undeveloped land would be included in the cities special assessment to help pay for the new interchange. This subject property has never benefited from the new interchange, but rather has been significantly hurt by the substantial reduction of traffic past or anywhere near the site. • Hwy 75 is now for all practical purposes a DEAD END street. • We have aggressively attempted to sell these 5 acres for 18 years and have not had one serious inquiry for use as a B-4 property in all that time. • Based on the history of the 17 acre parcel with 3 acres at the intersection of 75 and 39 and 2 more acres that are closer to 75 than our site, all of which are zoned B-4, and still undeveloped it could easily be concluded that our 5 acres zoned B-4 would not sell for another 18 years or more. • If the property is rezoned to R-4 and Headwaters is permitted to build its development the taxes generated would be substantial per year for decades to come. We currently pay $25,000. • The benefit just in dollars for the city, county and school district would be significant and start almost immediately. • City Staff evaluated Headwaters proposal, were very positive about the project and felt it was a good use for this site. • Trident and Mielke Development, a Senior Housing Developer, sent a memorandum to the city staff on Tuesday October 2, the same day as the planning commission meeting. • The information was provided so late in the day that Headwaters or our ownership group did not get the opportunity to review or respond. We had to request a copy of the memorandum from the staff the next day. • Upon reading the memorandum we believe that it was unfair that it was submitted so late without the knowledge or ability for Headwaters and our members to research and respond. We further feel it was unjust of the planning commission to base its decision solely, or even partly, on this memorandum. • The memorandum stated that this site is a prime B-4 property. In our opinion that is, at the very least, a self-serving statement and in our opinion no longer true. • The senior housing market and those requiring assisted living is growing, and this population is looking to down size. That market is going to continue to grow for a long time to come. Monticello is perfectly positioned to benefit from this growth because of its location, only an hour and a half from up north and forty-five minutes from downtown. Retired people tend to stay in the community and frequent the local businesses. In conclusion, we believe there will be plenty of seniors to fill the proposed senior development. We ask that you approve our proposed zoning change. Shawn Weinand 4065 Chelsea Road West Monticello, MN 55362 November 26, 2018 City of Monticello Monticello. MN 55362 Sorry I could not be here it)iiiglit. I would like to address the (Mayor and City Council regarding the senior living development project presented by Ileadwatcrs Development. I tun a local developer and businessman in the Cit} for the past 30 years. I do not have a dog in the fight other than I want to see what I think is best for the city. Ido lec1 that every good project that comes to the city needs to be considered as objectively as possible. This one,just feels right to me. Today I have in inventory over 100 acres of commercial land in Monticello in) sell'. I do both commercial and residential development in :Monticello and have for many years. It's very ditiicult today to develop roof tops that work in affordable price range. to be able to add population to our city. Even more so to be able to add affordable housing for senior tic ing or just additional senior housing. Monticello is eery much located in an area that will attract seniors. We not only have the Monticello hospitals but Buffalo and now the new Maple Grove North Memorial Groups all very much within a half hour drive. As well as much commerce that can benefit from and to the elderly. I remember back to the earIv 2000's the town of Ossco was concerned whether they could support two senior Complexes. Today as I drive through Osseo the town and commerce grew into a new downtown supported by hundreds of units of senior housing mired in with commercial uses. This is a good example of an area of growth that I think Monticello would belief it from. For those of you that were around when this piece of land was zoned or guided I ZM this is exactly what they had in mind. Because the designation PZM was dropped lets not be short sighted. This is a perfect use for this property. We need to build population which will help build and support our existing commerce as well as increase our tax base. bet's give the seniors who want to stay in the community an option and those looking for a place to move to an option. We have a lot to otter. Don't let this one get away. Thaouk you for ourconsideration. Shawn WeFnanfi Wright County Area Transportation Meeting December 19, 2018 2:OOPM Trailblazer Transit Buffalo Facilitii Chair Kasel called the meeting to order at 2:00pm. The following persons were present: Buffalo: Scott Enter, Merton Auger Annandale: Kelly Hinnenkamp Delano: Jason Franzen Howard Lake: Al Monson Monticello: Rachel Leonard Montrose: Wendy Manson, Dwight Johnson St. Michael: Kevin Kasel, Steve Bot Waverly: Connie Holmes Trailblazer: Gary Ludwig, Jake Nelson, Julie Latzig Wright County: Michael Potter, Darek Vetsch APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND MINUTES A motion was made by Vetsch and seconded by Manson to approve the agenda and October 23, 2018 minutes as presented. Motion carried. TREASURER'S REPORT Hinnenkamp presented the report which was updated through November. She is looking to meet with the County soon to transfer finances to Wright County. There is about 10K remaining in the WCAT account after paying insurance and the local share final bills. Vetch confirmed that the County will handle any remaining bills with the remaining 10K which should mostly cover it and the County would cover any additional items. The financial report was accepted by the Board. TRAILBLAZER UPDATE Director Ludwig discussed the third quarter (July through September 2018) and year to date ridership report which shows continued increased ridership. He projected that rides in 2018 would reach 120K or higher in Wright County this year which would be a new record but added service/busses have a part of that. Vetch asked about the status of capital bus applications and Ludwig/Nelson responded that they've received a favorable response from MnDOT but nothing is yet approved as to Trailblazers request for the Capital purchase of three new busses for Wright County. If approved, these busses would arrive in October at the earliest according to Ludwig. Ludwig mentioned that Trailblazer is now one of the largest rural transit systems in the nation which everyone should be proud of. He thanked the group for all their support and help in the success of Trailblazer in Wright County. Kasel thanked Ludwig and mentioned that today the Trailblazer board gave Ludwig a formal favorable review today on a 6-0 vote. WCAT ADVISORY BOARD AND TRAILBLAZER JPA UPDATE/DISCUSSION Kasel and Vetch updated the group on the Trailblazer Board meeting items from earlier that day. Kasel stated they were extending service into Elk River, Elk River Township, Big Lake, Big Lake Township, and Rogers based on a request from Functional Industries. Ludwig clarified that Trailblazer would bring riders to/from those town and within those towns but the ride origination must start in Wright County so as not to violate any MnDOT territory rules with Tri -Cap. He stated there are no restrictions in Rogers. Franzen mentioned in the Delano election, folks brought up that they'd like to be able to go into the Metro Area like Ridgedale. Potter said that although the rules don't allow that yet, they'd keep working on it. Ludwig reminded that group with this added service (especially to the heavily requested Big Lake Transit Station), they will continue to serve the routes which are most efficient and this may lead to added denials if the rides don't produce efficiency. Vetsch announced that the new JPA with Trailblazer has been approved to remove WCAT and add Wright County. As such, the resolutions being collected from the Cities withdrawing from WCAT are valid and WCAT will dissolve as of the first of the year. Vetch also mentioned that there was discussion and work going on to figure out what regional transit group Wright County should be a part of. Kasel/Ludwig reported that MnDOT has approved a 32 bus schedule in 2019 with 16 busses out of Wright County. This 16 bus service has filled the Buffalo facility and Ludwig is looking for additional bus garage capacity as he foresees adding three to four busses per year with expanded service and ridership projections. Commissioner Vetsch gave an update on the Wright County Transit Advisory Board. He stated all interested Cities can be represented on the Board if interested. Townships would also be invited to have representation. Potter thought quarterly meetings would be fine. Kasel stated delegates from the City could be either elected, staff or even citizens. Vetsch mentioned the County would pay per diem's to members and the structure would be similar to other County Advisory Boards that they have like Mental Health and others. April 16th (Tuesdays) at 3pm at the Trailblazer Facility in Buffalo was thought to be the best time for the first advisory board meeting. Ludwig stated he supports this structure for a transit advisory board in Wright County but wanted to make sure it was understood that an advisory board is now required by MnDOT so if Wright County wasn't setting it up, he'd need to as he's doing for the other Trailblazer Counties. Vetsch/Ludwig mentioned the goals and mission the County has for the advisory board going forward as they look to continue to expand efficient service in Wright County. Vetsch/Potter stated they also wanted to make sure Wright County starts marketing Transit in Wright County as it makes sense based on resources. Everyone expressed a gratitude to all for helping to make transit in Wright County a success! A motion was made by Franzen and seconded by Enter to adjourn at 2:58pm. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Steve Bot, WCAT Secretary THE IRANSPORTATION7 ALLIAN4(CE Honoring The Post, Embracing The Future ow January 2, 2019 Jeff O'Neill City of Monticello 505 Walnut St Ste 1 Monticello, MN 55362-8822 Dear Jeff: Transportation is your career and our passion. The Minnesota Transportation Alliance continues to fight for increased funding for the projects that improve the quality and safety of our transportation system statewide. We are the only association that focuses exclusively on transportation and we work at both the state and federal levels to advocate for every jurisdiction managing transportation in Minnesota. With your involvement and membership in the Transportation Alliance, we can work for you to increase awareness of transportation needs and increase funding. The Alliance bring everyone together: local governments, contractors, suppliers, consulting engineer firms, businesses, labor, transit systems and advocates for all modes. We work to bring our members together with elected officials and key decision makers. 2019 promises to be a critical year with great opportunities to build on the support that exists for investing in infrastructure. With a new governor and legislature in St. Paul, we will be working to increase dedicated, ongoing funding for roads, bridges and transit all across the state. At the federal level, we'll be working with the Minnesota delegation to advocate for a strong reauthorization of federal transportation funding as the FAST Act expires in 2020. Last biennium, we advocated for a number of funding increases and the legislature and governor enacted: A new statutory dedication of 100% of the revenue from the sales tax on leased motor vehicles and the sales tax on rental vehicles along with a portion of the sales tax collected on auto repair parts with most of that revenue deposited into the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. Under current law, the revenue from the auto repair parts will jump from $31 million per year to $145 million per year in 2020 — a 4 -fold increase in that revenue. We will be working to protect and build on that statutory dedication so that ALL of the revenue from the auto repair parts sales tax is dedicated to the HUTDF. Since 1893 525 Park St., Ste. 2400 Saint Paul, MN 55103 651/659-0804 • Fax 651/659-9009 Email: maroaret(@transportationalliance.com • www.transiDortationalliance.com • Additional funding for city streets and township roads. • The Capital Bonding Bills included $79 million for the Local Bridge program and $194 million for the Local Road Improvement Program. Bond proceeds were also provided for the Mall of America Transit Station ($8.75 million) and the Orange Line BRT ($12.1 million). Additional trunk highway bonds - $1.34 Billion - were authorized for the Corridors of Commerce program ($700M) and the State Road Construction program ($640M) along with trunk highway fund cash for right-of-way acquisition associated with the Corridors of Commerce program. • A new $75 annual fee for all -electric vehicles that is collected as part of the registration tax and is therefore constitutionally dedicated to the HUTDF. As a member of the Minnesota Transportation Alliance, you receive the latest news on the action in St. Paul and Washington, D.C. as well as opportunities to meet with colleagues and lawmakers throughout the year. In 2019, our Transportation Day at the Capitol (February 7th) will provide a key opportunity to meet our new MnDOT Commissioner, Metropolitan Council Chair and new legislators. As usual, Alliance staff are available to set up appointments for you with legislators and staff. Our Washington, D.C. Fly -In (June 18-20) will focus on reauthorization of the FAST Act, which expires in 2020. This event will provide a great opportunity to meet the 5 new members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation and advocate for additional infrastructure funding at the federal level through formula funds and grant programs like BUILD. With your support and membership in the Alliance, we will have the resources and strength to improve the stability and level of funding available for roads, bridges and transit throughout the state. The Minnesota Transportation Alliance also works to be a resource for you on important transportation topics. We have produced a new report analyzing ALL transportation funding options — Minnesota Transportation Funding that is available to our members along with our Transportation Membership and Funding Directory and our annual update to the Local Option Transportation Funding Sources Report. We are here to provide any assistance we can for our members. With a new Governor who campaigned on the need to increase the state gas tax, along with a new House Speaker and Transportation Committee Chair who are working hard to pass a transportation funding package, we have a great opportunity to make progress in the coming biennium! Again, thank you for your membership and please join us in another major year for transportation funding in Minnesota. Together, we can make 2019 a successful year for improving Minnesota's transportation system. Sincerely, Margaret Donahoe Executive Director 650"J a� . i O 4J O co U � 0 o O co Z ao Os -0 Co Q O N 41 V I� 4-) a N L. U c J O :3 ( L Q) I L >1 0 z O Q :3 s ( N LL c cd m O rd F— N 0 as O. c O "O cco F -- CN w� ZU o o� z-5?� c W N� N a C L O v s F O � C N V) ) O 1 C oU o E ZLu /' a aOc 7 � �y (on- c co ------------- \ 4- 3 cv O co L- 0 a co L L- 0 4- tioD L.L-- cv ,c lobi O � d - O N M 00 N O O I N LO Lo 4-; Lr) � L Ike D N to 0- O a- 4i _c N N d N N 41 to 0 O 4J O `- c N m c C O N E O 7 ,C •> 4- fu - N V L U I 3 3 3 O L O 3 41 Q- 0 z cu �; -v 41 Q c N ccv N > > "O cco N +-j Z U u o c c C L O v O n- N oU o E a aOc (on- c co cn O 4- '1 N I— N co (L) O O cn d) -0 �' .N � 4- C o Z O c ui N c, 3 ° c 3 4CP N z c N L L cv c c '4 J o s >- � 4-1 7 >U-0Z� c0a- O C7 V W _j E m u 3 : 3 E L J V :.c ' Z .o O Z U U d-> 0 3 cv O co L- 0 a co L L- 0 4- tioD L.L-- cv ,c lobi O � d - O N M 00 N O O I N LO Lo 4-; Lr) � L Ike D N to 0- O a- 4i _c N N d N N 41 to 0 O 4J O `- c N m c C O N E O 7 ,C •> 4- fu - N V L U I 3 3 3 T N O C � n O �. N •`" �- r O 4�•: CLO d O X N 3 i r4 co y X N T 0 �)'` •tt= i T f N S O N o it r ■ if� VIP V). 0 8 0 8 Ln 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 n T N O Q1 T Nj N O O 0 N O ow Gi d T Ln O -< NJ0 d Q N T - C O O N 1 C n o � r N n' rD rDr d N x 0 r W O o A' m T Un m x T N O C � n O �. N •`" �- r O 4�•: CLO d O X N 3 i r4 co y X N T 0 �)'` •tt= i T f N S O N o it r ■ THE E _ TRANSPORTN ALLIAZN5(CEF Honoring The Past, Embracing The Future TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENTS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2019 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA Minnesota's transportation system forms the backbone of the state's economy, allowing for the movement of people and products throughout the state and beyond. The Minnesota Transportation Alliance works for the resources necessary to improve the safety and effectiveness of all modes of transportation. Our mission: To coordinate and educate diverse groups statewide to effectively advocate for a safe, efficient transportation system that works for everyone. 1. Address the unmet needs on Minnesota's transportation system Increased funding and bonding for roads and bridges passed in 2017 has reduced the funding need in the short-term and has allowed for some important highway and bridge projects to be advanced. The funding gap for all modes of transportation continues to be a major problem leading to increased safety hazards, growing congestion, missed economic and job opportunities, damaged roads, deficient bridges and increased social costs as people struggle to get where they need to go with inadequate transit options. State Trunk highway and bridqe fundinq qap: $400 million per year — FY2019-2023 $600 million per year — FY2024-2027 $900 million per year — FY2028-2037 Corridors of Commerce program — Unfunded Projects: $7 billion Local Road and Bridqe fundinq qap: $900 million per year Metropolitan Area Transit fundinq qap: $100 - $200 million per year over the next 20 years From 2015 — 2040, growing the bus system by 1 % annually could require an additional $1.8 billion - $2.2 billion. Greater Minnesota Transit fundinq qap: $20-$40 million per year over the next 20 years To meet 100% of the need for transit service in Greater Minnesota, the total annual operating and capital investment will need to increase from $140 million in 2017 to $246 million in 2030. Ports and Waterways The four ports in Minnesota that most recently sought funds from the Port Development Assistance Program had project needs of more than $34 million. Airports Local airports $30 million 2. Provide increased, stable and dedicated funding for all modes of transportation to reduce the documented funding gap. Transportation infrastructure projects require years to develop and construct. Stable, dedicated funding has been critical to cost-effective planning and delivery of projects in Minnesota. That is why we have 3 constitutional Iv -dedicated revenue sources: fuel tax, motor vehicle registration fees and motor vehicle sales tax. Dollars in the Highway Trust Fund are not used for transit or other modes of transportation. New State Revenue Options • Increase and index the current state fuel tax. An increase in the per -gallon rate or a gross receipts tax on the sale of fuel charged at the wholesale level just like the current fuel tax could be used as well as a sales tax on fuel at the retail level. All fuel tax revenue is constitutionally dedicated to the Highway Trust Fund. • Increase revenue from the motor vehicle registration tax by increasing the 1.25% auto and the weight - based rates and changing the depreciation schedule. • Authorize an increase in the metro area sales tax to up to 1 % with dollars dedicated to transit and transportation in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. • Authorize a motor vehicle registration renewal surcharge ($10) and title transfer surcharge ($10) for city road repair. • Equalize the sales tax paid on leased and purchased vehicles (6.87%) • Levy current 6.87% sales tax on all auto parts and services and dedicate revenue to transportation • Increase the annual fee for vehicles that run solely on electricity from $75 per year to $150. • Explore fees on Transportation Network Services with revenue dedicated to expanded transit service or other infrastructure to improve mobility for people with disabilities. • If the state taxes sports betting, dedicate a portion of the revenue to improving the state's infrastructure. Dedicate Current State Revenue A surplus in the state's general fund provides the capacity to dedicate revenue from transportation related fees to ensure their use on the transportation system. Increased revenue from the collection of sales tax on internet purchases is estimated to provide an additional $130-$200 million per year to the state's general fund. • Statutorily dedicate all existing revenue from the sales tax on auto parts. The current statutory dedication of $145 million per year should be increased to dedicate all revenue from this transportation fee. ($250-$270 million per year for next biennium) • Use surplus dollars to restore the general fund appropriation for transit systems to previous levels to expand transit service. 0 Dedicate revenue from internet sales tax collections for MainStreets program in small cities. Bondinq/Cash Provide general obligation bond proceeds or general fund cash for transportation projects in a capital bonding bill with: • $100M for Local Bridge Program — bridges over $5 million in cost should be funded separately • $100M for Local Road Improvement Program — amend language for Trunk Highway Corridor Account to Local Cost -Share Assistance Account • Create a new Main Street assistance fund to support project costs when trunk highway construction is scheduled. • $ 20M for Railroad Crossings with local roadways • $100M for Transitways and facilities for both Metro and Greater Minnesota transit • $ 70M for Heywood II Bus Garage • $ 10M for Ports and Waterways • $ 40M to Dept. of Employment and Economic Development for TED program • $ 17M to Board of Soil and Water Resources (BSWR) for Wetland Mitigation related to road construction Trunk Highway Bondinq Authorize additional trunk highway bonds (with no more than 20% of trunk highway fund needed for debt service) or general fund dollars for Corridors of Commerce and Transportation Economic Development (TED) programs. Efficiencies/Tax Reform • Fund MnDOT and DPS Trunk Highway Fund expenditures not related to a Highway Purpose from the state general fund. • Support early acquisition of rights-of-way for transportation projects. Adequately fund the Right of Way Acquisition Loan Fund (RALF). • Eliminate payment of state sales tax on purchases for transportation projects for MnDOT, transit agencies and local units of government, including joint powers boards. • Eliminate some of the exemptions to payment of the motor vehicle sales tax. • Expand the transit taxing district to encompass the entire seven county metropolitan area if additional operating dollars are allocated to provide additional service. Remove restrictions on the use of regional property tax dollars collected by the Metropolitan Council for transit. Local Options • Authorize cities to create Street Improvement Districts. • Authorize a municipal local option sales tax for transportation that is similar to the county local option sales tax for transportation. • With an increase in revenue into the Trunk Highway Fund, revise the local cost participation policy to reduce the burden on local governments for contributing to state highway projects. Policv Issues 1) Support legislation to improve the transportation project delivery process, including the permitting process in order to speed up the completion of projects and reduce costs. • Support the implementation of the recommendations of the Wetland Streamlining committee. • Eliminate some requirements for projects within the existing right-of-way. • Increase the use of innovative technologies. • Support state assumption, in collaboration with local government, of the federal 404 permit program. 2) Support the use of Public Private Partnerships (P3s) for transportation projects that are in the public interest and supported by local governments. Processes should be established for managing P3 projects including the management of unsolicited proposals. 3) Monitor legislation related to autonomous and connected vehicle technology as well as the results of MnDOT's testing of an autonomous bus. Support funding for infrastructure improvements that will allow the state to take advantage of new technology that will improve safety and mobility. 4) Support ongoing efforts to improve the transparency of decision making at MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council including the project selection process. 5) Support legislation requiring hands-free use of cell phones. 6) Any loss of motor vehicle registration funds due to problems with the MnLARS collection system should be compensated with general fund dollars. 7) Support the current process for determining speed limits on state and county highways. 8) Monitor legislation related to the governance structure of the Metropolitan Council. 9) Road and bridge weight issues — Support the prohibition of any weight limit exemptions except during harvest and support the ability of counties to establish load restrictions on their county road systems. Support eliminating the implements of husbandry exemptions and support civil penalties for excess weight. Support eliminating the liability exemption for damage caused by non-weight related unlawful operation on public highway bridges. Oppose efforts to remove local permitting authority. 10) Support full state funding, from non -transportation funding sources, for mitigation of wetland impact from county and municipal highway projects. 11) Oppose increased funding out of the Highway Trust Fund for recreational trails or other non -highway purposes and support a comprehensive study of diversions of revenue from the Trunk Highway Fund. 12) In the event of a state government shutdown, state permits issued for local road, bridge and airport projects should remain in effect with local governments responsible for meeting all legal requirements of the permits. Additional costs incurred by contractors and vendors related to a government shutdown should be paid out of the state general fund. 13) Support electronic and photo monitoring on roadways and in work zones for data collection, traffic planning, driver education, and enforcement as a means of reducing road wear, crashes and injuries. 14) Review possible opportunities to increase safety in work zones including speed enforcement activities, changing MnDOT traffic control unit pricing in a low bid environment, public education and possible changes to the state driver manual. 15) Refine the eminent domain process to reduce costs with constitutionally dedicated tax dollars, including a requirement that owners provide their appraisal 45 days before the condemnation commissioners' hearing, and the acquiring entity provides a revised acquisition offer within 30 days of receipt of the owner's appraisal. 'OT co'. �'RI R 5 04Fti Monticello Monthly Report 2018 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 911 Abandoned Total: 5 12/14/18 19:34 911 Abandoned 12/18/18 14:27 911 Abandoned 12/19/18 12:02 911 Abandoned 12/25/18 20:53 911 Abandoned 12/29/18 13:03 911 Abandoned Wright County Sheriff's Office Sheriff Joe Hagerty 3800 Braddock Ave. NE, Buffalo, MN 55313 1-800-362-3667 Fax:763-682-7610 CFS # 2018099317 2018100472 2018100728 2018102410 2018103473 911 Abandoned; Check Welfare Total: 1 12/06/18 17:05 911 Abandoned; Check 2018097024 Final Incident 911 Abandoned; Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 1 12/04/18 21:54 911 Abandoned; 2018096518 Medical - Unconscious - 911 Hang-up Total: 17 12/01/1813:05 911 Hang-up 2018095571 12/01/1813:17 911 Hang-up 2018095576 12/02/18 02:22 911 Hang-up 2018095769 12/02/18 14:46 911 Hang-up 2018095868 12/05/18 09:52 911 Hang-up 2018096613 12/06/18 00:30 911 Hang-up 2018096807 12/06/18 15:46 911 Hang-up 2018096990 12/13/18 17:32 911 Hang-up 2018098968 12/15/18 10:56 911 Hang-up 2018099526 12/16/18 17:06 911 Hang-up 2018099929 12/19/18 08:24 911 Hang-up 2018100672 12/20/18 21:28 911 Hang-up 2018101150 12/21/1811:06 911 Hang-up 2018101281 12/24/18 02:40 911 Hang-up 2018102029 12/25/18 21:08 911 Hang-up 2018102413 12/29/18 18:21 911 Hang-up 2018103541 12/31/1814:41 911 Hang-up 2018103959 911 Hang-up 911 Hang-up QPpFE55I0NAIrS Printed on 1 • Case Number Codes How Reported 911ABANDON 911ABANDON 911 ABANDON 911ABANDON 911ABANDON 911ABANDON; WCSOP18038144 911 911ABANDON; MFALL 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P WCSOP18037 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HpANGUP WCSOSR0180039 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANgG1U1P 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP 911 HANGUP ZUERCHER Page 1 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 911 Open Line Total: 38 12/01/18 08:30 911 Open Line 2018095504 12/01/18 11:24 911 Open Line 2018095539 12/02/18 10:25 911 Open Line 2018095812 12/05/18 07:26 911 Open Line 2018096590 12/05/18 14:30 911 Open Line 2018096677 12/06/18 06:30 911 Open Line 2018096840 12/06/18 16:06 911 Open Line 2018097003 12/07/18 21:09 911 Open Line 2018097340 12/09/18 12:19 911 Open Line 2018097772 12/09/18 16:08 911 Open Line 2018097810 12/11/18 11:55 911 Open Line 2018098280 12/11/18 18:23 911 Open Line 2018098406 12/12/18 06:57 911 Open Line 2018098513 12/12/18 12:24 911 Open Line 2018098602 12/13/18 09:16 911 Open Line 2018098837 12/14/18 18:37 911 Open Line 2018099301 12/14/18 21:58 911 Open Line 2018099378 12/16/18 11:20 911 Open Line 2018099839 12/16/18 21:05 911 Open Line 2018099988 12/17/18 10:01 911 Open Line 2018100092 12/17/18 15:07 911 Open Line 2018100184 12/18/18 07:36 911 Open Line 2018100356 12/18/18 21:41 911 Open Line 2018100583 12/19/18 08:16 911 Open Line 2018100669 12/19/18 09:33 911 Open Line 2018100688 12/21/18 10:43 911 Open Line 2018101273 12/21/18 16:38 911 Open Line 2018101355 12/22/18 13:44 911 Open Line 2018101577 12/23/18 11:14 911 Open Line 2018101796 12/23/18 17:34 911 Open Line 2018101891 12/26/18 07:14 911 Open Line 2018102481 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911 OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911OPEN11 911 OPEN11 911OPEN11 ZUERCHER Page 2 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes Reported 12/27/18 11:41 911 Open Line 2018102834 12/27/1818:12 ggHow 2018101828 Animal WCSOP18040237 Phone ANIMAL 911OPEN11 12/27/18 12:10 911 Open Line 2018102837 911 911 OPEN 12/27/18 14:14 911 Open Line 2018102868 911 911OPEN 12/27/18 15:28 911 Open Line 2018102895 911OPEN11 12/28/18 08:43 911 Open Line 2018103121 11 911 OPEN 12/29/18 12:14 911 Open Line 2018103467 911 911OPEN 12/29/18 21:29 911 Open Line 2018103577 911 OPEN11 Abandoned Vehicle Total: 2 12/05/18 10:07 Abandoned Vehicle 2018096615 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOP18038ABANDVEFone 12/22/18 19:26 Abandoned Vehicle 2018101655 Abandoned Vehicle WCSOP18040157 Phone ABANDVEH Abuse Total: 1 12/01/18 10:13 Abuse 2018095521 Abuse Adult WCSOP18037723 Phone ABUSE Agency Assist Total: 11 12/01/18 00:43 Agency Assist 2018095443 Agency Assist 5 Ph Phone WCSOP18037 AGgASSIST 12/01/18 15:31 Agency Assist 2018095604 Agency Assist WCSOP18037 AG5ASSISTone 12/04/18 09:49 Agency Assist 2018096328 Agency Assist Ph Phone WCSOP18038 AGpASSIST 12/12/18 00:54 Agency Assist 2018098485 Agency Assist WCSOP18038 AGASSIRt er 12/16/18 15:51 Agency Assist 2018099903 AG5ASSISTone 12/17/18 16:27 Agency Assist 2018100197 Agency Assist WCSOP18039 AGASSIPhone 12/18/18 01:14 Agency Assist 2018100319 Civil Process Ph Phone WCSOP18039 AG2ASSIST 12/18/18 16:52 Agency Assist 2018100519 Agency Assist WCSOP18039 AGpASSISTone 12/19/18 11:23 Agency Assist 2018100720 Agency Assist WCSOP18039 AGASSIPhone 12/26/18 12:18 Agency Assist 2018102554 Agency Assist Ph ne WCSOP18040 14ASSIST 12/28/18 15:50 Agency Assist 2018103233 Agency Assist WCSOP18040 A4 GASSISTone Alarm Total: 1 12/10/18 08:16 Alarm Animal Total: 5 12/12/1817:02 Animal 12/17/18 22:58 Animal 12/21/18 03:00 Animal 12/23/1813:50 Animal 12/27/1818:12 Animal 2018097955 Alarm WCSOP18038 10911 ALARM 2018098674 Phone ANIMAL 2018100296 Animal WCSOP18039632 Phone ANIMAL 2018101211 Animal WCSOP18039 MIMAL911 2018101828 Animal WCSOP18040237 Phone ANIMAL 2018102972 911 ANIMAL ZUERCHER Page 3 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Animal - Abuse Total: 2 12/01/18 18:05 Animal - Abuse 2018095671 Animal - Abuse WCSOP18037784 Phone ANABUSpEh 12/06/18 18:25 Animal - Abuse 2018097052 Animal - Abuse WCSOP18038 USE one M Animal - Barking Dog Total: 1 12/29/18 04:30 Animal - Barking Dog 2018103414 Animal - Barking Dog WCSOP18040877 Phone ANBARK ATL Total: 1 12/13/18 11:43 ATL 2018098873 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP18039 Phone ATL CHKWELF Burglary Total: 4 Check Welfare 2018096110 Check Welfare WCSOP18037 CHKWEFFPhone 12/07/18 14:49 Burglary 2018097246 Burglary WCSOP18038 Phone BURG CHKWELF 12/16/18 11:58 Burglary 2018099849 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18039 BURG Phone CHggKWELLpFhh 12/24/18 13:53 Burglary 2018102117 Burglary WCSOP18040 BURG 911 12/06/18 22:20 Check Welfare 2018097105 Check Welfare WCSOP18038369 Phone 12/28/18 19:05 Burglary 2018103296 Burglary WCSOP18040 Phone 12/09/18 21:50 Check Welfare 2018097883 BURG WCSOP18038677 Phone Check Welfare Total: 21 12/03/18 13:48 Check Welfare 2018096088 Check Welfare WCSOP18037989 Phone CHKWELF 12/03/18 15:13 Check Welfare 2018096110 Check Welfare WCSOP18037 CHKWEFFPhone 12/04/18 22:20 Check Welfare 2018096528 Check Welfare WCSOP18038145 Phone CHKWELF 12/05/18 09:35 Check Welfare 2018096609 Check Welfare WCSOP18038180 Phone CHggKWELLpFhh 12/06/18 20:31 Check Welfare 2018097077 Check Welfare WCSOP18038 CHKWELFone 12/06/18 22:20 Check Welfare 2018097105 Check Welfare WCSOP18038369 Phone CHKWELF 12/09/18 21:50 Check Welfare 2018097883 Check Welfare WCSOP18038677 Phone CHKWELF 12/10/18 23:49 Check Welfare 2018098183 Check Welfare WCSOP18038 CHKWE9F1 12/11/18 18:42 Check Welfare 2018098415 Check Welfare WCSOP18038900 Phone CHKWELF 12/15/18 11:35 Check Welfare 2018099544 Check Welfare WCSOP18039337 Phone CHKWELF 12/17/18 07:25 Check Welfare 2018100062 Check Welfare WCSOP18039 KWELhone R12/17/18 17:04 Check Welfare 2018100207 Check Welfare WCSOP18039600 Phone CHKWELF 12/20/18 21:20 Check Welfare 2018101147 Check Welfare WCSOP18039963 Phone CHgKWELLFh 12/21/18 23:23 Check Welfare 2018101479 Check Welfare WCSOP18040 CHKWELFone 12/23/18 19:03 Check Welfare 2018101923 Check Welfare WCSOP18040268 Phone CHKWELF 12/24/18 13:05 Check Welfare 2018102109 Check Welfare WCSOP18040341 911 CHgKWELLFh 12/25/18 18:31 Check Welfare 2018102387 Check Welfare WCSOP18040 CHKWELFone 12/26/18 19:34 Check Welfare 2018102672 Check Welfare WCSOP18040552 911 CHKWELF 12/28/18 17:44 Check Welfare 2018103265 Check Welfare WCSOP18040822 911 CHKWELF ZU=RCHER Page 4 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/31/18 01:40 Check Welfare 2018103836 Check Welfare WCSOP18041032 Phone 12/01/18 11:43 Civil Complaint 2018095550 Civil Complaint CHKWELF 12/31/18 17:56 Check Welfare 2018104007 Check Welfare WCSOP18041110 Phone 12/01/18 16:54 Civil Complaint 2018095644 CHKWELF Citizen Aid Total: 11 Phone 12/01/18 13:43 Citizen Aid 2018095579 Citizen Aid WCSOP18037739 911 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone CITAID 12/02/18 16:21 Citizen Aid 2018095886 Citizen Aid WCSOP18037894 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone CITAID 12/03/18 10:02 Citizen Aid 2018096053 Citizen Aid WCSOP18037 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone M AID 12/03/18 12:43 Citizen Aid 2018096075 Citizen Aid WCSOP18037982 911 Civil Complaint WCSOP180383C46 Phone CITAID 12/09/18 10:26 Citizen Aid 2018097749 Citizen Aid WCSOP18038 2Ig 2018097060 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV 911 AID 12/10/18 14:26 Citizen Aid 2018098030 Citizen Aid WCSOP18038 911 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone CITAID 12/11/18 01:06 Citizen Aid 2018098193 Citizen Aid WCSOP18038816 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP1803851116 Phone CIgTAID 12/13/18 09:42 Citizen Aid 2018098844 Citizen Aid WCSOP18039 Phone Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 CIV Phone CIpTAID 12/15/18 20:04 Citizen Aid 2018099701 Citizen Aid WCSOP18039 911 Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 CIV 911 CITAID 12/15/18 23:19 Citizen Aid 2018099761 Citizen Aid WCSOP18039418 2018098272 Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 51Phone CIgTAID 12/22/18 20:13 Citizen Aid 2018101666 Citizen Aid WCSOP18040 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone CITAID Civil Complaint Total: 26 12/01/18 09:16 Civil Complaint 2018095510 Civil Complaint WCSOP1803771118 Phone 12/01/18 11:43 Civil Complaint 2018095550 Civil Complaint WCSOP18037 31911 CIV 12/01/18 16:54 Civil Complaint 2018095644 Civil Complaint WCSOP18037 68 Phone CIV 12/04/18 13:08 Civil Complaint 2018096365 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/04/18 15:31 Civil Complaint 2018096405 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/05/18 19:12 Civil Complaint 2018096755 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/06/18 17:48 Civil Complaint 2018097041 Civil Complaint WCSOP180383C46 Phone 12/06/18 18:46 Civil Complaint 2018097060 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV 911 12/07/18 07:35 Civil Complaint 2018097150 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/08/18 11:44 Civil Complaint 2018097477 Civil Complaint WCSOP1803851116 Phone 12/10/18 14:43 Civil Complaint 2018098033 Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/10/18 18:05 Civil Complaint 2018098104 Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 CIV 911 12/11/18 11:19 Civil Complaint 2018098272 Civil Child Custody WCSOP18038 51Phone CIV 12/12/18 14:01 Civil Complaint 2018098622 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038 CIV Phone 12/12/18 19:16 Civil Complaint 2018098719 Civil Complaint WCSOP18039 CIV Phone 12/12/18 20:13 Civil Complaint 2018098735 Civil Complaint WCSOP1803901116 Phone 12/13/18 11:09 Civil Complaint 2018098863 Civil Complaint WCSOP18039 CIV Phone ZUERCHER Page 5 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 12/16/18 14:12 Civil Complaint 2018099874 12/18/18 13:08 Civil Complaint 2018100450 12/22/18 19:52 Civil Complaint 2018101661 12/24/18 16:54 Civil Complaint 2018102157 12/26/18 16:20 Civil Complaint 2018102620 12/27/18 21:21 Civil Complaint 2018103021 12/28/18 13:08 Civil Complaint 2018103193 12/29/18 01:14 Civil Complaint 2018103384 12/31/18 21:11 Civil Complaint 2018104057 Civil Process Total: 57 12/04/18 12:16 Civil Process 2018096355 12/04/18 12:24 Civil Process 2018096357 12/05/18 09:25 Civil Process 2018096605 12/05/18 09:35 Civil Process 2018096610 12/05/18 09:54 Civil Process 2018096614 12/05/18 10:51 Civil Process 2018096628 12/05/18 17:50 Civil Process 2018096739 12/06/18 11:00 Civil Process 2018096900 12/06/18 11:28 Civil Process 2018096910 12/06/18 12:09 Civil Process 2018096922 12/06/18 12:23 Civil Process 2018096924 12/07/18 09:56 Civil Process 2018097179 12/07/18 10:16 Civil Process 2018097182 12/07/18 14:46 Civil Process 2018097243 12/07/18 15:11 Civil Process 2018097253 12/07/18 15:22 Civil Process 2018097255 12/07/18 17:31 Civil Process 2018097282 12/11/18 12:38 Civil Process 2018098293 12/11/18 12:44 Civil Process 2018098295 12/11/18 16:48 Civil Process 2018098372 12/11/18 17:01 Civil Process 2018098377 12/11/18 17:25 Civil Process 2018098383 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Civil Complaint WCSOP180394C66 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18039 CIV Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18040 CIV Phone Civil Child Custody WCSOP180403C68 Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP180405FIV Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18040 CIV Phone Civil Child Custody WCSOP18040 CIV Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18040 CIV Phone Civil Complaint WCSOP18041 CIV Phone CIVPRO?fficer CIVPROCpfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPRO?fficer CIVPROCpfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPROCppfficer CIVPROC Officer CIVPROC CIVPRO?fficer CIVPROCpfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPRO?fficer CIVPROCpfficer Officer CIVPROC CIVPRO?fficer CIVPROCpfficer Officer CIVPROpC CIVPROppCfficer CIVPROCfficer Officer CIVPROppC CIVPROCfficer ZUERCHER Page 6 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/11/18 17:44 Civil Process 2018098390 CIVPROQpfficer 12/12/18 08:28 Civil Process 2018098541 CIVPROCfficer 12/12/18 14:48 Civil Process 2018098636 Officer CIVPROC 12/12/18 15:14 Civil Process 2018098645 CIVPROQpfficer 12/12/18 16:27 Civil Process 2018098662 CIVPROCfficer 12/13/18 11:48 Civil Process 2018098874 Officer CIVPROppC 12/13/18 12:12 Civil Process 2018098879 CIVPROCfficer 12/14/18 08:31 Civil Process 2018099111 Qfficer CIVPRO 12/14/18 08:42 Civil Process 2018099113 Officer CIVPROC 12/14/18 08:50 Civil Process 2018099115 CIVPROQpfficer 12/14/18 13:12 Civil Process 2018099199 CIVPROCfficer 12/17/18 13:56 Civil Process 2018100160 Officer CIVPROC 12/18/18 11:02 Civil Process 2018100413 CIVPROQpfficer 12/18/18 11:16 Civil Process 2018100421 CIVPROCfficer 12/18/18 11:24 Civil Process 2018100423 Officer CIVPROC 12/19/18 10:46 Civil Process 2018100708 CIVPROQpfficer 12/19/18 10:56 Civil Process 2018100713 CIVPROCfficer 12/19/18 11:04 Civil Process 2018100714 Officer CIVPROC 12/19/18 11:14 Civil Process 2018100718 CIVPROQpfficer 12/19/18 11:18 Civil Process 2018100719 CIVPROCfficer 12/19/18 15:33 Civil Process 2018100776 Officer CIVPROC 12/20/18 09:31 Civil Process 2018100954 CIVPR02pfficer 12/20/18 10:34 Civil Process 2018100966 CIVPROCfficer 12/20/18 13:25 Civil Process 2018100997 Officer CIVPROC 12/20/18 16:46 Civil Process 2018101054 CIVPR02pfficer 12/20/18 16:52 Civil Process 2018101058 CIVPROCfficer 12/26/18 10:35 Civil Process 2018102526 Officer CIVPROC 12/26/18 10:41 Civil Process 2018102529 CIVPR02pfficer 12/26/18 13:03 Civil Process 2018102562 CIVPROCfficer 12/26/18 14:13 Civil Process 2018102581 Officer CIVPROC 12/26/18 14:26 Civil Process 2018102584 CIVPR02pfficer 12/26/18 14:31 Civil Process 2018102590 CIVPROCfficer 12/28/18 12:44 Civil Process 2018103188 Officer CIVPROC ZUERCHER Page 7 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 12/28/18 12:51 Civil Process 12/28/18 15:46 Civil Process CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 2018103189 CIVPRO?p'icer 2018103229 CIVPROCfficer Commercial Fire Alarm Total: 1 12/04/18 17:08 Commercial Fire Alarm 2018096430 Commercial Fire Alarm WCSOP18038118 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm Total: 28 12/01/18 17:12 Commercial General 2018095652 12/02/18 17:26 Commercial General 2018095902 12/04/18 03:58 Commercial General 2018096283 12/04/18 20:24 Commercial General 2018096487 12/06/18 05:36 Commercial General 2018096836 12/08/18 05:54 Commercial General 2018097430 12/09/18 11:03 Commercial General 2018097758 12/09/18 17:44 Commercial General 2018097837 12/10/18 04:24 Commercial General 2018097927 12/10/18 05:39 Commercial General 2018097932 12/11/18 05:37 Commercial General 2018098215 12/11/18 11:50 Commercial General 2018098278 12/15/18 00:06 Commercial General 2018099420 12/16/18 01:20 Commercial General 2018099782 12/16/18 10:46 Commercial General 2018099835 12/17/18 08:10 Commercial General 2018100070 12/18/18 19:53 Commercial General 2018100559 12/18/18 21:38 Commercial General 2018100582 12/19/18 17:05 Commercial General 2018100807 12/22/18 21:46 Commercial General 2018101688 12/23/18 06:27 Commercial General 2018101768 12/23/18 16:50 Commercial General 2018101877 12/24/18 04:38 Commercial General 2018102046 12/24/18 11:42 Commercial General 2018102091 12/26/18 05:36 Commercial General 2018102472 12/27/18 03:35 Commercial General 2018102754 12/27/18 13:07 Commercial General 2018102855 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18037773 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18037899 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038056 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038135 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038274 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038496 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038632 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038662 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038699 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038702 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038830 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18038852 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039287 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039424 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039448 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039535 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039724 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039731 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039824 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040174 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040209 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040255 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040313 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040333 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040489 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040601 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040637 Phone ALARM ZUERCHER Page 8 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/28/18 09:08 Commercial General 2018103129 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18040767 Phone ALARM Commercial General Alarm; Dispatch - CAD Total: 1 hh 12/15/18 07:18 Commercial General 2018099487 Commercial General Alarm WCSOP18039 ALARM: DI9'PCAD Court Order Violation Total: 9 12/04/18 15:52 Court Order Violation 2018096410 12/05/18 20:20 Court Order Violation 2018096767 12/12/18 10:42 Court Order Violation 2018098573 12/24/18 07:03 Court Order Violation 2018102050 12/24/18 12:37 Court Order Violation 2018102103 12/24/18 17:46 Court Order Violation 2018102169 12/24/18 21:34 Court Order Violation 2018102227 12/26/18 14:31 Court Order Violation 2018102588 12/27/18 16:46 Court Order Violation 2018102925 Criminal Damage to Property Total: 8 12/02/18 10:36 Criminal Damage to 2018095814 12/03/18 15:32 Criminal Damage to 2018096119 12/09/18 07:46 Criminal Damage to 2018097728 12/15/18 20:16 Criminal Damage to 2018099703 12/22/18 10:26 Criminal Damage to 2018101548 12/22/18 13:53 Criminal Damage to 2018101578 12/24/18 16:25 Criminal Damage to 2018102152 12/29/18 10:21 Criminal Damage to 2018103444 Court Order Violation WCSOP180381118 Phone Court Order Violation WCSOP18038246 Phone COV Court Order Violation WCSOP18038962 Phone COV Court Order Violation WCSOP180403118 Phone Court Order Violation WCSOP18040338 Phone COV Court Order Violation WCSOP180403C78 Phone Court Order Violation WCSOP18040391 911 COV Civil Child Custody WCSOP18040 Phone COV Court Order Violation WCSOP180406C70V Phone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18037 CDP Phone Theft WCSOP18038000 Phone CDP Theft WCSOP180386117 Phone CDP Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18039 Phone CDP Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP180401115 Phone CDP Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP180401C2�P Phone Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP18040 CDP Phone Criminal Damage to Property WCSOP180408C91 Phone Criminal Damage to Property; Civil Complaint Total: 1 12/08/18 14:49 Criminal Damage to 2018097516 Civil Complaint WCSOP18038533 Phone CDP; CIV CSC Sex Offense Total: 2 12/17/18 20:23 CSC Sex Offense 2018100267 CSC Sex Offense WCSOP180396C23C Phone 12/28/18 11:50 CSC Sex Offense 2018103182 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP180407C89 Phone Disabled Vehicle Total: 1 12/04/18 10:04 Disabled Vehicle Disorderly Total: 8 12/02/18 03:21 Disorderly 12/05/18 02:35 Disorderly ►Z�)iE:I�1rI:itBY��] 77C1'1TE11G7Ca 2018095779 Disorderly 2018096572 Disorderly WCSOP180380N Phone DI ABLVEH WCSOP18037 DPhone ISORD WCSOP18038 DIORDPhone ZUERCHER Page 9 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/06/18 02:52 Disorderly 2018096831 Disorderly WCSOP18038 DI11 11 12/05/18 21:40 Domestic Disturbance 2018096785 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP180382-51ag 12/06/18 18:29 Disorderly 2018097054 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18038 DISORD911 12/09/18 12:16 Domestic Disturbance 2018097771 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18038634 Phone 12/07/18 06:40 Disorderly 2018097141 Disorderly WCSOP18038 DIS911 12/15/18 23:36 Domestic Disturbance 2018099765 Domestic Disturbance O05RD 12/20/1813:37 Disorderly 2018101004 Disorderly WCSOSRO1808 9,05 SORD 12/20/18 20:57 Disorderly 2018101138 Disorderly WCSOP18039 DISORDPhone 12/21/18 20:47 Domestic Disturbance 2018101429 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP18040 Dgne 12/26/18 22:52 Disorderly 2018102706 Disorderly WCSOP18040 DISORDPhone 12/21/18 22:16 Domestic Disturbance 2018101463 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP1804008OMESTall D Domestic Disturbance Total: 11 12/02/18 02:42 Domestic Disturbance 2018095775 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP1803784OMESTall DRUGS 12/08/18 15:15 Drugs D 12/05/18 21:40 Domestic Disturbance 2018096785 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP180382-51ag DR 12/25/18 13:27 Drugs 2018102335 Drugs WCSOP18040 DRUGS Phone 12/09/18 12:16 Domestic Disturbance 2018097771 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18038634 Phone 12/08/18 11:19 Dumping DOMESTIC 12/15/18 23:36 Domestic Disturbance 2018099765 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18039 200all WCSOP18040 DUMPING one 12/17/18 02:44 Domestic Disturbance 2018100028 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP180395D1OMESTIC 12/21/18 20:47 Domestic Disturbance 2018101429 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP18040 Dgne OMESTPIC 12/21/18 22:16 Domestic Disturbance 2018101463 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP1804008OMESTall D 12/23/18 21:17 Domestic Disturbance 2018101962 Domestic Disturbance ag WCSOP180402b766MESTIC 12/25/18 09:53 Domestic Disturbance 2018102296 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP18040 DOOOMES911 TIC 12/29/18 02:52 Domestic Disturbance 2018103401 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP180408D6OMESTpIhC 12/29/18 11:16 Domestic Disturbance 2018103448 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18040892MESTICone Drugs Total: 3 12/01/1811:04 Drugs 2018095535 Drugs WCSOP18037 26911 DRUGS 12/08/18 15:15 Drugs 2018097528 Drugs WCSOP18038 377UGS Phone DR 12/25/18 13:27 Drugs 2018102335 Drugs WCSOP18040 DRUGS Phone Dumping Total: 2 12/08/18 11:19 Dumping 2018097475 Dumping pp WCSOP180385D15 NG one 12/22/18 13:18 Dumping 2018101573 Dumping WCSOP18040 DUMPING one Extra Patrol Total: 3 12/14/18 12:31 Extra Patrol 12/21/18 20:56 Extra Patrol 12/28/18 15:19 Extra Patrol Fight Total: 3 12/02/18 23:07 Fight 12/15/1819:53 Fight 2018099184 2018101433 2018103223 2018095977 Disorderly 2018099697 Fight XP Phone XP Phone Officer XP WCSOP18037 FIGHT 911 WCSOP180393F98GHT 911 ZUERCHER Page 10 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident 12/16/18 00:22 Fight 2018099773 Disorderly Fire - Gas Leak Total: 1 12/30/18 19:39 Fire - Gas Leak 2018103772 Fire - Gas Leak Fire - Hazardous Materials Total: 1 12/01/18 05:54 Fire - Hazardous 2018095488 Fire - Other Total: 1 12/22/18 15:21 Fire - Other Fire - Smoke - Odor Total: 2 12/17/18 20:16 Fire - Smoke - Odor 12/18/18 15:07 Fire - Smoke - Odor Fireworks Total: 1 12/23/1811:28 Fireworks Fraud - Checks - Cards Total: 9 2018101601 Fire - Other 2018100265 Fire - Smoke - Odor 2018100481 Case Number Codes How Reported WCSOP18039 421 911 WCSOP18041 FGASLEAI�ne Ph FHAZMAT one WCSOP180401F40 Phone WCSOP18039620MOKE911 oil 2018101799 Suspicious -Circumstances WCSOP18040 REARWge 12/05/18 13:38 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018096664 12/07/18 14:59 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018097248 12/10/18 11:33 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018097984 12/12/18 10:26 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018098569 12/12/18 13:42 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018098616 12/26/18 17:14 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018102637 12/27/18 00:06 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018102715 12/27/18 15:35 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018102897 12/31/18 18:35 Fraud - Checks - Cards 2018104016 Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards Civil Complaint Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP18038 FRAUDCH one WCSOCID180 FRAUDCHone WCSOP180387FRAUDCH one WCSOP18038959 Phone FRAUDCH WCSOP18038 FRAUDCHone WCSOP18040Rone AUDCH WCSOP18040 PoneFRAUDCH WCSOP18040 FRAUDCHone WCSOP18041 FR 911 CH Fraud - Internet Total: 2 pphh 12/04/18 17:44 Fraud - Internet 2018096443 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038WAUDIDone 12/13/18 14:40 Fraud - Internet 2018098915 Fraud - Internet WCSOP18039105 Phone FRAUDINT Funeral Escort Total: 2 12/01/18 08:44 Funeral Escort 2018095505 12/12/18 10:34 Funeral Escort 2018098570 Harassment Total: 3 12/05/1816:20 Harassment 2018096705 Harassment 12/13/1810:06 Harassment 2018098850 Harassment Ph FUNERAL one Ph FUNERAL one WCSOP18038?�?ARASS hone WCSOP18039 HARASS hone ZUERCHER Page 11 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/26/18 15:49 Harassment 2018102612 Harassment WCSOP1804002ARASS hone Hospice Death Total: 1 pp 12/16/18 01:40 Hospice Death 2018099789 Hospice Death WCSOP18039%SPICEhone Info Total: 8 12/10/18 17:05 Info 2018098083 Juvenile - Complaint 911 INFO VCOMP 12/20/18 19:14 Info 2018101105 Juvenile - Complaint Phone INFO 12/21/18 03:00 Info 2018101212 Juvenile - Complaint Phone INFO OMP 12/27/18 03:50 Info 2018102755 Juvenile - Complaint Phone INFO 12/27/18 22:49 Info 2018103046 Juvenile - Complaint Phone 12/14/18 21:06 Juvenile - Complaint 2018099357 INFO WCSOP18039 �U 911 12/28/18 12:59 Info 2018103191 911 Juvenile - Complaint; Theft Total: 1 INFO Juvenile - Complaint; 12/29/18 14:59 Info 2018103496 Phone JUVCOMP; THEFT INFO 12/29/18 19:28 Info 2018103554 Phone INFO Juvenile - Complaint Total: 6 12/05/18 14:55 Juvenile - Complaint 2018096682 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOSR0180�6210 VCOMP 12/08/18 20:56 Juvenile - Complaint 2018097618 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP18038 5OC�P�ione 12/12/18 14:08 Juvenile - Complaint 2018098628 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOSRO180 89gCOn4UV OMP 12/13/18 13:13 Juvenile - Complaint 2018098893 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOSR0180 90gOMP 12/14/18 10:34 Juvenile - Complaint 2018099144 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOSRO180339g82MP 12/14/18 21:06 Juvenile - Complaint 2018099357 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP18039 �U 911 MP Juvenile - Complaint; Theft Total: 1 12/21/18 18:27 Juvenile - Complaint; 2018101381 Juvenile - Complaint WCSOP18040064 Phone JUVCOMP; THEFT Juvenile - Runaway Total: 2 12/01/18 20:40 Juvenile - Runaway 2018095716 Juvenile - Runaway WCSOP180378Q,9 Phone 12/25/18 20:11 Juvenile - Runaway 2018102406 Juvenile - Runaway WCSOP18040 �VRUN hone Lock Out - Lock In Total: 4 12/04/18 13:24 Lock Out - Lock In 2018096370 Lock Out - Lock In WCSOSRO18038G9 LOCK 12/12/18 09:07 Lock Out - Lock In 2018098551 Lock Out - Lock In WCSOP18038949 Phone LOCK 12/20/18 14:11 Lock Out - Lock In 2018101009 Lock Out - Lock In WCSOSR0180�8 (p 12/21/18 18:02 Lock Out - Lock In 2018101375 Lock Out - Lock In WCSOP1804006911 LOCK Lost - Found Property Total: 3 12/16/18 08:10 Lost - Found Property 2018099815 Lost - Found Property WCSOP18039 LOSTPROP 12/17/18 09:53 Lost - Found Property 2018100088 Lost - Found Property WCSOP180395 OSTPROP ZUERCHER Page 12 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/31/18 16:15 Lost - Found Property 2018103982 Lost - Found Property WCSOP18041 LOSTPROP Medical - Abdominal Pain Total: 1 12/13/18 06:22 Medical - Abdominal 2018098807 MABDO1 9 Medical - Back Pain Total: 2 12/05/18 16:09 Medical - Back Pain 2018096701 911 MBACK 12/30/18 06:39 Medical - Back Pain 2018103639 Medical - Back Pain WCSOP18040963 911 MBACK Medical - Bleeding - Lacerations Total: 1 12/16/18 03:16 Medical - Bleeding - 2018099799 Medical - Bleeding - WCSOP18039431BLEE 911 Medical - Breathing Problems Total: 9 12/07/18 01:18 Medical - Breathing 2018097127 12/13/18 03:21 Medical - Breathing 2018098795 12/16/18 03:20 Medical - Breathing 2018099800 12/16/18 19:56 Medical - Breathing 2018099971 12/22/18 19:33 Medical - Breathing 2018101657 12/24/18 03:31 Medical - Breathing 2018102036 12/28/18 10:24 Medical - Breathing 2018103157 12/29/18 11:53 Medical - Breathing 2018103458 12/31/18 06:13 Medical - Breathing 2018103861 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18038MREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18039 MBREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18039 MBREAT9g11 HING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18039VIRREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18040 MMMBBBREAT ING 11 Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18040 MBREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18040779 911 M REA HING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18040 MBREATHING Medical - Breathing Problems WCSOP18041 MBREATHING Medical - Carbon Monoxide Inhalation Total: 1 12/19/18 19:43 Medical - Carbon 2018100853 Medical -Carbon Monoxide WCSOP1803984CPhone ARBX Medical - Chest Pain Total: 6 12/04/18 23:21 Medical - Chest Pain 2018096545 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP1803815CHESTi l MM 12/08/18 17:13 Medical - Chest Pain 2018097559 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP1803854g Phone MCHESTP 12/12/18 02:16 Medical - Chest Pain 2018098492 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP18038924 Phone MCHESTggP 12/23/18 13:59 Medical - Chest Pain 2018101831 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP180402358CCCHESTPI MM91V11HEST 12/29/18 15:46 Medical - Chest Pain 2018103506 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP18040 hone 12/31/18 05:50 Medical - Chest Pain 2018103855 Medical - Chest Pain WCSOP18041046 911 MCHESTP Medical - Choking Total: 1 12/08/18 07:51 Medical - Choking 2018097435 Medical - Choking WCSOP180385MOHOKINhQne Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet Total: 18 c; 12/01/18 20:35 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018095714 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18037WALL 911 ZU=RCHER Page 13 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident 12/05/18 12:50 Case Number Coggdes How Reported 12/06/18 05:10 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018096835 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP1803821V17FALL 911 2018099254 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/17/18 19:31 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018100254 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/19/18 18:24 12/10/18 21:13 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018098159 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18038802 911 12/26/18 09:46 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018102511 Medical - Psychiatric - WALL 12/11/18 13:06 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018098303 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18038859 911 WALL 12/14/18 04:42 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018099084 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP180391_FjFALL 911 12/16/18 08:45 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018099819 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18039442 911 WALL 12/16/18 16:01 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018099906 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18039477 911 WALL 12/18/18 10:42 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018100408 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18039(6FALL Phone 12/19/18 02:31 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018100642 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18039753 911 WALL 12/19/18 06:56 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018100655 Death Investigation - Natural WCSOP18039 911 MFALL 12/19/18 21:44 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018100880 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18039WALL 911 12/21/18 19:57 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018101411 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18040073 911 WALL 12/23/18 11:12 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018101793 911 WALL 12/23/18 16:40 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018101874 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18040253ALL MMF 911 12/27/18 14:08 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018102864 911 WALL 12/28/18 16:55 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018103248 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18040813 911 WALL 12/30/18 08:38 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018103646 911 WALL 12/31/18 08:03 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018103880 Phone WALL Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet; Residential Medical Alarm Total: 1 12/28/18 21:03 Medical - Fall Under 6 2018103328 Medical - Fall Under 6 Feet WCSOP18040842 Phone MFALL; ALARM Medical - Heart Problems Total: 1 12/30/18 14:31 Medical - Heart 2018103715 Medical - Heart Problems WCSOP18040985 911 MHEART Medical - Overdose - Poisoning Total: 1 gg 12/16/18 16:20 Medical - Overdose - 2018099916 Medical - Overdose - PoisoninpCSOP18039480VERDOSE 911 Medical - Psychiatric - Behavioral Total: 10 12/02/18 19:03 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018095933 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/05/18 12:50 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018096652 Suicidal - Attempt - Threat 12/08/18 03:30 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018097424 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/14/18 16:03 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018099254 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/17/18 19:31 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018100254 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/19/18 18:24 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018100838 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/22/18 13:58 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018101580 Medical - Psychiatric - 12/26/18 09:46 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018102511 Medical - Psychiatric - WCSOP18037V�SYC9H 11 WCSOP18038 MPSYCH11 WCSOP18038 MPSYCH11 WCSOP18039 MPSYCH11 WCSOP18039 MPSYCH11 WCSOP18039 MPSYCH11 WCSOP180401_$QSYCH hone WCSOP18040 MMMrPSYCH hone ZUERCHER Page 14 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time 12/31/18 11:20 12/31/18 12:32 Initial Call Medical - Psychiatric - Medical - Psychiatric - Medical - Seizure Total: 6 CFS # Final Incident 2018103911 Medical - Psychiatric - 2018103929 Warrant - Arrest Case Number Codes How Reported WCSOP18041 MPSYCH hone WCSOP18041 MPSYCH hone 12/01/18 08:47 Medical - Seizure 2018095506 Medical - Seizure WCSOP1803771SEIZU91 911 1V1 12/05/18 11:31 Medical - Seizure 2018096636 Medical - Seizure WCSOSR018 38191MSEIA 12/13/18 11:18 Medical - Seizure 2018098865 Medical - Seizure WCSOSRO1803907MSEJUR' l 12/17/18 15:09 Medical - Seizure 2018100186 Medical - Seizure WCSOP18039 91 Medical - Sick 2018096554 Medical - Sick WCSOP18038WICK MS5EIZURE 12/20/18 06:12 Medical - Seizure 2018100924 Death Investigation - Natural WCSOP180398�71SEIZUgNE 12/29/18 08:40 Medical - Seizure 2018103426 Medical - Seizure WCSOP18040V54,EIZUREI Medical - Sick Total: 15 12/03/18 11:54 Medical - Sick 2018096069 Medical - Sick WCSOP1803797g 911 MUNCONSCIOUS MSICK Medical - Unconscious - 12/04/18 02:38 Medical - Sick 2018096278 Medical - Sick WCSOP18038052 911 MUNCONSCIOUS 12/14/18 18:57 Medical - Unconscious - MSICK Medical - Unconscious - 12/05/18 00:45 Medical - Sick 2018096554 Medical - Sick WCSOP18038WICK 911 12/06/18 10:26 Medical - Sick 2018096889 Medical - Sick WCSOP18038 911 MSICK 12/08/18 09:58 Medical - Sick 2018097452 911 MSICK 12/13/18 03:47 Medical - Sick 2018098798 Medical - Sick WCSOP18039�4SICK 911 12/13/18 13:18 Medical - Sick 2018098894 911 MSICK 12/13/18 18:50 Medical - Sick 2018098989 911 MSICK 12/14/18 16:24 Medical - Sick 2018099263 Medical - Sick WCSOP18039 MSICK 911 12/17/18 10:52 Medical - Sick 2018100112 911 MSICK 12/17/18 12:07 Medical - Sick 2018100134 911 MSICK 12/22/18 14:17 Medical - Sick 2018101586 Medical - Sick WCSOP180401.341CK 911 MMMSICK 12/26/18 08:56 Medical - Sick 2018102497 Medical - Sick WCSOP18040 911 12/28/18 14:07 Medical - Sick 2018103207 Medical - Sick WCSOP18040798 911 MSICK 12/31/18 12:06 Medical - Sick 2018103920 911 MSICK Medical - Stroke Total: 1 12/21/18 14:09 Medical - Stroke 2018101316 911 MSTROKE Medical - Unconscious - Fainting Total: 6 12/01/18 19:12 Medical - Unconscious - 2018095692 Death Investigation - Natural WCSOP18037795 911 MUNCONSCIOUS 12/10/18 18:16 Medical - Unconscious - 2018098110 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP18038787 911 MUNCONSCIOUS 12/14/18 18:57 Medical - Unconscious - 2018099305 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP180392bUggNCONSCIOUS 12/23/18 09:22 Medical - Unconscious - 2018101782 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP18040218 911 MUNCONSCIOUS ZUERCHER Page 15 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/25/18 09:50 Medical - Unconscious - 2018102295 Medical - Unconscious - WCSOP18040418 Phone MUNCONSCIOUS 12/30/18 12:11 Medical - Unconscious - 2018103688 Agency Assist WCSOP18040977 911 MUNCONSCIOUS Medical - Unknown Total: 5 12/01/18 13:49 Medical - Unknown 2018095582 Medical - Unknown WCSOP18037 MOTORAIDone 12/05/18 14:16 MUNKNgOWN 12/19/18 00:13 Medical - Unknown 2018100615 Medical - Unknown WCSOP18039 MUNKNgO11 MOTORAI D 12/08/18 14:53 Motorist Aid 2018097520 MISSPER 12/24/18 11:40 Medical - Unknown 2018102090 Medical - Unknown WCSOP18040V6NKNgOWN 12/30/18 05:10 Medical - Unknown 2018103634 MUNKNgOWN 12/31/18 14:33 Medical - Unknown 2018103956 Medical - Unknown WCSOP18041VU9NKNOWN Officer MOTORAI D Missing Person Total: 4 12/03/18 09:13 Missing Person 2018096043 Missing Person WCSOP18037U SSPERhone MOTORAIDone 12/05/18 14:16 Motorist Aid 12/06/18 13:10 Missing Person 2018096933 Missing Person WCSOSRO18038307 MOTORAI D 12/08/18 14:53 Motorist Aid 2018097520 MISSPER 12/11/18 19:28 Missing Person 2018098426 Missing Person WCSOP18038 MIS911 1 Motorist Aid 2018097934 SPE 12/16/18 12:17 Missing Person 2018099855 Missing Person WCSOP1803945 SSPERhone Officer MOTORAI D Motorist Aid Total: 7 12/01/18 11:25 Motorist Aid 2018095540 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP180378M55911 MOTORAIDone 12/05/18 14:16 Motorist Aid 2018096674 MVA - Hit & Run 2018095867 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18037U5 MOTORAI D 12/08/18 14:53 Motorist Aid 2018097520 VAHR 12/13/18 14:01 MVA - Hit & Run 2018098906 MOTORAILhD 12/10/18 06:07 Motorist Aid 2018097934 MVAHR 12/14/18 07:09 MOTORAIDone 12/13/18 18:33 Motorist Aid 2018098984 Officer MOTORAI D 12/16/18 12:01 Motorist Aid 2018099852 Phone WCSOP18039V8 MOTORAILhD 12/26/18 17:14 Motorist Aid 2018102636 MVA - Hit & Run 2018101347 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18040051 MOTORAIDone MVA - Car Deer Total: 2 12/04/18 23:25 MVA - Car Deer 2018096546 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP18038153 Phone MVACD 12/11/18 06:06 MVA - Car Deer 2018098219 MVA - Car Deer WCSOP18038831 Phone MVACD MVA - Hit & Run Total: 6 12/02/18 09:15 MVA - Hit & Run 2018095798 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP180378M55911 VAHR 12/02/18 14:43 MVA - Hit & Run 2018095867 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18037U5 VAHR 12/13/18 14:01 MVA - Hit & Run 2018098906 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18039097 MVAHR 12/14/18 07:09 MVA - Hit & Run 2018099098 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18039173 MVAHR 12/19/18 15:17 MVA - Hit & Run 2018100771 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18039V8 VAHR 12/21/18 16:01 MVA - Hit & Run 2018101347 MVA - Hit & Run WCSOP18040051 MVAHR ZUERCHER Page 16 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported MVA - Injuries Total: 1 12/01/18 02:56 MVA - Injuries 2018095481 Agency Assist WCSOP180377pVAINJ MVA - No Injuries Total: 27 12/01/18 16:57 MVA - No Injuries 2018095646 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP180377_FVA 911 12/01/18 18:14 MVA - No Injuries 2018095677 Disabled Vehicle WCSOP18037 MVA 12/02/18 10:00 MVA - No Injuries 2018095809 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18037 MVA 911 12/03/18 05:27 MVA - No Injuries 2018096012 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18037U48 911 VA 12/10/18 07:15 MVA - No Injuries 2018097943 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18038 MVA 911 12/10/18 17:13 MVA - No Injuries 2018098085 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18038 MVA 12/12/18 06:59 MVA - No Injuries 2018098514 MVA 12/13/18 07:29 MVA - No Injuries 2018098811 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18039 MVA 12/13/18 14:13 MVA - No Injuries 2018098910 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18039 MVA 12/14/18 19:54 MVA - No Injuries 2018099326 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP180392 9 VA 12/18/18 18:39 MVA - No Injuries 2018100543 Agency Assist WCSOP18039 22911 MVA 12/19/18 09:26 MVA - No Injuries 2018100687 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18039 MVA 12/19/18 15:47 MVA - No Injuries 2018100782 Agency Assist WCSOP18039U4 VA 12/20/18 09:27 MVA - No Injuries 2018100950 MVA - No Injuries WCSOSR018 MVA 7 12/20/18 09:41 MVA - No Injuries 2018100955 DUI - MVA WCSOP18039 MVA 12/20/18 17:36 MVA - No Injuries 2018101080 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18039V7 VA 12/22/18 14:45 MVA - No Injuries 2018101594 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA 911 12/28/18 09:58 MVA - No Injuries 2018103141 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA 12/28/18 17:24 MVA - No Injuries 2018103258 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP1804OU9 911 VA 12/29/18 00:20 MVA - No Injuries 2018103376 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA Officer 12/29/18 09:19 MVA - No Injuries 2018103432 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA 911 12/29/18 13:03 MVA - No Injuries 2018103474 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040VO VA 12/29/18 14:11 MVA - No Injuries 2018103491 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA 12/29/18 15:04 MVA - No Injuries 2018103497 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA 12/29/18 15:15 MVA - No Injuries 2018103501 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040U1VA 911 12/29/18 15:35 MVA - No Injuries 2018103503 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP180409112 911 MVA 12/29/18 16:31 MVA - No Injuries 2018103520 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18040 MVA MVA - No Injuries; Sign - Signal Repair Total: 1 12/01/18 17:00 MVA - No Injuries; Sign 2018095647 MVA - No Injuries WCSOP18037771 MVA; SIGNREP ZUERCHER Page 17 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported Noise Total: 8 Parking 12/20/1817:46 Parking 12/28/18 09:12 Parking 12/01/18 04:07 Noise 2018095483 Noise WCSOP180377Q7911 NOISE 12/08/18 03:05 Noise 2018097423 Noise WCSOP18038,q,4 911 NNOISE 12/23/18 03:41 Noise 2018101752 Noise WCSOP18040 911 12/23/18 20:24 Noise 2018101946 Noise WCSOP18040272 911 NOISE 12/24/18 23:23 Noise 2018102258 Noise WCSOP1804OV8ISE 12/25/18 17:43 Noise 2018102372 Noise WCSOP18040 NOISE 12/29/18 00:07 Noise 2018103375 Noise WCSOP18040V8ISE 12/31/1800:57 Noise 2018103833 Noise WCSOP18041W81SE 911 Noise; Domestic Disturbance Total: 1 12/23/18 22:02 Noise; Domestic 2018101979 Noise WCSOP18040282 911 NOISE; DOMESTIC Off -Road Vehicle Complaint Total: 1 12/31/18 13:42 Off -Road Vehicle 2018103939 Off -Road Vehicle Complaint WCSOP18041 ORV Phone Open Door -Window Total: 1 12/16/18 23:52 Open Door - Window 2018100013 Open Door - Window Ordinance Violation Total: 3 12/04/18 14:16 Ordinance Violation 2018096383 Ordinance Violation 12/09/18 14:37 Ordinance Violation 2018097787 Ordinance Violation 12/09/18 14:39 Ordinance Violation 2018097788 Ordinance Violation Parking Total: 8 12/01/1811:32 Parking 12/02/18 20:00 Parking 12/07/1815:46 Parking 12/18/1814:22 Parking 12/20/1817:46 Parking 12/28/18 09:12 Parking 12/30/18 08:45 Parking 12/30/18 08:53 Parking Phone Call Total: 7 12/01/18 09:49 Phone Call 12/02/18 09:21 Phone Call 12/03/18 14:34 Phone Call 2018095545 2018095943 2018097262 2018100468 2018101085 2018103130 2018103651 2018103654 Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking Parking WCSOP18039 07 OPEN WCSOP180380RDINANCE WCSOP18038 ORDINANCE WCSOP18038 ORDINANCE WCSOPARK1 PARKING WCSOP180379P1ARKING WCSOP18038 PARKING WCSOP18039 PARKING WCSOP1803993ARKINgG WCSOP18040 PARKING11 WCSOP18040 PARKING WCSOP1804096ARKING 2018095516PH Other 2018095800 Phone Call WCSOP180378P5H Phone 2018096098PH Phone ZU=RCHER Page 18 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/04/18 22:54 Phone Call 2018096539 12/08/18 08:15 Other PROB Repossession PH Probation Check 12/06/18 17:37 Phone Call 2018097035 Officer Other 12/19/1814:57 Repossession PH 2018096398 12/14/18 16:06 Phone Call 2018099257 2018098240 Other Officer Repossession PH 12/28/18 15:45 Phone Call 2018103228 12/14/18 19:32 Other 2018099316 Repossession PH POR Check Total: 1 PROB REPO 12/28/18 10:48 POR Check 2018103163 2018100389 Officer Officer POR Probation Check Total: 6 12/06/18 16:05 Probation Check 2018097001 12/07/18 14:34 Officer 2018097241 12/08/18 08:15 REPO PROB Repossession 12/10/18 16:42 Probation Check 2018098072 WCSOP18038503 Officer REPO 12/19/1814:57 Repossession PROB 2018096398 12/11/18 08:49 Probation Check 2018098240 REPO Officer Repossession 2018103086 PROB 12/14/18 19:32 Probation Check 2018099316 Repossession Officer PROB REPO 12/18/18 09:57 Probation Check 2018100389 Officer PROB 12/28/18 11:26 Probation Check 2018103173 Officer PROB Repossession Total: 5 12/17/1814:49 Repossession 2018100181 12/07/18 14:34 Residential Medical 2018097241 12/08/18 08:15 REPO 12/18/1814:13 Repossession 2018100465 2018103416 SIA Area Watch Total: 13 WCSOP18038503 12/02/1813:25 REPO 12/19/1814:57 Repossession 2018100766 2018096398 12/07/18 14:27 SIA Area Watch 2018097240 REPO 12/28/18 04:00 Repossession 2018103086 REPO 12/28/18 05:50 Repossession 2018103092 REPO Residential General Alarm Total: 3 12/11/18 13:13 Residential General 2018098307 Residential General Alarm WCSOP18038861 Phone ALARM 12/16/18 14:46 Residential General 2018099888 Residential General Alarm WCSOP18039472 Phone ALARM 12/16/18 15:36 Residential General 2018099900 Residential General Alarm WCSOP18039474 Phone ALARM Residential Medical Alarm Total: 4 12/06/18 16:39 Residential Medical 2018097018 12/07/18 14:34 Residential Medical 2018097241 12/08/18 08:15 Residential Medical 2018097440 12/29/18 05:44 Residential Medical 2018103416 SIA Area Watch Total: 13 WCSOP18038503 12/02/1813:25 SIA Area Watch 2018095846 12/04/1815:07 SIA Area Watch 2018096398 12/07/18 14:27 SIA Area Watch 2018097240 Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP18038340 Phone ALARM Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP18038431 Phone ALARM Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP18038503 Phone ALARM Residential Medical Alarm WCSOP18040878 Phone ALARM SIA SIA SIA ZUERCHER Page 19 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time SIA Business Walk Initial Call CFS # 12/09/18 17:28 SIA Area Watch 2018097830 12/09/18 17:30 SIA Area Watch 2018097831 12/12/18 17:45 SIA Area Watch 2018098694 12/14/18 02:40 SIA Area Watch 2018099078 12/15/18 00:18 SIA Area Watch 2018099425 12/16/18 23:43 SIA Area Watch 2018100012 12/25/18 13:47 SIA Area Watch 2018102337 12/25/18 18:29 SIA Area Watch 2018102386 12/26/18 23:39 SIA Area Watch 2018102712 12/31/18 20:49 SIA Area Watch 2018104049 SIA Business Walk Through Total: 9 12/07/18 19:36 SIA Business Walk 2018097320 12/08/18 16:47 SIA Business Walk 2018097546 12/08/18 18:38 SIA Business Walk 2018097572 12/09/18 17:39 SIA Business Walk 2018097834 12/12/18 20:06 SIA Business Walk 2018098732 12/14/18 15:28 SIA Business Walk 2018099240 12/19/18 00:53 SIA Business Walk 2018100621 12/23/18 02:44 SIA Business Walk 2018101746 12/31/18 21:04 SIA Business Walk 2018104053 SIA Door Check Total: 3 12/09/18 20:19 SIA Door Check 2018097871 12/24/18 11:38 SIA Door Check 2018102089 12/27/18 20:38 SIA Door Check 2018103007 SIA Foot Patrol Total: 1 12/09/18 20:35 SIA Foot Patrol 2018097873 SIA Other Total: 6 12/01/1810:28 SIA Other 2018095528 12/01/1813:05 SIA Other 2018095570 12/04/18 21:23 SIA Other 2018096509 12/13/1815:56 SIA Other 2018098941 12/17/18 04:28 SIA Other 2018100037 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA SIA Officer Officer Officer ZUERCHER Page 20 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/23/18 18:14 SIA Other 2018101905 SIA SIA Parks Total: 6 12/01/18 07:02 SIA Parks 2018095493 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SIA 12/06/18 12:05 SIA Parks 2018096921 Snowbird 2018095453 Snowbird WCSOP18037680 SIA 12/08/18 10:31 SIA Parks 2018097464 SN3OWBIRD 12/01/18 02:04 Snowbird 2018095454 SIA 12/17/18 23:25 SIA Parks 2018100301 SNgOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:04 SIA 12/26/1810:22 SIA Parks 2018102524 SIA 12/31/18 07:05 SIA Parks 2018103869 Snowbird WCSOP18037686 SIA SIA School Check Total: 1 12/06/18 12:03 SIA School Check 2018096920 SIA Snowbird Total: 83 12/01/18 02:00 Snowbird 2018095452 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:00 Snowbird 2018095453 Snowbird WCSOP18037680 SN3OWBIRD 12/01/18 02:04 Snowbird 2018095454 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNgOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:04 Snowbird 2018095455 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:07 Snowbird 2018095457 Snowbird WCSOP18037686 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:09 Snowbird 2018095459 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNpOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:13 Snowbird 2018095461 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:18 Snowbird 2018095464 Snowbird WCSOP18037693 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:23 Snowbird 2018095467 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNgOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:31 Snowbird 2018095470 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:34 Snowbird 2018095472 Snowbird WCSOP18037701 SNOWBIRD 12/01/18 02:37 Snowbird 2018095473 Snowbird WCSOP18037702 SNOWBIRD 12/02/18 02:17 Snowbird 2018095767 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SNOWBIRD 12/02/18 02:23 Snowbird 2018095770 Snowbird WCSOP18037837 SNOWBIRD 12/03/18 02:14 Snowbird 2018095997 Snowbird WCSOP18037934 SNOWBIRD 12/03/18 03:02 Snowbird 2018096009 Snowbird WCSOP18037 SOWBIRD 12/04/18 02:10 Snowbird 2018096272 Snowbird WCSOP18038047 SNOWBIRD 12/04/18 02:19 Snowbird 2018096274 Snowbird WCSOP18038 S4NgOWBIRD 12/04/18 02:20 Snowbird 2018096275 Snowbird WCSOP18038 SNOWBIRD 12/04/18 02:27 Snowbird 2018096277 Snowbird WCSOP18038051 SNOWBIRD 12/04/18 03:03 Snowbird 2018096281 Snowbird WCSOP18038054 SNOWBIRD ZUERCHER Page 21 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/04/18 03:08 Snowbird 2018096282 Snowbird WCSOP18038 SNOWBIRD 12/05/18 02:10 Snowbird 2018096568 Snowbird WCSOP18038158 SNOWBIRD 12/05/18 02:17 Snowbird 2018096570 Snowbird WCSOP18038160 SNOWBIRD 12/05/18 02:39 Snowbird 2018096573 Snowbird WCSOP18038 Sg SNOWBIRD 12/06/18 02:01 Snowbird 2018096818 Snowbird WCSOP180382-64 OWBIRD 12/06/18 02:06 Snowbird 2018096819 Snowbird WCSOP18038266 SNOWBIRD 12/06/18 02:07 Snowbird 2018096820 Snowbird WCSOP18038 S5 SNOWBIRD 12/09/18 02:03 Snowbird 2018097694 Snowbird WCSOP18038591 SNOWBIRD 12/09/18 02:07 Snowbird 2018097696 Snowbird WCSOP18038593 SNOWBIRD 12/09/18 02:13 Snowbird 2018097701 Snowbird WCSOP18038 SNOWBIRD 12/09/18 02:17 Snowbird 2018097703 Snowbird WCSOP18038598 SNOWBIRD 12/09/18 02:30 Snowbird 2018097704 Snowbird WCSOP18038600 SNOWBIRD 12/11/18 02:09 Snowbird 2018098200 Snowbird WCSOP18038 Sp SNOWBIRD 12/11/18 02:39 Snowbird 2018098204 Snowbird WCSOP18038822 SNOWBIRD 12/11/18 02:49 Snowbird 2018098207 Snowbird WCSOP18038823 SNOWBIRD 12/13/18 01:27 Snowbird 2018098783 Snowbird WCSOP18039 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:00 Snowbird 2018099066 Snowbird WCSOP18039152 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:02 Snowbird 2018099067 Snowbird WCSOP18039153 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:05 Snowbird 2018099068 Snowbird WCSOP18039154 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:06 Snowbird 2018099069 Snowbird WCSOP18039155 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:14 Snowbird 2018099070 Snowbird WCSOP18039156 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:18 Snowbird 2018099072 Snowbird WCSOP18039157 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:22 Snowbird 2018099073 Snowbird WCSOP18039158 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 02:28 Snowbird 2018099075 Snowbird WCSOP18039160 SNOWBIRD 12/14/18 04:15 Snowbird 2018099081 Snowbird WCSOP18039164 SNOWBIRD 12/15/18 02:16 Snowbird 2018099460 Snowbird WCSOP180392-95 OWBIRD 12/15/18 02:20 Snowbird 2018099462 Snowbird WCSOP18039297 SNOWBIRD 12/15/18 02:43 Snowbird 2018099466 Snowbird WCSOP18039 Sg SNOWBIRD 12/15/18 02:48 Snowbird 2018099468 Snowbird WCSOP18039301 SNOWBIRD 12/18/18 02:41 Snowbird 2018100329 Snowbird WCSOP18039646 SNOWBIRD 12/19/18 01:59 Snowbird 2018100631 Snowbird WCSOP18039744 SNOWBIRD 12/19/18 02:03 Snowbird 2018100633 Snowbird WCSOP18039746 SNOWBIRD 12/19/18 02:08 Snowbird 2018100635 Snowbird WCSOP18039747 SNOWBIRD ZUERCHER Page 22 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/19/18 02:25 Snowbird 2018100640 Snowbird WCSOP18039751 SNOWBIRD 12/19/18 02:28 Snowbird 2018100641 Snowbird WCSOP18039752 SNOWBIRD 12/20/18 02:13 Snowbird 2018100907 Snowbird WCSOP18039863 SNOWBIRD 12/20/18 02:16 Snowbird 2018100908 Snowbird WCSOP18039864 SNOWBIRD 12/21/18 02:06 Snowbird 2018101198 Snowbird WCSOP18039979 SNOWBIRD 12/21/18 02:23 Snowbird 2018101202 Snowbird WCSOP18039983 SNOWBIRD 12/22/18 02:23 Snowbird 2018101505 Snowbird WCSOP18040 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 02:29 Snowbird 2018101741 Snowbird WCSOP18040192 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 02:32 Snowbird 2018101742 Snowbird WCSOP18040193 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 02:36 Snowbird 2018101743 Snowbird WCSOP18040194 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 02:44 Snowbird 2018101747 Snowbird WCSOP18040196 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 02:45 Snowbird 2018101748 Snowbird WCSOP18040197 SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 04:16 Snowbird 2018101755 Snowbird WCSOP18040 Sp SNOWBIRD 12/23/18 04:25 Snowbird 2018101756 Snowbird WCSOP180402ON SOWBIRD 12/27/18 02:22 Snowbird 2018102741 Snowbird WCSOP18040590 SNOWBIRD 12/27/18 02:33 Snowbird 2018102744 Snowbird WCSOP18040592 SNOWBIRD 12/27/18 02:47 Snowbird 2018102748 Snowbird WCSOP18040595 SNOWBIRD 12/27/18 02:51 Snowbird 2018102751 Snowbird WCSOP18040598 SNOWBIRD 12/27/18 02:57 Snowbird 2018102752 Snowbird WCSOP18040 SNOWBIRD 12/28/18 02:28 Snowbird 2018103080 Snowbird WCSOP18040749 SNOWBIRD 12/30/18 02:21 Snowbird 2018103624 Snowbird WCSOP18040951 SNOWBIRD 12/30/18 02:48 Snowbird 2018103627 Snowbird WCSOP18040954 SNOWBIRD 12/30/18 04:24 Snowbird 2018103631 Snowbird WCSOP18040957 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 02:47 Snowbird 2018103844 Snowbird WCSOP18041039 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 02:59 Snowbird 2018103846 Snowbird WCSOP18041041 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 04:55 Snowbird 2018103849 Snowbird WCSOP18041042 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 05:02 Snowbird 2018103850 Snowbird WCSOP18041043 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 05:15 Snowbird 2018103852 Snowbird WCSOP18041044 SNOWBIRD 12/31/18 05:47 Snowbird 2018103854 Snowbird WCSOP18041045 SNOWBIRD Stalking Total: 1 12/01/18 23:00 Stalking 2018095739 Stalking WCSOP18037 hone STALKIN Stolen - Property Total: 1 ZU=RCHER Page 23 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call 12/14/18 12:23 Stolen - Property Stolen - Vehicle Total: 2 12/04/18 22:03 Stolen - Vehicle 12/20/18 15:36 Stolen - Vehicle Stoparm Violation Total: 1 12/14/18 11:39 Stoparm Violation CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 2018099181 Stolen - Property WCSOP18039 Phpne 12/02/18 14:36 Suspicious - ST O 2018096522 Stolen - Vehicle one WCSOP18038 S1 EP 2018101036 Stolen - Vehicle WCSOP18039922 Phone 12/07/18 17:36 Suspicious - STOLVEH 2018099165 Stoparm Violation WCSOP18039 STOPAR Cher Suspicious - Circumstances Total: 21 12/02/18 00:45 Suspicious - 2018095752 12/02/18 09:38 Suspicious - 2018095803 12/02/18 14:36 Suspicious - 2018095863 12/04/18 17:31 Suspicious - 2018096435 12/07/18 11:11 Suspicious - 2018097198 12/07/18 17:36 Suspicious - 2018097286 12/08/18 16:05 Suspicious - 2018097541 12/09/18 23:37 Suspicious - 2018097902 12/10/18 11:27 Suspicious - 2018097982 12/11/18 19:29 Suspicious - 2018098427 12/11/18 20:23 Suspicious - 2018098451 12/15/18 05:36 Suspicious - 2018099481 12/19/18 08:45 Suspicious - 2018100677 12/19/18 21:21 Suspicious - 2018100877 12/21/18 09:59 Suspicious - 2018101263 12/21/18 20:42 Suspicious - 2018101426 12/22/18 10:47 Suspicious - 2018101549 12/24/18 15:17 Suspicious - 2018102135 12/26/18 15:52 Suspicious - 2018102615 12/28/18 18:41 Suspicious - 2018103289 12/30/18 08:41 Suspicious - 2018103649 Suspicious -Circumstances WCSOP18037 SU91 SPCI Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18037 SUQ11 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18037 SUSPCIRC ne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038 SU22Phone SPCIp Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038 SUSPCIRCone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038 SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038 42SPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18038 SUSPCgIRC Fraud - Internet WCSOP18038 SUSPCIgRCne SUOSPCIgRC Fraud - Forgery WCSOP18038 SUSPCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18039 SUSPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18039 SU1Phone SPCIp Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18039 SUSPCIRCone Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18040 1SPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18040 7091 Suspicious - Circumstances 8SPCIRC WCSOP18040 SUSPCIRCone Theft WCSOP18040 SUSPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18040 27SPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18040 SUSg PCIRC Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP18040 SUSPCIRCne Suspicious - Circumstances; Dispatch - CAD Total: 1 12/06/18 10:19 Suspicious - 2018096888 Suspicious -Circumstances WCSOP18038294 Phone SUSPCIRC; DISPCAD Suspicious - Person - Vehicle Total: 15 12/01/18 03:40 Suspicious - Person - 2018095482 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18037 SUSPPV hone ZU=RCHER Page 24 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Cogdes How Reported 12/02/18 02:27 Suspicious - Person - 2018095771 Theft WCSOP18037 SUSPPV hone THEFT 12/03/18 15:16 Suspicious - Person - 2018096114 Disorderly WCSOP18037 SUSPPV hone WCSOP180379r12 911 12/07/18 12:14 Suspicious - Person - 2018097213 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 SU5SPPV hone 12/03/1810:22 Theft 2018096057 Theft 12/09/18 23:49 Suspicious - Person - 2018097904 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 SUSPPV hone THEFT 12/10/18 04:57 Suspicious - Person - 2018097928 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 SUSPPV hone WCSOP18038066 Phone 12/11/18 00:25 Suspicious - Person - 2018098188 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 SUSPPV11 12/04/18 09:47 Theft 2018096327 Theft 12/11/18 18:52 Suspicious - Person - 2018098417 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 SUSPPV hone 2018096913 Theft WCSOP18038302 Phone 12/13/18 14:03 Suspicious - Person - 2018098908 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18039098 Phone THEFT 12/07/1818:57 SUSPPV 12/13/18 18:11 Suspicious - Person - 2018098977 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18039 SUSPPVPhone 12/19/18 21:22 Suspicious - Person - 2018100878 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18039 SU11 2018097485 Residential Burglary WCSOP18038,5r20EFT SUSPPV 12/21/18 00:46 Suspicious - Person - 2018101191 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18039 SUSPPV hone 12/12/1816:14 Theft 12/23/18 21:45 Suspicious - Person - 2018101973 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18040 SUSPPV hone 12/27/18 22:22 Suspicious - Person - 2018103038 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18040 SUSPPV hone 2018098767 Theft WCSOP18039029 Phone 12/30/18 14:24 Suspicious - Person - 2018103713 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18040984 Phone THEFT 12/12/18 23:26 SUSPPV Suspicious - Person - Vehicle; Check Welfare Total: 1 12/03/18 16:54 Suspicious - Person - 2018096141 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038010 Phone SUSPPV; CHKWELF Theft Total: 23 12/01/18 18:36 Theft 2018095685 Intoxicated Person WCSOP18037791 Phone THEFT 12/02/18 20:24 Theft 2018095947 Suspicious - Circumstances WCSOP180379r12 911 12/03/1810:22 Theft 2018096057 Theft WCSOP18037969 Phone THEFT 12/04/18 08:31 Theft 2018096315 Theft WCSOP18038066 Phone THEFT 12/04/18 09:47 Theft 2018096327 Theft WCSOSRO180�80FT 12/06/1811:33 Theft 2018096913 Theft WCSOP18038302 Phone THEFT 12/07/1818:57 Theft 2018097308 Theft WCSOP18038466 Phone THEFT 12/08/18 12:21 Theft 2018097485 Residential Burglary WCSOP18038,5r20EFT Phone 12/12/1816:14 Theft 2018098659 Theft WCSOP18038995 Phone THEFT 12/12/18 23:13 Theft 2018098767 Theft WCSOP18039029 Phone THEFT 12/12/18 23:26 Theft 2018098771 Theft WCSOP18039Y1Phone HEFT 12/12/18 23:43 Theft 2018098773 Theft WCSOP18039032 Phone THEFT 12/13/18 07:32 Theft 2018098814 Theft WCSOP18039060 Phone THEFT 12/13/18 07:44 Theft 2018098817 Theft WCSOP18039Q155EFT Phone 12/13/18 18:55 Theft 2018098992 Civil Complaint WCSOP18039132 Phone THEFT ZU=RCHER Page 25 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/17/18 09:19 Theft 2018100078 Theft WCSOP18039,5r40EFT Phone 12/17/18 07:10 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/17/18 13:20 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/22/18 14:42 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/17/1811:26 Theft 2018100122 Theft WCSOP18039560 Phone 12/26/18 07:57 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/27/18 15:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off THEFT Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/18/1815:09 Theft 2018100482 Theft WCSOP18039701 Phone THEFT 12/19/1813:38 Theft 2018100748 Theft WCSOSRO1803HEFT 12/19/1815:45 Theft 2018100781 Theft WCSOP18039812 Phone THEFT 12/19/1817:34 Theft 2018100818 Theft WCSOP18039831 Phone THEFT 12/26/18 14:39 Theft 2018102592 Civil Complaint WCSOP180405 Phone r24 12/27/18 09:00 Theft 2018102793 Theft WCSOP18040612 911 THEFT Theft - From Vehicle Total: 2 12/10/18 08:09 Theft - From Vehicle 2018097954 12/10/18 16:42 Theft - From Vehicle 2018098071 Theft - Gas Drive Off Total: 17 12/06/18 08:19 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/06/18 12:47 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/09/18 19:28 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/11/18 03:47 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/12/18 21:49 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/14/18 11:53 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/17/18 07:10 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/17/18 13:20 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/22/18 14:42 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/23/18 13:49 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/24/18 19:33 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/26/18 05:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/26/18 07:57 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/27/18 15:23 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/27/18 15:45 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/28/18 05:53 Theft - Gas Drive Off 12/28/18 18:37 Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Identity Theft Total: 1 12/21/18 16:38 Theft - Identity Theft Theft - Shoplifting Total: 14 2018096860 2018096928 2018097858 2018098212 2018098753 2018099170 2018100058 2018100149 2018101593 2018101825 2018102198 2018102471 2018102486 2018102894 2018102899 2018103093 2018103288 Theft - From Vehicle Theft - From Vehicle Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off Theft - Gas Drive Off 2018101354 Fraud - Checks - Cards WCSOP18038711 ne WCSOP18038 T5HEFTVEH WCSOP18038285EFTG h ne WCSOP18038 TTTFFHiiEFTGASne WCSOP18038 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18038826EFTGA1 WCSOP18039 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18039 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18039,5r2HEFTGAS ne WCSOP18039 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18040 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18040236EFTG h ne WCSOP18040 TTTFFHiiEFTGASne WCSOP18040 THEFTGAS WCSOP18040496EFTG h ne WCSOP18040 TTTFFHiiEFTGASne WCSOP18040 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18040 THEFTGAS WCSOP18040 THEFTGAS ne WCSOP18040 THEFTID hone ZU=RCHER Page 26 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/02/18 17:44 Theft - Shoplifting 2018095907 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP180371EFTSHO ne 12/10/18 08:06 Threats 2018097953 Threats WCSOP18038THggone 12/08/18 19:21 Theft - Shoplifting 2018097586 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18038 THEFTSHO ne 12/11/18 15:58 Threats 2018098350 Threats WCSOP18038179REATS one 12/13/18 17:07 Theft - Shoplifting 2018098958 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18039 THEFTSHO ne 12/09/18 00:04 Traffic - Complaint 2018097661 Traffic - Complaint THREATS 12/14/18 18:20 Theft - Shoplifting 2018099293 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18039253EFTSHO ne TTTFFHiiEFTSHO 12/15/18 14:00 Theft - Shoplifting 2018099585 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18039 ne 12/27/18 14:13 Threats 2018102867 Threats WCSOP18040CWREATS one 12/16/18 12:27 Theft - Shoplifting 2018099858 Theft WCSOP18039 THEFTSPhone 12/28/1813:01 Threats 2018103192 Threats WCSOP18040790 Phone 12/16/18 13:36 Theft - Shoplifting 2018099871 Theft - Shoplifting 911 WCSOP18039 64EFT HOP 12/20/18 19:52 Theft - Shoplifting 2018101116 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18039 THEFTSHO ne 911 12/12/18 14:51 Traffic - Complaint 2018098639 Traffic - Complaint 12/21/18 15:54 Theft - Shoplifting 2018101342 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18040 THPhone EFTSPho 12/24/18 14:46 Theft - Shoplifting 2018102124 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18040349EFT HOP 911 12/24/18 16:03 Theft - Shoplifting 2018102149 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18040 TFFHiiEFTSHOne 12/26/18 19:23 Theft - Shoplifting 2018102667 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18040 5EFTSHO ne 12/28/18 10:02 Theft - Shoplifting 2018103146 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18040 T0gne HEFTSHO 12/31/18 10:20 Theft - Shoplifting 2018103895 Theft - Shoplifting WCSOP18041 THEFTSHO ne Threats Total: 7 12/02/18 17:17 Threats 2018095901 Domestic Disturbance WCSOP18037898 911 Phone THREATS 12/10/18 08:06 Threats 2018097953 Threats WCSOP18038THggone Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038Y3 Phone 12/07/18 15:53 REATPS 12/11/18 15:58 Threats 2018098350 Threats WCSOP18038179REATS one 12/14/18 09:20 Threats 2018099120 Threats WCSOSRO18039185 Phone 12/09/18 00:04 Traffic - Complaint 2018097661 Traffic - Complaint THREATS 12/26/18 21:09 Threats 2018102689 Threats WCSOP1804O 58REATPS 12/09/18 12:47 Traffic - Complaint one 12/27/18 14:13 Threats 2018102867 Threats WCSOP18040CWREATS one 2018097891 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 T 1 911 12/11/18 16:40 Traffic - Complaint 12/28/1813:01 Threats 2018103192 Threats WCSOP18040790 Phone THREATS Traffic - Complaint Total: 18 12/03/18 14:57 Traffic - Complaint 2018096105 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18037 T 5 Phone 12/04/18 02:43 Traffic - Complaint 2018096279 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038Y3 Phone 12/07/18 15:53 Traffic - Complaint 2018097264 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038 T 7 Phone 12/09/18 00:04 Traffic - Complaint 2018097661 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038 T 1 Phone 12/09/18 12:47 Traffic - Complaint 2018097774 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038Y5 Phone 12/09/18 22:37 Traffic - Complaint 2018097891 Suspicious - Person - Vehicle WCSOP18038 T 1 911 12/11/18 16:40 Traffic - Complaint 2018098365 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038 T 4 Phone 12/11/18 19:19 Traffic - Complaint 2018098421 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038Y4 911 12/12/18 14:51 Traffic - Complaint 2018098639 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18038 T 9 Phone ZUERCHER Page 27 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/18/18 16:14 Traffic - Complaint 2018100514 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP180397�9 Phone 12/19/18 17:21 Traffic - Complaint 2018100814 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18039 T 8 Phone TS 12/20/18 14:31 Traffic - Complaint 2018101015 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18039 T 1 Phone TS 12/20/18 21:46 Traffic - Complaint 2018101157 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18039966 911 12/21/18 09:50 Traffic - Complaint 2018101261 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18040 T 8 Phone 12/01/18 14:02 Traffic Stop 2018095586 Officer 12/23/18 13:05 Traffic - Complaint 2018101818 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18040 T 2 911 12/01/18 15:22 Traffic Stop 2018095601 Officer 12/23/18 19:36 Traffic - Complaint 2018101934 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18040 T 9 Phone 12/01/18 15:29 Traffic Stop 2018095602 Officer 12/27/18 12:27 Traffic - Complaint 2018102844 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18040 T 4 Phone 12/01/18 15:45 Traffic Stop 2018095606 Officer 12/28/18 11:03 Traffic - Complaint 2018103167 Traffic - Complaint WCSOP18040 T 3 911 12/01/18 16:32 Traffic Stop 2018095627 Officer Traffic - Hazard Total: 2 12/26/18 22:14 Traffic - Hazard 2018102700 Traffic - Hazard WCSOP18040,5T 4 911 ZARD 12/28/18 19:43 Traffic - Hazard 2018103312 Phone THAZARD Traffic Stop Total: 344 12/01/18 00:49 Traffic Stop 2018095445 Officer TS 12/01/18 01:08 Traffic Stop 2018095448 Officer TS 12/01/18 02:55 Traffic Stop 2018095480 Officer TS 12/01/18 13:49 Traffic Stop 2018095583 Officer TS 12/01/18 14:02 Traffic Stop 2018095586 Officer TS 12/01/18 15:22 Traffic Stop 2018095601 Officer TS 12/01/18 15:29 Traffic Stop 2018095602 Officer TS 12/01/18 15:45 Traffic Stop 2018095606 Officer TS 12/01/18 16:32 Traffic Stop 2018095627 Officer TS 12/01/18 21:52 Traffic Stop 2018095726 Agency Assist WCSOP18037 TS Officer 12/01/18 22:33 Traffic Stop 2018095732 Officer TS 12/02/18 00:45 Traffic Stop 2018095753 Traffic Stop WCSOP18037$2S9 ITS Officer 12/02/18 02:16 Traffic Stop 2018095766 Officer 12/02/18 11:59 Traffic Stop 2018095831 Officer TS 12/02/18 13:12 Traffic Stop 2018095841 Officer TS 12/02/18 13:22 Traffic Stop 2018095845 Traffic Stop WCSOP18037 T7S4 Officer 12/02/18 14:27 Traffic Stop 2018095858 Officer TS 12/02/18 16:13 Traffic Stop 2018095884 Officer TS 12/02/18 18:33 Traffic Stop 2018095922 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 28 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/02/18 18:49 Traffic Stop 2018095926 Traffic Stop WCSOP18037Y ITS Officer 12/02/18 19:26 Traffic Stop 2018095935 Officer 12/02/18 20:39 Traffic Stop 2018095950 Officer TS 12/02/18 20:47 Traffic Stop 2018095954 Officer TS 12/02/18 21:08 Traffic Stop 2018095957 Officer TS 12/02/18 21:30 Traffic Stop 2018095961 Officer TS 12/03/18 10:27 Traffic Stop 2018096058 Officer TS 12/03/18 15:05 Traffic Stop 2018096108 TS 12/03/18 15:56 Traffic Stop 2018096126 Officer TS 12/03/18 23:29 Traffic Stop 2018096241 Officer TS 12/04/18 01:06 Traffic Stop 2018096261 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 TS Officer 12/04/18 01:59 Traffic Stop 2018096271 Officer TS 12/04/18 08:01 Traffic Stop 2018096308 Officer TS 12/04/18 08:12 Traffic Stop 2018096311 Officer TS 12/04/18 13:51 Traffic Stop 2018096378 Officer TS 12/04/18 14:22 Traffic Stop 2018096384 Traffic Stop WCSOP180381W Officer 12/04/18 15:21 Traffic Stop 2018096401 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 TS Officer 12/04/18 16:50 Traffic Stop 2018096423 Officer TS 12/04/18 17:42 Traffic Stop 2018096440 Officer TS 12/05/18 01:08 Traffic Stop 2018096557 Officer TS 12/05/18 05:01 Traffic Stop 2018096579 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T6S7 Officer 12/05/18 06:06 Traffic Stop 2018096581 Officer TS 12/05/18 13:40 Traffic Stop 2018096667 Officer TS 12/05/18 16:19 Traffic Stop 2018096704 Officer TS 12/05/18 16:23 Traffic Stop 2018096707 Officer TS 12/05/18 16:39 Traffic Stop 2018096718 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T2S4 Officer 12/05/18 19:59 Traffic Stop 2018096762 Officer TS 12/06/18 13:06 Traffic Stop 2018096932 Traffic Stop WCSOP180340 Officer 12/06/18 13:29 Traffic Stop 2018096939 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 TS Officer 12/06/18 13:30 Traffic Stop 2018096941 Officer TS 12/06/18 16:10 Traffic Stop 2018097005 TS 12/06/18 16:28 Traffic Stop 2018097011 Officer TS 12/06/18 17:11 Traffic Stop 2018097026 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 29 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # 12/06/18 20:51 Traffic Stop 2018097087 12/07/18 10:31 Traffic Stop 2018097186 12/07/18 11:37 Traffic Stop 2018097206 12/07/18 11:47 Traffic Stop 2018097210 12/07/18 12:39 Traffic Stop 2018097218 12/07/18 12:50 Traffic Stop 2018097222 12/07/18 13:15 Traffic Stop 2018097226 12/07/18 13:25 Traffic Stop 2018097229 12/07/18 13:33 Traffic Stop 2018097231 12/07/18 13:42 Traffic Stop 2018097233 12/07/18 17:21 Traffic Stop 2018097280 12/07/18 21:25 Traffic Stop 2018097341 12/07/18 23:52 Traffic Stop 2018097395 12/08/18 00:52 Traffic Stop 2018097410 12/08/18 02:12 Traffic Stop 2018097418 12/08/18 10:13 Traffic Stop 2018097457 12/08/18 10:28 Traffic Stop 2018097462 12/08/18 10:39 Traffic Stop 2018097468 12/08/18 11:57 Traffic Stop 2018097482 12/08/18 13:22 Traffic Stop 2018097499 12/08/1814:32 Traffic Stop 2018097513 12/08/18 16:03 Traffic Stop 2018097540 12/08/18 19:29 Traffic Stop 2018097591 12/08/18 21:05 Traffic Stop 2018097620 12/09/18 00:29 Traffic Stop 2018097669 12/09/18 00:40 Traffic Stop 2018097676 12/09/18 01:40 Traffic Stop 2018097689 12/09/18 09:21 Traffic Stop 2018097744 12/09/18 11:13 Traffic Stop 2018097761 12/09/18 11:15 Traffic Stop 2018097763 12/09/18 13:23 Traffic Stop 2018097777 12/09/18 13:24 Traffic Stop 2018097778 12/09/18 13:53 Traffic Stop 2018097783 Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported TS Officer TS Officer Officer Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop Traffic Stop TS TS WCSOP18038 TS WCSOP18038 2 TS WCSOP18038 TS WCSOP18038 TS TS WCSOP18038 TS TS TS WCSOP180384W TS TS TS TS TS TS TS WCSOP18038 3 TS TS TS WCSOP18038 6 TS TS TS TS TS TS TS WCSOP18038Y TS TS Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer Officer ZUERCHER Page 30 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/09/18 13:56 Traffic Stop 2018097784 Officer TS 12/09/18 16:40 Traffic Stop 2018097819 Officer TS 12/09/18 17:33 Traffic Stop 2018097832 Officer TS 12/09/18 19:30 Traffic Stop 2018097859 Officer TS 12/09/18 20:23 Traffic Stop 2018097872 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T7S3 Officer 12/09/18 23:36 Traffic Stop 2018097901 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T8S4 Officer 12/10/18 02:35 Traffic Stop 2018097920 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038(?4 Officer 12/10/18 11:31 Traffic Stop 2018097983 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T2S9 Officer 12/10/18 12:48 Traffic Stop 2018098007 Officer TS 12/10/18 13:31 Traffic Stop 2018098018 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 TS7 Officer 12/10/18 15:46 Traffic Stop 2018098057 Traffic Stop WCSOP180387T7� Officer 12/10/18 16:33 Traffic Stop 2018098069 Officer TS 12/10/18 16:39 Traffic Stop 2018098070 Officer TS 12/10/18 16:43 Traffic Stop 2018098074 Officer TS 12/11/18 01:50 Traffic Stop 2018098195 Officer TS 12/11/18 10:42 Traffic Stop 2018098262 Officer TS 12/11/18 12:17 Traffic Stop 2018098288 TS 12/11/18 12:33 Traffic Stop 2018098291 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 5 TS 12/11/18 13:39 Traffic Stop 2018098310 Officer TS 12/11/18 14:39 Traffic Stop 2018098325 Officer TS 12/11/18 14:59 Traffic Stop 2018098332 Officer TS 12/11/18 15:59 Traffic Stop 2018098352 Officer TS 12/11/18 19:25 Traffic Stop 2018098425 Officer TS 12/12/18 04:34 Traffic Stop 2018098496 Drugs WCSOP18038 T2S7 Officer 12/12/18 10:51 Traffic Stop 2018098576 Officer TS 12/12/18 11:03 Traffic Stop 2018098581 Officer TS 12/12/18 11:39 Traffic Stop 2018098593 Traffic Stop WCSOP18038 T6S9 Officer 12/12/18 11:55 Traffic Stop 2018098596 TS 12/12/18 12:29 Traffic Stop 2018098603 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18038 T7S3 Officer 12/12/18 17:08 Traffic Stop 2018098675 Officer TS 12/12/18 17:22 Traffic Stop 2018098681 Traffic Stop WCSOP180390TOS4 Officer 12/12/18 19:58 Traffic Stop 2018098728 Officer TS 12/13/18 00:48 Traffic Stop 2018098780 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 31 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/13/18 00:53 Traffic Stop 2018098781 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039Y4 Officer 12/13/18 04:59 Traffic Stop 2018098802 Officer TS 12/13/18 13:42 Traffic Stop 2018098902 Officer TS 12/13/18 15:41 Traffic Stop 2018098932 Officer TS 12/13/18 18:41 Traffic Stop 2018098988 Officer TS 12/13/18 23:42 Traffic Stop 2018099047 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS8 Officer 12/14/18 00:18 Traffic Stop 2018099053 Officer TS 12/14/18 00:26 Traffic Stop 2018099054 Officer TS 12/14/18 06:02 Traffic Stop 2018099087 Officer TS 12/14/18 09:08 Traffic Stop 2018099118 Traffic Stop WCSOP180391� Officer 12/14/18 09:55 Traffic Stop 2018099130 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T8S6 Officer 12/14/18 10:01 Traffic Stop 2018099134 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T8S7 Officer 12/14/18 10:30 Traffic Stop 2018099142 Traffic Stop WCSOP180391� Officer 12/14/18 10:35 Traffic Stop 2018099145 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T9S4 Officer 12/14/18 11:03 Traffic Stop 2018099156 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T9S8 Officer 12/14/18 11:04 Traffic Stop 2018099157 Traffic Stop WCSOP180391� Officer 12/14/18 11:16 Traffic Stop 2018099159 Officer TS 12/14/18 11:19 Traffic Stop 2018099160 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 01 Officer TS 12/14/18 11:35 Traffic Stop 2018099163 Traffic Stop WCSOP180392V52 Officer 12/14/18 11:52 Traffic Stop 2018099169 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS Officer 12/14/18 12:30 Traffic Stop 2018099183 Officer TS 12/14/18 12:41 Traffic Stop 2018099189 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS4 Officer 12/14/18 12:47 Traffic Stop 2018099191 Officer TS 12/14/18 12:54 Traffic Stop 2018099193 Officer TS 12/14/18 13:15 Traffic Stop 2018099201 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T2S1 Officer 12/14/18 13:35 Traffic Stop 2018099210 Officer TS 12/14/18 19:34 Traffic Stop 2018099318 Officer TS 12/14/18 19:42 Traffic Stop 2018099321 Officer TS 12/14/18 19:49 Traffic Stop 2018099323 Officer TS 12/14/18 19:55 Traffic Stop 2018099327 Officer TS 12/14/18 20:07 Traffic Stop 2018099334 Officer TS 12/14/18 20:25 Traffic Stop 2018099339 Officer TS 12/14/18 20:56 Traffic Stop 2018099352 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 32 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/14/18 23:37 Traffic Stop 2018099411 Officer TS 12/14/18 23:59 Traffic Stop 2018099417 Officer TS 12/15/18 01:39 Traffic Stop 2018099444 Officer TS 12/15/18 02:01 Traffic Stop 2018099454 Traffic Stop WCSOP180392?4 Officer 12/15/18 02:28 Traffic Stop 2018099463 Officer TS 12/15/18 10:48 Traffic Stop 2018099523 Officer TS 12/15/18 10:50 Traffic Stop 2018099524 Traffic Stop WCSOP18034,259 Officer 12/15/18 11:02 Traffic Stop 2018099529 Officer TS 12/15/18 11:02 Traffic Stop 2018099530 Officer TS 12/15/18 11:06 Traffic Stop 2018099533 TS 12/15/18 11:09 Traffic Stop 2018099536 Traffic Stop WCSOP180393T3� Officer 12/15/18 11:21 Traffic Stop 2018099540 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T3S4 Officer 12/15/18 11:34 Traffic Stop 2018099543 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039�35 Officer 12/15/18 11:49 Traffic Stop 2018099546 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T3S9 Officer 12/15/18 12:01 Traffic Stop 2018099550 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS3 Officer 12/15/18 12:01 Traffic Stop 2018099551 Traffic Stop WCSOP1803945 Officer 12/15/18 12:02 Traffic Stop 2018099552 Traffic Stop WCSOP180393T4V Officer 12/15/18 12:10 Traffic Stop 2018099554 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS4 Officer 12/15/18 12:16 Traffic Stop 2018099558 Officer TS 12/15/18 12:26 Traffic Stop 2018099560 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS Officer 12/15/18 12:33 Traffic Stop 2018099563 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS9 Officer 12/15/18 12:39 Traffic Stop 2018099565 Traffic Stop WCSOP1803455 Officer 12/15/18 12:50 Traffic Stop 2018099571 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T5S3 Officer 12/15/18 13:35 Traffic Stop 2018099578 TS 12/15/18 13:45 Traffic Stop 2018099582 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039�55 12/15/18 14:03 Traffic Stop 2018099588 TS 12/15/18 17:41 Traffic Stop 2018099653 Officer TS 12/15/18 19:39 Traffic Stop 2018099690 Officer TS 12/15/18 19:54 Traffic Stop 2018099698 Officer TS 12/15/18 20:02 Traffic Stop 2018099700 Officer TS 12/15/18 20:16 Traffic Stop 2018099702 Officer TS 12/15/18 20:30 Traffic Stop 2018099705 Officer TS 12/15/18 20:39 Traffic Stop 2018099706 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 33 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/15/18 20:48 Traffic Stop 2018099707 Officer TS 12/15/18 20:54 Traffic Stop 2018099712 Officer TS 12/15/18 21:07 Traffic Stop 2018099719 Officer TS 12/15/18 21:13 Traffic Stop 2018099721 Officer TS 12/15/18 21:19 Traffic Stop 2018099723 Officer TS 12/15/18 21:27 Traffic Stop 2018099730 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18039 08 Officer TS 12/15/18 23:39 Traffic Stop 2018099767 Officer TS 12/15/18 23:51 Traffic Stop 2018099769 Officer TS 12/16/18 00:00 Traffic Stop 2018099771 Officer TS 12/16/18 10:19 Traffic Stop 2018099828 Officer TS 12/16/18 11:36 Traffic Stop 2018099844 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T5S1 Officer 12/16/18 11:50 Traffic Stop 2018099845 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T5S2 Officer 12/16/18 12:05 Traffic Stop 2018099853 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039455 TITS Officer 12/16/18 18:03 Traffic Stop 2018099942 Officer 12/17/18 09:55 Traffic Stop 2018100089 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS2 Officer 12/17/18 10:04 Traffic Stop 2018100093 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS7 Officer 12/17/18 10:10 Traffic Stop 2018100097 Officer TS 12/17/18 10:25 Traffic Stop 2018100102 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS9 Officer 12/17/18 10:32 Traffic Stop 2018100104 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039555 TTS Officer 12/17/18 10:51 Traffic Stop 2018100111 Officer 12/17/18 10:58 Traffic Stop 2018100115 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T5S4 Officer 12/17/18 11:27 Traffic Stop 2018100124 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039555 TTS Officer 12/17/18 11:39 Traffic Stop 2018100125 Officer 12/17/18 11:46 Traffic Stop 2018100128 Officer TS 12/17/18 14:08 Traffic Stop 2018100162 Officer TS 12/17/18 15:45 Traffic Stop 2018100189 Officer TS 12/17/18 17:43 Traffic Stop 2018100225 Officer TS 12/17/18 17:44 Traffic Stop 2018100226 Officer TS 12/18/18 00:08 Traffic Stop 2018100311 Officer TS 12/18/18 00:13 Traffic Stop 2018100312 Officer TS 12/18/18 02:18 Traffic Stop 2018100324 Officer TS 12/18/18 09:41 Traffic Stop 2018100383 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T6S3 Officer 12/18/18 09:51 Traffic Stop 2018100385 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T6S4 Officer ZUERCHER Page 34 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/18/18 10:14 Traffic Stop 2018100393 Traffic Stop WCSOP1803N50 Officer 12/18/18 10:30 Traffic Stop 2018100400 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T7S6 Officer 12/18/18 11:07 Traffic Stop 2018100418 Officer TS 12/18/18 11:09 Traffic Stop 2018100419 Officer TS 12/18/18 11:27 Traffic Stop 2018100426 Officer TS 12/18/18 11:31 Traffic Stop 2018100428 Officer TS 12/18/18 11:37 Traffic Stop 2018100430 Traffic Stop WCSOP180396P54 Officer 12/18/18 11:42 Traffic Stop 2018100433 Officer TS 12/18/18 14:06 Traffic Stop 2018100462 Officer TS 12/18/18 14:21 Traffic Stop 2018100467 Officer TS 12/18/18 18:02 Traffic Stop 2018100533 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T2S0 Officer 12/18/18 22:33 Traffic Stop 2018100597 Officer TS 12/18/18 23:13 Traffic Stop 2018100608 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 TS Officer 12/19/18 00:03 Traffic Stop 2018100614 Drugs WCSOP180397T4V Officer 12/19/18 01:10 Traffic Stop 2018100622 Officer TS 12/19/18 01:46 Traffic Stop 2018100628 Officer TS 12/19/18 02:05 Traffic Stop 2018100634 Drugs WCSOP180397T4S Officer 12/19/18 02:10 Traffic Stop 2018100637 Drugs WCSOP18039 T5S5 Officer 12/19/18 06:21 Traffic Stop 2018100652 Drugs WCSOP18039 T6S2 Officer 12/19/18 08:01 Traffic Stop 2018100666 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T6S8 Officer 12/19/18 11:43 Traffic Stop 2018100725 Officer TS 12/19/18 11:56 Traffic Stop 2018100726 Officer TS 12/19/18 13:32 Traffic Stop 2018100746 Officer TS 12/19/18 13:36 Traffic Stop 2018100747 Officer TS 12/19/18 14:28 Traffic Stop 2018100756 Officer TS 12/19/18 14:45 Traffic Stop 2018100763 Officer TS 12/19/18 16:11 Traffic Stop 2018100787 Officer TS 12/19/18 18:54 Traffic Stop 2018100843 Officer TS 12/20/18 07:17 Traffic Stop 2018100935 Officer TS 12/20/18 09:52 Traffic Stop 2018100958 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T9S3 Officer 12/20/18 12:01 Traffic Stop 2018100981 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18039Y1 Officer 12/20/18 17:15 Traffic Stop 2018101067 Officer TS 12/20/18 17:43 Traffic Stop 2018101083 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 35 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/20/18 19:32 Traffic Stop 2018101113 Officer TS 12/20/18 19:52 Traffic Stop 2018101117 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039 T5S1 Officer 12/20/18 21:13 Traffic Stop 2018101143 Officer TS 12/20/18 21:44 Traffic Stop 2018101156 Traffic Stop WCSOP180346S9 Officer 12/20/18 23:32 Traffic Stop 2018101184 Officer TS 12/20/18 23:45 Traffic Stop 2018101187 Officer TS 12/21/18 02:31 Traffic Stop 2018101204 Traffic Stop WCSOP18039Y Officer 12/21/18 11:36 Traffic Stop 2018101287 Officer TS 12/21/18 13:35 Traffic Stop 2018101307 Officer TS 12/21/18 14:02 Traffic Stop 2018101315 Officer TS 12/21/18 17:33 Traffic Stop 2018101370 Officer TS 12/21/18 17:45 Traffic Stop 2018101373 Officer TS 12/21/18 18:18 Traffic Stop 2018101378 Officer TS 12/21/18 19:58 Traffic Stop 2018101413 Officer TS 12/21/18 21:50 Traffic Stop 2018101459 Officer TS 12/21/18 23:32 Traffic Stop 2018101484 Officer TS 12/22/18 00:09 Traffic Stop 2018101490 Officer TS 12/22/18 00:46 Traffic Stop 2018101496 Officer TS 12/22/18 01:29 Traffic Stop 2018101500 Officer TS 12/22/18 01:32 Traffic Stop 2018101501 Traffic Stop WCSOP180400T9Y Officer 12/22/18 02:43 Traffic Stop 2018101508 Officer TS 12/22/18 05:44 Traffic Stop 2018101517 Officer TS 12/22/18 09:55 Traffic Stop 2018101546 Officer TS 12/22/18 10:50 Traffic Stop 2018101551 Officer TS 12/22/18 12:28 Traffic Stop 2018101561 Officer TS 12/22/18 12:54 Traffic Stop 2018101569 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S5 Officer 12/22/18 23:22 Traffic Stop 2018101710 Officer TS 12/23/18 00:41 Traffic Stop 2018101725 Officer TS 12/23/18 01:35 Traffic Stop 2018101732 Officer TS 12/23/18 02:06 Traffic Stop 2018101734 Officer TS 12/23/18 05:32 Traffic Stop 2018101761 Officer TS 12/23/18 05:44 Traffic Stop 2018101762 Drugs WCSOP18040 TS Officer 12/23/18 08:17 Traffic Stop 2018101779 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 TS6 Officer ZUERCHER Page 36 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/23/18 10:51 Traffic Stop 2018101789 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S1 Officer 12/23/18 11:09 Traffic Stop 2018101792 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S3 Officer 12/23/18 11:14 Traffic Stop 2018101794 Officer TS 12/23/18 12:22 Traffic Stop 2018101808 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S7 Officer 12/23/18 12:36 Traffic Stop 2018101811 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S8 Officer 12/23/18 12:47 Traffic Stop 2018101814 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T3S0 Officer 12/23/18 13:03 Traffic Stop 2018101817 Officer TS 12/23/18 13:09 Traffic Stop 2018101820 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T3S4 Officer 12/23/18 18:07 Traffic Stop 2018101903 Officer TS 12/23/18 18:47 Traffic Stop 2018101919 Officer TS 12/24/18 02:44 Traffic Stop 2018102031 Officer TS 12/24/18 09:29 Traffic Stop 2018102068 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T2S3 Officer 12/24/18 09:40 Traffic Stop 2018102070 Traffic Stop WCSOP18044,254 Officer 12/24/18 10:05 Traffic Stop 2018102075 Officer TS 12/24/18 11:19 Traffic Stop 2018102086 TS 12/24/18 11:30 Traffic Stop 2018102088 Officer TS 12/25/18 11:40 Traffic Stop 2018102314 Officer TS 12/25/18 12:59 Traffic Stop 2018102326 Officer TS 12/25/18 13:11 Traffic Stop 2018102330 Officer TS 12/26/18 00:10 Traffic Stop 2018102451 Officer TS 12/26/18 01:38 Traffic Stop 2018102462 Officer TS 12/26/18 02:40 Traffic Stop 2018102467 Traffic Stop WCSOP180404W Officer 12/26/18 09:38 Traffic Stop 2018102509 Traffic Stop WCSOP180405T0q Officer 12/26/18 09:55 Traffic Stop 2018102517 Officer TS 12/26/18 10:19 Traffic Stop 2018102522 Officer TS 12/26/18 10:27 Traffic Stop 2018102525 Officer TS 12/26/18 11:33 Traffic Stop 2018102540 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 09 Officer TS 12/26/18 12:03 Traffic Stop 2018102547 Officer TS 12/26/18 12:14 Traffic Stop 2018102550 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 TS Officer 12/26/18 12:30 Traffic Stop 2018102558 Officer TS 12/26/18 13:04 Traffic Stop 2018102563 Officer TS 12/26/18 14:27 Traffic Stop 2018102586 Officer TS 12/26/18 16:58 Traffic Stop 2018102630 Officer TS ZUERCHER Page 37 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/27/18 10:59 Traffic Stop 2018102820 Officer TS 12/27/18 11:22 Traffic Stop 2018102825 Officer TS 12/27/18 12:24 Traffic Stop 2018102842 Officer TS 12/27/18 13:00 Traffic Stop 2018102852 Officer TS 12/27/18 13:05 Traffic Stop 2018102854 Officer TS 12/27/18 13:41 Traffic Stop 2018102858 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18040 TS5 Officer 12/28/18 07:59 Traffic Stop 2018103107 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T6S0 Officer 12/28/18 12:43 Traffic Stop 2018103187 Officer TS 12/28/18 19:22 Traffic Stop 2018103302 Officer TS 12/28/18 19:31 Traffic Stop 2018103307 Officer TS 12/28/18 19:43 Traffic Stop 2018103310 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 TS1 Officer 12/29/18 00:51 Traffic Stop 2018103380 Officer TS 12/29/18 10:08 Traffic Stop 2018103442 TS 12/29/18 13:39 Traffic Stop 2018103479 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 TS Officer 12/29/18 18:49 Traffic Stop 2018103548 Officer TS 12/29/18 20:12 Traffic Stop 2018103562 Traffic Stop WCSOP1804092 Officer 12/29/18 23:56 Traffic Stop 2018103602 Officer TS 12/30/18 00:06 Traffic Stop 2018103608 Officer TS 12/30/18 00:30 Traffic Stop 2018103611 Officer TS 12/30/18 00:36 Traffic Stop 2018103612 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 TS Officer 12/30/18 00:55 Traffic Stop 2018103613 Officer TS 12/30/18 13:49 Traffic Stop 2018103706 Officer TS 12/30/18 16:44 Traffic Stop 2018103743 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T9S3 Officer 12/30/18 17:01 Traffic Stop 2018103746 Traffic Stop WCSOP18040 T9S5 Officer 12/31/18 09:55 Traffic Stop 2018103890 Officer TS 12/31/18 21:14 Traffic Stop 2018104058 Officer TS 12/31/18 21:54 Traffic Stop 2018104066 Officer TS 12/31/18 23:51 Traffic Stop 2018104089 Officer TS Traffic Stop; Dispatch - CAD Total: 2 12/18/18 11:22 Traffic Stop ; Dispatch - 2018100422 TS; DISPC�cbr 12/29/18 00:33 Traffic Stop ; Dispatch - 2018103378 Officer TS; DISPCAD Training Total: 2 ZU=RCHER Page 38 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/10/18 08:35 Training 2018097956 TRAINING 12/18/1819:48 Training 2018100557 TRAINING Trespass Total: 2 12/14/18 08:55 Trespass 2018099116 Trespass WCSOSR018 3918 TRES 12/22/18 21:53 Trespass 2018101692 Trespass WCSOP18040 75Phone TRES Unwanted Person Total: 4 12/04/18 22:03 Unwanted Person 2018096524 Unwanted Person WCSOP18038142 Phone UNWANTED 12/23/18 02:06 Unwanted Person 2018101735 Unwanted Person WCSOP18040188 Phone UNWANTED 12/29/18 01:34 Unwanted Person 2018103389 Unwanted Person WCSOP18040864 911 UNWANTED 12/30/18 14:35 Unwanted Person 2018103716 Drugs WCSOP18040UhWANTE1D Vehicle Off Road Total: 3 12/01/18 16:41 Vehicle Off Road 2018095633 Vehicle Off Road WCSOP18037�p01R 911 12/27/18 22:29 Vehicle Off Road 2018103042 Vehicle Off Road WCSOP18040729 Phone VOR 12/31/18 16:26 Vehicle Off Road 2018103987 Vehicle Off Road WCSOP180411 11R 911 O Walk Away Total: 2 gg 12/11/18 17:35 Walk Away 2018098386 Walk Away WCSOP18038i 9ALKAWAY 12/20/18 20:17 Walk Away 2018101122 Walk Away WCSOP18039954 911 WALKAWAY Warrant - Arrest Total: 2 pp 12/05/18 03:57 Warrant - Arrest 2018096576 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18038 WARREO icer 12/17/18 18:43 Warrant - Arrest 2018100242 Warrant - Arrest WCSOP18039C�08ARREST ne Warrant - Attempt Total: 13 12/01/18 08:28 Warrant - Attempt 2018095503 WATTEMPT 12/03/18 19:26 Warrant - Attempt 2018096181 er WATTEMPT 12/10/18 19:08 Warrant - Attempt 2018098126 er WATTEMT 12/10/18 19:52 Warrant - Attempt 2018098143 Officer WATTEMPTcer 12/11/18 12:55 Warrant - Attempt 2018098299 WATTEMPT 12/11/18 16:36 Warrant - Attempt 2018098363 WATTEMPT 12/11/18 17:05 Warrant - Attempt 2018098380 WATTEMPT 12/12/18 11:16 Warrant - Attempt 2018098586 er WATTEMPT 12/15/18 17:27 Warrant - Attempt 2018099650 WATTEMPT 12/22/18 22:49 Warrant - Attempt 2018101704 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP18040 W3ATTEMOfficer 12/24/18 19:35 Warrant - Attempt 2018102199 Warrant - Attempt WCSOP18040 WATTEMPT er ZU=RCHER Page 39 of 40 Incident Start Date/Time Initial Call CFS # Final Incident Case Number Codes How Reported 12/26/18 13:24 Warrant - Attempt 2018102569 WATTEMPT 12/30/18 19:39 Warrant - Attempt 2018103773 Officer WATTEMPT Total Records: 1137 Made by Z1.1=RC ER Page 40 of 40